Next Article in Journal
Prebiotics, Probiotics, and Synbiotics—A Research Hotspot for Pediatric Obesity
Next Article in Special Issue
High-Throughput Short Sequence Typing Schemes for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Pure Culture and Environmental DNA
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Mould Exposure of Immunosuppressed Patients at a German University Hospital
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 11
Issue 11
10.3390/microorganisms11112653
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Taxifolin as a Metallo-β-Lactamase Inhibitor in Combination with Augmentin against Verona Imipenemase 2 Expressing Pseudomonas aeruginosa

by
Bogdan M. Benin
1,
Trae Hillyer
1,
Aylin S. Crugnale
1,
Andrew Fulk
1,
Caitlyn A. Thomas
2,
Michael W. Crowder
2,
Matthew A. Smith
1,3 and
Woo Shik Shin
1,*
1
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH 44272, USA
2
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA
3
Akron Children’s Hospital, Rebecca D. Considine Research Institute, Akron, OH 44302, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(11), 2653; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11112653
Submission received: 15 September 2023 / Revised: 23 October 2023 / Accepted: 25 October 2023 / Published: 28 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Pathogenicity, Drug Resistance Mechanisms and Interaction with the Host)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Among the various mechanisms that bacteria use to develop antibiotic resistance, the multiple expression of β-lactamases is particularly problematic, threatening public health and increasing patient mortality rates. Even if a combination therapy—in which a β-lactamase inhibitor is administered together with a β-lactam antibiotic—has proven effective against serine-β-lactamases, there are no currently approved metallo-β-lactamase inhibitors. Herein, we demonstrate that quercetin and its analogs are promising starting points for the further development of safe and effective metallo-β-lactamase inhibitors. Through a combined computational and in vitro approach, taxifolin was found to inhibit VIM-2 expressing P. aeruginosa cell proliferation at <4 μg/mL as part of a triple combination with amoxicillin and clavulanate. Furthermore, we tested this combination in mice with abrasive skin infections. Together, these results demonstrate that flavonol compounds, such as taxifolin, may be developed into effective metallo-β-lactamase inhibitors.

1. Introduction

Since the discovery of β-lactam antibiotics more than five decades ago, a huge decline in mortality rates has occurred. These antibiotics still serve as important primary-line treatments against common bacterial infections; however, resistance to β-lactam antibiotics, especially among the ESKAPE pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter spp.), threatens global public health while every year costing upwards of USD 4 billion due to community and hospital-acquired infections and causing over 23,000 deaths [1]. One of the major drivers of this resistance is the expression of β-lactamase enzymes that cleave β-lactam rings, rendering β-lactam antibiotics inactive. β-lactamases are classified into four classes: serine (classes A, C, and D; SBL) and metallo (class B) β-lactamases (MBLs). The primary difference between these classes is that SBLs utilize a catalytic serine residue, whereas metallo-β-lactamases utilize metal-activated water as a nucleophile for β-lactam hydrolysis [2]. Combining β-lactamase inhibitors (BLis) with β-lactam antibiotics is the only effective way to overcome β-lactam drug resistance while using the current antibiotic arsenal. Today, three classes, with six different drugs, of FDA-approved SBLis exist based on β-lactams (sulbactam, tazobactam, and clavulanate), 1,6-diazabicyclo octanes (avibactam, relebactam), and boron-based (vaborbactam) scaffolds. Still, and critically, none of these available inhibitors are effective against the most common MBLs, such as New Delhi MBL 1 (NDM-1) or Verona imipenemase 2 (VIM-2), which have emerged as major threats in recent years [3,4,5,6,7].
To inhibit MBLs, two strategies targeting the active site have been devised: (i) zinc sequestration/stripping and (ii) direct binding to zinc in the active site (i.e., competitive inhibition or ternary complex formation) [8]. Although Zn stripping agents or very strong chelators (e.g., N,N,N′N′-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or aspergillomarasmine A) have been demonstrated as effective MBL inhibitors [9,10,11,12,13,14,15], these agents are non-specific, and several reports have detailed the evolution of mutated MBLs exhibiting higher Zn affinities and greater antibiotic resistance promoted by Zn-limited conditions [7,14,16,17].
As a result of these limitations, more attention has been given to the research and development of inhibitors that interact directly with the zinc at the active site without sequestration. These promise, through the greater selectivity of enzymatic active sites, to be safer and more effective. Currently, two such inhibitors are in phase 1 and phase 3 clinical trials: QPX7728 and taniborbactam, respectively [18,19,20]. These are both based on boronic acids and have demonstrated broad-spectrum MBL and SBL inhibition. Still, these inhibitors are not equally active against all MBL classes, their mechanisms remain unclear and, although highly promising, they remain under investigation [17].
Typically, potential candidates must be able to (i) act as weak metal chelators, (ii) prevent the degradation of β-lactam antibiotics to restore their primary activity, and (iii) access the active site of enzymes. Flavonols, and quercetin more specifically, have been sporadically reported, with various studies suggesting that they may exhibit beneficial biological activities such as anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, anti-viral properties, etc. [21,22,23,24,25,26]. Now, however, these have received renewed attention as they have been demonstrated to successfully satisfy these three criteria for MBL inhibition (metal chelation, active binding site access, β-lactam cleavage prevention) and have been shown via solution NMR to bind to the active site of NDM-1 [21].
The first of these criteria, metal chelation, is achieved by the presence of various donor atoms on adjacent carbons. Although two possible binding sites exist (catechol and a β-hydroxyketone-like group), a Zn-quercetin complex was recently synthesized and demonstrates that quercetin acts as a bidentate ligand via the β-hydroxyketone-like functionality [27]. Importantly, quercetin binds Zn far weaker than other chelators and other metalloenzymes (Kd ~ 10−4), supporting the notion that it will be effective without metal-stripping and without disrupting other enzymes [28].
Reports on the second criterion, inhibition of the enzymatic cleavage of β-lactams, have thus far been scarce, although the concept of metalloenzyme inhibition by flavonols has been discussed since the 1990s [29,30]. One of the initial studies that focused on the ability of quercetin to act as an MBL inhibitor was published by West et al., in which quercetin and galangin were demonstrated to inhibit the MBL (L1) expressed by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia [31]. However, the inhibitor–enzyme conjugate structure was only demonstrated theoretically, and, although promising, the authors did not demonstrate the inhibition of β-lactam hydrolysis in bacterial studies.
Only recently, in 2020, was the third criterion demonstrated to be fulfilled by Morellet et al. who solved, for the first time, a flavonol-MBL (NDM-1) structure through the use of solution nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy [21]. The authors solved the structures for several NDM-1-flavonol conjugates with quercetin, myricetin, and morin. This not only demonstrated that these could act as competitive NDM-1 inhibitors, but it also indirectly validated the earlier, theoretical placement of galangin in the L1 active site. The authors also demonstrated that quercetin and its analogs, once bound to the NDM-1 active site, could effectively block the hydrolysis of imipenem. Their work joins others in demonstrating the capability of flavonols to act as effective MBLis. Other works have also supported this finding by treating clinical isolates with quercetin-containing combination therapies; however, these have generally not been focused on the ability of quercetin to inhibit MBLs, and some studies utilized non-resistant strains or non-β-lactam antibiotics [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42]. Of these, only Eumkeb et al. directly mentioned quercetin as a potential MBLi, but without reference to any specific MBL. This lack of control over MBL-type has insofar represented one of the key gaps in our current understanding of flavonol inhibitors, and it is unknown how well quercetin will interact with other MBLs (e.g., VIM, IMP, etc.).
Given the promising demonstration of NDM-1 inhibition by ternary complex formation with quercetin, myricetin, and morin, we sought to determine if this activity was also present against VIM-2—another class B1 MBL with widespread prevalence and culpable for a large portion of carbapenem treatment failures in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) infection cases [3,43,44,45]. We have, therefore, focused our current efforts on PA expressing VIM-2, as this pathogen is not only highly prevalent in hospital-acquired infections, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, but it is also known to harbor, share, and express this MBL. Even newly approved treatments, which have not yet been widely adopted throughout the world, such as cefidericol, are only effective against some MBL-producing PA strains [46], necessitating the continued discovery and development of safe and effective inhibitors.
Herein, we demonstrate that some quercetin–analog compounds may be promising scaffolds for the further development of combination therapies aimed at successfully treating VIM-2-producing PA. Our combined computational, in vitro, and in vivo study of a series of quercetin–analog compounds demonstrates that taxifolin, specifically, provides promise even without further development or optimization when combined with amoxicillin and clavulanate in treating VIM-2 expressing PA.

2. Materials and Methods

Quercetin, its analogs, and nitrocefin were purchased from the Cayman Chemical company (Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Ten mM stock solutions were prepared with H2O or DMSO (Sigma Alrdich, St. Louis, MO, USA, ≥99.9%). All materials were used as received without further purification. Assays were performed with biological triplicates.

2.1. Docking Studies

Modeling and docking studies were carried out with the Maestro Schrodinger 2022-2 software package (Schrodinger, Inc.; New York, NY, USA). Computational studies were based on NMR and X-ray structures (PDB: 6TTA and 4C1D). Proteins were prepared through the standard workflow, which includes adding missing sidechains and hydrogens as well as energy minimization using the OPLS-2005 force field. Glide docking was utilized to generate docking scores and compare models [47,48]. For each compound, a minimum of 5 poses were included. A two-tailed unpaired t-test was utilized to determine statistical significance. The resulting average, standard deviation, and p-value were reported.

2.2. Biochemical Assays

Nitrocefin was used as the substrate, as it is a chromogenic cephalosporin. The activity of purified VIM-2 was measured spectrophotometrically (Cytation 3, BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA) in a potassium phosphate buffer (PBS, pH = 7.4, prepared according to a published recipe) [49]. Nitrocefin concentrations ranging from 8 µM to 120 µM were utilized. The formation of the hydrolyzed product is measured at 486 nm at intervals of 10 s for at least 30 min until a plateau in product formation is observed [50,51,52]. The Km and kcat values were determined by plotting initial velocity measurements followed by fitting with a non-linear regression Michaelis–Menten kinetic model in OriginLab 2022b (OriginLab Corp., Northhampton, MA, USA).
The inhibitor constants (Ki) were determined following a similar approach, where the inhibitor was fixed at 500 μM with nitrocefin ranging from 5 to 100 μM. A blank consisting of DMSO, PBS, and the inhibitor was utilized to subtract any potential absorbance from the colored inhibitors at 486 nm. Each inhibitor was pre-incubated with the VIM-2 enzyme for 10 min at room temperature, and then the absorbance at 486 nm was measured and evaluated using a competitive inhibition model in Origin 2022b using the previously determined Km value.
Single-dose enzyme inhibition was determined by comparing the absorbance of the hydrolyzed nitrocefin (λ = 486 nm) after several time points (e.g., 5 min, 30 min, 1 h) between various samples of purified TEM-1 (10 nM) with and without inhibitors. Quercetin analog inhibitors were tested at concentrations of 500 μM, whereas known covalent inhibitors (clavulanate, sulbactam, tazobactam, vaborbactam) had concentrations of 50 μM. Enzymes were pre-incubated with inhibitors for 10 min at room temperature prior to their addition to nitrocefin (final nitrocefin concentration of 120 μM).

2.3. Bacteria Transformation

Starting with bioluminescent PA (PAX5), we developed a VIM-2 expressing strain of PAX5 (PAX5VIM-2). VIM-2 plasmid was isolated using the protocol provided by New England BioLabs, Inc. with their Monarch Plasmid Miniprep Kit. The transformation was carried out following a previously published procedure utilizing electroporation [53]. After incubation in recovery media, bacteria (100 μL) were plated on Luria–Bertani Agar (LBA) containing 50 μg/mL of kanamycin and incubated overnight at 37 °C. The following day, samples were taken and added to LB broth and incubated overnight at 37 °C with agitation (120 rpm). To test whether VIM-2 was expressed, disc diffusion assays with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and single-dose inhibition assays were carried out.

2.4. Disc Diffusion Assay

Bacteria cultured overnight were diluted to an optical density of 0.08–0.1 at 600 nm. Kirby–Bauer discs containing either 10 μg meropenem or 10 μg meropenem with 930 μg EDTA were added to the inoculated Müller–Hinton Agar (MHA) plates and incubated overnight at 37 °C [54,55,56]. The following day, photos and luminescence images were recorded to determine the inhibition zones around each disc.

2.5. Single-Dose Inhibition Assay

Bacteria were diluted to 5 × 105 CFU/mL in MH broth (MHB). A growth control containing only bacteria and a negative control containing only MHB were added. Test wells were treated with either 25 µM meropenem, ceftazidime, amoxicillin, or doripenem, as well as 1:1 combinations of the previous antibiotics with vaborbactam. Each set was repeated in triplicate, and the final viability was determined in reference to the growth control.

2.6. Luminescence Imaging

Luminescent images were obtained using the IVIS® Lumina XRMS Series III (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) in bioluminescence imaging mode. Exposure times were automatically determined by the LivingImage Software (version 4.5.5) with medium binning.

2.7. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Assay

MIC assays were carried out following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) established guidelines using MHB-2 and bacterial concentrations of 5 × 105 CFU/mL [57,58]. A varying concentration of quercetin derivatives or conventional antibiotics was dissolved in the media with bacteria cells. The resulting suspensions were transferred to a 96-well microliter plate at 200 μL/well (triplicate for each compound). The plate was then incubated overnight at 37 °C. The MIC was determined as the concentration at which no growth was observed.

2.8. In Vivo Treatment of the Murine Skin Wound Model

VIM-2 expressing bioluminescent PA (PAX5VIM-2) was grown overnight in LB broth. The overnight culture was then centrifuged, the media removed, and the pellet was resuspended in PBS. This suspension was later used to inoculate the mice. The experiment used fewer mice since each mouse had a paired control and test infection on the back. Three mice (JAX Swiss outbred), aged 15 weeks of age, were anesthetized with 3–5% isoflurane. Anesthesia was maintained with 2–3% isoflurane. Mice were then shaved, and the dorsal skin was scrubbed with povidone and washed away with 70% ethanol. A clear plastic template with a square 1 cm2 cutout was used to demarcate the corners of the planned needle-scratch grid. A 25G, 1½ needle was then used to carefully create the abrasive wound, with caution being paid not to deeply lacerate (see Supplementary Note S1 for additional details). Having created the two sets of wounds, PAX5VIM-2 (20 µL) was added via a pipette to each wound. Mice were kept under anesthesia using the attached XGI-8 Gas Anesthesia System from Caliper LifeSciences. IVIS images were taken after 24 h, and this was determined to be the start point of the experiment (t = 0). Treatments were given while the animals were anesthetized by adding either the QATC (4:1:2, 50 µM amoxicillin, 12.5 µM clavulanate, 25 µM taxifolin in DMSO) or DMSO (control treatment) directly to the wound area at t = 0, 2, 4, 8, 24 h. IVIS images were taken once per day prior to any planned treatment. Following the final treatment at t = 24, IVIS images were taken for an additional 2 days. After that point, biopsies of the infected tissue were taken using a 6 mm biopsy punch. To each biopsy, 1 mL of PBS was added, and the tissue was homogenized. The slurry was diluted 10,000×, and 50 µL was plated onto LBA and incubated overnight at 37 °C. Colonies were counted the following day.

2.9. Statistical Methods

Statistical analysis was performed using OriginLab. For computational docking studies, a two-tailed unpaired t-test was used to test for significance between the docking of two compounds. For in vivo studies, both one-way ANOVA and paired sample t-tests were utilized to investigate statistical significance. All tests were performed with a p-value < 0.005 being considered significant. In vitro studies were performed with biological triplicates.

3. Results and Discussion

In order to examine the potential binding mode between quercetin analogs and VIM-2 protein, we carried out a protein–ligand docking analysis (Figure 1). The previously reported NMR-based structure of NDM-1 metallo-β-lactamase complex with quercetin (PDB: 6TTA) served as a template, demonstrating the binding modes and interactions that may be expected from the VIM-2 protein (PDB: 4C1D) since the active sites are highly conserved among these related β-lactamase enzymes (Figure 1a,b; Supplementary Figure S1). The final docking model of quercetin with VIM-2 is predicted to exhibit very similar docking features as NDM-1. Some changes near the binding site of VIM-2, such as Phe62 in place of Met67 and the presence of the nearby Tyr67, further stabilize the quercetin ligand within the binding site through aromatic π-π interactions (Figure 1c). Additionally, the catechol moiety of quercetin is also able, in this static model, to hydrogen bond with the nearby Glu146. Furthermore, the Zn-O bond distances are predicted to agree with those previously determined in the NDM-1/quercetin model, suggesting stable binding to the metal ions within the active site. Together, these various factors, which appear to occur due to a more closed active site, result in several predicted poses having similar or more stable positions with acceptable glide scores compared to the NDM-1 redocked quercetin template model (Figure 1d). It is important to note that in both enzymes, the catechol moiety could be found in our model to bind to the Zn ions; however, the previously published structure of NDM-1/quercetin did not observe this binding moiety, and it has not been observed in synthetic analog complexes [27,59,60]. We have, therefore, disregarded these results, although it may be possible that they can exist for VIM-2, as the predicted docking scores were more stable with this enzyme (Supplementary Figure S2).
Given the similarity of docking scores between the NDM-1 and VIM-2 bindings of quercetin, we hypothesized that quercetin and its analogs may be potentially utilized as metallo-β-lactamase inhibitors against VIM-2-expressing pathogens. Through a high-throughput screening approach, we identified 20 analogs for further in vitro testing (Figure 2). While most of these compounds are related through various amounts or locations of hydroxyl groups, several, denoted by letters b–d, were glycated.
To determine the efficacy of these compounds in vitro, a VIM-2 plasmid was transformed into a bioluminescent PA cell line (Xen 5, PerkinElmer; ATCC 19660, henceforth referred to as PAX5,) to establish PAX5VIM-2 cells. A monarch plasmid isolation kit (New England BioLabs, Inc.; Ipswich, MA, USA) was used to isolate a VIM-2 plasmid from in-house plasmid pet24a-VIM-2-transformed BL21(DE3) E. coli cells.
With this isolated plasmid, a previously established protocol for transformation via electroporation was utilized to transform the commercially acquired PAX5 to PAX5VIM-2 [53,61]. The successful transformation was verified utilizing both disc diffusion assays and a comparative single-dose assay against the wild type PAX5 (PAX5-WT) and PAX5VIM-2 (Supplementary Figure S4). In both cases, the assays support the expression of the VIM-2 metallo-β-lactamase, given the fact that PAX5-WT has genes encoding for SBLs (blaOxa and blaAmpC) [62].
Based on our findings and the previous report of NDM-1 binding with quercetin (PDB ID: 6TTA), myricetin (PDB ID: 6TTAC), and morin (PDB ID: 6TT8), we hypothesized that the proper use of quercetin and its analogs would be as a part of a triple combination (QATC) containing a β-lactam (e.g., amoxicillin), an SBLi, and a quercetin analog compound. To determine the optimal ratio of QATC, we first determined the MIC of amoxicillin to be 100 µM or 36 µg/mL, followed by the MIC of clavulanate with amoxicillin (Supplementary Figure S5).
Observing that a 1:1 molar ratio of these compounds was enough to inhibit PAX5VIM-2 cell growth, we chose to test the efficacy of our chosen analogs in combination with a 2:1 molar ratio of amoxicillin to clavulanate (a roughly 7:1 ratio by mass, which is intermediate in the possible ratios of augmentin; Figure 3a). The single-dose results indicated that many of the analogs performed similarly well, with the majority of those tested nearly doubling the efficacy of the QATC vs. augmentin. Quercetin analogs with more than 90% of cell growth inhibition were chosen for further testing in order to determine the MIC of their respective QATCs (Figure 3b). MIC analysis revealed that compounds #4 (quercetagetin), #5 (taxifolin), and #14 (chrysoeriol) were the most potent inhibitors against PAX5VIM-2. Importantly, glycation, although predicted to be a potentially useful strategy for inhibition, was found to be generally less effective. Furthermore, we determined that many of these investigational compounds were effectively non-toxic when tested against wild type human HEK 293T cells (Figure 3b, Supplementary Table S1).
To better determine its enzyme-level kinetic inhibition activity and target specificity via its binding mode, the kinetic assays of VIM-2 inhibition and computational docking studies were performed for these compounds for comparison (Figure 4).
Kinetics studies were carried out using nitrocefin as a colorimetric indicator, with the hydrolyzed product measured at 486 nm [52]. The KM of our VIM-2 was found to be higher than what is typically reported; however, this may be a result of our use of PBS rather than other buffers, such as HEPES [63]. The discrepancy is also unlikely to be related to metalation, as low Zn, one Zn, and two Zn kinetics have been previously determined, and the KM values have been observed to vary only slightly [6]. Instead, it was typically observed that kcat was more significantly affected; however, two Zn kcat values agree with our determined result of 18.85 ± 1.96 s−1 (Supplementary Figure S6).
In agreement with the previously shown MIC values, #4, #5, and #13 were found to be the best inhibitors, with no statistical difference in their Ki values (Figure 4a). However, #5, which consistently showed reproducible inhibition, was selected as a candidate for further investigation. In the docking study, #5 was found to bind in a similar fashion as #1a (quercetin) at the binding site of the VIM-2 enzyme compared with the previous modeling study (Figure 4b). The predicted docking poses indicate that the nearby Asp117 and Arg205 participate in hydrogen binding, helping to stabilize the inhibitor within the active site (Supplementary Figure S7). These factors appear to result in a significantly lower (better) docking score for #5 than #1a (−8.01 ± 0.57 kcal/mol vs.−6.74 ± 0.48 kcal/mol, p < 0.01, Figure 4c). It is also likely that the greater flexibility of #5, owing to its reduced unsaturation compared to #1a, allows this molecule to adopt more conformations that are more favorable to fit into the binding site of the enzyme. Additionally, the ligand metal bond distances are predicted to be similar to those found in the published 6TTA crystal structure, with an average bond length of 2.70 Å vs. 2.64 Å, respectively (Figure 4d). The slightly longer average bond distance for the predicted #5-VIM-2 model may be explained by the more neutral position of #5 between the two Zn ions, whereas quercetin in the 6TTA structure is much closer and angled toward Zn(1). Recently, a report was published describing the potential of quercetin and its analog compounds to act as SBLis [64]. Throughout our investigation, we were unable to observe significant inhibition without the addition of clavulanate, suggesting that these compounds may only have very narrow SBL coverage. Having only purified TEM-1 available (class A), we tested the single-dose inhibition of this enzyme by these analogs in comparison with established SBLis (clavulanate, sulbactam, vaborbactam, and tazobactam; Supplementary Figure S8). No inhibition by analog compounds was observed, suggesting that these compounds, if able to inhibit some SBLs, may have limited coverage and may still be better suited as MBLis. Furthermore, we confirmed with SBL-only PAX5-WT that taxifolin was unable to provide any significant benefit in the killing. This further supports our hypothesis that these polyphenols are predominantly MBLis (Supplementary Figure S9).
To explore the therapeutic potential of #5 as a VIM-2 inhibitor, we used a murine skin wound infection model to perform a test of QATC. This model was chosen for several reasons. (i) The use of a localized, small infection allows for a significant reduction in the number of mice as well as a direct comparison between treatments and controls, (ii) The direct application of a test compound to the skin allows for more rapid efficacy testing without requiring significant efforts to be spent on potential solubility, absorption, metabolism, or excretion problems. (iii) Skin and soft tissue infections with PA are common with >10% isolation while typically resulting in greater lengths of stay and patient cost due to frequently inappropriate treatment [65,66,67]. Furthermore, without proper therapy, skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) can progress and become life-threatening. Additionally, multiple strategies exist on how to generate skin wounds. These differ by the depth and regularity of the wound and may consist of burns, abrasions, superficial or deep incisional wounds, and excisional wounds extending to the underlying muscle and fascia [66,68,69]. Previous reports have utilized these various methodologies with PA at concentrations ranging from 102 to 108 CFU. Based on these publications, we chose a needle-scratch method for generating an abrasive skin wound, as this approach has been reported to result in more stable infections with PA compared to an easier-to-perform excisional approach.
Briefly, two square grids of needle scratches (each having an area of 1 cm2) were created on the backs of each mouse. Each grid was inoculated with PAX5VIM-2 (20 μL, 2.4 × 109 CFU, in PBS; Figure 5a,b, Supplementary Figure S10; Supplementary Note S1). IVIS images were taken once daily prior to any treatments. Based on our previous in vitro studies, the QATC combination was prepared to contain 50 µM amoxicillin, 12.5 µM clavulanate, and 25 µM taxifolin. DMSO was used as the control. Treatments were applied daily for four days. Bioluminescence images were taken daily, and the radiative flux (photons/sec/cm2) was tracked as a measure of how the bacterial concentration changed over time (Supplementary Figure S11). In both cases, the treatment and control populations decreased with time, but the wounds treated with the QATC decreased to a greater extent due to the initially higher bacterial concentration in the infection (Figure 5b).
The mice skin wound infectious model test was performed in triplicate, and the corresponding IVIS mice image was successfully acquired (Supplementary Figure S10). As evidenced by the large difference in bioluminescent signal intensity, we consider the QATC therapy to be promising for treating P. aeruginosa, which maintains sustained expression of VIM-2 β-lactamases. QATC-treated infections showed significant variation in ROI reduction, indicating that most bacteria were effectively killed, and QATC treatment appears to reduce bacterial load (based on bioluminescent intensity) compared with the control.

4. Conclusions

Through combined in silico modeling, in vitro, and in vivo approaches, we have demonstrated that quercetin analog compounds, specifically taxifolin, are promising candidates for further derivitization and development into VIM-2 MBLis. In addition to the measured low toxicity, the utilization of taxifolin as a VIM-2 MBLi is a promising lead for expanding the use of current FDA-approved SBL-targeting combination treatments. The current lack of approved MBLis requires continued innovation and discovery of alternative structures that can inhibit the action of MBLs and be combined with current SBLs into triple therapies that are capable of addressing the threat of drug-resistant ESKAPE pathogens while also preserving the use of β-lactam antibiotics.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms11112653/s1, Figure S1: Multiple sequence viewer comparison of NDM-1 (6TTA) and VIM-2 (4C1D) amino acid sequences; Figure S2: Catechol binding pose is predicted to potentially occur in quercetin/VIM-2 inhibition; Figure S3: Ligand interaction diagram for quercetin bound to VIM-2; Figure S4: Transformation and single-dose testing of VIM-2 expressing BLPA; Figure S5: MIC vs. BLPAVIM-2 of amoxicillin (a) and clavulanate (b); Figure S6: VIM-2 enzyme kinetics; Figure S7: Ligand interaction diagram for #5 (taxifolin) bound to VIM-2; Figure S8: Single-dose inhibition of quercetin analogs against serine-β-lactamase and TEM-1; Figure S9: Single dose inhibition of taxifolin against SBL-producing PAX5-WT; Figure S10: IVIS image of PBS (left) and PAX5VIM-2 (right) used to inoculate mice; Figure S11: In vivo treatment of murine wound models infected with PAX5VIM-2.

Author Contributions

B.M.B. and W.S.S. performed computational screening and docking studies. B.M.B. transformed prepared VIM-2 expressing PA. B.M.B. and T.H. performed in vitro studies. B.M.B. and T.H. performed kinetics measurements. B.M.B., A.S.C., A.F. and M.A.S. performed the in vivo studies. C.A.T. and M.W.C. provided the purified VIM-2 enzyme. B.M.B. analyzed the results. B.M.B. and W.S.S. wrote the manuscript. W.S.S. supervised the work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants (1R01AG076699 to Woo Shik Shin, R15 GM134454 to Michael Crowder) and a Start-up/Translational research seed grant from Northeast Ohio Medical University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All animal procedures were performed in accordance with the Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC, Protocol # 21-03-295) of the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Northeast Ohio Medical University.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

Research support for Woo Shik Shin was provided by the Northeast Ohio Medical University, College of Pharmacy. The Northeast Ohio Medical University Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences provided all the necessary research resources.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Nelson, R.E.; Hatfield, K.M.; Wolford, H.; Samore, M.H.; Scott, R.D.; Reddy, S.C.; Olubajo, B.; Paul, P.; Jernigan, J.A.; Baggs, J. National Estimates of Healthcare Costs Associated With Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Infections Among Hospitalized Patients in the United States. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 72, S17–S26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lisa, M.N.; Palacios, A.R.; Aitha, M.; Gonzalez, M.M.; Moreno, D.M.; Crowder, M.W.; Bonomo, R.A.; Spencer, J.; Tierney, D.L.; Llarrull, L.I.; et al. A general reaction mechanism for carbapenem hydrolysis by mononuclear and binuclear metallo-beta-lactamases. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Salimraj, R.; Hinchliffe, P.; Kosmopoulou, M.; Tyrrell, J.M.; Brem, J.; van Berkel, S.S.; Verma, A.; Owens, R.J.; McDonough, M.A.; Walsh, T.R.; et al. Crystal structures of VIM-1 complexes explain active site heterogeneity in VIM-class metallo-beta-lactamases. FEBS J. 2019, 286, 169–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Carcione, D.; Siracusa, C.; Sulejmani, A.; Leoni, V.; Intra, J. Old and New Beta-Lactamase Inhibitors: Molecular Structure, Mechanism of Action, and Clinical Use. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Shapiro, A.B.; Moussa, S.H.; McLeod, S.M.; Durand-Reville, T.; Miller, A.A. Durlobactam, a New Diazabicyclooctane beta-Lactamase Inhibitor for the Treatment of Acinetobacter Infections in Combination with Sulbactam. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 709974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Aitha, M.; Marts, A.R.; Bergstrom, A.; Moller, A.J.; Moritz, L.; Turner, L.; Nix, J.C.; Bonomo, R.A.; Page, R.C.; Tierney, D.L.; et al. Biochemical, mechanistic, and spectroscopic characterization of metallo-beta-lactamase VIM-2. Biochemistry 2014, 53, 7321–7331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mojica, M.F.; Rossi, M.-A.; Vila, A.J.; Bonomo, R.A. The urgent need for metallo-β-lactamase inhibitors: An unattended global threat. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2022, 22, e28–e34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ju, L.C.; Cheng, Z.; Fast, W.; Bonomo, R.A.; Crowder, M.W. The Continuing Challenge of Metallo-beta-Lactamase Inhibition: Mechanism Matters. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2018, 39, 635–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nyborg, J.K.; Peersen, O.B. That zincing feeling: The effects of EDTA on the behaviour of zinc-binding transcriptional regulators. Biochem. J. 2004, 381, e3–e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Palzkill, T. Metallo-beta-lactamase structure and function. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2013, 1277, 91–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yamaguchi, Y.; Ding, S.; Murakami, E.; Imamura, K.; Fuchigami, S.; Hashiguchi, R.; Yutani, K.; Mori, H.; Suzuki, S.; Arakawa, Y.; et al. A demetallation method for IMP-1 metallo-beta-lactamase with restored enzymatic activity upon addition of metal ion(s). Chembiochem 2011, 12, 1979–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Paul-Soto, R.; Bauer, R.; Frere, J.M.; Galleni, M.; Meyer-Klaucke, W.; Nolting, H.; Rossolini, G.M.; de Seny, D.; Hernandez-Valladares, M.; Zeppezauer, M.; et al. Mono- and binuclear Zn2+-beta-lactamase. Role of the conserved cysteine in the catalytic mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 13242–13249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. King, A.M.; Reid-Yu, S.A.; Wang, W.; King, D.T.; De Pascale, G.; Strynadka, N.C.; Walsh, T.R.; Coombes, B.K.; Wright, G.D. Aspergillomarasmine A overcomes metallo-beta-lactamase antibiotic resistance. Nature 2014, 510, 503–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rotondo, C.M.; Sychantha, D.; Koteva, K.; Wright, G.D. Suppression of beta-Lactam Resistance by Aspergillomarasmine A Is Influenced by both the Metallo-beta-Lactamase Target and the Antibiotic Partner. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e01386-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bergstrom, A.; Katko, A.; Adkins, Z.; Hill, J.; Cheng, Z.; Burnett, M.; Yang, H.; Aitha, M.; Mehaffey, M.R.; Brodbelt, J.S.; et al. Probing the Interaction of Aspergillomarasmine A with Metallo-beta-lactamases NDM-1, VIM-2, and IMP-7. ACS Infect. Dis. 2018, 4, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bahr, G.; Vitor-Horen, L.; Bethel, C.R.; Bonomo, R.A.; Gonzalez, L.J.; Vila, A.J. Clinical Evolution of New Delhi Metallo-beta-Lactamase (NDM) Optimizes Resistance under Zn(II) Deprivation. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e01849-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Bahr, G.; Gonzalez, L.J.; Vila, A.J. Metallo-beta-lactamases in the Age of Multidrug Resistance: From Structure and Mechanism to Evolution, Dissemination, and Inhibitor Design. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 7957–8094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tsivkovski, R.; Totrov, M.; Lomovskaya, O. Biochemical Characterization of QPX7728, a New Ultrabroad-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Inhibitor of Serine and Metallo-Beta-Lactamases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e00130-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Liu, B.; Trout, R.E.L.; Chu, G.H.; McGarry, D.; Jackson, R.W.; Hamrick, J.C.; Daigle, D.M.; Cusick, S.M.; Pozzi, C.; De Luca, F.; et al. Discovery of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133): A Broad-Spectrum Serine- and Metallo-beta-lactamase Inhibitor for Carbapenem-Resistant Bacterial Infections. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 2789–2801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Hecker, S.J.; Reddy, K.R.; Lomovskaya, O.; Griffith, D.C.; Rubio-Aparicio, D.; Nelson, K.; Tsivkovski, R.; Sun, D.; Sabet, M.; Tarazi, Z.; et al. Discovery of Cyclic Boronic Acid QPX7728, an Ultrabroad-Spectrum Inhibitor of Serine and Metallo-beta-lactamases. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 7491–7507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Riviere, G.; Oueslati, S.; Gayral, M.; Crechet, J.B.; Nhiri, N.; Jacquet, E.; Cintrat, J.C.; Giraud, F.; van Heijenoort, C.; Lescop, E.; et al. NMR Characterization of the Influence of Zinc(II) Ions on the Structural and Dynamic Behavior of the New Delhi Metallo-beta-Lactamase-1 and on the Binding with Flavonols as Inhibitors. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 10466–10480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yang, D.; Wang, T.; Long, M.; Li, P. Quercetin: Its Main Pharmacological Activity and Potential Application in Clinical Medicine. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 2020, 8825387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wang, J.; Qian, X.; Gao, Q.; Lv, C.; Xu, J.; Jin, H.; Zhu, H. Quercetin increases the antioxidant capacity of the ovary in menopausal rats and in ovarian granulosa cell culture in vitro. J. Ovarian Res. 2018, 11, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Li, Y.; Yao, J.; Han, C.; Yang, J.; Chaudhry, M.T.; Wang, S.; Liu, H.; Yin, Y. Quercetin, Inflammation and Immunity. Nutrients 2016, 8, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Anand David, A.V.; Arulmoli, R.; Parasuraman, S. Overviews of Biological Importance of Quercetin: A Bioactive Flavonoid. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2016, 10, 84–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Maalik, A.; Khan, F.A.; Mumtaz, A.; Mehmood, A.; Azhar, S.; Atif, M.; Karim, S.; Altaf, Y.; Tariq, I. Pharmacological Applications of Quercetin and its Derivatives: A Short Review. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2014, 13, 1561–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Halevas, E.; Mavroidi, B.; Pelecanou, M.; Hatzidimitriou, A.G. Structurally characterized zinc complexes of flavonoids chrysin and quercetin with antioxidant potential. Inorganica Chim. Acta 2021, 523, 120407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bhuiya, S.; Haque, L.; Pradhan, A.B.; Das, S. Inhibitory effects of the dietary flavonoid quercetin on the enzyme activity of zinc(II)-dependent yeast alcohol dehydrogenase: Spectroscopic and molecular docking studies. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 95, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Parellada, J.; Suarez, G.; Guinea, M. Inhibition of zinc metallopeptidases by flavonoids and related phenolic compounds: Structure-activity relationships. J. Enzym. Inhib. 1998, 13, 347–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Parellada, J.; Guinea, M. Flavonoid inhibitors of trypsin and leucine aminopeptidase: A proposed mathematical model for IC50 estimation. J. Nat. Prod. 1995, 58, 823–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Denny, B.J.; Lambert, P.A.; West, P.W. The flavonoid galangin inhibits the L1 metallo-beta-lactamase from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2002, 208, 21–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hossion, A.M.; Zamami, Y.; Kandahary, R.K.; Tsuchiya, T.; Ogawa, W.; Iwado, A.; Sasaki, K. Quercetin diacylglycoside analogues showing dual inhibition of DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV as novel antibacterial agents. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 3686–3703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Vipin, C.; Saptami, K.; Fida, F.; Mujeeburahiman, M.; Rao, S.S.; Athmika; Arun, A.B.; Rekha, P.D. Potential synergistic activity of quercetin with antibiotics against multidrug-resistant clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0241304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lin, R.D.; Chin, Y.P.; Hou, W.C.; Lee, M.H. The effects of antibiotics combined with natural polyphenols against clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Planta Med. 2008, 74, 840–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Sahyon, H.A.; Ramadan, E.N.M.; Mashaly, M.M.A. Synergistic Effect of Quercetin in Combination with Sulfamethoxazole as New Antibacterial Agent: In Vitro and In Vivo Study. Pharm. Chem. J. 2019, 53, 803–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hirai, I.; Okuno, M.; Katsuma, R.; Arita, N.; Tachibana, M.; Yamamoto, Y. Characterisation of anti-Staphylococcus aureus activity of quercetin. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 45, 1250–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Abreu, A.C.; Serra, S.C.; Borges, A.; Saavedra, M.J.; McBain, A.J.; Salgado, A.J.; Simoes, M. Combinatorial Activity of Flavonoids with Antibiotics Against Drug-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Microb. Drug Resist. 2015, 21, 600–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Siriwong, S.; Thumanu, K.; Hengpratom, T.; Eumkeb, G. Synergy and Mode of Action of Ceftazidime plus Quercetin or Luteolin on Streptococcus pyogenes. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 2015, 759459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Siriwong, S.; Teethaisong, Y.; Thumanu, K.; Dunkhunthod, B.; Eumkeb, G. The synergy and mode of action of quercetin plus amoxicillin against amoxicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis. BMC Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2016, 17, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Qu, S.; Dai, C.; Shen, Z.; Tang, Q.; Wang, H.; Zhai, B.; Zhao, L.; Hao, Z. Mechanism of Synergy Between Tetracycline and Quercetin Against Antibiotic Resistant Escherichia coli. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pal, A.; Tripathi, A. Demonstration of bactericidal and synergistic activity of quercetin with meropenem among pathogenic carbapenem resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 143, 104120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kim, M.K.; Jung, M.; Park, K.-H.; Chong, Y. Quercetin-Pivaloxymethyl Conjugate Potentiates Antibiotics againstPseudomonas aeruginosaandAcinetobacter baumannii. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2018, 39, 879–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Poirel, L.; Naas, T.; Nicolas, D.; Collet, L.; Bellais, S.; Cavallo, J.-D.; Nordmann, P. Characterization of VIM-2, a Carbapenem-Hydrolyzing Metallo-β-Lactamase and Its Plasmid- and Integron-Borne Gene from a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clinical Isolate in France. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000, 44, 891–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Docquier, J.D.; Lamotte-Brasseur, J.; Galleni, M.; Amicosante, G.; Frere, J.M.; Rossolini, G.M. On functional and structural heterogeneity of VIM-type metallo-beta-lactamases. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2003, 51, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Livermore, D.M.; Woodford, N. The beta-lactamase threat in Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter. Trends Microbiol. 2006, 14, 413–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Oueslati, S.; Bogaerts, P.; Dortet, L.; Bernabeu, S.; Ben Lakhal, H.; Longshaw, C.; Glupczynski, Y.; Naas, T. In vitro Activity of Cefiderocol and Comparators against Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens from France and Belgium. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Halgren, T.A.; Murphy, R.B.; Friesner, R.A.; Beard, H.S.; Frye, L.L.; Pollard, W.T.; Banks, J.L. Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 1750–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Friesner, R.A.; Banks, J.L.; Murphy, R.B.; Halgren, T.A.; Klicic, J.J.; Mainz, D.T.; Repasky, M.P.; Knoll, E.H.; Shelley, M.; Perry, J.K.; et al. Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 1739–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chazotte, B. Labeling Golgi with fluorescent ceramides. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2012, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shannon, K.; Phillips, I. beta-Lactamase detection by three simple methods: Intralactam, nitrocefin and acidimetric. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1980, 6, 617–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shin, W.S.; Bergstrom, A.; Bonomo, R.A.; Crowder, M.W.; Muthyala, R.; Sham, Y.Y. Discovery of 1-Hydroxypyridine-2(1H)-thione-6-carboxylic Acid as a First-in-Class Low-Cytotoxic Nanomolar Metallo beta-Lactamase Inhibitor. ChemMedChem 2017, 12, 845–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. O’Callaghan, C.H.; Morris, A.; Kirby, S.M.; Shingler, A.H. Novel method for detection of beta-lactamases by using a chromogenic cephalosporin substrate. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1972, 1, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Woodall, C.A. Electroporation of E. coli. E. coli Plasmid Vectors: Methods and Applications; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2003; Volume 235. [Google Scholar]
  54. Bio-Rad. Impregnated Disks for Detecting Metallo-Β-Lactamase (MBL). 2012. Available online: https://commerce.bio-rad.com/webroot/web/pdf/inserts/CDG/en/67936_2012_10_EN.pdf (accessed on 23 January 2023).
  55. Yong, D.; Lee, K.; Yum, J.H.; Shin, H.B.; Rossolini, G.M.; Chong, Y. Imipenem-EDTA disk method for differentiation of metallo-beta-lactamase-producing clinical isolates of Pseudomonas spp. and Acinetobacter spp. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2002, 40, 3798–3801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Pitout, J.D.; Gregson, D.B.; Poirel, L.; McClure, J.A.; Le, P.; Church, D.L. Detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing metallo-beta-lactamases in a large centralized laboratory. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 3129–3135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. EUCAST. MIC Determination of Non-Fastidious and Fastidious Organisms. Available online: https://www.eucast.org/ast_of_bacteria/mic_determination (accessed on 30 January 2023).
  58. CLSI. M100 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; CLSI: Wayne, PA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  59. Liu, Y.; Guo, M. Studies on transition metal-quercetin complexes using electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Molecules 2015, 20, 8583–8594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Dolatabadi, J.E. Molecular aspects on the interaction of quercetin and its metal complexes with DNA. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2011, 48, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Thompson, M.G.; Yildirim, S. Transformation of Acinetobacter baumannii: Electroporation. Acinetobacter Baumannii 2019, 1946, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Pseudomonas Aeruginosa (ATCC® 19660™). Available online: https://genomes.atcc.org/genomes/4a6672c8744d4cdb?tab=annotations-tab (accessed on 13 February 2023).
  63. Leiros, H.K.; Edvardsen, K.S.; Bjerga, G.E.; Samuelsen, O. Structural and biochemical characterization of VIM-26 shows that Leu224 has implications for the substrate specificity of VIM metallo-beta-lactamases. FEBS J. 2015, 282, 1031–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Zhang, Y.; Chen, C.; Cheng, B.; Gao, L.; Qin, C.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, X.; Wang, J.; Wan, Y. Discovery of Quercetin and Its Analogs as Potent OXA-48 Beta-Lactamase Inhibitors. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 926104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kaye, K.S.; Petty, L.A.; Shorr, A.F.; Zilberberg, M.D. Current Epidemiology, Etiology, and Burden of Acute Skin Infections in the United States. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019, 68, S193–S199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Youn, C.; Archer, N.K.; Miller, L.S. Research Techniques Made Simple: Mouse Bacterial Skin Infection Models for Immunity Research. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2020, 140, 1488–1497.e1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Dryden, M.S. Complicated skin and soft tissue infection. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2010, 65 (Suppl. 3), iii35–iii44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Dai, T.; Kharkwal, G.B.; Tanaka, M.; Huang, Y.Y.; Bil de Arce, V.J.; Hamblin, M.R. Animal models of external traumatic wound infections. Virulence 2011, 2, 296–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Avci, P.; Karimi, M.; Sadasivam, M.; Antunes-Melo, W.C.; Carrasco, E.; Hamblin, M.R. In-vivo monitoring of infectious diseases in living animals using bioluminescence imaging. Virulence 2018, 9, 28–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Microorganisms 11 02653 g001
Figure 1. Docking study of quercetin with both NDM-1 and VIM-2. (a) NMR structure of quercetin at the active site of NDM-1 (PDB:6TTA). (b) X-ray crystal structure of the metallo-β-lactamase VIM-2 with L-captopril (PDB: 4C1D). (c) Predicted binding mode of quercetin with VIM-2 active site. (d) Comparison of glide docking scores for quercetin with both NDM-1 and VIM-2. Orange residues have similar locations in both NDM-1 and VIM-2; red residues are different.
Figure 1. Docking study of quercetin with both NDM-1 and VIM-2. (a) NMR structure of quercetin at the active site of NDM-1 (PDB:6TTA). (b) X-ray crystal structure of the metallo-β-lactamase VIM-2 with L-captopril (PDB: 4C1D). (c) Predicted binding mode of quercetin with VIM-2 active site. (d) Comparison of glide docking scores for quercetin with both NDM-1 and VIM-2. Orange residues have similar locations in both NDM-1 and VIM-2; red residues are different.
Microorganisms 11 02653 g001
Microorganisms 11 02653 g002
Figure 2. Structure variety of the quercetin analogs investigated. Cells labeled with v.s. (vide supra) indicate that modification is drawn above.
Figure 2. Structure variety of the quercetin analogs investigated. Cells labeled with v.s. (vide supra) indicate that modification is drawn above.
Microorganisms 11 02653 g002
Microorganisms 11 02653 g003
Figure 3. Cell-based studies against PAX5VIM-2. (a) Single-dose inhibition assays were performed for 18 h. Amoxicillin and augmentin were used as controls, and the compounds were treated in combination with augmentin. All tests were triplicated. (b) Toxicity values of Augmentin+quercetin analogues and of quercetin analogues alone against human kidney cell lines. a quercetin analogs in combination with augmentin. b quercetin analogs alone. * Augmentin was 25 µM amoxicillin and 12.5 µM clavulanate (2:1 ratio) and was tested against HEK293Twt cells.
Figure 3. Cell-based studies against PAX5VIM-2. (a) Single-dose inhibition assays were performed for 18 h. Amoxicillin and augmentin were used as controls, and the compounds were treated in combination with augmentin. All tests were triplicated. (b) Toxicity values of Augmentin+quercetin analogues and of quercetin analogues alone against human kidney cell lines. a quercetin analogs in combination with augmentin. b quercetin analogs alone. * Augmentin was 25 µM amoxicillin and 12.5 µM clavulanate (2:1 ratio) and was tested against HEK293Twt cells.
Microorganisms 11 02653 g003
Microorganisms 11 02653 g004
Figure 4. Enzyme kinetics and the protein–ligand docking study. (a) Measured KM and Ki values of quercetin analogs against VIM-2 with its colorimetric substrate, nitrocefin. (b) Predicted binding mode of compound #5 with the VIM-2 (PDB: 4C1D) enzyme. (c) Docking score comparison between compound #1a (quercetin) and #5 (taxifolin). (d) Predicted bond distance between compound #5 and Zn(1) and Zn(2) at the active site of the VIM-2 enzyme. ** indicates p < 0.01.
Figure 4. Enzyme kinetics and the protein–ligand docking study. (a) Measured KM and Ki values of quercetin analogs against VIM-2 with its colorimetric substrate, nitrocefin. (b) Predicted binding mode of compound #5 with the VIM-2 (PDB: 4C1D) enzyme. (c) Docking score comparison between compound #1a (quercetin) and #5 (taxifolin). (d) Predicted bond distance between compound #5 and Zn(1) and Zn(2) at the active site of the VIM-2 enzyme. ** indicates p < 0.01.
Microorganisms 11 02653 g004
Microorganisms 11 02653 g005
Figure 5. In vivo study of murine wound models infected with PAX5VIM-2. (a) The treatment scheme of wound infections induced by PAX5VIM-2 in a murine model following 4 days of treatment for the vehicle control or augmentin+#5. (b) IVIS imaging of local skin wound infection by bioluminescent P. aeruginosa (Xen05, VIM-2(+)) treatment. Four days of infection status comparison was quantified via bioluminescence ROI for each treatment. The bottom panel bar graphs show the quantification of the average bioluminescence intensity emitted by bacteria. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = three independent mice, ** p < 0.005, ANOVA test).
Figure 5. In vivo study of murine wound models infected with PAX5VIM-2. (a) The treatment scheme of wound infections induced by PAX5VIM-2 in a murine model following 4 days of treatment for the vehicle control or augmentin+#5. (b) IVIS imaging of local skin wound infection by bioluminescent P. aeruginosa (Xen05, VIM-2(+)) treatment. Four days of infection status comparison was quantified via bioluminescence ROI for each treatment. The bottom panel bar graphs show the quantification of the average bioluminescence intensity emitted by bacteria. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = three independent mice, ** p < 0.005, ANOVA test).
Microorganisms 11 02653 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Benin, B.M.; Hillyer, T.; Crugnale, A.S.; Fulk, A.; Thomas, C.A.; Crowder, M.W.; Smith, M.A.; Shin, W.S. Taxifolin as a Metallo-β-Lactamase Inhibitor in Combination with Augmentin against Verona Imipenemase 2 Expressing Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 2653. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11112653

AMA Style

Benin BM, Hillyer T, Crugnale AS, Fulk A, Thomas CA, Crowder MW, Smith MA, Shin WS. Taxifolin as a Metallo-β-Lactamase Inhibitor in Combination with Augmentin against Verona Imipenemase 2 Expressing Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(11):2653. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11112653

Chicago/Turabian Style

Benin, Bogdan M., Trae Hillyer, Aylin S. Crugnale, Andrew Fulk, Caitlyn A. Thomas, Michael W. Crowder, Matthew A. Smith, and Woo Shik Shin. 2023. "Taxifolin as a Metallo-β-Lactamase Inhibitor in Combination with Augmentin against Verona Imipenemase 2 Expressing Pseudomonas aeruginosa" Microorganisms 11, no. 11: 2653. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11112653

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop