Next Article in Journal
The Combined Use of Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Lachancea thermotolerans—Effect on the Anthocyanin Wine Composition
Next Article in Special Issue
Endophytic Bacteria Isolated from Panax ginseng Improves Ginsenoside Accumulation in Adventitious Ginseng Root Culture
Previous Article in Journal
Off-Center Rotation of CuPc Molecular Rotor on a Bi(111) Surface and the Chiral Feature
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chemical Comparison of Two Drying Methods of Mountain Cultivated Ginseng by UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS and Multivariate Statistical Analysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 22
Issue 5
10.3390/molecules22050734
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dynamic Changes in Neutral and Acidic Ginsenosides with Different Cultivation Ages and Harvest Seasons: Identification of Chemical Characteristics for Panax ginseng Quality Control

by
Zhi Liu
1,2,3,
Chong-Zhi Wang
3,
Xing-You Zhu
4,
Jin-Yi Wan
3,
Jing Zhang
2,
Wei Li
2,*,
Chang-Chun Ruan
1,* and
Chun-Su Yuan
3
1
Institute of Agricultural Modernization, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China
2
College of Chinese Medicinal Materials, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China
3
Tang Center for Herbal Medicine Research and The Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
4
Jinlin Provincial Sericulture Institute, Jilin 132012, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2017, 22(5), 734; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22050734
Submission received: 13 March 2017 / Revised: 24 April 2017 / Accepted: 27 April 2017 / Published: 4 May 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Trends in Ginseng Research)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this study, dynamic changes in ginsenoside content and ratios in the Panax ginseng root were investigated with different cultivation ages and different collection months, using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Our data indicate that changes in ginsenoside Ro and malonyl ginsenosides content were dependent on the ginseng cultivation age (p < 0.05); especially, the Ro content varied from 0.16 to 4.91 mg/g, with a difference about 30-fold. Further, we found that the samples of 5 and 6-year-old P. ginseng had high Ro/Re ratio, whereas two and three-year-old P. ginseng possessed low Ro/Re ratio. Thus, the Ro/Re ratio can be used as a characteristic marker for differentiating the age of the root. The relative content of ginsenosides Rg1 and Re were affected by the ginseng’s harvest season. The Re content was higher than the Rg1 content in May and June, but lower than the Rg1 content from August to October. Thus, the Rg1/Re ratio can be used as a characteristic marker for differentiating the ginseng’s harvest seasons. These results indicate that the chemical characteristics of P. ginseng at different cultivation ages and harvest seasons are clearly different, which may cause differences in pharmacological activities and therapeutic effects. In addition, we developed HPLC coupled with hierarchical cluster analysis and principal component analysis methods to identify the cultivation age and harvest season of P. ginseng using characteristic ginsenosides. Our results showed that this method can be used to discriminate the cultivation age and harvest season of P. ginseng.

1. Introduction

Panax ginseng is a slow-growing perennial plant of the Panax genus that has been used in China for thousands of years. Nowadays, P. ginseng has become a popular dietary supplement in many countries [1]. Modern pharmacological studies have demonstrated that P. ginseng possesses numerous health benefits including antitumor, antioxidant, anti-obesity and antidiabetic properties [2,3,4,5,6]. The active components of ginseng are commonly considered to be ginsenosides, a group of steroidal saponins, including commonly studied neutral ginsenosides (e.g., Rg1, Re, Rb1, Rb2, Rc and Rd) and the less studied oleanolic acid-type ginsenosides (e.g., ginsenoside Ro) and malonyl ginsenosides (e.g., mRb1, mRb2, mRc and mRd) (Figure 1). The ginsenoside Ro and malonyl ginsenosides are also called “acidic ginsenosides”. Previous studies have shown that the content of acidic ginsenosides represents up to 60% of the total ginsenosides in Asian ginseng [7,8].
The pharmacological effects and chemical analyses of neutral ginsenosides are frequently used for the evaluation and quality control of ginseng products [9,10]. Acidic ginsenosides are more polar and water-soluble than neutral ginsenosides, and the analysis of acidic ginsenosides by HPLC is more difficult than those of neutral ginsenosides using a mobile phase without phosphate buffer [7,11,12]. In previous studies, due to the unavailability of reference standards, identification of the malonyl ginsenoside and Ro was carried out by comparing the retention times of their chromatographic peaks with published data or by high-performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) [1,12,13,14]. The concentrations of mRb1, mRb2, mRc, and mRd were calculated relative to each other, on the basis of the calibration curves of Rb1, Rb2, Rc and Rd respectively [12,15].
Since the levels of ginsenosides contribute to ginseng’s bioactive properties, accurately knowing the levels of ginseng saponins and their proportions is important for the pharmacological evaluation of ginseng products. It has been shown that ginseng species, population, and geographical origin are linked to different ginsenoside contents and ratios [16,17,18,19,20]. For example, Sengupta et al. [16] reported that Asian ginseng had a high Rg1:Rb1 ginsenoside ratio and Rg1 was shown to promote wound healing. Conversely, American ginseng had a low Rg1:Rb1 ratio and Rb1 was shown to inhibit tumor growth. Schlag and McIntosh [20] showed that there were different chemotypes based on Rg1/Re ratios in the American ginseng population (the low Rg1/high Re chemotype and the high Rg1/low Re chemotype), and Re was shown to reduce blood glucose. The heterogeneity of ginsenosides is an important issue because these structure-similar ginsenosides perform different or even totally opposite pharmacological activities.
The quality and efficacy of ginseng are closely related to its cultivation age and harvest season. Many studies have demonstrated that changing trends in the saponin contents of P. ginseng with the cultivation age. Shi et al. [21] reported that Re, Rc, Rb2 and Rb3 content increases with cultivation age. The Rg1, Rb1 and Rd content increases from one-year-old to four-year-old P. ginseng, and then decreases. Qu et al. [22] compared the major saponins in the American ginseng, and found that the Re and Rb1 content gradually increased from ages 1 to 5 years in the P. ginseng root; the same result was also observed for the changes in total saponin content. However, most previously published reports on variations with cultivation age in the content of total and individual ginsenosides of P. ginseng are limited to the determination of neutral ginsenosides. In addition, past studies only collected ginseng samples in fall. The accumulation characteristics of neutral and acidic ginsenosides at different cultivation ages and harvest seasons of P. ginseng have not yet been explored. Dynamic changes in ginsenoside content and their ratios should provide important information for accurate evaluation and quality control of P. ginseng.
In recent years, the adulteration of ginseng products has been a major problem in ginseng commercial markets, because high-value ginseng products are expensive, adulteration with other cheaper plant material or ginseng radix younger than five or six years old is likely to occur in the marketplace. Therefore, it is critical to establish a rapid and reliable quality control methodology to identify ginseng products. Nowadays, metabolomic approaches combined with multivariate analyses have developed into a powerful tool for comprehensively evaluating and discriminating between medicinal plants [23]. Metabolomic approaches based on various analytical techniques, including gas chromatography (GC), liquid chromatography (LC), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), have been applied for metabolite profiling, in order to identify Panax ages [13,24,25,26]. However, very little work has been carried out on discrimination between cultivation ages and harvest seasons of P. ginseng root.
In the current study, dynamic changes in ginsenoside content and ratios in the P. ginseng root were investigated with different cultivation ages and different collection months, using HPLC. Our data indicate that changes in the contents of ginsenoside Ro and malonyl ginsenosides were clearly dependent on the ginseng’s cultivation age, and the content of ginsenosides Rg1 and Re were affected by the ginseng’s harvest season. The chemical characteristics for different cultivation ages and harvest seasons of P. ginseng are obviously different, which may cause differences in pharmacological activity and therapeutic effect.

2. Results

2.1. Method Validation

HPLC was used to analyze the ginseng saponins. Ginsenosides Rg1, Re, Ro, Rb1, Rc, Rb2, Rd, malonyl-Rb1, malonyl-Rc, malonyl-Rb2 and malonyl-Rd were identified by comparing their retention times with the mixed saponin standards. The chromatograms are shown in Figure 2. The HPLC method was validated by studying the linearity, repeatability, precision, stability, and recovery. Linearity was established by injections of the standard mixture solutions in the investigated ranges from low to high concentrations. A high degree of linearity was observed for all ginsenosides (r2 ranging between 0.9991 and 0.9999), for all standards. Repeatability was evaluated by analyzing six replicates of the same sample, and the relative standard deviation (RSD) values for the repeatability of the ginsenosides ranged from 1.96% to 3.85%. In the precision experiment, the intra-day precision was calculated six times per day and inter-day precision was analysed on 3 consecutive days, and the RSD values of both intra- and inter-day precisions did not exceed 3.61%. The stability of the sample was evaluated at the time points of 0, 2, 4, 8, 24 and 48 h with RSDs not more than 2.43%. The recoveries of ginsenosides were determined with spiked samples. Known amounts of the standard references were spiked into samples and then prepared as test solutions. The recoveries of all 11 ginsenosides were within the range of 96.9%–104.8%. The validation results demonstrated that the method was acceptable for the quantitative evaluation of ginsenosides in ginseng samples.

2.2. Changes of Ginsenosides in Panax ginseng at Different Cultivation Ages

Figure 3A shows variation trends in the contents of Rg1, Re and Ro in samples of P. ginseng at different ages. The average contents of Rg1, Re and Ro increased with cultivation age, but the rate of increase was different. In particular, the changes in Ro content are obviously dependent on age (p < 0.05). The average Ro content in six-year-old P. ginseng (4.228 mg/g) was approximately nine fold higher than that in two-year-old P. ginseng (0.445 mg/g). But, the changes in the contents of Rg1 and Re in root are relatively less from two to six years old, ranging from 1.705 to 3.195 mg/g and 2.22 to 2.9 mg/g, respectively.
The Ro/Re ratios were found to be different when compared across samples from two- to six-year-old P. ginseng (Figure 3B). The average ratio was calculated as 0.93 for four-year-old P. ginseng, 1.26 and 1.46 for five- and six-year-old P. ginseng respectively, and 0.2 and 0.54 for two- and three-year-old P. ginseng respectively. Our study showed that the content of Ro in four-year-old P. ginseng was slightly lower than that of Re, and the ratio of Ro/Re is approximately equal to 1.0. Meanwhile, the average Ro content was significantly higher than that of Re in five- and six-year-old P. ginseng; In contrast, the Ro content was lower than the Re content in two- and three-year-old P. ginseng. Therefore, the changes in the ratio of Ro/Re are obviously dependent on age. This facilitated Ro/Re ratio as a characteristic marker for differentiating the cultivation age of P. ginseng root.
The dynamic changes in saponin content and ratios with different cultivation ages and harvest seasons are summarized in Table 1. The Ro content in P. ginseng root was lowest in the May of the 2nd cultivation year and highest in the September of the 6th cultivation year, ranging from 0.16 to 4.91 mg/g, with a difference about 30-fold. The samples of five- and six-year-old P. ginseng had a high Ro/Re ratio, whereas two- and three-year-old P. ginseng possessed a low Ro/Re ratio.
As shown in Figure 4A, the average content of protopanaxadiol-type ginsenosides in P. ginseng root changes with age, and the change rates of the ginsenoside content were different. The changes in malonyl-Rb1, malonyl-Rb2 and malonyl-Rc content were obviously dependent on age. The Rb1, Rb2 and Rc content increased slightly with the age increase. Furthermore, the ratios of malonyl ginsenosides to their corresponding neutral ginsenosides (mRb1/Rb1, mRc/Rc, mRb2/Rb2 and mRd/Rd) ranged from 1.74 to 4.18 in different ages of P. ginseng root (Figure 4B). The total content of malonyl ginsenosides was two-fold higher than the content of corresponding neutral ginsenosides in fresh ginseng. These results indicate that malonyl ginsenosides are the characteristic and major constituents of fresh ginseng.

2.3. Changes of Ginsenosides in Panax ginseng from Different Harvest Seasons

As shown in Figure 3C, the average content of Re was significantly higher than Rg1 for growth in May and June in P. ginseng (p < 0.05); In July, the content of Re and Rg1 was nearly identical (2.36 mg/g and 2.31 mg/g, respectively), however the content of Re was lower than Rg1 from August to October (p < 0.05). Therefore, the amounts of ginsenosides Rg1 and Re were affected by the ginseng’s harvest season. May and June exhibited a ratio of Rg1/Re < 0.9 (Low Rg1/Re ratio), in July exhibited a ratio of 0.9 < Rg1/Re < 1.1 (Intermediate), and from August to October they exhibited a ratio of Rg1/Re > 1.1 (High Rg1/Re ratio) (Figure 3D). These results indicate that Rg1/Re ratio can be used as a characteristic marker for differentiating the cultivation month of P. ginseng root. Figure 4C shows changes of protopanaxadiol-type ginsenosides in Panax ginseng root with different collection month. The average concentrations of protopanaxadiol-type ginsenosides (mRb1, mRc, mRb2, mRd, Rb1, Rc, Rb2 and Rd) were higher in April, then decreased to the lowest level in July, then increased again during August to September, and then slightly declined in October.

2.4. Hierarchical Cluster Analysis (HCA) Data

Hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) was performed using the Within-groups linkage’ method, and a dendrogram was generated from the contents of 11 saponins in the P. ginseng samples. As shown in Figure 5A, the thirty samples were divided into three main clusters (I, II and III). Samples of two- and three-year-old P. ginseng were classified as cluster I. Cluster III was formed by the majority of five- and six-year-old P. ginseng samples and the other samples were in cluster II. Several samples including May-3Y, August-3Y, June-5Y, July-5Y and August-5Y were mixed with cluster II. In our study, the samples of P. ginseng were collected from plants of different ages from May to October. It was easy to obtain similar chemical qualities among close collection time the samples. Moreover, the samples of five- and six-year-old P. ginseng progressively merged with those of four-year-old P. ginseng to form a bigger cluster that finally merged with the cluster of samples of two- and three-year-old P. ginseng to create a whole tree structure. The result indicates that the cultivation age of P. ginseng root from two to six years can be discriminated based on their detected metabolites, whereas the sample’s month cannot be discriminated in this manner.
Secondly, a dendrogram of the HCA was generated using the contents of Rg1 and Re, the results of which are shown in Figure 5B. Ginseng samples were obviously classified into four main clusters: the P. ginseng from July to October contained cluster I (two- to four-year-old ginsengs) and II (five- and six-year-old ginsengs) and the P. ginseng from May to June included in cluster III (three- to six-year-old ginsengs) and cluster IV (two-year-old ginseng). The four ginseng clusters showed discrimination between samples at different months and ages.

2.5. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) Data

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) assay was carried out on the data set obtained from the HPLC chromatogram. Eleven characteristic saponins, ginsenoside Rg1, Re, Ro, Rb1, Rb2, Rc, Rd, mRb1, mRb2, mRc and mRd, were chosen to build up a 11-dimensional data set, which represents 11 vectors; the contents are the value of the vectors. As shown in Figure 6A, the two-dimensional PCA score plot showed that the samples could be divided into three groups with P. ginseng age. Samples 1–12 (two- and three-year-old P. ginseng) were in group I, samples 19, 20, and 22–30 (most of the five- and six-year-old P. ginseng) were classified in group III, while the others were in group II.
In the case of the 30 ginseng samples, although 11 saponins were tested, most were influential in age discrimination of P. ginseng, and only some affected classification of the month of harvest. Thus, the sample’s month cannot be discriminated using this method. To improve the accuracy of age and month discrimination, array optimizations were performed. In this study, several relevant ginsenosides for discriminating sample age were eliminated from the array to make a smaller one. A subset of three saponins (ginsenosides Rg1, Re and Ro) was chosen to build the PCA model. The two-dimensional PCA score plot with the three selected saponins showed better clustering than those with all of the saponins (Figure 6B). For the two-dimensional PCA score plot, the samples collected from May to June were located in the upper area, except sample 27. In contrast, the samples from July to October were in lower area (Figure 6C).

3. Discussion

The pharmacological effects and chemical analyses of neutral ginsenosides (Rg1, Re, Rb1, Rb2, Rc and Rd) are frequently used for the evaluation and quality control of ginseng products [9,10]. But ginsenoside Ro and malonyl ginsenosides (mRb1, mRb2, mRc and mRd) have been studied less often. The activity of ginsenoside Ro is known to include anti-inflammation, antihepatitic, antioxidant and hair regrowth-promoting activities [27,28]. Malonyl ginsenosides can alleviate hyperglycemia, hyperlipemia and insulin resistance of type 2 diabetes [4]. The ginsenoside Ro and malonyl ginsenosides are abundant in Asian ginseng. The analysis of ginsenoside Ro and malonyl ginsenosides by HPLC is more difficult than those of neutral ginsenosides using a mobile phase without phosphate buffer [7,12]. Therefore, many previously published studies on ginseng product quality control are limited to identifying neutral ginsenosides and ignoring ginsenoside Ro and malonyl ginsenosides.
Sample preparation is an important step that significantly affects the accuracy and repeatability of quantitative analysis. It has been reported that nonstandard sample pretreatment causes over 60% of analysis errors [29]. In a previous study in our laboratory, measurements of ginsenoside Ro and malonyl ginsenosides were evaluated by different extract solvents, such as methanol, ethanol, n-butanol, and water. The data indicated that the yields of ginsenoside Ro and malonyl ginsenosides in extraction solution with methanol were the highest and n-butanol were the lowest [8].
However, in most previous studies, the contents of ginsenoside Ro and malonyl ginsenosides from Panax ginseng were usually tested using HPLC with n-butanol as the extraction solvent, which negatively influenced the extraction efficacy of Ro and malonyl ginsenosides. Therefore, the content of ginsenoside Ro and malonyl ginsenosides could not be determined precisely.
Many studies have demonstrated variations in the content of total and individual ginsenosides in P. ginseng according to cultivation age, geographical origin, species, and various environmental conditions. Chung et al. [30] reported that total ginsenoside content in fresh ginseng was affected by cultivation age, whereas the effects of cultivation region were not significant for total ginsenoside level. Xiao et al. [17] showed that only the ginsenoside Rg1 and Re content increased with cultivation age of P. ginseng; the contents of Rb1, Rc, and Rd varied widely with cultivation ages from different cultivation locations. Another study suggested that the contents of Rb1, Rc, and Rb2 were affected by location; Re was affect by genotype; and Rg1 and Rd were affect by both location and genotype [18]. However, most previously published reports on variations in the content of total and individual ginsenosides in P. ginseng are limited to the determination of neutral ginsenosides. Very little work has been carried out on the accumulation characteristics of neutral and acidic ginsenosides of P. ginseng with different cultivation ages and harvest seasons.
In the present study, our results showed that the contents of ginsenoside Ro and malonyl ginsenosides in root increased during the two- to six-year-old stage. But the rate of increase was different. In particular, the dynamic changes in Ro content are significantly different than other saponins at different ages of P. ginseng. The Ro content in P. ginseng root was lowest in May of the second cultivation year and highest in September of the sixth cultivation year, ranging from 0.16 to 4.91 mg/g, with a difference about 30-fold (Table 1). Further, we found that the samples of 5 and 6-year-old P. ginseng had high Ro/Re ratio, whereas two- and three-year-old P. ginseng possessed a low Ro/Re ratio. The Ro/Re ratio presented a significantly large difference between cultivation ages of P. ginseng, which may cause differences in biological activity.
Interestingly, Wang et al. [20] showed that all samples of cultivated American ginseng grown in Wisconsin have the high Re/low Rg1 chemotype, whereas wild American ginseng samples are classified into two chemotypes based on the ratio Rg1/Re. Schlag and McIntosh [19] showed that chemotype did not vary by production type (wild versus cultivated American ginseng) and roots within a population rarely exhibited chemotypes different from the overall population chemotype. The chemotype variations in American ginseng populations are influenced more by genotype than environmental factors. Similarly, a significant variation in the saponin composition among Asian ginseng populations has been studied. According to the different expression patterns of core saponins, including Ra1/Ra2 and malonyl-Ra1/Ra2 isomers, Lee et al. [31] showed that the chromatographic patterns of core saponins could be approximately classified into three types, α, β and γ. The variations among ginsenosides play a critical role in discriminating between P. ginseng species. In our study, the results showed that the changes in the ratio of Re and Rg1 are clearly dependent on the harvest season of the P. ginseng root. May and June exhibit a low Rg1/Re ratio. July exhibits an intermediate ratio. August to October exhibit a high Rg1/Re ratio.
In general, ginseng roots harvested from the fifth to sixth year are considered to be the most valuable since they have the most mass and the highest amount of active components. But, it is likely that cheaper plant material and younger ginseng roots will appear in the marketplace [32]. Thus, a reliable quality control methodology to identify the age of P. ginseng is critical to prevent its adulteration in the market. However, it is difficult to apply traditional methods based on physical appearance to discriminating between ginseng products in slice or powder forms [9].
Recently, metabolomics research has been used to discriminate the cultivation age of ginseng products [13,24,25,26]. These metabolic approaches are usually combined with multivariate statistical analyses, which allow useful biological information to be extracted from complex metabolic data sets. However, the classification of samples with a massive volume of data is greatly challenging because numerous metabolites are analyzed by metabolome technique. Thus, it is important to improve data interpretability and reduce the sample size. This can be done by screening the influential metabolites from the data list that can be identified in samples. In this study, HCA and PCA were used to identify the cultivation age and season of P. ginseng using selected characteristic ginsenosides (ginsenosides Rg1, Re, and Ro). Our results showed that this method can be used to roughly discriminate the cultivation age and harvest season of P. ginseng. Kim et al. [25,33] reported the nontargeted metabolomics approach for age differentiation of P. ginseng using ultra-performance liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-QTOFMS). The results showed that P. ginseng at different cultivation ages can be more precisely discriminated on the basis of selected metabolites. However, these studies only collected ginseng samples in fall. In our study, the samples of P. ginseng were collected from plants of different ages from May to October. It was easy to obtain similar chemical qualities among the samples with the close collection times. Therefore, it is difficult to completely distinguish different cultivation ages and collection months of Panax ginseng. Furthermore, many chemical components, including gluconic acid, glucuronic acid, proline, glucaric acid, mannose, myoinositol, panaxydol, and panaxynol, have also been found as key and relevant compounds with which to differentiate the age of ginseng samples [24]. However, whether these components have a better role in discrimination of cultivation ages and harvest seasons for P. ginseng root has not yet been explored. On this point, further experiments need to be performed.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Chemicals

Ginsenoside Rg1, Re, Rb1, Rc, Rb2 and Rd were purchased from College of Fundamental Medical, Jilin University (Changchun, China). Ginsenoside Ro and malonyl ginsenoside Rb1, Rc, Rb2, Rd were separated from fresh Panax ginseng in our group, and were identified using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR spectroscopic data. All standards were at least 95% pure, as confirmed by HPLC. HPLC-grade acetonitrile and methanol were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Analytical grade methanol, ethanol and KH2PO4 were purchased from the Beijing Chemical Reagent Factory. Water was purified using a Milli-Q purification system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). All solutions were filtered through a 0.45 μm hydrophilic polypropylene membrane before use.

4.2. Plant Materials

P. ginseng root samples used in this study were cultivated in Jingyu, Jilin Province, China, according to the ginseng GAP standard cultivation guidelines. Samples ranging from two to six years of age were collected in the same farm field from May to October in 2011. A total of 30 sample groups were collected (Table 2). For each group sample, five or six adjacent ginseng roots were collected at three to five different collecting points. The distance between the points was at least 3 meters. The voucher samples were authenticated by Dr. Sun Guang-zhi and deposited in the Institute of Agricultural Modernization at Jilin agricultural University (Jilin, China). The ginseng root was rinsed thoroughly with cold water, dried at 35 °C, powdered, and passed through a 40 mesh sieve.

4.3. Sample Preparation

One gram of root powder was put into a 50 mL conical flask. After adding 20 mL of 80% methanol solution (v/v), the flask was sonicated by KQ2200E Ultrasonic Cleaners (Kunshan Ultrasonic Instrument Co., Ltd., Kunshan, China) three times for 30 minutes. The extract was concentrated under a reduced pressure at 40 °C, and the residue was transferred into a 25 mL volumetric flask and diluted to the desired volume with methanol. The solutions were stored at 4 °C until HPLC analysis.

4.4. High Performance Liquid Chromatographic Analysis

An agilent 1100 series HPLC apparatus (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), equipped with quaternary gradient pump, vacuum degasser, autosampler and a UV detector was used for ginsenoside analysis. The standard ginsenoside mixture and the samples of extraction were dissolved in 25 mL of methanol and filtered through filters (0.45 µm (Millipore Corporation, Bedford, MA, USA)) for HPLC analysis. The separation was carried out on a 250 mm × 4.6 mm i.d., 5 μm, Cosmosil C18 column (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan). For HPLC analysis, a 20 μL sample was injected into the column and eluted at 25 °C with a constant flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The separation of ginsenosides was obtained by gradient elution (eluents was the mixture of acetonitrile (A) and 0.05 mol·L−1 KH2PO4 (B)). The process was according to the following profiles: 21% A at 0–22 min, 21–29% A at 22–30 min, 29% A at 30–50 min, 29–35% A at 50–60 min and 35–50% A at 60–70 min. The absorbance was measured at wavelength of 203 nm.

4.5. Multivariate Analysis

To identify and distinguish the cultivation ages and seasons, two multivariate statistical methods, the hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) and the principal component analysis (PCA), were performed with SPSS version 20.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and SIMCA-P 11.5 software (Umetrics, Umea, Sweden) respectively. HCA is a clustering method used to compare patterns of similarities and dissimilarities, which measures the distances among samples. A dendrogram represents the relationships among samples [34]. PCA was conducted to efficiently decrease the dimensions of the original data set. It explains the correlation among a large number of variables in terms of a smaller number of underlying factors without much information loss [35]. A dataset consisting of the detected ginsenoside levels of 30 P. ginseng samples was used to create the HCA dendrogram based on Within-groups linkage method. Furthermore, PCA was performed by applying a correlation matrix after by-step extracted pretreatment according to an Eigenvalue greater than 1.

4.6. Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was conducted based on a SPSS20.0 system (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. The ginsenoside contents of two groups were analyzed by independent samples t-test. Differences between the groups were analyzed using ANOVA. A difference of p < 0.05 was considered as being statistically significant.

5. Conclusions

To provide chemical characteristics for Panax ginseng quality control, dynamic changes in neutral and acidic ginsenosides in the P. ginseng root were investigated with different cultivation ages and different collection months using HPLC-UV. Our data showed that changes in the contents of ginsenoside Ro and malonyl ginsenosides were clearly dependent on the ginseng’s cultivation age, and the contents of ginsenosides Rg1 and Re were affected by the ginseng’s harvest season. Further, we found that the samples of five- and six-year-old P. ginseng had a high Ro/Re ratio, whereas two- and three-year-old P. ginseng possessed a low Ro/Re ratio. The P. ginseng samples from May to June exhibited a low Rg1/Re ratio, while the samples from August to October exhibited a high Rg1/Re ratio. Therefore, the Ro/Re and Rg1/Re ratios can be used as characteristic markers for the quality control of P. ginseng. In addition, we developed HPLC coupled with HCA and PCA to identify the cultivation age and harvest season of P. ginseng using characteristic ginsenosides (ginsenosides Rg1, Re, and Ro). Our results showed that this method can be used to discriminate the cultivation age and harvest season of P. ginseng.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Educational Commission of Jilin Province of China (No. 201448), China Scholarship Council (No. 201408220068) and Tang Foundation for the Research of Traditional Chinese Medicines.

Author Contributions

C.-C.R. and W.L. conceived and designed the experiment. Z.L., C.-Z.W., X.-Y.Z., J.-Y.W., and C.-S.Y. wrote the main manuscript text and analyzed the data. All authors reviewed and approved the contents of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, Y.T.; You, J.Y.; Yu, Y.; Qu, C.L.; Zhang, H.R.; Ding, L.; Zhang, H.Q.; Li, X.W. Analysis of ginsenosides in Panax ginseng in high pressure microwave-assisted extraction. Food Chem. 2008, 110, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Park, E.H.; Kim, Y.J.; Yamabe, N.; Park, S.H.; Kim, H.K.; Jang, H.J.; Kim, J.H.; Cheon, G.J.; Ham, J.; Kang, K.S.; et al. Stereospecific anticancer effects of ginsenoside Rg3 epimers isolated from heat-processed American ginseng on human gastric cancer cell. J. Ginseng Res. 2014, 38, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Xiong, Y.; Shen, L.; Liu, K.J.; Tso, P.; Xiong, Y.; Wang, G.; Woods, S.C.; Liu, M. Antiobesity and antihyperglycemic effects of ginsenoside Rb1 in rats. Diabetes 2010, 59, 2505–2512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Liu, Z.; Li, W.; Li, X.; Zhang, M.; Chen, L.; Zheng, Y.N.; Sun, G.Z.; Ruan, C.C. Antidiabetic effects of malonyl ginsenosides from Panax ginseng on type 2 diabetic rats induced by high-fat diet and streptozotocin. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2013, 145, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Liu, Z.Q. Chemical insights into ginseng as a resource for natural antioxidants. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 3329–3355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Qi, L.W.; Wang, C.Z.; Yuan, C.S. Ginsenosides from American ginseng: Chemical and pharmacological diversity. Phytochemistry 2011, 72, 689–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chuang, W.C.; Wu, H.K.; Sheu, S.J.; Chiou, S.H.; Chang, H.C.; Chen, Y.P. A comparative study on commercial samples of ginseng radix. Planta Med. 1995, 61, 459–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Liu, Z.; Li, Y.; Li, X.; Ruan, C.C.; Wang, L.J.; Sun, G.Z. The effects of dynamic changes of malonyl ginsenosides on evaluation and quality control of Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2012, 64–65, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Fuzzati, N. Analysis methods of ginsenosides. J. Chromatogr. B 2004, 812, 119–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Qi, L.W.; Wang, C.Z.; Yuan, C.S. Isolation and analysis of ginseng: Advances and challenges. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2011, 28, 467–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Court, W.A.; Hendel, J.G.; Elmi, J. Reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatographic determination of ginsenosides of Panax quinquefolium. J. Chromatogr. A 1996, 755, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ren, G.X.; Chen, F. Degradation of ginsenosides in American ginseng (Panax quinquefolium) extracts during microwave and conventional heating. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 1501–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Shan, S.M.; Luo, J.G.; Huang, F.; Kong, L.Y. Chemical characteristics combined with bioactivity for comprehensive evaluation of Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer in different ages and seasons based on HPLC-DAD and chemometric methods. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2014, 89, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kite, G.C.; Howes, M.J.R.; Leon, C.J.; Simmonds, M.S.J. Liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry of malonyl-ginsenosides in the authentication of ginseng. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2003, 17, 238–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Xie, Y.Y.; Luo, D.; Cheng, Y.J.; Ma, J.F.; Wang, Y.M.; Liang, Q.L.; Luo, G.A. Steaming-Induced Chemical Transformations and Holistic Quality Assessment of Red Ginseng Derived from Panax ginseng by Means of HPLC-ESI-MS/MSn-Based Multicomponent Quantification Fingerprint. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 8213–8224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Sengupta, S.; Toh, S.A.; Sellers, L.A.; Skepper, J.N.; Koolwijk, P.; Leung, H.W.; Yeung, H.W.; Wong, R.N.S.; Sasisekharan, R.; Fan, T.P.D.; et al. Modulating angiogenesis: The yin and the yang in ginseng. Circulation 2004, 110, 1219–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Xiao, D.; Yue, H.; Xiu, Y.; Sun, X.L.; Wang, Y.B.; Liu, S.Y. Accumulation characteristics and correlation analysis of five ginsenosides with different cultivation ages from different regions. J. Ginseng Res. 2015, 39, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lim, W.; Mudge, K.W.; Vermeylen, F. Effects of population, age, and cultivation methods on ginsenoside content of wild American ginseng (Panax quinquefolium). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 8498–8505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Schlag, E.M.; McIntosh, M.S. Ginsenoside content and variation among and within American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L.) populations. Phytochemistry 2006, 67, 1510–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Wang, J.R.; Leung, C.Y.; Ho, H.M.; Chai, S.; Yau, L.F.; Zhao, Z.Z.; Jiang, Z.H. Quantitative comparison of ginsenosides and polyacetylenes in wild and cultivated American ginseng. Chem. Biodivers. 2010, 7, 975–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Shi, W.; Wang, Y.T.; Li, J.; Zhang, H.Q.; Ding, L. Investigation of ginsenosides in different parts and ages of Panax ginseng. Food Chem. 2007, 102, 664–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Qu, C.L.; Bai, Y.P.; Jin, X.Q.; Wang, Y.T.; Zhang, K.; You, J.Y.; Zhang, H.Q. Study on ginsenosides in different parts and ages of Panax quinquefolius L. Food Chem. 2009, 115, 340–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Okada, T.; Afendi, F.M.; Altaf-Ul-Amin, M.; Takahashi, H.; Nakamura, K.; Kanaya, S. Metabolomics of medicinal plants: The importance of multivariate analysis of analytical chemistry data. Curr. Comput. Aided Drug Des. 2010, 6, 179–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Park, H.E.; Lee, S.Y.; Hyun, S.H.; Kim, D.Y.; Marriott, P.J.; Choi, H.K. Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolic Profiling and Differentiation of Ginseng Roots According to Cultivation Age Using Variable Selection. J. AOAC Int. 2013, 96, 1266–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kim, N.; Kim, K.; Choi, B.Y.; Lee, D.; Shin, Y.S.; Bang, K.H.; Cha, S.W.; Lee, J.W.; Choi, H.K.; Jang, D.S.; et al. Metabolomic Approach for Age Discrimination of Panax ginseng Using UPLC-Q-Tof MS. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 10435–10441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yang, S.O.; Shin, Y.S.; Hyun, S.H.; Cho, S.; Bang, K.H.; Lee, D.; Choi, S.P.; Choi, H.K. NMR-based metabolic profiling and differentiation of ginseng roots according to cultivation ages. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2012, 58, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zhang, X.H.; Xu, X.X.; Xu, T. Ginsenoside Ro suppresses interleukin-1 β-induced apoptosis and inflammation in rat chondrocytes by inhibiting NF-κB. Chin. J. Nat. Med. 2015, 13, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Murata, K.; Takeshita, F.; Samukawa, K.; Tani, T.; Matsuda, H. Effects of ginseng rhizome and ginsenoside Ro on testosterone 5α-reductase and hair re-growth in testosterone-treated mice. Phytother. Res. 2012, 26, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Li, S.P.; Zhao, J.; Yang, B. Strategies for quality control of Chinese medicines. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2011, 55, 802–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Chung, I.M.; Kim, J.W.; Seguin, P.; Jun, Y.M.; Kim, S.H. Ginsenosides and phenolics in fresh and processed Korean ginseng (Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer): Effects of cultivation location, year, and storage period. Food Chem. 2012, 130, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lee, M.J.; Choi, J.S.; Cha, S.W.; Lee, K.S.; Lee, Z.W.; Hwang, G.S.; Lee, S.H.; Kamal, A.H.M.; Jung, Y.A.; Seung, N.S.; et al. Variation in the ginsenoside profiles of cultivated ginseng (Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer) landraces in Korea. Process Biochem. 2011, 46, 258–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yap, K.Y.L.; Chan, S.Y.; Lim, C.S. Authentication of traditional Chinese medicine using infrared spectroscopy: Distinguishing between ginseng and its morphological fakes. J. Biomed. Sci. 2007, 14, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kim, N.; Kim, K.; Lee, D.; Shin, Y.S.; Bang, K.H.; Cha, S.W.; Lee, J.W.; Choi, H.K.; Hwang, B.Y.; Lee, D. Nontargeted metabolomics approach for age differentiation and structure interpretation of age-dependent key constituents in hairy roots of Panax ginseng. J. Nat. Prod. 2012, 75, 1777–1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sumner, L.W.; Mendes, P.; Dixon, R.A. Plant metabolomics: Large-scale phytochemistry in the functional genomics era. Phytochemistry 2003, 62, 817–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Song, H.H.; Moon, J.Y.; Ryu, H.W.; Noh, B.S.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, H.K.; Oh, S.R. Discrimination of white ginseng origins using multivariate statistical analysis of data sets. J. Ginseng Res. 2014, 38, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sample Availability: Samples of the 11 compounds are available from the authors.
Molecules 22 00734 g001 550
Figure 1. Structures of ginsenosides from Panax ginseng root. glc—glucosyl; ma—malonyl; ara—arabinosyl; rha—rhamnosyl.
Figure 1. Structures of ginsenosides from Panax ginseng root. glc—glucosyl; ma—malonyl; ara—arabinosyl; rha—rhamnosyl.
Molecules 22 00734 g001
Molecules 22 00734 g002 550
Figure 2. Typical HPLC chromatogram of a fresh ginseng root. Peak numbers: 1—Rg1; 2—Re; 3—Ro; 4—malonyl-ginsenoside Rb1; 5—malonyl-ginsenoside Rc; 6—malonyl-ginsenoside Rb2; 7—Rb1; 8—Rc; 9—malonyl-ginsenoside Rd; 10—Rb2; 11—Rd.
Figure 2. Typical HPLC chromatogram of a fresh ginseng root. Peak numbers: 1—Rg1; 2—Re; 3—Ro; 4—malonyl-ginsenoside Rb1; 5—malonyl-ginsenoside Rc; 6—malonyl-ginsenoside Rb2; 7—Rb1; 8—Rc; 9—malonyl-ginsenoside Rd; 10—Rb2; 11—Rd.
Molecules 22 00734 g002
Molecules 22 00734 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) Changes in the ginsenoside Rg1, Re and Ro contents in the Panax ginseng root according to the cultivation year. * p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA (compared with the Year 4); (B) Ratio of ginsenosides Ro and Re in different cultivation years; (C) Changes of ginsenoside Rg1 and Re contents in Panax ginseng root with different collection month. * p < 0.05, independent sample t-test; (D) Ratio of ginsenosides Rg1 and Re in different collection months.
Figure 3. (A) Changes in the ginsenoside Rg1, Re and Ro contents in the Panax ginseng root according to the cultivation year. * p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA (compared with the Year 4); (B) Ratio of ginsenosides Ro and Re in different cultivation years; (C) Changes of ginsenoside Rg1 and Re contents in Panax ginseng root with different collection month. * p < 0.05, independent sample t-test; (D) Ratio of ginsenosides Rg1 and Re in different collection months.
Molecules 22 00734 g003
Molecules 22 00734 g004 550
Figure 4. (A) Changes in the protopanaxadiol-type ginsenosides contents in the Panax ginseng root according to the cultivation year; (B) Ratios of malonyl ginsenosides and their corresponding neutral ginsenosides in different cultivation years; (C) Changes of protopanaxadiol-type ginsenosides in Panax ginseng root with different collection month.
Figure 4. (A) Changes in the protopanaxadiol-type ginsenosides contents in the Panax ginseng root according to the cultivation year; (B) Ratios of malonyl ginsenosides and their corresponding neutral ginsenosides in different cultivation years; (C) Changes of protopanaxadiol-type ginsenosides in Panax ginseng root with different collection month.
Molecules 22 00734 g004
Molecules 22 00734 g005 550
Figure 5. Dendrograms of hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) using Within-groups linkage. (A) HCA was generated from the contents of 11 saponins in the tested samples; (B) HCA was generated from the contents of ginsenosides Rg1 and Re in the tested samples.
Figure 5. Dendrograms of hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) using Within-groups linkage. (A) HCA was generated from the contents of 11 saponins in the tested samples; (B) HCA was generated from the contents of ginsenosides Rg1 and Re in the tested samples.
Molecules 22 00734 g005
Molecules 22 00734 g006 550
Figure 6. HPLC-principal component analysis (PCA) of Panax ginseng root. (A) Two-dimensional diagrams of PCA1 and PCA2, using contents of 11 saponins as input data; (B,C) Two-dimensional diagrams of PCA1 and PCA2, using contents of ginsenosides Ro, Rg1 and Re as input data.
Figure 6. HPLC-principal component analysis (PCA) of Panax ginseng root. (A) Two-dimensional diagrams of PCA1 and PCA2, using contents of 11 saponins as input data; (B,C) Two-dimensional diagrams of PCA1 and PCA2, using contents of ginsenosides Ro, Rg1 and Re as input data.
Molecules 22 00734 g006
Table
Table 1. Ginsenoside content and ratio in different cultivation age and month of P. ginseng.
Table 1. Ginsenoside content and ratio in different cultivation age and month of P. ginseng.
SampleGinsenoside Content a (%)Rg1/ReRo/Re
MonthYearRg1ReRo
20.1560.2800.0160.5570.057
30.2510.3160.0720.7940.228
May40.2700.3200.1690.8440.528
50.2780.3280.2380.8480.726
60.3010.3300.3310.9121.003
20.0960.2910.0210.3300.072
30.2280.2960.1010.7700.341
June40.2530.3010.2150.8410.714
50.2560.3030.2930.8450.967
60.2760.3160.3640.8731.152
20.1330.1920.0160.6930.083
30.2280.2050.1451.1120.707
July40.2260.2120.2171.0661.034
50.2830.2390.3101.1841.297
60.3080.3060.4211.0071.376
20.2150.2020.0381.0640.188
30.2440.2090.1421.1670.679
August40.2450.2110.2531.1611.199
50.2890.2370.3661.2191.544
60.3580.2780.4861.2881.748
20.1970.1640.0731.2010.445
30.2090.1680.1031.2440.613
September40.2560.1960.2401.3061.224
50.2650.2400.4051.1041.688
60.3310.2510.4911.3191.956
20.2260.2030.1031.1130.507
30.3100.2270.2071.3660.912
October40.3120.2360.2861.3221.212
50.3370.2410.3961.3981.643
60.3430.2570.4461.3351.735
a Samples were tested in duplicate.
Table
Table 2. Panax ginseng root sample collection information.
Table 2. Panax ginseng root sample collection information.
No.Age (Year)Date
1 12 May
2 15 June
3Two18 July
4 16 August
5 19 September
6 21 October
7 12 May
8 15 June
9Three18 July
10 16 August
11 19 September
12 21 October
13 12 May
14 15 June
15Four18 July
16 16 August
17 19 September
18 21 October
19 12 May
20 15 June
21Five18 July
22 16 August
23 19 September
24 21 October
25 12 May
26 15 June
27Six18 July
28 16 August
29 19 September
30 21 October

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Z.; Wang, C.-Z.; Zhu, X.-Y.; Wan, J.-Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, W.; Ruan, C.-C.; Yuan, C.-S. Dynamic Changes in Neutral and Acidic Ginsenosides with Different Cultivation Ages and Harvest Seasons: Identification of Chemical Characteristics for Panax ginseng Quality Control. Molecules 2017, 22, 734. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22050734

AMA Style

Liu Z, Wang C-Z, Zhu X-Y, Wan J-Y, Zhang J, Li W, Ruan C-C, Yuan C-S. Dynamic Changes in Neutral and Acidic Ginsenosides with Different Cultivation Ages and Harvest Seasons: Identification of Chemical Characteristics for Panax ginseng Quality Control. Molecules. 2017; 22(5):734. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22050734

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Zhi, Chong-Zhi Wang, Xing-You Zhu, Jin-Yi Wan, Jing Zhang, Wei Li, Chang-Chun Ruan, and Chun-Su Yuan. 2017. "Dynamic Changes in Neutral and Acidic Ginsenosides with Different Cultivation Ages and Harvest Seasons: Identification of Chemical Characteristics for Panax ginseng Quality Control" Molecules 22, no. 5: 734. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22050734

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop