Next Article in Journal
Vegetation Analysis in the Archaeological Area of Pasargadae WHS (Iran) Enhancing the Naturalistic Value of the Site within the Occurring Environmental Changes
Previous Article in Journal
Liaoning University ChopMelon Net Project: Innovative Research on Sustainable Education Based on Real Social Issues
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 16
Issue 9
10.3390/su16093772
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Closing the Loop: Exploring Food Waste Management in the Near East and North Africa (NENA) Region during the COVID-19 Pandemic

by
Chedli Baya Chatti
1,*,
Tarek Ben Hassen
2 and
Hamid El Bilali
3
1
Department of Social Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar
2
Program of Policy, Planning, and Development, Department of International Affairs, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar
3
International Centre for Advanced Mediterranean Agronomic Studies (CIHEAM-Bari), Valenzano, 70010 Bari, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(9), 3772; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093772
Submission received: 10 November 2023 / Revised: 8 February 2024 / Accepted: 27 February 2024 / Published: 30 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Social Ecology and Sustainability)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted global food waste patterns through unanticipated shifts in composition and quantities. This review explores the impacts of COVID-19 on food waste generation and management approaches in the Near East and North Africa (NENA) region during the recovery phase. This paper comprehensively explores food loss and waste in the NENA region. It presents a detailed analysis of pandemic-induced changes in household food waste behaviors, analyses the integration of circular economy principles in recovery strategies and policy implications, and outlines potential avenues for future research in this critical area. The key findings are threefold: First, this study reaffirms that food waste is a critical challenge in NENA, contributing to food insecurity, water scarcity, and environmental issues. Second, the pandemic catalyzed a dichotomy in consumer behaviors—panic buying initially increased waste, while hardship measures later encouraged sustainable waste reduction practices like meal planning and leftover use. Third, adopting a circular economy approach holds potential, yet its implementation remains limited in terms of curbing food waste and promoting sustainability in NENA. Overall, while the pandemic accentuated the urgency of tackling food waste, it also stimulated innovative policy thinking and strategic planning for building more resilient food systems. This paper concludes that leveraging pandemic-driven sustainability mindsets while addressing systemic drivers of waste will be key to mitigating food waste and its impacts moving forward. This paper offers timely insights into the evolving food waste management landscape in NENA, underscoring the need for integrated policies to navigate post-pandemic recovery effectively.

1. Introduction

Food loss and waste (FLW) is defined as “a decrease, at all stages of the food chain, from harvest to consumption in mass, of food that was originally intended for human consumption, regardless of the cause” [1,2]. Food waste occurs at the downstream end of the supply chain, such as at the retail, food service, and household consumption stages. It refers to discarded edible food, regardless of whether it is still within the expiry date or has been left to rot [2,3,4,5]. Household food waste behavior may be influenced by several activities, including planning, grocery shopping, storage, cooking, and consuming [6]. As a result, a wide range of variables influences food waste, including behavioral (e.g., shopping and storage attitudes, insufficient knowledge), personal (e.g., level of education, experience, etc.), and product (e.g., packaging sizes, sale promotions, and discounts), as well as socio-economic characteristics (e.g., wages, food subsidies, etc.) [7].
The COVID-19 pandemic prompted a devastating international economic and financial downturn, negatively affecting socio-economic development and people’s lives [8]. It tremendously influenced people’s daily lives, including various substantial effects on diet and food-related practices, such as FLW [9]. The lack of proper storage facilities, transit disruptions, and labor shortages at the production level resulted in the loss of perishable products and excessive food waste in many countries [10]. At the consumer level, on the one hand, the pandemic significantly impacted household food shopping and planning, resulting in increased panic buying and food waste. On the other hand, some consumers began to adopt more sustainable behaviors, such as better food shopping planning and reusing leftovers to reduce food waste [11,12,13].
Due to several factors, including socio-economic development level and the efficiency of national healthcare systems, these habits are context-specific rather than global [14]. In the Near East and North Africa (NENA) region, which includes 20 countries spanning across North Africa and the Near East, the COVID-19 pandemic-related measures, as seen globally, led to many lifestyle changes and a shift in food habits. Even before the pandemic, FLW in the NENA region was a significant issue, leading to decreased food availability, exacerbated water crises and environmental challenges, and amplified food imports in an already heavily import-dependent region [15]. However, COVID-19’s long-term economic recovery gives the NENA region a chance for sustainable growth by applying the circular economy approach. Certainly, the current socio-economic emergency triggered by the pandemic in the NENA region has generated unique opportunities for promoting a circular economy and circular resource management, which might stimulate economic recovery [16].
Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the vulnerabilities of food systems in the NENA region and the importance of ensuring food security and sustainability. Understanding the impact of the pandemic on food waste and circular economy practices in the region is critical to developing effective policies and strategies to promote sustainable food systems and reduce food waste. However, there is a lack of research on the specific challenges and opportunities related to circular economy practices in the agrifood industry in the NENA region. The existing literature mostly focuses on developed countries, and there is a need for more research tailored to the unique socio-economic, cultural, and environmental contexts of the NENA region.
Consequently, this paper makes several valuable contributions to the academic literature on food loss and waste (FLW). First, it provides crucial new insights into the complex dynamics of FLW in the Near East and North Africa (NENA) region, specifically focusing on how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted food waste attitudes, behaviors, and quantities at the household level. Examining these pandemic effects within the unique socio-economic and environmental context of NENA represents a significant advancement, as this critical region has been understudied in existing FLW research. Second, this paper offers an original perspective on the relationship between global crises and localized FLW patterns, elucidating how disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic influenced food waste in NENA households and food systems. This advances our theoretical understanding of the linkages between global events and regional FLW trends.
Third, this paper conducts an innovative assessment of how circular economy principles are integrated into post-pandemic recovery strategies and policies for curbing food waste in the NENA region. This analysis of policy and government responses provides practical guidance to policymakers on more sustainable solutions for managing FLW. Finally, the paper goes beyond analysis to propose tangible recommendations tailored to improving FLW reduction and management, specifically in the NENA context. This applied focus on actionable solutions contributes meaningfully to developing more resilient and sustainable food systems in the region.
In summary, by offering the first in-depth examination of pandemic-catalyzed changes in food waste dynamics and connections to policy in NENA, this paper significantly advances academic and practical understanding of FLW challenges and opportunities. The insights from this timely research provide invaluable knowledge to guide policymakers, stakeholders, and researchers in building more sustainable food waste strategies as part of a green recovery in the NENA region and beyond. This paper makes pivotal contributions by elucidating global food waste transformations and corresponding policy responses to inform sustainable FLW management.
This paper is structured into seven main sections. Section 1 reviews the literature on the scale and characteristics of food loss and waste (FLW) in the Near East and North Africa (NENA) region, summarizing current knowledge on the magnitude of the issue. Section 2 outlines the study methodology, describing the data collection and analysis approach. Section 3 presents findings on attitudes, awareness, and self-reported behaviors related to household food waste during the COVID-19 pandemic. Quantitative and qualitative results provide insights into the pandemic’s impacts on food waste awareness and actions. Section 4 uses empirical data to examine how the pandemic influenced food waste generation, composition, and quantities. Trends in household food waste levels and types are analyzed. Section 5 discusses integrating circular economy principles and food waste management strategies into post-pandemic recovery policies and initiatives in NENA countries. Policy documents are scrutinized to assess sustainability considerations. Section 6 summarizes this study’s implications through a discussion and conclusion. Finally, Section 7 presents this paper’s limitations and suggests promising directions for future research on this pressing topic.

2. Materials and Methods

The methodology of this study is based on two steps. The first step is a systematic review based on a search conducted on Web of Science (WoS) on 17 March 2023. The search utilized a specific query string: (“COVID-19” OR COVID19 OR Coronavirus OR “SARS-CoV-2”) AND (food) AND (waste) AND (“Near East” OR “Middle East” OR “West* Asia” OR “North* Africa” OR Maghreb OR “East* Mediterranean” OR “South* Mediterranean” OR Arab OR Gulf OR Algeria OR Bahrain OR Egypt OR Iraq OR Jordan OR Kuwait OR Lebanon OR Libya OR Mauritania OR Morocco OR Oman OR Qatar OR Saudi OR Sudan OR Syria OR Tunisia OR “United Arab Emirates” OR UAE OR Yemen). From this search, 14 documents were retrieved [12,13,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28] and subsequently evaluated for their suitability based on two key criteria: geographical relevance (i.e., the document pertains to at least one country within the NENA region) and thematic pertinence (i.e., the document encompasses aspects of both COVID-19 and food waste issues). Consequently, only 10 documents [12,13,17,18,19,20,21,24,25,26] were eligible and included in this study.
Given the limited number of suitable scholarly documents obtained from Web of Science (WoS), the methodology was expanded to include a broader spectrum of the literature. Indeed, a further search was undertaken in other databases, including Google Scholar, which is renowned for its vast collection of non-indexed scholarly literature as well as grey literature. This supplementary search sought to include a broader range of information, such as reports, working papers, and policy briefs that are not commonly found in traditional academic databases but are important for understanding the full scope of COVID-19’s impact on food waste issues in the NENA region. This inclusive method ensured that the research included a broader range of perspectives and facts, resulting in a more comprehensive understanding of the subject matter.
This extensive review process included a thorough examination of publications from international organizations, such as the United Nations, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the High-Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition (HLPE), the World Bank, the World Food Program (WFP), the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). Moreover, the research embraced contributions from regional bodies, notably the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for West Asia (ESCWA), to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the NENA region’s unique context. This review was further enriched by insights from other research and policy institutions, such as the Economist Intelligence Unit, the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), and Wageningen University and Research.
In addition to scholarly and organizational sources, our methodology also incorporated valuable insights from leading regional newspapers and specialized news outlets, such as Arab News, Khaleej Times, The Peninsula Qatar, and Egypt Today, which were instrumental in providing real-time data, expert opinions, and ground-level perspectives on food waste challenges and initiatives within the region during the pandemic. These multiple sources gave an extensive viewpoint, which was critical for conducting a comprehensive analysis of food waste management dynamics in the NENA area during the COVID-19 pandemic.

3. Magnitude and Nature of Food Losses and Waste in the NENA Region

The NENA region is politically heterogeneous, with nations at various levels of economic development and unequal natural resources [29]. Food systems in the region are also marked by significant inequities, which may influence consumer choices and decisions and, consequently, food waste, in diverse ways. There are considerable income disparities between those in natural resource-rich countries (e.g., the Gulf Cooperation Council—GCC) and those in middle-income ones [29]. For instance, since GCC nations are capital-rich, food imports are exempt from financial restrictions. As a result, these countries have been less vulnerable to food price volatility than other food importers, and they have overcome local production shortfalls due to their solid fiscal position [11,30]. Consequently, in 2022, the Global Food Security Index ranked GCC countries as having the highest levels of food security globally and among Arab countries [31]. Moreover, food security vulnerabilities are more significant in conflict-affected countries such as Syria and Yemen [32,33].
Food waste is a major issue in the NENA region [15,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. It leads to decreased food availability, exacerbated water crises, and several environmental consequences [37]. Food waste is chronically high in the NENA region, pointing to the inefficiencies, unsustainability, and inequality that characterize most agrifood systems in the region [41]. High food waste is not only uneconomical but also affects food security by increasing food imports in an already heavily import-dependent area due to the scarcity of natural resources [42]. According to the FAO [3], the share of lost or wasted food is about 34% across the NENA region. Several FAO reports [37,43] revealed that fruits and vegetables are the most wasted foods in the NENA region (in some cases, close to 50% of production), followed by fish and seafood (28%) and roots and tubers (26%). For example, research conducted in 2015 on post-harvest food losses in Morocco indicates that loss rates were much higher for fruits than soft wheat (Table 1).
Nevertheless, apart from some rough estimates, there is a critical lack of accurate data on the causes and magnitude of FLW in the NENA region [37]. The FAO [3] estimates that per capita FLW is more than 200 kg/year in North Africa and West and Central Asia (cf. NENA region). To address the critical need for a more granular understanding of the extent and nuances of household food waste across the NENA region, the following table (Table 2) provides a comparative analysis based on the numbers provided by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) in the Food Waste Index Report of 2021 [5]. The table presents estimated household food waste per capita (kg/year) and total volume (tons/year) for nineteen nations in the area. It is worth noting that many countries in the region have very low or low confidence in these statistics, highlighting data collecting issues and the urgent need for more precise and thorough research. The outlier in the area is Saudi Arabia, the only country with a high confidence estimate, indicating a more robust data system than its counterparts in the region. This stark difference in data confidence levels across the region highlights not only disparities in data availability and reliability but also the need for more robust data collection and research to accurately assess the impact of household food waste and effectively tailor interventions.
According to more recent data [37], 32% of food waste in the NENA region happens at the consumer level and is concentrated in urban areas. In comparison, up to 68% occurs in the early phases of the food supply chain (production, transportation, manufacturing, and distribution/retail). The FAO [45] indicated that the drivers of FLW differ within the NENA area and consist of insufficient and poor infrastructure (e.g., cold chain, marketplaces) and inadequate regulatory and legislative frameworks. Baig et al. [46] highlighted that “the factors responsible for food waste include lack of awareness; insufficient and inappropriate shopping planning. Food waste in restaurants, celebrations, social events, and occasions is enormous. Waste is common in festivals and special events where the customs is to provide more food than required” (p. 1743). Therefore, according to Baig et al. [39], the most significant causes of food waste in the region are culture, food pricing, policy and industry issues, and awareness. Indeed, enormous food waste occurs on religious holidays, particularly in the fasting month of Ramadan, as well as on social occasions such as weddings and family reunions [37]. Food waste is a complex problem in the region, where consumers’ and retailers’ attitudes toward food waste are partly shaped by the region’s unique culture, traditions, and history [42]. This assumption is corroborated by the results of surveys on household food wastage in different NENA countries such as Tunisia [47], Egypt [48], Algeria [49], and Morocco [50].
Moreover, residents in the NENA region, especially in GCC countries, take food for granted. This is due to the highly subsidized nature of food items and groceries, especially essential items such as bread, sugar, oil, and other staples. These subsidized items are widely available to all residents, contributing to a perception that food is abundant and easily accessible [51]. In the NENA region, governments have traditionally relied on subsidies to lessen the cost of food, primarily to protect the poor and share wealth [52]. In many countries in the region, governments subsidize bread and make it cheap to ensure societal access to basic foodstuffs. For instance, the Egyptian government spends over USD 3 billion annually on wheat imports, predominantly to support the country’s long-running bread subsidy program. This program, known as the Tamween ration card system, provides subsidized bread to 73% of Egyptian households [53]. As a result, bread is both a critical source of nutrition and the most wasted food item. At the same time, recycling rates are low. In many parts of the region, only the informal sector carries out waste collection and recycling [54].
However, while the prevalence of subsidized food items in the NENA region might engender a perception of abundance and potentially contribute to increased food waste, it is imperative to consider the broader, more intricate socio-economic and cultural factors that play significant roles. As a matter of fact, the relationship between food abundance, prices, and waste is complex and not solely determined by subsidy schemes. For instance, subsidizing bread is often cited as contributing to high bread waste levels in the NENA region. However, it is critical to note that bread is the most consumed food and one of the most wasted foods in the world, even in many countries without such subsidy schemes, suggesting that other factors are also at play. Due to its brief shelf life and excess production, approximately 10% (900,000 tons) of bread is discarded throughout the supply chain, from production to consumer use [55]. For example, in the United Kingdom, 32% of household bread is wasted even without subsidies [56]. Similarly, over 50% of bread waste in Sweden happens at bakeries and retailers without subsidies [57]. Additionally, according to Jung et al. [58], wasted bread accounts for 13% of total food waste generated in Finland, 22% in the Netherlands, 23% in New Zealand, 27% in Norway, 7.9% in Portugal, 2.2% in South Korea, and between 12% and 17% in Sweden. The high levels of waste in these unsubsidized countries demonstrate that factors beyond subsidies, like cultural attitudes and retail practices, drive bread waste worldwide.

4. Food Loss and Waste during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the NENA Region

The COVID-19 pandemic affected global waste generation dynamics with unforeseen composition and quantity shifts, especially in food waste [59]. However, since it was caused by a human virus with no direct impact on agriculture production, the COVID-19 pandemic is not considered a direct food waste driver [60]. Consequently, FLW during the COVID-19 pandemic resulted from demand, supply, and logistics disruptions in the agrifood supply chain rather than direct food loss, as opposed to other epidemics (such as bird or swine flu), which caused direct food loss. Indeed, the pandemic influences food waste indirectly by causing changes in key food waste drivers [61].
At the production level, the lack of adequate storage facilities, transport interruptions, and a drop in demand in several countries led to losses of fresh items such as milk and vegetables. Labor shortages also affected crop harvesting [62]. Subsequently, social distancing measures and health checks at borders caused container delays, thus leading to the loss of perishable products and high food wastage [63]. For instance, in Iraq, vegetable farmers could not sell their products in local markets because of the curfew, resulting in spoiled produce and lost income [64]. Furthermore, limitations on mobility prohibited farmers from reaching markets, obtaining inputs, and vending their products, resulting in losses at the production level [63]. For instance, Jordan’s severe local emergency plan prohibited farmers from accessing their fields, delaying daily operations and disrupting the harvest season. Likewise, in Tunisia, due to movement limitations, agricultural workers had difficulty reaching their fields, and local markets faced a shortage of locally cultivated fruits [65].
At the consumer level, the pandemic considerably impacted household food buying and planning, including features identified as the leading causes of food waste in households [66]. However, the COVID-19 pandemic had paradoxical repercussions. On the one hand, panic buying was common in the early stages of the pandemic because of a lack of information about the virus and its severity. Stockpiling of non-perishable foods (such as flour, pasta, canned food, rice, etc.) increased in several countries in the region due to anticipated shortages in the near future [67,68]. In fact, panic buying and hoarding are prompted not by supply deficiencies but by consumers’ concerns and anxiety over a prospective shortage [69,70,71]. Panic buying and stockpiling of food items was also triggered by fear and anxiety surrounding potential exposure to the COVID-19 virus. For example, a study conducted in Morocco discovered that most consumers reduced the number of food shopping visits they made and shopped less often than usual. To minimize the need for store visits and limit perceived risks of exposure to COVID-19 while shopping, consumers compensated by purchasing larger quantities and stocking up on more items during each trip (Table 3).
This obsessive purchasing behavior may have raised food prices, aggravated overconsumption (cf. obesity), and caused inadequate food availability [73]. Several countries, for example, experienced temporary shortages and price increases. These did not persist long since certain governments soon intervened to stabilize prices via numerous strategies [67]. Moreover, those who have the financial wherewithal to purchase more food may end up hoarding it, causing havoc among underprivileged residents [74] and depriving some vulnerable groups (e.g., the elderly or the poor) of accessing particular food products [75]. Due to storage constraints, inappropriate cooking techniques, or the overpreparation of meals, panic buying may result in increased household food waste, particularly for fresh items. Excessive purchases caused by panic buying imply that more food will spoil before it can be eaten [9,76].
On the other hand, the COVID-19 pandemic opened up hitherto unforeseen opportunities for a more conscientious approach to consumption [77]. During the pandemic, several consumers in the region adopted a thriftier attitude and reduced food waste. Indeed, several studies conducted in the region revealed that household food waste decreased. Additionally, more and more people were cooking and baking at home due to the closing of the HORECA channel (hotels, restaurants, and caterers). For instance, a survey of 284 people in Tunisia revealed that about 89% of the participants indicated being aware of food waste. It was shown that COVID-19 measures led to better food shopping habits and an overall reduction in food waste. Also, 85% of those polled said they would not waste any food they purchased, and the majority outlined that they had a system for storing and consuming any leftovers [9]. Despite widespread panic shopping, there was no rise in food waste in Lebanon [78]. Since COVID-19 became a significant problem in the country, 73% of respondents said they had stockpiled food. However, 86% said they were not wasting more food, and 80% said they were more conscious of how much they were wasting. Likewise, in Qatar and Oman, food waste dropped due to the absence of panic buying and food stockpiling [13,24] (Figure 1).
Food waste also decreased in Qatar during the Omicron variant wave, with 76.17% of survey respondents reporting that they had reduced their food waste since the start of the wave and 68.82% reporting that they were more aware of the amount of food waste [79].
These results may be due to several factors. Firstly, the hospitality and tourism sectors are the two most prominent causes of food waste in the region [80]. COVID-19 had a substantial negative impact on the hospitality industry [81]. Lockdowns and social distancing regulations imposed the closure of the HORECA channel. Also, the closing of international borders halted incoming tourism. Consequently, many countries in the region, especially the GCC, saw decreased food waste in 2020 [82]. Secondly, family reunions became less frequent due to social distancing restrictions, reducing the waste caused by laying out massive spreads during holidays and social events such as Ramadan or weddings [82]. For instance, usually, during Ramadan, 30–50% of the food produced in Saudi Arabia is thrown away; this figure stands at 25% in Qatar and 40% in the UAE [83].
Thirdly, across the region, numerous good food management practices were adopted by households throughout the pandemic, including increased pre-shop planning, improved at-home food storage, and innovative ways of cooking/preparation (e.g., batch cooking and using up leftovers) [9]. Many households began purchasing more selectively and conserving what they could not finish for later [82]. Adopting these practices is driven by various motives, including a desire to save time and money, a desire to prevent running out of food, and a deep suspicion of grocery stores. Because individuals spent more time in their homes, they could spend more time in the kitchen without feeling pressured [84].
Furthermore, according to a poll of 200 participants from 10 West Asian nations conducted between July and November 2020, the use of leftovers changed following the pandemic. Undoubtedly, when questioned about the use of leftovers in their households, the proportion of respondents who stated “regularly/frequently” rose between the pre-COVID (42%) and post-COVID (50%) periods (Figure 2). This might have been due to an increased focus on healthy eating to promote immunity, since home-cooked meals are often considered more beneficial. This would encourage individuals to save leftovers for later instead of throwing them away [83].
However, according to Jribi et al. [9], the socio-economic circumstances of the pandemic (i.e., food supply, restricted mobility, and loss of income) are more likely to have influenced customer behavior towards food waste than a pro-sustainability attitude. Aside from being a public health concern, COVID-19 was a far more severe issue. The pandemic also triggered a global financial and economic crisis, leading to rising unemployment and widespread poverty [85]. Due to necessity, consumers reduced their food waste during the crisis. When faced with hardships, people tend to save rather than discard food, resulting in a noteworthy decrease in waste generation. These difficult circumstances compelled consumers to waste less food out of need [86], as observed during previous recessions in Greece and Italy [87,88] and during the ongoing economic crises in Lebanon [89] and Iran [17]. Nevertheless, the factors that aided in minimizing food waste during the COVID-19 pandemic were temporary and may not endure now that these measures have been abandoned and consumers have returned to their former habits and behaviors.

5. The Circular Economy and Food Waste in the NENA Region: Potential and Challenges

Long-term economic recovery from COVID-19 provides the NENA region with an exceptional chance for sustainable development [16]. While environmental preservation is often deprioritized, the present socio-economic crisis triggered by the pandemic in the NENA region has created a unique potential for fostering a circular economy and circular resource management, which might catalyze economic recovery. Circular business models use local resources to minimize import reliance and diversify suppliers for increased resilience [90]. Further, putting circularity at the center of natural resource plans will increase resource availability and value extraction. According to Al-Saidi et al. [91], it is possible to solve environmental challenges while simultaneously ensuring long-term supply security in the water and food sectors by promoting consumer awareness and resource circularity. The main goal is to “close the loops” by promoting reuse and recycling via economic structures. Circularity has the potential to be highly useful for arid regions, and it is typically hailed as a means to preserve resources while still creating prosperity [92,93].
Aside from immediate economic gains, circularity provides additional concrete and significant advantages that are incredibly relevant to the current NENA context, such as food waste. Indeed, addressing food waste with a circular mindset helps to reduce or reuse the volume of surplus food generated [94]. Indeed, on the one hand, circular economy approaches would reduce pollution and waste in the region, improving health and environmental circumstances. On the other hand, they would bring new economic possibilities to local populations, contributing to the region’s political stability and economic diversification [95].
More recently, in the NENA region, we noticed a growing awareness of the importance of addressing the issue of FLW at the level of public institutions and policy, civil society and NGOs, and the private sector. Firstly, policymakers in the region have started to recognize the importance of the circular economy and reducing food waste. For instance, at the policy level, in January 2021, the Cabinet of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Government approved the Circular Economy Policy (2021–2031), a comprehensive plan identifying the country’s framework for sustainable governance and better usage of natural resources, by implementing consumption and production processes that assure the quality of life for present and future generations. The strategy has many important goals, including improving environmental health, assisting the private sector in implementing clean manufacturing techniques, and lowering natural environmental stress to accomplish the country’s ambition of becoming a worldwide leader in green development [96]. Reducing food waste is considered a priority in the strategy. Indeed, the strategy states, “By adopting circular economy strategies in the food sector, the UAE expects that its ecosystems will be healthier, its food healthier and more nutritious, its food wasted reduced and its organic wastes more productively used.” (p. 15). The strategy also aims to raise public awareness and implement educational campaigns focused on nutritional guidelines and food waste reduction. These efforts would inform consumers about correctly interpreting best-before and use-by labels to decrease unnecessary waste. Outreach related to social events like weddings and religious celebrations would further promote less wasteful food habits. The strategy seeks to spread knowledge on mitigating food waste [97].
Likewise, in Qatar, in August 2021, the Ministry of Municipality and Environment announced a resolution on food waste. All outlets must now sort their garbage into solid and organic categories. The Ministry also established a strategic plan to eliminate agricultural overproduction and food waste. Due to this endeavor, organic waste will also be recycled into fertilizers and fodders. According to the plan, the school curriculum will include lessons on food waste reduction and public awareness campaigns will be created to promote a food-saving mindset. These programs will also be conducted in conjunction with restaurants to teach them how to prepare and serve meals that meet the needs of their consumers [98].
Moreover, there was a discussion of new legislation in the Egyptian House of Representatives in May 2022 to regulate food waste and encourage its redistribution, recycling, and donation. Food service providers such as restaurants and grocery stores face various fines under the new rule if they do not donate food that is fit for human consumption. The policy encourages and incentivizes recycling and a more reasonable approach to food consumption to prevent wasting surplus food people cannot consume [99].
In addition, food waste might be reduced with the help of startups and digital technologies [90]. Recently, many startups have been created in the NENA region to address the issue of food waste. For instance, in 2021, a food waste and climate change app, EroeGo, was created in the United Arab Emirates. EroeGo is an online grocery marketplace that allows consumers to purchase fresh products that are about to expire at reduced prices [100]. The startup also aims to change the notion of “unwanted” food in the region by providing a transparent platform that offers its consumers basic nutritional information, an efficient purchasing cycle for fresh items, and fair remuneration for its delivery drivers. Likewise, the startup Foodeals, created in Morocco in 2020, intends to become the greatest anti-food waste movement in the Middle East and Africa. Users may geolocate themselves and discover nearby companies providing specials or unsold items of the day using its application, inspired by the circular economy. Thus, the customer saves money, and the shopkeeper makes up for their loss of income while increasing their exposure. Currently functioning in Fez (central Morocco), Foodeals plans to expand to the Kingdom’s other main cities shortly, with a dozen pilot firms already in place. As part of its business-to-business (B2B) strategy, the startup aims to connect significant supermarkets and agribusinesses with NGOs with daily food requirements [101]. In the United Arab Emirates, Winnow, a British startup, makes kitchens smarter to aid food service and hospitality businesses. Artificial intelligence tools enabled by Winnow are used by some of Dubai’s most prestigious hotels to identify the kind of food items that are thrown out, as well as the amount of food that is thrown away. To reduce food wastage, commercial kitchens might use the information provided by the data to monitor their purchases and menus [102].

6. Discussion and Conclusions

Addressing FLW drivers throughout value chains gives us a chance to address some of the key issues within the NENA region’s agrifood systems and contribute to goals such as increasing income and employment, enhancing access to healthy food, and minimizing climate change impact, as well as achieving a better use of finite natural resources, notably arable land, and water [41]. With unexpected changes in content and amount, the COVID-19 pandemic significantly influenced worldwide FLW generation patterns, particularly food waste. This paper highlights that the current socio-economic crisis triggered by the pandemic in the NENA region has generated unique opportunities for creating a circular economy and circular resource management, which might stimulate economic recovery. Further, putting circularity at the center of natural resource management plans will increase resource availability and value extraction. Consequently, in the NENA region, we notice a growing awareness of the importance of addressing the issue of FLW at all levels (regional, national, and local) and from different stakeholders (from the public, civil society, and private sectors).
The previous section highlighted some promising developments related to circular economy and food waste reduction emerging in a few NENA countries. It is important to acknowledge that circular economy strategies in the region are still in their infancy, especially when it comes to concrete policies and national plans targeting food loss and waste. Consequently, few countries in the NENA region have designed and implemented strategies or policies promoting a circular economy. This study highlighted individual cases from the UAE, Qatar, and Egypt. However, there is no comprehensive regional circular economy policy or plan for reducing food waste. Specific themes, such as increasing home waste sorting, school education campaigns, and regulating food donations, have been explored on a national or municipal level rather than as part of a coordinated regional effort.
Based on a recent report by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) (German Society for International Cooperation) [103] examining the condition of circular economy in seven countries within the region (Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Tunisia, and the Palestinian Territories), it is evident that the CE encounters several challenges in this area. Firstly, the interpretation of the CE in these countries primarily focuses on steps aimed at mitigating the effect of current activities rather than adapting to reduce the impact of new activities from the start. In reality, the MENA area seems deficient in material circularity-focused CE projects that aim to close the loop by concentrating on the entire life cycle of products and services. Second, although the governments of these countries have developed national waste management policies, their actual enforcement and execution are limited, reducing their overall effectiveness. In certain countries, such as Morocco, strong legal frameworks have been put in place, and specialized government organizations have been entrusted with aiding the transition to a circular economy.
On the other hand, countries such as Algeria, Lebanon, the West Bank, and Gaza have challenges in moving these efforts forward, principally due to political instability and shaky governance institutions. Finally, research on CE themes in the MENA area is limited and focused on specific industries for each nation, with Morocco and Tunisia being the most active. Most of the available literature comes from foreign organizations rather than local research institutions, and it lacks information on themes like circular design and innovation [103].
As a general observation, short-term post-pandemic recovery strategies in the region encouraged business as usual, and most countries did not aggressively pursue green, resilient, or merely longer-term recoveries in the immediate aftermath of the pandemic [16]. However, given the future issues the region will face, such as climate change and rising population, strengthening circularity becomes even more imperative. While the circular economy can potentially reduce food loss and waste in NENA, the actual implementation is still in its early stages. More studies are required to evaluate the policies and initiatives in all NENA countries comprehensively. Standardized objectives and measuring methodologies would help nations learn from one other’s circular economy projects for reducing food waste. Regional collaboration might also aid in the rapid adoption of circular processes. As a result, policymakers must consider how best to encourage circular economy principles in the public and private sectors [95].
To solve these issues, addressing the distorting effects of food subsidies, the lack of community engagement, the inadequacy of current policies, and the inadequate channels for coordination between the many sectors engaged in reducing food waste is compulsory. Subsidies are financially unsustainable for governments, yet they are socio-economically necessary to maintain social peace [104]. Further, the impact of the present conflict in Ukraine on global food systems and supply chains (e.g., price increases) may provide a unique chance to increase awareness of the necessity of reducing food waste to support food security in the NENA region. The war emphasizes that the shift towards more sustainable and resilient food systems that guarantee food and nutrition security in the face of crises is timely, urgent, and highly needed. Given the interconnected nature of global agricultural markets, the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, two major players in the global food and fertilizer industries, has provoked extensive concerns regarding food security worldwide and sustaining global food supplies [105,106]. The conflict challenges many countries, particularly food import-reliant NENA countries [107,108].
Finally, reducing food waste and promoting the circular economy in the NENA region require collaborative efforts between different stakeholders, effective policies and regulations, innovation, and a more holistic and systemic approach that operationalizes connections between the circular economy and other alternative economic models. Moving from fragmented efforts to comprehensive food waste reduction roadmaps supported by solid monitoring and evaluation systems is required. A circular economy approach that prioritizes renewable energy, minimizes waste, and optimizes resource use can contribute to environmental sustainability. In contrast, a green and blue economy approach can promote sustainable economic growth and enhance social welfare. By adopting these strategies, the NENA region can achieve a sustainable food system that benefits both the environment and society [109].
First, collaborative efforts and networking between governments, the business sector, consumer groups, and non-governmental organizations are essential to meet the challenges the agrifood industry poses. This collaborative approach can promote the exchange of ideas and best practices, enabling the sharing of resources and building partnerships to address the issue of food waste. Policies and regulations play a significant role in driving measures to reduce FLW, but their effectiveness depends on faithful execution and mechanisms to verify compliance. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) emphasizes the importance of implementing policies and regulations that encourage responsible production and consumption patterns to reduce food waste [37].
Second, innovation is crucial to reducing food waste and promoting circularity and circular economy in the food system in the NENA region. Technological innovations such as developing efficient packaging and storage systems can minimize food spoilage and waste. Social innovations such as education and awareness campaigns that encourage responsible consumption and discourage food waste can also reduce food waste. Likewise, efforts should be made to increase awareness among residents about the environmental, social, and economic consequences of food waste. Launching food waste awareness programs tailored to cultural contexts, focusing on families, and training food industry actors is required. Messaging should encourage better buying habits, storage methods, portion proportions, and waste separation, which can help change consumer behavior and promote responsible food consumption and waste reduction practices. Third, efforts should be made to encourage and control waste reduction in the retail sector via training, certification programs, and legal restrictions on discarding unsold edible food.
Fourthly, future policies and initiatives addressing food waste in the NENA area should expressly include and recognize the informal sector’s contribution. The informal sector, primarily involved in garbage collection and recycling, is a largely neglected resource for achieving the most significant waste reduction and prevention goals. This sector’s extensive knowledge of local waste management techniques, agility, and community involvement make it an ideal partner in building a more robust and efficient circular economy. To realize this potential, strategic actions should include extensive research to document the sector’s current practices and challenges, policy integration to formalize and regulate operations, capacity-building initiatives to improve worker skills, stakeholder collaboration for innovative waste management solutions, and the implementation of incentive mechanisms to encourage active participation in food waste reduction initiatives. Adopting these strategic activities will not only address the environmental and economic aspects of waste management, but will also promote social inclusion and equality. Moreover, the countries of the region should develop national food loss and waste reduction objectives that are connected with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and implement food waste taxes to promote change.
Finally, given the lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic, it is critical to understand food waste management not as a separate issue but as an important component of more extensive public health emergency preparation and response. The pandemic has highlighted our food system’s vulnerability to global health crises, emphasizing the need of robust and adaptable food waste management measures. The lessons learned during this era provide essential information for future situations, implying that food waste management should be included in public health emergency preparedness to maintain food security, sustainability, and community well-being. This study adds to our knowledge of the complex interaction between food waste management and crisis response mechanisms by putting our results in the context of public health catastrophes. It is believed that these findings will help policymakers and stakeholders create resilient systems capable of overcoming the multiple difficulties offered by future global crises.

7. Limitations and Future Directions

The main limitation of this paper is that it focuses specifically on the NENA region. As a result, our findings and recommendations may have limited generalizability to other areas or contexts. The specific socio-economic, cultural, and environmental characteristics of the NENA region may influence the applicability of the suggested strategies in different geographical areas. Future research on sustainable food waste management in the NENA region can focus on the following directions to further advance knowledge and address existing gaps. Firstly, conducting in-depth studies that delve into the specific socio-economic, cultural, and environmental contexts of individual countries or sub-regions within the NENA region would provide a more nuanced understanding of food waste management practices. Such research would help identify region-specific challenges, opportunities, and potential solutions tailored to local contexts.
Secondly, although the preliminary results indicated that COVID-19 hardship measures decreased household waste in the short term, longitudinal research is required to determine long-term attitudinal and behavioral changes. Monitoring whether enhanced planning and storage practices remain after the pandemic gives essential insights into social habit formation processes. Follow-up surveys may reveal if the increased waste awareness is a temporary crisis reaction or an incentive for a proper move to sustainability.
Thirdly, studies should be conducted to assess the efficacy of context-specific behavioral nudges and social marketing approaches in encouraging home waste reduction. Environmental triggers, customized messages, and social comparisons are all approaches that should be tested and refined depending on cultural variations. Similarly, analyzing educational efforts may help to optimize welfare and sustainability results.
Finally, more research is needed to assess the effectiveness and impacts of policy interventions, regulations, and governance frameworks to reduce food waste in the NENA region. Comparative studies analyzing the outcomes of different policy approaches can inform evidence-based decision-making and support the development of robust policies that encourage sustainable practices. Community-engaged research may also explore the feasibility and acceptability of suggested policy initiatives to increase their acceptance. It is critical to foster such research–policy cooperation to transform academic knowledge into significant societal shifts.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.B.C. and T.B.H.; methodology, H.E.B.; validation, C.B.C., T.B.H. and H.E.B.; formal analysis, C.B.C., T.B.H. and H.E.B.; writing—original draft preparation, C.B.C.; writing—review and editing, C.B.C., T.B.H. and H.E.B.; supervision, C.B.C.; project administration, C.B.C.; funding acquisition, C.B.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Open Access funding provided by Qatar National Library.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. HLPE. Food Losses and Waste in the Context of Sustainable Food Systems. Available online: www.fao.org/cfs/cfs-hlpe (accessed on 3 July 2020).
  2. FAO. Food Wastage Footprint. Impacts on Natural Resources; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  3. FAO. Global Food Losses and Food Waste: Extent, Causes and Prevention; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  4. FAO. The State of Food and Agriculture 2019. Moving forward on Food Loss and Waste Reduction; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  5. UNEP. UNEP Food Waste Index Report 2021. Available online: https://www.unep.org/resources/report/unep-food-waste-index-report-2021 (accessed on 19 April 2022).
  6. Amicarelli, V.; Tricase, C.; Spada, A.; Bux, C. Households’ Food Waste Behavior at Local Scale: A Cluster Analysis after the COVID-19 Lockdown. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Roodhuyzen, D.M.A.; Luning, P.A.; Fogliano, V.; Steenbekkers, L.P.A. Putting Together the Puzzle of Consumer Food Waste: Towards an Integral Perspective. Trends. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 68, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. United Nations. Shared Responsibility, Global Solidarity: Responding to the Socio-Economic Impacts of COVID-19; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  9. Jribi, S.; Ben Ismail, H.; Doggui, D.; Debbabi, H. COVID-19 Virus Outbreak Lockdown: What Impacts on Household Food Wastage? Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2020, 22, 3939–3955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wageningen University & Research. Rapid Country Assessment: Kenya. Available online: https://www.wur.nl/upload_mm/a/5/3/e99ab70b-5b12-435a-8c73-8b445a71e913_COVID-19%20Food%20System%20-%20Rapid%20Country%20Assessment-Kenya%20%28July%29.pdf (accessed on 16 August 2020).
  11. Ben Hassen, T.; El Bilali, H. Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Food Security and Food Consumption: Preliminary Insights from the Gulf Cooperation Council Region. Cogent. Soc. Sci. 2022, 8, 2064608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ben Hassen, T.; El Bilali, H.; Allahyari, M.S.; Kamel, I.M.; Ben Ismail, H.; Debbabi, H.; Sassi, K. Gendered Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Food Behaviors in North Africa: Cases of Egypt, Morocco, and Tunisia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ben Hassen, T.; El Bilali, H.; Allahyari, M.S. Impact of COVID-19 on Food Behavior and Consumption in Qatar. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. HLPE. Interim Issues Paper on the Impact of COVID-19 on Food Security and Nutrition (FSN) by the High-Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition (HLPE); HLPE: Rome, Italy, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  15. Abiad, M.G.; Meho, L.I. Food Loss and Food Waste Research in the Arab World: A Systematic Review. Food Secur. 2018, 10, 311–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Luomi, M.; Bayoumi, M. Aligning Policies with Green, Resilient and Just Recoveries in the Middle East. Available online: https://www.sustainablefinance.hsbc.com/carbon-transition/a-green-resilient-and-just-recovery-in-the-middle-east (accessed on 15 June 2022).
  17. Allahyari, M.S.; Marzban, S.; El Bilali, H.; Ben Hassen, T. Effects of COVID-19 Pandemic on Household Food Waste Behaviour in Iran. Heliyon 2022, 8, e11337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ben Hassen, T.; El Bilali, H.; Allahyari, M.S.; Morrar, R. Food Attitudes and Consumer Behavior towards Food in Conflict-Affected Zones during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Case of the Palestinian Territories. Br. Food J. 2021. ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ben Hassen, T.; El Bilali, H.; Allahyari, M.S. Food Shopping during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Exploratory Study in Four Near Eastern Countries. J. Islam. Mark. 2022, 14, 2084–2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Olaimat, A.N.; Al-Nabulsi, A.A.; Nour, M.O.; Osaili, T.M.; Alkhalidy, H.; Al-Holy, M.; Ayyash, M.; Holley, R.A. The Effect of the Knowledge, Attitude, and Behavior of Workers Regarding COVID-19 Precautionary Measures on Food Safety at Foodservice Establishments in Jordan. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Alazaiza, M.Y.D.; AbdelFattah, F.A.M.; Al Maskari, T.; Bashir, M.J.K.; Nassani, D.E.; Albahnasawi, A.; Abushammala, M.F.M.; Hamad, R.J. Effect Of COVID-19 Pandemic on Food Purchasing and Waste Generation during the Lockdown Period in The Sultanate of Oman. Glob. NEST J. 2022, 24, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Alshubaith, I.H.; Alhajri, S.; Alhajri, A.; Alsultan, R.A.; Azhar, E.I.; Alhussaini, B.H.; Al Solami, L.S.; de Oliveira, M.C.; Khafaga, A.F.; Alqurashi, A.D.; et al. The Impact of COVID-19 on the Sustainability of the Environment, Animal Health and Food Security, and Safety. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 70822–70831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mertens, E.; Peñalvo, J.L. The Burden of Malnutrition and Fatal COVID-19: A Global Burden of Disease Analysis. Front. Nutr. 2021, 7, 619850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ben Hassen, T.; El Bilali, H.; Allahyari, M.S.; Al Samman, H.; Marzban, S. Observations on Food Consumption Behaviors during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Oman. Front. Public Health 2022, 9, 779654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Azazz, A.M.S.; Elshaer, I.A. Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic, Social Media Usage and Food Waste Intention: The Role of Excessive Buying Behavior and Religiosity. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Saidi, A.; Bouhid, L.; Napoleone, C.; El Hadad-Gauthier, F.; Moussalim, S.; Alj, A. The Sustainability of the Fruit and Vegetable Supply Chain Tested by COVID-19: Case of Meknes City, Morocco. Dev. Durable Territ. 2022, 13, e21266. [Google Scholar]
  27. Saleh, H.; Al-Kahlidi, M.; Abulridha, H.; Banoon, S.; Abdelzaher, M. Current Situation and Future Prospects for Plastic Waste in Maysan Governorate: Effects and Treatment During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Egypt J. Chem. 2021, 64, 4449–4460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hoteit, M.; Ibrahim, C.; Saadeh, D.; Al-Jaafari, M.; Atwi, M.; Alasmar, S.; Najm, J.; Sacre, Y.; Hanna-Wakim, L.; Al-Jawaldeh, A. Correlates of Sub-Optimal Feeding Practices among under-5 Children amid Escalating Crises in Lebanon: A National Representative Cross-Sectional Study. Children 2022, 9, 817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. ESCWA. The Innovation Landscape in Arab Countries a Critical Analysis. Available online: https://www.unescwa.org/publications/innovation-landscape-arab-countries-critical-analysis (accessed on 2 November 2020).
  30. Efron, S.; Fromm, C.; Gelfeld, B.; Nataraj, S.; Sova, C. Food Security in the Gulf Cooperation Council. Available online: www.rand.org/cmepp (accessed on 12 July 2020).
  31. The Economist Intelligence Unit. Global Food Security Index 2022. Available online: https://impact.economist.com/sustainability/project/food-security-index/resource-library (accessed on 3 May 2023).
  32. World Food Programme. Economic and Food Security Implications of the COVID-19 Outbreak 1 an Update with Insights from Different Regions. Available online: https://reliefweb.int/report/world/economic-and-food-security-implications-covid-19-outbreak-update-insights-different (accessed on 25 June 2020).
  33. de Carvalho, C.A.; Viola, P.C.D.A.F.; Sperandio, N. How Is Brazil Facing the Crisis of Food and Nutrition Security during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Public Health Nutr. 2020, 24, 561–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Capone, R.; El Bilali, H.; Debs, D.; Bottalico, F.; Cardone, G.; Berjan, S.; Elmenofi, G.A.G.; Aboubdillah, A.; Charbel, L.; Ali Arous, S. Bread and Bakery Products Waste in Selected Mediterranean Arab Countries. Am. J. Food Nutr. 2016, 4, 40–50. [Google Scholar]
  35. Berjan, S.; Capone, R.; Debs, P.; El Bilali, H. Food Losses and Waste: A Global Overview with a Focus on Near East and North Africa Region. Int. J. Agric. Manag. Dev. 2018, 8, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  36. FAO. Regional Overview of Food Insecurity—Near East and North Africa: Strengthening Regional Collaboration to Build Resilience for Food Security and Nutrition; FAO: Cairo, Egypt, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  37. FAO. Regional Strategic Framework—Reducing Food Losses and Waste in the Near East & North Africa Region. Available online: https://www.fao.org/policy-support/tools-and-publications/resources-details/en/c/1300339/ (accessed on 14 June 2022).
  38. Standing Committee for Economic and Commercial Cooperation of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. Reducing Food Waste in the OIC Countries; COMCEC: Ankara, Turkey, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  39. Baig, M.B.M.B.; Gorski, I.; Neff, R.A.R.A. Understanding and Addressing Waste of Food in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 26, 1633–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. El Bilali, H.; Ben Hassen, T. Food Waste in the Countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council: A Systematic Review. Foods 2020, 9, 463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Anríquez, G.; Foster, W.; Rocha, S.; Ortega, J.; Smolak, J.; Jansen, S. Reducing Food Loss and Waste in the Near East and North Africa—Producers, Intermediaries and Consumers as Key Decision-Makers; FAO: Cairo, Egypt, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  42. FAO. FAO and UNEP Join Hands to Prevent Food Waste in the Arab Region. Available online: https://www.fao.org/neareast/news/view/en/c/1397462/ (accessed on 13 June 2022).
  43. FAO. Reducing Food Loss and Waste in the Near East and North Africa; FAO: Cairo, Egypt, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  44. FAO. Rapport de Synthèse Sur La Réducṅon Des Pertes Post-Récolte Des Produits Alimentaires Au Maroc; FAO: Ribat, Morocco, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  45. FAO. Report of the Expert Consultation Meeting on Food Losses and Waste Reduction in the Near East Region: Towards a Regional Comprehensive Strategy; FAO: Cairo, Egypt, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  46. Baig, M.B.M.B.; Al-Zahrani, K.H.K.H.; Schneider, F.; Straquadine, G.S.G.S.; Mourad, M. Food Waste Posing a Serious Threat to Sustainability in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia—A Systematic Review. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 26, 1743–1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sassi, K.; Capone, R.; Abid, G.; Debs, P.; El Bilali, H.; Daaloul Bouacha, O.; Bottalico, F.; Driouech, N.; Sfayhi Terras, D. Food Wastage by Tunisian Households. Int. J. AgroFor 2016, 1, 172–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Elmenofi, G.; Capone, R.; Waked, S.; Debs, P.; Bottalico, F.; El Bilali, H. An Exploratory Survey on Household Food Waste in Egypt. In Proceedings of the VI International Scientific Agriculture Symposium “Agrosym 2015”, Jahorina, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 15–18 October 2015; pp. 1298–1304. [Google Scholar]
  49. Ali Arous, S.; Capone, R.; Debs, P.; Haddadi, Y.; El Bilali, H.; Bottalico, F.; Hamidouche, M. Exploring Household Food Waste Issue in Algeria. AgroFor Int. J. 2017, 2, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Abouabdillah, A.; Capone, R.; El Youssfi, L.; Debs, P.; Harraq, A.; El Bilali, H.; El Amrani, M.; Bottalico, F.; Driouech, N. Household Food Waste in Morocco: An Exploratory Survey. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Scientific Agricultural Symposium “Agrosym 2015”, Jahorina, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 15–18 October 2015; University of East Sarajevo: Lukavica, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2015; pp. 1353–1360. [Google Scholar]
  51. Ernst & Young; HSBC. Food for the Future: Sustainable Agriculture Sector in Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the UAE. Available online: https://www.sustainablefinance.hsbc.com/-/media/gbm/sustainable/attachments/food-for-the-future.pdf (accessed on 15 June 2022).
  52. Brixi, H.; El-Gammal, Y. Il Est Temps Que Le Monde Arabe Investisse Dans Sa Population Plutôt Que Dans Des Subventions. Available online: https://blogs.worldbank.org/fr/arabvoices/investir-dans-la-population-et-non-les-subventions (accessed on 14 June 2022).
  53. Ministry of Supply and Internal Trade. Results of the Tamween Program in 2019. Available online: http://www.msit.gov.eg/details.html?topicID=574 (accessed on 19 January 2023).
  54. Negm, A.M.; Shareef, N. Introduction to the “Waste Management in MENA Regions”. In Waste Management in MENA Regions; Negm, A.M., Shareef, N., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  55. Kumar, V.; Brancoli, P.; Narisetty, V.; Wallace, S.; Charalampopoulos, D.; Kumar Dubey, B.; Kumar, G.; Bhatnagar, A.; Kant Bhatia, S.; Taherzadeh, M.J. Bread Waste—A Potential Feedstock for Sustainable Circular Biorefineries. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 369, 128449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. WRAP. Reducing Household Bakery Waste. Available online: https://wrap.org.uk/resources/report/reducing-household-bakery-waste (accessed on 2 February 2024).
  57. Brancoli, P.; Lundin, M.; Bolton, K.; Eriksson, M. Bread Loss Rates at the Supplier-Retailer Interface—Analysis of Risk Factors to Support Waste Prevention Measures. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 147, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jung, J.-M.; Kim, J.Y.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, S.M.; Jung, S.; Song, H.; Kwon, E.E.; Choi, Y.-E. Zero-Waste Strategy by Means of Valorization of Bread Waste. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 365, 132795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sharma, H.B.; Vanapalli, K.R.; Cheela, V.S.; Ranjan, V.P.; Jaglan, A.K.; Dubey, B.; Goel, S.; Bhattacharya, J. Challenges, Opportunities, and Innovations for Effective Solid Waste Management during and Post COVID-19 Pandemic. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 162, 105052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Laborde, D.; Martin, W.; Swinnen, J.; Vos, R. COVID-19 Risks to Global Food Security. Science 2020, 369, 500–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Di Marcantonio, F.; Twum, E.K.; Russo, C. COVID-19 Pandemic and Food Waste: An Empirical Analysis. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wageningen University & Research. Rapid Country Assessment: Bangladesh. Available online: https://www.wur.nl/en/Research-Results/Research-Institutes/centre-for-development-innovation/Our-Value-Propositions/Guiding-Sector-Transformation/The-effects-of-COVID-19-on-food-systems-rapid-assessments/Rapid-Country-Assessment-Bangladesh.htm (accessed on 16 August 2020).
  63. Galanakis, C.M. The Food Systems in the Era of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic Crisis. Foods 2020, 9, 523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. FAO; WFP; IFAD. Food Security in Iraq—Impact of COVID-19 (June–August 2020). Available online: https://reliefweb.int/report/iraq/food-security-iraq-impact-covid-19-june-august-2020-enar (accessed on 25 April 2022).
  65. FAO; ESCWA. Arab Food Security: Vulnerabilities and Pathways. Available online: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/arab-regional-food-security-vulnerabilities-resilience-covid-19-crisis-english.pdf (accessed on 25 April 2022).
  66. Rodgers, R.F.; Lombardo, C.; Cerolini, S.; Franko, D.L.; Omori, M.; Linardon, J.; Guillaume, S.; Fischer, L.; Tyszkiewicz, M.F. “Waste Not and Stay at Home” Evidence of Decreased Food Waste during the COVID-19 Pandemic from the U.S. and Italy. Appetite 2021, 160, 105110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. CIHEAM. The COVID-19 Pandemic: Threats on Food Security in the Mediterranean Region. Available online: https://www.ciheam.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/COVID-rapport-FINAL-1.pdf (accessed on 15 August 2020).
  68. FAO. COVID-19 and Its Impact on Food Security in the Near East and North Africa: How to Respond? Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/ca8778en/CA8778EN.pdf (accessed on 6 September 2020).
  69. Lehberger, M.; Kleih, A.-K.; Sparke, K. Panic Buying in Times of Coronavirus (COVID-19): Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior to Understand the Stockpiling of Nonperishable Food in Germany. Appetite 2021, 161, 105118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Messner, W.; Payson, S.E. Effects of National Culture on the Extent of Panic Buying during the COVID-19 Outbreak. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 2021, 34, 235–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Tsao, Y.C.; Raj, P.V.R.P.; Yu, V. Product Substitution in Different Weights and Brands Considering Customer Segmentation and Panic Buying Behavior. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2019, 77, 209–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. El Bilali, H.; Ben Hassen, T.; Baya Chatti, C.; Abouabdillah, A.; Alaoui, S.B. Exploring Household Food Dynamics During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Morocco. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 724803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Omar, N.A.; Nazri, M.A.; Ali, M.H.; Alam, S.S. The Panic Buying Behavior of Consumers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Examining the Influences of Uncertainty, Perceptions of Severity, Perceptions of Scarcity, and Anxiety. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 62, 102600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Naja, F.; Hamadeh, R. Nutrition amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multi-Level Framework for Action. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2020, 74, 1117–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wesseler, J. Storage Policies: Stockpiling Versus Immediate Release. J. Agric. Food Ind. Organ 2020, 18, 20190055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Cranfield, J.A.L. Framing Consumer Food Demand Responses in a Viral Pandemic. Can. J. Agric. Econ./Rev. Can. D’agroeconomie 2020, 68, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sarkis, J.; Cohen, M.J.; Dewick, P.; Schröder, P. A Brave New World: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic for Transitioning to Sustainable Supply and Production. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 159, 104894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ben Hassen, T.; El Bilali, H.; Allahyari, M.S.; Charbel, L. Food Shopping, Preparation and Consumption Practices in Times of COVID-19: Case of Lebanon. J. Agribus. Dev. Emerg. Econ. 2021. ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ben Hassen, T.; Baya Chatti, C.; El Bilali, H. Impact of COVID-19 on Food Behavior and Diet in Qatar: A Cross-Sectional Survey on the Omicron Variant. Nutr. Health 2023. Available online: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02601060231189637 (accessed on 9 November 2023).
  80. Khaleej Times. How Much Food UAE Residents Waste in a Year. Available online: https://www.khaleejtimes.com/news/general/how-much-food-uae-residents-waste-in-a-year (accessed on 13 June 2022).
  81. Filimonau, V. The Prospects of Waste Management in the Hospitality Sector Post COVID-19. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 168, 105272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Arab News. Will Fall in Food Waste in the Middle East Outlast the Coronavirus Pandemic? Available online: https://www.arabnews.com/node/1774936/middle-east (accessed on 13 June 2022).
  83. UNEP. The State of Food Waste in West Asia. Available online: https://www.unep.org/resources/report/state-food-waste-west-asia (accessed on 6 November 2023).
  84. Vargas-Lopez, A.; Cicatiello, C.; Principato, L.; Secondi, L. Consumer Expenditure, Elasticity and Value of Food Waste: A Quadratic Almost Ideal Demand System for Evaluating Changes in Mexico during COVID-19. Socioecon. Plann. Sci. 2021, 82, 101065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. International Monetary Fund. World Economic Outlook Update, June 2020: A Crisis Like No Other, an Uncertain Recovery. Available online: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2020/06/24/WEOUpdateJune2020 (accessed on 31 July 2020).
  86. Durante, K.M.; Laran, J. The Effect of Stress on Consumer Saving and Spending. J. Mark. Res. 2016, 53, 814–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Fanelli, R.M.; Florio, A. Di Domestic Food Waste, Gap in Times of Crisis. Ital. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2016, 71, 111–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Martinengo, M.C. Household Food Waste and Consumer Culture: Reflections on Italian Behaviour. J. Nutr. Ecol. Food Res. 2014, 2, 73–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hassan, H.F.; Rizk, Y.; Chalak, A.; Abiad, M.G.; Mattar, L. Household Food Waste Generation during COVID-19 Pandemic and Unprecedented Economic Crisis: The Case of Lebanon. J. Agric. Food Res. 2023, 14, 100749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Material Economics. The Circular Economy and COVID-19 Recovery: How Pursuing a Circular Future for Europe Fits with Recovery from the Economic Crisis. Available online: https://materialeconomics.com/material-economics-the-circular-economy-and-covid-19-recovery.pdf?cms_fileid=0704a908d9b4cecad7d9768bb1193fdc (accessed on 14 June 2022).
  91. Al-Saidi, M.; Dehnavi, S. Toward a Circular Economy in the MENA Region: Insights from the Water-Food Nexus. In Economic Development in the MENA Region; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 139–159. [Google Scholar]
  92. Geissdoerfer, M.; Morioka, S.N.; de Carvalho, M.M.; Evans, S. Business Models and Supply Chains for the Circular Economy. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 190, 712–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Korhonen, J.; Honkasalo, A.; Seppälä, J. Circular Economy: The Concept and Its Limitations. Ecol. Econ. 2018, 143, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. ACTED. Circularity as a Lifeline for MENA Economies in Distress. Available online: https://www.acted.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/circularity-as-a-lifeline-for-mena-economies-in-distress-v3.pdf (accessed on 14 June 2022).
  95. Italian Institute for International Political Studies. Circular Approaches for the Middle East Sustainable Development. Available online: https://med.ispionline.it/agenda/circular-approaches-for-the-middle-east-sustainable-development/ (accessed on 14 June 2022).
  96. Emirates News Agency. Mohammed Bin Rashid Chairs First UAE Cabinet Meeting in 2021. Available online: https://wam.ae/en/details/1395302903978 (accessed on 14 June 2022).
  97. The Government of the United Arab Emirates. UAE Circular Economy Policy 2021–2031. Available online: https://u.ae/en/about-the-uae/economy/circular-economy (accessed on 14 June 2022).
  98. The Peninsula Qatar. Qatar Adopts Strategic Plan to Reduce Food Waste: Official. Available online: https://thepeninsulaqatar.com/article/14/08/2021/Qatar-adopts-strategic-plan-to-reduce-food-waste-Official (accessed on 14 June 2022).
  99. Egypt Today. Egypt’s Parliament Considers Bill Regulating Food Waste. Available online: https://www.egypttoday.com/Article/1/115471/Egypt’s-parliament-considers-bill-regulating-food-waste (accessed on 14 June 2022).
  100. Food Tank. 12 Apps Preventing Household Food Waste and Protecting the Planet. Available online: https://foodtank.com/news/2021/09/apps-preventing-household-food-waste-and-protecting-the-planet/ (accessed on 14 June 2022).
  101. KAWA News. 4 Startups Fighting against Food Waste in Mena. Available online: https://kawa-news.com/en/4-startups-fighting-against-food-waste-in-mena/ (accessed on 14 June 2022).
  102. Khaleej Times. Innovations Key to Cutting Food Waste. Available online: https://www.khaleejtimes.com/opinion/innovations-key-to-cutting-food-waste (accessed on 17 June 2022).
  103. GIZ. Assessment Report—The Circular Economy Ecosystem in the MENA Region. Available online: https://greentechknowledgehub.de/publications/assessment-report-circular-economy-ecosystem-mena-region (accessed on 3 February 2024).
  104. Abis, S.; Bertin, A. How the War in Ukraine Exacerbates Food Insecurity in the MENA Region. Available online: https://www.ispionline.it/en/pubblicazione/how-war-ukraine-exacerbates-food-insecurity-mena-region-34722 (accessed on 17 January 2023).
  105. Berkhout, P.; Bergevoet, R.; van Berkum, S. A Brief Analysis of the Impact of the War in Ukraine on Food Security. Available online: https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/596254 (accessed on 6 May 2022).
  106. Welsh, C. The Russia-Ukraine War and Global Food Security: A Seven-Week Assessment, and the Way Forward for Policymakers. Available online: https://www.csis.org/analysis/russia-ukraine-war-and-global-food-security-seven-week-assessment-and-way-forward (accessed on 6 May 2022).
  107. Benton, T.; Froggatt, A.; Wellesley, L.; Grafham, O.; King, R.; Morisetti, N.; Nixey, J.; Schröder, P. The Ukraine War and Threats to Food and Energy Security: Cascading Risks from Rising Prices and Supply Disruptions. Available online: https://chathamhouse.soutron.net/Portal/Public/en-GB/RecordView/Index/191102 (accessed on 8 May 2022).
  108. FAO. Impact of the Ukraine-Russia Conflict on Global Food Security and Related Matters under the Mandate of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/ni734en/ni734en.pdf (accessed on 11 May 2022).
  109. World Bank. Middle East & North Africa Climate Roadmap (2021–2025). Available online: https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/6f868d4a875db3ef23ef1dc747fcf2ca-0280012022/original/MENA-Roadmap-Final-01-20.pdf (accessed on 15 July 2023).
Sustainability 16 03772 g001
Figure 1. Food waste change during the COVID-19 pandemic in Qatar. Source: Ben Hassen, et al. [13].
Figure 1. Food waste change during the COVID-19 pandemic in Qatar. Source: Ben Hassen, et al. [13].
Sustainability 16 03772 g001
Sustainability 16 03772 g002
Figure 2. Recycling of food leftovers in West Asia pre and post COVID-19. Source: UNEP [83].
Figure 2. Recycling of food leftovers in West Asia pre and post COVID-19. Source: UNEP [83].
Sustainability 16 03772 g002
Table 1. Estimation of food loss in wheat and fruit value chains in Morocco using survey and sampling methods, 2015 (percentage of physical losses).
Table 1. Estimation of food loss in wheat and fruit value chains in Morocco using survey and sampling methods, 2015 (percentage of physical losses).
ProductHarvestStorageTransportWholesaleRetailProcessing
Soft Wheat1014110 2
Apple10192149---
Citrus51–221–2------
Fig (fresh)---------5---
Fig (dried)---2–5---Minimal2–55–10
Prickly pear16---------------
Dates14192Minimal------
Source: FAO [44].
Table 2. Comparative analysis of household food waste: a country-by-country overview of the NENA Region.
Table 2. Comparative analysis of household food waste: a country-by-country overview of the NENA Region.
CountryHousehold Food Waste Estimate (kg/Capita/Year)Household Food Waste
Estimate (Tons/Year)		Confidence in
Estimate
  Algeria913,918,529Very low confidence
  Bahrain132216,161Medium confidence
  Egypt919,136,941Very low confidence
  Iraq1204,734,434Medium confidence
  Jordan93939,897Low confidence
  Kuwait95397,727Low confidence
  Lebanon105717,491Medium confidence
  Libya76513,146Very low confidence
  Mauritania100450,720Low confidence
  Morocco913,319,524Very low confidence
  Oman95470,322Low confidence
  Palestine101501,602Low confidence
  Qatar95267,739Low confidence
  Saudi Arabia1053,594,080High confidence
  Sudan974,162,396Very low confidence
  Syria1041,771,842Low confidence
  Tunisia911,064,407Very low confidence
  United Arab Emirates95923,675Low confidence
  Yemen1043,026,946Very low confidence
Source: UNEP [5].
Table 3. Shopping behavior and purchasing changes during the COVID-19 pandemic in Morocco (n = 340).
Table 3. Shopping behavior and purchasing changes during the COVID-19 pandemic in Morocco (n = 340).
Variable StatementFrequencyPercentage
Shopping behavior changeI go shopping less than usual18654.71
I go shopping like I used to10230
I go shopping more than usual5215.29
Change in food purchaseI buy more than usual12035.29
I buy the same as usual16548.53
I buy less than usual5516.17
Source: El Bilali et al. [72].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Baya Chatti, C.; Ben Hassen, T.; El Bilali, H. Closing the Loop: Exploring Food Waste Management in the Near East and North Africa (NENA) Region during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3772. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093772

AMA Style

Baya Chatti C, Ben Hassen T, El Bilali H. Closing the Loop: Exploring Food Waste Management in the Near East and North Africa (NENA) Region during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability. 2024; 16(9):3772. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093772

Chicago/Turabian Style

Baya Chatti, Chedli, Tarek Ben Hassen, and Hamid El Bilali. 2024. "Closing the Loop: Exploring Food Waste Management in the Near East and North Africa (NENA) Region during the COVID-19 Pandemic" Sustainability 16, no. 9: 3772. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093772

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop