Next Article in Journal
Antinociceptive and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Octacosanol from the Leaves of Sabicea grisea var. grisea in Mice
Previous Article in Journal
Composition, Structure and Functional Properties of Protein Concentrates and Isolates Produced from Walnut (Juglans regia L.)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 13
Issue 2
10.3390/ijms13021582
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Functional Expression of an Orchid Fragrance Gene in Lactococcus lactis

by
Adelene Ai Lian Song
1,
Janna O. Abdullah
2,
Mohd Puad Abdullah
1,
Norazizah Shafee
2 and
Raha A. Rahim
1,3,*
1
Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University Putra Malaysia, 43400, UPM Serdang Selangor, Malaysia
2
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University Putra Malaysia, 43400, UPM Serdang, Malaysia
3
Institute of Bioscience, University Putra Malaysia, 43400, UPM Serdang, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13(2), 1582-1597; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13021582
Submission received: 11 October 2011 / Revised: 30 November 2011 / Accepted: 20 December 2011 / Published: 2 February 2012
(This article belongs to the Section Biochemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Vanda Mimi Palmer (VMP), an orchid hybrid of Vanda tesselata and Vanda Tan Chay Yan is a highly scented tropical orchid which blooms all year round. Previous studies revealed that VMP produces a variety of isoprenoid volatiles during daylight. Isoprenoids are well known to contribute significantly to the scent of most fragrant plants. They are a large group of secondary metabolites which may possess valuable characteristics such as flavor, fragrance and toxicity and are produced via two pathways, the mevalonate (MVA) pathway or/and the 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol-4-phosphate (MEP) pathway. In this study, a sesquiterpene synthase gene denoted VMPSTS, previously isolated from a floral cDNA library of VMP was cloned and expressed in Lactococcus lactis to characterize the functionality of the protein. L. lactis, a food grade bacterium which utilizes the mevalonate pathway for isoprenoid production was found to be a suitable host for the characterization of plant terpene synthases. Through recombinant expression of VMPSTS, it was revealed that VMPSTS produced multiple sesquiterpenes and germacrene D dominates its profile.

1. Introduction

Isoprenoids are a large and diverse class of naturally occurring metabolites. While all organisms produce isoprenoids such as prenyl lipids for cell membrane synthesis and ubiquinone for electron transport as part of their primary metabolism [1], many also produce isoprenoids as secondary metabolites with valuable characteristics such as flavor, fragrance, toxicity and medicinal properties. These qualities have been widely applied to pharmaceuticals such as the anti-malarial artemisinin and the chemotherapeutic paclitaxel, nutraceuticals such as carotenoids, flavors such as limonene and linalool, fragrances such as citronellol and geraniol [2] and fuels such as farnesane [3]. Isoprenoids have been reported to be produced via two pathways, the mevalonate (MVA) pathway and/or the 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol-4-phosphate (MEP) pathway, depending on the organism. Both pathways converge at a common precursor, isopentenyl pyrophosphate and its isomer dimethylallyl diphosphate (IPP/DMAPP) [4]. These precursors make up the C5 isoprenes which form the backbone structure for all isoprenoids. Depending on the number of C5 isoprene units, isoprenoids are further divided into mono-, sesqui-, di-, tri- and tetraterpenes [5].
There are more than 50,000 known isoprenoids to date and the major source of these isoprenoids is plants [6]. Unfortunately, since isoprenoids are produced as secondary metabolites in plants, they are not produced in appealing amounts in many cases or have to be extracted from a complex matrix. This combined with other limiting factors such as long life cycles, seasonal and regional limitations and the need for complicated down-stream processes to isolate the isoprenoid compounds have made plants to be unfavorable commercial isoprenoid factories. For example, a single dose of Taxol®, a chemotherapeutic drug produced from the diterpene taxadiene, requires the entire bark of a 100 year old Taxus brevifolia tree to produce [7]. In view of this, heterologous host production is deemed the savior to these limitations and much effort has been put into producing plant isoprenoids in microbial cell factories. Since prokaryotes possess the necessary metabolic pathways involved in isoprenoid production, plant terpene synthases cloned into prokaryotes enable them to produce plant isoprenoids in vivo. This can be carried out by utilization of the host’s precursors such as geranyl pyrophosphate (GPP) and farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP) for the production of mono- and sesquiterpenes respectively, provided that the pool of precursors is sufficient to maintain the requirements of both the endogenous pathways as well as the fabricated one. Therefore, efficient production hosts such as Escherichia coli [8,9] and yeasts [10–12] have been metabolically engineered for increased heterologous isoprenoids production.
In recent years, Lactococcus lactis, a Gram-positive lactic acid bacterium, which has been used for centuries in the food industry, has found new and exciting applications and has been developed into cell factories for the production of bioactive compounds such as enzymes, peptides and vaccine antigens [13,14]. Compared to E. coli, L. lactis has certain advantages as a heterologous host such as being food-grade and thereby classified as GRAS (Generally Regarded as Safe) and the absence of inclusion bodies, enabling uncomplicated product recovery [15]. Coupled with the development of the nisin-controlled gene expression (NICE) system [16] which uses the food grade inducer nisin for expression, L. lactis has become one of the most successful Gram-positive hosts for genetic engineering. However, to date, there are only a handful of plant genes which has been expressed in L. lactis [17–19], of which only one is an isoprenoid gene, the linalool/nerolidol synthase (FaNES) from strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa) [20].
In the current paper, we report on the functional expression of a sesquiterpene synthase gene from Vanda Mimi Palmer (VMP) in L. lactis which uses the mevalonate pathway for isoprenoid production, unlike most prokaryotes which use the MEP pathway. VMP is an award winning ornamental orchid hybrid of Vanda Tan Chay Yan and Vanda tessellate [21]. This orchid hybrid is known for its distinct sweet fragrance which was found to be dominated by a concoction of benzenoid, phenylpropanoid and terpenoid compounds [22]. The VMP sesquiterpene synthase gene, designated as VMPSTS was previously isolated and molecularly characterized based on its sequence but was not functionally identified (NCBI GenBank Accession no: EU145743) [23]. In the current study, through recombinant protein expression of the VMPSTS protein in L. lactis, the production of the plant isoprenoids by the recombinant sesquiterpene synthase was analyzed and identified. More importantly, L. lactis was shown to be a potential host for heterologous isoprenoid production, specifically sesquiterpenes, concurring with findings by Hernandez et al. [20].

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Plasmid Construction and Stability of Recombinant Strains

The sesquiterpene synthase from Vanda Mimi Palmer, previously isolated by Chan et al. [23] was successfully cloned into pNZ8048 yielding pNZ:VMPSTS. Sequencing of the gene of interest showed 98% identity with EU145743. This recombinant plasmid was then transformed into L. lactis NZ9000 host cells and was found to be 100% stable by growing the strains in the absence of antibiotics for 100 generations and subsequently streaking out 100 random colonies on plates supplemented with 7.5 μg/mL chloramphenicol. Plasmid integrity was further confirmed by restriction enzyme digestion analysis using PstI and XbaI (data not shown).

2.2. Expression of VMPSTS in L. lactis

Expression of VMPSTS in L. lactis was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blot analyses. In the crude protein extracts comparing induced and uninduced cultures for pNZ:VMPSTS as well as the negative control (clones harboring empty pNZ8048 plasmid), the SDS-PAGE did not show any distinct bands corresponding to an expected protein size of 63 kDa which was predicted to be exclusively visible in the induced culture (data not shown). However, subsequent analysis by Western Blot showed a clear expected band size of 63 kDa which was only present in the induced cultures but not in the uninduced cultures or the negative control (Figure 1). This shows that the recombinant protein was successfully expressed in L. lactis but the protein of interest may be masked by other host proteins of the same size in the crude protein extracts when seen on the SDS-PAGE gel. Optimization of the induction conditions showed that VMPSTS expression can be induced using 10–60 ng/mL nisin with no distinct differences in expression from 40 ng/mL nisin onwards, based on the intensities of the bands in the Western blot. However, 2 h induction was preferable compared to 4 h as VMPSTS expression seemed to decrease or perhaps degrade as the induction time was increased. Since growth rates of induced and uninduced cultures were similar (data not shown), this could possibly be associated with the production of isoprenoids in vivo which have been shown to follow exponential growth and to cease at the stationary phase owing to the FDP substrate being produced during growth for primary metabolism [24]. Therefore in subsequent studies, 40 ng/mL nisin was used to induce expression for 2 h prior to harvesting the cells. Purification of the crude protein using a Ni-NTA column to bind the N-terminal histidine tag of the recombinant protein produced clear protein band of the expected size of 63 kDa as observed through SDS-PAGE analysis confirming successful expression of the recombinant plant terpene synthase in L. lactis (Figure 2).

2.3. Enzymatic Assay of Crude VMPSTS

Functionality of the recombinant VMPSTS of both crude and purified recombinant protein extracts were analyzed by enzymatic assay using two different assay buffers. However, both buffer systems yielded comparable results with no significant differences. When the crude proteins of VMPSTS and the negative control were used for the enzymatic assay, majority of the FPP were converted to farnesol which gave the highest peak (data not shown) potentially by non-specific endogenous phosphatases, even when sodium tungsten and sodium fluoride were added to the assay as phosphatase inhibitors. Phosphatases have been reported to metabolize FPP to produce farnesol [25]. Apart from the non-specific phosphatase activity on FPP, it was reported that FPP was prone to non-enzymatic hydrolysis to nerolidol and farnesol when Mg2+ was present whereas in the presence of Mn2+, the hydrolysis product was almost exclusively nerolidol [26]. These cations are common co-factors for enzymes including terpene synthases and hence, precaution should be taken to rule out possibilities of products formed from such non-enzymatic hydrolysis of FPP in the terpenoid product profiles. Indeed, this was also observed in our study when FPP was incubated with the assay buffer without any protein extracts. Due to the high amount of farnesol which was produced when using crude protein extracts, only trace amounts of other sesquiterpenes which may be true products of VMPSTS were detected with peak areas <6% of the farnesol peak (Figure 3). Copaene and δ-cadinene peaks were observed at retention times (RT) 6.43 min and 6.94 min respectively and exclusively in assays performed with crude VMPSTS (Figure 3). Although peaks at RT 6.62 min, 6.71 min and 6.84 min observed from the VMPSTS crude protein also corresponded to sesquiterpene products and were identified as farnesene, aromadendrene and germacrene D respectively, peaks with similar retention times were also present in the negative control. Interestingly, a comparison of the negative control mass spectra to the NIST and Wiley libraries identifies the peak at RT 6.62 min as nerylacetone in comparison with farnesene in the VMPSTS crude protein and negates both peaks at RT 6.70 min and 6.84 min as sesquiterpenes, but identifies them as 1-dodecanol and methyl 4,4,7-trimethyl-4,7-dihydroindan-6-carboxylate instead.

2.4. Enzymatic Assay of His-Tag Purified VMPSTS and End Product Analysis

Further clarification on the identities of the products produced was made by enzymatic assays analysis using His-tag purified VMPSTS proteins. Consistent with the previous crude VMPSTS result, germacrene D was still the major product comprising 48.9% of the total sesquiterpenes produced while α-copaene and δ-cadinene contributed 9.5% and 8.8%, respectively (Figure 4). The mass spectra of the top three major products obtained based on peak area are shown in Figure 5. A host of other minor sesquiterpenes, undetected using the crude extract, was also produced albeit at lesser amounts when using the purified VMPSTS (Table 1). However, farnesene and aromadendrene which were detected in the crude protein extract analysis were not present in the purified protein analysis, suggesting that these could be intermediate metabolites or their derivatives resulting from the endogenous conversion of FPP to farnesol. Apart from the major peak at RT 19.44 min which was identified to be germacrene D, three other peaks at RT 18.19 min, 18.40 min and 18.66 min also had similar mass spectra and conferred germacrene D as the highest hit. This could represent four different stereoisomers of germacrene D which is not surprising considering germacrene D has 2 chiral centers in its carbon backbone. Furthermore, germacrenes have two endocyclic double bonds at 1(10)- and 4(5)- positions which could result in four geometric isomers [27]. It should also be noted that germacrene sesquiterpenes are prone to Cope rearrangements induced by GC-MS conditions such as elevated temperature resulting in artefacts [27]. As such, the ß-elemene peak at RT 17.56 min produced by the purified VMPSTS protein may not be a true product of VMPSTS. A few other sesquiterpenes were also produced but in negligible amounts (below 1%) and/or had match scores below 800 and thus were deemed ambiguous and are not reported here. Terpene synthases capable of producing multiple terpene products are very common due to rearrangements and quenching of the intermediate carbocations products [28,29]. The types of sesquiterpenes found in our research were in agreement with the reported ab initio investigation of the cyclization of germacrene D which is usually accompanied by a host of cadinane and muurolane sesquiterpenoids [30]. All peaks were identified by comparison with the NIST and Wiley libraries only since standards for these specialized sesquiterpenes are not easily available. However, comparison of retention times with standards and isolation of the major compounds followed by NMR spectroscopy are suggested to be carried out as future work for structure determination which will strongly confirm the identities of the peaks identified by the NIST and Wiley libraries.
Previously, it was reported that nerolidol was the only sesquiterpene detected at 0.5% of the total scent, when analyzed directly from open VMP flowers using SPME sampling [22]. Copaene and germacrene D were also found in the essential oils of VMP at 0.17% and 0.13% respectively when the compounds from open VMP flowers soaked in hexane overnight were analyzed using GC-MS [31]. The terpenoid composition obtained directly from the open flowers of VMP differs slightly from the products produced by the in vitro recombinant VMPSTS study. One salient observation was that cadinene, ylangene, muurolene and muurolol, caryophyllene, elemene, and gurjunene found in the in vitro study were not detected either in the scent or the essential oils of VMP open flowers. This could be due to the low amounts produced in the plants or the sampling method used which could subject the major sesquiterpenes to chemically rearrange in different ways than in the in vitro studies, resulting in different compositions of minor sesquiterpene compounds. In addition, types of hosts may also influence composition of products [32]. There are also many other terpenes found in VMP open flowers especially monoterpenes which contribute to the fragrance of the plant. However, the terpene synthases responsible for these terpenoids have not been isolated and characterized yet.
When the VMPSTS protein sequence was subjected to a BLAST search, α-humulene (synonym α-caryophyllene), germacrene-D and δ-cadinene terpene synthases were among the top hits with up to 48% identity, along with other unidentified sesquiterpene synthases. This shows that the protein sequence of VMPSTS is closely related to similarly functional sesquiterpene synthases from other plants such as ginger (Zinger zerumbet and Zinger officinale) and castor oil plant (Ricinus communis). Although germacrene D synthases has been isolated and characterized from other plants such as ginger (Zingiber officinale) [29] and grapevine (Vitis vinefera) [33], both enzymes and the one used in this study displayed different product compositions. The germacrene D synthase isolated from Zingiber officinale produced germacrene D and germacrene B as its major product along with nine co-products including germacrene C, α-humulene and trans-nerolidol. The germacrene D synthase from Vitis vinefera on the other hand only produced germacrene D as a major product and δ-cadinene as its minor product. The differences in the product compositions of germacrene D synthases from different plants demonstrate the vast array of isoprenoid variation and the versatility of the terpene synthases producing them.
In terms of bioactivity, germacrene D has been reported to have insecticidal effects against mosquitoes [34] and to repel aphids [35]. However, it is an attractant to the Tobacco Mudworm Moth, Heliothis virescens [36]. Alpha-copaene has been specifically identified as a potent attractant of male Mediterranean fruit flies, Ceratitis capitata [37] while δ-cadinene has been shown to have antileishmanial activity against the protozoan parasite, Leishmania which causes the human disease, leishmaniasis [38].
To date, there has been much work done on functional identification of various types of novel plant terpene synthase from sunflower (Helianthus annuus) [39], ginger (Zingiber officinale) [40], oregano (Origanum vulgare) [41], grapes (Vitis vinefera) [28] and others which involve functional identification of the terpene synthase via in vitro assays and GC-MS analyses of the gene products in the E. coli system. However, due to the tremendous variety, versatility and potential of these secondary metabolites, we have only begun to tap into an enormous warehouse of possibilities and these efforts are done with the hope of discovering novel terpenoids with high industrial and economic value. Increased production of these terpenoids in heterologous hosts via metabolic engineering is being highly pursued. The knowledge that all the 50,000 known terpenoids originate from the same common precursor IPP/DMAPP opens up the possibility of engineering one successful platform which can be used for the production of any of those 50,000 terpenoids. While E. coli and S. cerevisiae are the most common heterologous hosts for the optimization and production of isoprenoids, this study supports previous research by Hernandez et al. [20] that the GRAS L. lactis is another potential host for heterologous isoprenoid production.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Bacteria Strains and Growth Conditions

L. lactis NZ9000 strain [42] which is a nisin-negative derivative of L. lactis MG1363 was used in this study. NZ9000 has the nisR and nisK genes from the nisin gene cluster inserted into its chromosome. These genes enable nisin induction of the PnisA promoter on the pNZ8048 plasmid which was used for all L. lactis cloning purposes in this study. All L. lactis strains were cultured in M17 broth or agar [43] supplemented with 0.5% (w/v) glucose (GM17) and 7.5 μg/mL chloramphenicol whenever necessary. L. lactis was typically grown at 30 °C as a standstill culture. When screening for L. lactis transformants, M17 agar supplemented with 0.5% (w/v) glucose, 0.5 M sucrose and 7.5 μg/mL chloramphenicol was used. Top 10 E. coli strain (Invitrogen, CA, USA) was grown in LB broth and cultured at 37 °C with shaking at 250 rpm. When screening for E.coli transformants, LB agar supplemented with ampicillin (100 μg/mL) and 40 μg/mL of 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (X-gal) was used.

3.2. VMPSTS Gene Amplification and Plasmid Construction

The sesquiterpene synthase gene from VMP used in this project has 3 different nucleotides at 616A > G, 734G > A and 1560C > T compared to the NCBI deposited VMP gene (Accession no: EU145743) [23]. The primers used to amplify the Vanda sesquiterpene synthase gene were 5′-CT CTGCAGAACATCACCATCACCATCACATGGAGACTCTCAAAGC-3′ (forward) and 5′-CTTCTAGA CTACATAGAGTTAGAAATATCAG-3′ (reverse) using the cDNA library generated from previous work [23]. The restriction enzymes (underlined) used for directional cloning were PstI and XbaI and the His-tag sequence which was incorporated into the forward primer is italicized. The PCR reaction mixture contained 1× reaction buffer, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTP, 5 units of Taq polymerase, 0.5 μM of forward and reverse primers and approximately 20 ng of template DNA. The reaction was run for 30 cycles using a 94 °C for 1 min, 60 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 2 min temperature-time profile. The amplified gene was cloned into pGEM-T Easy Vector (Promega, WI, USA) and transformed into Top 10 E. coli competent cells prior to sub-cloning into the L. lactis plasmid, pNZ8048 yielding pNZ:VMPSTS which was then transformed into the L. lactis NZ9000 host. The heat-shocked method was used for transforming E. coli competent cells [44] while the electroporation method was used for transforming L. lactis competent cells [45]. The transformed E. coli recombinants were screened by blue-white screening as well as ampicillin resistance selection while the L. lactis transformants were screened based on chloramphenicol resistance selection. Positive transformants were confirmed by colony PCR, double digestion with PstI and XbaI and sequencing.

3.3. Expression of VMPSTS in L. lactis

For protein expression, overnight culture of L. lactis NZ9000 harboring pNZ:VMPSTS or empty pNZ8048 (as negative control) were inoculated into fresh GM17 medium at 5% (v/v) and grown to an OD600 of 0.4. The culture was split into sub-samples consisting of uninduced samples and samples induced with nisin at concentrations ranging from 10–60 ng/mL for 2 and 4 h. For subsequent experiments, cultures were induced at 40 ng/mL for 2 h after determining the optimum induction condition. After induction, the cells were harvested in an assay buffer (15 mM 3-morpholino-2- hydroxypropanesulfonic acid (MOPSO), pH 7, 10% v/v glycerol, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM MnCl2, 1 mM sodium ascorbate and 2 mM dithiothreitol) [20] or (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 5 mM MgCl2 and 2 mM dithiothreitol), modified from Chen et al. [46], by centrifugation at 1438 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. Crude extracts were prepared by subjecting the cells to sonication treatment using the Omni Ruptor 4000 (Omni International, GA, USA) set to 10% power and pulsed for 2 min per sample. Then, the samples were centrifuged at 16,000 × g, for 10 min, at 4 °C with the final aqueous phase subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western Blot analyses.
For recombinant protein purification, His SpinTrap (GE Healthcare, WI, USA) columns equilibrated with ten column volumes of binding buffer containing 20 mM imidazole were used according to the manufacturer’s protocol to trap recombinant protein via the N-terminal His-tag fusion. Subsequently, the column was washed with another ten column volumes of binding buffer and the final elution was performed in the presence of 300 mM imidazole. After purification, the proteins were desalted using HiTrap Column (GE Healthcare, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. At each step, the protein was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western Blot. SDS-PAGE analysis was done according to Laemmli [47] while Western Blot was performed using the chromogenic Western MAX™ horse radish peroxidase (HRP) kit (Amresco, OH, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol with slight modifications. The primary antibody used was mouse anti-his IgG (Novagen, NJ, USA) while the secondary antibody, HRP conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG, was supplied in the kit. Briefly, the samples were run on 12% SDS-PAGE Tris/glycine gels and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane using a semi-dry blotter (Biorad, CA, USA). Blocking was done using 1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin. PageRuler™ Unstained Protein Ladder (Fermentas, Ontario, Canada) was used as SDS-PAGE marker while for Western Blot, PageRuler™ Prestained Plus Protein Ladder, Fermentas, Ontario, Canada) was used.

3.4. Enzymatic Assays

Enzymatic assay for the recombinant sesquiterpene synthase was performed as previously described [46,20]. Briefly, the crude or purified protein extract in the assay buffer was mixed with 20 μL farnesyl diphosphate substrate from a 1 μg/μL stock (Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA) in a total volume of 1 mL. Phosphatase inhibitors, 0.4 mM NaWO4 and 0.2 mM NaF, were also added in the reaction mixture. The mixture was then incubated with shaking at 30 °C for 3 h and the reaction was stopped with 1 mL of 4 M CaCl2. All the above reactions were performed in a 20 mL headspace vial which was then subjected to solid phase microextraction (SPME) sampling using a 100 μm polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) coated fiber. Extraction time used was 15 min at 60 °C and desorption time was 5 min. Blank tests were run in between sampling runs to ensure no carryover from the SPME fiber or the GC-MS system.

3.5. GC-MS Analysis

Products from the enzymatic assays were analyzed using the GC-MS Turbomass Clarus 600 (Perkin Elmer, UK) and the GC column used was Perkin Elmer Elite 5 MS (30 m × 0.25 mm ID). The GC oven conditions were from an initial temperature of 40 °C (1 min hold) to 250 °C (3 min hold) with a 35 °C ramping temperature increase per min. For purified VMPSTS, ramping time was decreased to 7 °C per min for better separation as the former ramping rate was found to be unable to resolve the minor peaks satisfactorily. The column flow was held constant at 1 mL/min. The injection port was maintained at 250 °C, the transfer line at 220 °C while the MS source temperature was maintained at 200 °C. The MS, operated at 70 eV was set to scan from m/z 35 to 400. Products were identified by comparing the spectra to those in the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) library 2008 and the Wiley Registry of Mass Spectral Data, 8th Edition. The cut-off match score for the mass spectra of the products compared to the NIST and Wiley library used were >700 for the crude protein and >800 for the purified protein.

4. Conclusions

In this project, the VMPSTS gene previously isolated from the orchid hybrid, Vanda Mimi Palmer has been functionally identified to produce germacrene D, copaene and δ-cadinene among others. This was achieved by cloning and expression of the enzyme in L. lactis followed by in vitro enzymatic assays to identify the sesquiterpene products produced via GC-MS analysis. Based on the major sesquiterpene produced, VMPSTS is identified to be a germacrene D synthase. To our knowledge, this is the first terpene synthase gene from the Orchidaceae family to be functionally identified through recombinant technology and only the second plant isoprenoid gene ever to be cloned and expressed in L. lactis.

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by Malaysia Genome Institute, Project No: UKM-MGI-NBD0008- 2007 and National Science Fellowship, Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, Malaysia (MOSTI). We thank Kees Leenhouts of the University of Groningen, Netherlands for his generous gift of L. lactis NZ9000 and the plasmid pNZ8048, INBIOSIS, UKM, Malaysia for the usage of their GC-MS machine and Gwendoline Ee Cheng Lian for her invaluable comments on the GCMS results.

References

  1. Balibar, C.J.; Shen, X.; Tao, J. The mevalonate pathway of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol 2009, 191, 851–861. [Google Scholar]
  2. Misawa, N. Pathway engineering for functional isoprenoids. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol 2011, 22, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  3. Dellomonaco, C.; Fava, F.; Gonzalez, R. The path to next generation biofuels: Successes and challenges in the era of synthetic biology. Microb. Cell Fact 2010, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rodríguez-Concepción, M.; Boranat, A. Elucidation of the methylerythhritol phosphate pathway for isoprenoid biosynthesis in bacteria and plastids. A metabolic milestone achieved through genomics. Plant Physiol 2002, 130, 1079–1089. [Google Scholar]
  5. Barkovich, R.; Liao, J.C. Metabolic engineering of isoprenoids. Metab. Eng 2001, 3, 27–39. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kirby, J.; Keasling, J.D. Metabolic engineering of microorganisms for isoprenoid production. Nat. Prod. Rep 2008, 25, 656–661. [Google Scholar]
  7. Horwitz, S.B. How to make taxol from scratch. Nature 1994, 367, 593–594. [Google Scholar]
  8. Huang, Q.; Roessner, C.A.; Croteau, R.; Scott, A.I. Engineering Escherichia coli for the synthesis of taxadiene, a key intermediate in the biosynthesis of Taxol. Bioorg. Med. Chem 2001, 9, 2237–2242. [Google Scholar]
  9. Martin, V.J.; Pitera, D.J.; Withers, S.T.; Newman, J.D.; Keasling, J.D. Engineering a mevalonate pathway in Escherichia coli for production of terpenoids. Nat. Biotechnol 2003, 21, 796–802. [Google Scholar]
  10. Asadollahi, M.A.; Maury, J.; Patil, K.R.; Schalk, M.; Clark, A.; Nielsen, J. Enhancing sesquiterpene production in Saccharomyces cerivisiae through in silico driven metabolic engineering. Metab. Eng 2009, 11, 328–334. [Google Scholar]
  11. Engels, B.; Dahm, P.; Jennewein, S. Metabolic engineering of taxadiene biosynthesis in yeasts as a first step towards Taxol (Paclitaxel) production. Metab. Eng 2008, 10, 201–206. [Google Scholar]
  12. Miura, Y.; Kondo, K.; Saito, T.; Nakamura, K.; Misawa, N. Production of lycopene by the food yeast Candida utilis that does not naturally synthesize carotenoid. Biotechnol. Bioeng 1998, 58, 306–308. [Google Scholar]
  13. Anuradha, K.; Foo, H.L.; Mariana, N.S.; Loh, T.C.; Yusoff, K.; Hassan, M.D.; Sasan, H.; Raha, A.R. Live recombinant Lactococcus lactis vaccine expressing aerolysin genes D1 and D4 for protection against Aeromonas hydrophila in tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). J. Appl. Microbiol 2010, 109, 1632–1642. [Google Scholar]
  14. de Vos, W.M.; Hugenholtz, J. Engineering metabolic highways in Lactococcus and other lactic acid bacteria. Trends Biotechnol 2004, 22, 72–79. [Google Scholar]
  15. Mierau, I.; Kleerebezem, M. 10 years of nisin-controlled gene expression system (NICE) in Lactococcus lactis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol 2005, 68, 705–717. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kuipers, O.P.; Beerthuyzen, M.M.; de Ruyter, P.G.; Luesink, E.J.; de Vos, W.M. Autoregulation of nisin biosynthesis in Lactococcus lactis by signal transduction. J. Biol. Chem 1995, 270, 27299–27304. [Google Scholar]
  17. Berlec, A.; Jevnikar, Z.; Majhenič, A.C.; Rogelj, I.; Štrukelj, B. Expression of the sweet-tasting plant protein brazzein in Escherichia coli and Lactococcus lactis: A path toward sweet lactic acid bacteria. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol 2006, 73, 158–165. [Google Scholar]
  18. Frelet-Barrand, A.; Boutigny, S.; Movet, L.; Deniaud, A.; Seigneurin-Berny, D.; Salvi, D.; Bernaudat, F.; Richaud, P.; Pebay-Peyroula, E.; Jovard, J.; Rolland, N. Lactococcus lactis, an alternative system for functional expression of peripheral and intrinsic Arabidopsis membrane proteins. PLoS One 2010, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Martinez-Cuesta, M.C.; Gasson, M.J.; Narbad, A. Heterelogous expression of the plant coumarate: CoA ligase in Lactococcus lactis. Lett. Appl. Microbiol 2005, 40, 44–49. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hernandez, I.; Molenaar, D.; Beekwilder, J.; Bouwmeester, H.; van Hylckama Vlieg, J.E.T. Expression of plant flavor genes in Lactococcus lactis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 2007, 73, 1544–1552. [Google Scholar]
  21. Nair, H.; Arditti, J. Sustaining Orchids for the Future. Proceedings of the 17th World Orchid Conference, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia, 24 April–2 May 2002; Natural History Publications (Borneo) Sdn Bhd: Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mohd-Hairul, A.R.; Namasivayam, P.; Ee, C.L.G.; Abdullah, J.O. Terpenoid, benzonoid and phenylpropanoid compounds in the floral scent of Vanda Mimi Palmer. J. Plant Biol 2010, 53, 358–366. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chan, W.; Abdullah, J.O.; Namasivayam, P. Isolation, cloning and characterization of fragrance-related transcripts from Vanda Mimi Palmer. Sci. Hortic 2011, 127, 388–397. [Google Scholar]
  24. Martin, V.J.J.; Yasuo, Y.; Keasling, J.D. The in vivo synthesis of plant sesquiterpenes by Escherichia coli. Biotechnol. Bioeng 2001, 75, 497–503. [Google Scholar]
  25. Song, L. Detection of farnesyl diphosphate accumulation in yeast ERG9 mutants. Anal. Biochem 2003, 317, 180–185. [Google Scholar]
  26. George-Nascimento, C.; Pont-Lezica, R.; Cori, O. Non-enzymic formation of nerolidol from farnesyl pyrophosphate in the presence of bivalent cations. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 1971, 45, 119–124. [Google Scholar]
  27. Adio, A.M. Germacrenes A-E and related compounds: Thermal, photochemical and acid induced transannular cyclizations. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 1533–1552. [Google Scholar]
  28. Martin, D.M.; Bohlmann, J. Identification of Vitis vinefera (−)-α-terpineol synthase by in silico screening of full-length cDNA ESTs and functional characterization of recombinant terpene synthase. Phytochemistry 2004, 65, 1223–1229. [Google Scholar]
  29. Picaud, S.; Olsson, M.E.; Brodelius, M.; Brodelius, P.E. Cloning, expression, purification and characterization of recombinant (+)-germacrene D synthase from Zingiber officinale. Arch. Biochem. Biophys 2006, 452, 17–28. [Google Scholar]
  30. Setzer, W.N. Germacrene D cyclization: An ab initio investigation. Int. J. Mol. Sci 2008, 9, 89–97. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mohd-Hairul, A.R. Universiti Putra Malaysia: Selangor, Malaysia, Unpublished work; 2011.
  32. Lubertozzi, D.; Keasling, J.D. Expression of a synthetic Artemesia annua amorphadiene synthase in Aspergillus nidulans yield altered product distribution. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol 2008, 35, 1191–1198. [Google Scholar]
  33. Lücker, J.; Bowen, P.; Bohlmann, J. Vitis vinefera terpenoid cyclases: Fuctional identification of two sesquiterpene synthase cDNA encoding (+)-valencene synthase and (−)-germacrene D synthase and expression of mono- and sesquiterpene synthases in grapevine flowers and berries. Phytochemistry 2004, 65, 2649–2659. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kiran, S.R.; Devi, P.S. Evaluation of mosquitocidal activity of essential oil and sesquiterpenes from leaves of Chloroxylon swietenia DC. Parasitol. Res 2007, 101, 413–418. [Google Scholar]
  35. Bruce, T.J.A.; Birkett, M.A.; Blande, J.; Hooper, A.M.; Martin, J.L.; Khambay, B.; Prosser, I.; Smart, L.E.; Wadhams, L.J. Response of economically important aphids to components of Hemizygia petiolata essential oil. Pest Manag. Sci 2005, 61, 1115–1121. [Google Scholar]
  36. Mozuraitis, R.; Stranden, M.; Ramirez, M.I.; Borg-Karlson, A.K.; Mustaparta, H. (−)-Germacrene D increases attraction oviposition by the tobacco budworm moth Heliothis virescens. Chem. Senses 2002, 27, 505–509. [Google Scholar]
  37. Nishida, R.; Shelly, T.E.; Whittier, T.S.; Kaneshiro, K.Y. α-Copaene, a potential rendezvous cue for the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata. J. Chem. Ecol 1999, 26, 87–100. [Google Scholar]
  38. Zheljazkov, V.D.; Cantrell, C.L.; Tekwani, B.; Khan, S.I. Content, composition and bioactivity of the essential oils of three basil genotypes as a function of harvesting. J. Agric. Food Chem 2008, 56, 380–385. [Google Scholar]
  39. Gopfert, J.C.; Macnevin, G.; Ro, D.K.; Spring, O. Identification, functional characterization and developmental regulation of sesquiterpene synthases from sunflower capitate glandular trichomes. BMC Plant Biol 2009, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fujisawa, M.; Harada, H.; Kenmoku, H.; Mizutani, S.; Misawa, N. Cloning and characterization of a novel gene that encodes (S)-ß-bisabolene synthase from ginger, Zingiber officinale. Planta 2009, 232, 121–130. [Google Scholar]
  41. Crocoll, C.; Asbach, J.; Novak, J.; Gershenzon, J.; Degenhardt, J. Terpene synthases of oregano (Origanum vulgare L.) and their roles in the pathway and regulation of terpene biosynthesis. Plant Mol. Biol 2010, 73, 587–603. [Google Scholar]
  42. Kuipers, O.P.; de Ruyter, P.G.; Kleerebezem, M.; de Vos, W.M. Quorum sensing-controlled gene expression in lactic acid bacteria. J. Biotechnol 1998, 64, 15–21. [Google Scholar]
  43. Terzaghi, B.E.; Sandine, W.E. Improved medium for lactic streptococci and their bacteriophages. Appl. Microbiol 1975, 29, 807–813. [Google Scholar]
  44. Sambrook, J.; Russell, D.W. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 3rd ed; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  45. Holo, H.; Nes, I.F. High-frequency transformation by electroporation of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris grown with glycine in osmotically stabilized media. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 1989, 55, 3119–3123. [Google Scholar]
  46. Chen, X.; Chen, Y.; Heinstein, P.; Davisson, V.J. Cloning, expression and characterization of (+)-δ-cadinene synthase: A catalyst for cotton phytoalexin biosynthesis. Arch. Biochem. Biophys 1995, 324, 255–266. [Google Scholar]
  47. Laemmli, U.K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970, 227, 680–685. [Google Scholar]
Ijms 13 01582f1 1024
Figure 1. Western blot of VMPSTS expression profiles showing the expected band size of 63 kDa. (A) Clones harboring pNZ:VMPSTS were grown and induced with nisin at different concentrations and durations. Lanes 1 and 5: 10 ng/mL nisin; 2 and 6: 20 ng/mL nisin; 3 and 7: 40 ng/mL nisin; 4 and 8: 60 ng/mL nisin; (B) Comparison between induced, uninduced and negative control samples. M: PageRuler™ Prestained Plus Protein Ladder; (−): Empty pNZ8048 plasmid; I: 40 ng/mL nisin for 2 h; UI: uninduced.
Figure 1. Western blot of VMPSTS expression profiles showing the expected band size of 63 kDa. (A) Clones harboring pNZ:VMPSTS were grown and induced with nisin at different concentrations and durations. Lanes 1 and 5: 10 ng/mL nisin; 2 and 6: 20 ng/mL nisin; 3 and 7: 40 ng/mL nisin; 4 and 8: 60 ng/mL nisin; (B) Comparison between induced, uninduced and negative control samples. M: PageRuler™ Prestained Plus Protein Ladder; (−): Empty pNZ8048 plasmid; I: 40 ng/mL nisin for 2 h; UI: uninduced.
Ijms 13 01582f1
Ijms 13 01582f2 1024
Figure 2. SDS-PAGE analysis showing crude (A) and his-tag purified (B) protein extracted from clones harboring the pNZ:VMPSTS plasmid. Clones were grown and induced with 40 ng/mL nisin for 2 h. Lane M: PageRuler™ Unstained Protein Ladder; C: Crude total protein extract; P: His-tag purified VMPSTS protein at 63 kDa.
Figure 2. SDS-PAGE analysis showing crude (A) and his-tag purified (B) protein extracted from clones harboring the pNZ:VMPSTS plasmid. Clones were grown and induced with 40 ng/mL nisin for 2 h. Lane M: PageRuler™ Unstained Protein Ladder; C: Crude total protein extract; P: His-tag purified VMPSTS protein at 63 kDa.
Ijms 13 01582f2
Ijms 13 01582f3 1024
Figure 3. GC-MS chromatogram of products formed by crude VMPSTS protein at different retention times (RT). Negative control used consisted of NZ9000 host harboring empty pNZ8048 plasmid. At RT 6.00 min to 7.00 min: for VMPSTS, at 6.43: copaene, 6.62: farnesene, 6.71: aromadendrene, 6.77: 2-tridecanone, 6.84: germacrene D and 6.94: δ-cadinene were observed while in the negative control at 6.62: nerylacetone, 6.67: 4,6-di-tert-butyl-m-cresol, 6.70: 1-dodecanol, 6.77: 2-tridecanone and 6.84: methyl 4,4,7-trimethyl- 4,7-dihydroindan-6-carboxylate were noted.
Figure 3. GC-MS chromatogram of products formed by crude VMPSTS protein at different retention times (RT). Negative control used consisted of NZ9000 host harboring empty pNZ8048 plasmid. At RT 6.00 min to 7.00 min: for VMPSTS, at 6.43: copaene, 6.62: farnesene, 6.71: aromadendrene, 6.77: 2-tridecanone, 6.84: germacrene D and 6.94: δ-cadinene were observed while in the negative control at 6.62: nerylacetone, 6.67: 4,6-di-tert-butyl-m-cresol, 6.70: 1-dodecanol, 6.77: 2-tridecanone and 6.84: methyl 4,4,7-trimethyl- 4,7-dihydroindan-6-carboxylate were noted.
Ijms 13 01582f3
Ijms 13 01582f4 1024
Figure 4. GC-MS chromatogram showing sesquiterpenes produced from purified VMPSTS protein. The peaks in this chromatogram are listed in Table 1.
Figure 4. GC-MS chromatogram showing sesquiterpenes produced from purified VMPSTS protein. The peaks in this chromatogram are listed in Table 1.
Ijms 13 01582f4
Ijms 13 01582f5 1024
Figure 5. Mass spectra of top three sesquiterpenes produced by recombinant VMPSTS in comparison with the corresponding mass spectra from the NIST or Wiley Library. Top panel shows mass spectra of the sample compound while bottom panel shows mass spectra of the compound in the library. (a) is germacrene D; (b) is α-copaene; and (c) is δ-cadinene.
Figure 5. Mass spectra of top three sesquiterpenes produced by recombinant VMPSTS in comparison with the corresponding mass spectra from the NIST or Wiley Library. Top panel shows mass spectra of the sample compound while bottom panel shows mass spectra of the compound in the library. (a) is germacrene D; (b) is α-copaene; and (c) is δ-cadinene.
Ijms 13 01582f5
Table
Table 1. Summary of retention times, match score and percentages of sesquiterpenes produced.
Table 1. Summary of retention times, match score and percentages of sesquiterpenes produced.
SesquiterpenesRetention TimeMatch scorePercentage
δ-Elemene16.559502.4
Ylangene17.269554.5
α-Copaene17.409439.5
ß-Elemene17.569222.2
Germacrene D18.199035.3
Germacrene D18.409133.7
Germacrene D18.668902.1
α-Gurjunene18.749054.2
ɛ-Muurolene18.808241.2
α-Caryophyllene18.899462.1
Germacrene D19.4496648.9
γ-Muurolene19.688812.2
γ-Cadinene19.869341.3
δ-Cadinene19.959458.8
.tau.-Muurolol22.059271.6

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Song, A.A.L.; Abdullah, J.O.; Abdullah, M.P.; Shafee, N.; Rahim, R.A. Functional Expression of an Orchid Fragrance Gene in Lactococcus lactis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 1582-1597. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13021582

AMA Style

Song AAL, Abdullah JO, Abdullah MP, Shafee N, Rahim RA. Functional Expression of an Orchid Fragrance Gene in Lactococcus lactis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2012; 13(2):1582-1597. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13021582

Chicago/Turabian Style

Song, Adelene Ai Lian, Janna O. Abdullah, Mohd Puad Abdullah, Norazizah Shafee, and Raha A. Rahim. 2012. "Functional Expression of an Orchid Fragrance Gene in Lactococcus lactis" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 13, no. 2: 1582-1597. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13021582

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop