Next Article in Journal
Reactivity of a-Oxophosphonium Ylides: A Contribution to the Mechanistics
Previous Article in Journal
Supramolecular Bioorganic Chemistry: Nucleic Acids Recognition and Synthetic Vectors for Gene Transfer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Furyl(aryl)alkanes and Their Derivatives. 19. Synthesis of Benzofuran Derivatives via 2-Hydroxyaryl-R-(5-methylfur-2-yl)methanes. Reaction of Furan Ring Opening - Benzofuran Ring Closure Type

by
Andrey V. Gutnov
1,
Alexander V. Butin
2,*,
Vladimir T. Abaev
1,
Gennadij D. Krapivin
3 and
Valerij E. Zavodnik
4
1
Department of Organic Chemistry, North-Ossetian State University, Vatutina 46, Vladikavkaz, 362025, Russia
2
Research Laboratory of Furan Chemistry, Kuban State Technological University, Moskovskaya 2, Krasnodar, 350072, Russia
3
Department of Organic Chemistry, Kuban State Technological University, Moskovskaya 2, Krasnodar, 350072, Russia
4
X-Ray Laboratory, Karpov Institute of Physical Chemistry, Vorontsovo pole 10, Moscow, 103064, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 1999, 4(7), 204-218; https://doi.org/10.3390/40700204
Submission received: 6 June 1999 / Accepted: 28 June 1999 / Published: 17 July 1999

Abstract

:
2-Hydroxyaryl(5-methylfur-2-yl)alkanes synthesized by alkylation of 2-methylfuran with various 2-hydroxybenzylic alcohols, were rearranged into corresponding 3-R-benzo[b]furan derivatives by treatment with ethanolic HCl solution. These compounds can not be transformed into dibenzoxazulenium salts.

Introduction

As it was shown by the authors in previous publications, 2-hydroxyarylbis(5-methylfur-2-yl)methanes, which are readily available by sylvane and salicylaldehydes condensation, catalyzed by trimethylchlorosilane or boric acid [2], undergo a rearrangement to 3-(5-methylfur-2-yl)-2-(3-oxobutyl)benzo[b]furan derivatives A by treatment with ethanolic hydrogen chloride solution (Scheme 1) [3]. The latter compounds can serve as precursors for benzo[b]furo[2,3-h]-1-oxazulenium salts B both by trityl perchlorate oxidation [4] and by disproportionation in the presence of perchloric acid [5]:
Previous results were summarized in review [6].
In the present work we attempt to extend the scope of such reactions.

Results and Discussion

Starting from substituted 2-hydroxybenzylic alcohols 1a-g corresponding 2-hydroxyaryl-R-(5-methylfur-2-yl)alkanes were obtained:
Scheme 2.  
Scheme 2.  
Molecules 04 00204 sch002
When the condensation step was conducted in the presence of a highly acid, ion-exchange resin Amberlyst-15 or boric acid in boiling benzene the reaction did not go to completion. On the other hand the corresponding methanes 2a-g were obtained quantitatively (Table 1) by refluxing the rea-gents in benzene with a catalytic amount of p-toluenesulfonic acid and with a Dean-Stark trap. The structure was proved by 1H NMR spectra (Table 2). IR-spectra of these compounds contain the char-acteristic bands of absorption of valent vibrations of the OH group.
The prepared methanes were transformed smoothly into corresponding benzofuran derivatives 3a-g (Table 3) by treatment with ethanolic HCl solution (Scheme 3). The main feature of 1H NMR spectra (Table 4) of these compounds is the absence of the peaks of furan protons and the presence of two sig-nals from methylene protons α-CH2 and β-CH2. IR spectra of these compounds have an intensive band of valent vibrations of the CO group in the field of 1700 cm-1.
The results of X-ray study of benzofuran 3e monocrystal are given in Figure 1 and in Table 5, Table 6 and Table 7. No specific divergences from the bond lengths and valent angles in comparison with 3-furylbenzofuran A (data of X-ray study are given in [7]) are found except in the size of the dihedral angle between the benzofuran and the aromatic ring planes. In a molecule that contains a smaller furan cycle, this angle is 18°, and in a molecule 3e with a larger phenyl cycle, this angle is 40°.
As stated above (Scheme 1) 3-furylbenzofurans A can be transformed into oxazulenium cations B in high yields by oxidation with trityl perchlorate or by treatment with perchloric acid. Attempts to obtain analogues of these salts from 3-arylbenzofurans 3a-e were unsuccessful. Neither oxidation by trityl perchlorate or chloroanil in methylene chloride nor treatment with perchloric acid in boiling di-oxane gave the desired salts.
For the detection of the existing cation B features and the hypothetical cation C constitution (Scheme 4) their quantum-chemical calculation was conducted (preliminary optimization of geometry by a method MM+ and finally by a semiempirical method AM1). The outcomes of the cation B ge-ometry calculation is shown in Figure 2, Figure 4 and in Table 8, Table 9, in which the result of the X-ray study of its monocrystal is also shown [4]. As it can be seen, values of interatomic spacing intervals and va-lent angles obtained by computational are in good agreement with experimental X-Ray data, except for the lengths of furan C-O bonds for which the calculation gives higher values. There are no in-tramolecular contacts causing sterical strain in the cation B.
Vice-versa, flat geometry of cation C (Figure 3, Figure 5, Table 10, Table 11) should be accompanied by strong intramolecular strain leading to a noticeable distortion of some valent angles and bond lengths as compared with standard values and with the corresponding values in cation B.
The main cause of sterical strain is intramolecular interaction H (23) H (26) (Figure 5). Intera-tomic spacing interval H (23) H (26) according to calculation is 1.628 Å, which is much less then the sum of their Van-der-Vaals radii. As a result, the bond lengths and values of the valence angles in exocycle H(23)-C(3)-C(6)-C(9)-C(14)-C(15)-H(26) change.
Similar type of intramolecular interaction, leading to torsion of a molecule into a spiral with preser-vation of standard values of interatomic spacing intervals and valence angles, can be seen in the ben-zophenantrene molecule (Figure 6) [8]. Probably in cation C the energy of conjugating would be so great, that it does not allow the structure to bend in a spiral to decrease sterical tension. Obviously the inability of the molecule to undergo removal of intramolecular strain is the main reason why it can not be synthesized.
This example is not the only one known. It is of interest that the dibenzo[a,c]tropylium cation was not obtained by the route shown in Scheme 5 due to steric hindrance caused by two overlapping hy-drogens which makes complanarity of the aromatic cation impossible (Scheme 5) [9]:
Instead a green polymer was isolated despite the high stability of the cation predicted by MO LCAO. However dibenzo[a,d]tropylium salts are stable compounds [10].

Experimental

General

1H NMR spectra were registered on Tesla BS-587 (80 MHz) in CDCl3, with hexamethyldisiloxane as internal standard. IR spectra were obtained on Specord M80 in vaseline. The course of a reaction was controled by TLC on Sorbfil plates (bromine and dinitrophenylhydrazine solution as a developer).

General method of synthesis of 2-hydroxybenzyl alcohols 1

To a Grignard reagent prepared from 0.25 mol of the corresponding halide and 6.8 g (0.28 mol) of Mg in 250 ml of dry ether 13.6 g (0.1 mol) of substituted salicylaldehyde was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred for 5 minutes and then decomposed by slow addition of water until magnesium salts coagulated. The ether layer was separated and the solid residue in the flask repeatedly extracted with ether, combined extracts were dried over Na2SO4 and evaporated. The oily residue was dissolved in a hot benzene-hexane mixture, filtered through a pad of Al2O3 and left to crystallize overnight.
1a Yield 73%. M. p. 102-103°C. Analysis: Found C, 78.31; H 6.25; C14H14O2, Mr 214.26 requires C, 78.48; H 6.58. 1H NMR δ 2.13 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.91 (b. s, 1H, CHOH), 5.87 (b. s, 1H, CH), 6.61-6.86 (m, 3H, HAr), 7,29 (s, 5H, HAr), and 7.60 (b. s, 1H, OH). IR 3190 (b. s, OH) and 3530 cm-1(s, OH).
1b Yield 72%. M. p. 106-107°C. Analysis: Found C, 57.01; H 4.79; C14H13BrO2, Mr 293.16 requires C, 57.36; H 4.47. 1H NMR δ 2.14 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.17 (b. s, 1H, CHOH), 5.78 (s, 1H, CH), 6.61-6.86 (m, 3H, HAr), 7,17 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H, HAr), 7.30 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H, HAr) and 7.62 (s, 1H, OH). IR 3210 (b. s, OH) and 3520 cm-1 (s, OH).
1c Yield 81%. M. p. 97-98°C. Analysis: Found C, 79.11; H 7.25; C15H16O2, Mr 228.29 requires C, 78.92; H 7.06. 1H NMR δ 2.12 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.26 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.02 (b. s, 1H, CHOH), 5.79 (b. s, 1H, CH), 6.58-6.82 (m, 3H, HAr), 7,13 (s, 4H, HAr) and 7.73 (s, 1H, OH). IR 3310 cm-1 (b. s, OH).
1d Yield 78%. M. p. 87-88°C. Analysis: Found C, 78.16; H 5.89; C13H12O2, Mr 200.23 requires C, 77.98; H 6.04. 1H NMR 2.99 (b. s, 1H, CHOH), 5.92 (b. s, 1H, CH), 6.69-7.40 (m, 9H, HAr) and 7.83 (b. s, 1H, OH). IR 3215 (b. s, OH) and 3520 cm-1 (s, OH).
1e Yield 73%. M. p. 104-105°C. Analysis: Found C, 78.24; H 6.89; C14H14O2, Mr 214.26 requires C, 78.48; H 6.58. 1H NMR δ 2.25 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.07 (b. s, 1H, CHOH), 5.84 (s, 1H, CH), 6.64-7.30 (m, 8H, HAr) and 7.95 (b. s, 1H, OH). IR 3205 (b. s, OH) and 3530 cm-1 (s, OH).
1f Yield 69%. M. p. 82-83°C. Analysis: Found C, 78.59; H 6.72; C15H16O2, Mr 228.29 requires C, 78.92; H 7.06. 1H NMR δ 2.16 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.57 (b. s, 1H, CHOH), 3,01 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H, CH2), 4.87 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H, CH), 6.61-6.82 (m, 3H, HAr), 7,20 (s, 5H, HAr), and 7.70 (b. s, 1H, OH). IR 3170 (b. s, OH) and 3480 cm-1 (s, OH).
1g Yield 53%. M. p. 142-143°C. Analysis: Found C, 71.89; H 4.78; C10H14O2, Mr 166.22 requires C, 72.26; H 4.49. 1H NMR δ 0.72 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H, CH2CH3), 1.84 (k. d, 2.16 J = 7.2 Hz, J = 7.1 Hz, CH2CH3) 2.17 (s, 3H, CH3), 4.23 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H, CH), 6.55-6.87 (m, 3H, HAr), and 7.08 (s, 1H, OH). IR 3190 (b. s, OH) and 3370 cm-1 (s, OH).

General method of synthesis of 2-hydroxyaryl-R - (5-methylfur-2-yl)methanes 2

The mixture of 0.02 mol of alcohol 1, 0.022 mol of 2-methylfuran and 50 mg of p-toluenesulphonic acid in 20 ml of benzene was refluxed with Dean-Stark trap for 5 minutes. Cooled solution was fil-tered through a pad of Al2O3 and evaporated to dryness, leaving a product as a colourless oil.

General method of synthesis of 3-R-2 - (3-oxobutyl)benzo[b]furans 3

To a boiling solution of 0.01 mol of compound 2 in 5 ml of ethanol, 5 ml of saturated ethanolic HCl was added all at once. The reaction mixture was refluxed for 5 minutes, then cooled, diluted with water. The thick oil was washed with water and extracted with hot hexane. The warm extract was fil-tered through a pad of Al2O3, the mother liquor concentrated and left to crystallize at -5°C to give product as white crystals.

References and Notes

  1. Butin, A. V.; Stroganova, T. A.; Abaev, V. T.; Kul'nevich, V. G. Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin. 1998, 1250.
  2. Gutnov, A. V.; Abaev, V. T.; Butin, A. V.; Zavodnik, V. E.; Kul'nevich, V. G. Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin. 1996, 162.
  3. Abaev, V. T.; Gutnov, A. V.; Butin, A. V. Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin. 1998, 603.
  4. Butin, A. V.; Abaev, V. T.; Zavodnik, V. E.; Kul'nevich, V. G. Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin. 1993, 627.
  5. Butin, A. V.; Gutnov, A. V.; T. A. Abaev, V. T.; Krapivin, G. D. Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin. 1998, 883.
  6. Butin, A. V.; Gutnov, A. V.; T. A. Abaev, V. T.; Krapivin, G. D. Molecules 1999, 52.
  7. Butin, A. V.; Krapivin, G. D.; Zavodnik, V. E.; Kul'nevich, V. G. Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin. 1993, 616.
  8. Herbstein, F.N.; Schmidt, G.M.J. J. Chem. Soc. 1954, 3302.
  9. Dewar, M. J. S.; Ganellin, C.R. J.Chem. Soc. 1959, 3139.
  10. Berti, G.; Da Settimo, A. Ann. Chimica 1962, 995.
  • Samples Availability: Available from MDPI.
Scheme 1.  
Scheme 1.  
Molecules 04 00204 sch001
Scheme 3.  
Scheme 3.  
Molecules 04 00204 sch003
Figure 1. The X-Ray crystal structure of 3e.
Figure 1. The X-Ray crystal structure of 3e.
Molecules 04 00204 g001
Scheme 4.  
Scheme 4.  
Molecules 04 00204 sch004
Figure 2. Energy minimized structure (AM1) of cation B generated by HyperChem 5.0 program (with 2Dcontour map of electrostatic potential).
Figure 2. Energy minimized structure (AM1) of cation B generated by HyperChem 5.0 program (with 2Dcontour map of electrostatic potential).
Molecules 04 00204 g002
Figure 3. Energy minimized structure (AM1) of hypotetic cation C generated by HyperChem 5.0 pro-gram (with 2Dcontour map of electrostatic potential).
Figure 3. Energy minimized structure (AM1) of hypotetic cation C generated by HyperChem 5.0 pro-gram (with 2Dcontour map of electrostatic potential).
Molecules 04 00204 g003
Figure 4.  
Figure 4.  
Molecules 04 00204 g004
Figure 5.  
Figure 5.  
Molecules 04 00204 g005
Figure 6.  
Figure 6.  
Molecules 04 00204 g006
Scheme 5.  
Scheme 5.  
Molecules 04 00204 sch005
Table 1. Characterization of compounds 2a-g.
Table 1. Characterization of compounds 2a-g.
CompRXFormula, MrWi (calc.)%
Wi (found)%
Yield%IR-spectra cm-1 (bs, OH)
CH
2a Molecules 04 00204 i001CH3C19H18O2 82.086.58993560
278.3581.996.52
2b Molecules 04 00204 i002CH3C19H17BrO2 63.924.75993540
357.2563.884.80
2c Molecules 04 00204 i003CH3C20H20O2 82.086.86983540
292.3882.166.89
2d Molecules 04 00204 i004HC18H16O281.776.16983560
264.3281.796.10
2e Molecules 04 00204 i005HC19H18O282.056.54993550
278.3581.996.52
2f Molecules 04 00204 i006CH3C20H20O2 82.136.84973530
292.3882.166.89
2g-CH2CH3CH3C15H18O278.277.99983440
230.3178.237.88
Table 2. 1H-NMR spectra of compounds 2a-g.
Table 2. 1H-NMR spectra of compounds 2a-g.
Comp.δ, ppm
2a2.18 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.24 (s, 3H, CH3), 4.81 (bs, 1H, OH), 5.41 (s, 1H, CH), 5.67-5.87 (m, 2H, HFur), 6.62-7.34 (m, 8H, HAr)
2b2.15 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.19 (s, 3H, CH3), 4.59 (bs, 1H, OH), 5.40 (s, 1H, CH), 5.65 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H, 3-HFur), 5.77 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H, 4-HFur), 6.42-7.53 (m, 7H, HAr)
2c2.14 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.17 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.24 (s, 3H, CH3), 4.69 (bs, 1H, OH), 5.35 (s, 1H, CH), 5.62 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H, 3-HFur), 5.74 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H, 4-HFur), 6.48-7.19 (m, 7H, HAr)
2d2.17 (s, 3H, CH3), 5.02 (bs, 1H, OH), 5.56 (s, 1H, CH), 5.73 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H, 3-HFur), 5.81 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H, 4-HFur), 6.60-7.53 (m, 9H, HAr)
2e2.18 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.25 (s, 3H, CH3), 4.98 (bs, 1H, OH), 5.50 (s, 1H, CH), 5.47 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H, 3-HFur), 5.82 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H, 4-HFur), 6.64-7.32 (m, 8H, HAr)
2f2.13 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.18 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.10 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.18 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H, CH2), 4.28 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H, CH), 4.83 (bs, 1H, OH), 5.68 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H, 4-HFur), 5.79 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H, 3-HFur), 6.82-7.09 (m, 8H, HAr)
2g0.83 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 3H, CH2CH3,), 1.23 (m, 2H, CH2CH3), 2.16 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.26 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.92 (d, JCH=7.5 Hz, 1H, CH), 4.96 (bs, 1H, OH), 5.76 (d, J =3.2 Hz, 1H, 3-HFur), 5.71 (d, J3,4Fur=3.2 Hz, 1H, 4-HFur), 6.37-7.13 (m, 3H, HAr)
Table 3. Characterization of compounds 3a-g.
Table 3. Characterization of compounds 3a-g.
Comp.Formula, MrWi (calc.)%
Wi (found)%
Yield%M.p.(°C)
CH
3aC19H18O281.956.559257-58
278.3581.996.52
3bC19H17BrO263.924.779181-82
357.2563.884.80
3cC20H20O282.196.8695oil
292.3882.166.89
3dC18H16O281.846.189539-40
264.3281.796.10
3eC19H18O282.056.559368-69
278.3581.996.52
3fC20H20O282.216.819041-42
292.3882.166.89
3gC15H18O278.127.8090oil
230.3178.237.88
Table 4. 1H-NMR spectra of compounds 3a-g.
Table 4. 1H-NMR spectra of compounds 3a-g.
Compδ, ppm
3a2.09 (s, 3H, CH3CO), 2.35 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.68-2.93 (m, 2H, β-CH2), 2.96-3.21 (m, 2H, α-CH2), 6.91-7.49 (m, 8H, HBf + HAr)
3b2.08 (s, 3H, CH3CO), 2.34 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.67-2.91 (m, 2H, β-CH2), 2.92-3.16 (m, 2H, α-CH2), 6.98 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, 6-HBf), 7.20 (d, 1H, 4-HBf), 7.24 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, 7-HBf), 7.27 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, m-HAr), 7.52 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, o-HAr)
3c2.08 (s, 3H, CH3CO), 2.34 (s, 6H, CH3), 2.67-2.92 (m, 2H, β-CH2), 2.95-3.20 (m, 2H, α-CH2), 6.90-7.40 (m, 7H, HBf + HAr)
3d2.07 (s, 3H, CH3CO), 2.69-2.94 (m, 2H, β-CH2), 2.97-3.22 (m, 2H, α-CH2), 7.09-7.57 (m, 9H, HBf + HAr)
3e2.08 (s, 3H, CH3CO), 2.34 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.69-2.94 (m, 2H, β-CH2), 2.97-3.22 (m, 2H, α-CH2), 7.07-7.56 (m, 8H, HBf + HAr)
3f2.06 (s, 3H, CH3CO), 2.28 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.62-2.83 (m, 2H, β-CH2), 2.86-3.07 (m, 2H, α-CH2), 3.91 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.07-7.56 (m, 8H, HBf + HAr)
3g1.16 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 3H, CH2CH3) 2.10 (s, 3H, CH3CO), 2.37 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.56 (k, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H, CH2CH3) 2.60-2.85 (m, 2H, β-CH2), 2.87-3.02 (m, 2H, α-CH2), 6.94 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, 6-HBf), 7.16 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, 7-HBf) 7.18 (d, 1H, 4-HBf)
Table 5. Crystal data and structure refinement of 3e.
Table 5. Crystal data and structure refinement of 3e.
Unit contents: C(19)H(18)O(2)
Space group: P2(1)/c, Z = 4
Crystal system:monoclinic
Unit cell dimensions:a = 5.917(1)AAlpha = 90 deg.
b = 25.393(2)ABeta = 101.08 (1) deg.
c = 10.281(1)AGamma = 90 deg.
Volume:1515.9 (.6) A3
Density (calculated):1.220 g/cm3
Diffractometer:Syntex P1
Scan technique:Theta/2*Theta
Monochromator: none
Wave length:.73 cm-1
sin(Th)/WL(max):.6168
Lambda:Mo (K-alpha)
Number of reflections:1898 I > 3.00*s (I)
Programs:SHELXTL
Solution:Direct method
Final R factors:R = .044 Rw = .050
GOOF:2.10
Weight:1/(sigma** (F) + .000439*F*F)
Table 6. Atom coordinates (104) and temperature factors (A2 103).
Table 6. Atom coordinates (104) and temperature factors (A2 103).
AtomxYzUeq
O(1)2750 (2)5797 (1)4448 (1)47 (1) *
O(2)3568 (3)4516 (1)8262 (2)82 (1) *
C(1)650 (3)6537 (1)4561 (2)39 (1) *
C(2)-128 (4)7038 (1)4135 (2)48 (1) *
C(3)593 (5)7253 (1)3055 (2)58 (1) *
C(4)2105 (5)6985 (1)2408 (3)59 (1) *
C(5)2914 (5)6490 (1)2817 (2)53 (1) *
C(6)2145 (4)6279 (1)3873 (2)42 (1) *
C(7)1668 (4)5760 (1)5520 (2)40 (1) *
C(8)387 (3)6190 (1)5646 (2)37 (1) *
C(9)-892 (4)6314 (1)6703 (2)37 (1) *
C(10)7 (4)6208 (1)8029 (2)45 (1) *
C(11)-1124 (4)6350 (1)9019 (2)49 (1) *
C(12)-3226 (4)6615 (1)8741 (2)48 (1) *
C(13)-4144 (4)6718 (1)7423 (2)46 (1) *
C(14)-3021 (4)6571 (1)6421 (2)42 (1) *
C(15)-4417 (6)6784 (2)9839 (3)68 (1) *
C(16)2187 (4)5266 (1)6310 (2)47 (1) *
C(17)4624 (4)5254 (1)7116 (3)48 (1) *
C(18)5065 (4)4816 (1)8105 (2)51 (1) *
C(19)7478 (6)4776 (1)8881 (4)73 (1) *
* Equivalent isotropic U defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalised U (i, j) tensor
Table 7. Bond lengths (A) and angles (deg).
Table 7. Bond lengths (A) and angles (deg).
O(1) - C(6)1.376 (2)O(1) - C(7)1.380 (3)
O(2) - C(18)1.203 (3)C(1) - C(2)1.395 (3)
C(1) - C(6)1.396 (3)C(1) - C(8)1.452 (3)
C(2) - C(3)1.376 (4)C(3) - C(4)1.391 (4)
C(4) - C(5)1.383 (3)C(5) - C(6)1.365 (3)
C(7) - C(8)1.349 (3)C(7) - C(16)1.495 (3)
C(8) - C(9)1.473 (3)C(9) - C(10)1.391 (3)
C(9) - C(14)1.399 (3)C(10) - C(11)1.370 (3)
C(11) - C(12)1.395 (3)C(12) - C(13)1.384 (3)
C(12) - C(15)1.504 (4)C(13) - C(14)1.380 (3)
C(16) - C(17)1.519 (3)C(17) - C(18)1.495 (3)
C(18) - C(19)1.499 (4)
C(6) - O(1) - C(7)106.3 (2)C(2) - C(1) - C(6)118.1 (2)
C(2) - C(1) - C(8)135.7 (2)C(6) - C(1) - C(8)106.1 (2)
C(1) - C(2) - C(3)118.7 (2)C(2) - C(3) - C(4)121.3 (2)
C(3) - C(4) - C(5)121.0 (2)C(4) - C(5) - C(6)116.8 (2)
O(1) - C(6) - C(1)109.7 (2)O(1) - C(6) - C(5)126.2 (2)
C(1) - C(6) - C(5)124.0 (2)O(1) - C(7) - C(8)112.2 (2)
O(1) - C(7) - C(16)114.4 (2)C(8) - C(7) - C(16)133.5 (2)
C(1) - C(8) - C(7)105.7 (2)C(1) - C(8) - C(9)125.7 (2)
C(7) - C(8) - C(9)128.4 (2)C(8) - C(9) - C(10)121.9 (2)
C(8) - C(9) - C(14)121.1 (2)C(10) - C(9) - C(14)117.0 (2)
C(9) - C(10) - C(11)121.8 (2)C(10) - C(11) - C(12)121.2 (2)
C(11) - C(12) - C(13)117.3 (2)C(11) - C(12) - C(15)120.8 (2)
C(13) - C(12) - C(15)121.9 (2)C(12) - C(13) - C(14)121.7 (2)
C(9) - C(14) - C(13)121.0 (2)C(7) - C(16) - C(17)112.8 (2)
C(16) - C(17) - C(18)114.2 (2)O(2) - C(18) - C(17)121.7 (2)
O(2) - C(18) - C(19)122.4 (2)C(17) - C(18) - C(19)115.9 (2)
Table 8. Bond lengths (A) for compound B from X-ray and AM1 data.*
Table 8. Bond lengths (A) for compound B from X-ray and AM1 data.*
C(1) - C(2)1.400 (5)1.403C(2) - C(3)1.368 (5)1.394
C(3) - C(6)1.412 (5)1.394C(5) - C(6)1.391 (5)1.430
C(4) - C(5)1.387 (5)1.387C(1) - C(4)1.387 (5)1.398
C(5) - O(7)1.374 (4)1.404O(7) - C(8)1.375 (4)1.401
C(8) - C(9)1.411 (5)1.434C(6) - C(9)1.446 (5)1.448
C(8) - C(12)1.382 (5)1.390C(11) - C(12)1.385 (5)1.385
C(10) - C(11)1.399 (5)1.399C(10) - C(13)1.411 (5)1.397
C(13) - C(14)1.406 (5)1.436C(9) - C(14)1.377 (5)1.383
C(10) - C(19)1.513 (5)1.490O(15) - C(14)1.358 (4)1.394
O(15) - C(16)1.382 (4)1.410C(16) - C(17)1.339 (5)1.377
C(13) - C(17)1.430 (5)1.455C(16) - C(18)1.481 (5)1.463
*Bold numbers are quantum semi-empirical AM1 calculation data
Table 9. Bond angles (deg) for compound B from X-ray and AM1 data.*
Table 9. Bond angles (deg) for compound B from X-ray and AM1 data.*
C(1) - C(2) - C(3)122.3 (3)121.7C(2) - C(3) - C(6)116.9 (3)118.0
C(3) - C(6) - C(5)119.9 (3)119.2C(4) - C(5) - C(6)123.5 (3)123.3
C(1) - C(4) - C(5)115.6 (3)116.0C(2) - C(1) - C(4)121.8 (3)121.8
C(5) - O(7) - C(8)106.9 (3)106.4O(7) - C(8) - C(9)110.1 (3)110.4
C(6) - C(9) - C(8)106.0 (3)106.4C(5) - C(6) - C(9)105.6 (3)106.0
C(6) - C(5) - O(7)111.5 (3)110.8C(8) - C(12) - C(11)127.5 (3)127.2
C(10) - C(11) - C(12)131.2 (3)130.8C(11) - C(10) - C(13)125.4 (3)126.3
C(10) - C(13) - C(14)127.9 (3)129.1C(9) - C(14) - C(13)132.8 (3)130.9
C(8) - C(9) - C(14)123.7 (3)123.6C(9) - C(8) - C(12)131.4 (3)132.1
C(11) - C(10) - C(19)116.8 (3)117.1C(14) - O(15) - C(16)107.0 (3)107.1
O(15) - C(16) - C(17)110.6 (3)110.4C(13) - C(17) - C(16)107.7 (3)107.7
C(14) - C(13) - C(17)105.0 (3)105.4C(13) - C(14) - O(15)109.7 (3)109.5
*Bold numbers are quantum semi-empirical AM1 calculation data
Table 10. Bond lengths (A) for C from AM1 data.
Table 10. Bond lengths (A) for C from AM1 data.
C(1) - C(2)1.403C(2) - C(3)1.391
C(3) - C(6)1.404C(5) - C(6)1.435
C(4) - C(5)1.391C(1) - C(4)1.391
C(5) - O(7)1.389O(7) - C(8)1.406
C(8) - C(9)1.429C(6) - C(9)1.466
C(8) - C(12)1.384C(11) - C(12)1.380
C(10) - C(11)1.389C(10) - C(13)1.431
C(13) - C(14)1.438C(9) - C(14)1.425
C(10) - C(19)1.499C(14) - C(15)1.429
C(15) - C(16)1.372C(16) - C(17)1.407
C(17) - C(18)1.372C(13) - C(18)1.436
C(3) - H(23)1.098C(15) - H(26)1.095
H(23) … H(26)1.628
Table 11. Bond angles (deg). For C from AM1 calculation data.
Table 11. Bond angles (deg). For C from AM1 calculation data.
C(1) - C(2) - C(3)122.4C(2) - C(3) - C(6)119.9
C(3) - C(6) - C(5)115.5C(4) - C(5) - C(6)125.6
C(1) - C(4) - C(5)116.3C(2) - C(1) - C(4)120.4
C(5) - O(7) - C(8)106.0O(7) - C(8) - C(9)111.7
C(6) - C(9) - C(8)104.9C(5) - C(6) - C(9)106.1
C(6) - C(5) - O(7)111.2C(8) - C(12) - C(11)125.6
C(10) - C(11) - C(12)129.9C(11) - C(10) - C(13)129.2
C(10) - C(13) - C(14)128.6C(9) - C(14) - C(13)127.0
C(8) - C(9) - C(14)125.2C(9) - C(8) - C(12)134.4
C(11) - C(10) - C(19)112.7C(14) - C(15) - C(16)124.1
C(15) - C(16) - C(17)119.0C(16) - C(17) - C(18)119.0
C(13) - C(18) - C(17)123.9C(13) - C(14) - C(15)117.0
C(14) - C(15) - H(26)119.2C(6) - C(3) - H(23)123.8

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gutnov, A.V.; Butin, A.V.; Abaev, V.T.; Krapivin, G.D.; Zavodnik, V.E. Furyl(aryl)alkanes and Their Derivatives. 19. Synthesis of Benzofuran Derivatives via 2-Hydroxyaryl-R-(5-methylfur-2-yl)methanes. Reaction of Furan Ring Opening - Benzofuran Ring Closure Type. Molecules 1999, 4, 204-218. https://doi.org/10.3390/40700204

AMA Style

Gutnov AV, Butin AV, Abaev VT, Krapivin GD, Zavodnik VE. Furyl(aryl)alkanes and Their Derivatives. 19. Synthesis of Benzofuran Derivatives via 2-Hydroxyaryl-R-(5-methylfur-2-yl)methanes. Reaction of Furan Ring Opening - Benzofuran Ring Closure Type. Molecules. 1999; 4(7):204-218. https://doi.org/10.3390/40700204

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gutnov, Andrey V., Alexander V. Butin, Vladimir T. Abaev, Gennadij D. Krapivin, and Valerij E. Zavodnik. 1999. "Furyl(aryl)alkanes and Their Derivatives. 19. Synthesis of Benzofuran Derivatives via 2-Hydroxyaryl-R-(5-methylfur-2-yl)methanes. Reaction of Furan Ring Opening - Benzofuran Ring Closure Type" Molecules 4, no. 7: 204-218. https://doi.org/10.3390/40700204

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop