Next Article in Journal
Electronic Structure and Phase Transition in Ferroelectic Sn2P2S6 Crystal
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmaceutical Drug Binding into Calsequestrin
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 13
Issue 11
10.3390/ijms131114344
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Selection of Suitable Reference Genes for Normalization of Quantitative Real-Time PCR in Cartilage Tissue Injury and Repair in Rabbits

by
Xiao-Xiang Peng
1,†,
Rong-Lan Zhao
1,†,
Wei Song
1,
Hai-Rong Chu
1,
Meng Li
1,
Shu-Ya Song
1,
Guang-Zhou Li
1 and
Dong-Chun Liang
2,3,*
1
Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics, Department of Medical Laboratory, Weifang Medical University, Shandong 261053, China
2
Institute of Endocrinology and Metabolic Disease Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China
3
Key Lab of Hormone and Development, Tianjin Ministry, Tianjin 300070, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13(11), 14344-14355; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms131114344
Submission received: 4 August 2012 / Revised: 25 October 2012 / Accepted: 29 October 2012 / Published: 6 November 2012
(This article belongs to the Section Biochemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
When studying the altered expression of genes associated with cartilage regeneration by quantitative real-time RT-PCR (RT-qPCR), reference genes with highly stable expression during different stages of chondrocyte developmental are necessary to normalize gene expression accurately. Until now, no reports evaluating expression changes of commonly used reference genes in rabbit articular cartilage have been published. In this study, defects were made in rabbit articular cartilage, with or without insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) treatment, to create different chondrocyte living environments. The stability and intensity of the expressions of the candidate reference genes glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), 18S Ribosomal RNA (18S rRNA), cyclophilin (CYP), hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase (HPRT1), and β-2-microglobulin (B2M) were evaluated. The data were analyzed by geNorm and NormFinder. B2M and 18S rRNA were identified to be suitable reference genes for rabbit cartilage tissues.

1. Introduction

Many studies have focused on the process of repairing articular cartilage injuries. The various genes involved in this process are differentially expressed at different stages of repair. Quantifying their expression patterns may help us better understand the mechanisms of cartilage regeneration. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) provides the most accurate and specific measure of gene expression [1,2]. However, a number of variables can lead to inconsistent measurements, such as the number and type of cells in the evaluated tissue, the efficiency of mRNA extraction, the mRNA handling techniques [3], the mRNA integrity, the methods of reverse transcription and the analytical detection method [4]. To ensure accurate and specific results, all of these variables must be controlled for thorough normalization, whereby the expression of a target gene is compared to that of a standard reference gene [5,6]. An ideal reference gene should be expressed consistently across all samples being compared, regardless of whether the tissues are collected from physiological or pathological tissues. Housekeeping genes used to be considered to fulfill this criterion and they are the most commonly used reference genes in most experiments.
Normalization by reference genes allows the minimization of variables and increases confidence in relative differences in gene expression. However, more and more evidence suggests that expression of some commonly accepted reference genes, such as glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and beta actin (ACTB), are affected by experimental and clinical conditions; therefore, they may not always be suitable controls for normalization [7–10]. Leading qPCR investigators have suggested that reference genes must be validated for each experimental situation to acquire meaningful data [11,12]. Therefore, expression of the prospective reference genes needs to be explored in each specific tissue and type of experiment. In this study, we examined the putative suitability of GAPDH, 18S rRNA, CYP, HPRT1 and B2M as reference genes in injury repair of articular cartilage tissue. The five candidate genes tested in this study were chosen based on their previous use as reference genes [13–17]. ACTB was not included because the stability of its expression has been challenged in many organisms and tissues [16,18–20]. The RT-qPCR expression data were analyzed using geNorm [21] and NormFinder [22] to identify the most suitable reference genes, namely, those that are minimally affected by chondrocyte development status.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Results

2.1.1. Hematoxylin and Eosin (H and E) Staining

H and E staining is shown in Figure 1. Although there is noticeable chondrocyte proliferation, the injured cartilage had a limited capacity for self-repairing (Figure 1B). The defect was minimally repaired or filled after 30 days of recovery; treatment with IGF-1 greatly enhanced the repair of injured cartilage. As shown in Figure 1C, in the IGF-1 treated samples, the defect was filled with proliferative chondrocytes and connective fibers.

2.1.2. Correlation of Reference Genes

We studied the stability of five candidate reference genes (Table 1) in an articular cartilage injury repair model. Melt curves showed a single melt peak in all reactions except the NTC, which had no amplification. The amplification efficiencies ranged from 1.02 to 1.33. Expression levels among these five candidates varied widely, from highest Ct of 28.86, for HPRT1, to the lowest Ct of 14.52, for 18S rRNA (Figure 2). Using the 2 (−ΔCt) methods, the Ct values were transformed into relative quantification data and analyzed using the geNorm and NormFinder programs. geNorm is a statistical algorithm designed to analyze the expression stability of a list of selected reference genes in all samples by calculating M values. In this approach, the mean pairwise variation of a gene compared to all the other reference genes in a given set of samples is called the M value. The lower the M value, the more stable of expression. We found that the M values for the genes (from the most stable to the least stable) were as follows: B2M = 18S rRNA < GAPDH < HPRT1 < CYP (Figure 3A). Previous studies had defined M = 1.5 as an acceptable cut-off for selection of RT-qPCR reference genes [19,23]. The M values of all the candidates analyzed here are below this cut-off point. However, the M values indicated that CYP was the least stable reference gene. After stepwise exclusion, the B2M and 18S rRNA gene pair displayed the lowest M value, indicating that these two genes are the least affected by the cartilage regeneration status.
The geNorm program also determines a normalization factor (NF) to define the optimal number of reference genes required for an accurate normalization. The NF is calculated from two or more genes with the variable V as the pairwise variation (Vn/Vn+1) between two sequential normalization factors (NFn and NFn+1). We applied the default threshold (0.15) as a cut-off [7]. If the calculated NF is less than 0.15, additional reference genes are not necessary. In all groups evaluated in this study, the pairwise variations were all less than the cut-off threshold (Figure 3B), indicating that using more than two reference genes will not improve the qPCR accuracy. Therefore, the optimal normalization of data in this experimental setting should use two reference genes, B2M and18S rRNA.
The candidate reference genes were also analyzed by another program, NormFinder (Figure 4). In this analysis, higher expression stability is indicated by a lower stability value, which is as an estimate of the combined intra- and intergroup variation of the individual gene [24]. The NormFinder analysis also indicated that B2M and 18S rRNA were the most stably expressed genes. 18S rRNA, the least affected reference, has a stability value of 0.106. In addition, the geometric average indicated that the combination of B2M and 18S rRNA reduced the stability value to as low as 0.056.
In conclusion, the above results demonstrate that the use of two reference genes (B2M and 18S rRNA) is best for RT-qPCR normalization in rabbit cartilage tissue regeneration studies.

2.2. Discussion

RT-qPCR is a highly sensitive method for mRNA quantification in different samples. This technique requires an appropriate normalization of the data to minimize possible differences due to technical variations [21]. Reference genes are commonly used for transcript normalization because of their stable expression [25]. However, a large number of studies show that universal reference genes do not exist, and different experimental methods need to establish their own reference genes to ensure an accurate normalization strategy [23,26–28].
When damaged, the self-repair ability of cartilage tissue is very poor [29]. Cytokines or growth factors are indispensable for augmenting chondrocyte proliferation and cartilage regeneration [30–32]. By local administration, cytokines can increase thickness of the normal cartilage and can accelerate the repair of cartilage defects [33,34]. Cytokines exert their cartilage regeneration-enhancing abilities mostly by stimulating the expression of proliferative genes. In this study, we adopted IGF-1 as the therapeutic factor for repairing cartilage defects, and we applied it to samples at different stages of chondrocyte development to facilitate the determination of the most stably expressed reference genes in regenerating cartilage.
Artificial cartilage defects were induced in groups B and C by surgery, and the repair of defects was detected by histochemistry. H and E staining (Figure 1) confirmed that cartilage with this type of artificial defect had limited self-repair capacity; treatment with IGF-1 markedly stimulated chondrocyte proliferation and the formation of extracellular matrix, indicating that IGF-1 increases the rate of cartilage regeneration. Therefore, the regenerative status of the cartilage was different among the experimental groups.
We analyzed the RT-qPCR data using two different algorithms to determine the optimum number of, and the most stably expressed reference genes.
The geNorm and NormFinder algorithms are widely used and are based on divergent mathematical approaches. geNorm analyzes the expression stability of selected genes in all samples by calculating M values (M). However, NormFinder evaluates the expression stability of each reference gene independently and takes into account intra- and intergroup variations for normalization [35]. In this study, geNorm (Figure 3) and NormFinder (Figure 4) identified two genes, B2M and 18S rRNA, as the most stable single gene and the most stable reference gene pair to be used for normalizing RT-qPCR data from the cartilage regeneration model. 18S rRNA has been suggested to be suitable reference gene in different species (Homo sapiens, Rhodnius prolixus and Danio rerio) [20,36,37]. However, some studies have shown that 18S rRNA is not always a suitable reference gene [9,38]. These different results may be related to the species, tissue, organs or experimental factors. rRNA constitutes the largest fraction of RNA in the cell, and the high abundance of rRNA makes it suitable for high-abundant genes. B2M was among the least stable genes in rat MSCs, but was the most stable in rat chondrocytes [39]. Stephens et al.[40] reported that B2M stably expressed in osteoclasts and macrophages. In addition, we found that CYP, HPRT and GAPDH were unstable in rabbit cartilage tissue. From Figure 4A and NormFinder, it might be concluded that GAPDH is as reliable as B2M. Here, we show the detailed scores of each program calculation. geNorm analyzes the expression stability by calculating M values, the lower the value of M, the more stable of expression (GAPDH 0.344, B2M 0.249). With NormFinder, higher expression stability is indicated by a lower stability value (GAPDH 0.151, B2M 0.136). Together, geNorm and NormFinder showed that B2M was superior to GAPDH and that B2M and 18S rRNA is the most stable gene pair. Similar results have been shown in human cartilage. Pombo-Suarez M. et al.[15] reported that GAPDH and HPRT1 were less stably expressed in human osteoarthritic articular cartilage. Other studies also have shown that GAPDH has high expression variance in human mesenchymal stromal cells and hypoxia-cultured human chondrocytes [16,41]. Maccoux et al.[42] studied the expression stability of twelve newly identified housekeeping genes in canine osteoarthritic joint tissues. Their results showed that only a small number of the candidates are truly consistently expressed in a certain tissue type. In fact, when different candidate genes are studied, different genes might be identified as the most suitable references. Maccoux et al.[42] indicated that RPS4X and RPL13A are suitable reference genes for dog cartilage. However, their suitability for rabbit chondrocyte needs further investigation. Regardless, what their reports have in common with ours is that theirs also showed that GAPDH is less stably expressed than some other reference genes.
Our study shows that GAPDH is not suitable as a reference gene for rabbit cartilage even though it had been reported to be suitable for sheep [43]. This agrees with Dundas and Ling [44] and Too and Ling [45] that reference genes suitable for a specific organism or tissue may not be suitable for another organism or tissue. Thus, this paper compared the expression stability of the housekeeping genes in each tissue type under each pathological/physiological will undoubtedly be a good reference. So we recommend that researchers use B2M or 18S rRNA to calibrate the expression of their interest genes in studies of regenerating rabbit cartilage.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Materials

Trizol total RNA extraction reagent was purchased from Invitrogen (Invitrogen, Carisbad, CA, USA). Quantitative real-time PCR detection kit was purchased from Roche (Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland). Recombinant human IGF-1 was ordered from R&D (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Experimental rabbits were housed in individual cages with standard food and water ad libitum under normal conditions. All procedures involving animals were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of China.

3.2. Injury to Articular Cartilage

Three-month-old New Zealand white rabbits (2.8–3.0 kg) were obtained from VITAL RIVER (Beijing, China). Eighteen rabbits were randomly divided into three major groups (A, B and C). The two hind legs of each rabbit were studied; therefore, each group included 12 tissue samples. Rabbits in group A were not injured and served as controls. Artificial cartilage defects were induced in group B and C rabbits. Surgical procedures were performed under general anesthesia induced by intramuscular injection of ketamine hydrochloride (350 mg/kg body weight) and xylazine (5 mg/kg body weight); general anesthesia was maintained by additional injections at the same dosed every hour as required. After parapatellar arthrotomy, the patella was dislocated laterally, and a 5 mm diameter, 2 mm deep, partially articular cartilage defect was created in the patellar groove of the femur using a dentist drill. Defects were sufficiently lavaged with 0.9% saline, and all skin layers were sutured. Group B rabbits were not given IGF-1 treatment; group C rabbits were given IGF-1 after the operation. Postoperatively, the rabbits were returned to cages and allowed to move freely without splinting. One milliliter of rhIGF-1 (300 μg/mL in PBS) was injected into the articular capsules of the knee joints of group C animals every three days for 30 days, while group B rabbits received injections of PBS. The rabbits were sacrificed under general anesthesia. RNA was isolated from one half of each group and used for RT-qPCR. The remaining samples were subjected to histological evaluation.

3.3. Histological Evaluation of Articular Cartilage Injury and Repair

For histological evaluation, the whole defect region, including surrounding cartilage and some hard bone tissue, was dissected and fixed in 10% buffered formalin for 1 week. Specimens were decalcified in 0.5% EDTA solution containing 0.1 M amino-n-caproic acid (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) and 0.005 M benzamidine and embedded in paraffin. Four-micrometer sagittal sections of the defect area were collected and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H and E) according to standard protocol.

3.4. RNA Isolation and RT-qPCR Amplification of Reference

Defect surrounded cartilage was carefully trimmed off and immediately put into Trizol reagent. Total RNA was extracted from 1mg cartilage homogenate. The concentration and quality of total RNA were determined using a biological spectrophotometer (Eppendorf, Germany). RNA samples had OD260/280 ratios between 1.7 and 2.0 and OD260/230 ratios below 2.0, reflecting high purity and the absence of protein. The integrity of each total RNA sample was assessed by determining the ratio of 28S/18S ribosomal RNAs after agarose gel electrophoresis. Total RNA (0.5 μg) was used as template in a 20 μL cDNA synthesis reaction (42 °C for 60 min) containing 0.2 μg random hexamer, 200 U of M-MuLV reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carisbad, CA, USA), 20 U Ribonuclease inhibitor and dNTPs at a concentration of 1 mM. Each reverse transcript (0.5 μL) was used as template for PCR amplification. In addition, serial dilutions of the template cDNA were used to confirm reaction efficiency. Five reference genes, GAPDH, 18S rRNA, CYP, HPRT1, and B2M, were evaluated in this study. Primers for each gene are shown in Table 1. Optimum annealing temperatures were determined with gradient PCR prior to qPCR. Nontemplate controls were included for quality control purposes. To compare different RNA transcription levels, the Ct values were compared directly. Ct is the number of cycles required for the detection of the fluorescence signal reaches the set threshold level. Studies have shown that there is an inverse linear relationship between Ct and the amount of template nucleic acid. As the amount of template increases, the Ct value decreases [13]. Each 20 μL reaction contained 10 μL of 2× SYBR Green Mix, 0.5 μL of a 10 μM solution of each primer, 0.5 μL of cDNA and 8.5 μL of sterile distilled water. The RT-qPCR conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 58 °C for 20 s and 72 °C of 30 s. PCR was followed immediately by melting analysis, beginning at 72 °C for 1 min and ramping to 99 °C at a rate of 1 °C per 5 s. Each qPCR assay was run with triplicate technical samples. Relative quantification was performed using Light Cycler Software 1.5.0 (Roche Applied Science). To assess the expression stability of the selected reference genes, the raw Ct values were obtained by averaging the Ct values of the sample collection.

3.5. Expression Data Analysis

Data were analyzed after the raw Ct values were transformed into relative quantification data by the ΔCt method. In this study, the relative expression level equal was set to 1 for each gene measured with the minimum Ct, then, 2−ΔCt was used to represent the relative expression level of the reference genes in the other samples(ΔCt = Ct value of each sample − minimum Ct value). These data were further analyzed with the geNorm [21] and NormFinder [22] algorithms. The expression levels of candidate reference genes in the three experimental groups are represented as boxplots. Boxes represent the lower and upper quartiles of the cycle thresholds range with medians. The graph was plotted with SPSS 15.0 software.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, by comparing expressions in rabbit cartilage tissue samples, B2M and 18S rRNA were identified as the most stably expressed reference genes in rabbit cartilage tissues. Furthermore, they are the most suitable gene pair for normalizing qPCR data.

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to the financial support from Nature Science Foundation of Shandong Province Youth Project, China (grant ZR2012HQ034).
  • Conflict of InterestThe authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Derveaux, S.; Vandesompele, J.; Hellemans, J. How to do successful gene expression analysis using real-time PCR. Methods 2010, 50, 227–230. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bustin, S.A. Why the need for qPCR publication guidelines?—The case for MIQE. Methods 2010, 50, 217–226. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bustin, S.A.; Nolan, T. Pitfalls of quantitative real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. J. Biomol. Tech 2004, 15, 155–166. [Google Scholar]
  4. Imbeaud, S.; Graudens, E.; Boulanger, V.; Barlet, X.; Zaborski, P.; Eveno, E.; Mueller, O.; Schroeder, A.; Auffray, C. Towards standardization of RNA quality assessment using user-independent classifiers of microcapillary electrophoresis traces. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33, e56. [Google Scholar]
  5. Li, Y.L.; Ye, F.; Hu, Y.; Lu, W.G.; Xie, X. Identification of suitable reference genes for gene expression studies of human serous ovarian cancer by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Anal. Biochem 2009, 394, 110–116. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kowalewska, M.; Danska-Bidzinska, A.; Bakula-Zalewska, E.; Bidzinski, M. Identification of suitable reference genes for gene expression measurement in uterine sarcoma and carcinosarcoma tumors. Clin. Biochem 2012, 45, 368–371. [Google Scholar]
  7. Cinar, M.U.; Islam, M.A.; Uddin, M.J.; Tholen, E.; Tesfaye, D.; Looft, C.; Schellander, K. Evaluation of suitable reference genes for gene expression studies in porcine alveolar macrophages in response to LPS and LTA. BMC Res. Notes 2012, 5, 107. [Google Scholar]
  8. Uddin, M.J.; Cinar, M.U.; Tesfaye, D.; Looft, C.; Tholen, E.; Schellander, K. Age-related changes in relative expression stability of commonly used housekeeping genes in selected porcine tissues. BMC Res. Notes 2011, 4, 441. [Google Scholar]
  9. Nelissen, K.; Smeets, K.; Mulder, M.; Hendriks, J.J.; Ameloot, M. Selection of reference genes for gene expression studies in rat oligodendrocytes using quantitative real time PCR. J. Neurosci. Methods 2010, 187, 78–83. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang, F.; Wang, J.; Liu, D.; Su, Y. Normalizing genes for real-time polymerase chain reaction in epithelial and nonepithelial cells of mouse small intestine. Anal. Biochem 2010, 399, 211–217. [Google Scholar]
  11. Huggett, J.; Dheda, K.; Bustin, S.; Zumla, A. Real-time RT-PCR normalisation; strategies and considerations. Genes Immun 2005, 6, 279–284. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ho-Pun-Cheung, A.; Cellier, D.; Lopez-Crapez, E. Considerations for normalisation of RT-qPCR in oncology (In French). Ann. Biol. Clin 2008, 66, 121–129. [Google Scholar]
  13. Mamo, S.; Gal, A.B.; Polgar, Z.; Dinnyes, A. Expression profiles of the pluripotency marker gene POU5F1 and validation of reference genes in rabbit oocytes and preimplantation stage embryos. BMC Mol. Biol 2008, 9, 67. [Google Scholar]
  14. Seol, D.; Choe, H.; Zheng, H.; Jang, K.; Ramakrishnan, P.S.; Lim, T.H.; Martin, J.A. Selection of reference genes for normalization of quantitative real-time PCR in organ culture of the rat and rabbit intervertebral disc. BMC Res. Notes 2011, 4, 162. [Google Scholar]
  15. Pombo-Suarez, M.; Calaza, M.; Gomez-Reino, J.J.; Gonzalez, A. Reference genes for normalization of gene expression studies in human osteoarthritic articular cartilage. BMC Mol. Biol 2008, 9, 17. [Google Scholar]
  16. Foldager, C.B.; Munir, S.; Ulrik-Vinther, M.; Søballe, K.; Bünger, C.; Lind, M. Validation of suitable house keeping genes for hypoxia-cultured human chondrocytes. BMC Mol. Biol 2009, 10, 94. [Google Scholar]
  17. Majerowicz, D.; Alves-Bezerra, M.; Logullo, R.; Fonseca-de-Souza, A.L.; Meyer-Fernandes, J.R.; Braz, G.R.; Gondim, K.C. Looking for reference genes for real-time quantitative PCR experiments in Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). Insect Mol. Biol 2011, 20, 713–722. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kulkarni, B.; Mohammed, I.; Hopkinson, A.; Dua, H.S. Validation of endogenous control genes for gene expression studies on human ocular surface epithelium. PLoS One 2011, 6, e22301. [Google Scholar]
  19. Barsalobres-Cavallari, C.F.; Severino, F.E.; Maluf, M.P.; Maia, I.G. Identification of suitable internal control genes for expression studies in Coffea arabica under different experimental conditions. BMC Mol. Bio 2009, 10, 1. [Google Scholar]
  20. Paim, R.M.; Pereira, M.H.; di Ponzio, R.; Rodrigues, J.O.; Guarneri, A.A.; Gontijo, N.F.; Araújo, R.N. Validation of reference genes for expression analysis in the salivary gland and the intestine of Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera, Reduviidae) under different experimental conditions by quantitative real-time PCR. BMC Res. Notes 2012, 5, 128. [Google Scholar]
  21. Vandesompele, J.; de Preter, K.; Pattyn, F.; Poppe, B.; van Roy, N.; de Paepe, A.; Speleman, F. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol 2002, 3, research0034. [Google Scholar]
  22. Andersen, C.L.; Jensen, J.L.; Ørntoft, T.F. Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: A model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Res 2004, 64, 5245–5250. [Google Scholar]
  23. Rho, H.W.; Lee, B.C.; Choi, E.S.; Choi, I.J.; Lee, Y.S.; Goh, S.H. Identification of valid reference genes for gene expression studies of human stomach cancer by reverse transcription-qPCR. BMC Cancer 2010, 10, 240. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ferreira, E.; Cronjé, M.J. Selection of suitable reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR in apoptosis-induced MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Mol. Biotechnol 2012, 50, 121–128. [Google Scholar]
  25. Peletto, S.; Bertuzzi, S.; Campanella, C.; Modesto, P.; Maniaci, M.G.; Bellino, C.; Ariello, D.; Quasso, A.; Caramelli, M.; Acutis, P.L. Evaluation of internal reference genes for quantitative expression analysis by real-time PCR in ovine whole blood. Int. J. Mol. Sci 2011, 12, 7732–7747. [Google Scholar]
  26. Chervoneva, I.; Li, Y.; Schulz, S.; Croker, S.; Wilson, C.; Waldman, S.A.; Hyslop, T. Selection of optimal reference genes for normalization in quantitative RT-PCR. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11, 253. [Google Scholar]
  27. Mohelnikova-Duchonova, B.; Oliverius, M.; Honsova, E.; Soucek, P. Evaluation of reference genes and normalization strategy for quantitative real-time PCR in human pancreatic carcinoma. Dis. Markers 2012, 32, 203–210. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ledderose, C.; Heyn, J.; Limbeck, E.; Kreth, S. Selection of reliable reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR in human T cells and neutrophils. BMC Res. Notes 2011, 4, 427. [Google Scholar]
  29. Redler, L.H.; Caldwell, J.M.; Schulz, B.M.; Levine, W.N. Management of articular cartilage defects of the knee. Phys. Sportsmed 2012, 40, 20–35. [Google Scholar]
  30. Balcom, N.T.; Berg-Johansen, B.; Dills, K.J.; van Donk, J.R.; Williams, G.M.; Chen, A.C.; Hazelwood, S.J.; Sah, R.L.; Klisch, S.M. In vitro articular cartilage growth with sequential application of IGF-1 and TGF-β1 enhances volumetric growth and maintains compressive properties. J. Biomech. Eng 2012, 134, 031001. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ng, K.W.; O’Conor, C.J.; Kugler, L.E.; Cook, J.L.; Ateshian, G.A.; Hung, C.T. Transient supplementation of anabolic growth factors rapidly stimulates matrix synthesis in engineered cartilage. Ann. Biomed. Eng 2011, 39, 2491–2500. [Google Scholar]
  32. Williams, G.M.; Dills, K.J.; Flores, C.R.; Stender, M.E.; Stewart, K.M.; Nelson, L.M.; Chen, A.C.; Masuda, K.; Hazelwood, S.J.; Klisch, S.M.; et al. Differential regulation of immature articular cartilage compressive moduli and Poisson’s ratios by in vitro stimulation with IGF-1 and TGF-beta1. J. Biomech 2010, 43, 2501–2507. [Google Scholar]
  33. Suzuki, S.; Itoh, K.; Ohyama, K. Local administration of IGF-I stimulates the growth of mandibular condyle in mature rats. Am. J. Orthod 2004, 31, 138–143. [Google Scholar]
  34. Schmidt, M.B.; Chen, E.H.; Lynch, S.E. A review of the effects of insulin-like growth factor and platelet derived growth factor on in vivo cartilage healing and repair. Osteoarthr. Cartil 2006, 14, 403–412. [Google Scholar]
  35. Penna, I.; Vella, S.; Gigoni, A.; Russo, C.; Cancedda, R.; Pagano, A. Selection of candidate housekeeping genes for normalization in human postmortem brain samples. Int. J. Mol. Sci 2011, 12, 5461–5470. [Google Scholar]
  36. Bas, A.; Forsberg, G.; Hammarström, S.; Hammarström, M.L. Utility of the housekeeping genes 18S rRNA, beta-actin and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate-dehydrogenase for normalization in real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analysis of gene expression in human T lymphocytes. Scand. J. Immunol 2004, 59, 566–573. [Google Scholar]
  37. Tang, R.; Dodd, A.; Lai, D.; McNabb, W.C.; Love, D.R. Validation of zebrafish (Danio rerio) reference genes for quantitative real-time RT-PCR normalization. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin 2007, 39, 384–390. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kim, I.; Yang, D.; Tang, X.; Carroll, J.L. Reference gene validation for qPCR in rat carotid body during postnatal development. BMC Res. Notes 2011, 4, 440. [Google Scholar]
  39. Farrokhi, A.; Eslaminejad, M.B.; Nazarian, H.; Moradmand, A.; Samadian, A.; Akhlaghi, A. Appropriate reference gene selection for real-time PCR data normalization during rat mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Cell Mol. Biol. (Noisy-le-grand) 2012, 58, OL1660–1670. [Google Scholar]
  40. Stephens, A.S.; Stephens, S.R.; Morrison, N.A. Internal control genes for quantitative RT-PCR expression analysis in mouse osteoblasts, osteoclasts and macrophages. BMC Res. Notes 2011, 4, 410. [Google Scholar]
  41. Studer, D.; Lischer, S.; Jochum, W.; Ehrbar, M.; Zenobi-Wong, M.; Maniura-Weber, K. Ribosomal protein L13a as a reference gene for human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells during expansion, adipo-, chondro-, and osteogenesis. Tissue Eng 2012, 18, 10. [Google Scholar]
  42. Maccoux, L.J.; Clements, D.N.; Salway, F.; Day, P.J. Identification of new reference genes for the normalisation of canine osteoarthritic joint tissue transcripts from microarray data. BMC Mol. Biol 2007, 8, 62. [Google Scholar]
  43. Zang, R.; Bai, J.; Xu, H.; Zhang, L.; Yang, J.; Yang, L.; Lu, J.; Wu, J. Selection of suitable reference genes for real-time quantitative PCR studies in Lanzhou fat-tailed sheep (Ovis aries). Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv 2011, 6, 789–804. [Google Scholar]
  44. Dundas, J.; Ling, M. Reference genes for measuring mRNA expression. Theory Biosci. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Too, I.H.; Ling, M.H. Signal peptidase complex subunit 1 and Hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase beta subunit are suitable reference genes in human lungs. ISRN Bioinforma. 2012, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 13 14344f1 1024
Figure 1. H and E staining of the cartilage sections (40×). The normal control group (A) shows normal cartilage structure and composition; Evident cartilage defect could still be observed after 30 days in injury simple group (B); rhIGF-1 treatment can markedly enhance the repair of the defect by filling with proliferate chondrocyte and connective tissues (C).
Figure 1. H and E staining of the cartilage sections (40×). The normal control group (A) shows normal cartilage structure and composition; Evident cartilage defect could still be observed after 30 days in injury simple group (B); rhIGF-1 treatment can markedly enhance the repair of the defect by filling with proliferate chondrocyte and connective tissues (C).
Ijms 13 14344f1
Ijms 13 14344f2 1024
Figure 2. qPCR cycle threshold values for five candidate reference genes among three groups. Candidate reference genes include 18S rRNA, GAPDH, CYP, HPRT1, and B2M. Three groups were evaluated: normal (group A), injury (group B), injury + IGF-1 (group C). Boxes represent lower and upper quartiles of cycle thresholds range with medians. The distributions of Ct values was wide, from a high of 28.86 (HPRT1) to a low of 14.52 (18S rRNA).
Figure 2. qPCR cycle threshold values for five candidate reference genes among three groups. Candidate reference genes include 18S rRNA, GAPDH, CYP, HPRT1, and B2M. Three groups were evaluated: normal (group A), injury (group B), injury + IGF-1 (group C). Boxes represent lower and upper quartiles of cycle thresholds range with medians. The distributions of Ct values was wide, from a high of 28.86 (HPRT1) to a low of 14.52 (18S rRNA).
Ijms 13 14344f2
Ijms 13 14344f3 1024
Figure 3. The expression stability of reference genes were evaluated by geNorm. (A) Analysis of the average expression stability values (M) of the five selected reference genes with geNorm. According to the most stable gene pair to the lowest M value, the least stable genes were gradually removed. B2M and 18S rRNA is the gene pair with the lowest M value. The y-axis indicates the stability parameter M. The x-axis from left to right indicates the expression stability of the five selected reference genes; (B) The optimal number of normalization reference genes was determined by pair-wise variation analysis. Each bar represents the change in normalization accuracy that occurs when more reference genes are added in a stepwise manner according to the ranking in Figure 3A. To meet the recommended cut-off value of 0.15, two or three genes would be satisfactory for normalization. Based on the pairwise variation results, addition of a third reference gene does not improve normalization in cartilage tissue.
Figure 3. The expression stability of reference genes were evaluated by geNorm. (A) Analysis of the average expression stability values (M) of the five selected reference genes with geNorm. According to the most stable gene pair to the lowest M value, the least stable genes were gradually removed. B2M and 18S rRNA is the gene pair with the lowest M value. The y-axis indicates the stability parameter M. The x-axis from left to right indicates the expression stability of the five selected reference genes; (B) The optimal number of normalization reference genes was determined by pair-wise variation analysis. Each bar represents the change in normalization accuracy that occurs when more reference genes are added in a stepwise manner according to the ranking in Figure 3A. To meet the recommended cut-off value of 0.15, two or three genes would be satisfactory for normalization. Based on the pairwise variation results, addition of a third reference gene does not improve normalization in cartilage tissue.
Ijms 13 14344f3
Ijms 13 14344f4 1024
Figure 4. The expression stability of reference genes was evaluated by NormFinder. Five reference genes were used for normalization, and the lowest stability values demonstrate the best gene pair. This figure indicates that 18S rRNA is the most stable reference gene, while the B2M and 18S rRNA is the most stable gene-pair, namely, the pair with the least variation in gene expression during cartilage tissue injury and repair in rabbits.
Figure 4. The expression stability of reference genes was evaluated by NormFinder. Five reference genes were used for normalization, and the lowest stability values demonstrate the best gene pair. This figure indicates that 18S rRNA is the most stable reference gene, while the B2M and 18S rRNA is the most stable gene-pair, namely, the pair with the least variation in gene expression during cartilage tissue injury and repair in rabbits.
Ijms 13 14344f4
Table
Table 1. Primers for five candidate reference genes.
Table 1. Primers for five candidate reference genes.
Gene nameGene symbolAccession numberAmplicon length (bp)Primer sequences
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenaseGAPDH18S rRNANM_001082253.1198Forward: ATCCATTCATTgACCTCCACTAC
Reverse: gTACTgggCACCAgCATCAC
18S Ribosomal RNA18S rRNANR_033238.1167Forward: ATCAgATACCgTCgTAgTTC
Reverse: TTCCgTCAATTCCTTTAAg
Beta-2-microglobulinB2MXM_002717921.1157Forward: AACgTggAACAgTCAgACC
Reverse: AgTAATCTCgATCCCATTTC
CyclophilinCYPABB45383.1163Forward: gggAgAgAgAggATATggATAC
Reverse: AATgCCATAgTgCTTCAgC
Hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferaseHPRT1NM_001105671.1175Forward: TgATTAgTgATgATgAACCg
Reverse: CACACAgAgggCTACAATg

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Peng, X.-X.; Zhao, R.-L.; Song, W.; Chu, H.-R.; Li, M.; Song, S.-Y.; Li, G.-Z.; Liang, D.-C. Selection of Suitable Reference Genes for Normalization of Quantitative Real-Time PCR in Cartilage Tissue Injury and Repair in Rabbits. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 14344-14355. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms131114344

AMA Style

Peng X-X, Zhao R-L, Song W, Chu H-R, Li M, Song S-Y, Li G-Z, Liang D-C. Selection of Suitable Reference Genes for Normalization of Quantitative Real-Time PCR in Cartilage Tissue Injury and Repair in Rabbits. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2012; 13(11):14344-14355. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms131114344

Chicago/Turabian Style

Peng, Xiao-Xiang, Rong-Lan Zhao, Wei Song, Hai-Rong Chu, Meng Li, Shu-Ya Song, Guang-Zhou Li, and Dong-Chun Liang. 2012. "Selection of Suitable Reference Genes for Normalization of Quantitative Real-Time PCR in Cartilage Tissue Injury and Repair in Rabbits" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 13, no. 11: 14344-14355. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms131114344

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop