Next Article in Journal
Surviving a Double-Edged Sword: Response of Horticultural Crops to Multiple Abiotic Stressors
Previous Article in Journal
From Caves to the Savannah, the Mitogenome History of Modern Lions (Panthera leo) and Their Ancestors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Foci-Xpress: Automated and Fast Nuclear Foci Counting Tool
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Profile of Mutations Induced by Carbon Ion Beam Irradiation of Dehulled Rice Seeds

1
National Engineering Research Center of Plant Space Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
2
Heyuan Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Heyuan 517000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(10), 5195; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25105195
Submission received: 27 March 2024 / Revised: 30 April 2024 / Accepted: 8 May 2024 / Published: 10 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Radiation-Induced DNA Damage, Repair and Responses)

Abstract

:
As a physical mutagen, carbon ion beam (CIB) irradiation can induce high-frequency mutation, which is user-friendly and environment-friendly in plant breeding. In this study, we resequenced eight mutant lines which were screened out from the progeny of the CIB-irradiated dehulled rice seeds. Among these mutants, CIB induced 135,535 variations, which include single base substitutions (SBSs), and small insertion and deletion (InDels). SBSs are the most abundant mutation, and account for 88% of all variations. Single base conversion is the main type of SBS, and the average ratio of transition and transversion is 1.29, and more than half of the InDels are short-segmented mutation (1–2 bp). A total of 69.2% of the SBSs and InDels induced by CIBs occurred in intergenic regions on the genome. Surprisingly, the average mutation frequency in our study is 9.8 × 10−5/bp and much higher than that of the previous studies, which may result from the relatively high irradiation dosage and the dehulling of seeds for irradiation. By analyzing the mutation of every 1 Mb in the genome of each mutant strain, we found some unusual high-frequency (HF) mutation regions, where SBSs and InDels colocalized. This study revealed the mutation mechanism of dehulled rice seeds by CIB irradiation on the genome level, which will enrich our understanding of the mutation mechanism of CIB radiation and improve mutagenesis efficiency.

1. Introduction

Creating phenotypic variation through spontaneous or artificially induced mutations and excavating mutant genes have been a research hotspot in plant breeding for decades [1]. The mutation frequency of the genome under natural conditions is usually very low, for example, the average spontaneous mutation frequency for each regeneration is only 7 × 10−9 in Arabidopsis thaliana [2]. The mutation frequency can be increased by tens to hundreds of times by means of artificial mutagenesis treatment, such as carbon ion beam (CIB) irradiation. As one kind of effective high-LET radiation, CIB irradiation has been widely used in mutation breeding for several plant species. CIB irradiation displays an effective induction of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), resulting in a broad spectrum of phenotypic variations [3,4,5], which endows it with great value in plant germplasm creation.
Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is a staple food for nearly half of the world’s population, and it is also a model crop that has been widely used in physical mutation [6]. Many studies have evaluated the mutagenic effect of CIB radiation on rice from different aspects. CIB irradiation has been used to improve important agronomic traits, such as biotic and abiotic resistance, and some valuable rice mutants have been used in breeding and gene function study, including extremely late heading mutant [7], semi-dwarf mutant [8], low-cadmium rice [6], ultraviolet-resistant mutant [9], salt-tolerant mutant [10], and high temperature-resistant mutant [11]. In order to obtain the expected mutagenic effect, it is necessary to understand the molecular properties of CIB-induced mutation. Previous studies showed that the mutations induced by CIBs are mainly SBSs and small InDels [4,5,12,13], and the single base InDels are more common than the large fragment InDels (≥2-bp) [4]. Some studies also reported that CIBs induced MNVs (multi-nucleotide variants) [1] and SVs (structure variations) [14,15,16], large deletion, and genome rearrangement, such as inversion and translocation [16]. In previous studies, the mutation mechanism of dehulled rice seeds has been rarely reported.
Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is an efficient approach for variant identification in a mutant at single-nucleotide resolution [17,18], and it provides researchers with a robust tool for characterizing the spectrum of mutations on a whole-genome scale and identifying the causal mutations more efficiently. WGS successfully promoted the identification of induced causal mutations in many plants [1,19,20] and made gene identification much easier. And it also has been used to study mutagenic effects of different mutagens in rice [1,5,21,22] and Arabidopsis thaliana [23].
The study of the mechanism of heavy carbon ion beam mutation at the rice genome level will contribute to germplasm creation by radiation mutation. In the present study, we resequenced eight mutagenized rice mutants screened out from the progeny of the CIB-irradiated dehulled rice seeds, and analyzed the genome-wide mutation profiles of all the mutants. This study revealed the mutation mechanism of dehulled rice seeds by CIB irradiation on the genome level, which will enrich our understanding of the mutation mechanism of CIB radiation and improve mutagenesis efficiency.

2. Results

2.1. Summarized Information of CIB-Induced Mutations

CIB mutagenesis was carried out on H492, H499, and H574, three pure lines of Oryza sativa L. ssp. Indica. A total of 1000 dehulled and CIB-treated seeds of H492, H499, and H574, respectively, were planted to obtain M1 plants. Then, M2 seeds from M1 plants were collected. Phenotypic screening for visible mutant candidates in the M2 or M3 population was conducted throughout the whole growth period, and finally, eight lines of M6, including three mutants (H494, H495, H496) originated from H492, one mutant (H512) originated from H499, and four mutants (H579, H580, H592, H593) originated from H574, were used for sequencing in follow-up study. The wild-type H492, H499, and H574, respectively, were resequenced as well.
In general, all the mutants displayed visible and heritable traits. The plant architecture and grain type of the lines are shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2. There were significant differences in plant height, grain length, grain width and grain length–width ratio between mutants and wild-type, but the phenotypic mutagenic effects varied among different lines. Compared with the corresponding wild-type, the mutant lines H494, H495, and H496 displayed a significant increase in plant height, whereas the mutant line H512, H579, H580, H592, and H593 showed a decrease in plant height (Figure 1 and Figure S1). The grain size of the mutant lines from H492 significantly increased, whereas the mutant lines from H574 displayed the opposite (Figure 2 and Figure S1).
To investigate the effect of CIB irradiation on the rice genome, we sequenced the mutant lines and the corresponding nonirradiated parental lines. The summarized resequencing information of all the samples is listed in Table 1. On average, 15.8 Gb clean data were obtained for each line and mapped onto the Nipponbare reference genome, resulting in an average sequencing depth of 42.3-fold, and the percentage of genomic coverage with 10× sequencing depth mapped to the reference genome of each line reached 86.6% (Table 1).
Based on the classification of mutation types, reliable mutation data of eight mutants were sorted out, as shown in Table 2. A total of 135,539 variations were detected in these mutant lines treated by CIB irradiation, including 119,579 SBSs and 15,956 InDels, respectively. The number of all SBS mutations is 7.5 times that of InDels, indicating that SBS is the main mutation type (Table 2).

2.2. Frequency and Distribution of Mutations for CIB Irradiation

2.2.1. Distribution of Mutations on Chromosomes

To investigate the effect of CIB irradiation on the rice genome, we mix the mutations detected in every single mutant originated from the different WTs. For the sake of description, we name the mutants originated from H492 as Mutation Pond 1 (MP1), the mutant from H512 as Mutation Pond 2 (MP2), and the mutants originated from H574 as Mutation Pond 3 (MP3). Unusual high-frequency (HF) mutation regions were discovered by analyzing the mutation frequency per Mb along the genome of each Mutation Pond. The mutation in the 9~17 Mb region of Chr.12 of MP1 accounts for 37.8% of all mutations, and the mutation frequency in this region is 3.3 × 10−3, which is much higher than the average mutation frequency of Chr.12 of 6.3 × 10−5, and the same anomalies are also observed in Chr.2 and Chr.6 (Figure 3, Table S1). The high-frequency region of MP2 is concentrated in the 16~22 Mb region of Chr.3, and the number of mutations in this region accounts for 62.9% of all mutations. The mutation frequency in this region is 2.2 × 10−3, which is much higher than the average mutation frequency of Chr.3 of 6.3 × 10−5 (Figure 4, Table S1). The mutation in the 4~9 Mb region of Chr.7 of MP3 accounts for 36.4% of all mutations, and the mutation frequency in this region is 3.3 × 10−3, which is much higher than the average mutation frequency of Chr.7 of 4.1 × 10−5, and high-mutation-frequency regions are also observed in Chr.3 and Chr.10 (Figure 5, Table S1).
To investigate the distribution of SBSs and InDels on chromosomes of each single mutant, the number of SBS sites and InDels per 100 Kb was also calculated for each single mutant. Distribution of HF mutation regions varied among a single mutant. For MP1, many more HF regions emerged in H496 than in the other two mutants (Figure S2); for MP2, HF regions of SBSs and InDels occur on Chr. 1 and Chr.3 (Figure S3); for MP3, many more HF regions emerged in H580 than in the other mutants (Figure S4). No same HF mutation region was synpositionally identified on chromosomes among the mutants. But interestingly, the HF regions of SBSs and InDels were almost colocalized.

2.2.2. Theoretical Mutation Frequency of the M1 Generation

Although many homozygous mutations have been detected in the genome of M6 plants, only a quarter of the mutations in self-pollinated plants can be permanently preserved in their offspring. Therefore, we can roughly estimate the mutation rate of M1 according to the probability of heritable mutations in different generations and Mendel’s genetic law referred to in Yang et al. [1]. Assuming that all mutations appear as heterozygotes in the M1 generation, and assuming that N is the number of generations, Nn is the number of pure genes and mutations in the Mn generation.
N 1 = N n 2 n 2 n 1 1
We estimated the number of M1 mutations, and the average mutation rate estimated in this study was 9.8 × 10−5. The mutation frequency of different strains is very different. MP1 has the highest mutation frequency of 12.3 × 10−5, while MP3 has only 6.0 × 10−5 (Table 2).

2.3. Characteristics of Mutations Induced by CIB Irradiation

SBSs were revealed as the most abundant mutation. Two types of transitions (Ti) (mutations between the same type of bases, namely purine > purine or pyrimidine > pyrimidine) and transversions (Tv) (mutations between different types of bases, namely purine > pyrimidine or pyrimidine > purine) were identified. In general, CIB induced more transition than transversion in each mutant line, and the average Ti accounts for about 65% of the total substitution. The Ti/Tv ratios of MP1, MP2, and MP3 are 1.2, 1.4, and 1.2, respectively. In general, the proportions of Ti and Tv were similar among the mutants (Figure 6). CIB can induce two kinds of transitions, namely G: A transition and C: T transition. Among all the mutant lines, G > A and C > T were the main transitions, accounting for 66.7% of the total transitions. Eight kinds of transversion, including A > C/T, G > C/T, C > A/G, and T > A/G, were induced. The proportions of the different kinds of transversions in MP1, MP2, and MP3 were almost the same (Figure 7).
The fragment lengths of InDels ranged from 1 to 50 bp. For insertions, the 1 bp insertion and 2 bp insertion were the common types, accounting for 66.5% on average. The same scenario was revealed for 1 bp deletion and 2 bp deletion, accounting for 65.0% on average (Figure 7). The results indicate that the heavy carbon ion beam is more inclined to induce short fragment InDels.
We also analyzed the locations of all the SBSs and InDels on the genome-wide scale. On average, 68.3% of the SBSs were located in the intergenic region of the whole genome, 7.5% in the upstream region, 5.7% in the downstream region, 5.4% in the exonic region, 9.4% in the intron region, 2.7% in the UTR’3, and 1.1% in the UTR’5; 61.2% of the InDels occur in the intergenic region of the whole genome, 9.5% in the upstream region, 7.4% in the downstream region, 2.5% in the exonic region, 13% in the intron region, 4% in the UTR’3, and 2.4% in the UTR’5. Overall, the location distribution patterns of the two types of mutations are similar in each mutant (Figure 8).

2.4. Effect of CIB-Induced Mutation on Gene Function

Since the mutations occurring in the exon region are most likely to cause gene dysfunction, we predict the potential mutation effect on gene function by SnpEff, which is a japonica rice transcriptome database for gene function prediction. Four types of mutation effects were categorized, including synonymous mutation, nonsynonymous mutation, and nonsense and frameshift mutation. Among the above four types, nonsynonymous mutations only bring in single amino acid change, which may impair protein function. In the gene coding region, an increase or decrease by one or a few base pairs (not multiples of 3) will lead to frame shift mutation, which leads to great changes in protein sequence and even produces non-functional proteins truncated by terminators. Nonsense mutation refers to the mutation of a codon encoding an amino acid into a stop codon by a change in one base, resulting in early termination of peptide chain synthesis. A total of 149 frame shift mutations and 75 nonsense mutations were identified, with an average of 28 such high-impact mutations per line (Table 3).
We specifically analyzed genes with gene function affecting mutations including nonsynonymous mutation and nonsense mutation in each mutant, since these mutations more likely lead to gene dysfunction or even phenotypic variations. A total of 21 mutated genes were found in six mutants, including H494, H495, H496, H512, H580, and H592 (Table 4). These genes are functionally involved in regulating architecture, grain shape, or panicle shape. Seven of these genes were located in HF mutation regions. Four of these genes have still not been cloned. Many more functionally affected genes were discovered in H496 and H592. These results provide some clues to the identification of mutated genes in each mutant.

2.5. Verification of the Identified Mutation Sites

To verify the accuracy of resequencing data, six mutation sites were randomly selected for Sanger sequencing. The sequencing results confirmed the 7 bp deletion occurred in exon 3 and a single base substitution occurred in intron 3 of Os03g0576600 in H512 (Figures S5 and S6), 1 bp deletion occurred in intron 6 of Os08g0425500 in H512 (Figure S7), 2 bp deletion occurred in exon 1 of Os11g0112050 in H580 (Figure S8), and the insertion of 2 bp in exon 1 of Os10g0174548 (Figure S9) and the insertion of 7 bp in exon 1 of Os10g0163290 (Figure S10) in H580 were also confirmed by Sanger sequencing, which is consistent with resequencing data.

3. Discussion

The genome-wide profile of mutations induced by CIB irradiation in dehulled rice seeds was studied by genome-wide resequencing technology in this study. CIB irradiation induced SBSs and InDels, and SBSs were the most abundant type of mutation, similar to studies of CIB-induced mutations in other plants, such as Arabidopsis and Brachypodium [5,13]. However, differences were also revealed in some aspects due to different pretreatment in the present study.

3.1. The Mutation Rate of Dehulled Rice Seeds Induced by Carbon Ion Beam

According to the number of mutations revealed by the whole-genome sequencing of rice plants, we estimate that the carbon ion (12C6+ ions at 100 Gy (LET = 80 keV/µm) irradiation of dehulled dry seeds leads to an average theoretical mutation frequency of 9.8 × 10−5/bp, which is surprisingly higher than that in previous studies. Dry rice seeds were irradiated with 40 Gy carbon ion (LET:76 keV/μm), and the estimated mutation frequency was 2.7 × 10−7 per base [8]. On the other hand, the whole-genome sequencing analysis of the M6 line of “Hitomebore” rice seeds irradiated with 30 Gy carbon ion (LET: 107 keV/μm) estimated that the mutation rate in M2 was 2.4 × 10−7 per base [14]. The prominently higher mutation rate in our study may mainly be the result of two causes. One is the dosage variation. The dosage used in this study is comparatively higher. Different doses of carbon ion radiation lead to different methylation levels and different biological effects [24,25]. The mutation rate increases with the increase in dose below 150 Gy, and the mutation effect decreases with the increase in dose above 150 Gy [16]. The mutation rate induced by 80 Gyd carbon ion beam is higher than that induced by 40 Gy carbon ion beam [26]. The relatively higher radiation dosage used in this study may lead to higher mutation frequency. Another cause is the premutagenesis dehulling of rice seeds, which may directly expose the embryo to irradiation. “Naked” seeds are more susceptible to mutagenesis, which may further increase the mutation rate in our study. To date, dehulled rice seeds have seldom been used for irradiation studies. Our study may give a clue that dehulling of rice seeds may enhance the mutation frequency. More experiments can be conducted to verify the effect of this mutagenesis seed treatment.

3.2. SBSs and InDels Are the Two Main Mutation Types Occurring under CIB Irradiation

SBSs and InDels are two types of mutation identified in all the mutants, and the number of SBSs is 7.5 times that of InDels, indicating that SBSs are the most abundant type of mutation. Previous studies also reported that C ion irradiation tends to induce large fragments of InDels [27] or MNVs (multiple nucleotide variants) [25]. A WGS analysis of 11 mutants in Arabidopsis derived from CIB irradiation indicated that single base InDels were more prevalent than larger InDels (≥2 bp) [5]. Our result also showed that single base transition is the main form for SBSs; the short fragment InDels (1-bp and 2-b) are the main form for InDel.
Many abnormal regions of high-frequency mutation regions were also discovered in the present study. This uneven distribution of mutations induced by CIB irradiation was also observed in the previous research [1]. Theoretically, every single base on the genome possesses the same mutability under irradiation, but actually, mutations are not completely randomly occurring. The mutation frequencies of some parts are obviously higher than the average; these are called mutation hotspots [28]. Studies have shown that the point mutation rate of mutation hotspots is at least 20 times higher than that of other regions of the same DNA molecule [29]. The mutation rate of high-frequency mutation regions is even 100 times higher than the average frequency in our study. The reason for the formation of mutation hot spots is still not fully understood. “Common fragile sites” (CFSs) are believed to be present on the genome, and are particularly prone to breakage and instability during mitosis [30]. CFSs might be densely distributed in the mutation hotspots, which lead to the occurrence of high-frequency mutations in these regions on the genome. But un-synpositional HF mutation regions on chromosomes among different mutants in this study might indicate the randomness of CFS occurrence. In these high-frequency mutation regions, we also found that the SBSs and InDels were almost colocalized, which means that the high-frequency regions of SBSs are same as those of InDels.

3.3. Gene Function-Affecting Mutations Provide Some Clues to Gene Identification

Gene function-affecting mutations, including nonsynonymous mutation and nonsense mutation, are more likely to lead to gene dysfunction or even phenotypic variations. Targeted analysis of these mutated genes may contribute to identification of genes causing trait variation. Genes functionally involved in regulating architecture, grain shape, or panicle shape were discovered in our study, and they can be candidate genes regulating mutated traits. Of course, if whole-genome resequencing analysis can be combined with Bulked Segregation analysis or MutMap, it will surely improve the accuracy of mutated gene identification.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material, Mutagenesis, and Mutant Screening

CIB mutagenesis was carried out on H492, H499, and H574, three pure lines of Oryza:sativa L. ssp. Indica. The water content of the dry seeds was 15%, which was measured by seed moisture meter. The dehulled seeds of the above three lines were exposed to 12C6+ ions at 100 Gy (LET = 80 keV/µm) generated by the Heavy Ion Research Facility in Lanzhou (HIRFL) at the Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IMP-CAS). In the paddy field of South China Agricultural University, irradiated seeds and corresponding wild-types were planted. M2 seeds from individual M1 plants were collected. We screened visible mutant candidates in the M2 or M3 population throughout the whole growth period according to the screening criteria ( | M u t a t e d   t r a i t   v a l u e W i l d   t p y e   t r a i t   v a l u e ÷   S d e v W i l d   t p y e   t r a i t   v a l u e | 3 ), and the candidate mutants were planted in a separate line and bagged for selfing to obtain at least 500 seeds in the subsequent M3 to M6 generation. Finally, eight M6 lines induced by CIB irradiation were used for sequencing.

4.2. Whole-Genome Sequencing and Clean Read Filtering

Genomic DNA was extracted from a single plant of each mutant line. The rice genomic DNA was extracted using the cetyl-trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method and quantified using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, NC, USA). Total genomic DNA was extracted from samples and at least 3 µg genomic DNA was used to construct paired-end libraries with an insert size of 300–400 bp using Paired End DNA Sample Prep kit (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). These libraries were sequenced using the novaseq6000 (Illumina Inc, San Diego, CA, USA) NGS platform at Genedenovo company (Guangzhou, China). Quality trimming is an essential step to generate high confidence of variant calling. Raw reads would be processed to obtain high-quality clean reads according to four stringent filtering standards: removing reads with ≥ 10% unidentified nucleotides (N); removing reads with > 50% bases having phred (Phred score, Qphred) quality; removing reads aligned to the barcode adapter.

4.3. SNP and InDel Identification

To identify SNPs and InDels, the Burrows–Wheeler Aligner (BWA) was used to align the clean reads from each sample against the reference genome with the settings ‘mem 4 -k 32 -M’, where −k is the minimum seed length, and −M is an option used to mark shorter split alignment hits as secondary alignments [31]. Variant calling was performed for all samples using the GATK’s Unified Genotyper. SNPs and InDels were filtered using GATK’s Variant Filtration with proper standards (-Window 4, -filter “QD < 2.0 || FS > 60.0 || MQ < 40.0”, -G filter “GQ < 20”) and those exhibiting segregation distortion or sequencing errors were discarded. In order to determine the physical positions of each SNP, the software tool ANNOVAR 2020 [32] was used to align and annotate SNPs or InDels. The reference genome used in the study is Ensembl_release47_IRGSP-1.0_Nipponbar (http://plants.ensembl.org/Oryza_sativa/Info/Index?db=core, accessed on 28 November 2022.).

Variant Annotation and Gene Function Prediction

To identify genes affected by each induced mutation, we used the SnpEff [33] and Rice 7 databases (https://sourceforge.net/projects/snpeff/files/databases/v4_2/, accessed on 3 March 2023). Theoretical mutation frequency of the M1 generation was estimated according to the method used in Yang et al. [1].

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms25105195/s1.

Author Contributions

G.Y. and T.G. designed the research and revised the manuscript. Y.L. performed all the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. Y.Z. assisted in conducting experiments. M.H. helped in data analysis. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Heyuan Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture Project (DT20220002) and the “Unveiling and Leading” Project of Hainan Yazhou Bay Seed Laboratory and China National Seed Group (B23YQ1512, B23CQ15CP).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article/Supplementary Material. The WGS data reported in this study have been deposited in the Genome Sequence Archive (Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics) in the BIG (Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) Data Center and are publicly accessible at http://bigd.big.ac.cn/gsa, (accessed on 18 October 2023), reference number PRJCA019968.

Acknowledgments

We thank Hua Zhou and Libin Zhou for their help in manuscript revision.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yang, G.; Luo, W.; Zhang, J.; Yan, X.; Zhou, L. Genome-Wide Comparisons of Mutations Induced by Carbon-Ion Beam and Gamma-Rays Irradiation in Rice via Resequencing Multiple Mutants. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ossowski, S.; Schneeberger, K.; Lucas-Lledo, J.I.; Warthmann, N.; Clark, R.M.; Shaw, R.G.; Weigel, D.; Lynch, M. The rate and molecular spectrum of spontaneous mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 2010, 327, 92–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tanaka, A.; Shikazono, N.; Hase, Y. Studies on Biological Effects of Ion Beams on Lethality, Molecular Nature of Mutation, Mutation Rate, and Spectrum of Mutation Phenotype for Mutation Breeding in Higher Plants. J. Radiat. Res. 2010, 3, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kazama, Y.; Hirano, T.; Saito, H.; Liu, Y.; Ohbu, S.; Hayashi, Y.; Abe, T. Characterization of highly efficient heavy-ion mutagenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Du, Y.; Luo, S.; Li, X.; Yang, J.; Cui, T.; Li, W.; Yu, L.; Feng, H.; Chen, H.; Mu, J.; et al. Identification of Substitutions and Small Insertion-Deletions Induced by Carbon-Ion Beam Irradiation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ishikawa, S.; Lshimaru, Y.; Igura, M.; Kuramata, M.; Abe, T.; Senoura, T.; Hase, Y.; Arao, T.; Nishizawa, N.K.; Nakanishi, H. Ion-beam irradiation, gene identification, and marker-assisted breeding in the development of low-cadmium rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 19166–19171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ichitani, K.; Yamaguchi, D.; Taura, S.; Fukutoku, Y.; Onoue, M.; Shimizu, K.; Hashimoto, F.; Sakata, Y.; Sato, M. Genetic analysis of ion-beam induced extremely late heading mutants in rice. Breed. Sci. 2014, 64, 222–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Oono, Y.; Ichida, H.; Morita, R.; Nozawa, S.; Satoh, K.; Shimizu, A.; Abe, T.; Kato, H.; Hase, Y. Genome sequencing of ion-beam-induced mutants facilitates detection of candidate genes responsible for phenotypes of mutants in rice. Mutat. Res. 2020, 821, 111691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Takano, N.; Takahashi, Y.; Yamamoto, M.; Teranishi, M.; Yamaguchi, H.; Sakamoto, A.; Hase, Y.; Fujisawa, H.; Wu, J.; Matsumoto, T. Isolation of a novel UVB-tolerant rice mutant obtained by exposure to carbon-ion beams. J. Radiat. Res. 2013, 4, 637–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Hasan, N.; Mohd, Y.; Harun, A.; Faiz, A.; Sobri, H.; Yusof, S. Screening of phenotypic performance, drought, and salinity tolerance in the mutagenized population of Oryza sativa cv. MR219 generated through ion beam irradiation. Int. J. Agric. Technol. 2019, 17, 1735–1752. [Google Scholar]
  11. Tabassum, R.; Dosaka, T.; Ichida, H.; Morita, R.; Katsube-Tanaka, T. FLOURY ENDOSPERM11-2 encodes plastid HSP70-2 involved with temperature-dependent chalkiness of rice (Oryza sativa L.) grains. Plant J. 2020, 103, 604–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kazama, Y.; Saito, H.; Miyagai, M.; Takehisa, H.; Mii, M. Effect of heavy ion-beam irradiation on plant growth and mutation induction in Nicotiana tabacum. Plant Biotechnol. 2008, 25, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lee, M.B.; Kim, D.Y.; Seo, Y.W. Identification of candidate genes for the seed coat colour change in a Brachypodium distachyon mutant induced by gamma radiation using whole-genome re-sequencing. Genome 2017, 60, 581–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, F.; Shimizu, A.; Nishio, T.; Tsutsumi, N.; Kato, H. Comparison and Characterization of Mutations Induced by Gamma-Ray and Carbon-Ion Irradiation in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Using Whole-Genome Resequencing. G3-Genes Genomes Genet. 2019, 9, 3743–3751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zheng, Y.; Li, S.; Huang, J.; Fu, H.; Zhou, L.; Furusawa, Y.; Shu, Q. Identification and characterization of inheritable structural variations induced by ion beam radiations in rice. Mutat. Res. Fundam. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 2021, 823, 111757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ichida, H.; Morita, R.; Shirakawa, Y.; Hayashi, Y.; Abe, T. Targeted exome sequencing of unselected heavy-ion beam-irradiated populations reveals less-biased mutation characteristics in the rice genome. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2018, 10, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mccallum, C.M.; Comai, L.; Henikoff, G.S. Targeting induced local lesions IN genomes (TILLING) for plant functional genomics. Plant Physiol. 2000, 123, 439–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Li, G.; Jain, R.; Chern, M.; Pham, N.T.; Martin, J.A.; Wei, T.; Schackwitz, W.S.; Lipzen, A.M.; Duong, P.Q.; Jones, K.C.; et al. The Sequences of 1504 Mutants in the Model Rice Variety Kitaake Facilitate Rapid Functional Genomic Studies. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 1218–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Tabata, R.; Kamiya, T.; Shigenobu, S.; Yamaguchi, K.; Yamada, M.; Hasebe, M.; Fujiwara, T.; Sawa, S. Identification of an EMS-induced causal mutation in a gene required for boron-mediated root development by low-coverage genome re-sequencing in Arabidopsis. Plant Signal. Behav. 2013, 8, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Song, J.; Zhen, L.; Liu, Z.; Guo, Y.; Qiu, L.J. Next-Generation Sequencing from Bulked-Segregant Analysis Accelerates the Simultaneous Identification of Two Qualitative Genes in Soybean. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Li, G.; Chern, M.; Jain, R.; Martin, J.; Schackwitz, W.; Jiang, L.; Vega-Sánchez, M.; Lipzen, A.; Barry, K.; Schmutz, J. Genome-Wide Sequencing of 41 Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Mutated Lines Reveals Diverse Mutations Induced by Fast-Neutron Irradiation. Mol. Plant 2016, 7, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zheng, Y.; Li, S.; Huang, J.; Fu, H.; Zhou, L.; Furusawa, Y.; Shu, Q. Mutagenic effect of three ion beams on rice and identification of heritable mutations by whole genome sequencing. Plants 2020, 9, 551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kazama, Y.; Ishii, K.; Hirano, T.; Wakana, T.; Yamada, M.; Ohbu, S.; Abe, T. Different mutational function of low-and high-linear energy transfer heavy-ion irradiation demonstrated by whole-genome resequencing of Arabidopsis mutants. Plant J. 2017, 92, 1020–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ling, A.P.K.; Ung, Y.C.; Hussein, S.; Harun, A.R.; Yoshihiro, H. Morphological and biochemical responses of Oryza sativa L. (cultivar MR219) to ion beam irradiation. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2013, 14, 1132–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Georgakilas, A.G.; O’Neill, P.; Stewart, R.D. Induction and Repair of Clustered DNA Lesions: What Do We Know So Far? Radiat. Res. 2013, 180, 100–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhang, J.; Peng, Z.; Liu, Q.; Yang, G.; Zhou, L.; Li, W.; Wang, H.; Chen, Z.; Guo, T. Time Course Analysis of Genome-Wide Identification of Mutations Induced by and Genes Expressed in Response to Carbon Ion Beam Irradiation in Rice. Genes 2021, 12, 1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ryouhei, Y.; Shigeki, N.; Yoshihiro, H.; Issay, N.; Jun, H.; Sakamoto, A.N. Mutational effects of γ-rays and carbon ion beams on Arabidopsis seedlings. J. Radiat. Res. 2013, 6, 1050–1056. [Google Scholar]
  28. Benzer, S. On the Topography of the Genetic Fine Structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1961, 47, 403–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Miyagi, T.; Kapoor, S.; Sugita, M.; Sugiura, M. Transcript analysis of the tobacco plastid operon rps2/atpl/H/F/A reveals the existence of a nonconsensus type II (NCII) promoter upstream of the atpl coding sequence. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1998, 257, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Arlt, M.F.; Durkin, S.G.; Ragland, R.L.; Glover, T.W. Common fragile sites as targets for chromosome rearrangements. DNA Repair 2006, 5, 1126–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Li, H.; Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1754–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wang, K.; Li, M.; Hakonarson, H.; Wang, K.; Li, M. Hakonarson HANNOVAR: Functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, e164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Cingolani, P.; Platts, A.; Wang, L.; Coon, M.; Nguyen, T.; Wang, L.; Land, S.J.; Lu, X.; Ruden, D.M. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly 2012, 6, 80–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Comparison of plant architectures between wild-type and mutants.
Figure 1. Comparison of plant architectures between wild-type and mutants.
Ijms 25 05195 g001
Figure 2. Comparison of grain shape between wild-type and mutants.
Figure 2. Comparison of grain shape between wild-type and mutants.
Ijms 25 05195 g002
Figure 3. Average mutation distribution of the mutants induced from H492.
Figure 3. Average mutation distribution of the mutants induced from H492.
Ijms 25 05195 g003
Figure 4. Average mutation distribution of the mutants induced from H499.
Figure 4. Average mutation distribution of the mutants induced from H499.
Ijms 25 05195 g004
Figure 5. Average mutation distribution of the mutants induced from H574.
Figure 5. Average mutation distribution of the mutants induced from H574.
Ijms 25 05195 g005
Figure 6. Nucleotide preference in single-nucleotide mutations.
Figure 6. Nucleotide preference in single-nucleotide mutations.
Ijms 25 05195 g006
Figure 7. Number of Insertion-Deletion fragments of different length.
Figure 7. Number of Insertion-Deletion fragments of different length.
Ijms 25 05195 g007
Figure 8. Location distribution of SBSs and InDels induced by CIB irradiation.
Figure 8. Location distribution of SBSs and InDels induced by CIB irradiation.
Ijms 25 05195 g008
Table 1. Comparison between wild-type and mutant sequencing data and genome.
Table 1. Comparison between wild-type and mutant sequencing data and genome.
TypeLineSequenced GenerationHQ_Clean_
Data(bp)
Theoretical
Genome Coverage
Genome Coverage of 10× Sequencing Depth (%)Genome
Coverage of 20× Sequencing Depth (%)
Genome Coverage of 30× Sequencing Depth (%)
WTH492M616.0 42.993.7990.2280.01
MutantH494M616.243.5 88.0577.0862.57
MutantH495M616.243.3 88.7277.4762.03
MutantH496M616.444.1 89.6779.7365.36
WTH499M613.636.5 79.5564.2245.77
MutantH512M614.238.0 80.6366.2848.47
WTH574M615.641.9 85.9979.5564.71
MutantH579M615.942.7 86.6279.6764.11
MutantH580M616.945.3 86.9580.767.93
MutantH592M616.243.4 86.3879.7265.78
MutantH593M616.243.4 86.5180.566.75
Average 15.8 42.3 86.6 77.7 63.0
Table 2. Summary of mutation information of individual lines.
Table 2. Summary of mutation information of individual lines.
WTMutantTotalSBSsInDelsThe Estimated
Mutations in M1
Mutation
Rate in M1
H492H49424552101354491012.3 × 10−5
H49514511035290
H49666,81359,3157498133,626
H499H51221,10118,860224142,20211.3 × 10−5
H574H57985037257124617,0066.0 × 10−5
H5806196552866812,392
H59223,68920,548314147,378
H5936633586077313,266
Average 16,94214,947199533,8849.8 × 10−5
Table 3. Different types of mutation effects on gene function of each mutant.
Table 3. Different types of mutation effects on gene function of each mutant.
CategoryMutantSynonymous MutationNon-Synonymous MutationNonsense MutationFrameshift
Mutation
MP1H494636213
H4950210
H496141117283975
MP2H5123284651022
MP3H5793273021115
H58010513037
H592593496720
H59312311637
Total 2950330175149
Average 368.8412.69.418.6
Table 4. Candidate genes with function-affecting mutations.
Table 4. Candidate genes with function-affecting mutations.
MutantGene IDWhether in HF Mutation RegionGene DescriptionPossibly Affected
Phenotype
Cloned or Not
H494Os06g0247500NoPyrophosphate-fructose 6-phosphate 1-phosphotransferasePlant height, grain shapeYes
H495Os02g0278400NoCytochrome P450Plant height, grain shapeNo
H496Os05g0374200NoCytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenase 9Plant height, grain shape, setting percentageYes
H496Os01g0826400NoWRKY transcription factorPlant height, grain shapeYes
H496Os07g0214300Noα-amylase/trypsin inhibitorGrain shapeYes
H496Os07g0235800NoAPETALA2-like transcription factorGrain shapeYes
H496Os07g0583700NoWRKY transcription factor 78Plant height, grain shapeYes
H496Os12g0428600YesHECT-domain E3 ubiquitin ligasePlant height, grain shapeYes
H496Os12g0496900NoGRF-INTERACTING FACTOR 2Plant height, grain shapeNo
H496Os12g0552600NoGrain Weight (qTGW12a)Grain shapeYes
H512Os01g0972800NoWRKY transcription factorPlant height, grain lengthNo
H512Os03g0430000Yesdefective embryo sac1Setting percentageYes
H512Os05g0547850NoProgrammed cell death 5Plant height, grain shapeYes
H580Os04g0396500Nolax panicle2Panicle typeYes
H592Os03g0267800NoUbiquitin-interacting motif-containing ubiquitin receptorGrain shapeYes
H592Os03g0274800YesReceptor-like cytoplasmic kinasePlant archetechture, setting percentageYes
H592Os07g0192300YesNARROW LEAF 11Plant archetechture, panicle typeYes
H592Os07g0232100YesB3 domain transcription factorPanicle typeYes
H592Os07g0233300YesAlfin-like geneGrain lengthYes
H592Os07g0235800YesAPETALA2-like transcription factorGrain shapeYes
H592Os09g0281900NoMediator subunit genePlant height, grain shape, setting percentageNo
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ling, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, M.; Guo, T.; Yang, G. Genome-Wide Profile of Mutations Induced by Carbon Ion Beam Irradiation of Dehulled Rice Seeds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 5195. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25105195

AMA Style

Ling Y, Zhang Y, Huang M, Guo T, Yang G. Genome-Wide Profile of Mutations Induced by Carbon Ion Beam Irradiation of Dehulled Rice Seeds. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(10):5195. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25105195

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ling, Ying, Yuming Zhang, Ming Huang, Tao Guo, and Guili Yang. 2024. "Genome-Wide Profile of Mutations Induced by Carbon Ion Beam Irradiation of Dehulled Rice Seeds" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 10: 5195. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25105195

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop