Next Article in Journal
Astrogliosis in the GFAP-CreERT2:Rosa26iDTR Mouse Model Does Not Exacerbate Retinal Microglia Activation or Müller Cell Gliosis under Hypoxic Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Concentrations of Bioelements (Zn, Cu, Fe, Cr, Mg, Mn) in Serum and Bone Tissue of Aging Men Undergoing Hip Arthroplasty: Implications for Erectile Dysfunction
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 14
Issue 5
10.3390/biom14050566
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Regulatory Network of hnRNPs Underlying Regulating PKM Alternative Splicing in Tumor Progression

by
Yuchao Li
1,†,
Shuwei Zhang
1,†,
Yuexian Li
2,
Junchao Liu
1,
Qian Li
1,
Wenli Zang
1 and
Yaping Pan
1,*
1
Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, School and Hospital of Stomatology, China Medical University, Shenyang 110002, China
2
Department of Radiation Oncology Gastrointestinal and Urinary and Musculoskeletal Cancer, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110042, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biomolecules 2024, 14(5), 566; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom14050566
Submission received: 30 March 2024 / Revised: 26 April 2024 / Accepted: 7 May 2024 / Published: 9 May 2024
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
One of the hallmarks of cancer is metabolic reprogramming in tumor cells, and aerobic glycolysis is the primary mechanism by which glucose is quickly transformed into lactate. As one of the primary rate-limiting enzymes, pyruvate kinase (PK) M is engaged in the last phase of aerobic glycolysis. Alternative splicing is a crucial mechanism for protein diversity, and it promotes PKM precursor mRNA splicing to produce PKM2 dominance, resulting in low PKM1 expression. Specific splicing isoforms are produced in various tissues or illness situations, and the post-translational modifications are linked to numerous disorders, including cancers. hnRNPs are one of the main components of the splicing factor families. However, there have been no comprehensive studies on hnRNPs regulating PKM alternative splicing. Therefore, this review focuses on the regulatory network of hnRNPs on PKM pre-mRNA alternative splicing in tumors and clinical drug research. We elucidate the role of alternative splicing in tumor progression, prognosis, and the potential mechanism of abnormal RNA splicing. We also summarize the drug targets retarding tumorous splicing events, which may be critical to improving the specificity and effectiveness of current therapeutic interventions.

1. Introduction

Alternative splicing refers to pre-mRNA exon inclusion or intron exclusion to form alternative splice variants via splicing at different sites. A total of 90% to 95% of human pre-mRNA can produce multiple transcripts by alternative splicing to enrich the diverse proteome. In brief, alternative splicing is the primary way to maintain protein diversity, and preternatural alternative splicing can cause a variety of diseases, including cystic fibrosis, dysautonomia, autoimmune disease, type I diabetes, asthma, and especially cancers [1]. Obviously, compared to normal samples, tumors exhibit up to 30% more alternative splicing events, and thousands of alternative splicing events have only been detected in tumors [2]. Alternative splicing events can control a variety of carcinogenesis processes via cancer hallmarks, including apoptosis, cell cycle, proliferation, metabolism, genomic instability, epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), motility, invasion, angiogenesis, and so on [3]. Alternative splicing is generally divided into the following types: constitutive exon splicing, alternative 5’ splice site, alternative 3’ splice site, cassette exon skipping, retained intron, and mutually exclusive exons, which possess cell and stage-specific characteristics [4]. The process requires splice regulators including serine/arginine-rich proteins (SRs), heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs), and RNA binding motif (RBM) families. They belong to RNA binding proteins and recognize different motifs to efficiently affect the splicing decision. SRs have been reported to bind to exon enhancer or intron enhancer sequences more likely to activate splicing, while hnRNPs prefer to bind to exon silencer or intron silencer sequences to suppress the splice site selection. In addition, RBM can also perform similar regulations, but their functions are not entirely clear. Regardless, SRs, hnRNPs, and RBM are essential to tumor oncogenesis and progression.
Oxidative phosphorylation and glycolysis are two main metabolic pathways that provide energy for cells. Normal cells mainly depend on mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation to generate biological energy. In 1921, Otto Warburg found that cancer cells showed aberrantly active glycolysis even in the presence of sufficient oxygen. Tumor tissues metabolize 10 times the glucose to meet the energy needed for rapid growth, with lactate as the end product. Most cancer cells rely on aerobic glycolysis and the mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation decreases, which is referred to as the Warburg effect [5,6]. Pyruvate kinase (PK) is involved in the last step of glycolysis and catalyzes phosphoenolpyruvate to pyruvate. There are three isoforms of PK including PKL, PKR, and PKM, among which PKM is the most well-studied. PKM precursor mRNA, pre-mRNA, is alternatively spliced into PKM1 and PKM2 under multiple splicing factors control. Structurally, PKM1 excludes exon 10, and PKM2 excludes exon 9 (Figure 1). PKM1 is primarily expressed in the heart, muscle, brain, and mature sperm, in which cells require a great deal of energy via oxidative phosphorylation. PKM2 is selectively dispersed across proliferating cells with significant anabolic demands, such as embryonic cells, stem cells, gut, and thymus, as well as most tumor cells (Figure 1). The inactive dimer of PKM2 is commonly used by tumor cells [7] to facilitate the transition from oxidative phosphorylation into aerobic glycolysis, which is critical for tumor development [8]. Yet the splicing sites are relatively conservative in PKM pre-mRNA, and it cannot fully explain the aberrant splicing events. The upstream regulatory proteins can regulate abnormal expressions of splicing factors or change the interactions with PKM pre-mRNA, which eventually drives or affects metabolism programming in cancer cells. Thus, it is crucial to explore the upstream regulatory proteins and relative targets to clarify the aberrant RNA splicing events, which contributes to improving the specificity and effectiveness of cancer therapy. Among the splicing factors regulating PKM pre-mRNA splicing, hnRNPs aroused our interest for their multiple regulating approaches. Therefore, we review the structure, mechanism of regulating splicing events, epigenetic effects, and clinical drugs targeting hnRNPA1, hnRNPA2/B1, and hnRNPI/PTBP1.

2. SRs, hnRNPs, and RBM Contribute to the Oncogenesis and Tumor Progression via Alternative Splicing

Alternative splicing events are identified as a characteristic of almost all tumors. Abnormal events can generate cancer-related splicing isoforms including HIF1A, NUMB, PKM, HER2, IRF3, FAS, BRCA1, etc. These isoforms are implicated in boosting cancer cell proliferation, decreasing cell death, enhancing cell migration and metastasis, and renewing metabolism patterns [9]. Splicing factors (SFs) including SRs, hnRNPs, and RBM are able to regulate the splicing events [10,11]. The multiplied mutations and aberrant expressions of SFs are more frequent in cancers. Of note, the SR family mainly contains SRSF1-12, which is usually overexpressed and identified as oncogenes in lung, colon, gastric, ovarian, breast, leukemia, and pancreas tumors [9,12]. SRs are typically bound to exonic splicing enhancers (ESEs) of pre-mRNA and facilitate U1 small nuclear ribonucleic particles (snRNP) and U2 snRNP binding to splicing sites, which contribute to initiating splicing at neighboring splice sites and then including exons.
The family of heterogeneous ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs) was first identified in 1965 by Gall et al. [13] and belonged to the most abundant nuclear proteins. hnRNPs are located in the nucleolus of eukaryotic cells and can act as splicing factors facilitating PKM pre-mRNAs into PKM2 mRNAs. There are 21 members in the hnRNPs family [14]. hnRNPs can also promote nucleotide metabolism and serve as oncogenes and suppressors in different types of cancers. In adrenocortical, liver, and lung cancers, hnRNPs show high expressions. However, they show low expressions in kidney cancer and thymoma [15].
The RBM family has been identified as a regulator of alternative splicing factors in the last few decades. The RBM contains 50 members with RNA-recognizing domains in common. Of note, RBM10 is observed as a classic mutation in lung, colon, pancreas, and thyroid cancers [16]. RBM5 is another reported family member with low expressions in lung, breast, and prostate cancers and functions as a tumor suppressor. It has been reported that RBM5 can induce cancer cell apoptosis and inhibit proliferation [17,18]. To function as a splicing regulator, RBM could act on different steps of the splicing events and eventually contribute to cell apoptosis, cell cycle, and other biological process alterations [19]. Up to now, the concrete regulation mechanism has not been fully clarified, and further investigation is required [20,21,22,23].

3. The Different Functions Depending on hnRNP Intracellular Localization

The hnRNP family has a molecular weight range of 34–120 kDa and is composed of more than 20 macromolecular proteins as well as a few other small molecule proteins. hnRNPA1, hnRNPA2/B1, hnRNPB2, hnRNPC1, and hnRNPC2 are considered the core members. Except for at least one auxiliary domain that controls protein interactions and subcellular distribution, their protein structures contain one or more RNA binding motifs, which are crucial for hnRNPs acting as RNA-binding proteins. RNP-CS-RBD motif (the most prevalent), RGG box, and KH domain are the three main isoforms of RNA binding motifs. Among these, RNA binding activity in hnRNPA1 is mostly dependent on RNA binding domain (RBD) elements [24]. What’s more, the glycine-rich domain observed in hnRNPA/B is the most prevalent auxiliary domain. Since both hnRNPA1 and A2/B1 have a structure with two RBDs at the N-terminus and one glycine at the C-terminus, they are referred to as 2xRBD-Gly proteins [25]. Due to diverse intracellular localization patterns, hnRNPs exert a variety of functions. On the one hand, RNA splicing, 3′ terminal processing, transcriptional control, and immunoglobulin gene recombination are the principal functions of hnRNPs in the nucleus. On the other hand, mRNA nucleoplasm transport, mRNA localization, metabolism, translation, and protein stability are the main functions of hnRNPs that shuttle between the nucleus and cytoplasm [26]. hnRNPs can also influence how proteins interact with one another and their sub-cellular localization. Apoptosis-related target genes, including Bcl-2, IAP, and p53 tumor suppressor genes, as well as exogenous (Fas, caspase-8, caspase-2, and c-FLIP) and endogenous (Apaf-1, caspase 9, and ICAD) regulators are negatively impacted by abnormally expressed hnRNPs [27].

4. The Regulatory Network of Different hnRNP Family Members

4.1. hnRNPA1

hnRNPs were first identified as splicing factors that regulated exon splicing and intron removal to produce a range of transcripts. Additionally, hnRNPs bind to exonic or intronic splicing silencers (ESSs or ISSs) and consequently prevent the binding of splicing factor elements, which diminishes the selection of splicing sites and competes with SRs to promote exon jumping [28]. The hnRNPA/B family members include hnRNPA1, A2/B1, A3, and A0. Among the four members, hnRNPA1 and hnRNPA2/B1 have been studied more widely and deeply compared with hnRNPA3 and hnRNPA0 [29]. Interestingly, hnRNPA2 is structurally like B1, while hnRNPB1 differs from hnRNPA2 in that B1 inserts 12 amino acids at the N-terminal. hnRNPB1 consists of two N-terminus RRMs, a C-terminal LC (containing an RGG cassette), an M9-NLS, and a core PrLD. However, most studies on hnRNPA2/B1 have either failed to distinguish its subtypes or have focused only on A2 [30]. Hereafter, we mainly discussed the structure, distribution, function, and the regulatory network of hnRNPA1 and hnRNPA2/B1 in the hnRNPA/B family.
The hnRNPA1 domain consists of two RNA recognition motifs (RRM1 and RRM2), an RNA binding cassette (RGG), and a nucleus-targeted sequence M9 [31]. The size of the hnRNPA1 protein is about 34 kDa, and its main functions include mRNA splicing, transport, and end particle biosynthesis. hnRNPA1 exhibits minimal expression in normal tissues, but it is highly expressed in various types of malignancies, including breast cancer, prostate cancer, oral cancer, neuroblastoma, bladder cancer, lung cancer, colon cancer, and hepatocellular cancer. As an SF, hnRNPA1 can influence apoptotic gene expressions in cancer cells via regulating alternative splicing, mRNA stability, translation, and protein degradation. In breast and prostate cancer cells, hnRNPA1 weakens programmed cell death by promoting the production of the anti-apoptotic splicing isomer Bcl-x and inhibiting the synthesis of the anti-apoptotic protein cIAP1 [32,33]. Additionally, hnRNPA1 can bind to the GUAGUAGU motif found in CDK2’s intron 4 region and regulate the inclusion of exon 5 in CDK2. In this circumstance, hnRNPA1 controls the expressions of target genes linked to the G2/M stage, further promotes the growth of oral cancer cells [34], and activates telomerase to lengthen telomeres, resulting in the initiation and development of malignant tumors [35].
In terms of interfering with glycolysis, the arginine residue of the hnRNPA1 RGG motif binds to the UAGGGC sequence of intron 9 on the side of PKM pre-mRNA. hnRNPA1 can facilitate the switch from PKM1 to PKM2 in cancer cells, which accelerates glycolysis and cancer initiation [36]. A variety of genes essentially modulate the expression level of hnRNPA1, affecting PKM2 expression and controlling the proliferation, apoptosis, and migration of cancer cells (Figure 2). For instance, MYCN is directly bound to the hnRNPA1 and PTBP1 promoter regions and enhances their expressions, respectively. MYCN promotes neuroblastoma cell proliferation and is related to the poor prognosis of patients [37]. Also, hnRNPA1 is regulated in part by certain microRNAs. Let-7a is highly associated with cancer initiation and progression. It has multiple biological functions in cancer cells, including inhibiting cell proliferation, promoting cell differentiation, and apoptosis. However, breast cancer tissues exhibit a low expression of let-7a, preventing Stat3 translation due to less interaction with the Stat3 3′ UTR promoter. Eventually, the low expression of Stat3 reduces the hnRNPA1 level by binding to the GAS in the hnRNPA1 promoter region. Additionally, let-7a-5p maturation is inhibited by hnRNPA1, thus forming a let-7a-5p/Stat3/hnRNPA1 negative feedback pathway in breast cancer cells [38]. By inhibiting hnRNPA1-dependent PKM splicing and consequent PKM2 overexpression, RBMX neutralizes the aggressive phenotype of metastatic bladder cancer cells. With low expression in metastatic bladder cancer tissues, RBMX can competitively bind to the RGG motif of hnRNPA1 and block it from combining with the lateral intron of PKM mRNA exon 9, leading to high expression of PKM1 and weakening the malignancy and progression of tumors [39]. SAM68, an SRC-related protein in mitosis ubiquitously expressed in lung adenocarcinoma, has been linked to high cancer recurrence frequency, increased cancer-related mortality, and low overall survival. Also, the 351–443 amino acid region of the SAM68 protein is capable of binding to the RGG motif of hnRNPA1, driving PKM pre-mRNA alternative splicing onset and increasing PKM2 expression [40,41]. In addition, other factors also affect hnRNPA1 expression. The HOXB-AS3 peptide can competitively bind to the arginine residue in the hnRNPA1 RGG motif and inhibit the binding of hnRNPA1 to PKM, which further down-regulates the level of PKM2 and inhibits the metabolism reprogramming process of colon cancer cells [42]. A serine protease known as trichosanthes kirilowii protease (TKP) is derived from plants and prevents colon cancer cells from undergoing EMT and promotes apoptosis [43]. It has been reported that TKP significantly reduces β-catenin expression in a dose-dependent manner and inhibits the β-catenin/c-Myc/hnRNPA1 signaling cascade, thereby inhibiting glycolysis and cell proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma cells [44].

4.2. hnRNPA2/B1

hnRNPA2/B1 is mainly expressed in breast cancer, colon cancer, prostate cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer, etc. hnRNPA2/B1 functions as alternative splicing and can play a negative role in regulating DNA repair, transcriptional activators, RNA transport, and miRNA expression. hnRNPA2/B1 inhibits 5′ and 3′ splicing site recognition, promotes distal 5′ splicing site selection, and inhibits the use of proximal splicing sites [45]. Several studies have shown that hnRNPA2 binds to the target motif of hnRNPA1 and replaces its splicing role [46]. Exon exclusion and intron inclusion are part of the hnRNPA2/B1 regulating splicing process. Researchers have discovered motifs including UAG(G/A), UAGGG, GGUAGUAG, and AGGAUAGA that could be recognized and implicated in the splicing process [30]. Genes that can be recognized and spliced by hnRNPA2/B1 include VHLα [47], MST1R [48,49], c-FLIP, BIN1, WWOX [50], PKM2 [51], etc.
Numerous elements influence hnRNPA2/B1 expression or its function to increase the production of PKM2, improving the glycolytic capacity of cancer cells. Uncoupling proteins (UCP), which are extensively expressed in a variety of cancer tissues, are anionic transporters at the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM). By boosting the anti-apoptotic characteristics, UCP can inhibit the accumulation of mitochondrial ROS, which leads to chemotherapy resistance and enhances tumor aggressiveness. However, the specific concentration of ROS triggering this tumor-promoting effect is not yet determined. Through its antioxidant role, UCP2 increases the expression of hnRNPA2/B1 and upregulates GLUT1 and PKM2, increasing glycolytic activity and lactate production in breast cancer cells (Figure 3) [51]. Several non-coding RNAs can control hnRNPA2/B1 expression. The hnRNPA2/B1 mRNA 3′UTR region’s translation stability is maintained by miR-369, and its overexpression shifts from PKM to PKM2 variable to facilitate metabolic reprogramming [52]. In contrast, miR-124 and miR-137 accelerate the conversion of PKM pre-mRNA to PKM1 in colon cancer cells by inhibiting hnRNPA2. In this scenario, glucose is primarily metabolized through oxidative phosphorylation to inhibit colon cancer cell growth [53].
Exosomes carrying lncRNA LNMAT2 are secreted by prostate cancer cells, and these exosomes interact with hnRNPA2/B1 to facilitate lymph angiogenesis and lymph node metastases [54]. In non-small cell lung cancer, c-Myc can bind to the LINC01234 promoter to increase its transcription. LINC01234 then interacts with hnRNPA2/B1 to create a new carcinogenic loop of c-Myc/LINC01234/hnRNPA2/B1/miR-106b-5p/CRY2/c-Myc [55]. LncRNA H19 is upregulated in colon cancer and associated with a poor prognosis. H19 directly binds to hnRNPA2/B1 and afterward initiates the ERK signaling pathway, which orchestrates an EMT in colon cancer cells [56]. Also, a variety of lncRNA HOTAIR sequence segments can bind hnRNPA2/B1, especially the B1 subtype, which has a strong affinity for HOTAIR. Additionally, hnRNPB1 binds to chromatin and preferentially correlates with HOTAIR transcripts, promoting the invasion capability of breast cancers [57].

4.3. PTBP1

hnRNPI, also known as polypyrimidine tract-binding protein 1 (PTBP1), interacts with the polypyrimidine present at the upstream branch point of exons to serve as an SF in most situations. It consists of 531 amino acids, 4 RNA-binding RRM domains, and nuclear shuttle domains at the N terminus [58]. PTBP1 has a molecular weight of 59 kDa, which makes it easy to attach to promoters. It is highly expressed in tumor tissues and linked to a poor prognosis of colon cancer [59], glioma [60], renal clear cell carcinoma [61], and anaplastic large cell lymphoma [62]. PTBP1 increases alternative splicing events of CD44 to produce CD44 v8-10, which promotes cancer cell invasion. In addition, PTBP1 can also boost the expressions of cell-cycle-related proteins such as cyclin A, cyclin B, cyclin D, cyclin E, and CDC2, to promote tumor cell proliferation [63]. To accelerate tumor growth, PTBP1 develops radiation and chemotherapy resistance and has a positive correlation with hypoxic lesions [64].
The main roles of PTBP1 are splicing localization and poly-acylation of mRNA. PTBP1 can serve as an SF for many genes, including MEIS2, PKM [65], Axl [66] and EXOC7, etc. [67]. The binding of PTBP1 to pre-mRNA inhibits the splicing of exons adjacent to the binding sites and improves binding to the optimal motif in the polypyrimidine beam near the 3′-terminal splicing site (e.g., UCUUC). This action prevents the inclusion of downstream exons as a consequence [68]. PTBP1 preferentially binds to intron 8 when it comes to PKM pre-mRNA, further excluding exon 9, which leads to exon 10 inclusion and ultimately promotes PKM2 transcription (Figure 4) [61]. The expression of PTBP1 is markedly increased by EGF, which also promotes tumorigenesis by increasing transcription and translation of PKM2 [69]. MTR4 is a nuclear exosome-associated RNA helicase, and functions as an essential component of RNA processing and surveillance. It is an independent diagnostic marker for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with poor prognosis. In the promoter region of MTR4, c-Myc binds to 2 non-classical E cassettes (CACGCG, CACGAG) and 695 bp CpG islands around the TSS, recruiting PTBP1 to the target pre-mRNA through an independent RNA and protein interaction. This guarantees proper alternative splicing processes and produces the glycolytic gene PKM2 to boost cancer metabolism [70].
In addition, several tissue-specific non-coding RNAs can act as upstream targets of PTBP1. miR-124, miR-1, miR-133b, miR-137, miR-206, and miR-340 inhibit PTBP1 expression and reduce the PKM2/PKM1 ratio, impeding glycolysis [53,71] (Table 1). The brain contains a high level of miR-124, which has been extensively investigated in neurodevelopment. miR-124 has anti-tumor effects by increasing the oxidative stress products activated by the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA) and causing apoptosis and autophagy [72]. Particularly in the brain and colorectal cancers, low expression of miR-124 triggers a feedback cascade on PTBP1/PKM1/PKM2, which promotes cancer cell growth [73]. PKM2 could be significantly reduced by si-PTBP1 or miR-124 mimics, demonstrating that these molecules were crucial in controlling the ratio of PKM2/PKM1 [74]. miR-1 and miR-133 also function as anti-tumor non-coding RNAs expressed in muscle tissues, which mediate cell autophagy by silencing PTBP1. In addition, miR-133b can directly downregulate the pathogenic gene PAX3-FOXO1, causing reduced PTBP1 expression. All of this results in a dominant manner of PKM1-modulated oxidative phosphorylation in cells [75]. Other tissue-specific microRNAs can also regulate PTBP1 expression and stabilize the downstream target genes, which may participate in controlling the PKM splicing networks. For instance, PTB-AS stabilizes the mRNA by binding to the 3′UTR region of PTBP1 and increasing PTBP1 expression [76]. In non-small cell lung cancer, miR-644a functions as a tumor suppressor to inhibit PTBP1 expression [77], and in colorectal cancer, HuR binds to the 3’UTR region of PTBP1 to promote PTBP1 stability. However, circRHOBTB3 promotes HuR ubiquitination degradation caused by β-Trcp1 and reduces the production of downstream PTBP1 [78].

5. Epigenetic Modifications of hnRNPs Affect Glycolysis of Tumor Cells by Regulating PKM2

Under certain circumstances, continuous accumulations of genetic changes and epigenetic modifications in key tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes affect the occurrence and development of tumors [79]. Epigenetic modification refers to changes in gene expression rather than altering DNA sequence [80]. Common epigenetic changes in tumors include abnormal DNA methylation, histone modifications, and altered expression levels of various non-coding RNAs. PKM2 can be mutually regulated through phosphorylation, acetylation, and other modifications, which change PKM2 intracellular localization and specific biological functions, including energy supply for cancer cells, EMT, cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis (Table 2) [81]. However, attention must also be paid to the epigenetic alterations of the upstream SFs causing the shift in PKM2 expression. The stability or affinity of hnRNPs is affected by modifications like acetylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitination. Ultimately, it influences whether cells use PKM1-based oxidative phosphorylation metabolism or PKM2-based glycolysis.
The acetylated and phosphorylated hnRNPA1 increases its affinity with PKM pre-mRNA promoting PKM2 isoform generation and enhances cancer cell proliferation and invasion. In lung adenocarcinoma, ESCO2, as an evolutionarily conserved cohesion acetyltransferase, can catalyze hnRNPA1 acetylated at K277 and retain hnRNPA1 in the nucleus. This increases hnRNPA1 binding to PKM EI9 together with more PKM2 isoform mRNA production [82]. S6K2 catalyzes the phosphorylation of hnRNPA1 in Ser6 and causes colorectal cancer cells to preferentially express PKM2 instead of PKM1 and enhance the cell proliferation activity [83]. However, de-acetylation and ubiquitination increase PKM1 isoforms and inhibit aggressive cancer cell isotypes. In hepatocellular carcinoma, SIRT1 and SIRT6 cause de-acetylation at K3, K52, K87, and K350 lysine residues in hnRNPA1, hindering the splicing transition from PKM to PKM2 mRNA. This weakens PKM metabolic activity and the non-metabolic PKM2/β-catenin signaling pathway, which in turn inhibits cancer cells from utilizing glycolysis and proliferating [84]. E3 ubiquitin ligase ZFP91, a tumor suppressor, is typically less expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma. Overexpression of ZFP91 can promote K48 polyubiquitination of hnRNPA1 at K8, leading to hnRNPA1 degradation via the proteasome pathway [85]. And for PTBP1, its de-acetylation can decrease its affinity for PKM pre-mRNA. SMAR1, PTBP1, and HDAC6 can form a ternary complex, and in this scenario, SMAR1 can catalyze PTBP1 to maintain the deacetylated state in an HDAC6-dependent manner. SMAR1 inhibits glucose uptake and lactate production by reducing PKM2 expression, therefore inhibiting breast cell metabolism and malignancy [86].
In addition to glucose metabolism, the post-translation modifications of hnRNPs exert other aspects on cellular metabolism. The ubiquitination of PTBP1 and hnRNPA2/B1 affect lipogenesis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma [87] and hepatocellular carcinoma [88]. Additionally, hnRNPK phosphorylation influences mRNA metabolism [89]. So far, other types of metabolism are not as extensively investigated as glucose metabolism regulated by the hnRNPs family. More research on other metabolic effects needs to be explored in the future.

6. Potential Therapeutic Drugs or Inhibitors

Many effective drugs targeting PKM2 have already been found, such as benserazide (BEN), benzoxepane derivatives 10i, ML-265, parthenolide, TT-232 (CAP-232), TEPP-46, combohydroquinone, and histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi). These inhibitors can reduce mitochondrial metabolic reprogramming, weaken cell proliferation, inhibit tumor cell growth, and mediate apoptosis [74,90,91,92,93]. In addition to these existing inhibitors, exploration of medicine targeting the SFs of PKM to decrease PKM2 production may have great prospects to impair the glycolysis in cancer cells.
As one of the essential SFs for PKM, PTBP1 is highly expressed in two drug-resistant colon cancer cell lines (HCT-8/V and HCT116). Knocking down PTBP1 enhances the chemotherapy sensitivity and leads to inhibition of glycolysis [94]. Several plant-derived ingredients have been reported to show anti-tumor benefits. Kaempferol is essentially a flavonoid in fruits and vegetables that induces apoptosis and inhibits colon cancer cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, kaempferol promotes miR-339-5p expression, which directly targets hnRNPA1 and PTBP1, reducing PKM2 expression and inhibiting glycolysis in colon cancer [95]. Moreover, another plant-derived oleanolic acid induces a transition from PKM2 to PKM1 by inhibiting mTOR signaling and the c-Myc-dependent expressions of hnRNPA1 and hnRNPA2, thus weakening the glycolytic ability of cancer cells [96].
hnRNPs are correspondingly downregulated after the application of inhibitors. Quercetin is a flavonoid abundant in plants that specifically binds to the C-terminal region of hnRNPA1. Quercetin impairs the ability of hnRNPA1 to shuttle between the nucleus and cytoplasm and ultimately traps it in the cytoplasm [33]. β-caprylylone is the main component of coriander volatile oil, a Chinese herbal medicine that has recently been shown to have anti-glioma effects. Previous studies have shown that β-caprylylone can inhibit the expression of hnRNPA2/B1. β-caprylylone thereby promotes Bcl-x alternative splicing, increasing the ratio of Bcl-xS/Bc and mediating apoptosis of glioma cells [97]. In addition, pretreatment with the synthetic drug cilostazol, which is a novel antiplatelet drug, can reduce the overexpression of hnRNPA2/B1 in human dermal microvascular endothelial cells [98]. Nanoparticle-coupled aptamers bind specifically to hnRNPA2/B1, identifying and inhibiting the proliferation of a variety of tumor cells (HepG2, MCF-7, H1299, and HeLa), and they may have a promising application in cancer diagnosis and treatment [99]. The above findings suggest that hnRNP inhibitors are expected to become antineoplastic agents, and combining with PKM2 agonists or inhibitors may achieve better efficacy (Table 3). However, all the drugs or inhibitors mentioned above are only investigated in in vitro cells or animal models, the clinic trial information is limited and not reported yet. The effective therapeutic drugs are expected to be studied for clinical use in the future.

7. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

It has been decades since PKM alternative splicing first became implicated in tumorigenesis and progression. With the development of new methods for analyzing the alternative splicing events on a big scale, including quantAS [100], isoform long-reads RNA-seq (Iso-seq), and single-cell RNA-seq [101], our understanding of this event will continue to grow. Despite the emphasis on the change from PKM1 to PKM2, it does not seem that it can entirely account for the variety of splicing events. New knowledge may also provide novel targets for hnRNPs like hnRNPA1, hnRNPA2/B1, PTBP1, etc. We currently provide a brief review of the most recent research on the upstream regulators of hnRNPs, as well as the developed target drugs and inhibitors in vitro. In the future, more studies will be conducted to explore the unknown information on hnRNPs members. Additionally, there is scope for more investigation into deeper mechanisms of aberrant alternative splicing events in malignancies, as well as the potential side-effects of the aforementioned medicines and inhibitors. Small molecules, splice-switching antisense oligonucleotides, CRISPR-based approaches, or engineered small nuclear RNAs, etc. may be used for modulating the splicing events.

Author Contributions

Y.L. (Yuchao Li) and Y.P. conceived this review. Y.L. (Yuchao Li) and S.Z. searched the literature and wrote this paper together. Y.L. (Yuexian Li), J.L. and W.Z. were responsible for drawing and tabulating. Q.L. and Y.P. reviewed and modified the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO.82170969 and 82370975).

Acknowledgments

Thanks for F.G. (Fengxue Geng), who has polished the English writing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

EMT: epithelial–mesenchymal transition; PK: pyruvate kinase; SR: serine/arginine-rich protein; hnRNP: heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein; ESE: exonic splicing enhancer; snRNP: small nuclear ribonucleic particles; RBD: RNA binding domain; SF: splicing factor; ESS: exonic splicing silencer; ISS: intronic splicing silencer; TKP: trichosanthes kirilowii protease; UCP: uncoupling proteins; PTBP1: polypyrimidine tract-binding protein 1; TCA: tricarboxylic acid cycle; HDACi: histone deacetylase inhibitors.

References

  1. Wang, G.S.; Cooper, T.A. Splicing in disease: Disruption of the splicing code and the decoding machinery. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 8, 749–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kahles, A.; Lehmann, K.V.; Toussaint, N.C.; Huser, M.; Stark, S.G.; Sachsenberg, T.; Stegle, O.; Kohlbacher, O.; Sander, C.; Rätsch, G. Comprehensive analysis of alternative splicing across tumors from 8705 patients. Cancer Cell 2018, 34, 211–224.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bonnal, S.C.; Lopez-Oreja, I.; Valcarcel, J. Roles and mechanisms of alternative splicing in cancer—Implications for care. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 17, 457–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ule, J.; Blencowe, B.J. Alternative splicing regulatory networks: Functions, mechanisms, and evolution. Mol. Cell 2019, 76, 329–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Vander Heiden, M.G.; Cantley, L.C.; Thompson, C.B. Understanding the Warburg effect: The metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 2009, 324, 1029–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Koppenol, W.H.; Bounds, P.L.; Dang, C.V. Otto Warburg’s contributions to current concepts of cancer metabolism. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2011, 11, 325–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Christofk, H.R.; Vander Heiden, M.G.; Harris, M.H.; Ramanathan, A.; Gerszten, R.E.; Wei, R.; Fleming, M.D.; Schreiber, S.L.; Cantley, L.C. The M2 splice isoform of pyruvate kinase is important for cancer metabolism and tumour growth. Nature 2008, 452, 230–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Dayton, T.L.; Jacks, T.; Vander Heiden, M.G. PKM2, cancer metabolism, and the road ahead. EMBO Rep. 2016, 17, 1721–1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Bradley, R.K.; Anczukow, O. RNA splicing dysregulation and the hallmarks of cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2023, 23, 135–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Clower, C.V.; Chatterjee, D.; Wang, Z.; Cantley, L.C.; Vander Heiden, M.G.; Krainer, A.R. The alternative splicing repressors hnRNP A1/A2 and PTB influence pyruvate kinase isoform expression and cell metabolism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 1894–1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Huang, X.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, Y.; Liao, X.; Hu, L.; Fang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zeng, H.; Wu, H.; Liu, J.; et al. IGF2BP3 may contributes to lung tumorigenesis by regulating the alternative splicing of PKM. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 679. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zheng, X.; Peng, Q.; Wang, L.; Zhang, X.; Huang, L.; Wang, J.; Qin, Z. Serine/arginine-rich splicing factors: The bridge linking alternative splicing and cancer. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 16, 2442–2453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gall, J.G. Small granules in the amphibian oocyte nucleus and their relationship to RNA. J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol. 1956, 2, 393–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Geuens, T.; Bouhy, D.; Timmerman, V. The hnRNP family: Insights into their role in health and disease. Hum. Genet. 2016, 135, 851–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Li, H.; Liu, J.; Shen, S.; Dai, D.; Cheng, S.; Dong, X.; Sun, L.; Guo, X. Pan-cancer analysis of alternative splicing regulator heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs) family and their prognostic potential. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2020, 24, 11111–11119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Loiselle, J.J.; Sutherland, L.C. RBM10: Harmful or helpful-many factors to consider. J. Cell Biochem. 2018, 119, 3809–3818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sutherland, L.C.; Wang, K.; Robinson, A.G. RBM5 as a putative tumor suppressor gene for lung cancer. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2010, 5, 294–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhang, Y.P.; Liu, K.L.; Wang, Y.X.; Yang, Z.; Han, Z.W.; Lu, B.S.; Qi, J.-C.; Yin, Y.-W.; Teng, Z.-H.; Chang, X.-L.; et al. Down-regulated RBM5 inhibits bladder cancer cell apoptosis by initiating an miR-432-5p/beta-catenin feedback loop. FASEB J. 2019, 33, 10973–10985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Soubise, B.; Jiang, Y.; Douet-Guilbert, N.; Troadec, M.B. RBM22, a key player of pre-mRNA splicing and gene expression regulation, is altered in cancer. Cancers 2022, 14, 643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shepard, P.J.; Hertel, K.J. The SR protein family. Genome Biol. 2009, 10, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, Z.; Chatterjee, D.; Jeon, H.Y.; Akerman, M.; Vander Heiden, M.G.; Cantley, L.C.; Krainer, A.R. Exon-centric regulation of pyruvate kinase M alternative splicing via mutually exclusive exons. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012, 4, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kuranaga, Y.; Sugito, N.; Shinohara, H.; Tsujino, T.; Taniguchi, K.; Komura, K.; Ito, Y.; Soga, T.; Akao, Y. SRSF3, a splicer of the PKM gene, regulates cell growth and maintenance of cancer-specific energy metabolism in colon cancer cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bian, Z.; Yang, F.; Xu, P.; Gao, G.; Yang, C.; Cao, Y.; Yao, S.; Wang, X.; Yin, Y.; Fei, B.; et al. LINC01852 inhibits the tumorigenesis and chemoresistance in colorectal cancer by suppressing SRSF5-mediated alternative splicing of PKM. Mol Cancer. 2024, 23, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chaudhury, A.; Chander, P.; Howe, P.H. Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs) in cellular processes: Focus on hnRNP E1’s multifunctional regulatory roles. RNA 2010, 16, 1449–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Matunis, M.J.; Michael, W.M.; Dreyfuss, G. Characterization and primary structure of the poly(C)-binding heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein complex K protein. Mol. Cell Biol. 1992, 12, 164–171. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Dreyfuss, G.; Kim, V.N.; Kataoka, N. Messenger-RNA-binding proteins and the messages they carry. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002, 3, 195–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kedzierska, H.; Piekielko-Witkowska, A. Splicing factors of SR and hnRNP families as regulators of apoptosis in cancer. Cancer Lett. 2017, 396, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Fu, X.D.; Ares, M., Jr. Context-dependent control of alternative splicing by RNA-binding proteins. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2014, 15, 689–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Lu, Y.; Wang, X.; Gu, Q.; Wang, J.; Sui, Y.; Wu, J.; Feng, J. Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A/B: An emerging group of cancer biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Cell Death Discov. 2022, 8, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Han, S.P.; Friend, L.R.; Carson, J.H.; Korza, G.; Barbarese, E.; Maggipinto, M.; Hatfield, J.T.; Rothnagel, J.A.; Smith, R. Differential subcellular distributions and trafficking functions of hnRNP A2/B1 spliceoforms. Traffic 2010, 11, 886–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Roy, R.; Huang, Y.; Seckl, M.J.; Pardo, O.E. Emerging roles of hnRNPA1 in modulating malignant transformation. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 2017, 8, e1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Paronetto, M.P.; Achsel, T.; Massiello, A.; Chalfant, C.E.; Sette, C. The RNA-binding protein Sam68 modulates the alternative splicing of Bcl-x. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 176, 929–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ko, C.-C.; Chen, Y.-J.; Chen, C.-T.; Liu, Y.-C.; Cheng, F.-C.; Hsu, K.-C.; Chow, L.-P. Chemical proteomics identifies heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) A1 as the molecular target of quercetin in its anti-cancer effects in PC-3 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 22078–22089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yu, C.; Guo, J.; Liu, Y.; Jia, J.; Jia, R.; Fan, M. Oral squamous cancer cell exploits hnRNP A1 to regulate cell cycle and proliferation. J. Cell Physiol. 2015, 230, 2252–2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Shishkin, S.S.; Kovalev, L.I.; Pashintseva, N.V.; Kovaleva, M.A.; Lisitskaya, K. Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins involved in the functioning of telomeres in malignant cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. David, C.J.; Chen, M.; Assanah, M.; Canoll, P.; Manley, J.L. HnRNP proteins controlled by c-Myc deregulate pyruvate kinase mRNA splicing in cancer. Nature 2010, 463, 364–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, S.; Wei, J.S.; Li, S.Q.; Badgett, T.C.; Song, Y.K.; Agarwal, S.; Coarfa, C.; Tolman, C.; Hurd, L.; Liao, H.; et al. MYCN controls an alternative RNA splicing program in high-risk metastatic neuroblastoma. Cancer Lett. 2016, 371, 214–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yao, A.; Xiang, Y.; Si, Y.R.; Fan, L.J.; Li, J.P.; Li, H.; Guo, W.; He, H.-X.; Liang, X.-J.; Tan, Y.; et al. PKM2 promotes glucose metabolism through a let-7a-5p/Stat3/hnRNP-A1 regulatory feedback loop in breast cancer cells. J. Cell Biochem. 2019, 120, 6542–6554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yan, Q.; Zeng, P.; Zhou, X.; Zhao, X.; Chen, R.; Qiao, J.; Feng, L.; Zhu, Z.; Zhang, G.; Chen, C. RBMX suppresses tumorigenicity and progression of bladder cancer by interacting with the hnRNP A1 protein to regulate PKM alternative splicing. Oncogene 2021, 40, 2635–2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhu, S.; Chen, W.; Wang, J.; Qi, L.; Pan, H.; Feng, Z.; Tian, D. SAM68 promotes tumorigenesis in lung adenocarcinoma by regulating metabolic conversion via PKM alternative splicing. Theranostics 2021, 11, 3359–3375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhao, J.; Li, J.; Hassan, W.; Xu, D.; Wang, X.; Huang, Z. Sam68 promotes aerobic glycolysis in colorectal cancer by regulating PKM2 alternative splicing. Ann. Transl. Med. 2020, 8, 459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Huang, J.Z.; Chen, M.; Chen Gao, X.C.; Zhu, S.; Huang, H.; Hu, M.; Zhu, H.; Yan, G.-R. A peptide encoded by a putative lncRNA HOXB-AS3 suppresses colon cancer growth. Mol. Cell 2017, 68, 171–184.e176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhao, H.; Song, L. TKP, a serine protease from trichosanthes kirilowii, inhibits cell proliferation by blocking aerobic glycolysis in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Nutr. Cancer 2021, 74, 333–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, Y.; Shi, S.L. The roles of hnRNP A2/B1 in RNA biology and disease. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 2021, 12, e1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mayeda, A.; Munroe, S.H.; Caceres, J.F.; Krainer, A.R. Function of conserved domains of hnRNP A1 and other hnRNP A/B proteins. EMBO J. 1994, 13, 5483–5495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bilodeau, P.S.; Domsic, J.K.; Mayeda, A.; Krainer, A.R.; Stoltzfus, C.M. RNA splicing at human immunodeficiency virus type 1 3‘ splice site A2 is regulated by binding of hnRNP A/B proteins to an exonic splicing silencer element. J. Virol. 2001, 75, 8487–8497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, X.; Zhang, C.; Huang, H. Identification of anti-tumoral feedback loop between VHLalpha and hnRNPA2B1 in renal cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2020, 11, 688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liang, S.; Yu, B.; Qian, D.; Zhao, R.; Wang, B.; Hu, M. Human cytomegalovirus ie2 affects the migration of glioblastoma by mediating the different splicing patterns of RON through hnRNP A2B1. Neuroreport 2019, 30, 805–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gupta, A.; Yadav, S.; Pt, A.; Mishra, J.; Samaiya, A.; Panday, R.K.; Shukla, S. The HNRNPA2B1-MST1R-Akt axis contributes to epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in head and neck cancer. Lab. Investig. 2020, 100, 1589–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Golan-Gerstl, R.; Cohen, M.; Shilo, A.; Suh, S.S.; Bakacs, A.; Coppola, L.; Karni, R. Splicing factor hnRNP A2/B1 regulates tumor suppressor gene splicing and is an oncogenic driver in glioblastoma. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 4464–4472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Brandi, J.; Cecconi, D.; Cordani, M.; Torrens-Mas, M.; Pacchiana, R.; Pozza, E.D.; Butera, G.; Manfredi, M.; Marengo, E.; Oliver, J.; et al. The antioxidant uncoupling protein 2 stimulates hnRNPA2/B1, GLUT1 and PKM2 expression and sensitizes pancreas cancer cells to glycolysis inhibition. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2016, 101, 305–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Konno, M.; Koseki, J.; Kawamoto, K.; Nishida, N.; Matsui, H.; Dewi, D.L.; Ozaki, M.; Noguchi, Y.; Mimori, K.; Gotoh, N.; et al. Embryonic microRNA-369 controls metabolic splicing factors and urges cellular reprograming. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0132789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sun, Y.; Zhao, X.; Zhou, Y.; Hu, Y. miR-124, miR-137 and miR-340 regulate colorectal cancer growth via inhibition of the Warburg effect. Oncol. Rep. 2012, 28, 1346–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chen, C.; Luo, Y.; He, W.; Zhao, Y.; Kong, Y.; Liu, H.; Zhong, G.; Li, Y.; Li, J.; Huang, J.; et al. Exosomal long noncoding RNA LNMAT2 promotes lymphatic metastasis in bladder cancer. J. Clin. Investig. 2020, 130, 404–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chen, Z.; Chen, X.; Lei, T.; Gu, Y.; Gu, J.; Huang, J.; Lu, B.; Yuan, L.; Sun, M.; Wang, Z. Integrative analysis of NSCLC identifies LINC01234 as an oncogenic lncRNA that interacts with HNRNPA2B1 and regulates miR-106b biogenesis. Mol. Ther. 2020, 28, 1479–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, Y.; Huang, W.; Yuan, Y.; Li, J.; Wu, J.; Yu, J.; He, Y.; Wei, Z.; Zhang, C. Long non-coding RNA H19 promotes colorectal cancer metastasis via binding to hnRNPA2B1. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 39, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Meredith, E.K.; Balas, M.M.; Sindy, K.; Haislop, K.; Johnson, A.M. An RNA matchmaker protein regulates the activity of the long noncoding RNA HOTAIR. RNA 2016, 22, 995–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Keppetipola, N.; Sharma, S.; Li, Q.; Black, D.L. Neuronal regulation of pre-mRNA splicing by polypyrimidine tract binding proteins, PTBP1 and PTBP2. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2012, 47, 360–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jo, Y.K.; Roh, S.A.; Lee, H.; Park, N.Y.; Choi, E.S.; Oh, J.-H.; Park, S.J.; Shin, J.H.; Suh, Y.-A.; Lee, E.K.; et al. Polypyrimidine tract-binding protein 1-mediated down-regulation of ATG10 facilitates metastasis of colorectal cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2017, 385, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cheung, H.C.; Hai, T.; Zhu, W.; Baggerly, K.A.; Tsavachidis, S.; Krahe, R.; Cote, G.J. Splicing factors PTBP1 and PTBP2 promote proliferation and migration of glioma cell lines. Brain 2009, 132, 2277–2288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Jiang, J.; Chen, X.; Liu, H.; Shao, J.; Xie, R.; Gu, P.; Duan, C. Polypyrimidine tract-binding protein 1 promotes proliferation, migration and invasion in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma by regulating alternative splicing of PKM. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2017, 7, 245–259. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  62. Hwang, S.R.; Murga-Zamalloa, C.; Brown, N.; Basappa, J.; McDonnell, S.R.; Mendoza-Reinoso, V.; Basrur, V.; Wilcox, R.; Elenitoba-Johnson, K.; Lim, M.S.; et al. Pyrimidine tract-binding protein 1 mediates pyruvate kinase M2-dependent phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 and oncogenesis in anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Lab. Investig. 2017, 97, 962–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Takahashi, H.; Nishimura, J.; Kagawa, Y.; Kano, Y.; Takahashi, Y.; Wu, X.; Hiraki, M.; Hamabe, A.; Konno, M.; Haraguchi, N.; et al. Significance of polypyrimidine tract-binding protein 1 expression in colorectal cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2015, 14, 1705–1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Harris, A.L. Hypoxia--a key regulatory factor in tumour growth. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2002, 2, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Xie, R.; Chen, X.; Chen, Z.; Huang, M.; Dong, W.; Gu, P.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, Q.; Dong, W.; Han, J.; et al. Polypyrimidine tract binding protein 1 promotes lymphatic metastasis and proliferation of bladder cancer via alternative splicing of MEIS2 and PKM. Cancer Lett. 2019, 449, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Shen, L.; Lei, S.; Zhang, B.; Li, S.; Huang, L.; Czachor, A.; Breitzig, M.; Gao, Y.; Huang, M.; Mo, X.; et al. Skipping of exon 10 in Axl pre-mRNA regulated by PTBP1 mediates invasion and metastasis process of liver cancer cells. Theranostics 2020, 10, 5719–5735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Georgilis, A.; Klotz, S.; Hanley, C.J.; Herranz, N.; Weirich, B.; Morancho, B.; Leote, A.C.; D’Artista, L.; Gallage, S.; Seehawer, M.; et al. PTBP1-mediated alternative splicing regulates the inflammatory secretome and the pro-tumorigenic effects of senescent cells. Cancer Cell 2018, 34, 85–102.e109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Spellman, R.; Smith, C.W. Novel modes of splicing repression by PTB. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2006, 31, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Yang, W.; Xia, Y.; Cao, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Bu, W.; Zhang, L.; You, M.J.; Koh, M.Y.; Cote, G.; Aldape, K.; et al. EGFR-induced and PKCepsilon monoubiquitylation-dependent NF-kappaB activation upregulates PKM2 expression and promotes tumorigenesis. Mol. Cell 2012, 48, 771–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Yu, L.; Kim, J.; Jiang, L.; Feng, B.; Ying, Y.; Ji, K.-Y.; Tang, Q.; Chen, W.; Mai, T.; Dou, W.; et al. MTR4 drives liver tumorigenesis by promoting cancer metabolic switch through alternative splicing. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Taniguchi, K.; Sugito, N.; Shinohara, H.; Kuranaga, Y.; Inomata, Y.; Komura, K.; Uchiyama, K.; Akao, Y. Organ-Specific MicroRNAs (MIR122, 137, and 206) Contribute to tissue characteristics and carcinogenesis by regulating pyruvate kinase M1/2 (PKM) Expression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Chen, Y.; McMillan-Ward, E.; Kong, J.; Israels, S.J.; Gibson, S.B. Oxidative stress induces autophagic cell death independent of apoptosis in transformed and cancer cells. Cell Death Differ. 2008, 15, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Taniguchi, K.; Sugito, N.; Kumazaki, M.; Shinohara, H.; Yamada, N.; Nakagawa, Y.; Ito, Y.; Otsuki, Y.; Uno, B.; Uchiyama, K.; et al. MicroRNA-124 inhibits cancer cell growth through PTB1/PKM1/PKM2 feedback cascade in colorectal cancer. Cancer Lett. 2015, 363, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhang, H.; Wang, D.; Li, M.; Plecita-Hlavata, L.; D‘Alessandro, A.; Tauber, J.; Riddle, S.; Kumar, S.; Flockton, A.; McKeon, B.A.; et al. Metabolic and proliferative state of vascular adventitial fibroblasts in pulmonary hypertension is regulated through a microRNA-124/PTBP1 (polypyrimidine tract binding protein 1)/pyruvate kinase muscle axis. Circulation 2017, 136, 2468–2485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Sugito, N.; Taniguchi, K.; Kuranaga, Y.; Ohishi, M.; Soga, T.; Ito, Y.; Miyachi, M.; Kikuchi, K.; Hosoi, H.; Akao, Y. Cancer-specific energy metabolism in rhabdomyosarcoma cells is regulated by microRNA. Nucleic Acid. Ther. 2017, 27, 365–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhu, L.; Wei, Q.; Qi, Y.; Ruan, X.; Wu, F.; Li, L.; Zhou, J.; Liu, W.; Jiang, T.; Zhang, J.; et al. PTB-AS, a novel natural antisense transcript, promotes glioma progression by improving PTBP1 mRNA stability with SND1. Mol. Ther. 2019, 27, 1621–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wu, Z.; Jiang, H.; Fu, H.; Zhang, Y. A circGLIS3/miR-644a/PTBP1 positive feedback loop promotes the malignant biological progressions of non-small cell lung cancer. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2021, 11, 108–122. [Google Scholar]
  78. Chen, J.; Wu, Y.; Luo, X.; Jin, D.; Zhou, W.; Ju, Z.; Wang, D.; Meng, Q.; Wang, H.; Fu, X.; et al. Circular RNA circRHOBTB3 represses metastasis by regulating the HuR-mediated mRNA stability of PTBP1 in colorectal cancer. Theranostics 2021, 11, 7507–7526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Okugawa, Y.; Grady, W.M.; Goel, A. Epigenetic alterations in colorectal cancer: Emerging biomarkers. Gastroenterology 2015, 149, 1204–1225.e1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Dawson, M.A.; Kouzarides, T. Cancer epigenetics: From mechanism to therapy. Cell. 2012, 150, 12–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhang, Z.; Deng, X.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Sun, L.; Chen, F. PKM2, function and expression and regulation. Cell Biosci. 2019, 9, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhu, H.E.; Li, T.; Shi, S.; Chen, D.X.; Chen, W.; Chen, H. ESCO2 promotes lung adenocarcinoma progression by regulating hnRNPA1 acetylation. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2021, 40, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Sun, Y.; Luo, M.; Chang, G.; Ren, W.; Wu, K.; Li, X.; Shen, J.; Zhao, X.; Hu, Y. Phosphorylation of Ser6 in hnRNPA1 by S6K2 regulates glucose metabolism and cell growth in colorectal cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2017, 14, 7323–7331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Yang, H.; Zhu, R.; Zhao, X.; Liu, L.; Zhou, Z.; Zhao, L.; Liang, B.; Ma, W.; Zhao, J.; Liu, J.; et al. Sirtuin-mediated deacetylation of hnRNP A1 suppresses glycolysis and growth in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene 2019, 38, 4915–4931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Chen, D.; Wang, Y.; Lu, R.; Jiang, X.; Chen, X.; Meng, N.; Chen, M.; Xie, S.; Yan, G.-R. E3 ligase ZFP91 inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma metabolism reprogramming by regulating PKM splicing. Theranostics 2020, 10, 8558–8572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Choksi, A.; Parulekar, A.; Pant, R.; Shah, V.K.; Nimma, R.; Firmal, P.; Singh, S.; Kundu, G.C.; Shukla, S.; Chattopadhyay, S. Tumor suppressor SMAR1 regulates PKM alternative splicing by HDAC6-mediated deacetylation of PTBP1. Cancer Metab. 2021, 9, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Yu, X.; Tong, H.; Chen, J.; Tang, C.; Wang, S.; Si, Y.; Wang, S.; Tang, Z. CircRNA MBOAT2 promotes intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma progression and lipid metabolism reprogramming by stabilizing PTBP1 to facilitate FASN mRNA cytoplasmic export. Cell Death Dis. 2023, 14, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zhang, H.; Xia, P.; Yang, Z.; Liu, J.; Zhu, Y.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Yuan, Y. Cullin-associated and neddylation-dissociated 1 regulate reprogramming of lipid metabolism through SKP1-Cullin-1-F-boxFBXO11 -mediated heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A2/B1 ubiquitination and promote hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin. Transl. Med. 2023, 13, e1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Habelhah, H.; Shah, K.; Huang, L.; Ostareck-Lederer, A.; Burlingame, A.L.; Shokat, K.M.; Hentze, M.W.; Ronai, Z. ERK phosphorylation drives cytoplasmic accumulation of hnRNP-K and inhibition of mRNA translation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2001, 3, 325–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Wang, Y.; Hao, F.; Nan, Y.; Qu, L.; Na, W.; Jia, C.; Chen, X. PKM2 Inhibitor shikonin overcomes the cisplatin resistance in bladder cancer by inducing necroptosis. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2018, 14, 1883–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Stetak, A.; Veress, R.; Ovadi, J.; Csermely, P.; Keri, G.; Ullrich, A. Nuclear translocation of the tumor marker pyruvate kinase M2 induces programmed cell death. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 1602–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Martin, S.P.; Fako, V.; Dang, H.; Dominguez, D.A.; Khatib, S.; Ma, L.; Wang, H.; Zheng, W.; Wang, X.W. PKM2 inhibition may reverse therapeutic resistance to transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 39, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zhu, S.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, X.; Liu, H.; Yin, M.; Chen, X.; Peng, C. Pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) in cancer and cancer therapeutics. Cancer Lett. 2021, 503, 240–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Cheng, C.; Xie, Z.; Li, Y.; Wang, J.; Qin, C.; Zhang, Y. PTBP1 knockdown overcomes the resistance to vincristine and oxaliplatin in drug-resistant colon cancer cells through regulation of glycolysis. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 108, 194–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wu, H.; Cui, M.; Li, C.; Li, H.; Dai, Y.; Cui, K.; Li, Z. Kaempferol reverses aerobic glycolysis via miR-339-5p-mediated PKM alternative splicing in colon cancer cells. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 3060–3068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Liu, J.; Wu, N.; Ma, L.; Liu, M.; Liu, G.; Zhang, Y.; Lin, X. Oleanolic acid suppresses aerobic glycolysis in cancer cells by switching pyruvate kinase type M isoforms. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e91606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Li, L.; Yang, Y.; Wu, M.; Yu, Z.; Wang, C.; Dou, G.; He, H.; Wang, H.; Yang, N.; Qi, H.; et al. beta-asarone induces apoptosis and cell cycle arrest of human glioma U251 Cells via suppression of HnRNP A2/B1-mediated pathway in vitro and in vivo. Molecules 2018, 23, 1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. An, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Zhang, X.; Cho, S.B.; Kim, D.Y.; Choi, M.J.; Bang, D. Cilostazol inhibits the expression of hnRNP A2/B1 and cytokines in human dermal microvascular endothelial cells. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2017, 35 (Suppl. S108), 60–66. [Google Scholar]
  99. Li, H.; Guo, L.; Huang, A.; Xu, H.; Liu, X.; Ding, H.; Dong, J.; Li, J.; Wang, C.; Su, X.; et al. Nanoparticle-conjugated aptamer targeting hnRNP A2/B1 can recognize multiple tumor cells and inhibit their proliferation. Biomaterials 2015, 63, 168–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Song, Y.C.; Chen, M.X.; Zhang, K.L.; Reddy, A.S.N.; Cao, F.L.; Zhu, F.Y. QuantAS: A comprehensive pipeline to study alternative splicing by absolute quantification of splice isoforms. New Phytol. 2023, 240, 928–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Chen, G.; Chen, J.; Qi, L.; Yin, Y.; Lin, Z.; Wen, H.; Zhang, S.; Xiao, C.; Bello, S.F.; Zhang, X.; et al. Bulk and single-cell alternative splicing analyses reveal roles of TRA2B in myogenic differentiation. Cell Prolif. 2024, 57, e13545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomolecules 14 00566 g001
Figure 1. Schematic representation of different PKM pre-mRNA splicing patterns. (Left): In muscle and brain, terminally differentiated cells mainly depend on oxidative phosphorylation to generate biological energy in mitochondria. During this process, splicing factors exclude exon 10 of PKM pre-mRNA to generate more PKM1. (Right): In rapidly proliferating cells, such as embryonic cells, stem cells, and tumor cells, splicing factors exclude exon 9 and contain exon 10 to generate more PKM2 for strong anabolic demands.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of different PKM pre-mRNA splicing patterns. (Left): In muscle and brain, terminally differentiated cells mainly depend on oxidative phosphorylation to generate biological energy in mitochondria. During this process, splicing factors exclude exon 10 of PKM pre-mRNA to generate more PKM1. (Right): In rapidly proliferating cells, such as embryonic cells, stem cells, and tumor cells, splicing factors exclude exon 9 and contain exon 10 to generate more PKM2 for strong anabolic demands.
Biomolecules 14 00566 g001
Biomolecules 14 00566 g002
Figure 2. The graph depicts a regulatory network of hnRNPA1 in PKM alternative splicing in cancer cells.
Figure 2. The graph depicts a regulatory network of hnRNPA1 in PKM alternative splicing in cancer cells.
Biomolecules 14 00566 g002
Biomolecules 14 00566 g003
Figure 3. The graph depicts a regulatory network of hnRNPA2/B1 in PKM alternative splicing in cancer cells.
Figure 3. The graph depicts a regulatory network of hnRNPA2/B1 in PKM alternative splicing in cancer cells.
Biomolecules 14 00566 g003
Biomolecules 14 00566 g004
Figure 4. The graph depicts a regulatory network of PTBP1 in PKM alternative splicing in cancer cells.
Figure 4. The graph depicts a regulatory network of PTBP1 in PKM alternative splicing in cancer cells.
Biomolecules 14 00566 g004
Table 1. Non-coding RNA regulating PTBP1 in PKM alternative splicing events.
Table 1. Non-coding RNA regulating PTBP1 in PKM alternative splicing events.
Non-Coding RNA PartnerMechanismFunction/EffectType of CancerRefs
miR-124inhibits PTBP1 expression and reduces PKM2/PKM1 ratiotriggers a feedback cascade about PTBP1/PKM1/PKM2 and has anti-tumor effectsbrain and colorectal cancers[72,73,74]
miR-1
miR-133		silences PTBP1leads to a high level of PKM1 mRNArhabdomyosarcoma[75]
miR-133bdownregulates the pathogenic gene PAX3-FOXO1reduces PTBP1 expressionrhabdomyosarcoma[75]
PTB-ASbinds to the 3′UTR region of PTBP1stabilizes and increases PTBP1 expressionglioma[76]
circGLIS3sponge miR-644a and PTBP1 can bind to the flanking introns of cirGLIS3circGLIS3/miR-644a/PTBP1 positive feedback loop and promotes PTBP1 productionnon-small cell lung cancer[77]
HuRbinds to the 3’UTR region of PTBP1promotes PTBP1 stabilitycolorectal cancer[78]
circRHOBTB3promotes HuR ubiquitination degradationreduces the production of downstream PTBP1colorectal cancer[78]
Table 2. The epigenetic regulation of hnRNPs in PKM alternative splicing events.
Table 2. The epigenetic regulation of hnRNPs in PKM alternative splicing events.
Biomolecules 14 00566 i001Biomolecules 14 00566 i002Biomolecules 14 00566 i003Biomolecules 14 00566 i004Biomolecules 14 00566 i005
EnzymeESCO2S6K2SIRT1 and SIRT6ZFP91HDAC6
Modification sitesK277Ser6K3, K52, K87, and K350K8unreported
Mechanismretains hnRNPA1 in the nucleus and increases hnRNPA1 binding to PKM EI9promotes hnRNPA1 binding to the splicing site of the PKM geneweakens PKM metabolic activity and PKM2-β-catenin pathwayhnRNPA1 is degraded by the proteasome pathwaySMAR1, PTBP1, and HDAC6 can form a ternary complex
PKM2/PKM1 ratioupregulatedupregulateddownregulateddownregulateddownregulated
Type of cancerlung adenocarcinomacolorectal cancerhepatocellular carcinomahepatocellular carcinomabreast cancer
Refs[82][83][84][85][86]
OutcomePro-tumorAnti-tumor
Table 3. Drug or inhibitor agents applied in regulating hnRNP expression.
Table 3. Drug or inhibitor agents applied in regulating hnRNP expression.
Drugs or InhibitorsTherapeutic TargetMolecular MechanismsCancer CharacteristicsRefs
kaempferolmiR-339-5ppromotes miR-339-5p expression which downregulates hnRNPA1 and PTBP1colon cancer[95]
oleanolic acidmTOR signalinginhibits the c-Myc-dependent expression of hnRNPA1 and hnRNPA2prostate carcinoma and breast cancer[96]
quercetinhnRNPA1impairs the ability of hnRNPA1 shuttling between the nucleus and cytoplasm and ultimately traps it in the cytoplasmprostate cancer[33]
β-caprylylonehnRNPA2/B1inhibits the expression of hnRNPA2/B1glioma[97]
cilostazolhnRNPA2/B1reduces the overexpression of hnRNPA2/B1Bechet’s disease[98]
nanoparticle-coupled aptamer aptamershnRNPA2/B1acts as a cancer-specific probehepatocellular carcinoma; breast cancer; non-small cell lung cancer; cervical cancer[99]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Y.; Zhang, S.; Li, Y.; Liu, J.; Li, Q.; Zang, W.; Pan, Y. The Regulatory Network of hnRNPs Underlying Regulating PKM Alternative Splicing in Tumor Progression. Biomolecules 2024, 14, 566. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom14050566

AMA Style

Li Y, Zhang S, Li Y, Liu J, Li Q, Zang W, Pan Y. The Regulatory Network of hnRNPs Underlying Regulating PKM Alternative Splicing in Tumor Progression. Biomolecules. 2024; 14(5):566. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom14050566

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Yuchao, Shuwei Zhang, Yuexian Li, Junchao Liu, Qian Li, Wenli Zang, and Yaping Pan. 2024. "The Regulatory Network of hnRNPs Underlying Regulating PKM Alternative Splicing in Tumor Progression" Biomolecules 14, no. 5: 566. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom14050566

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop