Next Article in Journal
Methyl Antcinate A Suppresses the Population of Cancer Stem-Like Cells in MCF7 Human Breast Cancer Cell Line
Next Article in Special Issue
The Use of Bio-Guided Fractionation to Explore the Use of Leftover Biomass in Dutch Flower Bulb Production as Allelochemicals against Weeds
Previous Article in Journal
A Facile Synthesis of Deaza-Analogues of the Bisindole Marine Alkaloid Topsentin
Article Menu

Export Article

Molecules 2013, 18(3), 2528-2538; doi:10.3390/molecules18032528

Identification of Alternaria alternata Mycotoxins by LC-SPE-NMR and Their Cytotoxic Effects to Soybean (Glycine max) Cell Suspension Culture
Gezimar D. de Souza 1,2,3,*, Axel Mithöfer 2, Cristina Daolio 4,5, Bernd Schneider 4 and Edson Rodrigues-Filho 1
Laboratório de Bioquímica Micromolecular de Micro-organismos, Departamento de Química, Universidade Federal de São Carlos—UFSCar, Rodovia Washington Luiz, Km 235, 676 São Carlos-SP, Brazil
Department of Bioorganic Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology; Hans-Knöll-Straße 8, Jena D-07745, Germany
Accert Chemistry and Biotechnology Inc., Rua Alfredo Lopes 1717, São Carlos-SP, Brazil
Biosynthesis/NMR Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Hans-Knöll-Straße 8, Jena D-07745, Germany
NMR Applications Group, Bruker Biospin GmbH, Silberstreifen 4, Rheinstetten 76287, Germany
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; Tel.: +55-16-3414-0454; Fax: +55-16-3351-8350.
Received: 13 December 2012; in revised form: 29 January 2013 / Accepted: 16 February 2013 / Published: 26 February 2013


: This present work describes the application of liquid chromatograpy-solid phase extraction-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to analyse Alternaria alternata crude extracts. Altenusin (1), alternariol (2), 3'-hydroxyalternariol monomethyl ether (3), and alternariol monomethyl ether (4), were separated and identified. High-resolution mass spectrometry confirmed the proposed structures. The cytotoxic effects of these compounds towards plants were determined using soybean (Glycine max) cell cultures as a model. EC50 values which range from 0.11 (±0.02) to 4.69 (±0.47) μM showed the high cytotoxicity of these compounds.
LC-NMR; LC-SPE-NMR; mass spectrometry; alternariol; Alternaria; soybean; Glycine max; cell cultures; cytotoxicity

1. Introduction

Metabolites synthesized by plant pathogens are usually associated with disease symptoms [1]. In some cases host-pathogen interactions provide a favorable environment and source for the production of many different compounds, which can be employed in areas of economical relevance. During the last three decades the presence of mycotoxins in citrus plants symptomatic of Alternaria Brown Spot disease has caused several problems for citriculture worldwide. This disease is caused by the phytopathogenic fungus Alternaria alternata pv. citri [2]. It promotes lesions on young leaves, branches, and on fruits of tangerines, attacking almost the whole plant. On fruits it boosts lesions that can vary from minute spots to large craters [2,3,4]. Eruptions sometimes are formed and can be dislodged, generating irregular surfaces, reducing yields, and diminishing the marketability of fruits [3].

Magnani et al. [5] employed liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for quantification of two Alternaria mycotoxins, alternariol (2) and alternariol monomethyl ether (4) (Figure 1) in different parts of tangerines (Citrus reticulata). Recently, Asam et al. [6] used isotope dilution assays to detect alternariols in beverages. Other authors developed strategies to extracted simultaneously different types of mycotoxins produced not only by Alternaria, but also for other fungi [7,8,9]. These mycotoxins, including those produced by Alternaria species, are toxic to both humans and animals [10,11]. Therefore, it is of interest to develop analytical methods for detection and identification of such compounds.

Figure 1. Chemical structures of alternariols 14.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of alternariols 14.
Molecules 18 02528 g001 1024

Regarding detection and quantification of mycotoxins in complex matrices, LC-MS/MS is one of the best approaches since it provides high sensitivity and specificity [5]. However, its power for structure elucidation of organic compounds is limited due to the basic principle of such technique. In mass spectrometry the sample molecules are first ionized to obtain fragments of the ions of varied mass [12]. Although fragmentation patterns are somewhat characteristic and predictable for most classes of compounds, de novo interpretation without any pre-knowledge is challenging, if not totally impossible, due to the high molecular diversity and many similar compound structures [13]. Even using high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) such task is still hard and time-consuming.

Compared with MS, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy yields relatively low-sensitivity measurements, with limits of detection on the order of 10 μM or a few nmol at high fields using new cryoprobes [14]. Nevertheless, NMR is usually preferred for structure elucidation of natural compounds. As NMR spectroscopy is one of the most powerful analytical methods for identification and structure elucidation of organic compounds [15], it is interesting to use the hyphenation between HPLC and NMR in studies involving complex matrices.

Although this coupling is known for more than two decades, improvements in solvent suppression pulse sequences and sensitivity [16] have boosted its application in natural product chemistry. Hyphenation between HPLC, post column solid-phase extraction, and NMR (LC-SPE-NMR) has emerged as a very promising technique for structure elucidation [17,18]. Compounds separated by HPLC are transferred one by one to SPE cartridges in order to remove the non-deuterated mobile phase from the analyte. Subsequently, cartridges are dried by a nitrogen stream, analytes are desorbed with a small volume of deuterated solvent, and transferred through a capillary into the NMR flow cell [19]. The whole process can be carried out under full automation.

This procedure requires minimal quantity of sample and the risk of analyte degradation is minimized. The fraction that is analyzed by NMR can be also recovered for further spectroscopic analysis or bioassays. Moreover, the reproducible NMR measurement conditions allow direct comparison with spectra from conventional off-line NMR equipment [20].

This investigation describes the application of LC-SPE-NMR to identify mycotoxins produced by a pathogenic Alternaria alternata strain, which was isolated from tangerines exhibiting Alternaria Brown Spot symptoms. This appears to be the first report concerning the use of a NMR-based coupling method to identify Alternaria mycotoxins in complex matrices as well as to report cytotoxic effects of alternariols to plant cells, in particular soybean cell suspension culture.

2. Results and Discussion

A HPLC method has been developed to separate all interesting compounds contained in the extract obtained after fungal fermentation. Basically two peaks were detected with appropriate intensity when 5 mg/mL sample was injected (Figure 2A). However, when concentration was increased many additional peaks appeared in the chromatogram (Figure 2B). A concentration of 50 mg/mL was the highest value at which baseline separation was not significantly affected, so the extract at this concentration was injected (30 µL) six times into the LC-SPE-NMR system, which was done under automation, in order to trap as many peaks as possible on different SPE cartridges.

The 1H-NMR spectra of peaks 1 to 4 (Table 1) suggest metabolites related to alternariol. Measurements of the major components, i.e., peaks 2 and 4, resulted in very similar 1H-NMR data (Table 1). Four doublets at the aromatic region (δ 6.40 to 7.30) with meta-coupling constants suggest the presence of two tetrasubstituted aromatic rings. Intense singlets around δ 12.0 and 2.8 (integrating for 3H) indicate the presence of a chelated hydroxyl group and a methyl group linked to an aromatic ring, respectively. The only difference between the spectra of 2 and 4 is the presence of another 3H singlet at δ 3.92 in compound 4, suggesting that a methoxyl group is attached to one of the aromatic rings. 13C-NMR spectra are also quite similar for both compounds 2 and 4, except for the presence of a carbon signal at δ 56.7, which is assignable to the methoxyl group in compound 4. HMBC correlations obtained for both compounds (Table 1) are similar as well and they corroborate to the presence of alternariol’s chemical skeleton. H-3' of 2 correlates with carbon atoms appearing at δ 110.2 and 153.9 (assigned as C-1' and C-2', respectively), and H-3' of 4 correlates with carbon atoms at δ 109.3 (C-1') and 153.4 (C-2'). The same can be observed for the connectivity between rings B and C of 2, since H-6 (δ 7.28) correlates through three bonds with carbons at δ 110.2 and 99.6, assigned as C-1' and C-2, respectively. Such correlations of H-6 (δ 7.31) with C-1' (δ 109.3) and C-2 (δ 98.1) can be observed for compound 4 correspondingly. Based on these results and compared with published data [21,22], peaks 2 and 4 were identified as alternariol and alternariol monomethyl ether, respectively. High Resolution Electron Ionization Mass Spectrometry (HREIMS) gave exact masses which were consistent with the molecular formulae of compounds 2 and 4 (Table 2). Molecular ions [M+] at m/z 258.05197 (C14H10O5, cal.: 258.05281) were obtained for compound 2 and at m/z 272.06711 (C15H12O5, cal.: 272.0685) for compound 4. Alternariol (2) and alternariol monomethyl ether (4) have been isolated from many different cultures of the genus Alternaria such as A. alternata [23], A. arborescens, A. infectoria, A. tenuissima [24], among others [25]. They exhibit mutagenic and cytotoxic effects to bacterial and mammalian cells [26], and they are suspected to be carcinogenic for human beings [10,11].

Figure 2. HPLC chromatograms of Alternaria alternata extract (UV detection at 312 nm): (A) concentration at 5 mg/mL; (B) concentration at 50 mg/mL.
Figure 2. HPLC chromatograms of Alternaria alternata extract (UV detection at 312 nm): (A) concentration at 5 mg/mL; (B) concentration at 50 mg/mL.
Molecules 18 02528 g002 1024
Table 1. NMR spectroscopic data (MeCN-d3, 500 MHz) for compounds 14.
Table 1. NMR spectroscopic data (MeCN-d3, 500 MHz) for compounds 14.
Altenusin (1)Alternariol (2)
ObtainedReference (MeCN-d3) [26]ObtainedReference (CDCl3) [21]
δH (J in Hz)δCHMBCδH (J in Hz)δCδH (J in Hz)δCHMBCδH (J in Hz)δC
1 147.2 148.3 139.0 138.1
2 105.3 106.5 99.6 97.4
3 165.7 163.0 164.9 164.1
46.47, d (2.6)100.62, 3, 5, 66.25, d (2.2)102.36.42, d (2.0)101.12, 3, 66.38, d (1.9)100.9
5 165.1 165.3 165.3 165.5
66.19, d (2.6)111.41, 2, 4, 56.03, d (2.2)112.17.28, d (2.0)104.92, 4, 5, 1'7.27, d (2.0)104.4
7 165.1 164.7
1' 134.7 135.8 110.2 109.0
2'6.52, s116.41, 1', 3', 4', 6'6.46, s116.6 153.9 152.6
3' 142.5 143.36.68, d (2.4)102.31', 2', 4', 5'6.32, d (2.6)101.6
4' 144.2 144.7 158.0 158.4
5'6.63, s117.11', 3', 4', 6'-CH36.55, s117.26.73, d (2.4)117.41', 3', 6'-CH36.71, d (2.6)117.6
6' 127.6 127.3 139.2 138.3
3-OH11.87, s 11.86, s 2, 3, 7
5-OCH33.81, s56.253.87, s56.4
6'-CH31.90, s19.11', 2', 4' 5', 6'1.90, s19.32.78, s25.41, 1', 5', 6'2.77, s25.3
3'-Hydroxyalternariol monomethyl ether (3)Alternariol monomethyl ether (4)
ObtainedReference (in DMF-d7) [26]ObtainedReference (in DMSO-d6) [22]
δH (J in Hz)δCHMBCδH (J in Hz)δCδH (J in Hz)δC *HMBCδH (J in Hz)δC
1 138.4 139.5 138.3 137.8
2 100.0 99.2 98.1 98.4
3 165.5 165.4 165.5 164.0
46.52, d (1.9)100.32, 3, 66.63, d (1.8)99.76.57, d (2.0)101.52, 3, 5, 66.59, d (2.5)101.6
5 167.5 167.3 166.5 164.6
67.31, d (1.9)104.82, 4, 5, 1'7.30, d (1.8)104.27.31, d (2.0)103.32, 4, 5, 1'7.20, d (2.5)103.5
7 n.d. 165.8 168.3 166.1
1' 111.4 110.1 109.3 108.3
2' 142.2 142.3 153.4 152.6
3' 131.2 132.46.74, d (2.4)101.51', 2', 4', 5'6.63, d (2.0)99.1
4' 146.4 148.2 158.9 158.5
5'6.76, s117.51', 2', 3', 4', 6', 6'-CH36.82, s117.76.68, d (2.4)117.51', 3', 4', 6'-CH36.71, d (2.0)117.5
6' 128.7 123.3 138.8 138.4
3-OH11.91, s 11.89, s
5-OCH33.92, s56.653.99, s56.33.92, s56.753.90, s55.8
6'-CH32.70, s25.11, 6, 1', 2', 5', 6'2.74, s24.92.78, s25.71, 1', 2', 5', 6'2.72, s24.6

* Obtained from HSQC and HMBC experiments obtained in MeOD-d4.

By increasing the sample concentration injected onto the column it was possible to identify two more peaks, labeled herein as 1 and 3 (Figure 2B). Compound 1 shows a similar 1H-NMR spectrum if compared with compounds 2 and 4, although aromatic signals are shifted to a more shielded region (Table 1). However, two of the doublets observed in the 1H-NMR spectra of 2 and 4 collapsed into two singlets in the 1H-NMR spectrum of 1. These hydrogen atoms (H-2' and H-5') exhibit HMBC correlation with carbon atoms C-3' and C-4', suggesting a change in the substitution pattern of one of aromatic rings. Furthermore, a shift of both 1H and 13C signals attributed to the methyl group at ring A from δ 2.78 and 25.4, respectively, in 2 to a more shielded region at δ 1.90 and 19.1 in compound 1 was observed. Such a shift is consistent with an opening of the lactone ring [27]. Moreover, a HMBC correlation between H-2' (δ 6.52) and C-6' (δ 127.6) in compound 1 is also evidence of such opening (Table 1). Thus, based on this data and on comparison with literature [27], compound 1 was identified as altenusin (Figure 1), a metabolite produced by Alternaria and other microorganisms [28]. Once again HREIMS supported the structure proposition since a molecular ion at m/z 290.07970 (C15H14O6, cal.: 290.07904) was observed (Table 2).

Table 2. HREIMS data for compounds 14.
Table 2. HREIMS data for compounds 14.
CompoundDetected ion (m/z)Calculated mass (Da)Accuracy (ppm)Deviation (mDa)
Altenusin (1) (C15H14O6)290.07970290.07904−2.3−0.7
Alternariol (2) (C14H10O5)258.05198258.052813.30.8
3'-Hydroxyalternariol monomethyl ether (3) (C15H12O6)288.06381288.06339−1.5−0.4
Alternariol monomethyl ether (4) (C15H12O5)272.06711272.068475.01.4

Altenusin (1) is reported as a less toxic compound than its analogs alternariol (2) and alternariol monomethyl ether (4). However, Nakanishi et al. [28] verified that it could act as a possible inhibitor of myosyl light chain kinase, an enzyme that triggers contraction of smooth muscles. In addition, Aly et al. [27] reported that altenusin exhibits a considerable cytotoxic activity against mouse lymphoma cells, with a value for half maximal effective concentration (EC50) of 23.4 nM.

Compound 3 exhibited a very similar 1H-NMR data when compared to alternariol monomethyl ether (4) (Table 1). The main difference is the absence of two doublets at δ 6.78 and 6.72. Instead, it displayed a singlet at δ 6.80, which suggests the presence of a new substituent attached to the ring A.

According to the HREIMS results, which gave a molecular ion at m/z 288.06339 (C15H12O6, cal.: 288.06339), the new substituent could be a hydroxyl group (Table 2). HMBC correlations also matched the proposed structure of compound 3 (Table 2). The hydrogen signal at δ 6.76 (H-5') in the spectrum of compound 3 strongly correlates with the carbon signals at δ 25.1 (6'-CH3), δ 111.4 (C-1') and δ 131.2 (C-3'). These correlations indicate that the additional hydroxyl group is attached at position 3' in compound 3, which was identified as 3'-hydroxyalternariol monomethyl ether. This compound was already isolated from Alternaria culture [26].

In order to verify whether such compounds exhibit toxic effects on plant cells, soybean cell suspension cultures were used to develop a biological assay. Cell cultures have been using for predicting mycotoxins effects for over two decades [29]. Results obtained herein are presented in Figure 3. As it can be seen, all compounds 14 exhibited cytotoxic properties with half maximal effective concentrations (EC50) at nM and µM levels. In addition, the four parameter logistic model, which was the statistical model employed to determine cytotoxic properties of interesting compounds, has matched with obtained results with r2 greater than 0.96.

Figure 3. Cytotoxicity assay for compounds 14 using soybean cell suspension cultures. EC50 values were calculated using the four parameters logistic model equation. The obtained values ranged from 110 nM to 4.69 µM, which highlights the cytotoxic effect of those compounds.
Figure 3. Cytotoxicity assay for compounds 14 using soybean cell suspension cultures. EC50 values were calculated using the four parameters logistic model equation. The obtained values ranged from 110 nM to 4.69 µM, which highlights the cytotoxic effect of those compounds.
Molecules 18 02528 g003 1024

Altenusin (1) and alternariol (2) showed similar EC50 values, suggesting that the presence of a lactone ring is not crucial for cytotoxic effects. However, the presence of this ring on such kinds of structures is apparently closely related to cytotoxic properties since similar structures such as deoxytalaroflavone and 1-deoxyrubralactone, in which the ring A is contracted to a 5-membered ring, exhibit no cytotoxic effects [30,31]. Phenolic hydroxyl groups apparently play a key role in toxicity for soybean cell culture as well. If alternariol (2) is converted to alternariol monomethyl ether (4), the effect is apparently decreased sevenfold. Instead, if a hydroxyl group is introduced on ring A of 4 to give 3'-hydroxyalternariol monomethyl ether (3), cytotoxic effects are increased nearly 43-fold.

Few reports concerning cytotoxic effects of alternariols can be found in the literature. Aly et al. [26] reported strong effects of altenusin (1), alternariol (2), and alternariol monomethyl ether (4) towards mouse lymphoma cells. Alternariols have exhibited cytotoxic effects against both animal [26] and human mammalian cells [32]. However, this is apparently the first report concerning toxicity to vegetal cells.

3. Experimental

3.1. General Experimental Procedures

All LC-SPE-NMR analyses were carried out in a system composed of an Agilent Series 1100 liquid chromatograph (Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany) coupled to a Prospekt II SPE unit (SparkHolland, Emmen, The Netherlands). This system was coupled to an Avance 500 Ultrashield NMR equipment (11.7 T, Bruker, Rheinstetten, Germany) equipped with a TCI cryoprobe (5 mm) and a Cryofit insert for detection (flow cell volume 30 μL). A make-up pump (Knauer, Berlin, Germany) was used to add water (2.5 mL min−1) to the eluent after HPLC in order to reduce the eluotropic capacity. For HREIMS spectra, a Micromass MasSpec with three-sector double focusing MS (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) was used.

3.2. Fungal Cultivation and Preparation of Extracts

The fungus Alternaria alternata was isolated as previously reported [5] and cultivated in 15 flasks containing 70 g of wheat (Yoki, São Bernardo do Campo, Brazil) and 50% (v/w) of distillated water. The cultures were incubated at 25 °C for 25 days. After fungal growth, the contents of each flask were extracted twice with 200 mL of ethyl acetate (JT Baker, Ecatepec, Mexico) and twice with 200 mL of methanol (JT Baker). Extracts were then pooled and evaporated using a R-210 rotary evaporator (Büchi, Flawil, Switzerland).

3.3. Separation and Trapping of Alternaria Metabolites

Separation of the compounds was achieved employing gradient elution using acetonitrile (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) with 0.1% of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) (Merck) (solvent B) and ultrapure water (RiOs method, Millipore) with 0.1% of TFA (solvent A). For separating interesting compounds a Lichrosorb RP-18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm, Merck) was used and 20 µL of extract were injected in each analysis. The flow of mobile phase was set at 1 mL/min and UV detection was done at both 256 and 312 nm. The method employed a gradient elution starting with 37% of solvent B from 0 to 17 min. Then, the mobile phase linearly changed to 55% in 5 min. From 22 to 25 min, the mobile phase varied from 55 to 95%. The column was cleaned for 10 min and adjusted to the initial composition of mobile phase in 2 min. Conditioning time was set at 10 min. The stationary phase of SPE cartridges was a Hysphere resin GP 10–12 μm (SparkHolland, Emmen, The Netherlands), which is a polydivinyl-benzene resin that can be used for the retention of a wide variety of organic compounds. Samples were injected from 6 to 8 times and peaks detected at identical retention times trapped on the same SPE cartride in order to retain as much compound as necessary.

3.4. NMR and MS analyses

All trapped peaks were eluted from the SPE cartridges using 240 μL of MeCN-d3 (Deutero, Kastellaun, Germany). 1H-NMR and 2D spectra (HSQC, HMBC) were acquired using standard Bruker pulse sequences (Topspin 2.0, Bruker, Rheinstetten, Germany). The number of scans was determined according to the compound concentration and varied from 32 to 5,120. Spectra processing was done using zero filling (SI ≥ TD) and exponential multiplication (lb) of 0.3. Correlations obtained in HMBC experiments are from hydrogen(s) stated to the indicated carbons on the Table 1. NMR spectra were referenced to the signals of the solvent, MeCN-d3 (1H-NMR: δ 1.93; 13C-NMR: δ 1.39). Carbon chemical shift values were extracted from HMBC or HSQC experiments. For alternariol monomethyl ether (4) 13C-NMR values were extracted from HMBC and HSQC experiments recorded in MeOD-d4 (1H-NMR: δ 3.31; 13C-NMR: δ 49.1). After acquiring NMR experiments, compounds were collected using a fraction collector (C-LAB Chemievermittlung, Birkenfeld, Germany) and dried under N2 flow. Then, samples were weighted and submitted for HREIMS analysis and biological tests.

3.5. Cytotoxic (Phytotoxic) Assays

Soybean (Glycine max L. cv. Harosoy 63) cell suspension cultures were grown according to Fliegmann et al. [27]. After 5 days of growth 1 mL of suspension culture was carefully transferred to each well of 24 well plates (Costar 3526, Corning Inc., New York, NY, USA). Different solutions of interesting compounds in 96% ethanol (Merck) were added to each well so that final concentrations were at 0.1, 1.0, 10, 100, 1000, and 10,000 ng/mL. Every well was left with the same final volume and with the same amount of solvent (1.8%). All points were registered fivefold for each concentration. In addition, wells containing cell cultures plus solvent were maintained as control (also fivefold). All 24 well plates were kept under agitation and in the dark for 48 h. Soybean cell culture suspensions were then carefully transferred to 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany), freeze-dried for 24 h (Heto Maxi-Dry Lyo, Jouan Nordic A/S, Allerod, Denmark), and finally the dried mass of each well was determined. Such experiments were repeated threefold and compared with controls (cell cultures solution and cell cultures plus solvent). EC50 value calculations were done using the four parameter logistic model. Coefficients of variation as well as r2 values were achieved using SigmaPlot 2001 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).

4. Conclusions

The present investigation demonstrated the usefulness of the LC-SPE-NMR as a fast approach for metabolites identification in crude extracts and provides comparative data on the cytotoxic effects of four Alternaria toxins on soybean cells. As plant cell suspension cultures can be a model for investigating toxicity for plants in general [33], those results indicate that compounds 14 might have a considerable phytotoxic effect. These outcomes suggest that alternariols could play a key role on the plant-pathogen interaction, probably as non-specific phytotoxins.

Supporting Information

NMR (1D and 2D) and HREIMS spectra of detected compounds are available as supplementary materials, which can be accessed at:


We would like to thank Andrea Lehr for maintaining soybean cell cultures and Sybille Lorenz for acquiring HREIMS spectra. We are grateful to Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (MPG), to Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), to Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), and to Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Ensino Superior (CAPES), for all financial support given to this project.


  1. Strange, R.N. Phytotoxins produced by microbial plant pathogens. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2007, 24, 127–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Agostini, J.P.; Bushong, P.M.; Timmer, L.W. Greenhouse evaluation of products that induce host resistance for control of Scab, Melanose, and Alternaria Brown Spot of citrus. Plant Dis. 2003, 87, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Akimitsu, K.; Peever, T.L.; Timmer, L.W. Molecular, ecological and evolutionary approaches to understanding Alternaria diseases of citrus. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2003, 4, 435–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Peres, N.A.; Timmer, L.W. Evaluation of the Alter-Rater model for spray timing for control of Alternaria Brown Spot on murcott tangor in Brazil. Crop Protec. 2006, 25, 454–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Magnani, R.F.; de Souza, G.D.; Rodrigues-Filho, E. Analysis of alternariol and alternariol monomethyl ether on flavedo and albedo tissues of tangerines (Citrus reticulata) with symptoms of Alternaria Brown Spot. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 4980–4986. [Google Scholar]
  6. Asam, S.; Konitzer, K.; Schieberle, P.; Rychlik, M. Stable isotope dilution assays of alternariol and alternariol monomethyl ether in beverages. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 5152–5160. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ruberta, J.; Dzumanb, Z.; Vaclavikovab, M.; Zachariasovab, M.; Solera, C.; Hajslova, J. Analysis of mycotoxins in barley using ultra high liquid chromatography high resolution mass spectrometry: Comparison of efficiency and efficacy of different extraction procedures. Talanta 2012, 99, 712–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Abia, W.A.; Warth, B.; Sulyok, M.; Krska, R.; Tchana, A.N.; Njobeh, P.B.; Dutton, M.F.; Moundipa, P.F. Determination of multi-mycotoxin occurrence in cereals, nuts and their products in Cameroon by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Food Control. 2013, 31, 438–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cirlini, M.; Dall’Asta, C.; Galaverna, G. Hyphenated chromatographic techniques for structural characterization and determination of masked mycotoxins. J. Chromatogr. A 2012, 1255, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dong, Z.G.; Liu, G.T.; Dong, Z.M.; Qian, Y.Z.; An, Y.H.; Miao, J.A.; Zhen, Y.Z. Induction of mutagenesis and transformation by the extract of Alternaria alternata isolated from grains in Linxian, China. Carcinogenesis 1987, 8, 989–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. An, Y.-H.; Zhao, T.-Z.; Miao, J.; Liu, G.-T.; Zheng, Y.-Z.; Xu, Y.-M.; van Etten, R.L. Isolation, identification, and mutagenicity of alternariol monomethyl ether. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1989, 37, 1341–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pavia, D.L.; Lampman, G.M.; Kriz, G.S. Introduction to Spectroscopy, 2nd ed; Saunders College Publishing: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1996; pp. 303–371. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kind, T.; Fiehn, O. Advances in structure elucidation of small molecules using mass spectrometry. Bioanal. Rev. 2010, 2, 23–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pan, Z.; Raftery, D. Comparing and combining NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry in metabolomics. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2007, 387, 525–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pusecker, K.; Schewitz, J.; Gfrörer, P.; Tseng, L.-H.; Albert, K.; Bayer, E. On-Line coupling of capillary electrochromatography, capillary electrophoresis, and capillary HPLC with nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 3280–3285. [Google Scholar]
  16. Simpson, A.J.; Tseng, L.-H.; Simpson, M.J.; Spraul, M.; Braumann, U.; Kingery, W.L.; Kelleher, B.P.; Hayes, M.H.B. The application of LC-NMR and LC-SPE-NMR to compositional studies of natural organic matter. Analyst 2004, 129, 1216–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jaroszewski, J.W. Hyphenated NMR methods in natural products research, Part 2: HPLC-SPE-NMR and other new trends in NMR hyphenation. Planta Med. 2005, 71, 795–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Daolio, C.; Schneider, B. Coupling Liquid Chromatography and Other Separation Techniques to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. In Hyphenated and Alternative Methods of Detection in Chromatography; Shalliker, R.A., Ed.; Taylor & Francis–CRC Press: Oxford, UK, 2012; Volume 104, pp. 61–98, Chromatographic Science Series. [Google Scholar]
  19. Koskela, H.; Ervasti, M.; Björk, H.; Vanninen, P. On-Flow Pulsed field gradient heteronuclear correlation spectrometry in off-Line LC-SPE-NMR analysis of chemicals related to the chemical weapons convention. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 1262–1269. [Google Scholar]
  20. Seger, C.; Godejohann, M.; Spraul, M.; Stuppner, H.; Hadacek, F.J. Reaction product analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography-solid-phase extraction-nuclear magnetic resonance: Application to the absolute configuration determination of naturally occurring polyyne alcohols. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1136, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Koch, K.; Podlech, J.; Pfeiffer, E.; Metzler, M. Total synthesis of alternariol. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 3275–3276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tan, N.; Tao, Y.; Pan, J.; Wang, S.; Xu, F.; She, Z.; Lin, Y.; Jones, E.B.G. Isolation, structure elucidation, and mutagenicity of four alternariol derivatives produced by the mangrove endophytic fungus N. 2240. Chem. Nat. Comp. 2008, 44, 296–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bradburn, N.; Coker, R.D.; Blunden, G.; Turner, C.H.; Crabb, T.A. 5'-Epialtenuene and neoaltenuene, dibenzo-α-pyrones from Alternaria alternata cultured on rice. Phytochemistry 1994, 35, 665–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Andersen, B.; Kroger, E.; Roberts, R.G. Chemical and morphological segregation of Alternaria arborescens, A. infectoria and A. tenuissima species-groups. Mycol. Res. 2002, 106, 170–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Meng, X.; Mao, Z.; Lou, J.; Xu, L.; Zhong, L.; Peng, Y.; Zhou, L.; Wang, M. Benzopyranones from the endophytic fungus Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12 and their bioactivities. Molecules 2012, 17, 11303–11314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Brugger, E.-M.; Wagner, J.; Schumacher, D.M.; Koch, K.; Podlech, J.; Metzler, M.; Lehmann, L. Mutagenicity of the mycotoxin alternariol in cultured mammalian cells. Toxicol. Lett. 2006, 164, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Aly, A.H.; Edrada-Ebel, R.; Indriani, I.D.; Wray, V.; Müller, W.E.G.; Totzke, F.; Zirrgiebel, U.; Schächtele, C.; Kubbutat, M.H.G.; Lin, W.H.; et al. Cytotoxic metabolites from the fungal endophyte Alternaria sp. and their subsequent detection in its host plant Polygonum senegalense. J. Nat. Prod. 2008, 71, 972–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nakanishi, S.; Toki, S.; Saytoh, Y.; Tsukuda, E.; Kawahara, K.; Ando, K.; Matsuda, Y. Isolation of myosin light chain kinase inhibitors from microorganisms: Dehydroaltenusin, altenusin, atrovenetinone, and cyclooctasulfur. Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 1995, 59, 1333–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Robbana-Barnat, S.; Lafarge-Frayssinet, C.; Frayssinet, C. Use of cell cultures for predicting the biological effects of mycotoxins. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 1989, 5, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kuramata, M.; Fujioka, S.; Shimada, A.; Kawano, T.; Kimura, Y. Citrinolactones A, B and C, and sclerotinin C, plant growth regulators from Penicillium citrinum. Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 2007, 71, 499–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Naganuma, M.; Nishida, M.; Kuramochi, K.; Sugawara, F.; Yoshida, H.; Mizushina, Y. 1-Deoxyrubralactone, a novel specific inhibitor of families X and Y of eukaryotic DNA polymerases from a fungal strain derived from sea algae. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 2939–2944. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lehmann, L.; Wagner, J.; Metzler, M. Estrogenic and clastogenic potential of the mycotoxin alternariol in cultured mammalian cells. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2006, 44, 398–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fliegmann, J.; Schüler, G.; Boland, W.; Ebel, J.; Mithöfer, A. The role of octadecanoids and functional mimics in soybean defence response. Biol. Chem. 2003, 384, 437–446. [Google Scholar]
  • Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds alternariol and alternariol monomethyl ether are available from the authors.
Molecules EISSN 1420-3049 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top