Next Article in Journal
Global Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Plastic Supply Chain Resource Metabolism Efficiency and Carbon Emissions Co-Reduction Strategies
Previous Article in Journal
Urban Green Spaces’ Influence on Civilization Diseases—Meta-Analysis and Critical Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

From Isolated Valves to a Potential Marine Living Resource: History, Documented Distribution and Sustainable Population Enhancement Possibilities of the Smooth Scallop (Flexopecten glaber) on the Romanian Coast

1
Marine Living Resources Department, National Institute for Marine Research and Development “Grigore Antipa”, 300 Mamaia Blvd., 900581 Constanța, Romania
2
Marine Biology and Ecology Department, National Institute for Marine Research and Development “Grigore Antipa”, 300 Mamaia Blvd., 900581 Constanța, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(10), 3924; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16103924
Submission received: 12 April 2024 / Revised: 29 April 2024 / Accepted: 6 May 2024 / Published: 8 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Marine Fisheries Management and Ecological Sustainability)

Abstract

:
Until recently, the smooth scallop Flexopecten glaber (Linnaeus, 1758) was considered absent from Romanian Black Sea waters, as only isolated valves were documented on beaches of the southern coast. Yet, in 2020, the first living specimens were collected by dredging at 25 m depth in Mangalia. Moreover, in the past three years, a considerable number of live individuals were also retrieved from beam-trawling operations targeting the gastropod Rapana venosa (Valenciennes, 1846) along the Romanian coast, indicating that there is a stable population here. This remarkable expansion of F. glaber in Romanian waters may be explained as a consequence of the Black Sea’s recovery from eutrophication, reduced predatory pressure from the declining population of R. venosa and changing climate conditions. Our research aimed at using all this novel information to document for the first time the occurrence and distribution of this bivalve on the Romanian coast, also considering perspectives for the development of a new type of shellfish mariculture, avoiding any pressure on the natural stock. In total, 386 F. glaber individuals were sampled during 2020–2023, at depths between 22.5 and 33.3 m. The abundance and biomass per station oscillated between 5 and 319 specimens and 51.5 and 7377 g, respectively. A subsample of 122 specimens was preserved and analyzed in the laboratory, revealing an average shell length of 53.54 mm (±4.13 SD) and an average shell height of 49.54 mm (±3.64 SD). The smooth scallop has both ecological and economic value, which makes it a viable candidate for sustainable aquaculture by collecting spat from the most abundant areas and subsequently placing “seedlings” in the appropriate polygons for stock recovery. Ultimately, commercial exploitation from aquaculture installations can be considered, provided a permanent healthy F. glaber population is established on the Romanian coast.

1. Introduction

The smooth scallop, Flexopecten glaber (Linnaeus, 1758), is the only representative of the Pectinidae Family within the Black Sea. Originating from the Mediterranean, the Black Sea scallop is believed to have been established around 7000 years ago [1]. Designated as a subspecies, Flexopecten glaber ponticus (Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dollfus, 1889) is the recognized taxonomic classification for the Pectinidae species inhabiting the Black Sea [2]. Nevertheless, both morphological and genetic analyses have indicated no differences between Black Sea scallops and their counterparts in the Mediterranean Sea [1,3].
The Black Sea scallop has been recorded at various occurrence frequencies and abundance values along the entire Black Sea coast, as recently documented [4]. However, two patterns emerge in the Black Sea smooth scallop’s evolution. Firstly, certain regions, such as the southern, eastern (Central and North Caucasus) and northern (Crimea) sectors, demonstrate similar long-term dynamics in scallop population development. Historically, F. glaber was abundant enough along the Crimean coast and in Sevastopol Bay to support commercial harvesting operations [5]. Lately, there has been a significant decline in the scallop population across its former habitats, leading to its inclusion in the Red List of Crimea and Sevastopol [6,7]. In the southern part (i.e., the Turkish coast), F. glaber was a characteristic species in some benthic habitats. However, data from the southern region are primarily representative of the first half of the 20th century, with limited information available in recent years. In the eastern area, encompassing the Kerch pre-strait area and adjacent regions within the strait, scallop abundance has recorded a consistent decline over the past decade, culminating in the absence of records since the 1960s [4].
Conversely, other areas, particularly the western and northwestern sectors of the Black Sea, exhibit historically poor development of scallop populations. In the northwestern part, the smooth scallop was documented in benthic habitats but never as a characteristic species [4]. In the Black Sea, the smooth scallop has been recorded in a range of habitats, including both soft sediments and hard substrates, at depths between 0 and 48 m [4,8]. While habitat type may not be a limiting factor, salinity and dissolved oxygen levels appear to play crucial roles in its distribution [9]. Recently, in Bulgarian waters, an abundant population of F. glaber was discovered, marking the first occurrence since the 1960s [8].
Along the Romanian coast, the first record of living Black Sea scallops occurred in 2020, when the first living specimens were collected by dredging at 25 m depth in Mangalia (southern part of the coast) [10]. This finding led to its inclusion in the Red Book of Romania, classified as Critically Endangered (CR) [11]. In the past three years, a considerable number of live F. glaber specimens were also by-caught by beam-trawling targeting the gastropod Rapana venosa (Valenciennes, 1846) along the entire Romanian coast, indicating that there is a stable population here. Under these circumstances, the current research aimed at using all this novel information to document for the first time the occurrence and distribution of the smooth scallop on the Romanian coast, characterizing the species’ influencing environmental factors, spawning specificities, also considering perspectives for the development of a new type of shellfish mariculture, avoiding any pressure on the natural stocks.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling and Study Area

The smooth scallop sample collection was performed during research surveys along the entire Romanian coast targeting rapa whelk (R. venosa) in 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023, respectively, in the frame of a dedicated project aimed at assessing the stock of this gastropod in the Black Sea basin [12]. F. glaber specimens appeared as by-catch during the surveys. The gear used was a customized Turkish design beam trawl [13]. The mesh size of the codend was 72 mm (diamond stretched) and the nets were made of polyamide netting (nylon). A 40 mm mesh size cover netting was used around the codend to retain the specimens escaping from the sampling gear. The stretched length of the 40 mm cover was 1.5 times longer than the 72 mm survey net (Supplementary Materials S1). The gear was towed from the aft of NIMRD’s “Steaua de Mare 1“ research vessel (570 HP engine) and connected to a winch with a 12 mm warp diameter. The warp length was adjusted to 3–5 times the water depth so that the gear remained in good contact with the sea bottom. Each haul performed had a duration of 30 min at a trawling speed of 2 knots.
A total number of 51 stations were sampled yearly in the Romanian area in order to provide wide and homogeneous coverage of the continental shelf (Figure 1). The surveys were carried out on 3 water depth strata—5–15 m, 15–25 m and 25–35 m, respectively—covering a total research area of more than 5500 km2 (Table 1). The swept area covered by each haul ranged between 0.006 and 0.017 km2.

2.2. Biometrics and Age Reading

After each haul operation ended, the catch was sorted by species. All the catch was weighed and measured for total length and weight according to the FAO Technical Guidelines 2020 [14]. The by-caught scallops were measured in the field using a manual caliper, weighted on a Kadda electronic balance and subsequently released (Supplementary Materials S2).
For a comprehensive analysis of population characteristics, a subsample of 122 individuals was preserved in 70% ethanol and transported to the laboratory. Additional measurements were performed using a carbon fiber composite digital caliper (model X0027BRMP7, RoHS, accuracy ±0.1 mm), for more reliability. Within the laboratory, morphological parameters, specifically shell height (H) and length (L), were assessed, for the larger left (upper) shell of each specimen (Figure 2 left). The measurements were systematically organized into size classes, divided at 2 mm intervals (Figure 2 center). Afterward, the scallops were scrubbed with a brush to clean any epibiotic deposit, and the rings on the upper shell were marked with a pencil (Figure 2 right). The biological age of the individuals was estimated based on the number of annual rings [15].
The relationship between shell length (L) and shell height (H) was established based on the allometric equation:
y = a × xb

2.3. Statistical Analysis and Map Generation

The initial phase of data handling involved inputting the raw data into Microsoft Excel 2016 (KB4011684), where pre-processing and organization procedures were carried out. Subsequently, statistical analysis and visualization of the processed data were conducted using the Excel 2016 software package. The results encompass numerical data presented in a structured format. Mean values were calculated for each dataset, with associated standard deviations (SD) provided to convey the variability within the samples.
Distribution maps were created using the ArcMap 10.x Software (ESRI product).

3. Results

During the investigated period (2020–2023), F. glaber specimens were retrieved as by-catch in beam-trawl hauls for R. venosa along the entire Romanian coast, generally at depths between 20 m and 35 m (Figure 3). During the 2020 survey, 5 smooth scallop individuals were recorded in 2 stations, at depths ranging from 24.5 to 33.3 m. In 2021, 44 F. glaber specimens were identified in 6 stations at water depths between 23.5 m and 31.4 m. Further, 2022 was the year with the highest number of live smooth scallop specimens collected (319), found in 9 stations, at depths ranging from 22.4 m to 32.4 m. In 2023, 18 F. glaber individuals were identified in a single station, at a depth of 26.5 m (Supplementary Materials S3).
Regarding the habitat type preference of the smooth scallop, the majority of F. glaber specimens were found on circalittoral mixed sediments and circalittoral muds (Figure 3).
The abundance and biomass of F. glaber oscillated in the period 2020–2023 between 5 and 319 specimens (Figure 4 left) and 51.5 and 7377 g (Figure 4 right), respectively, with a peak in 2022 for both parameters considered. Concerning the spatial distribution, most specimens (>100) were recorded in the central part of the coast (off the Mamaia–Năvodari area), with significant occurrences (60–100 individuals) in the southern sector (off Mangalia), as well. The fewest F. glaber specimens were documented closer to the Danube mouths, off the Vadu–Portița area.
The shell length (L) of the analyzed specimens ranged between 36.8 and 63.6 mm, with an average length of 52.80 mm (±4.41 SD). The shell height (H) ranged from 35.8 to 58.1 mm, with a mean value of 48.78 mm (±3.76 SD). The size distribution was dominated by specimens within the length class of 53–55 mm (20%) and the height class of 49–51 mm (28%) (Figure 5). On average, shells were longer than higher with 4.01 mm (±1.70 SD). Just one individual was higher than longer (+0.6 mm).
The relationship between two size variables (i.e., H and L) was examined using the allometric Equation (1). The growth coefficient (b) was determined to be close to 1, with a value of 0.84. This suggests an allometric growth pattern, where an increase in length leads to a proportional increase in height, but at a slightly lesser rate (i.e., negative allometry of height) (Figure 6).
Analyses of the 122 F. glaber individuals brought to the laboratory revealed ages ranging from 5 to 9 years old. A significant share of the sampled population (56%; N = 68) fell within the 7-year age class, followed by the 6-year class (23%; N = 28) and 8-year age class (18%; N = 22). The size classes representing 5 and 9 years old exhibited the lowest representation (3%; N = 4) of the total number (Figure 7).
In this study, individuals aged 5 years exhibited dimensions ranging from 35.8 to 38.3 mm, while those aged 6 years had dimensions spanning between 39.8 to 56.6 mm. At 7 years of age, the individuals reached sizes of 44.6 to 57.6 mm, which increased slightly at 8 years to 45.8 to 58.1 mm. Finally, individuals aged 9 years showed dimensions ranging from 50.4 to 50.6 mm (Figure 8).
The investigated shells displayed six color morphs (Figure 9, left). The most frequent were brown (39%), multi-colored (32%) and off-white (11%) shells (Figure 9, right).

4. Discussion

The recovery of Black Sea scallop populations, following a significant decline, has piqued the interest of the scientific community, as evidenced by the emergence of publications in recent years [1,3,4,8]. On the Romanian shelf, however, before June 2020, F. glaber was documented solely as isolated shells on beaches. The reporting of isolated shells persisted across several studies [16,17,18,19,20], until the recent discovery of living specimens in the Mangalia area [10].
The occurrence of F. glaber in regions historically characterized by poor development, or in areas where it was previously absent, is frequently associated with environmental recovery following eutrophication (nutrient levels have constantly decreased in recent years [21]), declining populations of R. venosa due to economic harvesting and changing climate conditions, particularly seawater warming trends [4,8].
The biology and ecology of this species are incompletely understood in both the Mediterranean and Black Sea basins [22].
In the Mediterranean Sea, F. glaber is commonly found inhabiting sedimentary habitats at depths ranging from 5 to 900 m [23]. In the Black Sea, the smooth scallop was found in the depth range of 0–48 m [4,8]. During this study, the trawling activities took place between the 5 and 35 isobaths. Smooth scallops were primarily found within a narrow depth band from 20 to 35 m, inhabiting circalittoral soft-bottom benthic habitats, comprising mud and mixed sediments. This preference for such habitats aligns with findings reported in Bulgaria [8]. Notably, the presence of smooth scallops on hard substrates or within seagrass meadows has not been documented in Romania yet, unlike the observations made in Bulgaria or Ukraine [8,24].
As a habitat generalist species, the occurrence of F. glaber at depths exceeding 20 m could be attributed to the freshwater discharge from the Danube River (impacting salinity level, particularly within the 0–20 m depth) rather than to habitat type [25]. As for the maximum depth at which the smooth scallop can be found in Romanian waters, definitive assertions cannot be made at the moment. For this, research efforts should be extended to greater depths.
Among environmental factors, salinity and dissolved oxygen levels seem to be the most important limiting factors for smooth scallop distribution. Most scallop species inhabit fully saline waters and are incapable of colonizing low-salinity environments. Salinity not only limits the spatial distribution of bivalves but also impacts various aspects of their biology, including feeding, reproduction, growth, respiration, osmoregulation and interactions with parasites and diseases [15]. For Black Sea scallops, optimal salinity conditions fall within the range of 16–17‰ [9]. During our investigations, the salinity levels where the smooth scallop was found ranged between 16.4 and 18.6‰, which indicates proper conditions for development (Supplementary Materials S3).
Concerning the size of F. glaber individuals on the Romanian coast, the maximum shell length of smooth scallops (63.6 mm) exceeded those reported in Bulgaria (53.48 mm) [8] and Crimea (53.4 mm) [24,26], respectively. The maximum age (9 years) of specimens from Romania was similar to the maximum age found in Bulgaria [8]. The minimum length and age could not be compared with other studies from the Black Sea due to the use of a sampling gear with a mesh size of 40 mm (thus smaller), and younger scallops were not retained and documented.
With reference to shell color, the number of morphs found in our samples was comparable to the ones documented on the Bulgarian coast: six morphs in Romania compared to seven in Bulgaria [8]. The only color not identified in our samples was violet. This similarity indicates a rather homogeneous population in the north-western Black Sea area.
Smooth scallops (F. glaber) are simultaneous hermaphrodite species, characterized by rapid sexual maturation [27]. In the Mediterranean Sea, this species reproduces from April to September [22]. In the plankton of the Black Sea, veliger larvae of F. glaber are found from June to August [28]. The duration of larval life in marine bivalves ranges from three to five weeks, influenced by environmental conditions such as temperature, salinity and food availability [15]. In the Black Sea, the length of the meiosis stages, embryonic and larval development and the description of larvae at the veliger stage are provided based on cultivated material from Sevastopol Bay [29]. The age and size at first maturity for F. glaber were observed to be 9–10 months (22.4–25.1 mm shell height) in the Adriatic Sea [22].
Based on data from both the present study and research conducted in 2020, when the species was initially discovered in samples, it can be asserted that a stable population of F. glaber exists along the Romanian coast, thriving in favorable conditions for reproduction and development. Compared to 2020, there has been an observed expansion of the population along the Romanian littoral. Furthermore, individuals found in 2020 were predominantly aged 3–4 years, whereas in the current study, individuals aged 9 years were discovered, indicating continuity in the development of individuals.
Bivalves are essential marine organisms due to their ecological and commercial relevance, which are appreciated for their taste and nutritional qualities [30]. Among them, scallops are considered a delicacy worldwide and they represent an important part of the global seafood market and support both commercial fisheries and aquaculture developments globally [31]. In the past 10 years, the consumption of Pectinidae has increased and they are now an important part of the European seafood market [32]. Scallops are popular among consumers both fresh and frozen; consequently, their rearing may be economically profitable and able to provide a desirable product for human consumption with high market value [33]. The organoleptic characteristics (taste, texture, firmness, etc.) and the high market value of F. glaber, comparable to those of the great Mediterranean scallop [Pecten jacobeus (Linnaeus, 1758)], make this species of great interest for the development of shellfish culture [22]. In addition, smooth scallops have shown high growth and survival performance, early maturation and intensive breeding [34].
Similarly to other Black Sea riparian countries [35], bivalve culture in Romania is limited to mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis Lamarck, 1819) and some isolated attempts for Pacific oyster rearing [Magallana gigas (Thunberg, 1793)] [36]. Whereas F. glaber is an edible mollusk with considerable market value, it can be considered a viable candidate for diversifying shellfish aquaculture in the region, given the increasing social acceptability of seafood consumption [37]. As a potential candidate for aquaculture purposes, the smooth scallop may offer good prospects for rearing, considering not only its commercial value, but also that its use in aquaculture might contribute to a reduction in the negative impacts of fishing gears on the sea bottom [22]. The main hindrance to scallop aquaculture is a reliable and sufficient supply of seedlings [38], which can be obtained either by spat collection from the natural environment or by controlled spawning under laboratory conditions.
The deployment of artificial collectors at sea is a widespread technique for settling wild scallop spat and subsequently culturing different pectinid species worldwide [33,34,39,40,41]. Natural recruitment may ensure the permanent availability of scallop spat, addressing the problem of high seedling variability, which is a major constraint for scallop aquaculture activities. Due to biofouling, collectors are only effective for a limited period and must be deployed for a beneficial timeframe to become enticing for spat attachment [30,42,43]. Consequently, the pursuit of commercial bivalve culture calls for a good understanding of recruitment timing.
Scallop spawning season follows a latitudinal trend, with acute seasonality and synchronism at higher latitudes, that becomes longer and less synchronized as latitudes decrease [44]. In the north-western Adriatic, spawning is documented to occur mostly between July and September, with minor spawning events between April and May [22]. The settlement of viable larvae occurs some weeks after the species spawning period [41]. In the Ionian Sea, spawning is reported between February and early August; the larvae swim for three to four weeks before settling, at water temperatures ranging from 15 °C to 18 °C [34]. In the Turkish Aegean (Izmir Bay), two spawning peaks were determined, in November/December and July/August, respectively, at water temperatures ranging from 12 °C to 28 °C [45]. In the Black Sea, the spawning period of the smooth scallop peaks in June and July [29], when seawater temperature is usually around 25 °C [46].
There are several collector types that can be used for smooth scallop spat settlement. The Turkish model [45] consists of individual collector systems made from 50 cm x 20 cm polyethylene mesh bags set on polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipes, with a mesh size of the polyethylene bag of 5 × 4 mm. The collector system is designed as a surface and bottom collector. The bags are tied to the pipes with a plastic rope at 15 cm intervals. Two PVC pipes are attached to the main rope at depths of 1 and 5 m, with the surface and bottom collectors attached on either side. A buoy (20 L) at the top and an anchor (100 kg) are used to keep each system stable in the water [43]. Alternatively, the Greek model [34] proposes spat collectors made of 40 cm × 60 cm crop sacks filled with plastic net (mesh size 5 × 7 mm, area 40 × 100 cm), hung at 1, 4 and 8 m depth from each of four 8 m long polypropylene ropes placed vertically at 2 m of each other on a classic shellfish longline installation [47]. A weight is set at the bottom end of each vertical rope to maintain the position of the collector sacks [34]. Another version of collectors set on longlines consists of 28 cm × 53 cm net bags (4 mm mesh size), filled with a 5 m long tubular net that has a 5 cm mesh opening, which is commonly used for mussels. This internal net (called a “filler”) is folded and rolled up on itself to convey volume to the collector. Each set of collectors consists of a rope on which 10 net bags are placed 1 m from each other. The upper end of each rope is then tied to a longline submerged at 4 m depth so that collectors remain submerged from 5 to 14 m [41]. Using any of the collectors described, the highest number of spat settled closer to the seabed and density decreased towards the surface [34,41,45]. This tendency of spat to settle in deeper substrates may be explained by the need to avoid strong wave action, water turbulence and excessive fouling [48,49].
It is essential to deploy the collectors two weeks before the larvae settle to ensure that a microfilm coating forms [45]. Whereas peak spawning of Black Sea F. glaber is expected in July, the collectors should be deployed at sea in mid-June, aiming to maximize spat recruitment. In order to reach maturity and a shell length of about 40 mm, the collectors should be kept immersed for 2–2.5 years [50].
Laboratory/hatchery culture is another method of obtaining scallop spat, with the French experience being the reference standard for scallop hatcheries in Europe [51,52,53]. Before spawning, mature scallops collected from the wild are placed in a conditioning system with controlled light, temperature and food supply to ensure the production of viable larvae in the hatchery. Hatcheries typically use continuous flow-through systems (with or without sand on the tank bottom [54,55,56]. The conditioning of broodstock is carried out for 11–12 weeks at temperatures of 12–15 °C using a diet of multi-species microalgal mix [27,52]. If spawning does not occur naturally, scallops may be subjected to external stimuli (such as mechanical or electrical shock, intense illumination, use of ammonium hydroxide and variation of water pH) [57] or hormone (estradiol) injections [58]. After spawning, larvae are grown in flow-through cylindrical tanks with conical bottoms [52]. For the attachment and metamorphosis of pediveligers, circular sieves with a mesh bottom and airlift downwelling are used [52]. Subsequently, after reaching 3–4 mm shell height, the spat is transferred to grow-out collectors at sea [59]. The major drawbacks of hatchery production are large variations in larval production between years, bacterial infections and high maintenance costs [52]; thus, a spat collection from the wild seems to be the most feasible solution.
The smooth scallop has both ecological and economic value, which makes it a suitable candidate for aquaculture by collecting spat from the most abundant areas identified within this study, growing them out until reaching maturity and subsequently placing “seedlings” into appropriate polygons for stock recovery. After careful monitoring certifying that F. glaber has established a permanent and healthy population on the Romanian coast, sustainable commercial exploitation from aquaculture installations can be considered, adding value to the productive sector and introducing a highly appreciated seafood species.

5. Conclusions

The recent discovery of a significant number of live F. glaber individuals along the Romanian coast confirms the fact that smooth scallops are a constant presence in the marine fauna of the area. This occurrence in a region where it was previously absent may be attributed mainly to a post-eutrophication recovery. According to our investigations, F. glaber specimens sampled from Romania seem to be larger than those measured in other Black Sea areas, which suggests that the species found propitious environmental conditions to develop here. In order to accurately map the distribution and abundance and assess the stocks of this bivalve at the Romanian coast, dedicated studies are essential and envisaged in the future. Moreover, the smooth scallop has both ecological and economic value, which makes it a viable candidate for aquaculture by collecting spat from the most abundant areas and subsequently placing “seedlings” into appropriate polygons for stock recovery. As a possible candidate for aquaculture, the smooth scallop may provide good opportunities for rearing, considering not only its commercial worth, but also how its usage in aquaculture may contribute to a reduction in the destructive effects of fishing gear on the sea floor. Ultimately, after scientifically acknowledging that a healthy and thriving F. glaber population is established here, commercial exploitation from aquaculture installations can be considered, thus providing a valuable alternative marine living resource.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/su16103924/s1, Supplementary Materials S1: beam trawl used for smooth scallop sampling (original photos); Supplementary Materials S2: on-board length and weight measurements of F. glaber specimens (original photos); Supplementary Materials S3: coordinates and environmental parameters of the smooth scallop sampling during 2020–2023.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.N. and M.N.; Methodology, C.D., G.Ţ., A.F. and M.N.; Investigation, C.D., G.Ţ., A.F. and M.-C.T.; Resources, C.D., A.F., M.N. and V.N.; Data Curation, A.F., M.N. and V.N.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, C.D., G.Ţ., A.F. and M.N.; Writing—Review and Editing, V.N. and M.N.; Supervision, V.N.; Project Administration, V.N. and G.Ţ.; Funding Acquisition, V.N. and G.Ţ. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The scallop sampling was funded by FAO/GFCM under the framework of the project MTF/INT/943/MUL—Baby 33, entitled “GFCM 2030 Strategy Operationalized through Selected Activities for Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture in the Mediterranean and the Black Sea—Rapa Whelk Research Surveys in the Coastal Waters of Romania”. Data analysis, processing and interpretation were funded by the Romanian Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitization, grant number PN23230301, under the framework of the NUCLEU SMART-BLUE Programme.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors kindly thank Alina Spînu and Silvia Oprea for the creation of F. glaber distribution maps.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Bondarev, I.P. Taxonomic Status of Flexopecten glaber ponticus (Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dollfus, 1889)—The Black Sea Flexopecten glaber (Linnaeus, 1758) (Bivalvia: Pectinidae). Mar. Biol. J. 2018, 3, 29–35. [Google Scholar]
  2. WORMS. Flexopecten glaber ponticus in World Register of Marine Species. Available online: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=394257 (accessed on 4 April 2024).
  3. Slynko, Y.V.; Slynko, E.E.; Schurov, S.V.; Ryabushko, V.I. The Black Sea Flexopecten Species-Complex (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Pectinidae): Shell Morphology and 16S rDNA Variation. Ecol. Mont. 2020, 32, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Revkov, N.; Revkova, T. Long-term Variations in the Black Sea Population of Smooth Scallop, Flexopecten glaber (Linnaeus, 1758) (Bivalvia: Pectinidae): A Review. Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2023, 23, TRJFAS22610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Milashevich, K.O. Molluscs of the Black and Azov Seas. Fauna of Russia and Neighboring Countries: Mollusks of the Russian Seas. Part 1; Imperatorskaya Akademiya Nauk: Petrograd, Russia, 1916; 312p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  6. Revkov, N.K. The Black Sea Scallop Flexopecten glaber ponticus Bucquoy, Dautzenberg et Dollfus, 1889. In Red Book of the Republic of Crimea. Animals; Ivanov, S.P., Fateryga, A.V., Eds.; PP ARIAL LLC: Simferopol, Ukraine, 2015; 389p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  7. Revkov, N.K. The Black Sea Scallop Flexopecten glaber (Linnaeus, 1758). In Red Book of Sevastopol; Kaliningrad: Sevastopol, Ukraine, 2018; 347p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  8. Todorova, V.R.; Panayotova, M.D.; Bekova, R.I.; Prodanov, B.K. Recovery of Flexopecten glaber (Linnaeus, 1758) (Bivalvia: Pectinidae) in the Bulgarian Black Sea Waters: Recent Distribution, Population Characteristics and Future Perspectives for Protection and Commercial Utilization. Acta Zool. Bul. 2022, 74, 437–444. [Google Scholar]
  9. Nevesskaya, L.A. Late Quaternary Bivalve Mollusks of the Black Sea, their Systematics and Ecology; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 1965; 391p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  10. Filimon, A. First Record of Flexopecten glaber (Linnaeus, 1758) (Bivalvia: Pectinidae) from the Romanian Black Sea Shelf. Cercet. Mar.-Rech. Mar. 2020, 50, 186–191. [Google Scholar]
  11. Murariu, D.; Maican, S. (Eds.) The Red Book of Invertebrates of Romania; The Publishing House of the Romanian Academy: Bucharest, Romania, 2022; 401p. [Google Scholar]
  12. GFCM BlackSea4Fish. Beam Trawl Surveys for Black Sea Rapa Whelk Guidelines and Methodologies. 21p. Available online: https://gfcmsitestorage.blob.core.windows.net/website/Rapa%20whelk%20Survey%20Protocol.pdf (accessed on 14 March 2024).
  13. Kaykaç, M.H.; Zengin, M.; Özcan-Akpınar, İ.; Tosunoğlu, Z. Structural Characteristics of Towed Fishing Gear Used in the Samsun Coast (Black Sea). Ege J. Fish. Aqua. Sci. 2014, 31, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Carpentieri, P.; Bonanno, A.; Scarcella, G. Technical Guidelines for Scientific Surveys in the Mediterranean and the Black Sea; FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Papers No. 641; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2016; 108p. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gosling, E. Bivalve Molluscs. Biology, Ecology and Culture; Blackwell Publishing Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2003; 456p. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Borcea, I. Note sur les moules et sur les facies ou biocenoses a moules de la region littorale roumaine de la Mer Noire. Ann. Sci. Univ. Jassy. Tome. XIV 1926, 14, 129–139. [Google Scholar]
  17. Antipa, G. Marea Neagră. Vol I. Oceanografia, Bionomia şi Biologie generală a Mării Negre; Imprimeria Națională: Bucharest, Romania, 1941; 313p. (In Romanian) [Google Scholar]
  18. Grossu, A.V. Fauna Republicii Populare Române. Mollusca. Vol. III, Fascicula 2. Gastropoda: Prosobranchia şi Opisthobranchia; Romanian Academy Publishing House: Bucharest, Romania, 1956; 220p. (In Romanian) [Google Scholar]
  19. Grossu, A.V. Catalogue of the Molluscs from Romania. Trav. Mus. Hist. Nat. “G. Antipa” 1993, 33, 291–366. [Google Scholar]
  20. Grossu, A.V.; Cărăuşu, A. Contribution à la connaissance des mollusques de la côtte occidentale de la Mer Noire. Lucrările Stațiunii Zoologice Marine Agigea 1959, 213–222. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lazăr, L. Eutrophication Indicators. In Report on Marine and Coastal Environment State in 2022; Internal Report National Institute for Marine Research and Development “Grigore Antipa”: Constanța, Romania, 2023; pp. 32–35. [Google Scholar]
  22. Marčeta, T.; Da Ros, L.; Marin, M.G.; Codognotto, V.F.; Bressan, M. Overview of the Biology of Flexopecten glaber in the North-Western Adriatic Sea (Italy): A Good Candidate for Future Shellfish Farming Aims? Aquaculture 2016, 462, 80–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Poppe, G.T.; Goto, Y. European Seashells, Vol. I; Verlag Christa Hemmen: Wiesbaden, Germany, 1991; 352p. [Google Scholar]
  24. Bondarev, I.P. New Data on the Morphological Variability of the Shell of Flexopecten glaber (Linnaeus, 1758) (Bivalvia, Pectinidae) in the Black Sea. Ruthenica 2020, 30, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Karageorgis, A.P.; Kourafalou, V.H.; Anagnostou, C.; Tsiaras, K.P.; Raitsos, D.E.; Papadopoulos, V.; Papadopoulos, A. River-induced Particle Distribution in the Northwestern Black Sea (September 2002 and 2004). JGR Oceans 2009, 114, C12003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Revkov, N.K.; Pirkova, A.V.; Timofeev, V.A.; Ladygina, L.V.; Schurov, S.V. Growth and Morphometric Characteristics of the Scallop Flexopecten glaber (Bivalvia: Pectenidae) Reared in Cages off the Coast of Crimea (Black Sea). Ruthenica 2021, 31, 127–138. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Le Pennec, M.; Robert, R.; Avendaño, M. The Importance of Gonadal Development on Larval Production in Pectinids. J. Shellfish Res. 1998, 17, 97–101. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zakhvatkina, K.A. Larvae of Bivalve Mollusks—Bivalvia. Guide Identif. Fauna Black Azov Seas 1972, 3, 250–271. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  29. Pirkova, A.V.; Ladygina, L.V. Meiosis, Embryonic, and Larval Development of the Black Sea Scallop Flexopecten glaber ponticus (Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dollfus, 1889) (Bivalvia, Pectinidae). Mar. Biol. J. 2017, 2, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Prato, E.; Biandolino, F.; Parlapiano, I.; Gianguzza, P.; Fanelli, G. The Recruitment of Scallops (and beyond) by Two Different Artificial Collectors (Gulf of Taranto, Mediterranean Sea). Aquac. Res. 2015, 47, 3319–3331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shumway, S.E.; Parsons, G.J. Scallops: Biology, Ecology, Aquaculture, and Fisheries; Elsevier Science: Oxford, UK, 2016; 1214p. [Google Scholar]
  32. Manthey-Karl, M.; Lehmann, I.; Ostermeyer, U.; Rehbein, H.; Schroder, U. Meat Composition and Quality Assessment of King Scallops (Pecten maximus) and Frozen Atlantic Sea Scallops (Placopecten magellanicus) on a Retail Level. Foods 2015, 4, 524–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Papa, L.; Prato, E.; Biandolino, F.; Parlapiano, I.; Fanelli, G. Strategies for Successful Scallops Spat Collection on Artificial Collectors in the Taranto Gulf (Mediterranean Sea). Water 2021, 13, 462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tsiotisios, D.; Tzovenis, I.; Katselis, G.; Geiger, S.P.; Theodorou, J.A. Spat Settlement of the Smooth Scallop Flexopecten glaber (Linnaeus, 1758) and Variegated Scallop Chlamys varia (Linnaeus, 1758) in Amvrakikos Gulf, Ionian Sea (Northwestern Greece). J. Shellfish Res. 2016, 35, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Vural, P.; Acarli, S. Monthly Variations of Protein and Amino Acid Composition of the Smooth Scallop Flexopecten glaber (Linnaeus 1758) in the Çardak Lagoon (Lapseki-Çanakkale). Cah. Biol. Mar. 2021, 62, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Massa, F.; Aydın, I.; Fezzardi, D.; Akbulut, B.; Atanasoff, A.; Beken, A.T.; Bekh, V.; Buhlak, Y.; Burlachenko, I.; Can, E.; et al. Black Sea Aquaculture: Legacy, Challenges & Future Opportunities. Aquac. Stud. 2021, 21, 181–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Nenciu, M.; Niță, V.; Massa, F.; Fezzardi, D.; Fourdain, L. Let’s Talk Seafood: Romanian Acceptability of Marine Aquaculture at a Glance. Cercet. Mar.-Rech. Mar. 2021, 51, 156–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bourne, N.F. The Potential for Scallop Culture—The Next Millenium. Aquac. Int. 2000, 8, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Guo, X.; Luo, Y. Scallop Culture in China. In Scallops: Biology, Ecology and Aquaculture, 2nd ed.; Shumway, S.E., Parsons, G.J., Eds.; Elsevier: Boston, MA, USA, 2006; pp. 1143–1161. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kosaka, Y.; Ito, H. Japan. In Scallops: Biology, Ecology and Aquaculture, 2nd ed.; Shumway, S.E., Parsons, G.J., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006; pp. 1093–1142. [Google Scholar]
  41. Marčeta, T.; Marin, M.G.; Codognotto, V.F.; Bressan, M. Settlement of Bivalve Spat on Artificial Collectors (Net Bags) in Two Commercial Mussel Parks in the North-Western Adriatic Sea. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Margus, D. Settlement of Pectinid larvae in the Krka River estuary of Yugoslavia. In Scallop Biology and Culture; Shumway, S.E., Sandifer, P.E., Eds.; World Aquaculture Society: Baton Rouge, LA, USA, 1991; pp. 37–42. [Google Scholar]
  43. Mattei, N.; Pellizzato, M. A Population Study on Three Stocks of a Commercial Adriatic Pectinid (Pecten jacobaeus). Fish. Res. 1996, 26, 49–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Iglesias, P.; Louro, A.; Roman, G. Settlement of Queen Scallop Aequipecten opercularis on Artificial Substrates in Aldan, Ria de Pontevedra, Galicia, NW Spain. J. Shellfish Res. 2010, 29, 827–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yigitkurt, S.; Kırtık, A.; Kurtay, E.; Ugur, S.; Durmaz, Y. Spat Efficiency of the Smooth Scallop Flexopecten glaber in the Aegean Sea, Türkiye. Oceanol. Hydrobiol. Stud. 2019, 51, 298–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Vlăsceanu-Mateescu, E.; Lazăr, L. Seawater Temperature. In Report on Marine and Coastal Environment State in 2022; Internal Report National Institute for Marine Research and Development “Grigore Antipa”: Constanța, Romania, 2023; pp. 56–61. [Google Scholar]
  47. Niță, V.; Nenciu, M. Practical Guideline for Shellfish Culture; CD Press Publishing: Bucharest, Romania, 2020; ISBN 978-606-528-510-1. 81p. (In Romanian) [Google Scholar]
  48. Pearce, C.M.; Manuel, J.L.; Gallager, S.M.; Manning, D.A.; O’Dor, R.K.; Bourget, E. Depth and Timing of Settlement of Veligers from Different Populations of Giant Scallop Placopecten magellanicus (Gmelin) in Thermally Stratified Mesocosms. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2004, 312, 187–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Slater, J. Development and Application of Techniques for Prediction of the Scallop Pecten maximus (L.) Spatfall. J. Shellfish Res. 2006, 25, 795–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shcherban, S.A.; Melnik, A.V. Size and Age Characteristics and Phenotypic Peculiarities of Somatic Growth of the Black Sea Mollusk Flexopecten glaber ponticus (Bivalvia, Pectinidae). Biol. Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. 2020, 47, 920–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dao, J.C.; Fleury, P.G.; Barret, J. Scallop Culture in Europe. In Stock Enhancement and Sea Ranching; Howell, B., Moksness, E., Svasand, T., Eds.; Fishing News Books; Blackwell Science Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 1999; pp. 423–435. [Google Scholar]
  52. Andersen, S.; Christophersen, G.; Magnesen, T. Spat Production of the Great Scallop (Pecten maximus): A Roller Coaster. A Review. Can. J. Zool. 2011, 89, 579–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Strand, Ø.; Louro, A.; Duncan, P.F. European Aquaculture. In Scallops: Biology, Ecology, Aquaculture, and Fisheries; Shumway, S.E., Parsons, G.J., Eds.; Elsevier Science: Oxford, UK, 2016; pp. 859–890. [Google Scholar]
  54. Robert, R.; Gerard, A. Bivalve Hatchery Technology: The Current Situation for the Pacific Oyster Crassostrea gigas and the Scallop Pecten maximus in France. Aquat. Living Resour. 1999, 12, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Helm, M.M.; Bourne, N.; Lovatelli, A. Hatchery Culture of Bivalves. A Practical Manual; FAO Fish. Tech. Pap. No. 471; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome, Italy, 2004; 201p. [Google Scholar]
  56. Magnesen, T.; Bergh, Ø.; Christophersen, G. Yields of Great Scallop, Pecten maximus, Larvae in a Commercial Flow-through Rearing System in Norway. Aquacult. Int. 2006, 14, 377–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Comely, C.A. Larval Culture of the Scallop Pecten maximus (L). ICES J. Mar. Sci. 1972, 34, 365–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wang, C.; Croll, R.P. Effects of Sex Steroids on Spawning in the Sea Scallop, Placopecten magellanicus. Aquaculture 2006, 256, 423–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Louro, A.; Chistophersen, G.; Magnesen, T.; Roman, G. Suspension Culture of the Great Scallop Pecten maximus in Galicia, NW Spain: Intermediate Primary Culture of Hatchery Produced Spat. J. Shellfish Res 2005, 24, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Map of the sampling stations along the Romanian coast.
Figure 1. Map of the sampling stations along the Romanian coast.
Sustainability 16 03924 g001
Figure 2. Smooth scallop shell height (H) and length (L) measurement (left); size class division (center); age reading by counting annual rings (right) (original photos).
Figure 2. Smooth scallop shell height (H) and length (L) measurement (left); size class division (center); age reading by counting annual rings (right) (original photos).
Sustainability 16 03924 g002
Figure 3. Sampling stations where live F. glaber individuals were identified during 2020–2023, referenced to habitat type on the Romanian continental shelf.
Figure 3. Sampling stations where live F. glaber individuals were identified during 2020–2023, referenced to habitat type on the Romanian continental shelf.
Sustainability 16 03924 g003
Figure 4. Distribution of F. glaber abundance (left) and biomass (right) along the Romanian coast during 2020–2023.
Figure 4. Distribution of F. glaber abundance (left) and biomass (right) along the Romanian coast during 2020–2023.
Sustainability 16 03924 g004
Figure 5. F. glaber size distribution on length and height classes.
Figure 5. F. glaber size distribution on length and height classes.
Sustainability 16 03924 g005
Figure 6. Length–height relationship of F. glaber specimens at the Romanian coast.
Figure 6. Length–height relationship of F. glaber specimens at the Romanian coast.
Sustainability 16 03924 g006
Figure 7. Age distribution of F. glaber specimens sampled on the Romanian coast.
Figure 7. Age distribution of F. glaber specimens sampled on the Romanian coast.
Sustainability 16 03924 g007
Figure 8. Size at age for F. glaber derived from the application of the von Bertalanffy growth function to a sample of 122 individuals collected in Romanian waters.
Figure 8. Size at age for F. glaber derived from the application of the von Bertalanffy growth function to a sample of 122 individuals collected in Romanian waters.
Sustainability 16 03924 g008
Figure 9. Color morphs identified in F. glaber specimens on the Romanian coast (total number of individuals analyzed N = 122).
Figure 9. Color morphs identified in F. glaber specimens on the Romanian coast (total number of individuals analyzed N = 122).
Sustainability 16 03924 g009
Table 1. Area covered by the beam-trawling surveys (on depth strata).
Table 1. Area covered by the beam-trawling surveys (on depth strata).
Depth StrataArea (sqkm)
5–15 m1418.0
15–25 m1662.4
25–35 m2437.3
Total5517.7
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Danilov, C.; Nenciu, M.; Țiganov, G.; Filimon, A.; Tănase, M.-C.; Niță, V. From Isolated Valves to a Potential Marine Living Resource: History, Documented Distribution and Sustainable Population Enhancement Possibilities of the Smooth Scallop (Flexopecten glaber) on the Romanian Coast. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3924. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16103924

AMA Style

Danilov C, Nenciu M, Țiganov G, Filimon A, Tănase M-C, Niță V. From Isolated Valves to a Potential Marine Living Resource: History, Documented Distribution and Sustainable Population Enhancement Possibilities of the Smooth Scallop (Flexopecten glaber) on the Romanian Coast. Sustainability. 2024; 16(10):3924. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16103924

Chicago/Turabian Style

Danilov, Cristian, Magda Nenciu, George Țiganov, Adrian Filimon, Mihaela-Cosmina Tănase, and Victor Niță. 2024. "From Isolated Valves to a Potential Marine Living Resource: History, Documented Distribution and Sustainable Population Enhancement Possibilities of the Smooth Scallop (Flexopecten glaber) on the Romanian Coast" Sustainability 16, no. 10: 3924. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16103924

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop