Next Article in Journal
Experimental Study on Enhancing the Mechanical Properties of Sandy Soil by Combining Microbial Mineralization Technology with Silty Soil
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Simulation of Lost-Foam Casting for Key Components of A356 Aluminum Alloy in New Energy Vehicles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Welding Gap of Thin Plate Butt Welds on Inherent Strain and Welding Deformation of a Large Complex Box Structure
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 17
Issue 10
10.3390/ma17102348
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

AZ91 Magnesium Alloy CMT Cladding Layer Processed Using Friction Stir Processing: Effect of Traverse Speed on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties

by
Huichao Zhao
1,2,
Junqi Shen
1,2,*,
Shengsun Hu
1,2,
Yahui Zhen
1,2 and
Yang Chen
1,2
1
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Advanced Joining Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300354, China
2
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300354, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2024, 17(10), 2348; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17102348
Submission received: 15 April 2024 / Revised: 7 May 2024 / Accepted: 14 May 2024 / Published: 15 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Welding Technologies and Additive Manufacturing of Alloys and Metals (2nd Edition))
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Friction stir processing (FSP) is a solid-state treating method to enhance the mechanical properties of materials by altering their microstructure. In this study, FSP was applied to the AZ91 magnesium alloy cladding layer prepared using cold metal transition (CMT) technology, and the purpose was to investigate the effect of the traverse speed of the H13 steel stirring head under a constant rotation speed on the microstructure and mechanical properties of the cladding layer. The results demonstrated that FSP could effectively decrease the grain size of the cladding layer and lead to the dispersion and dissolution of the coarse β-Mg17Al12 second phase into the α-Mg matrix. The mechanical characteristics of the processed cladding layer were significantly enhanced compared to the unprocessed cladding layer due to the grain refinement and second-phase strengthening induced by FSP. When the stirring head rotation speed was set at 300 r/min, the average microhardness and tensile properties of the specimens showed a tendency of initially increasing and then dropping as the traverse speed increased. The cladding layer, obtained at a traverse speed of 60 mm/min, displayed optimal mechanical properties with an average microhardness, tensile strength, and elongation of 85.6 HV0.1, 278.5 MPa, and 13.4%, respectively.

1. Introduction

Magnesium alloys, being the most lightweight structural metallic materials used in engineering, possess exceptional physicochemical characteristics including low density, high specific stiffness and specific strength, recyclability, and effective damping properties [1,2,3,4]. Additionally, magnesium is widely available in Earth’s crust, ranking as the eighth most abundant element on Earth [5]. In today’s world, there is a growing trend towards structural lightweighting. Magnesium alloys, due to their aforementioned advantages, have been shown to be highly valuable in several industries such as automotive [6,7,8], aerospace [9], biomedical [10,11], and national defense [12]. Nevertheless, the comparatively low modulus of elasticity, inadequate wear resistance, and elevated corrosion rate of magnesium alloys make their surfaces prone to wear, scratches, and other forms of damage when in use [13]. Cold metal transfer (CMT)-based surfacing technology presents a viable way to repair the damaged structural components made of magnesium alloy. The low thermal input and stable welding process of this technology are its distinguishing features [14]. However, the surface repairing process of magnesium alloys through the use of the surfacing welding technique frequently results in the formation of defects like inclusions, porosity, and cracks [15]. Therefore, it is imperative to introduce an appropriate post-treatment technique to improve the performance of the repaired parts.
The current primary methods employed for altering the surface properties of magnesium alloys include the physical vapor deposition technique, chemical vapor deposition technique, laser surface modification technique, and FSP technique [16]. FSP is derived from friction stir welding (FSW) and is primarily employed for the purpose of altering the microstructure and properties of materials. The primary components of the FSP tool are the stirring head consisting of a pin and a shoulder. The high-speed rotating shaft shoulder comes into direct contact with the material surface during processing, resulting in significant heat generation that softens the metal material. Simultaneously, the rapid stirring motion of the pin causes the material to undergo substantial plastic deformation. The FSP can homogenize and densify the microstructure of the material as well as refine the grains, resulting in the improvement of material properties [17,18,19]. FSP has the following advantages over other methods. Firstly, FSP does not produce harmful gases and noise, and it is a green and pollution-free method. Secondly, FSP can carry out high-speed and high-efficiency processing. Thirdly, the stirring head shape, rotational speed, and traverse speed can be adjusted easily to suit the material. Lastly, FSP does not require additional heating equipment, and it is easy to operate.
Both domestic and international researchers have conducted numerous investigations on the FSP modification of Mg alloy materials and have obtained significant research outcomes. Rokkala et al. [20] showed that, after FSP, the grain size of the as-cast Mg–Zn–Dy alloy was reduced from 60 μm to 3 μm, and the hardness, yield strength, tensile strength, and elongation of the alloy were increased by 46%, 60%, 55%, and 53%, respectively. Elyasi et al. [21] utilized the FSP technique to treat a Mg–Zn–Si alloy, and they observed that the mechanical properties of the alloy were enhanced as a result of FSP-induced grain refinement and the reduction in porosity content. Sharahi et al. [22] found that the yielding strength, tensile strength, elongation, and energy absorption of the as-cast AZ91 Mg alloy were significantly increased by 42%, 80%, 350%, and 830%, respectively, due to the refinement of the grains and dissolution and dispersion of the Mg17Al12 intermetallic phases induced by the FSP process, compared to the unprocessed sample.
The key determinants of the quality of a friction stir processed sample are the rotational speed and traverse speed of the stirring head. These two parameters directly influence the amount of heat generated and the material deformation throughout the FSP process [23]. Kondaiah et al. [24] found that the rotating speed of the stirring head during FSP of ZE41 Mg alloy had an impact on the degree of refined grains and the breadth of the stirred zone (SZ). Girish and Anandakrishnan [25] found that a high traverse speed above 70 mm/min during FSP of AA7075 Al alloy could lead to insufficient heat input, thus decreasing the plastic deformation of the material. John et al. [26] demonstrated that an increase in the rotation speed or traverse speed of the stirring head in a proper range could lead to a rise in the tensile strength of AA 2014-T6 Al alloy, and the interaction between the traverse speed and rotation speed had a substantial impact on both the microstructure and microhardness of the SZ. Luo et al. [27] reported that the grain size and the proportion of large angular grain boundaries of the AZ61 Mg alloy exhibited an increase as the ratio of the rotation speed to the traverse speed increased. Hu et al. [28] FSP-treated ZK60 magnesium alloy plates at various rotational and traverse speeds. The results show that fine recrystallized grains and a high-angle grain boundary can be observed at different process parameters. The grain size and the proportion of high-angle grain boundary increase as the rotational speed increases, whereas the grain size reduces and the proportion of high-angle grain boundary increases as the traverse speed increases.
In summary, changes in the rotating speed and the traverse speed of the stirring head have a significant impact on the microstructure and mechanical properties of the processed materials. However, much of the research undertaken on the effects of FSP parameters on the properties of magnesium alloys has mostly focused on cast magnesium alloys. The issues experienced by the cladding layer manufactured using additive manufacturing techniques are distinct from those encountered by cast alloys. The main challenges encountered by the cladding layer can be succinctly described as follows: mechanical property anisotropy caused by the uneven distribution of microstructure, thermal stresses and deformation resulting from uneven heating and cooling during the additive manufacturing process, and pore defects arising from insufficient fusion between layers [29]. Investigating the influence of FSP parameters on the fusion cladding layer of magnesium alloy would help to address the mentioned difficulties, hence greatly broadening the potential uses of magnesium alloys.
Hence, the objective of this study was to examine the impact of the traverse speed of the stirring head on the microstructure and mechanical characteristics of the AZ91 magnesium alloy CMT cladding layer subjected to FSP. Furthermore, a comprehensive examination was carried out on the macroscopic characteristics, crystalline grain size, morphology, and distribution of the secondary phase, as well as the mechanical characteristics of the cladding layer achieved at different traverse speeds.

2. Experimental Procedure

An as-cast AZ91 magnesium alloy plate was used as the substrate, and the dimension of the substrate was 250 mm × 150 mm × 6 mm. The selected cladding material for this investigation was AZ91 magnesium alloy welding wire, which had a diameter of 1.2 mm. Table 1 presents the chemical components of both the substrate and the cladding wire.
The CMT cladding system consisted of a Motoman HP6 six-axis robot and a Fronius CMT Advanced 4000R welding machine. For the CMT cladding process, the used shielding gas was pure argon, and the specific cladding parameters can be found in Table 2.
AZ91 magnesium alloy CMT arc cladding layers were processed by using a gantry-type FSP machine (HT-JM16×15/2). A conical threaded stirring head made of H13 steel with a shoulder diameter of 15 mm and a pin length of 5 mm was used. The pin had a tip diameter of 4 mm and a root diameter of 6 mm. As shown in Figure 1, the processing direction was aligned with the travelling direction of the welding torch during the CMT cladding process. The FSP parameters are indicated in Table 3. During the FSP of the AZ91 magnesium alloy cladding layer, the rotation speed of the stirring head was set at 300 r/min. The tests were then conducted at traverse speeds of 30 mm/min, 60 mm/min, 90 mm/min, and 120 mm/min, respectively. Subsequently, the samples acquired at various traverse speeds underwent microstructure identification and mechanical characteristic tests. The impact of the traverse speed of the stirring head on the cladding layer was examined by analyzing the collected data.
The metallographic samples, which were cut perpendicular to the processing direction (i.e., the direction in which the welding torch was moving), were taken from the cladding layer before and after FSP. These samples were polished and then etched using a solution containing 10 mL of hydrochloric acid and 100 mL of alcohol. The cross-sectional macroscopic morphology of the SZ was examined using a super depth-of-field microscope (ZEISS Smart Zoom 5), and the microstructure of the samples was analyzed by using an optical microscope (ZEISS VERT A1) and a scanning electron microscope (SEM, JSM-7800F).
The microhardness of the unprocessed and treated cladding layer was measured and studied using an HV-1000A Vickers microhardness tester. The applied force was 100 g and the holding period was 15 s. As shown in Figure 2a, the microhardness test line on the cross-sectional sample of the cladding layer after FSP was positioned at a distance of 3 mm from the upper surface of the sample, and the interval between the adjacent test points in the SZ and the other region was 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm, respectively. The dimensions of the tensile sample are shown in Figure 2b. The tensile characteristics of the cladding layer were assessed using an electro-mechanical universal testing equipment (INSTRON 5848) at room temperature, and the loading rate was 0.3 mm/min. Three repetitions for each type of sample were performed, and the average value was considered as the final result. After the tensile test, the fracture morphology was observed and analyzed using a SEM (JSM-7800F).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Macrostructure

As shown in Figure 3, the CMT cladding layer of the AZ91 Mg alloy had a relatively flat and well-formed surface, while some pores could be observed in the top region of the cladding layer. According to the cross-sectional metallographs of the cladding layer, as shown in Figure 4, pores and microcracks were formed in the cladding layer.
By integrating the findings of relevant research [30], it is possible to determine that the pores in the cladding layer are hydrogen pores. Due to the high solubility and low solubility of hydrogen in the liquid and solid magnesium alloy, respectively, some of the hydrogen dissolved in the liquid molten pool became trapped in the cladding layer during the fast solidification process induced by the high thermal conductivity of the magnesium alloy, leading to the formation of hydrogen pores.
Cracks easily occur during the welding process of magnesium alloy, and there are two reasons for crack initiation and propagation. On one hand, due to the high stress concentration around the hydrogen pores, these pores could act as crack initiation sites, leading to the formation of microcracks under tensile stress [31]. On the other hand, as depicted in Figure 5, the grain size gradually increased during the solidification process of magnesium alloy, leading to a reduction in the mobility of the liquid metal of a low-melting-point eutectic, and the liquid metal took the form of a thin film at the grain boundaries during the final stage of solidification. Due to the large linear thermal expansion coefficient of magnesium alloys [32], a significant distortion of the solidified alloy induced by solidification shrinkage occurred, and the liquid film fractured under tensile stress [33]. Therefore, the cracks initiated at pores and propagated along the grain boundaries, as shown in Figure 4.
Figure 6 illustrates the cross-sectional macroscopic structure of the SZ at different traverse speeds. The SZ had a basin-like shape with a broad top and a narrow bottom for each parameter condition. The SZ exhibited no imperfections, such as pores or cracks. Additionally, when the traverse speed of stirring head was set at 30 mm/min, 60 mm/min, 90 mm/min, and 120 mm/min the intermediate width of the SZ was 5.36 mm, 5.11 mm, 5.04 mm, and 4.89 mm, respectively. Increasing the traverse speed at a constant rotation speed could lead to a decrease in the maximum temperature in the SZ, thus resulting in a decrease in the plastic deformation degree of the material in the SZ. Consequently, the width of the SZ at the intermediate position reduced as the traverse speed of the stirring head increased.

3.2. Microstructure

Figure 7a demonstrates that the microstructure of the unprocessed cladding layer closely resembles the that of the welded zone created using gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW), as described in reference [34], and the unprocessed cladding layer consists mainly of coarse equiaxed α-Mg grains and β-Mg17Al12 secondary phases at the grain boundaries, with an average grain size of approximately 17.6 μm. When the traverse speeds were 30 mm/min, 60 mm/min, 90 mm/min, and 120 mm/min the average grain size of the corresponding SZ was 6.2 μm, 5.6 μm, 3.4 μm, and 6.0 μm, respectively. Compared with the unprocessed cladding layer, the grains of the cladding layer were considerably refined after FSP. Moreover, there was a notable alteration in the morphology and distribution of the second phase, and the coarse Mg17Al12 phases, which distributed at the grain boundaries before FSP, dispersed into the α-Mg grains with small size after FSP. Under the constant rotation speed condition, an increase in the traverse speed could lead to a decrease in heat input, resulting in a reduction in the grain size of the SZ. Nevertheless, when the traverse speed was raised from 90 mm/min to 120 mm/min, the average grain size of the SZ exhibited a noticeable upward trend. When the traverse speed was excessively high, the plastic deformation of the material in the SZ was inadequate, resulting in uncompleted dynamic recrystallization and a combination of coarse and fine grain regions in the SZ. Therefore, when the traverse speed increased beyond a proper range, an increase rather than a decrease in the average grain size of the SZ occurred.
Figure 8a illustrates the presence of several elongated secondary phases of β-Mg17Al12 scattered along the grain boundaries in the cladding layer before FSP, and the α-Mg matrix was surrounded by the β-Mg17Al12 phase and the eutectic α-Mg. Based on the phase diagram of the Al–Mg alloy [35], it is evident that the homogeneous crystallization reaction of L→α-Mg occurs when AZ91 magnesium alloy solidifies under equilibrium conditions. As the temperature decreases to the solidus, the crystallization reaction ends and the liquid phase completely transforms into α-Mg solid solution, resulting in the homogenization of the composition through the diffusion of Al atoms. Subsequently, as the temperature further decreases beyond the solidus, the β-Mg17Al12 phase gradually precipitates around the grain boundaries. Finally, the microstructure of the AZ91 magnesium alloy is composed of α-Mg and β-Mg17Al12 phases when the temperature reaches room temperature. However, the deposited cladding layer of AZ91 magnesium alloy experienced rapid cooling during the CMT arc cladding process. This caused the deposited alloy to solidify in a non-equilibrium state, preventing the uniform diffusion of Al atoms in the α-Mg solid solution and, thus, leading to Al enrichment in the un-solidified liquid phase. As a result, a eutectic phase was formed via the eutectic reaction [36]. Hence, the cladding layer of AZ91 magnesium alloy contained a portion of the eutectic structure, alongside the α-Mg matrix and β-Mg17Al12 phase.
As shown in Figure 8b,c, the original coarse β-phase was effectively crushed and evenly distributed within the α-Mg matrix after FSP when the traverse speed was either 30 mm/min or 60 mm/min. At higher magnification, it was noticed that the β-phase was distributed as fine particles in the α-Mg matrix, as depicted in Figure 8f. As depicted in Figure 8d,e, there was a noticeable increase in the clustering of the second-phase particles in the SZ when the traverse speed was increased from 90 mm/min to 120 mm/min. This can be attributed to the fact that there was not enough stirring time in the SZ at an excessively high traverse speed, resulting in inadequate fragmentation and dispersion of the coarse second phase.

3.3. Microhardness

Figure 9 displays the microhardness distribution of the processed cladding layer, and Table 4 presents the average grain sizes and average microhardness of the unprocessed cladding layer and the SZ. The average microhardness of the SZ was enhanced as a result of the combined influence of fine grain strengthening and second-phase dispersion strengthening caused by FSP, in comparison to the cladding layer prior to FSP. When the traverse speed increased from 30 mm/min to 60 mm/min, the average microhardness of the SZ increased as the average grain size decreased. Nevertheless, the average microhardness of the SZ dropped when the traverse speed was raised to 90 mm/min, although the average grain size further decreased. When the traverse speed was increased beyond a certain critical value, the second phase could not be adequately crushed, weakening the second-phase dispersion strengthening effect induced by FSP and, thus, leading to a decrease in the average microhardness of the SZ. When the traverse speed was increased to 120 mm/min, the stirring effect was further weakened, resulting in a continuous fall in the average microhardness. Furthermore, because the grain size increased with the increase in the distance to the processing center, the microhardness distribution of the processed cladding layer exhibited an inverted V-shape.

3.4. Tensile Properties

As shown in Figure 10, the unprocessed cladding layer had an average ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of 233.4 MPa and an average elongation of 5.6%; after FSP with different traverse speeds, the cladding layer’s elongation and average UTS were both improved. The combined impact of second-phase fragmentation and dispersion, together with grain refining, is responsible for this shift. As the traverse speed increased, there was an initial increase followed by a decrease in both the average UTS and elongation of the processed cladding layer. The average UTS and elongation both attained their maximum values at a traverse speed of 60 mm/min, i.e., 278.5 MPa and 13.4%, respectively.
As shown in Figure 11a, the fracture surface of the unprocessed cladding layer exhibited typical brittle fracture characteristics with numerous tearing edges and no evident ductile dimples. However, when the traverse speeds were 30 mm/min, 60 mm/min, and 90 mm/min, the tensile fracture surface of the processed cladding layer displayed typical ductile fracture characteristics with a significant presence of dimples, as shown in Figure 11b–d. In addition, as the traverse speed increased, the dimple size gradually increased with a decrease in the dimple depth. At a traverse speed of 120 mm/min, the number of dimples on the fracture surface of the processed cladding layer significantly decreased, and a considerable number of tearing edges were present on the fracture surface. This indicates that the fracture mode of the processed cladding layer obtained using this parameter was a ductile–brittle facture with lower plasticity compared to the other processed cladding layer specimens.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the FSP was introduced to treat the AZ91 magnesium alloy cladding layers prepared using the CMT technique, and the influence of the traverse speed of the stirring head on the microstructure and mechanical characteristics of the cladding layers was investigated. The main conclusions obtained from this paper are as follows.
(1)
Defects such as pores and cracks were formed in the cladding layer, and the FSP could effectively eliminate the defects existing in the cladding layer. When the rotation speed of the stirring head remained constant at 300 r/min, the intermediate width of the SZ decreased as the traverse speed increased.
(2)
FSP-induced dynamic recrystallization could considerably reduce the average grain size of the cladding layer from 17.6 μm to 5.6 μm. Furthermore, the elongated β-Mg17Al12 second phases, which were originally present at the borders of the grains, were fragmented and scattered throughout the α-Mg matrix after FSP. As the traverse speed increased, the average grain size of the SZ initially declined and then rose.
(3)
The synergistic impact of fine-grain strengthening and second-phase dispersion strengthening caused by FSP resulted in a significant improvement in average micro-hardness, UTS, and elongation of the cladding layer, and these indexes all exhibited an initial increase followed by a decrease as the traverse speed increased. The unprocessed cladding layer presented typical brittle fracture features, whereas a majority of the cladding layers after FSP exhibited ductile fracture characteristics.
(4)
After FSP with a rotation speed of 300 r/min and a traverse speed of 60 mm/min, the CMT cladding layer of AZ91 magnesium alloy showed the best mechanical properties. The average microhardness, UTS, and elongation of the processed CMT cladding layer increased by 16.9%, 19.3%, and 139.3%, respectively, compared to those of the unprocessed cladding layer.
The results obtained in this study can provide a theoretical basis for improving the cladding layers of magnesium alloys, and it is beneficial to encourage the wider utilization of wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) and FSP hybrid technology for repairing damaged component surfaces made of magnesium alloy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.H. and Y.C.; methodology, Y.Z. and Y.C.; formal analysis, H.Z. and J.S.; investigation, H.Z. and Y.Z.; data curation, H.Z. and Y.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, H.Z.; writing—review and editing, J.S.; supervision, J.S. and S.H.; funding acquisition, J.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52075377).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request due to restrictions e.g., privacy or ethical.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Song, J.F.; She, J.; Chen, D.L.; Pan, F.S. Latest research advances on magnesium and magnesium alloys worldwide. J. Magnes. Alloy. 2020, 8, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. You, S.H.; Huang, Y.D.; Kainer, K.U.; Hort, N. Recent research and developments on wrought magnesium alloys. J. Magnes. Alloy. 2017, 5, 239–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tan, J.; Ramakrishna, S. Applications of magnesium and its alloys: A review. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 6861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xu, T.C.; Yang, Y.; Peng, X.D.; Song, J.F.; Pan, F.S. Overview of advancement and development trend on magnesium alloy. J. Magnes. Alloy. 2019, 7, 536–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Prasad, S.V.S.; Prasad, S.B.; Verma, K.; Mishra, R.K.; Kumar, V.; Singh, S. The role and significance of magnesium in modern day research-a review. J. Magnes. Alloy. 2022, 10, 1–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hirsch, J.; Al-Samman, T. Superior light metals by texture engineering: Optimized aluminum and magnesium alloys for automotive applications. Acta Mater. 2013, 61, 818–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hu, H.; Yu, A.; Li, N.Y.; Allison, J.E. Potential magnesium alloys for high temperature die cast automotive applications: A review. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2003, 18, 687–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, G.G.; Weiler, J.P. Recent developments in high-pressure die-cast magnesium alloys for automotive and future applications. J. Magnes. Alloy. 2023, 11, 78–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kurzynowski, T.; Pawlak, A.; Smolina, I. The potential of SLM technology for processing magnesium alloys in aerospace industry. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 2020, 20, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Brar, H.S.; Platt, M.O.; Sarntinoranont, M.; Martin, P.I.; Manuel, M.V. Magnesium as a biodegradable and bioabsorbable material for medical implants. JOM 2009, 61, 31–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ramalingam, V.V.; Ramasamy, P.; Kovukkal, M.D.; Myilsamy, G. Research and development in magnesium alloys for industrial and biomedical applications: A review. Met. Mater.-Int. 2020, 26, 409–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Malik, A.; Nazeer, F.; Wang, Y.W. A prospective way to achieve ballistic impact resistance of lightweight magnesium alloys. Metals 2022, 12, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, P.; Liu, Z.H.; Zhang, Z.P. The initial stage of surface modification of magnesium alloys by high intensity pulse ions beam. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B-Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 2016, 377, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ola, O.T.; Valdez, R.L.; Oluwasegun, K.M.; Ojo, O.A.; Chan, K.; Birur, A.; Cuddy, J. Process variable optimization in the cold metal transfer weld repair of aerospace ZE41A-T5 alloy using central composite design. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 105, 4827–4835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhen, Y.H.; Shen, J.Q.; Hu, S.S.; Yin, C.X.; Yin, F.L.; Bu, X.Z. Effect of rotation rate on microstructure and mechanical properties of CMT cladding layer of AZ91 magnesium alloy fabricated by friction stir processing. J. Manuf. Process. 2022, 79, 553–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Siddesh Kumar, N.M.; Chethan, S.; Nikhil, T.; Dhruthi. A review on friction stir processing over other surface modification processing techniques of magnesium alloys. Funct. Compos. Struct. 2022, 4, 015006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, H.C.; Hung, F.Y.; Lui, T.S.; Chen, L.H.; Huang, J.W. Effects of friction stir process and stabilizing heat treatment on the tensile and punch-shear properties of Mg-9Li-2Al-1Zn magnesium alloy. Mater. Trans. 2013, 54, 505–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Badkoobeh, F.; Mostaan, H.; Rafiei, M.; Bakhsheshi-Rad, H.R.; Berto, F. Friction stir welding/processing of mg-based alloys: A critical review on advancements and challenges. Materials 2021, 14, 6726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, W.; Chen, S.Y.; Qiao, K.; Peng, P.; Han, P.; Wu, B.; Wang, C.X.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.H.; Wang, K.S. Microstructure, mechanical properties, and corrosion behavior of Mg-Al-Ca alloy prepared by friction stir processing. Acta Metall. Sin.-Engl. Lett. 2022, 35, 703–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rokkala, U.; Bontha, S.; Ramesh, M.R.; Balla, V.K. Influence of friction stir processing on microstructure, mechanical properties and corrosion behaviour of Mg-Zn-Dy alloy. J. Mater. Sci. 2023, 58, 2893–2914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Elyasi, M.; Razaghian, A.; Moharami, A.; Emamy, M. Effect of Zirconium micro-addition and multi-pass friction stir processing on microstructure and tensile properties of Mg-Zn-Si alloys. J. Mater. Res. Technol-JMRT 2022, 20, 4269–4282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sharahi, H.J.; Pouranvari, M.; Movahedi, M. Strengthening and ductilization mechanisms of friction stir processed cast Mg-Al-Zn alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process. 2020, 781, 139249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gupta, M.K. Friction stir process: A green fabrication technique for surface composites—A review paper. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kondaiah, V.V.; Pavanteja, P.; Manvit, M.M.; Kumar, R.R.; Kumar, R.G.; Sunil, B.R. Surface engineering of ZE41 Mg alloy by friction stir processing: Effect of process parameters on microstructure and hardness evolution. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering (ICAMME), Guntur, India, 24–25 January 2018. [Google Scholar]
  25. Girish, G.; Anandakrishnan, V. Determination of friction stir processing window for AA7075. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Trends in Nanomaterials for Energy, Environmental and Engineering Applications (ICONEEEA), Tiruchirappalli, India, 28–29 March 2019. [Google Scholar]
  26. John, J.; Shanmuganatan, S.P.; Kiran, M.B.; Kumar, V.S.S.; Krishnamurthy, R. Investigation of friction stir processing effect on AA 2014-T6. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2019, 34, 159–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Luo, X.C.; Kang, L.M.; Liu, H.L.; Li, Z.J.; Liu, Y.F.; Zhang, D.T.; Chen, D.L. Enhancing mechanical properties of AZ61 magnesium alloy via friction stir processing: Effect of processing parameters. Mater. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process. 2020, 797, 139945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hu, Y.J.; Sun, Y.P.; He, J.M.; Fang, D.J.; Zhu, J.X.; Meng, X.C. Effect of friction stir processing parameters on the microstructure and properties of ZK60 magnesium alloy. Mater. Res. Express. 2022, 9, 016508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Stavropoulos, P. Additive Manufacturing: Design, Processes and Applications; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 123–128. ISBN 978-3-031-33792-5. [Google Scholar]
  30. Cao, X.; Jahazi, M.; Immarigeon, J.P.; Wallace, W. A review of laser welding techniques for magnesium alloys. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2006, 171, 188–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lasko, G.; Apel, M.; Carré, A.; Weber, U.; Schmauder, S. Effect of microstructure and hydrogen pores on the mechanical behavior of an Al7%Si0.3%Mg alloy studied by a combined phase-field and micromechanical approach. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2012, 14, 236–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pouranvari, M. Critical review on fusion welding of magnesium alloys: Metallurgical challenges and opportunities. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 2021, 26, 559–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, Y.; Fan, C.L.; Lin, S.B.; Yang, C.L. Effect of tungsten inert gas welding parameters on hot crack sensitivity of cast magnesium alloy. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2023, 32, 1382–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Nowak, P.; Mosialek, M.; Kharitonov, D.S.; Adamiec, J.; Turowska, A. Effect of TIG welding and rare earth elements alloying on corrosion resistance of magnesium alloys. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 131504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhou, W.; Aprilia, A.; Mark, C.K. Mechanisms of cracking in laser welding of magnesium alloy AZ91D. Metals 2021, 11, 1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhu, T.P.; Chen, Z.W.; Gao, W. Microstructure formation in partially melted zone during gas tungsten arc welding of AZ91 Mg cast alloy. Mater. Charact. 2008, 59, 1550–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 17 02348 g001
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the FSP treatment.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the FSP treatment.
Materials 17 02348 g001
Materials 17 02348 g002
Figure 2. Schematic of the sample for (a) microhardness test and (b) tensile test.
Figure 2. Schematic of the sample for (a) microhardness test and (b) tensile test.
Materials 17 02348 g002
Materials 17 02348 g003
Figure 3. Macromorphology of the cladding layer: (a) surface; (b) cross section.
Figure 3. Macromorphology of the cladding layer: (a) surface; (b) cross section.
Materials 17 02348 g003
Materials 17 02348 g004
Figure 4. Defects in the cladding layer: (a) low magnification; (b) high magnification.
Figure 4. Defects in the cladding layer: (a) low magnification; (b) high magnification.
Materials 17 02348 g004
Materials 17 02348 g005
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of liquid film formation during the solidification of magnesium alloy.
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of liquid film formation during the solidification of magnesium alloy.
Materials 17 02348 g005
Materials 17 02348 g006
Figure 6. The cross-sectional macroscopic morphology of the SZ at various traverse speeds: (a) 30 mm/min; (b) 60 mm/min; (c) 90 mm/min; and (d) 120 mm/min.
Figure 6. The cross-sectional macroscopic morphology of the SZ at various traverse speeds: (a) 30 mm/min; (b) 60 mm/min; (c) 90 mm/min; and (d) 120 mm/min.
Materials 17 02348 g006
Materials 17 02348 g007
Figure 7. Metallographic microstructure of the SZ at various traverse speeds: (a) before FSP; (b) 30 mm/min; (c) 60 mm/min; (d) 90 mm/min; and (e) 120 mm/min.
Figure 7. Metallographic microstructure of the SZ at various traverse speeds: (a) before FSP; (b) 30 mm/min; (c) 60 mm/min; (d) 90 mm/min; and (e) 120 mm/min.
Materials 17 02348 g007
Materials 17 02348 g008
Figure 8. SEM images of the SZ at various traverse speeds: (a) before FSP; (b) 30 mm/min; (c) 60 mm/min; (d) 90 mm/min; (e) 120 mm/min; and (f) magnification of the marked zone in (c).
Figure 8. SEM images of the SZ at various traverse speeds: (a) before FSP; (b) 30 mm/min; (c) 60 mm/min; (d) 90 mm/min; (e) 120 mm/min; and (f) magnification of the marked zone in (c).
Materials 17 02348 g008
Materials 17 02348 g009
Figure 9. Microhardness distribution of the cladding layer after FSP.
Figure 9. Microhardness distribution of the cladding layer after FSP.
Materials 17 02348 g009
Materials 17 02348 g010
Figure 10. Tensile properties of the samples.
Figure 10. Tensile properties of the samples.
Materials 17 02348 g010
Materials 17 02348 g011
Figure 11. Fracture morphology of the samples: (a) before FSP; (b) 30 mm/min; (c) 60 mm/min; (d) 90 mm/min; and (e) 120 mm/min.
Figure 11. Fracture morphology of the samples: (a) before FSP; (b) 30 mm/min; (c) 60 mm/min; (d) 90 mm/min; and (e) 120 mm/min.
Materials 17 02348 g011
Table 1. Chemical components of the materials (wt.%).
Table 1. Chemical components of the materials (wt.%).
MaterialsAlZnMnFeSiNiCuMg
Substrate8.700.580.240.00200.0200.001000.0050Bal.
Wire8.990.650.260.00180.0370.000430.0025Bal.
Table 2. CMT cladding parameters.
Table 2. CMT cladding parameters.
ParametersValue
Wire feed speed (m/min)12
Traverse speed (m/min)0.3
Flow rate of the shielding gas (L/min)15
Inter-pass cooling time (s)120
Table 3. FSP parameters.
Table 3. FSP parameters.
Test NumberRotation Speed (r/min)Traverse Speed (mm/min)
130030
230060
330090
4300120
Table 4. Average grain size and average microhardness of the samples.
Table 4. Average grain size and average microhardness of the samples.
ParametersAverage Grain Size (μm)Average Microhardness (HV0.1)
before FSP17.673.2
30 mm/min6.280.0
60 mm/min5.685.6
90 mm/min3.482.8
120 mm/min6.081.0
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, H.; Shen, J.; Hu, S.; Zhen, Y.; Chen, Y. AZ91 Magnesium Alloy CMT Cladding Layer Processed Using Friction Stir Processing: Effect of Traverse Speed on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties. Materials 2024, 17, 2348. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17102348

AMA Style

Zhao H, Shen J, Hu S, Zhen Y, Chen Y. AZ91 Magnesium Alloy CMT Cladding Layer Processed Using Friction Stir Processing: Effect of Traverse Speed on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties. Materials. 2024; 17(10):2348. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17102348

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Huichao, Junqi Shen, Shengsun Hu, Yahui Zhen, and Yang Chen. 2024. "AZ91 Magnesium Alloy CMT Cladding Layer Processed Using Friction Stir Processing: Effect of Traverse Speed on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties" Materials 17, no. 10: 2348. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17102348

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop