Next Article in Journal
Surface Deformation Calculation Method Based on Displacement Monitoring Data
Previous Article in Journal
Integrated Decision-Making of Urban Agriculture within the Greyfield Regeneration Environments (UAGR)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Improving Thermal Performance in Data Centers Based on Numerical Simulations

1
School of Civil Engineering, North China Institute of Aerospace Engineering, Langfang 065000, China
2
Range Technology Development Co., Ltd., Langfang 065000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2024, 14(5), 1416; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14051416
Submission received: 9 February 2024 / Revised: 2 April 2024 / Accepted: 3 May 2024 / Published: 14 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Building Energy, Physics, Environment, and Systems)

Abstract

:
(1) Background: With the rapid development of cloud computing, large AI models, and other emerging technologies, the issue of heat dissipation in data centers has become increasingly prominent. This issue is often caused by inappropriate temperature distribution when using cold air to cool servers. Improving temperature distribution is key to optimizing the thermal performance of data centers. Previous solutions do not include installing adjustable underfloor deflectors under a raised floor while adjusting the aperture ratio of the floor grille and replacing the side of the floor grille located near the air-conditioning unit with a fan floor. (2) Methods: A 3D model of a data center was established, and its meshing and boundary conditions were set. The airflow inside the data center was analyzed using a CFD simulation to assess the temperature distribution resulting from two proposed solutions. (3) Results: Simulations and analyses showed that both options balanced the airflow close to and away from the conditioned side cabinets. This maximized the cooling capacity and improved temperature uniformity. The maximum temperature drop registered for the average cabinet’s out temperature was 2.81 °C. And by installing an adjustable underfloor deflector under the floor grille in rows O and N and adjusting the grille opening, the airflow to the cabinet near the air-conditioned side increased by 18.1%, and the airflow away from the air-conditioned side decreased by 5.1%. Similarly, replacing the Q-row floor grille with a fan floor resulted in a 4.9% increase in airflow to the cabinet near the air-conditioning side and a 3.8% decrease in airflow to the cabinet away from the air-conditioning side. (4) Conclusions: Airflow is a crucial factor that affects cabinet temperature. And balancing airflow between the front-end and rear-end cabinets is essential to make the best use of the cooling capacity and improve temperature distribution within data-center cabinets. This can be achieved by installing a fan floor and an underfloor deflector device in front of high-temperature cabinets located near air-conditioning units.

1. Introduction

With the rapid development of the Internet of everything and the digital economy, the scale and complexity of data centers are increasing, as is the difficulty of their management and maintenance. Temperature distribution is critical to ensuring the stable operation of servers and network equipment in data centers and improving their overall performance [1]. Optimizing temperature distribution in data centers has become a topic of great interest. Computational fluid dynamics is a powerful numerical simulation tool that can accurately simulate and predict complex fluid-flow phenomena. By analyzing and comparing simulation results, a low-cost scheme can be determined, achieving reasonable data-center temperature distribution with higher thermal performance [2,3,4]. All unfamiliar acronyms and technical terms are listed in Table 1.
Yao, Q.F. et al. [5] implemented several measures to improve temperature distribution in a data center, including closing the hot and cold aisle, installing blinds in the empty U position, replacing the variable ventilation rate floor, and sealing all holes and cabinet side gaps. The results showed that these measures effectively eliminated the mixing of hot and cold airflow and solved the problem of local hot spots. Li, G.H. et al. [6] studied the impact of closed hot and cold aisles and different air-conditioning placements on the thermal environment and air distribution of a data room and showed that the optimization effect of closed hot aisles was better than that of closed cold aisles. Fulpagare, Y. et al. [7] investigated the impact of obstacles under the air-supply floor on the cooling performance of a server room through CFD simulation. They found that obstacles such as ducts under the floor can impede airflow by up to 80%. Nada, S.A. et al. [8] investigated the effects of different configurations of CRACs with varying arrangements and physical isolation modes of hot and cold aisles on the temperature distribution of rack arrays in data centers, as well as assessing their airflow characteristics. The results showed that the hot-air recirculation, cold-air bypass, and measurable performance parameters of a rack strongly depend on its location in the rack array. Ibrahim [9] studied the effect of the power density variation of IT equipment and the airflow-rate quality on the thermal performance of data centers, showing that the quality of IT equipment played a vital role in the slow decrease or increase in facility temperature. Fulpagare et al. [10] studied and analyzed temperature and airflow uniformity in data centers using the rack cooling index, heating index, coefficient of performance, and energy efficiency. The results of their study indicated that 50% of floor-grille openings provided the best airflow and temperature uniformity, reducing the air-conditioning system’s power consumption and increasing the overall system’s COP. Meng, X. et al. [11] analyzed the thermal environment of an existing typical data center located in Wuhan, China, through field experiments and numerical simulations. Several optimization methods were proposed, including closing empty rack slots, controlling valve openings under the perforated tiles, and installing air-conducting sleeves. They found that the cold-air bypass problem was partially solved. Diogo G.C.S. et al. [12] simulated high thermal loads at high and low airflow rates. The results showed that several hot spots occurred at minimum airflow rates but were successfully removed when all racks were cooled simultaneously at the maximum airflow rate. Chaoqiang Jin et al. [13] provided a review of the impact of airflow on the thermal environment and energy efficiency of a raised-floor data center. They emphasized the importance of airflow and numerical simulation in the management of a data center’s thermal environment and recommended that CRACs should be located at the end of each row of racks, and perforated tiles should have an opening area of 25 percent and an airflow exit angle of 60°. Nagarathinam Srinarayana et al. [14] found that thermal performance was better when using a ceiling return strategy to return hot exhaust air to the air-conditioning units in the computer room, as compared to room return. Jinkyun Cho et al. [15] found that a hot aisle enclosure cools IT equipment more efficiently than a cold aisle enclosure. Caifeng Gao et al. [16] investigated the airflow pattern of an underfloor air supply through CFD simulation. The results showed that the most significant improvement in cooling performance was achieved by partially enclosing the cold aisles, which resulted in a 3 °C increase in the supply air temperature. Mingrui Zhang et al. [17] found that closing the cold aisle eliminated bypass airflow and setting return air outlets on both sides of the hot aisle greatly improved the cooling performance and reduced hot-spot temperature by 0.5–5.0 °C.
Table 1. Term definitions.
Table 1. Term definitions.
NameSignificance
Redundant air conditioningIf an air conditioner in the data-center server room fails, a backup air conditioner will be activated to cool the server room instead.
PCBProcess Control Block
RAMRandom Access Memory
DIMMDual-line memory modules
Heat sink finsThe CPU and GPU, which are the main components generating heat, have heat sinks that allow for quick transfer of heat out of the server.
CRACComputer-room air conditioning
SHIThis characterizes the cold air in the equipment cabinets before the formal use of cold-air loss and equals the ratio of lost cold air to total cold air. The value is in the range of 0~1. The larger the value, the greater the loss of cold air [8].
RHIThis characterizes the proportion of cooling air used to cool parts of the equipment cabinets. The value is in the range of 0~1. The larger the value, the higher the utilization rate of cold air and the lower the air loss [18].
RTIThe return air temperature index also indicates whether there is airflow recirculation or airflow short-circuiting. A return air-temperature index greater than 100% indicates the presence of airflow recirculation, and a return air-temperature index under 100% indicates the presence of short-circuiting airflow. Ideally, an improved data center should have a return temperature index metric of 100% [19].
Fan floorThe fan floor is structured as an integrated connection between the fan and the floor grille. The fan begins rotating when the cabinet temperature reaches the set start-up temperature. However, it does not operate at full speed. It only does so when the sensor detects that the temperature has reached the fan’s full-speed operation temperature.
Adjustable underfloor deflectorA deflector located under the floor can be adjusted to modify the direction and angle of the airflow, making it suitable for units with varying load airflow needs [20].
MCITMaximum temperature of all cold air flowing into each cabinet.
MCOTMaximum temperature of all cooling air exhausted from each cabinet.
ACITAverage temperature of all cold air flowing into each cabinet.
ACOTAverage temperature of all cooling air discharged from each cabinet.
AASTAverage supply air temperature for each air conditioner.
AARTAverage return air temperature for each air conditioner.
The meanings of some of the terms are listed in Table 1 above. Figure 1a,b illustrates the causes of server heating and the temperature distribution within a server using a simple server model. Due to the large amount of server equipment in the server room, the cold air from the air-conditioning supply outlets is drawn in by the server fan and flows through the server, warming up as it passes through high-heat-dissipation components, such as the CPU and GPU, as well as through some low-power components. The warmed air is then released back into the server-room environment through the server outlet. This process is repeated, with the air flowing back to the air-conditioning unit and undergoing refrigeration and cooling before being delivered to the server room again. Figure 1c illustrates the airflow organization flow diagram in the server room.
The literature reviewed has examined the thermal performance of data centers by adjusting hot and cold aisle closures, blocking cabinet gap locations, modifying air-conditioning arrangements and underfloor obstacles, and so on. The focus has been on improving thermal performance by maximizing cold capacity and preventing cold leakage and consumption. However, there has been no investigation into the effect of installing deflectors and fan floors, as noted in the cited sources [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. This paper focuses on improving the thermal performance of a data center by means of these two methods to increase airflow at the front end, balancing the airflow between the front-end cabinets and the back-end cabinets to achieve a uniform temperature distribution. Compared to previous studies, the two solutions described in this paper are simple, adjustable, and can be combined with other methods to better regulate a server room’s temperature environment. The effectiveness of these solutions in improving temperature distribution is demonstrated in this paper, and the causes of high temperature within a cabinet are analyzed. This study addresses the temperature-distribution issues in current data centers, improving their operational efficiency and reliability. Additionally, it provides valuable ideas and methods for constructing green data centers.

2. Fundamental Methods

2.1. Project Overview and Physical Model

This study focuses on a 401-IDC computer room in Building 6 of a data center. It uses the CFD simulation software 6SigmaDC Release12.9 SP1 to analyze and improve the temperature distribution and thermal performance in the room [21,22]. 6SigmaDC software is developed by Future Facilities in the UK for data center design and management and thermal analysis of electronic products.
The server room is about 32.8 m long and 16.9 m wide, with a floor area of about 552.38 m2 (including the air-conditioning room), a floor height of 5 m, a raised floor height of 0.8 m, a floor-grid opening area of 50%, and a floor-grid valve opening area of 100%. There are 226 sets of 6.3 kW cabinets in the room, and each cabinet houses 21 2U servers with a power of 600 W. The air-conditioning room is located on the right side of the room, separated by an inner wall, and equipped with eleven sets of chilled-water-type precision air conditioners with a cooling capacity of 175 kW, two of which are redundant air-conditioning units, and an underfloor air supply. Two groups of humidifiers are placed inside the air-conditioning room. The cabinets in the room are arranged in a “face-to-face, back-to-back” manner, with the front area of the cabinets sending cold air to form a cold channel and the back area returning hot air to create a hot channel. This design is based on the method of underfloor air supply, cold channel closure, and wiring racks. The physical model depicted in Figure 2 was constructed using CFD software based on the data room’s parameters. The outer walls and room columns were drawn first to determine the space of the computer room after laying a raised floor. The raised-floor model, floor-grid model, cabinet model, server model, air-conditioning model, and cold aisle closure model were arranged according to their specifications, and their parameters were also set.

2.2. Pre-Processing

Pre-processing involved setting the correct boundary conditions, such as the heat transfer coefficient of the outer enclosure structure, establishing the computational domain, and dividing the grid of the completed physical model. The space was discretized and divided into hexahedral grids using the software’s meshing tools. After the calculation domain was meshed and the grid divided, the initial and boundary conditions were determined to ensure that the equations had a definite solution. The data center is a unique simulation object, and its correctness is key for security and efficiency; therefore, choosing a reasonable numerical model is crucial. The model was simplified as necessary. A numerical model was then developed and controlled as follows:
  • In engineering practice, although the temperature of the walls of a server room may not be completely stable, the effect of such variations on the room’s internal temperature distribution or the performance of the equipment may be small. The walls are usually assumed to be stationary temperature boundaries for ease of analysis and modeling. Therefore, a fixed temperature boundary condition (24 °C) was defined for the walls of the machine room;
  • The walls are made of concrete, while the closed cold aisle and the roof are made of plexiglass and steel. The surface material of the elevated floor is PVC. The detailed material characterization parameters are shown in Table 2;
  • The calculation would be solved using a standard κ − ε turbulence model;
  • Since the room is in the inner area of the building, the effect of solar radiation on the thermal environment of the room is very small. Given that the percentage of radiant heat transfer is much smaller than that of heat conduction and heat convection, which are the main modes of heat transfer in the room, the effects of solar radiation, thermal radiation, and electrical conductivity on the system are ignored in the present study;
  • The supply air temperature was set to 22 °C and the return air temperature to 34 °C, with a return air temperature difference of 12 °C;
  • The thermal conductivity and specific heat capacity of the fluid were assumed to be constant, since they vary relatively little with temperature and pressure in this project;
  • The system was divided into a structured grid, with a minimum grid size of 0.01 m. Figure 3 shows the division of the system grid;
  • The number of iteration steps was set to 1000. When the stability of the residual value tended to 1, the calculation would be considered a completed iteration.

2.3. Post-Processing

Finally, after post-processing the results, we obtained data on the thermal performance of the server room, including the temperature, velocity, and pressure fields; 6sigma includes post-processing functions that can directly display and output the results before and after the temperature-distribution improvement in terms of the air supply volume map, temperature distribution map, return air path, air conditioning, and refrigeration efficiency. We could then take appropriate measures to improve performance and achieve more satisfactory results. Any necessary improvements would be based on the initial results.

2.4. Transformation Process

This process was divided into three parts:
  • Simulation of the current situation of the server room using CFD;
  • Initial factual analysis;
  • Development of thermal performance modification schemes.
The following two thermal performance modification schemes were designed in our case:
Option I: Installation of an adjustable underfloor deflector under the floor grille in rows O and N and adjusting the opening rate of the grille;
Option II: Replacing the floor grille in row Q near the air-conditioning side with a fan floor.
As illustrated in Figure 4, the cabinets are numbered for convenience in subsequent analysis. They are numbered from left to right as Column 1 through Column 13 and from top to bottom as Row A through Row R.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Effect of Two Improvement Schemes on Cabinet-Related Thermal Performance

Taking the supply air temperature as 22 °C, the threshold value was set to ±1 °C, the fan speed was 100%, and the temperature difference between the supply and return air was set to 12 °C. The two standby air conditioners were turned off when the numerical simulations were performed. The initial CFD simulation data and improved simulation data for Options I and II are listed in Table 3.
As can be appreciated in Table 3, before the improvements, partial MCIT exceeded the optimal allowable value of 27 °C. When MCIT and MOIT values are high, they affect regular server operations, which in turn, affects server life. After improvement, the values of MCIT, MCOT, ACIT, and ACOT were reduced, the return temperature index of the cabinets was slightly reduced, the return heat index increased, and the supply heat index decreased. In particular, the values of ACIT, AAST, and AART were all within normal values. It is clearly seen that after the improvement of the scheme, the overall temperature of the cabinets tends to be uniform, and the system’s thermal performance is improved.
The CFD simulation diagrams are shown in Figure 5, reflecting the temperature distribution in the server room in the range of 31~38 °C. Temperature distributions at temperatures above 38 °C and below 31 °C are indicated in red and blue, respectively.
Figure 5a–c and Figure 6a,b show that the high-temperature region of the server room is mainly concentrated on the side near the air conditioner, particularly in columns O, P, Q, and R, where the improvement in performance is more obvious. Before improvement, the overall maximum air temperature and average air temperature of the cabinets were high, and the heat density was high in some areas.
After improvement, the temperature of the cabinets was reduced, while still being within the allowable range, thus avoiding local overheating, which would affect the normal operation of the server. The high-temperature area in the server room before improvement has a lower temperature and a smaller range than the improved area, which reduces the probability of the equipment running into operational risks. However, it is important to note that Option I is more effective than Option II in terms of cabinet temperature reduction.

3.2. Effect of Air Outflow on Cabinet Temperature Distribution

Table 4 displays a relationship between the air outflow and ACOT of the first row of cabinets, which are the object of study.
Upon comparison of the air outflow and ACOT data in Table 4, it is evident that cabinet N1 under Option I has the highest airflow and the lowest ACOT among all the cabinets. The maximum ACOT temperature drop is 2.81 °C. Further analysis reveals an inverse relationship between temperature change and air outflow change. Therefore, it can be concluded that the temperature of the cabinet decreases as the cold-air volume increases. Cabinets with larger airflows experience a greater decrease in temperature than those with smaller airflows when the airflow is higher and the amount of cold air is greater.
Figure 7 shows that balancing the cabinet air volume was achieved by implementing Option I and Option II. This is evident in the reduction of air volume away from the air-conditioning side of the cabinet and the increase of air volume close to the air-conditioning side of the cabinet. And, the equation for the percentage of change in airflow is defined as follows:
P c = A before   improvement , i   A option   K , i A before   improvement , i     i = A , B Q , R ; K = I , II
A represents air outflow, and P stands for the airflow percentage change. After improvement, the cabinets near the air-conditioned side experienced an increase in airflow of 18.1% and 4.9%, respectively, while the cabinets away from the air-conditioned side experienced a decrease in airflow of 5.1% and 3.8%, respectively.

3.3. CFD Simulation Analysis of Cabinets at Different Heights

Taking the first column of cabinets as the research object, a simulation analysis was carried out for the temperature field at different cabinet heights. The simulated temperature diagrams are shown in Figure 6.
Upon analyzing the temperature simulation in Figure 8a–c, we can observe that the temperature of the servers located at the upper end of the cabinets is consistently higher than that of those located at the lower end. Specifically, the temperature at the upper end of the cabinets is higher before the cabinets are improved compared to the temperature at the upper end of the improved cabinets. This demonstrates the effectiveness and accuracy of our improvement program.
The increase in temperature at the top end of the servers may be due to the lower density of hot air. Hot air rises naturally inside the cabinet, following the principle of hot air rising. Therefore, servers located in the upper part of the cabinet are more exposed to this hot air, resulting in relatively higher temperatures for the servers at the upper end.
This paper investigates the thermal performance of server rooms when running at full load. It is common for data-center server rooms to not run at full load due to the lengthy process of server racking. The focus of this study is on the most unfavorable case. This study demonstrates that, even when a data-center server room is operating at full capacity, both solutions can maintain a low ambient temperature while also maintaining the server equipment within the normal temperature range. It is evident that the thermal environment of the server room also meets operational standards when operating at a low load.

4. Conclusions

The results show that our two temperature-distribution schemes can effectively improve cooling efficiency. After the CFD temperature-distribution simulation and the improvement of the above case, the following conclusions are drawn:
  • High-temperature cabinets are typically located near the air-conditioning unit;
  • To improve air intake at the front and reduce the temperature of the cabinets, a fan floor and a deflector device can be installed in the front rows, and the maximum ACOT temperature drop is 2.81 °C by implementing the latter;
  • By installing an adjustable underfloor deflector under the floor grille in rows O and N and adjusting the grille opening, the airflow to the cabinet near the air-conditioned side increased by 18.1%, and the airflow away from the air-conditioned side decreased by 5.1%. Similarly, replacing the Q-row floor grille with a fan floor resulted in a 4.9% increase in airflow to the cabinet near the air-conditioning side and a 3.8% decrease in airflow to the cabinet away from the air-conditioning side;
  • Airflow is a crucial factor that affects cabinet temperature. Sufficient amounts of airflow can lower the temperature inside the cabinets;
  • Balancing airflow between the front-end and rear-end cabinets is essential to make the best use of the cooling capacity and improve temperature distribution within data-center cabinets;
  • In conclusion, CFD simulation software can clarify the temperature distribution at each point in the server room. This has a positive effect on our search for and implementation of improvement solutions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.Z.; methodology, Y.G., C.S. and H.G.; validation, Y.G., C.Z., H.G., C.S. and X.F.; formal analysis, H.G.; investigation, Y.G. and C.S.; resources, C.S.; data curation, Y.G.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.G.; writing—review and editing, C.Z. and H.G.; visualization, X.F. and C.Z.; supervision, X.F.; project administration, X.F.; funding acquisition, C.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the School of Civil Engineering, North China Institute of Aerospace Engineering, and Range Technology Development Co., Ltd., for their help in the simulation research.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Hao Gao and Cheng Shen were employed by the company Range Technology Development Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. El-Sayed, N.; Stefanovici, I.A.; Amvrosiadis, G.; Hwang, A.A.; Schroeder, B. Temperature management in data centers: Why some (might) like it hot. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGMETRICS/PERFORMANCE joint international conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems, London, UK, 11–15 June 2012; pp. 163–174. [Google Scholar]
  2. Iyengar, M.; Schmidt, R.R.; Hamann, H.; VanGilder, J. Comparison between numerical and experimental temperature distributions in a small data center test cell. In Proceedings of the International Electronic Packaging Technical Conference and Exhibition, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 8–12 July 2007; Volume 42770, pp. 819–826. [Google Scholar]
  3. Wang, W.Q. Research on Optimization of Airflow Organization in a Data Center Server Room in Beijing Area. Master’s Thesis, Beijing Architecture University, Beijing, China, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  4. Han, L. Research on Energy Saving of Air Conditioning System in Data Center. J. Phys. Conf. Series. IOP Publ. 2021, 2030, 012037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yao, Q.F.; Zhang, C.H.; Gao, F.Y.; Xu, Y.; Yan, R.; He, W.; Wu, T.; Zhang, Y. Application of CFD simulation software in data center temperature distribution improvement. HVAC 2023, 53, 68–71. [Google Scholar]
  6. LI, G.H.; Duan, Z.Y.; Hu, R. Improvement study of temperature distribution in a university computer room based on thermal environment evaluation index. HVAC 2023, 53, 144–150. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fulpagare, Y.; Mahamu, I.G.; Bhargav, A. Effect of plenum chamber obstructions on data center performance. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2015, 80, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nada, S.A.; Said, M.A.; Rady, M.A. CFD investigations of data centers’ thermal performance for different configurations of CRACs units and aisles separation. Alex. Eng. J. 2016, 55, 959–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ibrahim, M. Dynamic Thermal Management of Data Centers. Ph.D. Thesis, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  10. Fulpagare, Y.; Hsu, P.H.; Wang, C.C. Experimental analysis of airflow uniformity and energy consumption in data centers. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2022, 209, 118302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Meng, X.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, X.; Luo, Z.; Gong, H.; Gan, T. Optimization of the thermal environment of a small-scale data center in China. Energy 2020, 196, 117080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Macedo, D.G.; Gaspar, P.D.; Silva, P.D.; Covas, M.T.; Godina, R. Improving Airflow and Thermal Distribution in a Real Data Centre Room Through Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling. In Proceedings of the 2019 8th International Conference on Industrial Technology and Management (ICITM), Cambridge, UK, 2–4 March 2019; pp. 165–169. [Google Scholar]
  13. Jin, C.; Bai, X.; Yang, C. Effects of airflow on the thermal environment and energy efficiency in raised-floor data centers: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 695, 133801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Srinarayana, N.; Fakhim, B.; Behnia, M.; Armfield, S.W. Thermal performance of an air-cooled data center with raised-floor and non-raised-floor configurations. Heat Transf. Eng. 2014, 35, 384–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cho, J.; Park, C.; Choi, W. Numerical and experimental study of air containment systems in legacy data centers focusing on thermal performance and air leakage. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2021, 26, 101084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gao, C.; Yu, Z.; Wu, J. Investigation of airflow pattern of a typical data center by CFD simulation. Energy Procedia 2015, 78, 2687–2693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, M.; An, Q.; Long, Z.; Pan, W.; Zhang, H.; Cheng, X. Optimization of airflow organization for a small-scale date center based on the cold aisle closure. Procedia Eng. 2017, 205, 1893–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sharma, R.; Bash, C.; Patel, C. Dimensionless parameters for evaluation of thermal design and performance of large-scale data centers. In Proceedings of the 8th AIAA/ASME Joint Thermophysics and heat transfer conference, St. Louis, MO, USA, 24–26 June 2002; p. 3091. [Google Scholar]
  19. Herrlin, M. Improved data center energy efficiency and thermal performance by advanced airflow analysis. In Proceedings of the Digital Power Forum, San Francisco, CA, USA, 10–12 September 2007; pp. 10–12. [Google Scholar]
  20. A Method for Making a Combined Adjustable Underfloor Deflector Strip for Information Room. China Patent CN210951785U, 7 July 2020.
  21. Alissa, H.A.; Nemati, K.; Sammakia, B.; Ghose, K.; Seymour, M.; Schmidt, R. Innovative approaches of experimentally guided CFD modeling for data centers. In Proceedings of the 31st Thermal Measurement, Modeling and Management Symposium(SEMI-THERM), San Jose, CA, USA, 15–19 March 2015; pp. 176–184. [Google Scholar]
  22. Durand-Estebe, B.; Le Bot, C.; Arquis, E.; Mancos, J.N. Data center optimization using PID regulation in CFD simulations. Energy Build. 2013, 66, 154–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Data-center server model and temperature-distribution simulation diagrams: (a) Data-center server model, (b) temperature distribution in the server, and (c) airflow organization flow diagram in the server room.
Figure 1. Data-center server model and temperature-distribution simulation diagrams: (a) Data-center server model, (b) temperature distribution in the server, and (c) airflow organization flow diagram in the server room.
Buildings 14 01416 g001
Figure 2. Data-center room model: data-center layout.
Figure 2. Data-center room model: data-center layout.
Buildings 14 01416 g002
Figure 3. Data-center room meshing by projecting the system’s structured grid onto the YZ plane.
Figure 3. Data-center room meshing by projecting the system’s structured grid onto the YZ plane.
Buildings 14 01416 g003
Figure 4. Data-center room model: cabinet serial numbers.
Figure 4. Data-center room model: cabinet serial numbers.
Buildings 14 01416 g004
Figure 5. Temperature-distribution simulation diagrams: (a) ACOT before and after improvement, (b) MCOT before and after improvement, and (c) temperature cloud at Y = 1.2 m before and after improvement.
Figure 5. Temperature-distribution simulation diagrams: (a) ACOT before and after improvement, (b) MCOT before and after improvement, and (c) temperature cloud at Y = 1.2 m before and after improvement.
Buildings 14 01416 g005aBuildings 14 01416 g005b
Figure 6. Data line graphs: (a) ACOT in row 13 and (b) MCOT in row 13.
Figure 6. Data line graphs: (a) ACOT in row 13 and (b) MCOT in row 13.
Buildings 14 01416 g006
Figure 7. Vertical drop line graph: Air outflow from cabinets in column 1.
Figure 7. Vertical drop line graph: Air outflow from cabinets in column 1.
Buildings 14 01416 g007
Figure 8. Temperature-distribution simulation diagrams: (a) Temperature distribution of cabinets in column 1 before improvement. (b) Temperature distribution of cabinets in column 1 improved with Option I. (c) Temperature distribution of cabinets in column 1 improved with Option II.
Figure 8. Temperature-distribution simulation diagrams: (a) Temperature distribution of cabinets in column 1 before improvement. (b) Temperature distribution of cabinets in column 1 improved with Option I. (c) Temperature distribution of cabinets in column 1 improved with Option II.
Buildings 14 01416 g008aBuildings 14 01416 g008b
Table 2. Material parameters.
Table 2. Material parameters.
MaterialsThermal Conductivity (W/(m·K))Density (kg/m3)Specific Heat Capacity (J/kg·K)Relative Humidity (%)
Air0.0261.19100550%
Concrete1.3721001000-
Plexiglass0.1912001500-
Steel637860420-
PVC0.1614001000-
Table 3. Comparison of CFD simulation data.
Table 3. Comparison of CFD simulation data.
NameBefore ImprovementOption IOption II
MCIT (°C)22~27.922.0~22.622.0~22.7
MCOT (°C)32.2~39.931.7~36.432.1~37.2
ACIT (°C)22~23.722~22.222~22.2
ACOT (°C)31.9~38.531.4~36.131.8~36.3
AAST (°C)222222
AART (°C)32.0~33.832.9~33.631.9~33.8
RTI (%)90.289.689.8
RHI (%)98.398.498.4
SHI (%)0.590.330.31
Table 4. Air outflow and ACOT of cabinets in column 1.
Table 4. Air outflow and ACOT of cabinets in column 1.
Cabinet NumberBefore ImprovementOption IOption II
Air Outflow (cfm)ACOT (°C)Air Outflow (cfm)ACOT (°C)Air Outflow (cfm)ACOT (°C)
A198633.399383495033.82
B198233.4193733.9894833.83
C197433.5193534.0194133.9
D196633.693134.0393433.99
E195533.7292834.0792534.1
F194433.8692534.191534.23
G193234.0192134.1590534.37
H191834.1991734.289434.53
I190434.3791334.2488134.69
J189134.5591034.2887134.84
K187734.7691034.2986634.92
L185835.0491634.2185835.04
M183835.3793333.9983635.39
N181435.7995233.7581735.73
O176736.7593633.9579536.11
P175637.7786434.9679436.15
Q175638.3479536.1179536.13
R175637.6881235.8878936.27
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guo, Y.; Zhao, C.; Gao, H.; Shen, C.; Fu, X. Improving Thermal Performance in Data Centers Based on Numerical Simulations. Buildings 2024, 14, 1416. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14051416

AMA Style

Guo Y, Zhao C, Gao H, Shen C, Fu X. Improving Thermal Performance in Data Centers Based on Numerical Simulations. Buildings. 2024; 14(5):1416. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14051416

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guo, Yinjie, Chunyu Zhao, Hao Gao, Cheng Shen, and Xu Fu. 2024. "Improving Thermal Performance in Data Centers Based on Numerical Simulations" Buildings 14, no. 5: 1416. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14051416

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop