Next Article in Journal
Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv LpqG Protein Peptides Can Inhibit Mycobacterial Entry through Specific Interactions
Next Article in Special Issue
A Co-Precursor Approach Coupled with a Supercritical Modification Method for Constructing Highly Transparent and Superhydrophobic Polymethylsilsesquioxane Aerogels
Previous Article in Journal
Virtual Screening of Small Molecular Inhibitors against DprE1
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effect of Annealing Treatment and Atom Layer Deposition to Au/Pt Nanoparticles-Decorated TiO2 Nanorods as Photocatalysts

1
State Key Laboratory of New Ceramics and Fine Processing, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
2
Key Laboratory of Advanced Materials (MOE), School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2018, 23(3), 525; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23030525
Submission received: 2 January 2018 / Revised: 1 February 2018 / Accepted: 7 February 2018 / Published: 9 February 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chemistry of Aerogels and Their Applications)

Abstract

:
The wide band gap of TiO2 hinders the utilization of visible light in high-performance photocatalysis. Herein, vertically aligned Ti nanopillar arrays (NPAs) were grown by the glancing angle deposition method (GLAD) and then thermally oxidized into TiO2 NPAs. The metallic nanoparticles (NPs) were fabricated by successive ion layer adsorption and reaction (SILAR) method. And we covered ultrathin TiO2 layer on Au/Pt NPs decorated NPA using atomic layer deposition (ALD) method and did annealing process in the end. The photoelectrochemical (PEC) performance and dye degradation have been studied. We find the dye degradation efficiency of best combination reaches up to 1.5 times higher than that of original Au/Pt-TiO2 sample under visible light irradiation. The TiO2 ALD layer effectively protects the nanostructure from corrosion and helps the transmission of electrons to the electrolyte. By controlling the annealing temperature we could achieve a matched band gap due to change in noble metal particle size. Our work demonstrates that rational design of composite nanostructures enhances the usage of broader wavelength range light and optimizes photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants in practical applications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Composite nanomaterials have attracted researchers’ attention due to their multifunctional applications in various fields, such as semiconductor photocatalysts for pollutants degradation. TiO2, due to its nontoxic nature, long-term photostability, low cost, and relatively efficient photocatalytic activity, has been investigated in this context for many years [1]. However, it is just effective and operative in the UV region because of its wide band gap (~3.0 eV) [2] and the UV region only accounts for about ~4% in the solar radiation [3]. Moreover, the photogenerated electron-hole pairs have a quite short recombination time that also hinders further utilization of TiO2. Previously, a lot of work has been done to address these issues with apporaches such as noble-metal decoration [4], ion doping [5,6,7] or alteration of the unit morphology [8]. Nowadays the quantum size effect has been focused on as another hot topic [9,10]. TiO2 nanostructures tend to aggregate easily, which effects the efficiency in practical experiments. Here we use the glancing angle deposition (GLAD) technique to fabricate TiO2 nanopillar arrays (NPAs) vertically on substrates which are conveniently recycled and guarantee enough reaction surface area during the whole process.
Nanostructured noble metals could have a collective coherent oscillation of surface electrons which enables noble metals nanoparticles (NPs) to present surface plasmon resonance (SPR) effects [11,12]. These kinds of nanostructures show enhanced performance in a broad light range including the visible as well as the UV region [13,14,15], so TiO2 is usually combined with other semiconductors to form composites which possess certain functions such as photocatalytic properties. Li et al. [16] have designed a CdS-Au-TiO2 sandwich nanorod array capable of producing a photocurrent of 4.07 mA·cm−2 at 0 V (vs. Ag|AgCl) under full solar spectrum irradiation. It also showed a maximum solar-to-chemical energy conversion efficiency of 2.8%, which is much higher than that of pure TiO2. Herein Au NPs serve as plasmonic photosensitizers and form a Schottky barrier with TiO2. CdS and TiO2 are band gap matched, which enhances the excited separation of electrons and holes. As for the synthesis of noble metal particles on nanostructures, there are many ways to achieve this such as chemical vapour deposition [17], sol-gel synthesis [18], hydrothermal methods [19] and successive ion layer adsorption and reaction (SILAR) [20]. Here we have co-decorated both Au and Pt NPs on the surface of nanorods through the SILAR method because of the easy preparation in room temperature.
Corrosion always happens on nanostructures during the degradation process [21]. In order to protect nanostructures and suppress the recombination, a metal oxide thin layer such as Al2O3 [22], SnO2 [23] and ZrO2 [24] is always applied through atomic layer deposition (ALD) or other methods [25,26]. George et al. have employed Al2O3 and TiO2 ALD when fabricating an ultrathin barrier film on a Cu substrate to prevent water corrosion [27]. As for catalysis, Lu et al. [28] have applied a TiO2 overcoat on Au catalysts by ALD. They found higher activity in CO oxidation and investigated the reaction mechanism. This technique could control the thickness of layers at the nanoscale by setting the number of deposition cycles and self-limiting the reaction of dosed precursor gases.
Herein, we report co-decorated Au/Pt NPs on TiO2 NPAs with a wrapped up TiO2 ALD layer. TiO2 nanopillar arrays (NPAs) were first deposited on SiO2, F-doped SnO2 (FTO) and Si substrates through the GLAD method. Later metallic NPs (Au and Pt) were deposited on the NPAs using the SILAR method [29]. Then, we coated a TiO2 ALD layer on the nanostructured material. In order to improve the stability of the photocatalyst, we annealed the sample at different temperatures. The whole process is shown in Figure 1. We have also studied the effect of annealing on the photocatalytic performance of our fabricated nanostructures.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characterization of Materials

Figure 2 presents the SEM images of pure TiO2 NPAs (Figure 2a), coated only with noble metal NPs (Figure 2b), Au/Pt-TiO2 NPAs coated with one, three, and four cycles of TiO2 ALD (Figure 2c,e,f), and a magnified image of Au/Pt-TiO2 NPAs coated with one cycle of TiO2 ALD (Figure 2d), respectively. From the top view we can see that the Au and Pt nanoparticles are distributed on the TiO2 NPAs’ surface (Figure 2b), where they appear as little white dots randomly spread on the TiO2 NPA surface. It is difficult to distinguish the modifications in the nanostructures only from the morphology, because ALD application and the annealing treatment do not change them remarkably.
In order to improve the degree of crystallinity, we tried anneal the samples after ALD coating. Here we choose three different temperature (200 °C, 300 °C and 400 °C, respectively). The TEM images in Figure 3 show TiO2 without annealing (Figure 3a,b), 300 °C (Figure 3d,e) and 400 °C (Figure 3g,h) annealing based on two cycles of ALD TiO2. The TiO2 NPAs have a size of approximately 200 nm in length and a diameter of about 50 nm (Figure 3a). The calculation and test of lattice fringes, (d = 0.325 nm, 0.236 nm and 0.194 nm) matches with the lattice plane of rutile (110), Au (111) and Pt (111), respectively [30]. The generation of metal-semiconductor nanojunctions can result in the formation of a Schottky junction, which can dramatically affect the optoelectronic properties of the material. When Au and Pt contact to TiO2, the charge carriers would redistribute. Electrons move from the n-type semiconductor (higher Fermi level) to the metal (lower Fermi level) until reaching equilibrium. The Schottky barrier which could efficiently capture excited electrons. These facts would all be favourable to interfacial charge transfer between each component and improve the photocatalytic performance of the whole system eventually [31]. Our experimental results show that the interface of ALD thin film becomes clearer with higher crystallinity. This phenomenon indicates that the degree of crystallinity of our nanostructures improves with annealing treatment [32]. Here the number of ALD cycles is indicated before the term “ALD” in the sample name.
To confirm the valence of metallic NPs, the 2ALD/Au/Pt-TiO2 NPAs without annealing sample was investigated by the XPS technique (Figure 4). The intense doublet of Pt (70.2 and 73.6 eV) and Au (83.7 and 87.4 eV) correspond to metallic Pt0, Au0 [33]. These results show that the Au and Pt NPs were both successfully fabricated on TiO2 NPAs. Furthermore the outer layer is also TiO2. The O 1s XPS spectrum (Figure 4c) can be fitted by two peaks: a main peak showing at a binding energy of 529.8 eV which is attributed to lattice ‘O’ and another one located at 531.4 eV that refers to the hydroxyls or water adsorbed on the surface of the nanostructure. The Ti 2p spectrum includes doublets of Ti 2p1/2 and Ti 2p3/2 at binding energies of 466.1 and 460.3 eV which confirm the existence of Ti4+ cations in TiO2 [34]. There are two peak located around 464.6 and 458.8 eV indicating Ti-O-C 2p1/2 and Ti-O-C 2p3/2 bonds which are due to the ALD reaction process which indicates intermediate products formed after the reaction between tetrakis(dimethylamido)titanium(IV) and H2O [35].
Figure 5 show on-off PEC plots for Au/Pt-TiO2 NPAs with ALD coatings (1, 2, 3, 4 layers) and the corresponding annealed samples’ test result. The figures compare the photocurrent density of the series of samples with increased potential from −0.1 to +0.6 V. According to Figure 5a,b, we can see that the currents between light on/off are all about 15 μA cm−2, which doesn’t change much even under 200 °C heat treatment. However, when annealed at 300 °C and 400 °C for 1 h, the photocurrent generally increased. Especially, 300 °C annealing with two ALD layer cycles and 400 °C with three layers reach to 40 and 35 μA cm−2 (Figure 5c,d). They are enlarged about 1.5~2 times compared to the previous one without annealing treatment.
We also investigated the photocatalytic performance and degradation of Methylene Blue (MB) dye under visible light for 1 h. The Au/Pt-TiO2 NPs sample shows a degradation efficiency of 49.3%. Furthermore we analyzed the degradation efficiency of our composite nanostructures with different ALD cycle numbers and annealing temperature, as mentioned in Table 1. Our experiments show that after ALD coating and heat treatment most samples showed an improvement in the photocatalytic degradation. The sample without ALD shows lower efficiency because the metal NPs are easily photocorroded without the protection of the outer coating layer [36]. Compared with the ALD-coated samples, the excited electrons could not only transfer through TiO2 NPAs, but also ALD TiO2 which surrounds the metal NPs. Specifically the 2ALD/Au/Pt-TiO2 NPAs sample (with annealing at 300 °C) shows the highest degradation efficiency which is enhanced by about 150% compared with the blank sample. However, on the contrary the efficiency of composite nanostructures annealed at 400 °C goes down. For samples with the same annealing temperature, two cycles and three cycles usually show better performance. Through our experiemntal data calculations, annealing mainly influences and enhances the degradation efficiency of the MB pollutant. Usually demethylation would happen on MB when degraded by TiO2, thus the absorption peak of the dye solution will cause a blue shift [37].
In order to study the effect of annealing treatment in depth, diffuse reflectance UV-vis spectra of five different products (TiO2 NPAs, Au/Pt-TiO2 NPAs and Au/Pt-TiO2 NPAs with annealing for 200 °C, 300 °C, 400 °C) are presented in Figure S1, which are also calculated with the Kubelka−Munk function. The equation of the band gap energy (Eg) is α E photon = K ( E photon E g ) 1 / 2 , where α, K, Eg and Ephoton are respectively the absorption coefficient, a constant, the band gap energy and the discrete photon energy. Here we plot and calculate the intercept of an extrapolated linear fit [20].
TiO2 NPAs exhibit a UV absorption peak at 300~400 nm. The metal decoration of TiO2 NPAs indicates a remarkable improvement in the light absorption at about 480 nm due to the surface plasmon absorption of the decorated Au NPs [38], but we didn’t find any obvious difference in the UV adsorption after the annealing treatments, thus we turned our attention to the size of the metal NPs. Here we compare the statistical NPs radius according to the TEM images. The histograms are plotted in Figure 3c,f,i. From the average diameter statistics, the size of 2ALD/Au/Pt-TiO2 NPAs without annealing and annealing under 300 °C and 400 °C increases with higher heat treatment from 7.5 nm to 11.0 nm, but we could find that there is an extremum in the photoccatalytic properties, which means there probably exists an optimal NP diameter size.

2.2. Photocatalytic Mechanism

After visible light irradiation, strong SPR is excited by Au NPs [39]. During its dephasing, hot electrons are injected via Schottky junction into the conduction band (CB) for reduction reactions, leaving holes in the noble metal nanoparticles where oxidation reactions occur [40,41,42]. So in this system hot electrons shift from the surface of the Au NPs to the TiO2 conduction band [43]. The work function of Pt (~5.40 eV in vacuum [44]) is higher than that of Au (~4.78 eV in vacuum) which leads to the Fermi level of Pt being lower than that of Au. Thus electrons would move from Au to Pt via TiO2. Here Pt NPs play a role as cocatalyst.
Here electrons can both decompose the dye and interact with electron acceptors (O2) to create superoxide radicals (O2•−). At same time, the positively charged Au NPs would combine with OH into highly oxidizing species such as hydroxyl radicals, OH• or oxidize the MB molecule directly. The whole reaction is presented in Figure 6a. It is necessary to be aware that a close Au/TiO2 Schottky contact is due to the last-step annealing process. The treatment is helpful to produce an efficient visible-light photocatalyst [45]. Furthermore heterojunction arrays, which is the light trapping caused from the one-dimensional array nanostructure with matched bandgap, also improve the light absorption [46].
When the size reaches the nanoscale, the Fermi level of noble metal NPs usually improves with decreased size because of the quantum size effect. The mechanism is shown in Figure 6b. A suitable diameter could be achieved to match the band gap. Only this could convert electrons efficiently and suppress the combination of electrons and holes [47,48]. The energy level of Au NPs must stay higher than that of oxygen gas and lower than the CB of TiO2. When hot electrons are excited by visible light from Au NPs, just the rational energy level could let electrons move into the CB of TiO2 and be able to react with O2 to form O2•−. Otherwise, if the energy of the Au NPs becomes too high, it won’t transfer to TiO2; or if the energy becomes too low, it won’t have enough energy to react with O2. What’s more, if the particles become too big, they will also cover too much of the TiO2’s reaction surface which in turn hinders the photocatalytic properties.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Synthesis of TiO2 NPAs

Firstly, Ti NPAs were fabricated via e-beam using the GLAD technique on several substrates (i.e., quartz, silicon and FTO). The chamber need to be evacuated to 1 × 10−8 Torr before deposition. All substrates were cleaned using ultrasonication in acetone, ethanol and deionized (DI) water, respectively. The data of deposition was similar to that used in previous work [49]. After deposition, the thin films were oxidized in a tube furnace at 400 °C for 2 h.

3.2. Metallic Nanoparticle Decoration on TiO2 NPAs

Au and Pt NPs were reacted via the SILAR method with some modifications as previously published [49]. We dipped TiO2 successively into HAuCl4 (or HPt2Cl6) and reductant (NaBH4) solutions in order to form NPs. The substrates were immersed into a certain concentration of HAuCl4 (or HPt2Cl6) solution, DI water, 1 mg/mL NaBH4 solution, DI water respectively for 60 s. This complete procedure is regarded as one cycle. The whole process was repeated until the desired cycle number was fabricated. Au/Pt-TiO2 NPAs samples were consecutively deposited by Au and Pt NPs individually five times.

3.3. ALD Deposition

TiO2 NPAs were placed in a custom-built reactor, and the substrate temperature was kept at 150 °C during the ALD process [50]. When pumped into the chamber, the precursor, tetrakis(dimethylamido)titanium(IV), was controlled at 110 °C and water was at 40 °C. A soaking step was inserted in order to confirm the sufficient diffusion of the reacting molecules on the surface of the nanostructures [51]. The precursor was first pumped using 200 ms and soaked for 5 s, after which the chamber was evacuated for 20 s. Later, H2O (gas) was pulsed for 5 ms and kept for 3 s to let them react, with a 20 s purge step at the end. This whole procedure can be regarded as one ALD cycle. The process is repeated until the desired thickness of TiO2 is achieved.

3.4. Characterization

The chemical nature, morphology and nanostructure of all samples were characterized by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM, FE-SEM, JEOL-7001F, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) and high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM, JEOL-2011, JEOL). The surface composition was determined by X-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS) measurements performed on a PHI 5300 instrument (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Here the binding energy was calibrated with the C1s peak (284.6 eV). The light absorption of materials were tested via a Perkin Elmer Lambda 35 UV-Vis spectrometer (Perkin Elmer) in the wavelength range between 375 nm and 900 nm.

3.5. Property Measurements

The photocurrent density was measured by an electrochemistry workstation (CHI 660D, Chenhua Instrument, Shanghai, China). Here the film and substrates were regarded as the working electrode, while a Ag/AgCl electrode (saturated KCl) is used as a reference. Pt slices with specific shapes were applied as counter electrodes. A Xe lamp (300 W) was used as a light source with ultraviolet filter to intercept the UV light (wavelength shorter than 420 nm). Photocurrent densities with increased potential from −0.1~+0.6 V bias vs Ag/AgCl electrode were tested via a light on-off process. Here we selected intervals of 5 s for the switching time. The photocatalytic degradation performance was examined by using Methylene Blue (MB) under visible light. The samples on a quartz substrate (15 mm × 15 mm) were immersed in a 25 mL beaker containing 5 mL of MB (5 μM) solution. The samples remained in solution for half an hour before degradation to achieve an adsorption/desorption equilibrium. At the end of 1 h irradiation, we tested the concentration of MB by UV-Vis spectroscopy at its characteristic wavelength of 502 nm. Both remaining percentage (C/C0) and degradation efficiency (1 − C/C0) × 100% were recorded. PEC experiments with light on-off at specific voltages were also performed to assess the photoelectrochemical properties. 0.1 M Na2SO4 aqueous solution was used as the electrolyte.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have successfully prepared TiO2 ALD/Au/Pt NPs-decorated TiO2 nanostructures with an annealing treatment. When compared with nanostructures without ALD and annealing treatment, the process shows a great improvement no matter whether in the degradation of dyes or photocurrent production under visible light. The TiO2 ALD layers effectively protect the nanostructures from corrosion and make electrons accessible to the electrolyte. The annealing treatment could adjust the noble metal NPs into a band gap-matched nanoscale. The rational design of nanocomposites helps make the photocatalytic performance of TiO2 in the visible wavelength region more efficient. Thus this method offers an efficient way to achieve the maximum usage of solar energy for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants in practical applications.

Supplementary Materials

The supplementary materials are available online.

Acknowledgments

We greatly thank the supported from Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology (grant No. 2016YFE0104000) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 51372135).

Author Contributions

Shuang Shuang and Zhengjun Zhang conceived and designed the experiments; Shuang Shuang performed the experiments; Shuang Shuang analyzed the data; Zhengjun Zhang contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; Shuang Shuang wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, J.; Xu, Q.; Feng, Z.; Li, M.; Li, C. Importance of the relationship between surface phases and photocatalytic activity of TiO2. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1766–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhou, K.; Zhu, Y.; Yang, X.; Jiang, X.; Li, C. Preparation of graphene–TiO2 composites with enhanced photocatalytic activity. New J. Chem. 2011, 35, 353–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cowan, A.J.; Durrant, J.R. Long-lived charge separated states in nanostructured semiconductor photoelectrodes for the production of solar fuels. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 2281–2293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yu, J.; Xiong, J.; Cheng, B.; Liu, S. Fabrication and characterization of Ag–TiO2 multiphase nanocomposite thin films with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2005, 60, 211–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kowalska, E.; Remita, H.; Colbeau-Justin, C.; Hupka, J.; Belloni, J. Modification of titanium dioxide with platinum ions and clusters:  Application in photocatalysis. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 1124–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Subramanian, V.; Wolf, E.E.; Kamat, P.V. Catalysis with TiO2/gold nanocomposites. Effect of metal particle size on the fermi level equilibration. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4943–4950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zhang, L.; Yu, J.C.; Yip, H.Y.; Li, Q.; Kwong, K.W.; Xu, A.-W.; Wong, P.K. Ambient light reduction strategy to synthesize silver nanoparticles and silver-coated TiO2 with enhanced photocatalytic and bactericidal activities. Langmuir 2003, 19, 10372–10380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liang, Y.; Wang, H.; Sanchez Casalongue, H.; Chen, Z.; Dai, H. TiO2 nanocrystals grown on graphene as advanced photocatalytic hybrid materials. Nano Res. 2010, 3, 701–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, Z.; Liu, J.; Qiu, S.; Dawson, G.; Chen, W. The shape-specific photocatalytic efficiency of quantum size TiO2 nanoparticles. Catal. Commun. 2012, 21, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lin, H.; Huang, C.P.; Li, W.; Ni, C.; Shah, S.I.; Tseng, Y.-H. Size dependency of nanocrystalline TiO2 on its optical property and photocatalytic reactivity exemplified by 2-chlorophenol. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2006, 68, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, Z.; Wang, W.; Gao, E.; Sun, S.; Zhang, L. Photocatalysis coupled with thermal effect induced by SPR on Ag-loaded Bi2WO6 with enhanced photocatalytic activity. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 25898–25903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rayalu, S.S.; Jose, D.; Mangrulkar, P.A.; Joshi, M.; Hippargi, G.; Shrestha, K.; Klabunde, K. Photodeposition of aunps on metal oxides: Study of SPR effect and photocatalytic activity. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 3617–3624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Linic, S.; Christopher, P.; Ingram, D.B. Plasmonic-metal nanostructures for efficient conversion of solar to chemical energy. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 911–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Shahjamali, M.M.; Bosman, M.; Cao, S.W.; Huang, X.; Saadat, S.; Martinsson, E.; Aili, D.; Tay, Y.Y.; Liedberg, B.; Loo, S.C.J.; et al. Gold coating of silver nanoprisms. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 849–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ide, Y.; Matsuoka, M.; Ogawa, M. Efficient visible-light-induced photocatalytic activity on gold-nanoparticle-supported layered titanate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 16762–16764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Li, J.; Cushing, S.K.; Peng, Z.; Senty, T.; Meng, F.; Bristow, A.D.; Manivannan, A.; Wu, N. Solar hydrogen generation by a CdS-Au-TiO2 sandwich nanorod array enhanced with Au nanoparticle as electron relay and plasmonic photosensitizer. J Am Chem Soc. 2014, 136, 8438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Coyle, J.P.; Gordon, P.G.; Wells, A.P.; Mandia, D.J.; Sirianni, E.R.; Yap, G.P.A.; Barry, S.T. Thermally robust gold and silver iminopyrrolidinates for chemical vapor deposition of metal films. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 4566–4573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bharathi, S.; Fishelson, N.; Lev, O. Direct synthesis and characterization of gold and other noble metal nanodispersions in sol−gel-derived organically modified silicates. Langmuir 1999, 15, 1929–1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Belousov, O.V.; Belousova, N.V.; Sirotina, A.V.; Solovyov, L.A.; Zhyzhaev, A.M.; Zharkov, S.M.; Mikhlin, Y.L. Formation of bimetallic Au–Pd and Au–Pt nanoparticles under hydrothermal conditions and microwave irradiation. Langmuir 2011, 27, 11697–11703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Xie, Z.; Liu, X.X.; Wang, W.P.; Liu, C.; Li, Z.C.; Zhang, Z.J. Enhanced photoelectrochemical properties of TiO2 nanorod arrays decorated with CdS nanoparticles. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2014, 15, 055006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Zhao, H.; Chen, J.; Rao, G.; Deng, W.; Li, Y. Enhancing photocatalytic CO2 reduction by coating an ultrathin Al2O3 layer on oxygen deficient TiO2 nanorods through atomic layer deposition. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 404, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Le Formal, F.; Tetreault, N.; Cornuz, M.; Moehl, T.; Gratzel, M.; Sivula, K. Passivating surface states on water splitting hematite photoanodes with alumina overlayers. Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 737–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xi, L.; Chiam, S.Y.; Mak, W.F.; Tran, P.D.; Barber, J.; Loo, S.C.J.; Wong, L.H. A novel strategy for surface treatment on hematite photoanode for efficient water oxidation. Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 164–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, T.C.; Góes, M.S.; Fabregat-Santiago, F.; Bisquert, J.; Bueno, P.R.; Prasittichai, C.; Hupp, J.T.; Marks, T.J. Surface passivation of nanoporous TiO2 via atomic layer deposition of ZrO2 for solid-state dye-sensitized solar cell applications. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 18385–18390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pavlenko, M.; Siuzdak, K.; Coy, E.; Jancelewicz, M.; Jurga, S.; Iatsunskyi, I. Silicon/TiO2 core-shell nanopillar photoanodes for enhanced photoelectrochemical water oxidation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 30076–30085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sampath, S.; Maydannik, P.; Ivanova, T.; Shestakova, M.; Homola, T.; Bryukvin, A.; Sillanpää, M.; Nagumothu, R.; Alagan, V. Efficient solar photocatalytic activity of TiO2 coated nano-porous silicon by atomic layer deposition. Superlattices Microstruct. 2016, 97, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Abdulagatov, A.I.; Yan, Y.; Cooper, J.R.; Zhang, Y.; Gibbs, Z.M.; Cavanagh, A.S.; Yang, R.G.; Lee, Y.C.; George, S.M. Al2O3 and TiO2 atomic layer deposition on copper for water corrosion resistance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 4593–4601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wang, C.; Wang, H.; Yao, Q.; Yan, H.; Li, J.; Lu, J. Precisely applying TiO2 overcoat on supported Au catalysts using atomic layer deposition for understanding the reaction mechanism and improved activity in CO oxidation. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 478–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tanaka, A.; Nakanishi, K.; Hamada, R.; Hashimoto, K.; Kominami, H. Simultaneous and stoichiometric water oxidation and Cr(VI) reduction in aqueous suspensions of functionalized plasmonic photocatalyst Au/TiO2–Pt under irradiation of green light. ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 1886–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shuang, S.; Lv, R.; Xie, Z.; Zhang, Z. Surface plasmon enhanced photocatalysis of Au/Pt-decorated TiO2 nanopillar arrays. Sci. Rep. UK 2016, 6, 26670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Su, J.; Feng, L.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Z. The modulation of schottky barriers of metal-MoS2 contacts via bn-MoS2 heterostructures. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 16882–16889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ismail, A.A.; Bahnemann, D.W. Mesoporous titania photocatalysts: Preparation, characterization and reaction mechanisms. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 11686–11707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cao, L.; Tong, L.; Diao, P.; Zhu, T.; Liu, Z. Kinetically controlled pt deposition onto self-assembled Au colloids:  Preparation of Au (core)−Pt (shell) nanoparticle assemblies. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 3239–3245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Erdem, B.; Hunsicker, R.A.; Simmons, G.W.; Sudol, E.D.; Dimonie, V.L.; El-Aasser, M.S. Xps and ftir surface characterization of TiO2 particles used in polymer encapsulation. Langmuir 2001, 17, 2664–2669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bronneberg, A.C.; Höhn, C.; van de Krol, R. Probing the interfacial chemistry of ultrathin ALD-grown TiO2 films: An in-line XPS study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 5531–5538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bakke, J.R.; Pickrahn, K.L.; Brennan, T.P.; Bent, S.F. Nanoengineering and interfacial engineering of photovoltaics by atomic layer deposition. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 3482–3508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Awala, H.; Leite, E.; Saint-Marcel, L.; Clet, G.; Retoux, R.; Naydenova, I.; Mintova, S. Properties of methylene blue in the presence of zeolite nanoparticles. New J. Chem. 2016, 40, 4277–4284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Contreras-Caceres, R.; Dawson, C.; Formanek, P.; Fischer, D.; Simon, F.; Janke, A.; Uhlmann, P.; Stamm, M. Polymers as templates for Au and Au@Ag bimetallic nanorods: UV–vis and surface enhanced raman spectroscopy. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 158–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kominami, H.; Tanaka, A.; Hashimoto, K. Mineralization of organic acids in aqueous suspensions of gold nanoparticles supported on cerium(IV) oxide powder under visible light irradiation. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 1287–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Gomes Silva, C.; Juárez, R.; Marino, T.; Molinari, R.; García, H. Influence of excitation wavelength (UV or visible light) on the photocatalytic activity of titania containing gold nanoparticles for the generation of hydrogen or oxygen from water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 595–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Warren, S.C.; Thimsen, E. Plasmonic solar water splitting. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 5133–5146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mubeen, S.; Lee, J.; Singh, N.; Krämer, S.; Stucky, G.D.; Moskovits, M. An autonomous photosynthetic device in which all charge carriers derive from surface plasmons. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Szabo, Z.; Furo, I.; Csoregh, I. Combinatorial multinuclear nmr and x-ray diffraction studies of uranium(vi)-nucleotide complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 15236–15247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Trasatti, S. Work function, electronegativity, and electrochemical behaviour of metals. J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 1971, 33, 351–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ding, D.; Liu, K.; He, S.; Gao, C.; Yin, Y. Ligand-exchange assisted formation of Au/TiO2 schottky contact for visible-light photocatalysis. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 6731–6736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Bian, L.; Wu, Y.; Xie, C.; Han, Y.; Wang, Y.; Gao, P. Znse nanoribbon/Si nanowire p–n heterojunction arrays and their photovoltaic application with graphene transparent electrodes. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 22873–22880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Panayotov, D.A.; Frenkel, A.I.; Morris, J.R. Catalysis and photocatalysis by nanoscale Au/TiO2: Perspectives for renewable energy. ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 1223–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jakob, M.; Levanon, H.; Kamat, P.V. Charge distribution between UV-irradiated TiO2 and gold nanoparticles:  Determination of shift in the fermi level. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 353–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Peljo, P.; Manzanares, J.A.; Girault, H.H. Contact potentials, fermi level equilibration, and surface charging. Langmuir 2016, 32, 5765–5775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Xie, Z.; Liu, X.; Wang, W.; Wang, X.; Liu, C.; Xie, Q.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Z. Enhanced photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic performance of TiO2 nanorod arrays/CdS quantum dots by coating TiO2 through atomic layer deposition. Nano Energy 2015, 11, 400–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Roelofs, K.E.; Brennan, T.P.; Dominguez, J.C.; Bailie, C.D.; Margulis, G.Y.; Hoke, E.T.; McGehee, M.D.; Bent, S.F. Effect of Al2O3 recombination barrier layers deposited by atomic layer deposition in solid-state CdS quantum dot-sensitized solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 5584–5592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the preparation of Au/Pt-TiO2 nanorod arrays (NPAs) with ALD and the annealing treatment.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the preparation of Au/Pt-TiO2 nanorod arrays (NPAs) with ALD and the annealing treatment.
Molecules 23 00525 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of: (a) TiO2 NPAs; (b) Au/Pt-TiO2 NPAs; (c) Au/Pt-TiO2 NPAs coated with one ALD layer; (d) magnified image of Au/Pt-TiO2 NPAs coated with one ALD layer, Au/Pt-TiO2 NPAs coated with three (e); or four (f) ALD layers.
Figure 2. SEM images of: (a) TiO2 NPAs; (b) Au/Pt-TiO2 NPAs; (c) Au/Pt-TiO2 NPAs coated with one ALD layer; (d) magnified image of Au/Pt-TiO2 NPAs coated with one ALD layer, Au/Pt-TiO2 NPAs coated with three (e); or four (f) ALD layers.
Molecules 23 00525 g002
Figure 3. TEM images, HRTEM images and particles size statistics of (ac) 2ALD/Au/Pt-TiO2 NPAs; (df) 2ALD/Au/Pt-TiO2 NPAs annealing at 200 °C; (gi) 2ALD/Au/Pt-TiO2 NPAs annealing at 300 °C.
Figure 3. TEM images, HRTEM images and particles size statistics of (ac) 2ALD/Au/Pt-TiO2 NPAs; (df) 2ALD/Au/Pt-TiO2 NPAs annealing at 200 °C; (gi) 2ALD/Au/Pt-TiO2 NPAs annealing at 300 °C.
Molecules 23 00525 g003
Figure 4. XPS spectrum of 2ALD/Au/Pt-TiO2 NPAs: (a) Pt 4f; (b) Au 4f; (c) O 1s; (d) Ti 2p.
Figure 4. XPS spectrum of 2ALD/Au/Pt-TiO2 NPAs: (a) Pt 4f; (b) Au 4f; (c) O 1s; (d) Ti 2p.
Molecules 23 00525 g004
Figure 5. j-V characteristics (with light on/off) of (a) Au/Pt-TiO2 NPAs and coated with 1~4 ALD layers; Au/Pt-TiO2 NPAs coated with 1~4 ALD layers under 200 °C (b); 300 °C (c); 400 °C (d) annealing treatment.
Figure 5. j-V characteristics (with light on/off) of (a) Au/Pt-TiO2 NPAs and coated with 1~4 ALD layers; Au/Pt-TiO2 NPAs coated with 1~4 ALD layers under 200 °C (b); 300 °C (c); 400 °C (d) annealing treatment.
Molecules 23 00525 g005
Figure 6. (a) The charge transfer process of TiO2 ALD/Au/Pt/TiO2 NPAs under UV-vis lights; (b) Fermi level of nanoscale gold particles.
Figure 6. (a) The charge transfer process of TiO2 ALD/Au/Pt/TiO2 NPAs under UV-vis lights; (b) Fermi level of nanoscale gold particles.
Molecules 23 00525 g006
Table 1. Degradation efficiency (%) under visible light (λ ≥ 420 nm) of MB.
Table 1. Degradation efficiency (%) under visible light (λ ≥ 420 nm) of MB.
ALD Cycle/Annealing TemperatureNo Annealing Treatment200 °C300 °C400 °C
No ALD49.352.458.951.7
ALD163.363.374.761.4
ALD267.764.275.366.9
ALD362.667.665.367.3
ALD463.767.25766.5

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shuang, S.; Zhang, Z. The Effect of Annealing Treatment and Atom Layer Deposition to Au/Pt Nanoparticles-Decorated TiO2 Nanorods as Photocatalysts. Molecules 2018, 23, 525. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23030525

AMA Style

Shuang S, Zhang Z. The Effect of Annealing Treatment and Atom Layer Deposition to Au/Pt Nanoparticles-Decorated TiO2 Nanorods as Photocatalysts. Molecules. 2018; 23(3):525. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23030525

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shuang, Shuang, and Zhengjun Zhang. 2018. "The Effect of Annealing Treatment and Atom Layer Deposition to Au/Pt Nanoparticles-Decorated TiO2 Nanorods as Photocatalysts" Molecules 23, no. 3: 525. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23030525

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop