Next Article in Journal
Dietary Strategies for Relieving Stress in Pet Dogs and Cats
Next Article in Special Issue
Antifungal Action of Arabidopsis thaliana TCP21 via Induction of Oxidative Stress and Apoptosis
Previous Article in Journal
Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy Phenotype Induced by Oxidized High-Density Lipoprotein Associated with Increased Mortality in Septic-Shock Patients
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Effect of Biodegradable Films Containing Pitaya (Stenocereus thurberi) Extracts during the Refrigerated Storage of Fish

by
Daniela Castro-Enríquez
1,
José M. Miranda
2,
Marcos Trigo
3,
Francisco Rodríguez-Félix
1,*,
Santiago P. Aubourg
3,* and
Jorge Barros-Velázquez
2
1
Departamento de Investigación y Posgrado en Alimentos, University of Sonora, Hermosillo 83100, Sonora, Mexico
2
Departamento de Química Analítica, Nutrición y Ciencia de los Alimentos, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, Spain
3
Departamento de Ciencia y Tecnología de Alimentos, Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas (CSIC), 36208 Vigo, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2023, 12(3), 544; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12030544
Submission received: 31 January 2023 / Revised: 16 February 2023 / Accepted: 18 February 2023 / Published: 21 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oxidative Stress in Microbial Infections)

Abstract

:
This study focused on the quality loss inhibition of fish muscle during refrigerated storage. Two parallel experiments were carried out that were focused on the employment of pitaya (Stenocereus thurberi) extracts in biodegradable packing films. On the one hand, a pitaya–gelatin film was employed for hake (Merluccius merluccius) muscle storage. On the other hand, a pitaya–polylactic acid (PLA) film was used for Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus) muscle storage. In both experiments, fish-packing systems were stored at 4 °C for 8 days. Quality loss was determined by lipid damage and microbial activity development. The presence of the pitaya extract led to an inhibitory effect (p < 0.05) on peroxide, fluorescent compound, and free fatty acid (FFA) values in the gelatin–hake system and to a lower (p < 0.05) formation of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, fluorescent compounds, and FFAs in the PLA–mackerel system. Additionally, the inclusion of pitaya extracts in the packing films slowed down (p < 0.05) the growth of aerobes, anaerobes, psychrotrophs, and proteolytic bacteria in the case of the pitaya–gelatin films and of aerobes, anaerobes, and proteolytic bacteria in the case of pitaya–PLA films. The current preservative effects are explained on the basis of the preservative compound presence (betalains and phenolic compounds) in the pitaya extracts.

1. Introduction

Marine species constitute a valuable source of healthy constituents, such as polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), high-quality proteins, lipophilic vitamins, and minerals [1]. For decades, refrigerated fish products have dominated the fish markets and represent a great proportion of human consumption [2]. However, the deterioration of sensory quality and nutritional value is likely to be produced in refrigerated fish as a result of different damage mechanisms, such as microbial activity and lipid oxidation [3]. Based on the current need for high-quality fresh products, refrigerated storage has been used together with other preservative strategies to increase the shelf life of the resulting seafood [4,5].
Among such complementary technologies, the development of packing films that incorporate sustainable ingredients and materials is considered a crucial strategy of food technology, with a view to extend the shelf-life time of food products in an environmentally friendly manner [6,7,8]. Thus, biodegradable and edible materials obtained from animals and plants, including polysaccharides, lipids, and peptides, have been reported to be profitable alternatives to synthetic packaging films [9,10]. Gelatin is a polysaccharide that can be obtained from diverse animal sources (porcine, bovine, and fish). It has been reported to constitute an effective biofilm to reduce quality loss of seafood and food in general [11,12]. Furthermore, the combined employment of gelatin packing films with different kinds of preservative compounds obtained from different natural sources, such as tea [13], macroalgae extracts [14,15], and microalgae protein concentrates [16], has successfully improved the retention of seafood quality. Polylactic acid (PLA) is a biodegradable thermoplastic polyester that has shown a preservative behavior during the refrigerated storage of fish species [17,18]. Its preservative effect has shown to be increased when complemented with different kinds of antioxidant (ascorbyl palmitate, α-tocopherol, macroalgae extracts, and sorbic acid) [19,20] and antimicrobial (nisin, potassium sorbate, and Thymus foutanesil essential oil) [21,22] compounds.
The genus Stenocereus includes plant species that grow in arid and semiarid climates from the southern United States to Central America [23]. Pitayas, a common name employed for Stenocereus fruits, are attracting great attention as a source of natural colorants and have been employed to increase the attractiveness to consumers of food in general [24,25,26]. Based on the high content of betalains and phenolic compounds in Stenocereus fruits, a growing interest has been addressed to the identification of these compounds and their bioactivity [27,28]. Betalains, water-soluble nitrogenous pigments, have been reported to present diverse biological activities, such as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anticarcinogenic properties [29,30]. Meanwhile, phenolic compounds have been associated with biological activities based on phenolic hydroxyl groups and have shown remarkable preservative properties susceptible to application to seafood and food in general [31,32,33].
The objective of the present research was to inhibit the quality loss of fish muscle during refrigerated storage. Two parallel experiments were carried out based on the employment of a pitaya (S. thurberi) extract in biodegradable packing films. On the one hand, a pitaya–gelatin film was employed for hake (Merluccius merluccius) muscle storage. On the other hand, a pitaya–PLA film was used for Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus) muscle storage. In both experiments, a control film without pitaya extract was also analyzed. All packing systems were stored at 4 °C for 8 days. The quality loss was determined by lipid damage (oxidation and hydrolysis) and microbial activity development.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Pitaya Extract and Biofilm System Preparation

Pitaya fruits (S. thurberi) were obtained in Carbó (State of Sonora, Mexico) in the June/July period of 2016. The fruits were washed, dried at 25 °C, placed in plastic bags, and stored under frozen conditions (−20 °C) for later use.
The pitaya extract was obtained following the methodology developed by Castro-Enríquez et al. [33]. Two grams of pitaya pulp without seeds and 34 mL of distilled water were mixed, sonicated for 27 min, and stirred for 20 min on a horizontal shaker in the dark. Subsequently, the mixture was centrifuged at 3500× g for 10 min. Then the supernatant was filtered through a Millipore membrane with a pore size of 1 kDa, at a pressure of 50 psi, with nitrogen gas. The extract obtained was lyophilized and stored in amber vials under frozen conditions (−20 °C) for later use.
Gelatin films were prepared from two separate solutions. For the first one, an aq. 10% (w/v) gelatin solution was prepared, heated at 60 °C, and stirred for 30 min. For the second solution, an aq. 1% (w/v) pitaya extract solution was prepared and stirred for 30 min. Subsequently, 5 mL of each solution was mixed, 0.238 mL of glycerol was added as a plasticizer, and the mixture was stirred for 30 min. After this time, the final solution was poured into molds that were 10 cm in diameter, and the molds were then placed in a convection oven at 50 °C for 3 h. Then the films were stored frozen at −20 °C for later use and labelled GEL-TR (gelatin treatment). Similarly, gelatin films were prepared without pitaya extract and labelled GEL-CT (gelatin control).
PLA pellets were ground in a blade mill (Thomas-Wiley, model 4, Swedesboro, NJ, USA). Subsequently, a 5% (w/v) solution was made in 10 mL of acetone and stirred for 30 min. After this time, 0.263 mL of polyethylene glycol diglycidyl ether plasticizer and 0.02 g of pitaya extract were added to the solution and stirred for 30 min. The solution was poured into molds that were 10 cm diameter and placed in a vacuum oven at 50 °C for 12 h for solvent evaporation. The films were stored frozen at −20 °C for later use and labelled PLA-TR (PLA treatment). Similarly, PLA films were prepared without pitaya extract and labelled PLA-CT (PLA control).
In both kinds of biofilms, the content of pitaya extract was chosen on the basis of previous trials carried out in our laboratory. Concentrations chosen did not modify the sensory and external properties of the fish muscle (i.e., odor and color).

2.2. Fish Material, Processing, and Sampling

Fresh hake (10 specimens; 350–375 g each) and fresh mackerel (12 specimens; 225–270 g each) were caught near the Galician Atlantic Coast (NW Spain), obtained at the Vigo (Spain) harbor, and transported to the laboratory. From catching till arrival at the laboratory, the fish were maintained on ice. The time elapsed for the transport from harbor to laboratory was 10 min. Specimens of both fish species were beheaded, eviscerated, skinned, filleted, and cut to obtain 45 muscle pieces of 65–75 g each. For each fish species, nine such pieces were divided into three groups (3 pieces per group) that were analyzed (lipid damage and microbial activity) independently and considered the initial substrate (n = 3).
For hake fish, the remaining 36 fish pieces of hake muscle were divided into 2 groups (18 pieces per group) and sealed/packed individually under the two abovementioned packing systems (GEL-CT and GEL-TR). Similarly, the remaining 36 fish pieces of mackerel muscle were divided into 2 groups (18 portions per group) and sealed/packed individually under the two abovementioned PLA-packing systems (PLA-CT and PLA-TR).
Packed muscle pieces were kept in a refrigerated room (4 °C) for an 8-day period, and sampling and analyses were performed on days 4 and 8. At each sampling time and for each fish species, 9 fish pieces were taken for analysis from each packing condition and divided into 3 groups (3 pieces for each group), which were studied independently (n = 3).

2.3. Lipid Damage Analyses

Lipids were extracted from the fish white muscle according to the method employed by Bligh and Dyer [34]. This method employs a single-phase solubilization of the lipids, using a chloroform–methanol (1:1) mixture. The results on lipid content were calculated as g lipid·kg−1 muscle.
The peroxide value (PV) was assessed spectrophotometrically (520 nm) (Beckman Coulter DU 640 spectrophotometer, Brea, CA, USA) in the lipid extract by following the method proposed by Chapman and McKay [35]. In this method, peroxides present in the lipid extract are reduced with ferric thiocyanate. The resulting values were calculated as meq. active oxygen·kg−1 lipids.
The thiobarbituric acid index (TBA-i) was determined according to the method proposed by Vyncke [36]. In it, the formation of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) by reaction between a trichloroacetic acid extract of the fish muscle and thiobarbituric acid was spectrophotometrically measured at 532 nm. The results were calculated as mg malondialdehyde·kg−1 muscle based on a standard curve prepared from 1,1,3,3-tetraethoxy-propane.
The fluorescent compound content (Fluorimeter LS 45; Perkin Elmer España; Tres Cantos, Madrid, Spain) was determined in the aqueous fraction, resulting from the lipid extraction of fish muscle [34]. According to previous research [37], fluorescence was measured at excitation/emission wavelengths of 393/463 and 327/415 nm. The relative fluorescence (RF) was calculated as follows: RF = F/Fst, where F is the fluorescence measured at each excitation/emission wavelength pair and Fst is the fluorescence intensity of a quinine sulphate solution (1 µg·mL−1 in 0.05 M H2SO4) at the corresponding wavelength pair. Results are given as the fluorescence ratio (FR), which was calculated as the ratio between the two RF values: FR = RF393/463 nm/RF327/415 nm.
The free fatty acid (FFA) content was determined on the lipid extract obtained from the fish muscle according to Lowry and Tinsley [38]. In this method, complex formation with cupric acetate–pyridine, followed by spectrophotometric (715 nm) assessment, is carried out. The results were calculated as g FFA·kg−1 muscle.

2.4. Microbial Activity Analyses

Portions of 10 g of fish muscle were dissected aseptically from refrigerated fish specimens, mixed with 90 mL of 0.1% peptone water (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), and homogenized in sterilized stomacher bags (AES, Combourg, France), as previously described [39]. Serial dilutions from the microbial extracts were prepared in 0.1% peptone water in all cases.
Determination of total aerobes was carried out on plate count agar (PCA, Oxoid Ltd., London, UK) after incubation at 30 °C for 48 h. Assessment of anaerobes was carried out in the same manner, except that an anaerobic atmosphere kit was placed, together with the plates, inside the anaerobiosis jar. Determination of psychrotrophs was carried out on PCA after incubation at 7–8 °C for 7 days. Enterobacteriaceae were assessed in violet-red bile agar (VRBA) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) after incubation at 37 ± 0.5 °C for 24 h. Microorganisms exhibiting proteolytic or lipolytic phenotypes were determined in casein agar or tributyrin agar, respectively, after incubation at 30 °C for 48 h, according to previous research [40].
In all cases, bacterial counts were transformed into log CFU·g−1 muscle before undergoing statistical analysis. All analyses were conducted in triplicate.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Results obtained from all chemical and microbiological determinations were subjected to ANOVA to explore differences resulting from the effect of the pitaya presence in the packing system and the refrigeration time. The comparison of average values was performed using the least-squares difference (LSD) method. In all cases, analyses were carried out using PASW Statistics 18 software for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). In all cases, differences were considered significant for a confidence interval at the 95% level (p < 0.05).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Determination of Lipid Oxidation

A remarkable (p < 0.05) formation of peroxide compounds was detected in all kinds of fish samples with refrigeration time (Table 1). The presence of the pitaya extract in the gelatin-packing medium led to lower average values than in their counterpart control samples. Remarkably, differences were significant (p < 0.05) at day 4. In the case of mackerel samples, no inhibitory effect (p > 0.05) on peroxide formation was detected in the PLA–muscle system as a result of the presence of pitaya extract in the packing medium.
The average values obtained for TBARS formation showed a progressive increase with refrigeration time in all kinds of samples (Table 1). The presence of the pitaya extract led to lower average values in both hake and mackerel samples when compared to their corresponding control counterparts. Differences were found to be significant (p < 0.05) for PLA–mackerel samples but were not (p > 0.05) in the case of gelatin–hake samples.
The formation of fluorescent compounds revealed a substantial increase (p < 0.05) with storage time in all kinds of samples (Table 1). For both biopackaging systems, lower average FR values were detected in refrigerated fish that has pitaya extract in the packing media than in their counterpart controls. Differences were significant (p < 0.05) at day 8 in fish muscle in regard to both biopackaging systems.
Lipid oxidation is considered to be a complex damage mechanism since it involves the formation of a wide range of molecules, with most of them being unstable and, therefore, able to break down or interact with other molecules. This would be the case of primary (i.e., peroxides) and secondary (i.e., TBARS) lipid oxidation compounds, which are widely reported to break down and interact with nucleophilic-type molecules (proteins, peptides, free amino acids, aminated phospholipids, etc.) present in the fish muscle [15,41,42]. As a result of this interaction, the formation of fluorescent compounds has been reported to be produced, thus leading to a valuable way of assessing the advancement of the lipid oxidation mechanism development [43].
A wide range of previous studies revealed a high level of antioxidant properties in Stenococcus spp. juices [44,45]. This high antioxidant potential has been explained on the basis of the presence of substances with the capacity to donate an electron or a hydrogen atom to scavenge oxidizing compounds, such as ascorbic acid, betalains, and different phenolic compounds. Thus, Castro-Enríquez et al. [33] analyzed the antioxidant capacity (DPPH and ABTS assays) of S. thurberi and carried out the analytical determination of bioactive compounds. In such study, the UPLC–MS analysis revealed the presence of a wide range of phenolic (13–20 mg gallic acid equivalent·g−1) and betalain (0.94–1.37 mg·g−1) compounds. Among them, ferulic acid, catechin, caffeic acid, and quercetin could be mentioned. Remarkably, two phenolic compounds (i.e., gallic acid and resorcinol) were detected for the first time in species from the Stenocereus genus. Previously, total phenols (11.31 mg gallic acid equivalent·g−1 dry weight), total flavonoids (13.70 mg quercetin equivalent·g−1 dry weight), ascorbic acid (12.45 mg·100 g−1 fresh weight), and traces of carotenes were detected [27]. In addition, flavonol-type compounds such as quercetin, catechin, isorhamnetin, and kaempferol were detected in S. thurberi, S. stellatus, and S. pruinosus species [25,32].
Additionally, several in vitro and in vivo studies have reported the preservative and healthy properties of Stenococcus spp. juices. Thus, antioxidant (DPPH and FRAP assays) and antiproliferative (carcinogenic cell prevention) effects were detected in S. pruinosus juice that were explained by the presence of p-coumaric, gallic, caffeic, and vanillic acids [46]. Sandate-Flores et al. [47] showed the antioxidant properties (ABTS assay) of seed peptides obtained from S. pruinosus by sequential hydrolyzation of glutelin fractions with pepsin and trypsin–chymotrypsin. During an in vivo study, Ramírez-Rodríguez et al. [48] showed the antioxidant effect of S. huastecorum juice and explained it on the basis of the high content of betalains.
Concerning food applications, Stenocereus spp. fruits have been employed during the manufacture of several products, such as refreshing and alcoholic beverages, ice cream, and palettes [49,50]. However, to the best of our knowledge, no previous research has been reported taking advantage of the potential protecting properties for the preservation of seafood.
Previous research has reported the antioxidant effect derived from the inclusion of natural extracts in the biofilms used in the present research (gelatin and PLA). In general, this preservative effect has been justified as a result of the interaction between the antioxidant molecules present in the biofilm medium and the muscle of the marine species. Thus, García-Soto et al. [20] detected an inhibitory effect on lipid oxidation development (i.e., fluorescent compound formation) by including lyophilized F. spiralis and sorbic acid in a PLA packing film during the refrigerated storage (11 days at 4 °C) of megrim (L. whiffiagonis) fillets; this effect was explained on the basis of the preservative effect of the combination of sorbic acid and polyphenol compounds present in the alga. Additionally, the inclusion of F. spiralis protein concentrate in a gelatin-based film inhibited lipid oxidation development (TBARS and fluorescent compound formation) in refrigerated hake (M. merluccius) [33]. Recently, a lower fluorescent compound formation was observed in mackerel (S. scombrus) muscle as a result of employing a gelatin film containing lyophilized F. spiralis [15]. Concerning microalgae, the presence of a protein concentrate from Spirulina platensis in the gelatin packing film led to higher PUFA retention in refrigerated (4 °C) hake (M. merluccius) muscle [16]. A lower content of fluorescent compounds was obtained in mackerel (S. scombrus) muscle packed in a gelatin film containing a protein concentrate from S. platensis during storage at 4 °C [51].

3.2. Determination of Lipid Hydrolysis

Increased (p < 0.05) lipid hydrolysis development was detected in all kinds of samples with storage time (Figure 1). The presence of the pitaya extract in both kinds of packing media (gelatin and PLA) led to lower average values at both storage times. For gelatin–hake samples, differences were significant (p < 0.05) at day 8, while significant differences (p < 0.05) were detected at day 4 for PLA–mackerel samples.
Lipid hydrolysis itself does not provoke nutritional losses. However, a direct relationship between FFA formation and loss of sensory acceptance (detrimental texture changes and development of off-odor and off-taste) has been reported [3,52]. Furthermore, FFA formation has shown a remarkable effect on lipid-oxidation development. This effect has been explained as a result of the lower oxidative stability of FFA compared to its corresponding phospholipids and triacylglycerols, since these molecules show a higher steric hindrance to oxidative reactions [37].
FFA formation in fish muscle during refrigerated storage has been explained as a result of endogenous and microbial enzyme activities [3]. The inhibitory effect observed in the current study can be explained on the basis of the antimicrobial properties of compounds present in the pitaya extract. This antimicrobial behavior is described and discussed in the following section.
No previous research has accounted for the effect of pitaya extracts on lipid hydrolysis development in seafood or food in general. However, previous research has reported the inhibitory effect on lipid hydrolysis development derived from the inclusion of different kinds of extracts obtained from natural resources in gelatin-derived films. This inhibitory effect on FFA content has been explained on the basis of the microbial activity inhibition. Thus, chitosan–gelatin packing inhibited the FFA formation in rainbow trout (O. mykiss) fillets [53] and Belanger’s croaker (Johnius balangerii) fillets [54] during refrigerated storage (4 ± 1 °C). An inhibitory effect of a crosslinked-gelatin film containing a spirulina (S. platensis) protein concentrate on FFA formation was detected in lean (hake, M. merluccius) [16] and fatty (mackerel, S. scombrus) [48] fish muscle. Likewise, the presence of a macroalga F. spiralis protein concentrate in gelatin-based packing led to a lower FFA content in hake (M. merluccius) muscle [14]. Recently, a lower lipid hydrolysis development was detected in mackerel (S. scombrus) muscle as a result of employing a gelatin film containing lyophilized F. spiralis [15].

3.3. Microbial Activity

The investigation of aerobes in hake and mackerel muscle revealed a protective effect derived from the presence of the pitaya extract in the packaging films on both fish species (Figure 2). Thus, at advanced storage times (8 days), significant (p < 0.05) differences were observed between both hake batches, with the highest difference of 1.11 log units being observed on day 8, while on day 4, the differences were not significant (p > 0.05). Likewise, significant (p < 0.05) differences were observed between mackerel batches on day 8, with a difference of 0.89 log units being observed at that storage time, while on day 4, no significant (p > 0.05) differences were detected. Thus, in both fish species, a protective effect of the pitaya extract in the packing film on the microbial quality of fish was accomplished with regard to aerobe growth. Interestingly, this effect was observed for both types of fish species, despite their different lipid contents (i.e., 4.5–6.5 and 37.5–47.5 g·kg−1 muscle for hake and mackerel, respectively).
With respect to the development of anaerobes in hake and mackerel muscle, the results are compiled in Figure 3. Likewise, as in the case of aerobes, the active film containing pitaya extract provided a protective effect on both fish species with regard to anaerobic growth. Thus, significant (p < 0.05) differences were observed between hake batches on day 8, with this difference rising to 0.59 log units. Likewise, significant (p < 0.05) differences were also observed between both mackerel batches at the end of storage time (day 8), with such differences increasing up to 0.45 log units. Thus, as in the case of aerobes, the presence of the pitaya extract in the packing film provided a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in aerobe growth in both fish species.
Enterobacteriaceae growth was also assessed, and the results for both fish species are compiled in Table 2. In this case, the results did not show any significant (p > 0.05) differences between batches in either of the two species tested. Remarkably, the negligible growth of Enterobacteriaceae observed throughout storage time (counts always below 1.75 log units) revealed the high initial quality of the fish specimens considered in this study.
Table 2 also compiles the results obtained regarding psychrotrophic growth in both fish species over storage time. Remarkably, different results were observed for each of the fish species tested with regard to the effect of the inclusion of the pitaya extract in the packing film. Thus, the presence of the pitaya extract in the films provided a significant (p < 0.05) protective effect on hake muscle at advanced storage times (day 8), with differences in the microbial counts higher than 1.0 log unit. In contrast, no significant (p > 0.05) differences between both mackerel batches were observed at any storage time, revealing a more limited protective effect of the active film on this fish species.
Specific spoilage organisms (SSOs), namely bacteria able to produce extracellular proteases and lipases, were also considered in this study, and the results are also compiled in Table 2. With respect to proteolytic bacteria, this microbial group contributes to the breakdown of myofibrillar proteins that provide the structure of fish muscle, thus negatively affecting fish quality [55]. In our study, the presence of the pitaya extract in the packing film significantly (p < 0.05) slowed the growth of proteolytic bacteria in hake muscle at advanced storage times (day 8). Remarkably, the differences between both hake groups on day 8 were 1.20 log units, a result that underlines a considerable reduction in the growth of this SSO group. In the case of mackerel, such significant (p < 0.05) differences were assessed at intermediate storage times (0.56 log units on day 4) but not on day 8.
In the case of lipolytic bacteria, this SSO group generates FFAs from triacylglycerols and phospholipids, with the subsequent development of fish rancidity, which is detrimental to fish quality [52,56]. In our study, a lower average development of lipolytic bacteria was observed in both hake and mackerel batches that had pitaya extract in their packing film as compared to their control counterpart batches. However, such differences were not significant (p > 0.05) at any storage time.
Pitaya extracts contain bioactive compounds such as polyphenols, alkaloids, flavonoids, and tannins, which are responsible for their antimicrobial activity [57]. Interestingly, this activity has been reported to be more intense against Gram-positives as compared to Gram-negatives. Such differences in their respective sensitivities seem to be related to the different cell wall composition of both bacterial groups. Thus, the presence of outer membrane and porins in Gram-negatives, but not in Gram-positives, has been related to less sensitivity to pitaya active components that, in contrast, would penetrate more easily into the inner membrane of Gram-positives and cause membrane disruption [58].
Previous research related to the antimicrobial effect of extracts derived from plants of the genus Stenococcus can be considered scarce and consists of in vitro studies. Thus, a methanolic extract of S. pruinosus, including alkaloids, triterpenes, and flavonoids, showed remarkable antifungal activity [59]. Later, Soto-Cabrera et al. [60] showed the in vitro antimicrobial activity of hexanic, ethyl acetate, and methanolic extracts of S. stellatus branches and explained it on the basis of the high polyphenol and flavonoid content. A recent study by Cheong et al. [58] reported the in vitro activity of pitaya extracts against several pathogenic and spoilage bacteria, such as Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, Proteus vulgaris, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella typhi, Enterobacter cloacae, Enterobacter aerogenes, Yersinia enterocolitica, and Klebsiella pneumoniae.
A wide number of previous works have reported the inhibitory effect on the microbial activity derived from the inclusion of bioactive compounds obtained from natural sources in gelatin and PLA films. In such studies, the antimicrobial effect was explained as a result of the interaction between the preservative molecules present in the biofilm medium and the muscle of the marine species. Thus, Min et al. [11] detected an inhibitory effect on Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria by employing a catfish-gelatin packing medium containing an origanum (Thymus capitatus) extract. An active packing strategy including lyophilized macroalga F. spiralis in a PLA film implied remarkable reductions of microbial growth in megrim (Lepidorhombus whiffiagonis) fillets under refrigeration conditions during an 11-day storage [20]. Remarkable reductions in aerobes, psychrotrophs, Enterobacteriaceae, proteolytic bacteria, lipolytic bacteria, and anaerobes were detected in refrigerated European hake (M. merluccius) that was packed in a gelatin-based film containing a F. spiralis protein concentrate [14]. A recent study also reported the inhibition of aerobes, psychrotrophs, and proteolytic bacteria in mackerel (S. scombrus) packed with an active gelatin film containing lyophilized F. spiralis [15]. Concerning microalga employment, S. platensis extracts, including polyhydroxybutyrate and phenolic compounds, allowed active packing strategies due to their antimicrobial activity when included in edible films [61]. Moreover, active films have also been prepared by including a protein concentrate from S. platensis in a gelatin film, leading to better microbial growth in refrigerated hake (M. merluccius) [16] and mackerel (S. scombrus) [51].

4. Conclusions

Two biodegradable films containing a pitaya (S. thurberi) extract were investigated as a novel packing strategy for the quality loss inhibition of fish muscle under refrigeration. As a result, the presence of the pitaya extract led to an inhibitory effect (p < 0.05) on the peroxide, fluorescent compound, and FFA values in the gelatin–pitaya system applied to hake muscle and on the formation of TBARS, fluorescent compounds, and FFAs in the PLA–pitaya system applied to mackerel muscle. Concerning microbial development, the inclusion of the pitaya extract in the packing films slowed down (p < 0.05) the growth of aerobes, anaerobes, psychrotrophs, and proteolytic bacteria in the case of the pitaya–gelatin film and of aerobes, anaerobes, and proteolytic bacteria in the case of pitaya–PLA film. Based on the results obtained, an antioxidant and antimicrobial effect is concluded for the pitaya extract in both packing systems. The preservative effect is justified by the presence of different kinds of preserving molecules, such as betalains and phenolic compounds, in the pitaya extract. Such molecules would interact with the fish muscle and lead to an inhibitory effect on lipid oxidation and microbial activity.
The proposed preservation strategy agrees with the present efforts in the search for effective protective compounds (antioxidant and antimicrobial) obtained from natural sources to replace synthetic preservatives in food in general. Additionally, the use of biodegradable films constitutes a promising basis to reduce waste-material production during the different steps of fish-product commercialization. The current study constitutes a novel and beneficial strategy to enhance the quality of commercial fresh fish and facilitate environmental sustainability and the circular economy. Further research focused on the optimization of pitaya extract addition to the biofilms tested should be considered to apply this active packing strategy. This optimization should take into account the physicochemical properties of the resulting films in order to provide a safe, nutritious, and attractive fresh product to the consumer. Furthermore, maintenance of the sensory and external properties of the fish muscle ought to be guaranteed.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.R.-F., S.P.A. and J.B.-V.; methodology, D.C.-E., J.M.M., M.T. and F.R.-F.; data curation, D.C.-E., J.M.M., M.T. and S.P.A.; writing—original draft preparation, S.P.A. and J.B.-V.; writing—review and editing, J.M.M., F.R.-F., S.P.A. and J.B.-V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the SPANISH NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (CSIC, Spain), grant number 201370E001; and by CONACYT (Mexico), grant number 285445.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tilami, S.K.; Sampels, S. Nutritional Value of Fish: Lipids, Proteins, Vitamins, and Minerals. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquac. 2018, 26, 243–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. FAO Inform. Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics. In Commodities, Yearbook 2019; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2021; p. 41. [Google Scholar]
  3. Campos, C.; Gliemmo, M.; Aubourg, S.P.; Barros-Velázquez, J. Novel technologies for the preservation of chilled aquatic food products. In Novel Technologies in Food Science; McElhatton, A., Amaral Sobral, P., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012; Chapter 13; pp. 299–323. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mei, J.; Ma, X.; Xie, J. Review on natural preservatives for extending fish shelf life. Foods 2019, 8, 490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Gokoglu, N. Novel natural food preservatives and applications in seafood preservation: A review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 2068–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yousuf, S.; Maktedar, S.S. Utilization of quince (Cydonia oblonga) seeds for production of mucilage: Functional, thermal and rheological characterization. Sust. Food Technol. 2023, 1, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Westlake, J.R.; Tran, M.W.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Burrows, A.D.; Xie, M. Biodegradable biopolymers for active packaging: Demand, development and directions. Sust. Food Technol. 2023, 1, 50–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gupta, D.; Kumar, L.; Gaikwad, K.K. Carbon dots for food packaging applications. Sust. Food Technol. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. López-Rubio, A.; Gavara, R.; Lagarón, J. Bioactive packaging: Turning foods into healthier foods through biomaterials. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2006, 17, 567–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Umaraw, P.; Munekata, P.E.S.; Verma, A.K.; Barba, F.J.; Singh, V.P.; Kumar, P.; Lorenzo, J.M. Edible films/coating with tailored properties for active packaging of meat, fish and derived products. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 98, 10–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Min, B.J.; Oh, J.H. Antimicrobial activity of catfish gelatin coating containing origanum (Thymus capitatus) oil against Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria. J. Food Sci. 2009, 74, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Etxabide, A.; Uranga, J.; Guerrero, P.; de la Caba, K. Development of active gelatin films by means of valorisation of food processing waste. Food Hydroc. 2017, 68, 192–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Feng, X.; Ng, V.K.; Mikš-Krajnik, M.; Yang, H. Effects of fish gelatin and tea polyphenol coating on the spoilage and degradation of myofibril in fish fillet during cold storage. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2017, 10, 89–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Castro-Enríquez, D.D.; Miranda, J.M.; Barros-Velázquez, J.; Aubourg, S.P. Quality increase of refrigerated fish by employment of a gelatine biofilm including a protein hydrolysate obtained from alga Fucus spiralis. Bulg. Chem. Com. 2020, 52, 234–239. [Google Scholar]
  15. Trigo, M.; Nozal, P.; Miranda, J.M.; Aubourg, S.P.; Barros-Velázquez, J. Antimicrobial and antioxidant effect of lyophilized Fucus spiralis addition on gelatin film during refrigerated storage of mackerel. Food Cont. 2022, 131, 108416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Stejskal, N.; Miranda, J.M.; Martucci, J.F.; Ruseckaite, R.A.; Barros-Velázquez, J.; Aubourg, S.P. Quality enhancement of refrigerated hake muscle by active packaging with a protein concentrate from Spirulina platensis. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2020, 13, 1110–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Marano, S.; Laudadio, E.; Minnelli, C.; Stipa, P. Tailoring the barrier properties of PLA: A state-of-the-art review for food packaging applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mohan, S.; Panneerselvam, K. Development of polylactic acid based functional films reinforced with ginger essential oil and curcumin for food packaging applications. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2022, 16, 4703–4715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jamshidian, M.; Tehrany, E.A.; Imran, M.; Akhtar, M.J.; Cleymand, F.; Désobry, S. Structural, mechanical and barrier properties of active PLA-antioxidants films. J. Food Eng. 2012, 110, 380–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. García-Soto, B.; Miranda, J.; de Quirós, A.R.-B.; Sendón, R.; Rodríguez-Martínez, A.; Barros-Velázquez, J.; Aubourg, S.P. Effect of biodegradable film (lyophilised alga Fucus spiralis and sorbic acid) on quality properties of refrigerated megrim (Lepidorhombus whiffiagonis). Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 50, 1891–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Jin, T.; Zhang, H.; Boyd, G. Incorporation of preservatives in acid films for inactivating Escherichia coli O157:H7 and extending microbiological shelf life of strawberry puree. J. Food Protect. 2010, 73, 812–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Oussaid, S.; Madani, K.; Houali, K.; Marcet, I.; Amrouche, T.; Rendueles, M.; Diaz, M. Effect of novel bottle inner surface coatings made with polylactic acid and plant extracts on the physiological status of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in real liquid foods using flow cytometry. Packing Technol. Sci. 2022, 35, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Quiroz-González, B.; García-Mateos, R.; Corrales-García, J.J.E.; Colinas-León, M.T. Pitaya (Stenocereus spp.): An underutilized fruit. J. Prof. Assoc. Cactus Dev. 2018, 20, 82–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Vargas-Campos, L.; Valle-Guadarrama, S.; Martínez-Bustos, F.; Salinas-Moreno, Y.; Lobato-Calleros, C.; Calvo-López, A.D. Encapsulation and pigmenting potential of betalains of pitaya (Stenocereus pruinosus) fruit. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 2436–2445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Cejudo-Bastante, M.J.; Hurtado, N.; Muñoz-Burguillos, P.; Heredia, F.J. Stenocereus griseus (Haw) pitaya as source of natural colourant: Technological stability of colour and individual betalains. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 3024–3031. [Google Scholar]
  26. Albuquerque, B.R.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; Barros, L.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Could fruits be a reliable source of food colorants? Pros and cons of these natural additives. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 61, 805–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Rodríguez-Félix, A.; Fortiz-Hernández, J.; Tortoledo-Ortiz, O. Physico-chemical characteristics, and bioactive compounds of red fruits of sweet pitaya (Stenocereus thurberi). J. Prof. Assoc. Cactus Dev. 2019, 21, 87–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. García-Cruz, L.; Valle-Guadarrama, S.; Guerra-Ramírez, D.; Martínez-Damián, M.T.; Zuleta-Prada, H. Cultivation, quality attributes, postharvest behavior, bioactive compounds, and uses of Stenocereus: A review. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 304, 111336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Stintzing, F.C.; Carle, R. Functional properties of anthocyanins and betalains in plants, food, and in human nutrition. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 15, 19–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Choo, W.S. Betalains: Application in Functional Foods. In Bioactive Molecules in Food. Reference Series in Phytochemistry; Mérillon, J.M., Ramawat, K., Eds.; Springer Nature: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  31. García-Cruz, L.; Valle-Guadarrama, S.; Salinas-Moreno, Y.; Luna-Morales, C. Postharvest quality, soluble phenols, betalains content, and antioxidant activity of Stenocereus pruinosus and Stenocereus stellatus fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2016, 111, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. García-Cruz, L.; Dueñas, M.; Santos-Buelgas, C.; Valle-Guadarrama, S.; Salinas-Moreno, Y. Betalains and phenolic compounds profiling and antioxidant capacity of pitaya (Stenocereus spp.) fruit from two species (S. pruinosus and S. stellatus). Food Chem. 2017, 234, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Castro-Enríquez, D.D.; Montaño-Leyva, B.; Del Toro-Sánchez, C.L.; Juárez-Onofre, J.E.; Carvajal-Millán, E.; López-Ahumada, G.A.; Barreras-Urbina, C.G.; Tapia-Hernández, J.A.; Rodríguez-Félix, F. Effect of ultrafiltration of Pitaya extract (Stenocereus thurberi) on its phytochemical content, antioxidant capacity, and UPLC-DAD-MS profile. Molecules 2020, 25, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Bligh, E.; Dyer, W. A rapid method of total extraction and purification. Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 1959, 37, 911–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chapman, R.; McKay, J. The estimation of peroxides in fats and oils by the ferric thiocyanate method. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1949, 26, 360–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Vyncke, W. Direct determination of the thiobarbituric acid value in trichloracetic acid extracts of fish as a measure of oxidative rancidity. Fette Seifen. Anstrichm. 1970, 72, 1084–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Aubourg, S.P. Fluorescence study of the prooxidant activity of free fatty acids on marine lipids. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2001, 81, 385–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lowry, R.; Tinsley, I. Rapid colorimetric determination of free fatty acids. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1976, 53, 470–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Aubourg, S.P.; Losada, V.; Prado, M.; Miranda, J.M.; Barros-Velázquez, J. Improvement of the commercial quality of chilled Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) stored in slurry ice: Effects of a preliminary treatment with an antimelanosic agent on enzymatic browning. Food Chem. 2007, 103, 701–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ben-Gigirey, B.; de Sousa, J.V.B.; Villa, T.; Barros-Velázquez, J. Characterization of biogenic amine-producing Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strains isolated from white muscle of fresh and frozen albacore tuna. Int. J. Food Microb. 2000, 57, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tironi, V.; Tomás, M.; Añón, M.C. Structural and functional changes in myofibrillar proteins of sea salmon (Pseudopercis semifasciata) by interaction with malondialdehyde (RI). J. Food Sci. 2002, 67, 930–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Naseri, M.; Rezaei, M.; Moieni, S.; Hosseini, H.; Eskandari, S. Effects of different filling media on the oxidation and lipid quality of canned silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix). Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 46, 1149–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Aubourg, S.P. Review: Recent advances in assessment of marine lipid oxidation by using fluorescence. J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc. 1999, 76, 409–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Beltrán-Orozco, M.C.; Oliva-Coba, T.G.; Gallardo-Velázquez, T.; Osorio-Revilla, G. Ascorbic acid, phenolic content, and antioxidant capacity of red, cherry, yellow and white types of pitaya cactus fruit (Stenocereus stellatus Riccobono). Agrociencia 2009, 43, 153–162. [Google Scholar]
  45. García-Cruz, L.; Valle-Guadarrama, S.; Salinas-Moreno, Y.; Joaquín-Cruz, E. Physical, chemical, and antioxidant activity characterization of pitaya (Stenocereus pruinosus) fruits. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2013, 68, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Melchor Martínez, E.M.; Sandate-Flores, L.; Rodríguez-Rodríguez, J.; Rostro-Alanis, M.; Parra-Arroyo, L.; Antunes-Ricardo, M.; Serna-Saldívar, S.O.; Iqbal, H.M.N.; Parra Saldívar, R. Underutilized Mexican plants: Screening of antioxidant and antiproliferative properties of Mexican cactus fruit juices. Plants 2021, 10, 368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Sandate-Flores, L.; Méndez-Zamora, G.; Morales-Celaya, M.F.; Lara-Rreyes, J.A.; Aguirre-Arzola, V.E.; Gutiérrez-Díez, A.; Torres-Castillo, J.A.; Sinagawa-García, S.R. Biofunctional properties of the bioactive peptide from protein isolates of jiotilla (Escontria chiotilla) and pitaya (Stenocereus pruinosus) sedes. Food Sci. Technol. Campinas 2022, 42, e57922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ramírez-Rodríguez, Y.; Ramírez, V.; Robledo-Márquez, K.; García-Rojas, N.; Rojas-Morales, P.; Arango, N.; Pedraza-Chaverri, J.; Medina-Campos, O.N.; Pérez-Rojas, J.M.; Flores-Ramírez, R.; et al. Stenocereus huastecorum-fruit juice concentrate protects against cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity by nitric oxide pathway activity and antioxidant and antiapoptotic effects. Food Res. Int. 2022, 160, 111337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Luna-Morales, C.C.; Aguirre, J.R. Clasificación, tradicional, aprovechamiento y distribución ecológica de la pitaya mixteca en México. Interciencia 2001, 26, 18–24. [Google Scholar]
  50. Campos-Rojas, E.; Pinedo-Espinoza, J.M.; Campos-Montiel, R.G.; Hernández-Fuentes, A.D. Evaluation of pitaya plants (Stenocereus spp.) of natural populations of Monte Escobedo, Zacatecas. Rev. Chapingo Serie Hortic. 2011, 3, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Stejskal, N.; Miranda, J.M.; Martucci, J.F.; Ruseckaite, R.A.; Aubourg, S.P.; Barros-Velázquez, J. The effect of gelatine packaging film containing a Spirulina platensis protein concentrate on Atlantic mackerel shelf life. Molecules 2020, 25, 3209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Özoğul, Y. Methods for freshness quality and deterioration. In Handbook of Seafood and Seafood Products Analysis, Chapter 13; Nollet, L., Toldrá, F., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA; Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010; pp. 189–214. [Google Scholar]
  53. Nowzari, F.; Shabanpour, B.; Mahdi Ojagh, S. Comparison of chitosan-gelatin composite and bilayer coating and film effect on the quality of refrigerated rainbow trout. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 1667–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Saki, J.; Khodanazary, A.; Mehdi Hosseini, S. Effect of chitosan-gelatin composite and bi-layer coating combined with pomegranate peel extract on quality properties of Belanger’s croaker (Johnius belangerii) stored in refrigerator. J. Aq. Food Prod. Technol. 2018, 27, 557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rodríguez, O.; Losada, V.; Aubourg, S.P.; Barros-Velázquez, J. Sensory, microbial and chemical effects of a slurry ice system on horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus). J. Sci. Food Agric. 2005, 85, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. García-Soto, B.; Aubourg, S.P.; Calo-Mata, P.; Barros-Velázquez, J. Extension of the shelf life of chilled hake (Merluccius merluccius) by a novel icing medium containing natural organic acids. Food Cont. 2013, 34, 356–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Tenore, G.C.; Novellino, E.; Basile, A. Nutraceutical potential and antioxidant benefits of red pitaya (Hylocereus polyrhizus) extracts. J. Funct. Foods 2012, 4, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cheong, N.D.H.; Kashfi, A.F.H.; Yusof, H. The antibacterial effects of Hylocereus polyrhizus fruit extracts against selected bacteria. ESTEEM Academ. J. 2021, 17, 157–165. [Google Scholar]
  59. Treviño, N.J.F.; Rodríguez, G.R.G.; Verde, S.M.J.; Morales, R.M.E.; Garza, P.R.A.; Rivas, M.C.; Oranday, C.F. Antifungal activity of Stenocereus pruinosus and Echinocereus stramineus. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Farm. 2012, 43, 42–48. [Google Scholar]
  60. Soto-Cabrera, D.; Salazar, J.R.; Nogueda-Gutiérrez, I.; Torres-Olvera, M.; Cerón-Nava, A.; Rosales-Guevara, J.; Terrazas, T.; Rosas-Acevedo, H. Quantification of polyphenols and flavonoid content and evaluation of anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial activities of Stenocereus stellatus extracts. Nat. Prod. Res. 2016, 30, 1885–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Goettems Kuntzler, S.; Araujo de Almeida, A.; Vieira Costa, J.; Greque de Morais, M. Polyhydroxybutyrate and phenolic compounds microalgae electrospun nanofibers: A novel nanomaterial with antibacterial activity. Int. J. Biol. Macrom. 2018, 113, 1008–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Determination of free fatty acid (FFA) content (g·kg−1 muscle) in refrigerated fish muscle stored under different packing conditions. Average values of three replicates (n = 3); standard deviations are indicated by bars. For each fish species and refrigeration time, values accompanied by different lowercase letters (a,b) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of the pitaya extract’s presence in the packing medium. For each kind of fish sample, values accompanied by different capital letters (A–C) denote significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of the storage time. Abbreviations of packing conditions: CT-4d and CT-8d (control samples refrigerated for 4 and 8 days, respectively), and TR-4d and TR-8d (pitaya-treated samples refrigerated for 4 and 8 days, respectively).
Figure 1. Determination of free fatty acid (FFA) content (g·kg−1 muscle) in refrigerated fish muscle stored under different packing conditions. Average values of three replicates (n = 3); standard deviations are indicated by bars. For each fish species and refrigeration time, values accompanied by different lowercase letters (a,b) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of the pitaya extract’s presence in the packing medium. For each kind of fish sample, values accompanied by different capital letters (A–C) denote significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of the storage time. Abbreviations of packing conditions: CT-4d and CT-8d (control samples refrigerated for 4 and 8 days, respectively), and TR-4d and TR-8d (pitaya-treated samples refrigerated for 4 and 8 days, respectively).
Antioxidants 12 00544 g001
Figure 2. Aerobe development (log CFU·g−1 muscle) in refrigerated fish muscle stored under different packing conditions. Average values of three replicates (n = 3); standard deviations are indicated by bars. For each fish species and refrigeration time, values accompanied by different lowercase letters (a,b) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of the pitaya extract’s presence in the packing medium. For each kind of fish sample, values accompanied by different capital letters (A–C) denote significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of the storage time. Abbreviations of packing conditions are as expressed in Figure 1.
Figure 2. Aerobe development (log CFU·g−1 muscle) in refrigerated fish muscle stored under different packing conditions. Average values of three replicates (n = 3); standard deviations are indicated by bars. For each fish species and refrigeration time, values accompanied by different lowercase letters (a,b) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of the pitaya extract’s presence in the packing medium. For each kind of fish sample, values accompanied by different capital letters (A–C) denote significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of the storage time. Abbreviations of packing conditions are as expressed in Figure 1.
Antioxidants 12 00544 g002
Figure 3. Anaerobe development (log CFU·g−1 muscle) in refrigerated fish muscle stored under different packing conditions. Average values of three replicates (n = 3); standard deviations are indicated by bars. For each fish species and refrigeration time, values accompanied by different lowercase letters (a,b) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of the pitaya extract’s presence in the packing medium. For each kind of fish sample, values accompanied by different capital letters (A,B) denote significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of the storage time. Abbreviations of packing conditions are as expressed in Figure 1.
Figure 3. Anaerobe development (log CFU·g−1 muscle) in refrigerated fish muscle stored under different packing conditions. Average values of three replicates (n = 3); standard deviations are indicated by bars. For each fish species and refrigeration time, values accompanied by different lowercase letters (a,b) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of the pitaya extract’s presence in the packing medium. For each kind of fish sample, values accompanied by different capital letters (A,B) denote significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of the storage time. Abbreviations of packing conditions are as expressed in Figure 1.
Antioxidants 12 00544 g003
Table 1. Determination of lipid oxidation * in refrigerated fish muscle stored under different packing conditions **.
Table 1. Determination of lipid oxidation * in refrigerated fish muscle stored under different packing conditions **.
Quality IndexRefrigerated Time (Days)Hake MuscleMackerel Muscle
Packing ConditionPacking Condition
GEL-CTGEL-TRPLA-CTPLA-TR
PV
(meq. active oxygen·kg−1 lipids)
Initial0.72 ± 0.20 A0.72 ± 0.20 A0.36 ± 0.05 A0.36 ± 0.05 A
43.20 ± 0.12 bB2.89 ± 0.07 aB5.49 ± 0.69 aB5.86 ± 1.74 aB
86.96 ± 0.49 aC6.20 ± 0.41 aC12.59 ± 0.43 aC11.23 ± 2.18 aC
TBA-i (mg malondialdehyde·kg−1 muscle)Initial0.32 ± 0.17 A0.32 ± 0.17 A0.71 ± 0.42 A0.71 ± 0.42 A
40.66 ± 0.10 aB0.49 ± 0.17 aA4.84 ± 0.33 bB3.34 ± 0.45 aB
80.83 ± 0.18 aB0.64 ± 0.18 aA5.09 ± 0.12 bB4.60 ± 0.17 aC
Fluorescence ratioInitial0.76 ± 0.17 A0.76 ± 0.17 A2.51 ± 0.70 A2.51 ± 0.70 A
42.15 ± 0.16 aB1.98 ± 0.32 aB4.39 ± 0.48 aB3.63 ± 0.50 aA
84.47 ± 0.23 bC3.58 ± 0.31 aC8.29 ± 1.15 bC5.26 ± 0.41 aB
* Average values of three replicates (n = 3) ± standard deviations. For each fish species and refrigeration time, values accompanied by different lowercase letters (a,b) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of the pitaya extract’s presence in the packing medium. For each kind of fish sample, values accompanied by different capital letters (A–C) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of the storage time. ** Packing conditions: GEL-CT (hake muscle packed in gelatin biofilm; gelatin control), GEL-TR (hake muscle packed in gelatin biofilm containing pitaya extract), PLA-CT (mackerel muscle packed in polylactic acid biofilm; polylactic acid control), and PLA-TR (mackerel muscle packed in polylactic acid biofilm containing pitaya extract).
Table 2. Microbial (Enterobacteriaceae, psychrotrophs, proteolytic bacteria, and lipolytic bacteria) development (log CFU·g−1 muscle) * in refrigerated fish muscle stored under different packing conditions **.
Table 2. Microbial (Enterobacteriaceae, psychrotrophs, proteolytic bacteria, and lipolytic bacteria) development (log CFU·g−1 muscle) * in refrigerated fish muscle stored under different packing conditions **.
Microbial GroupRefrigerated Time (Days)Hake MuscleMackerel Muscle
Packing ConditionPacking Condition
GEL-CTGEL-TRPLA-CTPLA-TR
EnterobacteriaceaeInitial1.0 ± 0.0 A1.0 ± 0.0 A1.0 ± 0.0 A1.0 ± 0.0 A
41.74 ± 0.52 aB1.36 ± 0.39 aA1.0 ± 0.0 aA1.0 ± 0.0 aA
81.10 ± 0.17 aAB1.16 ± 0.27 aA1.0 ± 0.0 aA1.0 ± 0.0 aA
PsychrotrophsInitial3.79 ± 0.48 A3.79 ± 0.48 A2.75 ± 0.26 A2.75 ± 0.26 A
44.91 ± 0.76 aA4.87 ± 0.65 aA3.56 ± 0.41 aB3.75 ± 0.32 aB
87.40 ± 0.22 bB6.37 ± 0.32 aB4.46 ± 0.48 aB4.35 ± 0.60 aB
Proteolytic bacteriaInitial2.74 ± 0.67 A2.74 ± 0.67 A2.43 ± 0.38 A2.43 ± 0.38 A
44.92 ± 0.36 aB5.15 ± 0.59 aB4.44 ± 0.32 bB3.88 ± 0.61 aB
87.28 ± 0.57 bC6.08 ± 0.36 aB4.84 ± 0.47 aB4.97 ± 0.61 aB
Lipolytic bacteriaInitial2.00 ± 0.00 A2.00 ± 0.00 A2.00 ± 0.00 A2.00 ± 0.00 A
43.69 ± 0.64 aB3.33 ± 0.92 aB3.21 ± 0.41 aB3.33 ± 0.73 aB
84.05 ± 0.95 aB3.27 ± 0.89 aB3.98 ± 0.28 aC3.53 ± 0.92 aB
* Average values of three replicates (n = 3) ± standard deviations. For each fish species and refrigeration time, values accompanied by different lowercase letters (a,b) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of the pitaya extract’s presence in the packing medium. For each kind of fish sample, values accompanied by different capital letters (A–C) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of the storage time. ** Abbreviations of packing conditions are as expressed in Table 1.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Castro-Enríquez, D.; Miranda, J.M.; Trigo, M.; Rodríguez-Félix, F.; Aubourg, S.P.; Barros-Velázquez, J. Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Effect of Biodegradable Films Containing Pitaya (Stenocereus thurberi) Extracts during the Refrigerated Storage of Fish. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 544. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12030544

AMA Style

Castro-Enríquez D, Miranda JM, Trigo M, Rodríguez-Félix F, Aubourg SP, Barros-Velázquez J. Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Effect of Biodegradable Films Containing Pitaya (Stenocereus thurberi) Extracts during the Refrigerated Storage of Fish. Antioxidants. 2023; 12(3):544. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12030544

Chicago/Turabian Style

Castro-Enríquez, Daniela, José M. Miranda, Marcos Trigo, Francisco Rodríguez-Félix, Santiago P. Aubourg, and Jorge Barros-Velázquez. 2023. "Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Effect of Biodegradable Films Containing Pitaya (Stenocereus thurberi) Extracts during the Refrigerated Storage of Fish" Antioxidants 12, no. 3: 544. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12030544

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop