Next Article in Journal
Improved Electrical Properties of Organic Modified Thermoplastic Insulation Material for Direct Current Cable Application
Next Article in Special Issue
Balanced Thermal Insulation, Flame-Retardant and Mechanical Properties of PU Foam Constructed via Cost-Effective EG/APP/SA Ternary Synergistic Modification
Previous Article in Journal
Single-Component Hydrophilic Terpolymer Thin Film Systems for Imparting Surface Chemical Versatility on Various Substrates
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nano Boron Oxide and Zinc Oxide Doped Lignin Containing Cellulose Nanocrystals Improve the Thermal, Mechanical and Flammability Properties of High-Density Poly(ethylene)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 16
Issue 1
10.3390/polym16010045
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synergistic Effects of 9,10-Dihydro-9-oxa-10-phosphaphenanthrene-10-oxide-Based Derivative and Modified Sepiolite on Flame-Retarded Poly (Ethylene Oxide)–Poly (Butylene Adipate-Co-Terephthalate) Composites

by
Weijiang Huang
1,2,*,
Chunyun Tu
1,
Qin Tian
1,2,
Kui Wang
1,
Chunlin Yang
1,
Chao Ma
1,
Xiaolu Xu
1 and
Wei Yan
1,2,*
1
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Guiyang University, Guiyang 550005, China
2
National Engineering Research Center for Compounding and Modification of Polymer Materials, Guiyang 550014, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2024, 16(1), 45; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16010045
Submission received: 8 November 2023 / Revised: 13 December 2023 / Accepted: 19 December 2023 / Published: 22 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Flame Retardant Polymers)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A 9,10-dihydro-9-oxa-10-phosphaphenanthrene-10-oxide (DOPO)-based derivative (PN-DOPO) combined with aluminium phosphates-coated sepiolite (Sep@AlPO4) was used to improve the flame retardance, thermal stability and mechanical performances of poly (ethylene oxide) (PEO)/poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT) blends. The synergistic effects of PN-DOPO and Sep@AlPO4 on flame-retarded PEO/PBAT composites were systematically discussed. Results indicated that introducing 5 wt% Sep@AlPO4 with 10 wt% PN-DOPO into PEO/PBAT achieved a V-1 rating for the UL-94 test and increased the limiting oxygen index value to 23.7%. Moreover, the peak heat release rate (p-HRR), average HRR and total heat release values of PEO/PBAT/PN10%/Sep5% composites decreased by 35.6%, 11.0% and 23.0% compared with those of PEO/PBAT, respectively. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) results confirmed that PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 enhanced the initial thermal stability and char yield of PEO/PBAT matrix, and TGA/Fourier transform infrared spectrometry results revealed that the composites exhibited the characteristic absorption peaks of phosphorous-containing groups and an increase in gas-phase volatiles during thermal degradation. The morphological structures of the residues indicated that PN-DOPO and Sep@AlPO4 mixtures produced a more dense and continuous char layer on the composite surface during burning. Rheological behaviour revealed that higher complex viscosity and modulus values of PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 sample could also promote the crosslinking network structure of condensed phases during combustion. Furthermore, the PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 composites exhibited superior elongation at break and flexural performance than the PEO/PBAT system. All results demonstrated that the PEO/PBAT system modified with PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 showed remarkable flame retardance, and improved thermal stability and mechanical properties, indicating its potential application in areas requiring fire safety.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Poly (ethylene oxide) (PEO) is a typical matrix for solid polymer electrolyte electrolytes (SPEs) because lithium salts show good solubility in PEO, thereby promoting the generation of charge carriers for conductive ions [1,2]. Additionally, PEO can be used for moulding and synthesising water-soluble films owing to its low toxicity and good biological adhesion. However, neat PEO has low thermal stability and poor mechanical strength and rheological properties at room temperature [3,4,5]. Therefore, blending PEO with other polymers effectively improves the shortcomings of PEO-based matrices.
Recently, PEO-biopolymer blends can be considered as one of the research directions to improve the performance of the matrix, based on the high requirements for sustainable, green, renewable and biodegradable materials [6]. Poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT), which is a fully biodegradable polyester, is frequently combined with other polymers owing to its excellent elongation at break, good processing properties and hydrophilicity [7,8]. Thus, PBAT is considered a promising and practical counterpart for blending with PEO. Ye et al. [6] prepared PBAT/poly (lactic acid) (PLA)-based nanocomposites by melt-blending PLA/PBAT with PEO/graphene nanosheets (GNP). Incorporating a small amount of PEO into GNP could enhance its dispersion in the matrix, which considerably enhances the thermal behaviour and mechanical performances of nanocomposites.
However, both PEO and PBAT are safety hazards as they are highly flammable [9,10,11,12]. They have a low limiting oxygen index (LOI, less than 21%) and exhibit serious melt dripping during combustion. PEO-based SPEs are usually operated at higher temperatures, i.e., higher than 60 °C. Thus, PEO-based blends should exhibit high flame retardance and good thermal properties [13,14,15]. Therefore, to enhance the security of the matrix and reduce the fire risk under high-temperature conditions, high-performance PEO-based composites with excellent flame retardancy must be developed. However, few studies have focused on designing PEO-based blends with superior fire resistance and rheological properties [16].
Among the numerous flame retardants (FRs), 9,10-dihydro-9-oxa-10-phosphaphenanthrene-10-oxide (DOPO)-based compounds have attracted considerable attention owing to their outstanding fire resistance and low toxicity when DOPO is blended with various polymers such as polyesters, epoxies, polyamides and cellulose [17,18,19,20]. In previous studies, a DOPO-based FR (PN-DOPO) with excellent flame retardancy when combined with polyamide, epoxy resin, polylactic acid and polyolefins was prepared and verified [21,22,23,24]. To further enhance the fire resistance of DOPO-based FRs, synergistic agents can be introduced into the composites, such as montmorillonite, sepiolite, graphite nanosheets, carbon nanotube and halloysite [25,26,27]. Among them, sepiolite, which is a natural silicate clay material with a unique nanofibrous structure, is a potential FR or reinforcing agent. However, when only sepiolite is used as an FR, it does not exhibit satisfying flame retardancy [28,29]. Thus, an organic–inorganic hybrid FR was prepared by coating the sepiolite surface with aluminium phosphate (Sep@AlPO4) via a simple precipitation strategy based on our previous reports [30]. Adding 20 wt% Sep@AlPO4 into epoxy resin, the LOI value of composites increased to 30.1% and achieved a V-0 rating in a UL-94 test. Moreover, aluminium phosphate-coated sepiolite significantly enhanced the thermal property and mechanical performance of the matrix. As far as we know, there are few studies on the flame-retardant effects between phosphorus-containing FR and modified sepiolite for PEO/PBAT blends. Therefore, this work aims to enhance the fire resistance, mechanical performance and thermal properties of PEO/PBAT by introducing self-made PN-DOPO and Sep@AlPO4.
PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 composites were prepared by melt blending with PEO/PBAT as the matrix in this study, and PN-DOPO was made in our laboratory as a flame retardant and aluminium phosphate-coated sepiolite as a synergist. The morphology structure and chemical composition of the residues after combustion were characterised. Furthermore, the synergistic flame retardance, thermal behaviour and mechanical performance of a combination of PN-DOPO and Sep@AlPO4 on the PEO/PBAT blend were systematically discussed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The PEO (Mw: 100,000 g/mol) was brought from Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. The melt flow index is 8.0 g/10 min (at 100 °C, 2.16 kg) with a density of 0.93 g/cm3 at 25 °C. The melting temperature of PEO is 90 °C. The PBAT resin (Mn: 24,400 g/mol) was from Jinhui Zhaolong High-Tech Co., Ltd., Taiyuan, China. The melt flow index is 5 g/10 min (at 185 °C) with a density of 1.25 g/cm3. The FR (PN-DOPO) and synergist (aluminium phosphate-coated sepiolite, Sep@AlPO4) were synthesised in the laboratory according to the protocols described in previous reports [23,30,31].

2.2. Preparation of PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 Composites

PEO, PBAT, Sep@AlPO4 and PN-DOPO were dried at 85 °C for 5 h. PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 composites were melt-mixed at 150 °C through a torque rheometer (Haake PolyLab OS, Thermo Fisher Scientific Co., Ltd., Karlsruhe, Germany). The compositions of the samples are listed in Table 1. The compounds were first heat-pressed (16 MPa) at 150 °C for 12 min. Then, they were made into sheets of appropriate size and thickness at 25 °C for 20 min with 16 MPa through a plate vulcaniser (ZHY-W-1, Chengde Testing Machine Factory, Chengde, China).

2.3. Characterisation

The UL-94 rating was measured with the sample size of 130.0 × 13.0 × 3.2 mm3 according to ASTM D3801 [32]. The LOI values were tested using a JF-3 oxygen index tester (Nanjing Jiangning Instrument, Nanjing, China), where the sample dimension was 130.0 × 6.5 × 3.2 mm3. The cone calorimeter tests were conducted using a cone calorimeter (Fire Testing Technology, East Grinstead, UK) based on standard ISO 5660-1 [33], where the sample size was 100.0 × 100.0 × 6.0 mm3 under an external heat flux of 50 kW/m2. Each sample was tested at least thrice, and the repeatability of the test results should be within ±10%.
Thermal decomposition behaviours of PEO/PBAT and flame-retarded PEO/PBAT composites were measured using a thermogravimetric analyser (TGA, TG 219 F3, Netzsch Instruments, Selbu, Germany) in a N2 atmosphere. The specimen (about 5–10 mg) was heated at 30–800 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C/min.
Rheological behaviours of the composites were obtained using a rheometer (HAAKE MARSII, Thermo Fisher Co., Ltd., Karlsruhe, Germany) with parallel-plate geometry (25 mm diameter and 1 mm thickness). Frequency sweeping was performed from 0.01 to 100 rad/s with 1% strain, and the tests were performed at 150 °C.
The morphological structure of the residues after the cone calorimeter tests was determined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Quanta 250, FEI Instruments, Waltham, MA, USA) under the voltage of 20 kV. Energy-dispersive spectrometry (EDS, Energy 350, Oxford Instruments, Oxford, UK) was used to determine the composition of the char layer. The EDS tests were performed at the voltage of 30 kV.
The gases released from TGA were investigated using a Nicolet iS50 Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer (Nicolet iS50, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). Furthermore, the TGA–FTIR analysis was conducted using thermogravimetry coupled with FTIR. The FTIR spectra were collected over 16 scans for each sample at a wave number interval between 500 and 4000 cm−1.
Mechanical properties of the samples were performed using a CMT6104 universal polymer testing machine (MTS Systems Corporation, Shanghai, China) with a constant rate of 50.0 mm/min. The flexural tests were performed at a constant rate of 2.0 mm/min. Each sample was tested at least at least five times, and the repeatability of the test results should be within ±5%.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Flame Retardance of PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 Composites

The flame retardance of the PEO/PBAT and PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 composites were measured through UL-94 vertical burning and an LOI test, and the corresponding experimental results are presented in Table 2. Owing to the intrinsic dripping characteristics and low LOI values of PLA and PBAT, the PEO/PBAT sample exhibited severe dripping during combustion, and the LOI value was approximately 20.2%. The recording flame times of the samples exceeded 30 s and had no flame-retardant rating. When 15 wt% PN-DOPO was introduced into the PEO/PBAT blend, a UL-94 V-2 rating was attained and the LOI value increased to 22.6%. At only a Sep@AlPO4 loading of 15 wt%, the LOI of PEO/PBAT/Sep15% was 21.8%, and the composites also attained a V-2 rating. The dripping phenomenon was still evident.
The combination of PN-DOPO and Sep@AlPO4 was added into the PEO/PBAT blends to further reform the flame-retardant efficiency. A PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 loading of 15 wt% was also used in the PEO/PBAT blends. When 3 wt% and 5 wt% Sep@AlPO4 displaced the same amount of PN-DOPO, respectively, PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 composites reached the V-1 rating and exhibited anti-dripping performance. Furthermore, the LOI value of PEO/PBAT/PN10%/Sep5% sample was increased to 23.7%. The results indicated that a notable synergistic flame-retardant effect occurred between Sep@AlPO4 and PN-DOPO, and the combinations could obviously reform the flame retardancy of PEO/PBAT blends.

3.2. Flammability Behavior

To further study the synergistic flame-retardation effect of PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 compounds on the PEO/PBAT system, the flammability behaviour of the PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 composite was evaluated using a cone calorimeter test, and the data are summarised in Table 3. The ignition time (TTI) is usually used to represent the duration before polymer combustion; a high TTI indicates a difficulty to ignite the polymer using a luminous flame [34]. As shown in Table 3, the TTI of samples after incorporating PN-DOPO or PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 compounds obviously increased, compared with neat PEO/PBAT. Specifically, it was extended (about 17 s) when 10 wt% PN-DOPO and 5 wt% Sep@AlPO4 were introduced into the PEO/PBAT system, and the composite exhibited a TTI of 62 s. The increase in TTI suggested that the PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 composites could delay the early thermal decomposition [35].
Figure 1 provides the curves of flame-retarded PEO/PBAT composites including the heat release rate (HRR) and total heat release (THR). As shown in Figure 1, PEO/PBAT burned violently and reached a peak of HRR (p-HRR) of 1021.4 kW/m2. With the incorporation of 15 wt% PN-DOPO, the p-HRR of PEO/PBAT/PN15% decreased to 815.7 kW/m2. When 15 wt% PN-DOPO was introduced into PEO/PBAT blends, the p-HRR value of the composites reached 851.6 kW/m2. After the incorporation of 10 wt% PN-DOPO and 5 wt% Sep@AlPO4 into PEO/PBAT, the p-HRR reached only 657.8 kW/m2 and decreased by 35.6%. The time to p-HRR (TPHRR) was also significantly delayed to 385 s for PEO/PBAT/PN10%/Sep5% compared to that of 354 s for PEO/PBAT. The increase in TPHRR indicated that the PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 composites were more difficult to burn and showed delayed thermal decomposition compared to neat PEO/PBAT [7,30]. As depicted in Table 3, the THR and average HRR (av-HRR) of PEO/PBAT were 218.5 MJ/m2 and 574.3 kW/m2, respectively. After adding PN-DOPO, the THR and aV-HRR values were remarkably decreased. Additionally, the THR and av-HRR values of PEO/PBAT/PN10%/Sep5% decreased by 11.0% and 23.0%, respectively, compared to those of PEO/PBAT.
Figure 2 presents the total smoke release (TSR) and carbon dioxide production curves. As shown in Figure 2, the TSR value of PEO/PBAT was 579.0 m2/m2, which increased to 3044 m2/m2 when 15 wt% PN-DOPO was introduced into PEO/PBAT because the composite underwent an incomplete combustion [36]. After the incorporation of 10 wt% PN-DOPO and 5 wt% Sep@AlPO4 into PEO/PBAT, the TSR decreased to 2094 m2/m2. This decrease in TSR may be due to the formation of stable residues, which act as effective physical barriers [25]. It should be noted that the TSR values of PEO/PBAT/PN15% and PEO/PBAT/PN10%/Sep5% are significantly higher than those of PEO/PBAT or PEO/PBAT/Sep15%. Moreover, PEO/PBAT/PN10%/Sep5% exhibited a higher average COY value (0.18 kg/kg) and lower peak CO2 production (0.36 g/s) than PEO/PBAT (0.04 kg/kg of COY and 0.62 g/s of CO2 production), which might be attributed to the incomplete combustion of flame-retarded composites with the addition of PN-DOPO and Sep@AlPO4. The results of TSR, CO2 production and av-COY suggest that the incorporation of PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 into PEO/PBAT blends results in notable gas-phase flame retardancy and synergistic smoke suppression effects [37].
Based on the abovementioned analysis, the addition of PN-DOPO and Sep@AlPO4 could obviously reform the flame retardance of PEO/PBAT blends. Thus, PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 displayed remarkable synergistic flame-retardant and smoke suppression effects for flame-retarded PEO/PBAT composites.

3.3. Thermal Stability Analysis

Figure 3 presents the TGA and differential thermogravimetric analysis (DTG) curves of the flame-retarded composites in nitrogen atmosphere, and the detailed parameters are summarised in Table 4. The corresponding data include T5%, which is the temperature of 5 wt% weight loss, and Tmax, which is the maximum decomposition temperature at the maximum mass loss rate.
The thermal decomposition of PEO/PBAT mainly occurred between 300 °C and 450 °C in one single step. The T5% and Tmax were 344.9 °C and 409.5 °C. The mass loss rapidly increased after increasing the temperature, and the residual char could be ignored at 800℃. The thermal degradation of PEO/PBAT/PN15% composites also exhibited a one-step weight loss, with T5% = 357.5 °C and Tmax = 409.7 °C. The residual amount increased slightly to 1.86 wt%. After adding Sep@AlPO4 to PEO/PBAT, the onset thermal decomposition temperature increased to 356.8 °C, and the final residue was substantially increased to 10.27 wt%. When PN-DOPO was combined with Sep@AlPO4 in the PEO/PBAT system, the thermal degradation of the composites also exhibited one-step mass loss, and the TGA and DTG curves of the composites were similar to those for PEO/PBAT.
As listed in Table 4, the apparent increases in T5% indicated that the combination of PN-DOPO and Sep@AlPO4 enhanced the initial thermal stability of PEO/PBAT. Moreover, the char residues of the composites gradually increased with the increase in the amount of Sep@AlPO4. For PEO/PBAT/PN12%/Sep3%, the sample displayed the highest T5% and Tmax (363.4 °C and 410.7 °C, respectively). T5% increased by 18.5 °C compared to that of the PEO/PBAT blend, and the residual amount increased to 3.54 wt%. This enhancement in the initial thermal stability and char yield can be ascribed to the promoting effect of the FRs and sepiolite on the formation of protective layers [38,39]. Thus, the addition of PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 into PEO/PBAT may have a synergistic effect on the final residue, which can enhance the thermal stability of composites and delay the emission of the decomposition products. The TG and DTG curves of PEO/PBAT and flame-retarded PEO/PBAT composites under air atmosphere are shown in Figure S1, and the relevant data are listed in Table S1. Similar to the results in nitrogen atmosphere, the char residues of PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 composites were gradually increased by increasing the Sep@AlPO4 contents. The crystallization behavior of the composites was also determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) (Figure S2, Table S2).

3.4. TGA-FTIR Analysis

Composition analysis of the pyrolysis gas products was conducted through TGA–FTIR testing. Three-dimensional TGA–FTIR spectra of the thermal decomposition of the PEO/PBAT, PEO/PBAT/PN15%, PEO/PBAT/PN10%/Sep5% and PEO/PBAT/Sep15% samples are shown in Figure 4a–d, respectively. Clearly, all samples exhibited similar characteristic bands in 1000–1300 cm−1, 1600–1800 cm−1 and 2800–3000 cm−1, corresponding to ester groups, carbonyl compounds and hydrocarbons, respectively. Figure 4b,c show several new bands compared to the spectra in Figure 4a,d. The new peaks at 700–1400 cm−1 could be ascribed to the pyrolysis products of DOPO [25]. Furthermore, the intensity of the peaks of PEO/PBAT and PEO/PBAT/Sep15% was weaker than that of PEO/PBAT/PN10%/Sep5%, indicating that the gas-phase effect of the PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 composites was superior to that of PEO/PBAT.
In order to explore the detailed changes in pyrolysis gas products, the TGA-FTIR spectra of PEO/PBAT, PEO/PBAT/PN15%, PEO/PBAT/PN10%/Sep5% and PEO/PBAT/Sep15% composites at the different decomposition temperature are expressed in Figure 5. For all four samples, the common characteristic absorption peaks, i.e., hydrocarbons (2863 and 2966 cm−1), carbonyl compounds (1745 cm−1), aliphatic esters (1122, 1234 and 1265 cm−1), C–O bonds (1083 cm−1) and C–H bonds (743 and 878 cm−1) [1,8], occurred at 380–440 °C. Moreover, the peaks at 3500–4000 cm−1 were ascribed to water. For the PBAT/PEO/PN15% sample, the peaks occurred at 1351 and 1370 cm−1 were ascribed to the –P=O bond. The peak that occurred at 1449 cm−1 (corresponding to P–O–CAr) was weak at 400–600 °C [19,38]. The volatiles of the DOPO-based compounds were formed owing to the introduction of PN-DOPO into the PEO/PBAT matrix. When PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 was added to PEO/PBAT, absorption peaks appeared at 1351 cm−1 and 1370 cm−1, assigned to –P=O at 380–450 °C, and at 1449 cm−1 corresponding to a P–O–CAr bond appearing at 380 °C, respectively, compared to the PEO/PBAT and PEO/PBAT/Sep15% revealed in Figure 5a,d. These results indicated that the introduction of Sep@AlPO4 alone could not effectively increase the gas-phase products. After adding the combination of PN-DOPO and Sep@AlPO4, the blends exhibited absorption peaks of phosphorous-containing groups and an increase in gas-phase volatiles during the thermal degradation process, suggesting that the flame retardancy of the PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 composites were improved through a gas-phase flame-retardant mechanism.

3.5. Condensed-Phase Analysis

3.5.1. Morphologies of Residues

The morphologies of the char residues were investigated to examine the specific flame-retardant mechanism of PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 composites in the condensed phase. The digital photos of the residues are revealed in Figure 6.
Figure 6a indicates that the char residues left behind after combustion of the PEO/PBAT matrix exhibited a discontinuous and loose structure, with some cracks and poor quality. After incorporating 15 wt% PN-DOPO, the blends represented a very thin and incomplete char layer after burning, as depicted in Figure 6b. This form of residue could not protect the substrate from combustion or isolate the exchange of the combustion gases. In the cases of PEO/PBAT/PN10%/Sep5% and PEO/PBAT/Sep15%, the morphologies of the residues are substantially different from those of PEO/PBAT and PEO/PBAT/PN15% (as in Figure 6c,d). Especially in the case of the PEO/PBAT/PN10%/Sep5% composites, a full, thick and dense residual carbon layer was observed after the combustion (Figure 6c). The results indicated that combining PN-DOPO and Sep@AlPO4 could enhance the quality of the residues and contribute to the flame-retardant effect in the condensed phase.
The microscopic morphologies of the residues of the flame-retarded PEO/PBAT composites after the cone calorimetry test were further observed using SEM. The residue surface of the pure PEO/PBAT matrix presented a relatively loose and inhomogeneous structure, as in Figure 7(a1–a3), including some crevasses because of insufficient char formation during the burning process. As for PEO/PBAT/PN15%, uniform and dense char residues with a few holes after combustion can be found in Figure 7(b1–b3). With regard to PEO/PBAT/PN10%/Sep5% and PEO/PBAT/Sep15%, the morphologies of the char layer were markedly different from those of PEO/PBAT and PEO/PBAT/PN15%, as shown in Figure 7(c1–c3,d1–d3), presenting a more continuous and compact fibre-like structure. The results suggested that the addition of Sep@AlPO4 increased the carbon yield and promoted the formation of phosphorus-rich residues, making a denser char layer [38,40]. The layer exhibited higher thermal stability and strength, which could effectively prevent the escape of flammable volatiles and heat transfer during burning, further improving the flame retardance of the PEO/PBAT blends.

3.5.2. Chemical Compositions of the Residues

The elemental compositions of the residues were characterised using SEM–EDS, and the results are summarised in Table 5. In the case of the PEO/PBAT sample, only carbon and oxygen elements were detected. In addition to carbon and oxygen, phosphorus (19.1 wt%) was detected in the residue of the PEO/PBAT/PN15% composites. The results showed that there were phosphorus-containing products in the residue after the incorporation of DOPO-based flame retardants, while the oxygen, aluminium, silicon, magnesium elements and a relatively lower carbon content (11.7 wt%) and phosphorus content (12.8 wt%) were detected on the char layer of PEO/PBAT/Sep15% sample. These elements were the main components of aluminium phosphates and sepiolite residues [41,42]. After adding PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 into the PEO/PBAT blends, the sepiolite components (silicon, magnesium and aluminium) were observed in the char residues along with an increase in the phosphorus content (21.2 wt%). This further illustrates that PN-DOPO and Sep@AlPO4 can catalyse the reactions to form phosphorus- and oxide-rich residues, which exhibit barrier effects on oxygen and heat transfer.
In summary, PN-DOPO and Sep@AlPO4 were added to the PEO/PBAT blends, resulting in the composites exhibiting an increase in gas-phase volatiles. Additionally, absorption peaks of phosphorous-containing products were observed during combustion. The hybrid compounds rich in phosphorus, silicon and aluminium oxides can form a continuous and dense char layer. In this case, the flame retardance and thermal stability of the PEO/PBAT blends were considerably improved. Therefore, the PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 composites exhibited a synergistic flame-retardant effect through gas-phase quenching and char formation in the condensed phase.

3.6. Rheological Behavior

Rheological measurements have recently been used to study the combustion behaviour and fire resistance of polymeric composites. The effects of melt flow characteristics on flame-retarded composites were studied [24,43,44]. The influence of incorporating PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 into the PEO/PBAT blends on their rheological properties was examined. Furthermore, the relation of the storage modulus (G′) and loss modulus (G″) of PEO/PBAT and flame-retardant PEO/PBAT composites with frequency (ω) at 150 °C are illustrated in Figure 8, respectively. The G′ and G″ values of the PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 composites were higher than those of the PEO/PBAT and PEO/PBAT/Sep@AlPO4 blends over the whole frequency range. The increased G′ and G″ values of PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 might be attributed to interfacial interactions, and both the DOPO-based FRs and sepiolite could affect the viscoelastic behaviour and relaxation of the PEO/PBAT matrix [45,46]. Among these samples, PEO/PBAT/PN8%/Sep7% exhibited the highest G′ and G″ values, indicating that the interfacial interaction between the PN-DOPO and PEO/PBAT matrices was improved via the immobilisation of Sep@AlPO4 [44].
The complex viscosity (η*) of PEO/PBAT and flame-retardant PEO/PBAT is shown in Figure 9. The η* value increased with increasing Sep@AlPO4 content for the PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 system. The η* values of the PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 composites were obviously larger than the those of the PEO/PBAT and PEO/PBAT/Sep@AlPO4 blends, which might be due to the network structure formed by FRs and inorganic particles [47]. The PEO/PBAT/PN8%/Sep7% sample had the highest η* value. The flame-retarded PEO/PBAT/Sep@AlPO4 composites had high viscosity in the melted state, which could suppress the volatilisation of decomposition products and limit the flow of molecular chains during combustion [24]. High viscosity or storage modulus can also promote the crosslinking of condensed phases, and similar experimental results were reported by Li et al. [47] and He et al. [48]. According to Seraji et al. [49], the interfacial between the FR and polymer was improved with the increase in loading and the platform at the low-frequency region was more prominent, indicating the crosslinking network structure changed from from liquid-like to solid-like behaviour. The results indicate that a three-dimensional network is formed for flame-retardant composites, which is helpful to form a dense layer to enhance the fire resistance of composites during combustion. Therefore, high viscosity and modulus could promote the cross-linking of condensed phases during char formation, thus improving the flame retardance of the composites.

3.7. Mechanical Properties

The effects of PN-DOPO combined with Sep@AlPO4 on the mechanical performances of the PEO/PBAT system were also investigated. The stress–strain curves and tensile strength, elongation at break, flexural strength as well as modulus of all samples are shown in Figure 10. The tensile strength, flexural strength, flexural modulus and elongation at break of unfilled PEO/PBAT were 5.14 ± 0.21 MPa, 52.2 ± 1.94 MPa, 1.53 ± 0.05 GPa and 2.54 ± 0.09%, respectively. At the addition of 15 wt% PN-DOPO, the tensile strength and flexural modulus of the sample increased by 48.2% and 14.4%, respectively, whereas the elongation at break remained almost unchanged. Incorporating PN-DOPO and Sep@AlPO4 into the composites had a positive effect on the mechanical performances of pure PEO/PBAT. The flexural properties and elongation at break of the PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 composites exhibited a clear increase compared with those of PEO/PBAT. After adding 10 wt% PN-DOPO and 5 wt% Sep@AlPO4, the flexural strength, flexural modulus and elongation at break of the PEO/PBAT/PN10%/Sep5% sample were increased by 19.9%, 51.6% and 892%, respectively, compared with neat PEO/PBAT.
The improvement in the flexural properties and elongation at break of flame-retarded PEO/PBAT may be related to the dispersion of PN-DOPO and Sep@AlPO4 in the matrix during the melting process [24,50]. Moreover, the elongation at break increased with the increase in the amount of Sep@AlPO4, suggesting that PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 compounds effectively improved the toughness of the matrix. Herein, the multi-dimensional particle structure formed a good interface with the matrix, which was beneficial for the transfer from the polymer chain to the particles [51,52]. Thus, the PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 composites exhibited better mechanical properties.
To confirm the improvement in mechanical properties, SEM was used to observe the fracture surface of the PEO/PBAT and flame-retarded PEO/PBAT composites. As depicted in Figure 11(a1–a3), PEO/PBAT exhibited a flat and smooth surface, characteristic of the typical brittle fracture of thermoplastic resin, suggesting that plastic deformation did not occur during the fracture process [52,53]. PEO/PBAT/PN15% exhibited similar cross-sectional characteristics to pure PEO/PBAT. In contrast, PEO/PBAT/PN8%/Sep7% exhibited a rough surface with protrusions and pulling-out phenomena (Figure 11(c1–c3)), which may be due to the interface interaction between the fillers and the matrix. These obvious protrusions played an important role in hindering crack propagation [54]. Additionally, the improvement in the surface roughness confirmed the main fracture mode of plastic deformation, resulting in a considerable increase in the elongation at break of the PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 composites. Moreover, PEO/PBAT/Sep15% also presented a rough surface with obvious protrusions and orientations, as shown in the high-magnification SEM image (Figure 11(d3)), originating from the inorganic properties of fibrous sepiolite (marked with a red ellipse) [55]. Hence, the PEO/PBAT/Sep15% sample exhibited the maximum tensile strength.
In summary, when PN-DOPO and modified sepiolite were introduced into the PEO/PBAT system, the composites exhibited considerable synergistic flame-retardant effects on combustion behaviour, thermal stability, melt viscosity and carbonisation. Moreover, compared with the PEO/PBAT, PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO and PEO/PBAT/Sep@AlPO4 systems, the PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 composites showed improved mechanical performances, such as elongation at break and flexural performance, exhibiting cross-sectional plastic deformation characteristics.

4. Conclusions

In this study, a DOPO-based flame retardant (PN-DOPO) and aluminium phosphate-coated sepiolite (Sep@AlPO4) were jointly used to improve the flame retardance and mechanical performances of a PEO/PBAT system through melt mixing. The influences of PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 mixtures on the flame retardance, thermal decomposition, carbonisation and mechanical performances of PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 composites were systemically investigated using various analytical instruments. After adding 10 wt% PN-DOPO and 5 wt % Sep@AlPO4, the LOI value of the composites raised to 23.7% and achieved a V-1 rating. The p-HRR, THR and av-HRR values of PEO/PBAT/PN10%/Sep5% decreased by 35.6%, 11.0% and 23.0%, respectively, compared with those of PEO/PBAT. Furthermore, the TGA results elucidated that PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 could improve the initial thermal stability and char yield of the PEO/PBAT system. In the TGA–FTIR spectra, the PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 blends exhibited absorption peaks characteristic of phosphorous-containing groups. They also exhibited an increase in the gas-phase volatiles during their thermal decomposition process. The results of the SEM–EDS test confirmed that the PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 combination could promote a dense carbon layer rich in phosphorus, silicon and aluminium oxides in the condensed phase. Moreover, the PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 composites exhibited higher flexural properties and elongation at break than other samples. Thus, combining Sep@AlPO4 with PN-DOPO and introducing them into PEO/PBAT composites presented an evident synergistic flame-retardant effect. Moreover, Sep@AlPO4 is a promising and effective synergistic agent that can simultaneously improve the flame retardance, thermal stability and mechanical performances of flame-retarded PEO/PBAT blends.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/polym16010045/s1, Figure S1: TGA (a) and DTG (b) curves of flame-retarded PEO/PBAT composites in air atmosphere; Figure S2: DSC curves of PEO/PBAT and flame-retarded PEO/PBAT composites in nitrogen atmosphere, (a) melting curves and (b) crystallization curves; Table S1: TGA and DTG data of flame-retarded PEO/PBAT composites in air atmosphere; Table S2: DSC data of PEO/PBAT and flame-retarded PEO/PBAT composites.

Author Contributions

Methodology, W.H. and W.Y.; investigation, C.T. and Q.T.; formal analysis, K.W., C.Y. and X.X.; data curation, W.H., C.T. and C.M.; supervision, C.Y. and C.M.; writing—original draft preparation, W.H. and C.T.; writing—review and editing, W.H. and W.Y.; project administration, W.Y., X.X. and W.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (52063005, W.Y.), the Scientific Research Funds of Guiyang University (GYU-KY-2023, W.H.), Discipline Master’s Site Construction Project of Guiyang University through Guiyang City Financial Support (HC-2020, W.H.), the Science and Technology Support Project of Guizhou (2021488, W.Y.), the Guiyang science and technology plan project (Zhuke contract (2023), W.H.), the Innovative Talent Project of Guizhou Province (2020004, W.Y., 2022003, Q.T.) and the Outstanding Young Science and Technology Talent Project of Guizhou Province (20215622, W.Y.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors also graciously thank Xiaoshuai Sun for his aid in performing the TGA experiment and data collection during the paper revision process.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, Y.Y.; Han, L.F.; Liao, C.; Yu, H.; Kan, Y.C.; Hu, Y. Ultra-thin, non-combustible PEO polymer solid electrolyte for high safety polymer lithium metal batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 468, 143222–143234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pongsuk, P.; Pumchusak, J. Effect of ultrasonication on the morphology, mechanical property, ionic conductivity, and flame retardancy of PEO-LiCF3SO3-halloysite nanotube composites for use as solid polymer electrolyte. Polymers 2022, 14, 3710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jorge, L.; Meabe, L.; Riva, R.; Guzmán-González, G.; Porcarelliad, L.; Forsythade, M.; Mugica, A.; Müllerae, A.J.; Lecomte, P. Flame retardant polyphosphoester copolymers as solid polymer electrolyte for lithium batteries. Polym. Chem. 2021, 12, 3441–3450. [Google Scholar]
  4. Fazli, A.; Rodrigue, D. Biosourced Poly (lactic acid)/polyamide-11 Blends: Effect of an Elastomer on the Morphology and Mechanical Properties. Molecules 2022, 27, 6819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wang, K.; Jin, X.; He, X.H.; Huang, W.J.; Tian, Q.; Fu, Q.P.; Yan, W. Synthesis of aluminum phosphate-coated halloysite nanotubes: Effects on morphological, mechanical, and rheological properties of PEO/PBAT Blends. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ye, A.; Wang, S.J.; Zhao, Q.; Wang, Y.M.; Liu, C.T.; Shen, C.Y. Poly (ethylene oxide)-promoted dispersion of graphene nanoplatelets and its effect on the properties of poly (lactic acid)/poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) based nanocomposites. Mater. Lett. 2019, 253, 34–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Qi, J.; Pan, Y.T.; Luo, Z.L.; Wang, B.B. Facile and scalable fabrication of bioderived flame retardant based on adenine for enhancing fire safety of fully biodegradable PLA/PBAT/TPS ternary blends. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2021, 138, 50877–50893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, X.J.; Cai, Z.Z.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Tan, D.Y.; Xie, L.; Sun, H.J.; Zhong, G.J. The combined effect of absorption and catalysis of halloysite nanotubes during the thermal degradation of PBAT nanocomposties. Appl. Clay Sci. 2020, 196, 105762–105770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, X.Q.; Zhang, C.; Gao, S.Y.; Cai, S.J.; Wang, Q.F.; Liu, J.Y.; Liu, Z.H. A novel polyphosphonate flame-retardant additive towards safety-reinforced all-solid-state polymer electrolyte. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 239, 122014–122021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, Y.R.; Fang, T.M.; Wang, S.Y.; Wang, C.; Li, D.H.; Xia, Y.Z. Alginate fiber-grafted polyetheramine-driven high ion-conductive and flame-retardant separator and solid polymer electrolyte for lithium metal batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 56780–56789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Phetwarotai, W.; Suparanon, T.; Phusunti, N.; Potiyaraj, P. Influence of compatibilizer and multifunctional additive loadings on flame retardation, plasticization, and impact modification of polylactide and poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) biodegradable blends. Polym. Advan. Technol. 2020, 31, 2094–2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhou, Y.; Qiu, S.; Waterhouse, G.I.N.; Zhang, K.; Xu, J. Enhancing the properties of PBAT/PLA composites with novel phosphorus-based ionic liquid compatibilizers. Mater. Today Commun. 2021, 27, 102407–102416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, L.; Li, Y.T.; Fan, S.P.; Nan, C.W.; Goodenough, J.B. PEO/garnet composite electrolytes for solid-state lithium batteries: From “ceramic-in-polymer” to “polymer-in-ceramic”. Nano Energy 2018, 46, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nascimento, M.; Novais, S.; Ding, M.S.; Ferreira, M.S.; Koch, S.; Passerini, S.; Pinto, J.L. Internal strain and temperature discrimination with optical fiber hybrid sensors in Li-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2019, 410, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhai, H.W.; Xu, P.Y.; Ning, M.Q.; Cheng, Q.; Mandal, J.; Yang, Y. A flexible solid composite electrolyte with vertically aligned and connected ion-conducting nanoparticles for lithium batteries. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 3182–3187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Han, L.; Liao, C.; Mu, X.; Wu, N.; Xu, Z.; Wang, J.W.; Song, L.; Kan, Y.C.; Hu, Y. Flame-retardant ADP/PEO solid polymer electrolyte for dendrite-free and long-life lithium battery by generating Al, P-rich SEI layer. Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 4447–4453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Salmeia, K.A.; Gaan, S. An overview of some recent advances in DOPO-derivatives: Chemistry and flame retardant applications. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2015, 113, 119–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Levchik, S.; Piotrowski, A.; Weil, E.; Yao, Q. New developments in flame retardancy of epoxy resins. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2005, 46, 2778–2788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huang, W.J.; He, W.T.; Long, L.J.; Yan, W.; He, M.; Qin, S.H.; Yu, J. Highly efficient flame-retardant glass-fiber-reinforced polyamide 6T system based on a novel DOPO-based derivative: Flame retardancy, thermal decomposition and pyrolysis behavior. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2018, 148, 26–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhou, Y.; Lin, Y.; Tawiah, B.; Sun, J.; Yuen, R.K.K.; Fei, B. DOPO-decorated two-dimensional mXene nanosheets for flame-retardant, ultraviolet-protective, and reinforced polylactide composites. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 21876–21887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Huang, W.J.; Yan, W.; He, W.T.; Wang, K.; Long, L.J.; He, M.; Yu, J. Synergistic flame-retardant effect of DOPO-based derivative and organo-montmorillonite on glass-fiber-reinforced polyamide 6 T. Polym. Advan. Technol. 2020, 31, 2083–2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yan, W.; Yu, J.; Zhang, M.Q.; Wang, T.; Wen, C.; Qin, S.H.; Huang, W.J. Effect of multiwalled carbon nanotubes and phenethylbridged DOPO derivative on flame retardancy of epoxy resin. J. Polym. Res. 2018, 25, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Long, L.J.; Chang, Q.F.; He, W.T.; Xiang, Y.S.; Qin, S.H.; Yu, J. Effects of bridged DOPO derivatives on the thermal stability and flame retardant properties of poly (lactic acid). Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2017, 139, 55–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Huang, W.J.; Wang, K.; Tu, C.Y.; Xu, X.L.; Tian, Q.; Ma, C.; Fu, Q.P.; Yan, W. Synergistic effects of DOPO-based derivative and organo-montmorillonite on flame retardancy, thermal stability and mechanical properties of polypropylene. Polymers 2022, 14, 2372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jiang, P.; Zhang, S.; Bourbigot, S.; Chen, Z.; Duquesne, S.; Casetta, M. Surface grafting of sepiolite with a phosphaphenanthrene derivative and its flame-retardant mechanism on PLA nanocomposites. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2019, 165, 68–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Beryl, J.R.; Xavier, J.R. Halloysite for clay-polymer nanocomposites: Effects of nanofillers on the anti-corrosion, mechanical, microstructure, and flame-retardant properties- a review. J. Mater. Sci. 2023, 58, 10943–10974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hu, Y.L.; Feng, D.; Xie, Y.H.; Xie, D.L. Microwave-assisted confining flame-retardant polypropylene in carbon nanotube conductive networks for improved electromagnetic interference shielding and flame retardation. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2021, 23, 2100024–2100031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pan, Y.; Liu, L.X.; Cai, W.; Hu, Y.; Jiang, S.D.; Zhao, H.T. Effect of layer-by-layer self-assembled sepiolite-based nanocoating on flame retardant and smoke suppressant properties of flexible polyurethane foam. Appl. Clay Sci. 2019, 168, 230–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pappalardo, S.; Russo, P.; Acierno, D.; Rabe, S.; Schartel, B. The synergistic effect of organically modified sepiolite in intumescent flame retardant polypropylene. Eur. Polym. J. 2016, 76, 196–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yan, W.; Xie, P.; Yang, Z.W.; Luo, G.J.; Huang, W.J.; Tian, Q.; Tu, C.Y.; Zhang, C.M.; Yang, C.L.; Wang, K. Flame-retardant behaviors of aluminum phosphates coated sepiolite in epoxy resin. J. Fire Sci. 2021, 39, 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Huang, W.J.; He, W.T.; Long, L.J.; Yan, W.; He, M.; Qin, S.H.; Yu, J. Thermal degradation kinetics of flame-retardant glass-fiber-reinforced polyamide 6T composites based on bridged DOPO derivatives. Polym. Bull. 2019, 76, 2061–2080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. ASTM D3801; Standard Test Method for Measuring the Comparative Burning Characteristics of Solid Plastics in a Vertical Position. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2020.
  33. ISO 5660-1; Reaction-to-Fire tests—Heat Release, Smoke Production and Mass Loss Rate—Part 1: Heat Release Rate (Cone Calorimeter Method) and Smoke Production Rate (Dynamic Measurement). ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015.
  34. Samyn, F.; Bourbigot, S. Protection mechanism of a flame-retarded polyamide 6 nanocomposite. J. Fire Sci. 2014, 32, 241–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, W.C.; Li, X.M.; Li, L.M.; Yang, R.J. Study of the synergistic effect of silicon and phosphorus on the blowing-out effect of epoxy resin composites. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2012, 97, 1041–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yuan, B.; Fan, A.; Yang, M.; Chen, X.F.; Hu, Y.; Bao, C.L.; Jiang, S.H.; Niu, Y.; Zhang, Y. The effects of graphene on the flammability and fire behavior of intumescent flame retardant polypropylene composites at different flame scenarios. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2017, 143, 42–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fang, Y.Y.; Qian, L.J.; Huang, Z.G.; Tang, S.; Qiu, Y. Synergistic charring effect of triazinetrione-alkyl-phosphinate and phosphaphenanthrene derivatives in epoxy thermosets. RSC Adv. 2017, 73, 46505–46513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhan, Z.S.; Xu, M.J.; Li, B. Synergistic effects of sepiolite on the flame retardant properties and thermal degradation behaviors of polyamide 66/aluminum diethylphosphinate composites. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2015, 117, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, H.J.; Hu, X.P.; Liu, Y.R.; Zhang, S.H.; Wu, Z.Z. Convenient synthesis of one-dimensional a-SEP@LDH via self-assembly towards simultaneously improved fire retardance, mechanical strength and thermal resistance for epoxy resin. Compos. Part B-Eng. 2021, 216, 108857–108873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shafi, U.R.; Sana, J.; Muhammad, S.; Iftikhar, H.G.; Badar, R.; Muhammad, N.; Sabrina, J.C. Polystyrene-sepiolite clay nanocomposites with enhanced mechanical and thermal properties. Polymers 2022, 14, 3576–3589. [Google Scholar]
  41. Xu, T.; Qian, D.; Hu, Y.; Zhu, Y.Z.; Zhong, Y.; Zhang, L.P.; Xu, H.; Peng, H.X.; Mao, Z.P. Effect of Sepiolite-Loaded Fe2O3 on Flame Retardancy of Waterborne Polyurethane. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2021, 2021, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wu, N.J.; Xiu, Z.X. Surface microencapsulation modification of aluminum hypophosphite and improved flame retardancy and mechanical properties of flame-retardant acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene composites. RSC Adv. 2015, 61, 49143–49152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cheng, B.F.; Li, X.M.; Hao, J.W.; Yang, R.J. Rheological behavior of polycarbonate/ ultrafine octaphenyl silsesquioxane (OPS) composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133, 43638–43649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhu, F.; Yasin, S.; Hussain, M. Viscoelastic Rheological Behaviors of Polypropylene and LMPP Blends. Polymers 2021, 13, 3485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bascucci, C.; Duretek, I.; Lehner, S.; Holzer, C.; Gaan, S.; Hufenus, R.; Gooneie, A. Investigating thermomechanical recycling of poly (ethylene terephthalate) containing phosphorus flame retardants. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2021, 195, 109783–109791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, L.; Wang, G.; Liu, Z.; Xu, S.M.; Wang, Y.Z. Rheological premonitory of nanoclay morphology on the mechanical characteristics of composite aerogels. Compos. Part B-Eng. 2019, 173, 106889–106895. [Google Scholar]
  47. Li, X.; Liang, D.; Hu, Z.; He, J.L.; Bian, X.C.; Cui, J.L. Synergistic effects of polyoxometalate-based ionic liquid-doped sepiolite in intumescent flame-retardant high-density polyethylene. Polym. Advan. Technol. 2021, 32, 2240–2251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. He, W.T.; Liao, S.T.; Xiang, Y.S.; Long, L.J.; Qin, S.H.; Yu, J. Structure and properties study of PA6 nanocomposites flame retarded by aluminium salt of diisobutylphosphinic acid and different organic montmorillonites. Polymers 2018, 10, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Seraji, S.M.; Gan, H.; Le, N.; Zhang, J.; Varley, R.J. The effect of DOPO concentration and epoxy amine stoichiometry on the rheological, thermal, mechanical and fire-retardant properties of crosslinked networks. Polym. Int. 2022, 71, 1320–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhou, X.; Qiu, S.; Xing, W.; Gangireddy, C.S.R.; Gui, Z.; Hu, Y. Hierarchical polyphosphazene@ molybdenum disulfide hybrid structure for enhancing the flame retardancy and mechanical property of epoxy resins. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 29147–29156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jia, P.; Zhu, Y.; Lu, J.; Wang, B.; Song, L.; Wang, B.; Hu, Y. Multifunctional fireproof electromagnetic shielding polyurethane films with thermal management performance. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 439, 135673–135681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cao, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wang, J.; Wei, Y.; Yu, S. Chitosan-bridged synthesis of 2D/2D hierarchical nanostructure towards promoting the fire safety and mechanical property of epoxy resin. Compos. Part A-Appl. Sci. 2022, 158, 106958–106969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, Z.; Chen, M.; Li, S.; Fan, X.M.; Liu, C.P. Simultaneously improving the thermal, flame retardant and mechanical properties of epoxy resins modified by a novel multi-element synergistic flame retardant. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2019, 304, 1800619–1800627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Jian, R.; Wang, P.; Xia, L.; Yu, X.Q.; Zheng, X.L.; Shao, Z.B. Low-flammability epoxy resins with improved mechanical properties using a Lewis base based on phosphaphenanthrene and 2-aminothiazole. J. Mater. Sci. 2017, 52, 9907–9921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Liu, J.Q.; Xin, Z.X. Effect of sepiolite on properties of silicone rubber/melamine/starch/sepiolite flame retardant composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2023, 140, 53538–53549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 16 00045 g001
Figure 1. HRR (a) and THR (b) curves of PEO/PBAT and flame-retardant PEO/PBAT composites.
Figure 1. HRR (a) and THR (b) curves of PEO/PBAT and flame-retardant PEO/PBAT composites.
Polymers 16 00045 g001
Polymers 16 00045 g002
Figure 2. TSR (a) and carbon dioxide production (b) curves of PEO/PBAT and flame-retardant PEO/PBAT composites.
Figure 2. TSR (a) and carbon dioxide production (b) curves of PEO/PBAT and flame-retardant PEO/PBAT composites.
Polymers 16 00045 g002
Polymers 16 00045 g003
Figure 3. TGA (a) and DTG (b) curves of PEO/PBAT and flame-retardant PEO/PBAT composites under N2 atmosphere.
Figure 3. TGA (a) and DTG (b) curves of PEO/PBAT and flame-retardant PEO/PBAT composites under N2 atmosphere.
Polymers 16 00045 g003
Polymers 16 00045 g004
Figure 4. Three-dimensional TGA-FTIR spectra of (a) PEO/PBAT, (b) PEO/PBAT/PN15%, (c) PEO/PBAT/PN10%/Sep5% and (d) PEO/PBAT/Sep15%.
Figure 4. Three-dimensional TGA-FTIR spectra of (a) PEO/PBAT, (b) PEO/PBAT/PN15%, (c) PEO/PBAT/PN10%/Sep5% and (d) PEO/PBAT/Sep15%.
Polymers 16 00045 g004
Polymers 16 00045 g005
Figure 5. TGA-FTIR spectra of the gaseous phase during the thermal decomposition for (a) PEO/PBAT, (b) PEO/PBAT/PN15%, (c) PEO/PBAT/PN10%/Sep5% and (d) PEO/PBAT/ Sep15% at different temperatures.
Figure 5. TGA-FTIR spectra of the gaseous phase during the thermal decomposition for (a) PEO/PBAT, (b) PEO/PBAT/PN15%, (c) PEO/PBAT/PN10%/Sep5% and (d) PEO/PBAT/ Sep15% at different temperatures.
Polymers 16 00045 g005
Polymers 16 00045 g006
Figure 6. Photographs of the char residues for (a) PEO/PBAT, (b) PEO/PBAT/PN15%, (c) PEO/PBAT/PN10%/Sep5% and (d) PEO/PBAT/Sep15%.
Figure 6. Photographs of the char residues for (a) PEO/PBAT, (b) PEO/PBAT/PN15%, (c) PEO/PBAT/PN10%/Sep5% and (d) PEO/PBAT/Sep15%.
Polymers 16 00045 g006
Polymers 16 00045 g007
Figure 7. SEM images of the residues on PEO/PBAT ((a1)—2000×; (a2)—10,000×; (a3)—50,000×), PEO/PBAT/PN15% ((b1)—2000×; (b2)—10,000×; (b3)—50,000×), PEO/PBAT/PN10%/Sep5% ((c1)—2000×; (c2)—10,000×; (c3)—50,000×) and PEO/PBAT/Sep15% ((d1)—2000×; (d2)—10,000×; (d3)—50,000×).
Figure 7. SEM images of the residues on PEO/PBAT ((a1)—2000×; (a2)—10,000×; (a3)—50,000×), PEO/PBAT/PN15% ((b1)—2000×; (b2)—10,000×; (b3)—50,000×), PEO/PBAT/PN10%/Sep5% ((c1)—2000×; (c2)—10,000×; (c3)—50,000×) and PEO/PBAT/Sep15% ((d1)—2000×; (d2)—10,000×; (d3)—50,000×).
Polymers 16 00045 g007
Polymers 16 00045 g008
Figure 8. Storage modulus (a) and loss modulus (b) of PEO/PBAT and flame-retardant PEO/PBAT composites.
Figure 8. Storage modulus (a) and loss modulus (b) of PEO/PBAT and flame-retardant PEO/PBAT composites.
Polymers 16 00045 g008
Polymers 16 00045 g009
Figure 9. Complex viscosity of PEO/PBAT and flame-retardant PEO/PBAT composites.
Figure 9. Complex viscosity of PEO/PBAT and flame-retardant PEO/PBAT composites.
Polymers 16 00045 g009
Polymers 16 00045 g010
Figure 10. Mechanical properties of PEO/PBAT and flame-retarded PEO/PBAT composites: (a) stress–strain curves, (b) tensile strength and elongation at break and (c) flexural strength as well as modulus.
Figure 10. Mechanical properties of PEO/PBAT and flame-retarded PEO/PBAT composites: (a) stress–strain curves, (b) tensile strength and elongation at break and (c) flexural strength as well as modulus.
Polymers 16 00045 g010
Polymers 16 00045 g011
Figure 11. SEM images of fractured surfaces for PEO/PBAT ((a1)—500×; (a2)—2000×; (a3)—10,000×), PEO/PBAT/PN15% ((b1)—500×; (b2)—2000×; (b3)—10,000×), PEO/PBAT/PN10%/Sep5% ((c1)—500×; (c2)—2000×; (c3)—10,000×) and PEO/PBAT/Sep15% ((d1)—500×; (d2)—2000×; (d3)—1000×) at different magnifications.
Figure 11. SEM images of fractured surfaces for PEO/PBAT ((a1)—500×; (a2)—2000×; (a3)—10,000×), PEO/PBAT/PN15% ((b1)—500×; (b2)—2000×; (b3)—10,000×), PEO/PBAT/PN10%/Sep5% ((c1)—500×; (c2)—2000×; (c3)—10,000×) and PEO/PBAT/Sep15% ((d1)—500×; (d2)—2000×; (d3)—1000×) at different magnifications.
Polymers 16 00045 g011
Table 1. Composition of the PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 composites.
Table 1. Composition of the PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 composites.
SamplesPEO
(wt%)		PBAT
(wt%)		PN-DOPO
(wt%)		Sep@AlPO4
(wt%)
PEO/PBAT604000
PEO/PBAT/PN15%6040150
PEO/PBAT/PN14%/Sep1%6040141
PEO/PBAT/PN12%/Sep3%6040123
PEO/PBAT/PN10%/Sep5%6040105
PEO/PBAT/PN8%/Sep7%604087
PEO/PBAT/Sep15%6040015
Table 2. The UL-94 and LOI tests of PEO/PBAT and PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 composites.
Table 2. The UL-94 and LOI tests of PEO/PBAT and PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 composites.
SamplesUL-94 (3.2 mm)LOI (%)
t1 (s)t2 (s)DrippingRating
PEO/PBAT>30>30YesNo Rating20.2 ± 0.1
PEO/PBAT/PN15%19.65.1YesV-222.6 ± 0.1
PEO/PBAT/PN14%/Sep1%18.53.4YesV-222.8 ± 0.2
PEO/PBAT/PN12%/Sep3%12.74.6NoV-123.2 ± 0.2
PEO/PBAT/PN10%/Sep5%11.42.8NoV-123.7 ± 0.2
PEO/PBAT/PN8%/Sep7%16.86.2YesV-223.1 ± 0.3
PEO/PBAT/Sep15%20.15.5YesV-221.8 ± 0.2
Table 3. Cone calorimetric results for the PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 composites.
Table 3. Cone calorimetric results for the PEO/PBAT/PN-DOPO/Sep@AlPO4 composites.
SamplesTTIp-HRRav-HRRTPHRRTHRTSRav-COY
(s)(kW/m2)(kW/m2)(s)(MJ/m2)(m2/m2)(kg/kg)
PEO/PBAT551021.4574.3354218.5579.00.04
PEO/PBAT/PN15%61815.7486.0359194.23044.30.22
PEO/PBAT/PN10%/Sep5%62657.8442.3385194.52094.10.18
PEO/PBAT/Sep15%59851.6501.7373204.0483.90.05
Table 4. TGA and DTG data of PEO/PBAT and flame-retardant PEO/PBAT composites.
Table 4. TGA and DTG data of PEO/PBAT and flame-retardant PEO/PBAT composites.
SamplesT5%
(°C)		Tmax
(°C)		Residues at 800 °C
(wt%)
PEO/PBAT344.9409.50.06
PEO/PBAT/PN15%357.5409.71.86
PEO/PBAT/PN14%/Sep1%347.7407.20.62
PEO/PBAT/PN12%/Sep3%363.4410.73.54
PEO/PBAT/PN10%/Sep5%361.8408.14.76
PEO/PBAT/PN8%/Sep7%357.0406.49.18
PEO/PBAT/Sep15%356.8407.610.27
Table 5. Element contents of the char residues of PEO/PBAT and flame-retarded PEO/PBAT composites obtained via EDS.
Table 5. Element contents of the char residues of PEO/PBAT and flame-retarded PEO/PBAT composites obtained via EDS.
SamplesElemental Content (wt%)
COPAlSiMg
PEO/PBAT18.381.7----
PEO/PBAT/PN15%31.149.819.1---
PEO/PBAT/PN10%/Sep5%12.938.621.24.516.66.2
PEO/PBAT/Sep15%11.737.512.85.523.19.4
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, W.; Tu, C.; Tian, Q.; Wang, K.; Yang, C.; Ma, C.; Xu, X.; Yan, W. Synergistic Effects of 9,10-Dihydro-9-oxa-10-phosphaphenanthrene-10-oxide-Based Derivative and Modified Sepiolite on Flame-Retarded Poly (Ethylene Oxide)–Poly (Butylene Adipate-Co-Terephthalate) Composites. Polymers 2024, 16, 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16010045

AMA Style

Huang W, Tu C, Tian Q, Wang K, Yang C, Ma C, Xu X, Yan W. Synergistic Effects of 9,10-Dihydro-9-oxa-10-phosphaphenanthrene-10-oxide-Based Derivative and Modified Sepiolite on Flame-Retarded Poly (Ethylene Oxide)–Poly (Butylene Adipate-Co-Terephthalate) Composites. Polymers. 2024; 16(1):45. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16010045

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Weijiang, Chunyun Tu, Qin Tian, Kui Wang, Chunlin Yang, Chao Ma, Xiaolu Xu, and Wei Yan. 2024. "Synergistic Effects of 9,10-Dihydro-9-oxa-10-phosphaphenanthrene-10-oxide-Based Derivative and Modified Sepiolite on Flame-Retarded Poly (Ethylene Oxide)–Poly (Butylene Adipate-Co-Terephthalate) Composites" Polymers 16, no. 1: 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16010045

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop