Next Article in Journal
New Rock Magnetism and Magnetic Fabrics Studies on the Late Triassic Volcanic Rocks from Qaidam Block, Northern Tibetan Plateau
Next Article in Special Issue
Multi-Elemental Characterization of Soils in the Vicinity of Siderurgical Industry: Levels, Depth Migration and Toxic Risk
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation and Properties of Expansive Backfill Material Based on Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Fly Ash and Coal Gangue
Previous Article in Special Issue
Source and Migration Pathways of Heavy Metals in Soils from an Iron Mine in Baotou City, China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Source Analysis and Bioavailability of Soil Cadmium in Poyang Lake Plain of China Based on Principal Component Analysis and Positive Definite Matrix Factor

1
Jiangxi Nonferrous Geological Mineral Exploration and Development Institute, Nanchang 330030, China
2
Jiangxi Geological Survey and Exploration Institute, Nanchang 330030, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2024, 14(5), 514; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14050514
Submission received: 11 March 2024 / Revised: 26 April 2024 / Accepted: 7 May 2024 / Published: 15 May 2024

Abstract

:
In order to identify the source and bioavailability of soil Cd in the alluvial geological high background area, 3799 topsoil samples and 140 root soil samples were collected from the Jiulong area on the south bank of Poyang Lake, Jiangxi Province. The results confidently indicate that the range of topsoil Cd content is 0.02~8.12 ppm, with an exceedance rate of 14.6%. It is noteworthy that exceedance points were mostly distributed in quaternary sediments. The geostatistical analysis clearly shows that the spatial distribution characteristic of topsoil Cd is higher in the north and lower in the south. The area with extremely high values (>90% quantile) is predominantly located in the tidal flat and low-lying areas of the mainstream of the Xinjiang River. The PCA analysis confirms that the main source of topsoil Cd is man-made activities related to industry and mining. Soil Cd is primarily derived from upstream industrial and mining discharge (58.5%), as revealed by the PMF model analysis. The active Cd content in root soil is 77 ppb, with higher levels observed in the north and lower levels in the south. These findings suggest a significant risk of Cd diffusion along the upstream stream and deposition in the low-lying parts of the north. It is worth noting that Cd’s bioavailability and active forms in paddy fields are the highest, which can have a detrimental effect on food security. The correlation analysis suggests that genetic sources primarily control the bioavailability of soil Cd, followed by soil physicochemical properties such as SOC, Fe-Al oxides, and soil texture. Preventing source pollution and cutting off water system transmission are effective methods for preventing and controlling soil Cd pollution. These methods ensure the safety of cultivated land in the lakeside area of Poyang Lake Plain.

1. Introduction

As a thiophile element, Cadmium (Cd) is mainly stored in sulfide minerals such as sphalerite and galena in endogenous reduction environment [1]. Soil Cd originates from the weathering of parent rock and secondary enrichment of pedogenic processes under natural conditions [2]. However, it is important to note that continuous accumulation of heavy metal pollutants is mainly caused by external inputs such as mining, smelting, and agricultural production activities. Therefore, Cd has been identified as the primary factor contributing to soil pollution in China [3]. High background soil Cd is closely related to basalt [4], black shale [5], carbonate rock [6,7] and sulfide deposits [8]. In China, high background soil Cd is mainly distributed in southwest China [9,10,11], the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River [11,12], and the Pearl River Delta [13,14,15]. Soils with different geneses exhibit significant differences in the geochemical fractions, availability, and environmental risks of high background Cd. Soil with a high background developed from carbonate rocks generally exhibits a ‘high content and low bioavailability’ characteristic, resulting in relatively low risk [6,7,9,16]. On the other hand, soil with a high background developed from black shale exhibits a ‘serious acidification and high bioavailability’ characteristic, resulting in relatively high risk [5,17,18]. Identifying the sources of heavy metal pollution in soil is a necessary prerequisite for controlling heavy metal pollution and remediating the ecological environment. Soil source analysis includes the identification process and quantitative analysis of pollution sources. The commonly used methods are geostatistical analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), the chemical mass balance model (CMB), unmixing (UNMIX), the positive definite matrix factor decomposition method (PMF), the isotope method, and so on [19].
As a seasonal shallow lake, Poyang Lake is the largest freshwater lake in China, and it plays an important role in maintaining the ecological security of the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River. Although the lake’s mineral-rich basin has earned the nickname ‘Copper Capital of China’ due to its significant non-ferrous and precious metal minerals, it is imperative to prioritize the preservation of the lake’s ecological balance. The accumulation of heavy metals and other pollutants in Poyang Lake through the river, as a result of the exploitation and smelting of mineral resources over a long period, poses a significant threat to the ecological security of the river basin. Heavy metal anomalies are evident in Poyang Lake’s surface water [20,21], sediment [22,23], and soil [24,25]. It is important to note that the current research samples are limited, and the focus of these is on the total heavy metal content in the basin. Few systematic studies have been conducted on the origin, geochemical fraction, and bioavailability of cadmium in cultivated land in lakeside areas [26]. This paper confidently analyses the enrichment characteristics and geochemical fractions of Cd in the Jiulong area on the south bank of Poyang Lake. Through the use of PCA and PMF, potential pollution sources were qualitatively speculated and their relative contributions quantified. Additionally, the bioavailability and influencing factors of Cd were thoroughly discussed. The findings provide a strong basis for the safe utilization of Cd-contaminated cultivated land and the safe production of agricultural products in the Poyang Lake area.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The study area is located in the lakeside region on the southern bank of Poyang Lake in Jiangxi Province, China (Figure 1). It covers an extensive area of 190 km2, including Jiulong Town and Fenggang Town, and boasts a subtropical humid climate with four distinct seasons, abundant rainfall, sufficient sunshine, and a short frost period. As a result, it plays a crucial role as a commercial grain base. The area is located in the Poyang Lake Plain, with a gently sloping terrain from the southern hills to the north, transitioning to the lakeside plain.
The Xinjiang River has a total length of about 300 km and a basin area of about 17,600 square kilometers. The study area is located in the lower reaches of the Xinjiang River into the Poyang lake, mainly growing rice and vegetables, without industrial production and mineral resources’ development. Yongping Copper Mine in the middle reaches of Xinjiang River is a large mine dominated by copper and sulfur, and is the second largest open pit copper mine in China. The Guixi Smelter in the middle reaches of Xinjiang River is the largest copper smelter in China and its production scale has become the second largest in the world. According to previous studies, Poyang Lake receives an annual contribution of 26.5 tons of cadmium, 123 tons of zinc, and 24.4 tons of lead from Xinjiang River [27].
Jiangxi Province belongs to the Yangtze stratigraphic area, as indicated by its regional geological records [28]. The area is mainly composed of the Qingbaikou system, Permian, Triassic, and Quaternary strata, with the Permian Leping formation and Triassic Anyuan formation being typical coal-bearing strata. The surface materials are derived from quaternary sediments, quaternary residues, black shale, metamorphic rocks, and magmatic rocks. The primary soil types in this area are red soil and paddy soil, as identified by the second national soil survey [29].

2.2. Sample and Analysis

The Arcgis 10.2 software was confidently utilized to arrange sample points based on the thorough analysis of water system distribution, land use, soil type, and regional geology. Sample points were expertly arranged according to a grid of 1.0 km × 1.0 km, with a density of 20 samples/km2 for topsoil and 1 sample/1~4 km2 for root soil. A total of 3799 topsoil samples (including inland beach samples) and 140 root soil samples of crops (rice, sesame, corn, peanut, gorgon seed, oil tea camellia) were meticulously collected with precision and care. The soil sample (0–20 cm) was confidently classified as either ‘X’ or ‘S’-type based on the shape of the plot. The sample was expertly composited from 4 to 6 subsamples collected within 50 m of the sampling site. Any visible plant detritus and rock fragments were meticulously removed from the soil samples. Following air-drying, the samples were skillfully crumbled using a wooden hammer and precisely sieved through a 10 mesh (< 2 mm) nylon sieve for analysis.
After digestion with mixed acids (HF, HNO3, HClO4, H2SO4), soil Cd and Pb were determined by an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS), and soil Cr, Cu, Ni, and Zn were determined by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES). After (HNO3, HF, HClO4) digestion, soil As and Hg were determined by atomic fluorescence spectrometry (AFS). Soil P, K2O, Na2O, CaO, MgO, SiO2, Al2O3, and Fe2O3 were determined by an X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF). Soil pH was determined by the electrode method, soil organic matter (OM) and N were determined by the volumetric method (VOL), soil S was measured by the high frequency infrared method, soil CEC was measured by the ammonium acetate exchange method, and soil mechanical composition was measured by the hydrometer method. The detection limits of As, Cd, Pb, Cr, Cu, Ni, Zn, Hg, N, P, and S were 0.24, 0.02, 2, 0.2, 0.5, 0.2, 1, 0.0005, 12.5, 6.4, and 20 ppm, respectively. The detection limits of OM, K2O, Na2O, CaO, MgO, SiO2, Al2O3, and Fe2O3 and mechanical composition were 0.05%, 0.03%, 0.03%, 0.03%, 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.5%, 0.5%, and 0.1%, while the detection limit of pH was 0.01 and the detection limit of CEC was 1 cmol kg−1. In the analysis process, the national first-class soil geochemical reference materials were tested 12 times, the qualification rate of the standard materials and monitoring samples was 100%, and the reporting rate was 100%.
The soil samples were sequentially extracted to determine seven fractions of Cd: F1—soluble fraction, F2—ion exchangeable fraction, F3—easily mobilizable fraction, F4—labile OM fraction, F5—Fe–Mn oxides fraction, F6—refractory OM fraction, and F7—residual fraction. The specific procedures and reagents are listed in Table 1. The element concentrations in the digests and extracts were measured using ICP-AES. Total digestion was performed on the samples as an internal check.
To guarantee the very high quality of the achieved results, the sum of each element extracted in the seven-step sequential extraction was compared with the results obtained by a separate aqua regia digestion as follows:
R e c o v e r y = C s u m C t o t a l C t o t a l × 100 %
where Csum is the sum of each element extracted in the seven-step sequential extraction and Ctotal is the concentration obtained by a separate aqua regia digestion.
The maximum relative standard deviation between precision was less than 40%. The accuracy of calculating the soil Cd element speciation test data is less than 19.46%, which meets the needs of this study.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Data analysis and statistical measures were performed using Excel 2021. The spatial interpolation map was created using the geostatistical analysis function of ArcGIS 10.2, and was graded based on quantile values (10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 90%). The distribution characteristics of heavy metals in soil were visually represented, allowing for intuitive inference of their sources. The topsoil content in the lakeside area was analyzed for heavy metal content using SPSS 17. Factor analysis was employed to reduce the dimensionality of the data, explaining the main information of many variables using fewer representative factors and inferring pollution sources. Factor analysis was employed to reduce the dimensionality of the data, explaining the main information of many variables using fewer representative factors and inferring pollution sources. The analysis of the source of heavy metals in soil was conducted and its contribution rate was quantified using USEPA PMF 5.0. This software applies a non-negative constraint on the factorization matrix to ensure that the source component spectrum and source contribution rate are positive, resulting in a more accurate outcome [30]. The combined use of three source analysis methods is widely employed in the analysis of pollutant sources in the atmosphere, stream sediment, soil, and other pollutants [31,32,33,34,35]. This approach yields more accurate and effective results.

2.4. Risk Assessment Methods

The Nemiro comprehensive pollution index method is commonly used to evaluate the pollution level of heavy metals in the surface soil of a lakeside area.
The single factor pollution index is as follows:
P i = C i / S i
The multi-factor comprehensive pollution index is as follows:
P n = m a x ( P i ) 2 + a v e ( P i ) 2 2
where Pi is the single factor pollution index of the element i in the soil, Ci represents the measured concentration of the element i, Si represents the evaluation standard or background value of the element i, and Pn represents the comprehensive pollution index of soil i.

3. Results

3.1. Enrichment Characteristics and Spatial Distribution

The study area shows a wide range of topsoil Cd content, ranging from 0.02 to 8.12 ppm (Table 2). The average content is 0.21 ppm, which is higher than the background value of soil in Jiangxi Province (0.10 ppm) [36]. It is worth noting that 71.8% of the samples exceed this value. The Cd contents in soils developed from quaternary sediments, quaternary residues, black shale, metamorphic rocks, and magmatic rocks are 0.30 ppm, 0.10 ppm, 0.12 ppm, 0.10 ppm, and 0.10 ppm, respectively. These values are consistent with the high geological background characteristics of fluvial and lacustrine sediments. The average Cd content in root soil was 0.16 ppm, with a range of 0.03~0.65 ppm. Notably, 75.7% of the samples exceeded the background value.
The topsoil Cd is higher in the north and lower in the south of the study area (Figure 2). The high-value area (>75% quantile) is mainly distributed in the sedimentary area of the Xinjiang River mainstream and its tributary river and lake. The extremely high-value area (>90% quantile) is particularly concentrated in the tidal flat and low-lying areas of the Xinjiang River mainstream. This concentration may be closely related to the man-made pollution imported by the industrial and mining industries in the upper reaches [22,27]. The concentration of Cd in the soil of the southern Jiulong River watershed is similar to the background value of soil in Jiangxi Province, indicating that it is not significantly affected by human activities. Furthermore, there is a clear distinction in soil pH between the north and south regions, with the south being more acidic.
The level of Cd pollution in the topsoil was evaluated using the soil environmental quality standard (GB 15618-2018) [37]. The pollution index was found to be 19.2, with an exceedance rate of 14.6%, indicating a high level of pollution. The pollution index of soils, in terms of geological genesis, follows this order: quaternary sediment > black shale > root soil > magmatic rock > quaternary residual > metamorphic rock. The study area has a high pollution index due to the high values of a few samples found in quaternary fluvial and lacustrine sediments. Nevertheless, the root soil’s pollution index is relatively slight at 1.58, with an exceedance rate of 6.43%.

3.2. Geochemical Fractions and Bioavailability Characteristics

The distribution of Cd among the different geochemical fractions in the studied soils varies greatly and is strongly influenced by soil texture, pH, Eh, CEC, organic matter, and other factors. The order of Cd geochemical fraction in root soils is as follows: F2 (64 ppb) > F7 (29 ppb) > F4 (21 ppb) > F5 (15 ppb) > F3 (11 ppb) > F6 (5.6 ppb) > F1 (1.9 ppb) (Figure 3).
F2 accounts for 43.2% of the main geochemical fraction of Cd in the root soil, which is consistent with the findings of most studies. For example, the proportion of F2 in the soil developed from black shale in Chongqing is 40.6% [38], while that of paddy soils in the high geological background area of the Pearl River Delta is 35.7% [39]. Moreover, the F2 of soils in the geological high background area of gold deposits in Shaanxi Province is 54.4% [40]. The performance of the karst area in the southwest differs significantly, with both the soil F2 and F7 measuring at 26.8% [9].
The active fraction of Cd was determined in this study by considering the available state of Tessier extraction as ∑F1–F3, and calculating the ratio of the active fraction to the sum of each extracted in the seven-step sequential extraction (∑F1–F7) to determine the bioavailability of the element [41]. The results showed that the active fraction of root soil Cd in the study area was 77 ppb, and its bioavailability was 48.9%, respectively. The active fraction of root soil Cd is higher in the north than in the south (Figure 4). This suggests that the risk of Cd diffusing along the upstream water system and depositing in the low-lying parts of the north is higher. Conversely, the available fraction is lower in the south, where human activities have less impact, resulting in a lower risk.
Paddy fields exhibit significantly higher levels of active Cd and bioavailable Cd in root soil (Figure 4). The bioavailable Cd of root soil in paddy fields is highest; that is, the bioavailability is strong, where rice root soil Cd is 59.9%, while dryland root soil availability of Cd is in the middle, for example, sesame root soil availability Cd is 40.9%, and woodland is the lowest, for example, camellia oleifera is 32.5%.

4. Discussion

4.1. Source Analysis

4.1.1. Inference Analysis Based on PCA

The characteristics and composition of soil elements are influenced not only by their geochemical properties but also by epigenetic geochemical conditions and human activities. This study confidently employed principal component analysis to examine the combination of 15 indexes, including major and heavy metal elements, to explain the characteristics of soil Cd and other elements. PCA was deemed appropriate for this study as indicated by the KMO value of 0.754. Bartlett’s sphericity test was significant at p < 0.001. A cumulative contribution rate of 74.4% was explained by the four factors selected based on initial eigenvalues greater than 1 (Table 3).
PC1 had strong positive loadings of Cr, Ni, and Fe and moderate positive loadings of As and Al, explaining about 24.1% of the total variance. The study area experiences a subtropical humid climate with abundant rainfall. The parent rock undergoes strong decomposition during the process of rock weathering and soil formation, resulting in the leaching of silicon and base materials, and the accumulation of less mobile Fe-Al oxides [29]. Typical siderophile elements, such as As, Cr, and Ni, are commonly found in association with Fe-Al oxides in epigenetic geochemical environments.
PC2 had strong positive loadings of Pb, Zn, and K and moderate positive loadings of Cd and Al, explaining about 21.6% of the total variance. K is known for its highly active chemical properties and is easily lost in water systems, resulting in its deposition in downstream rivers and lakes, making it a valuable indicator element. Copper mines and smelters are located in the middle reaches of the Xinjiang River. Unfortunately, their early mining and smelting practices were found to be disorderly, leading to the continuous diffusion of heavy metals through the surface water system. This poses a significant threat to downstream ecology [22,23].
PC3 had strong positive loadings of N, S, and soil organic carbon (SOC) and moderate positive loadings of P, explaining about 19.3% of the total variance. The weathering of black shale continues to release heavy metals into the soil [36], and human agricultural production activities will continue to import heavy metals.
PC4 had moderate positive loadings of Cd and Hg, explaining about 9.44% of the total variance. It is well known that the combustion of fossil fuels and metal smelting are the main sources of Hg emissions [42]. With rapid economic growth, industrial enterprises consume a large amount of coal, which is likely to be the primary source of Hg in atmospheric sediments.

4.1.2. Contribution Rate Based on PMF

Fifteen indexes from 3799 topsoil samples were analyzed using EPA PMF 5.0. Setting factors 2 to 7, using Robust mode, and running 20 times, PMF confidently identified three significant factors with relative contribution rates of 14.2%, 21.4%, and 64.4%, respectively (Figure 5).
PM1 has a high load of SOC (100%), N (92%), S (71.6%), P (55%), Cd (41.5%), and Hg (45.5%), which is similar to the previous PC3. The sedimentary rocks in the study area have the primary composition of shale with layers of coal or coal lines. These rocks not only contain ore but also provide ore-forming materials for the formation of epigenetic deposits [43]. The weathering of the parent rock continuously releases a significant amount of heavy metals such as Cd and Hg.
PM2 has a high load of K (59.6%), Cd (58.5%), Pb (42%), and Zn (39.5%), which is similar to the previous PC2. Thiophile elements Cd, Pb, and Zn are commonly found together in sulfide deposits. Heavy metal pollution from mining, separating these deposits, and industrial metal smelting is a major concern.
PM3 has a high load of As (82.9%), Fe (81.2%), Cr (74.8%), Al (60.5%), Ni (73.6%), Cu (58.8%), Zn (50.6%), Hg (44%), and Pb (37.3%), which is similar to the previous PC1. Red soil is a zonal soil in the subtropical region, which is characterized by desilication and iron-rich aluminization [28]. Siderophile elements such as As, Cr, Ni, Cu, Pb, and Zn are easily absorbed and enriched by negatively charged Fe-Al oxide colloids.

4.2. Effect Factors on Bioavailable Cd

Soil metal elements’ geochemical fractions and bioavailability depend on their geochemical behavior, genetic sources, and soil physicochemical conditions, including pH, organic matter, Fe-Al oxides, soil texture, and the effects of the plant rhizosphere [44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. Under natural conditions, heavy metals such as Cd are retained in primary minerals, activated and released during primary mineral decomposition, leached into water bodies, or absorbed by secondary minerals. The increase in total Cd content in soil is mainly due to the increase in steady fractions (∑F4–F7). It is important to note that the ecological risk does not increase with the increase in total content [44,45].
Pearson correlation analysis (Figure 6) showed that the content of active Cd in root soil was significantly positively correlated with total Cd and K2O. At the same time, the bioavailable Cd of root soil was significantly positively correlated with the total Cd, which meant that its biological activity increased with the increase in the total Cd. It can be considered that the exogenous input Cd in the soil is mainly active, which has a great influence on the safety of the ecosystem.
Soil Cd’s solubility and mobility are significantly influenced by various physicochemical properties, including soil organic matter (SOM), pH, CEC, and Fe-Al oxides. These factors play a crucial role in determining the geochemical fractions of Cd in soil [44,47]. In the study area, the active Cd and bioavailable Cd of root soil showed a significant positive correlation with SOC and SiO2 while exhibiting a negative correlation with Al2O3 and Fe2O3. The soil organic matter (SOM) possesses a negative charge and can effectively adsorb Cd. Furthermore, the organic matter (OM) comprises numerous oxygen-containing functional groups that readily complex or chelate with Cd. As a result, the quantity of Cd adsorbed in soil rises proportionally with the increase in OM content [45,50]. The zonal red soil exhibits desilication and is rich in Fe-Al, making it an ideal soil for fixing Cd.
The geochemical behavior of heavy metals in soil is largely influenced by soil texture, with metal elements being generally more bioavailable in fine-grained soil than in coarse-grained soil. In the study area, the bioavailable Cd in the root soil showed a significant negative correlation with clay and a significant positive correlation with silt. Sand did not show any significant correlation. The colloidal properties, humus, and Fe-Al oxides present in clay make it easier to absorb Cd [45,46].

5. Conclusions

In this paper, the sources of soil Cd contamination in the study area were analysed by geostatistical spatial analysis, PCA, and PMF. The results showed that the Cd content in the topsoil ranged from 0.02 to 8.12 ppm, which was high in the north and low in the south. The above-standard points were mainly distributed in the mudflats and low-lying areas of the mainstream of the Xinjiang River in the north of the study area, which was caused by the transport and accumulation of industrial and mineral pollutants in the upstream with the river system, and the relative contribution rate was 58.5%. This can be used as a reference for the analysis of heavy metal pollution sources in high background areas.
The morphological analysis showed that the active Cd content of the crop root soil in the study area was 77 ppb, which was high in the north and low in the south, meaning that the risk was highest in the low-lying areas in the north. The correlation showed that the active state content of Cd in root soil was controlled by genetic sources, which was related to the high activity of exogenously imported Cd. The bioavailability of Cd in root soil is 48.9%, of which that of rice fields is the highest (59.9%), dryland is in the middle, and woodland is low, which is a major threat to food security. Bioavailability is mainly controlled by genetic sources, followed by soil physical and chemical properties such as SOC, Fe-Al oxides, and soil texture. This provides an effective basis for the safe use of Cd-contaminated farmland and the safe production of agricultural products in the Poyang Lake area.

Author Contributions

B.W.: conceptualization, methodology, data curation, software, validation, visualization, writing—original draft, and writing—review and editing.; H.J.: investigation, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, software, and writing—original draft and editing.; Y.G.: formal analysis, methodology, software, and visualization.; Q.Z.: funding acquisition, project administration, methodology, investigation, and data curation.; H.Q.: project administration, methodology, investigation, supervision, and review. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Geological Prospecting Foundation of Jiangxi Province (grant numbers 20190033, 20220010, 20240084, and 20240087) and the Jiangxi Geological Bureau (grant number 2022JXDZKJKY13).

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or used during the study appear in the submitted article.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the staff for their assistance during the sample collection and laboratory work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kubier, A.; Wilkin, R.T.; Pichler, T. Cadmium in Soils and Groundwater: A Review. Appl. Geochem. 2019, 108, 1004388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Palumbo, B.; Angelone, M.; Bellanca, A.; Dazzi, C.; Hauser, S.; Neri, R.; Wilson, J. Influence of Inheritance and Pedogenesis on Heavy Metal Distribution in Soils of Sicily, Italy. Geoderma 2000, 95, 247–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ministry of Environmental Protection, Ministry of Land and Resources; Survey, Bulletin of National Soil: Beijing, China, 2014.
  4. Wang, H.X.; Li, X.; Chen, Y.; Li, Z.; Chen, J. Geochemical Behavior and Potential Health Risk of Heavy Metals in Basalt-derived Agricultural Soil and Crops: A Case Study from Xuyi County, Eastern China. Sci. Total. Environ. 2020, 729, 139058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Park, M.; Chon, H.; Marton, L. Mobility and Accumulation of Selenium and its Relationship with Other Heavy Metals in the System Rocks/Soils-Crops in Areas Covered by Black Shale in Korea. J. Geochem. Explor. J. Assoc. Explor. Geochem. 2010, 107, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Reimann, C.; Garrett, R.G. Geochemical Background—Concept and Reality. Sci. Total Environ. 2005, 350, 12–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Quezada-Hinojosa, R.P.; Matera, V.; Adatte, T.; Rambeau, C.; FöLlmi, K.B. Cadmium Distribution in Soils Covering Jurassic Olitic Limestone with High Cd Contents in the Swiss Jura. Geoderma 2009, 150, 287–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Quezada-Hinojosa, R.P.; FöLlmi, K.B.; Verrecchia, E.; Adatte, T.; Matera, V. Speciation and Multivariable Analyses of Geogenic Cadmium in Soils at Le Gurnigel, Swiss Jura Mountains. Catena 2015, 125, 10–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wen, Y.B.; Li, W.; Yang, Z.Y.; Zhang, Q.; Ji, J. Enrichment and Source Identification of Cd and Other Heavy Metals in Soils with High Geochemical Background in the Karst Region, Southwestern China. Chemosphere 2020, 245, 125620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Liu, Y.Z.; Chen, Z.J.; Xiao, T.F.; Zhu, Z.; Jia, S.; Sun, J.; Ning, Z.; Gao, T.; Liu, C. Enrichment and Environmental Availability of Cadmium in Agricultural Soils Developed on Cd-rich Black Shale in Southwestern China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 36243–36254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xie, X.J.; Ren, T.X.; Sun, H.Z. Geochemical Atlas of China; Geological Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cheng, H.X.; Yang, Z.F.; Xi, X.H.; Zhao, C.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, J.; Luo, J.; Tang, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhuang, G.; et al. Strategy and Tactics for Tracing and Source Tracking of Cd Anomalies Along the Changjiang River Basin. Quat. Sci. 2005, 25, 285–291. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wong, S.C.; Li, X.D.; Zhang, G.; Qi, S.H.; Min, Y.S. Heavy Metals in Agricultural Soils of the Pearl River Delta, South China. Environ. Pollut. 2002, 119, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Han, Z.X.; Wang, X.Q.; Chi, Q.H.; Zhang, B.M.; Tian, M. Occurrence and Source Identification of Heavy Metals in the Alluvial Soils of Pearl River Delta Region, South China. China Environ. Sci. 2018, 38, 3455–3463. [Google Scholar]
  15. Xie, S.W.; Liu, C.S.; He, B.; Chen, M.; Gao, T.; Wei, X. Geochemical Fractionation and Source Identification of Pb and Cd in Riparian Soils and River Sediments from Three Lower Reaches Located in the Pearl River Delta. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 13819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Mapel-Hernández, M.D.; Altrin, A.; Botello, A.V.; Reynoso, L. Bioavailability of Cd and Pb in Sediments of the National Park Veracruz Reef System, Gulf of Mexico—ScienceDirect. Appl. Geochem. 2021, 133, 105085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nganje, T.N.; Edet, A.; Cuthbert, S.; Adamu, C.I.; Hursthouse, A.S. The Concentration, Distribution and Health Risk from Potentially Toxic Elements in the Soil—Plant—Water System Developed on Black Shales in SE Nigeria. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2020, 165, 103806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, Y.; Xiao, T.; Zhu, Z.; Ma, L.; Ning, Z. Geogenic Pollution, Fractionation and Potential Risks of Cd and Zn in Soils from a Mountainous Region Underlain by Black Shale. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 760, 143426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yu, D.Y.; Wang, Y.H.; Ding, F.; Chen, X.; Wang, J. Comparison of Analysis Methods of Soil Heavy Metal Pollution Sources in China in Last Ten Years. Chin. J. Soil Sci. 2021, 54, 1000–1008. [Google Scholar]
  20. Duan, W.L.; He, B.; Nover, D.; Yang, G.S.; Chen, W.; Meng, H.F.; Zou, S.; Liu, C.M. Water Quality Assessment and Pollution Source Identification of the Eastern Poyang Lake Basin Using Multivariate Statistical Methods. Sustainability 2016, 8, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chu, X.D.; Wang, H.; Zheng, F.; Huang, C.; Xu, C.; Wu, D. Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Sources of Nutrients and Heavy Metals in the Xiujiang River of Poyang Lake Basin in the Dry Season. Water 2021, 13, 1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kuang, H.F.; Hu, C.H.; Wu, G.L.; Chen, M. Combination of PCA and PMF to apportion the sources of heavy metals in surface sediments from Lake Poyang during the wet season. J. Lake Sci. 2020, 32, 964–976. [Google Scholar]
  23. Dai, L.J.; Wang, L.Q.; Li, L.F.; Liang, T.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, C.; Xing, B. Multivariate Geostatistical Analysis and Source Identification of Heavy Metals in the Sediment of Poyang Lake in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 621, 1433–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Jiang, Y.; Guo, X. Multivariate and Geostatistical Analyses of Heavy Metal Pollution from Different Sources among Farmlands in the Poyang Lake Region, China. J. Soil. Sediments 2019, 19, 2472–2484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, Y.H.; Kuang, H.F.; Hu, C.H.; Ge, G. Source Apportionment of Heavy Metal Pollution in Agricultural Soils around the Poyang Lake Region Using UNMIX Model. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhou, X.Y.; Wang, X.R. Cd Contamination Status and Cost-benefits Analysis in Agriculture Soils of Yangtze River basin—ScienceDirect. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 254, 112962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, W.M.; Yang, Z.F.; Zhou, L.; Tang, M.; Yuan, G.; Liu, C. Geochemical Characteristic and Fluxes of Heavy Metals in Water System of the Poyang Lake. Geoscience 2014, 28, 512–522. [Google Scholar]
  28. Jiangxi Provincial Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources Exploration and Development. Regional Geology of China: Jiangxi; Geological Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  29. Jiangxi Provincial Land use Administration. Jiangxi Soil; China Agricultural Science and Technology Press: Beijing, China, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  30. Paatero, P.; Tapper, U. Positive Matrix Factorization: A Non-negative Factor Model with Optimal Utilization of Error Estimates of Data Values. Environmetrics 1994, 5, 111–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gupta, S.; Gadi, R.; Sharma, S.K.; Mandal, T.K. Characterization and source apportionment of organic compounds in PM10 using PCA and PMF at a traffic hotspot of Delhi. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 39, 52–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sojka, M.; Jaskuła, J. Heavy Metals in River Sediments: Contamination, Toxicity, and Source Identification—A Case Study from Poland. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Cakmak, D.; Pavlovic, P.; Mrvic, V.; Saljnikov, E.; Perovic, V.; Jaramaz, D.; Sikiric, B. Using Different Receptor Models to Determine the Sources of Available Forms of Potentially Toxic Elements in Rasina District—A Case Study. Catena 2023, 222, 106865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Anaman, R.; Peng, C.; Jiang, Z.; Liu, X.; Zhou, Z.; Guo, Z.; Xiao, X. Identifying sources and transport routes of heavy metals in soil with different land uses around a smelting site by GIS based PCA and PMF. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 823, 153759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Saba, T.; Su, S. Tracking Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Congener Patterns in Newark Bay Surface Sediment Using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF). J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 260C, 634–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. He, J.L.; Xu, G.G.; Zhu, H.M. Study on the Background Value of Soil Environment in Jiangxi Province; China Environmental Science Press: Beijing, China, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  37. GB15618; Soil Environmental Quality: Risk Control Standard for Soil of Agricultural Land. Chinese Standard: Beijing, China, 2018.
  38. Deng, S.; Duan, J.H.; Ning, M.H.; Tan, L.; Pu, G.; Chen, J.; Qi, X.; Jiang, S.; Xie, T.; Lie, Y. Accumulation and Pollution Risks of Heavy Metals in Soils and Agricultural Products from a Typical Black Shale Region with High Geological Background. Environ. Sci. 2023, 44, 2234–2242. [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang, J.X.; Hou, Q.Y.; Ye, D.J.; Yang, Z.; Yu, T. Differences of Cadmium Mobility in Paddy Soils from Different Parent Materials in the Pearl River Delta and Its Influencing Factors. Geoscience 2023, 37, 197–207. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhang, J.H.; Wang, K.Y.; Li, H.; Chen, H.Q.; Zhao, A.N. Factors Affecting Bioavailability of Heavy Metal Elements Pb and Cd in Soil of the Tongguan Gold Ore District and Their Significance. Geol. Bull. China 2014, 33, 1188–1195. [Google Scholar]
  41. Rao, C.R.M.; Sahuquillo, A.; Sanchez, J.F.L. A Review of the Different Methods Applied in Environmental Geochemistry For Single and Sequential Extraction of Trace Elements in Soils and Related Materials. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2008, 189, 291–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zheng, D.M.; Wang, Q.C.; Li, Z.B. Comparative Study of Mercury Pollution in Two Different Typical Cities of Northern China: Coal-consumed and Industrial Cities. Earth Environ. 2007, 35, 273–278. [Google Scholar]
  43. Zheng, D.; Zhou, C.H.; Shen, Y.C. Dictionary of Geographical Regionalization and Planning; China Water Conservancy and Hydropower Press: Beijing, China, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  44. Hou, Q.Y.; Yang, Z.F.; Yang, X.Y.; Yang, Y.; Lai, M. Study of distribution of geochemical speciation of cadmium and factors controlling the distribution in paddy soil profiles, Chengdu Plain, Southwest China. Earth Sci. Front. 2008, 15, 36–46. [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhang, J.W.; Wang, X.N.; Li, J.; Luo, J.J.; Wang, X.S.; Ai, S.H.; Cheng, H.G.; Liu, Z.T. Bioavailability (BA)-based risk assessment of soil heavy metals in provinces of China through the predictive BA-models. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 465, 133327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Uddin, M.K. A Review on the Adsorption of Heavy Metals by Clay Minerals, with Special Focus on the Past Decade. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 308, 438–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Akkajit, P.; Tongcumpou, C. Fractionation of Metals in Cadmium Contaminated Soil: Relation and Effect on Bioavailable Cadmium. Geoderma 2010, 156, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kabata-Pendias, A. Behavioural Properties of Trace Metals in Soils. Appl. Geochem. 1993, 8, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Adriano, D. Trace Elements in Terrestrial Environments: Biogeochemistry, Bioavailability, and Risks of Metals; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  50. Pawlik, A.; Phillips, J.D.; Šamonil, P. Roots, Rock, and Regolith: Biomechanical and Biochemical Weathering by Trees and its Impact on Hillslopes—A Critical Literature Review. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2016, 159, 142–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Maksimović, J.; Pivić, R.; Stanojković-Sebić, A.; Jovković, M.; Jaramaz, D.; Dinić, Z. Influence of Soil Type on the Reliability of the Prediction Model for Bioavailability of Mn, Zn, Pb, Ni and Cu in the Soils of the Republic of Serbia. Agronomy 2021, 11, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wen, Y.B.; Wang, Y.Y.; Ji, W.B.; Wei, N.; Liao, Q.L.; Huang, D.L.; Song, Y.X. Influencing Factors of Elevated Levels of Potentially Toxic Elements in Agricultural Soils from Typical Karst Regions of China. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Map of the study area and sampling locations.
Figure 1. Map of the study area and sampling locations.
Minerals 14 00514 g001
Figure 2. Spatial distribution of pH (a) and Cd content (b) in topsoil.
Figure 2. Spatial distribution of pH (a) and Cd content (b) in topsoil.
Minerals 14 00514 g002
Figure 3. Characteristics of Cd geochemical fractions in root soils of different crops. (a) The content of geochemical fractions. (b) Distributions of Cd in various geochemical fractions.
Figure 3. Characteristics of Cd geochemical fractions in root soils of different crops. (a) The content of geochemical fractions. (b) Distributions of Cd in various geochemical fractions.
Minerals 14 00514 g003
Figure 4. Spatial distribution of active Cd (a) and bioavailable Cd (b) in root soil.
Figure 4. Spatial distribution of active Cd (a) and bioavailable Cd (b) in root soil.
Minerals 14 00514 g004
Figure 5. Source contribution for soil indexes by PMF (%).
Figure 5. Source contribution for soil indexes by PMF (%).
Minerals 14 00514 g005
Figure 6. Correlation analysis of influencing factors of active Cd and bioavailable Cd. * 0.01 < p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01.
Figure 6. Correlation analysis of influencing factors of active Cd and bioavailable Cd. * 0.01 < p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01.
Minerals 14 00514 g006
Table 1. Procedure of Tessier sequential extraction methods.
Table 1. Procedure of Tessier sequential extraction methods.
FractionExtractantExtraction Method
Soluble fractionDistilled water (pH = 7.0)25 mL, shake 30 min at 25 °C
Ion exchangeable fraction1 mol/L MgCl2·6H2O (pH = 7.0)25 mL, shake 30 min at 25 °C
Easily mobilizable fraction1 mol/L NaAc–Hac (pH = 5.0)25 mL, shake 1 h at 25 °C
Labile OM fraction1 mol/L Na4P2O7·10H2O (pH = 10.0)25 mL, shake 40 min at 25 °C
Fe–Mn oxides fraction0.25 mol/L HONH3Cl–HCl25 mL, shake 1 h at 25 °C
Refractory OM fraction30% H2O2–HNO3 (pH = 2.0)8 mL, water bath 3 h at 83 °C, shake 10 h at 25 °C
Residual fractionHCl–HNO3–HClO4 (1:1:1)0.2 g residual sample + 5 mL HCl–HNO3–HClO4 solution
Table 2. Statistics of soil Cd content in the study area (ppm).
Table 2. Statistics of soil Cd content in the study area (ppm).
SampleParent MaterialNRangeAverageStandard
Deviation
CV
(%)
Exceedance Rate (%)Pn
TopsoilQuaternary sediments20140.02~8.120.300.5617026.319.2
Quaternary residues4680.02~0.330.100.06550.210.82
Black shale9290.02~3.210.120.141171.947.57
Metamorphic rocks3440.02~0.320.100.06550.300.80
Magmatic rocks440.03~0.530.100.08802.271.27
Study area37990.02~8.120.210.3918314.619.2
Root soil/1400.03~0.650.160.09566.431.58
Table 3. Rotating loadings of soil indexes by PCA.
Table 3. Rotating loadings of soil indexes by PCA.
IndexesPC1PC2PC3PC4
Cd−0.170.63−0.070.54
Pb−0.070.870.200.01
Zn0.280.870.010.19
As0.71−0.02−0.190.34
Cr0.82−0.29−0.020.17
Ni0.880.11−0.01−0.03
Cu0.360.440.000.11
Hg0.15−0.030.230.76
N−0.240.050.910.09
P−0.020.110.530.37
S0.08−0.010.85−0.07
K−0.220.82−0.01−0.29
Fe0.870.07−0.29−0.13
Al0.680.58−0.04−0.30
SOC−0.250.020.920.11
Initial Eigenvalue4.153.382.401.23
Cumulative Variance (%)24.145.765.074.4
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wen, B.; Jiang, H.; Gao, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Qie, H. Source Analysis and Bioavailability of Soil Cadmium in Poyang Lake Plain of China Based on Principal Component Analysis and Positive Definite Matrix Factor. Minerals 2024, 14, 514. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14050514

AMA Style

Wen B, Jiang H, Gao Y, Zhou Q, Qie H. Source Analysis and Bioavailability of Soil Cadmium in Poyang Lake Plain of China Based on Principal Component Analysis and Positive Definite Matrix Factor. Minerals. 2024; 14(5):514. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14050514

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wen, Bangyong, Hongyu Jiang, Yuan Gao, Qiangqiang Zhou, and Haiman Qie. 2024. "Source Analysis and Bioavailability of Soil Cadmium in Poyang Lake Plain of China Based on Principal Component Analysis and Positive Definite Matrix Factor" Minerals 14, no. 5: 514. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14050514

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop