Next Article in Journal
On the Measure Entropy of Additive Cellular Automata f
Previous Article in Journal
Classical and Statistical Thermodynamics. Ashley H. Carter
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Magnetic Field on Entropy Generation Due to Laminar Forced Convection Past a Horizontal Flat Plate

by
Mohammed Q. Al-Odat
1,*,
Renhe A. Damseh
2 and
Moh\'d A. Al-Nimr
3
1
Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering Technology Al-Balqa Applied University, P.O. Box 340558 Amman 11134 Jordan
2
Mechanical Engineering Department, Al-Husn University College Al-Balqa Applied University, Irbid-Jordan
3
Mechanical Engineering Department, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid-Jordan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Entropy 2004, 6(3), 293-303; https://doi.org/10.3390/e6030293
Submission received: 9 February 2004 / Accepted: 5 June 2004 / Published: 5 June 2004

Abstract

:
Magnetic field effect on local entropy generation due to steady two-dimensional laminar forced convection flow past a horizontal plate was numerically investigated. This study was focused on the entropy generation characteristics and its dependency on various dimensionless parameters. The effect of various dimensionless parameters, such as Hartmann number (Ha), Eckert number (Ec), Prandtl number (Pr), Joule heating parameter (R) and the free stream temperature parameter (θ) on the entropy generation characteristics is analyzed. The dimensionless governing equations in Cartesian coordinate were solved by an implicit finite difference technique. The solutions were carried out for Ha2=0.5-3, Ec=0.01-0.05, Pr=1-5 and θ=1.1-2.5. It was found that, the entropy generation increased with increasing Ha, Ec and R. While, increasing the free stream temperature parameter, and Prandtl number tend to decrease the local entropy generation.

Introduction

The optimal design of thermal systems can be achieved by minimizing entropy generation in the systems. This issue has been the topic of great importance in many engineering field such as heat exchangers, cooling of nuclear reactors, MHD power generators, geophysical fluid dynamics, energy storage systems and cooling of electronic devices, etc. Entropy generation is associated with thermodynamics irreversibility, which is common in all types of heat transfer processes. Different sources of irreversibility are responsible for entropy generation such as heat transfer across finite temperature gradient, characteristics of convective heat transfer, magnetic field effect, viscous dissipation effect etc. Entropy generation in thermal engineering systems destroys system available work and thus reduces its efficiency. Bejan [1,2] illustrated that the flow parameter could be selected in order to minimizes the irreversibility associated with a specific convective heat transfer processes. Abu-Hijleh and Heilen [3] investigated entropy generation due to laminar mixed convection from an isothermal rotating cylinder. This study indicated that entropy generation is increased as the Reynolds number and the buoyancy parameter increased. Tasnim et al. [4] presented an analytical work to study the first and second laws (of thermodynamics) characteristics of flow and heat transfer inside a vertical channel made of two parallel plates embedded in a porous medium and under the action of transverse magnetic field. They demonstrated that the group parameter have a significant effect on entropy generation such that the higher values of group parameters cause higher entropy generation. Mahmud and Fraser [5] analyzed the second law (of thermodynamics) characteristics of heat and fluid flow due to forced convection inside a channel with circular cross-section and channel made of two parallel plates. They derived an analytical expression for the entropy generation and Bejan number. Second law analysis of combined heat and mass transfer in internal and external flows was presented by Carrington and Sun [6]. They derived an equation for the entropy generation and discussed the applicability of the resulting equation. Arpaci and Selamet [7] investigated the entropy production in boundary layers. They showed that the entropy generation for forced convective heat transfer is due to temperature gradient and viscosity effect in the fluid. Khalkhali et al. [8] developed a thermodynamic model of conventional cylindrical heat pipes based on the second law of thermodynamics. Their result showed that entropy generation is caused by the temperature difference between the hot and cold reservoirs, the frictional losses in the working fluid flows, and the vapor temperature/pressure drop along the heat pipe. Abu-Hijleh [9] computed entropy generation due to laminar mixed heat convection from an isothermal heated cylinder in an air cross flow for different values of the Reynolds number, buoyancy parameter, and cylinder diameter. His results showed that large cylinder diameters resulted in lower entropy generation. Mahmud and Fraser [10] investigated analytically the effect of radiation heat transfer on mixed convection through a vertical channel in the presence of transverse magnetic field, applying both the first and second law to analyze the problem. They found that the radiation and mixed convection parameters have dominating influence on entropy generation rate than Hartmann number. Haddad et al. [11] considered the local entropy generation of steady two-dimensional symmetric flow past a parabolic cylinder in a uniform stream parallel to its axis. Their results indicated that the thermal entropy generation increased as the temperature difference increased, while the viscous entropy generation decreased as Reynolds number increased. Buhler [12] analyzed the flow of an incompressible, viscous electrically conducting fluid in magnetic field with and without buoyancy effect. Raptis and Kafoussias [13] studied the flow and heat transfer characteristics in the presence of porous medium and magnetic field. Chamkha [14] studied the problem of steady, laminar, free convection flows over vertical porous surface in the presence of magnetic filed and heat generation or absorption. Elbashbeshy [15] investigated heat transfer over a stretching surface with variable and uniform heat flux subjected to suction. The common outcome of references [12,13,14,15] is that the presence of magnetic field tends to slowdown the fluid motion and thus increases the fluid temperature.
The above-mentioned investigations can be classified into two main categories. The first one deals with the effect of magnetic field on the first law (of thermodynamics) characteristics of heat transfer and fluid flow in external or internal flow processes. Whereas, the second category deals just with the second law (of thermodynamics) characteristics of heat transfer and fluid flow in internal flows with magnetic field effect, or in external flow without magnetic field effect. Based on the above brief literature review, there have been no reported investigations, which clarify the magnetic filed effects on the second law (of thermodynamics) characteristics of convective heat transfer in external flow processes. This constitutes the motive of the present study. Therefore, the main objective of this article is to investigate the effect of transverse magnetic field on local entropy generation due to steady two-dimensional laminar forced convection flow past a horizontal plate. In the present work, the full Navier-Stockes equations are solved using an implicit finite difference method to describe laminar forced convection over an isothermal flat plate. The entropy generation rates due to forced convection about a flat plate are computed for different values of Hartmann number (Ha), Eckert number (Ec), Prandtl number (Pr), Joule heating parameter (R) and the temperature difference between the flat plate and the free-stream (θ).

Problem formulation

Consider the two-dimensional steady, laminar MHD forced convection flow of an electrically conducting, incompressible, Newtonian fluid over an isothermal plate in the presence of a transverse magnetic field (By) applied normal to the flow direction. A schematic diagram of the problem under consideration is shown in Figure 1. The fluid is assumed to be incompressible with constant properties. The non-dimensional equations for steady state two-dimensional laminar MHD force convection over a flat plate are given by [16]
U X + V Y = 0
U U X + V U Y = 2 U Y 2 H a 2 U
U θ X + V θ Y = 1 Pr 2 θ Y 2 + E c ( U V ) 2 + R U 2
The dimensionless parameters are defined as:
θ = T T T w T ,    X = x x o ,    Y = y x o    V = v u ,    U = u u ,    x o = υ u , R = σ B y 2 μ ρ 2 C p Δ T ,    E c = U 2 C p Δ T ,    H a 2 = σ B y 2 υ u 2 ρ ,    Δ T = ( T w T ) ,    P r = υ α ,    θ = T Δ T }
Where is (X, Y) are the Cartesian coordinates along and normal to the plate, respectively, and (U, V) are the dimensionless velocity components along X and Y, respectively. θ is the dimensionless temperature, xo is the characteristic length of the plate, (θ) is free stream temperature parameter. Ha, Pr, Ec and R are Prandtl number, Eckert number, Hartmann number, and the Joule heating parameter, respectively. u is the velocity of the potential flow outside the boundary layer.
The physical problem assumes the following dimensionless boundary conditions
U ( 0 , Y ) = 1 ,    V ( 0 , Y ) = 0 ,    θ ( 0 , Y ) = 0 U ( X , 0 ) = 0 ,    V ( X , 0 ) = 0 ,    θ ( X , 0 ) = 1 U ( X , ) = 1 ,    V ( X , ) = 0 ,    θ ( X , ) = 0 }

Entropy generation

Assuming that the fluid is Newtonian and incompressible, and if it obeys the Fourier law of heat conduction, the non-dimensional form of the volumetric rate of local entropy generation in 2-D Cartesian coordinates is [17]:
S m = 1 θ + θ ( U Y ) 2 + 1 Pr E c ( θ + θ ) 2 [ ( θ X ) 2 + ( θ Y ) 2 ] + 1 θ + θ R U 2 E c
The dimensionless volumetric entropy generation is defined as:
S m = s m s o m   where   s o m   is given by   s o m = u 4 μ υ 2 Δ T .
The entropy generation equation consists of three parts, the first part is the irreversibility due to finite temperature gradient and generally termed as heat transfer irreversibility, this part is due to conduction, and the second is due to viscous dissipation while the third is due to Joule heating. Entropy generation is computed after the numerical solution of the velocity and temperature distributions has been obtained.

Solution Methodology

The governing differential equations (1)-(3) along with the boundary conditions Eq. (4) were solved numerically using an implicit finite difference method similar to that described by Patanker [18]. Applying central differences for spatial derivatives in the governing equations, a nonlinear system of equations is generated over a non-uniform grid, to accommodate the steep velocity and temperature at the wall. Non-uniform grid spacing was used in the X-direction with most grids located near the wall and uniform grid was adopted in the Y-direction. Constant step sizes of 0.01 were used in the normal direction (Y) and variable step sizes in longitudinal direction (X) with initial step size of 0.001 and a growth factor of 1.002. Due to nonlinearities of the governing equations, an iterative solution technique is required to solve the resulting system of nonlinear algebraic equations, in this study Gauss-Seidel iterative procedure associated with the relaxation parameters was considered. The computational domain was restricted to finite dimensions. Here, the height of the plate Xmax assumed to be 15. The boundary layer thickness Ymax was taken as 4. The maximum value of Y was chosen as 4 after some preliminary investigations so that, the last two boundary conditions (5) are satisfied (i.e. U → 0, θ → 0 as Y → ∞ ). Underrelaxation is required to secure convergence of the iteration procedure. The range for the Underrelaxation factor is taken as 0.1-0.6 for the velocity and temperature fields. The convergence criteria in iteration is stated as
| ϕ n e w ϕ o l d ϕ n e w | ε
where ϕnew and ϕold denote one of the main variables U, V, and θ and the subscripts new and old denote the values corresponding to the new iteration and old iteration. The value for the tolerance ε is taken as 10-6.
A grid independence study was carried out with 41×41, 61×61, 81×81 mesh size. The results obtained using a finer grid of 81×81 do not reveal discernible changes in the predicted heat transfer and flow field. Thus, due to computational cost and accuracy considerations a 61×61-mesh size was used in this investigation.
In order to assess the accuracy of presented numerical technique, the results obtained by the present method are compared of the classical forced-convection problem past an impermeable flat plate that reported by Kays and Crawford [19]. Table 1 and Table 2 illustrate a comparison for the dimensionless velocity values, and the temperature gradient at the wall θ ’ (0) of the present study in absence of the magnetic field effect and the viscous dissipation (i.e. Ha2=R=Ec=0) with those of ref. [19]. It can be seen that the present results agree very well with the previously published data. This has established confidence in the numerical results presented in this paper.

Results and discussion

Figure 2 shows the dimensionless velocity distributions at different values of Hartmann number (Ha). It is clear that, increase the value of (Ha) have a tendency to slow down the fluid motion. This is because the presence of the transverse magnetic field creates a resistive force similar to the drag force that acts in the opposite direction of the fluid motion, thus causing the velocity of the fluid to decrease. As expected, increasing (Ha) causes the fluid to become warmer and therefore increase its temperature as shown in Figure 3. This behavior is attributed to decrease of the fluid velocity due to the magnetic field.
The effect of Hartmann number (Ha) on the dimensionless volumetric entropy generation profiles is displayed in Figure 4. This figure shows that the entropy generation is slightly increases with Hartmann number. The Hartmann number is not too much dominating on entropy generation. A large variation of (Ha) causes a small variation in the rate of entropy generation.
Figure 5 illustrates the effect of the Joule heating parameter (R) on the dimensionless volumetric entropy generation distributions with Y. From this figure, it can be seen that the local entropy generation increases with R. This behavior may be explained by the fact that the energy loss (exergy destruction) increases with the Joule heating parameter.
The influence of Prandtl number (Pr) on the dimensionless volumetric entropy generation distributions with Y is plotted in Figure 6. As Prandtl number Pr increases the dimensionless volumetric entropy generation distributions decreases. This due to decrease in the temperature gradient with Prandtl number.
Figure 7 shows the influence of Eckert number (Ec) on the dimensionless volumetric entropy generation distributions with Y. It is obvious that the entropy generation increases significantly with Eckert number. This behavior is attributed to the increase of viscous dissipation as Ec increase.
The effect of the free stream temperature parameter (θ) on the dimensionless volumetric entropy generation distributions with Y is plotted in Figure 8. As expected, the volumetric entropy generation decreases as the free stream temperature parameter increases. This can be explained by recalling the definition of θ = T Δ T ; increasing θ could be achieved by decreasing ΔT or increasing the free stream temperature T. Decreasing ΔT tends to decrease heat transfer rate and thus the irreversibilities associated with the heat transfer process. Furthermore, increasing the free stream temperature means a reduction in the temperature difference between the free stream and the plate because the plate temperature is always higher than the free stream temperature

Concluding remarks

This study was focused on the influence of transverse magnetic field effect on local entropy generation of steady two-dimensional laminar forced convection flow past a horizontal plate with a uniform stream parallel to its axis. The factors, which were found to affect the problem under consideration, are Hartmann number (Ha), Eckert number (Ec), Prandtl number (Pr), Joule heating parameter (R) and the free stream temperature parameter (θ). It was found that, the volumetric entropy generation increased with increasing values of Hartmann number, Eckert number, and the Joule heating parameter. Whereas, the local entropy generation decreased as either of the free stream temperature parameter, and the Prandtl number increased. However, Joule heating parameter and Eckert number have dominating effect on local entropy generation than Hartmann number and Prandtl number.

Nomenclature

By
magnetic field flux density
Cp
specific heat of at constant pressure, (kJ/kg. K)
Ec
Eckert Number
g
gravitational acceleration, (m/s2)
Ha
Hartmann number
k
thermal conductivity, (W/m.K)
Pr
Prandtl number
R
Joule heating parameter
s g e n m
entropy generation per unit volume (W/m .K)
s g e n m
dimensionless entropy generation
T
temperature, (K)
T
free stream temperature, (K)
Tw
wall temperature, (K)
u
axial velocity, (m/s)
U
dimensionless axial velocity
v
lateral velocity, (m/s)
V
dimensionless lateral velocity
x, y
coordinates along and normal to the plate, respectively, (m)
X, Y
dimensionless coordinates along and normal to the plate, respectively
x0
reference length, x 0 = υ u
 
Greek Letters
α
thermal diffusivity, (m2/s)
ρ
fluid density, (kg/m3)
σ
fluid electrical conductivity, (Ω-1.m-1)
θ
dimensionless fluid temperature
θ
free stream temperature parameter
μ
dynamic viscosity
υ
kinematic viscosity, (m2/s)
 
Subscripts
w
wall
free stream condition

References

  1. Bejan, A. Second-law analysis in heat transfer and thermal design. Advanced heat transfer 1982, 15, 1–58. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bejan, A. Entropy Generation Minimization; CRC Press: New York, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  3. Abu-Hijleh, B.A.K.; Heilen, W.N. Entropy generation due to laminar natural convection over a heated rotating cylinder. Int. J. Heat and Mass Transfer 1999, 42, 4225–4233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tasnim, S.H.; Mahmud, S.; Mamun, M.A.H. Entropy generation in a porous channel with hydromagnetic effect. Exergy, an Int. J. 2002, 2(4), 300–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mahmud, S.; Fraser, R.A. The second law analysis in fundamental convective heat transfer problems. Int. J. of Therm. Sci. 2003, 42, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Carrington, C.G.; Sun, Z.F. Second law analysis of combined heat and mass transfer in internal flow and external flows. Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow. 1992, 132(1), 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Arpaci, V.S.; Selamet, A. Entropy production in boundary layers. J. Thermophys. Heat Transfer 1990, 4, 404–407. [Google Scholar]
  8. Khalkhali, H.; Faghri, A.; Zuo, Z.J. Entropy generation in a heat pipe system. Applied Thermal Eng. 1999, 19(10), 1027–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abu-Hijleh, B.A.K. Entropy generation in laminar convection from an isothermal cylinder in cross flow. Energy 1998, 23(10), 851–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mahmud, S.; Fraser, R.A. Analysis of mixed convection—Radiation interaction in a vertical channel: Entropy generation. Exergy an Int. J. 2002, 2, 330–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Haddad, O.M.; Abu-Qudais, M.; Abu-Hijleh, B.A.; Maqableh, A.M. Entropy generation due to laminar forced convection flow past a parabolic cylinder. Int. J. of Numerical Methods for Heat and Fluid Flow 2000, 10(7), 770–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Buhler, L. Laminar buoyant magnetohydrodynamics flow in a vertical rectangular ducts. Phys. Fluid 1998, 10, 223–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Raptis, A.; Kafoussias, N. Heat transfer in flow through a porous medium bounded by an infinite vertical plane under the action of magnetic field. Energy Res. 1982, 6, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chamkha, A.J. MHD free convection from a vertical plate in saturated porous medium. Appl. Math. Modeling 1997, 21, 603–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Albshbeshy, E.M.A. Heat transfer over stretching surface with variable heat flux. J. Applied Phy. D 1998, 31, 1951–1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Holman, J.P. Heat Transfer, 7th ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1992; Chapter 12; pp. 617–623. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bejan, A.A. Study of entropy generation in fundamental convective heat transfer. J. Heat Transfer 1979, 101, 718–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Patanker, S. Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow; Hemisphere: New York, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kays, W.M.; Crawford, M.E. Convective Heat and Mass Transfer; McGraw-Hill: New York, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the problem under consideration.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the problem under consideration.
Entropy 06 00293 g001
Figure 2. Dimensionless velocity distribution for different values of Hartmann number (Ha) at the midpoint length of the plate (X=7.5).
Figure 2. Dimensionless velocity distribution for different values of Hartmann number (Ha) at the midpoint length of the plate (X=7.5).
Entropy 06 00293 g002
Figure 3. Dimensionless temperature distribution for different values of Hartmann number (Ha) at the midpoint length of the plate (X=7.5).
Figure 3. Dimensionless temperature distribution for different values of Hartmann number (Ha) at the midpoint length of the plate (X=7.5).
Entropy 06 00293 g003
Figure 4. Dimensionless entropy generation for different values of Hartmann number (Ha) at the end edge of the plate (X=15).
Figure 4. Dimensionless entropy generation for different values of Hartmann number (Ha) at the end edge of the plate (X=15).
Entropy 06 00293 g004
Figure 5. Dimensionless entropy generation for different values of Joule heating factor (R) at the end edge of the plate (X=15).
Figure 5. Dimensionless entropy generation for different values of Joule heating factor (R) at the end edge of the plate (X=15).
Entropy 06 00293 g005
Figure 6. Dimensionless entropy generation for different values of Prandtl numbers (Pr) at the end edge of the plate (X=15).
Figure 6. Dimensionless entropy generation for different values of Prandtl numbers (Pr) at the end edge of the plate (X=15).
Entropy 06 00293 g006
Figure 7. Dimensionless entropy generation for different values of Eckert numbers (Ec) at the end edge of the plate (X=15).
Figure 7. Dimensionless entropy generation for different values of Eckert numbers (Ec) at the end edge of the plate (X=15).
Entropy 06 00293 g007
Figure 8. Dimensionless entropy generation for different values of (θ) at the end edge of the plate(X=15).
Figure 8. Dimensionless entropy generation for different values of (θ) at the end edge of the plate(X=15).
Entropy 06 00293 g008
Table 1. Comparison of the dimensionless velocity U distribution.
Table 1. Comparison of the dimensionless velocity U distribution.
η = Y X U = u u = f ( η ) , Kays and Crawford [19] U = u u , (Present results)
000
0.40.1330.131
0.80.2650.272
1.20.3940.402
1.60.5170.519
2.00.6300.632
2.80.8120.816
3.60.9230.925
4.40.9790.980
4.6------0.994
Table 2. Comparison of the wall temperature gradient θ’ (0) for various values of Pr.
Table 2. Comparison of the wall temperature gradient θ’ (0) for various values of Pr.
Prθ’ (0) , Kays and Crawford [ 19] θ Y Y = 0 , (Present results)
0.50.2590.261
0.70.2920.290
1.00.3320.331
7.00.6450.643
10.00.7300.729
17.00.8350.838

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Al-Odat, M.Q.; Damseh, R.A.; Al-Nimr, M.A. Effect of Magnetic Field on Entropy Generation Due to Laminar Forced Convection Past a Horizontal Flat Plate. Entropy 2004, 6, 293-303. https://doi.org/10.3390/e6030293

AMA Style

Al-Odat MQ, Damseh RA, Al-Nimr MA. Effect of Magnetic Field on Entropy Generation Due to Laminar Forced Convection Past a Horizontal Flat Plate. Entropy. 2004; 6(3):293-303. https://doi.org/10.3390/e6030293

Chicago/Turabian Style

Al-Odat, Mohammed Q., Renhe A. Damseh, and Moh\'d A. Al-Nimr. 2004. "Effect of Magnetic Field on Entropy Generation Due to Laminar Forced Convection Past a Horizontal Flat Plate" Entropy 6, no. 3: 293-303. https://doi.org/10.3390/e6030293

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop