Next Article in Journal
Determination of Ultra-trace Rhodium in Water Samples by Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry after Cloud Point Extraction Using 2-(5-Iodo-2-Pyridylazo)-5-Dimethylaminoaniline as a Chelating Agent
Previous Article in Journal
Metal-Based PSMA Radioligands
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 22
Issue 4
10.3390/molecules22040509
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nerolidol and Farnesol Inhibit Some Cytochrome P450 Activities but Did Not Affect Other Xenobiotic-Metabolizing Enzymes in Rat and Human Hepatic Subcellular Fractions

by
Alena Špičáková
1,
Barbora Szotáková
2,*,
Diana Dimunová
2,
Zuzana Myslivečková
2,
Vladimír Kubíček
3,
Martin Ambrož
2,
Kateřina Lněničková
2,
Kristýna Krasulová
1,
Pavel Anzenbacher
1 and
Lenka Skálová
2
1
Department of Pharmacology and Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Palacky University, Hněvotínská 3, 77515 Olomouc, Czech Republic
2
Department of Biochemical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Charles University, Akademika Heyrovského 1203, 50005 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
3
Department of Biophysics and Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Charles University, Akademika Heyrovského 1203, 50005 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2017, 22(4), 509; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22040509
Submission received: 10 February 2017 / Revised: 15 March 2017 / Accepted: 20 March 2017 / Published: 24 March 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Natural Products Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Sesquiterpenes, 15-carbon compounds formed from three isoprenoid units, are the main components of plant essential oils. Sesquiterpenes occur in human food, but they are principally taken as components of many folk medicines and dietary supplements. The aim of our study was to test and compare the potential inhibitory effect of acyclic sesquiterpenes, trans-nerolidol, cis-nerolidol and farnesol, on the activities of the main xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes in rat and human liver in vitro. Rat and human subcellular fractions, relatively specific substrates, corresponding coenzymes and HPLC, spectrophotometric or spectrofluorometric analysis of product formation were used. The results showed significant inhibition of cytochromes P450 (namely CYP1A, CYP2B and CYP3A subfamilies) activities by all tested sesquiterpenes in rat as well as in human hepatic microsomes. On the other hand, all tested sesquiterpenes did not significantly affect the activities of carbonyl-reducing enzymes and conjugation enzymes. The results indicate that acyclic sesquiterpenes might affect CYP1A, CYP2B and CYP3A mediated metabolism of concurrently administered drugs and other xenobiotics. The possible drug–sesquiterpene interactions should be verified in in vivo experiments.

1. Introduction

Sesquiterpenes, defined as 15-carbon compounds formed from three isoprenoid units, are an extremely diverse, heterogeneous and large group of natural compounds. Sesquiterpenes, together with monoterpenes, represent the major components of plant essential oils, widely used in folk medicines, health-supporting preparations and cosmetics [1]. Sesquiterpene structures form several acyclic, mono-, bi-, tri-, and tetracyclic systems. The acyclic representatives, also called farnesans, are derived directly from the basic structure, farnesol (FAR).
Farnesol occurs in, among others, cabreuva, ambrette, jasmine, ylang, and rose essential oils. FAR has a broad spectrum of biological activities including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-allergic, chemo-preventive and anticancer effects. For example, FAR ameliorates serum allergic antibody titres and lipid profiles in ovalbumin-challenged mice [2], and might have an anti-inflammatory potential to allergic asthmatic mice [3]. FAR attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced neurodegeneration in mice by regulating intrinsic apoptotic cascade [4]. FAR is an effective inducer of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in a variety of carcinoma cell types. In addition, FAR has been reported to inhibit tumorigenesis in several animal models, suggesting that it functions as a chemo-preventive and anti-tumor agent in vivo [5,6]. Oral FAR treatment of mice had the cardioprotective effect which was accompanied by increased protein geranylgeranylation and seemed to be independent of the antioxidant effect of FAR [7].
Nerolidol (NER) is the allylic isomer of farnesol and exists in two geometric isomers, a trans and a cis form. They can be found in cabreuva, niaouli and neroli oils, among others. NER is a common ingredient in many food and cosmetic products. In organisms, it exerts many biological effects e.g., antioxidant, antibacterial, anti-parasite and anticancer [8]. For example, NER was effective against babesiosis [9] and schistosomiasis [10]. Moreover, NER was able to improve the efficacy of drugs in treatment of malaria in mice [11]. Neuroprotective effect of NER, mediated through its anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory activities, was observed in rats [12]. Using HeLa and Jurkat cell lines, strong anti-tumor effects of NER at concentrations less than 5 µM was found [13].
Taken together, both acyclic sesquiterpenes mentioned above (structures are presented in Figure 1) have interesting biological activities, and their use in human therapy might be considered. Moreover, popularity of herbal products and essential oils containing these sesquiterpenes in folk medicines increases. In spite of these facts, FAR, and particularly NER isomers, have not been properly studied for their possible herb–drug interactions. These interactions, based on the ability to modulate activities of important drug-metabolising enzymes such cytochromes P450 (CYP), carbonyl reductase 1 (CBR1), NADPH-quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1), aldo-keto reductases (AKR), UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGT), sulfotransferases (SULT) and glutathione S-transferases (GST), may cause serious adverse effects on human health.
Cytochrome P450 (CYP)-catalyzed oxidative reactions are the most common phase I reactions in drug metabolism. However, CYPs are not the only enzymes involved in the phase I metabolism of drugs and other xenobiotics—carbonyl reduction is the major phase I reaction for an array of xenobiotics [14]. Carbonyl groups are frequently found in endogenous or xenobiotic compounds. They can promote oxidative stress, the products of which are thought to be an important initiating factor in degenerative diseases or cancer. Distinct enzymes, belonging to several families, mainly to aldo-keto reductases (AKR) and short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases, reduce carbonyl groups. These reductases often show broad and overlapping substrate specificities and some well-characterized members (e.g., CBR1, AKR1A, AKR1C, or NQO1), and have protective roles toward xenobiotic carbonyls and quinones, because metabolic reduction leads to less toxic products, which can be further conjugated with endogenous substrate and excreted [15,16,17,18].
Therefore, the present study was designed to evaluate the inhibitory effect of three abundant acyclic and biologically active sesquiterpenes farnesol, trans-nerolidol (TNER) and cis-nerolidol (CNER) on the activities of CYPs, CBR1, NQO1, AKRs, GSTs, UGTs and SULTs. With respect to possible inter-species differences in an action of inhibitors on drug-metabolizing enzymes, both rat and human hepatic subcellular fractions were used as consequent in vivo experiments in rat are being planned.

2. Results

In the present study, inhibitory effects of acyclic sesquiterpenes cis-nerolidol (CNER), trans-nerolidol (TNER), and farnesol (FAR), which are commonly found in the human diet, on cytosolic and microsomal biotransformation enzymes, were tested in human and rat liver subcellular fractions.

2.1. Screening for Enzyme Inhibition

First, the inhibitory effect of sesquiterpenes at final concentrations of 100 µM on the main hepatic biotransformation enzymes was assessed by measuring enzyme activities towards specific substrates. This high concentration was tested first to find out whether there is any inhibition at all. Specific activities of selected cytochromes P450 (CYP1A2, CYP2B, CYP3A), with and without sesquiterpenes in rat and human microsomes, are given in Table 1. Neither carbonyl-reducing enzymes, nor conjugation enzymes were inhibited by 100 µM sesquiterpenes. Specific activities of selected carbonyl-reducing enzymes (AKR1A, AKR1C, CBR1 and NQO1), and conjugation enzymes (GSTs, UGT and SULT) in rat and human liver subcellular fractions, together with these activities in the presence of 100 µM CNER, TNER and FAR, are available as supplementary files (Tables S1 and S2).
From all the tested enzymes, only CYP1A2 (EROD activity) and CYP2B/3A (BROD activity), both in human and rat microsomal fractions, were inhibited by CNER, TNER and FAR. Non-enzymatic interference of sesquiterpenes, with some compounds in the reaction mixtures (fluorescence quenching), was considered and excluded.

2.2. Determination of IC50

CYP1A2 (EROD activity) and CYP2B/3A (BROD activity) were strongly inhibited by testing sesquiterpenes in screening experiment. These enzymes were selected for further testing including determination of 50% inhibition concentration (IC50) in human and rat microsomes. Obtained IC50 values and their 95% confidence intervals are given in Table 2.
In humans, specific CYP1A2 inhibitor α-naphthoflavone (ANF) and CYP3A4 inhibitor ketoconazole (KET) were used for comparison of the inhibitory effect with sesquiterpenes. The 5 µM ANF inhibited EROD activity by 92% but 5 µM FAR, CNER and TNER, only by 77%, 50%, and 38%, respectively. On the other hand, the 5 µM KET inhibited BROD activity by 66%, while the inhibitory effect of 5 µM sesquiterpenes was stronger: FAR inhibited BROD activity by 85%, CNER by 71%, and TNER by 68%.
The inhibitory effect of CNER, TNER and FAR on other human CYP activities catalysed by CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, and CYP3A4/5 and corresponding IC50 values were determined, as high inhibitory effect of acyclic sesquiterpenes toward EROD and BROD activities was found in screening experiment. However, no such a high inhibition was observed in other CYP activities. Data are presented in Table 3.

2.3. Mechanism of Enzyme Inhibition

The type of inhibition for CYP1A2 (EROD activity) and CYP2B/3A (BROD activity) by TNER was determined in human and rat microsomal fractions. When the inhibition of CYPs was tested, microsomes were incubated with different concentrations of ethoxyresorufin or benzyloxyresorufin (0.5–5.0 µM) in the presence or absence of TNER (5 µM).
The results of kinetic study are presented in Figure 2. The human CYP1A2 was inhibited by TNER competitively, while non-competitive type of CYP1A2 inhibition by TNER was observed in rat microsomes. On the other hand, TNER acted as a non-competitive inhibitor toward human and rat BROD activity, as similar KM and apparent K’M values and lower apparent V´MAX than VMAX values were found in both species. Kinetic parameters are given in Table 4.

3. Discussion

Inhibition of drug-metabolizing enzymes is important from several points of view. Regarding drugs and toxic xenobiotics, the inhibition of the enzymes catalyzing their deactivation leads to augmented plasma concentration of biologically active/toxic substance. By this way, drug efficacy can be prolonged and, together with increased risk of undesired effects and the toxic effect of xenobiotics, can get worse. On the other hand, the inhibition of enzymes that activate xenobiotics into more reactive metabolites can decrease cellular toxicity of these xenobiotics and could contribute to chemo-prevention. In every way, it is necessary to know if all components of human food, as well as all potential drugs, are able to inhibit the main drug-metabolizing enzymes. For that reason, the inhibitory effects of many natural compounds, such as flavonoids, towards drug-metabolizing enzymes have been intensively studied e.g., [19,20,21,22].
Although sesquiterpenes as highly lipophilic compounds can be considered as probable inhibitors of drug-metabolizing enzymes, the information about their potential inhibitory effects is limited. Moreover, all studies have been focused only on cytochromes P450 (CYPs). When ten sesquiterpenes, isolated from the rhizomes of Curcuma aromatica, were evaluated for their ability to inhibit CYPs, the sesquiterpene (4S,5S)-(+)-germacrone-4,5-epoxide inhibited certain CYPs very potently with IC50 = 1.0 µM [23]. Sesquiterpenes zederone and germacrone moderately inhibited some CYP activities (namely, CYP2B6 and CYP3A4) in human liver microsomes [24]. Another sesquiterpene alantolactone showed a potent inhibitory effect on CYP3A4 activity with IC50 value of 3.6 µM in human liver microsomes [25]. Cedrol, β-cedrene and thujopsene, bioactive sesquiterpenes found in cedar essential oil, showed significant inhibition of several CYP isoforms in human liver microsomes [26].
In our study, the potential inhibitory effect of three acyclic sesquiterpenes FAR, CNER and TNER on the main drug-metabolizing enzymes was studied in rat and human hepatic subcellular fractions. In addition to CYPs, the activities of carbonyl-reducing enzymes and the main conjugation enzymes were also included in the study, with the aim to obtain more complex information. With respect to the necessity of further verifying of the results obtained in vitro in subsequent in vivo experiments, both rat and human samples were used in the present study. We aim to know if the sensitivity of drug-metabolizing enzymes to sesquiterpenes in rats is similar to those in humans, and thus rats could be a suitable experimental animal for planned evaluation of drug–sesquiterpene interactions in vivo.
Firstly, the inhibitory potency of acyclic sesquiterpenes at fixed concentration (100 µM) toward the main drug-metabolizing enzymes was screened in rat and human hepatic cytosols and microsomes. While marked inhibition of two CYP-mediated activities (EROD and BROD) by all three sesquiterpenes was observed, the activities of other enzymes were not affected by any sesquiterpene. Although the specific activities of individual enzymes mostly differed between rat and human, the effect of sesquiterpenes seemed to be similar: acyclic sesquiterpenes inhibited only EROD and BROD activities in both species.
Based on these results, the inhibitory effects of acyclic sesquiterpenes toward EROD and BROD activities were tested in details to obtain IC50 values, and to find out the type of inhibition. EROD activity is ascribed mainly to CYP1A2 in liver microsomes, while BROD activity mainly to CYP2B1 in rat, and to CYP3A4/2B6 activities in human [27].
Concerning BROD activities, IC50 values of three sesquiterpenes tested were similar (regardless of structure,) and they were slightly lower in humans (1.3–2.4 µM) than in rats (4.4–6.4 µM) microsomes. Interestingly, the inhibitory effect of acyclic sesquiterpenes was stronger than the effect of KET, a well-known CYP3A4 inhibitor. As CYP3A4 metabolizes about 50% of all drugs, its inhibition by sesquiterpenes might result in drug–sesquiterpene interactions. In the kinetic study, TNER (as a selected representative) acted as non-competitive inhibitor in both species.
In the case of EROD activity, the inhibitory potency differed more among sesquiterpenes, as well as between rat and human microsomes. Model CYP1A inhibitor ANF had a stronger effect than acyclic sesquiterpenes. TNER inhibited EROD competitively in humans but non-competitively in rats. The sesquiterpene mediated inhibition of CYP1A could represent a protective effect of sesquiterpenes, as CYP1A often catalyzes formation of toxic metabolites from environmental pollutants.
Consequently, the inhibitory effects of sesquiterpenes were followed up in other CYP-mediated activities in human liver microsomes. Nine substrates relatively specific for CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, and CYP3A4/5 were used, and corresponding IC50 values were determined. However, none or weak inhibition by acyclic sesquiterpenes have been observed. Surprisingly, hydroxylation of midazolam and testosterone, both ascribed to CYP3A enzymes, were inhibited only mildly, although BROD activity (also ascribed to CYP3A4) was strongly inhibited by all sesquiterpenes tested. TNER was the most potent inhibitor of testosterone hydroxylation with IC50 51 µM, while CNER was the most effective toward midazolam hydroxylation with IC50 66 µM. The discrepancy of these results can be explained by different substrate concentrations used in the enzyme assays (5 µM benzyloxyresorufin, 100 µM testosterone), and by different binding sites of these substrates [28].
Until now, the inhibitory effect of FAR on CYPs was tested only in rabbit liver microsomes. The obtained results showed that ethoxycoumarin deethylase and diclofenac-4-hydroxylase activities were most sensitive to FAR, while caffeine-8-hydroxylation and taxol-6-hydroxylation were not inhibited at all. The observed inhibition appeared to be reversible, and was not strictly competitive, but rather mixed in nature [29]. Concerning TNER and CNER, no information about their inhibitory effects toward drug-metabolizing enzymes has been reported yet.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Sesquiterpenes cis-nerolidol (CNER), trans-nerolidol (TNER), farnesol (FAR), and other chemicals benzyloxyresorufin, ethoxyresorufin, resorufin, coumarin, 7-ethoxy-4-(trifluoromethyl)coumarin, S-mephenytoin, diclofenac, bufuralol, testosterone, midazolam, chlorzoxazone, menadione, 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene, p-nitrophenol, p-nitrophenylsulphate, 2-napthol, 3’-phosphoadenosine-5’-phosphate, acenaphthenol, reduced glutathione, UDP-glucuronic acid, cytochrome c, NADH, NADP and NADPH, were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Prague, Czech Republic). All other chemicals used were of HPLC or analytical grade.

4.2. Preparation of Liver Microsomal and Cytosolic Fractions

Male Wistar rats (10–12 weeks old) were obtained from Velaz (Prague-Lysolaje, Czech Republic). They were housed in air-conditioned animal quarters with a 12 h light/dark cycle. Food (a standard rat chow diet) and water were provided ad libitum. The animal protocols used in this work were evaluated and approved by the Ethic Committee of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports (Protocol MSMT-24185/2015-11). The protocols were in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Protection of Animals from Cruelty Act No. 246/92, Czech Republic).
Human liver samples were obtained from livers excluded from transplantation for medical reasons (Cadaver Donor Programme of Transplant Centre of the Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic) and were used in compliance with National Ethic Laws.
Frozen liver (both rat and human) was thawed at room temperature for up to 15 min and processed to microsomal and cytosolic fractions. Briefly, livers were homogenized in a 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, at the ratio of 1:6 (v/v), using a Potter-Elvehjem homogenizer and sonication with Sonopolus (Bandelin, Germany). The subcellular fractions were isolated by differential centrifugation of the tissue homogenate [30] and stored at −80 °C.
Protein concentrations were assayed using the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay according to manufacturer’s instructions (Sigma-Aldrich). Human liver microsomal fraction contains 8.1 mg of protein in 1 mL, and cytosolic fraction 12.1 mg of protein in 1 mL. Rat liver microsomal fraction contains 8.5 mg of protein in 1 ml, and cytosolic fraction 13.1 mg of protein in 1 mL.

4.3. Enzyme Assays

Enzyme activities were assayed in human and rat liver cytosolic and microsomal fractions. The enzyme assays (each performed in 4–8 replicates) were repeated three times (HPLC measurement of CYP activities was repeated only twice, Table 3). Inhibition studies were carried out by incubation of specific substrates in the presence of sesquiterpenes (in the range 0–100 µM). The amount of organic solvents in the final reaction mixtures did not exceed 1% (v/v).
Enzyme activities of individual CYP forms were measured according to established protocols [31]. The following microsomal CYP activities were tested: CYP2A6, coumarin 7-hydroxylation [32,33]; CYP2B6, 7-ethoxy-4-(trifluoromethyl)coumarin 7-deethylation [33,34], CYP2C9, diclofenac 4′-hydroxylation [35], CYP2C19 assay, S-mephenytoin 4′-hydroxylation [36], CYP2D6 on bufuralol 1′-hydroxylation [37], CYP2E1, chlorzoxazone 6-hydroxylation [38] and CYP3A4, testosterone 6β-hydroxylation [39], and midazolam 1′-hydroxylation [40,41]. Activities were measured using the Prominence HPLC system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), equipped with a LiChroCART 250-4 LiChrospher 100 RP-18 column or Chromolith®HighResolution RP-18 end-capped column (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and UV or fluorescence detection, according to the cited literature. Further incubation details are described either in the corresponding references, as well as in the papers from this laboratory e.g., [42,43,44]. CYP1A2, 7-ethoxyresorufin O-deethylation, and CYP3A4/2B6 (human), CYP2B1 (rat), benzyloxyresorufin O-debenzylation were measured using the microplate reader Tecan Infinite M200 (Tecan Group; Mannedorf, Switzerland).
The assays of all other enzymes were based on spectrophotometric detection of product formed or detection of decreasing substrate/cofactor levels using microplate reader Tecan Infinite M200 in cytosolic or microsomal fractions. Enzyme activities were determined using slight modifications of previously-published methods: carbonyl reducing enzymes (AKR1A, AKR1C, CBR1 [45], NQO1 [46]), UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT [47]), sulfotransferase (SULT [48]), and cytosolic glutathione-S-transferase (GST [49]).

4.4. Screening for Enzyme Inhibition

Sesquiterpenes were first screened for inhibition of biotransformation enzymes in subcellular fractions in vitro, then the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) value and the mechanism of enzyme inhibition was revealed. Sesquiterpenes CNER, TNER and FAR, non-volatile liquids, were pipetted, and proper concentration was calculated according to density. All compounds were dissolved in DMSO. The final solvent concentration in the inhibition assays was 1%, which had no effect on the enzyme activity (data not shown). Non-enzymatic interference of sesquiterpenes with some compounds in the reaction mixtures (e.g., fluorescence enhancing or quenching) was considered and excluded. All experiments were performed in three replicates, if not stated otherwise.
CNER, TNER and FAR at a fixed concentration of 100 µM were screened for inhibition of cytosolic AKR1A1, AKR1C, CBR1, NQO1, SULT, and GST, and microsomal CYPs and UGT. The degree of inhibition caused by sesquiterpenes was compared with non-inhibited control reactions, which contained solvent without sesquiterpenes.

4.5. Determination of IC50

The concentration of sesquiterpenes required for 50% inhibition of enzyme activity, the IC50 value, was determined. Their final concentrations in the reaction mixture were proposed to cover the entire inhibitory range of these compounds (1–100 µM). The IC50 values for each sesquiterpene were determined by plotting sigmoidal dose response curves of specific enzyme activity vs. logarithm of sesquiterpene concentration using GraphPad Prism version 6.07 for Windows (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).

4.6. Mechanism of Enzyme Inhibition

The kinetic inactivation study of the CYP1A2 (EROD activity) and CYP2B/3A (BROD activity), both in rat and human, with TNER, was performed to find out the mechanism of enzyme inhibition by this sesquiterpene. Mechanism of EROD and BROD inhibition was tested at the final ethoxyresorufin or benzyloxyresorufin concentrations 0.5–5.0 µM. The concentration of TNER was 5.0 µM.
Experimental data were fitted to the Michaelis-Menten equation, basic kinetic parameters were determined using the program GraphPad Prism version 6.07 for Windows. The type of inhibition was estimated using a Lineweaver-Burk (double-reciprocal) plot.

4.7. Statistical Analysis

All experiments (each sample performed in four replicates) were repeated three times (HPLC measurement of CYP activities only twice). All calculations were done using Microsoft Excel and GraphPad Prism 6.07. Statistical significance was tested by one-way Anova, and differences were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation.

5. Conclusions

Taken together, acyclic sesquiterpenes FAR, CNER, and TNER showed certain potency to inhibit CYP1A, CYP2B and CYP3A activities in liver. On the other hand, these sesquiterpenes did not seriously affect other CYPs, carbonyl-reducing enzymes and conjugation enzymes. As CYP3A4 metabolizes about 50% of all drugs, its inhibition by sesquiterpenes might result in drug—sesquiterpene interactions. Nevertheless, the results obtained in vitro should be verified in vivo. Rat seems to be suitable model for these in vivo studies, as comparable sensitivity of drug-metabolizing enzymes to these sesquiterpenes have been observed in rat and human samples.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials are available online.

Acknowledgments

The project was supported by the Czech Science Foundation under grant No. P303/12/G163; and by the Charles University under research project SVV 260 416.

Author Contributions

L.S. and B.S. conceived and designed the experiments; A.Š., D.D., Z.M., V.K., M.A., K.L., K.K. performed the experiments; B.S. and P.A. analyzed the data; L.S. and B.S. wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Bartikova, H.; Hanusova, V.; Skalova, L.; Ambroz, M.; Bousova, I. Antioxidant, Pro-Oxidant and Other Biological Activities of Sesquiterpenes. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2014, 14, 2478–2494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ku, C.M.; Lin, J.Y. Farnesol, a sesquiterpene alcohol in essential oils, ameliorates serum allergic antibody titres and lipid profiles in ovalbumin-challenged mice. Allergol. Immunopath. 2016, 44, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ku, C.M.; Lin, J.Y. Farnesol, a Sesquiterpene Alcohol in Herbal Plants, Exerts Anti-Inflammatory and Antiallergic Effects on Ovalbumin-Sensitized and -Challenged Asthmatic Mice. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Santhanasabapathy, R.; Sudhandiran, G. Farnesol attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced neurodegeneration in Swiss albino mice by regulating intrinsic apoptotic cascade. Brain Res. 2015, 1620, 42–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Joo, J.H.; Jetten, A.M. Molecular mechanisms involved in farnesol-induced apoptosis. Cancer Lett. 2010, 287, 123–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lee, J.H.; Kim, C.; Kim, S.H.; Sethi, G.; Ahn, K.S. Farnesol inhibits tumor growth and enhances the anticancer effects of bortezomib in multiple myeloma xenograft mouse model through the modulation of STAT3 signaling pathway. Cancer Lett. 2015, 360, 280–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Szucs, G.; Murlasits, Z.; Torok, S.; Kocsis, G.F.; Paloczi, J.; Gorbe, A.; Csont, T.; Csonka, C.; Ferdinandy, P. Cardioprotection by Farnesol: Role of the Mevalonate Pathway. Cardiovasc. Drug Ther. 2013, 27, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Chan, W.K.; Tan, L.T.H.; Chan, K.G.; Lee, L.H.; Goh, B.H. Nerolidol: A Sesquiterpene Alcohol with Multi-Faceted Pharmacological and Biological Activities. Molecules 2016, 21, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. AbouLaila, M.; Sivakumar, T.; Yokoyama, N.; Igarashi, I. Inhibitory effect of terpene nerolidol on the growth of Babesia parasites. Parasitol. Int. 2010, 59, 278–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Silva, M.P.N.; Oliveira, G.L.S.; De Carvalho, R.B.F.; De Sousa, D.P.; Freitas, R.M.; Pinto, P.L.S.; De Moraes, J. Antischistosomal Activity of the Terpene Nerolidol. Molecules 2014, 19, 3793–3803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Saito, A.Y.; Rodriguez, A.A.M.; Vega, D.S.M.; Sussmann, R.A.C.; Kimura, E.A.; Katzin, A.M. Antimalarial activity of the terpene nerolidol. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agent 2016, 48, 641–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Javed, H.; Azimullah, S.; Khair, S.B.A.; Ojha, S.; Haque, M.E. Neuroprotective effect of nerolidol against neuroinflammation and oxidative stress induced by rotenone. BMC Neurosci. 2016, 17, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ryabchenko, B.; Tulupova, E.; Schmidt, E.; Wlcek, K.; Buchbauer, G.; Jirovetz, L. Investigation of anticancer and antiviral properties of selected aroma samples. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2008, 3, 1085–1088. [Google Scholar]
  14. Malatkova, P.; Wsol, V. Carbonyl reduction pathways in drug metabolism. Drug Metab. Rev. 2014, 46, 96–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Barski, O.A.; Tipparaju, S.M.; Bhatnagar, A. The aldo-keto reductase superfamily and its role in drug metabolism and detoxification. Drug Metab. Rev. 2008, 40, 553–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bousova, I.; Skalova, L.; Soucek, P.; Matouskova, P. The modulation of carbonyl reductase 1 by polyphenols. Drug Metab. Rev. 2015, 47, 520–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hoffmann, F.; Maser, E. Carbonyl reductases and pluripotent hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases of the short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase superfamily. Drug Metab. Rev. 2007, 39, 87–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Oppermann, U. Carbonyl reductases: The complex relationships of mammalian carbonyl- and quinone-reducing enzymes and their role in physiology. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2007, 47, 293–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Moon, Y.J.; Wang, X.D.; Morris, M.E. Dietary flavonoids: Effects on xenobiotic and carcinogen metabolism. Toxicol. In Vitro 2006, 20, 187–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Taneja, I.; Raju, K.S.R.; Wahajuddin, M. Dietary Isoflavones as Modulators of Drug Metabolizing Enzymes and Transporters: Effect on Prescription Medicines. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 2016, 56, S95–S109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Bousova, I.; Skalova, L. Inhibition and induction of glutathione S-transferases by flavonoids: Possible pharmacological and toxicological consequences. Drug Metab. Rev. 2012, 44, 267–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hodek, P. Flavonoids. In Metabolism of Drugs and Other Xenobiotics; Anzenbacher, P., Zanger, U.M., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2012; pp. 543–582. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bamba, Y.; Yun, Y.S.; Kunugi, A.; Inoue, H. Compounds isolated from Curcuma aromatica Salisb. inhibit human P450 enzymes. J. Nat. Med. 2011, 65, 583–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pimkaew, P.; Kublbeck, J.; Petsalo, A.; Jukka, J.; Suksamrarn, A.; Juvonen, R.; Auriola, S.; Piyachaturawat, P.; Honkakoski, P. Interactions of sesquiterpenes zederone and germacrone with the human cytochrome P450 system. Toxicol. In Vitro 2013, 27, 2005–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Qin, C.Z.; Lv, Q.L.; Wu, N.Y.Y.; Cheng, L.; Chu, Y.C.; Chu, T.Y.; Hu, L.; Cheng, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, H.H. Mechanism-based inhibition of Alantolactone on human cytochrome P450 3A4 in vitro and activity of hepatic cytochrome P450 in mice. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 168, 146–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Jeong, H.U.; Kwon, S.S.; Kong, T.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, H.S. Inhibitory Effects of Cedrol, beta-Cedrene, and Thujopsene on Cytochrome P450 Enzyme Activities in Human Liver Microsomes. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A 2014, 77, 1522–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Burke, M.D.; Thompson, S.; Weaver, R.J.; Wolf, C.R.; Mayer, R.T. Cytochrome-P450 specificities of alkoxyresorufin O-dealkylation in human and rat liver. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1994, 48, 923–936. [Google Scholar]
  28. Krasulova, K.; Siller, M.; Holas, O.; Dvorak, Z.; Anzenbacher, P. Enantiospecific effects of chiral drugs on cytochrome P450 inhibition in vitro. Xenobiotica 2016, 46, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Raner, G.M.; Muir, A.Q.; Lowry, C.W.; Davis, B.A. Farnesol as an inhibitor and substrate for rabbit liver microsomal P450 enzymes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002, 293, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gillette, J. Techniques for studying drug metabolism in vitro. In Fundamentals of Drug Metabolism and Drug Disposition; La Du, B.N., Mandel, H.G., Way, E.L., Eds.; The Williams and Wilkins Company: Baltimore, MA, USA, 1971; pp. 400–418. [Google Scholar]
  31. Phillips, I.R.; Shephard, E.A. Cytochrome P450 Protocols; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  32. Soucek, P. Novel sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic method for assay of coumarin 7-hydroxylation. J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl. 1999, 734, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Morse, M.A.; Lu, J. High-performance liquid chromatographic method for measurement of cytochrome P450-mediated metabolism of 7-ethoxy-4-trifluoromethylcoumarin. J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl. 1998, 708, 290–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Donato, M.T.; Jimenez, N.; Castell, J.V.; Gomez-Lechon, M.J. Fluorescence-based assays for screening nine cytochrome P450 (P450) activities in intact cells expressing individual human P450 enzymes. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2004, 32, 699–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Crespi, C.L.; Chang, T.K.; Waxman, D.J. Determination of CYP2C9-catalyzed diclofenac 4′-hydroxylation by high-performance liquid chromatography. Methods Mol. Biol. 1998, 107, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Crespi, C.L.; Chang, T.K.; Waxman, D.J. CYP2C19-mediated (S)-mephenytoin 4′-hydroxylation assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography with radiometric detection. Methods Mol. Biol. 1998, 107, 135–139. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Crespi, C.L.; Chang, T.K.; Waxman, D.J. CYP2D6-dependent bufuralol 1′-hydroxylation assayed by reversed-phase ion-pair high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. Methods Mol. Biol. 1998, 107, 141–145. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Lucas, D.; Menez, J.F.; Berthou, F. Chlorzoxazone: An in vitro and in vivo substrate probe for liver CYP2E1. Methods Enzymol. 1996, 272, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  39. Guengerich, F.P.; Martin, M.V.; Beaune, P.H.; Kremers, P.; Wolff, T.; Waxman, D.J. Characterization of rat and human liver microsomal cytochrome P-450 forms involved in nifedipine oxidation, a prototype for genetic polymorphism in oxidative drug metabolism. J. Biol. Chem. 1986, 261, 5051–5060. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Ghosal, A.; Satoh, H.; Thomas, P.E.; Bush, E.; Moore, D. Inhibition and kinetics of cytochrome P4503A activity in microsomes from rat, human, and cdna-expressed human cytochrome P450. Drug Metab. Dispos. 1996, 24, 940–947. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  41. Kronbach, T.; Mathys, D.; Umeno, M.; Gonzalez, F.J.; Meyer, U.A. Oxidation of midazolam and triazolam by human liver cytochrome P450IIIA4. Mol. Pharmacol. 1989, 36, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Veinlichova, A.; Jancova, P.; Siller, M.; Anzenbacher, P.; Kuca, K.; Jun, D.; Fusek, J.; Anzenbacherova, E. Effect of acetylcholinesterase oxime-type reactivators K-48 and HI-6 on human liver microsomal cytochromes P450 in vitro. Chem. Biol. Int. 2009, 180, 449–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Novotna, A.; Krasulova, K.; Bartonkova, I.; Korhonova, M.; Bachleda, P.; Anzenbacher, P.; Dvorak, Z. Dual effects of ketoconazole cis-enantiomers on CYP3A4 in human hepatocytes and HepG2 Cells. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e111286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kopecna-Zapletalova, M.; Krasulova, K.; Anzenbacher, P.; Hodek, P.; Anzenbacherova, E. Interaction of isoflavonoids with human liver microsomal cytochromes P450: Inhibition of CYP enzyme activities. Xenobiotica 2017, 47, 324–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Mate, L.; Virkel, G.; Lifschitz, A.; Ballent, M.; Lanusse, C. Hepatic and extra-hepatic metabolic pathways involved in flubendazole biotransformation in sheep. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2008, 76, 773–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Cullen, J.J.; Hinkhouse, M.M.; Grady, M.; Gaut, A.W.; Liu, J.R.; Zhang, Y.P.; Weydert, C.J.D.; Domann, F.E.; Oberley, L.W. Dicumarol inhibition of NADPH: Quinone oxidoreductase induces growth inhibition of pancreatic cancer via a superoxide-mediated mechanism. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 5513–5520. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Mizuma, T.; Machida, M.; Hayashi, M.; Awazu, S. Correlation of drug conjugate metabolism rates between in vivo and in vitro glucuronidation and sufatation of para-nitrophenol as a model comound in rat. J. Pharmacobio-Dyn. 1982, 5, 811–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Frame, L.T.; Ozawa, S.; Nowell, S.A.; Chou, H.C.; Delongchamp, R.R.; Doerge, D.R.; Lang, N.P.; Kadlubar, F.F. Simple colorimetric assay for phenotyping the major human thermostable phenol sulfotransferase (SULT1A1) using platelet cytosols. Drug Metabol. Dispos. 2000, 28, 1063–1068. [Google Scholar]
  49. Habig, W.H.; Pabst, M.J.; Jakoby, W.B. Glutathione S-transferase A from rat liver. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1976, 175, 710–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Samples are not available from the authors.
Molecules 22 00509 g001 550
Figure 1. Structural formulae of used sesquiterpenes, trans-nerolidol, cis-nerolidol, and farnesol.
Figure 1. Structural formulae of used sesquiterpenes, trans-nerolidol, cis-nerolidol, and farnesol.
Molecules 22 00509 g001
Molecules 22 00509 g002 550
Figure 2. Michaelis-Menten plot of EROD and BROD activities in control and 5 µM TNER inhibited reactions. The human CYP1A2 (EROD human) was competitively inhibited and rat CYP1A2 (EROD rat) non-competitively. BROD activity was inhibited non-competitively by TNER both in human and rat. Human and rat liver microsomes were incubated with 0.5–5.0 µM ethoxyresorufin (ER) or benzyloxyresorufin (BR) in the absence (control) or presence of TNER. Lineweaver-Burke plots show the type of inhibition.
Figure 2. Michaelis-Menten plot of EROD and BROD activities in control and 5 µM TNER inhibited reactions. The human CYP1A2 (EROD human) was competitively inhibited and rat CYP1A2 (EROD rat) non-competitively. BROD activity was inhibited non-competitively by TNER both in human and rat. Human and rat liver microsomes were incubated with 0.5–5.0 µM ethoxyresorufin (ER) or benzyloxyresorufin (BR) in the absence (control) or presence of TNER. Lineweaver-Burke plots show the type of inhibition.
Molecules 22 00509 g002
Table
Table 1. Specific activities of CYP1A2 (EROD activity) and CYP2B/3A (BROD activity) in human and rat liver subcellular fractions—controls and samples in the presence of 100 µM sesquiterpenes CNER, TNER and FAR.
Table 1. Specific activities of CYP1A2 (EROD activity) and CYP2B/3A (BROD activity) in human and rat liver subcellular fractions—controls and samples in the presence of 100 µM sesquiterpenes CNER, TNER and FAR.
Specific Activity (pmol/mg/min)
ControlCNERTNERFAR
HumanCYP1A21.88 ± 0.190.163 ± 0.005 *0.287 ± 0.013 *0.083 ± 0.005 *
CYP2B/3A1.22 ± 0.050.168 ± 0.007 *0.188 ± 0.005 *0.033 ± 0.004 *
RatCYP1A222.8 ± 0.12.16 ± 0.04 *1.53 ± 0.03 *1.55 ± 0.02 *
CYP2B/3A1.74 ± 0.020.331 ± 0.009 *0.153 ± 0.008 *0.212 ± 0.003 *
Mean ± S.D., n = 3; * significantly lower (p < 0.05) comparing to control.
Table
Table 2. Inhibition concentration (IC50) of sesquiterpenes CNER, TNER, FAR, and of specific inhibitors ANF (CYP1A2) and KET (CYP2B/3A) to CYP1A2 (EROD activity) and CYP2B/3A (BROD activity) in human and rat liver microsomes.
Table 2. Inhibition concentration (IC50) of sesquiterpenes CNER, TNER, FAR, and of specific inhibitors ANF (CYP1A2) and KET (CYP2B/3A) to CYP1A2 (EROD activity) and CYP2B/3A (BROD activity) in human and rat liver microsomes.
CNERTNERFARANF/KET
HumanCYP1A2IC50 (µM)2.498.691.830.41
95% CI1.38 to 4.485.96 to 12.71.39 to 2.410.22 to 0.75
CYP2B/3AIC50 (µM)1.322.401.782.68
95% CI1.02 to 1.712.02 to 2.831.59 to 2.012.07 to 3.48
RatCYP1A2IC50 (µM)5.704.3816.1-
95% CI5.30 to 6.143.91 to 4.9214.0 to 18.5-
CYP2B/3AIC50 (µM)6.475.114.43-
95% CI6.07 to 6.894.34 to 6.023.82 to 5.14-
Mean ± S.D., n = 3; 95% CI = 95% confidence intervals.
Table
Table 3. Inhibition concentration (IC50) of sesquiterpenes CNER, TNER and FAR to CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, and CYP3A4/5 in human liver microsomes.
Table 3. Inhibition concentration (IC50) of sesquiterpenes CNER, TNER and FAR to CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, and CYP3A4/5 in human liver microsomes.
CYPSubstrateIC50 (µM)
CNERTNERFAR
CYP2A6coumarin--85.9 ± 22.9
CYP2B67-ethoxy-4-(trifluoromethyl)coumarin---
CYP2C9diclofenac---
CYP2C19S-mephenytion-76.4 ± 52.1-
CYP2D6bufuralol---
CYP2E1chlorzoxazone---
CYP3A4/5testosterone186 ± 12550.5 ± 13.5-
CYP3A4/5midazolam66.1 ± 30.5--
Mean ± S.D., n = 2.
Table
Table 4. Kinetic parameters obtained for CYP1A2 (EROD activity) after incubation of human and rat liver microsomes with ethoxyresorufin (0.5–5.0 µM) in the presence (K’M, V’MAX) or absence (KM, VMAX) of TNER (5 µM), and for CYP2B/3A (BROD activity) after incubation of human and rat liver microsomes, with benzyloxyresorufin (0.5–5.0 µM) in the presence (K’M, V’MAX) or absence (KM, VMAX) of TNER (5 µM).
Table 4. Kinetic parameters obtained for CYP1A2 (EROD activity) after incubation of human and rat liver microsomes with ethoxyresorufin (0.5–5.0 µM) in the presence (K’M, V’MAX) or absence (KM, VMAX) of TNER (5 µM), and for CYP2B/3A (BROD activity) after incubation of human and rat liver microsomes, with benzyloxyresorufin (0.5–5.0 µM) in the presence (K’M, V’MAX) or absence (KM, VMAX) of TNER (5 µM).
EnzymeKM (µM)K’M (µM)VMAX (nM/min)V’MAX (nM/min)Ki (µM)
HumanCYP1A20.21 ± 0.110.87 ± 0.411.21 ± 0.101.06 ± 0.160.92 ± 0.52
CYP2B/3A0.93 ± 0.220.94 ± 0.392.27 ± 0.170.74 ± 0.102.41 ± 0.33
RatCYP1A21.64 ± 0.451.89 ± 0.494.32 ± 0.472.21 ± 0.244.68 ± 0.66
CYP2B/3A0.74 ± 0.121.26 ± 0.397.04 ± 0.350.81 ± 0.090.55 ± 0.11

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Špičáková, A.; Szotáková, B.; Dimunová, D.; Myslivečková, Z.; Kubíček, V.; Ambrož, M.; Lněničková, K.; Krasulová, K.; Anzenbacher, P.; Skálová, L. Nerolidol and Farnesol Inhibit Some Cytochrome P450 Activities but Did Not Affect Other Xenobiotic-Metabolizing Enzymes in Rat and Human Hepatic Subcellular Fractions. Molecules 2017, 22, 509. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22040509

AMA Style

Špičáková A, Szotáková B, Dimunová D, Myslivečková Z, Kubíček V, Ambrož M, Lněničková K, Krasulová K, Anzenbacher P, Skálová L. Nerolidol and Farnesol Inhibit Some Cytochrome P450 Activities but Did Not Affect Other Xenobiotic-Metabolizing Enzymes in Rat and Human Hepatic Subcellular Fractions. Molecules. 2017; 22(4):509. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22040509

Chicago/Turabian Style

Špičáková, Alena, Barbora Szotáková, Diana Dimunová, Zuzana Myslivečková, Vladimír Kubíček, Martin Ambrož, Kateřina Lněničková, Kristýna Krasulová, Pavel Anzenbacher, and Lenka Skálová. 2017. "Nerolidol and Farnesol Inhibit Some Cytochrome P450 Activities but Did Not Affect Other Xenobiotic-Metabolizing Enzymes in Rat and Human Hepatic Subcellular Fractions" Molecules 22, no. 4: 509. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22040509

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop