Influence of Soil Types on the Morphology, Yield, and Essential Oil Composition of Common Sage (Salvia officinalis L.)
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. Morphological Characteristics
3.2. Essential Oil Content
3.3. Composition of Essential Oil
3.4. The Correlation among Oil Compounds, the Examined Soil Components, and Sage Plant Properties
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Papafotiou, M.; Vlachou, G.; Martini, A.N. Investigation of the Effects of the Explant Type and Different Plant Growth Regulators on Micropropagation of Five Mediterranean Salvia Spp. Native to Greece. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tutin, T.G.; Heywood, V.H.; Burges, N.A.; Moore, D.M.; Valentine, D.H.; Walters, S.M.; Webb, D.A. Diapensiacea to Myoporaceae. In Flora Europaea; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1972; Volume 3, ISBN 978-0-521-08489-5. [Google Scholar]
- Toscano, S.; Franzoni, G.; Álvarez, S. Drought Stress in Horticultural Plants. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valkovszki, N.J.; Székely, Á.; Szalóki, T.; Kun, Á.; Kolozsvári, I.; Tavaszi-Sárosi, S.; Jancsó, M. Az öntözés hatása liziméterben nevelt orvosi zsályára (Salvia officinalis L.). J. Cent. Eur. Green Innov. 2022, 10, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xing, Z.; Bi, G.; Li, T.; Zhang, Q.; Knight, P.R. Nitrogen Fertilization Improves Growth and Bioactive Compound Content for Salvia Miltiorrhiza Bunge. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferrante, A.; Mariani, L. Agronomic Management for Enhancing Plant Tolerance to Abiotic Stresses: High and Low Values of Temperature, Light Intensity, and Relative Humidity. Horticulturae 2018, 4, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corell, M.; Garcia, M.; Contreras, J.; Segura, M.; Cermeño, P. Effect of Water Stress on Salvia officinalis L. Bioproductivity and Its Bioelement Concentrations. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2012, 43, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bettaieb, I.; Zakhama, N.; Wannes, W.A.; Kchouk, M.E.; Marzouk, B. Water Deficit Effects on Salvia officinalis Fatty Acids and Essential Oils Composition. Sci. Hortic. 2009, 120, 271–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Govahi, M.; Ghalavand, A.; Nadjafi, F.; Sorooshzadeh, A. Effects of Different Soil Fertility Systems on Some Physiological Characteristics, Yield and Essential Oil of Sage (Salvia officinalis L.) under Different Irrigation Regimes. Iran. J. Med. Arom. Plants Res. 2016, 32, 333–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mulugeta, S.M.; Gosztola, B.; Radácsi, P. Morphological and Biochemical Responses of Selected Species under Drought. Herba Pol. 2022, 68, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mulugeta, S.M.; Radácsi, P. Influence of Drought Stress on Growth and Essential Oil Yield of Ocimum Species. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szabó, K.; Zubay, P.; Németh-Zámboriné, É. What Shapes Our Knowledge of the Relationship between Water Deficiency Stress and Plant Volatiles? Acta Physiol. Plant. 2020, 42, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Russo, A.; Formisano, C.; Rigano, D.; Senatore, F.; Delfine, S.; Cardile, V.; Rosselli, S.; Bruno, M. Chemical Composition and Anticancer Activity of Essential Oils of Mediterranean Sage (Salvia officinalis L.) Grown in Different Environmental Conditions. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 55, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ben Taarit, M.; Msaada, K.; Hosni, K.; Hammami, M.; Kchouk, M.E.; Marzouk, B. Plant Growth, Essential Oil Yield and Composition of Sage (Salvia officinalis L.) Fruits Cultivated under Salt Stress Conditions. Ind. Crops Prod. 2009, 30, 333–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rapposelli, E.; Melito, S.; Barmina, G.G.; Foddai, M.; Azara, E.; Scarpa, G.M. Relationship between Soil and Essential Oil Profiles in Salvia Desoleana Populations: Preliminary Results. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2015, 10, 1615–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Owais, S.J.; Abdel-Ghani, A.H.; Ghrair, A.M.; Al-Dalain, S.A.; Almajali, N. Effect of Natural Jordanian Volcanic Tuff on Growth, Irrigation Water Saving and Leaves Mineral Content of Salvia officinalis. Jord. J. Agric. Sci. 2013, 9, 439–456. [Google Scholar]
- Kassahun, B.M.; German, T.; Zigene, Z.D.; Tilahun, S.; Gebere, A.; Taddese, S.; Fikadu, D.; Miesso, B. Performance of Sage (Salvia officinalis L.) for Morpho-Agronomic and Chemical Traits in Different Agro-Ecologies of Ethiopia. Int. J. Adv. Biol. Biomed. Res. 2015, 3, 351–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valkovszki, N.J.; Mihály, J.; Árpád, S.; Tímea, S.; Ildikó, K.; Ágnes, K. A termőhely hatása az orvosi zsálya (Salvia officinalis L.) morfológiai jellemzőire és droghozamára öntözetlen körülmények között—Előzetes eredmények. Kertgazdaság 2021, 53, 54–64. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Tabbal, J.; Alzboon, K.; Al-Zou’by, J.; Al Smadi, B.; Ammary, B. Effect of Zeolux Use on Sage (Salvia officinalis) Plant Irrigated by Fresh and RO Reject Waters. Glob. Nest J. 2016, 18, 425. [Google Scholar]
- Amer, H.M.; Salem, S.H.; Salaheldin, S.; Hussein, M.S.; El-Fatah, A. The Growth, Chemical Composition and Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity of Salvia officinalis Oil under Partial Substitution of Mineral NPK Fertilizer by Bio-Fertilizer. Middle East J. Agric. Res. 2019, 08, 457–468. [Google Scholar]
- Dashti, M.; Kafi, M.; Astaraei, A.; Zabihi, H. Investigation of Yield and Yield Components Response of Salvia Leriifolia Benth. to the Biological and Organic Fertilizers. Z. Arznei- Gewurzpfla. 2018, 22, 84–90. [Google Scholar]
- El-Haddad, M.E.; Zayed, M.S.; El-Sayed, G.A.M.; Abd EL-Satar, A.M. Efficiency of Compost and Vermicompost in Supporting the Growth and Chemical Constituents of Salvia officinalis L. Cultivated in Sand Soil. Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agric. 2020, 9, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greco, C.; Comparetti, A.; Febo, P.; La Placa, G.; Mammano, M.M.; Orlando, S. Sustainable Valorisation of Biowaste for Soilless Cultivation of Salvia officinalis in a Circular Bioeconomy. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greco, C.; Comparetti, A.; Fascella, G.; Febo, P.; La Placa, G.; Saiano, F.; Mammano, M.M.; Orlando, S.; Laudicina, V.A. Effects of Vermicompost, Compost and Digestate as Commercial Alternative Peat-Based Substrates on Qualitative Parameters of Salvia officinalis. Agronomy 2021, 11, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jafari, G.M.; Abbaszadeh, B.; Oraei, M. Effects of Chemical and Biological Fertilizers on Growth, Yield and Essential Oil of Salvia officinalis. J. Med. Plant By-Prod. 2015, 4, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khammar, A.A.; Moghaddam, M.; Asgharzade, A.; Sourestani, M.M. Nutritive Composition, Growth, Biochemical Traits, Essential Oil Content and Compositions of Salvia officinalis L. Grown in Different Nitrogen Levels in Soilless Culture. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2021, 21, 3320–3332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kocabas, I.; Kaplan, M.; Kurkcuoglu, M.; Baser, K.H.C. Effects of Different Organic Manure Applications on the Essential Oil Components of Turkish Sage (Salvia fruticosa Mill.). Asian J. Chem. 2010, 22, 1599–1605. [Google Scholar]
- Mona, Y.; Kandil, A.M.; Swaefy, H. Effect of Three Different Compost Levels on Fennel and Salvia Growth Character and Their Essential Oils. Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2008, 4, 34–39. [Google Scholar]
- Shukri, H.M. Effect of Diammonium Phosphate (DAP) Fertilization on Growth of Sage Plant (Salvia officinalis L.) and Concentration of Volatile Oil Salvia officinalis L. J. Biotechmol. Res. Cent. 2016, 10, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nell, M.; Vötsch, M.; Vierheilig, H.; Steinkellner, S.; Zitterl-Eglseer, K.; Franz, C.; Novak, J. Effect of Phosphorus Uptake on Growth and Secondary Metabolites of Garden Sage (Salvia officinalis L.). J. Sci. Food Agric. 2009, 89, 1090–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Michéli, E.; Fuchs, M.; Láng, V.; Szegi, T.; Dobos, E.; Szabóné Kele, G. Javaslat Talajosztályozási Rendszerünk Megújítására: Alapelvek, Módszerek, Alapegységek. Agrokémia Talajt. 2015, 64, 285–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schad, P. The International Soil Classification System WRB, Third Edition, 2014. In Novel Methods for Monitoring and Managing Land and Water Resources in Siberia; Mueller, L., Sheudshen, A.K., Eulenstein, F., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 563–571. ISBN 978-3-319-24409-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Den Dool, H.; Kratz, P.D. A Generalization of the Retention Index System Including Linear Temperature Programmed Gas—Liquid Partition Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1963, 11, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sárosi, S.; Sipos, L.; Kókai, Z.; Pluhár, Z.; Szilvássy, B.; Novák, I. Effect of Different Drying Techniques on the Aroma Profile of Thymus vulgaris Analyzed by GC-MS and Sensory Profile Methods. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 46, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sonmez, C.; Bayram, E. The Influence of Different Water and Nitrogen Applications on Some Yield Parameters and Antioxidant Activity in Sage (Salvia officinalis L.). Turk. J. Field Crops 2017, 22, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doda, Q.; Bardhi, N.; Teqja, Z.; Mero, G.; Kallço, I.; Zeka, B. Effects of Different Limestone Rates on Yield and Yield Indicators of a Sage (Salvia officinalis L.) Ecotype. Online Int. Interdiscip. Res. J. 2014, 4, 7–16. [Google Scholar]
- Yaldiz, G.; Camlica, M. Assessing the effect of various doses of organic manures on herbage yield, essential oil, and compositions of sage grown under climate chamber and field conditions. Org. Agric. 2023, 13, 377–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soltanbeigi, A. Qualitative Variations of Lavandin Essential Oil under Various Storage Conditions. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2020, 23, 1237–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valkovszki, N.; Jancsó, M.; Székely, Á.; Szalóki, T.; Kolozsvári, I.; Tavaszi-Sárosi, S.; Kun, Á. The effect of application of effluent water on sage (Salvia officinalis L.) yield and quality in lysimeters. Folia Hortic. 2023, 35, 163–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Govahi, M.; Ghalavand, A.; Nadjafi, F.; Sorooshzadeh, A. Comparing different soil fertility systems in Sage (Salvia officinalis) under water deficiency. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 74, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menghini, L.; Leporini, L.; Pintore, G.; Chessa, M.; Tirillini, B. Essential oil content and composition of three sage varieties grown in Central Italy. J. Med. Plants Res. 2013, 7, 480–489. Available online: https://academicjournals.org/journal/JMPR/article-full-text-pdf/CD5317220911 (accessed on 22 August 2023).
2021 | 2022 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Chernozem | Fluvisol | Chernozem | Fluvisol | |
pH (KCl) | 7.01 | 5.68 | 7.02 ± 0.02 | 5.46 ± 0.14 |
Arany-type cohesion measure (KA) | 45.0 | 73.0 | 44.4 ± 2.1 | 71.3 ± 3.2 |
Total water-soluble salts (m/m%) | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.05 ± 0.01 |
Carbonatet lime (m/m%) | 1.12 | <0.50 | 1.23 ± 0.05 | <0.50 |
Humus (m/m%) | 4.55 | 4.65 | 3.03 ± 0.16 | 3.74 ± 0.65 |
Nitrit-Nitrate-N (KCl, mg/kg) | 20.10 | 2.26 | 10.17 ± 1.70 | 3.33 ± 0,61 |
P2O5 (mg/kg) | 4030.00 | 497.00 | 3617.50 ± 72.98 | 411.94 ± 94.17 |
K2O (mg/kg) | 1720.00 | 542.00 | 1540.00 ± 78.83 | 325.69 ± 85.17 |
Plant Height | Plant Diameter | Shoot Length | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MS | F | Sig. | MS | F | Sig. | MS | F | Sig. | |
Soil | 2355.26 | 46.40 | 0.00 | 7115.37 | 102.65 | 0.00 | 1972.97 | 65.62 | 0.00 |
Harvest | 446.44 | 8.79 | 0.00 | 990.29 | 14.29 | 0.00 | 150.27 | 5.00 | 0.03 |
Year | 2044.39 | 40.27 | 0.00 | 1114.80 | 16.08 | 0.00 | 2005.04 | 66.69 | 0.00 |
Error | 50.77 | 69.32 | 30.06 | ||||||
Leaf DW | SPAD | ||||||||
MS | F | Sig. | MS | F | Sig. | ||||
Soil | 6317.84 | 85.02 | 0.00 | 90.37 | 3.91 | 0.05 | |||
Harvest | 412.60 | 5.55 | 0.02 | 378.94 | 16.41 | 0.00 | |||
Year | 2064.49 | 27.78 | 0.00 | 94.96 | 4.11 | 0.04 | |||
Error | 74.31 | 23.09 |
Fluvisol | Chernozem | |
---|---|---|
Plant height | −36.20 | −46.60 |
Plant diameter | −3.19 | −35.84 |
Shoot length | −66.54 | −65.01 |
Leaf DW | −72.02 | −54.70 |
SPAD | 14.33 | −10.40 |
2021 | 2022 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Fluvisol | Chernozem | Fluvisol | Chernozem | |
Dry leaves weight (DW; g/m2) | 56.48 ± 36.12 a | 163.94 ± 42.75 b | 32.43 ± 31.45 a | 91.32 ± 47.55 b |
Total oil concentration (mL/100 g DM) | 0.67 ± 0.04 b | 0.48 ± 0.04 a | 1.10 ± 0.04 b | 0.82 ± 0.04 a |
Total oil content (ml/m2 DM) | 37.65 ± 24.08 a | 78.64 ± 20.50 b | 35.71 ± 22.88 a | 74.82 ± 38.96 b |
2021 | 2022 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Components of Essential Oil (%) | Fluvisol | Chernozem | Fluvisol | Chernozem |
Hydrocarbon monoterpenes | ||||
α-Pinene | 1.53 | 0.67 | 2.22 | 0.78 |
Camphene | 1.47 | 0.39 | 2.13 | 0.48 |
ß-Pinene | 0.66 | 0.50 | 2.16 | 1.12 |
ß-Myrcene | 0.27 | 0.16 | 0.49 | 0.26 |
α-Terpinene | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.15 | 0.11 |
p-Cymene | 0.63 | 0.46 | 0.34 | 0.28 |
Limonene | 0.97 | 0.68 | 1.13 | 0.59 |
γ-Terpinene | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.37 | 0.32 |
α-Terpinolene | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.16 | 0.09 |
Oxygenated monoterpenes | ||||
1,8-cineol | 9.66 | 6.95 | 11.04 | 8.56 |
Linalool | 0.57 | 0.44 | 0.60 | 0.41 |
α-Thujone | 14.69 | 11.89 | 14.14 | 13.67 |
ß-Thujone | 7.78 | 8.04 | 6.01 | 8.47 |
Camphor | 9.90 | 6.18 | 0.77 | 4.72 |
Isoborneol | 8.08 | 5.42 | 7.87 | 2.94 |
Terpinene-4-ol | 0.38 | 0.33 | 0.31 | 0.24 |
α-Terpineol | 0.26 | 0.19 | 0.26 | 0.2 |
Izobornil-acetate | 0.92 | 0.79 | 0.96 | 0.3 |
Hydrocarbon sesquiterpenes | ||||
α-Copaene | 0.28 | 0.39 | 0.30 | 0.33 |
ß-Caryophyllene | 4.71 | 9.56 | 6.78 | 12.90 |
Aromadendrene | 0.00 | 0.33 | 0.02 | 0.26 |
α-Humulene | 10.59 | 15.57 | 12.49 | 16.34 |
Alloaromadendrene | 0.12 | 0.20 | 0.13 | 0.18 |
γ-Muurolene | 0.45 | 0.67 | 0.55 | 0.64 |
Viridiflorene | 0.21 | 0.45 | 0.22 | 0.37 |
α-Muurolene | 0.12 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.19 |
Cis-γ-Kadinene | 0.15 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.21 |
δ-Cadinene | 0.75 | 1.10 | 0.83 | 1.00 |
Oxygenated sesquiterpenes | ||||
Caryophyllene-oxide | 0.49 | 0.74 | 0.36 | 0.55 |
Viridiflorol | 15.71 | 18.05 | 14.49 | 19.02 |
Humulene-oxide II | 2.02 | 1.97 | 1.30 | 1.40 |
Viridiflorol | α-Thujone | α-Humulene | β-Caryophyllene | Camphor | β-Thujone | Isoborneol | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Viridiflorol | 1.00 | ||||||
α-thujone | −0.74 | 1.00 | |||||
α-humulene | 1.00 ** | −0.72 | 1.00 | ||||
β-caryophyllene | 0.96 * | −0.71 | 0.96 * | 1.00 | |||
Camphor | −0.23 | 0.07 | −0.29 | −0.28 | 1.00 | ||
β-thujone | 0.57 | −0.34 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.65 | 1.00 | |
Isoborneol | −0.93 | 0.46 | −0.92 | −0.98 * | 0.09 | −0.70 | 1.00 |
Soil Parameters | Plant Height (cm) | Plant Diameter (cm) | Shoot Length (cm) | Dry Leaves Weight (g/Plant) | SPAD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH (KCl) | 0.71 ** | 0.61 ** | 0.78 ** | 0.65 ** | −0.46 ** |
Soil cohesion (KA) | −0.69 ** | −0.55 ** | −0.72 ** | −0.64 ** | 0.42 * |
Total water-soluble salts (m/m%) | −0.42 * | −0.44 * | −0.42 * | −0.48 ** | 0.19 |
Carbonated lime (m/m%) | 0.71 ** | 0.62 ** | 0.76 ** | 0.64 ** | −0.44 * |
Humus (m/m%) | −0.31 | −0.27 | −0.36 * | −0.32 | 0.21 |
Nitrite-Nitrate-N (KCl, mg/Kg) | 0.74 ** | 0.59 ** | 0.79 ** | 0.62 ** | −0.49 ** |
P2O5 (mg/kg) | 0.72 ** | 0.62 ** | 0.78 ** | 0.67 ** | −0.45 * |
K2O (mg/kg) | 0.73 ** | 0.63 ** | 0.82 ** | 0.69 ** | −0.43 * |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Valkovszki, N.J.; Szalóki, T.; Székely, Á.; Kun, Á.; Kolozsvári, I.; Szalókiné Zima, I.; Tavaszi-Sárosi, S.; Jancsó, M. Influence of Soil Types on the Morphology, Yield, and Essential Oil Composition of Common Sage (Salvia officinalis L.). Horticulturae 2023, 9, 1037. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9091037
Valkovszki NJ, Szalóki T, Székely Á, Kun Á, Kolozsvári I, Szalókiné Zima I, Tavaszi-Sárosi S, Jancsó M. Influence of Soil Types on the Morphology, Yield, and Essential Oil Composition of Common Sage (Salvia officinalis L.). Horticulturae. 2023; 9(9):1037. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9091037
Chicago/Turabian StyleValkovszki, Noémi J., Tímea Szalóki, Árpád Székely, Ágnes Kun, Ildikó Kolozsvári, Ildikó Szalókiné Zima, Szilvia Tavaszi-Sárosi, and Mihály Jancsó. 2023. "Influence of Soil Types on the Morphology, Yield, and Essential Oil Composition of Common Sage (Salvia officinalis L.)" Horticulturae 9, no. 9: 1037. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9091037