Next Article in Journal
Theme Exploration and Sentiment Analysis of Online Reviews of Wuyishan National Park
Next Article in Special Issue
Farm Household Vulnerability Due to Land and Forest Fire in Peatland Areas in South Sumatra
Previous Article in Journal
Soil and Vegetation Characteristics of Grassland Have a Greater Influence on the Abundance and Diversity of Earthworms than the Mowing Intensity in a Managed Nature Reserve
Previous Article in Special Issue
Local Perspectives on Agrosilvofishery in Peatlands: A Case Study of Perigi Village, South Sumatra, Indonesia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of Peatland Research Trends Based on BERTopic

Global Forestry Division, Future Forest Strategy Department, National Institute of Forest Science, Seoul 02455, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2024, 13(5), 628; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13050628
Submission received: 11 March 2024 / Revised: 2 May 2024 / Accepted: 3 May 2024 / Published: 7 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Restoration of Tropical Peatlands: Science Policy and Practice)

Abstract

:
Peatlands comprise approximately 3% of the land area worldwide. Peatland exists in most countries, including tropical, subtropical, and boreal regions. Accordingly, peatland has garnered increased research attention as a potential countermeasure against climate change. Therefore, it is necessary to identify and comprise the topics constituting global peatland research. In this study, we applied BERTopic—a topic modeling technique—to analyze relatedness between research topics to classify global peatland research trends, evaluate changes over time, and analyze the relationships between topics. To this end, we searched the keyword “peatland” on ScienceDirect—a global academic publication data platform—and collected the titles and abstracts from 10,158 publications from 1953 to 2022 for dynamic topic modeling and network analysis. Eighty-two peatland research topics were identified, which were combined into 15 main topics. Over time, an increasing trend was observed in topics related to production, management, and fire. In addition, upon analysis of the relationships between topics, three groups centered on fire, peatland value, and carbon were identified. We anticipate that the findings of this study can be expanded to analyze trends in research related to fires in peatlands, regional characteristics of peat soil, prediction of greenhouse gases emission and mitigation due to peatland fires, and prediction of future peatland research topics.

1. Introduction

Peatland, i.e., wetlands with accumulated peat, is estimated to comprise approximately 3% of land area worldwide, with distribution across most geographical regions, including tropical, subtropical, and boreal regions [1,2,3,4]. Peatlands are typically defined as regions with ≥30 cm of peat soil depth, or where dead organic material comprises a minimum of 30% of the dry peat weight [4,5]. Peatlands provide various ecological services, including carbon and water storage and biodiversity conservation, and serve as the largest natural carbon store among land ecosystems, making them an important resource for mitigating climate change [2,6,7]. In particular, peatlands have an excellent carbon storage capacity per land area, storing about 40% of the earth’s soil carbon [8]. For example, it was reported that the carbon storage of Indonesian peatlands (approximately 20 million ha) is approximately 46 Gt, accounting for 8–14% of the global peatland carbon storage [9]. Through this, peatland restoration has recently received attention as a means of responding to climate change in degraded peatland.
Peatlands have garnered increasing attention throughout the international community, with studies reporting on the relationship between peatland and the climate crisis, reducing greenhouse gases using peatland [10,11,12], and changes in peatland microbial ecosystems with climate change [13]. Given the surge in peatland research, a need exists for the classification of associated peatland research topics such as climate change, greenhouse gases, and microbial ecosystems, etc. Previous studies that sought to achieve this goal applied topic modeling techniques to classify peatland studies by keywords and identify trends based on topic categories. However, Van Bellen and Larivière [14] were unable to efficiently investigate the significance of relationships between topics due to duplication issues when keywords were designated as topics. These results were improved upon by Yang et al. [15], who applied Dynamic Topic Modeling (DTM) and network analysis to select topics by keyword groups, enabling them to investigate structural properties and changes over time in topics. However, the study used algorithms based on DTM or Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), which limited the authors to consider the context of the studies. Furthermore, concerns were raised regarding duplication caused by the assumption that text contained various topics. To overcome these limitations, the latest techniques must be adopted, assigning a single topic per text and allowing combinations of topics to be analyzed based on the significance between topics.
Topic modeling is an unsupervised machine learning technique applied to determine abstract topics within large-scale text data. To date, various topic modeling methodologies, including LDA and Probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis (PLSA), have been suggested. However, these methods adopt the Bag of Words (BoW) technique, which is limited by the word order being ignored and sparse representation caused by the large number of words and dimensions in the data [16]. Moreover, semantic relationships between words cannot be investigated using these methodologies as the text context is not considered. In contrast, BERTopic, based on the Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT), has been increasingly applied since its development in 2018 as it performs natural language processing using embeddings at the text level. BERTopic boasts excellent performance functionality by applying new techniques, such as embeddings and c-TF-IDF, to extract topics based on context. In fact, it reportedly offers superior technological performance compared to LDA and Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) in terms of Normalized Pointwise Mutual Information (NPMI) [17]. Accordingly, BERTopic has received considerable attention from researchers as a deep-learning classifier in the field of natural language processing, with NMF, Corex, Top2Vec, and others [18,19].
This study is conducted to solve the limitations of previous studies by elucidating the significance and relationships between topics in peatland research. To this end, we applied BERTopic to derive topics from all classes via c-TF-IDF-based clustering and identify the hierarchical structure between topics as well as changes in research trends over time. The specific objectives of this study were to investigate (i) how peatland research topics are classified, (ii) changes in the proportion of peatland research topics over time, and (iii) the core peatland research topics, based on an analysis of the relationships between topics and their significance.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Research Framework

We used the deep-learning language model BERTopic to classify peatland-related studies and analyze their trends. After searching “peatland” on the academic publication data platform ScienceDirect, we collected the titles and abstracts of peatland-related papers published between 1953 and 2022. After pre-processing, BERTopic was applied to extract peatland-related topics based on the collected data. We then performed hierarchical clustering of 82 topics classified by BERTopic to extract 15 final main topics. The significance of changes in the 15 main topics over time and the relationships between topics was analyzed (Figure 1).

2.2. Data Collection and Pre-Processing

After searching for “peatland” on ScienceDirect, we collected the titles and abstracts of 11,519 papers published between 1953 and 2022. We excluded 1361 papers that were missing an abstract or for which the abstract was “unknown”. The remaining 10,158 papers were included in our analysis. The “all-mpnet-based-v2” model from Hugging Face was applied to embed the data. Subsequently, additional pre-processing was performed on the collected data to derive significant results. Using Python 3.11.4, we removed stop words using the stop word package provided by the Python NLTK, as well as verbs, adjectives, adverbs, and specific symbols commonly used in academic writing.

2.3. BERTopic Modeling

BERTopic improves research accuracy by performing NLP via document embedding based on the model published by Google in 2018 [19,20,21]. BERTopic uses a sentence transformer to construct document embedding, and then it clusters based on density using HDBSCAN (Hierarchical Density-based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise) after dimensionality reduction of embedded vectors using UMAP (Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection) (Figure 2). Meanwhile, c-TF-IDF was used to extract important topics and words for each cluster. BERTopic shows high topic coherence and topic diversity [22]. In particular, unlike previous topic modeling techniques, BERTopic can extract accurate topics while accounting for context [22] and can perform hierarchical clustering based on topic similarity. Accordingly, we applied the functionality of BERTopic to identify the topics constituting global peatland research, investigate how these topics change over time, and analyze the relationships between topics.
We trained a BERTopic model and derived 82 topics. Subsequently, c-TF-IDF was employed to measure the similarity between topics. Via hierarchical clustering, we condensed these 82 topics into 15 main topics, the titles for which were determined based on the top 20 keywords and representative papers for each topic. Additionally, the Python “statsmodel” library was used to perform linear regression analysis and test the significance of annual changes in the 15 main topics. The independent variable was the year of publication, whereas the dependent variables were the number and proportion of each topic. We performed significance testing for the papers published from 2001 to 2022 where all 15 main topics appeared. Using a significance level of 95%, positive (+) regression coefficients were categorized as hot topics that significantly increased over time, while negative (−) regression coefficients were categorized as cold topics that significantly decreased over time. Additionally, we inspected the intertopic distance map using the visualization function to assess the relationships between topics. The intertopic distance map is a visualization of the relationships between topic clusters generated during the modeling process of BERTopic. The distance between the visualized topics on this map indicates the semantic similarity between the topics.

3. Results

3.1. BERTopic Modeling

The 10,158 peatland studies analyzed by BERTopic were classified into 82 topics (Appendix A). After hierarchical clustering based on the similarity between topics (Figure 3), 15 main topics were generated. In the similarity matrix presented in Figure 3, a higher similarity between two topics indicated a closer relationship, causing them to be clustered together. For example, Topic 21 (fire_burned_burning) exhibited the highest similarity with Topic 60 (fire_charcoal_frequency; similarity 0.927) and Topic 61 (fire_wildfire_health; similarity 0.899). This demonstrates the close relationships between these topics; for example, studies investigating fires (fire, burn) on peatland may evaluate the frequency and breath of wildfire spread, the extent of tree burning (charcoal), and effects of smoke generation on health.
BERTopic can use hierarchical clustering to elucidate the relationships between topics based on their similarity (Figure 4). For example, Topic 21 (fire_burned_burning) and Topic 60 (fire_charcoal_frequency) showed high similarity with Topic 61 (fire_wildfire_health), causing them to be clustered together. Similarly, Topic 10 (aerosol_pm25_air) was clustered with Topic 55 (fire_emission_burning). The cluster containing Topics 10, 55, 60, 21, 61, and 49 formed one main topic (fire_detection_algorithm). Thus, by exploiting the strengths of BERTopic, hierarchical clustering was performed between highly similar topics, ultimately producing 15 main topics for peatland research.
The 15 main topics were assigned names based on the top 20 keywords for each topic indicated by BERTopic, and 3 representative papers (Table 1, Figure 5, Appendix B). BERTopic assigns topic numbers to the topics associated with the higher number and proportion of papers. Topic 1 (carbon dynamic) applied to approximately half of all papers (47.7%), whereas Topic 15 (deposit) applied to only 0.8%. Additionally, the number of papers in all topics is increasing every year (Figure 5).
Topic 1 was “carbon dynamic”, comprising various carbon dynamics studies that analyzed the flow of carbon. This included studies on regulating the release of CO2 and CH4 greenhouse gases through peatland management and rewetting [23], the stability of carbon in tropical peatlands assessed based on the flow and cycling of greenhouse gases [24], and changes in soil organic matter and vegetation with increasing CO2 concentration due to climate change [25].
Topic 2 was “past environmental change” and included studies on estimating changes in vegetation, climate, and landscape throughout the Holocene based on sedimentary matter records [26,27,28].
Topic 3 was “production” and included studies on the sustainability of peatlands for production, such as the environmental sustainability of biofuels (biodiesel, biochar, etc.) produced on peatlands and used in palm oil plantations [29], greenhouse gases released during palm oil production [30], and bioenergy production systems [31].
Topic 4 was “metal” and included studies on sedimentary heavy metals in peatlands, focusing on Hg, Pb, 137Cs, and Cd. One such research evaluated changes in the concentration of sedimentary heavy metals from the atmosphere and nearby rivers and lakes over time [32], whereas another research reported changes in the primary productivity of heavy metal sediments [33]. Additionally, the characteristics of heavy metal isotopes in peatland were investigated and compared [34].
Topic 5 was “management” and comprised studies focused on peatland sustainability through suitable management strategies. This included a research on improving air quality and biodiversity via ecological services provided in peatlands [35]. Another research proposed solutions for how to cooperate and resolve conflicts related to the positive benefits of peatlands and the need to increase the profitability of agriculture as the major peatland use [36,37].
Topic 6 was “microbe,” comprising studies on the biodiversity, species diversity, and species abundance of microbial communities in peatlands. Others evaluated the potential of testate amoebae as an ecological indicator [38,39,40].
Topic 7 was “soil organic matter” and included studies on changes in carbon and nitrogen stores at different soil depths due to root addition with climate change [41]. Another evaluated the activity of soil organic matter with pH change [42] and the rate of soil organic matter decomposition by different microbial communities [43].
Peatland fire can be broadly divided into two types [44]: surface fire (flaming), in which flames are visible above the surface and easier to be extinguished, and peat fire (smoldering), referring to the burning of organic matter in peat soil under the surface, hard to detect and producing thicker smoke and haze. Topic 8 was “surface fire (flaming)” and included studies on substances produced during peatland surface fires above the surface (atmospheric pollutants, greenhouse gases, particulate matter, etc.) [45], changes in peat forest vegetation due to fires during the Holocene [46], and the effects on tree species and parts according to fire frequency [47].
Topic 9 was “hydrology” and comprised studies on changes in the underground water level with peatland drying and wetting due to the effects of coastal water, rivers, and lakes [48], hydrological trends and the concentrations of dissolved materials [49], and changes in cation concentrations in underground water based on soil conditions [50].
Topic 10 was “global warming”, focusing primarily on changes in ozone concentration, UV-A, and UV-B due to the effects of global warming on peat soil, and how these effects influence greenhouse gas emissions [51,52,53].
Topic 11 was “forest” and included studies on the tree growth in peatland forests, changes in microbial communities after wood ash fertilization in drained peatland forests [54], changes in tree growth following wood ash fertilization [55], and the effects of these processes [56].
Topic 12 was “peat fire (smoldering)”, encompassing peatland fires that burn below the surface and deep surface. This topic primarily included studies on greenhouse gas emissions. For example, one research evaluated the smoke generated in peat fires and the effects of soil moisture content on fire spread [57]. Others reported the effects and physicochemical changes in fires at different soil depths [58] and the effects of smoldering fires on atmospheric oxygen [59].
Topic 13 was “biomarker” and primarily included studies that monitored past environmental changes using lipids extracted from the cell membranes of microbes living in peatland. For example, one research evaluated the changes in the distribution and abundance of Glycerol Dialkyl Glycerol Tetraethers (GDGTs) at different soil depths due to microclimate warming [60,61]. Meanwhile, another assessed seasonal changes in GDGTs [62].
Topic 14 was “permafrost” and comprised studies on the role of peatland in preventing freezing and melting. For example, a research reported on the stabilization and changes in organic carbon in peatland soil located in permafrost [63]. Others assessed the effects of permafrost destruction due to global warming on the structure and function of peatland ecosystems [64], and the characteristics of the permafrost [65].
Topic 15 was “deposit”, including studies on the effects of volcanic eruption on the tephra ecosystem [66], the types and composition of sedimentary layers due to volcanic ash deposition in coastal peatlands [67], and the classification of volcanic ash deposited during the Holocene [68].

3.2. Changes in the Number and Proportion of Papers for Each Topic

To analyze the trends in peatland studies over time, we assessed the significance of changes in the number and proportion of papers for each topic. First, considering that topics appear at different times, the same starting publication year was applied throughout to ensure that the order of appearance did significantly affect the proportion. Accordingly, for all 15 main topics, the significance of changes was evaluated based on papers published between 2001 and 2022 (Table 2).
We classified topics for which the number of papers increased significantly (p < 0.05) over time as hot topics. Of these, Topic 1 (carbon dynamic) showed the largest rate of increase in number, whereas Topic 15 (deposit) exhibited the lowest rate of increase.
An additional four hot topics exhibited a significant increase (p < 0.05) in paper proportion over time: Topic 3 (production), Topic 5 (management), Topic 8 (surface fire (flaming)), and Topic 12 (peat fire (smoldering)) (Figure 6a). Conversely, there were four cold topics with a significant decrease in proportion over time (p < 0.05): Topic 1 (carbon dynamic), Topic 4 (metal), Topic 6 (microbe), and Topic 11 (forest) (Figure 6b). The proportion of other topics did not exhibit significant trends over time.

3.3. Analysis of Relationships between Topics

A distance map was derived, demonstrating the relationships between the 15 main topics, which were further divided into three groups (Figure 7).
Group 1 comprised Topics 8 and 12, focused on fires. This group inevitably shows high relatedness, given that the two topics focus on peatland and peat fires, as well as the resulting effects on atmospheric pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and human health.
Group 2 comprised Topics 3 and 5, focused on the value obtained from peatlands. This group demonstrates the high relatedness between the value and scale of production (e.g., biofuel, bio-oil, bioenergy, etc.) from peatlands that differ depending on how peatlands are managed.
Group 3 was the largest cluster, including Topics 2, 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15, and centered on Topic 1 (carbon dynamic). This group exhibited the highest paper number of the 15 main topics. Semantically, the similarity between topics was higher than in Groups 1 and 2, demonstrating that the other topics were clustered around this topic. Through this, it can be seen that past environmental changes can be inferred based on the cycling of accumulated materials in peatland, and that basic scientific research fields related to peatlands are interconnected with a focus on carbon.

4. Discussion

In this study, we investigated global peatland research trends using BERTopic to analyze 10,158 papers retrieved by searching “peatland” on ScienceDirect. Initially, 82 topics were derived, which were subsequently reclassified into 15 main topics based on hierarchical clustering. The “hot topics” with significantly increased paper proportions over time were Topic 3 (production), Topic 5 (management), Topic 8 (surface fire (flaming)), and Topic 12 (peat fire (smoldering)), related to peatland management, usage, protection, and conservation. Conversely, the cold topics with a decreasing research proportion over time were Topic 1 (carbon dynamic), Topic 4 (metal), Topic 6 (microbe), and Topic 11 (forest), related to the basic ecology, chemistry, and matter cycles of peatlands. This shows that peatland research trends are shifting from basic studies to fields relating to utilization and applications. In previous studies analyzing peatland research trends, van Bellen and Larivière [12] and Yang et al. [13] also reported significant increases over time in keywords such as management, climate change, restoration, production, and biodiversity. This likely reflects the current circumstances in that the importance and utility of peatland are increasing due to the changes associated with human settlement, including its roles in habitats and its overall utility [69,70,71].
Upon analysis of the relationships between topics, three groups were divided. By combining the analysis of relatedness with changes in the proportion of papers over time, Topics 3 and 5 (hot topics) formed Group 2, whereas Topics 8 and 12 (hot topics) formed Group 1. Meanwhile, the remaining 11 topics, which were either cold topics or showed no change in paper proportions, formed Group 3. Topics 8 and 12 in Group 1 focused on fires, with the studies evaluating the effects of peat and surface fires, including atmospheric pollution, friction with neighboring countries due to smoke, the release of organic carbon stored in peatland soil in the form of greenhouse gases, and negative effects on human health [45,46,47,57,58].
Group 2 is particularly important to evaluate as it exhibited the fastest increase in the proportion of papers. This is similar to a report by Yang et al. [15], which not only considers peatland as a target for conservation or development but also emphasizes the importance of sustainable peatland management as a countermeasure to climate change that can mitigate greenhouse gases. Thus, we can conclude that the value and scale of ecosystem services and products (e.g., biofuel, bioenergy, etc.) from peatland may differ based on management, and effective peatland management is important to improve peatland productivity and sustainable use [29,30,31,35,36,37].
Topic 1 (carbon dynamic), which is the center of Group 3, had the highest number and proportion of papers from 1953 to 2022. Although this topic exhibited an annual increase in the raw number of papers, the proportion of total papers showed a decreasing trend. This result shows that other topics such as Topic 3, 5, 8, and 12 than Topic 1 are increasing over time. Based on the keywords and research content for Topic 1, overall, this topic is related to the basic flow of carbon within peatlands. Moreover, Topics 2, 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15 are centered on Topic 1, indicating that the circulation of accumulated materials in peatland and the associated basic science studies focus on carbon. This supports previous reports that peatland is closely related to carbon [1,72,73,74]. In fact, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar Convention) advised that peatlands should be included in Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs); accordingly, countries with peatlands are adopting these guidelines as a means of achieving their target NDC [3,10,12,75,76,77]. However, before expecting all countries with peatlands to implement these practices, given the different characteristics of each country and region, it will first be important to precisely ascertain and map the global peatland area [3].
Although previous studies on peatland research trends simply analyzed the keywords that received the most attention [14] or the structural relationships between topics using network analysis [15], the current study performed hierarchical clustering based on similarities between global peatland studies, deriving 15 main topics that were arranged into three groups by analyzing the relationships between topics. Additionally, the significance of these findings has been discussed. In particular, although several studies have previously highlighted that the topics of fire and carbon are inseparable from peatlands in global research [78,79,80,81], this was supported through the results of this study.
Most topic modeling techniques are limited by the nature of unsupervised learning in that the modeling results differ depending on the algorithms used and hyperparameter tuning. To overcome these limitations, we performed several rounds of BERTopic hyperparameter tuning and interpreted the results based on the learning capabilities of the researchers, including the contents of each topic and the naming of topics. Nevertheless, one limitation of this study is that BERTopic assumes that each text only corresponds to a single topic, thus restricting the consideration of multiple topics. To overcome this, the development and supplementation of new topic modeling techniques, the combined use of topic modeling techniques, and improvements in the review capacity of peatland research experts will be necessary. Moreover, based on our findings, further research is warranted to fully explore the composition of the fire-related topics (Topics 8 and 12), which are important in peatland research, as well as to differentiate the characteristics of peatland soil types in different regions.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we used BERTopic, a recent topic modeling technique, to analyze relatedness between topics, with the aim of classifying global peatland research trends into topics, examining the change in topics over time, and identifying core themes in peatland research trends and their significance. We classified global peatland research trends into 15 main topics and observed an overall increase in research related to production, management, and fire. When we analyzed the relationships between topics, three groups were divided, focusing on fire, peatland value, and carbon. Through these research results, we anticipate that, in the future, our findings can be expanded to analyze trends in research related to fires in peatlands, regional peat soil properties, the prediction of greenhouse gases emission and mitigation due to peatland fires, and the prediction of future peatland research topics, among others.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.-R.Y. and E.C.; methodology, A.-R.Y. and J.C.; software, J.C.; validation, A.-R.Y., J.C. and E.C.; investigation, A.-R.Y. and J.C.; resources, E.C.; data curation, J.C.; writing—original draft preparation, A.-R.Y. and J.C.; writing—review and editing, A.-R.Y., J.C. and E.C.; visualization, A.-R.Y. and J.C.; supervision, E.C.; project administration, E.C.; funding acquisition, E.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Institute of Forest Science, grant number No.FM0800-2021-03-2023.

Data Availability Statement

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. These data can be found here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ (accessed on 4 May 2023).

Acknowledgments

This study was carried out at the National Institute of Forest Science, Republic of Korea. The authors extend their gratitude to Keonju Na for technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A. The Name of 82 Topics

No.Topic NameNo.Topic Name
1soil_ch4_water42pahs_pah_polycyclic
2wetland_classification_map43catalyst_pyrolysis_biocrude
3holocene_monsoon_record44adsorption_membrane_electrocoagulation
4energy_biofuel_bioenergy45food_covid19_agrifood
5coal_seam_basin46methane_biogas_methanogens
6species_forest_tree47retention_species_richness
7hg_mercury_mehg48science_soil_policy
8palm_oil_deforestation49wtp_choice_preferences
9amoeba_testate_transfer50fire_detection_algorithm
10tropical_peatland_peat51grazing_heathland_upland
11aerosol_pm25_air52conservation_orngutan_habitat
12pb_metal_atmospheric53wind_energy_power
13ice_terrestrial_carbon54patterns_landscape_geochemistry
14uvb_ozone_radiation55subsidence_erosion_peat
15137cs_radionuclide_radiocaesium56fire_emission_burning
16microbial_soil_bacteria57nematodes_earthworm_nematode
17permafrost_thermal_ground58water_quality_management
18media_substrate_compost59birch_willow_biomass
19streams_riparian_diatom60nov_strains_strain
20habitat_bird_breeding61fire_charcoal_frequency
21fen_sand_oil62fire_wildfire_health
22fire_burned_burning63si_silicon_silica
23land_policy_farmers64drinking_mcpa_thm
24brgdgts_lipid_glycerol65snow_olt_thaw
25pollen_vegetation_past66solute_transport_pores
26smouldering_spread_fire67sorption_iodine_iodide
27ash_wood_treatment68methane_les_des
28africa_south_record69ghg_emission_agricultural
29fe_metal_river70biomass_reed_yield
30litter_decomposition_mass71stakeholders_public_legitimacy
31fungal_fungi_mycorrhizal72enzyme_activity_extracellular
32adaptation_climate_nbs73forest_stocks_carbon
33service_ecosystem_es74permafrost_thaw_lake
34consolidation_road_construction75tidal_coastal_sealevel
35tephra_volcanic_eruption76dust_deposition_ree
36habitat_bogs_spider77removal_cws_wastewater
37countries_emission_energy78groundwater_aquifer_springs
38gpr_geophysical_radar79permian_kerp_fusiformisporites
39carbon_atmosphere_global80uranium_th_ar
40tsunami_tephra_deposits81prediction_map_models
41caribou_habitat_population82lake_oc_chironomid
* The 82 topic names were automatically combining the top 3 keywords named by Python.

Appendix B. Number and Proportion of Papers Classified by Topic from 1953 to 2022 (n = 10,158)

Land 13 00628 g0a1

References

  1. Page, S.E.; Rieley, J.O.; Banks, C.J. Global and regional importance of the tropical peatland carbon pool. Glob. Change Biol. 2011, 17, 798–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Xu, J.; Morris, P.J.; Liu, J.; Holden, J. PEATMAP: Refining estimates of global peatland distribution based on a meta-analysis. Catena 2018, 160, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. UNEP. Global Peatlands Assessment: The State of the World’s Peatlands. Evidence for Action toward the Conservation, Restoration, and Sustainable Management of Peatlands Main Report; UNEP: Nairobi, Kenya, 2002; p. 425. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lourenco, M.; Fitchett, J.M.; Woodborne, S. Peat definitions: A critical review. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2023, 47, 506–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Joosten, H.; Clarke, D. Wise Use of Mires and Peatlands; International Mire Conservation Group and International Peat Society: Saarijärvi, Finland, 2002; p. 304. [Google Scholar]
  6. Nahlik, A.M.; Fennessy, M.S. Carbon storage in US wetlands. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Rieley, J.; Page, S. Tropical Peatland of the World Tropical Peatland Ecosystems; Springer: Tokyo, Japan, 2016; pp. 3–32. [Google Scholar]
  8. Yu, Z.; Loisel, J.; Brosseau, D.P.; Beilman, D.W.; Hunt, S.J. Global peatland dynamics since the Last Glacial Maximum. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2010, 37, L13402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. USIS; Winarti, S.; Adji, F.F.; Kusin, K.; Darung, U. The rate of carbon dioxide (CO2) emission in various ages and conditions of balangeran plant (Shorea Balangeran) at ombrogenous peatlands in central Kalimantan. Sys. Rev. Pharm. 2021, 12, 982–991. [Google Scholar]
  10. FAO. Peatlands and Climate Planning. Part 1: Peatlands and Climate Commitments; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2022; p. 70. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gaffney, P.P.J.; Tang, Q.; Li, Q.; Zhang, R.; Pan, J.; Xu, X.; Li, Y.; Niu, S. The impacts of land-use and climate change on the Zoige peatland carbon cycle: A review. WIREs Clim. Change 2024, 15, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Girkin, N.T.; Davidson, S.J. Protect peatlands to achieve climate goals. Science 2024, 383, 490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Geay, M.L.; Lauga, B.; Walcker, R.; Jassey, V.E.J. A meta-analysis of peatland microbial diversity and function responses to climate change. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2024, 189, 109287. [Google Scholar]
  14. van Bellen, S.; Larivière, V. The ecosystem of peatland research: A bibliometric analysis. Mires Peat 2020, 26, 30. [Google Scholar]
  15. Yang, H.; Chae, J.; Yang, A.-R.; Suwignyo, R.A.; Choi, E. Trends of peatland research based on topic modeling: Toward sustainable management under climate change. Forests 2023, 14, 1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Helaskar, M.N.; Sonawane, S.S. Text Classification Using Word Embeddings. In Proceedings of the 2019, 5th International Conference on Computing, Communication, Control and Automation (ICCUBEA), Pune, India, 19–21 September 2019; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  17. Abuzayed, A.; AI-Khalifa, H. BERT for Aravic topic modeling: An experimental study on BERTopic technique. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2021, 189, 191–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sánchez-Franco, M.J.; and Rey-Moreno, M. Do travelser’s reviews depend on the destination? An analysis in coastal and urban peer-to-peer lodgings. Psychol. Market. 2022, 39, 441–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Egger, R.; Yu, J. A topic modeling comparison between LDA, NMF, Top2Vec, and BERTopic to demystify ‘Twitter Posts’. Front Sociol. 2022, 7, 886498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Hendry, D.; Darari, F.; Nufadillah, R.; Khanna, G.; Sun, M.; Condylis, P.C.; Taufik, N. Topic modeling for customer service chats. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS), Depok, Indonesia, 23–25 October 2021; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kim, R.; Kim, D. Research trends of COVID-19 in public administration and policy research studies using BERTopic topic modeling. JGS 2022, 28, 105–137. [Google Scholar]
  22. Grootendorst, M. BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedure. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2203.05794. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kløve, B.; Berglund, K.; Berglund, Ö.; Weldon, S.; Maljanen, M. Future options for cultivated Nordic peat soils: Can land management and rewetting control greenhouse gas emissions? Environ. Sci. Policy 2017, 69, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cooper, H.V.; Vane, C.H.; Evers, S.; Aplin, P.; Girkin, N.T.; Sjögersten, S. From peat swamp forest to oil palm plantations: The stability of tropical peatland carbon. Geoderma 2019, 342, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tinker, P.B.; Ineson, P. Chapter 7 Soil Organic Matter and Biology in Relation to Climate Chance. Dev. Soil Sci. 1990, 20, 71–87. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhang, Y.; Yang, P.; Tong, C.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, G.; Meyers, P.A. Palynological record of Holocene vegetation and climate changes in a high-resolution peat procile from the Xinjiang Altai Mountains, northwestern China. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2018, 201, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, F.; Zhang, J.; Liu, J.; Cao, X.; Hou, J.; Zhu, L.; Xu, X.; Liu, X.; Wang, M.; Wu, D.; et al. Climate change, vegetation history, and landscape responses on the Tibetan Plateau during the Holocene: A comprehensive review. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2020, 243, 106444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhao, Y.; Yu, Z. Vegetation response to Holocene climate change in East Asian monsoon-margin region. Eart. Sci. Rev. 2012, 113, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Silalertruksa, T.; Gheewala, S.H. Environmental sustainability assessment of palm biodiesel production in Thailand. Energy 2012, 43, 306–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Harsono, S.S.; Grundmann, P.; Siahaan, D. Role of Biogas and Biochar Palm Oil Residues for Reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Biodiesel Production. Energy Procedia 2015, 65, 344–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wicke, B.; Dornburg, V.; Junginger, M.; Faaij, A. Different palm oil production systems for energy purposes and their greenhouse gas implications. Biomass Bioenergy 2008, 32, 1322–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pelletier, N.; Chételat, J.; Palmer, M.; Vermaire, J.C. Bog and lake sediment archives reveal a lagged response of subarctic lakes to diminishing atmospheric Hg and Pb deposition. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 775, 145521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Brazeau, M.; Poulain, A.J.; Paterson, A.M.; Keller, W.B.; Sanei, H.; Blais, J.M. Recent changes in mercury deposition and primary productivity inferred from sediments of lakes from the Hudson Bay Lowlands, Ontario, Canada. Environ. Pollut. 2013, 173, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chen, J.; Hintelmann, H.; Zheng, W.; Feng, X.; Cai, H.; Wang, Z.; Yuan, S.; Wang, Z. Isotopic evidence for distinct sources of mercury in lake waters and sediments. Chem. Geol. 2016, 426, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hein, L.; White, L.; Miles, A.; Roberts, P. Analysing the impacts of air quality policies on ecosystem services; a case study for Telemark, Norway. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 206, 650–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Schulte, R.P.O.; Creamer, R.E.; Donnellan, T.; Farrelly, N.; Fealy, R.; O’Donoghue, C.; O’hUallachain, D. Functional land management: A framework for managing soil-based ecosystem services for the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Environ. Sci. Policy 2014, 38, 45–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Austin, Z.; McVittie, A.; McCracken, D.; Moxey, A.; Moran, D.; White, P.C.L. The co-benefits of biodiversity conservation programmes on wider ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 2016, 20, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Beaulne, J.; Magnan, G.; Garneau, M. Evaluating the potential of testate amoebae as indicators of hydrological conditions in boreal forested peatlands. Ecol. Indic. 2018, 91, 386–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mazei, Y.A.; Trulova, A.; Mazei, N.G.; Payne, R.J.; Tsyganov, A.N. Contributions of temporal and spatial variation to the diversity of soil-dwelling testate amoeba assemblages in a swampy forest. Pedobiologia 2020, 81–82, 150660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Swindles, G.T.; Green, S.M.; Brown, L.; Holden, J.; Raby, C.L.; Turner, T.E.; Smart, R.; Peacock, M.; Baird, A.J. Evaluating the use of dominant microbial consumers (testate amoebae) as indicators of blanket peatland restoration. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 69, 318–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Song, Y.; Song, C.; Hou, A.; Ren, J.; Wang, X.; Cui, Q.; Wang, M. Effects of temperature and root additions on soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization in a predominantly permafrost peatland. Catena 2018, 165, 381–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sinsabaugh, R.L. Phenol oxidase, peroxidase and organic matter dynamics of soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2010, 42, 391–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Waldrop, M.P.; Harden, J.W.; Turetsky, M.R.; Petersen, D.G.; McGuire, A.D.; Briones, M.J.I.; Churchill, A.C.; Doctor, D.H.; Pruett, L.E. Bacterial and enchytraeid abundance accelerate soil carbon turnover along a lowland vegetation gradient in interior Alaska. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2012, 50, 188–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Usup, A.; Hashimoto, Y.; Takahashi, H.; Hayasaka, H. Combustion and thermal characteristics of peat fire in tropical peatland in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Tropics 2004, 14, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, T.; Mickley, L.J.; Marlier, M.E.; DeFries, R.S.; Khan, M.F.; Latif, M.T.; Karambelas, A. Diagnosing spatial biases and uncertainties in global fire emissions inventories: Indonesia as regional case study. Remote Sens. Environ. 2020, 237, 111557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Feurdean, A.; Florescu, G.; Vannière, B.; Tantău, I.; O’Hara, R.B.; Pfeiffer, M.; Hutchinson, S.M.; Gałka, M.; Moskal-del Hoyo, M.; Hickler, T. Fire has been an important driver of forest dynamics in the Carpathian Mountains during the Holocene. For. Ecol. Manag. 2017, 389, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Feurdean, A.; Florescu, G.; Tantău, I.; Vannière, B.; Diaconu, A.C.; Pfeiffer, M.; Warren, D.; Hutchinson, S.M.; Gorina, N.; Gałka, M.; et al. Recent fire regime in the southern boreal forests of western Siberia is unprecedented in the last five millennia. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2020, 244, 106495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Toro, M.; Ptak, T.; Massmann, G.; Sültenfuß, J.; Janssen, M. Groundwater flow patterns in a coastal fen exposed to drainage, rewetting and interaction with the Baltic Sea. J. Hydrol. 2022, 615, 128726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Khadka, B.; Munir, T.M.; Strack, M. Dissolved organic carbon in a constructed and natural fens in the Athabasca oil sands region, Alberta, Canada. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 557–558, 579–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Schot, P.P.; Wassen, M.J. Calcium concentrations in wetland groundwater in relation to water sources and soil conditions in the recharge area. J. Hydrol. 1993, 141, 197–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, Y.; Han, Z.; Li, X.; Zhang, H.; Yuan, X.; Feng, Z.; Wang, P.; Mu, Z.; Song, W.; Blake, D.R.; et al. Plants and related carbon cycling under elevated ground-level ozone: A mini review. Appl. Geochem. 2022, 144, 105400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rinnan, R.; Saarnio, S.; Haapala, J.K.; Mörsky, S.K.; Martikainen, P.; Silvola, J.; Holopainen, T. Boreal peatland ecosystems under enhanced UV-B radiation and elevated tropospheric ozone concentration. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2013, 90, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Smith, P.; Fang, C.; Dawson, J.J.C.; Moncrieff, J.B. Impact of global warming on soil organic carbon. Adv. Agron. 2008, 97, 1–43. [Google Scholar]
  54. Peltoniemi, K.; Pyrhönen, M.; Laiho, R.; Moilanen, M.; Fritze, H. Microbial communities after wood ash fertilization in a boreal drained peatland forest. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2016, 76, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Saarsalmi, A.; Kukkola, M.; Moilanen, M.; Arola, M. Long-term effects of ash and N fertilization on stand growth, tree nutrient status and soil chemistry in a Scots pine stand. For. Ecol. Manag. 2006, 235, 116–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mahmood, S.; Finlay, R.D.; Fransson, A.M.; Wallander, H. Effects of hardened wood ash on microbial activity, plant growth and nutrient uptake by ectomycorrhizal spruce seedlings. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2003, 43, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Prat-Guitart, N.; Rein, G.; Hadden, R.M.; Belcher, C.M.; Yearsley, J.M. Effects of spatial heterogeneity in moisture content on the horizontal spread of peat fires. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 572, 1422–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Zaccone, C.; Rein, G.; D’Orazio, V.; Hadden, R.M.; Belcher, C.M.; Miano, T.M. Smouldering fire signatures in peat and their implications for palaeoenvironmental reconstructions. Geochim. Consmochim. Acta. 2014, 137, 134–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jiuling, Y.; Naian, L.; Haixiang, C.; Wei, G.; Ran, T. Effects of atmospheric oxygen on horizontal peat smoldering fires: Experimental and numerical study. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2019, 37, 4063–4071. [Google Scholar]
  60. Huguet, A.; Fosse, C.; Laggoun-Défarge, F.; Delarue, F.; Derenne, S. Effects of a short-term experimental microclimate warming on the abundance and distribution of branched GDGTs in the French peatland. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2013, 105, 294–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ding, S.; Kohlhepp, B.; Trumbore, S.; Küsel, K.; Totsche, K.U.; Pohnert, G.; Gleixner, G.; Schwab, V.F. In situ production of core and intact bacterial and archaeal tetraether lipids in groundwater. Org. Geochem. 2018, 126, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Qian, S.; Yang, H.; Dong, C.; Wang, Y.; Wu, J.; Pei, H.; Dang, X.; Lu, J.; Zhao, S.; Xie, S. Rapid response of fossil tetraether lipids in lake sediments to seasonal environmental variables in a shallow lake in central China: Implications for the use of tetraether-based proxies. Org. Geochem. 2019, 108, 108–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wang, D.; Zang, S.; Wu, X.; Ma, D.; Li, M.; Chen, Q.; Liu, X.; Zhang, N. Soil organic carbon stabilization in permafrost peatlands. Saudi. J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 7037–7045. [Google Scholar]
  64. Yang, Z.P.; Ou, Y.H.; Xu, X.L.; Zhao, L.; Song, M.H.; Zhou, C.P. Effects of permafrost degradation on ecosystems. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2010, 30, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Elias, S.A.; Mock, C.J. Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science, 2nd ed.; Burn, C.R., Ed.; Permafrost and Periglacial Features|Permafrost; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2013; pp. 464–471. [Google Scholar]
  66. Arnalds, O. Chapter Six–The influence of Volcanic Tephra (Ash) on Ecosystems. Adv. Agron. 2013, 121, 331–380. [Google Scholar]
  67. Nakanishi, R.; Ashi, J.; Okamura, S. A dataset for distribution and characteristics of Holocene pyroclastic fall deposits along the Pacific coasts in western Hokkaido, Japan. Data Br. 2020, 33, 106565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ponomareva, V.; Portnyagin, M.; Pendea, I.F.; Zelenin, E.; Bourgeois, J.; Pinegina, T.; Kozhurin, A. A full holocene tephrochronology for the Kamchatsky Peninsula region: Applications from Kamchatka to North America. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2017, 168, 101–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kato, T.; Silsigia, S.; Yusup, A.A.; Osaki, M. Tropical Peatland Eco-Management: Coexistence of Humans and Nature in Tropical Peatlands; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 135–161. [Google Scholar]
  70. Bullock, C.H.; Collier, M.J.; Convery, F. Peatlands, their economic value and priorities for their future management–The example of Ireland. Land Use Policy 2012, 29, 921–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Reed, M.S.; Bonn, A.; Evans, C.; Glenk, K.; Hansjürgens, B. Assessing and valuing peatland ecosystem services for sustainable management. Ecosyst. Serv. 2014, 9, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Clymo, R.S.; Turunen, J.; Tolonen, K. Carbon Accumulation in Peatland. Oikos 1998, 81, 368–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Blodau, C. Carbon cycling in peatlands ? A review of processes and controls. Environ. Rev. 2002, 10, 111–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Yu, Z.C. Northern peatland carbon stocks and dynamics: A review. Biogeosciences 2012, 9, 4071–4085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Puspitaloka, D.; Kim, Y.-S.; Purnomo, H.; Fulé, P.Z. Analysis of challenges, costs, and governance alternative for peatland restoration in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Trees Forst People 2021, 6, 100131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Bonn, A.; Allott, T.; Evans, M.; Joosten, H.; Stoneman, R. Peatland restoration and ecosystem services: An introduction. Bonn, A. In Peatland Restoration and Ecosystem Services: Science, Policy and Practice; Allott, T., Evans, M., Joosten, H., Stoneman, R., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2016; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  77. Matthews, G.V.T. The ramsar convention on wetlands: Its history and development. In Re-Issued Ramsar Convention Secretariat; Ramsar Convention Bureau: Gland, Switzerland, 2013; pp. 1–86. [Google Scholar]
  78. Turetsky, M.R.; Benscoter, B.; Page, S.; Rein, G.; van der Werf, G.R. Global vulnerability of peatlands to fire and carbon loss. Nat. Geosci. 2015, 8, 11–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Mickler, R.A.; Welch, D.P.; Bailey, A.D. Carbon emissions during wildland fire on a north american temperate peatland. Fire Ecol. 2017, 13, 34–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Konecny, K.; Ballhorn, U.; Navratil, P.; Jubanski, J.; Page, S.E.; Tansey, K.; Hooijer, A.; Vernimmen, R.; Siegert, F. Variable carbon losses from recurrent fires in drained tropical peatlands. Glob. Change Biol. 2016, 22, 1469–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zoltai, S.C.; Morrissey, L.A.; Livingston, G.P.; Groot, W.J. Effects of fires on carbon cycling in North American boreal peatlands. Environ. Rev. 1998, 6, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. An overall research framework for identifying changes in peatland research trends.
Figure 1. An overall research framework for identifying changes in peatland research trends.
Land 13 00628 g001
Figure 2. BERTopic algorithm process in which topics are extracted.
Figure 2. BERTopic algorithm process in which topics are extracted.
Land 13 00628 g002
Figure 3. Similarity matrix between 82 topics. The x and y axes represent 82 topics; the darker the color, the higher the similarity score between topics.
Figure 3. Similarity matrix between 82 topics. The x and y axes represent 82 topics; the darker the color, the higher the similarity score between topics.
Land 13 00628 g003
Figure 4. Hierarchical clustering of 82 topics. The linkage distance required to merge two clusters and used to measure inter-cluster similarity. Lower values indicate higher similarity, while higher values indicate greater difference. The color line connecting each other show clustering into highly similarity topics.
Figure 4. Hierarchical clustering of 82 topics. The linkage distance required to merge two clusters and used to measure inter-cluster similarity. Lower values indicate higher similarity, while higher values indicate greater difference. The color line connecting each other show clustering into highly similarity topics.
Land 13 00628 g004
Figure 5. Change in number of papers per topic from 1953 to 2022 (n = 10,158).
Figure 5. Change in number of papers per topic from 1953 to 2022 (n = 10,158).
Land 13 00628 g005
Figure 6. Proportions of topics which significantly (a) increased (hot topics) or (b) decreased (cold topics) from 2001 to 2022.
Figure 6. Proportions of topics which significantly (a) increased (hot topics) or (b) decreased (cold topics) from 2001 to 2022.
Land 13 00628 g006
Figure 7. Intertopic distance map of 15 topics. The size of the circles represents the paper number for each topic, and semantically similar topics are positioned in closer proximity to one another.
Figure 7. Intertopic distance map of 15 topics. The size of the circles represents the paper number for each topic, and semantically similar topics are positioned in closer proximity to one another.
Land 13 00628 g007
Table 1. Top 20 keywords with high probability appearing in each topic calculated using BERTopic modeling in peatland research from 1953 to 2022.
Table 1. Top 20 keywords with high probability appearing in each topic calculated using BERTopic modeling in peatland research from 1953 to 2022.
No.Topic 1Topic 2Topic 3Topic 4Topic 5Topic 6Topic 7Topic 8
Carbon
Dynamic
Past Environmental
Change
ProductionMetalManagementMicrobeSoil Organic
Matter
Surface Fire
(Flaming)
1soilcoalenergyHgservicespeciessoilfire
2waterHoloceneoilconcentrationecosystemhabitatmicrobialburning
3carbonpollenpalmPbpolicyamoebalitteraerosol
4wetlandrecordemissionmercurylandtestateenzymewildfire
5peatclimateproductionmetalmanagementcommunityactivityforest
6peatlandvegetationpolicyMeHgbiodiversityconservationdecompositionemission
7forestregionbiofueldepositionclimateforestcommunityburned
8CH4changeslandpeatwaterpopulationbacteriaair
9organiclakesustainabilityatmosphericusediversityfungalPM25
10areaChinausesoilconservationareaplantbiomass
11emissionbasinenvironmentalelementsenvironmentalpeatlandorganicsmoke
12ecosystemmonsoonsustainablesedimentsoilcariboufungisoil
13concentrationsedimentforestFeareaassemblageseffectarea
14CO2KafuelsourceESbiodiversitycarbonhaze
15vegetationpeatbioenergyriverframeworkrichnessnutrientseverity
16effectseamfoodlakebenefitsabundancediversitycharcoal
17plantconditionsghgdustagriculturalusedincreasedhealth
18changestemperaturebiodiesel137Csimpactssitesspeciescarbon
19sitesprecipitationdevelopmenttraceapproachecologicaltreatmentconcentration
20speciesclimaticdeforestationCdqualitytaxatemperatureregion
No.Topic 9Topic 10Topic 11Topic 12Topic 13Topic 14Topic 15
HydrologyGlobal warmingForestPeat fire
(smoldering)
BiomarkerPermafrostDeposit
1groundwatercarbonashsmolderingmethanepermafrosttephra
2fenglobalgrowthpeatlipidsoilvolcanic
3peatozonebiomassremovalbrGDGTslayereruption
4waterUVBsubstratespreadbacteriathawtsunami
5sandCO2growingfiretemperaturewarmingcryptotephra
6oilclimatemediawaterglycerolgroundlayer
7soilemissionwoodtreatmentGDGTsactiverecord
8wetlandatmosphericpeatcombustionbranchedtemperaturedeposits
9reclamationterrestrialtreatmentcatalystsourcethermalvolcano
10regionSIplantadsorptionacidclimateHolocene
11areaatmosphereproductionwastewatermicrobialiceash
12surfaceradiationnutrientpyrolysissedimentfrozenKa
13flowcyclecompostcontenttetraethersdegradationsediment
14peatlandplantbiocharmoistureproductionarcticisland
15constructedeffectcontrolsoliddialkylfreezingnew
16subsidencechangeseffectusinganaerobicthermokarstregion
17concentrationelevatedsoilfuelsoilthawingMIS
18GPRtemperaturebirchignitionenvironmentsdiscontinuousexplosive
19athabascaO3fertilizationorganicdistributionregionage
20soluteisopreneseedlingsconditionsarchaealpeattephrochronology
Table 2. Regression coefficients and p-values of topic number and proportion over time from 2001 to 2022 (n = 9002). ‘Hot’ indicates topics where the number and proportion changes significantly increase (p < 0.05), while ‘Cold’ represents topics where the number and proportion changes significantly decrease (p < 0.05). ‘-’ is not statistically significant.
Table 2. Regression coefficients and p-values of topic number and proportion over time from 2001 to 2022 (n = 9002). ‘Hot’ indicates topics where the number and proportion changes significantly increase (p < 0.05), while ‘Cold’ represents topics where the number and proportion changes significantly decrease (p < 0.05). ‘-’ is not statistically significant.
TopicPaper
Number
(2001 to 2022)
Topic Number (Frequency)Topic Proportion
Coefficientp-ValueHot/ColdCoefficientp-ValueHot/Cold
1424016.507062.56 × 10−13Hot−0.006834.48 × 10−6Cold
27893.9350651.38 × 10−8Hot0.0007160.363856-
37234.5065023.11 × 10−9Hot0.0044541.39 × 10−5Hot
44681.6736315.38 × 10−8Hot−0.001770.005069Cold
55053.2202155.18 × 10−8Hot0.0027697.36 × 10−7Hot
64671.617732.26 × 10−8Hot−0.002030.001801Cold
73501.804637.93 × 10−9Hot0.0004430.240627-
83061.8475245.93 × 10−8Hot0.0016440.00179Hot
92641.1620552.21 × 10−7Hot−0.000260.52559-
102240.7216263.97 × 10−6Hot−0.00070.066037-
111720.5872391.53 × 10−8Hot−0.000550.025334Cold
121550.9521366.33 × 10−6Hot0.0005920.010549Hot
131360.683239.85 × 10−7Hot0.000190.352263-
141260.811473.45 × 10−5Hot0.0004430.076562-
15770.3613412.05 × 10−5Hot−0.000150.328624Normal
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, A.-R.; Chae, J.; Choi, E. Analysis of Peatland Research Trends Based on BERTopic. Land 2024, 13, 628. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13050628

AMA Style

Yang A-R, Chae J, Choi E. Analysis of Peatland Research Trends Based on BERTopic. Land. 2024; 13(5):628. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13050628

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, A-Ram, Jeongyeon Chae, and Eunho Choi. 2024. "Analysis of Peatland Research Trends Based on BERTopic" Land 13, no. 5: 628. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13050628

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop