Understanding Tsunami Evacuation via a Social Force Model While Considering Stress Levels Using Agent-Based Modelling
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Study Area
3.2. Social Force Model
SFM Parameters
3.3. Experimental Scenarios
3.4. Tsunami Evacuation Stress and Spread
3.5. Model Parameter Setting
3.6. NetLogo Model Setup
4. Simulation Results
4.1. Mean Evacuation Time: Scenario 1 and Scenario 2
4.2. Impact of the Tsunami Evacuation Stress
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Scenario | Agents | Time Frame (s) | No Obstacles | Obstacles |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scenario 1 | 50 | 66.50–78.13 | 89.59% | |
50 | 65.93–77.53 | 57.16% | ||
100 | 66.66–87.83 | 76.24% | ||
100 | 65.37–82.30 | 79.24% | ||
200 | 66.20–99.80 | 63.80% | ||
200 | 65.83–92.87 | 83.60% | ||
Scenario 2 | 50 | 16.83–19.10 | 84.53% | |
50 | 16.76–19.63 | 81.19% | ||
100 | 16.90–20.43 | 77.36% | ||
100 | 16.83–21.43 | 69.99% | ||
200 | 16.70–19.20 | 90.84% | ||
200 | 16.80–21.77 | 58.86% |
References
- ElDesconcierto.cl. Available online: https://www.eldesconcierto.cl/nacional/2019/10/27/multitudinaria-marcha-que-une-vina-y-valparaiso-se-dirige-al-congreso.html (accessed on 28 April 2022).
- Reuters. Available online: https://www.reuters.com/graphics/SOUTHKOREA-STAMPEDE/CHRONOLOGY/zjvqjqmmlpx/index.html (accessed on 30 January 2023).
- Cornes, F.E.; Frank, G.A.; Dorso, C.O. Fear propagation and the evacuation dynamics. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 2019, 95, 112–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, R.F.; Lee, E.W.M.; Yuen, A.C.Y.; Chan, Q.N.; Xie, W.; Shi, M.; Yeoh, G.H. Development of an evacuation model considering the impact of stress variation on evacuees under fire emergency. Saf. Sci. 2021, 138, 105232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cimellaro, G.P.; Ozzello, F.; Vallero, A.; Mahin, S.; Shao, B. Simulating earthquake evacuation using human behavior models. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 2017, 46, 985–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mao, Y.; Yang, S.; Li, Z.; Li, Z. Personality trait and group emotion contagion based crowd simulation for emergency evacuation. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2020, 79, 3077–3104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takabatake, T.; Fujisawa, K.; Esteban, M.; Shibayama, T. Simulated effectiveness of a car evacuation from a tsunami. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2020, 47, 101532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helbing, D.; Farkas, I.; Vicsek, T. Simulating dynamical features of scape panic. Nature 2000, 407, 487–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Treiber, M.; Kanagaraj, V.; Li, H. Social force models for pedestrian traffic–state of the art. Transp. Rev. 2018, 38, 625–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilensky, U.; Rand, W. An Introduction to Agent-Based Modelling: Modelling Natural, Social, and Engineered Complex Systems with Netlogo; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015; pp. 29–40. [Google Scholar]
- Mas, E.; Suppasri, A.; Imamura, F.; Koshimura, S. Agent-based Simulation of the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake/Tsunami Evacuation: An Integrated Model of Tsunami Inundation and Evacuation. J. Nat. Disaster Sci. 2012, 34, 41–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solís, I.A.; Gazmuri, P. Evaluation of the risk and the evacuation policy in the case of a tsunami in the city of Iquique, Chile. Nat. Hazards 2017, 88, 503–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.S.; Sambuaga, R.D.; Flores, C. Effects of Tsunami Shelters in Pandeglang, Banten, Indonesia, Based on Agent-Based Modelling: A Case Study of the 2018 Anak Krakatoa Volcanic Tsunami. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helbing, D.; Molnár, P. Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Phys. Rev. E 1995, 51, 4282–4286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Helbing, D.; Farkas, I.J.; Molnar, P.; Vicsek, T. Simulation of pedestrian crowds in normal and evacuation situations. In Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics; Schreckenberg, M., Sharma, S.D., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2002; pp. 21–58. [Google Scholar]
- Helbing, D.; Buzna, L.; Johansson, A.; Werner, T. Self-Organised Pedestrian Crowd Dynamics: Experiments, simulations, and Design Solutions. Transp. Sci. 2005, 39, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siyam, N.; Alqaryouti, O.; Abdallah, S. Research Issues in Agent-Based Simulation for Pedestrians Evacuation. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 134435–134455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahal, F.L.; Péroche, M. Complementary methods to plan pedestrian evacuation of the French Riviera’s beaches in case of tsunami threat: Graph- and multiagent-based modelling. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2013, 13, 1735–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Callejas, E.; Inostrosa-Psijas, A.; Moreno, F.; Oyarzun, M.; Carvajal-Schiaffino, R. COVID-19 Transmission During a Tsunami Evacuation in a Lockdown City. In Proceedings of the 39th International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society (SCCC), Coquimbo, Chile, 16–20 November 2020; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Astudillo, G.; Gil-Costa, V.; Marin, M. Efficient simulation of natural hazard evacuation for seacoast cities. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022, 81, 103300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- León, J.; Castro, S.; Mokrani, C.; Gubler, A. Tsunami evacuation analysis in the urban built environment: A multiscale perspective through two modelling approaches in Viña del Mar, Chile, Coast. Eng. J. 2020, 62, 389–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- León, J.; Catalán, P.A.; Gubler, A. Assessment of Top-Down Design of Tsunami Evacuation Strategies Based on Drill and Modelled Data. Front. Earth Sci. 2021, 9, 744193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- León, J.; March, A. Urban morphology as a tool for supporting tsunami rapid resilience: A case study of Talcahuano, Chile. Habitat Int. 2015, 43, 250–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flores, C.; Lee, H.S.; Mas, E.; Salar, J. Tsunami evacuation in a massive crowd event using an agent-based model. In Proceedings of the 37th Conference on Coastal Engineering, Sydney, Australia, 4–9 December 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lomnitz, C. Major Earthquakes of Chile: A Historical Survey, 1535–1960. Seismol. Res. Lett. 2004, 75, 368–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madariaga, R.; Métois, M.; Vigny, C.; Campos, J. Central Chile Finally, Breaks. Science 2010, 328, 181–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- CSN. National Seismological Centre University of Chile. Available online: https://www.sismologia.cl/informacion/grandes-terremotos.html (accessed on 27 February 2022).
- Carvajal, M.; Cisternas, M.; Catalán, P.A. Source of the 1730 Chilean earthquake from historical records: Implications for the future tsunami hazard on the coast of Metropolitan Chile. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 2017, 122, 3648–3660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gorrini, A.; Crociani, L.; Vizzari, G.; Bandini, S. Stress estimation in pedestrian crowds: Experimental data and simulations results. Web Intell. 2019, 17, 85–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Challenger, W.; Clegg, W.C.; Robinson, A.M. Understanding Crowd Behaviours: Guidance and Lessons Identified; UK Cabinet Office: London, UK, 2009; pp. 11–13. [Google Scholar]
- Johansson, A.; Helbing, D.; Shukla, P.K. Specification of the social force pedestrian model by evolutionary adjustment to video tracking data. Adv. Complex Syst. 2007, 10, 271–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bassoli, E.; Vincenzi, L. Parameter Calibration of a Social Force Model for the Crowd-Induced Vibrations of Footbridges. Front. Built Environ. 2021, 7, 656799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sticco, I.M.; Frank, G.A.; Dorso, C.O. Social Force Model parameter testing and optimisation using a high stress real-life situation. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 2021, 561, 125299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chraibi, M. Oscillating behavior within the social force model. arXiv 2014, arXiv:1412.1133. [Google Scholar]
- Kretz, T. On Oscillations in the Social Force Model. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 2015, 438, 272–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, P.; Wang, X. Social Force in Pedestrian Crowd. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2109.12597. [Google Scholar]
- Wilensky, U. NetLogo; Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modelling, Northwestern University: Evanston, IL, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Mas, E.; Koshimura, S.; Imamura, F.; Suppasri, A.; Muhari, A.; Adriano, B. Recent Advances in Agent-Based Tsunami Evacuation Simulations: Case Studies in Indonesia, Thailand, Japan and Peru. Pure Appl. Geophys. 2015, 172, 3409–3424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mas, E.; Adriano, B.; Koshimura, S. An Integrated Simulation of Tsunami Hazard and Human Evacuation in La Punta, Peru. J. Disaster Res. 2013, 8, 285–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wood, N.J.; Schmidtlein, M.C. Community variations in population exposure to near-field tsunami hazards as a function of pedestrian travel time to safety. Nat. Hazards 2013, 65, 1603–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fraser, S.A.; Wood, N.J.; Johnston, D.M.; Leonard, G.S.; Greening, P.D.; Rossetto, T. Variable population exposure and distributed travel speeds in least-cost tsunami evacuation modelling. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2014, 14, 2975–2991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haghani, M.; Cristiani, E.; Bode, N.W.F.; Boltes, M.; Corbetta, A. Panic, Irrationality, and Herding: Three Ambiguous Terms in Crowd Dynamics Research. J. Adv. Transp. 2019, 2019, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- YouTube. Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HG1NkBo18uc&ab_channel=ClaudioFredesOsses (accessed on 28 February 2023).
- Castellucci, H.I.; Viviani, C.A.; Molenbroek, J.F.M.; Arezes, P.M.; Martínez, M.; Aparici, V.; Bragança, S. Anthropometric characteristics of Chilean workers for ergonomic and design purposes. Ergonomics 2019, 62, 459–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, X.; Wang, J. An Entropy-Based Combined Behavior Model for Crowd Evacuation. Entropy 2022, 24, 1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moussaïd, M.; Helbing, D.; Theraulaz, G. How simple rules determine pedestrian behavior and crowd disasters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 6884–6888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johansson, A.; Helbing, D.; Al-Abideen, H.Z.; Al-Bosta, S. From crowd dynamics to crowd safety: A video-based analysis. Adv. Complex Syst. 2008, 11, 497–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsurushima, A. Tunnel Vision Hypothesis: Cognitive Factor Affecting Crowd Evacuation Decisions. SN Comput. Sci. 2022, 3, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Reference | Ai [m/s2] | Bi [m] | Aiw [m/s2] | Biw [m] | τ [s] | vi [m/s] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Helbing et al. [8] | 27 | 0.08 | 27 | 0.08 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
Helbing et al. [16] | 3 | 0.2 | 5 | 0.1 | 1 | Normal distribution. Mean = 1.3 SD 0.3 |
Parameter | Scenario 1 | Scenario 2 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Symbol | Unit | |||
Ai | m/s2 | 3 | ||
Bi | m | 0.2 | ||
Aiw, Aiobs | m/s2 | 40 | ||
Biw, Biobs | m | 0.2 | ||
τ | s | 1 | 0.6 | |
m/s | 0.6 + 0.1 | 1 | ||
vdes | m/s | 0.66 | Sigmoid | |
ri | m | Normal distribution. Mean = 0.466, SD 0.031 | ||
mass | kg | 78.45 | ||
kg/s2 | 1.2 × 105 | |||
FOV_radius | m | 3 | 1 | |
rj_radius | m | 3 | 1 | |
FOV_obs | m | 3 | 1 | |
FOV_walls | m | 3 | 1 | |
k | - | 2 | ||
spread_radius | m | - | >1 |
Agents | No Obstacles | Obstacles | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
50 | 92.70 | 98.53 | 6.29% |
100 | 103.67 | 108.67 | 4.82% |
200 | 123.33 | 129.23 | 4.78% |
Agents | No Obstacles | Obstacles | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
50 | 21.53 | 23.63 | 9.75% |
100 | 24.40 | 31.43 | 28.83% |
200 | 30.77 | 31.40 | 2.06% |
Agents | No Obstacles | Obstacles | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
50 | 49.73 | 50.60 | 1.74% |
100 | 53.77 | 53.37 | −0.74% |
200 | 60.33 | 63.70 | 5.58% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Flores, C.; Lee, H.S.; Mas, E. Understanding Tsunami Evacuation via a Social Force Model While Considering Stress Levels Using Agent-Based Modelling. Sustainability 2024, 16, 4307. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104307
Flores C, Lee HS, Mas E. Understanding Tsunami Evacuation via a Social Force Model While Considering Stress Levels Using Agent-Based Modelling. Sustainability. 2024; 16(10):4307. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104307
Chicago/Turabian StyleFlores, Constanza, Han Soo Lee, and Erick Mas. 2024. "Understanding Tsunami Evacuation via a Social Force Model While Considering Stress Levels Using Agent-Based Modelling" Sustainability 16, no. 10: 4307. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104307