Next Article in Journal
Phenolic Antioxidants Isolated from the Flowers of Osmanthus fragrans
Previous Article in Journal
An Improved Synthesis of 1,2-Diarylethanols under Conventional Heating and Ultrasound Irradiation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development and Characterization of EST-SSR Markers from Scapharca broughtonii and Their Transferability in Scapharca subcrenata and Tegillarca granosa

1
College of Fisheries and Life Science, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian 116023, China
2
Key Laboratory of Sustainable Development of Marine Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China
3
College of Fisheries and Life Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2012, 17(9), 10716-10723; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules170910716
Submission received: 4 June 2012 / Revised: 23 August 2012 / Accepted: 24 August 2012 / Published: 7 September 2012

Abstract

:
Twenty-five novel EST-derived simple sequence repeat (EST-SSR) markers were developed in the ark shell Scapharca broughtonii. Polymorphisms of these EST-SSR markers were evaluated in 48 wild individuals collected from Shidao, Shandong Province, China. A total of 202 alleles were detected at 25 loci. The numbers of alleles per locus ranged from 4 to 14, with an average of 8.08. The observed and expected heterozygosities varied from 0.2917 to 1.000 and from 0.3570 to 0.9002, respectively. After sequential Bonferroni correction for multiple tests, only one locus was found to deviate from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Twenty-five EST-SSR markers showed a high rate of across-species transferability (100%) in Scapharca subcrenata and a low rate of across-genus transferability (20%) in Tegillarca granosa. These EST-SSRs will be helpful for QTL mapping, molecular breeding and investigation of population genetic diversity in ark shell S. broughtonii and other Scapharca species.

1. Introduction

The ark shell Scapharca broughtonii (S. broughtonii), a member of the family Arcidae distributed along the northwestern Pacific coast, is a commercially important bivalve species in Asian countries [1]. However, the natural resources of S. broughtonii in China have declined drastically due to the unsustainable exploitation and environmental impacts over the last decades [1]. Characterizing the population structure of S. broughtonii would help understanding the effect of overexploitation and environmental changes and provide important information for maintenance and management of ark shell resources.
To date, DNA-based molecular markers, including RFLP [2], RAPD [3], AFLP [4], SSR [5], ISSR [6], mtDNA [7] and SNP [8], have been used extensively in genetic studies. Compared with other types of molecular markers, SSR markers have many advantages including high abundance, random distribution in the entire genome, high information content, codominant inheritance and reproducibility [9]. Generally, SSRs are divided in two categories: genomic SSRs derived from random genomic sequences and EST-SSRs derived from expressed sequence tags. Compared with the development of EST-SSR, genomic SSRs from the repeat-enriched genomic library is very time-consuming, cost-expensive and labor-intensive [10]. Furthermore, Genomic SSRs have neither genic function nor close linkage to transcriptional regions, while EST-SSRs are potentially tightly linked with functional genes that perhaps control certain important genetic characters [9]. In addition, EST-SSR markers contain high transferability because EST-SSRs are derived from expressed sequences that are more conserved than the non-genic sequences and easily found in other relative species [11]. Therefore, more and more EST-SSR markers have been identified and used extensively for comparative mapping [12], DNA fingerprinting [13], biodiversity [13], evolutionary studies [14] and so on.
In the present study, we report the development and characterization of 25 EST-SSRs, and the transferability of EST-SSRs across-species in Scapharca subcrenata and across-genus in Tegillarca granosa. These EST-SSRs will be helpful for QTL mapping, molecular breeding and investigation of population genetic diversity in ark shell S. broughtonii and other Scapharca species.

2. Results and Discussion

A total of 3005 EST sequences were received by T3 random sequencing. Of these sequences, 84 SSRs (2.8%) were identified [15]. Among the 84 EST-SSRs, 67 (79.8%) were dinucleotide repeats, 14 (16.7%) were trinucleotide, two (2.3%) were tetranucleotide, and one (1.2%) was a hexanucleotide repeat. The most common dinucleotide and trinucleotide repeats were the motif (TA)n (13.4%) and (CAA)n (2.0%) in obtained EST-SSRs. (AT)n (AC)n (CA)n and (GA)n in total accounted for 43.7% of all SSR repeats found in the 84 SSRs [16].
Primer pairs were designed in 72 SSR-containing ESTs. After optimization, the 41 primer pairs (57%) amplified the expected products. Of the 41 primer pairs, 25 (61.0%) were polymorphic, while the others (39%) were monomorphic. The primer sequences and PCR conditions for the 25 polymorphic loci were presented in Table 1. SSR markers derived from ESTs are considered less polymorphic than that of genomic SSR markers [17,18].
Table 1. Characteristics of 25 microsatellite loci in 48 S. broughtonii individuals.
Table 1. Characteristics of 25 microsatellite loci in 48 S. broughtonii individuals.
LocusGenebankRepeatP-valueHeHOPRIMERSizeTmAllele numberScapharca subcrenataTegillarca granosa
accession No.Motif°C
KH110.59231GGGCACTGGACATTTACACAT36255
JX105439(TA)9CAGTTGTTGTTGGCTGTAGAGAA5+
KH30.25420.83440.8542ATAGAGCTTTCCCCAGTCCAA22855
JX105440(AC)15GAACTTGTATATGGTTATGCCACG11+
KH4 *0.02140.65190.4889CTGGTGGACATGCTGTTATTTC23155+
JX105441(GT)9CTGTGAGTGATAGAAAACCCCA4+
KH60.00590.88840.7917AGTGGAGGGGAGTGTAGTGAAG29757+
JX105442(CT)12GTGATTTTCTTCTGGTTTTCCG13+
KH90.69190.45570.4583GAGATCAAATGGCACACAAACA31855
JX105443(CA)9TGCATAGATCCAGTTCTGCCTT8+
KH120.02630.3570.2917CAGAACGATTTACTGGCCTTTT35855+
JX105444(AC)9CGGACCTCAAACAACTTACTTTC4+
KH190.0660.77790.7021TGCGGTTAGTTGAATTTGTCAG22060+
JX105445(GC)8TATACTCGGGAGAAGGGTAACG12+
KH200.05390.78220.6667TGCCTGCAAATAAAGGACACTA35250
JX105446(GA)11TTTACAAACCCCTCTTTCTCTCC6+
KH24 *0.00940.750.6042TGCAGTACATTAACAGGCCAAT26050
JX105447(TGT)7AAGTAATCTCCAAAGTCGTGGC6+
KH330.9450.83790.9167TCCTTATGACAATCCACTTCACAC31350
JX105448(TACA)6GCGGCTATCCTGAAACTAAAAG10+
KH36 *0.00790.52150.3542TTCAACAGAACAACCTGTGACC33750+
JX105449(TC)7GCACCACAAAATAGACCAACAA5+
KH400.33950.82170.8125CGTATCCATATCCGTGTTGATT34050
JX105450(GA)7CATGTGTTGGGGTTTTCAGTAT10+
KH4610.6731CACAACAAAGGGTCTGGTTTATG24750
JX105451(CAA)7CGTCAAAATGGGAAAATCTGTC6+
KH4810.64720.7708AACAGTGAAATGAGCAGTGGAA37050
JX105452(ACG)7CGGTTACGGAAGGAATTTGTAA10+
KH52 *00.84450.8912TTTTCGTTTAATTTTCTGTTG28155
JX105453(AT)6GATTCAGGTTGTCAGGGA10+
KH550.92470.89120.9583CAAAGTAGCGCCAGATACAGAA37050
JX105454(CT)7CGAATACGAGAAGGTCTGCAC13+
KH560.02380.90020.7917CACCTGCCCTAAGAAAAT CGTACGTCGAAATAGTCAT24850
JX105455(CA)2014+
KH570.97890.75470.8726TTTATTCTTAACACTGGCAA28950
JX105456(CA)10TTAGGCATGAATGGGAAA7+
KH580.00340.58660.5531GATTCGGATACCAAGGGACATA33852
JX105457(AT)8GCATTTTCCATCACAGAACTGA7+
KH59 *0.12150.72460.5625GCTGTGGTTGGATGGGTT TACCCTGTCTTAGAATGTCAGCA32652
JX105458(ATT)68+
ACGAGAAGAAGAGGTGAT
KH61JX105459(CAT)80.32730.76890.75TAAAACTGAATGGTGATG351508+
KH630.92580.6050.6875CTATTCATGGACACCAGATGC31755
JX105460(TA)6CCGAAAACCAAAAGACATACAC5+
KH6510.70570.9792TAATTGAAAACCATCCAGGG AACCACATCACAGTCAAACAGA21948
JX105461(TG)75+
KH6710.80071ATTATCGTCTATTGCTGCCGAG18245
JX105462(CA)7TCTAGTCTCCCCTGAACCAGAA11+
KH7110.69451ACATGTACCTTGAATAAC24655
JX105463(CA)7GTATGCTTCAGTGTATCT4+
P-value, Hardy-Weinberg probability test; Tm, optimized annealing temperature; Ho, observed heterozygosity; He, expected heterozygosity; indicated deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P-value < 0.002); * indicated harboring null alleles (null allele frequency >5%); + stands for amplified successful; − stands for amplified unsuccessful.
However, our study showed that the ratio of polymorphic loci from EST-SSRs was similar to those of from genomic-SSRs in S. broughtonii, where the ratios of polymorphic loci were 64.7% [19] and 40% [20], respectively. Similar observations were also found in the Crassostrea virginica [21,22,23]. The ratios of polymorphic loci from EST-SSRs were 80% [21], while those from genomic-SSRs in C. virginica were 70% [22] and 85.8% [23], respectively.
The 25 polymorphic loci were further characterized in a population of 48 individuals. The number of alleles per locus ranged from 4 to 14, with an average of 8.08, which was low in comparison with those of genomic-SSRs in S. broughtonii, which were 11.5 [1], 13 [19] and 17.4 [20], respectively. In contrast, the number of average alleles from EST-SSRs (10.11) [21] are higher than those of genomic SSRs (5.4 and 5.7) in C. virginica [22,23]. Different results may have been caused by different populations and sample sizes used in different studies [21]. The observed and expected heterozygosities ranged from 0.2917 to 1.000 and from 0.3570 to 0.9002, with the average of 0.7503 and 0.7147, respectively. After sequential Bonferroni correction for multiple tests, only one locus deviated from Hardy-Weinberg (p < 0.002). In previous study, the numbers of loci from genomic-SSRs deviated from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in S. broughtonii were two out of 11 (18.2%), four out of 10 (40%) and nine out of 12 (75%), respectively, which were higher than that of EST-SSRs (4%) in our research [1,19,20]. Different populations and sample sizes used in studies may have led to these different results [21]. Gene linkage can’t be found in all of the loci. Of the 25 loci, KH4, KH24, KH36, KH52 and KH59 showed signs of null alleles.
Because EST-SSRs are more conserved than the non-genic sequences, EST-SSR markers share high transferability [11]. After cross-species detection, all of the 25 reliable SSRs were amplified successfully and showed polymorphism in S. subcrenata. In cross-genus application, only five of 25 loci (20%) were amplified stably and detected polymorphism in T. granosa. This was the first report about the cross-genus amplification of EST-SSRs in S. broughtonii. With the EST-SSR markers developed in our study, further studies can be conducted for comparative mapping [12], DNA fingerprinting [13], biodiversity [13], and evolutionary studies [14] and so on. These will help advance the investigation of the genetic population structure and genetic diversity in this species.

3. Experimental

3.1. DNA Extraction from S. broughtonii, S. subcrenata and T. granosa

Forty-eight wild individuals of S. broughtonii, six of S. subcrenata and six of T. granosa, respectively, were collected from Shidao, Shandong Province, China. Genomic DNA was extracted from adductor muscle by standard proteinase K digestion, phenol-chloroform extraction, and DNA precipitation [3].

3.2. cDNA Library Construction and EST-SSR Identification

A cDNA library was constructed from the whole of ark shell S. broughtonii, using the ZAP-cDNA synthesis kit and ZAP-cDNA Gigapack III Gold cloning kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA). Random sequencing of the library using T3 primer yielded 3005 successful EST sequences. These ESTs were screened to find regions containing SSRs using SSRHUNTER program, where the parameters were set for detection of di-, tri-, tetra-, penta- and hexa-nucleotides motifs with a minimum of six repeats. A total o f 84 SSR loci were identified and 72 were appropriate for SSR marker optimization.

3.3. Primer Design and Validation

Primers flanking microsatellite were designed using the PRIMER PREMIER 5.0 program (PREMIER Biosoft International, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The major parameters for primer design were set as follows: primer length from 18 to 24 nucleotides, PCR product size from 180 to 360 bp, optimum annealing temperature at 55–65 °C, and GC contents from 40% to 60%.
Primer pairs were validated using six ark shell individuals by PCR and denaturing PAGE. PCR was performed on a Veriti Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in a 25 μL reaction volume, concluding 2.5 μL of 10 × PCR buffer, 1.5 μL of MgCl2 (25 mmol L−1), 2.0 μL of dNTP (2.5 mmol L−1), 1 μL of each primer (10 μmol L−1), 15.8 μL of PCR-grade water, 0.2 μL (1 U) of Taq polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), and 1 μL of 10–100 ng DNA. The PCR temperature profile was 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 33 cycles of 95 °C for 45 s, 45 s at the locus-specific annealing temperature (Table 1), 72 °C for 45 s, and the final extension step at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were separated on 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gel, and visualized by silver-staining. The size of allele was estimated according to the pBR322/MspI marker (TianGen, Beijing, China).

3.4. EST-SSR Polymorphism Analysis and Transferability in S. Subcrenata and T. Granosa

Loci with stable, specific and polymorphic PCR fragments were characterized in 48 ark shells from a wild population, as well in S. subcrenata and T. granosa to assess their transferability. PCR and denaturing PAGE were performed at the same condition as above. The observed and expected heterozygosities together with tests for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and linkage disequilibrium were calculated by GENEPOP 4.0 [15]. Null allele frequencies were analysed by MICRO-CHECKER 2.2.3 [16]. All results for multiple tests were corrected using sequential Bonferroni’s correction.

4. Conclusions

Here, we report the development and characterization of a set of EST-SSRs, which was derived from a cDNA library of ark shell S. broughtonii by random sequencing. Twenty-five polymorphic EST-SSR markers not only are suitable for evaluating the population genetics of ark shell, but also showed a high rate of across-species transferability in S. subcrenata and a low rate of across-genus transferability in Tegillarca granosa. These EST-SSRs will be helpful for QTL mapping, molecular breeding and investigation of population genetic diversity in ark shell S. broughtonii and other Scapharca species.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Su-Fang Liu, Cui-Cui Bai and other labmates for technical advice and service. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 40976073 and 31061160187), the National Marine Public Welfare Research Project of China (No. 201205031), and the National Key Technology R&D Program of China (No. 2011BAD13B02).

References

  1. Li, J.J.; Li, Q. Isolation and characterization of twelve novel microsatellite loci in the ark shell Scapharca broughtonii. Conserv. Genet. 2008, 9, 1055–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Karl, S.A.; Avise, J.C. Balancing selection at allozyme loci in oysters: Implications from nuclear RFLPs. Science 1992, 256, 100–102. [Google Scholar]
  3. Sekino, M.; Hamaguchi, M.; Aranishi, F.; Okoshi, K. Development of novel microsatellite DNA markers from the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas. Mar. Biotechnol. 2003, 5, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yu, Z.; Guo, X. Genetic linkage map of the eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica Gmelin. Biol. Bull. 2003, 204, 327–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, Z.J.; Cordes, J.F. DNA marker technologies and their applications in aquaculture genetics. Aquaculture 2004, 238, 1–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bornet, B.; Branchard, M. Nonanchored inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers: Reproducible and specific tools for genome fingerprinting. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2001, 19, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jenuth, J.P.; Peterson, A.C.; Shoubridge, E.A. Tissue-specific selection for different mtDNA genotypes in heteroplasmic mice. Nat. Genet. 1997, 16, 93–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Germer, S.; Holland, M.J.; Higuchi, R. High-throughput SNP allele-frequency determination in pooled DNA samples by kinetic PCR. Genome Res. 2000, 10, 258–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zeng, S.H.; Xiao, G.; Guo, J.; Fei, Z.J.; Xu, Y.Q.; Roe, B.A.; Wang, Y. Development of a EST dataset and characterization of EST-SSRs in a traditional Chinese medicinal plant, Epimedium sagittatum (Sieb. Et Zucc.) maxim. BMC Genomics 2010, 11, 94–104. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bozhko, M.; Riegel, R.; Schubert, R.; Muller-Starck, G. A cyclophilin gene marker confirming geographical differentiation of Norway spruce populations and indicating viability response on excess soil-born salinity. Mol. Ecol. 2003, 12, 3147–3155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Scott, K.D.; Eggler, P.; Seaton, G.; Rossetto, M.; Ablett, E.M.; Lee, L.S.; Henry, R.J. Analysis of SSRs derived from grape ESTs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2000, 100, 723–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yu, J.K.; Rota, M.L.; Kantety, R.V.; Sorrells, M.E. EST derived SSR markers for comparative mapping in wheat and rice. Mol. Gen. Genomics 2004, 271, 742–751. [Google Scholar]
  13. Chakravarthi, B.K.; Naravaneni, R. SSR marker based DNA fingerprinting and diversity study in rice (Oryza sativa. L). Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2006, 5, 684–688. [Google Scholar]
  14. Castillo, A.; Budak, H.; Varshney, R.; Budak, H.; Varshney, R.K.; Dorado, G.; Graner, A.; Hernandez, P. Transferability and polymorphism of barley EST-SSR markers used for phylogenetic analysis in Hordeum chilense. BMC Plant Biol. 2008, 8, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rousset, F. GENEPOP’007: A complete reimplementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2007, 8, 103–106. [Google Scholar]
  16. Van Oosterhout, C.; Hutchinson, W.F.; Wills, D.P.M.; Shipley, P. MICRO-CHECKER: Software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2004, 4, 535–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Eujayl, I.; Sorrells, M.; Baum, M.; Wolters, P.; Powell, W. Assessment of genotypic variation among cultivated durum wheat based on EST-SSRS and genomic SSRS. Euphytica 2001, 119, 39–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gupta, P.K.; Rustgi, S.; Sharma, S.; Singh, R.; Balyan, H.S. Transferable EST-SSR markers for the study of polymorphism and genetic diversity in bread wheat. Mol. Gen. Genomics 2003, 270, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sekino, M.; Kurokawa, T.; Sasaki, K. Multiplex PCR panels of novel microsatellites for the ark shell Scapharca broughtonii (Pteriomorphia, Arcoida). Conserv. Genet. Resour. 2009, 2, 39–42. [Google Scholar]
  20. An, H.Y.; Park, J.Y. Ten new highly polymorphic microsatellite loci in the blood clam Scapharca broughtonii. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2005, 5, 896–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, Y.P.; Guo, X.M. Development and Characterization of EST-SSR Markers in the Eastern Oyster Crassostrea virginica. Mar. Biotechnol. 2007, 9, 500–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Brown, B.L.; Franklin, D.E.; Gaffney, P.M.; Hong, M.; Dendanto, D.; Kornfield, I. Characterization of microsatellite loci in the eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica. Mol. Ecol. 2000, 9, 2217–2219. [Google Scholar]
  23. Li, G.; Hubert, S.; Bucklin, K.; Ribes, V.; Hedgecock, D. Characterization of 79 microsatellite DNA markers in the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2003, 3, 228–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  • Sample Availability: Not available.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, M.; Zhu, L.; Zhou, C.-Y.; Lin, L.; Fan, Y.-J.; Zhuang, Z.-M. Development and Characterization of EST-SSR Markers from Scapharca broughtonii and Their Transferability in Scapharca subcrenata and Tegillarca granosa. Molecules 2012, 17, 10716-10723. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules170910716

AMA Style

Li M, Zhu L, Zhou C-Y, Lin L, Fan Y-J, Zhuang Z-M. Development and Characterization of EST-SSR Markers from Scapharca broughtonii and Their Transferability in Scapharca subcrenata and Tegillarca granosa. Molecules. 2012; 17(9):10716-10723. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules170910716

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Meng, Ling Zhu, Chun-Ya Zhou, Lin Lin, Yan-Jun Fan, and Zhi-Meng Zhuang. 2012. "Development and Characterization of EST-SSR Markers from Scapharca broughtonii and Their Transferability in Scapharca subcrenata and Tegillarca granosa" Molecules 17, no. 9: 10716-10723. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules170910716

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop