Next Article in Journal
A Systematic Computational Study on Flavonoids
Previous Article in Journal
Green Chemistry in Protected Horticulture: The Use of Peroxyacetic Acid as a Sustainable Strategy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Isolation and Characterization of Novel Microsatellite Markers in Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.)

by
Seyed Mostafa Pirseyedi
1,
Sahar Valizadehghan
1,
Mohsen Mardi
1,*,
Mohammad Reza Ghaffari
1,
Parvaneh Mahmoodi
1,
Mehdi Zahravi
2,
Mehrshad Zeinalabedini
1 and
Seyed Mojtaba Khayam Nekoui
1
1
Department of Genomics, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran, Mahdasht Road, Karaj, Iran
2
Iranain National Gene Bank, Mahdasht Road, Karaj, Iran
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010, 11(5), 2010-2016; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms11052010
Submission received: 11 March 2010 / Revised: 17 April 2010 / Accepted: 27 April 2010 / Published: 3 May 2010
(This article belongs to the Section Biochemistry)

Abstract

:
Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) has been cultivated from ancient times for its economic, ornamental and medicinal properties globally. Here, we report the isolation and characterization of 12 polymorphic microsatellite markers from a repeat-enriched genomic library of Punica granatum L. The genetic diversity of these loci was assessed in 60 genotypes of Punica granatum L. All loci were variable: the number of polymorphic alleles per locus ranged from two to five (average 2.9). The observed and expected heterozygosities ranged from 0.15 to 0.87 and 0.29 to 0.65, respectively. The polymorphic information content ranged from 0.26 to 0.61 (average: 0.43). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that polymorphic microsatellite markers have been reported for P. granatum L. These new markers should allow studies of the population structure and genetic diversity of pomegranate to be performed in the future.

1. Introduction

The pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) probably originated in Iran [1], and from there diversified to other regions such as the Mediterranean. Large areas of Iran within the boundaries of the two deserts that occupy the central Iranian plateau (Dasht-e-kavir and Kavir-e-Loot) have arid or semiarid conditions that make them suitable for pomegranate production. In fact, the pomegranate has been cultivated from ancient times for its economic, ornamental and medicinal properties in all of the provinces that border the central desert. In these provinces, the area under cultivation, rate of expansion, diversity of varietals, yield per tree, and quality of the product is all considerable. All of these factors support the fact that the pomegranate is endemic to Iran [2].
To understand the structure of the population, to prevent duplication, and assess the variation of this valuable species accurately, it is necessary to characterize each accession not only in terms of its morphological variation, but also by a genome-wide survey of genetic diversity. Although a wide range of morphological and physiological characteristics show variability in the pomegranate, only a few studies based on molecular markers have been performed to investigate the population dynamics of this economically important species [37]. Here, we report the isolation and characterization of the first polymorphic microsatellite markers for pomegranate.

2. Results and Discussion

Out of 80 clones sequenced, it was possible to design unique primers for 58 (72%). For the remaining clones, in some cases, the sequence quality was poor and in others, the SSRs were too close to the start or end of the insert. The polymorphism of the SSR markers was examined in 60 samples of P. granatum L. Twelve of the 58 markers were scorable and polymorphic. For these 12 markers, 35 alleles were identified (Table 1); the number of alleles ranged from two to five, with an average of 2.9 alleles per locus. The observed (Ho) and expected (He) heterozygosities ranged from 0.15 to 0.87 and 0.29 to 0.65, respectively. The PIC values ranged from 0.26 to 0.61, with an average of 0.43. Out of 12 polymorphic loci, 10 were departed significantly from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) (P < 0.05).
In this study, 12 polymorphic microsatellite markers for pomegranate were developed from an enriched partial genomic library that was constructed using the fast isolation by AFLP of sequences containing repeats (FIASCO) protocol. The efficiency of this method in this species was approximately 73%, which conformed to the expected percentage of efficiency reported [8]. In our sample, some markers deviated from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. This result could be due to loss of genetic diversity in small random mating populations, small numbers of microsatellite markers, possible group structures and a mating system with a high level of inbreeding. A larger number of markers would still be required in future to enable wider genome coverage.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that polymorphic microsatellite markers have been reported for P. granatum L. Iran hosts a great genetic diversity of Punica granatum and more than 760 Iranian genotypes are collected at Iranian national pomegranate in Yazd, Iran. However, the study of genetic diversity, genetic background and mating behavior in Iranian pomegranate has been limited because of the lack of sufficient polymorphic microsatellite markers.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Isolation of SSR Markers

Genomic DNA was extracted from a pomegranate cultivar “Malas Yazd” using DNeasy Plant Mini kit (Qiagen, Germany). A genomic library enriched for di- and trinucleotides was constructed using the fast isolation by AFLP of sequences containing repeats (FIASCO) protocol [8,9] with some modifications. A total of 250 ng genomic DNA was digested with MseI (Fermentase) to give DNA fragments between 200 and 1000 bp in length. The fragments were ligated to adapters and then amplified in two stages by PCR using MseI primers to give numerous copies of each fragment. The genomic DNA fragments that contained SSRs were captured by hybridization to biotinylated probes that consisted of di- and trinucleotide repeats [(GC)17, (AC)17, (CT)17, (AT)17, (GT)17, (ATT)10, and (CTT)10], followed by binding to streptavidin-conjugated magnetic beads (BioMag®; Qiagen, Germany). Three non-stringent and three stringent washes were carried out with separation in a magnetic field. The recovered DNA fragments were amplified for 30 cycles using the MseI primers. The PCR products were cloned into pGEM-T Easy (Promega, Germany), and transformed into Escherichia coli DH5a. Recombinant clones were identified by blue/white screening and restriction analysis (EcoRI; Fermentase, Germany). Eighty clones with inserts were purified using a plasmid extraction kit (Core-Bio, Canada) and sequenced (Macrogen Sequencing Service, Korea). Fifty eight of the clones contained microsatellite repeats and it was possible to design primers for them.
PCR amplification was performed on an ABI thermal cycler in a total volume of 15 μL, which included 20 ng DNA, 1× PCR buffer, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.06 pmol each primer, and 0.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentase, Germany). The following reaction conditions were used: 5 min at 95 °C, followed by 10 touchdown cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 45 s at 60 °C (1 °C lower per cycle) and 40 s at 72 °C, and 25 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 50 °C and 40 s at 72 °C, with a final extension step of 7 min at 72 °C. Amplified products were separated on 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gels and visualized by silver staining. A 50-bp DNA ladder (Fermentase, Germany) was used to identify the alleles.

3.2. Data Analysis

The variability of these markers was analysed in 60 Punica granatum L. genotypes that were sampled from Iranian national pomegranate collection, Yazd, Iran (Table 2). POPGENE 32 [10] was used to calculate the observed and expected heterozygosities and to evaluate deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) and linkage disequilibrium between pairs of loci. All results were adjusted for multiple simultaneous comparisons using a sequential Bonferroni correction [11]. Polymorphic information content (PIC) was estimated using CERVUS v.2.0 [12].

4. Conclusions

Pomegranate germplasm collections will be benefited by utilizing the isolated microsatellite markers. These markers can complement morphological and pomological traits analyses for accurate population genetics studies and assessing genetic variations. They are also expected to be useful for efficient genetic studies, e.g., linkage analysis, construction of molecular linkage maps and marker-assisted breeding on Punica granatum L. These polymorphic microsatellite markers would be useful tools for future collection strategies and management of pomegranate genetic resources.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII).

References

  1. Levin, GM. Pomegranate (Punica granatum) plant genetic resources in Turkmenistan. Plant Gen. Resour. Newslett 1994, 97, 31–36. [Google Scholar]
  2. FAO/WHO. Coordinating committee for the near east: project document for a regional standard for Pomegranate; 2009; available online: ftp://ftp.fao.org/codex/ccnea5/ne05_09e.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  3. Durgac, C; Özgen, M; Simsek, Ö; Kacar, AY; Kıyga, Y; Celebi, S; Gündüz, K; Serce, S. Molecular and pomological diversity among pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cultivars in Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. Afr. J. Biotechnol 2008, 7, 1294–1301. [Google Scholar]
  4. Elfalleh, W; Sarrai, N; Gasmi, F; Marzougui, N; Ferchichi, A. A taxonomic analysis of seed storage protein in eight Tunisian pomegranate (Punica granatum) ecotypes. Trends Bioinform 2008, 1, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  5. Jbir, R; Hasnaoui, N; Mars, M; Marrakchi, M; Trifi, M. Characterization of Tunisian pomegranate (Punica granatum) cultivars using amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis. Sci. Horticult 2008, 115, 231–237. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mars, M; Marrakchi, M. Diversity among pomegranate (Punica granatum) germplasm in Tunisia. Genet. Resour. Crop 1999, 46, 461–467. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zamani, Z; Sarkhosh, A; Fatahi, R; Ebadi, A. Genetic relationships among pomegranate genotypes studied by fruit characteristics and RAPD markers. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol 2007, 82, 11–18. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zane, L; Bargelloni, L; Patarnello, T. Strategies for microsatellite isolation: A review. Mol. Ecol 2002, 11, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  9. Xu, YQ; Wang, Y; Li, ZZ; Bao, ZX; Zhou, JF; Huang, HW. Characterization of polymorphic microsatellite loci in a traditional Chinese medicinal plant, Gastrodia elata. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2008, 6, 316–318. [Google Scholar]
  10. Yeh, FC; Boyle, TJB. Population genetic analysis of co-dominant and dominant markers and quantitative traits. Belg. J. Bot 1997, 129, 157. [Google Scholar]
  11. Rice, WR. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution: Int. J. Org. Evol 1989, 43, 223–225. [Google Scholar]
  12. Marshal, TC; Slate, J; Kruuk, LEB; Pemberton, JM. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol 1998, 7, 639–655. [Google Scholar]
Table 1. Characterization of 12 polymorphic microsatellite loci in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.).
Table 1. Characterization of 12 polymorphic microsatellite loci in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.).
LocusPrimer sequences (5′→3′)Repeat motifExpected product Length/observed range (bp)No. of allelesHOHEPICAccession Number
ABRII-MP04F:5-CAGGTGATTGACTACTTGG-3(GT)7201/195–21520.82**0.480.36
R:5-CAGATCTACAATAACATCAC-3GU950619
ABRII-MP07F:5-GATTAACAGCAAAGCCTAGAGG-3(AT)9(GT)7181/180–19020.390.320.39
R:5-AGTAGCTGCAACAAGATAAGG-3GU950620
ABRII-MP12F:5-TTGAGTCCCGATCATATCTC-3(CA)11270/240–27030.60**0.420.34
R:5-TCAATCTGTCAGGAACAACA-3GU950621
ABRII-MP26F:5-TTTCTCGAAGAATTGGGTAA-3(AG)25166/145–16050.37**0.620.60
R:5-CTGAGTAAGCTGAGGCTGAT-3GU950622
ABRII-MP28F:5-ATCCTCTGTCTTTGTGTTCG-3(GAGG)3(GA)19349/350–39030.15**0.650.58
R:5-TGAGTAATTCCGGTCAGAAG-3GU950623
ABRII-MP30F:5-CCCAGTTTGTAGCAAGGTA-3(TGAGC)3175/160–19030.85**0.600.52
R:5-AAGCTGACATTCTTTGAAGC-3GU950624
ABRII-MP33F:5- TCTGTTTATTGCTGAAAGGG-3(AG)12105/80–12020.65**0.430.34
R:5-TCTTCTTCTTCTCCACCGTA-3GU950625
ABRII-MP34F:5-GGAAGAAGCAGAGCAATAGA-3(GAA)3210/180–22030.75**0.480.36
R:5-GTCCTGAGTAACCTGAGCTGGU950626
ABRII-MP39F:5-AGTCTCTGAAGTTTGTCGGA-3(GA)8(TTTTCT)2252/250–30520.300.290.26
R:5-CCTGAGTAAAGCATCTCACTG-3GU950627
ABRII-MP42F:5-GAGCAGAGCAATTCAATCTC-3(GA)9194/200–22040.87**0.610.54
R:5-AACAATTTCCCATGTTTGAC-3GU950628
ABRII-MP46F:5-AGTTGATCTGATGGACAAGG-3(GTT)4270/250–30020.51**0.380.31
R:5-CAGTACGGTGCTCAATACAA-3GU950629
HO, observed heterozygosity;
HE, expected heterozygosity;
**indicated deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium after Bonferroni correction (P < 0.01); PIC, polymorphic information content.
Table 2. Iranian pomegranate genotypes included in the study.
Table 2. Iranian pomegranate genotypes included in the study.
GenotypesCollection LabelOrigin
Torsh nar riz zirabR2-69-2Mazandaran
Meikhosh marvast mehrizR3-67-23Yazd
Shoor poost nazok saghandR1-71-5Yazd
Panje aroos khafr torhR1-67-22Fars
Ardestani malas darjzinR1-69-3Semnan
Shirin dane sefid mehranR2-71-28Ilam
Shahvar shirinR4-68-29Yazd
Amene khatooni abrandabad malasR6-67-1Yazd
Poost sefid paveh torshR1-70-5Kordestan
Torsh ashrafR2-70-30Mazandaran
Shirin ardestanR4-70-14Isfahan
Togh gardanR2-70-23Yazd
Torsh poost nazokR4-70-24Chahar mahal bakhtiari
Torsh poost sefid taromR5-70-5Zanjan
Tabestani saveR5-70-16Markazi
Vahshi tamini torshR5-70-21Sistan baloochestan
Jazi poost ghermez shirinR5-68-9Kerman
Malas yazdiR1-67-14Yazd
Shririn jazirehR2-69-3Booshehr
Shirin poost nazok darjzinR2-69-4Semnan
Siahdane shahvarkan malasR2-69-11Tehran
Malas dane siah ramhormozR2-69-13Khoozestan
Vahshi jangali babolsar torshR2-69-21Mazandaran
Shirin poost sefid shahrezaR2-69-30Isfahan
Mesri torsh kazeroonR2-69-7Fars
Garach shahvar yazdiR1-67-21Yazd
Malas soorati dezfoolR4-69-19Khoozestan
Tolfdar dane ghermez malasR4-69-25Khoozestan
Bitolf dane ghermez malasR4-69-29Khoozestan
Vahshi jangali ghaemsharR5-69-2Mazandaran
Sorkhpoost izeR5-69-3Khoozestan
Narak pishva varaminR5-69-20Tehran
Vahshi jangali roodsarR5-69-26Tehran
Malas zoodras kanR4-69-10Tehran
Zardanar poost nazokR5-67-2Fars
Rash poost nazokR6-69-18Kohkilooye
Zagh yazdiR1-67-3Yazd
Malasie bidane malasR6-69-20Semnan
Shiri ahmadi gogrganR6-69-21Mazandaran
Goli zirab savadkooh torshR6-69-23Mazandaran
Shirin taghlid konR4-69-28Tehran
Dombkooh sarjangal shirinR5-67-16Kerman
Bihaste sangan shirin sistanR3-67-21Sistan baloochestan
Meykhosh poostnazokR1-67-26Kerman
Khajeatar mehriz malasR5-68-2Yazd
Soghar naiin torshR5-67-1Isfahan
Malas soori pavehR5-70-15Kermanshah
Vashik torshR6-67-30Sistan baloochestan
Vahshinarak torshR1-67-13Fars
Shoorporbar seidoon torshR3-67-22Fars
Poost sefid abrandabadR4-67-15Yazd
Gol peivandi torshR3-68-29Yazd
Domboland toshR5-69-15Mazandaran
Aghamohseni shirinR2-69-24Mazandaran
Ghors galooboland bafgh malasR5-70-4Yazd
Ood poostghermezR6-67-29Fars
Asali sarvestan shirinR5-67-9Fars
Khafri jahrom shirinR3-67-19Fars
Bazri shirin dastjerdR1-67-24Isfahan

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pirseyedi, S.M.; Valizadehghan, S.; Mardi, M.; Ghaffari, M.R.; Mahmoodi, P.; Zahravi, M.; Zeinalabedini, M.; Nekoui, S.M.K. Isolation and Characterization of Novel Microsatellite Markers in Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010, 11, 2010-2016. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms11052010

AMA Style

Pirseyedi SM, Valizadehghan S, Mardi M, Ghaffari MR, Mahmoodi P, Zahravi M, Zeinalabedini M, Nekoui SMK. Isolation and Characterization of Novel Microsatellite Markers in Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2010; 11(5):2010-2016. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms11052010

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pirseyedi, Seyed Mostafa, Sahar Valizadehghan, Mohsen Mardi, Mohammad Reza Ghaffari, Parvaneh Mahmoodi, Mehdi Zahravi, Mehrshad Zeinalabedini, and Seyed Mojtaba Khayam Nekoui. 2010. "Isolation and Characterization of Novel Microsatellite Markers in Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.)" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 11, no. 5: 2010-2016. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms11052010

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop