Next Article in Journal
Effects of Polysaccharides from Different Species of Dendrobium (Shihu) on Macrophage Function
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis and Characterization of Oil-Chitosan Composite Spheres
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Anti-Infective Potential of Marine Invertebrates and Seaweeds from the Brazilian Coast

by
Éverson Miguel Bianco
1,2,
Simone Quintana De Oliveira
1,
Caroline Rigotto
3,†,
Maiko Luis Tonini
4,†,
Tatiana Da Rosa Guimarães
1,†,
Francine Bittencourt
1,
Lidiane Pires Gouvêa
2,
Cassandra Aresi
1,
Maria Tereza Rojo De Almeida
1,
Maria Izabel Goularte Moritz
1,
Cintia Dalcuche Leal Martins
2,
Fernando Scherner
2,
João Luís Carraro
5,
Paulo Antunes Horta
2,
Flávio Henrique Reginatto
1,
Mario Steindel
4,
Cláudia Maria Oliveira Simões
3 and
Eloir Paulo Schenkel
1,*
1
Laboratório de Produtos Naturais, Departamento de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, CEP 88.040-900, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil
2
Laboratório de Ficologia, Departamento de Botânica, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, CEP 88.040-900, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil
3
Laboratório de Virologia Aplicada, Departamento de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, CEP 88.040-900, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil
4
Laboratório de Protozoologia, Departamento de Microbiologia, Imunologia e Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, CEP 88.040-900, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil
5
Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, CEP 91.501-970, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2013, 18(5), 5761-5778; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules18055761
Submission received: 28 March 2013 / Revised: 3 May 2013 / Accepted: 10 May 2013 / Published: 16 May 2013

Abstract

:
This manuscript describes the evaluation of anti-infective potential in vitro of organic extracts from nine sponges, one ascidian, two octocorals, one bryozoan, and 27 seaweed species collected along the Brazilian coast. Antimicrobial activity was tested against Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) and Candida albicans (ATCC 10231) by the disk diffusion method. Antiprotozoal activity was evaluated against Leishmania braziliensis (MHOM/BR/96/LSC96-H3) promastigotes and Trypanosoma cruzi (MHOM/BR/00/Y) epimastigotes by MTT assay. Activity against intracellular amastigotes of T. cruzi and L. brasiliensis in murine macrophages was also evaluated. Antiviral activity was tested against Herpes Simplex Virus type 1 (HSV-1, KOS strain) by the plaque number reduction assay (IC50). Cytotoxicity on VERO cells was evaluated by the MTT assay (CC50). The results were expressed as SI = CC50/IC50. The most promising antimicrobial results were obtained against S. aureus and C. albicans with Dragmacidon reticulatum. Among the seaweeds, only Osmundaria obtusiloba showed moderate activity against P. aeruginosa. Concerning antiprotozoal activity, Bugula neritina, Carijoa riseii, Dragmaxia anomala and Haliclona (Halichoclona) sp. showed the most interesting results, mainly against extracellular promastigote forms of L. braziliensis (66, 35.9, 97.2, and 43.6% inhibition, respectively). Moreover, six species of seaweeds Anadyomene saldanhae, Caulerpa cupressoides, Canistrocarpus cervicornis, Dictyota sp., Ochtodes secundiramea, and Padina sp. showed promising results against L. braziliensis (87.9, 51.7, 85.9, 93.3, 99.7, and 80.9% inhibition, respectively), and only Dictyota sp. was effective against T. cruzi (60.4% inhibition). Finally, the antiherpes activity was also evaluated, with Haliclona (Halichoclona) sp. and Petromica citrina showing the best results (SI = 11.9 and SI > 5, respectively). All the active extracts deserve special attention in further studies to chemically characterize the bioactive compounds, and to perform more refined biological assays.

1. Introduction

Marine natural products represent an immeasurable potential source of new drugs with diverse and often unique structures [1], and diverse biological properties, such as antiviral [2], antibacterial [3], antiprotozoal [4,5,6], antifungal [7], cytotoxic [8,9,10] and antitumoral activities [11,12] have been reported. Success in these areas is demonstrated by several new compounds in pre- or clinical evaluation [13,14].
Brazil is a continental country, with 8,500 km of Atlantic coastline that supports an exclusive and rich diversity of endemic marine fauna and flora that can offer rich rewards for the chemical study of marine natural products in the search for novel bioactive secondary metabolites with potential medicinal properties. However, so far only a few classes of Brazilian marine organisms have been investigated for their chemical and pharmacological properties [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. We therefore believe that the identification of Brazilian organisms with significant biotechnological potential for use in drugs is an important goal [18].
Some studies regarding bioprospection of Brazilian marine organisms have been reported. In 2002, Monks and co-workers performed the first biological screening with marine sponges collected from the Santa Catarina coast, in the south of Brazil. Several activities, such as cytotoxic, antichemotactic and antimicrobial properties were detected for the organic and aqueous extracts of 10 marine sponges [19].
Silva et al. [20] evaluated the in vitro antiherpes (HSV-1, KOS strain), anti-adenovirus (human AdV serotype 5) and anti-rotavirus (simian RV SA11) activities of extracts from 27 different marine sponges (Porifera) collected from the Brazilian coast. The results showed that the aqueous extracts from Cliona sp., Agelas sp., Tethya sp., Axinella aff. corrugata, Polymastia janeirensis and Protosuberites sp. were highly promising and deserve special attention in further studies. Furthermore, Frota-Jr and co-authors reported the antitumor activity of the marine sponge P. janeirensis in human U138MG glioma cell line [21,22].
Jimenez and colleagues performed the first ascidian antitumor screening with organisms from the Northeast coast of Brazil. The results suggest these are a rich source of natural compounds with cytotoxic properties [23].
Seleghim et al. screened 349 crude extracts from marine sponges, ascidians, bryozoans, and octocorals collected along the Brazilian coastal against bacteria strains, yeasts, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, cancer cell lines [MCF-7 (breast cancer), B16 (murine melanoma) and HCT8 (colon)]. The results showed a high percentage of bioactive extracts from the phyla Porifera, Ascidiacea, Cnidaria and Bryozoa [24].
Recently, Soares and colleagues [25] evaluated the antiviral activity of extracts from 36 species of seaweeds from seven locations of the Brazilian coastline against HSV-1 and HSV-2 strains. The results obtained reinforce the role of seaweeds as an important source of compounds with for the development of new drugs against herpes.
The marine biodiversity loss that has been observed worldwide [26], but especially in Brazil, is driving an unprecedented loss of biotechnological potential related with these organisms [27,28]. In attention to the human constant need for new drugs and therapies in the present work, we performed an anti-infective (antibacterial, antifungal, antiprotozoal and antiviral) screening of 95 different extracts and fractions from 13 marine invertebrates collected from the southern Brazilian coast, and 27 seaweeds from the northeastern Brazilian coast.

2. Results and Discussion

This paper describes the in vitro antimicrobial, antiprotozoal and antiviral evaluation of organic extracts and fractions from 13 marine invertebrate species (nine sponges, one ascidian, two octocorals, and one bryozoans (Table 1), and 27 seaweeds species [sixteen Rhodophyta (59.2%), seven Phaeophyceae (26%), and five Chlorophyta (14.8%) (Table 2). A total of 95 extracts and fractions (65 from marine invertebrates and 30 from seaweeds) were assayed. The results showed that 53 samples (56%) exhibited some anti-infective activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli and Candida albicans (antimicrobial), Leishmania braziliensis and Trypanosoma cruzi (anti-protozoal), as well as against HSV-1 replication (antiviral).
Table 1. Marine invertebrates collected for biological assays.
Table 1. Marine invertebrates collected for biological assays.
SpeciesCollection local and deepCollection date
Phylum Cnidaria (Octocorallia)
 Carijoa riiseiXavier Island (10–14 m deep)May 2011
 Leptogorgia puniceaAranhas Island (10–14 m deep)April 2011
Phylum Bryozoa
 Bugula neritinaSambaqui Beach (1–2 m deep)October 2011
Phylum Porifera
Cliona celataXavier Island (10–12 m deep)March 2011
 Dragmacidon reticulatumXavier Island (10–14 m deep)May 2011
 Dragmaxia anomalaAranhas Island (10–14 m deep)December 2011
 Guitarra sepiaXavier Island (7–14 m deep)May 2011
 Haliclona (Halichoclona) sp.Aranhas Island (10–14 m deep)April 2011
 Petromica citrinaXavier Island (9–17 m deep)January–July 2010
 Polymastia janeirensisXavier Island (10–14 m deep)December 2011
 Tedania ignisAranhas Island (6–10 m deep)April 2011
 Trachycladus sp.Campeche Island (15 m deep)May 2011
Phylum Urochordata (Tunicate)
 Didemnum granulatumAranhas Island (7–14 m deep)April 2011
Table 2. Marine seaweeds collected for biological assays.
Table 2. Marine seaweeds collected for biological assays.
SpeciesCollection local and deep #Collection date
Phylum Rhodophyta
 Acanthophora speciferaConceição Lagoon, SC (27°36'29'' S; 48°26'31'' W)March 2012
 Botryocladia occidentalisTaíba Beach, CE (03°30'27'' S; 38°55'11'' W)August 2011
 Bryothamnion seaforthiiTaíba Beach, CE (03°30'27'' S; 38°55'11'' W)August 2011
 Bryothamnion triquetrumTaíba Beach, CE (03°30'27'' S; 38°55'11'' W)August 2011
 Bryothamnion triquetrumFarol de Itapoã Beach, BA (12°57'25'' S; 38°21'15'' W)September 2011
 Cryptonemia seminervisTaíba Beach, CE (03°30'27'' S; 38°55'11'' W)August 2011
 Digenea simplexAtol das Rocas, RN (03° 51'03'' S, 33° 40'29'' W)February 2012
 Gracilaria caudateTaíba Beach, CE (03°30'27'' S; 38°55'11'' W)August 2011
 Gracilaria cervicornisTaíba Beach, CE (03°30'27'' S; 38°55'11'' W)August 2011
 Gracilaria cervicornisArraial d´Ajuda Beach, BA (16°29'54'' S; 39° 04'07'' W)September 2011
 Grateloupia cuneifoliaCanasvieiras Beach, SC (27°25'29'' S; 48°26'43'' W)October 2011
 Hypnea cenomyceTaíba Beach, CE (03°30'27'' S; 38°55'11'' W)August 2011
 Hypnea musciformisTaíba Beach, CE (03°30'27'' S; 38°55'11'' W)August 2011
 Laurencia dendroideaArraial d´Ajuda Beach, BA (16°29'54'' S; 39° 04'07'' W)September 2011
 Ochtodes secundirameaArraial d´Ajuda Beach, BA (16°29'54'' S; 39° 04'07'' W)September 2011
 Osmundaria obtusilobaCabo Branco Beach, PB (07°07'31'' S; 34°49'19'' W)July 2012
 Palisada flagelliferaEnseada dos Corais Beach, PE (08°19'23'' S; 34° 56'55'' W)March 2012
 Palisada papillosaArraial d´Ajuda Beach, BA (16°29'54'' S; 39° 04'07'' W)September 2011
Class Pheophyceae
 Canistrocarpus cervicornisArraial d´Ajuda Beach, BA (16°29'54'' S; 39° 04'07'' W)September 2011
 Dictyopteris delicatulaDa Barra Beach, BA (16°29'54'' S; 39° 04'07'' W)September 2011
 Dictyopteris jolyanaCabo Branco Beach, PB (07°07'31'' S; 34°49'19'' W)July 2012
 Dictyota sp.Arraial d´Ajuda Beach, BA (16°29'54'' S; 39° 04'07'' W)March 2012
 Padina sp.Farol de Itapoã Beach (12°57'25'' S; 38°21'15'' W)September 2011
 Padina gymnosporaArraial d´Ajuda Beach, BA (16°29'54'' S; 39° 04'07'' W)March 2012
 Sargassum sp.Arraial d´Ajuda Beach, BA (16°29'54'' S; 39° 04'07'' W)September 2011
Phylum Chlorophyta
 Anadyomene saldanhaeArraial d´Ajuda Beach, BA (16°29'54'' S; 39° 04'07'' W)September 2011
 Anadyomene stellataArraial d´Ajuda Beach, BA (16°29'54'' S; 39° 04'07'' W)May 2012
 Caulerpa sertularioidesArraial d´Ajuda Beach, BA (16°29'54'' S; 39° 04'07'' W)September 2011
 Caulerpa cupressoides aFarol da Barra Beach, BA (13°00'40'' S 38°31'55'' W)September 2011
 Caulerpa cupressoidesbArraial d´Ajuda Beach, BA (16°29'54'' S; 39° 04'07'' W)September 2011
# All seaweeds were collected in the intertidal zone. a,b same species, but collected in different locales.

2.1. Marine Invertebrates

Thirteen species of marine invertebrates were assayed against bacteria and fungus. Of these, seven [Dragmacidon reticulatum, Dragmaxia anomala, Haliclona (Halichoclona) sp., Leptogorgia punicea, Petromica citrina, Tedania ignis, and Trachycladus sp.], showed some activity (Table 3).
The most interesting antimicrobial results were obtained with the sponge D. reticulatum thatshowed significant growth inhibition (13–16 mm) against S. aureus and C. albicans. A similar result was proved in another screening carried out with marine organisms from the southeastern Brazilian coast where the sponge D. reticulatum showed a weak antimicrobial activity against S. aureus and C. albicans [24]. As far as we are aware, this is the first report of this biological activity for D. reticulatum, D. anomala, and Trachycladus sp.
Furthermore, a weak antimicrobial activity against S. aureus, E. faecalis, and E. coli was also detected in the present study for Haliclona (Halichoclona) sp. and Petromica citrina (9–12 mm inhibition zone), and T. ignis (6–8 mm inhibition zone). In the same way, we verified a weak antimicrobial activity against S. aureus and C. albicans of the n-hexane extract from the octocoral Leptogorgia punicea.
Table 3. Antibacterial and antifungal screening of marine invertebrates by disc diffusion method.
Table 3. Antibacterial and antifungal screening of marine invertebrates by disc diffusion method.
SpeciesExtractsBacterial and fungal strains
S. aureusE. faecalisE. coliP. aeruginosaC. albicans
Dragmaxia anomalaE1++
Dragmacidon reticulatumE3F1++++++
Haliclona (Halichoclona) sp.E3F2+++++-+
Leptogorgia puniceaE1++++
Petromica citrinaE3F2++++--++
Tedania ignisE2+
Trachycladus sp.E3F2++++++
E3F3+
(−): no activity; (+): 6–8 mm of inhibition zone; (++): 9–12 mm of inhibition zone; (+++): 13–16 mm of inhibition zone. Positive controls: S. aureus: oxacillin (1 µg) 18–24 mm; E. faecalis: ampicillin (10 µg) > 17 mm; P. aeruginosa: ceftazidime (30 µg) 22–29 mm; E. coli: ampicillin (10 µg) 16–22 mm; C. albicans: fluconazole (25 µg) > 19 mm; E1: n-hexane extract; E2: dichloromethane extract; E3F1: ethyl acetate fraction from E3 (methanol extract); E3F2: n-butanol fraction from E3 (methanol extract); E3F3: aqueous residue from E3 (methanol extract).
As far as we aware, this is the first report for antimicrobial activity for this gorgonian species. On the other hand, the extracts from B. neritina, C. riseii, C. celata, D. granulatum, G. sepia and P. janeirensis did not show antimicrobial activity against the assayed microorganism strains.
Recently it was reported that aqueous extract of P. citrina (collected in Rio de Janeiro State, southeast of Brazil) showed a large spectrum of activity against clinical strains and resistant-bacteria including S. aureus, S. epidermidis, E. coli, E. faecalis, M. fortuitum and N. gonorrhoeae. All these activities were related to the presence of halistanol trisulphate A in this marine sponge [29,30]. Moreover, the antifungal activity for this substance, isolated from Petromica ciocalyptoides was also reported [31].
Another study led by Monks et al. [19] concerning the antimicrobial activity against E. coli, S. aureus, S. epidermis, B. subtilis, and M. luteus strains of southern Brazilian sponges, including Guitarra sp., T. ignis, Haliclona aff. tubifera, demonstrated that H. aff. tubifera showed moderate activity against E. coli and weak activity against S. aureus, S. epidermis,and M. luteus. Our results are in agreement with those obtained by these authors, although we used different libraries of microbial strains and extracts.
Concerning antiprotozoal activity, few studies reporting antileishmanial and tripanocidal activities have been described for marine invertebrates. In this work, 13 marine invertebrate species were evaluated against L. brasiliensis and T. cruzi (Table 4).
Table 4. Antiprotozoal activity expressed as growth inhibition (%) of extracts and fractions obtained from marine invertebrates.
Table 4. Antiprotozoal activity expressed as growth inhibition (%) of extracts and fractions obtained from marine invertebrates.
SpeciesSamplesLeishmania braziliensis (promastigotes)Trypanosoma cruzi (epimastigotes)
Bugula neritinaE166
E3F247
E3F330.7
Carijoa riiseiE135.943.4
E229
E3F126.1
E3F214.62.6
E3F35.5
Didemnun granulatumE121.5
E3F115.713.2
E3F217.9
Dragmacidon reticulatumE124.111.4
E220
E3F121.2
E3F219.8
E3F313.815.3
Dragmaxia anomalaE197.271.7
Guitarra sepiaE3F212.5
E3F314.9
Haliclona (Halichoclona) sp.E114.6
E3F128.3
E3F243.633
E3F316.9
Leptogorgia puniceaE119.2
E238.8
E3F211.1
E3F315
Tedania ignisE216.1
E3F112.2
E3F218.4
E3F319.1
Extracts and fractions concentration: 50 µg/mL; (−): no activity; E1: hexane extract; E2: dichlorometane extract; E3F1: ethyl acetate fraction from E3 (methanol extract); E3F2: n-butanol fraction from E3 (methanol extract); E3F3: aqueous residue from E3 (methanol extract).
Out of these 13 species tested, Bugula neritina (E1 extract), Carijoa riisei (E1 extract), Dragmaxia anomala (extract E1), and Haliclona (Halichoclona) sp. (fraction E3F2) showed the best results, particularly against extracellular promastigote forms of L. braziliensis (66, 35.9, 97.2 and 43.6% grown inhibition, respectively). However, only two species, C. riisei and D. anomala showed some tripanocidal effects (43.4 and 71.7% growth inhibition, respectively).
Additionally, these extracts and fractions were assayed on L. brasiliensis amastigotes in bone marrow macrophages from mice, and only the sponge Haliclona (Halichoclona) sp. and the octocoral C. riisei were active (Table 5). Based on these preliminary results, the E1 extract from C. riisei was fractionated by chromatographic techniques leading to the isolation of an active pregnane steroid [32]. Finally, the extracts from C. celata, P. citrina, P. janeirensis and Trachycladus sp. were not active against L. braziliensis or T. cruzi.
Table 5. Effects of marine invertebrates extracts and fractions on Leishmania brasiliensis amastigotes in bone marrow macrophages from mice, and cytotoxicity on J774.G8 macrophage cell line.
Table 5. Effects of marine invertebrates extracts and fractions on Leishmania brasiliensis amastigotes in bone marrow macrophages from mice, and cytotoxicity on J774.G8 macrophage cell line.
SpeciesSamplesCC50 ± SD (µg/mL)IC50 ± SD (µg/mL)Selective index (CC50/IC50)
Bugula neritinaE1ND>50ND
Carijoa riiseiE148.6 ± 4.843.3 ± 8.51.1
Dragmaxia anomalaE154.3 ± 1.9>15<3.6
Haliclona (Halichoclona) sp.E3F2279.7 ± 21.243.9 ± 3.46.8
Positive Control: amphotericin B (IC50 = 0.06 ± 0.02 μM); ND: not determinated; E1: hexane extract; E3F2: n-butanol fraction from E3 (methanol extract); E3F3: aqueous residue from E3 (methanol extract).
In this work, the antiviral activity against Herpes Simplex Virus type 1 (HSV-1, KOS strain) was also evaluated. Before the evaluation of the antiviral activity, the cytotoxic effects of the selected samples were investigated on VERO cells by MTT assay, and for each tested sample, a CC50 value was calculated. Of the 95 extracts and fractions tested, only the E3F2 fractions from the sponges Haliclona (Halichoclona) sp. and P. citrina showed antiviral activity (SI = 11.92 and, SI > 5, respectively).
In 2006, Silva and co-workers [20] performed an in vitro study on the antiherpes, anti-adenovirus and anti-rotavirus activities of marine sponges collected from the Brazilian coast, including Haliclona sp., Polymastia janeirensis and T. ignis. Of these, only the organic extract (methanol/toluene, 3:1 v/v) from P. janeirensis showed antiherpetic activity [20].

2.2. Marine Seaweeds

Only five out of 27 species from seaweeds assayed (Rhodophyta: Digenea simplex, Laurencia dendroidea, Ochtodes secundiramea, Osmundaria obtusiloba, andPhaeophyta: Dictyota sp.) showed weak growth inhibition zone (6 to 8 mm, (Table 6). Otherwise, A. specifera, A. saldanhae, A. stellata, B. occidentalis, B. seaforthii, B. triquetrum, C. cervicornis, C. sertularioides, C. cupressoidesa, C. cupressoidesb, C. seminervis, D. delicatula, D. jolyana, G. caudata, G. cervicornis, G. cuneifólia, H. cenomyce, H. musciformis, P. gymnospora, Padina sp., P. flagellifera, P. papillosa and Sargassum sp. did not show any antimicrobial activity.
Antibacterial activity may vary according to the species division [33]. In this study species from the phylum Rhodophyta exhibited better results than species from Chlorophyta and Phaeophyceae. In this context, our results are in agreement with the findings of Padmakumar and Ayyakkannu [34]. Members of the family Rhodophyceae are prolific producers of acetogenins as well as mono-, sesqui-, di- and triterpenes, many of them halogenated [35]. Many articles have reported antimicrobial activity of halogenated sesquiterpenes and acetogenins derived from Laurencia species, especially for (−)-elatol, obtusol, (+)-obtusane, cartilagineol, and triquinane derivatives [36,37]. Studies performed with Osmundaria species are scarce, but some compounds so far described have potential antimicrobial activity, particularly the halogenated phenol derivatives, such as lanosol and sulfated oligobromophenols [38,39].
Table 6. Antibacterial and antifungal screening of marine seaweeds by disc diffusion method.
Table 6. Antibacterial and antifungal screening of marine seaweeds by disc diffusion method.
SpeciesExtractsBacterial and fungal strains
S. aureusE. faecalisE. coliP. aeruginosaC. albicans
Dictyota sp.DS+++
Digenea simplexDS+++
Laurencia dendroideaFS++
Ochtodes secundirameaFS+
Osmundaria obtusilobaDS++
(−): no activity; (+): 6–8 mm of inhibition zone; (++): 9–12 mm of inhibition zone; (+++): 13–16 mm of inhibition zone. Positive controls: S. aureus: oxacillin (1 µg) 18–24 mm; E. faecalis: ampicillin (10 µg) > 17 mm; P. aeruginosa: ceftazidime (30 µg) 22–29 mm; E. coli: ampicillin (10 µg) 16–22 mm; C. albicans: fluconazole (25 µg) > 19 mm; DS: extract obtained from dried seaweeds using CH2Cl2: MeOH (2:1); FS: extract from fresh seaweeds using Me2CO.
Regarding the antiprotozoal activity, of the 27 species assayed, six showed interesting activity against L. braziliensis and T. cruzi. Extracts from Anadyomene saldanhae (FS extract), Caulerpa cupressoides(a) (FS extract), Canistrocarpus cervicornis (FS extract), Dictyota sp. (FS extract), Ochtodes secundiramea (FS extract), and Padina sp. (FS extract) showed promising results against L. braziliensis (87.9, 51.7, 85.9, 93.3, 99.7, and 80.9% growth inhibition, respectively). Only Dictyota sp. was effective against T. cruzi (60.4% growth inhibition) (Table 7). Otherwise, B. triquetrum, C. sertularioides, C. cupressoidesb, D. delicatula, G. caudata, H. cenomyce, H. musciformis, P. papillosa and Sargassum sp., none antiprotozoal activity was detected.
As far as we are aware, there are no reports in the literature on the antiprotozoal activity for four of these seaweeds species (A. saldanhae, C. cupressoidesa, Padina sp., and O. secundiramea). Concerning the activity of FS extract from the red seaweed L. dendroidea (= formerly Laurencia obtusa), only a weak (14.6%) antileishmanial activity against the promastigote forms of L. braziliensis was observed (Table 7). Furthermore, two species of seaweeds, A. saldanhae (SI = 12.3) and Padina sp. (SI = 7.5), were effective against L. brasiliensis amastigotes. Additionally, C. cervicornis, C. cupressoidesa, Dictyota sp., and O. secundiramea were strongly cytotoxic for bone marrow macrophages (Table 8).
Table 7. Antiprotozoal activity expressed as growth inhibition (%) of extracts and fractions obtained from marine seaweeds.
Table 7. Antiprotozoal activity expressed as growth inhibition (%) of extracts and fractions obtained from marine seaweeds.
SpeciesExtractsLeishmania braziliensis (promastigotes)Trypanosoma cruzi (epimastigotes)
Anadyomene saldanhaeFS87.9
Botryocladia occidentalisDS20.7
Bryothamnion seaforthiiDS33.5
Canistrocarpus cervicornisFS85.8
Caulerpa cupressoidesFS51.7
Dictyota sp.DS93.360.4
Digenea simplexDS26
Gracilaria caudataDS9.3
Grateloupia cuneifoliaFS35.215.9
DS3723.98
Laurencia dendroideaFS14.6
Ochtodes secundirameaFS99.7
Padina sp.FS80.9
Palisada flagelliferaDS21
Extracts and fractions concentration: 50 µg/mL; (−): no activity; DS: extract obtained from dried seaweeds using CH2Cl2/MeOH (2:1); FS: extract from fresh seaweeds using Me2CO.
Table 8. Effects of marine seaweeds extracts and fractions on Leishmania brasiliensis amastigotes in bone marrow macrophages from mice, and cytotoxicity on J774.G8 macrophage cell line.
Table 8. Effects of marine seaweeds extracts and fractions on Leishmania brasiliensis amastigotes in bone marrow macrophages from mice, and cytotoxicity on J774.G8 macrophage cell line.
SpeciesSamplesCC50 ± SD (µg/mL)IC50 ± SD (µg/mL)Selective index (CC50/IC50)
Anadyomene saldanhaeFS294.2 ± 28.223.9±2.312.3
Canistrocarpus cervicornisFS>50NDND
Caulerpa cupressoides(a)FS>50NDND
Dictyota sp.DS>50NDND
Ochtodes secundirameaFS>50NDND
Padina sp.FS300.4 ± 28.540.2 ± 4.37.5
Positive Control: amphotericin B (IC50 = 0.06 ± 0.02 μM); ND: not determined; DS: extract obtained from dried seaweeds using CH2Cl2/MeOH (2:1); FS: extract from fresh seaweeds using Me2CO.
Previous studies performed by Veiga-Santos et al. [5] and Machado et al. [37] showed that lipophilic extracts from L. dendroidea collected from the southeastern coast of Brazil strongly inhibited the growth of T. cruzi and L. amazonensis. These results are not completely in agreement with our findings for L. dendroidea and this discrepancy may be due to the different geographic regions where this species was collected, as well as the seawater conditions.
Another study led by Santos and colleagues [4] found that lipophilic extracts from the brown seaweed C. cervicornis collected from the northeastern coast of Brazil also strongly inhibited the growth of L. amazonensis. From this species, a 4-acetoxydolastane diterpene was isolated, which demonstrated dose-dependent activity during 72 h of treatment, exhibiting IC50 values of 2.0, 12.0 and 4.0 μg/mL for promastigotes, axenic amastigotes and intracellular amastigotes of L. amazonensis, respectively.
Concerning antiviral activity, none of the species tested displayed any anti-HSV-1 activity. Although Soares and colleagues [25] reported the anti-HSV-1 activity for the red alga L. dendroidea collected from the coast of Rio de Janeiro, in our work this specie showed high cytotoxicity against VERO cells and none antiviral activity was detected.
To summarize, the present work reports the antimicrobial, antiprotozoal and antiviral evaluation of organic extracts from nine sponges, two octocorals, one ascidian, one bryozoan, and 27 seaweeds species, collected along the Brazilian coastline. Of a total of 95 extracts and fractions, 53 (56%) showed some anti-infective activity against S. aureus, E. faecalis, P. aeruginosa, E. coli, C. albicans, L. braziliensis, T. cruzi, and HSV-1.
Clearly, the marine invertebrates and seaweeds from the Brazilian coast could play an important part in the future control of the global infectious-disease burden. Although substantial progress has been made in identifying new biotechnological potential from these organisms, further chemical analysis and biological studies are required for investigating the mechanism of action, the chemical content as well as the potential use of these marine organisms extracts in the prevention of pathologies.

3. Experimental

3.1. Collection of the Marine Organisms

Marine invertebrates were collected in April/May 2011, at Xavier (27°36'39''S; 48°23'32''W), Arvoredo (27°17'00''S; 48°22'00''W) and Aranhas (27°29'12''S; 48°21'37''W) Islands, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina State, Brazil, at a depth of 9–17 m. They were immediately frozen and then lyophilized. For the identification, the sponges were submitted to dissociated spicule preparations, and thick sections were made according to Mothes-de-Moraes [40]. Voucher specimens were deposited in the Porifera Collection of the Museu de Ciências Naturais, Fundação Zoobotânica do Rio Grande do Sul (MCNPOR). Tunicate and bryozoa were deposited in the Invertebrate Collection of the Departamento de Ecologia e Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (Table 1).
Seaweeds specimens (Rhodophyta, Pheophyceae, and Chlorophyta) were collected in the midlittoral zone of the southern and northeastern Brazilian coast, in August/October 2011 (Table 2). The epiphytic organisms from the seaweeds were manually cleaned immediately after collection, and air dried. The voucher specimens were deposited at the Herbarium of the Department of Botany at Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil.

3.2. Preparation of the Extracts

Organic extracts from marine invertebrates were prepared according to a standard procedure (Figure 1). Organic extracts from marine seaweeds were obtained using two distinct methods: CH2Cl2/MeOH (2:1) for dried seaweeds (DS extracts), and Me2CO for fresh seaweeds (FS extracts).
Figure 1. Procedure for obtaining the marine invertebrate extracts.
Figure 1. Procedure for obtaining the marine invertebrate extracts.
Molecules 18 05761 g001

3.3. Antibacterial and Antifungal Assays

The microorganism strains tested were from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA): Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), and Candida albicans (ATCC 10231).
The antibacterial and antifungal activities were evaluated by the disk diffusion method as previously described by de Oliveira et al. [41], with minor modifications. Briefly, filter paper disks (5 mm) were impregnated with 20 μl of the extracts or fractions solutions (100 mg/mL) and then placed on Muller-Hinton agar plates (HIMEDIA®), which were inoculated with the microorganisms according to the standard protocol described by the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute [42]. The plates were incubated at 35 °C (± 1°C), and after 18 h, the diameters of the inhibition zones were measured. Filter-paper disks containing DMSO were used as negative control and no inhibition was observed. Standard antibiotic disks were selected according to the sensitivity of the microorganism tested: ampicillin (10 μg), oxacillin (1 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg) and fluconazole (25 μg) [43].

3.4. Antiprotozoal Activity

3.4.1. Antileishmanial and Antitrypanosomal Activities

Leishmania braziliensis (MHOM/BR/96/LSC96-H3) promastigotes were grown at 26 °C in Schneider’s medium (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 5% heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 2% urine. Trypanosoma cruzi (MHOM/BR/00/Y) epimastigotes were grown at 26 °C in Liver Infusion Tryptose (LIT) medium containing 10% FBS. Both parasite cultures were grown in 10 U/mL penicillin and 10 μg/mL of streptomycin (Gibco®). For the growth inhibition assays, L. braziliensis promastigotes or T. cruzi epimastigotes in the exponential phase of growth were harvested and washed twice in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) by centrifugation at 1,500 × g. for 10 min. The parasites were counted in a Neubauer hemocytometer and seeded in 96-well microplates at 5.4 × 106 (T. cruzi) or 3 × 106 parasites/mL (L. braziliensis) in a final volume of 180 μL in LIT or Schneider´s medium, respectively. Parasites were incubated for 48 h at 26 °C in the presence of 20 μL of the samples (final concentration = 50 μg/mL). The standard drugs amphotericin B (Sigma) at 0.1 μM and benznidazole (Sigma) at 30 μM were used as positive controls and 1% DMSO was used as negative control. Parasite survival was assessed by the MTT assay [44]. The assays were carried out in triplicate, and the results were expressed as percentage of parasite growth inhibition.

3.4.2. Activity against Intracellular Amastigotes of T. cruzi and L. braziliensis in Murine Macrophages

In this work, only the samples that showed parasite growth inhibition higher than 40% against the extracellular forms were analyzed through this methodology. Murine (Balb/C) bone marrow derived macrophages were differentiated for 7 days in 6 well plates, with Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM-Gibco) supplemented with HEPES (25 mM), penicillin (100 U/mL), streptomycin (100 μg/mL), FBS (10%) and 25% (v/v) supernatant of the murine fibroblast cell line L929 at 37 °C and 5% CO2, as described by Marim and co-workers [45], with minor modifications. Adherent cells were washed with PBS, trypsinized, counted in a Neubauer hemocytometer and concentration adjusted to 4.105 cells/mL. Cell viability was assessed using Trypan Blue (0.04%). Next, 100 μl of cell suspension were seeded in 96 well plates and cultivated for 24 h at 37 °C. Thereafter, macrophages were infected with L. braziliensis axenic amastigotes (10 parasites/cell) for 3 h, at 34 °C and 5% CO2 or with VERO cell derived T. cruzi trypomastigotes (5 parasites/cell) for 4 h, at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Non-internalized parasites were removed by washing with PBS. After 24 h of incubation, 20 μL of the samples was added to the infected cell monolayers starting from 50 μg/mL and incubated for 48 h in 5% CO2 (34 °C for L. braziliensis and 37 °C for T. cruzi). The cells were washed with PBS, methanol fixed and Giemsa stained. The percentage of infected cells and the number of intracellular amastigotes were assessed using an Olympus IX70 optical inverted microscope, randomly counting 100 cells/well at a magnification of 400×. The reduction of the parasitic index was calculated as described elsewhere [46], and the 50% inhibitory concentration was calculated by linear least squares regression, using the software GraphPad Prism 5.0. Amphotericin B (0.2 μM) and benznidazole (15 μM) were used as positive controls. DMSO 1% was used as negative control. The experiments were carried out in triplicate and repeated at least twice.

3.4.3. Cytotoxic Activity against J774.G8 Macrophage Cell Line

Murine J774.G8 phagocytic cells were seeded in 96 well plates with DMEM supplemented with HEPES (25 mM), penicillin (100 U/mL), streptomycin (100 μg/mL) and FBS (10%), and incubated for 72 h with the samples starting from 500 μg/mL. The assays were carried out in triplicate and cell viability was determined as described above for VERO cells. The CC50 was calculated by minimum square linear regression with the software GraphPad Prism 5.0.

3.5. Anti-HSV-1 Assay

3.5.1. Virus and Cell Line

The cell line used (VERO-ATCC: CCL81) was grown in Eagle’s minimum essential medium (MEM; Cultilab, Campinas, Brazil) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 100 U/mL penicillin G, 100 µg/mL streptomycin and 25 µg/mL amphotericin B (Cultilab®). Cell cultures were maintained at 37 °C and 5% CO2. The HSV-1 (KOS strain, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Rennes, France) was propagated in VERO cells. Viral stock was prepared, titrated based on plaque forming units (PFU), counted by the plaque assay as previously described [47] and stored at −80 °C.

3.5.2. Cytotoxicity Assay

Confluent VERO cells were exposed to different concentrations of the samples for 72 h. After incubation, cell viability was assessed by the MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] assay [44]. The assays were carried out in triplicate, and the results were expressed as the CC50, which was defined as the concentration that reduced cell viability by 50%, when compared to the untreated controls.

3.5.3. Viral plaque Number Reduction Assay

This assay followed the procedures described by Kuo et al. [48], with minor modifications. Approximately 100 PFU of HSV-1 was adsorbed for 1 h at 37 °C on confluent VERO cells. Cultures were then overlaid with MEM containing 1.5% carboxymethylcellulose (CMC; Sigma) with or without different concentrations of the samples. After 72 h, the cells were fixed and stained with naphtol blue-black (Sigma), and the plaques were counted. The assays were carried out in triplicate, and the results were expressed as the IC50, which was defined as the concentration that reduced the number of viral plaques formed by 50%, when compared to the untreated controls. Acyclovir (Sigma) was used as a positive control.

4. Conclusions

In this work, we screened 95 different extracts and fractions from Brazilian marine seaweeds and invertebrates, for their potential anti-infective properties (antibacterial, antifungal, antiprotozoal and antiviral activities). The studies showed that invertebrates Bugula neritina, Carijoa riisei, Dragmaxia anomala, Haliclona (Halichoclona) sp. and Petromica citrina and seaweeds Anadyomene saldanhae, Canistrocarpus cervicornis, Caulerpa cupressoides, Dictyota sp., Digenea simplex, Laurencia dendroidea, Ochtodes secundiramea and Osmundaria obtusiloba showed some type/level of anti-infective property.
Moreover, this work also shows the importance of bioprospecting studies highlighting the importance of marine biodiversity as sources of potential natural compounds with pharmacological properties or biotechnological potential that could be used in the development of new drugs. All the active extracts deserve special attention in further studies to chemically characterize the bioactive compounds as well as more refined biological assays.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico [CNPq, MCTI (Grants 151561/2008-7, 306917/2009-2 and 471307/2011-4), SISBIOTAMar (Grant 381235/2011-4)], Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior [PNPD, CAPES-MEC (Grant 2207/2009)], Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Estado de Santa Catarina (FAPESC/BIODIVERSIDADE—Grant 14170/2010) for their financial support. The authors P. A. Horta, F. H. Reginatto, M. Steindel, C. M. O. Simões and E. P. Schenkel are also grateful to the CNPq for granting research fellowships.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fusetani, N. Drugs from the Sea; S. Karger AG: Basel, Switzerland, 2000; p. 158. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sagar, S.; Kaur, M.; Minneman, K.P. Antiviral lead compounds from marine sponges. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 2619–2638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mancini, I.; Defant, A.; Guella, G. Recent synthesis of marine natural products with antibacterial activities. Anti-Infect Agents Med. Chem. 2007, 6, 17–48. [Google Scholar]
  4. Santos, A.O.; Veiga-Santos, P.; Ueda-Nakamura, T.; Dias-Filho, B.P.; Sudatti, D.B.; Bianco, E.M.; Pereira, R.C.; Nakamura, C.V. Effect of elatol, isolated from red seaweed Laurencia dendroidea, on Leishmania amazonensi. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 2733–2743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Veiga-Santos, P.; Rocha, K.J.P.; Santos, A.O.; Ueda-Nakamura, T.; Dias-Filho, B.P.; Lautenschlager, S.O.S.; Sudatti, D.B.; Bianco, E.M.; Pereira, R.C.; Nakamura, C.V. In vitro anti-trypanosomal activity of elatol isolated from red seaweed Laurencia dendroidea. Parasitology 2010, 137, 1661–1670. [Google Scholar]
  6. Santos, A.O.; Britta, E.A.; Bianco, E.M.; Ueda-Nakamura, T.; Dias-Filho, B.P.; Pereira, R.C.; Nakamura, C.V. Leshmanicidal activity of an 4-acetoxy-dolastane diterpene from the Brazilian brown alga Canistrocarpus cervicornis. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 2369–2383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wattanadilok, R.; Sawangwong, P.; Rodrigues, C.; Cidade, H.; Pinto, M.; Pinto, E.; Silva, A.; Kijjoa, A. Antifungal activity evaluation of the constituents of Haliclona baeri and Haliclona cymaeformis, collected from the Gulf of Thailand. Mar. Drugs 2007, 5, 40–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Moore, R.E.; Scheuer, P.J. Palytoxin: A new marine toxin from a coelenterate. Science 1971, 172, 495–498. [Google Scholar]
  9. Friedman, M.A.; Fleming, L.E.; Fernandez, M.; Bienfang, P.; Schrank, K.; Dickey, R.; Bottein, M.; Backer, L.; Ayyar, R.; Weisman, R.; et al. Ciguatera fish poisoning: Treatment, prevention and management. Mar. Drugs 2008, 6, 456–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, D. Neurotoxins from marine dinoflagellates: A brief review. Mar. Drugs 2008, 6, 349–371. [Google Scholar]
  11. Rinehart, K.L., Jr; Gloer, J.B.; Hughes, R.G., Jr; Renis, H.E.; Mcgovren, J.P.; Swynenberg, E.B.; Stringfellow, D.A.; Kuentzel, S.L.; Li, L.H. Didemnins: Antiviral and antitumor depsipeptides from a Caribbean tunicate. Science 1981, 212, 933–935. [Google Scholar]
  12. Simmons, T.L.; Andrianasolo, E.; Flatt, K.M.P.; Gerwick, W.H. Marine natural products as anticancer drugs. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2005, 4, 333–342. [Google Scholar]
  13. Costa-Lotufo, L.V.; Wilke, D.V.; Jimenez, P.C.; Epifanio, R.A. Organismos marinhos como fonte de novos fármacos: histórico & perspectivas. Quim. Nova 2009, 32, 703–716. [Google Scholar]
  14. Molinski, T.F.; Dalisay, D.S.; Lievens, S.L.; Saludes, J.P. Drug development from marine natural products. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2009, 8, 69–85. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kelecom, A. Marine natural products in Brazil. Part 1. Isolation and structure determination. Cienc. Cult. 1997, 49, 321–330. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bianco, E.M.; Teixeira, V.L.; Pereira, R.C. Chemical defenses of the tropical marine seaweed Canistrocarpus cervicornis against herbivory by sea urchin. Braz. J. Oceanogr. 2010, 58, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pereira, R.C.; Oliveira, A.S.; Sudatti, D.B. Ecologia química marinha: origem, evolução e perspectivas no Brasil. Oecol. Aust. 2011, 15, 412–435. [Google Scholar]
  18. Teixeira, V.L. Caracterização do Estado da Arte em Biotecnologia Marinha no Brasil. Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde, Ministério da Saúde, Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia, Série B.; Textos Básicos de Saúde: Brasília, Brasil (In Portuguese language), 2010; p. 134. [Google Scholar]
  19. Monks, N.R.; Lerner, C.; Henriques, A.T.; Farias, F.M.; Schapoval, E.E.S.; Suyenaga, E.S.; Rocha, A.B.; Schwartsmann, G.; Mothes, B. Anticancer, antichemotactic and antimicrobial activities of marine sponges collected off the coast of Santa Catarina, southern Brazi. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2002, 281, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  20. Silva, A.C.; Kratz, J.M.; Farias, F.M.; Henriques, A.T.; Santos, J.; Leonel, R.M.; Lerner, C.; Mothes, B.; Barardi, C.M.; Simões, C.M.O. In vitro antiviral activity of marine sponges collected off Brazilian coast. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2006, 29, 135–140. [Google Scholar]
  21. Frota, M.L.C., Jr; Braganhol, E.; Canedo, A.D.; Klamt, F.; Apel, M.A.; Mothes, B.; Lerner, C.; Battastini, A.M.O.; Henriques, A.T.; Moreira, J.C.F. Brazilian marine sponge Polymastia janeirensis induces apoptotic cell death in human U138MG glioma cell line, but not in a normal cell culture. Invest. New Drugs 2009, 27, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Frota, M.L.C., Jr; Braganhol, E.; Canedo, A.D.; Klamt, F.; Apel, M.A.; Mothes, B.; Lerner, C.; Battastini, A.M.O.; Henriques, A.T.; Moreira, J.C.F. Extracts of marine sponge Polymastia janeirensis induce oxidative cell death through a caspase-9 apoptotic pathway in human U138MG glioma cell line. Invest. New Drugs 2009, 27, 440–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jimenez, P.C.; Fortier, S.C.; Lotufo, T.M.C.; Pessoa, C.; Moraes, M.E.A.; Moraes, M.O.; Costa-Lotufo, L.V. Biological activity in extracts of ascidians (Tunicata, Ascidiacea) from the northeastern Brazilian coast. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2003, 287, 93–101. [Google Scholar]
  24. Seleghim, M.H.R.; Lira, S.P.; Kossuga, M.H.; Batista, T.; Berlinck, R.G.S.; Hajdu, E.; Muricy, G.; da Rocha, R.M.; do Nascimento, G.G.F.; Silva, M.; et al. Antibiotic, cytotoxic and enzyme inhibitory activity of crude extracts from Brazilian marine invertebrates. Braz. J. Pharmacog. 2007, 17, 287–318. [Google Scholar]
  25. Soares, A.R.; Robaina, M.C.S.; Mendes, G.; Silva, T.S.L.; Gestinari, L.M.S.; Pamplona, O.S.; Yoneshigue-Valentin, Y.; Kaiser, C.R.; Romanos, M.T.V. Antiviral activity of extracts from Brazilian seaweeds against herpes simplex vírus. Braz. J. Pharmacog. 2012, 22, 714–722. [Google Scholar]
  26. Halpern, B.S.; Walbridge, S.; Selkoe, K.A.; Kappel, C.V.; Micheli, F.; D’Agrosa, C.; Bruno, F.F.; Casey, E.C.; Fox, H.E.; Fujita, R.; et al. Global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 2008, 319, 948–952. [Google Scholar]
  27. Horta, P.A.; Vieira-Pinto, T.; Martins, C.D.L.; Sissini, M.; Ramlov, F.; Lhullier, C.; Scherner, F.; Sanches, P.; Farias, J.; Bastos, E.; et al. Evaluation of impacts of climate change and local stressors on the biotechnological potential of marine macroalgae: A brief theoretical discussion of likely scenarios. Braz. J. Pharmacog. 2012, 22, 768–774. [Google Scholar]
  28. Cordell, G.A. Biodiversity and drug discovery—A symbiotic relationship. Phytochemistry 2000, 55, 463–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Marinho, P.R.; Muricy, G.R.S.; Silva, M.F.L.; de Marval, M.G.; Laport, M.S. Antibiotic-resistant bacteria inhibited by extracts and fractions from Brazilian marine sponges. Braz. J. Pharmacog. 2010, 20, 267–275. [Google Scholar]
  30. Marinho, P.R.; Simas, N.K.; Kuster, R.M.; Duarte, R.S.; Fracalanzza, S.E.L.; Ferreira, D.F.; Romanos, M.T.V.; Muricy, G.; Giambiagi-Demerval, M.; Laport, M.S. Antibacterial activity and cytotoxicity analysis of halistanol trisulphate from marine sponge Petromica citrina. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012, 67, 2396–2400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kossuga, M.H.; de Lira, S.P.; Nascimento, A.M.; Gambardella, M.T.P.; Torres, R.G.S.Y.R.; Nascimento, G.G.F.; Pimenta, E.F.; Silva, M.; Thiemann, O.H.; Olivia, G.; Tempone, A.G. Quim. Nova 2007, 30, 1194–1202. [CrossRef]
  32. Almeida, M.T.R.; Tonini, M.L.; Guimarães, T.R.; Bianco, E.M.; Moritz, M.I.G.; Oliveira, S.Q.; Cabrera, G.M.; Palermo, J.; Reginatto, F.H.; Steindel, M.; et al. Anti-infective pregnane steroid from the octocoral Carijoa riisei collected in South Brazil. Lat. Am. J. Pharm. 2012, 31, 1489–1495. [Google Scholar]
  33. Manivannan, K.; Karthikai, D.G.; Anantharaman, P.; Balasubramanian, T. Antimicrobial potential of selected brown seaweeds from Vedalai coastal waters, Gulf of Mannar. Asian Pac.J. Trop. Biomed. 2011, 1, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Padmakumar, K.; Ayyakkannu, K. Seasonal variation of antibacterial and antifungal activities of the extracts of marine algae from Southern coasts of India. Bot. Mar. 1997, 40, 507–516. [Google Scholar]
  35. Bhakuni, D.S.; Rawat, D.S. Bioactive Marine Natural Products; Anamaya Publishers: New Delhi, India, 2005; p. 382. [Google Scholar]
  36. Bansemir, A.; Just, N.; Michalik, M.; Lindequist, U.; Lalk, M. Extracts and sesquiterpene derivatives from the red alga Laurencia chondrioides with antibacterial activity against fish and human pathogenic bacteria. Chem. Biodivers. 2004, 1, 463–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Machado, F.L.S.; Pacienza-Lima, W.; Rossi-Bergmann, B.; Gestinari, L.M.S.; Fujii, M.T.; de Paula, J.C.; Costa, S.S.; Lopes, N.P.; Kaiser, C.R.; Soares, A.R. Antileishmanial sesquiterpenes from the Brazilian red alga Laurencia dendroidea. Planta Med. 2011, 77, 733–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Barreto, M.; Meyer, J.J.M. Isolation and antimicrobial activity of a lanosol derivative from Osmundaria serrata (Rhodophyta) and a visual exploration of its biofilm covering. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2006, 72, 521–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Carvalho, L.R.; Guimarães, S.M.P.B.; Roque, N.F. Sulfated bromophenols from Osmundaria obtusiloba (C. Agardh) R. E. Norris (Rhodophyta, Ceramiales). Revista Brasil. Bot. 2006, 29, 453–459. [Google Scholar]
  40. Mothes-de-Moraes, B. Primeiro registro de Myriastra purpurea (Ridley, 1884) para a costa brasileira (Porifera, Demospongiae. Rev. Bras. Zool. 1985, 2, 321–326. [Google Scholar]
  41. De Oliveira, S.Q.; Trentin, V.H.; Kappel, V.D.; Barelli, C.; Gosmann, G.; Reginatto, F.H. Screening of antibacterial activity of south Brazilian Baccharis species. Pharm. Biol. 2005, 43, 434–438. [Google Scholar]
  42. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests: approved standard M2-A8. In Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 8th ed; CLSI document M2-A8; CLSI: Wayne, PA, USA, 2002; pp. 1–58. [Google Scholar]
  43. Kappel, V.D.; Costa, G.M.; Scola, G.; Silva, F.A.; Landell, M.F.; Valente, P.; Souza, D.G.; Vanz, D.C.; Reginatto, F.H.; Moreira, J.C.F. Phenolic content and antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of fruits of Capsicum baccatum L. var. pendulum at different maturity stages. J. Med. Food 2008, 11, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mosmann, T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Methods 1983, 16, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Marim, F.M.; Silveira, T.N.; Lima, D.S., Jr; Zamboni, D.S. A method for generation of bone marrow-derived macrophages from cryopreserved mouse bone marrow cells. PLoS One 2010, 5, e15263. [Google Scholar]
  46. Sereno, D.; Holzmuller, P.; Lemesre, J.L. Efficacy of second line drugs on antimonyl-resistant amastigotes of Leishmania infantum. Acta Tropica 2000, 74, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Burlenson, F.G.; Chamberts, T.M.; Wiedbrauk, D.L. Virology: a Laboratory Manual; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1992; p. 250. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kuo, Y.C.; Chen, C.C.; Tsai, W.J.; Ho, Y.H. Regulation of herpes simplex virus type 1 replication in Vero cells by Psychotria serpens: relationship to gene expression, DNA replication, and protein synthesi. Antiviral. Res. 2001, 51, 95–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  • Sample Availability: Not available.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bianco, É.M.; De Oliveira, S.Q.; Rigotto, C.; Tonini, M.L.; Da Rosa Guimarães, T.; Bittencourt, F.; Gouvêa, L.P.; Aresi, C.; De Almeida, M.T.R.; Moritz, M.I.G.; et al. Anti-Infective Potential of Marine Invertebrates and Seaweeds from the Brazilian Coast. Molecules 2013, 18, 5761-5778. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules18055761

AMA Style

Bianco ÉM, De Oliveira SQ, Rigotto C, Tonini ML, Da Rosa Guimarães T, Bittencourt F, Gouvêa LP, Aresi C, De Almeida MTR, Moritz MIG, et al. Anti-Infective Potential of Marine Invertebrates and Seaweeds from the Brazilian Coast. Molecules. 2013; 18(5):5761-5778. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules18055761

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bianco, Éverson Miguel, Simone Quintana De Oliveira, Caroline Rigotto, Maiko Luis Tonini, Tatiana Da Rosa Guimarães, Francine Bittencourt, Lidiane Pires Gouvêa, Cassandra Aresi, Maria Tereza Rojo De Almeida, Maria Izabel Goularte Moritz, and et al. 2013. "Anti-Infective Potential of Marine Invertebrates and Seaweeds from the Brazilian Coast" Molecules 18, no. 5: 5761-5778. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules18055761

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop