Next Article in Journal
KRAS and MAPK1 Gene Amplification in Type II Ovarian Carcinomas
Next Article in Special Issue
Quorum Quenching in Culturable Phyllosphere Bacteria from Tobacco
Previous Article in Journal
Changes in the Number of Double-Strand DNA Breaks in Chinese Hamster V79 Cells Exposed to γ-Radiation with Different Dose Rates
Previous Article in Special Issue
Kinetic Model for Signal Binding to the Quorum Sensing Regulator LasR
Article Menu

Export Article

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14(7), 13727-13747; doi:10.3390/ijms140713727

The Organization of the Quorum Sensing luxI/R Family Genes in Burkholderia
Kumari Sonal Choudhary 1, Sanjarbek Hudaiberdiev 1, Zsolt Gelencsér 2, Bruna Gonçalves Coutinho 1,3, Vittorio Venturi 1,* and Sándor Pongor 1,2,*
International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), Padriciano 99, Trieste 32149, Italy
Faculty of Information Technology, PázmányPéter Catholic University, Práter u. 50/a, Budapest 1083, Hungary
The Capes Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil, Cx postal 250, Brasilia, DF 70.040-020, Brazil
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed; Tel.: +39-40-375-7300 (S.P.); Fax: +39-40-226-555 (S.P.).
Received: 30 May 2013; in revised form: 20 June 2013 / Accepted: 24 June 2013 / Published: 2 July 2013


: Members of the Burkholderia genus of Proteobacteria are capable of living freely in the environment and can also colonize human, animal and plant hosts. Certain members are considered to be clinically important from both medical and veterinary perspectives and furthermore may be important modulators of the rhizosphere. Quorum sensing via N-acyl homoserine lactone signals (AHL QS) is present in almost all Burkholderia species and is thought to play important roles in lifestyle changes such as colonization and niche invasion. Here we present a census of AHL QS genes retrieved from public databases and indicate that the local arrangement (topology) of QS genes, their location within chromosomes and their gene neighborhoods show characteristic patterns that differ between the known Burkholderia clades. In sequence phylogenies, AHL QS genes seem to cluster according to the local gene topology rather than according to the species, which suggests that the basic topology types were present prior to the appearance of current Burkholderia species. The data are available at
quorum sensing; N-AHL; local topologies; chromosomal arrangements; Burkholderia

1. Introduction

The Burkholderia genus are gram negative bacteria that are ubiquitous in the environment and may cause a number of diseases in plants, animals and humans. Opportunistic human infection can be particularly serious for patients with cystic fibrosis while other members are causative agents in various diseases. Conversely, Burkholderia are involved in nitrogen fixation in the rhizosphere and various species have the ability to metabolize pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), making them attractive from an agricultural perspective (although in this latter case concerns have been raised because of the pathogenic potential of some species).

One of the most important aspects of understanding this genus as a pathogen or as beneficial microorganisms is that quorum sensing (QS) systems operating in Burkholderia are important regulators of virulence and other phenotypic traits. Furthermore, QS systems appear to be of crucial importance in governing overall colonization and niche invasion. This suggests that modulation of these regulatory systems might be an attractive route for controlling virulence and hence the development of interventions designed to treat infection or (in the case of agriculture) induce beneficial activities. It is therefore crucial that we have a more complete understanding of QS systems in Burkholderia and in particular the genetic basis upon which it operates.

One of the challenges faced by researchers is that Burkholderia are very diverse from taxonomic and genetic perspectives. For many years, Burkholderia were recognized as members of the non-fluorescent pseudomonads. However, pseudomonads were found to be taxonomically heterogeneous and five species homology groups were devised on the basis of rRNA-DNA hybridization experiments [1] and the genus Pseudomonas was divided into five well-defined rRNA homology groups. Subsequently, polyphasic taxonomy analyses, including 16S rRNA sequence analysis, DNA-DNA hybridization and fatty acid analysis, led to the establishment of the Burkholderia genus to accommodate seven species of the Pseudomonas rRNA group II (P. cepacia, P. caryophylli, P. gladioli, P. mallei, P. pseudomallei, P. solanacearum and P. picketti) [2,3]. P. solanacearum and P. picketti were later renamed as Ralstonia.

In the early 1980s, strains of B. cepacia were increasingly being recovered from cultures of respiratory tract specimens from cystic fibrosis patients [4]. Continuous taxonomic studies allowed the designation of binomial species names of clinically-isolated Burkholderia and are now referred to as the species of the Burkholderia cepacia complex (BCC) [57]. Given their clinical importance, the BCC members as well as other pathogenic Burkholderia such as B. mallei and B. pseudomallei have been the subject of intense analysis in terms of both their taxonomy and pathogenicity [812]. B. pseudomallei is for example the causative agent of melioidosis, an infectious disease endemic in southeast Asia and northern Australia (and may occur in other tropical and subtropical regions—in 1969, several cases of melioidosis were reported in non-human primates in the USA [13]). B. mallei, on the other hand is the causative agent of glanders in horses and is generally transmitted to humans through infected animals. B. mallei was also used as a bio-weapon in civil wars of America and Afghanistan [14,15]. Recently, other Burkholderia species have been characterized as potentially beneficial in terms of their role in plant-growth-promotion and nitrogen fixation in the rhizosphere and/or endosphere—many of them are diazotrophs and a few are capable of nodulation in mimosa and legumes [1618].

Although their taxonomy is continually under review, the Burkholderia genus currently comprises over 60 validly described species. Phylogenetic trees inferred from independent gene sequence analyses (16S rRNA, recA, gyrB, rpoB, acdS), indicate that there are numerous divisions inside the Burkholderia genus with significant (>90%) bootstrap values [1923]. Altogether, these analyses suggest that three major clades may exist inside the Burkholderia cluster. These include the B. cepacia complex (BCC), the “pseudomallei” group and a recently described clade that contains non-pathogenic plant-beneficial Burkholderia species.

Despite the apparent genetic diversity within the Burkholderia genus, a common characteristic is that they may utilize QS as part of their colonization and invasion strategies. QS is a process in which bacteria regulate gene expression according to their local population density. In gram-negative bacteria, the most common QS system involves the production and response to N-acylated homoserine lactones (AHLs) [24]. AHL production is catalyzed by an AHL synthase belonging to the LuxI-family of proteins; this enzyme requires S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) and an acylated acyl carrier protein (ACP) from the fatty acid biosynthesis pathway, as substrates. Upon reaching a minimal threshold level, AHL binds to a sensor/regulator protein that typically belongs to the LuxR-family of proteins. The N-terminal region of the LuxR protein has an AHL-binding domain which is reported to facilitate the formation of functional homodimers that allow it to bind to various DNA sequences and regulate the transcription of target genes [25]. Most commonly, one of the targets of the LuxR/AHL complex is the luxI gene thus creating a positive feedback loop which increases the production of AHL. This loop is important for the timing of the QS response in accordance with the AHL concentration and hence, population density [26].

Previous studies have shown that LuxR regulators are sometimes present in excess in comparison to AHL synthases. These have been termed as orphan or solo LuxR as they are not associated with cognate AHL synthases [27]. In some of the cases, these orphan or solo LuxR have been found to respond to endogenously/exogenously produced AHLs or to molecules produced by eukaryotes. These solo LuxR therefore, might help in the expansion of QS network and be involved in interspecies and inter-kingdom signaling [28,29].

According to an excellent review published in 2006, AHL QS circuitry is widely present in the genus Burkholderia [30]. In the present work we update this catalogue and provide new details on local gene arrangements, chromosomal locations, regulatory patterns and the chemical nature of QS signals distributed among the known and emerging sub-groups of the genus.

2. Local Topological Arrangement of Quorum Sensing Genes

One of the key aspects we are interested in, is the local topology of QS genes. This concept denotes the local arrangement of QS genes with respect to each other. The local arrangements found in Proteobacteria can be classified into 16 topology groups [31]. Denoting luxI genes as I, luxR genes as R, we can define a number of simple topologies, such as tandem orientation (R⃑I⃑), convergent orientation (R⃑I⃐), divergent orientation (R⃐I⃑), etc. In some more complicated arrangements, there is one intervening gene between the R and I genes, and this intervening gene frequently encodes a negative regulator [31]. The rsaL [3234] and the rsaM [31,35,36] genes/homologs, denoted here by L and M, respectively, are typical examples. There are further arrangements which we term complex topologies [31] in which there are several intervening genes. A further classification is based on the position of the AHL system with respect to the replication origin within the chromosome, or alternatively on which chromosome the AHL system is located.

In addition to arrangement patterns, AHL systems can also be regarded as regulatory circuits that display a number of simple regulatory architectures [24,26,37]. The core element is the auto-inductive circuit of R and I genes that was originally used to define the concept of QS regulation [37]. However, in the absence of additional, stabilizing elements, autoinduction would raise signal levels without limit. A down-regulation loop activated at higher signal concentrations is perhaps the simplest way to limit and stabilize the signal levels. There are a variety of mechanisms that can play this stabilizing role in QS systems. For example, the master regulator TraM can form a non-functional heterodimer with the TraR gene product in Agrobacterium tumefaciens [38,39]. A homodimer of the RsaL gene product (denoted here as L) acts as negative regulator by binding on the bi-directional rsaL-luxI promoter [40]. RsaM (denoted here as M) is another small regulatory protein that might be acting in a similar way to RsaL in many Burkholderia species [35]. Bacterial genomes also encode enzymes that degrade AHLs in response to the stress signal ppGpp, which can also efficiently down-regulate QS signaling [4145]. Down-regulation is also thought to result from more sophisticated, RNA-mediated mechanisms [46,47] or from the clash of transcriptional machineries on overlapping genes [48]. The crucial nature of these negative regulatory effects is shown by the fact that their deletion leads to signal overproduction and a less virulent bacterial phenotype. For the sake of completeness we also highlight that downregulation can also be automatically achieved by simple resource limitation where a reduction in number of QS cells would result in a decrease of the QS signal concentration itself [31].

Finally, yet another classification of AHL systems is possible on the basis of the chemical nature of the AHL signals they produce. It is well known that proteobacteria produce over 20 kinds of AHL signals [49,50], although much less are produced by selected genera such as Pseudomonas [51].

When this article was written (data collection was finished on 18 March, 2013), the NCBI archive contained 35 complete Burkholderia genomes, 57 draft genomes (30323 contigs and 266 scaffolds) and 16585 individual Genbank entries with Burkholderia sequences, a small portion of which contained full or partial AHL systems. Local gene arrangements were extracted from complete, well-annotated genomes, even though we noticed that the annotation of QS genes is at times inaccurate. Draft genomes contained some annotated genes, but frequently only the contig sequences were given. Finally, individual DNA sequences in GenBank rarely contained a complete AHL system, meaning that topological data could not be abstracted. In order to cope with these uncertainties, we re-annotated all DNA sequences using a sensitive computational procedure (described in Supplementary material). As for the other types of molecular data, regulatory circuit architectures and the chemical types of the AHLs produced did not form standard parts of databases; these had to be retrieved manually, as best we could, from the experimental papers. The result is an eclectic ensemble of data, some of it well annotated and reliable, some of it less well annotated, and inevitably, some of the research papers containing regulatory architectures or chemical data on AHL signals which may have gone unnoticed. For this reason, we primarily based our classification on validated data (such as complete genomes, review articles). A typical example of the difficulties is the classification of Burkholderia species based on 16S rRNA data. These data are available for complete genomes and have previously been used to define three main groups of Burkholderia: the B. cepacia complex, the B. pseudomallei group and the plant-beneficial and environmental (PBE) groups [52]. In addition there are further emerging groups that are defined by their hosts and pathogenicities, such as those of fungal symbionts [52] of plant-pathogenic species that may be partly overlapping with these groups. However, 16S rRNA data are not available for many of the newly discovered species.

3. A Brief Overview of AHL Systems in Burkholderia

A comparison of Burkholderia 16S rRNA sequences is known to yield three main taxonomical clusters/clades, i.e. the B. cepacia complex (BCC), the B. pseudomallei group (consisting of B. mallei and B. pseudomallei) and the recently defined plant-beneficial (PBE) group [52]. Of the near 20 AHL signals described so far (mainly C4 to C18-homoserine lactones (HSL) as well as HSLs with the C3 position substituted or unsubstituted by an oxo, or hydroxyl group), Burkholderia responds to six types of AHLs (Table 1).

On the other hand, the topological arrangements of the AHL systems within the Burkholderia genus show a broad variation. Briefly, Burkholderia species contain one to three AHL systems that follow different topological arrangements, as summarized in Table 2.

Out of the 16 local topological arrangements described in proteobacteria, 10 are found in Burkholderia (comprising of completely sequenced genomes, draft genomes and individual Genbank entries), including a new topology type named here as M4 (R⃐M⃑X (< 7)I⃑), which had previously not been detected in Proteobacteria. Out of 35 completely sequenced Burkholderia genomes, 32 (91%) were found to have AHL QS systems that belonged to eight distinct local topology types. In contrast, out of 44 completely sequenced genomes of Pseudomonads, only 11 (25%) had AHL QS genes that belonged to three topology types. Two of the three topology types, R1 (R⃑I⃑) and L1 (R⃑L⃐I⃑) were also present in Burkholderia. While the arrangements of AHL genes of pseudomonads are apparently simpler and have less intervening sequences between the R and I genes, the Burkholderia genus, especially the B. pseudomallei group, has a number of more complex arrangements.

The cladograms of LuxR and LuxI proteins show a seemingly complex classification scheme which can however be explained by the local topology of their AHL systems (Supplementary material). Namely, the I and R genes seem to classify according to their local topology, rather than according to the species. For instance, an I gene with a given topology within a species (e.g., R⃑I⃑ in B. pseudomallei 1710b) is consistently more similar to an I gene of identical topology within another species (R⃑I⃑ in B.thailandensis E264), than to an I gene of the same species, but having a different local topology (e.g., R⃐M⃑I⃑ in B. pseudomallei ). It thus appears that local topology within the chromosome may have evolved before the separation of various Burkholderia clades.

As schematically shown in Table 3 and Figure 1, the chemical structure of the AHL signals is in good correlation with the local topology of the AHL systems, i.e., the same chemical signal is produced by AHL systems belonging to identical or related local topologies, or to a few topology types. The agreement across genera is less equivocal (details not shown). For instance, an AHL system of L1 topology in B. xenovorans is regulated by the signal OC14, while an analogous AHL system in P. aeruginosa is regulated by a different signal, OC12. In comparison, the R1 topology is connected to a variety of signals in at least 96 proteobacterial species in which it has been detected so far [31].

3.1. Burkholderia cepacia Complex (BCC)

The taxonomy of the Burkholderia cepacia complex refers to closely related species (previously called genomovars) that have been isolated from clinical samples and are opportunistic human pathogens. BCC is composed of at least 17 species, including Burkholderia cepacia, B. multivorans, B. cenocepacia, B. vietnamiensis, B. ambifaria, B. stabilis, B. dolosa, B. anthina and B. pyrrocina [53].

The AHL QS in the BCC group consists of luxI/R homologs known as cepI and cepR. CepI synthesizes two AHL signals, the C8-HSL (N-octanoyl-L-homoserine lactone) and C6-HSL (N-hexanoyl-L-homoserine lactone) in greater and lesser amounts respectively. CepR binds and consequently responds to the abundant cognate C8-HSL [53].

The cepI and cepR genes are divergently transcribed and the intergenic region most commonly contains an rsaM homolog. This kind of arrangement is termed as M1 (R←M→I→) [31]. The intergenic gene rsaM has previously been shown to be a negative regulator of the AHL QS system in P. fuscovaginae [35]. Another QS system, called cciI/R, has recently been identified in B. cenocepacia strains harboring pathogenicity islands as is the case in B. cenocepacia K56-2, B. cenocepacia J2315 and B. cenocepacia MC0-3. This system produces primarily C6-HSL and minor amounts of C8-HSL [54,55]. cciI and cciR are transcribed in the same direction and accordingly the topology is named as R1. All B. cenocepacia members contain a solo or orphan luxR homolog named as cepR2 [29,56]. All QS systems are present on chromosome 2 except in some cases—bviI/R of B. vietnamiensis (X5 topology) and luxI/rsaM of B. ambifaria. QS topologies in BCC members are shown in Table 4.

Importantly, the QS systems in B. cenocepacia are interrelated with each other; CepR regulates cepI and cciIR genes, while CciR negatively regulates the expression of cepI thus allowing for a negative regulatory feedback loop on the cepI/R system [55]. The solo/orphan cepR2 which lacks the associated cognate luxI-AHL synthase gene, negatively regulates itself and is also negatively regulated by CciR [57]. Figure 2 shows an example of the regulatory pattern observed in BCC members.

Studies on B. cenocepacia have shown that the production of AHL is also influenced by a neighboring gene downstream from cepI [56]. This was identified as ORF BCAM1871, it is co-transcribed with cepI and is regulated by CepR. Orthologs of the ORF BCAM1871 contain a domain of 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase family (HMG-CoA reductase). Its genomic location is conserved in all BCC members. Previous studies suggest that BCAM1871 alone cannot activate AHL synthesis, but it enhances the rate of AHL production [56]. Apart from the BCC group, the orthologs of ORF BCAM1871 are also conserved in B. mallei and B. pseudomallei, it flanks downstream to luxI homologs, and the corresponding systems are flanked upstream by an Mg transporter gene. (i.e., the M1 topology (RMI) is complemented by two conserved flanking genes in these species) (Figure 3).

Circular map representations reveal that the chromosomal arrangements of the AHL QS genes in BCC members are relatively well conserved with respect to the potential OriC (Figure 4).

3.2. Burkholderia pseudomallei Group

The Burkholderia pseudomallei group consists of B. mallei and B. pseudomallei subgroups. Both are characterized by multiple AHL QS systems as well as additional luxR homologs [58].

3.2.1. Burkholderia mallei

The genome of B. mallei contains two luxI and four luxR homologs arranged as two complete luxI/R AHL QS systems and two orphan/solo luxR homologs [59]. The complete QS systems in B. mallei are called BmaI/R, and their luxR homologues bmaR1 and bmaR3 respond to signals produced by adjacent luxI homolog genes bmaI1 and bmaI3, respectively [60]. BmaI1/R1 shares sequence similarity with BpsI1/R1 in B. pseudomallei, producing and responding to C8-HSL [60]. bmaI1-bmaR1 are transcribed in opposite orientation to each other and are separated by an intergenic ORF which contains a homolog of rsaM. The second LuxI/R homolog pair of B. mallei is BmaR3/I3. The bmaR3-bmaI3 pair is transcribed in the same direction and do not contain ORFs in the intergenic region. BmaI3 produces multiple AHL molecules and includes abundant levels of N-3-hydroxy-octanoyl-HSL (3OHC8-HSL). In addition to 3OHC8-HSL, BmaI3 produces N-3-hydroxy-hexanoyl-HSL (3OHC6-HSL), and N-3-hydroxy-decanoyl-HSL (3OHC10-HSL) in minor amounts. BmaR3 responds to the most abundant product 3OHC8-HSL [59]. The role of orphan/solo LuxR homologs, BmaR4 and BmaR5 are currently unknown. In this genus, all the QS genes are present on chromosome 2.

3.2.2. Burkholderia pseudomallei

The B. pseudomallei genome has been identified as having three luxI/R pair homologs, namely bpsI1/R1, bpsI2/R2, and bpsI3/R3, and two orphan or solo luxR regulator homologs, designated as bpsR4 and bpsR5. With the exception of bpsR5, which is present on chromosome 1, most of the QS genes are present on chromosome 2 [61].

The major AHL produced by BpsI1 is C8-HSL(N-octanoyl-L-homoserine lactone), whereas BpsI2 and BpsI3 are associated predominantly with N-3-hydroxy-octanoyl homoserine lactone (OHC8-HSL) and N-3-hydroxy-decanoyl homoserine lactone (OHC10-HSL) respectively [62]. bpsI1 is divergently transcribed to bpsR1, representing the M1 topology, and is separated by an intergenic region which contains an ORF homologous to rsaM. bpsI2 is transcribed in the same direction as bpsR2, representing the M3 topology, and is separated by two to seven genes, one of which is a rsaM homolog. bpsI3 is also transcribed in the same direction as bpsR3 but is not separated by any of the intergenic ORFs and represents the R1 topology.

The local topological patterns and location of QS genes in members of the B. pseudomallei group are shown in Table 5.

The location of the QS genes within the circular chromosome 2 also shows similarities between genomes even though the conservation is stronger in B. pseudomallei than in B. mallei (Figure 5).

QS regulation of B. pseudomallei is rather complex and hierarchical. BpsR1 regulates bpsI1 in the presence of a cognate AHL in a positive feedback loop. BpsR5 also partially activates bpsR1. bpsI2 is constitutively expressed and its expression is enhanced by each of the BpsR—especially by BpsR1 and BpsR3—in the presence of 3-oxo-C8HSL. bpsI3 is also constitutively expressed but its expression is repressed in the presence of any BpsR protein, although the repression is less in the case of BpsR3 [61] (Figure 6).

3.3. Plant-Beneficial and Environmental (PBE) Group

This group of the Burkholderia genus currently includes 29 non-pathogenic species which are most often associated with plants [63]. The AHL QS systems have been identified only in some members of this group. One system related to the LasI/R system of P. aeruginosa is BraI/R, and is highly conserved among all species of this group. The braR and braI genes are transcribed in the same direction and are under strict negative regulation by the RsaL repressor that is present between the braR and braI genes [16] (Figure 7). This arrangement is termed the L1 topology (R→L←I→).

BraI produces multiple AHLs, including 3-oxo-C6-HSL, 3-oxo-C8-HSL, 3-oxo-C10-HSL, and 3-oxo-C12-HSL and 3-oxo-C14-HSL. BraR responds best to 3-oxo-C14-HSL meaning that is likely to be the cognate AHL for BraI/R systems [63].

Some members of the PBE group (mostly from the B. xenovorans, B. graminis and B. phytofirmans subclade) have an additional AHL system that resembles LuxI/R pairs in other Burkholderia species. This additional AHL system is named as XenI2/R2 and produces and responds to 3-hydroxy-C8-HSL (Table 6).

In members of the PBE group, braI/R genes are always present on chromosome 2. The additional QS system XenI2/R2 is present on chromosome 1 and chromosome 3 in B. phytofirmans and B. xenovorans, respectively. The position of QS genes in the PBE group within the chromosomes was conserved with respect to the oriC (Figure 8).

In contrast to members of the BCC group, there is apparently no hierarchical connection between the BraI/R and XenI2/R2 systems. However, an orphan LuxR homolog called BxeR is present in B. xenovorans LB400 and other strains from this cluster (B. graminis C4D1M, B. terricola LMG30594, B. phytofirmans PsJN and B. phenoliruptrix AC1100) and negatively regulates xenI2/R2 [63] (Figure 9).

3.4. Other Pathogenic Burkholderia spp

There are some human and phytopathogens, including phytopathogenic B. glumae, B. gladioli and B. plantarii that do not cluster with either the BCC or with the B. pseudomallei groups. Quorum sensing is known to play an important role in the pathogenicity of these bacteria [6466]. Typical arrangements are shown in Table 7. B. glumae causes disease in rice seedlings and B. gladioli, which is phylogenetically close to B. glumae, is both a rice pathogen as well as an opportunistic pathogen in humans [65]. Another plant pathogen is B. plantarii which also requires the AHL QS system for its pathogenicity [64]. Interestingly, B. glumae has different topology of AHL QS genes in two different strains. luxR and luxI homologs in B. glumae BGR1 are divergently transcribed and are separated by an intergenic gene tofM, which is an rsaM homolog [31,36,67]. In contrast, the LuxR homolog in B. glumae ATCC 33617 is 110 amino acids longer and is believed to be non-functional [65]. This luxR homolog is also divergently transcribed with respect to its luxI homolog but is not separated by any intergenic gene [65]. The topology of B. gladioli is similar to B. glumae BGR1. In B. plantarii, luxR and luxI homologs are divergently transcribed and are adjacent to each other.

Regulation of the QS system in these species is canonical in that a positive feedback loop is present. The repressive action of TofM in B. glumae BGR1 remains unclear and needs to be further studied [36].

4. Conclusions

The ability to produce AHL signals is very common in the genus Burkholderia. The genes of Burkholderia QS systems follow at least 11 typical topological arrangements (10 are common to topological arrangements in other Proteobacteria). Some species, like B. mallei and B. pseudomallei and certain members of the BCC group, contain multiple AHL QS systems that usually do not operate independently from each other but form a complex hierarchical regulatory network. QS genes in Burkholderia are usually located on chromosome 2 where most genes related to virulence and secretion systems are found [14]. This is in agreement with the finding that QS genes regulate pathogenesis and virulence in many species of Burkholderia.

The chemical structure of the AHL signals, the local topology of the QS genes and the location of QS systems within the chromosomes show a degree of conservation throughout the entire genus. The fact that some AHL QS systems, which produce OHC8 and OHC10, can be associated with different local topologies in different species possibly indicates that QS topologies evolved before the Burkholderia genus separated into the current taxonomical groups. We speculate that the AHL signals appeared before the appearance of the genus and the subsequent rearrangements of the ancestral QS systems lead to the local and chromosomal topologies seen in current species.

The conserved patterns of AHL QS gene neighborhoods is at apparent variance with the general view that gene arrangements in prokaryotes are evolutionarily volatile and may change substantially even on short evolutionary scales when gene sequences diverge minimally [68]. On the other hand, it is generally believed that genome architecture is not a straightforward product of adaptation but rather is determined by an intricate balance between selection pressure, recombination as well as the activity of selfish elements [68]. Seen from this evolutionary perspective we speculate that the appearance of a novel QS system may cause a major change in the lifestyle of a bacterial species, for instance it allows the species to colonize a new nutrient-source. Consequently, there will be selection pressure against losing the new system by genetic rearrangements. On the other hand, continuously present genetic rearrangements may add new elements to the system, such as the regulation of new genes.

A point of interest is the number of AHL QS genes in Burkholderia. Galperin and associates argued that the number of bacterial signaling genes is relatively higher in bacteria living in more complex environments, and relatively lower in those living in more sheltered habitats [69,70]. While the original statement referred to two-component systems, a similar general tendency might also be expected with respect to AHL QS systems. The tendency is much less clear, however. Firstly, the number of AHL systems per genome is considerably lower than that of two-component systems. Secondly, the number of AHL systems and solo luxR genes is the highest in Rhizobia and the pseudomallei group of Burkholderia, but the other two clades of Burkholderia have a low to average number of QS genes. As such, we speculate that the number of AHL genes can be better understood in terms of precise molecular mechanisms connected with the lifestyle of QS bacteria rather than in terms of niche characteristics. It must be noted however that Burkholderia also contain at least one other QS system which utilizes another type of signaling molecule which is called Burkholderia Diffusible Signaling Factor (BDSF) [7173]. The newly identified QS system, just like the AHL system, is very widespread among the Burkholderia genus [74,75]. In addition, further unidentified QS systems might exist in the genus; consequently, the mechanism of QS signaling is not yet fully understood in Burkholderia.

Supplementary Information



The authors would like to thank for the help of the late Jack Leunissen (1954-2012) in memory of whom this work is dedicated. Thanks are due to Max Bingham (Freelancer, Rotterdam, The Netherlands) for technical writing and editorial assistance prior to submission. Kumari Sonal Choudhary, Bruna Gonçalves Coutinho and Sanjarbek Hudaiberdiev are graduate students at ICGEB, Trieste. Zsolt Gelencsér is the graduate student at the Faculty of Information Technology, Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Budapest (PPKE-ITK). Bruna Gonçalves Coutinho’s PhD. program is funded by CAPES (Brazil).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Palleroni, N.J.; Kunisawa, R.; Contopoulou, R.; Doudoroff, M. Nucleic Acid Homologies in the Genus Pseudomonas. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 1973, 23, 333–339. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gillis, M.; Van, T.; Bardin, R.; Goor, M.; Hebbar, P.; Willems, A.; Segers, P.; Kersters, K.; Heulin, T.; Fernandez, M.P. Polyphasic Taxonomy in the Genus Burkholderia Leading to an Emended Description of the Genus and Proposition of Burkholderia vietnamiensis sp. nov. for N2-Fixing Isolates from Rice in Vietnam. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 1995, 45, 274–289. [Google Scholar]
  3. Yabuuchi, E.; Kosako, Y.; Oyaizu, H.; Yano, I.; Hotta, H.; Hashimoto, Y.; Ezaki, T.; Arakawa, M. Proposal of Burkholderia gen. nov. and transfer of seven species of the genus Pseudomonas homology group II to the new genus, with the type species Burkholderia cepacia (Palleroni and Holmes 1981) comb. nov. Microbiol. Immunol 1992, 36, 1251–1275. [Google Scholar]
  4. Isles, A.; Maclusky, I.; Corey, M.; Gold, R.; Prober, C.; Fleming, P.; Levison, H. Pseudomonas cepacia infection in cystic fibrosis: An emerging problem. J. Pediatr 1984, 104, 206–210. [Google Scholar]
  5. Vanlaere, E.; Lipuma, J.J.; Baldwin, A.; Henry, D.; De Brandt, E.; Mahenthiralingam, E.; Speert, D.; Dowson, C.; Vandamme, P. Burkholderia latens sp. nov., Burkholderia diffusa sp. nov., Burkholderia arboris sp. nov., Burkholderia seminalis sp. nov. and Burkholderia metallica sp. nov., novel species within the Burkholderia cepacia complex. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol 2008, 58, 1580–1590. [Google Scholar]
  6. Vanlaere, E.; Baldwin, A.; Gevers, D.; Henry, D.; De Brandt, E.; LiPuma, J.J.; Mahenthiralingam, E.; Speert, D.P.; Dowson, C.; Vandamme, P. Taxon K, a complex within the Burkholderia cepacia complex, comprises at least two novel species, Burkholderia contaminans sp. nov. and Burkholderia lata sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol 2009, 59, 102–111. [Google Scholar]
  7. Vandamme, P.; Holmes, B.; Vancanneyt, M.; Coenye, T.; Hoste, B.; Coopman, R.; Revets, H.; Lauwers, S.; Gillis, M.; Kersters, K.; Govan, J.R.W. Occurrence of multiple genomovars of Burkholderia cepacia in cystic fibrosis patients and proposal of Burkholderia multivorans sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 1997, 47, 1188–1200. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mahenthiralingam, E.; Vandamme, P. Taxonomy and pathogenesis of the Burkholderia cepacia complex. Chronic Respir. Dis 2005, 2, 209–217. [Google Scholar]
  9. Mahenthiralingam, E.; Baldwin, A.; Dowson, C.G. Burkholderia cepacia complex bacteria: Opportunistic pathogens with important natural biology. J. Appl. Microbiol 2008, 104, 1539–1551. [Google Scholar]
  10. Leitão, J.H.; Sousa, S.A.; Ferreira, A.S.; Ramos, C.G.; Silva, I.N.; Moreira, L.M. Pathogenicity, virulence factors, and strategies to fight against Burkholderia cepacia complex pathogens and related species. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol 2010, 87, 31–40. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gilad, J. Burkholderia mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei: The causative micro-organisms of glanders and melioidosis. Recent Pat. Anti-Infect. Drug Discov 2007, 2, 233–241. [Google Scholar]
  12. Coenye, T. Social interactions in the Burkholderia cepacia complex: Biofilms and quorum sensing. Future Microbiol 2010, 5, 1087–1099. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kaufmann, A.F.; Alexander, A.D.; Allen, M.A.; Cronin, R.J.; Dillingham, L.A.; Douglas, J.D.; Moore, T.D. Melioidosis in imported non-human primates. J. Wildl. Dis 1970, 6, 211–219. [Google Scholar]
  14. Whitlock, G.C.; Estes, D.M.; Torres, A.G. Glanders: Off to the races with Burkholderia mallei. FEMS Microbiol. Lett 2007, 277, 115–122. [Google Scholar]
  15. Horn, J.K. Bacterial agents used for bioterrorism. Surg. Infect 2003, 4, 281–287. [Google Scholar]
  16. Suárez-Moreno, Z.R.; Caballero-Mellado, J.; Venturi, V. The new group of non-pathogenic plant-associated nitrogen-fixing Burkholderia spp. shares a conserved quorum-sensing system, which is tightly regulated by the RsaL repressor. Microbiology 2008, 154, 2048–2059. [Google Scholar]
  17. Estrada-De Los Santos, P.; Bustillos-Cristales, R.; Caballero-Mellado, J. Burkholderia, a genus rich in plant-associated nitrogen fixers with wide environmental and geographic distribution. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 2001, 67, 2790–2798. [Google Scholar]
  18. Bontemps, C.; Elliott, G.N.; Simon, M.F.; Dos Reis, F.B., Jr.; Gross, E.; Lawton, R.C.; Neto, N.E.; De Fátima Loureiro, M.; De Faria, S.M.; Sprent, J.I.; et al. Burkholderia species are ancient symbionts of legumes. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19, 44–52. [Google Scholar]
  19. Godoy, D.; Randle, G.; Simpson, A.J.; Aanensen, D.M.; Pitt, T.L.; Kinoshita, R.; Spratt, B.G. Multilocus sequence typing and evolutionary relationships among the causative agents of melioidosis and glanders, Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia mallei. J. Clin. Microbiol 2003, 41, 2068–2079. [Google Scholar]
  20. Onofre-Lemus, J.; Hernández-Lucas, I.; Girard, L.; Caballero-Mellado, J. ACC (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate) deaminase activity, a widespread trait in Burkholderia species, and its growth-promoting effect on tomato plants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 2009, 75, 6581–6590. [Google Scholar]
  21. Payne, G.W.; Ramette, A.; Rose, H.L.; Weightman, A.J.; Jones, T.H.; Tiedje, J.M.; Mahenthiralingam, E. Application of a recA gene-based identification approach to the maize rhizosphere reveals novel diversity in Burkholderia species. FEMS Microbiol. Lett 2006, 259, 126–132. [Google Scholar]
  22. Payne, G.W.; Vandamme, P.; Morgan, S.H.; Lipuma, J.J.; Coenye, T.; Weightman, A.J.; Jones, T.H.; Mahenthiralingam, E. Development of a recA gene-based identification approach for the entire Burkholderia genus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 2005, 71, 3917–3927. [Google Scholar]
  23. Tayeb, L.A.; Lefevre, M.; Passet, V.; Diancourt, L.; Brisse, S.; Grimont, P.A.D. Comparative phylogenies of Burkholderia, Ralstonia, Comamonas, Brevundimonas and related organisms derived from rpoB, gyrB and rrs gene sequences. Res. Microbiol 2008, 159, 169–177. [Google Scholar]
  24. Netotea, S.; Bertani, I.; Steindler, L.; Kerényi, A.; Venturi, V.; Pongor, S. A simple model for the early events of quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Modeling bacterial swarming as the movement of an “activation zone”. Biol. Direct 2009, 4, 6. [Google Scholar]
  25. Miller, M.B.; Bassler, B.L. Quorum sensing in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol 2001, 55, 165–199. [Google Scholar]
  26. Goryachev, A.B.; Toh, D.J.; Lee, T. Systems analysis of a quorum sensing network: Design constraints imposed by the functional requirements, network topology and kinetic constants. Biosystems 2006, 83, 178–187. [Google Scholar]
  27. Patankar, A.V.; González, J.E. Orphan LuxR regulators of quorum sensing. FEMS Microbiol. Rev 2009, 33, 739–756. [Google Scholar]
  28. Subramoni, S.; Gonzalez, J.F.; Johnson, A.; Péchy-Tarr, M.; Rochat, L.; Paulsen, I.; Loper, J.E.; Keel, C.; Venturi, V. Bacterial subfamily of LuxR regulators that respond to plant compounds. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 2011, 77, 4579–4588. [Google Scholar]
  29. Subramoni, S.; Venturi, V. LuxR-family “solos”: Bachelor sensors/regulators of signalling molecules. Microbiology 2009, 155, 1377–1385. [Google Scholar]
  30. Eberl, L. Quorum sensing in the genus Burkholderia. Int. J. Med. Microbiol 2006, 296, 103–110. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gelencsér, Z.; Choudhary, K.S.; Coutinho, B.G.; Hudaiberdiev, S.; Galbáts, B.; Venturi, V.; Pongor, S. Classifying the topology of AHL-driven quorum sensing circuits in proteobacterial genomes. Sensors 2012, 12, 5432–5444. [Google Scholar]
  32. Rampioni, G.; Polticelli, F.; Bertani, I.; Righetti, K.; Venturi, V.; Zennaro, E.; Leoni, L. The Pseudomonas quorum-sensing regulator RsaL belongs to the tetrahelical superclass of H-T-H proteins. J. Bacteriol 2007, 189, 1922–1930. [Google Scholar]
  33. Rampioni, G.; Bertani, I.; Zennaro, E.; Polticelli, F.; Venturi, V.; Leoni, L. The quorum-sensing negative regulator RsaL of Pseudomonas aeruginosa binds to the lasI promoter. J. Bacteriol 2006, 188, 815–819. [Google Scholar]
  34. Rampioni, G.; Schuster, M.; Greenberg, E.P.; Bertani, I.; Grasso, M.; Venturi, V.; Zennaro, E.; Leoni, L. RsaL provides quorum sensing homeostasis and functions as a global regulator of gene expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol. Microbiol 2007, 66, 1557–1565. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mattiuzzo, M.; Bertani, I.; Ferluga, S.; Cabrio, L.; Bigirimana, J.; Guarnaccia, C.; Pongor, S.; Maraite, H.; Venturi, V. The plant pathogen Pseudomonas fuscovaginae contains two conserved quorum sensing systems involved in virulence and negatively regulated by RsaL and the novel regulator RsaM. Environ. Microbiol 2011, 13, 145–162. [Google Scholar]
  36. Chen, R.; Barphagha, I.K.; Karki, H.S.; Ham, J.H. Dissection of quorum-sensing genes in Burkholderia glumae reveals non-canonical regulation and the new regulatory gene tofM for toxoflavin production. PloS One 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Goryachev, A.B. Understanding bacterial cell-cell communication with computational modeling. Chem. Rev 2011, 111, 238–250. [Google Scholar]
  38. Qin, Y.; Smyth, A.J.; Su, S.; Farrand, S.K. Dimerization properties of TraM, the antiactivator that modulates TraR-mediated quorum-dependent expression of the Ti plasmid tra genes. Mol. Microbiol 2004, 53, 1471–1485. [Google Scholar]
  39. Chen, G.; Malenkos, J.W.; Cha, M.-R.; Fuqua, C.; Chen, L. Quorum-sensing antiactivator TraM forms a dimer that dissociates to inhibit TraR. Mol. Microbiol 2004, 52, 1641–1651. [Google Scholar]
  40. Venturi, V.; Rampioni, G.; Pongor, S.; Leoni, L. The virtue of temperance: Built-in negative regulators of quorum sensing in Pseudomonas. Mol. Microbiol 2011, 82, 1060–1070. [Google Scholar]
  41. Henke, J.M.; Bassler, B.L. Three parallel quorum-sensing systems regulate gene expression in Vibrio harveyi. J. Bacteriol 2004, 186, 6902–6914. [Google Scholar]
  42. Lenz, D.H.; Miller, M.B.; Zhu, J.; Kulkarni, R.V.; Bassler, B.L. CsrA and three redundant small RNAs regulate quorum sensing in Vibrio cholerae. Mol. Microbiol 2005, 58, 1186–1202. [Google Scholar]
  43. Lenz, D.H.; Mok, K.C.; Lilley, B.N.; Kulkarni, R.V.; Wingreen, N.S.; Bassler, B.L. The small RNA chaperone Hfq and multiple small RNAs control quorum sensing in Vibrio harveyi and Vibrio cholerae. Cell 2004, 118, 69–82. [Google Scholar]
  44. Kobayashi, H.; Kaern, M.; Araki, M.; Chung, K.; Gardner, T.S.; Cantor, C.R.; Collins, J.J. Programmable cells: Interfacing natural and engineered gene networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 8414–8419. [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang, C.; Zhang, H.-B.; Wang, L.-H.; Zhang, L.-H. Succinic semialdehyde couples stress response to quorum-sensing signal decay in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Mol. Microbiol 2006, 62, 45–56. [Google Scholar]
  46. Cui, Y.; Chatterjee, A.; Hasegawa, H.; Chatterjee, A.K. Erwinia carotovora subspecies produce duplicate variants of ExpR, LuxR homologs that activate rsmA transcription but differ in their interactions with N-acylhomoserine lactone signals. J. Bacteriol 2006, 188, 4715–4726. [Google Scholar]
  47. Sjöblom, S.; Brader, G.; Koch, G.; Palva, E.T. Cooperation of two distinct ExpR regulators controls quorum sensing specificity and virulence in the plant pathogen Erwinia carotovora. Mol. Microbiol 2006, 60, 1474–1489. [Google Scholar]
  48. Tsai, C.-S.; Winans, S.C. LuxR-type quorum-sensing regulators that are detached from common scents. Mol. Microbiol 2010, 77, 1072–1082. [Google Scholar]
  49. Fuqua, C.; Parsek, M.R.; Greenberg, E.P. Regulation of gene expression by cell-to-cell communication: acyl-homoserine lactone quorum sensing. Annu. Rev. Genet 2001, 35, 439–468. [Google Scholar]
  50. Steindler, L.; Venturi, V. Detection of quorum-sensing N-acyl homoserine lactone signal molecules by bacterial biosensors. FEMS Microbiol. Lett 2007, 266, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  51. Juhas, M.; Eberl, L.; Tümmler, B. Quorum sensing: The power of cooperation in the world of Pseudomonas. Environ. Microbiol 2005, 7, 459–471. [Google Scholar]
  52. Suárez-Moreno, Z.R.; Caballero-Mellado, J.; Coutinho, B.G.; Mendonça-Previato, L.; James, E.K.; Venturi, V. Common features of environmental and potentially beneficial plant-associated Burkholderia. Microb. Ecol 2012, 63, 249–266. [Google Scholar]
  53. Venturi, V.; Friscina, A.; Bertani, I.; Devescovi, G.; Aguilar, C. Quorum sensing in the Burkholderia cepacia complex. Res. Microbiol 2004, 155, 238–244. [Google Scholar]
  54. O’Grady, E.P.; Viteri, D.F.; Malott, R.J.; Sokol, P.A. Reciprocal regulation by the CepIR and CciIR quorum sensing systems in Burkholderia cenocepacia. BMC Genomics 2009, 10, 441. [Google Scholar]
  55. Malott, R.J.; Baldwin, A.; Mahenthiralingam, E.; Sokol, P.A. Characterization of the cciIR quorum-sensing system in Burkholderia cenocepacia. Infect. Immun 2005, 73, 4982–4992. [Google Scholar]
  56. O’Grady, E.P.; Viteri, D.F.; Sokol, P.A. A unique regulator contributes to quorum sensing and virulence in Burkholderia cenocepacia. PLoS One 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Malott, R.J.; O’Grady, E.P.; Toller, J.; Inhülsen, S.; Eberl, L.; Sokol, P.A. A Burkholderia cenocepacia orphan LuxR homolog is involved in quorum-sensing regulation. J. Bacteriol 2009, 191, 2447–2460. [Google Scholar]
  58. Larsen, J.C.; Johnson, N.H. Pathogenesis of Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia mallei. Military Med 2009, 174, 647–651. [Google Scholar]
  59. Duerkop, B.A.; Herman, J.P.; Ulrich, R.L.; Churchill, M.E.A.; Greenberg, E.P. The Burkholderia mallei BmaR3-BmaI3 quorum-sensing system produces and responds to N-3-hydroxy-octanoyl homoserine lactone. J. Bacteriol 2008, 190, 5137–5141. [Google Scholar]
  60. Duerkop, B.A.; Ulrich, R.L.; Greenberg, E.P. Octanoyl-homoserine lactone is the cognate signal for Burkholderia mallei BmaR1-BmaI1 quorum sensing. J. Bacteriol 2007, 189, 5034–5040. [Google Scholar]
  61. Kiratisin, P.; Sanmee, S. Roles and interactions of Burkholderia pseudomallei BpsIR quorum-sensing system determinants. J. Bacteriol 2008, 190, 7291–7297. [Google Scholar]
  62. Gamage, A.M.; Shui, G.; Wenk, M.R.; Chua, K.L. N-Octanoylhomoserine lactone signalling mediated by the BpsI-BpsR quorum sensing system plays a major role in biofilm formation of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Microbiology 2011, 157, 1176–1186. [Google Scholar]
  63. Suárez-Moreno, Z.R.; Devescovi, G.; Myers, M.; Hallack, L.; Mendonça-Previato, L.; Caballero-Mellado, J.; Venturi, V. Commonalities and differences in regulation of N-acyl homoserine lactone quorum sensing in the beneficial plant-associated Burkholderia species cluster. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 2010, 76, 4302–4317. [Google Scholar]
  64. Solis, R.; Bertani, I.; Degrassi, G.; Devescovi, G.; Venturi, V. Involvement of quorum sensing and RpoS in rice seedling blight caused by Burkholderia plantarii. FEMS Microbiol. Lett 2006, 259, 106–112. [Google Scholar]
  65. Devescovi, G.; Bigirimana, J.; Degrassi, G.; Cabrio, L.; LiPuma, J.J.; Kim, J.; Hwang, I.; Venturi, V. Involvement of a quorum-sensing-regulated lipase secreted by a clinical isolate of Burkholderia glumae in severe disease symptoms in rice. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 2007, 73, 4950–4958. [Google Scholar]
  66. Chun, H.; Choi, O.; Goo, E.; Kim, N.; Kim, H.; Kang, Y.; Kim, J.; Moon, J.S.; Hwang, I. The quorum sensing-dependent gene katG of Burkholderia glumae is important for protection from visible light. J. Bacteriol 2009, 191, 4152–4157. [Google Scholar]
  67. Kim, J.; Kim, J.-G.; Kang, Y.; Jang, J.Y.; Jog, G.J.; Lim, J.Y.; Kim, S.; Suga, H.; Nagamatsu, T.; Hwang, I. Quorum sensing and the LysR-type transcriptional activator ToxR regulate toxoflavin biosynthesis and transport in Burkholderia glumae. Mol. Microbiol 2004, 54, 921–934. [Google Scholar]
  68. Koonin, E. Evolution of genome architecture. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol 2009, 41, 298–306. [Google Scholar]
  69. Galperin, M.Y.; Higdon, R.; Kolker, E. Interplay of heritage and habitat in the distribution of bacterial signal transduction systems. Mol. Biosystems 2010, 6, 721–728. [Google Scholar]
  70. Galperin, M.Y. A census of membrane-bound and intracellular signal transduction proteins in bacteria: Bacterial IQ, extroverts and introverts. BMC Microbiol. 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bi, H.; Christensen, Q.H.; Feng, Y.; Wang, H.; Cronan, J.E. The Burkholderia cenocepacia BDSF quorum sensing fatty acid is synthesized by a bifunctional crotonase homologue having both dehydratase and thioesterase activities. Mol. Microbiol 2012, 83, 840–855. [Google Scholar]
  72. Ryan, R.P.; McCarthy, Y.; Watt, S.A.; Niehaus, K.; Dow, J.M. Intraspecies signaling involving the diffusible signal factor BDSF (cis-2-dodecenoic acid) influences virulence in Burkholderia cenocepacia. J. Bacteriol 2009, 191, 5013–5019. [Google Scholar]
  73. Boon, C.; Deng, Y.; Wang, L.-H.; He, Y.; Xu, J.-L.; Fan, Y.; Pan, S.Q.; Zhang, L.-H. A novel DSF-like signal from Burkholderia cenocepacia interferes with Candida albicans morphological transition. ISME J 2008, 2, 27–36. [Google Scholar]
  74. Deng, Y.; Wu, J.; Eberl, L.; Zhang, L.-H. Structural and functional characterization of diffusible signal factor family quorum-sensing signals produced by members of the Burkholderia cepacia complex. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 2010, 76, 4675–4683. [Google Scholar]
  75. Deng, Y.; Schmid, N.; Wang, C.; Wang, J.; Pessi, G.; Wu, D.; Lee, J.; Aguilar, C.; Ahrens, C.H.; Chang, C.; et al. Cis-2-dodecenoic acid receptor RpfR links quorum-sensing signal perception with regulation of virulence through cyclic dimeric guanosine monophosphate turnover. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 15479–15484. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Clustering of LuxI protein sequences and perceived signals by LuxR homologues in complete Burkholderia genomes. In the following parts we review the AHL systems in the major Burkholderia clades.
Figure 1. Clustering of LuxI protein sequences and perceived signals by LuxR homologues in complete Burkholderia genomes. In the following parts we review the AHL systems in the major Burkholderia clades.
Ijms 14 13727f1 1024
Figure 2. QS regulatory circuits in Burkholderia cenocepacia J2315 [54].
Figure 2. QS regulatory circuits in Burkholderia cenocepacia J2315 [54].
Ijms 14 13727f2 1024
Figure 3. Cladogram of the orthologs of ORF BCAM1871, encoding a protein with an HMG-CoA domain in Burkholderia spp. The orthologs are well separated into cepacia and pseudomallei groups. The RMI (R←M→I→) motive is flanked by conserved genes on both sides in members of both cepacia and pseudomallei groups. The numbers on the tree branches indicate bootstrap values (%).
Figure 3. Cladogram of the orthologs of ORF BCAM1871, encoding a protein with an HMG-CoA domain in Burkholderia spp. The orthologs are well separated into cepacia and pseudomallei groups. The RMI (R←M→I→) motive is flanked by conserved genes on both sides in members of both cepacia and pseudomallei groups. The numbers on the tree branches indicate bootstrap values (%).
Ijms 14 13727f3 1024
Figure 4. Typical arrangements of QS genes in chromosome II of the Burkholderia cepacia complex (BCC) group. (A) Arrangement of QS genes in the BCC members with cciR/I genes (for example B. cenocepacia J2315 and B. cenocepacia MC0-3); (B) Arrangement of QS genes in BCC members having just one pair of luxR/I homologs (cepR/I) (for example B. cenocepacia AU1054, B. cenocepacia HI2424, B. cepacia GG4, etc.). OriC denotes the origin of replication, solo luxR genes (i.e. those without adjacent I genes) are denoted by black and white ovals, respectively, with the latter indicating two adjacent luxR homologues.
Figure 4. Typical arrangements of QS genes in chromosome II of the Burkholderia cepacia complex (BCC) group. (A) Arrangement of QS genes in the BCC members with cciR/I genes (for example B. cenocepacia J2315 and B. cenocepacia MC0-3); (B) Arrangement of QS genes in BCC members having just one pair of luxR/I homologs (cepR/I) (for example B. cenocepacia AU1054, B. cenocepacia HI2424, B. cepacia GG4, etc.). OriC denotes the origin of replication, solo luxR genes (i.e. those without adjacent I genes) are denoted by black and white ovals, respectively, with the latter indicating two adjacent luxR homologues.
Ijms 14 13727f4 1024
Figure 5. An example of the chromosomal arrangement of QS genes in completely sequenced genome of B. pseudomallei strains (for example B. pseudomallei 1026b, B. pseudomallei 1026a etc.). RXR: Two solo luxR homologs are separated by a hypothetical gene. The X gene is missing in some B. pseudomallei.
Figure 5. An example of the chromosomal arrangement of QS genes in completely sequenced genome of B. pseudomallei strains (for example B. pseudomallei 1026b, B. pseudomallei 1026a etc.). RXR: Two solo luxR homologs are separated by a hypothetical gene. The X gene is missing in some B. pseudomallei.
Ijms 14 13727f5 1024
Figure 6. Schematic representation of the complex regulatory circuit in B. pseudomallei K92643 [61]. Dashed lines indicate partial regulation.
Figure 6. Schematic representation of the complex regulatory circuit in B. pseudomallei K92643 [61]. Dashed lines indicate partial regulation.
Ijms 14 13727f6 1024
Figure 7. Regulatory circuit of BraR/I system in the plant-beneficial Burkholderia group (for example B. xenovorans LB400) [63].
Figure 7. Regulatory circuit of BraR/I system in the plant-beneficial Burkholderia group (for example B. xenovorans LB400) [63].
Ijms 14 13727f7 1024
Figure 8. Chromosomal arrangement of QS genes (braI/R) and OriC in completely sequenced members of the plant-beneficial and environmental group (for example, B. phytofirmans PsJN, B. xenovorans LB400, etc.).
Figure 8. Chromosomal arrangement of QS genes (braI/R) and OriC in completely sequenced members of the plant-beneficial and environmental group (for example, B. phytofirmans PsJN, B. xenovorans LB400, etc.).
Ijms 14 13727f8 1024
Figure 9. Regulatory circuit of xenI2/R2 and bxeR genes in plant-beneficial and environmental group (for example, B. xenovorans LB400) [63].
Figure 9. Regulatory circuit of xenI2/R2 and bxeR genes in plant-beneficial and environmental group (for example, B. xenovorans LB400) [63].
Ijms 14 13727f9 1024
Table 1. Chemical structure of N-acylated homoserine lactone (AHL) signals used by LuxR in the known species of the genus Burkholderia.
Table 1. Chemical structure of N-acylated homoserine lactone (AHL) signals used by LuxR in the known species of the genus Burkholderia.
N-hexanoyl-L-Homoserine lactone(C6-HSL)Ijms 14 13727f10N-decanoyl-L-Homoserine lactone (C10-HSL)Ijms 14 13727f11
N-octanoyl-L-Homoserine lactone (C8-HSL)Ijms 14 13727f12N-3-hydroxydecanoyl Homoserine lactone (OHC10-HSL)Ijms 14 13727f13
N-3-hydroxyoctanoyl Homoserine lactone (OHC8-HSL)Ijms 14 13727f14N-3-oxotetradecanoyl- L-homoserine lactone (OC14-HSL)Ijms 14 13727f15
Table 2. Typical local topologies of AHL-driven quorum sensing circuits in Burkholderia.
Table 2. Typical local topologies of AHL-driven quorum sensing circuits in Burkholderia.
IDGene topologyOccurrence in Burkholderia

BCC groupB. pseudomallei groupPlant-beneficial/environmental groupOther pathogenic Burkholderia species
RI topologies

R1Ijms 14 13727f1631740
R2Ijms 14 13727f170001
R3Ijms 14 13727f188203

RXI topololgies

L1Ijms 14 13727f1900013
M1Ijms 14 13727f20244603
M3Ijms 14 13727f2103000
M31Ijms 14 13727f225500
M4Ijms 14 13727f231000
X3Ijms 14 13727f2402410
X5Ijms 14 13727f251000
X6Ijms 14 13727f260100
Table 3. Correlation between the chemical structure and the local gene arrangements in Burkholderia.
Table 3. Correlation between the chemical structure and the local gene arrangements in Burkholderia.
SymbolOccurrences in Burkholderia
BCC groupB. pseudomallei groupPlant-beneficial/environmental groupOther pathogenic Burkholderia species
C6-HSL2 (R1)000
C8-HSL14 (M1)13 (M1)02 (M1: B. glumae and R3: B. plantarii)
OHC8-HSL011 (R1 and X3: B. mallei; R1: B. thailandensis and M3 of B. pseudomallei)3 (R1)0
C10-HSL1 (X5)000
OHC10-HSL05 (R1 of B. pseudomallei and M3 of B. thailandensis)00
OC14-HSL009 (L1)0
Table 4. Quorum sensing (QS) topologies in the Burkholderia cepacia complex.
Table 4. Quorum sensing (QS) topologies in the Burkholderia cepacia complex.
SpeciesQS systemIDGene TopologyChr.Major AHLComments
B. ambifariabafR//bafIM1Ijms 14 13727f27Chr2C8Present in all B. ambifaria strains
/M31Ijms 14 13727f28Chr3Present in some strains such as B. ambifaria AMMD, B.ambifaria MC40-6
/R1Ijms 14 13727f29NAB. ambifaria IOP40
B. cenocepaciacepR//cepIM1Ijms 14 13727f30Chr2C8Present in all B. cenocepacia strains
cciR/cciIR1Ijms 14 13727f29Chr2C6Present in some strains such as B. cenocepacia K56-2, B. cenocepacia J2315 and B. cenocepacia MC0-3
B. multivoransbmuR//bmuIM1Ijms 14 13727f30Chr2C8B. multivorans ATCC 17616
B. multivorans ATCC 17616*sdiA//bmuIM1Ijms 14 13727f30Chr2C8B. multivorans ATCC 17616*
B.vietnamiensiscepR//cepIM1Ijms 14 13727f30Chr2C8B. vietnamiensis G4
bviR//bviIX5Ijms 14 13727f31Chr3C10B. vietnamiensis G4
/R2Ijms 14 13727f32NAPresent in B. vietnamiensis C2822, B. vietnamiensis G4 etc.
B. cepaciacepI/cepRR2Ijms 14 13727f32NAPresent in B. cepacia ATCC 25416, B. cepacia DBO1, B. cepacia K56-2

*same strain but different bioproject.

Table 5. QS topologies in the Burkholderia pseudomallei group.
Table 5. QS topologies in the Burkholderia pseudomallei group.
SpeciesQS systemIDGene topologyChr.Major AHLComments
B. malleibmaR3/bmaI3R1Ijms 14 13727f29Chr2OCH8B. mallei ATCC 23344
bmaR1//bmaI1M1Ijms 14 13727f30Chr2C8Present in all B. mallei strains
bmaR3//bmaI3X3Ijms 14 13727f33Chr2OCH8Present in some strains such as B. mallei NCTC 10229 and B. mallei NCTC 10247, B. mallei FMH etc.
B. pseudomalleibpsR3/bpsI3R1Ijms 14 13727f34Chr2OHC10Present in all B. pseudomallei strains
bpsR1//bpsI1M1Ijms 14 13727f35Chr2C8Present in all B. pseudomallei strains
bpsR2//bpsI2M3Ijms 14 13727f36Chr2OHC8Present in all B. pseudomallei strains
//X3Ijms 14 13727f37Chr2Present in some strains such as B. pseudomallei 1026b, B. pseudomallei MSHR346, B. pseudomallei 112 etc.
bpsI/bpsRR2Ijms 14 13727f38NAB. pseudomallei 844
B. thailandensisbtaR3/btaI3R1Ijms 14 13727f34Chr2OHC8Present in some strains of B. thailandensis
btaR1//btaI1M1Ijms 14 13727f35Chr2C8Present in all B. thailandensis strains
btaR2//btaI2M3Ijms 14 13727f36Chr2OHC8, OHC10Present in all B. thailandensis strains
//X3Ijms 14 13727f37NAPresent in some strains such as B. thailandensis Bt4, B. thailandensis TXDOH
Table 6. QS topologies in plant-beneficial and environmental Burkholderia sps.
Table 6. QS topologies in plant-beneficial and environmental Burkholderia sps.
SpeciesQS systemIDGene topologyChr. No.Major AHLComments
PlantbeneficialBurkholderiasps.braR/rsaL/braIL1Ijms 14 13727f39Chr2OC14All plant-beneficial strains have this system. Ex: B. phymatum STM815, B. phytofirmans PsJN, B. xenovorans LB400, B. graminis C4D1M, B. unamae etc.
PlantbeneficialBurkholderiasps.xenR2/xenI2R1Ijms 14 13727f40Chr1 (B. phytofirmans PsJN); Chr3 (B. xenovorans LB400)OHC8Present in some plantbeneficial strains. Ex: B. phytofirmans PsJN, B. xenovorans LB400, B. graminis C4D1M
Table 7. QS topologies in plant pathogenic Burkholderia sps.
Table 7. QS topologies in plant pathogenic Burkholderia sps.
SpeciesQS systemIDGene topologyChr. No.Major AHLComments
B. glumaetofR/tofM/tofIM1Ijms 14 13727f41Chr 2C8B. glumae BGR1, B. glumae 336gr-1
tofR/tofIR3Ijms 14 13727f42NANon functionalB. glumae ATCC33617 and B. glumae AU6208
B. gladioli//M1Ijms 14 13727f43Chr2B. gladioli BSR3
//M1Ijms 14 13727f43plasmidB. gladioli BSR3
B. plantariiplaR/plaIR3Ijms 14 13727f42NAC8B. plantarii ATCC43733
Int. J. Mol. Sci. EISSN 1422-0067 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top