Next Article in Journal
Difficult Vascular Access in Children with Short Bowel Syndrome: What to Do Next?
Next Article in Special Issue
Cleft Lip and/or Cleft Palate: Prenatal Accuracy, Postnatal Course, and Long-Term Outcomes
Previous Article in Journal
Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography, Shear Wave Dispersion and Attenuation Imaging of Pediatric Liver Disease with Histological Correlation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Regional Splanchnic Oxygenation during Continuous versus Bolus Feeding among Stable Preterm Infants

1
Department of Neonatology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar-Saba 4428164, Israel
2
Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
3
Department of Pediatrics, Meir Medical Center, Kfar-Saba 4428164, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children 2022, 9(5), 691; https://doi.org/10.3390/children9050691
Submission received: 22 March 2022 / Revised: 24 April 2022 / Accepted: 3 May 2022 / Published: 9 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Healthcare for Neonates Volume II)

Abstract

:
Introduction: There is no agreement regarding the best method for tube-feeding preterm infants. Few studies, to date, have evaluated the influence of different methods of enteral feeding on intestinal oxygenation. The use of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) has permitted the noninvasive measurement of splanchnic regional oxygenation (rSO2S) in different clinical conditions. The aim of this prospective, single-center study was to compare rSO2S during continuous versus bolus feeding among stable preterm infants. Methods: Twenty-one preterm infants, less than 32 weeks gestation and appropriate for gestational age, were enrolled. All infants were clinically stable and on full tube feedings. Each infant received a bolus feeding initially (20 min duration), and after 3 h, a continuous feeding (5 h duration). Infants were evaluated 30 min before and 30 min after the bolus and continuous feedings. The regional splanchnic saturation (rSO2S) was measured using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) technology and systemic saturation was measured with pulse oximetry. From these measurements, we calculated the splanchnic fractional oxygen extraction ratio (FOES) for each of the four intervals. Results: rSO2S decreased after continuous vs. bolus feeding (p = 0.025), while there was a trend toward decreased SaO2 after bolus feeding (p = 0.055). The FOES, which reflects intestinal oxygen extraction, was not affected by the feeding mode (p = 0.129). Discussion/Conclusion: Continuous vs. bolus feeding decreases rSO2S but does not affect oxygen extraction by intestinal tissue; after bolus feeding there was a trend towards decreased systemic saturation.

1. Introduction

Optimal enteral feeding of premature infants has a strong impact on their short- and long-term outcomes. It is widely accepted that human milk is the optimal nutrition for preterm infants, and it is associated with decreased incidences of sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) [1]. There is also enough evidence that early initiation of enteral feeding decreases metabolic and infectious complications and improves intestinal function [2,3,4]. However, there is no agreement on the best method for tube feeding [2,3]. Studies that compared intermittent bolus feeding to continuous feeding reported inconsistent results regarding growth, time to achieve full enteral feeding, and gastrointestinal complications [4,5].
Previous studies evaluated the association between intestinal blood flow and gastrointestinal morbidities [6,7]. Fang et al., assessed the mesenteric perfusion in preterm infants with Doppler and found a significant correlation between increased blood flow velocity in the superior mesenteric artery and an early tolerance to enteral feeding [6].
In the last decade, the use of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS (technology for the assessment of mesenteric perfusion has been increasing [8,9]. NIRS is based on the principle that most biological tissues, other than hemoglobin and cytochrome oxidase, are relatively transparent to infrared light in the 700–1000 nanometer range. The absorbance spectrum of hemoglobin depends on its oxygenation status: deoxygenated hemoglobin absorbs more red light and less infrared light compared to oxygenated hemoglobin. The device emits light at wavelengths within the above-mentioned spectral range and analyzes photons returning to the transducer. The change in the intensity of the reflected light depends on the oxyhemoglobin-to-deoxyhemoglobin ratio, from which oxyhemoglobin saturation in the underlying tissue can be derived [10].
The measurement of splanchnic regional oxygenation (rSO2S) by NIRS reflects mesenteric perfusion and oxygenation [8,9], with a good correlation between rSO2S and superior mesenteric artery blood flow, as measured by Doppler [11].
The association between splanchnic oxygenation and feeding intolerance in infants was studied previously. In 2015, Dani et al., reported that rSO2S, when measured during the first days of life, does not predict the time it takes to achieve full enteral feeding [12]. In contrast, Corvalia et al., found that lower regional oxygenation before and after the first feeding predicts feeding intolerance [13].
Several studies investigated the impact of enteral feeding on splanchnic oxygenation in preterm infants [9,11,12,13,14,15], but to our knowledge, only two small studies have compared the influence of different methods of enteral feeding on intestinal oxygenation [14,15]. Although an increase in rSO2S following bolus feeding was found, there were inconsistencies regarding the effects of continuous feeding. Dani et al., found no effect on intestinal oxygenation [14], while Corvalia et al., showed decreased oxygenation following continuous feeding [15].
The current study compared rSO2S and oxygen extraction by intestinal tissue during continuous vs. bolus feeding among stable, preterm infants.

2. Materials and Methods

Preterm infants born at Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel, participated in the study. Infants were eligible if they met the criteria of a gestational age <32 weeks, weight appropriate for their gestational age, clinically stable at the time of the study, on full enteral feedings (150 mL/kg/day) for at least a week before enrollment, and tolerated bolus feeding the day before the study (every 2 or 3 h according to the local enteral feeding protocol; gastric residuals <25% of the feeding volume).
Premature infants with intrauterine growth retardation, major congenital anomalies, severe central nervous system disorder, gastrointestinal disorder, cutaneous disease, prior diagnosis of NEC or spontaneous intestinal perforation, and those who received blood product transfusion or vasopressor therapy up to a week before enrollment, were excluded from the study.

2.1. Study Protocol

Each patient was first given a bolus feeding (20–30 min duration), and after 2 or 3 h started 5 h of continuous feeding of the same type of milk (fortified human milk or preterm formula). The bolus feeding regimen was then restored.
The volume of the bolus feed was the same as that given the day before the study, while the volume of the continuous feed was calculated by dividing the total daily requirements into 4 meals (25%). It was administered over a period of 5 h, followed by an hour pause.
During the study period, infants were kept in the supine position with minimal handling to minimize NIRS artifacts. The arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) was continuously measured using pulse oximetry (Massimo). The rSO2S was measured with NIRS (INVOS 5100, Somanetics Corporation, Troy, MI, USA), using a sensor over the splanchnic bed, placed just below the umbilicus, according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (Figure 1). SaO2 and rSO2S were measured continuously from 30 min before the bolus feeding to 30 min after the continuous feeding was completed.
The study was divided into 4 intervals: Period 0—30 min before the bolus feeding, Period 1—30 min after the bolus feeding, Period 2—30 min before the continuous feeding, and Period 3—30 min after the continuous feeding. For each period, the average SaO2, rSO2S, and FOES values were calculated.
The FOES was calculated as the difference between arterial SaO2, measured with pulse oximetry, and rSO2S, measured by NIRS (FOES = (SaO2‒rSO2S)/SaO2). This parameter reflects the balance between oxygen delivery and oxygen consumption. Therefore, an increase in the FOES suggests an increase in tissue oxygen extraction due to higher oxygen consumption in relation to oxygen delivery, while a decrease suggests less oxygen use in comparison with the supply.
Infants’ characteristics were recorded from their electronic medical records, including gestational age, birth weight, sex, type of delivery, age and weight at study entry, type of feeding, age at full enteral feeding, and prematurity-related complications (respiratory distress syndrome, need of surfactant, patent ductus arteriosus, intraventricular hemorrhage, NEC, or bronchopulmonary dysplasia).

2.2. Statistical Analysis

We calculated that a sample size of at least 12 infants was required. The power calculation was based on the results of Dani et al., to detect a statistically significant difference of 10% in rSO2S, 30 min after bolus feeding, with 80% power at 0.05 levels [14]. SaO22 and rSO2S were recorded continuously with documentation every minute. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of SaO2, rSO2S, and the FOES were calculated for every 30 min study period. Serial measurements of the variables were compared by ANOVA with repeated measures with 2 within-subject factors (before vs. after and bolus vs. continuous). A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

The study was conducted from October 2014 to April 2016. A total of 21 infants with a mean gestational age of 28.8 ± 1.6 weeks and a mean birth weight of 1260 ± 330 g were included. Age at the time of the study was 32.1 ± 13.6 days. All were on full enteral feeds of 157.71 ± 7 mL/kg/day (Table 1).
Thirteen study participants were diagnosed with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) after birth (63%), eleven of whom received surfactant therapy (52%). Five infants (23%) had patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), three were treated with paracetamol, all were closed, and patients were asymptomatic. During the study, 50% of the participants were treated with caffeine, and 3 were still on oxygen supplementation. One infant developed NEC after completing the study and was treated conservatively. None of the study participants were diagnosed with significant IVH (grade 3–4) and none were diagnosed with BPD, defined as oxygen requirement at 36 weeks post-conceptional age.
Table 2 summarizes the results of the regional mesenteric and systemic saturation measurements during the study periods.
Our results demonstrate a significant decrease in rSO2S after the continuous feeding compared to the bolus feeding. In contrast, compared to continuous feeding, SaO2 decreased after bolus feeding. This finding was not statistically significant (Table 2).
The oxygen extraction by the intestinal tissue (FOES), which was calculated from the rSO2S and SaO2 data, was comparable between the two feeding regimens (Table 2).

4. Discussion

This prospective study assessed the effect of two different methods of enteral tube feeding on intestinal oxygenation and oxygen extraction among healthy, stable, appropriate-for-gestational-age preterm infants. We found that compared to a bolus feeding, rSO2S decreased after a continuous feeding, with no difference in the intestinal tissue oxygen extraction.
Previous studies that compared bolus to continuous feeding reported inconsistent results. Early studies that measured blood flow velocity in the superior mesenteric artery with Doppler demonstrated an increase in mesenteric blood flow 30–60 min after a meal [6,16,17]. The peak blood flow velocity was achieved faster when breast milk was given compared to formula [18].
The results of more recent studies that used NIRS technology also varied. Dave et al., showed that rSO2S, but not brain oxygenation, increased significantly an hour after feeding in stable preterm infants. However, continuous feeding was not assessed [9]. Demirel et al., used NIRS to examine the effects of positional changes on cerebral and mesenteric tissue oxygenation in very-low-birth-weight premature infants. They found no changes in regional cerebral or intestinal oxygenation with position change for an hour after bolus feeding [19].
In a subsequent study, Dave et al., compared bolus and continuous feeding using both NIRS and Doppler. They found an increase in rSO2S, as well as in blood flow velocity, in the superior mesenteric artery 30 min after bolus feeding among infants who were either average- or small-for-gestational-age. However, no change was demonstrated after continuous feeding. In agreement with our study, intestinal oxygen extraction was not affected by either feeding method in both study groups [14].
Corvaglia et al., also compared bolus and continuous feeding [15]. They measured cerebral regional oxygenation and rSO2S in 30 healthy, preterm infants during a bolus feeding and during a continuous feeding. Cerebral oxygenation was not affected by the method of feeding. Splanchnic oxygenation was increased following the bolus feeding and decreased after continuous feeding.
Many factors affect intestinal blood flow in preterm infants, including postnatal age, volume, and whether they receive human milk or formula. We assume that the increase in mesenteric blood flow after bolus feeding is mediated by the gastrointestinal hormones, gastrin, enteroglucagon, and gastric inhibitory peptide [20,21]. This hormonal response is probably not obtained following continuous feeding.
It is possible that we failed to find an increase in intestinal oxygenation after the bolus feeding due to a difference in feeding protocols. According to our local feeding protocol, a bolus feeding is given for 20–30 min, compared to 5–10 min in studies that did find the expected increased oxygenation after a bolus feeding.
Another possible cause is the duration of the measurements. In the current study, NIRS measurements were collected for 30 min after the end of the feeding. Although increased mesenteric blood flow was described previously during this period, others found it only after an hour [11].
Our study revealed a trend toward decreased systemic saturation after the bolus feeding that was not observed after the continuous feeding (p = 0.055). The clinical significance of this trend needs further evaluation. Previous studies investigated the influence of enteral feeding on systemic saturation. Desaturations were documented for bottle feeding, as well as tube feeding, regardless of the method of tube feeding [22]. However, while Toce and colleagues showed no change in the incidences of apnea during both bolus and continuous feeding [23], Akintorin et al., in agreement with our observation, found increased incidences of apneic events during bolus feeding [24].
The current study is limited primarily by the small sample size. A larger, follow-up study is needed to confirm the results and validate the conclusions. It is possible that a larger sample will reveal significant differences in systemic saturation and fractional oxygen extraction (FOES) as well. However, the main difficulty in recruiting patients for the study was the narrow window of opportunity between the achievement of full tube enteral feeding and the initiation of oral feeding. The study included only healthy, appropriate-for-gestational-age infants, on full enteral feeding. The results may not apply to unstable or small-for-gestational-age infants, who are at a higher risk for gastrointestinal complications. Another limitation is that all the participants received intermittent bolus feeding prior to enrollment. We cannot exclude the possibility of the results being somewhat influenced by the feeding method prior to enrollment in the study.
In conclusion, we demonstrated that intermittent bolus feeding and continuous feeding, two feeding techniques routinely used for preterm infants, affect regional intestinal oxygenation differently. We found a decrease in the rSO2S after continuous feeding and not after bolus feeding. On the other hand, there was a trend toward decreased systemic saturation after bolus feeding compared to continuous feeding.
The results may suggest that the mode of enteral feeding should be individualized and adjusted to the hemodynamic, respiratory, and nutritional status of each infant. Further studies should assess whether continuous feeding could be beneficial for infants coping with respiratory difficulties, while bolus feeding would be advantageous for those at a higher risk of hypoxic–ischemic gut damage (such as small-for-gestational-age infants).
To make useful recommendations regarding the best enteral feeding technique for preterm infants, it is important to include preterm infants during the first days of life, who tend to be less clinically stable.

Author Contributions

G.L.S. and I.L.: participated in the study design, analysis, and interpretation of the data, as well as the drafting and revision of the manuscript. C.V. and S.S.M.: were responsible for data collection. O.L. and E.G.: contributed to data analysis and interpretation. S.A. and S.B.R.: contributed to the design of the study and to the revision of the S.S.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee. Written informed consent was obtained from all parents. Clinical Trials registration number: NCT02072109, Date 9 June 2014.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. Schanler, R.J.; Shulman, R.J.; Lau, C. Feeding strategies for premature infants: Beneficial outcomes of feeding fortified human milk versus preterm formula. Pediatrics 1999, 103, 1150–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hay, W.W., Jr. Strategies for feeding the preterm infant. Neonatology 2008, 94, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Ehrenkranz, R.A.; Das, A.; Wrage, L.A. Early nutrition mediates the influence of severity of illness on extremely LBW infants. Pediatr. Res. 2011, 69, 522–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Morgan, J.; Young, L.; McGuire, W. Delayed introduction of progressive enteral feeds to prevent necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2011, 16, CD001970. [Google Scholar]
  5. Premji, S.S.; Chessell, L. Continuous nasogastric milk feeding versus intermittent bolus milk feeding for premature infants less than 1500 grams. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2011, 11, CD001819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fang, S.; Kempley, S.T.; Gamsu, H.R. Prediction of early tolerance to enteral feeding in preterm infants by measurement of superior mesenteric artery blood flow velocity. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2001, 85, F42–F45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Pezzati, M.; Dani, C.; Tronchin, M.; Fillipi, L.; Rossi, S.; Rubaltelli, F.F. Prediction of early tolerance to enteral feeding by measurement of superior mesenteric artery blood flow velocity: Appropriate- versus small-for-gestational-age preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 2004, 93, 797–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cortez, J.; Gupta, M.; Amaram, A.; Pizzino, J.; Sawhney, M.; Sood, B.G. Noninvasive evaluation of splanchnic tissue oxygenation using near-infrared spectroscopy in preterm neonates. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011, 24, 574–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dave, V.; Brion, L.P.; Campbell, D.E.; Scheiner, M.; Raab, C.; Nafday, S.M. Splanchnic tissue oxygenation, but not brain tissue oxygenation, increases after feeds in stable preterm neonates tolerating full bolus orogastric feeding. J. Perinatol. 2009, 29, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Wahr, J.A.; Tremper, K.K.; Samra, S.; Delpy, D.T. Near infrared spectroscopy: Theory and applications. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 1996, 10, 406–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gillam-Krakauer, M.; Cochran, C.M.; Slaughter, J.C.; Polavarapu, S.; McElroy, S.J.; Hernanz-Schulman, M.; Engelhardt, B. Correlation of abdominal rSO2 with superior mesenteric artery velocities in preterm infants. J. Perinatol. 2013, 33, 609–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Dani, C.; Corsini, I.; Generoso, M.; Gozzini, E.; Bianconi, T.; Pratesi, S. Splanchnic Tissue Oxygenation for Predicting Feeding Tolerance in Preterm Infants. J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr. 2015, 39, 935–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Corvaglia, L.; Martini, S.; Battistini, B.; Rucci, P.; Faldella, G.; Aceti, A. Splanchnic oxygenation at first enteral feeding in preterm infants: Correlation with feeding tolerance. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2017, 64, 550–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dani, C.; Pratesi, S.; Barp, J.; Bertini, G.; Gozzini, E.; Mele, L.; Parrini, L. Near-infrared spectroscopy measurements of splanchnic tissue oxygenation during continuous versus intermittent feeding method in preterm infants. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2013, 56, 652–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Corvaglia, L.; Martini, S.; Battistini, B.; Rucci, P.; Aceti, A.; Faldella, G. Bolus vs. continuous feeding: Effects on splanchnic and cerebral tissue oxygenation in healthy preterm infants. Pediatr. Res. 2014, 76, 81–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Leidig EOzkan, H.; Oren, H.; Erdag, N.; Cevik, N. Breast milk versus infant formulas: Effects on intestinal blood flow in neonates. Indian J. Pediatr. 1994, 61, 703–709. [Google Scholar]
  17. Coombs, R.C.; Morgan, M.E.; Durbin, G.M.; Booth, I.W.; McNeish, A.S. Doppler assessment of human neonatal gut blood flow velocities: Postnatal adaptation and response to feeds. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 1992, 15, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lane, A.J.P.; Coombs, R.C.; Evans, D.H.; Levin, R.J. Effect of feed interval and feed type on splanchnic hemodynamics. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1998, 79, F49–F53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Demirel, G.; Oguz, S.; Celik, I.H.; Erdeve, O.; Dilmen, U. Cerebral and mesenteric tissue oxygenation by positional changes in very low birth weight premature infants. Ear. Hum. Dev. 2012, 88, 409–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Aynsley-Green, A.; Adrian, T.E.; Bloom, S.R. Feeding and the development of enteroinsular hormone secretion in the preterm infant: Effects of continuous gastric infusions of human milk compared with intermittent boluses. Acta Paediat. Scand. 1982, 71, 379–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Havranek, T.; Miladinovic, B.; Wadhawan, R.; Carver, J.D. Factors that affect the postnatal increase in superior mesenteric artery blood flow velocity in very low birth weight preterm infants. J. Perinat. Med. 2012, 40, 565–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Poets, C.F.; Langner, M.U.; Bohnhorst, B. Effects of bottle feeding and two different methods of gavage feeding on oxygenation and breathing patterns in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 1997, 86, 419–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Toce, S.S.; Keenan, W.J.; Homan, S.M. Enteral feeding in very-low-birth-weight infants. A comparison of two nasogastric methods. Am. J. Dis. Child. 1987, 141, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Akintorin, S.M.; Kamat, M.; Pildes, R.S. A prospective randomized trial of feeding methods in very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 1997, 100, E4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) technology for assessment of mesenteric perfusion.
Figure 1. Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) technology for assessment of mesenteric perfusion.
Children 09 00691 g001
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of infants in the study group (N = 21).
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of infants in the study group (N = 21).
CharacteristicResult
Gestational age at birth, weeks28.81 ± 1.63
Birth weight, grams *1270 ± 330
Male sex **12 (57)
Cesarean section delivery **15 (61)
Age at study, days *32.05 ± 13.59
Gestational age at study, weeks33.29 ± 1.38
Weight at study entry, grams *1730 ± 310
Feeding volume at study entry, ml/kg/day *157.71 ± 7
Gestational age at study entry, weeks *30.61 ± 1.24
Type of feeding **Fortified human milk10 (48)
Preterm formula4 (19)
Mix7 (33)
* Mean ± SD; ** N (%).
Table 2. Changes in SaO2, rSO2S, and FOES during the 4 study periods.
Table 2. Changes in SaO2, rSO2S, and FOES during the 4 study periods.
Mean ± SDPeriod 0Period 1Period 2Period 3* p
rSO2S58.99 ± 10.7158.78 ± 9.0760.32 ± 10.0255.60 ± 12.410.025
SaO297.43 ± 2.3596.81 ± 2.5097.29 ± 2.6197.71 ± 1.730.055
FOES0.39 ± 0.110.39 ± 0.090.40 ± 0.120.44 ± 0.110.129
* p refers to the difference between periods 0 and 1 compared to the difference between periods 2 and 3. Data presented as mean ± SD. rSO2S—Regional splanchnic oxygenation; FOES—fractional oxygen extraction ratio.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sirota, G.L.; Litmanovitz, I.; Vider, C.; Arnon, S.; Moore, S.S.; Grinblatt, E.; Levkovitz, O.; Bauer Rusek, S. Regional Splanchnic Oxygenation during Continuous versus Bolus Feeding among Stable Preterm Infants. Children 2022, 9, 691. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9050691

AMA Style

Sirota GL, Litmanovitz I, Vider C, Arnon S, Moore SS, Grinblatt E, Levkovitz O, Bauer Rusek S. Regional Splanchnic Oxygenation during Continuous versus Bolus Feeding among Stable Preterm Infants. Children. 2022; 9(5):691. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9050691

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sirota, Gisela Laura, Ita Litmanovitz, Carmel Vider, Shmuel Arnon, Shiran Sara Moore, Eynit Grinblatt, Orly Levkovitz, and Sofia Bauer Rusek. 2022. "Regional Splanchnic Oxygenation during Continuous versus Bolus Feeding among Stable Preterm Infants" Children 9, no. 5: 691. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9050691

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop