Next Article in Journal
CFD-DEM Simulation of Slugging and Non-Slugging Fast Fluidization of Fine Particles in a Micro Riser
Next Article in Special Issue
Personal Wearable Thermal and Moisture Management Clothing: A Review on Its Recent Trends and Performance Evaluation Methods
Previous Article in Journal
Design of the LIMELIGHT Test Rig for Component Testing for High-Temperature Thermal Energy Storage with Liquid Metals
Previous Article in Special Issue
Systematic Evaluation of Research Progress in the Textile Field over the Past 10 Years: Bibliometric Study on Smart Textiles and Clothing
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Processes
Volume 11
Issue 10
10.3390/pr11102976
processes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Quantitative Comparison of Personal Cooling Garments in Performance and Design: A Review

by
Yiying Zhou
1,
Lun Lou
2 and
Jintu Fan
1,3,4,*
1
School of Fashion and Textiles, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
2
Energy Sector, Nano and Advanced Materials Institute, Hong Kong Science Park, Hong Kong
3
Research Center of Textiles for Future Fashion, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
4
Research Institute of Sports Science and Technology, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2023, 11(10), 2976; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11102976
Submission received: 11 September 2023 / Revised: 10 October 2023 / Accepted: 12 October 2023 / Published: 14 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Smart Wearable Technology: Thermal Management and Energy Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Personal cooling garments (PCGs) have gained increasing attention as a promising solution to alleviate heat stress and enhance thermal comfort in hot and humid conditions. However, limited attention has been paid to the influence of clothing design on cooling performance. This review highlights the influence of design factors and provides a quantitative comparison in cooling performance for different types of PCGs, including air cooling garments, evaporative cooling garments, phase-change cooling garments, and liquid cooling garments. A detailed discussion about the relationship between design factors and the cooling performance of each cooling technique is provided based on the available literature. Furthermore, potential improvements and challenges in PCG design are explored. This review aims to offer a comprehensive insight into the attributes of various PCGs and promote interdisciplinary collaboration for improving PCGs in both cooling efficiency and garment comfort, which is valuable for further research and innovation.

1. Introduction

Heat stress has become a growing concern with the impact of climate change. The high air temperatures, high relative humidity, high radiant temperature, and high activity levels or a combination of these factors present a significant challenge to both public health and occupational productivity [1,2,3,4]. Since humans can only regulate their core body temperature within a narrow range, excessive body heat beyond the capacity of physiological thermoregulation can result in heat accumulation. It may lead to a higher risk of heat-related illness and conditions such as dehydration, heat stroke, chronic kidney injuries, or even mortality [5,6,7,8,9].
Thermal comfort, as defined by the International Organization for Standardization [10], refers to the subjective state of an individual’s satisfaction with the thermal environment. Individual differences in thermal comfort may exist in different climates as well as different physiological, behavioral, and cultural elements. Consequently, even when exposed to the same environmental conditions, individuals may perceive thermal comfort differently [11,12]. Finding acceptable temperatures for individuals depends on their opportunities to adjust conditions, such as changing their clothing or workplace to feel more comfortable. Although heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems are commonly employed in indoor environments to lower temperatures and alleviate heat stress, they are primarily designed to cater to groups of occupants within buildings. Additionally, they are limited by energy requirements and operational costs, making them unsuitable for outdoor settings [13,14]. In contrast, personal cooling garments (PCGs) aim to provide direct thermal management to individuals, having been proven as an effective measure to manage the thermal state, satisfy individual thermal comfort needs, and improve working performance [15,16]. By focusing on individuals and offering personalized cooling solutions, PCGs offer a promising approach to address thermal comfort challenges in various situations.
Various types of PCGs have been investigated and reviewed in the past decade [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. However, prior reviews primarily focused on the classification of PCG types, the introduction of materials, and potential applications; there is limited discussion about the quantitative comparison of different PCGs. Moreover, the factors of garment design that are closely related to the cooling performance are mentioned less in previous reviews. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of the art, examine design factors associated with cooling efficiency, and conduct a quantitative comparison of different PCGs in critical aspects.

2. Methodology

2.1. Literature Search Strategy

Database searches were conducted in Google Scholar and Web of Science, covering the period from 1966 to 2023. All the terms that related to ‘personal cooling garment’ and ‘cooling power’ were searched through the Google Scholar system. The search strategy incorporated keywords and synonyms, which were searched in the title, abstract, or keyword fields of the databases. Moreover, to find more relevant studies, we surveyed journals using keywords that included ‘air cooling garment’, ‘evaporative cooling garments’, ‘phase change cooling garments’, ‘liquid cooling garments’, ‘thermoelectric cooling garments’, and ‘radiative cooling garments’. We also assessed all full-text papers for eligibility.

2.2. Selection Criteria

A systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant articles, research papers, and studies related to personal cooling garments. The following criteria were used for source selection.
Inclusion criteria:
  • Peer-reviewed journal articles, conference papers, and academic studies.
  • Publications addressing personal cooling garments, technologies, and related topics.
  • Publications addressing cooling performance (e.g., cooling power).
  • Publications addressing the clothing design which affected the cooling performance.
Exclusion criteria:
  • Non-peer-reviewed sources, such as blog posts.
  • Publications that do not directly pertain to personal cooling.
  • Publications that do not assess the cooling performance (e.g., cooling power) of personal cooling garments.
  • Publications that do not related to garments.

3. Classification and Design Parameters

Personal cooling garments can be categorized into six different types based on the cooling technique used, namely, air cooling garments, evaporative cooling garments, phase-change cooling garments, liquid cooling garments, thermoelectric cooling garments, and radiative cooling garments. Detailed discussions such as the definition, principle, and design factors affecting the effectiveness of each category will be discussed in this section.
  • Air cooling garments
Air cooling garments (ACGs) which improve the convective and evaporative heat dissipation of the human body can be classified into two types: active and passive ACGs. The active ACGs require batteries or external energy supplies to promote ventilative heat exchange within the clothing microenvironment. A forced convection can be introduced by electronic devices such as fans [25] (Figure 1a), vortex tubes [26] (Figure 1b), blowers [27], etc. In terms of garment design, to create sufficient air space between the garment and the human body, the outer layer of most active ACGs is usually made of wind-proof fabric to prevent air from escaping to the environment. In contrast, passive ACGs rely on air ventilation triggered by body movements and natural convection as well as the internal characteristics of textiles. The cooling effect can be regulated by the opening and mesh or spacer and mesh structures of a garment [28,29,30,31].
The cooling effectiveness of ACGs can be affected by many factors, such as clothing design, environmental conditions, and the users. From the aspect of clothing design, these factors are related to the clothing size, the type of devices, the placement site of devices, the opening site, and the clothing eyelet. Zhao et al. [32] studied the design of locations for fans and openings at different torso sites. They found that the lower front placement site with both front and back openings achieved the best cooling performance. For the localized cooling, the ventilation location had more influence than the design of the opening. The ventilation units can be placed anywhere requiring more evaporative cooling. The adjustable openings (closed or opened) are helpful for the wearers’ comfort but have no significant difference in the cooling performance under the same flow rate. Zhao et al. [33] investigated the effect of clothing eyelet designs (sizes and positions) for the air ventilation system and found that the eyelet could reduce the clothing bulkiness (p < 0.05) but had no significant impact on the cooling effectiveness (p > 0.05). Ho et al. [28] designed 10 different opening and mesh styles of T-shirts and found that the openings applied at two vertical side panels along the side seams of t-shirts were the most effective to release heat and moisture from the human body. Yang et al. [34] found that the upper body heat loss of ACGs was related to the combined influences of ventilation rate and clothing size. The ventilation rate can increase upper body heat loss, while the clothing size has almost no impact on the effectiveness in high ventilation. Yi et al. [25] evaluated different ventilation units for ACGs and found that ACGs with higher flow rates perform better, which can achieve a higher cooling power. Lou et al. [35] investigated the effects of garment design on cooling performance and recommended that the inner space between ACGs and the human body that may influence the efficiency of heat exchange is important for garment design.
In brief, ACGs provide an innovative approach to enhance thermal comfort and mitigate physiological strain. These cooling garments, which create an air gap between the body and clothing, coupled with active cooling mechanisms such as fans or blowers, offer effective heat dissipation. For the design of active ACGs, the eyelet design and adjustable openings are helpful for the bulkiness problem caused by the impermeable outer fabric; at the same time, the inner space between ACGs and the human body also needs to be considered in the design process. Placing devices with a higher flow rate at the sweating region is preferred for improving cooling efficiency, while the direct cooling of fans at their location may decrease the localized comfort sensation.
  • Evaporative cooling garments
Evaporative cooling garments (ECGs) are based on the phase change of liquid (mostly water or sweat generated by the human body) from liquid to vapor state that can absorb heat for personal thermal management. As a passive cooling garment, it is energy-saving and environment-friendly. There are two mainly used ECGs (Figure 2): One is a liquid-soaked (water mainly) garment that provides cooling by direct contact with the skin surface; it should be dipped in liquid to reserve the cooling liquid in the garment before use. Another is dry evaporative cooling garments that need to be filled with water before use.
The cooling performance of the ECG is related to the properties of the clothing fabric, fitness, and ambient environment, such as the moisture evaporation and water vapor permeability of fabric and the air gap between the human body and clothing. For this type of garment, the cooling only happened on the outer clothing surface, not the inner surface. Hes et al. [36] studied the cooling effect of wet fabric with the fabric worn with or without an air gap between the skin and the fabric. They found that the cooling efficiency increased with the increase of the fabric moisture content without air layers, and if 2 mm and 4 mm thick air layers were involved, the total cooling efficiency would not be influenced by the water content. The better cooling performance happened when the fabric had direct contact with the skin. Guan et al. [37] studied the cooling power of ECGs that provide cooling by sweating from the human body and showed that the evaporative area and locus (in-plane and trans-plane moisture transfer) were determinants of the cooling efficiency. The cooling efficiency was negatively correlated with the evaporative resistance and the thickness of the fabric. Gillis et al. [38] assessed an ECG saturated with combined menthol and ethanol for evaporative cooling performance versus that with water and found that menthol and ethanol caused cooler sensations and a heat storage response.
ECGs utilize the natural phase change of water from liquid to vapor to provide effective personal cooling. They offer an energy-efficient and environmentally friendly approach to maintaining thermal comfort. To improve the cooling performance of ECGs, the first step is to increase the liquid content and ensure that the fabric has direct contact with skin. The second is to decrease the evaporative resistance and thickness of the fabric for ECGs.
  • Phase-change cooling garments
Phase-change cooling garments (PCCGs) provide cooling through phase-change materials (PCMs) which can store latent heat for thermal energy transfer. PCMs can absorb heat from the body surface during the phase-change process that can increase the heat loss of the human body. PCMs can absorb or release heat at a constant temperature. Over 150 phase-change materials are used in scientific research [39]. Some commonly used PCMs are ice, frozen gel, and paraffin waxes. They have different phase-change temperatures (from 0–40 °C) and can be applied for various heat storage capacities [40]. There are two primary technologies used for the development of PCCGs. One is the phase-change material packs which can be placed inside the garment’s pockets (Figure 3). The other is to incorporate PCMs into daily clothing, such as ordinary fabrics or fibers. (1) Phase-change microcapsules are PCMs packaged within a suitable wall material which can be impregnated or coated on the surface of the garment [41,42]. (2) Phase-change fiber is the PCM packaged inside a fiber that can be used in garment textiles [43,44]. However, the preparation process of phase-change microcapsules and fiber is complicated and costly, and most studies focus on the development of materials; there are limited studies about the cooling garments that are made by phase-change microcapsules and fiber.
The cooling effect of PCCGs mainly depends on the clothing design as well as the form and selection of PCMs. Yoo et al. [45] investigated the effects of the number and position of PCM-treated fabrics and found that the treated fabric with a greater amount of PCMs performed better. Moreover, if there is more than one layer, the outer layer of the garment is more appropriate for the effects of the PCMs. According to Mokhtari et al. [23], the PCM microcapsules can only provide a small capacity of heat absorption (about 15 W) with the limitation of the weight of materials that can be coated on the garment. Hence, they are not applicable in hot environments, where ice packs are more effective. House et al. [46] assessed the performance of four PCCGs containing different PCMs, which melted at 0 °C, 10 °C, 20 °C, and 30 °C separately, and the PCCGs were worn under firefighters’ protective clothing. They found that 10 °C has the best cooling efficiency when combining work and rest periods, and they also stated that a cooling vest containing ice packs (melting at 0 °C) could be used only if the thermal resistance between the ice packs and the skin was higher. Gao et al. [47] evaluated PCCGs with different melting temperatures, masses, and covering areas and found that the PCCG with the lower melting temperature (24 °C) performed better than those with higher melting temperatures. They also found that the cooling performance was mainly determined by the covering area, while the cooling duration depended on the PCM mass. In hot climates, the temperature gradient for PCCGs was suggested to be equal to or greater than 6 °C.
PCCGs represent an innovative and promising solution for achieving effective cooling and enhancing thermal comfort in various environments. By harnessing the properties of PCMs that can change from solid to liquid and vice versa to create a cooling effect, these garments offer a unique approach to regulating body temperature. The design and composition of PCCGs play an important role in their cooling efficiency. A higher mass of PCMs or PCM microcapsules is positive for cooling efficiency, and the lower melting temperature can provide a higher cooling rate. The higher phase-transition temperature can provide a longer cooling duration. A temperature gradient over 6 °C is recommended. Ice packs can only be used when there is sufficient thermal resistance between the skin and ice. At the same time, the covering area needs to be considered in the design of PCCGs.
  • Liquid cooling garments
Liquid cooling garments (LCGs) provide cooling by the pump-driven circulation of liquid coolant inside the tubes embedded in the garment (Figure 4). The tubes may be sewn into the fabric layer, and the pump is powered by electricity. The circulating liquid may be cold or icy water, liquid metal, or a mixture of water and propylene or ethylene glycol [48,49]. The liquid microclimate cooling systems produce a temperature gradient that makes the conductive and convective heat transfer take place among the coolant, the human body, and the environment.
The cooling performance of LCGs depends on the design of the clothing, the ambient condition, and the controller, which determines the liquid flow rate, coolant temperature, and intermittent or regional cooling control [50,51,52,53,54]. In terms of clothing design, it is related to the fitness, tubing characteristics, different body areas, and fabric [55,56,57,58]. Kayacan et al. [51] compared two different designed LCGs and found that the fabrics with a natural curved structure performed better than the plain fabrics; they also found that when the liquid inlet temperature was decreased, the effective cooling increased slightly. Burton et al. [52] found that the heat removal rate of LCGs was not linearly related to the flow rate when the flow was relatively slow. When the flow rate exceeds 1 L/min, little further improvement in the cooling performance can be made with the increase in flow rate. These findings were also shown by Frim et al. [50]. Dionne et al. [59] evaluated PCGs with different densities of tubing through thermal manikin testing. They found that under the condition of the same flow rate and liquid inlet temperature, the heat removal rate increased with the density of the tubing. Branson et al. [55] used a 3D body scanner to compare the fit analyses of LCGs and indicated that from the aspect of different users, it is better to develop an adjustable cooling garment. Cao et al. [58] investigated the effect of inner fabric layers of LCGs on heat exchange and cooling efficiency. They found that an inner layer with good thermal conductivity, good moisture management, and good tactile properties is desirable.
LCGs offer a promising approach to regulating body temperature and enhancing comfort. These garments utilize the circulation of cold liquid through tubes in clothing to facilitate heat exchange between the body, the liquid, and the environment. For the design of LCGs, a lower liquid temperature with a higher flow rate (no more than 1 L/min) is beneficial to improve cooling performance. As conductive heat transfer is the primary cooling mechanism for LCGs, a good fitness of LCGs can also increase cooling efficiency. An adjustable (fitness and flows) LCG could be designed to reduce the discomfort caused by the coolant having direct contact with skin, and a three-layer system may be better for wearer comfort. The comparative analysis of different LCGs demonstrates their varied cooling powers, durations, and temperature ranges, allowing for tailored choices based on specific cooling needs. Further exploration and real-world studies will contribute to a deeper understanding of LCGs’ performance and their utility in diverse settings.
  • Thermoelectric cooling garments
Thermoelectric cooling garments (TCGs) are based on the Peltier effect that can convert electrical energy into thermal power. The single-stage thermoelectric (TE) module is composed of type-N and type-P semiconductors which connected electrically in series. The Peltier effect can transfer heat from one side to the other; therefore, one face is heated and the opposite is cooled, which can be changed by the direction of the electric current [60,61]. A single TE device can be embedded in a clothing system to provide cooling by direct contact with the skin [62] (Figure 5). However, there are some apparent weaknesses in the design of such TCGs, for example, the poor coefficient of performance and low efficiency, so there is nearly no cooling garment designed solely using the Peltier effect. Some enhanced cooling garments, such as the combination of the air and TE cooling techniques which enhance air cooling through the TE unit [63,64] and the combination of the liquid and TE cooling techniques which enhance liquid cooling through the TE unit [64] were developed for better cooling performance.
  • Radiative cooling garments
Radiative cooling garments (RCGs) provide thermal comfort through enhanced radiative heat loss from the human skin or the clothing outer surface. Human skin can be regarded as a near-black radiating source with an emissivity value over 0.95 [65,66], which makes it a near-perfect emitter of thermal infrared radiation. Based on this concept, some fabrics, textiles, and garments were designed for personal thermal management. The cooling garment with mid-IR transparency [67], mid-IR emissivity [68], or solar-reflecting mid-IR emissivity [69] are all potential solutions to achieve better cooling efficiency. RCGs as passive cooling systems contribute to energy saving. The innovation of RCGs mainly focuses on the material design [70,71,72,73]; there is limited knowledge about the cooling performance of this kind of garment which may need more attention.

4. Comparative Study

Several methods have been employed to evaluate PCGs. Human trials, thermal manikin tests, and model simulation were the three mainly used methods for the assessment of PCGs [74]. Human testing provides practical data for the physiological impact of PCGs on the human body with the work intensity and specific test conditions set [75,76,77]. A sweating, heated manikin (ASTM F2371-16) can provide objective and reproducible results to assess the effectiveness of PCGs [78,79], while thermal manikins cannot simulate realistic thermo-physiological responses, such as changes in sweat and heart rate. Thermal manikins can be used as an alternative method when human trials are not applicable, while it cannot replace the human subject tests. Generally, human trials can be conducted independently or combined with thermal manikins to evaluate PCGs. Thermoregulation models could be a good alternative to human trial studies to avoid the ethical problems and operating limitations. Thermoregulation models that can simulate physiological responses and the complex heat transfer of the human body were developed to predict human thermal responses in different environmental and activity conditions [80,81,82]. However, thermoregulation models need to be combined with human trials to demonstrate their reliability and applicability. The evaluation of different types of PCGs plays an important role in the development and improvement of cooling technology. In this section, the separate and overall quantitative comparisons in cooling performance for different types of PCGs will be discussed.
Table 1 provides a comparative analysis of different ACGs based on key parameters such as cooling power, weight, duration, and flow rate. The cooling powers of the listed ACGs in Table 1 were measured through thermal manikin tests (ASTM-F2371-16). ACG 1, designed by Zhao et al. [32], demonstrates the highest estimated cooling power range of 71.5–106 W, while ACG 2 [83] offers a cooling power of 79.5–97.6 W, and the cooling temperature is 30 °C. ACG 3 [25] has a cooling power of approximately 67.72 W. ACG 4 [63] was proposed as a thermoelectric ACG, providing a personal cooling of 15.5 W. ACG 5 [84] was designed for healthcare workers and provides a constant cooling temperature of 22.85 °C and exhibits a cooling power of 51.7 W. Notably, these ACGs were tested under different environmental settings. ACG 4 [63] and ACG 5 [84] as the thermoelectric ACGs that can provide a lower cooling temperature through a thermoelectric unit are heavier than normal ACGs. The cooling duration of active ACGs mainly relies on the capacity of the cooling device’s battery. Research by Yi et al. [25] highlights the positive impact of higher airflow rates on ACGs’ performance. Additionally, the cooling coverage area is influenced by the positioning and outlet of the cooling mechanism.
Table 2 offers a comprehensive insight into the characteristics and performances of different PCCGs as assessed in various studies. The cooling power of PCCGs 1—3 were measured through thermal manikin tests (ASTM-F2371-16), the value of PCCG 4 was calculated from the average evaporation heat flux using an equation, and the value of PCCG 5 was simulated through Stolwijk’s mathematical modeling [85]. A notable observation is the variability in cooling power across the examined cooling garments, ranging from 6.0 to 98.6 W. Regarding cooling duration, the assessed garments demonstrate a range from 65 to 360 min, suggesting varying capacities for sustained cooling during use. In addition, the garments were evaluated under different testing scenarios, encompassing diverse conditions such as hot climates and specific temperature gradients, which are significant factors influencing their efficacy. PCCG 1 [47] exhibits varying cooling powers, ranging from 6 to 28.4 W based on different phase-transition temperatures. The lower phase-transition temperature can provide a longer cooling duration, and the duration of the cooling is from 2.5 to 6 h. PCCG 2 [76] achieves cooling powers of 8.4 W and 10.5 W, with a weight of 1296 g. It operates for durations of 65 min and 125 min which depends on the different phase-transition temperatures. The cooling mechanism involves a dual-phase transition at 15 °C + 15 °C and 15 °C + 23 °C, contributing to the flexibility of the garment in addressing different thermal requirements. PCCG 3 [86] emphasizes its cooling power from 10–20 W and its weight of 2224 g. It sustains cooling for an extended duration of 210 min under specific testing conditions. PCCG 4, designed by Yang et al. [77], is based on the concept of vacuum desiccant cooling and emphasizes an average cooling power of 89.6 ± 9 W with a weight of 3400 g. It can achieve a minimum cooling temperature of 16 °C. Hou et al. [87] proposed a PCM-liquid cooling garment (PCCG 5) to enhance PCCGs; it demonstrates a cooling power ranging from 13.4 to 19.4 W, optimized for a prolonged usage of over 2 h under a testing scenario of 30 °C and 45% relative humidity.
Table 3 provides a comparison of four LCGs based on these parameters including cooling power, weight, duration, testing scenario, flow rate, cooling area, and cooling temperature. The cooling power of the LCG 1 and LCG 4 is calculated through equations, the value of LCG 2 is estimated by analysis, and the value of LCG 3 is estimated through the previous study [88]. LCG 1, designed by Guo et al. [89], demonstrates the estimated cooling power range of 67.2–138.1 W with a weight of 1.5 kg, and it offers a cooling duration of 0.79 to 3.36 h, tested within a temperature range of 40 °C to 50 °C. Meanwhile, LCG 2 [90] offers a relatively higher cooling power of 300 W, and its weight is less than 10 kg; it provided cooling for a minimum of 1 h under varying conditions of 30–45 °C in temperature and 20–80% relative humidity. LCG 3 [91] has a cooling power of 90.8–96.5 W with a weight of 3 kg, offering a cooling duration of 1.5 h within the specific conditions of 35.89 °C ± 1.25 °C in temperature and 35% relative humidity. Notably, LCG 2 [90] achieves a cooling temperature range of 22 to 27 °C, whereas LCG 3 [91] achieves a lower cooling temperature range of 10 to 15 °C. LCG 4 which was designed by Xu et al. [64] and based on thermoelectric refrigeration exhibits a high cooling power of 340.4 W, thereby providing effective cooling in a 30 °C environment.
Table 4 offers a comparative analysis of four different types of PCGs based on these parameters including cooling power, weight, duration, testing scenario, cooling area, and cooling temperature. The results show that the cooling powers of the different PCGs range from 6 to 340.4 W. The enhanced LCG which is based on thermoelectric refrigeration demonstrates the highest cooling power, while the PCCG exhibits the lowest. The estimated cooling power for ACGs, PCCGs, LCGs, and ECGs ranges from 15.5 to 106 W, 6–98.6 W, 67.2–340.4 W, and 48–57 W, respectively. Weight is an important consideration for portable cooling systems, and lighter systems are usually preferred [92]. The weight of the personal cooling garments listed in this table varies from less than 100 g to over 3000 g, and ACGs present a relatively lower weight among these cooling garments. The testing scenarios, including temperature, humidity, and air velocity, listed in the table are important for the evaluation and application of different cooling systems. Most cooling garments are designed for use in hot climates which are higher than 30 °C, and the recommended temperature gradient for PCCGs is suggested to be greater than 6 °C.
The duration of cooling is an important consideration when choosing a cooling system for a particular application. The cooling duration needs to be considered when selecting a cooling system for a particular application. The duration of cooling provided by each cooling technique ranges from less than an hour to several hours. For active ACGs, the cooling duration is dependent on the battery provided for the cooling device. For PCCGs, it is related to the weight, covering area, and cooling temperature of the PCM. For LCGs, it is influenced by the flow rate, weight, and temperature of the cooling liquid.
Additionally, the cooling area is more important for designers to achieve better cooling performance. The cooling temperature for active ACGs is related to the environmental temperature and cannot be controlled by users; PCCGs and LCGs’ cooling temperature is related to the phase-transition temperature of the PCMs and the temperature of the cooling liquid, respectively, and both cannot be controlled manually; and for ECGs, water evaporation is highly wind-speed dependent.

5. Conclusions

This paper presents a literature review on the design and comparison of personal cooling garments. Based on the cooling technique, PCGs are divided into six different types, including ACGs, PCCGs, LCGs, ECGs, TCGs, and RCGs. A brief introduction of each kind of cooling system has been presented, and the cooling efficiency, design-affecting parameters were also discussed.
The results of this review reveal that the cooling power exhibited by different types of cooling garments varies. It seems that these cooling garments are effective at reducing the physiological strain in a hot environment. LCGs demonstrate a relatively higher cooling power, ranging from 67.2–340.4 W.
As a relatively lightweight cooling garment, the cooling efficiency of ACGs is sensitive to environmental factors such as humidity levels and air temperature. In addition, ACGs rely on the exchange of the air from the inside to the outside of clothing; it cannot work when worn underneath personal protective equipment (PPE). The active ACGs require a power source to operate, and this can be problematic in situations where a continuous power source is not readily available. The passive ACGs show limited cooling efficiency, but they are lightweight and no extra devices needed, which is suitable for sportswear. For the design of active ACGs, the fabric of the outer layer should be considered for the air circulation inside the clothing, and the incorporating features such as the eyelet design and adjustable openings can prove beneficial in mitigating the bulkiness problem. Furthermore, optimizing the placement of devices with higher flow rates in the sweating region is recommended to enhance cooling efficiency.
The suitability of LCGs and PCCGs as normal clothing is limited by their excessive weight, which in turn affects the duration of cooling provided. The weight can add bulk, making them less comfortable and practical for everyday use, especially in athletic settings. The LCGs and PCCGs typically have a limited cooling duration, and their cooling sources need to be recharged or replaced to maintain their function. This limitation can be a concern for individuals requiring long-lasting cooling, such as athletes during extended competitions. In terms of LCGs, optimizing the cooling performance involves utilizing a lower liquid temperature coupled with a higher flow rate (not exceeding 1 L/min). Additionally, the design of adjustable (fitness and flows) LCGs can minimize the discomfort resulting from direct contact between the coolant and the skin. For PCCGs, enhanced cooling efficiency can be achieved by increasing the mass of the PCMs or phase-change microcapsules. Lower melting temperatures of the PCM provide higher cooling rates. Finally, achieving a proper fit of LCGs and PCCGs is essential to enhance cooling efficiency.
The performance of ECGs is influenced by ambient temperature and humidity. In extremely hot or humid conditions, they may struggle to provide adequate cooling, especially for individuals engaged in strenuous activities. To enhance the cooling performance of direct ECGs, firstly, increasing the liquid content and ensuring direct contact between the fabric and the skin can enhance cooling efficiency. Secondly, reducing the evaporative resistance and the thickness of the fabric used in ECGs can promote improved cooling effects.
However, the detailed exploration of other cooling garments, such as TCGs and RCGs, remains relatively limited in current research. Thus, further investigations in these categories are warranted to expand our understanding and guide future advancements in this field.
Further research is needed to balance the function, ergonomics, and aesthetic design for different applications. The efficiency of these PCGs not only depends on the effect of the cooling performance but also the effects of ambient temperature and experimental protocol. Therefore, different designs based on the consideration of end-use scenarios is necessary for the improvement of PCGs. Moreover, the development of these types of PCGs requires the impact of human factors, including metabolic rates and physical activities, on individuals’ responses during the use of cooling garments under normal working conditions and should be studied in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.F., L.L., and Y.Z.; methodology, J.F. and Y.Z.; resources, Y.Z.; data curation, Y.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z.; writing—review and editing, Y.Z. and L.L.; supervision, J.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The funding from Research Centre of Textiles for Future Fashion is acknowledged.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sherwood, S.C. Adapting to the challenges of warming. Science 2020, 370, 782–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pennisi, E. Living with Heat; American Association for the Advancement of Science: Washington, DC, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  3. Habibi, P.; Moradi, G.; Dehghan, H.; Moradi, A.; Heydari, A. The impacts of climate change on occupational heat strain in outdoor workers: A systematic review. Urban Clim. 2021, 36, 100770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Patz, J.A.; Campbell-Lendrum, D.; Holloway, T.; Foley, J.A. Impact of regional climate change on human health. Nature 2005, 438, 310–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gao, C.; Kuklane, K.; Östergren, P.-O.; Kjellstrom, T. Occupational heat stress assessment and protective strategies in the context of climate change. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2018, 62, 359–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Flouris, A.D.; Dinas, P.C.; Ioannou, L.G.; Nybo, L.; Havenith, G.; Kenny, G.P.; Kjellstrom, T. Workers’ health and productivity under occupational heat strain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Planet. Health 2018, 2, e521–e531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ioannou, L.G.; Mantzios, K.; Tsoutsoubi, L.; Panagiotaki, Z.; Kapnia, A.K.; Ciuha, U.; Nybo, L.; Flouris, A.D.; Mekjavic, I.B. Effect of a simulated heat wave on physiological strain and labour productivity. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ioannou, L.G.; Mantzios, K.; Tsoutsoubi, L.; Nintou, E.; Vliora, M.; Gkiata, P.; Dallas, C.N.; Gkikas, G.; Agaliotis, G.; Sfakianakis, K. Occupational heat stress: Multi-country observations and interventions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Chan, A.P.; Yi, W. Heat Stress and Its Impacts on Occupational Health and Performance; SAGE Publications: London, UK, 2016; Volume 25, pp. 3–5. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zare, S.; Hasheminezhad, N.; Sarebanzadeh, K.; Zolala, F.; Hemmatjo, R.; Hassanvand, D. Assessing thermal comfort in tourist attractions through objective and subjective procedures based on ISO 7730 standard: A field study. Urban Clim. 2018, 26, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, Z.; de Dear, R.; Luo, M.; Lin, B.; He, Y.; Ghahramani, A.; Zhu, Y. Individual difference in thermal comfort: A literature review. Build. Environ. 2018, 138, 181–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, Z.; Zhang, H.; He, Y.; Luo, M.; Li, Z.; Hong, T.; Lin, B. Revisiting individual and group differences in thermal comfort based on ASHRAE database. Energy Build. 2020, 219, 110017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Guo, W.; Zhou, M. Technologies toward thermal comfort-based and energy-efficient HVAC systems: A review. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, San Antonio, TX, USA, 11–14 October 2009; pp. 3883–3888. [Google Scholar]
  14. Karjalainen, S.; Koistinen, O. User problems with individual temperature control in offices. Build. Environ. 2007, 42, 2880–2887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Golbabaei, F.; Heydari, A.; Moradi, G.; Dehghan, H.; Moradi, A.; Habibi, P. The effect of cooling vests on physiological and perceptual responses: A systematic review. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 2022, 28, 223–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Morris, N.B.; Jay, O.; Flouris, A.D.; Casanueva, A.; Gao, C.; Foster, J.; Havenith, G.; Nybo, L. Sustainable solutions to mitigate occupational heat strain–an umbrella review of physiological effects and global health perspectives. Environ. Health 2020, 19, 95. [Google Scholar]
  17. Peng, Y.; Cui, Y. Advanced textiles for personal thermal management and energy. Joule 2020, 4, 724–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lou, L.; Chen, K.; Fan, J. Advanced materials for personal thermal and moisture management of health care workers wearing PPE. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2021, 146, 100639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sajjad, U.; Hamid, K.; Sultan, M.; Abbas, N.; Ali, H.M.; Imran, M.; Muneeshwaran, M.; Chang, J.-Y.; Wang, C.-C. Personal thermal management-A review on strategies, progress, and prospects. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 2022, 130, 105739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Song, W.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, Z.; Wang, F.; Yang, B. Thermal comfort and energy performance of personal comfort systems (PCS): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Energy Build. 2022, 256, 111747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ren, S.; Han, M.; Fang, J. Personal Cooling Garments: A Review. Polymers 2022, 14, 5522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lou, L.; Wu, Y.S.; Shou, D.; Fan, J. Thermoregulatory clothing for personal thermal management. Annu. Rev. Heat Transf. 2018, 21, 205–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mokhtari Yazdi, M.; Sheikhzadeh, M. Personal cooling garments: A review. J. Text. Inst. 2014, 105, 1231–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sarkar, S.; Kothari, V. Cooling garments—A review. Indian J. Fibre Text. Res. 2014, 39, 450–458. [Google Scholar]
  25. Yi, W.; Zhao, Y.; Chan, A.P. Evaluation of the ventilation unit for personal cooling system (PCS). Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2017, 58, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhai, X. Research on the application of vortex tube type of cooling jacket in coal mine. AIP Conf. Proc. 2017, 1864, 020220. [Google Scholar]
  27. Al Sayed, C.; Vinches, L.; Dupuy, O.; Douzi, W.; Dugue, B.; Hallé, S. Air/CO2 cooling garment: Description and benefits of use for subjects exposed to a hot and humid climate during physical activities. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 2019, 29, 899–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ho, C.; Fan, J.; Newton, E.; Au, R. Effects of athletic T-shirt designs on thermal comfort. Fibers Polym. 2008, 9, 503–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sun, C.; Au, J.S.-C.; Fan, J.; Zheng, R. Novel ventilation design of combining spacer and mesh structure in sports T-shirt significantly improves thermal comfort. Appl. Ergon. 2015, 48, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, W.; Yao, L.; Cheng, C.-Y.; Zhang, T.; Atsumi, H.; Wang, L.; Wang, G.; Anilionyte, O.; Steiner, H.; Ou, J. Harnessing the hygroscopic and biofluorescent behaviors of genetically tractable microbial cells to design biohybrid wearables. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1601984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chai, J.; Kang, Z.; Yan, Y.; Lou, L.; Zhou, Y.; Fan, J. Thermoregulatory clothing with temperature-adaptive multimodal body heat regulation. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2022, 3, 100958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhao, M.; Gao, C.; Wang, F.; Kuklane, K.; Holmér, I.; Li, J. A study on local cooling of garments with ventilation fans and openings placed at different torso sites. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2013, 43, 232–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhao, M.; Yang, J.; Wang, F.; Udayraj; Chan, W.C. The cooling performance of forced air ventilation garments in a warm environment: The effect of clothing eyelet designs. J. Text. Inst. 2022, 114, 378–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yang, J.; Wang, F.; Song, G.; Li, R.; Raj, U. Effects of clothing size and air ventilation rate on cooling performance of air ventilation clothing in a warm condition. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 2022, 28, 354–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lou, L.; Wu, Y.S.; Zhou, Y.; Fan, J. Effects of body positions and garment design on the performance of a personal air cooling/heating system. Indoor Air 2022, 32, e12921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hes, L.; de Araujo, M. Simulation of the effect of air gaps between the skin and a wet fabric on resulting cooling flow. Text. Res. J. 2010, 80, 1488–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Guan, M.; Annaheim, S.; Li, J.; Camenzind, M.; Psikuta, A.; Rossi, R.M. Apparent evaporative cooling efficiency in clothing with continuous perspiration: A sweating manikin study. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2019, 137, 446–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gillis, D.J.; Barwood, M.; Newton, P.; House, J.; Tipton, M. The influence of a menthol and ethanol soaked garment on human temperature regulation and perception during exercise and rest in warm, humid conditions. J. Therm. Biol. 2016, 58, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Sharma, A.; Tyagi, V.V.; Chen, C.R.; Buddhi, D. Review on thermal energy storage with phase change materials and applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2009, 13, 318–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pause, B. Driving more comfortably with phase change materials. Tech. Text. Int. 2002, 11, 24–27. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhang, W.; Hao, S.; Zhao, D.; Bai, G.; Zuo, X.; Yao, J. Preparation of PMMA/SiO2 PCM microcapsules and its thermal regulation performance on denim fabric. Pigment Resin Technol. 2020, 49, 491–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Geng, X.; Li, W.; Wang, Y.; Lu, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, N.; Li, J.; Zhang, X. Reversible thermochromic microencapsulated phase change materials for thermal energy storage application in thermal protective clothing. Appl. Energy 2018, 217, 281–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chen, C.; Wang, L.; Huang, Y. Electrospun phase change fibers based on polyethylene glycol/cellulose acetate blends. Appl. Energy 2011, 88, 3133–3139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Golestaneh, S.; Mosallanejad, A.; Karimi, G.; Khorram, M.; Khashi, M. Fabrication and characterization of phase change material composite fibers with wide phase-transition temperature range by co-electrospinning method. Appl. Energy 2016, 182, 409–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yoo, H.; Lim, J.; Kim, E. Effects of the number and position of phase-change material-treated fabrics on the thermo-regulating properties of phase-change material garments. Text. Res. J. 2013, 83, 671–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. House, J.R.; Lunt, H.C.; Taylor, R.; Milligan, G.; Lyons, J.A.; House, C.M. The impact of a phase-change cooling vest on heat strain and the effect of different cooling pack melting temperatures. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2013, 113, 1223–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gao, C.; Kuklane, K.; Holmér, I. Cooling vests with phase change material packs: The effects of temperature gradient, mass and covering area. Ergonomics 2010, 53, 716–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Richardson, G.; Cohen, J.; McPhate, D.; Hayes, P. A personal conditioning system based on a liquid-conditioned vest and a thermoelectric supply system. Ergonomics 1988, 31, 1041–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Vallerand, A.; Michas, R.; Frim, J.; Ackles, K. Heat balance of subjects wearing protective clothing with a liquid-or air-cooled vest. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 1991, 62, 383–391. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  50. Frim, J.; Michas, R.D.; Cain, B. Personal cooling garment performance: A parametric study. In Environmental Ergonomics. Recent Progress and New Frontiers; Freund Publishing House, Ltd.: London, UK; Tel Aviv, Israel, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  51. Kayacan, Ö.; Kurbak, A. Effect of garment design on liquid cooling garments. Text. Res. J. 2010, 80, 1442–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Burton, D. Performance of water conditioned suits. Aerosp. Med May 1966, 1966, 500–504. [Google Scholar]
  53. Cheuvront, S.N.; Kolka, M.A.; Cadarette, B.S.; Montain, S.J.; Sawka, M.N. Efficacy of intermittent, regional microclimate cooling. J. Appl. Physiol. 2003, 94, 1841–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Xu, X. Multi-loop control of liquid cooling garment systems. Ergonomics 1999, 42, 282–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Branson, D.H.; Cao, H.; Jin, B.; Peksoz, S.; Farr, C.; Ashdown, S. Fit analysis of liquid cooled vest prototypes using 3D body scanning technology. J. Text. Appar. Technol. Manag. 2005, 4, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  56. Burton, D. Engineering aspects of personal conditioning. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Individual Cooling, Manhattan, KS, USA, 17–18 March 1969; pp. 33–49. [Google Scholar]
  57. Young, A.J.; Sawka, M.N.; EpStein, Y.; Decristofano, B.; Pandolf, K.B. Cooling different body surfaces during upper and lower body exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 1987, 63, 1218–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Cao, H.; Branson, D.H.; Peksoz, S.; Nam, J.; Farr, C.A. Fabric selection for a liquid cooling garment. Text. Res. J. 2006, 76, 587–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dionne, J.; Semeniuk, K.; Makris, A.; Teal, W.; Laprise, B. Thermal manikin evaluation of liquid cooling garments intended for use in hazardous waste management. In Proceedings of the Waste Management 2003 Symposium, Tucson, AZ, USA, 3–27 February 2003. [Google Scholar]
  60. Enescu, D.; Virjoghe, E.O. A review on thermoelectric cooling parameters and performance. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 38, 903–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Riffat, S.B.; Ma, X. Thermoelectrics: A review of present and potential applications. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2003, 23, 913–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hong, S.; Gu, Y.; Seo, J.K.; Wang, J.; Liu, P.; Meng, Y.S.; Xu, S.; Chen, R. Wearable thermoelectrics for personalized thermoregulation. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaaw0536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Lou, L.; Shou, D.; Park, H.; Zhao, D.; Wu, Y.S.; Hui, X.; Yang, R.; Kan, E.C.; Fan, J. Thermoelectric air conditioning undergarment for personal thermal management and HVAC energy saving. Energy Build. 2020, 226, 110374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Xu, Y.; Li, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhang, M.; Jia, M.; Wang, Q. Man-portable cooling garment with cold liquid circulation based on thermoelectric refrigeration. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2022, 200, 117730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sanchez-Marin, F.J.; Calixto-Carrera, S.; Villaseñor-Mora, C. Novel approach to assess the emissivity of the human skin. J. Biomed. Opt. 2009, 14, 024006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Tong, J.K.; Huang, X.; Boriskina, S.V.; Loomis, J.; Xu, Y.; Chen, G. Infrared-transparent visible-opaque fabrics for wearable personal thermal management. Acs Photonics 2015, 2, 769–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hsu, P.-C.; Song, A.Y.; Catrysse, P.B.; Liu, C.; Peng, Y.; Xie, J.; Fan, S.; Cui, Y. Radiative human body cooling by nanoporous polyethylene textile. Science 2016, 353, 1019–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Zeng, S.; Pian, S.; Su, M.; Wang, Z.; Wu, M.; Liu, X.; Chen, M.; Xiang, Y.; Wu, J.; Zhang, M. Hierarchical-morphology metafabric for scalable passive daytime radiative cooling. Science 2021, 373, 692–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Sun, Y.; Ji, Y.; Javed, M.; Li, X.; Fan, Z.; Wang, Y.; Cai, Z.; Xu, B. Preparation of passive daytime cooling fabric with the synergistic effect of radiative cooling and evaporative cooling. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2022, 7, 2100803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhu, F.; Feng, Q. Recent advances in textile materials for personal radiative thermal management in indoor and outdoor environments. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2021, 165, 106899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhu, B.; Li, W.; Zhang, Q.; Li, D.; Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Xu, N.; Wu, Z.; Li, J.; Li, X. Subambient daytime radiative cooling textile based on nanoprocessed silk. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2021, 16, 1342–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Iqbal, M.I.; Lin, K.; Sun, F.; Chen, S.; Pan, A.; Lee, H.H.; Kan, C.-W.; Lin, C.S.K.; Tso, C.Y. Radiative cooling nanofabric for personal thermal management. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 23577–23587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wu, X.; Li, J.; Jiang, Q.; Zhang, W.; Wang, B.; Li, R.; Zhao, S.; Wang, F.; Huang, Y.; Lyu, P. An all-weather radiative human body cooling textile. Nat. Sustain. 2023, 2023, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  74. Bogerd, N.; Psikuta, A.; Daanen, H.; Rossi, R. How to measure thermal effects of personal cooling systems: Human, thermal manikin and human simulator study. Physiol. Meas. 2010, 31, 1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ouahrani, D.; Itani, M.; Ghaddar, N.; Ghali, K.; Khater, B. Experimental study on using PCMs of different melting temperatures in one cooling vest to reduce its weight and improve comfort. Energy Build. 2017, 155, 533–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zheng, Q.; Ke, Y.; Wang, H. Design and evaluation of cooling workwear for miners in hot underground mines using PCMs with different temperatures. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 2022, 28, 118–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Yang, Y.; Stapleton, J.; Diagne, B.T.; Kenny, G.P.; Lan, C.Q. Man-portable personal cooling garment based on vacuum desiccant cooling. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2012, 47, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Jetté, F.-X.; Dionne, J.-P.; Rose, J.; Makris, A. Effect of thermal manikin surface temperature on the performance of personal cooling systems. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2004, 92, 669–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Miura, K.; Takagi, K.; Ikematsu, K. Evaluation of two cooling devices for construction workers by a thermal manikin. Fash. Text. 2017, 4, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Schellen, L.; Loomans, M.; Kingma, B.; De Wit, M.; Frijns, A.; van Marken Lichtenbelt, W. The use of a thermophysiological model in the built environment to predict thermal sensation: Coupling with the indoor environment and thermal sensation. Build. Environ. 2013, 59, 10–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zolfaghari, A.; Maerefat, M. A new simplified thermoregulatory bioheat model for evaluating thermal response of the human body to transient environments. Build. Environ. 2010, 45, 2068–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kang, Z.; Wang, F. An advanced three-dimensional thermoregulation model of the human body: Development and validation. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 2019, 107, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wu, G.; Liu, H.; Wu, S.; Liu, Z.; Mi, L.; Gao, L. A study on the capacity of a ventilation cooling vest with pressurized air in hot and humid environments. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2021, 83, 103106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Lou, L.; Zhou, Y.; Yan, Y.; Hong, Y.; Fan, J. Wearable cooling and dehumidifying system for personal protective equipment (PPE). Energy Build. 2022, 276, 112510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Stolwijk, J.A. A Mathematical Model of Physiological Temperature Regulation in Man; NASA: Washington, DC, USA, 1971.
  86. Gao, C.; Kuklane, K.; Wang, F.; Holmér, I. Personal cooling with phase change materials to improve thermal comfort from a heat wave perspective. Indoor Air 2012, 22, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Hou, J.; Yang, Z.; Xu, P.; Huang, G. Design and performance evaluation of novel personal cooling garment. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2019, 154, 131–139. [Google Scholar]
  88. Nag, P.; Pradhan, C.; Nag, A.; Ashtekar, S.; Desai, H. Efficacy of a water-cooled garment for auxiliary body cooling in heat. Ergonomics 1998, 41, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Guo, T.; Shang, B.; Duan, B.; Luo, X. Design and testing of a liquid cooled garment for hot environments. J. Therm. Biol. 2015, 49, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Bartkowiak, G.; Dabrowska, A.; Marszalek, A. Assessment of an active liquid cooling garment intended for use in a hot environment. Appl. Ergon. 2017, 58, 182–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Shirish, A.; Kapadia, V.; Kumar, S.; Kumar, S.; Mishra, S.; Singh, G. Effectiveness of a cooling jacket with reference to physiological responses in iron foundry workers. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 2016, 22, 487–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Butts, C.L.; Torretta, M.L.; Smith, C.R.; Petway, A.J.; McDermott, B.P. Effects of a phase change cooling garment during exercise in the heat. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2017, 17, 1065–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Rykaczewski, K. Rational design of sun and wind shaded evaporative cooling vests for enhanced personal cooling in hot and dry climates. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2020, 171, 115122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Processes 11 02976 g001
Figure 1. The schematic diagram of active air cooling garments (ACGs) (e.g., cooling achieved by fan (a) and vortex tube (b)).
Figure 1. The schematic diagram of active air cooling garments (ACGs) (e.g., cooling achieved by fan (a) and vortex tube (b)).
Processes 11 02976 g001
Processes 11 02976 g002
Figure 2. The schematic diagram of evaporative cooling garments (ECGs).
Figure 2. The schematic diagram of evaporative cooling garments (ECGs).
Processes 11 02976 g002
Processes 11 02976 g003
Figure 3. The schematic diagram of phase-change cooling garments (PCCGs).
Figure 3. The schematic diagram of phase-change cooling garments (PCCGs).
Processes 11 02976 g003
Processes 11 02976 g004
Figure 4. The schematic diagram of liquid cooling garments (LCGs).
Figure 4. The schematic diagram of liquid cooling garments (LCGs).
Processes 11 02976 g004
Processes 11 02976 g005
Figure 5. The schematic diagram of thermoelectric cooling garments (TCGs).
Figure 5. The schematic diagram of thermoelectric cooling garments (TCGs).
Processes 11 02976 g005
Table 1. Quantitative analysis for air cooling garments (ACGs).
Table 1. Quantitative analysis for air cooling garments (ACGs).
No.Cooling PowerWeightDurationTesting ScenarioFlow RateCooling Area
ACG 171.5–106 WN/AN/A34 °C, 60% RH, 0.4 m/s12 L/sN/A
ACG 279.5–97.6 WN/AN/A30–34 °C,
90% RH		10 m3/h or 14 m3/h.0.53 m2
ACG 367.72 ± 0.74 W98 g (Fan only)7.05 h34 °C, 60% RH, 0.4 ± 0.1 m/s8–22 L/sN/A
ACG 415.5 W994 gN/A26.1 °C,
50% RH		1 × 10−3~1.17 × 10−3 m3/s N/A
ACG 551.7 W1.2 kgN/A23 °C,
50% RH		70 L/minN/A
Table 2. Quantitative analysis for phase-change cooling garments (PCCGs).
Table 2. Quantitative analysis for phase-change cooling garments (PCCGs).
NO.Cooling PowerWeightDurationTesting
Scenario		Phase-Transition TemperatureCooling AreaCooling
Temperature
PCCG 119.2–28.4 W2224 g150 minHot climates (the required temperature gradient is suggested to be greater than 6 °C)24 °C0.2054 m2≥24 °C
12.9–21.2 W2226 g288 min28 °C≥28 °C
6.0–14.2 W1973 g360 min32 °C≥32 °C
PCCG 28.4 W1296 g65 min30 ± 0.5 °C,
80 ± 5% RH, <0.1 m/s		15°C + 15 °C0.1404 m2≥15 °C
10.5 W125 min15°C + 23 °C≥15 °C
PCCG 310–20 W 2224 g210 min34 ± 0.5 °C, 60% RH, 0.4 m/s21 °C0.57 m2≥21 °C
PCCG 489.6 ± 9 W3400 gN/A37 °C, 50% RHN/A0.4 m2≥16 °C
PCCG 513.4–19.4 W1800 g≥2 h30 °C, 45% RH24–26 °CN/A≥24 °C
Table 3. Quantitative analysis for liquid cooling garments (LCGs).
Table 3. Quantitative analysis for liquid cooling garments (LCGs).
NO.Cooling PowerWeightDurationTesting ScenarioFlow RateCooling AreaCooling
Temperature
LCG 167.2–138.1 W1.5 kg0.79–3.36 h40 °C–50 °C224.5–544.2 mL/min0.568 m2N/A
LCG 2300 W<10 kg≥1 h30–45 °C,
20–80% RH		3.8 L/minN/A22–27 °C
LCG 390.8–96.5 W3 kg90 min35.89 ± 1.25 °C, 35% RHN/A10–15 °C
LCG 4340.4 WN/AN/A30 °CN/AN/A15.7 °C
Table 4. Comparative analysis for different types of personal cooling garments (PCGs).
Table 4. Comparative analysis for different types of personal cooling garments (PCGs).
Ref.Cooling TechniqueCooling PowerWeightDurationTesting ScenarioCooling AreaCooling Temperature
[32]ACG71.5–106 WN/AN/A34 °C, 60% RH, 0.4 m/sN/AN/A
[83]79.5–97.6 WN/AN/A30–34 °C,
90% RH		0.53 m230 °C
[25]67.72 ± 0.74 W98g (Fan only)7.05 h34 °C, 60% RH, 0.4 ± 0.1 m/sN/AN/A
[63]15.5 W994 gN/A26.1 °C, 50% RHN/A19.8–26.5 °C
[84]51.7 W1.2 kgN/A23 °C,
50% RH		N/AN/A
[47]PCCG19.2–28.4 W2224 g2.5 hHot climates (the required temperature gradient is suggested to be greater than 6 °C)0.2054 m2≥24 °C
12.9–21.2 W2226 g4.8 h≥28 °C
6.0–14.2 W1973 g6 h≥32 °C
[76]8.4 W1296 g65 min30 ± 0.5 °C,
80 ± 5% RH, <0.1m/s		0.1404 m2≥15 °C
10.5 W125 min≥15 °C
[86]10–20 W2224 g210 min34 ± 0.5 °C, 60% RH, 0.4 m/s0.57 m2≥21 °C
[77]89.6 ± 9 W3400 gN/A37 °C, 50% RH0.4 m2N/A
[87]13.4–19.4 W1800 g≥2 h30 °C, 45% RHN/AN/A
[89]LCG67.2–138.1 W1500 g0.79–3.36 h40 °C–50 °C0.568 m2N/A
[90]300 W<10 kg≥1 h30–45 °C, 20–80% RHN/A22–27 °C
[91]90.8–96.5 W3000 g90 min35.89 ± 1.25 °C, 35% RH10–15 °C
[64]340.4 WN/AN/A30 °C≥15.7 °C
[93]ECG48–57 WN/AN/A40 °C, 10% RH0.6 m2N/A
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, Y.; Lou, L.; Fan, J. Quantitative Comparison of Personal Cooling Garments in Performance and Design: A Review. Processes 2023, 11, 2976. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11102976

AMA Style

Zhou Y, Lou L, Fan J. Quantitative Comparison of Personal Cooling Garments in Performance and Design: A Review. Processes. 2023; 11(10):2976. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11102976

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhou, Yiying, Lun Lou, and Jintu Fan. 2023. "Quantitative Comparison of Personal Cooling Garments in Performance and Design: A Review" Processes 11, no. 10: 2976. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11102976

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop