Next Article in Journal
A Study on the Frequency-Domain Black-Box Modeling Method for the Nonlinear Behavioral Level Conduction Immunity of Integrated Circuits Based on X-Parameter Theory
Previous Article in Journal
Passive Wireless Partial Discharge Sensors with Multiple Resonances
Previous Article in Special Issue
Racetrack Ring Resonator-Based on Hybrid Plasmonic Waveguide for Refractive Index Sensing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Design of Miniaturized 90-Degree Hybrid Coupler with Wide Rejection Band Using Neural Network

1
Department of Electrical Engineering, Lorestan University, Khorramabad 68151, Iran
2
Department of Electrical Engineering, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah 67189, Iran
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2024, 15(5), 657; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15050657
Submission received: 5 April 2024 / Revised: 14 May 2024 / Accepted: 15 May 2024 / Published: 17 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Sensors and Electronic Instrumentation 2024)

Abstract

:
In this paper, a 3 dB 90-degree hybrid coupler with size reduction and harmonics rejection was designed. In the proposed coupler structure, four simple low-pass filters (LPFs) were applied. An artificial neural network (ANN) was used to determine the dimensions of the applied LPFs based on EM simulation data. The applied ANN model could also provide the desired LPF parameters, including the cut-off frequency (fc), bandwidth (BW), and insertion loss (IL). Designing an applied LPF involves complex mathematical calculations and simulations to optimize parameters. However, by utilizing neural networks, the design process can be significantly streamlined and automated. Neural networks have the ability to learn complex patterns and relationships within data, making them well suited for optimizing the performance of applied components. The proposed 90-degree hybrid coupler works correctly at 1800 MHz and has a small size of 16.6 mm × 15.15 mm, which provides a 73% size reduction compared to a normal 1800 MHz coupler. The designed coupler not only decreases the circuit size but also provides a wide rejection band from 4.8 GHz to 11.2 GHz, which suppresses the second to sixth harmonics. The insertion loss parameter of this 90-degree hybrid coupler is less than 0.1 dB at the working frequency, which shows the superior performance of the proposed coupler.

1. Introduction

As the use of microwaves has expanded in modern communication systems, the primary requirements have become reducing dimensions, eliminating harmonics, and lowering costs while simplifying the design process. Couplers are widely used in microwave devices, such as radar systems [1], UWB circuits [2], OFDM transmission [3], and medical applications [4]. Couplers can be applied to combine or divide power in RF frequencies, with different types. Also, couplers can be incorporated in amplifier and inverter structures [5,6]. The common types of couplers are branch-line, rat-race, and hybrid structures [7,8].
A typical 90-degree hybrid coupler has four branches and combines or divides power with ninety degrees of phase difference [7]. Conventional couplers have very large dimensions. They also pass unwanted harmonics along with the main signal and cause nonlinear effects in the circuit, which is undesirable. These two cases can be called the main disadvantages of conventional couplers [9]. So far, many methods have been used to improve these two defects in couplers, and in many of them, only a few parts of the mentioned problems have been solved, which will be discussed in the following section.
In [10,11], two compact couplers were designed using resonators, with harmonic elimination. The coupler designed in [10] has acceptable performance at the working frequency of 2400 MHz. The above coupler is about 24% smaller than a conventional coupler. Also, the second and third harmonics are removed by the above coupler, which is not impressive. In [11], with resonators applied in a conventional branch-line coupler structure, about a 64% reduction in dimensions was achieved, which was desirable, but the above coupler only removes the third and fifth harmonics, which is not impressive. In [12], a small coupler was designed using coupled transmission lines. This coupler has the same function as a conventional branch-line coupler, but its dimensions were reduced. Unfortunately, in this structure, unwanted harmonics are present in the frequency response and the size reduction is not significant. Also, the application of coupled transmission lines increases the insertion loss. In [13], four resonators were used in a coupler using bent transmission lines. With this method, the dimensions of the coupler were reduced by eighteen percent, and this coupler also eliminates harmonics in a relatively wide frequency band. The obvious feature of the above design is the proper elimination of harmonics, but unfortunately this circuit has a very complex structure. In [14], a coupler with a working frequency of 2.5 GHz and an acceptable size reduction was designed using a T-shaped structure. Unfortunately, the above structure does not provide harmonic elimination. In [15], bent lines and resonators were used to provide a compact coupler with suppressed harmonics. The above coupler has good performance at a frequency of 1.5 GHz, but it has a complex structure. In [16], a compact coupler with harmonic rejection was designed using a defected ground structure (DGS). The DGS technique requires several additional steps that increase fabricating process complexities. In [17], compact couplers with harmonic elimination were designed using lumped elements (inductors and capacitors). DGS and lumped-element methods are not desirable at high frequencies [18].
Neural networks and machine learning algorithms have been widely used to solve different problems and find the nonlinear behaviors behind various structures [19,20,21]. The application of neural networks in the design of a hybrid coupler represents a novel approach to achieving optimal performance in microwave components. Traditionally, the design of RF couplers has involved complex mathematical calculations and simulations to optimize parameters such as the coupling coefficient, isolation, and return loss [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. However, by utilizing neural networks, the design process can be significantly streamlined and automated. Neural networks have the ability to learn complex patterns and relationships within data, making them well suited for optimizing the performance of microwave components [32]. In some works [33,34,35,36], neural networks have been used to design microstrip filters, couplers, and antennas with optimized performances. In [33], open stubs and T-shaped stubs were used to design a small coupler at 1.8 GHz, which provided second-harmonic rejection. In [33], a neural network was used to find the optimal location of transmission zero. This coupler had a small size, with a 65% size reduction compared with a typical 1.8 GHz coupler.
In [34], a coupler for a wireless system was developed using an artificial neural network (ANN). The applied ANN model was developed based on the back-propagation algorithm to predict parameters and solve for the resonant frequency.
In this work, a compact 90-degree hybrid coupler with a planar structure was proposed at a frequency of 1800 MHz. An ANN model was used to obtain the optimal dimensions of the applied resonator, which resulted in a 73% size reduction compared to a typical 90-degree hybrid coupler and eliminated the second to sixth harmonics. The substrate used to design the proposed coupler was RT/Duroid-5880 with a thickness of 0.508 mm and an εr of 2.2. The highlights and innovations of the proposed work can be listed as follows:
-
The proposed neural network model determines the optimal dimensions of low-pass filters, enhancing the design efficiency of 90-degree hybrid couplers.
-
A 73% reduction in the size of the standard coupler was achieved, which could conserve significant space in RF applications.
-
The proposed design effectively suppresses the second to sixth harmonics, ensuring cleaner signal transmission and reducing signal interference.
This paper is organized as follows: In Section 2, a short review of existing technologies is provided. This section discusses previous approaches to RF coupler design, highlighting the limitations of the typical coupler. Section 3 provides the methodology and details of the design and implementation of the neural network, including the data preparation, model architecture, and training process. Section 4 provides the results and discussion. It presents the results of the EM simulations, measurements, and neural network model, comparing the predicted and actual outcomes, and discusses the efficacy of the model in the design process. Conclusions are provided in Section 5, which summarizes the key findings and innovations of this research.

2. Conventional Branch-Line Coupler Design

The structure of a typical 90-degree hybrid coupler at a frequency of 1800 MHz is depicted in Figure 1. As seen in Figure 1, a typical 90-degree hybrid coupler has four long microstrip lines arranged at 90-degree angles (λ/4). The two horizontal lines have an impedance of 35.4 ohms, and the two vertical lines have an impedance of 50 ohms. With the above structure, the scattering parameters of a typical 90-degree hybrid coupler at 1800 MHz are demonstrated in Figure 2.
As seen in Figure 2, for a signal radiated from port 1, at the working frequency, no signal should be re-radiated to port 1 and no part of the signal should be transferred to port 4, so the values of S11 and S14 should be very small. On the other hand, a signal radiated from port 1 will be divided into two equal parts. Half of the signal will be transferred to the second port, and the other half should be transferred to the third port, so the values of S13 and S12 should be equal to −3 dB. As shown in Figure 2, the values of S13 and S12 are −3 dB at the operating frequency of 1800 MHz.

3. Proposed Transmission Line with Simple LPF Design

In a common 90-degree hybrid coupler, four 90-degree lines are used. The structure of the long conventional horizontal line is illustrated in Figure 3a at the working frequency of 1800 MHz. The length of this line with the mentioned substrate is equal to 30.3 mm, and the width of this line is equal to 2.54 mm. Figure 3b shows the structure of the proposed line with a much shorter length of 14.6 mm. Both lines have similar responses at the working frequency of 1800 MHz, which are shown in Figure 3c.

3.1. The LC Equivalent Circuit of the Proposed Line

The lumped-element equivalent circuit of the compact proposed line is depicted in Figure 4a. This circuit includes two 8 nH inductors, which are located at the input and output ports, as well as a series inductor and a capacitor with values of 0.2 nH and 0.9 pF. The scattering parameters of the provided lumped-element equivalent circuit are drawn in Figure 4b and are similar to the frequency response of the proposed line.
The extracted transfer function (H(S)) of the LC resonator is provided in (1) as follows:
H s = 1.6 × 1 0 08 s 4 + 4.1 × 1 0 09 s 3 + 2.6 × 1 0 26 s 2 + 2.4 × 1 0 31 s + 1.4 × 1 0 48 s 4 + 1.7 × 1 0 18 s 3 + 1 . × 1 0 28 s 2 + 4.6 × 1 0 38 s + 1.4 × 1 0 48
In order to validate the obtained H(s), a Bode plot of this transfer function that was created using Matlab R2022a version software is provided in Figure 5.
The results show that there is good agreement between the extracted Bode plot of the provided H(s), which was created using Matlab R2022a version software, and the S-parameter results of the LC model, which were generated using ADS software (Advanced Design System 2023). This validates the theoretical analysis.

3.2. The Structure of the Designed Artificial Neural Network

The designed model utilized a multilayer neural network to predict the parameters of the desired LPF based on the device dimensions. In other words, this model served as a surrogate for predicting LPF parameters. To determine the optimal configuration of the ANN model, various models with various layers were evaluated. The most effective structure consisted of two hidden layers with five and six neurons, offering low complexity.
Figure 6 illustrates the designed MLP configuration for the applied artificial neural network. In this model, the cut-off frequency (fc), stopband bandwidth (BW), and insertion loss (IL) are considered the outputs of the network. Also, L1, L2, W1, and W2, which are shown in Figure 3b, are considered the inputs of the network.
In the design of the proposed miniaturized 90-degree hybrid coupler, a feedforward multilayer perceptron (MLP) network was utilized, structured, and implemented using MATLAB’s newff (new feedforward network) function. The ANN architecture, which was specifically chosen for its efficacy in handling the nonlinear problems typical in electromagnetic simulations, consisted of two hidden layers. The first hidden layer contained five neurons, while the second layer comprised six neurons. They were selected based on empirical trials that were carried out to optimize performance without overfitting. The activation functions used within the network were sigmoid functions, which helped capture the complex mappings between the input dimensions and the filter parameters.
To train the network, backpropagation with a Levenberg–Marquardt optimization, known for its fast convergence in medium-sized networks, was employed. The dataset fed into the ANN comprised parameters extracted directly from electromagnetic simulations conducted to evaluate various LPF configurations. This dataset was split into sets containing 78% for training, 20% for testing, and 2% for validation, ensuring that the model was tested against unseen data to effectively evaluate its generalization capability.
As seen in Figure 6, the parameters of L1, L2, W1, and W2, which have main effects on the performance of the proposed filter, were selected as inputs, and the cut-off frequency(fc), stopband bandwidth (BW), and insertion loss (IL) parameters of the designed LPF were considered the output parameters of the proposed ANN model.
For the designed ANN model, 50 samples were used, with 39 samples used to train the ANN model. Then, ten samples were used to test the ANN model. Finally, one sample was applied to validate the designed ANN model.
The related errors of MRE and RMSE were used to verify the accuracy of the proposed model and were obtained as follows:
M R E = 1 N i = 1 N Y R i Y P i Y R i
R M S E = i = 1 N Y R i Y P i 2 N
where the N in (2) and (3) indicates the number of the dataset, which was 50 for this model. YPi and YRi are the predicted and real outputs of the proposed neural network, respectively.
The proposed neural network model with two hidden layers, consisting of five and six neurons, was selected as the most accurate model. Figure 7 displays a comparison between the real and predicted values of the output parameters of the applied LPF (fc (GHz), BW (MHz), and insertion loss (dB)) for both the training and testing datasets.
Figure 8 displays a comparison between the predicted and real values of the parameters fc (GHz), BW (MHz), and insertion loss (dB) for both the testing and training datasets in the selected neural network model. The accuracy of the predicted circuit parameters was evident, and the validation sample further confirmed the accuracy of the designed model. As shown in Figure 8, the 39 samples used for the training procedure trained the model accurately. Also, the predicted values of the 10 test samples had acceptable accuracy for all of the LPF outputs. As seen in the figure, the predicted values for insertion loss (IL) and bandwidth (BW) were more accurate than the predicted values for the cut-off frequency (fc). However, the validation sample was used for the design and fabrication of the LPF. The predicted values for the validation sample are also shown in Figure 8 for all of the LPF outputs, which had high accuracy.
The applied dataset and predicted data for the training, testing, and validation procedures are provided in Table 1, including 39 datasets for training, 10 datasets for testing, and 1 dataset for validation. All of the applied samples that were used in the testing, training, and validation processes are listed in Table 1.
The trained model’s predictions of the LPF parameters (cut-off frequency (fc), bandwidth (BW), and insertion loss (IL)) showed high accuracy, with the mean relative errors and root-mean-square errors maintained within the targeted precision limits. These parameters, after being predicted by the ANN, were verified against additional EM simulation results, thereby validating the efficacy and reliability of the neural network approach in streamlining the design process of a 90-degree hybrid coupler.
The outcomes of the designed artificial neural network model are presented in Table 2, demonstrating noteworthy prediction accuracy. As per the information in the table, the model was perfectly trained using the training data.
Table 2 details the performance of the ANN by reporting three critical error metrics: the mean relative error (MRE), root-mean-square error (RMSE), and validation errors for each predicted parameter (cut-off frequency (fc), stopband bandwidth (BW), and insertion loss (IL)). The mean relative error (MRE) and root-mean-square error (RMSE) were crucial in evaluating the accuracy and consistency of the neural network’s predictions. The MRE provided insights into the average magnitude of the errors relative to the actual values, offering a sense of model bias, whereas the RMSE gave a measure of error variability, indicating the prediction stability across the dataset. Low values of MRE and RMSE across the training, testing, and validation datasets, as shown in Table 2, affirmed that the model's predictions were both accurate and consistent. These reported error values substantiate that the ANN model is not only well tuned and robust but also reliable for practical application in designing miniaturized 90-degree hybrid couplers. These findings demonstrate that the neural network effectively captures and predicts the intricate relationships within the RF design parameters, significantly contributing to the field of RF engineering by enabling more efficient and accurate designs.
A scattering parameter comparison between a typical line and the proposed compact line is illustrated in Figure 9a,b. Both lines have the same response at a frequency of 1.8 GHz. The conventional line has no harmonic elimination, but the proposed line has a wide stopband from 5.6 to 14.6 GHz, which shows the proper performance of the above line with much smaller dimensions. As seen in the figure, the proposed line acts as an LPF with a cut-off frequency of 2.7 GHz, which allows signals from DC to 2.7 GHz to pass and suppresses signals at higher frequencies. As seen in Figure 9, the value of S11 in the pass band is less than 9 dB and the value of S21 is near 0 dB (0.1 dB) for both the conventional and proposed lines, which is acceptable.
Figure 10 depicts the current distributions of the applied low-pass filter at 1.8 GHz and 7.2 GHz. The applied LPF has a cut-off frequency of 2.7 GHz, while the designed coupler is working at 1.8 GHz. As shown in Figure 10a, the signal coming from port 1 correctly passes to port 2. Also, the proposed LPF provides a wide rejection band from 5.6 to 14.6 GHz with more than 20 dB of attenuation. As seen in Figure 10b, the signal coming from port 1 at 7.2 GHz, which is located in the stopband, does not pass to port 2.

4. Proposed 90-Degree Hybrid Coupler

The structure of the proposed 90-degree hybrid coupler is illustrated in Figure 11. The final dimensions of the designed 90-degree hybrid coupler are 16.6 mm × 15.15 mm, which provides a size reduction of 73% compared to the dimensions of a common coupler (31 mm × 31 mm) at the same frequency of 1800 MHz.
Figure 12 shows the simulated frequency response of the proposed 90-degree hybrid coupler. The designed 90-degree hybrid coupler has a good response at the working frequency of 1800 MHz, and the insertion loss is 0.1 dB. Also, the designed coupler provides a wide cut-off bandwidth in a range from 4.8 GHz to 11.2 GHz with an attenuation level exceeding 20 decibels.
In Figure 13, the current distributions of the designed 90-degree hybrid coupler at 1800 MHz and 4 GHz are depicted. The proposed 90-degree hybrid coupler operates at 1800 MHz and provides a rejection band from 4.8 to 11.2 GHz. As shown in Figure 13a, the signal coming from port 1 at 1800 MHz correctly passes to port 2 and port 3, while no signal is transmitted to port 4. Additionally, as seen in Figure 13b, the signal coming from port 1 at 4 GHz, which is located in the stopband, does not pass to port 2 or port 3.
The designed 90-degree hybrid coupler was fabricated on an RT duroid 5880 Rogers substrate, and a photo of the designed coupler is presented in Figure 14. The final dimensions of the coupler are only 16.6 mm × 15.15 mm, which is a size reduction of 73% compared to the dimensions of a common coupler (31 mm × 31 mm) at a working frequency of 1800 MHz. The simple planar structure of the microstrip coupler allows for easy fabrication without the need for additional processes.
The measured and simulated frequency responses of the proposed 90-degree hybrid coupler are presented in Figure 15. There is good agreement between the simulations and measurements. The measurements confirm the simulations. The proposed coupler has good performance at 1.8 GHz. Also, the proposed coupler provides a wide harmonics rejection band in a frequency range from 4.8 GHz to 11.2 GHz.
The measured and simulated output phase curves of the 90-degree hybrid coupler are illustrated in Figure 16. The output phase difference at 1.8 GHz is −270.5 degrees, which is 0.5 degrees out of phase.
In Table 3, the performance of the designed 90-degree hybrid coupler is compared with those of couplers from some similar works. In the comparison, the advantages of the 90-degree hybrid coupler in terms of its low losses, small size, and wide rejection band can be clearly seen.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, a small 90-degree hybrid coupler was designed using open-ended lines at a working frequency of 1800 MHz. The proposed 90-degree hybrid coupler has a very simple structure and is 73% smaller than a typical 90-degree hybrid coupler. The designed coupler has very good performance at the working frequency, and its insertion loss is less than 0.1 dB. Also, the proposed coupler provides a wide stopband at higher frequencies and removes unwanted signals from 4.8 GHz to 11.2 GHz with more than 20 dB of attenuation, which includes the second to sixth harmonics. The above-mentioned coupler is suitable for wireless communication applications. In the proposed coupler structure, four simple low-pass filters (LPFs) are utilized. An artificial neural network (ANN) was used to determine the dimensions of the applied LPFs based on EM simulation data. Designing an applied LPF involves complex mathematical calculations and simulations to optimize parameters. However, by utilizing neural networks, the design process can be significantly streamlined and automated.

Author Contributions

Methodology, G.M., S.K. and S.R.; Software, G.M. and S.R.; Validation, S.R.; Formal analysis, S.K. and S.R.; Resources, G.M. and S.K.; Writing—original draft, G.M. and S.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

All data from this study are mentioned in this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Reddy, A.V.; Borkar, V.G. Design and Simulation of Microstrip Branch Line Coupler and Monopulse Comparator for Airborne Radar Applications. In Advances in Decision Sciences, Image Processing, Security and Computer Vision, Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering (ICETE), Hyderabad, India, 22–23 March 2019; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; Volume 2, pp. 10–18. [Google Scholar]
  2. Tatsis, G.I.; Christofilakis, V.A.; Votis, C.O.; Kostarakis, P.A.; Ivrissimtzis, L.E.; Chronopoulos, S.K. BER performance of an ultra-wideband impulse radio correlator receiver. WSEAS Trans. Inf. Sci. Appl. 2011, 8, 401–406. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chronopoulos, S.K. Flexible and Reconfigurable OFDM Implementation in DSP Platform for Various Purposes and Applications. Sensors 2024, 24, 2732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Sohn, S.M.; Gopinath, A.; Vaughan, J.T. A compact, high power capable, and tunable high directivity microstrip coupler. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2016, 64, 3217–3223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chen, D.; Zhao, T.; Han, L.; Feng, Z. Single-Stage Multi-Input Buck Type High-Frequency Link’s Inverters with Series and Simultaneous Power Supply. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2021, 37, 7411–7421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, D.; Zhao, T.; Xu, S. Single-stage multi-input buck type high-frequency link’s inverters with multiwinding and time-sharing power supply. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2022, 37, 12763–12773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pozar David, M. Microwave Engineering; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  8. Tahmasbi, M.; Razaghian, F.; Roshani, S. Design of compact microstrip low pass filter using triangular and rectangular shaped resonator with ultra-wide stopband and sharp roll-off. Analog Integr. Circuits Signal Process. 2019, 101, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Roshani, S.; Roshani, S.; Zarinitabar, A. A modified Wilkinson power divider with ultra-harmonic suppression using open stubs and lowpass filters. Analog Integr. Circuits Signal Process. 2019, 98, 395–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gu, J.; Sun, X. Miniaturization and harmonic suppression of branch-line and rat-race hybrid coupler using compensated spiral compact microstrip resonant cell. In Proceedings of the IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, Long Beach, CA, USA, 17 June 2005; pp. 1211–1214. [Google Scholar]
  11. Roshani, S.; Roshani, S. A compact coupler design using meandered line compact microstrip resonant cell (MLCMRC) and bended lines. Wirel. Netw. 2021, 27, 677–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, Z.; Weikle, R.M. A compact quadrature coupler based on coupled artificial transmission lines. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2005, 15, 889–891. [Google Scholar]
  13. Zong, B.F.; Wang, G.M.; Zhang, C.X.; Wang, Y.W. Miniaturised branch-line coupler with ultra-wide high suppression stopband. Electron. Lett. 2014, 50, 1365–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ali, M.; Rahim, S.K.; Nor, M.Z.; Jamlos, M.F. Branch line coupler using hybrid T-model structure. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2012, 54, 237–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hosseinkhani, F.; Roshani, S. A compact branch-line coupler design using low-pass resonators and meandered lines open stubs. Turk. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 2018, 26, 1164–1170. [Google Scholar]
  16. Dwari, S.; Sanyal, S. Size reduction and harmonic suppression of microstrip branch-line coupler using defected ground structure. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2006, 48, 1966–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Beigizadeh, M.; Dehghani, R.; Nabavi, A. Analysis and design of a lumped-element hybrid coupler using limited quality factor of components. AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2017, 82, 312–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cheng, K.K.; Ip, W.C. A novel power divider design with enhanced spurious suppression and simple structure. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2010, 58, 3903–3908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, C.; Han, D.; Chang, C.C. MPCCT: Multimodal vision-language learning paradigm with context-based compact Transformer. Pattern Recognit. 2024, 147, 110084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, C.; Han, D.; Shen, X. CLVIN: Complete language-vision interaction network for visual question answering. Knowl. -Based Syst. 2023, 275, 110706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, D.; Zhao, J.; Qin, S. SVM strategy and analysis of a three-phase quasi-Z-source inverter with high voltage transmission ratio. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 2023, 66, 2996–3010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Roshani, S.; Yahya, S.I.; Ghadi, Y.Y.; Roshani, S.; Parandin, F.; Yaghouti, B.D. Size Reduction and Harmonics Suppression in Microwave Power Dividers. ARO-Sci. J. Koya Univ. 2023, 1, 122–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mohammadi, N.; Moloudian, G.; Roshani, S.; Roshani, S.; Parandin, F.; Lalbakhsh, A. A Wilkinson power divider with harmonic suppression through low-pass filter for GSM and LTE applications. Sci. Rep. 2022, 14, 2429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Roshani, S.; Roshani, S. Design of a compact LPF and a miniaturized Wilkinson power divider using aperiodic stubs with harmonic suppression for wireless applications. Wirel. Netw. 2020, 26, 1493–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lotfi, S.; Roshani, S.; Roshani, S. Design of a miniaturized planar microstrip Wilkinson power divider with harmonic cancellation. Turk. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 2020, 28, 3126–3136. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hookari, M.; Roshani, S.; Roshani, S. Design of a low pass filter using rhombus-shaped resonators with an analyticallc equivalent circuit. Turk. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 2020, 28, 865–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Roshani, S.; Roshani, S. Two-section impedance transformer design and modeling for power amplifier applications. Appl. Comput. Electromagn. Soc. J. (ACES) 2017, 32, 1042–1047. [Google Scholar]
  28. Rezaei, A.; Yahya, S.I. A new design approach for a compact microstrip diplexer with good passband characteristics. ARO-Sci. J. Koya Univ. 2022, 10, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yahya, S.I.; Rezaei, A.; Khaleel, Y.A. Design and analysis of a wide stopband microstrip dual-band bandpass filter. ARO-Sci. J. Koya Univ. 2021, 9, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Roshani, S.; Dehghani, K.; Roshani, S. A lowpass filter design using curved and fountain shaped resonators. Frequenz 2019, 73, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rezaei, A.; Yahya, S.I.; Nouri, L. A Comprehensive Review on Microstrip Couplers. ARO-Sci. J. Koya Univ. 2023, 11, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Guo, J.; Liu, Y.; Zou, Q.; Ye, L.; Zhu, S.; Zhang, H. Study on optimization and combination strategy of multiple daily runoff prediction models coupled with physical mechanism and LSTM. J. Hydrol. 2023, 624, 129969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Roshani, S.; Azizian, J.; Roshani, S.; Jamshidi, M.; Parandin, F. Design of a miniaturized branch line microstrip coupler with a simple structure using artificial neural network. Frequenz 2022, 76, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xiao, J.; Chen, S.; Wu, X.; Wang, Z.; Mo, Y. Position-Insensitive WPT System with an Integrated Coupler Based on ANN Modeling and Variable Frequency Control. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 9th International Conference on Power Electronics Systems and Applications (PESA), Hong Kong, China, 20–22 September 2022; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  35. Jamshidi, M.B.; Lalbakhsh, A.; Mohamadzade, B.; Siahkamari, H.; Mousavi, S.M. A novel neural-based approach for design of microstrip filters. AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2019, 110, 152847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mehrafrooz, A.; He, F.; Lalbakhsh, A. Introducing a novel model-free multivariable adaptive neural network controller for square MIMO systems. Sensors 2022, 22, 2089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Barik, R.K.; Phani Kumar, K.V.; Karthikeyan, S.S. A compact wideband harmonic suppressed 10 dB branch line coupler using cascaded symmetric PI sections. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2016, 58, 1610–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Iran-Nejad, V.; Lotfi-Neyestanak, A.A.; Shahzadi, A. Compact broadband quadrature hybrid coupler using planar artificial transmission line. Electron. Lett. 2012, 48, 1602–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Velidi, V.K.; Patel, B.; Sanyal, S. Harmonic suppressed compact wideband branch-line coupler using unequal length open-stub units. Int. J. RF Microw. Comput. -Aided Eng. 2011, 21, 115–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, J.; Ni, J.; Zhao, S.; Guo, Y.X. Compact microstrip ring branch-line coupler with harmonic suppression. J. Electromagn. Waves Appl. 2009, 23, 2119–2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kim, J.S.; Kong, K.B. Compact branch-line coupler for harmonic suppression. Prog. Electromagn. Res. C 2010, 16, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Choi, K.S.; Yoon, K.C.; Lee, J.Y.; Lee, C.K.; Kim, S.C.; Kim, K.B.; Lee, J.C. Compact branch-line coupler with harmonics suppression using meander T-shaped line. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2014, 56, 1382–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, L.Y.; Hsu, K.; Tu, W.H. Compact microstrip harmonic-suppressed quadrature hybrids. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2009, 51, 981–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sedighy, S.H.; Khalaj-Amirhosseini, M. Compact branch line coupler using step impedance transmission lines (SITLs). Appl. Comput. Electromagn. Soc. J. (ACES) 2013, 28, 866–867. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Conventional 90-degree hybrid coupler structure at frequency of 1800 MHz.
Figure 1. Conventional 90-degree hybrid coupler structure at frequency of 1800 MHz.
Micromachines 15 00657 g001
Figure 2. The scattering parameters (a) S11 and S12 and (b) S13 and S14 at working frequency of 1800 MHz.
Figure 2. The scattering parameters (a) S11 and S12 and (b) S13 and S14 at working frequency of 1800 MHz.
Micromachines 15 00657 g002
Figure 3. (a) The structure of the typical horizontal branch that is used in the normal 90-degree hybrid coupler at the working frequency of 1800 MHz, (b) the structure of the designed branch that is used in the designed coupler at a similar working frequency, and (c) the frequency responses of the typical and proposed lines.
Figure 3. (a) The structure of the typical horizontal branch that is used in the normal 90-degree hybrid coupler at the working frequency of 1800 MHz, (b) the structure of the designed branch that is used in the designed coupler at a similar working frequency, and (c) the frequency responses of the typical and proposed lines.
Micromachines 15 00657 g003
Figure 4. (a) The LC equivalent circuit and (b) its frequency response for the compact proposed line.
Figure 4. (a) The LC equivalent circuit and (b) its frequency response for the compact proposed line.
Micromachines 15 00657 g004
Figure 5. The extracted Bode plot of the provided H(s).
Figure 5. The extracted Bode plot of the provided H(s).
Micromachines 15 00657 g005
Figure 6. The building blocks of the designed ANN, including two hidden layers with five and six neurons.
Figure 6. The building blocks of the designed ANN, including two hidden layers with five and six neurons.
Micromachines 15 00657 g006
Figure 7. Comparison between predicted and real values of (a) fc (GHZ), (b) BW (GHZ), and (c) insertion loss (dB) for testing and training data using proposed ANN model.
Figure 7. Comparison between predicted and real values of (a) fc (GHZ), (b) BW (GHZ), and (c) insertion loss (dB) for testing and training data using proposed ANN model.
Micromachines 15 00657 g007
Figure 8. Predicted and real data for training and testing values of (a) fc (GHZ), (b) BW (GHZ), and (c) insertion loss (dB) parameters versus numbers of samples in the designed model.
Figure 8. Predicted and real data for training and testing values of (a) fc (GHZ), (b) BW (GHZ), and (c) insertion loss (dB) parameters versus numbers of samples in the designed model.
Micromachines 15 00657 g008aMicromachines 15 00657 g008b
Figure 9. Scattering parameter comparisons between a typical line and the proposed compact line: (a) S11 and (b) S12.
Figure 9. Scattering parameter comparisons between a typical line and the proposed compact line: (a) S11 and (b) S12.
Micromachines 15 00657 g009aMicromachines 15 00657 g009b
Figure 10. The current distributions of the applied low-pass filter at (a) 1.8 GHz (fundamental frequency of the coupler), which is located in the pass band, and (b) 7.2 GHz (frequency of the 4th harmonic of the coupler), which is located in the stopband.
Figure 10. The current distributions of the applied low-pass filter at (a) 1.8 GHz (fundamental frequency of the coupler), which is located in the pass band, and (b) 7.2 GHz (frequency of the 4th harmonic of the coupler), which is located in the stopband.
Micromachines 15 00657 g010
Figure 11. The configuration of the proposed 90-degree hybrid coupler at the working frequency of 1800 MHz.
Figure 11. The configuration of the proposed 90-degree hybrid coupler at the working frequency of 1800 MHz.
Micromachines 15 00657 g011
Figure 12. Scattering parameters of the designed 90-degree hybrid coupler at a working frequency of 1800 MHz.
Figure 12. Scattering parameters of the designed 90-degree hybrid coupler at a working frequency of 1800 MHz.
Micromachines 15 00657 g012
Figure 13. The current distributions of the proposed coupler at (a) 1.8 GHz, which is the working frequency of the coupler, and (b) 4 GHz, which is located in the rejected band.
Figure 13. The current distributions of the proposed coupler at (a) 1.8 GHz, which is the working frequency of the coupler, and (b) 4 GHz, which is located in the rejected band.
Micromachines 15 00657 g013
Figure 14. Photo of the designed 90-degree hybrid coupler at a frequency of 1800 MHz.
Figure 14. Photo of the designed 90-degree hybrid coupler at a frequency of 1800 MHz.
Micromachines 15 00657 g014
Figure 15. Measured and simulated frequency responses of the proposed coupler.
Figure 15. Measured and simulated frequency responses of the proposed coupler.
Micromachines 15 00657 g015
Figure 16. Measured and simulated output phase differences of the designed coupler.
Figure 16. Measured and simulated output phase differences of the designed coupler.
Micromachines 15 00657 g016
Table 1. The applied dataset and predicted data for the training, testing, and validation procedures.
Table 1. The applied dataset and predicted data for the training, testing, and validation procedures.
Input Output
W1 (mm)L1 (mm)W2 (mm)L2 (mm)Fc (GHz)Stopband Bandwidth (GHz)IL @ 1800 MHz
(dB)
1Training Values of Design Parameters7.930.10.32.718.480.2
27.93.20.10.32.648.730.15
37.93.20.20.32.719.120.15
47.93.20.20.42.649.130.15
57.53.20.20.42.728.860.2
67.530.20.42.88.60.25
77.530.10.42.88.160.25
87.530.10.32.88.480.3
97.530.10.22.98.80.35
107.230.10.22.98.90.3
117.22.80.10.23.29.00.5
127.02.80.10.23.28.90.6
137.02.80.10.33.28.70.5
147.02.80.10.43.48.350.5
157.02.80.20.43.08.750.55
167.02.80.20.52.98.40.5
177.02.80.10.52.857.950.3
187.02.50.10.53.07.750.7
197.02.50.10.43.08.00.7
207.02.50.10.33.18.250.8
217.02.50.10.23.18.60.85
226.82.50.10.23.188.50.91
236.82.50.10.33.138.10.85
246.82.50.10.43.068.020.8
256.82.50.10.53.037.80.75
266.82.50.20.53.068.10.8
276.82.50.20.43.188.50.83
286.82.50.20.33.178.70.87
296.82.40.10.23.278.71.0
306.82.40.10.33.178.30.95
316.82.40.10.43.117.90.90
326.82.40.10.53.088.00.84
336.82.40.20.53.178.20.87
346.82.40.20.43.178.40.91
356.82.40.20.33.238.70.95
366.82.40.20.23.159.21.05
376.52.40.10.23.38.71.1
386.52.40.10.33.278.21.05
396.52.40.10.43.178.01.0
40Testing Values of Design Parameters6.52.40.10.53.157.650.95
416.52.40.20.53.178.20.98
426.52.40.20.43.228.41.0
436.52.40.20.33.38.81.05
446.52.20.10.33.48.61.2
456.52.20.10.43.368.11.1
466.52.20.10.53.277.81.1
476.52.20.20.53.288.31.1
486.52.20.20.43.368.71.2
496.52.20.20.33.488.91.2
50Validation Values of Design Parameters7.730.10.32.78.50.2
Table 2. Final obtained values of the applied neural network model.
Table 2. Final obtained values of the applied neural network model.
fc (GHz)
Errors
BW (GHz)
Errors
IL (dB)
Errors
TrainingTesting Valid.TrainingTesting Valid.TrainingTesting Valid.
MRE 1.71 × 10−110.01810.01357.45 × 10−80.01896.09 × 10−46.27 × 10−90.02950.2056
RMSE7.47 × 10−110.07340.03644.18 × 10−60.21010.00522.37 × 10−90.03700.0411
Table 3. Performance comparison of the proposed 90-degree hybrid coupler and couplers from similar works.
Table 3. Performance comparison of the proposed 90-degree hybrid coupler and couplers from similar works.
ReferenceFrequency
(GHz)
Size Reduction (%)Insertion Loss (dB)Harmonic Suppression
[17]0.9640.33rd and 5th harmonics
[33]1.8650.42nd harmonic
[37]0.976.60.94th harmonic
[38]2.453N/ANo harmonic suppression
[39]1710.84th harmonic
[40]1.39780.43rd harmonic
[41]1630.33rd harmonic
[42]2.1630.93rd harmonic
[43]2300.53rd harmonic
[44]1500.33No harmonic suppression
Proposed Coupler1.8730.12nd to 6th harmonics
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mohamadpour, G.; Karimi, S.; Roshani, S. Design of Miniaturized 90-Degree Hybrid Coupler with Wide Rejection Band Using Neural Network. Micromachines 2024, 15, 657. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15050657

AMA Style

Mohamadpour G, Karimi S, Roshani S. Design of Miniaturized 90-Degree Hybrid Coupler with Wide Rejection Band Using Neural Network. Micromachines. 2024; 15(5):657. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15050657

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mohamadpour, Golshan, Salman Karimi, and Saeed Roshani. 2024. "Design of Miniaturized 90-Degree Hybrid Coupler with Wide Rejection Band Using Neural Network" Micromachines 15, no. 5: 657. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15050657

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop