1. Introduction
Aphis gossypii Glover (cotton aphids) are a significant pest for cotton crops. They attach themselves to the backs of plant leaves and cause damage by sucking the sap from leaves. This damage results in yellow and white spots on the leaves, causing them becoming curled or crumpled [
1]. Infestation can have a significant impact on the development of new leaves, delay the growth cycle, and ultimately affect the quality and yield of cotton [
2]. Currently, the control strategy for
A. gossypii primarily involves passive, large-scale pesticide spraying. Furthermore, the excessive use of pesticides can result in the development of resistance in
A. gossypii [
3]. To reduce the toxic side effects of pesticides on the ecological environment and beneficial organisms, it is necessary to explore a method for the green control of cotton aphids.
Biological control technologies, stimulated by the goal of repairing agricultural ecosystems in a safe and ecologically conscious manner, are now acknowledged as viable alternatives to chemically focused strategies [
4]. Scholars, both domestically and abroad, have increasingly invested their time and effort in discovering green alternatives for the alleviation of pest burdens on
Gossypium hirsutum Linn. (cotton) crops. The suggested strategies often involve blending cotton fields with other crops such as
Brassica campestris L.,
Zea mays L. (corn),
Sorghum bicolor (Linn.) Moench,
Suaeda glauca (Bunge), or
Medicago sativa L. (alfalfa) as a means of boosting natural predator populations, a strategy referred to as planting traps [
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11]. Alfalfa is a host plant for
Aphis craccivora Koch (the alfalfa aphid) and may prove to be an important reservoir of natural enemies to combat this pest.
A. craccivora mainly feeds on legumes and does not attack cotton. In contrast,
A. gossypii primarily use cotton as their host and do not feed on alfalfa [
4,
12,
13]. Research on the effect of green manure intercropping in cotton fields has shown that crops such as rapeseed and hemp have a trapping effect on natural predators [
14]. Other studies, using
Triticum aestivum L. (wheat), suggest that top natural predators spread throughout cotton fields. However, wheat is not as effective as alfalfa in preventing diseases [
15]. Additionally, it has been observed that plantations with maize traps show an increase in the number and diversity of natural predators [
16]. Further ecological research is necessary to understand the environmental conditions that play key roles in alfalfa–aphid interactions. The identification of natural predators is crucial to protect and promote their populations for the more targeted ecological control of aphids [
12,
17]. Researchers have conducted studies on the ecological control mechanisms of alfalfa, and these studies will bolster our understanding of the role alfalfa plays within the ecological control processes of different agroecosystems [
18].
Xinjiang is a region in China known for producing high-quality cotton. Currently, the prediction of cotton pests and diseases in Xinjiang relies heavily on manual investigation by technicians and their experience-based judgments [
2]. There is an urgent need to incorporate remote sensing and implement green control methods to mitigate the damage caused by cotton aphids on cotton. UAVs have a long history of use in monitoring applications and have been used in tasks such as identifying crop diseases, monitoring pests, and estimating pest damage levels [
19,
20,
21,
22]. Controlling the number of cotton aphids through the carefully orchestrated implementation of ‘trap crops’ like alfalfa draws on certain biological principles [
23]. The existing studies on controlling cotton aphids using alfalfa traps have demonstrated that this strategy can have a positive impact on suppressing cotton insect pests and enhancing cotton yield [
3,
24]. However, the exact mechanism of the ecological aphid control action of alfalfa traps is not yet fully understood. Further research is required to ascertain whether alfalfa requires mowing as well as the optimal frequency of mowing to maintain pest populations in cotton fields long-term and in a low-hazard state.
This study analyzed the population dynamics of A. craccivora and their main natural predators in alfalfa traps, as well as the temporal pattern and temporal ecological niche dynamics of cotton aphids and their main natural predators in cotton fields. In addition, this study investigated the effects of different mowing frequencies on cotton aphid populations and their natural predators in alfalfa traps, based on survey data and UAV multispectral images. The objective of this study was to construct practical instructions for the subtle natural control of cotton aphids plaguing cotton plantations.
4. Discussion
The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of using alfalfa traps for ecologically controlling
A. gossypii in cotton fields. We mowed the alfalfa to promote the transfer of aphids’ natural predators to the cotton fields, which led to a reduction in the population of
A. gossypii. The analyses revealed differences in the activity periods or ‘temporal niche widths’ of these organisms. This study analyzed the population dynamics of alfalfa aphids and their natural predators. Natural predator populations inhabiting alfalfa traps display variable density rates depending on the different phases of alfalfa growth, leading to substantial changes in predator counts [
11]. In a significant advance in bolstering aphid control through the optimum use of cotton aphids’ natural predators, researchers specializing in plant protection have unveiled the results of their examinations into the predatory influence exerted by primary natural predators like
H. variegata,
P. japonica, and lacewings. In the scenario where alfalfa traps are utilized in cotton fields,
H. variegata,
P. japonica, and lacewings emerge as the key adversaries of the
A. gossypii. This is attributable to their sizeable numbers and coordinated actions as well as their potent predation abilities. The influence exerted by the cotton bollworm over the cotton fields is, without a doubt, profound. The current study aimed to assess how successful adult
H. variegata, adult
P. japonica, and lacewings might be when dealing with these
A. gossypii [
23,
32,
38,
39,
40,
41,
42,
43]. These findings underscore a concerted effort among these pivotal predators to harvest
A. craccivora populations by occurring simultaneously during specific periods. However, the reasons for the accumulation of so many alfalfa aphids in alfalfa were not quantitatively studied. This requires further research, particularly into the spreading sources, growth, and declining patterns of alfalfa aphids and other natural predators.
This study analyzed the reasons for the rapid increase in
A. gossypii in cotton fields. The increased
A. gossypii population can be attributed to cotton growing providing a favorable food source for
A. gossypii. The mowing of the alfalfa traps reduced the number of alfalfa aphids present. Natural enemies of the alfalfa aphid have migrated to cotton fields and may, therefore, have access to additional food sources [
25]. The survey data revealed that cotton fields without alfalfa traps had to wait passively for the migration of the main natural predators of the
A. gossypii. However, our experimental design did not aim to breed the natural predators that were originally present in the cotton fields. This aspect could be further developed in the next phase of this study.
The continual fluctuation between growth and decline observed in the population of
A. gossypii, alongside that of their prevalent natural predators, demonstrates the intricate balance they maintain [
12,
13].
Figure 5 illustrates this dynamic equilibrium process that the population of
A. gossypii in cotton fields undergoes in the absence of alfalfa trap control. The analysis of the temporal patterns of
A. gossypii and their primary natural predators indicates that the damage caused by
A. gossypii in the cotton fields before alfalfa mowing was greater and lasted longer than that in cotton fields with alfalfa traps.
A. gossypii populations were more abundant in cotton fields without alfalfa traps after alfalfa mowing. This hindered the efficiency of reducing the pest population via their natural predators [
18]. Fields with traps managed to significantly slow down the growth rate of this aphid species. These findings suggest that establishing an overlap in time between the life cycle of the aphid and its predators is crucial for effective control of
A. gossypii infestations using their natural predators. However, upon examining the overall distribution of the
A. gossypii population, no significant difference was observed in the number of major natural predators of
A. gossypii between cotton fields with alfalfa traps and those without.
In the area under investigation, cultivable land is engaged in growing crops such as wheat, cotton, and corn. Winter wheat farms represent a significant source of natural predators for
A. gossypii. While there have been favorable outcomes from cultivating cotton, an overlap occurs between the harvest time of wheat and when cotton planting starts [
15]. Over time, this timing clash has spurred a decrease in wheat production spaces yearly, which concurrently has diminished the number of these predator adversaries that combat
A. gossypii [
44]. In addition, global climate change issues have led to temperature elevations triggering pest and disease appearances earlier during the period when the planting and nurturing of cotton takes place [
25]. The decline in populations of natural predators that regulate cotton pests, along with timing mismatches, has led to a weaker control over
A. gossypii. Consequently, the intensity of
A. gossypii infestations has been rising annually [
45]. Using alfalfa planting in protective forestry surrounding cotton fields can achieve two objectives: it fills the void left by the diminishing number of wheat fields (the original habitat where natural predators thrived), and acts as an invaluable feed crop. The timely trimming of alfalfa helps alleviate potential damage from
A. gossypii in the primary field and presents an eco-friendly solution to pest management. Compared to other crop traps, alfalfa can provide a breeding ground for the natural predators of cotton pests, such as
A. gossypii. Studies in the literature have affirmed that alfalfa mowing aids natural predators in transitioning as it assists in relocating them from their indigenous habitats to cotton fields. This approach maintains elevated levels of the natural remedy against pests over time; subsequently, it leads to a substantial decrease in crop parasite populations. Previous studies have emphasized the importance of judiciously managing the frequency of mowing based on the specific requirements of field production and management [
30,
46]. This study did not thoroughly investigate the optimal ratio of alfalfa and cotton planting or the optimal aphid control effect of alfalfa planting patterns around cotton fields. These aspects require further research.
In the experimental design shown in
Figure 6, the results of the remote sensing feature classification indicate that in the area where alfalfa traps were not planted, the field weeds contained
P. australis and
T. ramosissima. The survey data revealed that the number of
H. variegate and lacewings on the natural weeds on both sides of the cotton field was 0 throughout the survey period. Additionally, at the height of the cotton aphid population, there were less than 50
P.
japonica per 100 cotton plants on the natural weeds on both sides of the field [
25]. In 2023, Peng et al. conducted a biological control trial of cotton aphids using trap plants (
Brassica napus L.,
T. aestivum,
Lupinus micranthus Guss.,
Mentha haplocalyx Briq.,
Fagopyrum esculentum Moench, and natural weeds) in a plot adjacent to the experimental area. The results showed that
B. napus and
T. aestivum were the most effective crops for trapping natural enemies, while natural weeds were not effective in trapping the natural enemies of
A. gossypii [
25]. However, further investigation is needed to understand the mechanism of the effect of trapping plants on the transfer and spread of natural enemies to cotton fields. In parallel, Jiang et al. constructed an XGBoost–GWO–SVR prediction model for cotton aphid populations in 2023, utilizing artificial intelligence methodologies [
34]. Future research will aim to construct cotton growth models, as well as
A. gossypii and natural enemy growth and dispersal models, using a wider range of data. This study also found a positive correlation between
A. gossypii population and temperature, with populations collapsing after prolonged periods of high temperatures [
8]. Therefore, to improve
A.
gossypii prediction models, it is necessary to include meteorological factors, such as temperature and precipitation, in addition to the collection and application of imaging data. It is important to understand the mechanism of these effects, so the model should comprehensively analyze the synergistic effects of these indicators on the population of
A. gossypii and their natural predators.
The manuscript’s studies on the role of the ecological regulation of
A. gossypii in alfalfa traps are still dominated by small plots. Future applied studies should expand to larger regions. This study also proposed a method for reconstructing ground hyperspectral reflectance data from sampling points in cotton fields to generate data for the entire area, providing a new basis for the fine classification of cotton field features. This method can be used to effectively predict
A. gossypii infestations in the study area [
34]. The collected and processed dataset was used to research
A. gossypii identification, prediction, and control. Some deficiencies were identified during the preliminary study of this technology, and further follow-up studies are needed. Additionally, further research is needed to determine the scientifically appropriate number and frequency of alfalfa mowing to maintain low pest levels in cotton fields.