Next Article in Journal
Flow Topology in the Confluence of an Open Channel with Lateral Drainage Pipe
Previous Article in Journal
Temporal Variability of Temperature Extremes in the Sardinia Region (Italy)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Flash Flood Impact Assessment in Jeddah City: An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Advances in Flood Early Warning: Ensemble Forecast, Information Dissemination and Decision-Support Systems

1
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Integrated Surface Water-Groundwater Pollution Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
2
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Soil and Groundwater Pollution Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
3
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hunghom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Hydrology 2020, 7(3), 56; https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7030056
Submission received: 7 August 2020 / Revised: 12 August 2020 / Accepted: 12 August 2020 / Published: 13 August 2020

Abstract

:
Floods are usually highly destructive, which may cause enormous losses to lives and property. It is, therefore, important and necessary to develop effective flood early warning systems and disseminate the information to the public through various information sources, to prevent or at least mitigate the flood damages. For flood early warning, novel methods can be developed by taking advantage of the state-of-the-art techniques (e.g., ensemble forecast, numerical weather prediction, and service-oriented architecture) and data sources (e.g., social media), and such developments can offer new insights for modeling flood disasters, including facilitating more accurate forecasts, more efficient communication, and more timely evacuation. The present Special Issue aims to collect the latest methodological developments and applications in the field of flood early warning. More specifically, we collected a number of contributions dealing with: (1) an urban flash flood alert tool for megacities; (2) a copula-based bivariate flood risk assessment; and (3) an analytic hierarchy process approach to flash flood impact assessment.

Introduction to the Special Issue

Flood is one of the most common and major devastating natural disasters around the world that can cause great losses to lives and property. In the last decade, flood has caused huge property damage (i.e., over $155 billion) in the United States. A recent study on global-scale flood damage showed that the number of flood events, flood-related fatalities and economic losses have increased significantly since 1960s [1]. In the future, flood damages are expected to continuously increase due to population growth, economic development, urban expansion and climate change [2]. Flood prevention and emergency management have become permanent government services for many flood-prone regions worldwide [3]. In particular, it is critical to develop novel methods for flood early warning so that preventive measures can be taken to mitigate flood damages [4,5].
Joint efforts from multiple interdisciplinary domains are required to make new advances in flood early warning, which include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) meteorological forecasts that can provide accurate weather prediction with sufficient lead time [6,7]; (2) land-surface modeling that can generate flood inundation maps to quantify the exposure to flood risk with high spatial-temporal resolutions [8,9]; and (3) information dissemination systems that can provide timely warnings to the public [10]. In addition, several studies have shown that the effectiveness of flood early warning can be noticeably affected by infrastructure development and social management systems in flood-prone areas [11,12]. With the advances in social hydrology and urban hydrology, it has been proposed that a holistic integration of social, economic and hydrological dimensions is critical for the development of effective flood early warnings [13,14].
Recent studies have offered a number of innovative advances in flood early warning. For instance, global flood hazard maps of fluvial floods were derived [15], both ground data and remote sensing data could be used as the input [16,17,18], a service-oriented architecture was proposed for efficient flood forecast [10], a tool for the cost-effective delineation of flood-prone areas was developed [19], and the role of social media and individual behaviors in flood evacuation processes were explored [20,21,22]. All these studies are valuable for enhancing our capacity to prevent or at least mitigate the damages to lives and property due to floods.
This Special Issue was proposed with the aim of collecting the latest methodological developments and applications in the field of flood early warning. Potential topics include, but are not limited to, the following: flood dynamics, mechanisms and processes; the development of methods for flood early warning, especially in ungauged basins; improvement of flood forecast and information dissemination using various information sources; new methods/techniques for flood risk analysis, vulnerability analysis and evacuation behaviors; empirical analysis of flood warnings and flood-mitigation practices during real-world flood events; etc. The collection of papers covers several of these aspects, and the contribution of each specific paper is summarized as follows.
The first paper is the one by Al-Suhili et al. [23] that introduces an urban flooding tool that couples a rainfall–runoff model with a flood-level map database to expedite the alert system process and estimate the flooded areas. The authors modeled the hydrological processes of Manhattan, New York City, USA, at a 0.30 m horizontal resolution, and suggested that, decisions, such as closing traffic in a particular area, can be aided by the proposed approach.
The second paper is the one by Naz et al. [24] which uses frequency analysis for flood forecast, taking the Indus River of Pakistan as the study area. The authors tested bivariate Archimedean copula-based models for flood risk analysis, and found that the return periods in a single variable analysis would give overestimated results. The outcomes could provide valuable information to managers to make better decisions on flood control.
The third paper is the one by Dano et al. [25] which applies an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model to explore the impacts of flash flood hazards. The author utilized experts’ judgments for assessing flash flood impacts and indicated that property loss and productivity loss ranked as the top two for the probability of occurrence in flash flood events. It is suggested that river management and flood early warning systems are favorable alternatives for flood impact reduction.
In conclusion, the present Special Issue provides new avenues to recognize the importance of flood early warning and a good overview of the advances in flood early warning.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tanoue, M.; Hirabayashi, Y.; Ikeuchi, H. Global-scale river flood vulnerability in the last 50 years. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 36021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Paprotny, D.; Sebastian, A.; Morales-nápoles, O. Trends in flood losses in Europe over the past 150 years. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Verkade, J.S.; Werner, M.G.F. Estimating the benefits of single value and probability forecasting for flood warning. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2011, 15, 3751–3765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Fotovatikhah, F.; Herrera, M.; Shamshirband, S.; Chau, K.W.; Ardabili, S.F.; Piran, M.J. Survey of Computational Intelligence as Basis to Big Flood Management: Challenges, research directions and Future Work. Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech. 2018, 12, 411–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Yaseen, Z.M.; Sulainman, S.O.; Deo, R.C.; Chau, K.W. An enhanced extreme learning machine model for river flow forecasting: State-of-the-art, practical applications in water resource engineering area and future research direction. J. Hydrol. 2019, 569, 387–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Arheimer, B.; Lindström, G.; Olsson, J. A systematic review of sensitivities in the Swedish flood-forecasting system. Atmos. Res. 2011, 100, 275–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Moore, R.J.; Bell, V.A.; Jones, D.A. Forecasting for flood warning. Comptes Rendus Geosci. 2005, 337, 203–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Horritt, M.S.; Bates, P.D. Effects of spatial resolution on a raster based model of flood flow. J. Hydrol. 2001, 253, 239–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hunter, N.M.; Bates, P.D.; Horritt, M.S.; Wilson, M.D. Simple spatially-distributed models for predicting flood inundation: A review. Geomorphology 2007, 90, 208–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shi, H.Y.; Li, T.J.; Liu, R.H.; Chen, J.; Li, J.Y.; Zhang, A.; Wang, G.Q. A service-oriented architecture for ensemble flood forecast from numerical weather prediction. J. Hydrol. 2015, 527, 933–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Grothmann, T.; Reusswig, F. People at risk of flooding: Why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. Nat. Hazards 2006, 38, 101–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tullos, D. Opinion: How to achieve better flood-risk governance in the United States. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 3731–3734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Di Baldassarre, G.; Viglione, A.; Carr, G.; Kuil, L.; Salinas, J.L.; Blöschl, G. Socio-hydrology: Conceptualising human-flood interactions. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2013, 17, 3295–3303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Börner, K.; Rouse, W.B.; Trunfio, P.; Stanley, H.E. Forecasting innovations in science, technology, and education. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 12573–12581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Pappenberger, F.; Dutra, E.; Wetterhall, F.; Cloke, H.L. Deriving global flood hazard maps of fluvial floods through a physical model cascade. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2012, 16, 4143–4156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Shi, H.Y.; Chen, J.; Li, T.J.; Wang, G.Q. A new method for estimation of spatially distributed rainfall through merging satellite observations, raingauge records, and terrain digital elevation model data. J. Hydro-Environ. Res. 2020, 28, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shi, H.Y.; Li, T.J. Estimating hydrological parameters based on rainfall patterns in river basins with no long-term historical observations. J. Hydrol. 2017, 553, 651–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Giustarini, L.; Chini, M.; Hostache, R.; Pappenberger, F.; Matgen, P. Flood hazard mapping combining hydrodynamic modeling and multi annual remote sensing data. Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 14200–14226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Samela, C.; Albano, R.; Sole, A.; Manfreda, S. An open source GIS software tool for cost effective delineation of flood prone areas, Computers. Environ. Urban Syst. 2018, 70, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Du, E.H.; Cai, X.M.; Sun, Z.Y.; Minsker, B. Exploring the Role of Social Media and Individual Behaviors in Flood Evacuation Processes: An Agent-Based Modeling Approach. Water Resour. Res. 2017, 53, 9164–9180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Du, E.H.; Rivera, S.; Cai, X.M.; Myers, L.; Ernest, A.; Minsker, B. Impacts of Human Behavioral Heterogeneity on the Benefits of Probabilistic Flood Warnings: An Agent-Based Modeling Framework. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2016, 53, 316–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rosser, J.F.; Leibovici, D.G.; Jackson, M.J. Rapid flood inundation mapping using social media, remote sensing and topographic data. Nat. Hazards 2017, 87, 103–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Al-Suhili, R.; Cullen, C.; Khanbilvardi, R. An Urban Flash Flood Alert Tool for Megacities—Application for Manhattan, New York City, NY, USA. Hydrology 2019, 6, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Naz, S.; Ahsanuddin, M.; Inayatullah, S.; Siddiqi, T.A.; Imtiaz, M. Copula-Based Bivariate Flood Risk Assessment on Tarbela Dam, Pakistan. Hydrology 2019, 6, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Dano, U.L. Flash Flood Impact Assessment in Jeddah City: An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach. Hydrology 2020, 7, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shi, H.; Du, E.; Liu, S.; Chau, K.-W. Advances in Flood Early Warning: Ensemble Forecast, Information Dissemination and Decision-Support Systems. Hydrology 2020, 7, 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7030056

AMA Style

Shi H, Du E, Liu S, Chau K-W. Advances in Flood Early Warning: Ensemble Forecast, Information Dissemination and Decision-Support Systems. Hydrology. 2020; 7(3):56. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7030056

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shi, Haiyun, Erhu Du, Suning Liu, and Kwok-Wing Chau. 2020. "Advances in Flood Early Warning: Ensemble Forecast, Information Dissemination and Decision-Support Systems" Hydrology 7, no. 3: 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7030056

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop