Next Article in Journal
Synthetic Peptides Selected by Immunoinformatics as Potential Tools for the Specific Diagnosis of Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis
Previous Article in Journal
Isolation, Identification, Genomic Diversity, and Antimicrobial Resistance Analysis of Streptococcus suis in Hubei Province of China from 2021 to 2023
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Molecular Detection of Cryptosporidium spp. and Microsporidia in Human and Animal Stool Samples

by
María Teresa Gómez-Romano
1,
Manuel Antonio Rodríguez-Iglesias
2,3,4 and
Fátima Galán-Sánchez
2,3,*
1
C.E.P. Salus Infirmorum, 11001 Cádiz, Spain
2
Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, 11009 Cádiz, Spain
3
Instituto de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias Biomédicas de Cádiz (INiBICA), 11009 Cádiz, Spain
4
Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Cádiz, 11003 Cádiz, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2024, 12(5), 918; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12050918
Submission received: 25 March 2024 / Revised: 24 April 2024 / Accepted: 29 April 2024 / Published: 30 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Parasitology)

Abstract

:
Cryptosporidium spp. and Microsporidia are opportunistic microorganisms with remarkable zoonotic transmission potential due to their capacity to infect humans and animals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of these microorganisms in stool samples of animal and human origin. In total, 369 stool samples (205 from human patients with diarrhea and 164 of animal origin) were included in the study. Cryptosporidium spp. and Microsporidia presence were determined by using multiplex nested PCR. Positive results were analyzed by using Sanger sequencing of the amplicon, utilizing BLASTN and ClustalX software to confirm identification. Cryptosporidium spp. were found in 0.97% and 4.26% of human and animal samples, respectively. Enterocytozoon bieneusi was detected in human and animal stools in 6.82% and 3.05% of the samples, respectively. No associations were found when analyzing the presence of Cryptosporidium spp. and E. bieneusi and the demographic and clinical variables of patients and animals. This study demonstrates the presence of these microorganisms in human and animal samples from different species, and the most interesting findings are the detection of Cryptosporidium spp. in pets (e.g., rodents) that are not usually included in this type of study, and the identification of E. bieneusi in patients with diarrhea without underlying disease.

1. Introduction

Cryptosporidium spp. are protozoan parasites within the phylum Apicomplexa and they infect the microvilli of the gastrointestinal epithelium of a wide range of vertebrates, including humans [1]. Profuse diarrhea has become the most common symptom. Moreover, extraintestinal cryptosporidiosis have been reported, with lungs, the hepatobiliary system, and pancreas mainly being affected [2]. Cryptosporidiosis have been described in immunocompromised as well as in immunocompetent people [3,4], and are associated with several different types of exposures. Large outbreaks of cryptosporidiosis have been associated with person-to-person transmission and exposure to recreational waters, animal and environmental sources, and food [4,5,6,7]. While cryptosporidiosis is recognized as being among the most common causes of human parasitic diarrhea in the world, there is currently limited knowledge on Cryptosporidium infection mechanisms, a scarcity of diagnostic methods, and a need for additional therapeutic options [8].
Microsporidia are a ubiquitous group of spore-forming obligate intracellular microorganisms that infect a wide range of vertebrates and invertebrates. They belong to the phylum Microsporidia within the kingdom Fungi [9]. However, at the taxonomic level, there are some contradictions that remain in doubt. More than 220 genera, which include an additional 1700 species, have been described to date. Nine of these genera (Encephalitozoon, Enterocytozoon, Pleistophora, Trachipleistophora, Vittaforma, Anncaliia, Endoreticulatus, Tubulinosema, and Microsporidium) [10] and seventeen species are related to human infection, with Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Enterocytozoon intestinalis being the most common [11]. These species are responsible for an extensive variety of systemic and non-systemic diseases. Although chronic diarrhea is the clinical manifestation that best correlates with infection due to these microorganisms, ocular, breathing, renal, and nervous system infections have also been described [2,5]. Since the discovery of the species E. bieneusi, the number of patients affected by this microorganism has increased considerably. As a result, Microsporidia have become causal agents of intestinal and systemic infections in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and other immunocompromised individuals. Additionally, the presence of Microsporidia has been described in the feces of immunocompetent people [12]. Transmission occurs mainly through fecal–oral routes; accordingly, sources of infection are usually infected people or animals. Moreover, even food or water contaminated with spores could be an infection focus [13]. Several works have shown the zoonotic potential of Microsporidia [13,14].
Although Cryptosporidium spp. and Microsporidia are opportunistic microorganisms with a potential for zoonotic transmission, information on their prevalence in pets and other animals in close contact with humans and their contribution as an etiological agent of diarrhea in humans (mainly due to the lack of routine diagnosis in clinical laboratories) is scarce. In Spain, there has been a remarkable increase in the number of pet owners in recent years (https://www.anfaac.org/datos-sectoriales/ (accessed on 1 February 2024). In this study, we evaluate the prevalence of these microorganisms in stool samples from animal and human origin.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Origin of Samples

Feces of animal and human origin were collected over three years (2017, 2018, and 2022). The samples of animal origin refer to pets and farm animals collected in the province of Cádiz, southern Spain, whose owners were pupils of educational institutions. Dog, cat, cow, pig, and goat samples were collected by swab directly from feces, and chicken samples were recollected from cottages, in a collective way; dove feces were sampled directly from deposition places.
The human samples belong to surplus diarrhea samples. These samples were sent in Cary Blair transport medium to the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory of the Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar for routine stool culture (for the diagnosis of Salmonella enterica, Shigella spp., Campylobacter spp., Aeromonas spp., Vibrio spp., and Yersinia spp.) and included all the samples received in the laboratory during one day of each month. All the surplus diarrhea and animal samples included in the study were immediately processed for DNA extraction.

2.2. Sample Size

Using the G-Power 3.1 program, a minimum sample size of n = 112 was calculated for an effect size of 0.3, alpha = 0.05, and a power of 0.90. Nevertheless, an attempt was made to include as many patients and animals as possible, so the final samples consisted of a total of 205 human and 164 animal samples.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The association between the presence of Cryptosporidium and Microsporidia and demographic and clinical variables were evaluated by means of χ2 tests of homogeneity or Fisher’s exact test when appropriate. All the statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS software v. 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). In all cases, p values ≤ 0.05 were considered significant.

2.4. DNA Extraction

For DNA extraction, ASL buffer (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany) was used, following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 500 µL of ASL buffer was added to 15 µL of the stool sample in Cary Blair medium (human samples) or a feces suspension in sterile distilled water (animal samples); the mix was vortexed for 20 s, incubated for 10 min at 95 °C, and then centrifuged at 13,000 for 5 min. The supernatant was used for DNA extraction using the EZ1 automated extraction system (QIAGEN).

2.5. Bacterial 16S rRNA Gene PCR

In order to discard PCR inhibitors, a 16S rRNA gene PCR was performed on all the samples. The PCR reactions were set in a 25 µL final volume. Each PCR tube contained 2.5 µL of My Taq HS DNA polymerase (Bioline Meridian Bioscience, Cincinnati, OH, USA), 5 µL of DNA, 5 µL of 5× PCR buffer, 0.25 µM of primers fD1 (AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG), and rD2 (ACGGCTACCTTGTTAGCACTT). A total of 40 cycles were carried out, each consisting of 94 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 15 s, and 72 °C for 30 s, with an initial hot start at 94 °C for 5 min and a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. PCR amplification products were resolved by electrophoresis using a 1% agarose gel.

2.6. Multiplex Nested PCR

A multiplex nested PCR was performed for the detection of E. bieneusi, Encephalocytozoon, and Cryptosporidium spp. as proposed by Rubio et al. [5]. In each run, positive (kindly provided by Dr. David Carmena, from the Parasitology Reference and Research Laboratory, National Center for Microbiology, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain) and negative controls were included. The PCR reactions were set in a 25 µL final volume. Each PCR tube contained 5 µL of DNA, 0.5 µL of My Taq HS DNA polymerase (Bioline Meridian Bioscience), 5 µL of 5xMy Taq PCR buffer, 1 µM of primer Univ1 (GATTCCGGAGAGGGAGCC), and 0.5 µM of primers Crypto1 (CAAGGCATATGCCTGCTTTAAGC), Entero1 (CGCCAGTCTATACTACACTCCCTATCC) and Encef1 (CTTCGCTTCTSTYCGTCCAG). A total of 40 cycles were carried out, each consisting of 94 °C for 30 s, 61 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s, with an initial hot start at 94 °C for 7 min and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The second PCR reaction conducted was the identification reaction and it incorporated the products of the first reaction (2 µL) along with 0.5 µL of My Taq HS DNA polymerase (Bioline Meridian Bioscience), 5 µL 5× MyTaq PCR buffer, and 0.75 uM of primer Crypto2 (CCTCCAATTGATACTTGTAAAGGG), 0.5 µM of primers Entero2 (GGTCTTTACACTCAGGTCTTATACTCA) and Encef2(CTTCRTATTTCACCCCTCGC), plus 1 µM of primer Univ2 (CGGAGAGGGAGCCTGAG). A total of 35 cycles were carried out, each consisting of 94 °C for 15 s, 58 °C for 15 s, and 72 °C for 20 s, with an initial hot start at 94 °C for 7 min and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR amplification products were resolved by using electrophoresis with a 2% agarose gel. Positive results were confirmed by using Sanger sequencing of the amplicon, utilizing BLASTN (blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and ClustalX (www.clustal.org) software to confirm identification and avoid false positive results due to non-specific reactions.

3. Results

Two hundred and five samples of human origin were analyzed. Epidemiological characteristics, such as the age and hospitalization of the patients included in the study, are presented in Table 1. In detail, 48% of the samples came from women, while samples from men accounted for 51.7% of the total. In addition, 5.8% of the samples came from oncologic patients, 3.9% from patients affected by chronic kidney diseases, 0.97% from patients diagnosed with chronic hepatitis, and 0.97% from patients diagnosed with HIV.
One hundred and sixty-four samples from different species of animal origin were collected and analyzed (Table 2). In detail, 50% of these samples came from dogs, which were the most representative species, followed by birds and cats, which represented 16.5% and 14% of the samples, respectively. Samples from rodents represented 5.5% of the total, and the remaining (14%) were from different farm animals.

3.1. Cryptosporidium spp. and Microsporidia Detection in Human Fecal Samples

Cryptosporidium spp. were detected in 2 samples (0.97%, 95% CI 0.27–3.49) and E. bieneusi was detected in 14 samples (6.82%, 95% CI 4.11–11.14) of the 205 human feces samples. The epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the patients with positive results are shown in Table 3.
The χ2 tests did not show any relationship (p > 0.05) between the frequency of E. bieneusi and the underlying disease, sex, age, or origin of the patients.
Fisher’s exact test did not show any relationship (p > 0.05) between the frequency of Cryptosporidium spp. and the underlying disease, sex, age, or origin of the patients.

3.2. Cryptosporidium spp. and Microsporidia Detection in Animal Fecal Samples

Cryptosporidium spp. and E. bieneusi were detected in 4.26% (95% CI 2.08–8.55) and 3.04% (95% CI 1.31–6.94) of the samples of animal origin, respectively. The epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the animals with positive results are presented in Table 4.
The χ2 tests did not show any relationship (p > 0.05) between the frequency of E. bieneusi and the sex, age, or type of population of the animals.
Fisher´s exact test did not show any relationship (p > 0.05) between the frequency of Cryptosporidium spp. and the sex, age, or type of population of the animals.

4. Discussion

In Spain, there was a remarkable increase in the number of pet owners. In 2021, the numbers of dogs and cats were estimated to be approximately 9.3 and 5.8 million, respectively (https://www.anfaac.org/datos-sectoriales/ accessed on 1st February 2024.
Despite companionship from these animals, which provide a clear benefit to people, pets can carry diseases that spread between them and humans, presenting a potential threat to public health [15].
Our study has demonstrated the presence of Cryptosporidium spp. and E. bieneusi in humans and domestic and farm animals. These animals are in close contact with human populations and could be an important zoonotic factor for infection and a possible source of environmental contamination [16].
In our study, no relationships between the different demographic and clinical variables of the human and animal populations with Cryptosporidium spp. were found. We detected Cryptosporidium spp. in only two human samples from adult oncologic patients. However, no positive samples from pediatric feces were detected, in accordance with a previous study performed in the community of Madrid, where the presence of Cryptosporidium spp. in children from 1 to 16 years old was very low (0.9%) (13/1512) [17]. In a study carried out in Brazil that included children with underlying diseases, such as diarrhea, cancer, HIV, and malnutrition, the prevalence was 2.2% (14/626) in this age range [18]. In samples of animal origin, we detected the presence of Cryptosporidium spp. in a cat suffering from diarrhea (4.34%; 1/23) as well as in three dogs (3.61%; 3/83). A recent study carried out in Poland showed similar results, describing the presence of this microorganism in two felines, also affected with diarrhea, (n = 101; 2%), and nine asymptomatic dogs (n = 264; 3.4%) [19]. This study emphasizes the presence of diarrhea in both felines, just as described in our study. Moreover, another study performed in Austria showed a prevalence of 1.7% (37/298) when cats were analyzed [20]. A study carried out in 2010 highlighted the presence of these parasites (9%) in fecal samples from dogs and cats taken from public parks in Madrid [14].
In addition, Cryptosporidium spp. was detected in two farm animals: a lactating pig (20%; 1/5) and a goat (16.66%; 1/6). A similar study carried out on farms in China found a prevalence of 2.7% (8/299) in lactating pigs [21]. The prevalence of this microorganism in goats is high, as was revealed in a study carried out in Ecuador where 10.49% of the goats were infected by Cryptosporidium spp. [22]. A similar study described a prevalence of 14.3% (1/7) in different farms located in northern Spain (Galicia) [23].
In our study, the presence of Cryptosporidium spp. was described in a dwarf winter white Russian hamster for the first time in Spain, which was the only one that was included. A recent study in China that included these rodents [24] described an incidence of 39.32% in this species (138/351). However, there is a lack of information focused on this kind of rodent, and it would be interesting to include rodents in future studies due to their possible implications for human health, as they are usually found as pets.
A major limitation of our study is that no species identification in Cryptosporidium was done, so it is unclear which relevance the observation of Cryptosporidium spp. in animals has.
In our study, when infections by E. bieneusi were analyzed, the results revealed interesting data, although no relationship between the different demographic and clinical variables of the human and animal population with E.bieneusi was found. We have found that the percentage of infected patients aged 14 years and older was lower than that in pediatric patients (5.8% vs. 11.7%) and included two adult oncologic patients (2/171). One study carried out in Egypt described a prevalence of 4.6% (27/585) in pediatric patients and noted that children from rural zones, who are usually more in contact with animals than children from urban areas, have a higher infection rate [25]. This fact is corroborated by a study carried out in China, where a higher infection rate by E. bieneusi in rural compared to urban areas was estimated [26]. Our study included children from urban areas of two cities with more than 95,000 citizens.
It has been shown that the Microsporidia species constitute one of the more important opportunistic pathogens due to their ability to cause grave disease after infection, especially in immunocompromised patients [27]. Therefore, the clinical course of microsporidiosis depends on the host immune state, where the infections occur, and the Microsporidium species implicated [28]. The number of patients not infected by HIV who present other immunodeficiency problems, such as transplanted or oncologic patients, has also increased [5].
A recent study carried out in Spain showed the relationship between colon cancer and Microsporidia infection, which was revealed through an analysis of tissue samples [29]. The presence of healthy carriers has also been documented, which clearly shows the presence of Microsporidia in the feces of immunocompetent patients and that microsporidiosis may not be linked to any clinical symptoms in healthy populations, as it has been detected in individuals infected with E. bieneusi who are totally asymptomatic [12].
Remarkably, in our study, the majority of patients with E. bieneusi did not have any serious underlying disease, and other diarrhea-causing enteropathogens were not found. However, more studies are necessary to clarify the need to include the determination of this microorganism in the routine study of diarrhea. It could be especially interesting when no other enteropathogens are found in the usual determinations.
Regarding the prevalence of E. bieneusi in different animals, our results reveal its presence to be mainly in dogs (4.81%; 4/83). Several studies carried out in Spain show that the prevalence of this microorganism in dogs varies considerably, with percentages between 0.8% and 11.7% [11,15,23]. These studies have included pets as well as animals from the street, with the last group being the largest carrier of the microorganism. In China, other studies have revealed an incidence of 6.74% (18/2067), and most infections occurred in males younger than one year old that were collected from a pet market [30]. Another study carried out in Australia showed an incidence of 4.4% (15/342) [31]. However, in a recent study carried out in Portugal, no positive samples for E. bieneusi were found in 46 fecal samples [32]. Even so, our study indicates that dogs in urban settings are also prone to harbor E. bieneusi infections in addition to stray dogs, which may be more affected due to greater exposure to the parasite and poorer standards of care [15]. In addition, in our study, we detected the presence of E. bieneusi in the feces of a pig (20%; 1/5). In comparison to these results, a previous study carried out in southern Spain (Cordoba) revealed an incidence of 22.6% in these animals [33].
On the other hand, due to the limited number of swine feces samples included in this study, no significant relationships between prevalence and public health were detected. Therefore, more samples are needed in future studies to provide more information about E. bieneusi infection in pigs as well as in other animals and humans.

5. Conclusions

This study evidences the presence of Cryptosporidium spp. and E. bieneusi in human and animal samples. On the one hand, the detection of Cryptosporidium spp. in pets that are not usually included in this type of study, such as rodents, is one of the most interesting findings, and, on the other hand, the identification of E. bieneusi in patients with diarrhea of different age groups and without underlying disease is a highly interesting finding also. It would be desirable to carry out further studies on these two aspects, analyzing the risk of zoonotic transmission of certain types of pets and the convenience of including the determination of E. bieneusi in the routine study of parasites since it may represent a problem of public health concern.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: F.G.-S., M.T.G.-R. and M.A.R.-I. Performed the experiments: F.G.-S. and M.T.G.-R. Analyzed the data: F.G.-S. and M.T.G.-R. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: F.G.-S. and M.T.G.-R. Wrote the paper: F.G.-S., M.T.G.-R. and M.A.R.-I. Manuscript review: F.G.-S., M.T.G.-R. and M.A.R.-I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Ethic Committee of Cádiz in March 2017 (Approval Code: 30.17). It was performed following the international ethical recommendations contained in the Declaration of Helsinki (Fortaleza, 2013), as established in Law 14/2007, of 3 July, on Biomedical Research, Law 41/2002, of 14 November, basic regulatory law on patient autonomy and rights and obligations regarding clinical information and documentation. Personal data were processed in accordance with the provisions of Organic Law 15/1999, of 13 December 1999, on the Protection of Personal Data.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to David Carmena of Parasitology Reference and Research Laboratory, National Centre for Microbiology, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain, for his invaluable help.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Xiao, L.; Fayer, R.; Ryan, U.; Upton, S.J. Cryptosporidium Taxonomy: Recent Advances and Implications for Public Health. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2004, 17, 72–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Franzen, C.; Müller, A. Microsporidiosis: Human diseases and diagnosis. Microbes Infect. 2001, 3, 389–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Baldursson, S.; Karanis, P. Waterborne transmission of protozoan parasites: Review of worldwide outbreaks—An update 2004–2010. Water Res. 2011, 45, 6603–6614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chalmers, R.M.; Robinson, G.; Elwin, K.; Elson, R. Analysis of the Cryptosporidium spp. and gp60 subtypes linked to human outbreaks of cryptosporidiosis in England and Wales, 2009 to 2017. Parasites Vectors 2019, 12, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rubio, J.M.; Lanza, M.; Fuentes, I.; Soliman, R.H. A novel nested multiplex PCR for the simultaneous detection and differentiation of Cryptosporidium spp., Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Encephalitozoon intestinalis. Parasitol. Int. 2014, 63, 664–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fayer, R. Cryptosporidium and Cryptosporidiosis; IWA Publishing: London, UK; Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  7. Xiao, L.; Moore, J.E.; Ukoh, U.; Gatei, W.; Lowery, C.J.; Murphy, T.M.; Dooley, J.S.; Millar, B.C.; Rooney, P.J.; Rao, J.R. Prevalence and identity of Cryptosporidium spp. in pig slurry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 4461–4463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Widmer, G.; Carmena, D.; Kváč, M.; Chalmers, R.M.; Kissinger, J.C.; Xiao, L.; Sateriale, A.; Striepen, B.; Laurent, F.; Lacroix-Lamandé, S.; et al. Update on Cryptosporidium spp.: Highlights from the seventh international Giardia and Cryptosporidium conference. Parasite 2010, 27, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Han, B.; Weiss, L.M. Microsporidia: Obligate intracellular pathogens within the fungal kingdom. Microbiol. Spectr. 2017, 5, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Han, B.; Pan, G.; Weiss, L.M. Microsporidiosis in humans. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2021, 34, e00010-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Didier, E.S.; Weiss, L.M. Microsporidiosis: Current status. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2006, 19, 485–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sak, B.; Brady, D.; Pelikánová, M.; Květoňová, D.; Rost, M.; Kostka, M.; Tolarová, V.; Hůzová, Z.; Kváč, M. Unapparent microsporidial infection among immunocompetent humans in the Czech Republic. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2011, 49, 1064–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Galván-Díaz, A.L.; Magnet, A.; Fenoy, S.; Henriques-Gil, N.; Haro, M.; Gordo, F.P.; Miro, G.; Águila, C.D.; Izquierdo, F. Microsporidia Detection and Genotyping Study of Human Pathogenic E. bieneusi in Animals from Spain. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Dado, D.; Izquierdo, F.; Vera, O.; Montoya, A.; Mateo, M.; Fenoy, S.; Galván, A.L.; García, S.; García, A.; Aránguez, E.; et al. Detection of zoonotic intestinal parasites in public parks of Spain. Potential epidemiological role of microsporidia. Zoonoses Public Health 2012, 59, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Dashti, A.; Santín, M.; Cano, L.; de Lucio, A.; Bailo, B.; de Mingo, M.H.; Köster, P.C.; Fernández-Basterra, J.A.; Aramburu-Aguirre, J.; López-Molina, N.; et al. Occurrence and genetic diversity of Enterocytozoon bieneusi (Microsporidia) in owned and sheltered dogs and cats in Northern Spain. Parasitol. Res. 2019, 118, 2979–2987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kothavade, R.J. Potential molecular tools for assessing the public health risk associated with waterborne Cryptosporidium oocysts. J. Med. Microbiol. 2012, 61, 1039–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Salimo Muadica, A.; Carolina Koster, P.; Dashti, A.; Bailo, B.; Hernandez-de-Mingo, M.; Reh, L.; Balasegaram, S.; Verlander, N.Q.; Ruiz Chércoles, E.; Carmena, D. Molecular Diversity of Giardia duodenalis, Cryptosporidium spp. and Blastocystis sp. in Asymptomatic School Children in Leganes, Madrid (Spain). Microorganisms 2020, 8, 466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Pacheco, F.T.F.; Freitas, H.F.D.; Silva, R.K.N.R.; Carvalho, S.S.D.; Martins, A.S.; Menezes, J.F.; Ribeiro, T.C.; Mattos, Â.P.; Costa-Ribeiro Júnior, H.D.; Pedreira, J.N.; et al. Cryptosporidium diagnosis in different groups of children and characterization of parasite species. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2022, 55, e0041-2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Piekara-Stępińska, A.; Piekarska, J.; Gorczykowski, M. Cryptosporidium spp. in dogs and cats in Poland. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2021, 28, 345–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Hinney, B.; Ederer, C.; Stengl, C.; Wilding, K.; Štrkolcová, G.; Harl, J.; Flechl, E.; Fuehrer, H.P.; Joachim, A. Enteric protozoa of cats and their zoonotic potential—A field study from Austria. Parasitol. Res. 2015, 114, 2003–2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, P.; Li, S.; Zou, Y.; Du, Z.C.; Song, D.P.; Wang, P.; Chen, X.Q. The infection and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in diarrheic pigs in southern China. Microb. Pathog. 2022, 165, 105459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Celi, K.; Guzmán, L.; Rey-Valeirón, C. Apicomplexans in Goat: Prevalence of Neospora caninum, Toxoplasma gondii, Cryptosporidium spp., Eimeria spp. and Risk Factors in Farms from Ecuador. Animals 2022, 12, 2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lores, B.; Del Aguila, C.; Arias, C. Enterocytozoon bieneusi (microsporidia) in faecal samples from domestic animals from Galicia, Spain. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2012, 97, 941–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, S.; Chai, Y.; Deng, L.; Liu, H.; Zhong, Z.; Fu, H.; Hu, Y.; Shen, L.; Zhou, Z.; Geng, Y.; et al. Cryptosporidium spp. in pet dwarf winter white Russian hamsters (Phodopus sungoris sungoris) in China. J. Parasitol. 2021, 107, 770–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Naguib, D.; Roellig, D.M.; Arafat, N.; Xiao, L. Prevalence and genetic characterization of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in children in Northeast Egypt. Parasitol. Res. 2022, 121, 2087–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Liu, H.; Jiang, Z.; Yuan, Z.; Yin, J.; Wang, Z.; Yu, B.; Zhou, D.; Shen, Y.; Cao, J. Infection by and genotype characteristics of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in HIV/AIDS patients from Guangxi Zhuang autonomous region, China. BMC Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Hamamcı, B.; Çetinkaya, Ü.; Berk, V.; Kaynar, L.; Kuk, S. Prevalence of Encephalitozoon intestinalis and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in cancer patients under chemotherapy. Mikrobiyoloji Bul. 2015, 49, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Moretto, M.M.; Khan, I.A.; Weiss, L.M. Gastrointestinal cell mediated immunity and the microsporidia. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8, e1002775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Redondo, F.; Hurtado-Marcos, C.; Izquierdo, F.; Cuéllar, C.; Fenoy, S.; Sáez, Y.; Magnet, Á.; Galindo-Regal, L.; Uribe, N.; López-Bañeres, M.; et al. Latent microsporidia infection prevalence as a risk factor in colon cancer patients. Cancers 2022, 14, 5342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, W.; Li, Y.; Song, M.; Lu, Y.; Yang, J.; Tao, W.; Jiang, Y.; Wan, Q.; Zhang, S.; Xiao, L. Prevalence and genetic characteristics of Cryptosporidium, Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Giardia duodenalis in cats and dogs in Heilongjiang province, China. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 208, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, Y.; Koehler, A.V.; Wang, T.; Cunliffe, D.; Gasser, R.B. Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes in cats and dogs in Victoria, Australia. BMC Microbiol. 2019, 19, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Figueiredo, A.M.; Dashti, A.; Santín, M.; Köster, P.C.; Torres, R.T.; Fonseca, C.; Mysterud, A.; Carvalho, J.; Sarmento, P.; Neves, N.; et al. Occurrence and molecular characterization of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in wild and domestic animal species in Portugal. Med. Mycol. 2023, 61, myad018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Dashti, A.; Rivero-Juarez, A.; Santín, M.; López-López, P.; Caballero-Gómez, J.; Frías-Casas, M.; Köster, P.C.; Bailo, B.; Calero-Bernal, R.; Briz, V.; et al. Enterocytozoon bieneusi (Microsporidia): Identification of novel genotypes and evidence of transmission between sympatric wild boars (Sus scrofa ferus) and Iberian pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus) in Sothern Spain. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2020, 67, 2869–2880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Number of hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients by age range.
Table 1. Number of hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients by age range.
Age RangeOutpatient
(n; %)
Inpatient
(n; %)
Total
0–1432; 19.42; 534
15–4044; 26.62; 546
41–6559; 35.714; 373
>6630; 18.222; 552
Total16540205
Table 2. Animals populations investigated in the present study.
Table 2. Animals populations investigated in the present study.
Dogs
(n = 83)
Cats
(n = 23)
Rodents a
(n = 3)
Lagomorphs b
(n = 6)
Birds c
(n = 27)
Others d
(n = 22)
Pets100%100%100%100% 22%
Farm 78% 100%
a 2 hamsters and 1 guinea pig, b 6 rabbits, c 1 turtledove, 2 ducks, 1 turkey, 1 canary, 2 lovebirds, 1 parrot, 1 kestrel, 4 pigeons, and 14 group samples of chicken coops; d 5 pigs, 6 goats, 11 cows.
Table 3. Positive samples for Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Cryptosporidium spp. in fecal samples from humans.
Table 3. Positive samples for Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Cryptosporidium spp. in fecal samples from humans.
IDSexAgeUnderlying DiseaseOriginMicroorganism
5Female61 yearsLymphoma InpatientCryptosporidium spp.
20Male22 years OutpatientE. bieneusi
26Male80 years InpatientE. bieneusi
42Female24 years OutpatientE. bieneusi
101Male1 month OutpatientE. bieneusi
106Female57 years OutpatientE. bieneusi
111Female37 years OutpatientE. bieneusi
115Female21 years OutpatientE. bieneusi
118Male10 years OutpatientE. bieneusi
120Female7 years OutpatientE. bieneusi
125Female32 years OutpatientE. bieneusi
128Male89 yearsMelanoma OutpatientE. bieneusi
129Male63 yearsLung adenocarcinomaOutpatientE. bieneusi
131Female42 years OutpatientE. bieneusi
180Male6 years OutpatientE. bieneusi
186Male59 yearsMetastatic Colon AdenocarcinomaInpatientCryptosporidium spp.
Table 4. Positive samples for Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Cryptosporidium spp. in fecal samples from animals.
Table 4. Positive samples for Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Cryptosporidium spp. in fecal samples from animals.
IDHostBreedAgeMicroorganismDiarrheaType of Population
17CatCommon European3 monthsCryptosporidium spp.yesPet
26DogEnglish setter10 yearsE. bieneusinoPet
29DogYorkshire16 monthsCryptosporidium spp.noPet
67PigIberian PorkBreedingCryptosporidium spp.unknownFarm
68PigIberian PorkBreedingE. bieneusiunknownFarm
69GoatUnknownBreedingCryptosporidium spp.unknownFarm
70DogHungarian Shorthaired Pointer1 yearCryptosporidium spp.noPet
75DogMongrel4 yearsE. bieneusinoPet
94DogGolden Retriever14 monthsE. bieneusinoPet
96DogRatonero Andaluz15 yearsCryptosporidium spp.noPet
123HamsterDarwf winter White Russian1 yearCryptosporidium spp.noPet
135DogMongrel2 yearsE. bieneusinoPet
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gómez-Romano, M.T.; Rodríguez-Iglesias, M.A.; Galán-Sánchez, F. Molecular Detection of Cryptosporidium spp. and Microsporidia in Human and Animal Stool Samples. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 918. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12050918

AMA Style

Gómez-Romano MT, Rodríguez-Iglesias MA, Galán-Sánchez F. Molecular Detection of Cryptosporidium spp. and Microsporidia in Human and Animal Stool Samples. Microorganisms. 2024; 12(5):918. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12050918

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gómez-Romano, María Teresa, Manuel Antonio Rodríguez-Iglesias, and Fátima Galán-Sánchez. 2024. "Molecular Detection of Cryptosporidium spp. and Microsporidia in Human and Animal Stool Samples" Microorganisms 12, no. 5: 918. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12050918

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop