Next Article in Journal
Empirical Analysis of a Super-SBM-Based Framework for Wetland Carbon Stock Safety Assessment
Previous Article in Journal
Determining Riverine Surface Roughness at Fluvial Mesohabitat Level and Its Influence on UAV-Based Thermal Imaging Accuracy
Previous Article in Special Issue
AFMUNet: Attention Feature Fusion Network Based on a U-Shaped Structure for Cloud and Cloud Shadow Detection
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Deep Learning Classification Scheme for PolSAR Image Based on Polarimetric Features

Remote Sens. 2024, 16(10), 1676; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16101676
by Shuaiying Zhang 1, Lizhen Cui 2, Zhen Dong 1 and Wentao An 3,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(10), 1676; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16101676
Submission received: 2 April 2024 / Revised: 2 May 2024 / Accepted: 6 May 2024 / Published: 9 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing Image Classification and Semantic Segmentation)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

See the attachment file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Minor editing of English language required.

Author Response

The authors, above all, would like to thank you for your comments to help to improve the manuscript. All the comments are seriously considered and the manuscript is refined correspondingly. We thank you for taking the time to review the manuscript and appreciate all your comments and suggestions. Based on the instructions provided in your letter, we have submitted the revised manuscript with revisions highlighted in a different color (red).

Please refer to the attachment for details

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This article focuses on a method to perform polarimetric classification of SAR images using artificial intelligence.
The article appears to be technically correct, but there are some things that need to be modified/improved.
The Abstract is too long. The issue is not well focused, so it needs to be modified ad hoc to make it more understandable.
In the current version, Fig. 1 is not consistent in the sense that the author does not understand its meaning at all. Every figure that you insert must have the necessary information to be fully comprehensible, at minimum effort. Therefore, first of all it must be enlarged and then the dimensions of the matrices and tensors are not indicated. The results include classification maps that are not explained well.
The formulas need to be adjusted, they are all misaligned, I honestly cannot imagine that the manuscript was submitted like this, without at least checking the graphics. As far as the contents are concerned, more crucial information regarding the analytical model needs to be added, in this condition it is highly unlikely that the work can at least be sent forward for further revision.
Experimental results may be fine, as there are ground truths.  

Comments on the Quality of English Language

No issue detected

Author Response

The authors, above all, would like to thank you for your comments to help to improve the manuscript. All the comments are seriously considered and the manuscript is refined correspondingly. We thank you for taking the time to review the manuscript and appreciate all your comments and suggestions. Based on the instructions provided in your letter, we have submitted the revised manuscript with revisions highlighted in a different color (red).

Please refer to the attachment for details

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear Author, in my personal opinion this article can be accepted in the present form.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Accepted

Back to TopTop