Next Article in Journal
Altered Expression of PDE4 Genes in Schizophrenia: Insights from a Brain and Blood Sample Meta-Analysis and iPSC-Derived Neurons
Previous Article in Journal
Is CYP2C Haplotype Relevant for Efficacy and Bleeding Risk in Clopidogrel-Treated Patients?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Transcriptomic Analysis of Green Leaf Plants and White–Green Leaf Mutants in Haworthia cooperi var. pilifera

College of Horticulture, Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University, Xinyang 464000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this paper.
Genes 2024, 15(5), 608; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15050608
Submission received: 13 April 2024 / Revised: 5 May 2024 / Accepted: 8 May 2024 / Published: 10 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

:
Haworthia cooperi var. pilifera is a succulent plant with ornamental value. The white–green leaf mutant (wl) showed a significant difference in leaf color from the wild-type plant (WT). In this study, we integrated the transcriptomes of wl and WT plants to screen differentially expressed genes related to leaf color variation. The results of transcriptome analysis showed that 84,163 unigenes were obtained after de novo assembly and the NR database annotated the largest number of unigenes, which accounted for 57.13%, followed by NT (43.02%), GO (39.84%), Swiss-Prot (39.25%), KEGG (36.06%), and COG (24.88%). Our finding showed that 2586 genes were differentially expressed in the two samples, including 1996 down-regulated genes and 590 up-regulated genes. GO analysis predicted that these differentially expressed genes (DEGs) participate in 12 cellular components, 20 biological processes, and 13 molecular function terms and KEGG analysis showed that metabolic pathways, plant–pathogen interaction, glycerophospholipid metabolism, endocytosis, plant hormone signal transduction, and ether lipid metabolism were enriched among all identified pathways. Through functional enrichment analysis of DEGs, we found that they were involved in chloroplast division and the biosynthesis of plant pigments, including chlorophyll, carotenoids, anthocyanin, and transcription factor families, which might be related to the formation mechanism of leaf color. Taken together, these results present insights into the difference in gene expression characteristics in leaves between WT and wl mutants and provide a new insight for breeding colorful leaf phenotypes in succulent plants.

1. Introduction

Haworthia, which is a succulent plant having transparent leaves, is widely grown and valued commercially as ornamentals [1,2]. In the past few decades, researchers have focused on tissue culture [3], new phenolics separation [4], propagation methods [5], DNA fingerprinting, and the botanical study [6] of plants from Haworthia species. Genomic information about this species is not yet available. Haworthia cooperi var. pilifera, a succulent plant from South Africa, is quite popular in China and belongs to the genus Haworthia and the family Liliaceae. Previously, during the breeding of H. cooperi var. pilifera, a white–green leaf mutant (wl) was obtained. The wl mutant displayed a distinct white–green phenotype, which is quite different from the wild-type plant (WT) with a green leaf and it is a very valuable resource because a white–green leaf is one of the most special traits in succulent plants.
Leaf color is a significant ornamental trait of plants and the formation mechanism of leaf color is very complex [7,8,9,10,11,12]. The color of plant leaves is mainly determined by the categories and content of pigments, such as chlorophyll, carotenoids, and anthocyanins [13,14]. Previous studies found that the molecular mechanism of plant leaf color involves many different genes [15,16]. Genes for chloroplast development [17] and division [18], chlorophyll biosynthesis [19], carotenoid biosynthesis, and anthocyanin synthesis [20,21,22] have been identified in many plants, as well as transcription factors [23,24,25] associated with leaf color.
Transcriptome sequencing is a new technique to study the expression level of genes, which contributes to molecular biology research in both model and nonmodel plants and is not dependent on an existing genomic sequence. Previous transcriptome sequencing analyses related to leaf color have focused on specific plants, such as birch (Betula platyphylla × B. pendula) [26], tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) [27], and Acer palmatum Thunb. (maple) [28]. Transcriptome analysis of green leaves and red–purple leaves from Fraxinus angustifolia showed that there were nine differentially expressed genes related to anthocyanins [29]. However, research on the change in leaf color has been limited, especially in succulent plants.
In this study, transcriptome sequencing analysis was performed on the leaves of the white–green leaf mutant (wl) and green leaf plant (WT) of H. cooperi var. pilifera to characterize the gene expression and then to screen out the DEGs that may be related to the metabolic process of leaf color expression. The results provide a theoretical basis for elucidating the mechanism of leaf color formation, which can be used in succulent plant breeding to obtain better ornamental phenotype accessions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

H. cooperi var. pilifera, a popular succulent cultivar, was used in this experiment. The seedlings with green leaf (WT)and white–green leaf (wl) were grown on MS medium with a thermoperiod of 25 °C (day) and 22 °C (night) and a photoperiod of 16 h. The leaves from healthy plants were harvested and stored at −80 °C for subsequent RNA-Seq. Three biological replicates were performed for each group.

2.2. RNA Extraction, mRNA-seq Library Construction, and Sequencing

The total RNA of the two groups (WT and wl) was extracted using a Plant RNA Kit (TaKaRa, Tokyo, Japan) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The quality and quantity of the total RNA were assessed at absorbance ratios of OD260/280 and OD260/230 and with 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. The replicates were mixed to produce 2 pooled samples for the sequencing analysis. After mRNA-seq libraries were generated using the VAHTS mRNA-seq v2 Library Prep Kit for Illumina (Vazyme, NR601, Nanjing, China) following the manufacturer’s recommendations and the library concentration was measured using the Qubit® RNA Assay Kit in Qubit® 3.0 for preliminary quantification. The insert size was assessed using the Agilent Bioanalysis 2100 system and found to be consistent with expectations; then, the qualified insert size was accurately quantified using qPCR with the StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR system (ABI, Norwalk, CT, USA). The clustering of the index-coded samples was performed on a cBot Cluster Generation System (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After cluster generation, the libraries were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq X Ten platform with the 150 bp paired-end module.

2.3. Sequence Analysis, De Novo Assembly, and Annotation

The raw reads were cleaned by removing adaptor sequences, low-quality sequences (reads with ambiguous bases ‘N’), and reads with Q-value < 20 bases. Then, we discarded reads with lengths less than 150 bp. Next, the remaining high-quality reads were de novo assembled into transcripts using the Trinity pipeline with the default settings. Then, the contigs were connected into transcript sequences to recover full-length transcripts across a broad range of expression levels, with the redundant duplicated reads removed. The longest transcript from the potential assembled alternative splicing transcript components was selected as the unigene of each set for subsequent analysis.
The unigenes were compared with public databases and functional annotations were made based on similarity. The data used for comparison included the NCBI nonredundant proteins (NCBI NR), Gene Ontology (GO), Clusters of Orthologous Genes (COG), and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) databases.

2.4. Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs)

The DEGs in the WT vs. wl comparison were defined using an FDR (false discovery rate) of ≤0.05 and an absolute value of log2 abundance ratio of ≥1 (twofold change). Then, the identified DEGs were subjected to GO functional analysis and KEGG pathway analysis.

3. Results

3.1. Sequencing and De Novo Assembly

The main characteristics of the two RNA-seq libraries are summarized in Table 1. The number of raw reads per library ranged from ~42.1 to ~47.1 million. After filtering low-quality reads containing adaptors and low-quality sequences (defined as containing <90% confidently identified bases), we obtained 40,952,422 and 45,235,250 clean reads, which corresponded to 6,142,863,400 and 6,785,287,500 base pairs, respectively. The proportion of clean reads from each library was >96.04%. The transcriptomes of both the WT and wl samples were represented by at least four million clean reads each, which allowed for quantitative analysis of gene transcription. The raw sequencing data were submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database with accession number SUB8069563.
Through de novo assembly, 84,163 unigenes with a mean length of 1013 bp were obtained. The length of the assembled unigenes ranged from 200 to 15,563 bp with an N50 length of 1668 bp (Table S1). The sequence length distribution of these unigenes is shown in Figure 1. Most unigenes were from 200–300 bp, while the longest unigene was 15,563 bp.

3.2. Gene Annotation and Functional Calculation

Alignment between the unigenes and public databases such as NR, NT, Swiss-Prot, KEGG, Clusters of Orthologous Genes (COG), and GO was performed and the results with the best alignment were used to determine the sequence direction of each unigene. The number and percentage of unigenes aligned to each database are shown in Table S2. A total of 48,085 (57.13%), 36,210 (43.02%), 33,036 (39.25%), 30,353 (36.06%), 20,941 (24.88%), and 33,527 (39.84%) unigenes had significant hits in NR, NT, Swiss-Prot, KEGG, COG, and GO, respectively.
For the E-value distribution, 58.26% of the unigenes had confidence levels of at least 1 × 10−45 (Figure 2A). A total of 53.21% had alignment identities greater than 60% with existing proteins in the NR database (Figure 2B). To gain insight into the percentage of the 47,851 unigenes that showed similarity to genes in other plant species, we analyzed the species distribution of Haworthia cooperi var. pilifera in the NR database, in which 65.51% of the genes were annotated as having the highest similarity to genes from 8 species, the largest number among the databases examined (Figure 3). Among the various plants, the 12,378 unigenes had the highest number of unigenes with the greatest similarity to Vitis vinifera (25.87%), 8.93% to Oryza sativa Japonica Group, 5.83% to Prunuis persca, 5.73% to Ricinus communis, and 5.04% to Brachypodium distachyon.
The GO analysis allowed the functional classification of 33,527 unigenes. As shown in Figure 4, the unigenes could be categorized into 56 functional groups on the terms of sequence homology. GO terms are grouped into three categories: biological process, cellular component and molecular function. In the biological process category, the largest number of unigenes were associated with ‘cellular process’ (59.55%), followed by ‘metabolic process’ (55.79%) and ‘single-organism process’ (33.67%). On the other hand, only a few genes were associated with ‘biological adhesion’ (0.12%), ‘locomotion’ (0.10%), and ‘cell killing’ (0.02%). The major cellular component terms in the GO classification were ‘cell’, ‘cell part’ and ‘organelle’, while the predominant molecular function terms were ‘binding’ and ‘catalytic activity’.
We further classified the functions of the unigenes by using the COG database. A total of 20,941 unigenes were assigned to 25 specific COG categories, which are listed in Figure 5. The largest group was ‘general function prediction only’ with 7834 unigenes (37.41%), followed by ‘transcription’ with 6253 unigenes (29.86%), ‘replication, recombination, and repair’ with 4778 unigenes (22.82%), ‘posttranslational modification, protein turnover, and chaperones’ with 3888 unigenes (18.57%), and ‘signal transduction mechanisms’ with 3872 unigenes (18.49%). ‘Function unknown’ contained 3529 unigenes (16.85%), ‘translation, ribosomal structure, and biogenesis’ contained 3428 unigenes (16.37%), ‘cell cycle control, cell division, and chromosome partitioning’ contained 3197 unigenes (15.27%), ‘carbohydrate transport and metabolism’ contained 3150 unigenes (15.04%), and ‘cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis’ contained 2712 unigenes (12.95%). The categories ‘nuclear structure’ and ‘extracellular structures’ represented the smallest groups.
KEGG was used as a higher-order functional annotation to understand the metabolic and biological pathways and functions of the gene products in the cells. We annotated and mapped 128 KEGG pathways for 30,353 unigenes (Figure 6). These pathways were distributed in five main categories: metabolism (97.33%), genetic information processing (35.37%), organismal systems (6.94%), cellular processes (9.22%), and environmental information processing (6.17%). The KEGG pathway analysis showed that the unigenes were mainly located in metabolic pathways (ko01100, 8107 unigenes), biosynthesis of secondary metabolites (ko01110, 3183 unigenes), endocytosis (ko04144, 2079 unigenes), and glycerophospholipid metabolism (ko00564, 2059 unigenes).

3.3. Analysis of Potential DEGs

Based on expression abundance (FPKM values), the gene expression levels of the two samples are shown in Figure 7. A total of 2586 genes were found to be differentially expressed in wl compared with WT using a threshold of ratio change ≥2 and false discovery rate (FDR) ≤0.05. A higher number of down-regulated than up-regulated genes was observed in the wl sample. In total, 590 DEGs showed up-regulated expression, while 1996 DEGs were down-regulated (Table S3).

3.4. GO and KEGG Enrichment Analyses of DEGs

GO annotation was used to determine the functions of the DEGs. The DEGs were divided into 45 functional terms in three categories: biological process, cellular component, and molecular function (Figure 8). Cell (846 DEGs) was the most common term, followed by cell part (842), cellular process (764), catalytic activity (735), metabolic process (727), single-organism process (609), organelle (609), binding (584), and membrane (541). The GO terms in all three ontologies with the highest enrichment of DEGs are shown in Table 2.
Further classifications under each category are also listed. To understand the biological functions of the DEGs, we also mapped these genes to pathways in the KEGG database. The DEGs were functionally assigned to 109 KEGG pathways and the 20 pathways most enriched in DEGs are shown in Figure 9. Among the mapped pathways, 24 pathways were significantly enriched (p-value ≤ 0.01) (Table S4). ‘Metabolic pathways’ was the most enriched pathway (420 DEGs), followed by ‘plant–pathogen interaction’ (149), ‘glycerophospholipid metabolism’ (127), ‘endocytosis’ (125), ‘plant hormone signal transduction’ (124), and ‘ether lipid metabolism’ (117).

4. Discussion

4.1. Identification of DEGs Involved in Chloroplast Division

Leaf-color mutants are affected by chloroplast development and division, which can directly or indirectly affect chloroplast structure and number and other metabolic processes performed by these complex macromolecular machines, which have components positioned on both the inner and outer envelope surfaces [18]. Many proteins, such as FtsZ1, tubulin-like protein, MinD, and ARTEMIS, are involved in chloroplast division [30,31,32,33,34,35]. In this process, tubulin-like proteins localize to a ring at the site of plastid constriction, which drives chloroplast division. In our study, we found that six unigenes of seven DEGs encoding tubulin proteins were down-regulated in the white–green leaf mutant, including Unigene5427_All, CL2099.Contig19_All, CL2099.Contig8_All, CL2099.Contig6_All, Unigene8230_All, and CL2099.Contig4_All (Table S5); one gene (Unigene1981_All) encoding an α-tubulin suppressor was up-regulated, suggesting that these genes might be associated with chloroplast division and might therefore affect leaf color.

4.2. Identification of DEGs Involved in Plant Pigment Synthesis

Plant leaf color is related to the types and contents of pigments in the cells. Enzymes are needed for the synthesis of plant pigments; for example, Mg-chelatase and protoporphyrinogen oxidase are involved in chlorophyll synthesis, zeta-carotene desaturase and zeaxanthin epoxidase in carotenoid synthesis, and chalcone synthase in anthocyanin synthesis.
In our work, one gene (CL11028.Contig1_All) encoding magnesium chelatase was significantly down-regulated, while Unigene17322_All, encoding protoporphyrinogen oxidase, was up-regulated, as was one gene encoding the probable chlorophyll (ide) b reductase NYC1. Magnesium chelatase is a heterotrimeric enzyme complex that catalyzes a key regulatory and enzymatic reaction in chlorophyll biosynthesis [36], protoporphyrinogen oxidase is a common enzyme in chlorophyll biosynthesis [20], and chlorophyll b reductase NYC1 and NOL (NYC-like) form the chlorophyll b reductase complex, which is necessary to catalyze the first step of chlorophyll b degradation [37].
Seven zeta-carotene desaturase genes (three up-regulated and four down-regulated), three zeaxanthin epoxidase genes (one up-regulated and two down-regulated), and one 15-cis-zeta-carotene isomerase gene (up-regulated) were differentially expressed. Zeta-carotene desaturase is a key enzyme that controls β-carotene production upstream of carotenoid biosynthesis [21]. Zeaxanthin epoxidase is an important enzyme that converts zeaxanthin to violaxanthin [38]. 15-Cis-zeta-carotene isomerase can isomerize 9,15,9′-tri-cis-zeta-carotene into 9,9′-di-cis-zeta-carotene, which is the last identified gene in the plant carotenoid biosynthetic pathway [39].
Five genes predicted to encode naringenin-chalcone synthase were down-regulated and Unigene26705_All was significantly decreased (|log2Ratio| > 10). Chalcone synthase is the first key enzyme and rate-limiting enzyme in flavonoid synthesis [40].
Four genes encoding flavonoid 3′-monooxygenase were down-regulated in the white–green leaf mutant, including CL3495.Contig2_All, Unigene632_All, Unigene20726_All, and CL3495.Contig1_All. Flavonoid 3′-monooxygenase is responsible for one reaction in flavonoid compound biosynthesis [41].
We identified 15 differentially expressed cytochrome P450 genes, of which 3 genes were up-regulated and 12 down-regulated. Cytochrome P450 is a monooxygenase encoded by a supergene family that is involved in the synthesis of many terpenoids in plants, including carotenoids [42]. In addition, we found six genes encoding chloroplast chlorophyll a/b-binding protein, all of which were down-regulated. Chlorophyll a/b-binding protein can enhance photosynthesis in the chloroplasts of plants [43].

4.3. Identification of DEGs Involved in Anthocyanin Transport

In our study, 22 genes encoding ABC (ATP binding cassette) transporter, 5 genes encoding MATE (multidrug and toxic compound extrusion), and 8 genes encoding GST (glutathione S-transferase) were found among the DEGs. All three of these transporter types can transport anthocyanin in plants by various pathways. In this work, four genes encoding ABC transporters were up-regulated in wl, while the others were down-regulated. The up-regulated genes were CL5908.Contig1_All, Unigene14496_All, CL1076.Contig2_All, and CL9731.Contig1_All, as shown in Table S5. Both the genes encoding MATE and those encoding GST were down-regulated in wl compared to WT. These results suggested that the transporters might transport plant pigments by complex molecular mechanisms.

4.4. Identification of DEGs Encoding Transcription Factors Involved in Leaf Color

Transcription factors are involved in chloroplast development through upstream regulation of gene expression pertaining to chlorophyll, anthocyanin, and carotenoid biosynthesis in plants, such as the MYB, bHLH, and WD40 transcription factor families. MYB transcription factors, which regulate the expression of key enzymes in the early flavonoid biosynthetic pathway, enhance the synthesis and accumulation of proanthocyanidins in plants [44]. In tobacco, overexpression of LeAN2, which encodes an anthocyanin-associated R2R3-MYB transcription factor, induced the expression of several anthocyanin biosynthetic genes and the content of anthocyanin was markedly higher in the transgenic tobacco than in wild-type plants [33]. Here, 13 MYB transcription factors were identified; 1 was up-regulated and the others were down-regulated. Recent studies have revealed that bHLH transcription factors also regulate chlorophyll biosynthesis. For example, PIF1 negatively regulates chlorophyll biosynthesis, while pif1 mutant seedlings accumulate excess free protochlorophyllide when grown in the dark, with consequent lethal bleaching upon exposure to light [14]. In this study, we found 10 bHLH family genes that were down-regulated in wl, as shown in Table S5. WD40 transcription factors regulate the synthesis and accumulation of anthocyanin by affecting the expression of anthocyanin structural genes [45]. TTG1, a WD-repeat (WDR) protein, acts as an important regulator of enzymes controlling proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in plants [25]. In the present study, five genes encoding WD40 were down-regulated, while one was up-regulated. All these results suggested that transcription factors might constitute a complex network regulating leaf color in plants.

5. Conclusions

Though the high-throughput transcriptome sequencing for the leaves of green leaf plant and white–green leaf plant from H. cooperi var. pilifera, we obtained 40,952,422 and 45,235,250 clean reads, which corresponded to 6,142,863,400 and 6,785,287,500 base pairs, respectively. In total, 84,163 unigenes with a mean length of 1013 bp were obtained after de novo assembly. A total of 48,085 (57.13%), 36,210 (43.02%), 33,036 (39.25%), 30,353 (36.06%), 20,941 (24.88%), and 33,527 (39.84%) unigenes were annotated in NR, NT, Swiss-Prot, KEGG, COG, and GO, respectively. There were 2586 DEGs between the two samples, with 590 up-regulated and 1996 down-regulated. Transcriptome data showed that DEGs had significant expression differences in the two samples, which are associated with chloroplast division and the biosynthesis of plant pigments, such as chlorophyll, carotenoids, anthocyanin, and transcription factor families. We predicted that they were the key structural genes and the main factors of the molecular regulation mechanism of the leaf color of H. cooperi var. pilifera.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes15050608/s1, Table S1: Statistics of de novo assembly; Table S2: Annotation of unigenes with different public database; Table S3: DEGs of the two groups; Table S4: KEGG annotation of DEGs (p value≤ 0.01); Table S5: The differentially expressed genes related to plant pigment in leaf color mutant compared to control plant of Haworthia cooperi var. pilifera.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.L. and M.R.; validation and formal analysis, M.R., J.C., J.Y., S.L., and Q.Z., writing—original draft, P.L. and M.R.; review and editing and supervision, M.R. and Z.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 32002083), the Foundation of Central Laboratory of Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University (Grant No. FCL202002), and the Program for Innovative Research Team of Horticultural Plant Resources and Utilization in Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University (XNKJTD-012).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to anonymous reviewers and editors for their helpful comments and suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Campbell, G.; Bank, H.V.D.; Ben-Erik, V.W. Genetic variation in Haworthia pumila and H. herbacea. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1995, 23, 793–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hiratsu, K.; Mitsuda, N.; Matsui, K.; Ohme-Takagi, M. Identification of the minimal repression domain of superman shows that the DLELRL hexapeptide is both necessary and sufficient for repression of transcription in Arabidopsis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004, 321, 172–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ogihara, Y. Tissue culture in Haworthia. V. Characterization of chromosomal changes in cultured callus cells. Jpn. J. Genet. 1982, 57, 499–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yamasaki, F.; Machida, S.; Nakara, A.; Nugroho, A.E.; Hirasawa, Y.; Kaneda, T.; Shirota, O.; Hagane, N.; Sugizaki, T.; Morita, H. Haworforbins A-C, new phenolics from Haworthia cymbiformis. J. Nat. Med. 2013, 67, 212–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, H.X.; Gan, Y.H.; Wan, X.F. Comparative study on different propagation methods of succulent Haworthia cooperi var. Picturata. South. Hortic. 2019, 30, 8–10. [Google Scholar]
  6. Shamy, A.; Hawary, S.E.; Fahmy, H.; Ezzat, S. Comparative DNA fingerprinting and botanical study of certain haworthia and gasteria species growing in egypt. Pharmacogn. J. 2019, 11, 388–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Meier, S.; Tzfadia, O.; Vallabhaneni, R.; Gehring, C.; Wurtzel, E.T. A transcriptional analysis of carotenoid, chlorophyll and plastidial isoprenoid biosynthesis genes during development and osmotic stress responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Syst. Biol. 2011, 5, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ki-Hong, J.; Junghe, H.; Choong-Hwan, R.; Youngju, C.; Yong-Yoon, C.; Akio, M.; Hirohiko, H.; An, G. Characterization of a rice chlorophyll-deficient mutant using the T-DNA gene-trap system. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003, 44, 463–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lin, N.; Gao, Y.M.; Zhou, Q.Y.; Ping, X.K.; Li, J.N.; Liu, L.Z.; Yin, J.M. Genetic mapping and physiological analysis of chlorophyll-deficient mutant in Brassica napus L. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Guan, H.Y.; Xu, X.B.; He, C.M.; Liu, C.X.; Liu, Q.; Dong, R.; Liu, T.S.; Wang, L.M. Fine mapping and candidate gene analysis of the leaf-color gene ygl-1 in Maize. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0153962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Han, J.; Ma, Z.G.; Chen, L.J.; Wang, Z.Z.; Wang, C.; Wang, L.N.; Cao, C.H.; Ren, Z.H.; Cao, C.X. Morphological characterization and integrated transcriptome and proteome analysis of Organ Development Defective 1 (odd1) mutant in Cucumis sativus L. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sun, T.T.; Zhang, J.K.; Zhang, Q.; Li, X.L.; Li, M.J.; Yang, Y.Z.; Zhou, J.; Wei, Q.P.; Zhou, B.B. Methylome and transcriptome analyses of three different degrees of albinism in apple seedlings. BMC Genom. 2022, 23, 310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yu, X.N.; Zhang, Q.X. Review of researches on leaf color changing of color-leafed plants. Acta Hortic. Sin. 2000, 27, 533–538. [Google Scholar]
  14. He, B.; Liu, L.L.; Zhang, W.W.; Wan, J.M. Plant leaf color mutants. Plant Physiol. Commun. 2006, 42, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  15. Deng, X.J.; Zhang, H.Q.; Wang, Y.; He, F.; Liu, J.L.; Xiao, X.; Shu, Z.F.; Li, W.; Wang, G.H.; Wang, G.L. Mapped clone and functional analysis of leaf-color gene Ygl7 in a rice hybrid (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica). PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e99564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chen, Z.; Lu, X.Y.; Xuan, Y.; Tang, F.; Wang, J.J.; Shi, D.; Fu, S.L.; Ren, J. Transcriptome analysis based on a combination of sequencing platforms provides insights into leaf pigmentation in Acer rubrum. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Waters, M.T.; Wang, P.; Korkaric, M.; Capper, R.G.; Saunders, N.J.; Langdale, J.A. GLK transcription factors coordinate expression of the photosynthetic apparatus in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 1109–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gao, H.B.; Kadirjan-Kalbach, D.; Froehlich, J.E.; Osteryoung, K.W. ARC5, a cytosolic dynamin-like protein from plants, is part of the chloroplast division machinery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 4328–4333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zhang, H.T.; Li, J.J.; Yoo, J.H.; Yoo, S.C.; Cho, S.H.; Koh, H.J.; Seo, H.S.; Paek, N.C. Rice chlorina-1 and chlorina-9 encode ChlD and ChlI subunits of Mg-chelatase, a key enzyme for chlorophyll synthesis and chloroplast development. Plant Mol. Biol. 2006, 62, 325–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Molina, A.; Volrath, S.; Guyer, D.; Maleck, K.; Ward, E. Inhibition of protoporphyrinogen oxidase expression in Arabidopsis causes a lesion-mimic phenotype that induces systemic acquired resistance. Plant J. 2010, 17, 667–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wong, J.C.; Lambert, R.J.; Wurtzel, E.T.; Rocheford, T.R. QTL and candidate genes phytoene synthase and ζ-carotene desaturase associated with the accumulation of carotenoids in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2004, 108, 349–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ferrer, J.L.; Jez, J.M.; Bowman, M.E.; Dixon, R.A.; Noel, J.P. Structure of chalcone synthase and the molecular basis of plant polyketide biosynthesis. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1999, 6, 775–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Meng, X.; Yin, B.; Feng, H.L.; Zhang, S.; Liang, X.Q. Overexpression of R2R3-MYB gene leads to accumulation of anthocyanin and enhanced resistance to chilling and oxidative stress. Biol. Plant. 2014, 58, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Huq, E.; Al-Sady, B.; Hudson, M.; Kim, C.H.; Ape, K.; Quail, P.H. Phytochrome-interacting facotr 1 is a critical bHLH regulator of chlorophyll biosynthesis. Science 2004, 305, 1937–1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Baudry, A.; Heim, M.A.; Dubreucq, B.; Caboche, M.; Weisshaar, B.; Lepiniec, L. TT2, TT8, and TTG1 synergistically specify the expression of BANYULS and proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2004, 39, 366–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gang, H.X.; Liu, G.F.; Chen, S.; Jiang, J. Physiological and transcriptome analysis of a yellow-green leaf mutant in birch (Betula platyphylla × B. pendula). Forests 2019, 10, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, L.; Yue, C.; Cao, H.L.; Zhou, Y.H.; Zeng, J.M.; Yang, Y.J.; Wang, X.C. Biochemical and transcriptome analyses of a novel chlorophyll-deficient chlorina tea plant cultivar. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, S.S.; Li, Q.Z.; Rong, L.P.; Tang, L.; Wang, J.J.; Zhang, B. Analysis of the transcriptome of green and mutant golden-yellow leaves of Acer palmatum Thunb. using high-throughput RNA sequencing. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2015, 7, 388–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, Y.L.; Zhen, J.P.; Che, X.Y.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, G.W. Transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis of autumn leaf color change in Fraxinus angustifolia. PeeJ 2023, 11, e15319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yoshida, Y.; Mogi, Y.; Terbush, A.D.; Osteryoung, K.W. Chloroplast FtsZ assembles into a contractible ring via tubulin-like heteropolymerization. Nat. Plants 2016, 20, 16095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fujiwara, M.T.; Sekine, K.; Yamamoto, Y.Y.; Abe, T.; Stato, N.; Itoh, R.D. Live imaging of chloroplast FtsZ1 filaments, rings, spirals, and motile dot structures in the AtMinE1 mutant and overexpressor of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009, 50, 1116–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Gonzalez-Garay, M.L.; Cabral, F. α-tubulin limits its own synthesis: Evidence for a mechanism involving translational repression. J. Cell Biol. 1996, 135, 1525–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dinkins, R.; Reddy, S.M.; Leng, M.; Collins, G.B. Overexpression of the Arabidopsis thaliana MinD1 gene alters chloroplast size and number in transgenic tobacco plants. Planta 2001, 2, 180–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Funes, S.; Gerdes, L.; Inaba, M.; Soll, J.; Herrmann, J.M. The Arabidopsis thaliana chloroplast inner envelope protein ARTEMIS is a functional member of the Alb3/Oxa1/YidC family of proteins. FEBS Lett. 2004, 569, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, H.Y.; Bai, M.; Jiang, X.S.; Shen, R.X.; Wang, H.N.; Wang, H.Y.; Wu, H. Cytological evidence of BSD2 functioning in both chloroplast division and dimorphic chloroplast formation in maize leaves. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rissler, H.M.; Collakova, E.; Dellapenna, D.; Whelan, J.; Pogson, B.J. Chlorophyll biosynthesis. expression of a second chl I gene of Magnesium chelatase in Arabidopsis supports only limited chlorophyll synthesis. Plant Physiol. 2002, 128, 770–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sato, Y.; Morita, R.; Katsuma, S.; Nishimura, M.; Tanake, A.; Kusaba, M. Two short-chain dehydrogenase/reductases, NON-YELLOW COLORING 1 and NYC1-LIKE, are required for chlorophyll b and light-harvesting complex II degradation during senescence in rice. Plant J. 2010, 57, 120–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Thompson, A.J.; Jackson, A.C.; Parker, R.A.; Morpeth, D.R.; Burbidge, A.; Taylor, I.B. Abscisic acid biosynthesis in tomato: Regulation of zeaxanthin epoxidase and 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase mRNAs by light/dark cycles, water stress and abscisic acid. Plant Mol. Biol. 2000, 42, 833–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zambrano, B.; Alonso, J. Functional characterization of the plant 15-cis-zeta-carotene isomerase Z-iso. Synthesiology 2005, 4, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Park, H.L.; Yoo, Y.; Bhoo, S.H.; Lee, T.H.; Lee, S.W.; Cho, M.H. Two chalcone synthase isozymes participate redundantly in UV-Induced sakuranetin synthesis in rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Larson, R.L.; Bussard, J.B. Microsomal flavonoid 3′-monooxygenase from maize seedlings. Plant Physiol. 1986, 80, 483–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Morant, M.; Jørgensen, K.; Schaller, H.; Pinot, F.; Møller, B.L.; Werck-Reichhart, D.; Bak, S. CYP703 is an ancient cytochrome P450 in land plants catalyzing in-chain hydroxylation of lauric acid to provide building Blocks for sporopollenin synthesis in pollen. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 1473–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lamppa, G.K. The chlorophyll a/b-binding protein inserts into the thylakoids independent of its cognate transit peptide. J. Biol. Chem. 1988, 263, 14996–14999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Camargo-Ramírez, R.; Val-Torregrosa, B.; Segundo, B.S. MiR858-mediated regulation of flavonoid-specific MYB transcription factor genes controls resistance to pathogen infection in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2018, 59, 190–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Carey, C.C.; Strahle, J.T.; Selinger, D.A.; Chandler, V.L. Mutations in the pale aleurone color1 regulatory gene of the Zea mays anthocyanin pathway have distinct phenotypes relative to the functionally Similar transparent Testa Glabra1 gene in Arabidopsisi thaliana. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 450–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Length distribution of unigenes. The x-axis indicates sequence lengths from 1 to 20,000 nt. The y-axis indicates the corresponding number of unigenes.
Figure 1. Length distribution of unigenes. The x-axis indicates sequence lengths from 1 to 20,000 nt. The y-axis indicates the corresponding number of unigenes.
Genes 15 00608 g001
Figure 2. Homology search results for query sequences aligned by BLASTx to the NR database. (A) E-value distribution of unigene BLASTx hits in the NR database with an E-value threshold of 1.0 × 10−5. (B) Identity distribution of the top BLAST hits for each unigene.
Figure 2. Homology search results for query sequences aligned by BLASTx to the NR database. (A) E-value distribution of unigene BLASTx hits in the NR database with an E-value threshold of 1.0 × 10−5. (B) Identity distribution of the top BLAST hits for each unigene.
Genes 15 00608 g002
Figure 3. Percentage of the H. cooperi var. pilifera unigenes showing similarity to genes in other plant species. The H. cooperi var. pilifera unigenes were aligned by BLASTx to the NR database.
Figure 3. Percentage of the H. cooperi var. pilifera unigenes showing similarity to genes in other plant species. The H. cooperi var. pilifera unigenes were aligned by BLASTx to the NR database.
Genes 15 00608 g003
Figure 4. Distribution of Gene Ontology (GO) annotations of all unigenes from H. cooperi var. pilifera. A total of 33,527 unigenes were assigned GO terms and they were classified into three GO categories: biological process, cellular component, and molecular function. The left y-axis indicates the percentage of unigenes in a specific category. The right y-axis indicates the number of unigenes in a category.
Figure 4. Distribution of Gene Ontology (GO) annotations of all unigenes from H. cooperi var. pilifera. A total of 33,527 unigenes were assigned GO terms and they were classified into three GO categories: biological process, cellular component, and molecular function. The left y-axis indicates the percentage of unigenes in a specific category. The right y-axis indicates the number of unigenes in a category.
Genes 15 00608 g004
Figure 5. COG functional classifications of all unigenes from H. cooperi var. pilifera. A total of 20,941 sequences had a COG classification among 25 categories.
Figure 5. COG functional classifications of all unigenes from H. cooperi var. pilifera. A total of 20,941 sequences had a COG classification among 25 categories.
Genes 15 00608 g005
Figure 6. KEGG pathway assignments of the assembled unigenes. A total of 30,353 unigenes were mapped to 128 KEGG pathways belonging to five categories: metabolism (red), genetic information processing (yellow), organismal systems (green), cellular processes (blue), and environmental information processing (purple).
Figure 6. KEGG pathway assignments of the assembled unigenes. A total of 30,353 unigenes were mapped to 128 KEGG pathways belonging to five categories: metabolism (red), genetic information processing (yellow), organismal systems (green), cellular processes (blue), and environmental information processing (purple).
Genes 15 00608 g006
Figure 7. Gene expression levels between the two libraries (WT and wl). Red dots represent transcripts more prevalent in the wl library, green dots show those present at a lower frequency in wl, and blue dots indicate transcripts that did not change significantly.
Figure 7. Gene expression levels between the two libraries (WT and wl). Red dots represent transcripts more prevalent in the wl library, green dots show those present at a lower frequency in wl, and blue dots indicate transcripts that did not change significantly.
Genes 15 00608 g007
Figure 8. GO enrichment analysis of DEGs in WT vs. wl. Enrichment in the GO categories ‘biological process’, ‘cellular components’, and ‘molecular function’ categories is shown.
Figure 8. GO enrichment analysis of DEGs in WT vs. wl. Enrichment in the GO categories ‘biological process’, ‘cellular components’, and ‘molecular function’ categories is shown.
Genes 15 00608 g008
Figure 9. Top 20 KEGG pathways enriched in DEGs in WT vs. wl.
Figure 9. Top 20 KEGG pathways enriched in DEGs in WT vs. wl.
Genes 15 00608 g009
Table 1. The statistics of sequencing.
Table 1. The statistics of sequencing.
SummaryWTwl
Total raw reads42,199,19247,096,827
Total clean reads40,952,42245,235,250
Total clean nucleotides (bp)6,142,863,4006,785,287,500
Q20 (%)97.2897.16
Q30 (%)93.4993.20
N content (%)0.010.01
Table 2. The most reliable top 10 significantly enriched pathways of DEGs in the cellular component, molecular function, and biological process.
Table 2. The most reliable top 10 significantly enriched pathways of DEGs in the cellular component, molecular function, and biological process.
TypePathwayNumber p-Value
Cellular componentcell wall807.34 × 10−15
external encapsulating structure808.57 × 10−15
extracellular region1019.41 × 10−11
intrinsic component of plasma membrane563.46 × 10−9
cell periphery2571.33 × 10−8
integral component of plasma membrane401.43 × 10−5
plant-type cell wall321.85 × 10−5
plasma membrane part582.77 × 10−5
membrane5410.00807
plant-type vacuole membrane150.01089
Molecular functionsymporter activity271.35 × 10−6
xyloglucan:xyloglucosyl transferase activity122.57 × 10−6
transmembrane transporter activity1241.40 × 10−5
carboxylic acid transmembrane transporter activity281.70 × 10−5
amino acid transmembrane transporter activity231.95 × 10−5
organic acid transmembrane transporter activity283.15 × 10−5
superoxide dismutase activity106.47 × 10−5
oxidoreductase activity, acting on superoxide radicals as acceptor106.47 × 10−5
anion transmembrane transporter activity460.00014
ion transmembrane transporter activity890.0002
Biological processresponse to high light intensity212.21 × 10−5
amino acid transmembrane transport232.89 × 10−5
anion transport534.50 × 10−5
carbon utilization77.62 × 10−5
response to light intensity259.11 × 10−5
organic acid transmembrane transport240.00029
amino acid transport230.00034
response to reactive oxygen species240.00055
carbohydrate metabolic process1140.00061
xyloglucan metabolic process120.00067
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, P.; Ren, M.; Chen, J.; Yue, J.; Liu, S.; Zhu, Q.; Wang, Z. Transcriptomic Analysis of Green Leaf Plants and White–Green Leaf Mutants in Haworthia cooperi var. pilifera. Genes 2024, 15, 608. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15050608

AMA Style

Li P, Ren M, Chen J, Yue J, Liu S, Zhu Q, Wang Z. Transcriptomic Analysis of Green Leaf Plants and White–Green Leaf Mutants in Haworthia cooperi var. pilifera. Genes. 2024; 15(5):608. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15050608

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Peiling, Maofei Ren, Juanjuan Chen, Jianhua Yue, Songhu Liu, Qingsong Zhu, and Zhiyong Wang. 2024. "Transcriptomic Analysis of Green Leaf Plants and White–Green Leaf Mutants in Haworthia cooperi var. pilifera" Genes 15, no. 5: 608. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15050608

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop