Next Article in Journal
Nuclear Matter Equation of State in the Brueckner–Hartree–Fock Approach and Standard Skyrme Energy Density Functionals
Previous Article in Journal
Gravitational Waves of Holographic QCD Phase Transition with Hyperscaling Violation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Detecting Wandering Intermediate-Mass Black Holes with AXIS in the Milky Way and Local Massive Galaxies

1
Center for Astrophysics|Harvard & Smithsonian, 60 Garden St., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
2
Black Hole Initiative, Harvard University, 20 Garden St., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
3
Department of Physics, University of Miami, 1320 Campo Sano Ave, Coral Gables, FL 33146, USA
4
Department of Physics, University of Maryland Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Cir, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Universe 2024, 10(5), 225; https://doi.org/10.3390/universe10050225
Submission received: 12 April 2024 / Revised: 2 May 2024 / Accepted: 13 May 2024 / Published: 17 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Galaxies and Clusters)

Abstract

:
This white paper explores the detectability of intermediate-mass black holes (IMBHs) wandering in the Milky Way (MW) and massive local galaxies, with a particular emphasis on the role of AXIS. IMBHs, ranging within 10 3 6 M , are commonly found at the centers of dwarf galaxies and may exist, yet undiscovered, in the MW. By using model spectra for advection-dominated accretion flows (ADAFs), we calculated the expected fluxes emitted by a population of wandering IMBHs with masses of 10 5 M in various MW environments and extrapolated our results to massive local galaxies. Around 40 % of the potential population of wandering IMBHs in the MW can be detected in an AXIS deep field. We proposed criteria to aid with selecting IMBH candidates using already available optical surveys. We also showed that IMBHs wandering in >200 galaxies within 10 Mpc can be easily detected with AXIS when passing within dense galactic environments (e.g., molecular clouds and cold neutral medium). In summary, we highlighted the potential X-ray detectability of wandering IMBHs in local galaxies and provided insights for guiding future surveys. Detecting wandering IMBHs is crucial for understanding their demographics and evolution and the merging history of galaxies. This white paper is part of a series commissioned for the AXIS Probe Concept Mission; additional AXIS white papers can be found at the AXIS website.

1. Introduction

Many of the black holes (BHs) observed thus far are accreting at or near the Eddington rate M ˙ Edd 1.4 × 10 18 M g s 1 , where M is the mass of the compact object in solar masses. In this limiting case, the outward acceleration on a test particle resulting from radiation pressure is balanced by the inward gravitational acceleration. Notably, this is the case for high-luminosity quasars, which are characterized by super-massive BHs with masses M > 10 6 M . In the conventional α -disk model [1,2], ∼10% of the rest-mass energy ( M c 2 ) of the infalling material is radiated away [3].
This standard picture of accretion has been widely tested, especially in the high-z Universe [4], where the large availability of gas makes accretion at the Eddington rate feasible [5]. However, the radiative efficiency, ϵ , can significantly deviate from the typical 10 % value, both for strongly super-Eddington ( M ˙ M ˙ Edd ) and sub-Eddington ( M ˙ M ˙ Edd ) accretion rates [6,7,8,9,10]. For accretion rates in the range 0.01 M ˙ Edd < M ˙ < M ˙ Edd , the accreting material creates a radiatively efficient, geometrically thin and optically thick accretion disk [1]. The radiative efficiency in this particular case depends on the spin of the black hole and varies from ∼6% for non-rotating black holes to ∼32% for maximally rotating ones [11]; hence, it is ∼10% on average.
Below 1 % of the Eddington rate, theoretical calculations suggest that the flow enters the regime of advection-dominated accretion flow (ADAF) [12,13,14,15,16]. BHs accreting in ADAF mode exhibit radiative efficiencies several orders of magnitude lower than the typical ∼10% value. Given the rarity of conditions supporting large accretion rates in the local Universe, it is likely that a substantial fraction of BHs accretes in the ADAF mode, e.g., the super-massive BH at the center of the MW [17]. Similarly, a putative population of intermediate-mass BHs (IMBHs) wandering in galaxies would also accrete in ADAF mode. It is important to note that, while accretion processes characterized by rates lower than 1 % of the Eddington rate are typically denominated ADAF, the specifics of the accretion flow and its effects on the environment (e.g., the possibility of forming a jet, see Tchekhovskoy et al. [18]) depend on environmental properties (e.g., its density) and on the evolutionary history of the system.
IMBHs are a bridge between stellar mass and super-massive objects and have masses in the range 10 3 M < M < 10 6 M , although the definition greatly varies depending on the sub-field of interest. Central IMBHs have been extensively detected in dwarf galaxies; their mass generally follows the scaling relations between black hole mass and stellar mass [19]. Additionally, dwarf galaxies have active fractions ranging from ∼5% to 22 % [20,21]. Some of these central black holes in dwarf galaxies, and up to z 3 , are found to be significantly overmassive with respect to the stellar content of their hosts, in violation of scaling relations [22,23]. Exceptionally overmassive black holes are now systematically found in the high-z Universe [24,25] by JWST. The redshift evolution of these populations of black holes and the role that wandering black holes played in their formation (see, e.g., [26]) is still unclear. For these reasons, recent studies are focusing on investigating the existence of wandering IMBHs in the MW and massive galaxies and their orbital and radiative properties [26,27,28,29].
IMBHs potentially wandering in the MW could have formed (i) in situ and (ii) ex situ. In situ (i.e., within the galaxy) formation channels include direct collapse of high-mass quasi-stars [30,31], super-Eddington accretion onto stellar-mass BHs [32], runaway mergers in dense globular stellar clusters [33,34,35,36,37], and supra-exponential accretion on seed black holes in the early Universe [38,39]. The ex situ channel forms wandering black holes through tidal disruption of satellite/dwarf galaxies when merged into larger halos [40,41,42,43].
These wandering IMBHs accrete from the interstellar medium (ISM) at low rates M ˙ M ˙ Edd , resulting in electromagnetic signatures typical of the ADAF accretion mode. A recent study [44] modeled the accretion and radiation properties of putative IMBHs with masses of 10 5 M wandering in the MW using five realistic ISM environments [45]: molecular clouds (MCs), cold neutral medium (CNM), hot neutral medium (HNM), warm ionized medium (WIM), and hot ionized medium (HIM). MC is the densest environment, with typical gas number densities of 10 2 10 4 cm 3 , while HIM is the most rarified environment, with typical gas number densities of 10 3 cm 3 . All results presented here consider the volume fractions of the different environments considered. MC is the most uncommon environment, occupying only ∼0.05% of the volume of the MW, while HIM is the most common, with a volume occupation fraction of ∼47%: almost half of the entire volume [44]. The mass of a perturbing black hole was chosen as the typical mass of IMBHs detected in the nuclei of dwarfs [20]. The accretion rate onto the IMBH was estimated using a Bondi rate, which was adequately adjusted to account for outflows and convection [44,46,47,48].
This white paper first summarizes the result presented in [44], which focused on the X-ray properties of wandering IMBHs in the MW. Then, it expands on the contribution that AXIS [49] could provide to detect these sources. Lastly, it predicts the observability of IMBHs wandering in local galaxies.

2. Detecting Wandering IMBHs Using X-rays with AXIS

2.1. Accretion Rates and Spectral Energy Distributions

The left panel of Figure 1 shows the distribution of accretion rates predicted for a 10 5 M IMBH wandering in typical ISM environments of the MW. The accretion rates range between 10 14 and 10 4 M yr 1 ; hence, they span ∼10 orders of magnitude. MC and CNM environments show the highest accretion rates because they are the densest; as such, they offer the best chance for X-ray detection of IMBHs in the MW.
As a reference, the Eddington rate for a 10 5 M IMBH is M ˙ Edd 2 × 10 3 M yr 1 : all accretion rates predicted are strongly sub-Eddington. The resulting spectral energy distributions (SEDs) typical for the five ISM environments are shown in the right panel of Figure 1, with Eddington ratios (i.e., the actual accretion rate normalized to the Eddington rate) ranging from 10 11 to 10 3 . The SEDs were calculated using a code designed specifically for ADAF mode accretion [50]. The SED peak shifts to higher frequencies with increasing accretion rates.

2.2. X-ray Observability and Selection Criteria: The Role of AXIS

The left panel of Figure 2 shows the resulting (volume-weighted) X-ray flux distribution. These results suggest that AXIS, in its proposed deep survey [51,52] with a flux limit ∼3 × 10 18 erg s 1 cm 2 and an area of 0.1 deg 2 , will detect a fraction, in number, of ∼38% of wandering IMBHs in the MW, assuming a uniform sampling of the region occupied by the galaxy [49].
To aid in the task of selecting IMBH candidates, [44] proposed essential selection criteria to be used in photometric surveys. The right panel of Figure 2 shows two luminosity ratios calculated as a function of the Eddington ratio of the IMBH: (i) the X-ray-to-optical/UV ratio represented by the standard α ox parameter [53] and (ii) the optical/UV to sub-mm ratio (see [44] for their definition). A combination of X-ray, optical, and sub-mm observations can sift out potential candidates and uniquely determine the accretion rate onto wandering IMBHs.
Predicting the number of IMBHs detectable by AXIS in a deep galactic survey is challenging because the total number of such sources is unknown. The MW has encountered ∼ 15 ± 3 galaxies with stellar mass > 10 7 M during its cosmic evolution [54]. Such galaxies could have hosted IMBHs that are massive enough to be detected in AXIS searches. Therefore, assuming an expected number of ∼10 IMBHs, ref. [28] showed that these objects are more likely to wander in the innermost ∼1 kpc of the MW. However, it is informative to compare the capabilities of AXIS with those of other facilities that are currently operational. Table 1 shows that AXIS would allow for a significant improvement of at least 40 % over current facilities, thanks not only to its extraordinary sensitivity but also to its wide field of view.

2.3. Extending the Search to Local Galaxies

The left panel of Figure 2 shows that the passage of a 10 5 M IMBH generates the highest X-ray fluxes within MC and CNM environments. Galaxies in the same mass category of the MW share a similar environmental composition. Hence, we investigate the fluxes that the passage of equally massive IMBHs would produce in nearby galaxies.
In Figure 3, we show the X-ray fluxes (0.2–10 keV) generated by the passage of a 10 5 M IMBH in the five ISM environments for a range of distances between 1 kpc and 10 Mpc. We indicate the distance to a few example locations, from the galactic center to the Andromeda galaxy, noting that within a radius of 4 Mpc, there are more than 200 galaxies, although many of them are dwarfs [55]. We calculated the flux reported in Figure 3 for the five ISM environments from their median luminosities. As some environments exhibit a range of luminosities spanning ∼13 orders of magnitudes (see Figure 2), the typical values of fluxes in Figure 3 are indicative.
From Figure 3, we see that the median luminosities generated in the WNM, WIM, and HIM are invisible to AXIS or are detectable only within the MW. On the contrary, fluxes generated in the CNM and MCs are detectable by an AXIS deep field well outside the MW. AXIS imaging reaching a depth of ∼ 3 × 10 18 erg s 1 cm 2 could detect the electromagnetic signature of the passage of an IMBH of 10 5 M in hundreds of galaxies within 10 Mpc distance. Although MC and CNM environments occupy only a small volume fraction of a typical MW-like galaxy ( 0.05 % and 1 % , respectively; see [45]), the availability of a large number of external galaxies within reach dramatically expands the chances of detecting such signatures.
As most of the X-ray luminosities of the sources considered here are < 10 40 erg s 1 , contamination from X-ray binaries (XRBs) is of concern. To disentangle their emissions, synergies with observatories that use other wavelengths (e.g., JWST, Roman, and Rubin) will be fundamental.

3. Concluding Remarks

To conclude, AXIS represents a significant improvement over current X-ray facilities and opens the way to detect a completely unknown population of black holes. In the MW and, even more crucially, in >200 local galaxies, AXIS can detect the X-rays emitted by the passage of IMBHs within dense ISM environments. Such detections are crucial for understanding the demographics and evolution of IMBHs and the merging history of galaxies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: F.P., B.S., Y.N., N.C. and A.F.; software: F.P. and B.S.; writing—original draft preparation: F.P.; writing—review and editing: F.P., B.S., Y.N., N.C. and A.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

F.P. acknowledges support from a Clay Fellowship administered by the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory. This work was also supported by the Black Hole Initiative at Harvard University, which is funded by grants from the John Templeton Foundation and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. The authors kindly acknowledge the AXIS team for their outstanding scientific and technical work over the past year. This work results from several months of discussion in the AXIS-AGN SWG.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Shakura, N.I.; Sunyaev, R.A. Reprint of 1973A&A....24..337S. Black holes in binary systems. Observational appearance. Astron. Astrophys. 1973, 500, 33–51. [Google Scholar]
  2. Novikov, I.D.; Thorne, K.S. Astrophysics of black holes. In Proceedings of the Black Holes (Les Astres Occlus); 1973; pp. 343–450. Available online: https://inspirehep.net/literature/1361968 (accessed on 10 May 2024).
  3. Narayan, R.; Quataert, E. Black Hole Accretion. Science 2005, 307, 77–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Fan, X.; Bañados, E.; Simcoe, R.A. Quasars and the Intergalactic Medium at Cosmic Dawn. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2023, 61, 373–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Power, C.; Baugh, C.M.; Lacey, C.G. The redshift evolution of the mass function of cold gas in hierarchical galaxy formation models. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2010, 406, 43–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Begelman, M.C. Black holes in radiation-dominated gas—An analogue of the Bondi accretion problem. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1978, 184, 53–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Paczynski, B.; Abramowicz, M.A. A model of a thick disk with equatorial accretion. Astrophys. J. 1982, 253, 897–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Abramowicz, M.A.; Czerny, B.; Lasota, J.P.; Szuszkiewicz, E. Slim accretion disks. Astrophys. J. 1988, 332, 646–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Volonteri, M.; Rees, M.J. Rapid Growth of High-Redshift Black Holes. Astrophys. J. 2005, 633, 624–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sadowski, A. Slim Disks Around Kerr Black Holes Revisited. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2009, 183, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Thorne, K.S. Disk-Accretion onto a Black Hole. II. Evolution of the Hole. Astrophys. J. 1974, 191, 507–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Narayan, R.; Yi, I. Advection-dominated Accretion: A Self-similar Solution. Astrophys. J. 1994, 428, L13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Narayan, R.; Yi, I. Advection-dominated Accretion: Underfed Black Holes and Neutron Stars. Astrophys. J. 1995, 452, 710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Abramowicz, M.A.; Chen, X.; Kato, S.; Lasota, J.P.; Regev, O. Thermal Equilibria of Accretion Disks. Astrophys. J. 1995, 438, L37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Narayan, R.; McClintock, J.E. Advection-dominated accretion and the black hole event horizon. New Astron. Rev. 2008, 51, 733–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yuan, F.; Narayan, R. Hot Accretion Flows Around Black Holes. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2014, 52, 529–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yuan, F.; Quataert, E.; Narayan, R. Nonthermal Electrons in Radiatively Inefficient Accretion Flow Models of Sagittarius A*. Astrophys. J. 2003, 598, 301–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tchekhovskoy, A.; Narayan, R.; McKinney, J.C. Efficient generation of jets from magnetically arrested accretion on a rapidly spinning black hole. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2011, 418, L79–L83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kormendy, J.; Ho, L.C. Coevolution (Or Not) of Supermassive Black Holes and Host Galaxies. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2013, 51, 511–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Greene, J.E.; Strader, J.; Ho, L.C. Intermediate-Mass Black Holes. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 58, 257–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pacucci, F.; Mezcua, M.; Regan, J.A. The Active Fraction of Massive Black Holes in Dwarf Galaxies. Astrophys. J. 2021, 920, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mezcua, M.; Siudek, M.; Suh, H.; Valiante, R.; Spinoso, D.; Bonoli, S. Overmassive Black Holes in Dwarf Galaxies Out to z 0.9 in the VIPERS Survey. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2023, 943, L5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mezcua, M.; Pacucci, F.; Suh, H.; Siudek, M.; Natarajan, P. Overmassive black holes at cosmic noon: Linking the local and the high-redshift Universe. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2024, 966, L30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pacucci, F.; Nguyen, B.; Carniani, S.; Maiolino, R.; Fan, X. JWST CEERS and JADES Active Galaxies at z = 4–7 Violate the Local M -M Relation at >3σ: Implications for Low-mass Black Holes and Seeding Models. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2023, 957, L3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pacucci, F.; Loeb, A. The Redshift Evolution of the M –M Relation for JWST’s Supermassive Black Holes at z > 4. Astrophys. J. 2024, 964, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Di Matteo, T.; Ni, Y.; Chen, N.; Croft, R.; Bird, S.; Pacucci, F.; Ricarte, A.; Tremmel, M. A vast population of wandering and merging IMBHs at cosmic noon. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2023, 525, 1479–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ricarte, A.; Tremmel, M.; Natarajan, P.; Quinn, T. Unveiling the Population of Wandering Black Holes via Electromagnetic Signatures. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2021, 916, L18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Weller, E.J.; Pacucci, F.; Hernquist, L.; Bose, S. Dynamics of intermediate-mass black holes wandering in the milky way galaxy using the illustris TNG50 simulation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2022, 511, 2229–2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Weller, E.J.; Pacucci, F.; Ni, Y.; Chen, N.; Di Matteo, T.; Siwek, M.; Hernquist, L. Orbital and radiative properties of wandering intermediate-mass black holes in the ASTRID simulation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2023, 520, 3955–3963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Volonteri, M.; Begelman, M.C. Quasi-stars and the cosmic evolution of massive black holes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2010, 409, 1022–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Schleicher, D.R.G.; Palla, F.; Ferrara, A.; Galli, D.; Latif, M. Massive black hole factories: Supermassive and quasi-star formation in primordial halos. Astron. Astrophys. 2013, 558, A59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ryu, T.; Tanaka, T.L.; Perna, R.; Haiman, Z. Intermediate-mass black holes from Population III remnants in the first galactic nuclei. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2016, 460, 4122–4134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Portegies Zwart, S.F.; McMillan, S.L.W. The Runaway Growth of Intermediate-Mass Black Holes in Dense Star Clusters. Astrophys. J. 2002, 576, 899–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gürkan, M.A.; Freitag, M.; Rasio, F.A. Formation of Massive Black Holes in Dense Star Clusters. I. Mass Segregation and Core Collapse. Astrophys. J. 2004, 604, 632–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Shi, Y.; Grudić, M.Y.; Hopkins, P.F. The mass budget for intermediate-mass black holes in dense star clusters. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2021, 505, 2753–2763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. González, E.; Kremer, K.; Chatterjee, S.; Fragione, G.; Rodriguez, C.L.; Weatherford, N.C.; Ye, C.S.; Rasio, F.A. Intermediate-mass Black Holes from High Massive-star Binary Fractions in Young Star Clusters. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2021, 908, L29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fragione, G.; Kocsis, B.; Rasio, F.A.; Silk, J. Repeated Mergers, Mass-gap Black Holes, and Formation of Intermediate-mass Black Holes in Dense Massive Star Clusters. Astrophys. J. 2022, 927, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Alexander, T.; Natarajan, P. Rapid growth of seed black holes in the early universe by supra-exponential accretion. Science 2014, 345, 1330–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Natarajan, P. A new channel to form IMBHs throughout cosmic time. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2021, 501, 1413–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Governato, F.; Colpi, M.; Maraschi, L. The fate of central black holes in merging galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1994, 271, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Volonteri, M.; Haardt, F.; Madau, P. The Assembly and Merging History of Supermassive Black Holes in Hierarchical Models of Galaxy Formation. Astrophys. J. 2003, 582, 559–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. O’Leary, R.M.; Kocsis, B.; Loeb, A. Gravitational waves from scattering of stellar-mass black holes in galactic nuclei. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2009, 395, 2127–2146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Greene, J.E.; Lancaster, L.; Ting, Y.S.; Koposov, S.E.; Danieli, S.; Huang, S.; Jiang, F.; Greco, J.P.; Strader, J. A Search for Wandering Black Holes in the Milky Way with Gaia and DECaLS. Astrophys. J. 2021, 917, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Seepaul, B.S.; Pacucci, F.; Narayan, R. Detectability of wandering intermediate-mass black holes in the Milky Way galaxy from radio to X-rays. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2022, 515, 2110–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ferrière, K.M. The interstellar environment of our galaxy. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2001, 73, 1031–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Igumenshchev, I.V.; Narayan, R.; Abramowicz, M.A. Three-dimensional Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations of Radiatively Inefficient Accretion Flows. Astrophys. J. 2003, 592, 1042–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Proga, D.; Begelman, M.C. Accretion of Low Angular Momentum Material onto Black Holes: Two-dimensional Magnetohydrodynamic Case. Astrophys. J. 2003, 592, 767–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Perna, R.; Narayan, R.; Rybicki, G.; Stella, L.; Treves, A. Bondi Accretion and the Problem of the Missing Isolated Neutron Stars. Astrophys. J. 2003, 594, 936–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Reynolds, C.S.; Kara, E.A.; Mushotzky, R.F.; Ptak, A.; Koss, M.J.; Williams, B.J.; Allen, S.W.; Bauer, F.E.; Bautz, M.; Bodaghee, A.; et al. Overview of the Advanced X-ray Imaging Satellite (AXIS). arXiv 2023, arXiv:2311.00780. [Google Scholar]
  50. Pesce, D.W.; Palumbo, D.C.M.; Narayan, R.; Blackburn, L.; Doeleman, S.S.; Johnson, M.D.; Ma, C.P.; Nagar, N.M.; Natarajan, P.; Ricarte, A. Toward Determining the Number of Observable Supermassive Black Hole Shadows. Astrophys. J. 2021, 923, 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Marchesi, S.; Gilli, R.; Lanzuisi, G.; Dauser, T.; Ettori, S.; Vito, F.; Cappelluti, N.; Comastri, A.; Mushotzky, R.; Ptak, A.; et al. Mock catalogs for the extragalactic X-ray sky: Simulating AGN surveys with ATHENA and with the AXIS probe. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 642, A184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mushotzky, R.; Aird, J.; Barger, A.J.; Cappelluti, N.; Chartas, G.; Corrales, L.; Eufrasio, R.; Fabian, A.C.; Falcone, A.D.; Gallo, E.; et al. The Advanced X-ray Imaging Satellite. Proc. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 2019, 51, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lusso, E.; Comastri, A.; Vignali, C.; Zamorani, G.; Brusa, M.; Gilli, R.; Iwasawa, K.; Salvato, M.; Civano, F.; Elvis, M.; et al. The X-ray to optical-UV luminosity ratio of X-ray selected type 1 AGN in XMM-COSMOS. Astron. Astrophys. 2010, 512, A34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kruijssen, J.M.D.; Pfeffer, J.L.; Chevance, M.; Bonaca, A.; Trujillo-Gomez, S.; Bastian, N.; Reina-Campos, M.; Crain, R.A.; Hughes, M.E. Kraken reveals itself—The merger history of the Milky Way reconstructed with the E-MOSAICS simulations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020, 498, 2472–2491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Karachentsev, I.D.; Makarov, D.I.; Kaisina, E.I. Updated Nearby Galaxy Catalog. Astron. J. 2013, 145, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Left panel: distribution of accretion rates, categorized by the five ISM environments investigated. All rates are strongly sub-Eddington. Right panel: collection of SEDs for five values of the accretion rate representative of each ISM environment.
Figure 1. Left panel: distribution of accretion rates, categorized by the five ISM environments investigated. All rates are strongly sub-Eddington. Right panel: collection of SEDs for five values of the accretion rate representative of each ISM environment.
Universe 10 00225 g001
Figure 2. Left panel: Probability density of the X-ray fluxes produced by IMBHs passing through the five ISM environments considered. The AXIS flux limit is indicated. Right panel: Luminosity ratios (optical-to-X-ray and sub-mm-to-optical) for selecting IMBH candidates in multi-wavelength surveys.
Figure 2. Left panel: Probability density of the X-ray fluxes produced by IMBHs passing through the five ISM environments considered. The AXIS flux limit is indicated. Right panel: Luminosity ratios (optical-to-X-ray and sub-mm-to-optical) for selecting IMBH candidates in multi-wavelength surveys.
Universe 10 00225 g002
Figure 3. X-ray fluxes (0.2–10 keV) generated by the passage of a 10 5 M IMBH as a function of its distance. The green-shaded area is detectable by an AXIS deep field. Electromagnetic signatures of the passage of an IMBH can be detected in MC and CNM in hundreds of galaxies within 10 Mpc.
Figure 3. X-ray fluxes (0.2–10 keV) generated by the passage of a 10 5 M IMBH as a function of its distance. The green-shaded area is detectable by an AXIS deep field. Electromagnetic signatures of the passage of an IMBH can be detected in MC and CNM in hundreds of galaxies within 10 Mpc.
Universe 10 00225 g003
Table 1. Volume-weighted detectability of wandering IMBHs of 10 5 M in the MW by AXIS, Chandra, and eROSITA. The detectability indicates the percent of the total number of objects that are detectable by a given instrument.
Table 1. Volume-weighted detectability of wandering IMBHs of 10 5 M in the MW by AXIS, Chandra, and eROSITA. The detectability indicates the percent of the total number of objects that are detectable by a given instrument.
X-ray TelescopeFlux Limit [ erg s 1 cm 2 ] Detectability
AXIS 3.0 × 10 18 38 %
Chandra 2.0 × 10 16 27 %
eRosita 2.0 × 10 14 13 %
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pacucci, F.; Seepaul, B.; Ni, Y.; Cappelluti, N.; Foord, A. Detecting Wandering Intermediate-Mass Black Holes with AXIS in the Milky Way and Local Massive Galaxies. Universe 2024, 10, 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe10050225

AMA Style

Pacucci F, Seepaul B, Ni Y, Cappelluti N, Foord A. Detecting Wandering Intermediate-Mass Black Holes with AXIS in the Milky Way and Local Massive Galaxies. Universe. 2024; 10(5):225. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe10050225

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pacucci, Fabio, Bryan Seepaul, Yueying Ni, Nico Cappelluti, and Adi Foord. 2024. "Detecting Wandering Intermediate-Mass Black Holes with AXIS in the Milky Way and Local Massive Galaxies" Universe 10, no. 5: 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe10050225

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop