Next Article in Journal
Sensing and Responding to UV-A in Cyanobacteria
Next Article in Special Issue
Plant Glandular Trichomes as Targets for Breeding or Engineering of Resistance to Herbivores
Previous Article in Journal
Activation Energy of Aggregation-Disaggregation Self-Oscillation of Polymer Chain
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Phorbol Ester Fraction from Jatropha curcas Seed Oil: Potential and Limits for Crop Protection against Insect Pests
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

In Vitro Antifungal Activity of Burkholderia gladioli pv. agaricicola against Some Phytopathogenic Fungi

1
Department of Science, University of Basilicata, Viale dell'Ateneo Lucano, 85100 Potenza, Italy
2
School of Agricultural, Forestry, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Basilicata, Viale dell'Ateneo Lucano, 85100 Potenza, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13(12), 16291-16302; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms131216291
Submission received: 13 November 2012 / Revised: 27 November 2012 / Accepted: 29 November 2012 / Published: 3 December 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Green Biocides)

Abstract

:
The trend to search novel microbial natural biocides has recently been increasing in order to avoid the environmental pollution from use of synthetic pesticides. Among these novel natural biocides are the bioactive secondary metabolites of Burkholderia gladioli pv. agaricicola (Bga). The aim of this study is to determine antifungal activity of Bga strains against some phytopathogenic fungi. The fungicidal tests were carried out using cultures and cell-free culture filtrates against Botrytis cinerea, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus niger, Penicillium digitatum, Penicillium expansum, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Phytophthora cactorum. Results demonstrated that all tested strains exert antifungal activity against all studied fungi by producing diffusible metabolites which are correlated with their ability to produce extracellular hydrolytic enzymes. All strains significantly reduced the growth of studied fungi and the bacterial cells were more bioactive than bacterial filtrates. All tested Bulkholderia strains produced volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which inhibited the fungal growth and reduced the growth rate of Fusarium oxysporum and Rhizoctonia solani. GC/MS analysis of VOCs emitted by strain Bga 11096 indicated the presence of a compound that was identified as 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethenyl)-cyclohexene, a liquid hydrocarbon classified as cyclic terpene. This compound could be responsible for the antifungal activity, which is also in agreement with the work of other authors.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The biological control of plant diseases, insects and nematodes by microorganisms has been proposed as an alternative or a supplement to chemical control [1,2]. The biological control activity of several bacteria is exerted either directly through antagonism of pathogen development, or indirectly by eliciting a plant-mediated resistance response [3]. Mechanisms responsible for antagonistic activity include: inhibition of the pathogen growth; competition for colonization sites, nutrients and minerals; parasitism; and, mycophagy [46]. It is a common strategy of bacterial antagonists to inhibit the plant pathogens by excretion of antimicrobial metabolites (AMMs). Well-known AMMs are antibiotics, toxins and bio-surfactants [7]. Recently, it was demonstrated that volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including hydrocarbons, alcohols, ketones, aldehydes, ethers, esters, terpenes, terpene derivatives, and several heteroaromatic compounds produced by some bacteria can influence the growth of fungi [810].
Burkholderia gladioli pv. agaricicola (Bga) is an important pathogen in the mushroom industry, since it causes soft rot of Agaricus bitorquis and A. bisporus[1113]. Burkholderia gladioli possesses a great potential as a plant pathogen antagonist [1417]. In particular, the LMG 18920 strain of B. gladioli (Pseudomonas antimicrobica) showed antagonistic activity in vitro against a wide range of fungal and bacterial species [1517]. Metabolites produced by this bacterium caused a significant inhibition of the conidial germination of Botrytis cinerea[16,17]. Recent experiments performed in an apricot tree field proved its efficacy as a biocontrol agent against Monilia laxa[18], and it also showed completely in vitro inhibition for the conidial germination of Penicillium digitatum and Penicillium expansum[18]. Components of B. gladioli showed high ability to produce extracellular hydrolytic enzymes such as chitinase, protease, cellulase, amylase and glucanase that may have direct effect on the fungal growth [1923]. Among these enzymes, chitinase is able to degrade chitin in chitooligosaccharides which have numerous and important applications in pharmaceutical and industrial fields [21]. Jijakli and Lepoivre [22] demonstrated that in vivo and in vitro antifungal activity of Pichia anomala are directly related to a β-1,3-exoglucanase enzyme production. Saligkarias et al.[23] reported that protease enzyme has been shown to have antifungal activity against phytopathogenic fungi in vivo and in vitro.
This work aims to evaluate the bioactivity of of four Bga strains and their culture filtrates against the plant pathogenic and plant-associated fungi: B. cinerea Pers., Aspergillus flavus Link ex Gray, Aspergillus niger van Tieghem, P. digitatum Sacc., P. expansum Link, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary and Phytophthora cactorum (Leb. and Cohn) Schröeter, and to assess the effect of Bga-produced VOCs on the growth rate and suppression of Fusarium oxysporum Schlect and Rhizoctonia solani J.G. Kühn.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Screening of Antifungal Activity

Many species of bacteria have been reported to be able to suppress the growth of several fungal and bacterial pathogens and nematodes through antagonist behavior. Among them are included: Agrobacterium radiobacter, Bacillus subtillis, B. megaterium, B. pumilus, B. cereus, Burkholderia cepacia, Pasteuria penetrans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, P. fluorescent, P. putida, P. syringae, Serratia marcescens, Serratia sp., and Sternotrophomonas maltophilia[2428].
In this study, a preliminary experiment was carried out to evaluate in the dual plate assay the ability of four B.g. pv. agaricicola strains and of their respective culture filtrates to inhibit the growth of the phytopathogenic and plant-associated fungi B. cinerea, A. flavus, A. niger, P. digitatum, P. expansum, S. sclerotiorum and P. cactorum. Results showed that Bga strains and their culture filtrates inhibited the growth of the selected fungi. Similar antifungal activities have been reported for Burkholderia spp. [19,29,30]. Although in some of the cases the microbial activity was proposed to be mostly due to the fungal cell wall lytic enzymes [30], other antifungal metabolites such as antibiotics, Fe-chelating siderophores, ammonia and cyanide were also reported [19].
Mycelia growth of target fungi in dual plate assays was significantly different from the control (p < 0.05). Strain ICMP 11096 of B.g. pv. agaricicola revealed the highest significant fungitoxicity against A. flavus, A. niger, B. cinerea, P. expansum, P. cactorum and S. sclerotiorum (Table 1). In contrast, strain Bga ICMP 12220 showed the highest significant antifungal activity against P. digitatum (Table 1).

2.2. Comparing the Fungitoxicity of Bacterial Culture and Filtrate

Bga strain ICMP 11096 has been selected for comparing the fungitoxicity of either whole culture or cell-free culture filtrate according to the percentage of fungal mycelium inhibition (PGI). The culture filtrate of bacterial strain ICMP 11096 inhibited the growth of all tested fungi on PDA agar plate assay (Figure 1). The size of the inhibition zones produced by bacterial cells was significantly higher than that produced by the corresponding culture filtrate. On the other hand, there is no significant difference between filtrate and bacterial cells regarding A. niger and S. sclerotiorum, which achieved the same fungitoxicity percentage.

2.3. Extracellular Hydrolytic Activities

Bga strains showed chitinase, protease and glucanase activities, forming clear zones on chitin, skim milk and Lichenan media plates ranging from 13 to 25 mm, 25 to 36 mm and 20 to 26 mm, respectively. On the contrary, the selected strains did not show cellulase, amylase, pectinase and polygalacturonase activities. The production of chitinase and glucanase could contribute to the growth inhibition control of the phytopathogenic fungi through degradation of fungal cell walls [31]. Protease enzymes as cell wall lytic enzymes, may play a significant role in degrading the fungal cell wall, since fungal cell wall “skeletal” components are embedded in a protein matrix [23] and proteolytic activity is necessary for the lysis of whole fungal cells.

2.4. Antifungal Activity of Volatile Organic Compounds

Strains of Bga produced VOCs which reduced the mycelium growth of F. oxysporum (Figure 2). Strains Bga ICMP11096 and ICMP12220 showed the highest significant reduction of fungal growth compared to other studied strains. Strain Bga ICMP11096 has been selected for studying the effect of its VOCs on the fungal growth rate of F. oxysporum (Figure 3). After four days of incubation, the fungal growth appeared to be almost stopped. Similar results were obtained when the above assays were performed versus R. solani (Figure 4). Strains Bga ICMP11096, ICMP11097 and ICMP 12220 showed the highest significant reduction of fungal growth compared to strain Bga ICMP 12322. In contrast, Kai et al.[32] found that volatiles of Pseudomonas spp., Serratia spp., Stenotrophomonas spp. drastically inhibited the growth of R. solani, while a moderate or no inhibition was observed with the volatile substances of B. cepacia and Staphylococcus epidermidis, respectively.
Also in this case the strain Bga ICMP 11096 was able to block completely the mycelium growth after four days of incubation (Figure 5).

2.5. Analysis of VOCs by GC-MS

GC-MS analysis of VOCs produced by Bga strain ICMP 11096 indicated the presence of 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethenyl)-cyclohexene, which was detected at retention time 11.61 min and has a molecular weight of 136 (Figure 6). This isolated main volatile compound is a liquid hydrocarbon that can be classified as cyclic terpene. This compound could be responsible for the antifungal activity of Bga strain ICMP 11096 against all studied phytopathogenic fungi.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Bacterial and Fungal Strains Used in this Study

The phytopathogenic as well as plant-associated fungi B. cinerea, A. flavus, A. niger, P. digitatum, P. expansum, S. sclerotiorum, P. cactorum, F. oxysporum and R. solani, were grown and maintained on potato dextrose agar (PDA) or corn meal agar (CMA). Bga strains ICMP 11096, 11097, 12220 and 12322, isolated from Agaricus bitorquis (Quelet) Saccardo, were obtained from International Collection of Micro-organisms from Plants (ICMP) (Landcare Research, Auckland, New Zealand). Bacterial strains were maintained as lyophils at 4 °C and subcultures were obtained on the medium King Agar B (KB) for 48 h at 25 °C.

3.2. Antifungal Assays

The antifungal activity of of Bga strains against fungi was carried out by growing the bacterial strains on KB medium and incubated at 30 °C for 24 h. Then 1 cm2 agar disc was cut off with a cork borer and placed onto the surface of fungal plates containing PDA medium using bacterial disc method [33]. The plates were incubated at 25 °C for 4–5 days.
The antifungal activity of cell-free filtrates of Bga against fungi grown on PDA was conducted using the diffusion method [34]. Erlenmeyer flask containing 150 mL of liquid minimal mineral medium (MM) were inoculated with 1.5 mL bacterial suspension containing 108 CFU mL−1 and incubated under rotary shaking (180 rpm) at 25 °C for 7 days [35]. Then, the culture was centrifuged at 20,000× g for 15 min and membrane filtered (Millipore, 0.20 μm), then 10 μL of filtrate was deposited on 14 mL solid PDA medium inoculated with 1 cm2 of fungal disc. After 4–5 days of incubation, the diameter of the fungal colonies were scored and measured in mm.

3.3. Comparing the Fungitoxicity of Bacterial Cultures and Filtrates

According to the screening test, the agar diffusion method was used for testing the antifungal activity of cell-free culture filtrates for the highest bioactive antagonistic bacterial strain of Bga. The antifungal activity of bacterial cultures and filtrates was determined against all studied phytopathogenic fungi and the fungitoxicity was expressed as percentage of growth inhibition (PGI) and calculated according to Zygadlo et al. formula [36] (Equation 1).
PGI  ( % ) = 100 ( GC - GT ) / GC
where GC represents the average diameter of fungi grown in PDA (control); GT represents the average diameter of fungi cultivated on the treated PDA dish containing the antagonistic bacteria.

3.4. Extracellular Hydrolytic Activities

Chitinase and protease activities of Bga strains were determined according to Tahtamouni et al.[37] on plates of KB containing chitin (1%) and skim milk (1%) respectively. Cellulase activity was detected according to the Essghaier et al. method [38] using carboxymethyl cellulose (0.4%). Glucanase activity was detected according to Teather and Wood method [39] using Lichenan (0.2%).
Amylase, pectinase and polygalacturanase activities were detected using soluble starch (1%), pectin (0.5%) and polygalacturanic acid (1%), respectively [40,41]. After incubation at 30 °C for 4–5 days, the plates were flooded with specific staining solutions; congo red 0.03% for chitinase, cellulase and glucanase; lugol solution for amylase; CTAB 2% for pectinase; and, ruthenium red 0.1% for polygalacturanase. The enzymatic activity was taken as evidence by appearance of clear zones around the colonies and their diameters were measured in millimeters.

3.5. Antifungal Activity of Volatile Secondary Metabolites

The assays were carried out by plating 100 μL of bacterial suspension containing 108 CFU mL−1 on the surface of Petri dishes containing 14 mL KB incubated at 25 °C for 24 h, whereas fungi were grown on Petri dishes containing 14 mL PDA incubated at 30 °C for 96 h. The bottom parts of the plates were tightly joined with parafilm and incubated in the darkness at 30 °C for 4–5 days. Fungitoxicity of volatile metabolites was expressed by measuring the diameter of mycelium growth (mm). All treatments of the experiment were carried out twice with three replicates. The highest bioactive antagonistic strain was selected to study the effect of its volatile metabolites on fungal growth rate using the Evmert et al. method [42].

3.6. Analysis of Volatile Substances by GC-MS

For the production of VOCs, the Bga strains were grown on KB and 100 μL bacterial suspensions of about 108 CFU mL−1 were used to inoculate 25 mL glass vials containing 10 mL KB. Vials were sealed with a plastic cap fitted with a Teflon/silicon septum and then incubated for 5 days at 25 °C.
An SPME fiber coated with 100 μm of nongrafted poly-dimethylsiloxane (PDMS) phase (Supelco 57300-U on a Supelco 57330 support) was conditioned for 1 h at 250 °C in helium stream; after that, the fiber was inserted into the headspace of the glass vial containing the inoculated strain and was maintained there for 20 min at 25 °C. The fiber was then introduced into the injection port of a HP 6890 plus gas chromatograph equipped with a Phenomenex Zebron ZB-5 MS capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm ID × 0.25 μm film thickness). The HP5973 mass selective detector was used (mass range: 15–800 mAU; scan rate: 1.9 scan/s; EM voltage: 1435), helium at 0.8 mL min−1 was adopted as carrier gas. The injection port, equipped with glass insert (internal diameter 0.75 mm) was splitless at 250 °C. The desorption time of 1.0 min was used. The oven temperature was fixed at 40 °C for 2 min, then increased up to 250 °C (8 °C min−1); finally, it was maintained for 10 min. All the analyses were performed in triplicate. A blank run was performed after each analysis in order to confirm that no residual compound was polluting the fiber or the column. The chromatograms obtained from the total ion current (TIC) were integrated without any correction for coelutions and results were expressed as percent of the total area of peaks. All the peaks were identified from their mass spectra by comparison with spectra in Wiley 6N and NIST98 libraries.

3.7. Statistical Analysis

The experimental data of the antifungal activity of diffusible and volatile bioactive substances of Bga strains on the phytopathogenic and plant-associated fungi growth were analyzed statistically by one-way ANOVA, Duncan and Tukey B post hoc test using SPSS statistical software (version 13.0, Prentice Hall: Chicago, IL, USA, 2004).

4. Conclusions

The genus Burkholderia in recent years has been phylogenetically well defined, consisting of species that are functionally remarkably diverse [43]. In fact, Burkholderia species have been isolated from many different environmental niches, including soil and water, and can form associations with plants, animals and humans. Several Burkholderia spp. are widespread in nature and some of them are considered to be beneficial in the natural environment [15]. Burkholderia gladioli pv. agaricicola is an important pathogen in the mushroom industry; it causes soft rot of Agaricus bitorquis and A. bisporus[1113].
In the present study we verified the biological and metabolic properties of selected strains of Bga, which can be exploited for the biological control of fungal diseases. Strains of Bga have been shown to antagonize a wide range of important phytopathogenic and plant-associated fungi, including B. cinerea, A. flavus, A. niger, P. digitatum, P. expansum, S. sclerotiorum and P. cactorum. In other studies the ability of this mushroom pathogen to inhibit the growth of yeast, Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria has been reported [11,12,1820]. The highest level of antifungal activity was recorded when bacterial cultures of Bga were used in antagonist dual tests. This antifungal activity could be attributed to the ability of studied bacterial strains to produce some extracellular hydrolytic enzymes such as chitinase, protease and glucanase. The production of hydrolytic enzymes is considered one of the most important mechanisms explaining the biocontrol of phytopathogenic fungi by the degradation of fungal cell walls [44].
On the other hand, Bga produced VOCs, which apparently reduced the fungal growth rate of F. oxysporum and R. solani and completely blocked their growth after five days of incubation. GC-MS analysis of bulk VOCs produced by Bga strain ICMP11096 showed that the main compound was 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethenyl)-cyclohexene, a cyclic terpene considered one of the most common D isomer of limonene. This VOC is apparently responsible for the antifungal activity against phytopathogenic and plant-associated fungi in agreement with Ayoola et al.[45] that reported the antimicrobial activity of D limonene against a wide range of organisms including fungi. On the other hand, Hossain et al.[46] showed the remarkable antifungal effect of Orthosiphon stamineus essential oil against some phytopathogenic fungi. The activity of O. stamineus essential oil has been attributed to the presence of caryophyllene, humulene, elemene, bourbonene, pinene, caryophyllene oxide, camphene and limonene, which significantly inhibited the growth of all the phytopathogens tested as B. cinerea, R. solani, Fusarium solani, Colletotricum capsici and Phytophthora capsici.
We can speculate that the potential biological control of selected Bga strains could be correlated with their ability to produce extracellular hydrolytic enzymes and diffusible and volatile secondary metabolites. Although the preliminary results of this study suggest Bga as biocontrol agents for the diseases caused by tested fungi, further investigation appears necessary in this regard, as well as the chemical and biological characterization of bioactive secondary metabolites, which are currently under examination in our laboratories.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs for the research grant assigned to Hazem Elshafie, and to UNIBAS-CLA for English revision.
  • Conflict of InterestThe authors declare no conflict of interest

References

  1. Parke, J.L.; Gurian-Sherman, D. Diversity of the Burkholderia cepaciacom plex and implications for risk assessment of biological control strains. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol 2001, 39, 225–258. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gerhardson, B. Biological substitutes for pesticides. Trends Biotechnol 2002, 20, 338–343. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bordiec, S.; Paquis, S.; Lacroix, H.; Dhond, S.; Barka, E.A.; Kauffmann, S.; Jeandet, P.; Gourbeyre, F.M.; Clement, C.; Baillieul, F.; et al. Comparative analysis of defence responses induced by the endophytic plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Burkholderia phytofirmans strain PsJN and the non-host bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv. Pisi in grapevine cell suspensions. J. Exp. Bot 2010, 62, 595–603. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bais, H.P.; Park, S.W.; Weir, T.L.; Callaway, R.M.; Vivanco, J.M. How plants communicate using the underground information superhighway. Trends Plant Sci 2004, 9, 26–32. [Google Scholar]
  5. Walker, T.S.; Bais, H.P.; Grotewold, E.; Vivanco, M.J. Update on root exudation and rhizosphere biology. Plant Physiol 2003, 132, 44–51. [Google Scholar]
  6. Haas, D.; Defago, G. Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 2005, 10, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  7. Raaijmakers, J.M.; Vlami, M.; de Sou, J.T. Antibiotic production by bacterial biocontrol agents. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2002, 81, 537–547. [Google Scholar]
  8. Alstrom, S. Characteristics of bacteria from oil seed rape in relation to their biocontrol of activity against Verticillium dahlia. J. Phytopathol 2001, 149, 57–64. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wheatley, R.E. The consequences of volatile organic compound mediated bacterial and fungal interactions. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2002, 81, 357–364. [Google Scholar]
  10. Schalchli, H.; Hormazabal, E.; Becerra, J.; Birkett, M.; Alvear, M.; Vidal, J.; Quiroz, A. Antifungal activity of volatile metabolites emitted by mycelial cultures of saprophytic fungi. J. Chem. Ecol 2011, 27, 503–513. [Google Scholar]
  11. Andolfi, A.; Cimmino, A.; Lo Cantore, P.; Iacobellis, N.S.; Evidente, A. Bioactive and structural metabolites of Pseudomonas and Burkholderia species causal agents of cultivated mushrooms diseases. Perspect. Med. Chem 2008, 2, 81–112. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lamorte, D.; Elshafie, H.; Lelario, F.; Bufo, S.A.; Iacobellis, N.S. Production of Bioactive Secondary Metabolites by Burkholderia gladioli Pathovars; Pesticides 2010, Proceedings of 6th European Conference “Pesticides and Related Organic Micropollutants in the Environment—12th Symposium on Chemistry and Fate of Modern Pesticides”, Matera, Italy, 7–10 September 2010, Bufo, S.A., Scrano, L., Eds.; Digilabs: Bari, Italy, 2010; pp. 350–351. [Google Scholar]
  13. Prashanth, S.N.; Bianco, G.; Cataldi, T.R.; Iacobellis, N.S. Acyl homoserine lactone production by bacteria associated with cultivated Mushrooms. J. Agric. Food Chem 2011, 59, 11461–11472. [Google Scholar]
  14. Chiou, A.L.; Wu, W.S. Isolation, identification and evaluation of bacterial antagonists against Botrytis ellipticaon lily. J. Phytopathol 2001, 149, 319–324. [Google Scholar]
  15. Compant, S.; Nowak, J.; Coenye, T.; Clement, C.; Ait Barka, E. Diversity and occurrence of Burkholderia spp. in the natural environment. FEMS Microbiol. Rev 2008, 32, 607–626. [Google Scholar]
  16. Walker, R.; Emslie, K.A.; Allan, E.J. Bioassay methods for the detection of antifungal activity by Pseudomonas antimicrobica against the grey mould pathogen Botrytis cinerea. J. Appl. Bacteriol 1996, 81, 531–537. [Google Scholar]
  17. Walker, R.; Innes, C.M.J.; Allan, E.J. The potential biocontrol agent Pseudomonas antimicrobica inhibits germination of conidia and outgrowth of Botrytis cinerea. Lett. Appl. Microbiol 2001, 32, 346–348. [Google Scholar]
  18. Altindag, M.; Sahin, M.; Esitken, A.; Ercisli, S.; Guleryuz, M.; Donmez, M.F.; Sahin, F. Biological control of brown rot (Monilinia laxa Er.) on apricot (Prunus armeniaca L. cv. Hacihaliloglu) by Bacillus, Burkholderia, and Pseudomonas application under in vitro and in vivo conditions. Biol. Control 2006, 38, 369–372. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hu, F.-P; Young, J.M. Biocidal activity in plant pathogenic Acidovorax, Burkholderia, Herbaspirillum, Ralstonia and Xanthomonas spp. J. Appl. Microbiol. 1998, 84, 263–271. [Google Scholar]
  20. Scuderi, G.; Bonaccorsi, A.; Panebianco, S.; Vitale, A.; Polizzi, G.; Cirvilleri, G. Some strains of Burkholderia gladioli are potential candidates for postharvest biocontrol of fungal rots in citrus and apple fruits. J. Plant Pathol 2009, 91, 207–213. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang, Y.; Zhou, P.; Yu, J.; Pan, X.; Wang, P.; Lan, W.; Tao, S. Antimicrobial effect of chitooligosaccharides produced by chitosanase from Pseudomonas CUY8. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr 2007, 16, 174–177. [Google Scholar]
  22. Jijakli, M.W.; Lepoivre, P. Characterization of an exo-beta-1,3-glucanase produced by Pichia anomala strain K, antagonist of Botrytis cinerea on apples. Phytophatology 1998, 88, 335–343. [Google Scholar]
  23. Saligkarias, I.D.; Gravanis, F.T.; Harry, A.S. Biological control of Botrytis cinerea on tomato plants by the use of epiphytic yeasts Candida guilliermondii strains 101 and US 7 and Candida oleophila strain I-182: II. A study on mode of action. Biol. Control 2002, 25, 151–161. [Google Scholar]
  24. Fulton, E.W.; Dickson, D.W.; Whitty, E.B. Suppression of Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica by Pasteuria penetransin field soil. J. Nematol 1996, 28, 43–49. [Google Scholar]
  25. Donmez, M.F.; Esitken, A.; Yildiz, S. Biocontrol of botrytis cinerea on strawberry fruit by plant growth promoting bacteria. J. Anim. Plant Sci 2011, 21, 758–763. [Google Scholar]
  26. Heydari, A.; Misaghi, I.J. Biocontrol activity Burkholderia cepacia against Rhizoctonia solani in herbicide-treated soil. Plant Soil 1998, 202, 109–116. [Google Scholar]
  27. Miyagawa, H. Biocontrol of bacterial seedling blight of rice caused by Burkholderia gladioli using with its avirulent isolate. Ann. Phytopathol. Soc. Jpn 2000, 66, 232–238. [Google Scholar]
  28. Vesudevan, P.; Kavitha, S.; Priyadarisini, V.B.; Bubejee, L.; Gnanamanickam, S.S. Biological Control of Rice Diseases. Gnanamanickam, S.S., Ed.; In Progress in Biological Control; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2002; Volume 2, pp. 11–32. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sindhu, S.S.; Dadarwal, K.R. Chitinolytic and cellulolytic Pseudomonas spp. Antagonistic to fungal pathogens enhances nodulation by Mesorhizobium spp. Cicer in chickpea. Microbiol. Rev 2001, 56, 662–676. [Google Scholar]
  30. Weller, D.M. Pseudomonas biocontrol agents of soilborne pathogens: Looking back over 30 years. Phytopathology 2007, 97, 250–256. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ordentlich, A.; Elad, Y.; Chet, I. The role of chitinase of Serratia marcescens in biocontrol Sclerotium rolfsii. Phytopathology 1988, 78, 84–87. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kai, M.; Evmert, U.; Berg, G.; Piechulla, B. Volatiles of bacterial antagonists inhibit mycelial growth of the plant pathogen Rhizoctonia solani. Arch. Microbiol 2007, 187, 351–360. [Google Scholar]
  33. Tomas, M.J.E.; Simone, P.M.D.; Congergado, F.; Suarez, F.G. Methods to assess antagonism of soil microorganisms towards fungal spore germination. Soil Biol. Biochem 1980, 12, 197–198. [Google Scholar]
  34. Mehmood, Z.; Ahmed, I.; Mohammad, F.; Ahmed, S. Indian medicinal plants: A potential source of anticandidial drug. Pharm. Biol 1999, 37, 237–242. [Google Scholar]
  35. Lavermicocca, P.; Iacobellis, N.S.; Simmaco, M.; Graniti, A. Biological properties and spectrum of activity of Pseudomonas syringae pv. Syringae toxins. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol 1997, 50, 129–140. [Google Scholar]
  36. Zygadlo, J.A.; Guzman, C.A.; Grosso, N.R. Antifungal properties of the leaf oils of Tagetes minuta L., T. filifolia Lag. J. Essent. Oil Res 1994, 6, 617–621. [Google Scholar]
  37. Tahtamouni, M.E.W.; Hameed, K.M.; Saadoun, I.M. Biological control of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum using indigenous chitolytic actinomycetes in Jordan. J. Plant Pathol 2006, 22, 107–114. [Google Scholar]
  38. Essghaier, B.; Fardeau, M.L.; Cayol, J.L.; Haijaoui, M.R.; Boudabous, A.; Jijakli, H.; Zouaoui, N.S. Biological control of grey mould in strawberry fruits by halophilic bacteria. J. Appl. Microbiol 2009, 106, 833–846. [Google Scholar]
  39. Teather, R.M.; Wood, P.J. Use of Congo red-polysacchatide interaction in enumeration and characterization of cellulolytic bacteria from the bovine rumen. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 1998, 43, 777–780. [Google Scholar]
  40. Sung, N.; Keun, K.; Sung, H.C. Isolation of soil bacteria secreting raw-starch-digesting enzyme and the enzyme production. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol 1993, 3, 99–107. [Google Scholar]
  41. Bhardwaj, V.; Garg, N. Exploitation of Micro-Organisms for Isolation and Screening of Pectinase from Environment. Proceedings of 8th International Conference, Making Innovation Work for Society: Linking, Leveraging and Learning, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 1–3 November 2010.
  42. Evmert, M.K.; Gabriele, B.G.; Piechulla, B. Volatiles of bacterial antagonists inhibit mycelial growth of the plant pathogen Rhizoctonia solani. Arch. Microbiol 2007, 187, 351–360. [Google Scholar]
  43. Coenye, T.; Vandamme, P. Diversity and significance of Burkholderia species occupying diverse ecological niches. Environ. Microbiol 2003, 5, 719–729. [Google Scholar]
  44. Cherif, M.; Benhamou, N.; Belanger, R.R. Occurrence of cellulose and chitin in the hyphal cell walls of Pythium ultimum: A comparative study with other plant pathogenic fungi. Can. J. Microbiol 1992, 39, 213–222. [Google Scholar]
  45. Ayoola, G.A.; Johnson, O.O.; Adelowotan, T.; Aibinu, I.E.; Adenipekun, E.; Adepoju-Bello, A.A.; Coker, H.A.B.; Odugbemi, T.O. Evaluation of the chemical constituents and the antimicrobial activity of the volatile oil of Citrus reticulata fruit (Tangerine fruit peel) from South West Nigeria. Afr. J. Biotechnol 2008, 7, 2227–2231. [Google Scholar]
  46. Hossain, M.A; Ismail, Z.; Rahman, A.; Kang, S.C. Chemical composition and anti-fungal properties of the essential oils and crude extracts of Orthosiphon stamineus Benth. Ind. Crop Prod. 2008, 27, 328–334. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Percentage of growth inhibition (PGI) for cell-free culture filtrate and bacterial culture of Bga ICMP 11096. Bars with different letters indicate mean values significantly different at p < 0.05 according to Tukey B test. Data are expressed as mean of three replicates ± SD.
Figure 1. Percentage of growth inhibition (PGI) for cell-free culture filtrate and bacterial culture of Bga ICMP 11096. Bars with different letters indicate mean values significantly different at p < 0.05 according to Tukey B test. Data are expressed as mean of three replicates ± SD.
Ijms 13 16291f1
Figure 2. Antifungal activity of volatile organic compounds of Bga strains vs. F. oxysporum (5 days growth). Bars with different letters indicate mean values significantly different at p < 0.05 according to Duncan test. Data are expressed as mean of three replicates ± SD.
Figure 2. Antifungal activity of volatile organic compounds of Bga strains vs. F. oxysporum (5 days growth). Bars with different letters indicate mean values significantly different at p < 0.05 according to Duncan test. Data are expressed as mean of three replicates ± SD.
Ijms 13 16291f2
Figure 3. Effect of volatile secondary metabolites of Bga ICMP11096 on the growth rate of F. oxysporum. Data are expressed as a mean of three replicates ± SD.
Figure 3. Effect of volatile secondary metabolites of Bga ICMP11096 on the growth rate of F. oxysporum. Data are expressed as a mean of three replicates ± SD.
Ijms 13 16291f3
Figure 4. Antifungal activity of volatile secondary metabolites of Bga strains vs. R. solani (five days). Bars with different letters indicate mean values significantly different at p < 0.05 according to Duncan test. Data are expressed as mean of three replicates ± SD.
Figure 4. Antifungal activity of volatile secondary metabolites of Bga strains vs. R. solani (five days). Bars with different letters indicate mean values significantly different at p < 0.05 according to Duncan test. Data are expressed as mean of three replicates ± SD.
Ijms 13 16291f4
Figure 5. Effect of volatile secondary metabolites of Bga 11096 on growth rate of R. solani. Data are expressed as mean of three replicates ± SD.
Figure 5. Effect of volatile secondary metabolites of Bga 11096 on growth rate of R. solani. Data are expressed as mean of three replicates ± SD.
Ijms 13 16291f5
Figure 6. Mass spectrum of the main volatile compound produced by Bga ICMP11096, a cyclic terpene (an isomer of limonene).
Figure 6. Mass spectrum of the main volatile compound produced by Bga ICMP11096, a cyclic terpene (an isomer of limonene).
Ijms 13 16291f6
Table 1. In vitro antagonistic activity of bacterial cultures and cell-free culture filtrates recorded as the mean diameter of fungal mycelium growth (mm) ± Standard Deviation. Values followed by the same letter in each vertical column are not significantly different according to Duncan test at p < 0.05. Data were obtained on three replicates.
Table 1. In vitro antagonistic activity of bacterial cultures and cell-free culture filtrates recorded as the mean diameter of fungal mycelium growth (mm) ± Standard Deviation. Values followed by the same letter in each vertical column are not significantly different according to Duncan test at p < 0.05. Data were obtained on three replicates.
Fungal pathogens (Mean diameter of fungal mycelium growth mm ± SD)

Bacterial FiltratesB. cinereaA. flavusA. nigerP. digitatumP. expansumS. sclerotiorumP. cactorum
1109610.5 ± 2.12 c13.0 ± 1.41 c11.0 ± 1.41 c11.5 ± 2.12 b11.0 ± 1.41 b6.5 ± 0.71 c7.5 ± 0.71 b
1109715.5 ± 2.12 b18.0 ± 1.41 b15.0 ± 1.41 b,c13.0 ± 1.41 b13.5 ± 0.71 b9.5 ± 0.71 b10.0 ± 2.83 b
1222011.0 ± 1.41 b,c16.5 ± 0.71 b,c16.0 ± 1.41 b9.5 ± 0.71 b14.5 ± 0.71 b8.5 ± 0.71 b,c11.0 ± 1.41 b
1232214.0 ± 1.41 b,c16.5 ± 2.12 b,c15.0 ± 1.41 b,c7.5 ± 0.71 b13.5 ± 2.12 b9.5 ± 0.71 b8.5 ± 0.71 b
Control46.0 ± 1.41 a36.5 ± 2.12 a47.0 ± 2.83 a36.0 ± 4.24 a27.0 ± 2.83 a44.0 ± 1.41 a40.0 ± 1.41 a
Bacterial CulturesB. cinereaA. flavusA. nigerP. digitatumP. expansumS. sclerotiorumP. cactorum
110965.5 ± 1.4 c12.6 ± 0.7 c9.0 ± 2.1 c6.0 ± 1.4 c5.0 ± 2.1 c6.0 ± 1.4 c2.5 ± 0.7 c
110978.5 ± 2.1 b17.0 ± 0.7 b14.0 ± 2.1 b8.5 ± 2.8 b8.0 ± 2.8 b11.5 ± 2.5 b5.5 ± 0.7
122209.0 ± 1.4 b14.0 ± 1.4 b,c13.0 ± 2.1 b4.5 ± 0.7 b,c6.0 ± 2.1 b,c9.5 ± 2.1 b3.5 ± 0.7 b,c
123228.0 ± 2.1 b19.0 ± 1.4 b14.0 ± 1.4 b11.5 ± 2.1 b9.5 ± 2.1 b9.5 ± 0.7 b7.5 ± 0.7
Control27.5 ± 2.1 a48.0 ± 2.8 a42.0 ± 2.1 a39.0 ± 1.4 a47.0 ± 2.8 a44.5 ± 2.1 a31.5 ± 2.1 a

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Elshafie, H.S.; Camele, I.; Racioppi, R.; Scrano, L.; Iacobellis, N.S.; Bufo, S.A. In Vitro Antifungal Activity of Burkholderia gladioli pv. agaricicola against Some Phytopathogenic Fungi. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 16291-16302. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms131216291

AMA Style

Elshafie HS, Camele I, Racioppi R, Scrano L, Iacobellis NS, Bufo SA. In Vitro Antifungal Activity of Burkholderia gladioli pv. agaricicola against Some Phytopathogenic Fungi. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2012; 13(12):16291-16302. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms131216291

Chicago/Turabian Style

Elshafie, Hazem S., Ippolito Camele, Rocco Racioppi, Laura Scrano, Nicola S. Iacobellis, and Sabino A. Bufo. 2012. "In Vitro Antifungal Activity of Burkholderia gladioli pv. agaricicola against Some Phytopathogenic Fungi" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 13, no. 12: 16291-16302. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms131216291

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop