Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of Main-Chain Chiral Quaternary Ammonium Polymers for Asymmetric Catalysis Using Quaternization Polymerization
Next Article in Special Issue
The Genus Caesalpinia L. (Caesalpiniaceae): Phytochemical and Pharmacological Characteristics
Previous Article in Journal
Design, Synthesis and Antiviral Potential of 14-Aryl/Heteroaryl-14H-dibenzo[a,j]xanthenes Using an Efficient Polymer-Supported Catalyst
Previous Article in Special Issue
Eugenol—From the Remote Maluku Islands to the International Market Place: A Review of a Remarkable and Versatile Molecule
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Novel Furozan-Based Nitric Oxide-Releasing Derivatives of Oridonin as Potential Anti-Tumor Agents

1
Department of Medicinal Chemistry, China Pharmaceutical University, 24 Tongjia Xiang, Nanjing 210009, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University, 24 Tongjia Xiang, Nanjing 210009, China
3
Center of Drug Discovery, China Pharmaceutical University, 24 Tongjia Xiang, Nanjing 210009, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2012, 17(6), 7556-7568; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17067556
Submission received: 25 April 2012 / Revised: 8 June 2012 / Accepted: 12 June 2012 / Published: 18 June 2012
(This article belongs to the Collection Bioactive Compounds)

Abstract

:
To search for novel nitric oxide (NO) releasing anti-tumor agents, a series of novel furoxan/oridonin hybrids were designed and synthesized. Firstly, the nitrate/nitrite levels in the cell lysates were tested by a Griess assay and the results showed that these furoxan-based NO-releasing derivatives could produce high levels of NO in vitro. Then the anti-proliferative activity of these hybrids against four human cancer cell lines was also determined, among which, 9h exhibited the most potential anti-tumor activity with IC50 values of 1.82 µM against K562, 1.81 µM against MGC-803 and 0.86 µM against Bel-7402, respectively. Preliminary structure-activity relationship was concluded based on the experimental data obtained. These results suggested that NO-donor/natural product hybrids may provide a promising approach for the discovery of novel anti-tumor agents.

1. Introduction

Nitric oxide, a special gaseous molecular, is a key mediator involved in many physiological and pathological processes [1,2]. High concentrations of NO and its metabolic derivatives can modify functional proteins, leading to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, particularly in tumor cells [3,4,5]. Indeed, some synthesized NO-releasing compounds have shown cytotoxic activity against human carcinoma cells in vitro and inhibit the growth and metastasis of cancers in vivo [6,7,8]. So, the NO-based anti-cancer agents have been investigating for cancer therapy at clinic [9,10]. Furoxans represent one class of NO donors that can produce high levels of NO and exhibit strong anti-cancer activity [11,12]. In the previous work by our group, several classes of NO-releasing compounds have been reported, which possess strong anti-proliferative activity against human carcinoma cells in vitro, inhibition of cancer cells growth in vivo and the ability to increase sensitivity of Pgp-mediated multidrug resistance (MDR) in solid tumors, separately [13,14,15,16,17]. These results motivated us to further design some novel NO-donor/natural product hybrids.
Oridonin (1, see Figure 1) is a commercially available natural ent-kaurene diterpenoid that has recently attracted much attention because of its anti-tumor activity with a mechanism of inhibition effect on nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) activation, induction of G2/M phase arrest and apoptosis [18]. Oridonin has been safely used for the treatment of hepatoma and promyelocytic leukemia in China for many years. In previous studies, we found that a series of novel 1-O- and 14-O-derivatives of oridonin exhibited stronger cytotoxicity against six cancer cell lines in vitro and some of them had stronger anti-tumor activity than the parent compound 1 and the positive control cyclophosphamide in mice with H22 liver tumor in vivo [19,20,21]. Hence, it may be a desired lead compound using for further design of novel furoxan-based NO-releasing derivatives for the development of anti-tumor agents. Therefore, a series of novel furozan-based nitric oxide-releasing derivatives of oridonin were designed and synthesized.
Figure 1. The structure and atom numbering of oridonin.
Figure 1. The structure and atom numbering of oridonin.
Molecules 17 07556 g001

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis of Furoxan-Based NO Donor

The substituted furoxans were prepared in five steps in the following way (Scheme 1). The starting material benzenethiol (2) was converted to 2-(phenylthio)acetic acid (4) by treatment with chloroacetic acid (3). Then, compound 4 was oxidized by 30% H2O2 aqueous solution to give 2-(phenylsulfonyl) acetic acid (5) and fuming HNO3 was added to obtain diphenylsulfonylfuroxan (6), which was then converted to various monophenylsulfonylfuroxans 7ac by treatment with the corresponding diol. Finally, anhydrides were added and furoxan-based NO donors 8ai were obtained.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of compounds 8ai.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of compounds 8ai.
Molecules 17 07556 g003

2.2. Synthesis of Furoxan/Oridonin Hybrids

The resulting furoxans 8ai were treated with oridonin to give the target compounds 9ai, as shown in Scheme 2.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of compounds 9ai.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of compounds 9ai.
Molecules 17 07556 g004
Treatment of oridonin with 2,2-dimethoxypropane (DMP) in the presence of p-toluenesulfonic acid (TsOH) in acetone afforded 7,14-(1-methylethylene)-dioxyoridonin derivative 10. Compound 10 upon reaction with Ac2O/pyridine yielded 1-O-acetyl derivative 11. Deprotection of 11 with AcOH gave 1-O-acetyl-oridonin 12 in quantitative yield. Target compounds 13ai were prepared by reaction of 12 with furoxan-based NO donors 8ai in the presence of 4-dimethylaminopyridine/1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethyllaminopropyl)carbodiimide hydrochloride (DMAP/EDCI) in CH2Cl2, as shown in Scheme 3.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of compounds 13ai.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of compounds 13ai.
Molecules 17 07556 g005

2.3. NO-Releasing Test of Hybrids 9ai and 13ai in Vitro

The levels of nitrate/nitrite in the lysates of target compounds 9ai and 13ai were determined at 100 μM by Griess assay over a duration of 0–60 min. As shown in Figure 2, variable levels of NO were produced by compounds 9ai and 13ai. The concentration of NO increased with time, and at the time point of 60 min, all tested compounds produced more than 15 μmol/L of NO. The amount of NO released by compounds 13ai (13g with the lowest level of 16.88 μmol/L at the 60 min time point) was less than that of 9ai (9d with the highest level of 45.44 μmol/L at the 60 min time point).
Figure 2. Variable levels of NO produced by compounds (a) 9ai and (b) 13ai.
Figure 2. Variable levels of NO produced by compounds (a) 9ai and (b) 13ai.
Molecules 17 07556 g002

2.4. Anti-proliferative Activity in Vitro

The anti-proliferative activity of oridonin and its NO-donor hybrids 9a-i as well as 1-O-derivatives of oridonin (12) and its NO-donor hybrids 13ai was evaluated against four human cancer cell lines (Bel-7402, K562, MGC-803, CaEs-17) by MTT assay. The results are shown in Table 1 [22]. All the target compounds 9ai and 13ai exhibited stronger anti-proliferative activity than their parent compounds 1 (oridonin) and 12 (1-oxo-oridonin), correspondingly. Among them, 13ai released less NO (Figure 2) and showed less potent anti-proliferative activity than 9ai. For example, 13e with IC50 value of 2.13 µM compared to 9e (1.33 µM) against Bel-7402 cells, 13g with IC50 value of 2.45 µM compared to 9g (1.33 µM) against MGC803 cells, and so on. These results and our previous studies [13,14,15,16,17] indicated that the releasing of NO contributed to anti-proliferative activity and higher levels of NO releasing could produce stronger activity.
Table 1. IC50 values of the furoxan/oridonin hybrids against four human tumor cell lines a.
Table 1. IC50 values of the furoxan/oridonin hybrids against four human tumor cell lines a.
Compd.Bel-7402K562MGC-803CaEs-17
Taxol b1.89 ± 0.090.41 ± 0.02 c0.85 ± 0.06 c0.43 ± 0.03 d
Oridonin7.48 ± 0.534.76 ± 0.325.69 ± 0.3911.03 ± 1.02
9a2.37 ± 0.854.33 ± 0.143.22 ± 0.198.46 ± 0.05
9b1.91 ± 0.093.46 ± 0.602.57 ± 0.076.98 ± 0.20
9c2.23 ± 0.044.02 ± 0.053.46 ± 0.238.17 ± 1.01
9d1.89 ± 0.223.78 ± 0.193.08 ± 0.478.04 ± 0.18
9e1.33 ± 0.152.85 ± 0.032.21 ± 0.166.77 ± 0.32
9f1.97 ± 0.043.72 ± 0.263.23 ± 0.258.09 ± 0.47
9g0.95 ± 0.21 c1.94 ± 0.141.98 ± 0.134.81 ± 0.10 c
9h0.86 ± 0.08 c1.82 ± 0.071.81 ± 0.204.56 ± 0.32 c
9i0.97 ± 0.10 c1.92 ± 0.341.90 ± 0.115.24 ± 0.18
123.21 ± 0.255.06 ± 0.184.05 ± 0.047.24 ± 0.41
13a2.85 ± 0.144.65 ± 0.073.77 ± 0.315.30 ± 0.28
13b2.19 ± 0.193.85 ± 0.062.90 ± 0.124.11 ± 0.07 c
13c2.76 ± 0.424.11 ± 0.153.65 ± 0.405.22 ± 0.12
13d2.70 ± 0.094.08 ± 0.303.64 ± 0.125.38 ± 0.24
13e2.13 ± 0.173.04 ± 0.212.79 ± 0.104.00 ± 0.31 c
13f2.66 ± 0.303.97 ± 0.163.42 ± 0.275.11 ± 0.39
13g1.94 ± 0.132.22 ± 0.292.45 ± 0.513.28 ± 0.06 c
13h1.72 ± 0.082.08 ± 0.342.22 ± 0.293.24 ± 0.23 c
13i1.86 ± 0.152.65 ± 0.082.41 ± 0.163.13 ± 0.21 c
a Results are expressed as IC50 values in µM and the values are means ± SD; n = 3. b Taxol was used as a positive control. c p < 0.05 versus oridonin; d p < 0.01 versus oridonin.
Among the tested compounds, the series 9gi and 13gi with a o-C6H4 linker (R1) (compounds gi) showed lower IC50 values than the corresponding compounds af. Compared the IC50 values of the compounds of series ac with df in different cell lines, there was a decline with the extension of the length of R1. In general, when R1 were aromatic groups (compounds gi), the activity was stronger than those with alkyl groups. While R1 were alkyl groups, IC50 values decreased with lengthening of carbon chain. In almost all cases (except 13h), when the length of R2 is three carbons, more potential anti-proliferative activity was observed than those of two and four carbons, correspondingly (for instance, 9b > 9a and 9c, 9e > 9d and 9f, 9h > 9g and 9i, 13b > 13a and 13c, 13e > 13d and 13f). This suggested that the length of the linker group R2 with three carbons would be more suitable. In all the target synthetic hybrids, compound 9h (R1=o-C6H4; R2=CH2CH2CH2) exhibited the most potential anti-tumor activity against tested cell lines: IC50 values of 0.86 µM against Bel-7402 (stronger than parent compound oridonin of 7.48 µM and positive control taxol of 1.89 µM), 1.82 µM against K562, 1.81 µM against MGC-803 (stronger than oridonin of 5.69 µM) and 4.56 µM against CaEs-17 (stronger than oridonin of 11.03 µM). Subsequent design and synthesis of novel NO releasing anti-tumor agents based on present SAR and more intensive biological studies were undertaking.

3. Experimental

3.1. Chemistry

All commercially available solvents and reagents were used without further purification. Melting points were taken on XT-4 micro melting point apparatus and are uncorrected. Infrared (IR) spectra (KBr pellets) were recorded on a Nicolet Impact 410 instrument (Madison, WI, USA). 1H-NMR spectra were recorded at 300 MHz with a Bruker AV-300 spectrometer (Karlsruhe, Germany) in the indicated solvents (TMS as internal standard): The values of the chemical shifts are expressed in δ values (ppm) and the coupling constants (J) in Hz. Mass spectra were obtained using FTMS-2000 (Madison, WI, USA). HR-MS were obtained using an Agilent QTOF 6520 (Palo Alto, CA, USA). Compounds 24 were commercially available. Compounds 5, 6, 7ac, 10, 11 and 12 were synthesized, as previously described [13,19,20].

3.1.1. General Procedure for the Preparation of 8ai

Compound 7ac (2 mmol) in pyridine (5 mL) was mixed with the corresponding anhydride (4 mmol) by stirring at room temperature for 6–12 h. The mixture was concentrated in vacuo, dissolved in H2O (15 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (15 mL × 3). The organic layers were combined, washed with water and saturated NaCl solution sequentially, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude products 8ai used for the next step without further purification.

3.1.2. General Procedure for the Preparation of 9ai and 13ai

Compounds 8ai (0.24 mmol) were dissolved in CH2Cl2 (10 mL) and stirred at room temperature. Oridonin or its derivative 12 (0.2 mmol), EDCI (93 mg, 0.6 mmol) and DMAP (catalytic amount) were added. After 8–12 h, the reaction mixture was washed with water and saturated NaCl solution sequentially, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude products were purified by column chromatography (MeOH/CH2Cl2 1:200 v/v) to give the title compounds.
ent-1α,6β,7β-Trihydroxy-(14β-O-(4-oxo-butyric acid-(3-phenylsulfonyl-1,2,5-oxadiazole-2-oxide-4) oxyethyl))-15-oxo-7,20-epoxy-16-kaurene (9a). Yield 41%, m.p. 93–95 °C; 1H-NMR (CDCl3), δ (ppm) 1.12 (3H, s, –CH3), 1.25 (3H, s, –CH3), 3.16 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz, 13-CH), 3.49 (1H, m, 1-CH), 3.76 (1H, m, 6-CH), 4.02(1H, s, 1-OH), 4.06, 4.30 (each 1H, dd, JA = JB = 10.2 Hz, 20-CH2), 4.51 (2H, t, J = 4.5 Hz, –CH2), 4.62 (2H, t, J = 4.8 Hz, –CH2), 5.53 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 5.92 (1H, s, 14-CH), 6.04 (1H, d, J = 10.8 Hz, 6-OH), 6.15 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 7.64 (2H, t, J = 7.2 Hz, Ar-H), 7.77 (1H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, Ar-H), 8.07 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz, Ar-H); MS(ESI) m/z: 755.4 [M+Na]+; HR-MS (ESI, M+Na) m/z: calcd for C34H40N2NaO14S: 755.2092, found 755.2095.
ent-1α,6β,7β-Trihydroxy-(14β-O-(4-oxobutyric acid-(3-phenylsulfonyl-1,2,5-oxadiazole-2-oxide-4)-oxypropyl))-15-oxo-7,20-epoxy-16-kaurene (9b). Yield 34%, m.p. 86–88 °C; IR υmax 3419, 2955, 2025, 1736, 1615, 1554, 1451, 1359, 733, 686 cm−1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3), δ (ppm) 1.11 (6H, s, –CH3), 3.14 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz, 13-CH), 3.49 (1H, m, 1-CH), 3.74 (1H, m, 6-CH), 4.07 (1H, s, 1-OH), 4.28 (2H, m, –CH2), 4.06, 4.30 (each 1H, dd, JA = JB = 10.2 Hz, 20-CH2), 4.50 (2H, t, J = 6.0 Hz, –CH2), 5.52 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 5.89 (1H, s, 14-CH), 6.07 (1H, d, J = 10.8 Hz, 6-OH), 6.15 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 7.63 (2H, t, J = 7.8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.77 (1H, t, J = 7.2 Hz, Ar-H), 8.06 (2H, d, J = 7.2 Hz, Ar-H); MS(ESI) m/z: 764.3 [M+NH4]+, 747.3 [M+H]+, 781.4 [M+Cl]; HR-MS (ESI, M+Na) m/z: calcd for C35H42N2NaO14S: 769.2249, found 769.2254.
ent-1α,6β,7β-Trihydroxy-(14β-O-(4-oxobutyric acid-(3-phenylsulfonyl-1,2,5-oxadiazole-2-oxide-4)-oxybutyl))-15-oxo-7,20-epoxy-16-kaurene (9c). Yield 48%, m.p. 83–85 °C; IR υmax 3417, 2955, 2025, 1734, 1635, 1554, 1451, 1367, 733, 686 cm–1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3), δ (ppm) 1.11 (6H, s, –CH3), 3.15 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz, 13-CH), 3.48 (1H, m, 1-CH), 3.75 (1H, m, 6-CH), 4.07 (1H, s, 1-OH), 4.17 (2H, m, –CH2), 4.05, 4.29 (each 1H, dd, JA = JB = 11.1 Hz, 20-CH2), 4.45 (2H, t, J = 6.0 Hz, –CH2), 5.52 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 5.90 (1H, s, 14-CH), 6.06 (1H, d, J = 10.8 Hz, 6–OH), 6.15 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 7.63 (2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, Ar-H), 7.77 (1H, t, J = 7.2 Hz, Ar-H), 8.06 (2H, d, J = 7.2 Hz, Ar-H); MS(ESI) m/z: 778.2 [M+NH4]+, 761.1 [M+H]+, 795.2 [M+Cl]; HR-MS (ESI, M+Na) m/z: calcd for C36H44N2NaO14S: 783.2405, found 783.2411.
ent-1α,6β,7β-Trihydroxy-(14β-O-(5-oxo-pentanoic acid-(3-phenylsulfonyl-1,2,5-oxadiazole-2-oxide-4)-oxyethyl))-15-oxo-7,20-epoxy-16-kaurene (9d). Yield 45%, m.p. 86–89 °C; IR υmax 3405, 2952, 2025, 1739, 1618, 1554, 1451, 1360, 732, 676 cm–1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3), δ (ppm) 1.10 (6H, s, –CH3), 3.16 (1H, d, J = 9.9 Hz, 13-CH), 3.48 (1H, m, 1-CH), 3.73 (1H, m, 6-CH), 4.14 (1H, s, 1-OH), 4.05, 4.30 (each 1H, dd, JA = JB = 10.2 Hz, 20-CH2), 4.47 (2H, m, –CH2), 4.61 (2H, m, –CH2), 5.50 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 5.87 (1H, s, 14-CH), 6.06 (1H, d, J = 10.5 Hz, 6-OH), 6.13 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 7.63 (2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, Ar-H), 7.77 (1H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, Ar-H), 8.06 (2H, d, J = 7.8 Hz, Ar-H); MS(ESI) m/z: 764.0 [M+NH4]+, 747.1 [M+H]+, 781.2 [M+Cl]; HR-MS (ESI, M+Na) m/z: calcd for C35H42N2NaO14S: 769.2249, found 769.225.
ent-1α,6β,7β-Trihydroxy-(14β-O-(5-oxopentanoic acid-(3-phenylsulfonyl-1,2,5-oxadiazole-2-oxide-4)-oxypropyl))-15-oxo-7,20-epoxy-16-kaurene (9e). Yield 42%, m.p. 80–82 °C; IR υmax 3439, 2954, 2025, 1734, 1615, 1554, 1452, 1383, 733, 686 cm–1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3), δ (ppm) 1.11 (6H, s, –CH3), 3.16 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz, 13-CH), 3.50 (1H, m, 1-CH), 3.75 (1H, m, 6-CH), 4.07, 4.30 (each 1H, dd, JA = JB = 10.8 Hz, 20-CH2), 4.25 (2H, t, J = 6.0 Hz, –CH2), 4.50 (2H, t, J = 6.0 Hz, –CH2), 5.51 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 5.87 (1H, s, 14-CH), 6.05 (1H, d, J = 10.5 Hz, 6–OH), 6.14 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 7.63 (2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, Ar-H), 7.77 (1H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, Ar-H), 8.05 (2H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, Ar-H); MS(ESI) m/z: 778.3 [M+NH4]+, 761.3 [M+H]+, 795.4 [M+Cl]; HR-MS (ESI, M+Na) m/z: calcd for C36H44N2NaO14S: 783.2405, found 783.2419.
ent-1α,6β,7β-Trihydroxy-(14β-O-(5-oxo-pentanoic acid-(3-phenylsulfonyl-1,2,5-oxadiazole-2-oxide-4)-oxybutyl))-15-oxo-7,20-epoxy-16-kaurene (9f). Yield 37%, m.p. 92–94 °C; IR υmax 3440, 2955, 2025, 1733, 1615, 1554, 1451, 1367, 732, 686 cm–1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3), δ (ppm) 1.11 (6H, s, –CH3), 3.39 (1H, d, J = 9.9 Hz, 13-CH), 3.50 (1H, m, 1-CH), 3.76 (1H, m, 6-CH), 4.06 (1H, s, 1-OH), 4.08, 4.34 (each 1H, dd, JA = JB = 10.2 Hz, 20-CH2), 4.46 (1H, m, –CH2), 4.57 (1H, m, –CH2), 4.58 (2H, m, –CH2), 5.56 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 6.05 (1H, d, J = 10.5 Hz, 6-OH), 6.07 (1H, s, 14-CH), 6.17 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 7.52 (2H, m, Ar-H), 7.57 (3H, m, Ar-H), 7.75 (2H, m, Ar-H), 8.06 (2H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, Ar-H); MS(ESI) m/z: 792.3 [M+NH4]+, 775.5 [M+H]+, 809.6 [M+Cl]; HR-MS (ESI, M+Na) m/z: calcd for C37H46N2NaO14S: 797.2562, found 797.2565.
ent-1α,6β,7β-Trihydroxy-(14β-O-(2-formyl benzoic acid-(3-phenylsulfonyl-1,2,5-oxadiazole-2-oxide-4)-oxyethyl))-15-oxo-7,20-epoxy-16-kaurene (9g). Yield 53%, m.p. 123–125 °C; IR υmax 3392, 2951, 2025, 1714, 1618, 1553, 1451, 1363, 739, 685 cm–1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3), δ (ppm) 1.09 (6H, s, –CH3), 3.37 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz, 13-CH), 3.50 (1H, m, 1-CH), 3.72 (1H, m, 6-CH), 4.05 (1H, s, 1–OH), 4.07, 4.36 (each 1H, dd, JA = JB = 10.2 HZ, 20-CH2), 4.67 (2H, m, –CH2), 4.76 (2H, m, –CH2), 5.54 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 6.04 (1H, d, J = 12.0 Hz, 6-OH), 6.07 (1H, s, 14-CH), 6.14 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 7.46 (2H, t, J = 7.8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.58 (4H, m, Ar-H), 7.78 (1H, m, Ar-H), 8.01 (2H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, Ar-H); MS(ESI) m/z: 798.3 [M+NH4]+, 781.2 [M+H]+, 815.3 [M+Cl]; HR-MS (ESI, M+Na) m/z: calcd for C38H40N2NaO14S: 803.2092, found 755.2093.
ent-1α,6β,7β-Trihydroxy-(14β-O-(2-formyl benzoic acid-(3-phenylsulfonyl-1,2,5-oxadiazole-2-oxide-4)-oxypropyl))-15-oxo-7,20-epoxy-16-kaurene (9h). Yield 47%, m.p. 113–115 °C; IR υmax 3418, 2954, 2025, 1714, 1616, 1554, 1451, 1384, 736, 685 cm–1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3), δ (ppm) 1.11 (6H, s, –CH3), 3.39 (1H, d, J = 9.9 Hz, 13-CH), 3.50 (1H, m, 1-CH), 3.76 (1H, m, 6-CH), 4.06 (1H, s, 1-OH), 4.08, 4.34 (each 1H, dd, JA = JB = 10.2 Hz, 20-CH2), 4.46 (1H, m, –CH2), 4.57 (1H, m, –CH2), 4.58 (2H, m, –CH2), 5.56 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 6.05 (1H, d, J = 10.5 Hz, 6-OH), 6.07 (1H, s, 14-CH), 6.17 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 7.52 (2H, m, Ar-H), 7.57 (3H, m, Ar-H), 7.75 (2H, m, Ar-H), 8.06 (2H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, Ar-H); MS(ESI) m/z: 812.3 [M+NH4]+, 795.3 [M+H]+, 829.4 [M+Cl]; HR-MS (ESI, M+Na) m/z: calcd for C39H42N2NaO14S: 817.2249, found 755.2252.
ent-1α,6β,7β-Trihydroxy-(14β-O-(2-formylbenzoic acid-(3-phenylsulfonyl-1,2,5-oxadiazole-2-oxide-4)-oxybutyl))-15-oxo-7,20-epoxy-16-kaurene (9i). Yield 50%, m.p. 108–110 °C; IR υmax 3384, 2952, 2025, 1715, 1615, 1553, 1450, 1368, 734, 685 cm–1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3), δ (ppm) 1.10 (6H, s, –CH3), 3.32 (1H, d, J = 9.9 Hz, 13-CH), 3.50 (1H, m, 1-CH), 3.76 (1H, m, 6-CH), 4.08, 4.34 (each 1H, dd, JA = JB = 8.4 HZ, 20-CH2), 4.44 (2H, m, –CH2), 4.50 (2H, t, J = 5.4 Hz, –CH2), 5.30 (1H, s, 1-OH), 5.56 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 6.04 (1H, d, J = 10.5 Hz, 6-OH), 6.09 (1H, s, 14-CH), 6.61 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 7.53 (3H, m, Ar-H), 7.61 (2H, m, Ar-H), 7.76 (2H, m, Ar-H), 8.06 (2H, d, J = 7.8 Hz, Ar-H); MS(ESI) m/z: 826.1 [M+NH4]+, 809.0 [M+H]+, 843.3 [M+Cl]; HR-MS (ESI, M+Na) m/z: calcd for C40H44N2NaO14S: 831.2405, found 831.2411.
ent-(1α-O-Acetyl)-6β,7β-dihydroxy-(14β-O-(4-oxobutyric acid-(3-phenylsulfonyl-1,2,5-oxadiazole-2-oxide-4)-oxyethyl))-15-oxo-7,20-epoxy-16-kaurene (13a). Yield 40%, m.p. 105–107 °C; IR υmax 3384, 2958, 2025, 1739, 1618, 1554, 1452, 1363, 732, 686 cm–1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3), δ (ppm) 1.12 (6H, s, –CH3), 2.17 (3H, s, –CH3), 3.13 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz, 13-CH), 3.76 (1H, m, 6-CH), 4.17, 4.28 (each 1H, dd, JA = JB = 10, 5 Hz, 20-CH2), 4.51 (2H, m, –CH2), 4.61 (1H, m, 1-CH), 4.62 (2H, m, –CH2), 5.52 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 5.87 (1H, s, 14-CH), 6.09 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz, 6–OH), 6.15 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 7.63 (2H, t, J = 7.2 Hz, Ar-H), 7.91 (1H, t, J = 7.8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.07 (2H, d, J = 7.2 Hz, Ar-H); MS(ESI) m/z: 775.3 [M+H]+, 809.4 [M+Cl]; HR-MS (ESI, M+Na) m/z: calcd for C36H42N2NaO15S: 797.2198, found 797.2207.
ent-(1α-O-Acetyl)-6β,7β-dihydroxy-(14β-O-(4-oxobutyric acid-(3-phenylsulfonyl-1,2,5-oxadiazole-2-oxide-4)-oxypropyl))-15-oxo-7,20-epoxy-16-kaurene (13b). Yield 51%, m.p. 95–97 °C; IR υmax 3383, 2957, 2025, 1738, 1615, 1554, 1452, 1373, 733, 686 cm–1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3), δ (ppm) 1.12 (6H, s, –CH3), 1.99 (3H, s, –CH3), 3.12 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz, 13-CH), 3.77 (1H, m, 6-CH), 4.31 (2H, m, –CH2), 4.17, 4.34 (each 1H, dd, JA = JB = 10.2 Hz, 20-CH2), 4.51 (2H, t, J = 6.0 Hz, –CH2), 4.62 (1H, m, 1-CH), 5.52 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 5.85 (1H, s, 14-CH), 6.12 (1H, d, J = 11.1 Hz, 6–OH), 6.15 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 7.64 (2H, t, J = 7.8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.77 (1H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, Ar-H), 8.06 (2H, d, J = 7.2 Hz, Ar-H); MS(ESI) m/z: 806.3 [M+NH4]+, 789.3 [M+H]+, 823.3 [M+Cl]; HR-MS (ESI, M+Na) m/z: calcd for C37H44N2NaO15S: 811.2355, found 811.2362.
ent-(1α-O-Acetyl)-6β,7β-dihydroxy-(14β-O-(4-oxobutyric acid-(3-phenylsulfonyl-1,2,5-oxadiazole-2-oxide-4)-oxybutyl))-15-oxo-7,20-epoxy-16-kaurene (13c). Yield 48%, m.p. 109–111 °C; IR υmax 3385, 2957, 2025, 1737, 1616, 1554, 1451, 1371, 733, 686 cm–1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3), δ (ppm) 1.12 (6H, s, –CH3), 1.99 (3H, s, CH3), 3.13 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz, 13-CH), 3.78 (1H, m, 6-CH), 4.19 (2H, m, –CH2), 4.11, 4.27 (each 1H, dd, JA = JB = 10.5 Hz, 20-CH2), 4.46 (2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, –CH2), 4.62 (1H, m, 1-CH), 5.53 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 5.88 (1H, s, 14-CH), 6.11 (1H, d, J = 10.5 Hz, 6–OH), 6.16 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 7.64 (2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, Ar-H), 7.78 (1H, t, J = 7.2 Hz, Ar-H), 8.07 (2H, d, J = 7.8 Hz, Ar-H); MS(ESI) m/z: 820.4 [M+NH4]+, 803.3 [M+H]+, 837.3 [M+Cl]; HR-MS (ESI, M+Na) m/z: calcd for C38H46N2NaO15S: 825.2511, found 825.2525.
ent-(1α-O-Acetyl)-6β,7β-dihydroxy-(14β-O-(4-oxopentanoic acid-(3-phenylsulfonyl-1,2,5-oxadiazole-2-oxide-4)-oxyethyl))-15-oxo-7,20-epoxy-16-kaurene (13d). Yield 42%, m.p. 92–94 °C; IR υmax 3530, 3386, 2956, 2025, 1738, 1618, 1553, 1451, 731, 686 cm–1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3), δ (ppm) 1.12 (6H, s, CH3), 1.99 (3H, s, –CH3), 3.16 (1H, d, J = 9.9 Hz, 13-CH), 3.75 (1H, m, 6-CH), 4.17, 4.27 (each 1H, dd, JA = JB = 10.5 Hz, 20-CH2), 4.49 (2H, m, –CH2), 4.61 (2H, m, –CH2), 5.50 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 5.83 (1H, s, 14-CH), 6.06 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz, 6–OH), 6.13 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 7.63 (2H, t, J = 7.8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.76 (1H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, Ar-H), 8.06 (2H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, Ar-H); MS(ESI) m/z: 806.4 [M+NH4]+, 789.2 [M+H]+, 823.3 [M+Cl]; HR-MS (ESI, M+Na) m/z: calcd for C37H44N2NaO15S: 811.2355, found 811.2367.
ent-(1α-O-Acetyl)-6β,7β-dihydroxy-(14β-O-(5-oxopentanoic acid-(3-phenylsulfonyl-1,2,5-oxadiazole-2-oxide-4)-oxypropyl))-15-oxo-7,20-epoxy-16-kaurene (13e). Yield 36%, m.p. 86–88 °C; IR υmax 3421, 2958, 2025, 1737, 1616, 1554, 1452, 1374, 732, 686 cm–1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3), δ (ppm) 1.12 (6H, s, –CH3), 2.19 (3H, s, –CH3), 3.16 (1H, d, J = 10.2 Hz, 13-CH), 3.77 (1H, m, 6-CH), 4.20, 4.38 (each 1H, dd, JA = JB = 10.5 Hz, 20-CH2), 4.26 (2H, t, J = 6.0 Hz, –CH2), 4.50 (2H, t, J = 6.0 Hz, –CH2), 4.62 (1H, m, 1-CH), 5.52 (1H, s, 14-CH), 5.83 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 6.06 (1H, d, J = 10.5 Hz, 6–OH), 6.15 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 7.63 (2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, Ar-H), 7.77 (1H, t, J = 7.2 Hz, Ar-H), 8.06 (2H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, Ar-H); MS(ESI) m/z: 803.3 [M+H]+, 837.4 [M+Cl]; HR-MS (ESI, M+Na) m/z: calcd for C38H46N2NaO15S: 825.2511, found 825.2523.
ent-(1α-O-Acetyl)-6β,7β-dihydroxy-(14β-O-(5-oxopentanoic acid-(3-phenylsulfonyl-1,2,5-oxadiazole-2-oxide-4)-oxybutyl))-15-oxo-7,20-epoxy-16-kaurene (13f). Yield 40%, m.p. 98–101 °C; IR υmax 3394, 2957, 2025, 1737, 1617, 1554, 1451, 1373, 732, 686 cm–1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3), δ (ppm) 1.12 (6H, s, –CH3), 2.35 (3H, s, –CH3), 3.17 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz, 13-CH), 3.76 (1H, m, 6-CH), 4.20 (2H, t, J = 6.0 Hz, –CH2), 4.18, 4.27 (each 1H, dd, JA = JB = 10.2 Hz, 20-CH2), 4.46 (2H, t, J = 5.7 Hz, –CH2), 4.61 (1H, m, 1-CH), 5.52 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 5.83 (1H, s, 14-CH), 6.07 (1H, d, J = 10.2 Hz, 6–OH), 6.15 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 7.63 (2H, t, J = 7.2 Hz, Ar-H), 7.74 (1H, t, J = 7.8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.05 (2H, d, J = 7.2 Hz, Ar-H); MS(ESI) m/z: 834.4 [M+NH4]+, 817.3 [M+H]+, 851.3 [M+Cl]; HR-MS (ESI, M+Na) m/z: calcd for C39H48N2NaO15S: 839.2668, found 839.2679.
ent-(1α-O-Acetyl)-6β,7β-dihydroxy-(14β-O-(3-formylbenzoic acid-(3-phenylsulfonyl-1,2,5-oxadiazole-2-oxide-4)-oxyethyl))-15-oxo-7,20-epoxy-16-kaurene (13g). Yield 46%, m.p. 154–156 °C; IR υmax 3383, 2957, 2025, 1736, 1617, 1554, 1451, 1364, 739, 685 cm–1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3), δ (ppm) 1.12 (6H, s, –CH3), 2.01 (3H, s, CH3), 3.36 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz, 13-CH), 3.75 (1H, m, 6-CH), 4.19, 4.36 (each 1H, dd, JA = JB = 10.5 Hz, 20-CH2), 4.64 (2H, m, –CH2), 4.79 (2H, m, –CH2), 4.82 (1H, m, 1-CH), 5.54 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 6.02 (1H, s, 14-CH), 6.03 (1H, d, J = 10.5 Hz, 6–OH), 6.15 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 7.44 (2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, Ar-H), 7.79 (1H, m, Ar-H), 7.58 (4H, m, Ar-H), 8.03 (2H, d, J = 7.8 Hz, Ar-H); MS(ESI) m/z: 840.2 [M+NH4]+, 823.2 [M+H]+, 857.3 [M+Cl]; HR-MS (ESI, M+Na) m/z: calcd for C40H42N2NaO15S: 845.2198, found 845.2208.
ent-(1α-O-Acetyl)-6β,7β-dihydroxy-(14β-O-(3-formylbenzoic acid-(3-phenylsulfonyl-1,2,5-oxadiazole-2-oxide-4)-oxypropyl))-15-oxo-7,20-epoxy-16-kaurene (13h). Yield 52%, m.p. 136–138 °C; IR υmax 3379, 2957, 2025, 1735, 1616, 1554, 1451, 1374, 738, 685 cm–1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3), δ (ppm) 1.12 (6H, s, –CH3), 2.02 (3H, s, –CH3), 3.33 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz, 13-CH), 3.78 (1H, m, 6-CH), 4.22, 4.34 (each 1H, dd, JA = JB = 8.7 Hz, 20-CH2), 4.45 (1H, m, –CH2), 4.57 (1H, m, –CH2), 4.61 (2H, m, –CH2), 4.64 (1H, m, 1-CH), 5.56 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 6.02 (1H, s, 14-CH), 6.10 (1H, d, J = 10.5 Hz, 6–OH), 6.17 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 7.53 (2H, m, Ar-H), 7.62 (3H, m, Ar-H), 7.72 (2H, m, Ar-H), 8.09 (2H, d, J = 7.8 Hz, Ar-H); MS(ESI) m/z: 854.3 [M+NH4]+, 837.2 [M+H]+, 871.3 [M+Cl]; HR-MS (ESI, M+Na) m/z: calcd for C41H44N2NaO15S: 859.2355, found 859.2368.
ent-(1α-O-Acetyl)-6β,7β-dihydroxy-(14β-O-(2-formylbenzoic acid-(3-phenylsulfonyl-1,2,5-oxadiazole-2-oxide-4)-oxybutyl))-15-oxo-7,20-epoxy-16-kaurene (13i). Yield 45%, m.p. 116–118 °C; IR υmax 3382, 2958, 2025, 1726, 1616, 1553, 1451, 1373, 733, 685 cm–1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3), δ (ppm) 1.12 (6H, s, –CH3), 1.97 (3H, s, –CH3), 3.45 (1H, d, J = 9.9 Hz, 13-CH), 3.77 (1H, m, 6-CH), 4.21, 4.33 (each 1H, dd, JA = JB = 10.5 Hz, 20-CH2), 4.43 (2H, m, –CH2), 4.50 (2H, t, J = 5.7 Hz, –CH2), 4.64 (1H, m, 1-CH), 5.57 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 6.07 (1H, s, 14-CH), 6.07 (1H, d, J = 10.2 Hz, 6–OH), 6.16 (1H, s, 17-CH2), 7.54 (3H, m, Ar-H), 7.61 (2H, t, J = 7.8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.77 (2H, m, Ar-H), 8.06 (2H, d, J = 7.2 Hz, Ar-H); MS(ESI) m/z: 868.3 [M+NH4]+, 885.4 [M+Cl]; HR-MS (ESI, M+Na) m/z: calcd for C42H46N2NaO15S: 873.2511, found 873.2527.

3.2. In Vitro MTT Assay

The MTT assay was employed as an in vitro cytotoxicity assay, which was performed in 96-well plates. Test cells at the log phase of their growth cycle (5 × 104 cell/mL) were added to each well (100 µL/well), then treated in three replicates at various concentrations of the samples (0.39–100 µg/mL), and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. After 72 h, 20 µL of MTT solution (5 mg/mL) per well was added to each cultured medium, which was incubated for further 4 h. Then, DMSO was added to each well (150 µL/well). After 10 min at room temperature, the OD of each well was measured on a Microplate Reader (BIO-RAD instruments Inc. No. 550, Hercules, CA, USA) at a wavelength of 490 nm. In these experiments, the negative reference was 0.1% DMSO, and taxol was used as the positive reference with the concentration of 10 µg/mL.

3.3. NO-Releasing Test: Nitrate/Nitrite Measurement in Vitro

The levels of nitrate/nitrite formed from individual compounds were determined by the colorimetric assay using the nitrate/nitrite colorimetric assay kit, in triplicate with 100 μM of individual compounds for 0–60 min according to the manufacturer's instructions (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). The lysates were mixed with Griess for 40 min and centrifugalized for 10 min, and then followed by measuring at 540 nm, similar as previously reported [13,14,15,16,17].

4. Conclusions

In summary, a series of novel furoxan/oridonin hybrids were synthesized and tested for anti-proliferative activity against four human cancer cell lines by an in vitro MTT assay. Among them, compound 9h exhibited the most potential anti-tumor activity against all test cell lines. The preliminary SAR of the target compounds was discussed based on the experimental data obtained. Furthermore, more than 15 μmol/L NO were produced by all target compounds at the 60 min time point, and the results showed that higher levels of NO releasing produced stronger anti-proliferative activity, so high levels of NO release by these hybrids could play a role in growth inhibition activity. These results suggested that NO-donor/natural product hybrids may provide a promising approach for the discovery of novel anti-tumor agents. Further studies on the structure modification of these hybrids and the mechanism of the derivatives are currently in progress and will be reported in due course.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grant from National Natural Science Fund (No. 30973610), Key Fund of Ministry of Education of China (No. 108069), Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (No. 20100096110001), Project for Research and Innovation of Graduates in Universities of Jiangsu Province (CXZZ11-0800) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (JKY2011030) for financial assistance.

References and Notes

  1. Mocellin, S. Nitric oxide: Cancer target or anticancer agent? Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 2009, 9, 214–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ignarro, L.J. Signal transduction mechanisms involving nitric oxide. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1991, 41, 485–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fukuto, J.M.; Wink, D.A. Nitric oxide (NO): Formation and biological roles in mammalian systems. Met. Ions Biol. Syst. 1999, 36, 547–595. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wink, D.A.; Ridnour, L.A.; Hussain, S.P.; Harris, C.C. The reemergence of nitric oxide and cancer. Nitric Oxide 2008, 19, 65–67. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hirst, D.; Robson, T. Nitric oxide in cancer therapeutics: Interaction with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2010, 16, 411–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Millet, A.; Bettaieb, A.; Renaud, F.; Prevotat, L.; Hammann, A.; Solary, E.; Mignotte, B.; Jeannin, J.F. Influence of the nitric oxide donor glyceryl trinitrate on apoptotic pathways in human colon cancer cells. Gastroenterology 2002, 123, 235–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Postovit, L.M.; Adams, M.A.; Lash, G.E.; Heaton, J.P.; Graham, C.H. Nitric oxide-mediated regulation of hypoxia-induced B16F10 melanoma metastasis. Int. J. Cancer 2004, 108, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Findlay, V.J.; Townsend, D.M.; Saavedra, J.E.; Buzard, G.S.; Citro, M.L.; Keefer, L.K.; Ji, X.; Tew, K.D. Tumor cell responses to a novel glutathione S-transferase-activated nitric oxide-releasing prodrug. Mol. Pharmacol. 2004, 65, 1070–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yasuda, H.; Yamaya, M.; Nakayama, K.; Sasaki, T.; Ebihara, H.; Kanda, A.; Asada, M.; Inoue, D.; Suzuki, T.; Okazaki, T.; et al. Randomized phase II trial comparing nitroglycerin plus vinorelbine and cisplatin with vinorelbine and cisplatin alone in previously untreated stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006, 24, 688–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Siemens, D.R.; Heaton, J.P.; Adams, M.A.; Kawakami, J.; Graham, C.H. Phase II study of nitric oxide donor for men with increasing prostate-specific antigen level after surgery or radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Urology 2009, 74, 878–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Moharram, S.; Zhou, A.; Wiebe, L.I.; Knaus, E.E. Design and synthesis of 3'- and 5'-O-(3-benzenesulfonylfuroxan-4-yl)-2'-deoxyuridines: Biological evaluation as hybrid nitric oxide donor-nucleoside anticancer agents. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 1840–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Maksimovic-Ivanic, D.; Mijatovic, S.; Harhaji, L.; Miljkovic, D.; Dabideen, D.; Fan Cheng, K.; Mangano, K.; Malaponte, G.; Al-Abed, Y.; Libra, M.; et al. Anticancer properties of the novel nitric oxide-donating compound (S,R)-3-phenyl-4,5-dihydro-5-isoxazole acetic acid-nitric oxide in vitro and in vivo. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2008, 7, 510–520. [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen, L.; Zhang, Y.; Kong, X.; Lan, E.; Huang, Z.; Peng, S.; Kaufman, D.L.; Tian, J. Design, synthesis, and antihepatocellular carcinoma activity of nitric oxide releasing derivatives of oleanolic acid. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 4834–4838. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lai, Y.; Shen, L.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, W.; Zhang, Y.; Ji, H.; Tian, J. Synthesis and biological evaluation of furoxan-based nitric oxide-releasing derivatives of glycyrrhetinic acid as anti-hepatocellular carcinoma agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 6416–6420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ling, Y.; Ye, X.; Ji, H.; Zhang, Y.; Lai, Y.; Peng, S.; Tian, J. Synthesis and evaluation of nitric oxide-releasing derivatives of farnesylthiosalicylic acid as anti-tumor agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 3448–3456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ling, Y.; Ye, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Lai, Y.; Ji, H.; Peng, S.; Tian, J. Novel nitric oxide-releasing derivatives of farnesylthiosalicylic acid: Synthesis and evaluation of antihepatocellular carcinoma activity. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 3251–3259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tang, X.; Gu, X.; Ai, H.; Wang, G.; Peng, H.; Lai, Y.; Zhang, Y. Synthesis and evaluation of nitric oxide-releasing DDB derivatives as potential Pgp-mediated MDR reversal agents in MCF-7/Adr cells. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 22, 801–805. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kang, N.; Zhang, J.H.; Qiu, F.; Chen, S.; Tashiro, S.; Onodera, S.; Ikejima, T. Induction of G(2)/M phase arrest and apoptosis by oridonin in human laryngeal carcinoma cells. J. Nat. Prod. 2010, 73, 1058–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xu, J.; Yang, J.; Ran, Q.; Wang, L.; Liu, J.; Wang, Z.; Wu, X.; Hua, W.; Yuan, S.; Zhang, L.; et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel 1-O- and 14-O-derivatives of oridonin as potential anticancer drug candidates. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 4741–4744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, L.; Ran, Q.; Li, D.; Yao, H.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, S.; Zhang, L.; Shen, M.; Xu, J. Synthesis and anti-tumor activity of 14-O-derivatives of natural oridonin. Chin. J. Nat. Med. 2011, 9, 194–198. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang, L.; Li, D.; Wang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, J. Recent progress in the development of natural ent-kaurane diterpenoids with anti-tumor activity. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2011, 11, 910–919. [Google Scholar]
  22. Wang, L.; Li, D.; Xu, S.; Cai, H.; Yao, H.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, J.; Xu, J. The conversion of oridonin to spirolactone-type or enmein-type diterpenoid: Synthesis and biological evaluation of ent-6,7-seco-oridonin derivatives as novel potential anticancer agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 52, 242–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  • Sample Availability: Contact the first authors.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, D.; Wang, L.; Cai, H.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, J. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Novel Furozan-Based Nitric Oxide-Releasing Derivatives of Oridonin as Potential Anti-Tumor Agents. Molecules 2012, 17, 7556-7568. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17067556

AMA Style

Li D, Wang L, Cai H, Zhang Y, Xu J. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Novel Furozan-Based Nitric Oxide-Releasing Derivatives of Oridonin as Potential Anti-Tumor Agents. Molecules. 2012; 17(6):7556-7568. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17067556

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Dahong, Lei Wang, Hao Cai, Yihua Zhang, and Jinyi Xu. 2012. "Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Novel Furozan-Based Nitric Oxide-Releasing Derivatives of Oridonin as Potential Anti-Tumor Agents" Molecules 17, no. 6: 7556-7568. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17067556

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop