Next Article in Journal
9-O Acetylated Gangliosides in Health and Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
Nuclear Localization of G3BP6 Is Essential for the Flowering Transition in Arabidopsis
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of CDR3 Sequences from T-Cell Receptor β in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Previous Article in Special Issue
TCP Transcription Factors in Plant Reproductive Development: Juggling Multiple Roles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Transcription Factor HaHB11 Boosts Grain Set and Yield in Rice Plants, Allowing Them to Approach Their Ideal Phenotype

by
Jesica Raineri
,
Luciano Nicolás Caraballo
,
Maximiliano Gómez
and
Raquel Lía Chan
*
Instituto de Agrobiotecnología del Litoral, CONICET, Facultad de Bioquímica y Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Colectora Ruta Nacional 168 km 0, Santa Fe 3000, Argentina
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2023, 13(5), 826; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13050826
Submission received: 8 March 2023 / Revised: 1 May 2023 / Accepted: 8 May 2023 / Published: 12 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Plant Reproduction: From Cells to Nature)

Abstract

:
The ideal rice phenotype is that of plants exhibiting fewer panicles with high biomass, large grain number, flag leaf area with small insertion angles, and an erected morphology improving light interception. The sunflower transcription factor HaHB11, homeodomain–leucine zipper I, confers increased seed yield and abiotic stress tolerance to Arabidopsis and maize. Here, we report the obtaining and characterization of rice plants expressing HaHB11 driven by its promoter or the 35S constitutive one. Transgenic p35S:HaHB11 plants closely resembled the ideal high-yield phenotype, whereas those carrying the pHaHB11:HaHB11 construct were hard to distinguish from the wild type. The former had an erected architecture, enhanced vegetative leaf biomass, rolled flag leaves with a larger surface, sharper insertion angles insensitive to brassinosteroids, and higher harvest index and seed biomass than the wild type. The combination of the distinct features exhibited by p35S:HaHB11 plants, including the increased number of set grains per panicle, supports the high-yield phenotype. We wondered where HaHB11 has to be expressed to achieve the high-yield phenotype and evaluated HaHB11 expression levels in all tissues. The results indicate that its expression is particularly necessary in the flag leaf and panicle to produce the ideal phenotype.

1. Introduction

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is one of the four main crops feeding the world’s population. It is in growing demand, challenging the scientific community to find strategies to enhance yields, stress tolerance, and nutritional quality. To improve these characteristics, it is necessary to have deep knowledge of plant physiology and molecular biology. In addition to the crucial role of rice in global food security, it also serves as a model for monocotyledonous species [1]. Knowledge of this species was significantly advanced in recent decades, revealing several architectural parameters defining seed production.
Regarding seed production, the traits associated with increased yield are large panicle size, moderate tillering capacity, heavy and drooping panicles at maturity, erected leaves until maturity, flag leaf length above panicle height, small flag leaf–uppermost internode angle, and a harvest index equal to or higher than 0.55. The combination of these characteristics in a single plant constitutes the ideal high-yield phenotype [2].
Some architectural parameters significantly impact rice yield. The height of the uppermost internode is one of them. Short uppermost internodes cannot push the panicle out of the flag leaf, resulting in panicle enclosure [3]. Panicle enclosure blocks normal development and pollination, reducing seed production in hybrid rice. This characteristic was associated with IAA and GA contents, affecting cell number and elongation [3]. Tiller diameter and height are also related to grain yield, constituting the main characteristics selected during the Green Revolution, because shorter plants spend less energy producing tillers, which can help to improve lodging resistance, and are less susceptible to the overturning produced by strong winds. The erectness of leaves represents an important agronomic trait. During ripening, the leaf inclination angle diminishes. Notably, the cultivar Takanari (high-yield indica) exhibits more erected leaves than Koshihikari (high-quality japonica). Cells on the flag leaf adaxial side significantly increased after leaf expansion in the japonica cultivar, whereas no significant differences were observed in indica, indicating that cell elongation causes the differences in the leaf inclination angle [4]. Kitaake is a model rice variety easy to propagate, short in stature, having a nine-week life cycle. This variety can be routinely transformed and edited, and multiple insertional mutants in this background are available, as well as a public database offering protocols and genetic tools (https://kitbase.ucdavis.edu/home; accessed on 8 April 2023 [5]).
Considering leaf abaxial curling, the insertional mutant BY240 exhibits a differential phenotype. This mutant, obtained with T-DNA insertion interrupting the ACL1 (Abaxially Curled Leaf 1) gene promoter, leads to the overexpression of BY240, resulting in leaf curling. ACL1 has a homolog, ACL2, and both participate in the leaf morphology architecture. A microscopical analysis indicated more bulliform cells and the expansion of epidermal cells. A discoordination of the abaxial and adaxial leaf sides resulted in abaxially curled leaves [6].
Among the strategies to improve rice and other crops’ yield and quality, one frequently used is the alteration of certain regulatory protein levels. There are many examples of the modulation of transcription factor (TF) expression by means of transformation or editing that became biotechnological tools. TFs can repress or induce whole signaling pathways. In plants, TFs were classified into several families and subfamilies, mainly according to their DNA binding domain and other characteristics, such as the genetic structure and additional functional motifs [7,8]. Among them, the homeodomain–leucine zipper family is composed of four groups, I to IV; their members exhibit the unique association of a homeodomain (HD), which recognizes and binds specific DNA sequences, and a leucine zipper (LZ), able to homo- or heterodimerize. The dimerization of these proteins is a prerequisite to DNA binding [9]. Aside from the HD-Zip domain, these TFs exhibit uncharacterized conserved motifs in their carboxyl and amino termini [10]. Among these motifs, only the transactivation AHA motif was assigned a function so far [11]. Several of these motifs interact with other components of the transcriptional regulatory machine [11]. For example, Arabidopsis member AtHB23, involved in root development and salinity response, interacts with MYB TF AtPHL1 and AtMYB68 [12,13].
In rice, thirty-one transcription factors belonging to HD-Zip families I, II, and III were identified after a genome-wide survey aiming at determining drought-responsive genes. Among them, thirty were expressed in mature plants and seedlings. Types I and II, as in Arabidopsis, were related to water deficit response [14]. Besides OsHOX4, studied in the same work, only a few were functionally characterized. HOX12 is involved in panicle exertion as a positive modulator of EUI1 (ELONGATED UPPERMOST INTERNODE1; [15]). OsHOX1 and OsHOX28, members of the HD-Zip II subfamily, severely repress the expression of HEAT STRESS TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR2D (HSFA2D), the main responsible for tiller angle establishment in rice and the local distribution of auxin [16]. A member of subfamily IV, TF1L, is expressed in rice, conferring drought tolerance, promoting lignin biosynthesis and stomatal closure [17]. Aside from those of rice, many HD-Zip TFs from varied species have been studied and reported as crucial players in developmental events and environmental responses [9,18].
HaHB11 is a divergent member of the HD-Zip I sunflower subfamily. Similar to its sister, HaHB4, this TF exhibits a very short carboxyl terminus. These HD-Zip I members only exist in the Asteraceae superfamily and are absent in the genomes of the model and crop species. When introduced in Arabidopsis, HaHB11 interacted with the motor protein Kinesin13B; such interaction was crucial to conferring a differential phenotype [19]. Besides Arabidopsis, this sunflower gene was ectopically expressed in alfalfa and maize plants, triggering flooding tolerance and enhanced seed yield [20,21]. In particular, the expression of HaHB11 in maize significantly augmented the grain set in lines and hybrids under normal conditions or under stress caused by waterlogging or defoliation [22,23]. Notably, among the differential traits produced by this TF and also by HaHB4, the enlargement of stem width was associated with increased yield in Arabidopsis and sunflower plants [24].
Here, we show that in five field trials, HaHB11 conferred several differential characteristics to rice plants that allowed them to approach the ideal phenotype. Rice plants transformed with 35S:HaHB11 exhibited higher leaf biomass, more grains, enhanced flag leaf area with smaller insertion angles, and an erected morphology compared with their controls or transgenic plants transformed with the construct pHaHB11:HaHB11.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material, Growth Conditions, and Treatments

Greenhouse conditions: Rice plants from the genotype Kitaake were grown in 8 L pots under a long-day photoperiod (16/8 h light/dark cycles). For each genotype and condition, at least five biological replicates were included in the assay. Daily temperatures fluctuated between a minimum of 10 °C and a maximum of 40 °C, depending on the month of the assay. Although the temperature reached almost 40 °C on some days, all plant genotypes were grown together and exposed to the same conditions. Plants were well irrigated during their life cycle and fertilized once a week with Hakaphos® Rojo and Basafer Plus®. The multiplication of seeds was performed in the greenhouse.
Field trial conditions: Five independent experiments were conducted every year between 2017 and 2021 at Institute of Agrobiotechnology (IAL) located in Santa Fe (31°38′17.1″ S, 60°40′01.8″ W) in pools (nylon-isolated, making flooding possible) of 2 m in width, 5 m in length, and 30 cm in depth. The evaluated germplasm included Kitaake controls and transgenic lines transformed with 35S:HaHB11 (independent events H11-1 and H11-2) and proHaHB11:HaHB11 (independent events pH11-2 and pH11-3). In the first campaign, we used null segregants as controls; since the results were similar to those obtained with the wild-type genotype, we continued with the latter. Sowing took place in November of every year at the single-stand density of 223 plants m−2. Such density was decided after observing the short stature of the Kitaake variety and the planting uses for japonica [25]. The three genotypes were distributed in a completely randomized design with three replicates of each one. Parcels had three–four rows of 2 m in length. The distance between rows was 15 cm, and between individual plants, 3 cm. The plants were drip-irrigated daily until flooding, and urea was applied as fertilizer (50 kg/ha) 15 and 50 days after sowing (DAS). The trials were kept free of weeds, insects, and diseases by employing the necessary chemical and manual controls and were flooded when seedlings reached the V5 stage (five fully expanded leaves). The results presented in the figures are representative of the five repetitions. The sowing, waterlogging, anthesis, and harvest dates of each trial are listed in Supplementary Table S1. IRGA is a commercial genotype included as control in several trials. All assays were carried out after obtaining the corresponding authorization from CONABIA (National Committee of Biotechnology) and INASE (Seeds National Institute).

2.2. Genetic Constructs

35S:HaHB11: The complete cassette was restricted with HindIII and EcoRI from a clone (pBI 121) used to transform Arabidopsis plants [20] and cloned in the same sites of pCAMBIA1308. Plants transformed with this construct were named H11.
ProHaHB11:HaHB11: The entire segment was restricted from the pBI construct [20] with HindIII/EcoRI and subcloned in pCAMBIA 1308 in the same sites. This fragment contained a 1373 pb sequence upstream of the transcription start site of the sunflower HaHB11 promoter plus its cDNA. Plants transformed with this construct were named pH11.

2.3. Rice Transformation

Agrobacterium-mediated rice callus transformation was essentially performed as described by Main et al. [26] with few modifications. The agrobacterium tumefaciens EHA105 strain was used and transformed with the binary plasmid pCAMBIA1380 containing a 35S:HaHB11 or pHaHB11:HaHB11 expression cassette. Mature Kitaake rice seeds were surface-sterilized and germinated in callus induction medium containing 2,4-D (10 mg/mL). Embryogenic calli (white and friable) were selected and subcultured in fresh induction medium three days before infection. Calli were infected with Agrobacterium for two minutes and co-cultivated on wet filter paper for three days in the dark. Calli were then transferred to selection medium containing 50 mg/L hygromycin for transgenic callus selection, timentin (100 mg/mL), and cefotaxime (100 mg/mL) for Agrobacterium growth control and incubated in the dark at 30 °C. Actively growing calli in the selection medium were individualized and changed to regeneration medium. Plates were sealed with vent tape and placed in the light (16:8 h photoperiod, 80–100 μmol/m2/s, 28 °C) until shoots developed. Plantlets were moved to jars containing 45 mL of medium for further root elongation. The shoots exhibiting an adequate root system were placed in a growth chamber and subsequently transferred to the greenhouse.

2.4. RNA Isolation and Expression Analyses with Real-Time RT-PCR

Total RNA for real-time RT-PCR was isolated from rice tissues using Trizol® reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and real-time qPCR was performed using an Mx3000P Multiplex qPCR system (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA) as previously described [20]. The primers used are listed in Supplementary Table S2.

2.5. Crop Phenotyping

Crop phenotype was assessed during the five field trials during spring–summer 2017–2021. Samples were taken from at least six plants per plot and evaluated from day 30 after sowing until harvest. Tillers, vegetative leaves, flag leaves, and panicles were manually counted. Rolled and unrolled leaf length and width were measured with a ruler. Plant height was considered from the soil surface to the uppermost visible node (tiller length—UI), and tiller diameter was measured at the base of the plant. Vegetative (tillers, vegetative leaves, and flag leaves) and reproductive (panicles) biomass was obtained after oven-drying at 60 °C until the sample weight was constant (over approximately three days). The uppermost internode length was considered from the base of the panicle to the node directly below it.
The anthesis day was registered when 50% of the plants in the plot exhibited visible hanging anthers having mature pollen.
Flag leaf and tiller angles were quantified using a protractor in situ. Alternatively, we took pictures of individual tillers and used the free ImageJ software.
Plants from all the genotypes, occupying 50 linear cm of each row, were harvested and evaluated 115 DAS, which was considered the end of the life cycle. Grain yield (panicle weight) was assessed in these samples, and the harvest index (HI) was calculated as the quotient between grain yield and total plant biomass. Width, height, and length were determined for individual grains. Branching was evaluated by dissecting the panicles, and grain number was assessed in each branch.
The evolution of light interception was obtained fortnightly between 31 and 93 DAS. It was computed as in Equation (1) [27].
Light interception = 1 − (IPARb/IPARa)
where IPARa and IPARb represent incident photosynthetically active radiation above the canopy and immediately below the lowermost green leaves, respectively.

2.6. Green Index Evaluation

The green index was determined using a specific chlorophyll meter device (Cavadevices®, Buenos, Aires, Argentina; https://cavadevices.com/archivos/FOLLETOS/Clorofilio.pdf; accessed on 8 April 2023). Values were expressed as chlorophyll content index (CCI), calculated using the following formula: CCI = %T940 nm/%T660 nm, where % TXX nm means the transmittance through the leaf at the specified wavelength.

2.7. Histology

Histology of the cross-sections was carried out as previously described [22], and cross-sections were stained with safranine fast green. Cross-sections were evaluated using microscopy. Photographs were taken with a Nikon Coolpix L810 camera mounted on an Eclipse E200 microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).
Large vascular parenchyma sections, bulliform cell number, flag leaf area, large vascular bundle diameter of flag leaf and tiller, the transversal section area of the uppermost internode, and tiller thickness were assessed using the program ImageJ (1.50 v) [28].

2.8. Brassinosteroid Treatment

The brassinosteroid effect on flag leaf angle was evaluated as described by Li et al. [29] with a few modifications. Detached vegetative leaves were incubated in darkness at 28° in deionized water or with 1 × 10−7 M brassinolide (BL) addition. A minimum of 12 leaves were used per point. Photographs and samples were taken two days after initiating treatment.

2.9. Sequence Analyses

The HaHB11 cDNA sequence was compared with the rice genome database using the Blast tool. Moreover, we used an optimized algorithm to compare two similar sequences [30].

2.10. Statistical Analyses

As indicated in the corresponding figure legends, ANOVA followed by Tukey’s (differences across means) tests were used for the comparison of all the parameters evaluated across field experiments. Error bars represent SEM (standard error of the mean). p-Values are indicated in the legends of the corresponding figures. PCA was used to evaluate the correlations among traits for the different genotypes.

2.11. Accession Numbers

The accession numbers of the genes evaluated in this work are available in Supplementary Table S2.

3. Results

3.1. Rice Plants Constitutively Expressing HaHB11 Partition More Biomass to Leaves Than Controls and Exhibit Delayed Anthesis

HaHB11 expression in Arabidopsis and maize plants enhanced their biomass and seed yield. Because rice plants are evolutionarily distant from those species, we wondered whether the sunflower gene could confer beneficial traits to this species. HaHB11 is a divergent member of the sunflower HD-Zip I family of TFs and has no homologs outside the Asteraceae group [10]. Sequence comparison in public databases indicated that its closest rice member is OsHOX6. However, this TF strongly differs from HaHB11, particularly outside the HD-Zip domain in the N and C termini. Global identity is lower than 30%, whereas similarity is around 50% (Supplementary Figure S1). We generated transgenic rice plants with two constructs: one in which the HaHB11 promoter drove the HaHB11 cDNA expression (events pH11-2 and pH11-3) and the second carrying the constitutive 35S mosaic virus (events H11-1 and H11-3). Two independent lines from each construct and their controls were grown in large pools in open air and evaluated during the life cycle. In the early vegetative stage, the growing rate of H11 plants was slower than that of the other genotypes, accelerating after 70 DAS (Figure 1a). Tiller and leaf biomass was weighed from day 30 after sowing to harvest. Total biomass per plant was similar in all the genotypes (Figure 1a), whereas total leaf biomass per plant was slightly larger in H11 plants (Figure 1b), and total tiller biomass per plant significantly decreased in the same plants compared with controls and pH11, particularly at the end of the life cycle (Figure 1c). During almost the entire life cycle, H11 plants partitioned more biomass to leaves than tillers (Figure 1d). On day 93, individual leaf biomass was higher in H11 plants, resulting in enhanced total leaf biomass, although leaf biomass per plant tended to be lower (Supplementary Figure S2c). Individual tiller biomass was lower in H11 plants on day 53 but did not show significant differences later or at harvest (Figure 1e), while individual vegetative leaf biomass was significantly larger in H11 plants than in controls and pH11 (Figure 1f). Neither the number of leaves per plant nor the green index in vegetative and flag leaves exhibited significant differences among genotypes (Supplementary Figure S2a,b,d,e). Although the number of tillers, and in consequence that of flag leaves, was smaller in H11 plants, flag leaf biomass in these plants almost doubled that of controls and pH11 plants. This is because each one was larger and heavier than those of the other genotypes. (Supplementary Figure S2c). Tillering capacity on day 93 was around 750 for H11 plants, whereas controls and pH11 plants had 950 and 1300 panicles/m2, respectively. Together with these characteristics, H11 plants exhibited an anthesis delay of approximately 15 days compared with the wild-type genotype, whereas pH11 did not differ from controls, such as in the other evaluated characteristics (Figure 1g, and Supplementary Tables S1 and S3). However, the total life cycle did not significantly differ among genotypes, and harvest was carried out on the same date for all the plants (Supplementary Tables S1 and S3), indicating that the grain-filling stage was shorter in H11 plants than in controls. Altogether, these results suggest that widely expressed HaHB11 triggered differential biomass partitioning to leaves.

3.2. In the Reproductive Stage, H11 Plants Exhibit Significantly Improved Traits Compared with Controls and pH11 Plants

We assessed traits directly associated with seed yield to evaluate the impact of the differential characteristics described above. Notably, the number of panicles per plant was lower in H11 plants than in the other genotypes (Figure 2a). However, such panicles were significantly longer and wider and almost doubled the weight of those in controls and pH11 plants (Figure 2b and Figure S3b, and Tables S3 and S4), except for one of the pH11 lines (pH11-2), which had longer panicles than controls, albeit shorter than H11 (Figure 3a). Individual panicle biomass and the ratio of panicle biomass/total biomass were higher in H11 plants than in controls (Figure 2c,d). The analysis of individual panicles indicated that they had more branches, and each one had more grains than controls and pH11 plants (Figure 2e,f and Figure S3b). Grain size and weight, individual width, height, and length, as well as 100-grain weight, did not differ among genotypes (Supplementary Figure S3c and Tables S3 and S4), whereas the number of panicles per tiller was lower in H11 plants (Supplementary Figure S3e). However, H11 plants stopped tillering earlier than the other genotypes and sent their resources to panicles. Notably, aerial biomass partitioning significantly differed in H11 plants (Supplementary Figure S3d), supporting their shorter stage of panicle filling, which compensated for the anthesis delay, leading to life cycle similarity with the other genotypes. Remarkably, one of the crucial traits determining seed yield, the harvest index, was significantly higher in H11 plants than in controls and pH11 lines (Figure 2h). It is important to note that the harvest index was calculated by only considering the aerial biomass. The combination of differential traits, particularly those shown by panicles (Figure 2g), resulted in an enhanced number of grains per panicle, positively impacting seed yield (Figure 2g).

3.3. The Uppermost Internode Length, Flag Leaf, and Tiller Angle in H11 Plants Contribute to Explaining Their Increased Yield

The ideal phenotype of rice plants is a set of several combined traits that together lead to better grain set, harvest index, and grain yield.
We evaluated these characteristics in HaHB11-modified plants. Uppermost internodes were shorter in H11 than in control plants (Figure 3a,b and Figure S4a). Regarding flag leaf angle, it was sharper in H11 plants and more open in pH11 plants than in the wild type (Figure 3b,c). Notably, individual tiller length was longer below the uppermost internode in H11 plants and shorter in pH11 ones than in controls. H11 plants lost this difference when the total length of tillers was assessed, because the uppermost internode was shorter, compensating for the total length. On the other hand, pH11 lines retained the differential trait (Figure S3a). Flag leaf laminas were longer in the H11 genotype, while pH11 did not significantly differ from controls (Figure 3d). These characteristics were easy to visualize (Figure 3e and Figure S4c). Light interception did not differ among genotypes (Supplementary Figure S4b), but H11 plants exhibited a leaf-rolled structure, and the top three leaves were above the panicle height, impacting the exposed leaf area (Figure 3b and Figure S4c). Remarkably, tiller angles were sharper in the H11 genotype and pH11 plants (one out of two lines and a tendency in the second one). Despite their differential leaf architecture, light interception in H11 plants was similar to that in controls (Supplementary Figure S4b,d). We carried out a principal component analysis considering H11 and control plants (Supplementary Figure S4d), supporting the observations described above.
Given that HaHB11 encodes a transcription factor and modulates the expression of endogenous genes related to the observed differential traits, we quantified, in the panicle and flag leaf, the transcript levels of well-characterized genes previously assigned a role in the rolled leaf phenotype and enhanced yields. OsROC5 and OsAGO1 were slightly induced in H11 and pH11 panicles and did not differ in flag leaves, whereas OsHOX32 did not show modulation in these tissues, nor did OsPFL in panicles, and the latter was not detected in flag leaves (Supplementary Figure S5).

3.4. H11 Plants Exhibit Larger Vascular Bundles in Flag Leaf and Tiller Than Controls

Regarding the differential traits described so far, we were interested in whether the cellular organization at the microscopic levels of leaves and stems could explain the macroscopic characteristics. For this purpose, flag leaf histological sections were obtained from 76-day-old plants, stained with safranin fast green, and analyzed (Figure 4a). The vascular parenchyma sections and the vascular bundle diameters were larger in H11 plants than in controls, whereas pH11 plants did not show significant differences, except for the pH11-2 line exhibiting shorter vascular bundle diameters (Figure 4). Bulliform cell number and area did not differ among genotypes (Supplementary Figure S6a,b). We obtained a similar result by analyzing the transversal area of the uppermost internode (Figure 4b); H11 plants had larger surfaces than controls and pH11 (Figure 4b). The observation of longitudinal sections of the uppermost internode suggested increased stomatal density in H11 plants (Supplementary Figure S6d). Tiller thickness exhibited a different scenario (Figure 4c); those of controls were wider than those of the H11 and pH11-2 lines, whereas this characteristic did not differ in the pH11-3 line. Although controls showed broader tillers, their vascular bundles were narrower than in H11 plants (Figure 4c), whereas the cell number in the stem thickness did not vary among genotypes (Supplementary Figure S6c).

3.5. H11 Flag Leaf Angles Are Insensitive to Brassinosteroids

Flag leaf architecture is one of the determinants of plant light use efficiency, which is related to a better photosynthetic rate. Shorter angles between the flag leaf and the uppermost internode approach the ideal phenotype, whereas larger ones are undesirable. Angle aperture is positively modulated by brassinosteroids (BRs), whereas ABA has the opposite effect. To evaluate the differential flag leaf angle phenotype in H11 plants and test their sensitivity to BRs, detached plant leaves, including lamina joints, were treated with brassinolide. As expected, wild-type and pH11 plants opened their angles until almost 90°, whereas H11 plants remained with the same aperture, indicating that these plants are insensitive to BRs (Figure 5). We quantified the transcript levels of enzymes participating in BR synthesis and perception in all the genotypes. Surprisingly, they did not show significant differences, except for OsBRD1, which was induced in H11 plants (Supplementary Figure S7), suggesting that a post-transcriptional modulation or an alternative molecular mechanism was taking place to trigger this BR insensitivity in H11 plants. Additional genes involved in BR synthesis and signaling were evaluated but were undetectable in our samples.

3.6. The Constitutive Expression of the Sunflower HaHB11 Gene Is Necessary to Confer the Differential Traits

The observations described above evidence that HaHB11 expression driven by the 35S CaMV promoter resulted in the differential traits allowing H11 plants to approach the ideal phenotype, whereas those in which the HaHB11 promoter caused the expression of the sunflower gene did not significantly differ from controls. Considering that the ideal phenotype comprised several characteristics in different tissues and developmental stages, we wondered in which tissues HaHB11 expression was necessary. To answer this question, we evaluated HaHB11 transcript levels in H11 and pH11 plants (Figure 6). While expression levels did not differ in vegetative leaves among these genotypes (except for a lower expression in the pH11-2 line), the differences in flag leaves, panicles, and the lamina joint tissue were enormous. These results indicate, on one hand, that the HaHB11 promoter does not induce enough expression in rice flag leaves, lamina joint, and panicles to impact the phenotype, and on the other hand, that in those tissues, and not in vegetative leaves, expression is needed and responsible for the differential traits (Figure 6).

4. Discussion

Rice breeding programs use the ideotype approach to improve yield potential. Good results were obtained by combining this approach and intersubspecific heterosis, reaching a grain yield of 12 t ha−1 [2]. The ideal phenotype includes moderate tillering capacity; heavy and dropping panicles at maturity; a harvest index of at least 0.55; and specific traits in the top three leaves, such as being erected, large and rolled, and having a sharp flag leaf angle, among other characteristics [31]. Notably, both strategies focus on the same traits. However, yield potential has stagnated at about 10 Mg ha−1 in tropical environments since the Green Revolution [31,32]. Here, we show that the expression of a single heterologous gene, the sunflower HaHB11 gene, achieved excellent results, approaching the ideal phenotype.
Biomass partitioning was one of the distinctive features of H11 plants, evidenced by the lower tiller/leaf ratio and supported by the evaluation of tiller and leaf biomass/plant, reduced and enhanced in H11 plants compared with their controls, respectively. Moreover, H11 flag leaves were larger and taller (overpassing the panicle height) and exhibited better architecture, evidenced by their erected form. Even though a particular sowing density value was not defined, for japonica varieties, such density varying between 50 and 150 kg/ha did not significantly affect most yield components [25]. Taking into account that Kitaake plants are short and hardly reach 100% light interception, phenotyping at 226 plants/m2 (equivalent to 61 kg/ha) would not significantly change when varying this parameter. The reduced tiller capacity, the enhanced uppermost internode area, and the increased vascular bundle diameters both in the uppermost internode and the tillers also helped the differential biomass partitioning in H11 plants. Additionally, the harvest index shown by these plants was around 0.6 (Figure 2i), higher than the looked-for 0.55 [2], whereas Kitaake controls exhibited a value of 0.3 (Figure 2i). Even though the absolute measurements in H11 plants differed from those described for the ideotype [2], all the differential traits pointed in the same direction. The distance with the ideotype can be explained by the background genotype being Kitaake, which is not an elite variety. For example, ideal tiller capacity was established in 270–300 panicles/m2 and increased in our assays, but not in H11 plants, in which it was significantly lower than in controls (Figure 2). Notably, neither the green index nor total flag leaf biomass per plant differed between controls and H11 plants. Although H11 plants exhibited fewer panicles and flag leaves, total biomass was similar, because each flag leaf was larger, heavier, and more erected. These characteristics are likely due to the rolled form and the increased vascular parenchyma section (Figure 4a), in agreement with the traits considered in the ideotype [2].
Fewer IAA provision to the uppermost internode and gibberellin deficiency resulted in cell number and elongation decreases, generating a shortened uppermost internode. In this situation, the panicle cannot push and go out of the flag leaf and results in panicle enclosure, blocking normal pollination and reducing seed production [3]. Remarkably, H11 plants exhibited unexpectedly shorter uppermost internodes than their controls; however, they did not show panicle enclosure, indicating that this trait was somehow compensated for. EUI1 is a GA-deactivating enzyme; when the encoding gene was overexpressed, it triggered a GA-deficient dwarf phenotype [33,34]. The HD-Zip TF HOX12 represses EUI1, enhancing panicle exertion [17]. It is tempting to speculate that HaHB11 can dimerize with HOX12, inhibiting its natural function.
Plant architecture defines its ability to intercept light. In this sense, the erected leaves allow light to reach the whole canopy, leading to better net photosynthesis. H11 plants presented a differential architecture compared with controls and pH11 ones, distinguishable due to their sharper tiller and flag leaf angles, and increased leaf area supported by the double length of these leaves. Moreover, the rolled and erected leaves contributed to a compact phenotype. Particularly, flag leaf width [35] and length [2] were positively correlated with yield per plant, probably helping H11 plants to enhance seed yield.
Abaxial leaf rolling is an important agronomic trait. Interestingly, the suppression of Roc5 (Rice outermost cell-specific gene 5), an ortholog of the Arabidopsis GLABRA2 gene (a class IV HD-Zip), resulted in abaxial leaf rolling, whereas its overexpression led to adaxially rolled leaves. These characteristics went together with bulliform cell number and size increases [36], impacting seed yield. H11 plants exhibited rolled leaves, and interestingly, Roc5 was induced in their panicles, albeit not in the flag leaves, suggesting that the rolling can be somehow the result of this HD-Zip IV gene modulation.
Erected leaves make more efficient light capture and penetration to the whole canopy possible, improving photosynthesis and nitrogen storage for grain filling, allowing higher planting density to be obtained, which triggers increased grain yield [32,37]. Although H11 plants exhibited this characteristic plus sharper insertion angles, they did not differ in light interception. This fact was intriguing; however, the enhanced yield can be explained by improved partitioning, favored by better plant architecture. The differences in their vascular system morphology, tiller and leaf vascular bundles with larger diameters, and shorter uppermost internodes could allow photosynthates to be better transported to panicles. Moreover, the number of panicles per tiller was around 1 in H11 plants and 1.5 in controls (Supplementary Figure S3e). Notably, total biomass/plant at harvest did not significantly differ among genotypes, and H11 plants had fewer tillers, suggesting that such plants concentrated their resources, performing more efficient although energy-consuming photosynthate transport, which negatively impacted dry net biomass accumulation, as evidenced by the significantly increased grain yield (Figure 2).
The rice HD-Zip I genes Oshox12 and Oshox14 are the closest homologs of Vrs1, and a recessive mutation in Vrs1 (HvHox1) changes two-rowed barley to six-rowed barley, which considerably improves yield [38,39]. OsHOX12 and OsHOX14 were highly expressed in developing panicles, and their overexpression generated reduced panicle length and a dwarf phenotype. Moreover, the lines overexpressing OsHOX14 showed a deficiency in panicle exertion [40]. We showed that the ectopic and constitutive expression of HaHB11 generated a partially contrasting phenotype. Even though H11 plants exhibited shorter uppermost internodes below this internode, the plant was higher, compensating for the total height, similar to controls. Unfortunately, Oshox12 and Oshox14 mutants or edited plants have not been described so far, but it is tempting to speculate that the sunflower gene could be heterodimerizing with these TFs, avoiding deficiency in panicle exertion. Another possibility is the interaction with OsHOX6, the closest rice HaHB11 TF; however, no expression or functional information about this rice gene supporting this hypothesis is available. Heterodimerization among HD-Zip I TFs has already been reported, even with members from different species [11,41]. Alternatively, HaHB11 can bind the target sequences of rice TFs, blocking the possibility of OsHOX6, -12, and -14 acting in this developmental stage. Further profound studies will be necessary to corroborate these hypotheses.
Lamina joint inclination is antagonistically modulated by brassinosteroids and high ABA concentrations, whereas low ABA concentrations have an effect opposite to that exerted by higher ones [42], stimulating and repressing angle aperture, respectively [43]. The brassinosteroid-deficient mutant osdwarf4 exhibited sharper angles and erected leaves [44]. Notably, H11 plants were insensitive to brassinosteroids in agreement with their erected leaves and sharper lamina joint angle phenotype. However, among the evaluated genes associated with these characteristics, only OsBRD1, involved in brassinosteroid biosynthesis, was induced in H11 plants (Supplementary Figure S7). We were not able to detect BRD-2 or D11, also involved in the synthesis, or OsBZR-1, OsGSK2, OsLIC, or OsDLT, participating in BR signaling, probably due to sample dilution, because we took one linear centimeter from the flag leaf and the expression of these genes only localized in a few cells of the lamina joint. On the other hand, we expected the repression of OsBRD1, but it showed induction. It is possible that H11 plants sensed the lack of BRs, and in consequence, activated this gene in vain to compensate for the situation (Supplementary Figure S7).
All the differential characteristics shown by H11 plants that allowed them to approach the ideotype required the expression of the sunflower gene in the reproductive stage, particularly in rice flag leaves, lamina joint tissue, and panicles, where the HaHB11 promoter does not drive expression in these plants.
It is important to note that H11 plants had more green areas when they switched to anthesis because flowering was delayed. Notably, the total life cycle was similar to that of controls because their panicles accumulated biomass faster. Moreover, these plants exhibited enhanced photosynthate transport to leaves. In agreement with this, longer flowering times have been proposed, as additional physiological traits may result in further improvements [45].
HaHB11 has become a biotechnological tool to improve rice yield, either with its overexpression or by elucidating the molecular mechanism by which this sole gene can confer all the differential phenotypes approaching the rice ideotype. Future studies will be necessary to investigate the latter alternative (Figure 7).
Summary of the main differential traits exhibited by H11 plants compared with controls. Enlargements of some traits are shown in circles.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biom13050826/s1, Figure S1: OsHOX6, the closest rice HD-Zip I member, significantly differs from HaHB11, Figure S2: Biomass partitioning differs between H11 plants and their controls, Figure S3: H11 plants exhibit larger panicles exhibiting more branches than controls, Figure S4: H11 plants exhibit longer tillers, shorter uppermost internodes, and sharper flag leaf angles than their controls, Figure S5: OsROC5 is upregulated in H11 panicles, Figure S6: The surface of bulliform cells is enhanced in H11 plants, Figure S7: OsBRD-1, encoding a key enzyme involved in brassinosteroid synthesis, is induced in HB11 plants, Table S1: Dates of sowing, waterlogging, anthesis, and harvesting in the five field assays, Table S2: Oligonucleotides used for cloning or RT-qPCR, Table S3: Trait values measured in each campaign, Table S4: Statistical analyses of the trials.

Author Contributions

J.R. and R.L.C. conceived the experiments; J.R. performed most of the experiments and designed most of the illustrations; L.N.C. actively participated in field assays; M.G. obtained the transformed rice plants; R.L.C. conceived and wrote the paper; J.R. and L.N.C. contributed to the writing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 2015-2176, PICT 2017 0305, PICT 2019 01916, and PICT 2020 0805) and CONICET (PUE 040). L.C. was an undergraduate student at Universidad Nacional del Litoral and is currently a CONICET fellow. J.R. was a fellow of CONICET and is currently, similar to RLC, a career member of the same institution. M.G. was a CONICET technician.

Data Availability Statement

All the data corresponding to this study was included in the article or in the Supplementary Material.

Acknowledgments

We thank Silvia Lede and Ayelén Rapopport for their professional assistance in the procurement of CONABIA and INASE (Ministry of Agriculture) permits. We are very grateful for the permanent technical assistance provided by Manuel Franco in field trials. We also thank Mabel Campi for her collaboration in rice transformation protocols, Pablo Ortiz for his technical assistance in preparing parcels and the irrigation system, María Crepy for her helpful advice in rice cropping, and the undergraduate students Bárbara Peiró and Débora Reato for their technical collaboration.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Izawa, T.; Shimamoto, K. Becoming a model plant: The importance of rice to plant science. Trends Plant Sci. 1996, 1, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Peng, S.; Khush, G.S.; Virk, P.; Tang, Q.; Zou, Y. Progress in ideotype breeding to increase rice yield potential. Field Crops Res. 2008, 108, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yin, C.; Gan, L.; Ng, D.; Zhou, X.; Xia, K. Decreased panicle-derived indole-3-acetic acid reduces gibberellin A1 level in the uppermost internode, causing panicle enclosure in male sterile rice Zhenshan 97A. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 2441–2449. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. San, N.S.; Yamashita, M.; Adachi, S.; Tanabata, T.; Ookawa, T.; Hirasawa, T. Differences in lamina joint anatomy cause cultivar differences in leaf inclination angle of rice. Plant Prod. Sci. 2018, 21, 302–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, G.; Jain, R.; Chern, M.; Pham, N.T.; Martin, J.A.; Wei, T.; Schackwitz, W.S.; Lipzen, A.M.; Duong, P.Q.; Jones, K.C.; et al. The Sequences of 1504 Mutants in the Model Rice Variety Kitaake Facilitate Rapid Functional Genomic Studies. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 1218–1231. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Li, L.; Shi, Z.Y.; Li, L.; Shen, G.Z.; Wang, X.Q.; An, L.S.; Zhang, J.L. Overexpression of ACL1 (abaxially curled leaf 1) increased Bulliform cells and induced Abaxial curling of leaf blades in rice. Mol. Plant 2010, 3, 807–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gonzalez, D.H. Introduction to transcription factor structure and function. In Plant Transcription Factors: Evolutionary, Structural and Functional Aspects; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 3–11. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hong, J.C. General Aspects of Plant Transcription Factor Families. In Plant Transcription Factors: Evolutionary, Structural and Functional Aspects; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 35–56. [Google Scholar]
  9. Perotti, M.F.; Ribone, P.A.; Chan, R.L. Plant transcription factors from the Homeodomain-Leucine Zipper family I. Role in development and stress responses. IUBMB Life 2017, 69, 280–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Arce, A.L.; Raineri, J.; Capella, M.; Cabello, J.V.; Chan, R.L. Uncharacterized conserved motifs outside the HD-Zip domain in HD-Zip subfamily I transcription factors; a potential source of functional diversity. BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Capella, M.; Ré, D.A.; Arce, A.L.; Chan, R.L. Plant homeodomain-leucine zipper I transcription factors exhibit different functional AHA motifs that selectively interact with TBP or/and TFIIB. Plant Cell Rep. 2014, 33, 955967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Spies, F.P.; Raineri, J.; Miguel, V.N.; Cho, Y.; Hong, J.C.; Chan, R.L. The Arabidopsis transcription factors AtPHL1 and AtHB23 act together promoting carbohydrate transport from pedicel-silique nodes to seeds. Plant Sci. 2022, 315, 111133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Spies, F.P.; Perotti, M.F.; Cho, Y.; Jo, C.I.; Hong, J.C.; Chan, R.L. A complex tissue-specific interplay between the Arabidopsis transcription factors AtMYB68, AtHB23, and AtPHL1 modulates primary and lateral root development and adaptation to salinity. Plant J. 2023, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Agalou, A.; Purwantomo, S.; Overnäs, E.; Johannesson, H.; Zhu, X.; Estiati, A.; de Kam, R.J.; Engström, P.; Slamet-Loedin, I.H.; Zhu, Z.; et al. A genome-wide survey of HD-Zip genes in rice and analysis of drought-responsive family members. Plant Mol. Biol. 2008, 66, 87–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gao, S.; Fang, J.; Xu, F.; Wang, W.; Chu, C. Rice HOX12 Regulates Panicle Exsertion by Directly Modulating the Expression of ELONGATED UPPERMOST INTERNODE1. Plant Cell. 2016, 28, 680–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hu, Y.; Li, S.; Fan, X.; Song, S.; Zhou, X.; Weng, X.; Xiao, J.; Li, X.; Xiong, L.; You, A.; et al. OsHOX1 and OsHOX28 Redundantly Shape Rice Tiller Angle by Reducing HSFA2D Expression and Auxin Content. Plant Physiol. 2020, 184, 1424–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Bang, S.W.; Lee, D.K.; Jung, H.; Chung, P.J.; Kim, Y.S.; Choi, Y.D.; Suh, J.W.; Kim, J.K. Overexpression of OsTF1L, a rice HD-Zip transcription factor, promotes lignin biosynthesis and stomatal closure that improves drought tolerance. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019, 17, 118–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ribone, P.A.; Capella, M.; Arce, A.L.; Chan, R.L. What do we know about Homeodomain-Leucine Zipper I transcription factors? Functional and biotechnological considerations. In Plant Transcription Factors: Evolutionary, Structural and Functional Aspects; Daniel, G., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; Chapter 22. [Google Scholar]
  19. Miguel, V.N.; Ribichich, K.F.; Giacomelli, J.I.; Chan, R.L. Key role of the motor protein Kinesin 13B in the activity of homeodomain-leucine zipper I transcription factors. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 6282–6296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cabello, J.V.; Giacomelli, J.I.; Piattoni, C.V.; Iglesias, A.A.; Chan, R.L. The sunflower transcription factor HaHB11 improves yield, biomass and tolerance to flooding in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. J. Biotechnol. 2016, 222, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cabello, J.V.; Giacomelli, J.I.; Gómez, M.C.; Chan, R.L. The sunflower transcription factor HaHB11 confers tolerance to water deficit and salinity to transgenic Arabidopsis and alfalfa plants. J. Biotechnol. 2017, 257, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Raineri, J.; Campi, M.; Chan, R.L.; Otegui, M.E. Maize expressing the sunflower transcription factor HaHB11 has improved productivity in controlled and field conditions. Plant Sci. 2019, 287, 110185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Raineri, J.; Caraballo, L.; Rigalli, N.; Portapila, M.; Otegui, M.E.; Chan, R.L. Expressing the sunflower transcription factor HaHB11 in maize improves waterlogging and defoliation tolerance. Plant Physiol. 2022, 189, 230–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cabello, J.V.; Chan, R.L. Arabidopsis and sunflower plants with increased xylem area show enhanced seed yield. Plant J. 2019, 99, 717–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Estorninos, L.E., Jr.; Gealy, D.R.; Talbert, R.E.; Gbur, E.E. Rice and red rice interference. I. Response of red rice (Oryza sativa) to sowing rates of tropical japonica and indica rice cultivars. Weed Sci. 2005, 53, 676–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Main, M.; Frame, B.; Wang, K. Agrobacterium Protocols. In Methods in Molecular Biology 1223; Kan, W., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2015; Volume 1, Chapter 13. [Google Scholar]
  27. Gallo, K.P.; Daughtry, C.S.T. Techniques for measuring intercepted and absorbed photosynthetically active radiation in corn canopies. Agron. J. 2016, 78, 752–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Schneider, C.A.; Rasband, W.S.; Eliceiri, K.W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 671–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Li, H.Y.; Wang, H.M.; Jang, S. Rice Lamina Joint Inclination Assay. Bio-Protocol 2017, 7, e2409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Needleman, S.B.; Wunsch, C.D. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1970, 48, 443–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Peng, S.; Cassman, K.G.; Virmani, S.S.; Sheehy, J.E.; Khush, G.S. Yield potential trends of tropical rice since the release of IR8 and the challenge of increasing rice yield potential. Crop Sci. 1999, 39, 1552–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dingkuhn, M.; Laza, M.R.C.; Kumar, U.; Mendez, K.S.; Collard, B.; Jagadish, K.; Singh, R.K.; Padolina, T.; Malabayabas, M.; Torres, E.; et al. Improving yield potential of tropical rice: Achieved levels and perspectives through improved ideotypes. Field Crops Res. 2015, 182, 43–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Luo, A.; Qian, Q.; Yin, H.; Liu, X.; Yin, C.; Lan, Y.; Tang, J.; Tang, Z.; Cao, S.; Wang, X.; et al. EUI1, encoding a putative cytochrome P450 monooxygenase, regulates internode elongation by modulating gibberellin responses in rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2006, 47, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhu, Y.; Nomura, T.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Peng, Y.; Mao, B.; Hanada, A.; Zhou, H.; Wang, R.; Li, P.; et al. ELONGATED UPPERMOST INTERNODE encodes a cytochrome P450 monooxygenase that epoxidizes gibberellins in a novel deactivation reaction in rice. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 442–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, B.; Ye, W.; Ren, D.; Tian, P.; Peng, Y.; Gao, Y.; Ruan, B.; Wang, L.; Zhang, G.; Guo, L.; et al. Genetic analysis of flag leaf size and candidate genes determination of a major QTL for flag leaf width in rice. Rice 2015, 8, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zou, L.P.; Sun, X.H.; Zhang, Z.G.; Liu, P.; Wu, J.X.; Tian, C.J.; Qiu, J.L.; Lu, T.G. Leaf rolling controlled by the homeodomain leucine zipper class IV gene Roc5 in rice. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 1589–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, J.J.; Xu, J.; Qian, Q.; Zhang, G.H. Development of rice leaves: How histiocytic cells modulate leaf polarity establishment. Rice Sci. 2020, 27, 468–479. [Google Scholar]
  38. Komatsuda, T.; Pourkheirandish, M.; He, C.; Azhaguvel, P.; Kanamori, H.; Perovic, D.; Stein, N.; Graner, A.; Wicker, T.; Tagiri, A.; et al. Six-rowed barley originated from a mutation in a homeodomain-leucine zipper I-class homeobox gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 1424–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ren, X.; Wang, Y.; Yan, S.; Sun, D.; Sun, G. Population genetics and phylogenetic analysis of the vrs1 nucleotide sequence in wild and cultivated barley. Genome 2014, 57, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shao, J.; Haider, I.; Xiong, L.; Zhu, X.; Hussain, R.M.F.; Övernäs, E.; Meijer, A.H.; Zhang, G.; Wang, M.; Bouwmeester, H.J.; et al. Functional analysis of the HD-Zip transcription factor genes Oshox12 and Oshox14 in rice. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0199248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. González, F.G.; Capella, M.; Ribichich, K.F.; Curín, F.; Giacomelli, J.I.; Ayala, F.; Watson, G.; Otegui, M.E.; Chan, R.L. Field-grown transgenic wheat expressing the sunflower gene HaHB4 significantly outyields the wild type. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 1669–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Xiong, M.; Feng, G.; Gao, Q.; Zhang, C.; Li, Q.; Liu, Q.Q. Brassinosteroid regulation in rice seed biology. Seed Biol. 2022, 1, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, Q.F.; Lu, J.; Zhou, Y.; Wu, F.; Tong, H.N.; Wang, J.D.; Yu, J.W.; Zhang, C.Q.; Fan, X.L.; Liu, Q.Q. Abscisic Acid Represses Rice Lamina Joint Inclination by Antagonizing Brassinosteroid Biosynthesis and Signaling. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sakamoto, T.; Morinaka, Y.; Ohnishi, T.; Sunohara, H.; Fujioka, S.; Ueguchi-Tanaka, M.; Mizutani, M.; Sakata, K.; Takatsuto, S.; Yoshida, S.; et al. Erect leaves caused by brassinosteroid deficiency increase biomass production and grain yield in rice. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 105–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kumar, S.; Tripathi, S.; Singh, S.P.; Prasad, A.; Akter, F.; Syed, M.A.; Badri, J.; Das, S.P.; Bhattarai, R.; Natividad, M.A.; et al. Rice breeding for yield under drought has selected for longer flag leaves and lower stomatal density. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 4981–4992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Rice plants constitutively expressing HaHB11 partition more biomass to leaves than to tillers and exhibit delayed anthesis. (a) Total biomass per plant. (b) Total leaf biomass per plant. (c) Total tiller biomass per plant. (d) Total tiller biomass/total leaf biomass ratio. (e) Individual tiller biomass. (f) Individual vegetative leaf biomass expressed in g/leaf. (g) Anthesis day. Assays were repeated during four campaigns with N: 18–24/genotype. Wild-type Kitaake plants were used as controls (C) and are graphed in black color, whereas H11 and pH11 plants are represented in yellow and blue, respectively. The figure illustrates the data obtained in one of these campaigns, that of summer 2021–2022. The whole data of the five campaigns can be visualized in Table S3. Error bars represent SEM. Asterisks indicate significant differences (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Figure 1. Rice plants constitutively expressing HaHB11 partition more biomass to leaves than to tillers and exhibit delayed anthesis. (a) Total biomass per plant. (b) Total leaf biomass per plant. (c) Total tiller biomass per plant. (d) Total tiller biomass/total leaf biomass ratio. (e) Individual tiller biomass. (f) Individual vegetative leaf biomass expressed in g/leaf. (g) Anthesis day. Assays were repeated during four campaigns with N: 18–24/genotype. Wild-type Kitaake plants were used as controls (C) and are graphed in black color, whereas H11 and pH11 plants are represented in yellow and blue, respectively. The figure illustrates the data obtained in one of these campaigns, that of summer 2021–2022. The whole data of the five campaigns can be visualized in Table S3. Error bars represent SEM. Asterisks indicate significant differences (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Biomolecules 13 00826 g001
Figure 2. H11 plants have fewer panicles per plant, albeit heavier, and produce more grains than controls. (a) Number of total panicles per plant. (b) Illustrative picture of panicles at maturity; the scale bar represents 1 cm; C, H11, and pH11 plants. (c) Total biomass per panicle biomass ratio. (d) Individual panicle biomass. (e) Number of branches per panicle. (f) Number of grains per branch. (g) Number of grains per panicle. (h) Individual plant seed yield. (i) Harvest index. The trials were repeated at least three times with N: 18–24/genotype. The figure illustrates the data obtained in one of these campaigns, that of summer 2021–2022. The whole data of the five campaigns can be visualized in Table S3. Error bars represent SEM. Asterisks indicate significant differences (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Figure 2. H11 plants have fewer panicles per plant, albeit heavier, and produce more grains than controls. (a) Number of total panicles per plant. (b) Illustrative picture of panicles at maturity; the scale bar represents 1 cm; C, H11, and pH11 plants. (c) Total biomass per panicle biomass ratio. (d) Individual panicle biomass. (e) Number of branches per panicle. (f) Number of grains per branch. (g) Number of grains per panicle. (h) Individual plant seed yield. (i) Harvest index. The trials were repeated at least three times with N: 18–24/genotype. The figure illustrates the data obtained in one of these campaigns, that of summer 2021–2022. The whole data of the five campaigns can be visualized in Table S3. Error bars represent SEM. Asterisks indicate significant differences (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Biomolecules 13 00826 g002
Figure 3. H11 plants exhibit a differential architecture impacting seed yield. (a) Plant height on day 93 after sowing, indicating the contribution of the tiller, the uppermost internode, and the panicle length. (b) Picture illustrating the differences between genotypes in uppermost internodes and flag leaf angles of 93-day-old plants; measured angles are shown in red. (c) Angle formed between the uppermost internode and the flag leaf seven days after flowering. (d) Flag leaf length in 97-day-old plants. (e) Illustrative picture of control, pH11, and H11 93-day-old plants. (f) Tiller angles assessed 30 days after sowing. Assays were repeated at least three times with N: 18–24/genotype. The figure illustrates the data obtained in one of these campaigns, that of summer 2021–2022. The whole data of the five campaigns can be visualized in Table S3. Error bars represent SEM. Asterisks indicate significant differences (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Figure 3. H11 plants exhibit a differential architecture impacting seed yield. (a) Plant height on day 93 after sowing, indicating the contribution of the tiller, the uppermost internode, and the panicle length. (b) Picture illustrating the differences between genotypes in uppermost internodes and flag leaf angles of 93-day-old plants; measured angles are shown in red. (c) Angle formed between the uppermost internode and the flag leaf seven days after flowering. (d) Flag leaf length in 97-day-old plants. (e) Illustrative picture of control, pH11, and H11 93-day-old plants. (f) Tiller angles assessed 30 days after sowing. Assays were repeated at least three times with N: 18–24/genotype. The figure illustrates the data obtained in one of these campaigns, that of summer 2021–2022. The whole data of the five campaigns can be visualized in Table S3. Error bars represent SEM. Asterisks indicate significant differences (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Biomolecules 13 00826 g003
Figure 4. Vascular bundles in the flag leaf and the uppermost internode are larger in H11 plants than in controls. (a) Left panel: illustrative picture of flag leaf histological section from control and H11 93-day-old plants; right panel: quantification of flag leaf vascular parenchyma surface and flag leaf large vascular bundle diameter. (b) Left panel: transversal section area of the uppermost internode; right panel: illustrative pictures of uppermost internode sections of 93-day-old plants. (c) Illustrative pictures of tiller transversal sections of 93-day-old plants; right panel: quantification of tiller thickness and large vascular bundle diameter. All the values were expressed in relative units (RUs) after normalizing them to those obtained in control plants (C), which were arbitrarily assigned a value of 1 (one). The assays were repeated at least twice with N: 4–6/genotype. Error bars represent SEM. Asterisks indicate significant differences (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Figure 4. Vascular bundles in the flag leaf and the uppermost internode are larger in H11 plants than in controls. (a) Left panel: illustrative picture of flag leaf histological section from control and H11 93-day-old plants; right panel: quantification of flag leaf vascular parenchyma surface and flag leaf large vascular bundle diameter. (b) Left panel: transversal section area of the uppermost internode; right panel: illustrative pictures of uppermost internode sections of 93-day-old plants. (c) Illustrative pictures of tiller transversal sections of 93-day-old plants; right panel: quantification of tiller thickness and large vascular bundle diameter. All the values were expressed in relative units (RUs) after normalizing them to those obtained in control plants (C), which were arbitrarily assigned a value of 1 (one). The assays were repeated at least twice with N: 4–6/genotype. Error bars represent SEM. Asterisks indicate significant differences (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Biomolecules 13 00826 g004
Figure 5. H11 flag leaf angles are insensitive to brassinosteroids. (a) Illustrative picture of detached leaf section including lamina joint of control (C), H11 (two independent lines, H11-2 and H11-3), and pH11 (two independent lines, pH11-2 and pH11-3) plants before (upper panel) and after (lower panel) brassinolide treatment; the scale bar represents 1 cm. (b) Angle of the lamina joint. The assays were repeated at least twice with N: 10–12/genotype. Error bars represent SEM. Asterisks indicate significant differences (** p < 0.01).
Figure 5. H11 flag leaf angles are insensitive to brassinosteroids. (a) Illustrative picture of detached leaf section including lamina joint of control (C), H11 (two independent lines, H11-2 and H11-3), and pH11 (two independent lines, pH11-2 and pH11-3) plants before (upper panel) and after (lower panel) brassinolide treatment; the scale bar represents 1 cm. (b) Angle of the lamina joint. The assays were repeated at least twice with N: 10–12/genotype. Error bars represent SEM. Asterisks indicate significant differences (** p < 0.01).
Biomolecules 13 00826 g005
Figure 6. The localized expression of the sunflower HaHB11 gene is necessary to confer the differential traits. (a) HaHB11 transcript levels evaluated with RT-qPCR in 93-day-old H11 (two independent lines, H11-2 and H11-3) and pH11 (two independent lines, pH11-2 and pH11-3) flag leaves; the same panicles (b), vegetative leaves (c), and lamina joint (d). All the values were normalized to those obtained in pH11-2 plants, which were arbitrarily assigned a value of 1 (one). N: 3/genotype. Error bars represent SEM. Asterisks indicate significant differences (* p < 0.05).
Figure 6. The localized expression of the sunflower HaHB11 gene is necessary to confer the differential traits. (a) HaHB11 transcript levels evaluated with RT-qPCR in 93-day-old H11 (two independent lines, H11-2 and H11-3) and pH11 (two independent lines, pH11-2 and pH11-3) flag leaves; the same panicles (b), vegetative leaves (c), and lamina joint (d). All the values were normalized to those obtained in pH11-2 plants, which were arbitrarily assigned a value of 1 (one). N: 3/genotype. Error bars represent SEM. Asterisks indicate significant differences (* p < 0.05).
Biomolecules 13 00826 g006
Figure 7. Proposed model of HaHB11 action allowing rice plants to approach their ideal phenotype.
Figure 7. Proposed model of HaHB11 action allowing rice plants to approach their ideal phenotype.
Biomolecules 13 00826 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Raineri, J.; Caraballo, L.N.; Gómez, M.; Chan, R.L. The Transcription Factor HaHB11 Boosts Grain Set and Yield in Rice Plants, Allowing Them to Approach Their Ideal Phenotype. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 826. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13050826

AMA Style

Raineri J, Caraballo LN, Gómez M, Chan RL. The Transcription Factor HaHB11 Boosts Grain Set and Yield in Rice Plants, Allowing Them to Approach Their Ideal Phenotype. Biomolecules. 2023; 13(5):826. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13050826

Chicago/Turabian Style

Raineri, Jesica, Luciano Nicolás Caraballo, Maximiliano Gómez, and Raquel Lía Chan. 2023. "The Transcription Factor HaHB11 Boosts Grain Set and Yield in Rice Plants, Allowing Them to Approach Their Ideal Phenotype" Biomolecules 13, no. 5: 826. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13050826

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop