Next Article in Journal
Preparation and Bioactivity Assessment of Chitosan-1-Acetic Acid-5-Flurouracil Conjugates as Cancer Prodrugs
Previous Article in Journal
Characteristics of Multifunctional, Eco-Friendly Lignin-Al2O3 Hybrid Fillers and Their Influence on the Properties of Composites for Abrasive Tools
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 22
Issue 11
10.3390/molecules22111532
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Green Ultrasound versus Conventional Synthesis and Characterization of Specific Task Pyridinium Ionic Liquid Hydrazones Tethering Fluorinated Counter Anions: Novel Inhibitors of Fungal Ergosterol Biosynthesis

by
Nadjet Rezki
1,2,*,
Salsabeel A. Al-Sodies
1,
Sheikh Shreaz
3,
Rayees Ahmad Shiekh
1,4,
Mouslim Messali
1,
Vaseem Raja
5 and
Mohamed R. Aouad
1,2,*
1
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Taibah University, P.O. Box 344, Al-Madinah Al-Munawarah 30002, Saudi Arabia
2
Laboratoire de Chimie et Electrochimie des Complexes Métalliques (LCECM) USTO-MB, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Sciences and Technology Mohamed Boudiaf, P.O. Box 1505, El M`nouar, Oran 31000, Algeria
3
Environment and Life Sciences Research Center, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, P.O. Box 24885, Safat 13109, Kuwait
4
Government Degree College Pulwama, University of Kashmir, Srinagar 192301, India
5
Department of Applied Sciences & Humanities, Faculty of Engineering & Technology, Jamia Millia Islamia, Central University, New Delhi 110025, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2017, 22(11), 1532; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22111532
Submission received: 27 September 2017 / Accepted: 3 November 2017 / Published: 7 November 2017
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A series of specific task ionic liquids (ILs) based on a pyridiniumhydrazone scaffold in combination with hexafluorophosphate (PF6−), tetrafluoroboron (BF4−) and/or trifluoroacetate (CF3COO−) counter anion, were designed and characterized by IR, NMR and mass spectrometry. The reactions were conducted under both conventional and green ultrasound procedures. The antifungal potential of the synthesized compounds 2–25 was investigated against 40 strains of Candida (four standard and 36 clinical isolates). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC90) of the synthesized compounds were in the range of 62.5–2000 μg/mL for both standard and oral Candida isolates. MIC90 results showed that the synthesized 1-(2-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-oxoethyl)-4-(2-(4-fluorobenzylidene)hydrazinecarbonyl)-pyridin-1-ium hexafluorophosphate (11) was found to be most effective, followed by 4-(2-(4-fluorobenzylidene)hydrazinecarbonyl)-1-(2-(4-nitrophenyl)-2-oxoethyl)-pyridin-1-ium hexafluorophosphate (14) and 1-(2-ethoxy-2-oxoethyl)-4-(2-(4-fluorobenzylidene)hydrazinecarbonyl)pyridin-1-ium hexafluorophosphate (8). All the Candida isolates showed marked sensitivity towards the synthesized compounds. Ergosterol content was drastically reduced by more active synthesized compounds, and agreed well with MIC90 values. Confocal scanning laser microscopy (CLSM) results showed that the red colored fluorescent dye enters the test agent treated cells, which confirms cell wall and cell membrane damage. The microscopy results obtained suggested membrane-located targets for the action of these synthesized compounds. It appears that the test compounds might be interacting with ergosterol in the fungal cell membranes, decreasing the membrane ergosterol content and ultimately leading to membrane disruption as visible in confocal results. The present study indicates that these synthesized compounds show significant antifungal activity against Candida which forms the basis to carry out further in vivo experiments before their clinical use.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Candida species are pleomorphic diploid organisms existing within the normal microflora of skin, oral cavity and gastrointestinal tract [1]. Pathogenic Candida species are responsible for mild cutaneous infections of the human body as well as life threatening systemic diseases [2]. As per the available reports, the last two decades have shown dramatic increase in the number of patients with deep fungal infections due to the increasing magnitude of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients, patients with organ transplantations and increased use of intravenous lines or urinary catheters [3,4]. At present, infections due to Candida species are the leading cause of hematogenous infections worldwide [5]. It is well-known that most of the available antifungal drugs like azoles, allylamines and morpholines target ergosterol in the fungal cell membranes or inhibit the ergosterol biosynthetic pathway. Most of these antifungals, like amphotericin B and some commonly used azoles, are linked to severe toxicity issues [6,7], and in addition, most of the emerging fungal strains have developed resistance to the present antifungal agents [8,9].
During the last decades, the amazing properties associated with ionic liquids/salts that include low vapor pressure, high thermal stability, non volatility and inflammability have made them promising green solvents as alternatives to well-known organic solvents in organic chemistry [10,11,12,13,14,15]. They have also found applications in analytical chemistry, biotechnology and medicine [16,17,18]. Furthermore, the introduction of one or more functional groups was found to provide specific task ionic liquids (ILs) endowed with fascinating medical and industrial applications [19,20]. The synthesis of new fluorine-containing organic molecules has emerged as one of the hottest topics in medicinal research [21,22,23,24]. Therefore, fluorine-containing substituents were often incorporated to organic molecules during drug design to decrease toxicity [25], and increase lipophilicity, metabolitic stability and binding affinity [26]. In our recent work, some N-C2/C7 alkyl pyridinium hydrazones carrying fluorinated counteranions were synthesized and found to exhibit noteworthy antimicrobial activities against different pathogenic Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [27], which stimulated us to investigate further research in this area. Inspired by these results, and in view of the promising bioactivity associated with the presence of fluorine substitution in organic molecules, we present here another significant synthetic contribution which aimed to preserve the basic structural skeleton of pyridinium hydrazone and fluorinated counter anions of lead compounds by changing the alkyl chain on the pyridine ring to a functionalized alkyl group. The antifungal activities of the synthesized compounds against different standard and various Candida species have been extensively investigated.
Previous studies by our research group have shown that chemically synthesized molecules have shown promising antifungal activities against a diverse range of Candida species [28,29,30,31,32,33]. In this study, anticandidal activity of the synthesized compounds in liquid medium has been investigated through minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC90). Insights into the mechanism of antifungal action have been gained by examining the effect of these synthesized compounds on total ergosterol content and membrane integrity.
During the last years, ultrasonic irradiation has been extensively adopted in our laboratory as an eco-friendly energy source for the construction of several novel heterocyclic scaffolds [34,35,36]. Because of the promising features of ultrasound-assisted organic synthesis, namely the selectivity, ease of experimental set-up, enhanced reaction times and yields, as well as the environmental impact [37,38,39], a protocol in this current study has been directed to use this green technique for the synthesis of target ionic liquids tagged with Schiff bases in a comparative study with classical methods.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

The preparation and structure of fluorinated pyridinium hydrazones tailored functionalized alkyl side chains encountered with three fluorinated anions are illustrated in Scheme 1. Briefly, the precursor 4-fluorophenylpyridine hydrazone was treated by several functionalized alkyl halides to afford the halogenated specific task ionic liquid intermediates 2–7, which then reacted under metathetical conditions with KPF6, NaBF4 and/or CF3COONa to give the target fluorinated specific task ILs 8–25. The alkylation reaction required irradiation under ultrasound for 4–6 h to afford excellent yields (88–96%) of ILs 2–7, which were alternatively synthesized in 80–93% yields after thermal heating for 20–48 h (Table 1). Bromide and/or iodide anion exchange has been achieved successfully by thermal treatment of the halogenated ionic liquids 2–7 for 16 h, and furnished the desired specific task ILs 8–25 in 83–94% yields. When these reactions were carried out under ultrasonic conditions, only 4–5 h were required and no changes in yields were noticed (Table 2).
The structure of the reaction products 2–7 was established by their spectral data (IR, 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, 19F-NMR and mass spectroscopy in supporting information). In their IR spectra, the characteristic aliphatic hydrogens (CH2) appeared as a broad band around 2900 cm−1.
As an example, NMR of compound 3 will be described. The 1H-NMR spectrum displayed two characteristic singlets at δH 6.59 and 6.61 ppm with a ratio of 1:3, and integrated totally for two protons assigned to the NCH2 group, which confirmed the presence of such compound in their anti and syn conformers. As reported previously [40], the H-C=N and NH protons appeared as two sets of singlets at δH 8.21, 8.60 and 12.57, 12.65 ppm, respecively, presumaly due to E/cis and E/trans diastereomers (Figure 1). In addition, four extra aromatic protons were observed in the aromatic area confirming the presence of chlorophenyl ring in this compound.
The presence of compound 3 as a mixture of E/cis and E/trans diastereomers was further supported by the 13C-NMR experiment, which revealed the appearance of each signal as double peaks. Thus, the methylene carbon split into two distinguished signals at δC 66.33 and 66.36 ppm, presumably due to the hydrazone stereoisomerism. In the downfield region, the hydrazone C=N and C=O groups of E/cis and E/trans diastereomers resonated as two sets of signals at δC 158.94, 162.29 and 164.77, 165.22 ppm, respectively. In addition, the aromatic carbons were also recorded in their appropriate region and the two signals at 189.58, 189.74 ppm were attributed to the ketone carbonyl (C=O) group (Figure 2).
The 19F-NMR spectrum was also used in the establishment of such structure. The spectrum exhibited two signals which resonated as two multiplets at δF (−109.92 to −109.84) ppm and (−109.44 to −109.36) ppm assigning to aromatic fluorine (Figure 3).
The structures of the fluorinated specific task ILs 8–25 have been established on the basis of their spectral data using different NMR experiments, including 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, 19F-NMR, 31P-NMR and 11B-NMR. No change in the protons and carbons assignment has been observed in the 1H- and 13C-NMR spectra of compounds 8–25 after the metathesis reactions, while their 19F-NMR, 31P-NMR and 11B-NMR facilitated the anion assignment.
The structure of 11 was deduced from its 31P-NMR spectrum which clearly showed the presence of a phosphorus atom that resonated as a multiplet at δP −157.36 to −131.01 ppm (Figure 4). The signals corresponding to fluorine atoms were characterized by their 19F-NMR spectrum as two singlets at δF −71.14 and −69.25 ppm confirming the presence of PF6− anion in the anion head group of compound 11. The spectrum also revealed the presence of aromatic fluorine (Figure 5).
The presence of BF4− anion in compound 12 as an anion head has been confirmed by 11B- and 19F-NMR spectra. The boron atom resonated as a doublet at δB −1.28 ppm, and the fluorine atom was characterized as two doublets at δF −148.36 and −148.30 ppm, respectively. The fluorine phenyl atom was observed as two multiplets at δF (−109.94 to −109.77) and (−109.47 to −109.35) ppm.
Another metathesis reaction has been achieved through the displacement of the bromide anion by trifluoroacetate and resulted in the formation of IL 13. Its structure has been established based on the 19F-NMR by the appearance of the characteristic singlet peak at δF −73.50 ppm. The two muliplet signals related to the aromatic fluorine appeared at δF (−109.98 to −109.90) and (−109.52 to −109.44) ppm.

2.2. Antifungal Screening

2.2.1. Determination of MIC90

This is a standard and valid parameter to check the antifungal susceptibility of chemically synthesized molecules. Table 3 shows the Candida isolates used in this study. Table 4, shows the range of minimum inhibitory concentration of the synthesized compounds in μg/mL against 40 strains of Candida (four standard and 36 clinical isolates). MIC90 results showed that synthesized compound 11 was found to be more effective, followed by compound 14 and compound 8. As per the results, varying degrees of antifungal activities were shown by the synthesized compounds. Generally, all the Candida isolates investigated were found to be sensitive to these synthesized compounds. The MIC results reflected the antifungal potential of each synthesized compound. A closer look at the structures of the most active compounds (8, 11 and 14) indicates that the presence of the PF6− counter ion has significantly enhanced the activity of these compounds. It may be suggested that the PF6− ion in these compounds might have created a favorable environment for these compounds to interact with the target, ergosterol. PF6− is more effective (owing to the presence of six electronegative fluorine atoms around a phosphorus atom) to interact with the positive portions/sites (possibilities of non-covalent interactions such as formation of hydrogen bonds and salt bridges) of the cell membrane; thus enabling the positively charged 8, 11 and 14 to escape the unnecessary repulsions/hurdles with the cell membranes. The ineffectiveness of BF4− and CH3COO− might be attributed to the electron-deficient nature of boron, and the delocalization of the negative charge on the carboxylic group of the acetate anion. This may have helped these three compounds to reach ergosterol with ease and cause the death of the fungal cells. The higher activity of 11 and 14, as compared to 8, is probably due to the insertion of the terminal substituted aromatic moieties in 11 and 14, which might have enabled these two compounds to interact better with ergosterol via π-π interactions/stacking. However, the decreased activity of 11 in comparison to 14 may be explained on the basis of the greater steric influence of the bulky NO2 group as compared to the relatively smaller chlorine atom.

2.2.2. Effect of the Synthesized Compounds on Membrane Ergosterol Content

Figure 6a–c shows the effect of the highest active synthesized compound on the UV spectrophotometric sterol profiles of different C. albicans isolates (C. albicans ATCC 10261, C. albicans CN 9 and C. albicans CN 38) when grown for 16 h. In the graphs, control cells with normal ergosterol content show a characteristic four-peaked curve (red color). In case of cells treated with compound 11, it was observed that as the concentration of the synthesized compound increases from MIC/4, MIC/2 to MIC, suppression of four peaks in the curve is observed which is denoted by green, blue and black curves. The results obtained show a visible effect of test compound concentrations on the sterol profile of three different Candida strains. In our previous study, the total ergosterol content decreased in the same fashion in the presence of MIC and sub-MIC values of the synthesized compounds [28]. In this study, the average percent decrease in total ergosterol content for three standard isolates and three clinical Candida isolates after exposure to MIC and sub-MIC values of compounds 8, 14 and 11 have been summarized in Table 5. From the results, it is clear that as the concentration of the synthesized compounds increases, ergosterol content decreases and finally at MIC value, almost a straight line is seen that indicates the absence ergosterol in the sample.
The plasma membranes of fungi are almost similar to the plasma membranes of the mammals; the only difference is that fungi have non-polar sterol ergosterol and mammals have cholesterol as the principal sterol [41]. The plasma membrane being selectively permeable is responsible for transport of materials in and out of the cell. In addition, the control of some physiological events, modulation of membrane fluidity and membrane structure are provided and maintained by membrane sterols [42].
Yeast membrane ergosterol is the most common antifungal target studied so far, available reports show that ergosterol or its biosynthetic pathway are the sites of interaction for most antifungal agents [43]. In this study, an attempt was made to explore the possible target sites for the antifungal actions of the active synthesized compounds. It was observed that the synthesized compounds exposure resulted in dose dependent decrease in ergosterol content (Figure 6a–c). No systematic difference in ergosterol content was seen between standard and clinical Candida isolates used in this study.

2.2.3. Confocal Scanning Laser Microscopy (CSLM)

This experiment was done to localize and confirm cell membrane damage in the presence of the highest active test compounds (8, 11 and 14). Cells were incubated with and without the synthesized compounds in the presence of propidium iodide (PI). PI is a red dye employed to evaluate the effect of drugs on cell membranes. Compound treatment was given initially, and then the dye was added to cells after 16 h of incubation with the test compounds. The dye slowly gets dissolved in the liquid media, and when a drug causes breakage of the cell, the dye present within the media enters inside the broken cells. Cells with severe damage of membrane and cell wall will internalize PI which forms a red color inside resulting in an increased red fluorescence. The laser confocal images of stained C. albicans ATCC 10261 cells exposed to MIC values of compounds 8, 14 and 11 are shown in Figure 7b–d, respectively. The panel on the left side shows the confocal microscopy results of stained Candida cells without any treatment (Figure 7a), while the panel on right side shows confocal results of cells exposed to PI and MIC values of compounds 8, 14 and 11. The results obtained confirm that the dye penetrates the cells treated with MIC values of the test compounds, implying that the cell membrane and cell wall were disrupted by the synthesized compounds. The results showed that in case of compound 11 treatments, most of the yeast cells appeared red which indicates that the antifungal effect is much superior when cells are exposed to the MIC value of compound 11. In the present study, an attempt was made to assess the antifungal role of these synthesized compounds by studying their effect on membrane integrity. Permeation to PI, following incubation with MIC values of the synthesized compounds, indicates that these compounds directly target the cell membrane and form severe lesions on the membrane that ultimately leads to cell death.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Chemistry

Melting points were recorded on a Stuart Scientific SMP1 apparatus and are uncorrected. The IR spectra were measured using an FTIR-8400s-Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer-Shimadzu. The NMR spectra were determined on Advance Bruker (Fällanden, Switzerland) NMR spectrometer at 400 and 600 MHz with TMS as internal standard. The ESI mass spectra were measured by a Finnigan LCQ spectrometer. Reactions performed under ultrasounds were carried out using a Kunshan KQ-250B ultrasound cleaner (50 KHz, 240 W). All solvents and reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Hamburg, Germany).

3.2. General Alkylation Procedure for the Synthesis of Halogenated Specific Task ILs Tagged Hydrazones 2–7

3.2.1. Conventional Method (CM)

A mixture of compound 1 (1 mmol) in acetonitrile (30 mL) and functionalized alkyl halides (1.3 mmol) was refluxed for 20–48 h. The solvent was reduced by evaporation under reduced pressure; the precipitate formed was collected by filtration and washed with acetonitrile to afford the desired ionic liquids 2–7.

3.2.2. Ultrasound Method (US)

A mixture of compound 1 (1 mmol) in acetonitrile (30 mL) and functionalized alkyl halides (1.3 mmol) was irradiated by ultrasound irradiation. The reaction was processed as described above to give the same ionic liquids 2–7.
1-(2-Ethoxy-2-oxoethyl)-4-(2-(4-fluorobenzylidene)hydrazinecarbonyl)pyridin-1-ium iodide (2). It was obtained as brown crystals; m.p.: 113–114 °C. FT-IR (KBr): ῡ =1310 (C-O), 1599 (C=N), 1688 (C=O), 2890 and 2930 (Al-H), 3065 cm−1 (Ar-H). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH = 1.28 (t, 3H, J = 8 Hz, CH2CH3), 4.25–4.31 (m, 2H, CH2CH3), 5.73 (s, 0.5H, NCH2), 5.74 (s, 1.5H, NCH2), 7.26 (dd, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, 12 Hz, Ar-H), 7.35 (t, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.61 (dd, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.90 (dd, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.17 (s, 0.25H, H-C=N), 8.48 (d, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.49 (s, 0.75H, H-C=N), 8.60 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.19 (d, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 9.26 (d, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 12.52 (s, 0.75H, CONH), 12.55 (s, 0.25H, CONH). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC =13.93 (CH2CH3), 60.49, 60.53 (CH2CH3), 62.42, 62.47 (NCH2), 115.77, 115.97, 116.19, 125.99, 126.83, 129.32, 129.41, 129.75, 129.84, 129.99, 130.18, 130.21, 145.26, 146.66, 147.24, 149.44, 150.90 (Ar-C), 158.86, 162.30, 164.78, 165.16 (C=N, C=O), 166.12, 166.19 (C=OO). 19F-NMR (377 MHz, DMSO-d6): δF = (−109.82 to −109.74), (−109.38 to −109.30) (2m, 1F, Ar-F). MS (ESI) m/z = 457.29 [M+].
1-(2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-2-oxoethyl)-4-(2-(4-fluorobenzylidene)hydrazinecarbonyl)-pyridin-1-ium bromide (3). It was obtained as yellow crystals; m.p.: 122–123 °C. FT-IR (KBr): ῡ = 1630 (C=N), 1655 (C=O), 2925 (Al-H), 3066 cm−1 (Ar-H). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH = 6.59 (s, 0.5H, NCH2), 6.61 (s, 1.5H, NCH2), 7.25 (t, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.35 (t, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.64 (dd, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.78 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.89 (dd, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.12 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.21 (s, 0.25H, H-C=N), 8.52 (d, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.60 (s, 0.75H, H-C=N), 8.68 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.17 (d, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.24 (d, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 12.57 (s, 0.25H, CONH), 12.65 (s, 0.75H, CONH). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC = 66.33, 66.36 (NCH2), 115.79, 115.96, 116.18, 126.03, 126.86, 129.31, 129.44, 129.72, 129.81, 130.18, 130.24, 132.26, 132.31, 139.58, 139.61, 145.24, 146.67, 147.22, 148.26, 149.43, 150.60 (Ar-C), 158.94, 162.29, 164.77, 165.22 (C=N, C=O), 189.58, 189.74 (CH2C=O). 19F-NMR (377 MHz, DMSO-d6): δF = (−109.92 to −109.84), (−109.44 to −109.36) (2m, 1F, Ar-F). MS (ESI) m/z = 475.01 [M+].
4-(2-(4-Fluorobenzylidene)hydrazinecarbonyl)-1-(2-(4-nitrophenyl)-2-oxoethyl)-pyridin-1-ium bromide (4). It was obtained as orange crystals; m.p.: 109–110 °C. FT-IR (KBr): ῡ =1380 and 1550 (NO2), 1612 (C=N), 1640 (C=O), 2922 (Al-H), 3070 cm−1 (Ar-H). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH = 6.63 (s, 0.5H, NCH2), 6.65 (s, 1.5H, NCH2), 7.28 (dd, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, 12 Hz, Ar-H), 7.38 (dd, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, 12 Hz, Ar-H), 7.64 (dd, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.90 (dd, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.21 (s, 0.25H, H-C=N), 8.31–8.34 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 8.48–8.51 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 8.53 (d, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 8.57 (s, 0.75H, H-C=N), 8.68 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.16 (d, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.23 (d, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 12.57 (s, 0.25H, CONH), 12.63 (s, 0.75H, CONH). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC = 66.61, 66.66 (NCH2), 115.79, 115.97, 116.19, 124.19, 126.09, 126.93, 129.35, 129.44, 129.75, 129.82, 130.23, 138.17, 138.22, 145.27, 146.69, 147.25, 148.43, 149.44, 150.69 (Ar-C), 158.96, 162.31, 164.78, 165.21 (C=N, C=O), 189.80, 189.95 (CH2C=O). 19F-NMR (377 MHz, DMSO-d6): δF = (−109.93 to −109.85), (−109.46 to −109.38) (2m, 1F, Ar-F). MS (ESI) m/z = 486.90 [M+].
4-(2-(4-Fluorobenzylidene)hydrazinecarbonyl)-1-(4-phenoxybutyl)pyridin-1-ium iodide (5). It was obtained as yellow crystals; m.p.: 105–106 °C. FT-IR (KBr): ῡ =1315 (C-O), 1616 (C=N), 1690 (C=O), 2935 (Al-H), 3070 cm−1 (Ar-H). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH = 1.75–1.83 (m, 2H, CH2CH2N), 2.11–2.21 (m, 2H, CH2CH2O), 4.01–4.05 (m, 2H, CH2N), 4.78 (t, 2H, J = 8 Hz, OCH2), 6.91–6.95 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 7.24 (dd, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, 12 Hz, Ar-H), 7.29 (t, 2H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.34 (t, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.62 (dd, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.89 (dd, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.16 (s, 0.25H, H-C=N), 8.41 (d, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.52 (s, 0.75H, H-C=N), 8.55 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.28 (d, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.37 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 12.46 (bs, 1H, CONH). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC = 24.55, 24.60 (CH2CH2N), 26.87, 26.96 (CH2CH2O), 59.98, 60.05 (CH2N), 65.88, 65.92 (OCH2), 113.72, 115.03, 115.23, 115.45, 119.84, 125.47, 126.46, 128.72, 129.01, 129.09, 129.53, 144.40, 145.02, 146.66, 148.69, 148.96 (Ar-C), 157.67, 158.02, 161.57, 164.04, 164.45 (C=N, C=O). 19F-NMR (377 MHz, DMSO-d6): δF = (−109.92 to −109.84), (−109.43 to −109.35) (2m, 1F, Ar-F). MS (ESI) m/z = 519.00 [M+].
1-Benzyl-4-(2-(4-fluorobenzylidene)hydrazinecarbonyl)pyridin-1-ium bromide (6). It was obtained as yellow crystals; m.p.: 94–95 °C. FT-IR (KBr): ῡ = 1590 (C=N), 1655 (C=O), 2935 (Al-H), 3080 cm−1 (Ar-H). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH = 6.00 (s, 2H, NCH2), 7.22 (t, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.33 (t, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.44–7.49 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 7.59 (dd, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.60–7.62 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.86 (dd, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.18 (s, 0.25H, H-C=N), 8.42 (d, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 8.59 (s, 0.75H, H-C=N), 8.60 (d, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 9.39 (d, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 9.51 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 12.52 (s, 0.25H, CONH), 12.59 (s, 0.75H, CONH). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC = 63.34, 63.39 (NCH2), 115.75, 115.94, 116.16, 126.63, 127.51, 128.93, 128.97, 129.23, 129.34, 129.46, 129.69, 129.78, 130.22, 130.25, 134.02, 134.06, 145.18, 145.74, 147.70, 149.39 (Ar-C), 158.71, 162.26, 164.74, 165.99 (C=N, C=O). 19F-NMR (377 MHz, DMSO-d6): δF = (−109.83 to −109.75), (−109.41 to −109.33) (2m, 1F, Ar-F). MS (ESI) m/z = 413.90 [M+].
4-(2-(4-Fluorobenzylidene)hydrazinecarbonyl)-1-(2-hydroxyethyl)pyridin-1-ium iodide (7). It was obtained as brown crystals; m.p.: 97–98 °C. FT-IR (KBr): ῡ = 1320 (C-O), 1590 (C=N), 1655 (C=O), 2924 (Al-H), 3079 cm−1 (Ar-H). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH = 3.89–3.93 (m, 2H, OCH2), 4.74 (t, 2H, J = 4 Hz, NCH2), 7.26 (dd, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, 12 Hz, Ar-H), 7.37 (dd, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, 12 Hz, Ar-H), 7.62 (dd, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.89 (dd, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.16 (s, 0.25H, H-C=N), 8.40 (d, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 8.49 (s, 0.75H, H-C=N), 8.53 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.15 (d, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.23 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 12.48 (s, 0.75H, CONH), 12.50 (s, 0.25H, CONH). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC = 60.00 (OCH2), 63.37, 63.44 (NCH2), 115.77, 115.97, 116.19, 125.80, 126.83, 129.37, 129.46, 129.73, 129.82, 130.01, 130.04, 130.20, 130.23, 145.17, 145.48, 146.11, 147.57, 148.38, 149.71 (Ar-C), 158.90, 162.29, 164.76, 165.23 (C=N, C=O). 19F-NMR (377 MHz, DMSO-d6): δF = (−109.87 to −109.76), (−109.40 to −109.35) (2m, 1F, Ar-F). MS (ESI) m/z = 415.38 [M+].

3.3. General Metathesis Procedure for the Synthesis of Fluorinated Specific Task ILs 8–25

3.3.1. Conventional Method (CM)

A mixture of ionic liquid 2–7 (1 mmol) in methanol (30 mL) and potassium hexafluorophosphate, sodium tetrafluoroborate, and/or sodium trifluoroacetate (1.2 mmol) was refluxed for 16 h. The precipitate formed was collected by filtration and washed with the appropriate solvent to give the expected ionic liquids 8–25.

3.3.2. Ultrasound Method (US)

A mixture of ionic liquid 2–7 (1 mmol) in dichloromethane, acetonitrile or methanol (30 mL), and potassium hexafluorophosphate, sodiumtetrafluoroborate, and/or sodium trifluoroacetate (1.2 mmol) was irradiated by ultrasound irradiation. The reaction was processed as described above to give the same ionic liquids 8–25.
1-(2-Ethoxy-2-oxoethyl)-4-(2-(4-fluorobenzylidene)hydrazinecarbonyl)pyridin-1-ium hexafluorophosphate (8). It was obtained as brown crystals; m.p.: 81–82 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH = 1.28 (t, 3H, J = 8 Hz, CH2CH3), 4.24–4.30 (m, 2H, CH2CH3), 5.73 (s, 0.5H, NCH2), 5.74 (s, 1.5H, NCH2), 7.25 (t, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.37 (dd, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, 12 Hz, Ar-H), 7.61 (dd, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.89 (dd, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.17 (s, 0.25H, H-C=N), 8.48 (d, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.49 (s, 0.75H, H-C=N), 8.60 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.19 (d, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.26 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 12.51 (s, 0.75H, CONH), 12.54 (s, 0.25H, CONH). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC =13.92 (CH2CH3), 60.49, 60.53 (CH2CH3), 62.42, 62.46 (NCH2), 115.76, 115.96, 116.18, 125.99, 126.83, 129.32, 129.41, 129.75, 129.84, 130.00, 130.03, 130.19, 130.22, 145.27, 146.66, 147.24, 148.62, 149.45, 150.91 (Ar-C), 158.85, 162.31, 164.78, 165.15 (C=N, C=O), 166.11, 166.18 (C=OO). 31P-NMR (162 MHz, DMSO-d6): δP = −152.97 to −135.41 (m, 1P, PF6). 19F-NMR (377 MHz, DMSO-d6): δF = −71.13, −69.24 (2s, 6F, PF6); (−109.82 to −109.74), (−109.38 to −109.30) (2m, 1F, Ar-F). MS (ESI) m/z = 475.90 [M+].
1-(2-Ethoxy-2-oxoethyl)-4-(2-(4-fluorobenzylidene)hydrazinecarbonyl)pyridin-1-ium tetrafluoroborate (9). It was obtained as brown crystals; m.p.: 88–89 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH = 1.28 (t, 3H, J = 8 Hz, CH2CH3), 4.24–4.30 (m, 2H, CH2CH3), 5.73 (s, 0.5H, NCH2), 5.74 (s, 1.5H, NCH2), 7.25 (t, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.37 (dd, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, 12 Hz, Ar-H), 7.61 (dd, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.89 (dd, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.17 (s, 0.25H, H-C=N), 8.48 (d, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.49 (s, 0.75H, H-C=N), 8.60 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.19 (d, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 9.26 (d, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 12.51 (s, 0.75H, CONH), 12.54 (s, 0.25H, CONH). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC =13.93 (CH2CH3), 60.49, 60.53 (CH2CH3), 62.42, 62.46 (NCH2), 115.76, 115.96, 116.18, 125.99, 126.83, 129.33, 129.41, 129.75, 129.84, 130.00, 130.03, 130.19, 130.22, 145.27, 146.66, 147.24, 148.62, 149.44, 150.90 (Ar-C), 158.85, 162.31, 164.78, 165.15 (C=N, C=O), 166.11, 166.18 (C=OO). 11B-NMR (128 MHz, DMSO-d6): δB = −1.29 (d, 1B, BF4). 19F-NMR (377 MHz, DMSO-d6): δF = (−109.81 to −109.74), (−109.42 to −109.30) (2m, 1F, Ar-F); −148.34, −148.28 (2d, 4F, BF4). MS (ESI) m/z = 417.90 [M+].
1-(2-Ethoxy-2-oxoethyl)-4-(2-(4-fluorobenzylidene)hydrazinecarbonyl)pyridin-1-ium trifluoroacetate (10). It was obtained as brown crystals; m.p.: 93–94 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH = 1.28 (t, 3H, J = 8 Hz, CH2CH3), 4.24–4.30 (m, 2H, CH2CH3), 5.73 (s, 0.5H, NCH2), 5.75 (s, 1.5H, NCH2), 7.25 (t, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.37 (dd, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, 12 Hz, Ar-H), 7.61 (dd, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.89 (dd, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.17 (s, 0.25H, H-C=N), 8.48 (d, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.50 (s, 0.75H, H-C=N), 8.60 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.19 (d, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 9.27 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 12.51 (s, 0.75H, CONH), 12.54 (s, 0.25H, CONH). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC =13.93 (CH2CH3), 60.49, 60.53 (CH2CH3), 62.42, 62.46 (NCH2), 115.76, 115.96, 116.18, 125.98, 126.83, 129.33, 129.41, 129.75, 129.84, 130.00, 130.03, 130.19, 130.22, 145.27, 146.66, 147.24, 148.62, 149.46, 150.91 (Ar-C), 158.85, 162.31, 164.78, 165.15 (C=O), 166.10, 166.17 (C=OO). 19F-NMR (377 MHz, DMSO-d6): δF = −73.60 (s, 3F, CF3); (−109.82 to −109.74), (−109.40 to −109.31) (2m, 1F, Ar-F). MS (ESI) m/z = 443.90 [M+].
1-(2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-2-oxoethyl)-4-(2-(4-fluorobenzylidene)hydrazinecarbonyl)-pyridin-1-ium hexafluorophosphate (11). It was obtained as yellow crystals; m.p.: 84–85 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH = 6.59 (s, 0.5H, NCH2), 6.61 (s, 1.5H, NCH2), 7.25 (t, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.35 (t, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.64 (dd, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.78 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.89 (dd, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 8.13 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.22 (s, 0.25H, H-C=N), 8.52 (d, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.60 (s, 0.75H, H-C=N), 8.68 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.17 (d, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.24 (d, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 12.58 (s, 0.25H, CONH), 12.66 (s, 0.75H, CONH). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC = 66.33, 66.36 (NCH2), 115.79, 115.96, 116.18, 126.03, 126.86, 129.31, 129.44, 129.72, 129.81, 130.18, 130.24, 132.26, 132.31, 139.61, 145.24, 146.67, 147.22, 148.26, 149.43, 150.60 (Ar-C), 158.94, 162.29, 164.77, 165.22 (C=N, C=O), 189.58, 189.74 (CH2C=O). 31P-NMR (162 MHz, DMSO-d6) δP = −157.36 to −131.01 (m, 1P, PF6). 19F-NMR (377 MHz, DMSO-d6): δF = −71.14, −69.25 (2s, 6F, PF6), (−109.92 to −109.84), (−109.44 to −109.36) (2m, 1F, Ar-F). MS (ESI) m/z = 541.90 [M+].
1-(2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-2-oxoethyl)-4-(2-(4-fluorobenzylidene)hydrazinecarbonyl)-pyridin-1-ium tetrafluoroborate (12). It was obtained as yellow crystals; m.p.: 89–90 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH = 6.60 (s, 0.5H, NCH2), 6.62 (s, 1.5H, NCH2), 7.25 (t, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.35 (t, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.64 (dd, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.78 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.89 (dd, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 8.12 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.21 (s, 0.25H, H-C=N), 8.52 (d, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.60 (s, 0.75H, H-C=N), 8.68 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.16 (d, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.24 (d, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 12.57 (s, 0.25H, CONH), 12.65 (s, 0.75H, CONH). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC = 66.33, 66.36 (NCH2), 115.79, 115.96, 116.18, 126.03, 126.86, 129.31, 129.44, 129.72, 129.81, 130.18, 130.24, 132.26, 132.31, 139.61, 145.24, 146.67, 147.22, 148.26, 149.43, 150.60 (Ar-C), 158.94, 162.29, 164.77, 165.22 (C=N, C=O), 189.58, 189.74 (CH2C=O). 11B-NMR (128 MHz, DMSO-d6): δB = −1.28 (d, 1B, BF4). 19F-NMR (377 MHz, DMSO-d6): δF = (−109.94 to −109.77), (−109.47 to −109.35) (2m, 1F, Ar-F), −148.35, −148.30 (2d, 4F, BF4). MS (ESI) m/z = 483.90 [M+].
1-(2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-2-oxoethyl)-4-(2-(4-fluorobenzylidene)hydrazinecarbonyl)-pyridin-1-ium trifluoroacetate (13). It was obtained as yellow crystals; m.p.: 97–98 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH = 6.59 (s, 0.5H, NCH2), 6.61 (s, 1.5H, NCH2), 7.25 (t, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.35 (t, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.64 (dd, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.78 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.89 (dd, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 8.12 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.21 (s, 0.25H, H-C=N), 8.52 (d, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.60 (s, 0.75H, H-C=N), 8.68 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.17 (d, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.24 (d, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 12.57 (s, 0.25H, CONH), 12.65 (s, 0.75H, CONH). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC = 53.71, 66.36 (NCH2), 115.79, 115.96, 116.18, 126.03, 126.86, 129.31, 129.44, 129.72, 129.81, 130.18, 130.24, 132.26, 132.31, 139.61, 145.24, 146.67, 147.22, 148.26, 149.43, 150.60 (Ar-C), 158.94, 162.29, 164.77, 165.22 (C=N, C=O), 189.58, 189.74 (CH2C=O). 19F-NMR (377 MHz, DMSO-d6): δF = −73.50 (s, 3F, CF3); (−109.98 to −109.90), (−109.52 to −109.44) (2m, 1F, Ar-F). MS (ESI) m/z = 509.90 [M+].
4-(2-(4-Fluorobenzylidene)hydrazinecarbonyl)-1-(2-(4-nitrophenyl)-2-oxoethyl)-pyridin-1-ium hexafluorophosphate (14). It was obtained as yellow crystals; m.p.: 79–80 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH = 6.63 (s, 0.5H, NCH2), 6.65 (s, 1.5H, NCH2), 7.22 (t, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.33 (t, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.62 (dd, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.87 (dd, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.16 (s, 0.25H, H-C=N), 8.16–8.20 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 8.33–8.36 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 8.52 (d, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 8.54 (s, 0.75H, H-C=N), 8.68 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.13 (d, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.21 (d, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 12.48 (s, 0.25H, CONH), 12.51 (s, 0.75H, CONH). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC = 52.27, 66.66 (NCH2), 115.73, 115.93, 116.15, 123.82, 125.74, 126.71, 129.35, 129.44, 129.68, 129.76, 130.04, 138.07, 130.24, 130.27, 130.59, 134.99, 145.10, 145.88, 146.50, 146.91, 149.41, 150.21 (Ar-C), 158.74, 162.27, 164.75, 165.25 (C=N, C=O), 189.80, 189.95 (CH2C=O). 31P-NMR (162 MHz, DMSO-d6): δP = −157.35 to −131.01 (m, 1P, PF6). 19F-NMR (377 MHz, DMSO-d6): δF = −71.14, −69.25 (2s, 6F, PF6); (−109.93 to −109.85), (−109.46 to −109.38) (2m, 1F, Ar-F). MS (ESI) m/z = 552.90 [M+].
4-(2-(4-Fluorobenzylidene)hydrazinecarbonyl)-1-(2-(4-nitrophenyl)-2-oxoethyl)-pyridin-1-ium tetrafluoroborate (15). It was obtained as yellow crystals; m.p.: 84–85 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH = 6.63 (s, 0.5H, NCH2), 6.65 (s, 1.5H, NCH2), 7.22 (t, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.32 (t, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.62 (dd, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.87 (dd, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.16 (s, 0.25H, H-C=N), 8.17–8.20 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 8.32–8.36 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 8.52 (d, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 8.54 (s, 0.75H, H-C=N), 8.68 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.14 (d, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.24 (d, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 12.48 (s, 0.25H, CONH), 12.56 (s, 0.75H, CONH). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC = 52.27, 66.66 (NCH2), 115.22, 115.42, 115.64, 123.31, 125.22, 126.23, 128.84, 128.93, 129.19, 129.27, 129.56, 129.73, 129.76, 130.08, 134.50, 144.61, 145.36, 145.99, 146.47, 148.80, 148.92, 149.71 (Ar-C), 158.24, 161.78, 164.25, 164.74 (C=N, C=O), 189.80, 189.95 (CH2C=O). 11B-NMR (128 MHz, DMSO-d6): δB = −1.28 (d, 1B, BF4). 19F-NMR (377 MHz, DMSO-d6): δF = (−109.94 to −109.86), (−109.48 to −109.40) (2m, 1F, Ar-F); −148.38, −148.33 (2d, 4F, BF4). MS (ESI) m/z = 494.90 [M+].
4-(2-(4-Fluorobenzylidene)hydrazinecarbonyl)-1-(2-(4-nitrophenyl)-2-oxoethyl)-pyridin-1-ium trifluoroacetate (16). It was obtained as yellow crystals; m.p.: 89–90 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH = 6.63 (s, 0.5H, NCH2), 6.65 (s, 1.5H, NCH2), 7.22 (t, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.33 (t, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.62 (dd, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.87 (dd, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.17 (s, 0.25H, H-C=N), 8.16–8.21 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 8.31–8.35 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 8.52 (d, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 8.54 (s, 0.75H, H-C=N), 8.68 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.14 (d, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.24 (d, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 12.47 (s, 0.25H, CONH), 12.55 (s, 0.75H, CONH). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC = 52.27, 66.66 (NCH2), 115.22, 115.42, 115.64, 123.31, 125.22, 126.23, 128.84, 128.93, 129.19, 129.27, 129.56, 129.73, 129.76, 130.08, 134.50, 144.61, 145.36, 145.99, 146.47, 148.80, 148.92, 149.71 (Ar-C), 158.24, 161.78, 164.25, 164.74 (C=N, C=O), 189.80, 189.95 (CH2C=O). 19F-NMR (377 MHz, DMSO-d6): δF = −73.65 (s, 3F, CF3); (−110.00 to −109.92), (−109.53 to −109.45) (2m, 1F, Ar-F). MS (ESI) m/z = 520.00 [M+].
4-(2-(4-Fluorobenzylidene)hydrazinecarbonyl)-1-(4-phenoxybutyl)pyridin-1-ium hexafluorophosphate (17). It was obtained as yellow crystals; m.p.: 75–76 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH = 1.75–1.83 (m, 2H, CH2CH2N), 2.11–2.21 (m, 2H, CH2CH2O), 4.01–4.05 (m, 2H, CH2N), 4.78 (t, 2H, J = 8 Hz, OCH2CH2), 6.91–6.95 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 7.24 (dd, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, 12 Hz, Ar-H), 7.29 (t, 2H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 7.34 (t, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.62 (dd, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.89 (dd, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.17 (s, 0.25H, H-C=N), 8.41 (d, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 8.53 (s, 0.75H, H-C=N), 8.56 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.28 (d, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.36 (d, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 12.50 (bs, 1H, CONH). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC = 25.28, 25.33 (CH2CH2N), 27.59, 27.68 (CH2CH2O), 60.72, 60.78 (CH2N), 66.60, 66.64 (OCH2), 114.44, 115.74, 115.94, 116.16, 120.56, 126.20, 127.19, 129.44, 129.72, 129.81, 130.06, 130.23, 130.26, 145.12, 145.74, 147.37, 149.43, 149.69 (Ar-C), 158.39, 158.72, 162.29, 164.76, 165.16 (C=N, C=O). 31P-NMR (162 MHz, DMSO-d6): δP = −157.36 to −131.01 (m, 1P, PF6). 19F-NMR (377 MHz, DMSO-d6): δF = −71.13, −69.24 (2s, 6F, PF6); (−109.92 to −109.84), (−109.43 to −109.35) (2m, 1F, Ar-F). MS (ESI) m/z = 537.00 [M+].
4-(2-(4-Fluorobenzylidene)hydrazinecarbonyl)-1-(4-phenoxybutyl)pyridin-1-ium tetrafluoroborate (18). It was obtained as yellow crystals; m.p.: 80–81 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH = 1.74–1.82 (m, 2H, CH2CH2N), 2.11–2.20 (m, 2H, CH2CH2O), 4.01–4.04 (m, 2H, CH2N), 4.79 (dd, 2H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, OCH2), 6.91–6.94 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 7.21 (t, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.28 (t, 2H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 7.36 (dd, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz,12 Hz, Ar-H), 7.62 (dd, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.88 (dd, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.16 (s, 0.25H, H-C=N), 8.40 (d, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.51 (s, 0.75H, H-C=N), 8.54 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.26 (d, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 9.35 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 12.47 (bs, 1H, CONH). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC = 24.59, 24.64 (CH2CH2N), 26.90, 26.99 (CH2CH2O), 60.06, 60.13 (CH2N), 65.93, 65.96 (OCH2CH2), 113.77, 115.08, 115.28, 115.50, 119.90, 125.51, 126.52, 128.70, 128.78, 129.07, 129.15, 129.51, 129.54, 144.42, 144.50, 145.04, 146.68, 148.80, 148.99 (Ar-C), 157.70, 158.09, 161.62, 164.09, 164.47 (C=N, C=O). 11B-NMR (128 MHz, DMSO-d6): δB = −1.29 (d, 1B, BF4). 19F-NMR (377 MHz, DMSO-d6): δF = (−109.90 to −109.82), (−109.38 to −109.30) (2m, 1F, Ar-F); −148.34, −148.29 (2d, 4F, BF4). MS (ESI) m/z = 479.90 [M+].
4-(2-(4-Fluorobenzylidene)hydrazinecarbonyl)-1-(4-phenoxybutyl)pyridin-1-ium trifluoroacetate (19). It was obtained as yellow crystals; m.p.: 87–88 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH = 1.75–1.83 (m, 2H, CH2CH2N), 2.11–2.19 (m, 2H, CH2CH2O), 4.01–4.05 (m, 2H, CH2N), 4.78 (t, 2H, J = 8 Hz, OCH2CH2), 6.91–6.95 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 7.24 (dd, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, 12 Hz, Ar-H), 7.29 (t, 2H, J = 8 Hz, o-Ar-H), 7.34 (t, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.62 (dd, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.89 (dd, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.16 (s, 0.25H, H-C=N), 8.41 (d, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.51 (s, 0.75H, H-C=N), 8.55 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.28 (d, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.37 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 12.45 (bs, 1H, CONH). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC = 25.28, 25.33 (CH2CH2N), 27.58, 27.68 (CH2CH2O ), 60.71, 60.77 (CH2N), 66.61, 66.64 (OCH2), 114.45, 115.75, 115.95, 116.17, 120.56, 126.19, 127.18, 129.37, 129.44, 129.73, 129.82, 130.02, 130.05, 130.22, 145.12, 145.74, 147.38, 149.42 (Ar-C), 158.39, 158.74, 162.29, 164.76, 165.16 (C=N, C=O). 19F-NMR (377 MHz, DMSO-d6): δF = −73.52 (s, 3F, CF3); (−109.92 to −109.84), (−109.48 to −109.35) (2m, 1F, Ar-F). MS (ESI) m/z = 505.00 [M+].
1-Benzyl-4-(2-(4-fluorobenzylidene)hydrazinecarbonyl)pyridin-1-ium hexafluorophosphate (20). It was obtained as yellow crystals; m.p.: 70–71 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH = 5.94 (s, 2H, NCH2), 7.22 (t, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.36 (dd, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, 12 Hz, Ar-H), 7.45–7.50 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 7.56–7.59 (m, 2.5H, Ar-H), 7.88 (dd, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.15 (s, 0.25H, H-C=N), 8.43 (d, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.49 (s, 0.75H, H-C=N), 8.55 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.33 (d, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.43 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 12.45 (s, 0.75H, CONH), 12.50 (s, 0.25H, CONH). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC = 63.23, 63.32 (NCH2), 115.47, 115.66, 115.88, 126.34, 127.29, 128.59, 128.64, 128.99, 129.14, 129.21, 129.45, 129.53, 129.77, 129.93, 129.96, 133.69, 133.73, 144.89, 145.48, 147.59, 149.13, 149.75 (Ar-C), 158.48, 162.02, 164.50, 164.72 (C=N, C=O). 31P-NMR (162 MHz, DMSO-d6): δP = −157.34 to −131.00 (m, 1P, PF6). 19F-NMR (377 MHz, DMSO-d6): δF = −71.11, −69.22 (2s, 6F, PF6); (−109.83 to −109.75) and (−109.41 to −109.33) (2m, 1F, Ar-F). MS (ESI) m/z = 479.90 [M+].
1-Benzyl-4-(2-(4-fluorobenzylidene)hydrazinecarbonyl)pyridin-1-ium tetrafluoroborate (21). It was obtained as yellow crystals; m.p.: 79–80 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH = 5.94 (s, 2H, NCH2), 7.22 (t, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.36 (dd, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, 12 Hz, Ar-H), 7.45–7.50 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 7.56–7.59 (m, 2.5H, Ar-H), 7.88 (dd, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.15 (s, 0.25H, H-C=N), 8.43 (d, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.48 (s, 0.75H, H-C=N), 8.55 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.32 (d, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 9.42 (d, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 12.44 (s, 0.75H, CONH), 12.50 (s, 0.25H, CONH). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC = 63.51, 63.61 (NCH2), 115.74, 115.93, 116.15, 126.60, 127.56, 128.86, 128.92, 129.26, 129.42, 129.49, 129.72, 129.81, 130.04, 130.20, 130.23, 133.95, 134.00, 145.15, 145.75, 147.87, 149.41, 150.03 (Ar-C), 158.76, 161.98, 162.30, 164.77, 164.99 (C=N, C=O). 11B-NMR (128 MHz, DMSO-d6): δB = −1.26 (d, 1B, BF4). 19F-NMR (377 MHz, DMSO-d6): δF = (−109.83 to −109.75) and (−109.41 to −109.33) (2m, 1F, Ar-F); −148.30, −148.25 (2d, 4F, BF4). MS (ESI) m/z = 421.90 [M+].
1-Benzyl-4-(2-(4-fluorobenzylidene)hydrazinecarbonyl)pyridin-1-ium trifluoroacetate (22). It was obtained as yellow crystals; m.p.: 83–84 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH = 5.97 (s, 2H, NCH2), 7.22 (t, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.33 (t, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.44–7.49 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 7.57–7.60 (m, 2.5H, Ar-H), 7.86 (dd, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.18 (s, 0.25H, H-C=N), 8.42 (d, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 8.55 (s, 0.75H, H-C=N), 8.58 (d, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 9.37 (d, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.47 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 12.53 (s, 0.25H, CONH), 12.63 (s, 0.75H, CONH). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC = 63.44, 63.50 (NCH2), 115.73, 115.94, 116.15, 126.61, 127.53, 128.88, 128.94, 129.23, 129.40, 129.46, 129.68, 129.76, 130.04, 130.24, 130.27, 134.00, 134.04, 145.19, 145.76, 147.80, 149.44, 150.03 (Ar-C), 157.75, 158.06, 158.73, 162.27, 164.75, 164.98 (C=N, C=O). 19F-NMR (377 MHz, DMSO-d6): δF = −73.51 (s, 3F, CF3), (−109.86 to −109.79), (−109.46 to −109.38) (2m, 1F, Ar-F). MS (ESI) m/z = 447.00 [M+].
4-(2-(4-Fluorobenzylidene)hydrazinecarbonyl)-1-(2-hydroxyethyl)pyridin-1-ium hexafluorophosphate (23). It was obtained as black crystals; m.p.: 68–69 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH = 3.87–3.93 (m, 2H, OCH2), 4.75 (t, 2H, J = 4 Hz, NCH2), 7.24 (dd, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.33 (t, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.62 (dd, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.88 (dd, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.16 (s, 0.25H, H-C=N), 8.39 (d, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 8.50 (s, 0.75H, H-C=N), 8.52 (d, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 9.15 (d, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.24 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 12.46 (s, 1H, CONH). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC = 60.00 (OCH2), 63.39, 63.45 (NCH2), 115.77, 115.95, 116.17, 125.80, 126.93, 129.40, 129.48, 129.73, 129.82, 129.99, 130.02, 130.19, 130.22, 145.18, 145.46, 146.11, 147.50, 147.53, 149.44, 149.70 (Ar-C), 158.87, 161.41, 162.27, 164.42, 164.74, 165.23 (C=N, C=O). 31P-NMR (162 MHz, DMSO-d6): δP = −152.97 to −135.41 (m, 1P, PF6). 19F-NMR (377 MHz, DMSO-d6): δF = −71.11, −69.22 (2s, 6F, PF6); (−109.87 to −109.76), (−109.40 to −109.35) (2m, 1F, Ar-F). MS (ESI) m/z = 433.90 [M+].
4-(2-(4-Fluorobenzylidene)hydrazinecarbonyl)-1-(2-hydroxyethyl)pyridin-1-ium tetrafluoroborate (24). It was obtained as black crystals; m.p.: 73–74 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH = 3.76–3.79 (m, 2H, OCH2), 4.64 (t, 2H, J = 4 Hz, NCH2), 7.24 (dd, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.33 (t, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.62 (dd, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.88 (dd, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.16 (s, 0.25H, H-C=N), 8.39 (d, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 8.50 (s, 0.75H, H-C=N), 8.52 (d, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 9.15 (d, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.24 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 12.46 (s, 1H, CONH). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC = 60.01 (OCH2), 63.29, 63.52 (NCH2), 115.76, 115.95, 116.17, 125.80, 126.93, 129.40, 129.48, 129.73, 129.82, 129.99, 130.02, 130.19, 130.22, 145.18, 145.46, 146.11, 147.50, 147.53, 149.44, 149.70 (Ar-C), 158.87, 161.41, 162.27, 164.42, 164.74, 165.23 (C=N, C=O). 11B-NMR (128 MHz, DMSO-d6): δB = −1.29 (d, 1B, BF4). 19F-NMR (377 MHz, DMSO-d6): δF = (−109.90 to −109.82), (−109.38 to −109.30) (2m, 1F, Ar-F); −148.34, −148.29 (2d, 4F, BF4). MS (ESI) m/z = 375.90 [M+].
4-(2-(4-Fluorobenzylidene)hydrazinecarbonyl)-1-(2-hydroxyethyl)pyridin-1-ium trifluoroacetate (25). It was obtained as black crystals; m.p.: 79–80 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH = 3.87–3.92 (m, 2H, OCH2), 4.75 (t, 2H, J = 4 Hz, NCH2), 7.23 (t, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.34 (dd, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, 12 Hz, Ar-H), 7.62 (dd, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.88 (dd, 1.5H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.16 (s, 0.25H, H-C=N), 8.40 (d, 0.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 8.50 (s, 0.75H, H-C=N), 8.53 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 9.15 (d, 0.5H, J = 4 Hz, Ar-H), 9.24 (d, 1.5H, J = 8 Hz, Ar-H), 12.46 (s, 1H, CONH). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC = 59.99 (OCH2), 63.38, 63.44 (NCH2), 115.77, 115.95, 116.17, 125.47, 126.93, 126.82, 126.91, 129.47, 129.73, 129.82, 130.24, 130.19, 145.19, 145.48, 146.11, 147.56, 149.43, 149.72 (Ar-C), 158.88, 162.28, 163.55, 164.76, 165.19 (C=N, C=O). 19F-NMR (377 MHz, DMSO-d6): δF = −74.77 (s, 3F, CF3); (−109.92 to −109.84), (−109.48 to −109.35) (2m, 1F, Ar-F). MS (ESI) m/z = 401.90 [M+].

3.4. Antifungal Screening

3.4.1. Growth Conditions, Species Identification and Determination of MIC90

Yeast extract, peptone and dextrose (YPD) medium (Sigma, Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used to culture the yeast strains used in this study. For longer periods, the strains were maintained on YPD agar plates and kept at 4 °C. For experimental purposes, a loop-full of culture was taken from the plates, dissolved in 50 mL of YPD medium and grown on a rotary shaker at 37 °C (150–170 rpm). The culture samples were stored at −80 °C with 500 μL of cell culture and 500 μL of glycerol as glycerol stocks. Identification of the yeasts was done through Gram staining procedure, germ tube test, CHROMagar test and VITEK 2 yeast identification system.
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC90) was determined following the NCCLS document M27-A2, 2002 [44]. The cell suspensions and required concentrations of the synthesized compounds were added to different wells of 96 well microtitre plates as done earlier [45,46,47,48,49,50].

3.4.2. Ergosterol Extraction and Estimation Assay

Initially, Candida cells and MIC and sub-MIC values of the test agents were added to 50 mL of YPD medium. Both the control and treated samples were incubated for 16 h and each sample was harvested by centrifugation for 5 min at 2700 rpm. After the weighing the pellet, 25% alcoholic potassium hydroxide solution was added to each sample and it was vortexed for 1 min. For sterol extraction, sterile distilled water and n-heptane was added to the sample in 1:3 ratio followed by vortexing for 3 min. Sterol extract (20 μL) was then diluted in ethanol (100%) and scanned between 230 and 300 nm. The detailed procedure about the calculation of total ergosterol content in control and treated samples can be obtained from our previous studies [51,52,53,54,55].

3.4.3. Confocal Scanning Laser Microscopy (CSLM)

Initially, Candida cells (106 cells/mL) were added to YPD medium. The MIC value of the test agent was added to the medium and the samples were incubated at 37 °C for 16 h. The suspensions were centrifuged at 2700 rpm for 10 min, washed and resuspended in PBS. After this, 5 μL of PI (1 μg/mL) was taken and added to both control and test agent-treated samples. The samples were then incubated again for 30 min at 37 °C. Finally, the control and treated cells were examined under Olympus Laser Confocal Scanning Microscope as done previously [56,57,58].

4. Conclusions

This study reports an efficient and ecofriendly ultrasound versus conventional synthesis of novel specific task pyridinium ionic liquid hydrazones tethering fluorinated counter anions. To gain insights into the antifungal mechanism of action, we examined the effect of these synthesized compounds on total ergosterol content present in yeast cell membranes. The results obtained showed a significant decrease in ergosterol content at MIC90 values of the active compounds (compounds 8, 14 and 11). Thus, we suggest that ergosterol is important as a pharmacological target of the synthesized compounds. Part of this antifungal activity may be originating from the direct binding of these compounds to membrane ergosterol. This may be creating pores in fungal cell membranes, and consequently lead to loss of intracellular content, which ultimately kills the cells as confirmed by our confocal results. Further in vivo studies are necessary to obtain a novel and effective antifungal agent against Candida infections.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary File 1

Author Contributions

N.R., S.A.A-S., M.M. and M.R.A. carried out of the experimental work and cooperated in the preparation of the manuscript. N.R., M.R.A. and M.M. gave the concepts of work, collected data, interpreted the results and prepared the manuscript. S.S. and V.R. performed the biological assays. N.R., S.S., R.A.S., M.M. and M.R.A. wrote the paper and edited English language. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors declare no conflict of interests.

References

  1. Paluchowska, P.; Tokarczyk, M.; Bogusz, B.; Skiba, I.; Budak, A. Molecular epidemiology of Candida albicans and Candida glabrata strains isolated from intensive care unit patients in Poland. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 2014, 109, 436–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rathor, N.; Khillan, V.; Sarin, S.K. Nosocomial candiduria in chronic liver disease patients at a hepatobilliary center. Indian J. Crit. Care Med. 2014, 18, 234–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Eggimann, P.; Garbino, J.; Pittet, D. Epidemiology of Candida species infections in critically ill non-immunosuppressed patients. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2003, 3, 685–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Abi-Said, D.; Anaissie, E.; Uzun, I.; Raad, O.; Pinzcowski, H.; Vartivarian, S. The epidemiology of hematogenous candidiasis caused by different Candida species. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1997, 24, 1122–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pierce, G.E. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida albicans, and device-related nosocomial infections: Implications, trends, and potential approaches for control. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 32, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Laniado-Laborin, R.; Cabrales-Vargas, M.N. Amphotericin: Side effects and toxicity. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2009, 26, 223–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Pham, C.P.; DeFeiter, P.W.; VanderKuy, P.H.; VanMook, W.N. Long QTc interval and torsade de pointes caused by fluconazole. Ann. Pharmacother. 2006, 40, 1456–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Cannon, R.D.; Lamping, E.; Holmes, A.R.; Niimi, K.; Baret, P.V.; Keniya, M.V.; Tanabe, K.; Niimi, M.; Goffeau, A.; Monk, B.C. Efflux-mediated antifungal drug resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 22, 291–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Odds, F.C.; Brown, A.J.; Gow, N.A. Antifungal agents: Mechanisms of action. Trends Microbiol. 2003, 11, 272–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Itoga, M.; Aoki, S.; Suzuki, A.; Yoshida, Y.; Fujinami, Y.; Masuko, M. Toward resolving anxiety about the accelerated corrosive wear of steel lubricated with the fluorine-containing ionic liquids at elevated temperature. Tribol. Int. 2016, 93, 640–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tiruye, G.A.; Muñoz-Torrero, D.; Palma, J.; Anderson, M.; Marcilla, R. Performance of solid state supercapacitors based on polymer electrolytes containing different ionic liquids. J. Power Sources 2016, 326, 560–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Andreeva, N.A.; Chaban, V.V. Amino-functionalized ionic liquids as carbon dioxide scavengers. Ab initio thermodynamics for chemisorption. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2016, 103, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Savest, N.; Plamus, T.; Tarasova, E.; Viirsalu, M.; Krasnou, I.; Gudkova, V.; Küppar, K.; Krumme, A. The effect of ionic liquids on the conductivity of electrospun polyacrylonitrile membranes. J. Electrost. 2016, 83, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhai, W.; Zhu, H.; Wang, L.; Liu, X.; Yang, H. Study of PVDF-HFP/PMMA blended micro-porous gel polymer electrolyte incorporating ionic liquid [BMIM]BF4 for Lithium ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 133, 623–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Al-Aqmar, D.M.; Abdelkader, H.I.; AbouKana, M.T.H. Optical, photo-physical properties and photostability of pyrromethene (PM-597) in ionic liquids as benign green-solvents. J. Lumin. 2015, 161, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Poole, C.F.; Lenca, N. Green sample-preparation methods using room temperature ionic liquids for the chromatographic analysis of organic compounds. Trends Anal. Chem. 2015, 71, 144–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ferreira, A.M.; Faustino, V.F.M.; Monda, D.; Coutinho, J.A.P.; Freire, M.G. Improving the extraction and purification of immunoglobulin G bythe use of ionic liquids as adjuvants in aqueous biphasic systems. J. Biotechnol. 2016, 236, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Shamshina, J.L. Develop ionic liquid drugs. Update regulation to spur research into drugs that the body absorbs more easily and that could reach market more quickly, urge. Nature 2015, 528, 188–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Shirkhanloo, H.; Ghazaghi, M.; Mousavi, H.Z. Cadmium determination in human biological samples based on trioctylmethyl ammonium thiosalicylate as a task specific ionic liquid by dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction method. J. Mol. Liq. 2016, 218, 478–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hernoux-Villière, A.; Lévêque, J.; Kärkkäinen, J.; Papaiconomou, N.; Lajunen, M.; Lassi, U. Task-specific ionic liquid for the depolymerisation of starch-based industrial waste into high reducing sugars. Catal. Today 2014, 223, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Da, Y.; Yuan, W.; Xin, T.; Nie, Y.; Ye, Y.; Yan, Y.; Liang, L.; Chen, Z. Synthesis and biological evaluation of new fluorine substituted derivatives as angiotensin II receptor antagonists with anti-hypertension and anti-tumor effects. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2012, 20, 7101–7111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kirk, K.L. Fluorine in medicinal chemistry: Recent therapeutic applications of fluorinated small molecules. J. Fluor. Chem. 2006, 127, 1013–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kirk, K.L. Selective fluorination in drug design and development: An overview of biochemical rationales. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2006, 6, 1447–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Shah, P.; Westwell, A.D. The role of fluorine in medicinal chemistry. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2007, 22, 527–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Unzner, T.A.; Magauer, T. Carbon–fluorine bond activation for the synthesis of functionalized molecules. Tetrahedron Lett. 2015, 56, 877–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Václavík, J.; Chernykh, Y.; Jurásek, B.; Beier, P. Nucleophilic tetrafluoroethylation of carbonyl compounds with fluorinated sulfones. J. Fluorine Chem. 2015, 169, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rezki, N.; Al-Sodies, S.A.; Aouad, M.R.; Bardaweel, S.; Messali, M.; ElAshry, E.S.H. An eco-friendly ultrasound-assisted synthesis ofnovel fluorinated pyridinium salts-based hydrazones and antimicrobial and antitumor screening. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 766–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Shreaz, S.; Sheikh, R.A.; Rimple, B.; Hashmi, A.A.; Nikhat, M.; Khan, L.A. Anticandidal activity of cinnamaldehyde, its ligand and Ni(II) complex: Effect of increase in ring and side chain. Microb. Pathog. 2010, 49, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Sheikh, R.A.; Shreaz, S.; Malik, M.A.; Khan, L.A.; Hashmi, A.A. Spectroscopic elucidation of new metal hetroscorpionates: A novel class of antifungal and antibacterial agents. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 2010, 2, 133–146. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sheikh, R.A.; Shreaz, S.; Sharma, G.S.; Khan, L.A.; Hashmi, A.A. Synthesis, characterization and antimicrobial screening of a novel organylborate ligand, potassium hydro (phthalyl)(salicylyl) borate and its Co (II), Ni (II), and Cu (II) complexes. J. Saud. Chem. Soc. 2012, 16, 353–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sheikh, R.A.; Wani, M.Y.; Shreaz, S.; Hashmi, A.A. Synthesis, characterization and biological screening of some Schiff base macrocyclic ligand based transition metal complexes as antifungal agents. Arab. J. Chem. 2016, 9, S743–S751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sharma, G.S.; Sheikh, R.A.; Shreaz, S.; Hashmi, A.A.; Khan, L.A. Synthesis, characterization and antimicrobial activity of potassium hydro (benzoyl)(phthalyl) borate and Its Cobalt (II), Nickel (II), and Copper (II) Complexes. Chin. J. Chem. 2009, 27, 1300–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shiekh, R.A.; Shreaz, S.; Khan, L.A.; Hashmi, A.A. Development and characterization of bioactive macrocyclic metal complexes, use as a potential drug. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 2010, 2, 172–185. [Google Scholar]
  34. Messali, M.; Aouad, M.R.; Ali, A.A.-S.; Rezki, N.; Ben Hadda, T.; Hammouti, B. Synthesis, characterization, and POM analysis of novel bioactive imidazolium-based ionic liquids. Med. Chem. Res. 2015, 24, 1387–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Messali, M.; Aouad, M.R.; El-Sayed, W.S.; Ali, A.A.-S.; Ben Hadda, T.; Hammouti, B. New eco-Friendly 1-alkyl-3-(4-phenoxybutyl) imidazolium-based ionic liquids derivatives: A green ultrasound-assisted synthesis, characterization, antibacterial activity and POM analyses. Molecules 2014, 19, 11741–11759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Messali, M.; Almtiri, M.N.; Abderrahman, B.; Salghi, R.; Aouad, M.R.; Alshahateet, S.F.; Ali, A.A.-S. New pyridazinium-based ionic liquids: An eco-friendly ultrasound-assisted synthesis, characterization and biological activity. S. Afr. J. Chem. 2015, 68, 219–225. [Google Scholar]
  37. Chatel, G.; MacFarlane, D.R. Ionic liquids and ultrasound in combination: Synergies and challenges. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 8132–8149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Marullo, S.; D’Anna, F.; Rizzo, C.; Noto, R. The ultrasounds–ionic liquids synergy on the copper catalyzed azide–alkyne cycloaddition between phenylacetylene and 4-azidoquinoline. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2015, 23, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Messali, M. Conventional vs. ultrasound and microwave assisted synthesis: Some new environmentally friendly functionalized picolinium-based ionic liquids with potential antibacterial activity. Acta Pharm. 2015, 65, 253–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Rezki, N.; Al-Yahyawi, A.M.; Bardaweel, S.K.; Al-Blewi, F.F.; Aouad, M.R. Synthesis of novel 2,5-disubstituted-1,3,4-thiadiazoles clubbed 1,2,4-triazole, 1,3,4-thiadiazole, 1,3,4-oxadiazole and/or schiff base as potential antimicrobial and antiproliferative agents. Molecules 2015, 20, 16048–16067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Czub, J.; Baginski, M. Comparative molecular dynamics study of lipid membranes containing cholesterol and ergosterol. Biophys. J. 2006, 90, 2368–2382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. de Kroon, A.I.; Rijken, P.J.; De Smet, C.H. Checks and balances in membrane phospholipid class and acyl chain homeostasis, the yeast perspective. Prog. Lipid Res. 2013, 52, 374–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ghannoum, M.A.; Rice, L.B. Antifungal agents: mode of action, mechanisms of resistance, and correlation of these mechanisms with bacterial resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1999, 12, 501–517. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS). Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts; Approved Standard M27-A2; National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards: Wayne, PA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  45. Shreaz, S.; Sheikh, R.A.; Bhatia, R.; Neelofar, K.; Imran, S.; Hashmi, A.A.; Manzoor, N.; Basir, S.F.; Khan, L.A. Antifungal activity of α-methyl trans cinnamaldehyde, its ligand and metal complexes: Promising growth and ergosterol inhibitors. Biometals 2011, 24, 923–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Shreaz, S.; Bhatia, R.; Khan, N.; Muralidhar, S.; Manzoor, N.; Khan, L.A. Influences of cinnamicaldehydes on H+ extrusion activity and ultrastructure of Candida. J. Med. Microbiol. 2013, 62, 232–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Khan, N.; Shreaz, S.; Bhatia, R.; Ahmad, S.I.; Muralidhar, S.; Manzoor, N.; Khan, L.A. Anticandidal activity of curcumin and methyl cinnamaldehyde. Fitoterapia 2012, 83, 434–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Bharathi, N.P.; Alam, M.; Shreaz, S.; Hashmi, A.A. Synthesis, characterization and biological studies of oil based tin polymer. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mat. 2009, 19, 459–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bharathi, N.P.; Khan, N.U.; Lam, M.A.; Shreaz, S.; Hashmi, A.A. Cadmium incorporated oil based bioactive polymers: Synthesis, characterization and physico-chemical studies. J. Inorg. Organom. Pol. Mat. 2010, 20, 833–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shreaz, S.; Bhatia, R.; Khan, N.; Maurya, I.K.; Ahmad, S.I.; Muralidhar, S.; Manzoor, N.; Khan, L.A. Cinnamic aldehydes affect hydrolytic enzyme secretion and morphogenesis in oral Candida isolates. Microb. Pathog. 2012, 52, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Irshad, M.; Shreaz, S.; Manzoor, N.; Khan, L.A.; Rizvi, M.M.A. Anticandidal activity of Cassia fistula and its effect on ergosterol biosynthesis. Pharm. Biol. 2011, 49, 727–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Shreaz, S.; Bhatia, R.; Khan, N.; Muralidhar, S.; Basir, S.F.; Manzoor, N.; Khan, L.A. Exposure of Candida to p-anisaldehyde inhibits its growth and ergosterol biosynthesis. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 2011, 57, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Neelofar, K.; Shreaz, S.; Rimple, B.; Muralidhar, S.; Nikhat, M.; Khan, L.A. Curcumin as a promising anticandidal of clinical interest. Can. J. Microbiol. 2011, 57, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Vaseem, R.; Sheikh, S.; Jawad, M.B.; Weqar, A.S. In vitro effect of ethanolic extract of Curcuma longa rhizome on growth and sterol synthesis in different Candida isolates. J. Pure Appl. Microbio. 2016, 10, 2231–2239. [Google Scholar]
  55. Shreaz, S.; Bhatia, R.; Khan, N.; Muralidhar, S.; Basir, S.F.; Manzoor, N.; Khan, L.A. Spice oil cinnamaldehyde exhibits potent anticandidal activity against fluconazole resistant clinical isolates. Fitoterapia 2011, 82, 1012–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Vaseem, R.; Shreaz, S.; Siddiqui, W.A. Curcuma longa rhizome extract as a promising source of anticandidal agents. Adv. Sci. Lett. 2014, 20, 1644–1649. [Google Scholar]
  57. Shreaz, S.; Shiekh, R.A.; Raja, V.; Wani, W.A.; Behbehani, J.M. Impaired ergosterol biosynthesis mediated fungicidal activity of Co(II) complex with ligand derived from cinnamaldehyde. Chem. Biol. Int. 2016, 247, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Raja, V.; Ahmad, S.I.; Irshad, M.; Wani, W.A.; Siddiqi, W.A.; Shreaz, S. Anticandidal activity of ethanolic root extract of Juglans regia (L.): Effect on growth, cell morphology, and key virulence factors. J. Mycol. Med. 2017, 16, 30311–30320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sample Availability: Not available.
Molecules 22 01532 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Conventional versus ultrasound synthesis of halogenated and fluorinated specific task ILs 2–25.
Scheme 1. Conventional versus ultrasound synthesis of halogenated and fluorinated specific task ILs 2–25.
Molecules 22 01532 sch001
Molecules 22 01532 g001 550
Figure 1. 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 3.
Figure 1. 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 3.
Molecules 22 01532 g001
Molecules 22 01532 g002 550
Figure 2. 13C-NMR spectrum of compound 3.
Figure 2. 13C-NMR spectrum of compound 3.
Molecules 22 01532 g002
Molecules 22 01532 g003 550
Figure 3. 19F-NMR spectrum of compound 3.
Figure 3. 19F-NMR spectrum of compound 3.
Molecules 22 01532 g003
Molecules 22 01532 g004 550
Figure 4. 31P-NMR spectrum of compound 11.
Figure 4. 31P-NMR spectrum of compound 11.
Molecules 22 01532 g004
Molecules 22 01532 g005 550
Figure 5. 19F-NMR spectrum of compound 11.
Figure 5. 19F-NMR spectrum of compound 11.
Molecules 22 01532 g005
Molecules 22 01532 g006 550
Figure 6. UV spectrophotometric sterol profile of (a) C. albicans ATCC 10261 (b) C. albicans CN 9 (c) C. albicans CN 38 grown for 16 h in YPD broth containing MIC/4, MIC/2 and MIC of compound 11. UV- Spectral profiles of extracted sterols were read between 230–300 nm. Control implies without any treatment. In the cases of MIC/4 and MIC/2, cells were treated with one fourth and one half of MIC (μg/mL) value of test compound, respectively. In the MIC case, the sample was treated with MIC (μg/mL) value of test compound. The MIC90 for compound 11 against C. albicans ATCC 10261, C. albicans CN 9, and C. albicans CN 38 was 62.5, 31.25 and 62.5 μg/mL, respectively.
Figure 6. UV spectrophotometric sterol profile of (a) C. albicans ATCC 10261 (b) C. albicans CN 9 (c) C. albicans CN 38 grown for 16 h in YPD broth containing MIC/4, MIC/2 and MIC of compound 11. UV- Spectral profiles of extracted sterols were read between 230–300 nm. Control implies without any treatment. In the cases of MIC/4 and MIC/2, cells were treated with one fourth and one half of MIC (μg/mL) value of test compound, respectively. In the MIC case, the sample was treated with MIC (μg/mL) value of test compound. The MIC90 for compound 11 against C. albicans ATCC 10261, C. albicans CN 9, and C. albicans CN 38 was 62.5, 31.25 and 62.5 μg/mL, respectively.
Molecules 22 01532 g006
Molecules 22 01532 g007 550
Figure 7. Laser confocal images of C. albicans ATCC 10261. To confirm membrane damage, cells were stained with propidium iodide (PI; red signals). (a) Control (b) Cells treated with compound 8 (c) Cells treated with compound 14 (d) Cells treated with compound 11. Left panel contains Candida cells without any treatment; in this case only dye was added to the cells. No red color was seen in the confocal image in the left panel (control cells); this implies that the dye has not entered the cells. In the right panel (treated cells), the red color is quite visible, implying that cell membranes and cell walls have been disrupted.
Figure 7. Laser confocal images of C. albicans ATCC 10261. To confirm membrane damage, cells were stained with propidium iodide (PI; red signals). (a) Control (b) Cells treated with compound 8 (c) Cells treated with compound 14 (d) Cells treated with compound 11. Left panel contains Candida cells without any treatment; in this case only dye was added to the cells. No red color was seen in the confocal image in the left panel (control cells); this implies that the dye has not entered the cells. In the right panel (treated cells), the red color is quite visible, implying that cell membranes and cell walls have been disrupted.
Molecules 22 01532 g007
Table
Table 1. Conventional versus ultrasound times and yields of halogenated specific task ionic liquids (ILs) 2–7.
Table 1. Conventional versus ultrasound times and yields of halogenated specific task ionic liquids (ILs) 2–7.
Compound No.RConventional Method CMUltrasound Method US
Time (h)Yield (%)Time (h)Yield (%)
2CH2COOEt2090494
3p-ClC6H4COCH22491594
4p-NO2C6H4COCH22480588
5C6H5O(CH2)42493496
6C6H5CH24089692
7OH(CH2)24880688
Table
Table 2. Conventional versus ultrasound times and yields of fluorinated specific task-ILs 8–25.
Table 2. Conventional versus ultrasound times and yields of fluorinated specific task-ILs 8–25.
Compound No.RYConventional Method CMUltrasound Method US
Time (h)Yield (%)Time (h)Yield (%)
8CH2COOEtPF61688492
9CH2COOEtBF41685490
10CH2COOEtCOOCF31683490
11p-ClC6H4COCH2PF61690494
12p-ClC6H4COCH2BF41686490
13p-ClC6H4COCH2COOCF31692496
14p-NO2C6H4COCH2PF61689492
15p-NO2C6H4COCH2BF41684492
16p-NO2C6H4COCH2COOCF31691494
17C6H5O(CH2)4PF61684592
18C6H5O(CH2)4BF41684590
19C6H5O(CH2)4COOCF31689592
20C6H5CH2PF61694596
21C6H5CH2BF41688592
22C6H5CH2COOCF31686590
23OH(CH2)2PF61690594
24OH(CH2)2BF41683590
25OH(CH2)2COOCF31687592
Table
Table 3. Standard Candida species and clinical isolates used in this study.
Table 3. Standard Candida species and clinical isolates used in this study.
Isolates/Strain Species (Number of Strains)
Sensitive (standard, n = 4)
ATCC 10261C. albicans
ATCC 90030C. glabrata
ATCC 750C. tropicalis
ATCC 6258C. krusei
Clinical isolates (n = 36)C. albicans (19), C. tropicalis (5), C. glabrata (8), C. krusei (4)
Table
Table 4. Range of MIC90 (μg/mL) of the synthesized compounds against four standard and 36 clinical Candida isolates.
Table 4. Range of MIC90 (μg/mL) of the synthesized compounds against four standard and 36 clinical Candida isolates.
Test AgentsMIC90 Range (μg/mL)
2>1000
3>1000
4>1000
5>1000
6>1000
7500–1000
862.5–250
9250–500
10250–500
1131.25–62.5
12125–250
13250–500
1462.5–125
15250–500
16500–1000
17125–250
18250–500
19500–1000
20125–250
21250–500
22500–1000
23250–500
24500–1000
25250–500
Fluconazole (standard drug)1–32
Table
Table 5. Percent ergosterol decrease in three standard and three clinical Candida isolates grown in presence of MIC and sub-MIC values of compounds 8, 11 and 14, respectively.
Table 5. Percent ergosterol decrease in three standard and three clinical Candida isolates grown in presence of MIC and sub-MIC values of compounds 8, 11 and 14, respectively.
% Ergosterol Decrease
Test CompoundConcentration Standard Strains (n = 3)Clinical Strains (n = 3)
Control00
8MIC/411.6 (± 0.69)12.9 (± 1.15)
MIC/238.3 (± 3.05)36.73 (± 2.61)
MIC59.06 (± 4.10)55.23 (± 2.92)
11MIC/452.43 (± 3.89)53.91 (± 3.26)
MIC/265.66 (± 4.93)62.76 (± 4.27)
MIC88.26 (± 2.12)84.3 (± 5.00)
14MIC/436.13 (± 4.00)29.26 (± 1.16)
MIC/251.16 (± 2.36)45.72 (± 1.83)
MIC70.4 (± 2.62)71.41 (± 3.16)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rezki, N.; Al-Sodies, S.A.; Shreaz, S.; Shiekh, R.A.; Messali, M.; Raja, V.; Aouad, M.R. Green Ultrasound versus Conventional Synthesis and Characterization of Specific Task Pyridinium Ionic Liquid Hydrazones Tethering Fluorinated Counter Anions: Novel Inhibitors of Fungal Ergosterol Biosynthesis. Molecules 2017, 22, 1532. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22111532

AMA Style

Rezki N, Al-Sodies SA, Shreaz S, Shiekh RA, Messali M, Raja V, Aouad MR. Green Ultrasound versus Conventional Synthesis and Characterization of Specific Task Pyridinium Ionic Liquid Hydrazones Tethering Fluorinated Counter Anions: Novel Inhibitors of Fungal Ergosterol Biosynthesis. Molecules. 2017; 22(11):1532. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22111532

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rezki, Nadjet, Salsabeel A. Al-Sodies, Sheikh Shreaz, Rayees Ahmad Shiekh, Mouslim Messali, Vaseem Raja, and Mohamed R. Aouad. 2017. "Green Ultrasound versus Conventional Synthesis and Characterization of Specific Task Pyridinium Ionic Liquid Hydrazones Tethering Fluorinated Counter Anions: Novel Inhibitors of Fungal Ergosterol Biosynthesis" Molecules 22, no. 11: 1532. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22111532

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop