Alleviating the H0 Tension in Scalar–Tensor and Bi-Scalar–Tensor Theories
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Scalar–Tensor Theories Alleviating the Tension
3. Bi-Scalar–Tensor Theories Alleviating the Tension
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Perivolaropoulos, L.; Skara, F. Challenges for ΛCDM: An update. New Astron. Rev. 2022, 95, 101659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aghanim, N.; Akrami, Y.; Ashdown, M.; Aumont, J.; Baccigalupi, C.; Ballardini, M.; Banday, A.J.; Barreiro, R.B.; Bartolo, N.; Basak, S.; et al. [Planck Collaboration] Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 641, A6, Erratum in Astron. Astrophys. 2021, 652, C4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zarrouk, P.; Burtin, E.; Gil-Marín, H.; Ross, A.J.; Tojeiro, R.; Pâris, I.; Dawson, K.S.; Myers, A.D.; Percival, W.J.; Chuang, C.H.; et al. The clustering of the SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey DR14 quasar sample: Measurement of the growth rate of structure from the anisotropic correlation function between redshift 0.8 and 2.2. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2018, 477, 1639–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alam, S.; Ata, M.; Bailey, S.; Beutler, F.; Bizyaev, D.; Blazek, J.A.; Bolton, A.S.; Brownstein, J.R.; Burden, A.; Chuang, C.H.; et al. The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2017, 470, 2617–2652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Valentino, E.; Mena, O.; Pan, S.; Visinelli, L.; Yang, W.; Melchiorri, A.; Mota, D.F.; Riess, A.G.; Silk, J. In the realm of the Hubble tension—A review of solutions. Class. Quant. Grav. 2021, 38, 153001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Valentino, E.; Melchiorri, A.; Silk, J. Beyond six parameters: Extending ΛCDM. Phys. Rev. D 2015, 92, 121302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernal, J.L.; Verde, L.; Riess, A.G. The trouble with H0. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2016, 2016, 019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.; Nunes, R.C. Probing the interaction between dark matter and dark energy in the presence of massive neutrinos. Phys. Rev. D 2016, 94, 123511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Valentino, E.; Melchiorri, A.; Mena, O. Can interacting dark energy solve the H0 tension? Phys. Rev. D 2017, 96, 043503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Valentino, E.; Bœhm, C.; Hivon, E.; Bouchet, F.R. Reducing the H0 and σ8 tensions with Dark Matter-neutrino interactions. Phys. Rev. D 2018, 97, 043513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Binder, T.; Gustafsson, M.; Kamada, A.; Sandner, S.M.R.; Wiesner, M. Reannihilation of self-interacting dark matter. Phys. Rev. D 2018, 97, 123004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Valentino, E.; Melchiorri, A.; Linder, E.V.; Silk, J. Constraining Dark Energy Dynamics in Extended Parameter Space. Phys. Rev. D 2017, 96, 023523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solà, J.; Gómez-Valent, A.; de Cruz Pérez, J. The H0 tension in light of vacuum dynamics in the Universe. Phys. Lett. B 2017, 774, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Eramo, F.; Ferreira, R.Z.; Notari, A.; Bernal, J.L. Hot Axions and the H0 tension. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2018, 2018, 014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poulin, V.; Smith, T.L.; Karwal, T.; Kamionkowski, M. Early Dark Energy Can Resolve The Hubble Tension. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 122, 221301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, S.; Yang, W.; Singha, C.; Saridakis, E.N. Observational constraints on sign-changeable interaction models and alleviation of the H0 tension. Phys. Rev. D 2019, 100, 083539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandey, K.L.; Karwal, T.; Das, S. Alleviating the H0 and σ8 anomalies with a decaying dark matter model. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2020, 2020, 026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adhikari, S.; Huterer, D. Super-CMB fluctuations and the Hubble tension. Phys. Dark Univ. 2020, 28, 100539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perez, A.; Sudarsky, D.; Wilson-Ewing, E. Resolving the H0 tension with diffusion. Gen. Rel. Grav. 2021, 53, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, S.; Yang, W.; Paliathanasis, A. Non-linear interacting cosmological models after Planck 2018 legacy release and the H0 tension. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020, 493, 3114–3131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benevento, G.; Hu, W.; Raveri, M. Can Late Dark Energy Transitions Raise the Hubble constant? Phys. Rev. D 2020, 101, 103517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elizalde, E.; Khurshudyan, M.; Odintsov, S.D.; Myrzakulov, R. Analysis of the H0 tension problem in the Universe with viscous dark fluid. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 102, 123501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alvarez, P.D.; Koch, B.; Laporte, C.; Rincón, A. Can scale-dependent cosmology alleviate the H0 tension? J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2021, 2021, 019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haridasu, B.S.; Viel, M.; Vittorio, N. Sources of H0-tension in dark energy scenarios. Phys. Rev. D 2021, 103, 063539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seto, O.; Toda, Y. Comparing early dark energy and extra radiation solutions to the Hubble tension with BBN. Phys. Rev. D 2021, 103, 123501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernal, J.L.; Verde, L.; Jimenez, R.; Kamionkowski, M.; Valcin, D.; Wandelt, B.D. The trouble beyond H0 and the new cosmic triangles. Phys. Rev. D 2021, 103, 103533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alestas, G.; Perivolaropoulos, L. Late-time approaches to the Hubble tension deforming H(z), worsen the growth tension. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2021, 504, 3956–3962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krishnan, C.; Mohayaee, R.; Colgáin, E.O.; Sheikh-Jabbari, M.M.; Yin, L. Does Hubble tension signal a breakdown in FLRW cosmology? Class. Quant. Grav. 2021, 38, 184001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Theodoropoulos, A.; Perivolaropoulos, L. The Hubble Tension, the M Crisis of Late Time H(z) Deformation Models and the Reconstruction of Quintessence Lagrangians. Universe 2021, 7, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, B.; Raveri, M. Can modified gravity models reconcile the tension between the CMB anisotropy and lensing maps in Planck-like observations? Phys. Rev. D 2015, 91, 123515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khosravi, N.; Baghram, S.; Afshordi, N.; Altamirano, N. H0 tension as a hint for a transition in gravitational theory. Phys. Rev. D 2019, 99, 103526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belgacem, E.; Dirian, Y.; Foffa, S.; Maggiore, M. Nonlocal gravity. Conceptual aspects and cosmological predictions. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2018, 2018, 002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adil, S.A.; Gangopadhyay, M.R.; Sami, M.; Sharma, M.K. Late-time acceleration due to a generic modification of gravity and the Hubble tension. Phys. Rev. D 2021, 104, 103534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nunes, R.C. Structure formation in f(T) gravity and a solution for H0 tension. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2018, 2018, 052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Valentino, E.; Melchiorri, A.; Mena, O.; Vagnozzi, S. Nonminimal dark sector physics and cosmological tensions. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 101, 063502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vagnozzi, S. New physics in light of the H0 tension: An alternative view. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 102, 023518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Braglia, M.; Ballardini, M.; Finelli, F.; Koyama, K. Early modified gravity in light of the H0 tension and LSS data. Phys. Rev. D 2021, 103, 043528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Agostino, R.; Nunes, R.C. Measurements of H0 in modified gravity theories: The role of lensed quasars in the late-time Universe. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 101, 103505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barker, W.E.V.; Lasenby, A.N.; Hobson, M.P.; Handley, W.J. Systematic study of background cosmology in unitary Poincaré gauge theories with application to emergent dark radiation and H0 tension. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 102, 024048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, D.; Mota, D. Can f(T) gravity resolve the H0 tension? Phys. Rev. D 2020, 102, 063530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ballardini, M.; Braglia, M.; Finelli, F.; Paoletti, D.; Starobinsky, A.A.; Umiltà, C. Scalar-tensor theories of gravity, neutrino physics, and the H0 tension. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2020, 2020, 044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Linares Cedeño, F.X.; Nucamendi, U. Revisiting cosmological diffusion models in Unimodular Gravity and the H0 tension. Phys. Dark Univ. 2021, 32, 100807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Da Silva, W.J.C.; Silva, R. Cosmological Perturbations in the Tsallis Holographic Dark Energy Scenarios. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 2021, 136, 543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Odintsov, S.D.; Sáez-Chillón Gómez, D.; Sharov, G.S. Analyzing the H0 tension in F(R) gravity models. Nucl. Phys. B 2021, 966, 115377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdalla, E.; Abellán, G.F.; Aboubrahim, A.; Agnello, A.; Akarsu, Ö.; Akrami, Y.; Alestas, G.; Aloni, D.; Amendola, L.; Anchordoqui, L.A.; et al. Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies. JHEAp 2022, 34, 49–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saridakis, E.N.; Lazkoz, R.; Salzano, V.; Moniz, P.V.; Capozziello, S.; Jiménez, J.B.; De Laurentis, M.; Olmo, G.J.; Akrami, Y.; Bahamonde, S.; et al. Modified Gravity and Cosmology: An Update by the CANTATA Network. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2105.12582. [Google Scholar]
- Capozziello, S.; De Laurentis, M. Extended Theories of Gravity. Phys. Rept. 2011, 509, 167–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Felice, A.; Tsujikawa, S. f(R) theories. Living Rev. Rel. 2010, 13, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nojiri, S.; Odintsov, S.D. Unified cosmic history in modified gravity: From F(R) theory to Lorentz non-invariant models. Phys. Rept. 2011, 505, 59–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Starobinsky, A.A. Disappearing cosmological constant in f(R) gravity. JETP Lett. 2007, 86, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cognola, G.; Elizalde, E.; Nojiri, S.; Odintsov, S.D.; Sebastiani, L.; Zerbini, S. A Class of viable modified f(R) gravities describing inflation and the onset of accelerated expansion. Phys. Rev. D 2008, 77, 046009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amendola, L.; Tsujikawa, S. Phantom crossing, equation-of-state singularities, and local gravity constraints in f(R) models. Phys. Lett. B 2008, 660, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De la Cruz-Dombriz, A.; Dobado, A. A f(R) gravity without cosmological constant. Phys. Rev. D 2006, 74, 087501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, P. Testing f(R) gravity against the large scale structure of the universe. Phys. Rev. D 2006, 73, 123504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faraoni, V. de Sitter space and the equivalence between f(R) and scalar-tensor gravity. Phys. Rev. D 2007, 75, 067302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basilakos, S.; Nesseris, S.; Perivolaropoulos, L. Observational constraints on viable f(R) parametrizations with geometrical and dynamical probes. Phys. Rev. D 2013, 87, 123529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papanikolaou, T.; Tzerefos, C.; Basilakos, S.; Saridakis, E.N. Scalar induced gravitational waves from primordial black hole Poisson fluctuations in f(R) gravity. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2022, 2022, 013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nojiri, S.; Odintsov, S.D. Modified Gauss-Bonnet theory as gravitational alternative for dark energy. Phys. Lett. B 2005, 631, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Felice, A.; Tsujikawa, S. Construction of cosmologically viable f(G) dark energy models. Phys. Lett. B 2009, 675, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y.Y.; Wu, Y.B.; Lu, J.B.; Zhang, Z.; Han, W.L.; Lin, L.L. Modified f(G) gravity models with curvature-matter coupling. Eur. Phys. J. C 2012, 72, 1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shamir, M.F.; Naz, T. Stellar structures in f(G) gravity admitting Noether symmetries. Phys. Lett. B 2020, 806, 135519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asimakis, P.; Basilakos, S.; Saridakis, E.N. Building cubic gravity with healthy and viable scalar and tensor perturbations. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2212.12494. [Google Scholar]
- Lovelock, D. The Einstein tensor and its generalizations. J. Math. Phys. 1971, 12, 498–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deruelle, N.; Farina-Busto, L. The Lovelock Gravitational Field Equations in Cosmology. Phys. Rev. D 1990, 41, 3696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cai, Y.F.; Capozziello, S.; De Laurentis, M.; Saridakis, E.N. f(T) teleparallel gravity and cosmology. Rept. Prog. Phys. 2016, 79, 106901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bengochea, G.R.; Ferraro, R. Dark torsion as the cosmic speed-up. Phys. Rev. D 2009, 79, 124019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Linder, E.V. Einstein’s Other Gravity and the Acceleration of the Universe. Phys. Rev. D 2010, 81, 127301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.H.; Dent, J.B.; Dutta, S.; Saridakis, E.N. Cosmological perturbations in f(T) gravity. Phys. Rev. D 2011, 83, 023508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tamanini, N.; Boehmer, C.G. Good and bad tetrads in f(T) gravity. Phys. Rev. D 2012, 86, 044009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bengochea, G.R. Observational information for f(T) theories and Dark Torsion. Phys. Lett. B 2011, 695, 405–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, D.; Reboucas, M.J. Energy conditions bounds on f(T) gravity. Phys. Rev. D 2012, 86, 083515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daouda, M.H.; Rodrigues, M.E.; Houndjo, M.J.S. Anisotropic fluid for a set of non-diagonal tetrads in f(T) gravity. Phys. Lett. B 2012, 715, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohseni Sadjadi, H. Generalized Noether symmetry in f(T) gravity. Phys. Lett. B 2012, 718, 270–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Finch, A.; Said, J.L. Galactic Rotation Dynamics in f(T) gravity. Eur. Phys. J. C 2018, 78, 560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Golovnev, A.; Guzmán, M.J. Bianchi identities in f(T) gravity: Paving the way to confrontation with astrophysics. Phys. Lett. B 2020, 810, 135806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bejarano, C.; Ferraro, R.; Guzmán, M.J. Kerr geometry in f(T) gravity. Eur. Phys. J. C 2015, 75, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darabi, F.; Atazadeh, K. f(T) quantum cosmology. Phys. Rev. D 2019, 100, 023546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahlu, S.; Ntahompagaze, J.; Elmardi, M.; Abebe, A. The Chaplygin gas as a model for modified teleparallel gravity? Eur. Phys. J. C 2019, 79, 749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benetti, M.; Capozziello, S.; Lambiase, G. Updating constraints on f(T) teleparallel cosmology and the consistency with Big Bang Nucleosynthesis. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020, 500, 1795–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Golovnev, A.; Guzmán, M.J. Approaches to spherically symmetric solutions in f(T) gravity. Universe 2021, 7, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duchaniya, L.K.; Lohakare, S.V.; Mishra, B.; Tripathy, S.K. Dynamical stability analysis of accelerating f(T) gravity models. Eur. Phys. J. C 2022, 82, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kofinas, G.; Saridakis, E.N. Teleparallel equivalent of Gauss-Bonnet gravity and its modifications. Phys. Rev. D 2014, 90, 084044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kofinas, G.; Saridakis, E.N. Cosmological applications of F(T,TG) gravity. Phys. Rev. D 2014, 90, 084045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bahamonde, S.; Böhmer, C.G.; Wright, M. Modified teleparallel theories of gravity. Phys. Rev. D 2015, 92, 104042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farrugia, G.; Levi Said, J.; Gakis, V.; Saridakis, E.N. Gravitational Waves in Modified Teleparallel Theories. Phys. Rev. D 2018, 97, 124064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Escamilla-Rivera, C.; Levi Said, J. Cosmological viable models in f(T,B) theory as solutions to the H0 tension. Class. Quant. Grav. 2020, 37, 165002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caruana, M.; Farrugia, G.; Levi Said, J. Cosmological bouncing solutions in f(T,B) gravity. Eur. Phys. J. C 2020, 80, 640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreira, A.R.P.; Silva, J.E.G.; Lima, F.C.E.; Almeida, C.A.S. Thick brane in f(T,B) gravity. Phys. Rev. D 2021, 103, 064046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horndeski, G.W. Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 1974, 10, 363–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Felice, A.; Tsujikawa, S. Generalized Galileon cosmology. Phys. Rev. D 2011, 84, 124029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deffayet, C.; Gao, X.; Steer, D.A.; Zahariade, G. From k-essence to generalised Galileons. Phys. Rev. D 2011, 84, 064039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mota, D.F.; Sandstad, M.; Zlosnik, T. Cosmology of the selfaccelerating third order Galileon. JHEP 2010, 12, 051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barreira, A.; Li, B.; Hellwing, W.A.; Baugh, C.M.; Pascoli, S. Nonlinear structure formation in the Cubic Galileon gravity model. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2013, 2013, 027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, T.; Evslin, J.; Cai, Y.F.; Li, M.; Zhang, X. Bouncing Galileon Cosmologies. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2011, 2011, 036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Appleby, S.A.; Linder, E.V. Trial of Galileon gravity by cosmological expansion and growth observations. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2012, 2012, 026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barreira, A.; Li, B.; Baugh, C.; Pascoli, S. The observational status of Galileon gravity after Planck. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2014, 2014, 059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arroja, F.; Bartolo, N.; Karmakar, P.; Matarrese, S. The two faces of mimetic Horndeski gravity: Disformal transformations and Lagrange multiplier. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2015, 2015, 051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hinterbichler, K.; Joyce, A. Hidden symmetry of the Galileon. Phys. Rev. D 2015, 92, 023503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babichev, E.; Charmousis, C.; Hassaine, M. Charged Galileon black holes. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2015, 2015, 031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brax, P.; Burrage, C.; Davis, A.C. Laboratory Tests of the Galileon. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2011, 2011, 020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Renk, J.; Zumalacárregui, M.; Montanari, F.; Barreira, A. Galileon gravity in light of ISW, CMB, BAO and H0 data. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2017, 2017, 020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gleyzes, J.; Langlois, D.; Piazza, F.; Vernizzi, F. Healthy theories beyond Horndeski. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 114, 211101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Langlois, D.; Noui, K. Degenerate higher derivative theories beyond Horndeski: Evading the Ostrogradski instability. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2016, 2016, 034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Langlois, D. Dark energy and modified gravity in degenerate higher-order scalar–tensor (DHOST) theories: A review. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 2019, 28, 1942006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babichev, E.; Charmousis, C.; Lehébel, A. Asymptotically flat black holes in Horndeski theory and beyond. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2017, 2017, 027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilyas, A.; Zhu, M.; Zheng, Y.; Cai, Y.F.; Saridakis, E.N. DHOST Bounce. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2020, 2020, 002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naruko, A.; Yoshida, D.; Mukohyama, S. Gravitational scalar–tensor theory. Class. Quant. Grav. 2016, 33, 09LT01. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saridakis, E.N.; Tsoukalas, M. Cosmology in new gravitational scalar-tensor theories. Phys. Rev. D 2016, 93, 124032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heisenberg, L.; Villarrubia-Rojo, H.; Zosso, J. Simultaneously solving the H0 and σ8 tensions with late dark energy. Phys. Dark Univ. 2023, 39, 101163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heisenberg, L.; Villarrubia-Rojo, H.; Zosso, J. Can late-time extensions solve the H0 and σ8 tensions? Phys. Rev. D 2022, 106, 043503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Felice, A.; Tsujikawa, S. Conditions for the cosmological viability of the most general scalar-tensor theories and their applications to extended Galileon dark energy models. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2012, 2012, 007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kobayashi, T.; Yamaguchi, M.; Yokoyama, J. Generalized G-inflation: Inflation with the most general second-order field equations. Prog. Theor. Phys. 2011, 126, 511–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petronikolou, M.; Basilakos, S.; Saridakis, E.N. Alleviating H0 tension in Horndeski gravity. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2110.01338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saridakis, E.N.; Sushkov, S.V. Quintessence and phantom cosmology with non-minimal derivative coupling. Phys. Rev. D 2010, 81, 083510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koutsoumbas, G.; Ntrekis, K.; Papantonopoulos, E.; Saridakis, E.N. Unification of Dark Matter-Dark Energy in Generalized Galileon Theories. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2018, 2018, 003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karydas, S.; Papantonopoulos, E.; Saridakis, E.N. Successful Higgs inflation from combined nonminimal and derivative couplings. Phys. Rev. D 2021, 104, 023530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bellini, E.; Sawicki, I. Maximal freedom at minimum cost: Linear large-scale structure in general modifications of gravity. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2014, 2014, 050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peirone, S.; Koyama, K.; Pogosian, L.; Raveri, M.; Silvestri, A. Large-scale structure phenomenology of viable Horndeski theories. Phys. Rev. D 2018, 97, 043519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Felice, A.; Tsujikawa, S. Cosmology of a covariant Galileon field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 111301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Appleby, S.; Linder, E.V. The Paths of Gravity in Galileon Cosmology. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2012, 2012, 043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ezquiaga, J.M.; Zumalacárregui, M. Dark Energy After GW170817: Dead Ends and the Road Ahead. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 119, 251304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nesseris, S.; Basilakos, S.; Saridakis, E.N.; Perivolaropoulos, L. Viable f(T) models are practically indistinguishable from ΛCDM. Phys. Rev. D 2013, 88, 103010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banerjee, S.; Petronikolou, M.; Saridakis, E.N. Alleviating the H0 tension with new gravitational scalar tensor theories. Phys. Rev. D 2023, 108, 024012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Petronikolou, M.; Saridakis, E.N. Alleviating the H0 Tension in Scalar–Tensor and Bi-Scalar–Tensor Theories. Universe 2023, 9, 397. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe9090397
Petronikolou M, Saridakis EN. Alleviating the H0 Tension in Scalar–Tensor and Bi-Scalar–Tensor Theories. Universe. 2023; 9(9):397. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe9090397
Chicago/Turabian StylePetronikolou, Maria, and Emmanuel N. Saridakis. 2023. "Alleviating the H0 Tension in Scalar–Tensor and Bi-Scalar–Tensor Theories" Universe 9, no. 9: 397. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe9090397