Next Article in Journal
One-Pot Synthesis of Organic-Sulfur-Zinc Hybrid Materials via Polycondensation of a Zinc Salt and Thiols Generated in Situ from Cyclic Dithiocarbonates
Next Article in Special Issue
Autodisplay of Human Hyaluronidase Hyal-1 on Escherichia coli and Identification of Plant-Derived Enzyme Inhibitors
Previous Article in Journal
Copper-Catalyzed Dimerization/Cyclization of Itaconates
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recombinant Production of Snakin-2 (an Antimicrobial Peptide from Tomato) in E. coli and Analysis of Its Bioactivity
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 20
Issue 8
10.3390/molecules200815033
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Inhibition of Cytosolic Phospholipase A2α (cPLA2α) by Medicinal Plants in Relation to Their Phenolic Content

by
Eva Arnold
*,
Thorsten Benz
,
Cornelia Zapp
and
Michael Wink
*
Institute of Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 364, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2015, 20(8), 15033-15048; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200815033
Submission received: 7 July 2015 / Revised: 5 August 2015 / Accepted: 11 August 2015 / Published: 17 August 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Proceedings of the the 4th Young Researcher Meeting, Münster, March 13-14, 2015)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The cytosolic phospholipase A2α (cPLA 2 α ) is one of the potential targets for anti-inflammatory drugs, since this enzyme plays a key role in the inflammation processes seen in health disorders, like asthma, allergic reactions, arthritis and neuronal diseases. In this study, cPLA 2 α inhibition by 43 methanol extracts from medicinal plants rich in polyphenols was determined. The eight most active extracts were derived from Ribes nigrum (IC 50 of 27.7 µg/mL), Ononis spinosa (IC 50 of 39.4 µg/mL), Urtica dioica (IC 50 of 44.32 µg/mL), Betula sp. (IC 50 of 58.02 µg/mL), Sanguisorba officinalis (IC 50 of 76.25 µg/mL), Orthosiphon stamineus (IC 50 of 78.83 µg/mL), Petasites hybridus (IC 50 of 81.02 µg/mL) and Tussilago farfara (IC 50 of 123.28 µg/mL). Additionally, the antioxidant activities of these extracts were determined with the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay and their phenolic content with the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent. Antioxidant activity showed a non-linear, positive correlation to the phenolic content, but no correlation of PLA 2 α inhibition with phenolic content could be established. This study provides evidence that cPLA 2 α may be a relevant target for anti-inflammatory agents.

1. Introduction

The phospholipases A 2 (PLA 2 ) play an important role in the inflammatory response. The enzymes catalyze the release of a fatty acid at the sn 2 -position of membrane phospholipids. This leads to the release of a lysophospholipid, which itself functions as a signal molecule, and arachidonic acid (AA), a poly-unsaturated fatty acid. AA is the precursor for the synthesis of the eicosanoids, which are lipid mediators of the inflammatory response. Two well-known subgroups of eicosanoids are the prostaglandins and leukotrienes, which are produced from AA through the enzymes cyclooxygenase 1 and 2 (COX-1 and COX-2) and 5-lipoxygenase (5-LOX), respectively [1]. Whereas COX enzymes are well-studied targets for anti-inflammatory drugs like acetylsalicylic acid, no drugs are on the market for 5-LOX and PLA 2 , so far. Depending on their size, catalytic mechanism and specificity for AA, there are more than ten groups of PLA 2 enzymes [1]. Among PLA 2 enzymes, the cytosolic PLA 2 alpha from Subgroup IV (cPLA 2 α ) is known to have the highest specificity for AA [2] and, therefore, is discussed as the key enzyme in the release of AA for eicosanoid synthesis [1,3]. cPLA 2 α has been associated with inflammation-related diseases, like asthma and allergic reactions [4,5,6], arthritis [7,8] and neuronal diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease [9,10], multiple sclerosis [11] and Parkinson’s disease [12]. Therefore, the cPLA 2 α isoform should be a potential target for anti-inflammatory drugs [13].
In the history of the therapy of inflammation, medicinal plants have always played important roles [14]; still, their mechanisms of action are often unknown. In this study, porcine cPLA 2 α inhibition by 43 methanol extracts of different medicinal plants was analyzed, known to accumulate potentially anti-inflammatory polyphenols, such as flavonoids, which are known to have an influence on the arachidonic acid metabolism [14,15,16]. Following this screening, we further examined the eight most potent inhibitory extracts in more detail. In addition, the total phenolic content of these extracts was quantified with Folin–Ciocalteu reagent and their antioxidant activity with DPPH. We further analyzed whether anti-inflammatory properties are correlated with phenolic content and anti-oxidant activities.

2. Results and Discussion

Initially, 43 methanol extracts from 43 species of 25 different plant families were screened for cPLA 2 α inhibition at a final concentration of 100 µg/mL. As a positive control, the cPLA 2 α inhibitor arachidonyl trifluoromethyl ketone (25 µM) was employed, resulting in an 80% inhibition. All experiments were conducted the same way, and no abnormalities occurred. Figure 1 shows an exemplary HPLC chromatogram from a sample of 100 µg/mL Ononis spinosa incubated with cPLA 2 α . Among the active extracts, 17 showed over 50% inhibition of AA release (see Table 1 for all screening results). From these, the eight best inhibitory extracts, Urtica dioica (leaf), Petasites hybridus (leaf), Sanguisorba officinalis (herb), Ribes nigrum (leaf), Betula sp. (leaf), Ononis spinosa (herb), Orthosiphon stamineus (leaf) and Tussilago farfara (leaf), in descending order, were chosen to establish the dose dependence of cPLA 2 α inhibition.
The activity of cPLA 2 α strongly depends on calcium ions, which are necessary for its binding to substrate [2,17]. Furthermore, enzymatic activity can be raised two to three times by phosphorylation [18,19]. It has been shown that phosphorylation of human cPLA 2 α takes place within five minutes after stimulation of platelets with thrombin [18,20]. In our experimental setup, we isolate the porcine cPLA 2 α from fresh blood. In the process of slaughtering, the pigs experience stress and injury, which may trigger the production of thrombin. Thus, during the process of platelet isolation from porcine blood in the lab, phosphorylation of porcine cPLA 2 α may take place. However, we did not observe platelet coagulation as a consequence of thrombin production.
Table
Table 1. cPLA 2 α inhibition (%) by 100 µg/mL methanol extract of 43 plants. Species are ordered according to their inhibitory activity.
Table 1. cPLA 2 α inhibition (%) by 100 µg/mL methanol extract of 43 plants. Species are ordered according to their inhibitory activity.
Scientific NamePlant FamilyPartDrug NameInhibition ± Error (%)
Urtica dioica L.UrticaceaeleafUrticae folium74.7 ± 2.87
Petasites hybridus (L.) Gaertn.AsteraceaeleafPetasitidis folium73.01 ± 2.42
Sanguisorba officinalis L.RosaceaeherbSanguisorbae herba70.24 ± 2.88
Ribes nigrum L.GrossulariaceaeleafRibis nigri folium69.49 ± 8.49
Betula sp. L.BetulaceaeleafBetulae folium68.69 ± 13.3
Ononis spinosa L.FabaceaeherbOninidis herba67.97 ± 7.94
Orthosiphon stamineus BenthLamiaceaeleafOrthosiphonis folium65.71 ± 7.64
Tussilago farfara L.AsteraceaeleafFarfarae folium54.91 ± 3.82
Paullinia cupana KunthSapindaceaefruitGuaranae fructus54.71 ± 3.86
Senegalia catechu (L.F.) Hurter & Mabb.FabaceaegumGummi catechu54.61 ± 7.2
Styphnolobium japonicum (L.) SchottFabaceaeflowerSophorae flos53.68 ± 2.69
Helichrysum arenarium (L.) MoenchAsteraceaeflowerHelichrysi flos53.12 ± 3.34
Hamamelis virginiana L.HamamelidaceaeleafHamamelidis folium52.82 ± 5.67
Camellia sinensis (L.) KuntzeTheaceaeleafTheae folium52.46 ± 2.93
Centella asiatica (L.) UrbanApiaceaeherbCentellae herba51.85 ± 4.07
Tropaeolum majus L.TropaeolaceaeherbTropaeoli herba50.85 ± 3.59
Arnica montana L.AsteraceaeflowerArnicae flos50.06 ± 4.1
Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Sch.Bip.AsteraceaeherbTanaceti parthenii herba49.46 ± 3.92
Cynara cardunculus L.AsteraceaeleafCynarae folium44.85 ± 4.52
Plantago lanceolata L.PlantaginaceaeleafPlantaginis lanceolatae folium42.25 ± 3.93
Leonurus cardiaca L.LamiaceaeherbLeonuri herba41.87 ± 3.79
Marsdenia cundurango Rchb.f.ApocynaceaecortexCondurango cortex41.84 ± 5.34
Melissa officinalis L.LamiaceaeleafMelissae folium41.53 ± 4.48
Agathosma betulina (Berg.) PillansRutaceaeleafBucco folium39.49 ± 5.55
Solidago sp. L.AsteraceaeherbSolidaginis herba36.66 ± 5.12
Quercus sp. L.FagaceaecortexQuercus cortex36.29 ± 3.95
Salix alba L.SalicaceaecortexSalicis cortex34.33 ± 5.71
Crataegus sp. Tourn. ex L.RosaceaeflowerCrataegi flos29.83 ± 18.31
Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.EricaceaeleafVitis idaei folium29.36 ± 6.88
Harungana madagascariensis Lam. ex PoiretHypericaceaecortexHarongae cortex29.36 ± 4.16
Peumus boldus MolinaMonimiaceaeleafboldo folium28.46 ± 8.37
Salvia officinalis L.LamiaceaeleafSalviae folium26.16 ± 7.89
Berberis vulgaris L.BerberidaceaecortexBerberidis cortex24.9 ± 4.27
Juglans regia L.JuglandaceaeleafJuglandis folium23.88 ± 4.45
Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (L.) Spreng.EricaceaeleafUvae-ursi folium22.04 ± 5.75
Verbascum sp. L.ScrophulariaceaeflowerVerbasci flos21.64 ± 4.49
Vaccinium myrtillus L.EricaceaeleafMyrtilli folium19.17 ± 6.68
Filipendula ulmaria (L.) Maxim.RosaceaeherbFilipendulae herba10.19 ± 10.43
Alchemilla vulgaris L.RosaceaeherbAlchemillae herba10.03 ± 5.76
Fragaria vesca L.RosaceaeleafFragariae folium7.28 ± 5.14
Hamamelis virginiana L.HamamelidaceaecortexHamamelidis cortex1.41 ± 12.42
Punica granatum L.LythraceaecortexGranati cortex−10.69 ± 6.81
Humulus lupulus L.CannabaceaeglandsLupuli glandula−65.16 ± 10.73
Arachidonyl Trifluoromethyl Ketone (25 µM)---80.04 ± 3.58
Molecules 20 15033 g001 550
Figure 1. HPLC chromatogram of a sample of Ononis spinosa herb extract (100 µg/mL) incubated with cPLA2α. Absorbance (AU, y-axis) is depicted in relation to time (min, x-axis) at a detection wavelength of 200 nm (A) and 254 nm (B), respectively. AA = arachidonic acid peak; Int.Std. = the peak of the internal standard 4-undecyloxybenzoic acid.
Figure 1. HPLC chromatogram of a sample of Ononis spinosa herb extract (100 µg/mL) incubated with cPLA2α. Absorbance (AU, y-axis) is depicted in relation to time (min, x-axis) at a detection wavelength of 200 nm (A) and 254 nm (B), respectively. AA = arachidonic acid peak; Int.Std. = the peak of the internal standard 4-undecyloxybenzoic acid.
Molecules 20 15033 g001

2.1. Dose Dependence of cPLA 2 α Inhibition

All eight extracts exhibited a dose-dependent cPLA 2 α inhibition (Figure 2). With an IC 50 value of 27.7 ± 4.71 µg/mL, the extract from Ribes nigrum was the most potent cPLA 2 α inhibitor (Figure 2A), followed by Ononis spinosa (39.4 ± 6.49 µg/mL) (Figure 2B), Urtica dioica (44.32 ± 5.88 µg/mL) (Figure 2C) and Betula sp. (58.02 ± 5.99 µg/mL) (Figure 2D). A little less active were the extracts of Sanguisorba officinalis (Figure 2E), Orthosiphon stamineus (Figure 2F) and Petasites hybridus (Figure 2G), with corresponding IC 50 values of 76.25 ± 10.93 µg/mL, 78.83 ± 15.55 µg/mL and 81.02 ± 18.23 µg/mL, respectively. The least active extract in this selection came from Tussilago farfara with an IC 50 of 123.28 ± 15.06 µg/mL (Figure 2H).
Previous studies have reported anti-inflammatory activity for four of the eight plants, Urtica dioica, Orthosiphon stamineus, Ribes nigrum and Ononis spinosa, in the carragenan-induced paw edema model in rats [21,22,23,24,25,26]. The inflammatory reaction to carrageenan is biphasic: in the first phase, there is a release of histamine and serotonin, whereas the second phase is characterized by the release of eicosanoids, like prostaglandins [27,28,29]. This model can thus be used to study non-specific inflammation, including the release of arachidonic acid through cPLA 2 α . In addition to the effect in the paw edema model, Urtica dioica extracts were shown to inhibit COX-1 and COX-2 directly and to act as an antagonist at the histamine 1 receptor, a key target for allergic reactions [30,31]. With regard to the role of cPLA 2 α enzyme in allergic reactions [4,5,6], the cPLA 2 α inhibiting the potential of Urtica dioica may be important as an anti-allergy agent.
Molecules 20 15033 g002 550
Figure 2. Dose-dependence of cytosolic phospholipase A2α (cPLA2α) inhibition by extracts of: Ribes nigrum (A); Ononis spinosa (B); Urtica dioica (C); Betula sp. (D); Sanguisorba officinalis (E); Orthosiphon stamineus (F); Petasites hybridus (G); and Tussilago farfara (H). cPLA2α activity (%) is plotted against extract concentration (µg/mL). The x-axes are scaled logarithmically.
Figure 2. Dose-dependence of cytosolic phospholipase A2α (cPLA2α) inhibition by extracts of: Ribes nigrum (A); Ononis spinosa (B); Urtica dioica (C); Betula sp. (D); Sanguisorba officinalis (E); Orthosiphon stamineus (F); Petasites hybridus (G); and Tussilago farfara (H). cPLA2α activity (%) is plotted against extract concentration (µg/mL). The x-axes are scaled logarithmically.
Molecules 20 15033 g002
As concerns Sanguisorba officinalis and Ononis spinosa, the roots are well-known traditional phytomedicines [14]. For the aerial parts of these plants, anti-inflammatory activities have not been reported. Root extracts of Sanguisorba officinalis exhibited an anti-asthmatic and anti-allergic effect in mouse models [32,33]. In vitro assays with lipopolysaccharide and interferon gamma stimulated mouse macrophages showed the potential of a Sanguisorba officinalis extract to substantially inhibit prostaglandin, nitric oxide (NO) and tumor necrosis factor alpha production [34,35]. Ononis spinosa root extract showed an analgesic effect in mice equivalent to the positive control aspirin [36] and was able to reduce carrageenan-induced paw edema in rats [21]. We now provide evidence that cPLA 2 α is probably the target for the anti-inflammatory activity of the aerial parts from Sanguisorba officinalis and Ononis spinosa.
Prostaglandin and leukotriene synthesis were inhibited by extracts from Petasites hybridus [37,38]. Furthermore, extracts from this plant are marketed as a prophylactic for the treatment of migraine [39,40]. However, its use in the therapy of allergic rhinitis and asthma has been discussed controversially [41,42,43,44]. In this study, we provide evidence that Petasites hybridus directly inhibits cPLA 2 α , which would also explain the reported inflammatory and anti-allergic activities. The extract of Tussilago farfara and its ingredient tussilagon inhibit NO and prostaglandin production in stimulated murine microglia cells and macrophages [35,45,46]. The anti-inflammatory effect of tussilagone may be due to an induction of heme oxygenase-1 [47] and an inhibition of COX-2 and nitric oxide synthase gene expression [45]. The anti-inflammatory activity is moderate, as seen from our results of cPLA 2 α inhibition.
In traditional medicine, Betula sp. leaves are used to treat inflammation [14]. This may be the result of a variety of flavonoids and triterpenoids present [48,49,50]. Betula pendula leaf extract showed an inhibitory effect against corneal inflammation in rats [51], lymphocyte growth and cell division [52]. Our results indicate that the anti-inflammatory effect of Betula sp. may involve the inhibition of cPLA 2 α .

2.2. cPLA 2 α Inhibition in Relation to Phenolic Content and Antioxidant Activities

Phenolic secondary metabolites, for example flavonoids, have the ability to unspecifically interact with all kinds of biomolecules, especially proteins. This results, for example, in an inhibition of the catalytic mechanism of enzymes [53]. As a consequence, polyphenols could directly inhibit cPLA 2 α , which would lead to a lower AA release. As expected, the results of the Folin–Ciocalteu assay confirmed that all eight extracts contain phenolic ingredients (see Table 2). It is very interesting that four of the plants—Betula sp., Orthosiphon stamineus, Urtica dioica and Ononis spinosa—are used as diuretics in phytomedicine [14]. The diuretic effect is attributed to the flavonoid content of these plants. Many flavonoids are known for their anti-inflammatory properties [15,49,54].
The Folin–Ciocalteu reagent not only reacts to phenolic compounds, but also to reducing agents [55]. To evaluate this interference, the reducing power of the extracts was tested with the stable free radical DPPH. As a control, the EC 50 value of ascorbic acid was determined and was expectedly low with 3.18 ± 0.15 µg/mL [56]. Several previous studies confirmed a correlation between the phenolic content determined with Folin–Ciocalteu reagent and the reducing capacity of different plant extracts [57,58,59,60]. In view of the mechanism, which in both assays is based on electron transfer, this is no surprise [55].
Table
Table 2. Summary of cPLA 2 α inhibition, phenolic content and DPPH scavenging activity of the eight most potent extracts. The cPLA 2 α inhibition is shown as the IC 50 value (µg/mL final extract concentration); phenolic content relates to gallic acid equivalents (GAE) in mg per g extract. The DPPH radical scavenging is shown as EC 50 (µg/mL final extract concentration). Values are means (n = 3) ± the standard error (SE), ordered according to their cPLA 2 α inhibitory activity.
Table 2. Summary of cPLA 2 α inhibition, phenolic content and DPPH scavenging activity of the eight most potent extracts. The cPLA 2 α inhibition is shown as the IC 50 value (µg/mL final extract concentration); phenolic content relates to gallic acid equivalents (GAE) in mg per g extract. The DPPH radical scavenging is shown as EC 50 (µg/mL final extract concentration). Values are means (n = 3) ± the standard error (SE), ordered according to their cPLA 2 α inhibitory activity.
cPLA 2 α InhibitionPhenolic ContentRadical Scavenging
Extract(IC 50 )(GAE)(EC 50 )
 µg/mL ± SE mg/g ± SE µg/mL ± SE
Ribes nigrum27.7 ± 4.71131.25 ± 7.1513.36 ± 0.6
Ononis spinosa39.4 ± 6.4920.55 ± 2.56271.07 ± 13.13
Urtica dioica44.32 ± 5.8838.26 ± 2.4190.5 ± 4.01
Betula sp.58.02 ± 5.9962.59 ± 2.3827.17 ± 1.26
Sanguisorba officinalis76.25 ± 10.93116.96 ± 5.8914.93 ± 0.66
Orthosiphon stamineus78.83 ± 15.5550.2 ± 0.2630.33 ± 2.06
Petasites hybridus81.02 ± 18.23122.61 ± 4.7314.27 ± 0.76
Tussilago farfara123.28 ± 15.06122.39 ± 5.4614.54 ± 0.72
EC 50 values for DPPH reduction range between 13.36 ± 0.6 µg/mL (Ribes nigrum) and 271.07 ± 13.13 µg/mL (Ononis spinosa). With an IC 50 value of >200 µg/mL, Ononis spinosa may be considered as not active. When our results of the radical scavenging are plotted against the phenolic content, an inverse non-linear correlation can be seen (see Table 2, Columns 2 and 3, and Figure 3A), meaning that the higher the phenolic content, the stronger the antioxidant effects. Hence, the extracts with higher phenolic content also show higher radical scavenging activity (evident in a low EC 50 ).
While radical scavenging activity and phenolic content correlate very well, cPLA 2 α inhibition is apparently not correlated with the phenolic content (Figure 3B). The best example is Tussilago farfara extract, which showed the lowest cPLA 2 α inhibition by far, combined with the third highest phenolic content. However, Ribes nigrum extract showed the highest phenolic content together with the strongest cPLA 2 α inhibition (Table 2).

2.3. Urtica dioica and Ononis spinosa as Promising New Anti-Inflammatory Drugs with Regard to cPLA 2 α as a Target

Polyphenols unspecifically bind to proteins, thereby often resulting in conformational changes that lead to inhibition of the enzymatic activity [53]. However, phenolic secondary metabolites may not be the main cause for cPLA 2 α inhibition, since there seems to be no correlation between phenolic content of the eight methanol extracts and their cPLA 2 α inhibition. Furthermore, some polyphenol-rich plant extracts, such as Punica granatum and Humulus lupulus, did not inhibit cPLA 2 α , but instead appear to act as agonists, as the AA production was elevated to 110% and 165%, compared to the control (see Table 1). Therefore, other non-phenolic ingredients may be responsible for cPLA 2 α inhibition. Two extracts showing very low phenolic content, but high cPLA 2 α inhibition, are Ononis spinosa and Urtica dioica. Since these two extracts seem to be the most promising cPLA 2 α inhibitors despite their low phenolic content, we assume that they may contain specific cPLA 2 α inhibitors.
Molecules 20 15033 g003 550
Figure 3. Correlation of antioxidant activities and cPLA2α inhibition with the phenolic content of the extracts. In (A), the EC values of radical scavenging (µg/mL extract concentration, y-axis) are plotted against the phenolic content (GAE mg/g, x-axis). The non-linear regression curve is calculated with SigmaPlot (polynomial, inverse second order, simplified), resulting in the following equation: D P P H   s c a v e n g i n g = 3.6 + 1.1 · 10 5 p h e n o l i c   c o n t e n t 2 ; (B) The IC values of cPLA2α inhibition (µg/mL extract concentration, y-axis) plotted against the phenolic content (GAE mg/g, x-axis). The values do not reveal a correlation. (A): DPPH (EC) vs. phenolic content; (B): cPLA2α inh. (IC50) vs. phenolic content.
Figure 3. Correlation of antioxidant activities and cPLA2α inhibition with the phenolic content of the extracts. In (A), the EC values of radical scavenging (µg/mL extract concentration, y-axis) are plotted against the phenolic content (GAE mg/g, x-axis). The non-linear regression curve is calculated with SigmaPlot (polynomial, inverse second order, simplified), resulting in the following equation: D P P H   s c a v e n g i n g = 3.6 + 1.1 · 10 5 p h e n o l i c   c o n t e n t 2 ; (B) The IC values of cPLA2α inhibition (µg/mL extract concentration, y-axis) plotted against the phenolic content (GAE mg/g, x-axis). The values do not reveal a correlation. (A): DPPH (EC) vs. phenolic content; (B): cPLA2α inh. (IC50) vs. phenolic content.
Molecules 20 15033 g003

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Reagents and Chemicals

HPLC-grade water and acetonitrile, nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA), 4-undecyloxybenzoic acid, Folin–Ciocalteu phenol reagent (2 N), protease inhibitor cocktail (containing AEBSF, aprotinin, Bestatin, E-64, leupeptin and pepstatin A) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Taufkirchen, Germany); 1-stearoyl-2-arachidonoyl-phosphatidylcholine (SAPC), 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycerol (DOG) and bromoenol lactone were from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI, USA, delivered via Biomol, Hamburg, Germany); dithiothreitol (DTT) from Applichem (Darmstadt, Germany) and ascorbic acid were from Carl Roth (Karlsruhe, Germany).

3.2. Isolation of cPLA 2 α from Porcine Platelets

Fresh porcine blood (750 mL) from a nearby slaughterhouse (Fleischversorgungszentrum, Mannheim, Germany) was immediately mixed 1:5 with citrate buffer (85 mM Na 3 Citrate × 2 H 2 O, 66.6 mM citric acid and 111 mM D(+)glucose) and subsequently centrifuged at portions of 20 mL (per 50 mL tube) at 2000× g (Hettich Rotina 380R, Hettich Lab Technology, Tuttlingen, Germany) for 3 min at 4 ∘ C. The platelet-rich supernatant was transferred to fresh tubes, and platelets were centrifuged at 1600× g for 20 min at 4 ∘ C. The pellet was resuspended with 3 mM EDTA in phosphate-buffered saline (137 mM NaCl, 2.68 mM KCl, 10.14 mM Na 2 HPO 4 , 1.76 mM KH 2 PO 4 , pH 7.5) and centrifuged again. Platelet lysis and cPLA 2 α isolation were conducted as described in [61], with minor changes. Briefly, platelets were lysed in a hypotonic buffer at −20 ∘ C over night after the addition of protease inhibitor cocktail. After sonification (Omni-Ruptor 4000, Omni International Inc., Kennesaw, GA, USA, 2 times 30 s, 50% intensity), cell debris was separated by centrifugation at 48,000× g for 60 min at 4 ∘ C (Beckman J2-21 centrifuge, rotor type JA-20, Beckman Coulter, Krefeld, Germany). The clear supernatant was diluted 1:1 with Buffer A (25 mM Tris, 1 mM EGTA, 2 mM DTT, pH 8.0) and transferred to a HiPrep™ Q XL 16/10 anionic exchange column (GE Healthcare Europe, Freiburg, Germany, column volume: 20 mL, flow rate: 5 mL/min), which was conditioned with the subsequent addition of 100 mL Buffer A, 100 mL Buffer B (1 M NaCl, 25 mM Tris, 1 mM EGTA, 2 mM DTT, pH 8.0) and 140 mL Buffer A again. After sample loading, the column was washed with 100 mL Buffer A, following a stepwise elution of 4 fractions of 60 mL each. The fractions were eluted with different NaCl concentrations in buffer (realized through a mixture of Buffers A and B), which were 150, 300, 450 and 600 mM each. The 450 mM NaCl fraction contained the cPLA 2 α and was concentrated through a centrifugal filter with a molecular weight cut-off of 50 kDa (Vivaspin® 20, Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany) at 4000× g (4 ∘ C). The resulting volume of 7 mL was incubated for 10 min at room temperature with bromoenol lactone (5 µM final concentration) to permanently inhibit the activity of the calcium-independent PLA 2 isoform. Secreted PLA 2 (sPLA 2 ) isoforms have up to eight disulfide bonds essential for their activity. By adding DTT to Buffer A and to the assay buffer, these disulfide bonds get reduced to free thiols, resulting in an activity loss of the sPLA 2 isoforms [1,2,62]. In contrast to the sPLA 2 s, cPLA 2 α is only active without disulfide bonds in the reducing environment of the cytosol, which is mimicked by the DTT [62,63]. Other cPLA 2 isoforms are considered negligible, since arachidonyl trifluoromethyl ketone, a specific cPLA 2 α inhibitor [64], inhibits arachidonic acid production over 96% in our test system (at a concentration of 200 µM). The protein solution was diluted in Buffer A to liberate about 1 nmol AA in 60 min incubation at 37 ∘ C. The enzyme fraction was stored in aliquots at −80 ∘ C.

3.3. Incubation Procedure for the cPLA 2 α Assay

The incubation procedure and solid phase extraction was executed as described in [61], with some modifications. In short, 2 µL of extract (or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in the case of the control and blank) were incubated together with 10 µL isolated enzyme (blank: 10 µL buffer) and 88 µL mixed micelle emulsion as a substrate (formed by 200 µM SAPC and 100 µM DOG). After a 60-min incubation time at 37 ∘ C, the reaction was stopped by adding 200 µL of acetonitrile/methanol/Na 2 EDTA (16:15:1) containing nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA, 0.6 µg/200 µL) and 4-undecyloxybenzoic acid as the internal standard (156 ng/200 µL). After solid-phase extraction according to [65] with BondElut C18 columns (100 mg sorbent, 3 mL volume; Agilent technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), the eluate was diluted 1:1 with water for HPLC analysis.
The initial PLA 2 α inhibition screening was conducted with 43 methanol extracts (final concentration: 100 µg/mL), once in duplets. To establish dose dependence, the eight most potent inhibitors were tested in different concentrations in duplets in three independent experiments (n = 3). Controls and blanks were carried out in triplets for all experiments.

3.4. HPLC Analysis of AA

For quantification of AA, a Young Lin YL9100 HPLC system (Young Lin Instrument Co. Ltd., Anyang, Korea, quaternary pump, degasser and diode array detector) connected to a Spark Marathon autosampler (Spark Holland, Emmen, The Netherlands) with a 200 µL sample loop was used. Using an isocratic program described in [65] with acetonitrile/water/phosphoric acid (77:23:0.1 v/v/v) as the mobile phase, 200 µL of the prepared sample was injected, and chromatographic separation was carried out with a Nucleosil C18 column (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany, 3 mm inner diameter, 3 µm particle size, 125 mm length). AA and internal standard were detected at a wavelengths of 200 nm and 254 nm, respectively. For quantification of the relative enzyme activity, the AA peak area was set in relation to the internal standard peak area. The control (2 µL DMSO, 10 µL enzyme, 88 µL substrate) was defined as 100% activity, whereas the blank (2 µL DMSO, 10 µL buffer and 88 µL substrate) was defined as 0% activity.

3.5. Quantification of the Phenolic Agents with Folin–Ciocalteu Reagent

This assay was used to quantify the phenolic content of the extracts. It is an adapted method from [66]. From each extract, 20 µL of a dilution in DMSO (1 mg/mL) was transferred in triplets to a 96-well plate. After addition of the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent (100 µL), the mixture was alkalinized with 80 µL of Na 2 CO 3 solution (7.5% (w/v) in HPLC-grade water). For calibration, a dilution series of gallic acid (0 to 1.25 mg/mL) was treated the same way. Subsequently, the 96-well plate was incubated in the dark at room temperature for 60 min, following the measurement of absorption at 750 nm with a plate reader (Tecan Infinite M200 Pro, Tecan Group Ltd., Männedorf, Switzerland). To minimize the influence of inherent absorption from the extracts, the absorption of blanks containing 100 µL water instead of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent were subtracted from the absorptions of the samples. The same was done for the gallic acid standards. Using gallic acid, a calibration curve was established, and the phenolic content of the extracts was calculated using gallic acid equivalents (GAE), quantified as mg of gallic acid per g of extract.

3.6. DPPH Assay

For evaluation of the reducing potential, the DPPH radical scavenging activity was determined. This assay was originally established in [67]. One hundred microliters of diluted extract were transferred to a 96-well plate in duplicates. Subsequently, 100 µL of DPPH solution (0.2 mM in methanol) were added, and incubation took place for 30 min in the dark at room temperature, following the determination of the absorption at 517 nm (Tecan Infinite M200 Pro). Final concentrations of the extracts ranged between 0.3 µg/mL to 5 mg/mL. As a control, 100 µL methanol was mixed with 100 µL of DPPH solution. The inherent absorption of the extracts was measured separately (extract and methanol) and subtracted from each sample’s absorption. Ascorbic acid (0.06 µg/mL to 62.5 µg/mL) served as a standard control. Radical scavenging was calculated with the following formula:
s c a v e n g i n g ( % ) = 100 · A 0 - A s A 0
with A 0 = control (DPPH + methanol) and A s = sample (DPPH + extract or ascorbic acid, respectively).

3.7. Statistics

For the PLA 2 α inhibition screening, errors were calculated with Gaussian error propagation. Standard deviations from the mean values were calculated for the dose-dependent studies and phenolic content. The IC 50 and EC 50 concentrations and their standard errors were calculated with SigmaPlot 11.0 (standard curve analysis with four parameter logistic).

4. Conclusions

In this study, we have provided evidence that polyphenol-rich medicinal plants often exert anti-inflammatory activities, which may be due to an inhibition of cPLA 2 α , which has been rather neglected as a relevant target for anti-inflammatory drugs. In another series of experiments, we have tried to identify the active substances in these extracts (Arnold and Wink, in preparation). However, possible synergistic effects from two or more of the ingredients in the extracts should not be left out of consideration [53].

Acknowledgments

We thank Matthias Lehr (University of Münster), who kindly shared the know-how of the PLA 2 α inhibition assay with us. Special thanks for help in the realization of this assay go to Walburga Hanekamp (technical assistant, University of Münster). Finally, our sincere thanks go to Madeleine Bachowsky, Laura Dehm, Tania Freitas dos Santos, Stefan Martin, Gözde Özen and Maren Memmhardt for preparing the methanol extracts.

Author Contributions

cPLA 2 α inhibition experiments were carried out by E.A., T.B. and C.Z.; determination of phenolic content and DPPH radical scavenging activity by E.A. Experiments were designed by E.A. and M.W. The manuscript was written by E.A. and revised by M.W.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dennis, E.A.; Cao, J.; Hsu, Y.H.; Magrioti, V.; Kokotos, G. Phospholipase A2 enzymes: Physical structure, biological function, disease implication, chemical inhibition, and therapeutic intervention. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 6130–6185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Clark, J.D.; Lin, L.L.; Kriz, R.W.; Ramesha, C.S.; Sultzman, L.A.; Lin, A.Y.; Milona, N.; Knopf, J.L. A novel arachidonic acid-selective cytosolic PLA2 contains a Ca2+-dependent translocation domain with homology to PKC and GAP. Cell 1991, 65, 1043–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Balsinde, J.; Winstead, M.V.; Dennis, E.A. Phospholipase A2 regulation of arachidonic acid mobilization. FEBS Lett. 2002, 531, 2–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sokolowska, M.; Stefanska, J.; Wodz-Naskiewicz, K.; Cieslak, M.; Pawliczak, R. Cytosolic phospholipase A2 group IVA is overexpressed in patients with persistent asthma and regulated by the promoter microsatellites. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010, 125, 1393–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mruwat, R.; Yedgar, S.; Lavon, I.; Ariel, A.; Krimsky, M.; Shoseyov, D. Phospholipase A2 in experimental allergic bronchitis: A lesson from mouse and rat models. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e76641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Pniewska, E.; Sokolowska, M.; Kupryś-Lipińska, I.; Przybek, M.; Kuna, P.; Pawliczak, R. The step further to understand the role of cytosolic phospholipase A2 Alpha and group X secretory phospholipase A2 in allergic inflammation: Pilot study. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 670814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sommerfelt, R.M.; Feuerherm, A.J.; Jones, K.; Johansen, B. Cytosolic phospholipase A2 regulates TNF-induced production of joint destructive effectors in synoviocytes. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e83555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kokotos, G.; Feuerherm, A.J.; Barbayianni, E.; Shah, I.; Sæther, M.; Magrioti, V.; Nguyen, T.; Constantinou-Kokotou, V.; Dennis, E.A.; Johansen, B. Inhibition of group IVA cytosolic phospholipase A2 by thiazolyl ketones in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 7523–7535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Stephenson, D.; Rash, K.; Smalstig, B.; Roberts, E.; Johnstone, E.; Sharp, J.; Panetta, J.; Little, S.; Kramer, R.; Clemens, J. Cytosolic phospholipase A2 is induced in reactive glia following different forms of neurodegeneration. Glia 1999, 27, 110–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sagy-Bross, C.; Kasianov, K.; Solomonov, Y.; Braiman, A.; Friedman, A.; Hadad, N.; Levy, R. The role of Cytosolic Phospholipase A2α in Amyloid Precursor Protein induction by amyloid beta1–42-Implication for Neurodegeneration. J. Neurochem. 2014, 132, 559–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kalyvas, A.; David, S. Cytosolic phospholipase A2 plays a key role in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis-like disease. Neuron 2004, 41, 323–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lee, H.J.; Bazinet, R.P.; Rapoport, S.I.; Bhattacharjee, A.K. Brain arachidonic acid cascade enzymes are upregulated in a rat model of unilateral Parkinson disease. Neurochem. Res. 2010, 35, 613–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Meyer, M.C.; Rastogi, P.; Beckett, C.S.; McHowat, J. Phospholipase A2 inhibitors as potential anti-inflammatory agents. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2005, 11, 1301–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Van Wyk, B.E.; Wink, M. Medicinal Plants of the World: An Illustrated Scientific Guide to Important Medicinal Plants and Their Uses, 2nd ed.; Timber Press: Portland, OR, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  15. Serafini, M.; Peluso, I.; Raguzzini, A. Flavonoids as anti-inflammatory agents. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2010, 69, 273–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ferrándiz, M.L.; Alcaraz, M.J. Anti-inflammatory activity and inhibition of arachidonic acid metabolism by flavonoids. Agents Actions 1991, 32, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Channon, J.Y.; Leslie, C.C. A calcium-dependent mechanism for associating a soluble arachidonoyl-hydrolyzing phospholipase A2 with membrane in the macrophage cell line RAW 264.7. J. Biol. Chem. 1990, 265, 5409–5413. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Kramer, R.M.; Roberts, E.F.; Manetta, J.V.; Hyslop, P.A.; Jakubowski, J.A. Thrombin-induced phosphorylation and activation of Ca2+-sensitive cytosolic phospholipase A2 in human platelets. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 26796–26804. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Lin, L.L.; Wartmann, M.; Lin, A.Y.; Knopf, J.L.; Seth, A.; Davis, R.J. cPLA2 is phosphorylated and activated by MAP kinase. Cell 1993, 72, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kramer, R.M.; Roberts, E.F.; Strifler, B.A.; Johnstone, E.M. Thrombin induces activation of p38 MAP kinase in human platelets. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 27395–27398. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Bolle, P.; Faccendini, P.; Bello, U.; Panzironi, C.; Tita, B. Ononis spinosa L.: Pharmacological effect of ethanol extract. Pharmacol. Res. 1993, 27, 27–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Garbacki, N.; Tits, M.; Angenot, L.; Damas, J. Inhibitory effects of proanthocyanidins from Ribes nigrum leaves on carrageenin acute inflammatory reactions induced in rats. BMC Pharmacol. 2004, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Dar, S.A.; Ganai, F.A.; Yousuf, A.R.; Balkhi, M.U.H.; Bhat, T.M.; Sharma, P. Pharmacological and toxicological evaluation of Urtica dioica. Pharm. Biol. 2013, 51, 170–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Declume, C. Anti-inflammatory evaluation of a hydroalcoholic extract of black currant leaves (Ribes nigrum). J. Ethnopharmacol. 1989, 27, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hajhashemi, V.; Klooshani, V. Antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects of Urtica dioica leaf extract in animal models. Avicenna J. Phytomedicine 2013, 3, 193–200. [Google Scholar]
  26. Yam, M.F.; Lim, V.; Salman, I.M.; Ameer, O.Z.; Ang, L.F.; Rosidah, N.; Abdulkarim, M.F.; Abdullah, G.Z.; Basir, R.; Sadikun, A.; et al. HPLC and anti-inflammatory studies of the flavonoid rich chloroform extract fraction of Orthosiphon stamineus leaves. Molecules 2010, 15, 4452–4466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Di Rosa, M.; Giroud, J.P.; Willoughby, D.A. Studies on the mediators of the acute inflammatory response induced in rats in different sites by carrageenan and turpentine. J. Pathol. 1971, 104, 15–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Di Rosa, M. Biological properties of carrageenan. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1972, 24, 89–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Vinegar, R.; Truax, J.F.; Selph, J.L.; Johnston, P.R.; Venable, A.L.; McKenzie, K.K. Pathway to carrageenan-induced inflammation in the hind limb of the rat. Fed. Proc. 1987, 46, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Farag, M.A.; Weigend, M.; Luebert, F.; Brokamp, G.; Wessjohann, L.A. Phytochemical, phylogenetic, and anti-inflammatory evaluation of 43 Urtica accessions (stinging nettle) based on UPLC-Q-TOF-MS metabolomic profiles. Phytochemistry 2013, 96, 170–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Roschek, B., Jr.; Fink, R.C.; McMichael, M.; Alberte, R.S. Nettle extract (Urtica dioica) affects key receptors and enzymes associated with allergic rhinitis. Phytother. Res. 2009, 23, 920–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lee, N.H.; Lee, M.Y.; Lee, J.A.; Jung, D.Y.; Seo, C.S.; Kim, J.H.; Shin, H.K. Anti-asthmatic effect of Sanguisorba officinalis L. and potential role of heme oxygenase-1 in an ovalbumin-induced murine asthma model. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2010, 26, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Shin, T.Y.; Lee, K.B.; Kim, S.H. Anti-allergic effects of Sanguisorba officinalis on animal models of allergic reactions. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 2002, 24, 455–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Yu, T.; Lee, Y.J.; Yang, H.M.; Han, S.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, Y.; Kim, C.; Han, M.H.; Kim, M.Y.; Lee, J.; et al. Inhibitory effect of Sanguisorba officinalis ethanol extract on NO and PGE2 production is mediated by suppression of NF-κB and AP-1 activation signaling cascade. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2011, 134, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ravipati, A.S.; Zhang, L.; Koyyalamudi, S.R.; Jeong, S.C.; Reddy, N.; Bartlett, J.; Smith, P.T.; Shanmugam, K.; Münch, G.; Wu, M.J.; et al. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of selected Chinese medicinal plants and their relation with antioxidant content. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2012, 12, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yılmaz, B.S.; Ozbek, H.; Citoğlu, G.S.; Uğraş, S.; Bayram, I.; Erdoğan, E. Analgesic and hepatotoxic effects of Ononis spinosa L. Phytother. Res. 2006, 20, 500–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Fiebich, B.L.; Grozdeva, M.; Hess, S.; Hüll, M.; Danesch, U.; Bodensieck, A.; Bauer, R. Petasites hybridus extracts in vitro inhibit COX-2 and PGE2 release by direct interaction with the enzyme and by preventing p42/44 MAP kinase activation in rat primary microglial cells. Planta Med. 2005, 71, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Bickel, D.; Röder, T.; Bestmann, H.J.; Brune, K. Identification and characterization of inhibitors of peptido-leukotriene-synthesis from Petasites hybridus. Planta Med. 1994, 60, 318–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Agosti, R.; Duke, R.K.; Chrubasik, J.E.; Chrubasik, S. Effectiveness of Petasites hybridus preparations in the prophylaxis of migraine: A systematic review. Phytomedicine 2006, 13, 743–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Lipton, R.B.; Göbel, H.; Einhäupl, K.M.; Wilks, K.; Mauskop, A. Petasites hybridus root (butterbur) is an effective preventive treatment for migraine. Neurology 2004, 63, 2240–2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Käufeler, R.; Polasek, W.; Brattström, A.; Koetter, U. Efficacy and safety of butterbur herbal extract Ze 339 in seasonal allergic rhinitis: Postmarketing surveillance study. Adv. Ther. 2006, 23, 373–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Grossmann, M.; Schmidramsl, H. An extract of Petasites hybridus is effective in the prophylaxis of migraine. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2000, 38, 430–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Thomet, O.A.R.; Simon, H.U. Petasins in the treatment of allergic diseases: Results of preclinical and clinical studies. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2002, 129, 108–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Guo, R.; Pittler, M.H.; Ernst, E. Herbal medicines for the treatment of allergic rhinitis: A systematic review. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2007, 99, 483–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lim, H.J.; Lee, H.S.; Ryu, J.H. Suppression of inducible nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase-2 expression by tussilagone from Farfarae flos in BV-2 microglial cells. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2008, 31, 645–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Qin, Z.B.; Zhang, J.; Wu, X.D.; He, J.; Ding, L.F.; Peng, L.Y.; Li, X.Y.; Li, Y.; Deng, L.; Guo, Y.D.; et al. Sesquiterpenoids from Tussilago farfara and their inhibitory effects on nitric oxide production. Planta Med. 2014, 80, 703–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Hwangbo, C.; Lee, H.S.; Park, J.; Choe, J.; Lee, J.H. The anti-inflammatory effect of tussilagone, from Tussilago farfara, is mediated by the induction of heme oxygenase-1 in murine macrophages. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2009, 9, 1578–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Keinänen, M.; Julkunen-Tiitto, R. High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of flavonoids in Betula pendula and Betula pubescens leaves. J. Chromatogr. A 1998, 793, 370–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Guardia, T.; Rotelli, A.E.; Juarez, A.O.; Pelzer, L.E. Anti-inflammatory properties of plant flavonoids. Effects of rutin, quercetin and hesperidin on adjuvant arthritis in rat. Farmaco 2001, 56, 683–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Germanò, M.P.; Cacciola, F.; Donato, P.; Dugo, P.; Certo, G.; D’Angelo, V.; Mondello, L.; Rapisarda, A. Betula pendula leaves: Polyphenolic characterization and potential innovative use in skin whitening products. Fitoterapia 2012, 83, 877–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Wacker, K.; Gründemann, C.; Kern, Y.; Bredow, L.; Huber, R.; Reinhard, T.; Schwartzkopff, J. Inhibition of corneal inflammation following keratoplasty by birch leaf extract. Exp. Eye Res. 2012, 97, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Gründemann, C.; Gruber, C.W.; Hertrampf, A.; Zehl, M.; Kopp, B.; Huber, R. An aqueous birch leaf extract of Betula pendula inhibits the growth and cell division of inflammatory lymphocytes. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2011, 136, 444–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wink, M. Evolutionary advantage and molecular modes of action of multi-component mixtures used in phytomedicine. Curr. Drug Metab. 2008, 9, 996–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Mamani Matsuda, M.; Kauss, T.; Al Kharrat, A.; Rambert, J.; Fawaz, F.; Thiolat, D.; Moynet, D.; Coves, S.; Malvy, D.; Mossalayi, M.D. Therapeutic and preventive properties of quercetin in experimental arthritis correlate with decreased macrophage inflammatory mediators. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2006, 72, 1304–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Huang, D.; Ou, B.; Prior, R.L. The chemistry behind antioxidant capacity assays. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 1841–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Kukić, J.; Popović, V.; Petrović, S.; Mucaji, P.; Ćirić, A.; Stojković, D.; Soković, M. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of Cynara cardunculus extracts. Food Chem. 2008, 107, 861–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Katsube, T.; Tabata, H.; Ohta, Y.; Yamasaki, Y.; Anuurad, E.; Shiwaku, K.; Yamane, Y. Screening for antioxidant activity in edible plant products: Comparison of low-density lipoprotein oxidation assay, DPPH radical scavenging assay, and Folin-Ciocalteu assay. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 2391–2396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Cai, Y.; Luo, Q.; Sun, M.; Corke, H. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds of 112 traditional Chinese medicinal plants associated with anticancer. Life Sci. 2004, 74, 2157–2184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Wojdyło, A.; Oszmiański, J.; Czemerys, R. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds in 32 selected herbs. Food Chem. 2007, 105, 940–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Djeridane, A.; Hamdi, A.; Bensania, W.; Cheifa, K.; Lakhdari, I.; Yousfi, M. The in vitro evaluation of antioxidative activity, α-glucosidase and α-amylase enzyme inhibitory of natural phenolic extracts. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Hanekamp, W.; Lehr, M. Determination of arachidonic acid by on-line solid-phase extraction HPLC with UV detection for screening of cytosolic phospholipase A2α inhibitors. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2012, 900, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Li, B.; Copp, L.; Castelhano, A.L.; Feng, R.; Stahl, M.; Yuan, Z.; Krantz, A. Inactivation of a cytosolic phospholipase A2 by thiol-modifying reagents: cysteine residues as potential targets of phospholipase A2. Biochemistry 1994, 33, 8594–8603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Cleland, W.W. Dithiothreitol, a new protective reagent for SH groups. Biochemistry 1964, 3, 480–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Riendeau, D.; Guay, J.; Weech, P.K.; Laliberté, F.; Yergey, J.; Li, C.; Desmarais, S.; Perrier, H.; Liu, S.; Nicoll Griffith, D. Arachidonyl trifluoromethyl ketone, a potent inhibitor of 85-kDa phospholipase A2, blocks production of arachidonate and 12-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid by calcium ionophore-challenged platelets. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 15619–15624. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  65. Schmitt, M.; Lehr, M. HPLC assay with UV spectrometric detection for the evaluation of inhibitors of cytosolic phospholipase A2. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2004, 35, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Singleton, V.L.; Orthofer, R.; Lamuela-Raventós, R.M. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Methods Enzymol. 1999, 299, 152–178. [Google Scholar]
  67. Blois, M. Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical. Nature 1958, 181, 1199–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  • Sample Availability: Samples of the methanol extracts or the cPLA2α are not available.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Arnold, E.; Benz, T.; Zapp, C.; Wink, M. Inhibition of Cytosolic Phospholipase A2α (cPLA2α) by Medicinal Plants in Relation to Their Phenolic Content. Molecules 2015, 20, 15033-15048. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200815033

AMA Style

Arnold E, Benz T, Zapp C, Wink M. Inhibition of Cytosolic Phospholipase A2α (cPLA2α) by Medicinal Plants in Relation to Their Phenolic Content. Molecules. 2015; 20(8):15033-15048. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200815033

Chicago/Turabian Style

Arnold, Eva, Thorsten Benz, Cornelia Zapp, and Michael Wink. 2015. "Inhibition of Cytosolic Phospholipase A2α (cPLA2α) by Medicinal Plants in Relation to Their Phenolic Content" Molecules 20, no. 8: 15033-15048. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200815033

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop