Next Article in Journal
β-Glucans: Relationships between Modification, Conformation and Functional Activities
Next Article in Special Issue
An Easy Approach to Control β-Phase Formation in PFO Films for Optimized Emission Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation of “Constrained Geometry” Titanium Complexes of [1,2]Azasilinane Framework for Ethylene/1-Octene Copolymerization
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of a Polymercaptan Material on the Electro-Optical Properties of Polymer-Dispersed Liquid Crystal Films
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 22
Issue 2
10.3390/molecules22020262
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Weak Base Addition to Hole-Collecting Buffer Layers in Polymer:Fullerene Solar Cells

by
Jooyeok Seo
1,
Soohyeong Park
2,
Myeonghun Song
1,
Jaehoon Jeong
1,
Chulyeon Lee
1,
Hwajeong Kim
1,3 and
Youngkyoo Kim
1,*
1
Organic Nanoelectronics Laboratory and KNU Institute for Nanophotonics Applications (KINPA), Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Applied Chemical Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea
2
Advanced Composites Materials Technical Center, Toray Advanced Materials Korea, Gumi-Si, Gyeongbook 39422, Korea
3
Priority Research Center, Research Institute of Advanced Energy Technology, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2017, 22(2), 262; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22020262
Submission received: 13 January 2017 / Accepted: 4 February 2017 / Published: 9 February 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Organic Nanophotonics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
We report the effect of weak base addition to acidic polymer hole-collecting layers in normal-type polymer:fullerene solar cells. Varying amounts of the weak base aniline (AN) were added to solutions of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS). The acidity of the aniline-added PEDOT:PSS solutions gradually decreased from pH = 1.74 (AN = 0 mol %) to pH = 4.24 (AN = 1.8 mol %). The electrical conductivity of the PEDOT:PSS-AN films did not change much with the pH value, while the ratio of conductivity between out-of-plane and in-plane directions was dependent on the pH of solutions. The highest power conversion efficiency (PCE) was obtained at pH = 2.52, even though all devices with the PEDOT:PSS-AN layers exhibited better PCE than those with the pristine PEDOT:PSS layers. Atomic force microscopy investigation revealed that the size of PEDOT:PSS domains became smaller as the pH increased. The stability test for 100 h illumination under one sun condition disclosed that the PCE decay was relatively slower for the devices with the PEDOT:PSS-AN layers than for those with pristine PEDOT:PSS layers.

1. Introduction

Polymer solar cells have been extensively studied because of their potential merits for making flexible plastic solar modules that can be easily rolled up like wallpaper [1,2,3,4]. Low-cost manufacturing processes are expected for polymer solar cells due to the potential of using continuous fabrication technology based on roll-to-roll printing processes employing plastic film substrates [2,3,4,5,6]. It is considered that it should be possible to make large-area plastic solar modules at room temperature because polymeric solutions are used for the continuous wet-coating processes [5,6]. In order to achieve such benefits, semiconducting polymers are of crucial importance in the construction of light-absorbing active layers [1,2,7,8,9,10].
The coming-out of polymer solar cells, exhibiting a viable power conversion efficiency (PCE) values since the organic bulk heterojunction (BHJ) concept was first reported, can be ascribed to the control of effective charge percolation nanomorphology in the polymer:fullerene BHJ layers by varying material compositions, solvents, annealing conditions, etc. [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Recently, the PCE of polymer:fullerene solar cells reached ca. 10%–11% in a single stack structure, while tandem structures delivered ca. 12%–13% PCE [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Such enhanced PCEs in single stack structures can be also attributed to the introduction of interlayers in the inverted-type devices [29,30,31,32].
In the case of normal-type devices, a hole-collecting buffer layer is necessary for effective hole collections from the active layers because the work function of typical transparent conducting oxides, for example, indium-tin oxide (ITO), makes large energy barriers for the transfer of holes from the p-type polymer components in the BHJ layers [2,33,34,35]. As a hole-collecting buffer layer, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) has been extensively used thanks to its work function range suitable for the effective hole collections [36,37,38]. However, the strong acidity of PEDOT:PSS has been pointed as one of the problems leading to the poor stability of devices, which has motivated various approaches to solve this issue, including the addition of strong bases [39,40,41,42].
In this work, we attempted to make the acidity of PEDOT:PSS milder by adding a weak base because strong bases can give rise to adverse effects including undesirable breaking of doped states between PEDOT and PSS components. Aniline (AN), as a weak base, has been added to the PEDOT:PSS solution, leading to the aniline-doped PEDOT:PSS (PEDOT:PSS-AN), which were then used for the preparation of the hole-collecting buffer layers in the normal-type solar cells with the BHJ layers of poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) and [6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester (PC61BM). The acidity of the PEDOT:PSS solutions was changed according to the aniline content, which in turn influenced the PCE of the P3HT:PC61BM solar cells.

2. Materials and Methods

P3HT (regioregularity = 92.2%; weight-average molecular weight = 59 kDa; polydispersity index = 2.32) and PC61BM (purity = 99.5%) were purchased from Rieke Metals (Lincoln, NE, USA) and Nano-C (Westwood, MA, USA), respectively. A blend of P3HT and PC61BM (P3HT:PC61BM = 1:1 by weight) was dissolved in chlorobenzene at a solid concentration of ~30 mg/mL. PEDOT:PSS (PH500, conductivity = ~500 S/cm) was received from Heraeus (Clevios PH 500, Hanau, Germany), to which aniline was added by varying the molar ratio up to 1.8 mol % with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, 5 vol %). Indium-tin oxide (ITO)-coated glass substrates (sheet resistance= 10 Ω/□) were cleaned using acetone and isopropyl alcohol, dried, and treated by UV-ozone cleaning system (AH-1700, Ahtech LTS, Anyang-si, Korea) for 20 min. The PEDOT:PSS-AN layers (40 nm thick) were spin-coated on the ITO-glass substrates and thermally annealed at 230 °C for 15 min. Then the P3HT:PC61BM layers (ca. 85 nm) were spin-coated on the PEDOT:PSS layers that were coated on the ITO-glass substrates and soft-baked at 60 °C for 15 min. These samples were moved into a vacuum chamber for the deposition of lithium fluoride (LiF, ca. 1 nm) and aluminum (Al, 100 nm) through a metal shadow mask, defining the active area of 0.09 cm2 (note that the active area was cross-checked by the optical microscope measurement). All devices were subject to thermal annealing at 150 °C for 10 min.
The thickness of films including electrodes was measured using a thickness profiler (Alpha Step 200, Tencor Instruments, Milpitas, CA, USA). The in-plane (IP) conductivity of the PEDOT:PSS-AN films was measured using a four-probe measurement system equipped with an semiconductor parameter analyzer (4200-SCS, Keithley, Cleveland, OH, USA), while the out-of-plane (OOP) conductivity was obtained from the current-voltage (I-V) curves of the stacked devices (glass/ITO/PEDOT:PSS-AN/Al). The work functions of the PEDOT:PSS-AN films were measured using a photoelectron yield spectrometer (AC2, Riken-Keiki, Tokyo, Japan). The surface morphology was measured using an atomic force microscopy (AFM, Nanoscope IIIa, Digital Instruments, Santa Barbara, CA, USA). The solar cell performance of devices was measured by employing a specialized solar cell measurement system which integrates a solar simulator (A-class, air mass 1.5 G, 100 mW/cm2, Newport Oriel, Irvine, CA, USA), an electrometer (Model 2400, Keithley), and optical components. The one sun condition (100 mW/cm2) was adjusted using a calibrated reference cell (BS-520, Bunko-Keiki, Sharp Electronics, Tokyo, Japan). The external quantum efficiency (EQE) of devices were measured without a white bias using a home-built EQE measurement system equipped with a light source (tungsten-halogen lamp, 150 W, ASBN-W, Spectral Products, Putnam, CT, USA), a monochromator (CM110, Spectral Products), and a calibrated Si photodiode (818-UV, Newport, Irvine, CA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

The device structure of the P3HT:PC61BM solar cells fabricated in this work is illustrated in Figure 1a, in which the hole-collecting PEDOT:PSS-AN layer is placed between the ITO electrode and the BHJ (P3HT:PC61BM) layer. As depicted on the right side in Figure 1a, aniline (AN) is thought to form additional doped states after reacting with the free sulfonic acid groups in the PSS component of PEDOT:PSS [43]. Interestingly, as shown in Figure 1b, the conductivity of the PEDOT:PSS-AN layers seems not to be so much changed even after aniline doping because no huge variation can be observed in the trend of conductivity for both in-plane (IP) and out-of-plane (OOP) directions. Note that the IP conductivity (σIP, parallel to the film plane) was measured by employing a four-probe technique, while the OOP conductivity (σOOP, normal to the film plane) was obtained from the I-V characteristics of diode-type devices (ITO/PEDOT:PSS-AN/Al). However, the conductivity ratios, OOP conductivity to IP conductivity (σOOP/σIP), was found to vary with the acidity (pH) of the solutions. The highest conductivity ratio was obtained at pH = 2.52 (AN = 1.2 mol %), which implies that the PEDOT:PSS-AN layer coated from the solution at pH = 2.52 can deliver the effective charge transport between the ITO electrode and the BHJ layer in the P3HT:PC61BM solar cells.
Next, the current density–voltage (J-V) characteristics of the P3HT:PC61BM solar cells with the PEDOT:PSS-AN layers were measured under illumination with a simulated solar light (air mass 1.5 G, 100 mW/cm2). As shown in Figure 2, the light J-V curves were improved by the aniline-doped PEDOT:PSS (PEDOT:PSS-AN) layers. In particular, the light J-V curve at pH = 2.52 was better than any other J-V curves, implying an optimum aniline content for the best performance in the given device structure. It is worthy to note that the short circuit current density (JSC) was pronouncedly changed but the open circuit voltage (VOC) was only marginally varied according to the pH change. This result indicates that the charge transport in the devices might be considerably affected by the different pH of PEDOT:PSS-AN, whereas the photovoltage level was minimally influenced by the pH change.
The detailed trend of solar cell parameters is plotted in Figure 3 and Table 1. As briefly discussed in Figure 2, the highest JSC value was obtained at pH = 2.52 (aniline content = 1.2 mol %). However, JSC was gradually decreased after pH = 2.52 even though the JSC value was still higher for the devices with the PEDOT:PSS-AN layers than the device with the pristine PEDOT:PSS layer. In contrast, VOC was very slightly increased as the pH value increased. The fill factor (FF) was also gradually increased with the pH value, which is somewhat different from the trend of JSC. This can be explained by the continuously decreased series resistance (RS) trend and the successively increased solar cell shunt resistance trend, which can induce the efficient charge transport.
As a consequence, the PCE trend was similar to the JSC trend because of the dominant influence of JSC compared to other parameters. This result supports that the aniline addition (doping) has a critical influence on the charge collection characteristics in the present normal-type P3HT:PC61BM solar cells.
In order to briefly understand the performance change according to the pH of PEDOT:PSS solutions with aniline, the surface morphology of the PEDOT:PSS-AN layers was examined with atomic force microscopy (AFM). As shown in Figure 4, both big and small domains (grains) were measured for the pristine PEDOT:PSS layer (without aniline). However, very fine domains were formed for the PEDOT:PSS-AN layers, irrespective of pH (i.e., aniline content). Further investigation provides that the size of such domains became much finer as the pH increased. This result informs that the aniline molecules added to the PEDOT:PSS solutions might effectively react with the free sulfonic acid parts of PSS and then change the aggregation size of PEDOT:PSS domains in the solutions (note that the work function of PEDOT:PSS-AN layers was almost unchanged ca. 5.1–5.2 eV as measured using the photoelectron yield spectrometer).
Taking into account the correlation between the device performance and the domain size, two small domains are considered to deliver an adverse effect in terms of charge transport as discussed on the conductivity ratio in Figure 1b. Finally, the stability of the P3HT:PC61BM solar cells with the pristine PEDOT:PSS layer (pH = 1.74) and the PEDOT:PSS-AN layer (pH = 2.52) was briefly tested under continuous (100 h) illumination with a simulated solar light (air mass 1.5 G, 100 mW/cm2). As shown in Figure 5, the light J-V curve was slightly changed after 100 h illumination for both pH = 1.74 and 2.52. The major change can be ascribed to the reduced JSC in the presence of marginal decrease in VOC. The overall trend for >10 devices is plotted in Figure 6. The JSC value was very similarly reduced with the illumination time for both devices, which may indicate the same origin on the charge collection in devices. Interestingly, the VOC decay was very small for the devices with the PEDOT:PSS-AN layers, whereas it was relatively quite large for those with the pristine PEDOT:PSS layers. The similar trend was measured for the FF trend. Considering both VOC and FF trends, it is shortly concluded that the reduced pH in the PEDOT:PSS-AN layers might have a positive influence on the prevention of degradation at the interfaces between the BHJ layer and the hole-collecting layer or between the ITO electrode and the hole-collecting layer. Consequently, the PCE decay was relatively slower for the devices with the PEDOT:PSS-AN layers than those with the pristine PEDOT:PSS layers.

4. Conclusions

The effect of aniline addition to the PEDOT:PSS layers was investigated by employing normal-type P3HT:PC61BM solar cells. The electrical conductivity in both OOP and IP directions was slightly changed with the pH variation but the conductivity ratio (OOP to IP directions) was varied with the pH value. The best solar cell performance was obtained at pH = 2.52, whereas the device performance was gradually decreased as the pH value increased further. The most influential parameter was JSC, while a minor contribution was given by both VOC and FF. The surface nanomorphology revealed that the size of PEDOT:PSS domains became smaller with the addition of aniline (doping), and became much finer as the pH increased. The stability test for 100 h illumination under one sun condition showed that the PEDOT:PSS-AN layers are beneficial for preventing the decay of VOC and FF in the present normal-type solar cells, even though the JSC decay could not be prohibited owing to the intrinsic degradation inside the bulk heterojunction films.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by Kyungpook National University (Bokhyeon Research Fund 2015).

Author Contributions

Y.K. designed this work and supervised whole experimental processes; J.S. (main), S.P., M.S., J.J., and C.L. carried out all experiments; H.K. helped with discussion for each step; Y.K. wrote this manuscript and J.S. contributed to the editing of final version.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Krebs, F.C. Fabrication and processing of polymer solar cells: A review of printing and coating techniques. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2009, 93, 394–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ameri, T.; Dennler, G.; Lungenschmied, C.; Brabec, C.J. Organic tandem solar cells: A review. Energy Environ. Sci. 2009, 2, 347–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kim, H.; Nam, S.; Jeong, J.; Lee, S.; Seo, J.; Han, H.; Kim, H.; Kim, Y. Organic solar cells based on conjugated polymers: History and recent advances. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2014, 31, 1095–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hau, S.K.; Yip, H.-L.; Jen, A.K.-Y. A review on the development of the inverted polymer solar cell architecture. Polym. Rev. 2010, 50, 474–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Forrest, S.R. The path to ubiquitous and low-cost organic electronic appliances on plastic. Nature 2004, 428, 911–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Schrödner, M.; Sensfuss, S.; Schache, H.; Schultheis, K.; Welzel, T.; Heinemann, K.; Milker, R.; Marten, J.; Blankenburg, L. Reel-to-reel wet coating by variation of solvents and compounds of photoactive inks for polymer solar cell production. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2012, 107, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nam, S.; Shin, M.; Kim, H.; Ha, C.-S.; Ree, M.; Kim, Y. Improved performance of polymer:polymer solar cells by doping electron-accepting polymers with an organosulfonic acid. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2011, 21, 4527–4534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cho, C.-K.; Hwang, W.-J.; Eun, K.; Choa, S.-H.; Na, S.-I.; Kim, H.-K. Mechanical flexibility of transparent PEDOT:PSS electrodes prepared by gravure printing for flexible organic solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2011, 95, 3269–3275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Krebs, F.C. Polymer solar cell modules prepared using roll-to-roll methods: Knife-over-edge coating, slot-die coating and screen printing. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2009, 93, 465–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Han, H.; Lee, H.; Nam, S.; Jeong, J.; Lee, I.; Kim, H.; Ha, C.-S.; Kim, Y. Poly(3-hexylthiophene-co-benzothiadiazole) (THBT) as an electron-accepting polymer for normal and inverted type all-polymer solar cells. Polym. Chem. 2013, 4, 2053–2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Su, M.-S.; Kuo, C.-Y.; Yuan, M.-C.; Jeng, U.-S.; Su, C.-J.; Wei, K.-H. Improving device efficiency of polymer/fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells through enhanced crystallinity and reduced grain boundaries induced by solvent additives. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 3315–3319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Nam, S.; Lee, S.; Lee, I.; Shin, M.; Kim, H.; Kim, Y. Nanomorphology-driven two-stage hole mobility in blend films of regioregular and regiorandom polythiophenes. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 4261–4269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Dante, M.; Peet, J.; Nguyen, T.-Q. Nanoscale charge transport and internal structure of bulk heterojunction conjugated polymer/fullerene solar cells by scanning probe microscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 7241–7249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Collins, B.A.; Tumbleston, J.R.; Ade, H. Miscibility, crystallinity, and phase development in P3HT/PCBM solar cells: Toward an enlightened understanding of device morphology and stability. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 3135–3145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kim, H.; Shin, M.; Kim, Y. Distinct annealing temperature in polymer:fullerene:polymer ternary blend solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 1620–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nam, S.; Woo, S.; Seo, J.; Kim, W.H.; Kim, H.; McNeill, C.R.; Shin, T.J.; Bradley, D.D.C.; Kim, Y. Pronounced cosolvent effects in polymer:polymer bulk heterojunction solar cells with sulfur-rich electron-donating and imide-containing electron-accepting polymers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 15995–16002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Schmidt-Hansberg, B.; Sanyal, M.; Klein, M.F.G.; Pfaff, M.; Schnabel, N.; Jaiser, S.; Vorobiev, A.; Müller, E.; Colsmann, A.; Scharfer, P.; et al. Moving through the phase diagram:morphology formation in solution cast polymer-fullerene blend films for organic solar cells. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 8579–8590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Shin, M.; Kim, H.; Park, J.; Nam, S.; Heo, K.; Ree, M.; Ha, C.-S.; Kim, Y. Abrupt morphology change upon thermal annealing in poly(3-hexylthiophene)/soluble fullerene blend films for polymer solar cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010, 20, 748–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Holliday, S.; Ashraf, R.S.; Wadsworth, A.; Baran, D.; Yousaf, S.A.; Nielsen, C.B.; Tan, C.-H.; Dimitrov, S.D.; Shang, Z.; Gasparini, N.; et al. High-efficiency and air-stable P3HT-based polymer solar cells with a new non-fullerene acceptor. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kumari, T.; Lee, S.M.; Kang, S.-H.; Chen, S.; Yang, C. Ternary solar cells with a mixed face-on and edge-on orientation enable an unprecedented efficiency of 12.1%. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhao, J.; Li, Y.; Yang, G.; Jiang, K.; Lin, H.; Ade, H.; Ma, W.; Yan, H. Efficient organic solar cells processed from hydrocarbon solvents. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 15027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jeong, J.; Seo, J.; Nam, S.; Han, H.; Kim, H.; Anthopoulos, T.D.; Bradley, D.D.C.; Kim, Y. Significant stability enhancement in high-efficiency polymer:fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells by blocking ultraviolet photons from solar light. Adv. Sci. 2016, 3, 1500269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhao, W.; Qian, D.; Zhang, S.; Li, S.; Inganäs, O.; Gao, F.; Hou, J. Fullerene-free polymer solar cells with over 11% efficiency and excellent thermal stability. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 4734–4739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yang, Y.; Zhang, Z.-G.; Bin, H.; Chen, S.; Gao, L.; Xue, L.; Yang, C.; Li, Y. Side-chain isomerization on an n-type organic semiconductor ITIC acceptor makes 11.77% high efficiency polymer solar cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 15011–15018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Nam, S.; Seo, J.; Woo, S.; Kim, W.H.; Kim, H.; Bradley, D.D.C.; Kim, Y. Inverted polymer fullerene solar cells exceeding 10% efficiency with poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) nanodots on electron-collecting buffer layers. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Li, M.; Gao, K.; Wan, X.; Zhang, Q.; Kan, B.; Xia, R.; Liu, F.; Yang, X.; Feng, H.; Ni, W.; et al. Solution-processed organic tandem solar cells with power conversion efficiencies >12%. Nat. Photonics 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, K.; Gao, K.; Xia, R.; Wu, Z.; Sun, C.; Cao, J.; Qian, L.; Li, W.; Liu, S.; Huang, F.; et al. High-performance polymer tandem solar cells employing a new n-type conjugated polymer as an interconnecting layer. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 4817–4823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ye, L.; Zhao, W.; Li, S.; Mukherjee, S.; Carpenter, J.H.; Awartani, O.; Jiao, X.; Hou, J.; Ade, H. High-efficiency nonfullerene organic solar cells: Critical factors that affect complex multi-length scale morphology and device performance. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Woo, S.; Kim, W.H.; Kim, H.; Yi, Y.; Lyu, H.-K.; Kim, Y. 8.9% Single-stack inverted polymer solar cells with electron-rich polymer nanolayer-modified inorganic electron-collecting buffer layers. Adv. Energy Mater. 2014, 4, 1301692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nam, S.; Seo, J.; Han, H.; Kim, H.; Hahm, S.G.; Ree, M.; Gal, Y.-S.; Anthopoulos, T.D.; Bradley, D.D.C.; Kim, Y. >10% Efficiency polymer:fullerene solar cells with polyacetylene-based polyelectrolyte interlayers. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 3, 1600415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cowan, S.R.; Schulz, P.; Giordano, A.J.; Garcia, A.; MacLeod, B.A.; Marder, S.R.; Kahn, A.; Ginley, D.S.; Ratcliff, E.L.; Olson, D.C. Chemically controlled reversible and irreversible extraction barriers via stable interface modification of zinc oxide electron collection layer in polycarbazole-based organic solar cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 4671–4680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kang, H.; Hong, S.; Lee, J.; Lee, K. Electrostatically self-assembled nonconjugated polyelectrolytes as an ideal interfacial layer for inverted polymer solar cells. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 3005–3009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Po, R.; Carboner, C.; Bernardi, A.; Camaioni, N. The role of buffer layers in polymer solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 285–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Park, S.-Y.; Kim, H.-R.; Kang, Y.-J.; Kim, D.-H.; Kang, J.-W. Organic solar cells employing magnetron sputtered p-type nickel oxide thin film as the anode buffer layer. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2010, 94, 2332–2336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhao, W.; Ye, L.; Zhang, S.; Fan, B.; Sun, M.; Hou, J. Ultrathin polyaniline-based buffer layer for highly efficient polymer solar cells with wide applicability. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lu, L.; Luo, Z.; Xu, T.; Yu, L. Cooperative plasmonic effect of Ag and Au nanoparticles on enhancing performance of polymer solar cells. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Lim, F.J.; Ananthanarayanan, K.; Luther, J.; Ho, G.W. Influence of a novel fluorosurfactant modified PEDOT:PSS hole transport layer on the performance of inverted organic solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 25057–25064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jeong, J.; Woo, S.; Park, S.; Kim, H.; Lee, S.W.; Kim, Y. Wide range thickness effect of hole-collecting buffer layers for polymer:fullerene solar cells. Org. Electron. 2013, 14, 2889–2895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. McCarthy, J.E.; Hanley, C.A.; Brennan, L.J.; Lambertini, V.G.; Gun’ko, Y.K. Fabrication of highly transparent and conducting PEDOT:PSS films using a formic acid treatment. J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 2, 764–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ouyang, J. Solution-processed PEDOT:PSS films with conductivities as indium tin oxide through a treatment with mild and weak organic acids. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 13082–13088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Tsai, T.-C.; Chang, H.-C.; Chen, C.-H.; Huang, Y.-C.; Whang, W.-T. A facile dedoping approach for effectively tuning thermoelectricity and acidity of PEDOT:PSS films. Org. Electron. 2014, 15, 641–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kim, H.; Nam, S.; Lee, H.; Woo, S.; Ha, C.-S.; Ree, M.; Kim, Y. Influence of controlled acidity of hole-collecting buffer layers on the performance and lifetime of polymer:fullerene solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 13502–13510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lee, W.; Song, M.; Park, S.; Nam, S.; Seo, J.; Kim, H.; Kim, Y. Acidity-controlled conducting polymer films for organic thermoelectric devices with horizontal and vertical architectures. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 33795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.
Molecules 22 00262 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Device structure for the P3HT:PC61BM solar cell with the polymer hole-collecting layer (PEDOT:PSS-AN); (b) Electrical conductivity and conductivity ratio (σOOP/σIP) of the PEDOT:PSS-AN films as a function of pH: Note that out-of-plane (OOP) and in-plane (IP) denote the directions perpendicular and parallel to the plane of films, respectively.
Figure 1. (a) Device structure for the P3HT:PC61BM solar cell with the polymer hole-collecting layer (PEDOT:PSS-AN); (b) Electrical conductivity and conductivity ratio (σOOP/σIP) of the PEDOT:PSS-AN films as a function of pH: Note that out-of-plane (OOP) and in-plane (IP) denote the directions perpendicular and parallel to the plane of films, respectively.
Molecules 22 00262 g001
Molecules 22 00262 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Light J-V curves according to the pH of PEDOT:PSS layers for the P3HT:PC61BM solar cells under illumination with a simulated solar light (air mass 1.5G, 100 mW/cm2); (b) EQE spectra for the P3HT:PC61BM solar cells according to the pH of PEDOT:PSS layers.
Figure 2. (a) Light J-V curves according to the pH of PEDOT:PSS layers for the P3HT:PC61BM solar cells under illumination with a simulated solar light (air mass 1.5G, 100 mW/cm2); (b) EQE spectra for the P3HT:PC61BM solar cells according to the pH of PEDOT:PSS layers.
Molecules 22 00262 g002
Molecules 22 00262 g003 550
Figure 3. Solar cell parameters as a function of pH for the P3HT:PC61BM solar cells with the polymer hole-collecting layers (PEDOT:PSS and PEDOT:PSS-AN). All data were averaged from more than 20 devices.
Figure 3. Solar cell parameters as a function of pH for the P3HT:PC61BM solar cells with the polymer hole-collecting layers (PEDOT:PSS and PEDOT:PSS-AN). All data were averaged from more than 20 devices.
Molecules 22 00262 g003
Molecules 22 00262 g004 550
Figure 4. AFM images (a: height-mode, b: phase mode) for the pristine PEDOT:PSS (pH = 1.74) and PEDOT:PSS-AN layers (pH = 2.52 and 4.24) coated on the ITO-glass substrates. The scan size of images was 3 μm × 3 μm (inset: 1 μm × 1 μm).
Figure 4. AFM images (a: height-mode, b: phase mode) for the pristine PEDOT:PSS (pH = 1.74) and PEDOT:PSS-AN layers (pH = 2.52 and 4.24) coated on the ITO-glass substrates. The scan size of images was 3 μm × 3 μm (inset: 1 μm × 1 μm).
Molecules 22 00262 g004
Molecules 22 00262 g005 550
Figure 5. Light J-V curves for the P3HT:PC61BM solar cells with the polymer hole-collecting layers before and after continuous (100 h) illumination with a simulated solar light (air mass 1.5 G, 100 mW/cm2): (a) pristine PEDOT:PSS layer (pH = 1.74); (b) PEDOT:PSS-AN layer (pH = 2.52).
Figure 5. Light J-V curves for the P3HT:PC61BM solar cells with the polymer hole-collecting layers before and after continuous (100 h) illumination with a simulated solar light (air mass 1.5 G, 100 mW/cm2): (a) pristine PEDOT:PSS layer (pH = 1.74); (b) PEDOT:PSS-AN layer (pH = 2.52).
Molecules 22 00262 g005
Molecules 22 00262 g006 550
Figure 6. Solar cell parameters as a function of illumination time for the P3HT:PC61BM solar cells with the polymer hole-collecting layers under continuous (100 h) illumination with a simulated solar light (air mass 1.5 G, 100 mW/cm2): (red filled circles) pristine PEDOT:PSS layer (pH = 1.74), (blue filled squares) PEDOT:PSS-AN layer (pH = 2.52).
Figure 6. Solar cell parameters as a function of illumination time for the P3HT:PC61BM solar cells with the polymer hole-collecting layers under continuous (100 h) illumination with a simulated solar light (air mass 1.5 G, 100 mW/cm2): (red filled circles) pristine PEDOT:PSS layer (pH = 1.74), (blue filled squares) PEDOT:PSS-AN layer (pH = 2.52).
Molecules 22 00262 g006
Table
Table 1. Summary of solar cell parameters for the P3HT:PC61BM solar cells with the polymer hole-collecting layers (PEDOT:PSS and PEDOT:PSS-AN). Note that the parameter values were taken from the average ones in Figure 3 (air mass 1.5G, 100 mW/cm2).
Table 1. Summary of solar cell parameters for the P3HT:PC61BM solar cells with the polymer hole-collecting layers (PEDOT:PSS and PEDOT:PSS-AN). Note that the parameter values were taken from the average ones in Figure 3 (air mass 1.5G, 100 mW/cm2).
ParameterspH
1.742.522.914.24
VOC (V)0.62 (±0.01)0.63 (±0.01)0.63 (±0.01)0.62 (±0.01)
JSC (mA/cm2)11.15 (±0.41) * (10.89)12.54 (±0.09) * (12.15)12.01 (±0.08) * (11.80)12.14 (±0.52) * (11.67)
FF (%)60.90 (±1.60)62.60 (±0.80)63.50 (±1.10)62.9 (±0.60)
PCE (%)4.21 (±0.14) 4.95 (±0.05)4.80 (±0.07)4.73 (±0.30)
RS (Ω cm2)110 (±17.0)100 (±11.0)90 (±11.0)90 (±10.0)
RSH (kΩ cm2)5.7 (±0.01)5.9 (±0.02)10.3 (±0.02)12.5 (±0.01)
* JSC calculated from the EQE spectra in Figure 2b.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Seo, J.; Park, S.; Song, M.; Jeong, J.; Lee, C.; Kim, H.; Kim, Y. Influence of Weak Base Addition to Hole-Collecting Buffer Layers in Polymer:Fullerene Solar Cells. Molecules 2017, 22, 262. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22020262

AMA Style

Seo J, Park S, Song M, Jeong J, Lee C, Kim H, Kim Y. Influence of Weak Base Addition to Hole-Collecting Buffer Layers in Polymer:Fullerene Solar Cells. Molecules. 2017; 22(2):262. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22020262

Chicago/Turabian Style

Seo, Jooyeok, Soohyeong Park, Myeonghun Song, Jaehoon Jeong, Chulyeon Lee, Hwajeong Kim, and Youngkyoo Kim. 2017. "Influence of Weak Base Addition to Hole-Collecting Buffer Layers in Polymer:Fullerene Solar Cells" Molecules 22, no. 2: 262. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22020262

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop