Next Article in Journal
The Spontaneous Origin of New Levels in a Scalar Hierarchy
Previous Article in Journal
Entropy Analysis for Non-Newtonian Fluid Flow in Annular Pipe: Constant Viscosity Case
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optimal Cooling Load and COP Relationship of a Four-Heat-Reservoir Endoreversible Absorption Refrigeration Cycle

1
Faculty 306, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, P.R. China
2
Mechanical Engineering Department, U.S. Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD21402, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Entropy 2004, 6(3), 316-326; https://doi.org/10.3390/e6030316
Submission received: 5 April 2004 / Accepted: 14 June 2004 / Published: 15 June 2004

Abstract

:
On the basis of a four-heat-reservoir endoreversible absorption refrigeration cycle model, another linear heat transfer law [i.e., the heat-flux Q∝∆(T−1) ] is adopted, the fundamental optimal relation between the coefficient of performance (COP) and the cooling load, as well as the maximum cooling load and the corresponding COP of the cycle coupled to constant-temperature heat reservoirs are derived by using finite-time thermodynamics or thermodynamic optimization. The optimal distribution of the heat-transfer surface areas is also obtained. Moreover, the effects of the cycle parameters on the COP and the cooling load of the cycle are studied by detailed numerical examples. The results obtained herein are of importance to the optimal design and performance improvement of an absorption refrigeration cycle.

Introduction

The absorption refrigerators can be driven by ‘low-grade’ heat energy such as waste heat in industries, solar energy and geothermal energy, and have a large potential for reducing the heat pollution for the environment. Thus, absorption refrigerators for industrial and domestic use are generating renewed interest throughout the world. In the last years, finite-time thermodynamics (or endoreversible thermodynamics, or entropy generation minimization, or thermodynamic optimization) [1,2,3,4] was applied to the performance study of absorption refrigerators, and a lot of results, which are different from those by using the classical thermodynamics, have been obtained. Yan et al. [6], Wijeysundera [7, 8], Goktun [9] and Chen et al. [10] analyzed the performance of the three-heat-reservoir endoreversible [6,7,8] and irreversible [9,10] absorption refrigeration cycles with Newton’s heat transfer law. Chen et al. [11,12,13] studied the performance of the three-heat-reservoir endoreversible [11, 12] and irreversible [13] absorption refrigeration cycles with another linear heat transfer law, i.e., linear phenomenological law, Q∝∆(T−1). A three-heat-reservoir absorption refrigerator is a simplified model that the temperature of a condenser is equal to that of an absorber, but a real absorption refrigerator is not. Therefore, a four-heat-reservoir absorption refrigeration cycle model is closer to a real absorption refrigerator. The performance of the four-heat-reservoir absorption refrigeration cycle with Newton’s heat transfer law was studied by Chen [14], Shi et al. [15] and Zheng et al. [16]. Chen [14] deduced the maximum cooling load limit and the corresponding coefficient of performance (COP) of the endoreversible four-heat-reservoir absorption refrigeration cycle with the sole irreversibility of heat transfer, Shi et al. [15] deduced the fundamental optimal relation between the cooling load and the COP of the endoreversible four-heat-reservoir absorption refrigeration cycle with the sole irreversibility of heat transfer, and Zheng et al. [16] deduced the optimal heat transfer surface areas of the four heat exchangers the endoreversible four-heat-reservoir absorption refrigeration cycle with the sole irreversibility of heat transfer. On the basis of these research work, a four-heat-reservoir endoreversible absorption refrigeration cycle with linear phenomenological heat transfer law is established in this paper. The fundamental optimal relation between the COP and the cooling load, as well as the maximum cooling load and the corresponding COP of the cycle are derived. The results can provide the theoretical bases for the optimal design and operation of real absorption refrigerator operating between four temperature levels. The present work is different from a recent work of the authors [17]. In Ref. [17], an endoreversible four-heat-reservoir absorption heat-transformer with Newton’s heat transfer law was established, and the fundamental optimal relation between the COP and the heating load, as well as the maximum heating load and the corresponding COP of the cycle were derived.

Physical Model

A four-heat-reservoir endoreversible absorption refrigeration cycle that consists of a generator, an evaporator, an absorber and a condenser is shown in Fig. 1. The flow of the working fluid in the cycle system is stable and the different parts of the working fluid exchange heat with the heat reservoirs at temperature TH, TL, TO and TM during the full time (cycle period) τ, whereas there are thermal resistances between the working fluid and the external heat reservoirs. Therefore, the corresponding working fluid temperatures are T1, T2, T3 and T4, respectively. Work input required by the solution pump in the system is negligible relative to the energy input to the generator and is often neglected for the purpose of analysis [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. It is assumed that the heat transfers between the working fluid in the heat exchangers and the external heat reservoirs are carried out under a finite temperature difference and obey linear phenomenological heat transfer law [i.e., the heat-flux Q∝∆(T−1) ], and these heat exchange processes are isothermal and the equations of heat transfer may be written as
Q 1 = U 1 A 1 ( T 1 1 T H 1 ) τ
Q 2 = U 2 A 2 ( T 2 1 T L 1 ) τ
Q 3 = U 3 A 3 ( T O 1 T 3 1 ) τ
Q 4 = U 4 A 4 ( T M 1 T 4 1 ) τ
where U1, U2, U3 and U4 are, respectively, the overall heat-transfer coefficients of the generator, evaporator, condenser and absorber; and A1, A2, A3 and A4 are, respectively, the heat-transfer surface areas of the generator, evaporator, condenser and absorber. The overall heat-transfer surface area A is
A = A1 + A2 + A3 + A4

Fundamental Optimal Relation

From the first law of thermodynamics, one has
Q1 + Q2Q3Q4 = 0
From the second law of thermodynamics and the endoreversible property of the cycle, one has
Q 1 T 1 + Q 2 T 2 Q 3 T 3 Q 4 T 4 = 0
Defining the parameter a (the distribution of the total heat reject quantity between the condenser and the absorber)
a = Q4 /Q3
From equations (6) and (7), one can obtain the COP of an endoreversible absorption refrigerator
ε = Q 2 Q 1 = T 3 1 + a T 4 1 ( 1 + a ) T 1 1 ( 1 + a ) T 2 1 T 3 1 a T 4 1
Using equations (1) - (9), the cooling load of the refrigerator can be written as
R = Q 2 τ = A [ ε 1 U 1 ( T 1 1 T H 1 ) + 1 + ε 1 ( 1 + a ) U 3 ( T O 1 T 3 1 ) + a ( 1 + ε 1 ) ( 1 + a ) U 4 ( T M 1 T 4 1 ) + 1 U 2 ( B T L 1 ) ] 1
where B = ( 1 + ε 1 ) ( T 3 1 + a T 4 1 ) ( 1 + a ) ε 1 T 1 1 .
Using equation (10) and the extremal conditions R / ( T 1 1 ) = 0 , R / ( T 3 1 ) = 0 and R / ( T 4 1 ) = 0 , one can derive the temperatures of the working fluid in the generator, absorber, condenser and evaporator, which correspond the optimal cooling load for the given COP. Substituting them into equation (10) yields the fundamental optimal relation between the cooling load and the COP of the four-heat-reservoir endoreversible absorption refrigeration cycle with linear phenomenological heat transfer law as follows
R = A ( 1 + a ) [ ( 1 + ε 1 ) ( a T M 1 + T O 1 ) ( 1 + a ) ( T L 1 + T H 1 ε 1 ) ] [ ( 1 + a ) ( U 2 1 2 + U 1 1 2 ε 1 ) + ( 1 + ε 1 ) ( U 3 1 2 + a U 4 1 2 ) ] 2
Equation (11) is the major results of this paper. It can reveal the Rε characteristics of a four-heat-reservoir endoreversible absorption refrigeration cycle affected by thermal resistance, and some significant results and new bounds may be derived from it.
Using equations (1)-(4), (11), and the temperatures of the working fluid in the generator, absorber, condenser and evaporator which are derived, one can obtain the optimal distribution relation of the heat-transfer surface areas as follows
A 1 A 2 = U 2 1 2 ε U 1 1 2
A 3 A 4 = U 4 1 2 a U 3 1 2
A 1 + A 2 A 3 + A 4 = ( U 1 1 2 + ε U 2 1 2 ) ( 1 + a ) ( U 3 1 2 + U 4 1 2 a ) ( 1 + ε )
From equations (5) and (12)-(14), one can find the relations between the heat-transfer surface areas of each heated exchanger and the total heat-transfer surface area A as follows
A 1 = U 1 1 2 ( 1 + a ) A / [ ( U 1 1 2 + ε U 2 1 2 ) ( 1 + a ) + ( U 3 1 2 + a U 4 1 2 ) ( 1 + ε ) ]
A 2 = ε U 2 1 2 ( 1 + ε ) A / [ ( U 1 1 2 + ε U 2 1 2 ) ( 1 + a ) + ( U 3 1 2 + a U 4 1 2 ) ( 1 + ε ) ]
A 3 = U 3 1 2 ( 1 + ε ) A / [ ( U 1 1 2 + ε U 2 1 2 ) ( 1 + a ) + ( U 3 1 2 + a U 4 1 2 ) ( 1 + ε ) ]
A 4 = a U 4 1 2 ( 1 + ε ) A / [ ( U 1 1 2 + ε U 2 1 2 ) ( 1 + a ) + ( U 3 1 2 + a U 4 1 2 ) ( 1 + ε ) ]

Results and Discussion

1. When R = 0, one can obtain the reversible COP εr of the four-heat-reservoir absorption refrigeration cycle
ε r = a T M 1 + T O 1 ( 1 + a ) T H 1 ( 1 + a ) T L 1 a T M 1 T O 1
It can be seen that the optimal COP of the four-heat-reservoir endoreversible absorption refrigeration cycle can’t exceed the reversible COP εr. This shows that the real absorption refrigerators must decrease the COP level if one wants to obtain some cooling load.
2. When ε < εr, there exists a maximum cooling load. Using equation (11) and the extremal condition R/(ε) = 0, one can obtain
ε R = a T M 1 + T O 1 ( 1 + a ) T H 1 2 ( 1 + a ) T L 1 ( 1 + a ) T H 1 a T M 1 T O 1
and
R m = A ( T L 1 T H 1 ) [ a T M 1 + T O 1 ( 1 + a ) T H 1 ] 2 { [ 2 ( 1 + a ) U 1 1 2 + 2 ( U 3 1 2 + a U 4 1 2 ) ] T L 1 [ ( 1 + a ) ( U 1 1 2 + U 2 1 2 ) + 2 ( U 3 1 2 + a U 4 1 2 ) ] T H 1 + ( U 2 1 2 U 1 1 2 ) ( a T M 1 + T O 1 ) } 2
where Rm is the maximum cooling load, and εR is the corresponding COP. Rm and εR are two important parameters of the four-heat-reservoir endoreversible absorption refrigeration cycle with linear phenomenological heat transfer law, because they determine the upper bound for the cooling load and the lower bound of the COP, and provide a finite-time thermodynamic criteria for the optimal design of real absorption refrigerators, i.e., the real absorption refrigerator design must match the condition εr > ε ≥ εR to make the refrigerator operates under the optimal conditions.
When a = 1, TM = TO and U i (i = 1,2,3,4) = U, the four-heat-reservoir endoreversible absorption refrigeration cycle with linear phenomenological heat transfer law becomes the three-heat-reservoir endoreversible absorption refrigeration cycle with linear phenomenological heat transfer law, and equations (20) and (21) become [11]
ε R ' = T L ( T H T O ) T H ( 2 T O T L ) T O T L
R m ' = U A 16 T L ( T H T O ) 2 T O 2 T H ( T H T L )
3. Defining the ratio x = TO /TL of the temperatures of the condenser to the evaporator, and the ratio y = TH /TM of the temperatures of the generator to the absorption, one can analyze the performance numerically. In the calculation, A = 1100m2, TM = 305K, TL = 273K, U1 = 458.167kWK / m2, U2 = 682.223kWK / m2, U3 = 1622.5kWK / m2 and U4 = 458.167kWK / m2 are set [5, 18].
The influence of a on the optimal cooling load R versus the COP ε of the four-heat-reservoir endoreversible absorption refrigeration cycle with TH = 403K and TO = 313K is shown in Fig. 2. The influence of x on the optimal cooling load R versus the COP ε with TH = 403K and a = 1.5 is shown in Fig. 3. The influence of y on the optimal cooling load R versus the COP ε with TO = 313K and a = 1.5 is shown in Fig. 4. Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4 show that the optimal cooling load R versus the COP ε is a parabolic curve, and there exists a maximum cooling load Rm and the corresponding COP εR. When R < Rm, there exist two different ε for a fixed R, one is larger than εR, and another is smaller than εR. When ε < εR, the COP decreases with the decrease of the cooling load, so the optimal operation range of the COP of the absorption refrigerators should be selected in εr > εεR.
The influences of x on the reversible COP εr, the maximum cooling load Rm and the corresponding COP εR versus a with TH = 403K and y = 1.35 are shown in Fig. 5, Fig. 6 and Fig. 7. Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7 show that for a fixed a, εr, Rm and εR decrease with the increase of x. When a is larger than one in value, the influence of the εr, Rm and εR are less. There is a special point x = 1.1172 for the cycle. When x < 1.1172, εr ≥ 2.0747, εR ≥ 0.5092, both εr and εR decrease with the increase of a; and when x > 1.1172, εr < 2.0747, εR < 0.5092, both εr and εR increase with the increase of a. These imply that εr and εR will reach their asymptotic values, i.e., εr → 2.0747 and εR → 0.5092 when a tends to infinity. Rm decreases with the increase of a, and when a is larger than one in value, the influence of them are less significant.
The influence of y on the reversible COP εr, the maximum cooling load Rm and the corresponding COP εR versus a with TO = 313K and x = 1.14 are shown in Fig. 8, Fig. 9 and Fig. 10. Figure 8, Figure 9 and Figure 10 show that for a fixed a, εr, Rm and εR increase with the increase of y. Here x > 1.1172 holds, Rm decreases with the increase of a, εr and εR increase with the increase of a.
4 The performance optimization can be carried out by optimizing the distribution of the heat exchanger total inventory [19, 20]. Using UA = U1A1 + U2A2 + U3A3 + U4A4 to replace equation (5), i.e. using the distribution of the heat conductances to replace the distribution of the heat-transfer surface areas, one can obtain the optimal distribution relation of the heat conductances as follows
U 1 A 1 U 2 A 2 = ε 1
U 3 A 3 U 4 A 4 = a 1
U1A1 + U2A2 = U3A3 + U4A4
From equations (24)-(26), one can obtain
U1A1 = UA / 2(1 + ε)
U2A2 = εUA / 2(1 + ε)
U3A3 = UA / 2(1 + a)
U4A4 = aUA / 2(1 + a)
The optimal relation between the cooling load and the COP in this case is as following
R = U A 4 [ a T M 1 + T O 1 ( 1 + a ) ( 1 + ε 1 ) T L 1 + T H 1 ε 1 ( 1 + ε 1 ) 2 ]
Using equation (31) and the extremal condition R/(ε) = 0 yields the maximum cooling load Rm and the corresponding COP εR as follows
ε R = a T M 1 + T O 1 ( 1 + a ) T H 1 2 ( 1 + a ) T L 1 ( 1 + a ) T H 1 a T M 1 T O 1
R m = U A [ a T M 1 + T O 1 ( 1 + a ) T H 1 ] 2 16 ( 1 + a ) 2 ( T L 1 T H 1 )

Conclusion

The performance of the four-heat-reservoir endoreversible absorption refrigeration cycle with linear phenomenological heat transfer law is analyzed and optimized by using finite-time thermodynamics in this paper. Moreover, the effects of the cycle parameters on the COP and the cooling load of the cycle are studied by detailed numerical examples. The selection range for the practice parameters of the four-heat-reservoir endoreversible absorption refrigeration cycle with another linear heat transfer law are derived. The results obtain herein have realistic significance and may provide some new theoretical guidance for the optimal design and performance improvement of real absorption refrigerators.

Acknowledgements

This paper is supported by The Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of P. R. China (Project No. 200136) and The National Key Basic Research and Development Program of P. R. China (Project No. G2000026301).

References

  1. Sieniutycz, S.; Shiner, J. S. Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes and Its Relation to Chemical Engineering: Second Law Analyses and Finite Time Thermodynamics. J. Non-Equilib. Thermodyn. 1994, 19, 303–348. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bejan, A. Entropy Generation Minimization: The New Thermodynamics of Finite-Size Device and Finite-Time Processes. J. Appl. Phys. 1996, 79, 1191–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Berry, R. S.; Kazakov, V. A.; Sieniutycz, S.; Szwast, Z.; Tsirlin, A. M. Thermodynamic Optimization of Finite Time Processes; Wiley: Chichester, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, L.; Wu, C.; Sun, F. Finite Time Thermodynamic Optimization or Entropy Generation Minimization of Energy Systems. J. Non-Equilib. Thermodyn. 1999, 24, 327–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gordon, J. M.; Ng, K. C. Cool Thermodynamics; Cambridge Int. Science Publishers: Cambridge, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  6. Yan, Z.; Chen, J. An Optimal Endoreversible Three- Heat-Reservoir Refrigerator. J. Appl. Phys. 1989, 65, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wijeysundera, N. E. Simplied Models for Solar-Powered Absorption Cooling Systems. Renewable Energy 1999, 16, 679–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kodal, A.; Sahin, B.; Ekmekci, I.; Yilmaz, T. Thermoeconomic Optimization for Irreversible Absorption Refrigeration and Heat Pumps. Energy Convers. Mgmt. 2003, 44, 109–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Goktun, S. Optimal Performance of an Irreversible Refrigerator with Three Heat Sources. Energy 1997, 22, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, J.; Wu, C. The Rε Characteristics of a Three- Heat-Source Refrigeration Cycle. Appl. Thermal Engng. 1996, 16, 901–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, L.; Sun, F.; Chen, W. Analysis of the COP of Three-Heat-Reservoir Absorption Refrigeration. Vacuum Cryogenics 1990, 9, 30–33. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen, L.; Sun, F.; Chen, W. Optimal Performance Coefficient and Cooling Load Relationship of a Three- Heat-Reservoir Endoreversible Refrigerator. Int. J. Pow. Energy System 1997, 17, 206–208. [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen, L.; Li, Y.; Sun, F.; Wu, C. Optimal Performance of an Irreversible Absorption Refrigerator with Heat Transfer Law of q ∝ ∆(T−1). Exergy, An Int. J. 2002, 2, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, J. The Optimum Performance Characteristics of a Four-Temperature-Level Irreversible Absorption Refrigerator at Maximum Specific Cooling Load. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 1999, 32, 3085–3091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shi, Q.; Chen, J. The Fundamental Optimum Relation of a Four-Heat-Source Irreversible Absorption Refrigeration System and Its Performance Analysis. Cryogenics 2001, (No.4), 58–64. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  16. Zheng, F.; Chen, G.; Wang, J. The Optimal Heat-Transfer Area of the Four-Heat-Source Endoreversible Absorption Refrigerator. Chinese J Engng. Thermophys. 2002, 23, 1–4. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  17. Qin, X.; Chen, L.; Sun, F.; Wu, C. Optimal Performance of an Endoreversible Four-Heat- Reservoir Absorption Heat-Transformer. Open Systems & Information Dynamics 2004, in press. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wei, C.; Lu, S.; Zhou, Z. Practical Handbook of Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning Engineering; Machinery Industry Publishers: Beijing, 2002. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. Bejan, A.; Vargas, J. V. C. Optimal Allocation of a Heat Exchanger Inventory in Heat Driven Refrigerators. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 1995, 38, 2997–3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sokolov, M.; Vargas, J. V. C.; Bejan, A. Thermodynamic Optimization of Solar-Driven Refrigerators. Trans. ASME J. Sol. Energy Engng. 1996, 118, 130–135. [Google Scholar]
Fig.1. A four-heat-reservoir endoreversible absorption cycle model
Fig.1. A four-heat-reservoir endoreversible absorption cycle model
Entropy 06 00316 g001
Fig.2. The influence of a on the optimal cooling load R versus the COP ε
Fig.2. The influence of a on the optimal cooling load R versus the COP ε
Entropy 06 00316 g002
Fig.3. The influence of x on the optimal cooling load R versus the COP ε
Fig.3. The influence of x on the optimal cooling load R versus the COP ε
Entropy 06 00316 g003
Fig.4. The influence of y on the optimal cooling load R versus the COP ε
Fig.4. The influence of y on the optimal cooling load R versus the COP ε
Entropy 06 00316 g004
Fig.5. The influence of x on the COP εr versus a
Fig.5. The influence of x on the COP εr versus a
Entropy 06 00316 g005
Fig.6. The influence of x on the maximum cooling load Rm versus a
Fig.6. The influence of x on the maximum cooling load Rm versus a
Entropy 06 00316 g006
Fig.7. The influence of x on the COP εR versus a
Fig.7. The influence of x on the COP εR versus a
Entropy 06 00316 g007
Fig.8. The influence of y on the COP εr versus a
Fig.8. The influence of y on the COP εr versus a
Entropy 06 00316 g008
Fig.9. The influence of y on the maximum cooling load Rm versus a
Fig.9. The influence of y on the maximum cooling load Rm versus a
Entropy 06 00316 g009
Fig.10. The influence of y on the COP εR versus a
Fig.10. The influence of y on the COP εR versus a
Entropy 06 00316 g010

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, L.; Zheng, T.; Sun, F.; Wu, C. Optimal Cooling Load and COP Relationship of a Four-Heat-Reservoir Endoreversible Absorption Refrigeration Cycle. Entropy 2004, 6, 316-326. https://doi.org/10.3390/e6030316

AMA Style

Chen L, Zheng T, Sun F, Wu C. Optimal Cooling Load and COP Relationship of a Four-Heat-Reservoir Endoreversible Absorption Refrigeration Cycle. Entropy. 2004; 6(3):316-326. https://doi.org/10.3390/e6030316

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Lingen, Tong Zheng, Fengrui Sun, and Chih Wu. 2004. "Optimal Cooling Load and COP Relationship of a Four-Heat-Reservoir Endoreversible Absorption Refrigeration Cycle" Entropy 6, no. 3: 316-326. https://doi.org/10.3390/e6030316

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop