Next Article in Journal
Development and Validation of an LC-MS/MS Method for the Determination of Plasma and Red Blood Cell Omega Fatty Acids: A Useful Diagnostic Tool
Previous Article in Journal
Phosphate Recovery Mechanism from Low P-Containing Wastewaters via CaP Crystallization Using Apatite as Seed: Seed Adsorption, Surface-Induced Crystallization, or Ion Clusters Aggregation?
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Impact of Pesticide Residues on Soil Health for Sustainable Vegetable Production in Arid Areas
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fertilizers’ Impact on Grassland in Northeastern Romania

1
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research—International Intergovernmental Organization, 8 Joliot Curie Str., 141980 Dubna, Russia
2
National Institute for R & D in Electrical Engineering ICPE-CA, 313 Splaiul Unirii, 030138 Bucharest, Romania
3
Fiterman Pharma Ltd., 127 Pacurari Str., 700544 Iasi, Romania
4
Horia Hulubei National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, 30 Reactorului Str., 077125 Magurele (Ilfov), Romania
5
Department of Structure of Matter, Earth and Atmospheric Physics, Astrophysics, 405 Atomistilor Str., 077125 Magurele (Ilfov), Romania
6
Geological Institute of Romania, 1 Caransebes Str., 012271 Bucharest, Romania
7
Research and Development Station for Meadows, 256 Stefan cel Mare Str., 730006 Vaslui, Romania
8
Faculty of Agriculture, “Ion Ionescu de la Brad” Iași University of Life Sciences, 3 Mihail Sadoveanu Avn., 700490 Iasi, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Separations 2024, 11(5), 139; https://doi.org/10.3390/separations11050139
Submission received: 1 April 2024 / Revised: 26 April 2024 / Accepted: 28 April 2024 / Published: 1 May 2024

Abstract

:
In order to obtain more data concerning the influence of fertilizers (organic and mineral) on different forage plants in the northeastern Romanian grassland, the mass fractions of 14 essential, enzymatic, or toxic elements were determined by instrumental neutron activation analysis together with the amount of crude proteins, ash, fibers, as well as fat ether extract. The final results showed a significant variance in the content of analyzed elements on organic as well as on mineral fertilized experimental plots. At the same time, increased content of crude protein and fat ether extract was evident in fertilized grasses for all applied fertilizers, while other global indicators such as neutral and acid fibers of sulfuric lignin content decreased, suggesting significantly higher nutritional values for fertilized forage plants.

1. Introduction

Romania is a medium-sized country located in southeastern Europe. Bordering on the Black Sea, the country is halfway between the equator and the North Pole and equidistant from the westernmost part of Europe–the Atlantic Coast—and the most easterly–the Ural Mountains. At the same time, Romania has a well-balanced relief, in that about one-third of the country’s surface is represented by plains, one-third by hills, and one-third by mountains with a maximum height of 2544 m [1,2].
Both geographical position and relief diversity determine a variety of climatic zones, beginning with humid subtropical in the south to subarctic and tundra at altitudes higher than 1800 m, and with a medium temperature varying between +11 °C in the south and +8 °C in the north. Under these conditions, the average precipitation is 589 mm for a relative humidity around of 70% [3].
These factors significantly influence the distribution of agricultural surface such that, from a total of 14.8 Mha of agriculture classes, the exploitable grassland (pasture and hay-field) covers about 4.9 Mha [4]. On the other hand, due to improper management, a significant proportion of pastures, which cover about 60% of the mountain area (18% of the entire country), are in many places overgrazed.
Overgrazing represents one of the most acute problems of any ecosystem, which can be extended to entire countries. As a rule, overgrazing appears when livestock graze on vegetation at a rate exceeding the system’s capacity to regrow. Once the vegetation carpet disappears, the soil loses the most fertile topsoil, becoming prone to irreversible and total degradation. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations [5,6], livestock represents one of the most significant factors that affect the environment, while the overgrazed area represents more than 20% of total pasture surface.
In Romania, grazing is well-regulated by the Land Fund Law 18/1991 [7], which was complemented in 2013 by Emergency Ordinance 34/2013 [8]. They establish the regime of exploitation of natural grasslands, including the fact that they can be organized for at least five years depending on the species of plants that inhabit them. As a corollary, grasslands cannot be turned into agricultural land or urban areas without government approval.
To prevent overgrazing, in addition to a series of severe regulations at the national level as mentioned above, the reintroduction of native fodder plants can mitigate overgrazing consequences. At the same time, better management and the administration of both natural and mineral fertilizer could be long-term solutions to prevent the consequences of overgrazing.
It has been shown that the application of natural fertilizers such as manure or N and P mineral fertilizers has increased the above-soil biomass and microbial community, stimulated plant diversity, and, at the same time, contributed to overgrazed topsoil regeneration [9,10,11]. The effect of this procedure has been shown to be beneficial for a great diversity of grassland [12,13], not only by restoring the vegetation but also by increasing the amount of forage crude protein (CP) and dried matter digestibility [14], which, in their own way, have a helpful influence on the grazing animals.
In this regard, it is worth mentioning that the use of fertilizer could significantly increase the forage biomass per hectare [15], and, at the same time, it could affect not only the nutritional value but also the content of a great diversity of elements, including Na, K, and Cl, whose concentration defines the dietary cation–anion difference (DCAD) [16], as well as the more enzymatic transition metal elements, i.e., Mn, Fe, Co, Zn, Mo, and Se [17], and even harmful ones such as Al [18,19] and As [20,21]. To this list, we could add Mg and Ca, whose role in plant metabolism and in the cell wall and membrane structures is essential [22,23], as well as Sr, due to its role in the process of osteosynthesis by stimulating bone formation together with the inhibition of bone resorption [24,25]. On the other hand, according to [26], Sr could cause harmful effects due to its mobility within plants. All these facts make the study of this category of elements that plays a major role not only in plants’ physiology but also in the quality of derivative products currently used for human consumption, such as milk and or meat, very important [27,28].
Since Romania’s admission to the European Union, European standards on food security have been adopted and implemented, and their application, according to Romanian legislation [29], is mandatory for all units that make up the food chain, agricultural production, the food industry, and public nutrition [30].
For a better characterization of the influence of fertilizer on the most common type of grasses, we have used instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) in both its thermal and epithermal variants [31] to determine the mass fractions of 14 major and trace elements in three types of perennial grasses in correlation with some of the most important biochemical descriptors of their nutritional values. It is worth mentioning that the forage grasses considered here are commonly used for cattle food.
To determine the mass fraction of a large category of elements, including the metabolic and structural, enzymatic, as well as toxic ones [17], we used INAA due to both its ability to determine the mass fractions of more than 40 elements with an accuracy on the order of 0.1–1 mg/kg and to the fact that INAA permits direct measurements of samples without any preliminary processing such as acid digestion [32]. Also, access to one of the best nuclear reactors still in use, i.e., IBR2 of the Joint Institute of Nuclear Research in Dubna, encouraged us to use INAA instead of other high-accuracy analytical methods such as ICP-MS or ICO-OAS.

2. Hypothesis and Research Objectives

Given the diversity of both forage grasses and their habitats, the main goals of this study are as follows:
(i)
To investigate to what extent the use of natural and mineral fertilizers influences the content of some essential and harmful elements in three types of forage grasses common in Romanian medium- to high-altitude grasslands;
(ii)
To quantify the influence of fertilizers as reflected by the parameters that characterize the nutritional value of the forages considered, i.e., the dietary requirements.
The results of our study performed under these circumstances will be further presented and discussed.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Sampling and Sample Preparation

For our study, we have chosen three types of perennial grasses, all of them currently populating the temperate climate grassland, i.e., Agrostis capillaris L., Festuca rubra L., and Nardus stricta L. The experiment was organized in four different places in Suceava County, northeastern Romania, at altitudes between 611 and 840 m, which are typical for Romania grasslands (Figure 1).
All experiments consisted of applying a mixture of natural and mineral fertilizers for five consecutive years following different schemes as illustrated in Table 1. For this, 15 to 27 plots of land of 2 × 3 m, randomly disposed to form compact blocks of 90, 126, and 162 m2, respectively, were kept unfertilized as reference or were fertilized as previously mentioned (Figure S1). For each experimental location, a detailed description of the different procedures used in fertilizer administration is reproduced in Table A1Table A3 (see Appendix A).
After four years of controlled fertilization, for two consecutive years, the grass was harvested, cleaned of foreign vegetation, dried, ground, and analyzed for major and trace elements as well as for the nutritional quality specific parameters.

3.2. Analytical Techniques

INAA was used to determine the mass fractions of the following elements: Na, Mg, Al, Cl, K, Ca, Mn, Fe, Co, Zn, Se, As, Br, Sr, and Mo. Among them, Mn, Fe, Co, Cu, Zn, Mo, and Se enter, according to Markert et al. [17], into the composition of some enzymes that are indispensable for plants’ vital processes. Also important are the alkali elements Na and K, whose average mass fractions can reach up to 1.5% wt., together with the structural elements Cl and Ca, considered to be some of the main constituents of plant cells [17]. As mentioned before, Al [18,19] and As [20,21] are considered toxic for animals and especially for human consumption, while Sr could be harmful to plants [26]. For this reason, their presence needs special attention.
Related to this, it is worth mentioning that the mass fractions of Na, K, and Cl define the dietary cation–anion difference (DCAD) [16] as follows:
DCAD = ( Na + + K + ) Cl ,
where Na+, K+, and Cl represent the concentrations of mentioned elements expressed in milli-equivalents per 100 g of dietary dry matter.
The DCAD represents a valuable proxy in estimating the influence of the grasses’ major elements (Na, K, and Cl) on cattle lactation and meat productivity. Accordingly, in dry cows, a negative DCAD can help prevent metabolic problems, while in the case of lactating cows, a positive DCAD helps increase milk production and nutritional potential.
All INAA measurements were performed by using the fast-pulsed reactor IBR2. To determine the mass fraction of the above-mentioned elements, both short- and long-time irradiation were used. More details on the experimental setup and quality control are provided in [33,34,35,36].
Special attention was paid to quality control, accomplished by simultaneous use of Standard Reference Materials (SRMs) assembled to compose the so-called Group of Standard Samples (GSSs) proprietary software [33,34,35]. The aim of this procedure consisted of selecting the most suitable SRM lines to maximize both accuracy and precision of INAA determinations for all considered elements. This allowed us to attain an accuracy between 3 and 15% for each INAA measurement, expressed using combined statistical uncertainty (CSU) [36,37].
Simultaneously with the INAA measurements, five chemical parameters essential for characterizing the nutritional qualities of grasses, i.e., the ash content (AC), CP, fat ether extract (FEE), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and neutral detergent fiber (NDF), were also determined.
The ash content was gravimetrically determined by muffle furnace ignition at 550 °C [38]; CP and FEE were determined by the Kjeldahl [39] and Soxhlet extraction [40] methods, respectively; and the Van Sosest method was used to determine both ADF and NDF, as well as the sulfuric lignin content (SLC) [41]. For these methods, the CSU was no greater than 7%. All these parameters were experimentally determined in the Chemical Analysis Laboratory of the Iasi University of Life Sciences.

3.3. Statistical Data Analysis

In order to examine to what extent the utilized fertilizers influenced the presence of the considered elements, Student’s t-test was used. Both elemental statistics and Student’s t-tests were performed using PAST software (version 4) [42].

4. Results

The final results concerning the mass fractions of the most important elements in both unfertilized (for reference) and fertilized soil grasses are reproduced in Table 2. Accordingly, to highlight the influence of fertilizers, we have provided not only the mass fractions of investigated elements but also the corresponding values of the reference plants [17], the recommended dietary mineral requirements (RDMR) [43], and the maximum tolerable level (MTL) [43]; all of the data can be found in Table 2. In this regard, it should be mentioned that, for a better statistical analysis, as well as to be closer to real grasslands, all presented results refer to the average values obtained by combining the corresponding parameters for all three types of grasses considered in this study.
In order to examine the influence of the fertilizing procedures investigated in this study, in Table 3, we have illustrated to what extent the presence of fertilizer influenced the mass fractions of the considered elements in the fertilized grasses. All values were significant at p < 0.05 (95% probability) according to Student’s t-test. In this regard, it should be noted that the provided value is for the average results of all three grass species, i.e., Agrostis capillaris L., Festuca rubra L., and Nardus stricta L.

5. Discussion

Regarding the first objective of our study, we have compared the content of the above-mentioned category of elements in the foraging grasses cultivated on fertilized grassland with the content of the same elements in grasses collected from unfertilized plots.
A first remark concerning the global data provided in Table 2 points toward a great spread of final mass fractions of almost all elements, although the CSU, as previously mentioned, never exceeded 7%.
In our opinion, this fact could be attributed to either the reduced experimental surfaces that determined the significant variability in the numerical data or to the diversity of pedologic conditions. On this subject, it should be taken into account that the experiment took place in four different places at heights varying between 610 m for Putna and 940 m for Sarul Dornei (Figure 1), with different local climate and soil types.
At the same time, the results reproduced in Table 2 and Table 3 clearly show that, in all cases, Na presents a chronic deficit, as its mass fraction is significantly lower than the RDMR. Also, it should be remarked that, in Cosna, Pojorata, and Sarul Dornei, the Al mass fraction locally exceeded the MTL, which should be a concern for local authorities. In all other cases, the content of investigated elements was either lower or higher than the RDMR, never exceeding the MTL.
The same results confirmed a relatively dispersed reaction to fertilizer administration, which most probably, as mentioned before, can be attributed to local variability of soil and micro-climates. From this point of view, the most positive results were observed in the Cosna experimental plots with organic fertilizers, where the presence of almost all elements showed a statistically proven growth at p < 0.05.
We have also noted the opposite tendency in the Cosna experimental plots, but this time for mineral fertilizers, where the content of almost all considered elements decreased to that of non-fertilized areas.
The extreme variation we have noticed in Na and Ca content in fertilized grasses increased in six locations, mainly as a result of applying organic fertilizer, and in the case of Mn, whose mass fraction decreased in six locations that were mostly fertilized with manure.
Although V and Cr can play a significant role in plant metabolism, their content was, in many cases below the detection limit, so we did not consider them in this report.
More detailed information concerning the influence of different fertilizing procedures is provided in Table 3. Here we have illustrated to what extent the presence of the considered elements increased, decreased, or remained unchanged after fertilizer administration. In all cases, the probability was more than 95% (p < 0.05). Accordingly, the contents increased in 24% of plots, decreased in 23%, and remained unchanged in 45%, while in 8%, their content was below the detection limits, as in the case of Se. It should be remarked that, according to the data in Table 3, Fe remains the single element whose content, excepting the Sarul Dornei (organic fertilizer) and Pojorate (mineral fertilizer) experimental areas, increased in all other locations; see Table 3.
The best results were observed for the Cosna plots (organic fertilizers, 2010) where the mass fraction of eight elements increased. On the opposite side was Pojorata (organic fertilizer, 2011), where the mass fractions of all elements either remained unchanged or even decreased.
In terms of the second objective, we have calculated the more representative descriptors, such as dietary cation–anion difference (DCAD), crude protein (CP), ash content (AC), fat ether extract (FEE), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF), as well as the sulfuric lignin content (SLC), by using the results obtained by both INAA and chemical analysis.
The obtained results reproduced in Table 4 show that DCAD, whose values are determined by the content of Na, K, and Cl, as well as by the fertilizer type, either organic or mineral, seems to have greater values in the case of mineral fertilizers. In our opinion, this fact may be due to the reduced content of Na, which the use of organic and mineral fertilizers could not increase significantly. Despite this fact, DCAD presented positive values everywhere.
At the same time, both organic and mineral fertilizers seem to have a positive role in increasing the quality of foraging grasses. According to results illustrated in Table 4, CP and FEE, the latter of which consists chiefly of fats and fatty acids, increased in almost all cases. A similar behavior could be seen for AC, which represents a measure of the total amount of minerals present within plants. The higher the AC, the more developed the aerial part of the plant. This characteristic could be well-correlated with an increased content of protein and fats for all three grass species, i.e., Agrostis capillaris L., Festuca rubra L., and Nardus stricta L.
On this subject, it is worth mentioning that the ash content increased only in the case of organic fertilizers, showing an opposite tendency for mineral ones. In our opinion, this fact, if future experiments can confirm it, could play a significant role in increasing the use of organic fertilizers, which are more environmentally friendly.
It is worth mentioning that the values of the other nutritional parameters, such as NDF, ADF, and SLC, significantly decreased in the presence of both mineral and organic fertilizers, which, in our opinion, confirms the positive role of fertilizer in the regeneration process of the overgrazed grasslands.

6. Conclusions

To examine the possible influence of different fertilizing procedures, instrumental neutron activation analysis and other analytical techniques were used to determine the mass fractions of 14 elements as well as the numerical values of seven nutritional descriptors in three species of Gramineae currently found on Romanian grasslands. The grass samples were collected from unfertilized and fertilized experimental plots, all of them located in Suceava County in northeastern Romania.
The analysis of the elemental content of the 14 most important structural, metabolic, enzymatic, or potentially toxic elements showed, first of all, a significant Na deficit for all plants harvested from both fertilized and unfertilized experimental plots.
Also, we noticed a significant variance in the content of analyzed elements for both types of experimental plots; e.g., the elemental content increased in 24% of plots, decreased in 23%, and remained unchanged in 45%, while in 8%, it was below the detection limits, as in the case of Se.
A better influence was noticed for crude protein and ether extract, whose content increased in almost all fertilized grasses. Both indicators point towards an increased nutritional value.
The values of other global indicators, such as neutral and acid fibers of sulfuric lignin content, decreased in almost all cases. This finding again suggests the beneficial influence of both organic and mineral fertilization.
The great variability observed for all descriptors points towards the use, in future studies, of significantly larger experimental plots to reduce as much as possible the statistical uncertainties associated with small amounts of the analyzed material.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/separations11050139/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, O.A.C., D.T., M.S. and V.V.; data curation, O.A.C., D.T., I.Z., O.G.D., M.S. and V.V.; formal analysis, D.T., I.Z., O.G.D., M.S. and V.V.; investigation, O.A.C. and I.Z.; methodology, O.A.C., D.T., I.Z., O.G.D., M.S. and V.V.; project administration, O.A.C. and D.T.; resources, O.A.C. and D.T.; software, O.A.C. and O.G.D.; supervision, I.Z.; validation, D.T., I.Z. and V.V.; visualization, O.A.C., I.Z., O.G.D., M.S. and V.V.; writing—original draft, O.A.C.; writing—review and editing, O.A.C., D.T., I.Z. and O.G.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The project was realized within the Cooperation Programs between the Iasi University of Life Sciences, University Alexandru Ioan Cuza, Iasi, University of Bucharest, and the JINR International Intergovernmental Organization, Dubna, Russian Federation. We wish to thank three anonymous reviewers for their useful remarks and advice.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Doina Tarcau was employed by the company Fiterman Pharma ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ACAsh Content
ADFAcid Detergent Fiber
CPCrude Protein
DCADDietary Cation–Anion Difference
FEEFat Ether Extract
INAAInstrumental Neutron Activation Analysis
MTLMaximum Tolerable Level
NDFNeutral Detergent Fiber
RDMRRecommended Dietary Mineral Reserve
SLCSulfuric Lignin Content
SRMStandard Reference Material

Appendix A

Table A1. Detailed description of the fertilizing procedure for Nardus stricta L. in the Cosna grassland.
Table A1. Detailed description of the fertilizing procedure for Nardus stricta L. in the Cosna grassland.
Experience 1: Organic FertilizerExperience 2: Mineral Fertilizer
PlotPlot
V1Unfertilized controlV1Unfertilized control
V220 t/h manure applied every yearV2 N 100 P 100
V330 t/h manure applied every yearV3 N 140 P 140
V440 t/h manure applied every yearV4 N 200 P 200
V550 t/h manure applied every yearV5 N 100 P 100 + N 100 P 100
V620 t/h manure applied every 2 yearsV6 N 100 P 100 + N 100 P 100
V730 t/h manure applied every 2 yearsV7 N 80 P 80 + N 60 P 60
V840 t/h manure applied every 2 years
V950 t/h manure applied every 2 years
Table A2. Detailed description of the fertilizing procedure for the Pojorata permanent grassland of Agrostis capillaris L. and Festuca rubra L. (Experience 1), as well as Nardus stricta L. (Experience 2).
Table A2. Detailed description of the fertilizing procedure for the Pojorata permanent grassland of Agrostis capillaris L. and Festuca rubra L. (Experience 1), as well as Nardus stricta L. (Experience 2).
Experience 1: Organic FertilizerExperience 2: Mineral Fertilizer
PlotPlot
V1Unfertilized controlV1Unfertilized control
V210 t/ha manure applied every yearV230 kg/ha mineral nitrogen + 10 t/ha manure applied every year
V320 t/ha manure applied every 2 yearsV350 kg/ha mineral nitrogen + 10 t/ha manure applied every year
V430 t/ha manure applied every 3 yearsV430 kg/ha mineral nitrogen + 20 t/ha manure applied every 2 years
V520 t/ha manure annually + 10 t/ha manure every 2 years + no manureV550 kg/ha mineral nitrogen + 20 t/ha manure applied every 2 years
V620 t/ha manure annually + no manure + 10 t/ha manure every 3 yearsV630 kg/ha mineral nitrogen + 30 t/ha manure applied every 3 years
V720 t/ha manure annually + 10 t/ha manure every 2 years + 10 t/ha manure every 2 yearsV750 kg/ha mineral nitrogen + 30 t/ha manure applied every 3 years
Table A3. Detailed description of the fertilizing procedure for Nardus stricta L. in the Cosna grassland.
Table A3. Detailed description of the fertilizing procedure for Nardus stricta L. in the Cosna grassland.
Sarul Dornei: Organic FertilizerPutna: Mineral Fertilizer
PlotPlot
V1Unfertilized controlV1Unfertilized control
V220 t/ha manure applied every yearV2 N 100 P 100
V330 t/ha manure applied every yearV3 N 140 P 140
V430 t/ha manure applied every 2 yearsV4 N 200 P 200
V550 + 0 + 40 + 0 t/ha manure appliedV5 N 100 P 100 + N 40 P 40

References

  1. Ghinea, D. Geographical Encyclopaedia of Romania; Enciclopedica, Ed.; Enciclopedica Publisher: Bucharest, Romania, 2002; ISBN 973-45-0396-0. (In Romanian) [Google Scholar]
  2. Radoane, M.; Vespremeanu-Stroe, A. (Eds.) Introduction in Romanian Geomorphology; Springer: Doerdrecht, The Netherlands, 2017; ISBN 978-3-319-32589-7. [Google Scholar]
  3. National Administration of Meteorology, National Administration of Meteorology. Available online: http://www.meteoromania.ro/anm2/clima/clima-romaniei/ (accessed on 23 August 2022).
  4. National Institute of Statistics, Romanian Statistical Yearbook, National Institute of Statistics, Bucharest. 2016. Available online: http://www.insse.ro/cms/sites/default/files/field/publicatii/anuar_statistic_al_romaniei_2016_format_carte_0.pdf (accessed on 23 August 2022).
  5. Steinfield, H.; Gerber, P.; Wassenaar, T.; Castel, V.; De Haan, C. Livestock’s Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options; Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy, 2006; ISBN 978-9251055717. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ontel, I.; Cheval, S.; Irimescu, A.; Boldeanu, G.; Amihaesei, V.A.; Mihailescu, D.; Nertan, A.; Angearu, C.V.; Craciunescu, V. Assessing the recent trends of land degradation and desertification in Romania using remote rensing rndicators. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 4842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Anonymous. Land Fund Law 18/1991 Republished in 1998; Monitorul Oficial Publishin House: Bucharet, Romania, 1998; Volume 1. (In Romanian) [Google Scholar]
  8. Anonymous. Emergency Ordinance 34/2013; Monitorul Oficial Publishin House: Bucharet, Romania, 2013; Volume 267. (In Romanian) [Google Scholar]
  9. Watson, C.A.; Atkinson, D.; Gosling, P.; Jackson, L.R.; Rayns, F.W. Managing soil fertility in organic farming systems. Soil Use Manag. 2002, 18, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Frossard, E.; Bünemann, E.; Jansa, J.; Oberson, A.; Feller, C. Concepts and practices of nutrient management in agro-ecosystems: Can we draw lessons from history to design future sustainable agricultural production systems? Bodenkultur 2009, 60, 43–60. Available online: https://diebodenkultur.boku.ac.at/volltexte/band-60/heft-1/frossard.pdf (accessed on 24 April 2024).
  11. Tejada, M.; Gonzalez, J.L.; Garcia-Martinez, A.M.; Parrado, J. Application of a green manure and green manure composted with beet vinasse on soil restoration: Effects on soil properties. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 4949–4957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tong, Z.; Quan, G.; Wan, L.; He, F.; Li, X. The effect of fertilizers on biomass and biodiversity on a semi-arid grassland of Northern China. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Walie, M.; Tegegne, F.; Mekuriaw, Y.; Tsunekawa, A.; Kobayashi, N.; Ichinohe, T.; Haregeweyn, N.; Tassew, A.; Mekuriaw, S.; Masunaga, T.; et al. Biomass yield, quality, and soil nutrients of pasture influenced by farmyard manure and enrichment planting. Rangeland Ecol. Manag. 2023, 88, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, X.; Jiao, T.; Nie, Z.; Zhang, D.; Wang, J.; Qi, J. Effects of different fertilizers on nutrient quality and mineral elements in different economic forage groups in Qilian Mountain alpine meadows. PeerJ 2022, 10, e14223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sinde-Gonzalez, I.; Gil-Docampo, M.; Arza-garcia, M.; Grefa-Sánchez, J.; Yánez-Simba, D.; Pérez-Guerrero, P.; Abril-Porras, V. Biomass estimation of pasture plots with multitemporal UAV-based photogrammetric surveys. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obser. Geoinform. 2021, 101, 102355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sanchez, W.K.; Beede, D.K.; Delorenzo, M.A. Macromineral element interrelationships and lactational performance: Empirical models from a large data set. J. Diary. Sci. 1994, 77, 3096–3110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Markert, B.; Kayser, G.; Korhammer, S.; Oehlmann, J. Distribution and effects of trace substances in soils, plants and animals. In Trace Elements—Their Distribution and Effects in the Environment; Markert, B., Friese, K., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gupta, R.C. Aluminum. In Veterinary Toxicology; Gupta, R.C., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007; ISBN 978-0-12-370467-2. [Google Scholar]
  19. Exley, C. The toxicity of aluminium in humans. Morphologie 2016, 329, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Garland, T. Arsenic. In Veterinary Toxicology; Gupta, R.C., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007; ISBN 978-0-12-370467-2. [Google Scholar]
  21. Khan, M.I.; Ahmad, M.F.; Ahmad, I.; Ashfaq, F.; Wahab, S.; Alsayegh, A.A.; Kumar, S.; Hakeem, K.R. Arsenic exposure through dietary intake and associated health hazards in the Middle East. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hopkins, W.G.; Hüner, N.P.A. Introduction to Plant Physiology; Willey: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009; ISBN 978-0-470-24766-2. [Google Scholar]
  23. White, P.J.; Broadley, M.R. Calcium in Plants. Ann. Bot. 2003, 92, 487–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lin, K.; Xia, L.; Li, H.; Jiang, X.; Pan, H.; Xu, Y.; Lu, W.W.; Zhang, Z.; Chang, J. Enhanced osteoporotic bone regeneration by strontium-substituted calcium silicate bioactive ceramics. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 10028–10042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Vandana, U.; Nancy, D.; Sabareeswaran, A.; Remya, N.S.; Rajendran, N.; Mohanan, P.V. Biocompatibility of strontium incorporated ceramic coated titanium oxide implant indented for orthopaedic applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2021, 264, 114954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Burger, A.; Lichtscheidl, I. Strontium in the environment: Review about reactions of plants towards stable and radioactive strontium isotopes. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 653, 1458–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Naccari, C.; Cicero, N.; Vadalà, R.; Bartolomeo, G.; Palma, E. Toxicological analysis of metals content in agro-food wastes as possible supplement in animal feed. Nat. Prod. Res. 2023, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Vadalà, R.; Mottese, A.F.; Bua, G.D.; Salvo, A.; Mallamace, D.; Corsaro, C.; Vasi, S.; Giofrè, S.V.; Alfa, M.; Cicero, N.; et al. Statistical analysis of mineral concentration for the geographic identification of garlic samples from Sicily (Italy), Tunisia and Spain. Foods 2016, 5, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Anonymous. Code of Consumption, Law 296/2006; Monitorul Oficial Publishin House: Bucharet, Romania, 2008; Volume 224. (In Romanian) [Google Scholar]
  30. Oancea, S.; Banaduc, D. Food security and safety. In Integrated and Strategic Management of the Smart Fight against the Global Food Crisis, Based on Bioeconomy And Ecoeconomy; Bogdan, T.A., Oprean, C., Oprean, L., Eds.; Editura Academiei: Bucharest, Romania, 2012. (In Romanian) [Google Scholar]
  31. Steines, E. Activation analysis in agriculture and botany. In Activation Analysis II; Alfassi, Z.B., Ed.; CRC: Bocca Raton, FL, USA, 2000; pp. 568–579. ISBN 0-8493-4584-7. [Google Scholar]
  32. Frontasyeva, M.V. Neutron activation analysis in the life sciences. Phys. Part. Nucl. 2011, 42, 332–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pavlov, S.S.; Dmitriev, A.Y.; Frontasyeva, M.V. Automation system for neutron activation analysis at the reactor IBR-2, Frank Laboratory of Neutron Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2016, 309, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Culicov, O.A.; Yurukova, L.; Duliu, O.G.; Zinicovscaia, I. Elemental content of mosses and lichens from Livingston Island (Antarctica) as determined by instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 5717–5732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zinicovscaia, I.; Duliu, O.G.; Culicov, O.A.; Sturza, R.; Bilici, C.; Gundorina, S. Geographical origin identification of Moldavian wines by neutron activation analysis. Food Anal. Methods 2017, 10, 3523–3530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Abdusamadzoda, D.; Abdushukurov, D.A.; Zinicovscaia, I.; Duliu, O.G.; Vergel, K.N. Assessment of the ecological and geochemical conditions in surface sediments of the Varzob river, Tajikistan. Microchem. J. 2020, 158, 105173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Farrance, I.; Frenkel, R. Uncertainty of Measurement: A Review of the Rules for Calculating Uncertainty Components through Functional Relationships. Clin. Biochem. Rev. 2012, 33, 49–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Marshall, M.R. Ash Analysis. In Food Analysis; Nielsen, S., Ed.; Food Science Text Series; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chang, S.K.C.; Zhang, Y. Protein Analysis. In Food Analysis; Nielsen, S., Ed.; Food Science Text Series; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 315–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Min, D.B.; Ellefson, W.C. Fat Analysis. In Food Analysis; Nielsen, S., Ed.; Food Science Text Series; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 117–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dence, C.W. The Determination of Lignin. In Methods in Lignin Chemistry; Lin, S.Y., Dence, C.W., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1992; pp. 33–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hammer, Ø.; Harper, D.A.T.; Ryan, P.D. Past: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 2001, 4, 4. [Google Scholar]
  43. National Research Council. Mineral Tolerance of Animals: Second Revised Edition; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The location of experimental areas within Suceava County of the Romanian territory (inset).
Figure 1. The location of experimental areas within Suceava County of the Romanian territory (inset).
Separations 11 00139 g001
Table 1. General data concerning the location of the experimental parcel, grass species involved in the experiment, as well as the type and amount of administered fertilizers.
Table 1. General data concerning the location of the experimental parcel, grass species involved in the experiment, as well as the type and amount of administered fertilizers.
LocalityNatural FertilizerChemical Fertilizer
Grass Species(t/ha)(t/ha)
Cosna (840 m altitude)
Nardus stricta L.
20 to 50 t of manure applied annually/biannually (1–4 years) N 100 P 100 ; N 140 P 140 ; N 200 P 200 ; N 100 P 100 + N 40 P 40 ; N 100 P 100 + N 100 P 100 ; N 80 P 80 + N 640 P 60
Pojorata (717 m altitude)
Agrostis capillaris L.
Festuca rubra L.
Nardus stricta L.
10 to 50 t of manure applied
annually/biannually
(1–4 years)
30–50 kg mineral nitrogen +
10 to 30 t of manure applied
annually, biannually, or every
three years
Putna (611 m altitude)
Agrostis capillaris L.
Festuca rubra L.
20 to 50 t of partially or totally
fermented manure
—–
Sarul Dornei (940 m altitude)
Festuca rubra L.
Nardus stricta L.
20 t to 30 t of manure applied
annually and biannually
following the schedule: 50 + 0
+ 40 + 0 t over 4 years
—–
Table 2. Final results concerning the effect of fertilization on the mass fractions (in mg/kg) of the metabolic and structural elements (black ink), enzymatic elements (blue ink), as well as potentially toxic elements (red ink) in foraging grasses involved in the experiment. For a better comparison, the recommended dietary mineral reserve (RDMR) [41], maximum tolerable level (MTL) [43], and the reference plants (RPs) [17] are reproduced as well. Note: bdl—below detection limit.
Table 2. Final results concerning the effect of fertilization on the mass fractions (in mg/kg) of the metabolic and structural elements (black ink), enzymatic elements (blue ink), as well as potentially toxic elements (red ink) in foraging grasses involved in the experiment. For a better comparison, the recommended dietary mineral reserve (RDMR) [41], maximum tolerable level (MTL) [43], and the reference plants (RPs) [17] are reproduced as well. Note: bdl—below detection limit.
CosnaPojorataSarul DorneiPutna
ElementUnfertilizedFertilizedUnfertilizedFertilizedUnfertilizedFertilizedUnfertilizedFertilizedRDMMTLRP
Na80 ± 50110 ± 5090 ± 50100 ± 3050 ± 2050 ± 1080 ± 2090 ± 101000–200040,000150
Cl1960 ± 8202730 ± 13201350 ± 8201480 ± 6104630 ± 20904500 ± 17303310 ± 17404290 ± 13001300–290040,0002000
K9500 ± 370012,200 ± 490016,500 ± 370015,800 ± 370016,900 ± 350019,000 ± 370020,300 ± 370021,700 ± 25004700–10,00030,00019,000
Mg2800 ± 8603860 ± 25305700 ± 8605080 ± 12403020 ± 8003280 ± 8902100 ± 5301940 ± 6001100–210020002000
Ca5160 ± 14107150 ± 295014,230 ± 141011,110 ± 42309530 ± 8309650 ± 10505780 ± 15806290 ± 13102200–3800700010,000
Mn550 ± 210590 ± 34080 ± 1070 ± 30260 ± 40240 ± 20460 ± 90440 ± 4013–241000200
Fe300 ± 250360 ± 180250 ± 250290 ± 120220 ± 140160 ± 30210 ± 80200 ± 7012–40500150
Co0.23 ± 0.10.27 ± 0.10.16 ± 0.10.16 ± 0.050.16 ± 0.050.15 ± 0.040.19 ± 0.040.18 ± 0.030.10–0.15250.2
Ni3.3 ± 0.43.1 ± 0.7bdl1.9 ± 0.43.8 ± 1.94.3 ± 2.54.9 ± 1.25 ± 1.521–555001.5
Zn70 ± 1165 ± 1540 ± 1133 ± 969 ± 871 ± 755 ± 649 ± 90.1–0.3250
Mo1 ± 1.30.4 ± 0.40.5 ± 1.30.5 ± 0.20.2 ± 0.10.2 ± 0.10.2 ± 0.10.3 ± 0.10.250.5
Se0.2 ± 0.030.22 ± 0.04bdl0.19 ± 0.040.28 ± 0.080.28 ± 0.090.29 ± 0.040.29 ± 0.0313–2410000.02
Al510 ± 400640 ± 440490 ± 400390 ± 290350 ± 330240 ± 50180 ± 50200 ± 60100080
As1.7 ± 0.71.8 ± 0.81 ± 0.71.1 ± 0.61.4 ± 0.71.4 ± 0.61.5 ± 0.51.4 ± 0.4300.1
Sr24 ± 1230 ± 1014 ± 1213 ± 340 ± 942 ± 632 ± 833 ± 7200050
Table 3. Influence of fertilizer type on the content of metabolic and structural elements (black ink), enzymatic elements (blue ink), as well as potential toxic elements (red ink) in foraging grasses involved in the experiment. All results were significant at p < 0.05 according to Student’s t-test. Note: nd means below the detection limit.
Table 3. Influence of fertilizer type on the content of metabolic and structural elements (black ink), enzymatic elements (blue ink), as well as potential toxic elements (red ink) in foraging grasses involved in the experiment. All results were significant at p < 0.05 according to Student’s t-test. Note: nd means below the detection limit.
ElementOrganic FertilizersMineral Fertilizers
Increased (%)Unchanged (%)Decreased (%)Increased (%)Unchanged (%)Decreased (%)
Na5037.512.55050nd
Cl87.512.5nd252550
K5037.5ndnd7525
Mg5012.537.5252550
Ca62.512.525nd2575
Mnnd12.587.5502525
Fe62.512.525502525
Co2575nd502525
Zn255025252550
Sendndndndndnd
Mo75nd2525nd50
Al2512.562.5252550
Asnd62.537.5502525
Sr75nd25nd5050
Table 4. The influence of organic fertilizers on the parameters characterizing the nutritional qualities of grasses for both organic and mineral fertilizers. All results were significant at p < 0.05 according to Student’s t-test.
Table 4. The influence of organic fertilizers on the parameters characterizing the nutritional qualities of grasses for both organic and mineral fertilizers. All results were significant at p < 0.05 according to Student’s t-test.
Fertilization VariantDCADCPACFEENDFADFSLC
Organic Fertilizers
V1 Unfertilized Control31006.45.51.674.747.111
V2 20 t/ha every year31309.39.8260.238.410.4
V3 30 t/ha every year372011.591.655.137.510.4
V4 40 t/ha every year31709.710.51.950.138.510.4
V5 50 t/ha every year394010.810.22.253.840.79.9
V6 20 t/ha every 2 years210011.78.81.757.537.79.9
V7 30 t/ha every 2 years21501291.357.839.49.5
V8 40 t/ha every 2 years259012.89.41.355.938.69.6
V9 50 t/ha every 2 years262013.1101.554.843.19.2
Mineral Fertilizers
V1 Unfertilized Control32006.57.62.7724610
V2 N100P10034206.66.3359349.6
V3 N140P14044308.16.23.159339.8
V4 N200P2003180107.13.252339.5
V5 N100P100 + N40P403370116355349.7
V6 N100P100 + N100P1003070147.33.3543210.5
V7 N80P80 + N60P602670116.22.659409.6
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Culicov, O.A.; Tarcau, D.; Zinicovscaia, I.; Duliu, O.G.; Stavarache, M.; Vintu, V. Fertilizers’ Impact on Grassland in Northeastern Romania. Separations 2024, 11, 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations11050139

AMA Style

Culicov OA, Tarcau D, Zinicovscaia I, Duliu OG, Stavarache M, Vintu V. Fertilizers’ Impact on Grassland in Northeastern Romania. Separations. 2024; 11(5):139. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations11050139

Chicago/Turabian Style

Culicov, Otilia A., Doina Tarcau, Inga Zinicovscaia, Octavian G. Duliu, Mihai Stavarache, and Vasile Vintu. 2024. "Fertilizers’ Impact on Grassland in Northeastern Romania" Separations 11, no. 5: 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations11050139

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop