Next Article in Journal
Detection of Abnormal Extracellular Matrix in the Interstitium of Regenerating Renal Tubules
Next Article in Special Issue
Association between ADIPOQ +45T>G Polymorphism and Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Sodium Hydrosulfide Prevents Myocardial Dysfunction through Modulation of Extracellular Matrix Accumulation and Vascular Density
Previous Article in Special Issue
Associations of NR5A2 Gene Polymorphisms with the Clinicopathological Characteristics and Survival of Gastric Cancer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Associations between Variants in IL-33/ST2 Signaling Pathway Genes and Coronary Heart Disease Risk

1
Department of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1277 Jiefang Dadao, Wuhan 430022, China
2
Institute of Occupational Medicine and the Ministry of Education, Key Lab of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 13 HangKong Road, Wuhan 430030, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15(12), 23227-23239; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms151223227
Submission received: 25 October 2014 / Revised: 2 December 2014 / Accepted: 5 December 2014 / Published: 15 December 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Disease Diagnostics)

Abstract

:
The IL-33/ST2 signaling pathway plays an important role in coronary artery disease (CHD); however, few studies have explored how variants in IL-33/ST2 genes influence CHD risk. Here, we examined the association between genetic variants in IL-33, ST2, and IL-1RAcP of the IL-33/ST2 axis and the risk of CHD. We conducted a case-controlled study with 1146 CHD cases and 1146 age- and sex-frequency-matched controls. Twenty-eight single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in IL-33, ST2, and IL-1RAcP were genotyped by Sequenom MassArray and TaqMan assay. Logistic regression was used to analyze these associations. The SNP rs4624606 in IL-1RAcP was nominally associated with CHD risk. The AA genotype was associated with a 1.85-fold increased risk of CHD (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.01–3.36; p = 0.045) compared to the TT genotype. Further analysis showed that AA carriers also had a higher risk of CHD than TT + TA carriers (odds ratio (OR) = 1.85; 95% CI = 1.85–3.35; p = 0.043). However, no significant association was observed between variants in IL-33/ST2 genes and CHD risk. Further studies are needed to replicate our results in other ethnic groups with larger sample size.

1. Introduction

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a complex chronic inflammatory process mediated by the innate and acquired immune systems and involves pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines [1]. Evidence indicates the interleukin 33/interleukin 1 receptor-like 1 (IL-33/ST2) axis participates in various fields of cardiovascular disease [2,3,4,5,6,7]. IL-33 is a member of the interleukin-1 family of cytokines, and ST2, which consists of a transmembrane ligand (ST2L), a soluble component (sST2), and ST2V, is the receptor for IL-33 [8]. IL-33 and ST2L form a heterodimeric receptor complex with IL-1R accessory protein (IL-1RAcP) [9,10]. By interacting with ST2L, IL-33 prevents cardiomyocyte apoptosis and attenuates myocardial fibrosis and myocyte hypertrophy [4]. In vivo, IL-33 significantly attenuates atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in ApoE−/− mice on a high-fat diet via the induction of IL-5 and oxidized low-density lipoprotein antibodies. The IL-33 decoy receptor, sST2, alters the atheroprotective activity of IL-33 [2]. In contrast, other studies have reported that IL-33 promotes adhesion molecules and inflammatory activation in human endothelial cells and may, in such way, enhance the development of atherosclerotic lesions in the vessel wall [11,12]. The mechanisms of these contradictory effects of IL-33 are not yet completely understood yet. Clinically, IL-33 serum levels were elevated in patients with heart failure and associated with coronary in-stent restenosis and mortality in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction [13,14,15,16]. Furthermore, sST2 has been demonstrated as a strong prognostic biomarker in patients with heart failure and myocardial infarction [3,5,17,18,19].
Despite powerful biological and prognostic data describing the role of IL-33/ST2 signaling in the development of CHD, there is little information regarding the significance of IL-33/ST2 genetic variants in CHD. Recently, Tsapaki et al. revealed that two polymorphisms in the distal promoter region of ST2 were associated with susceptibility to severe CHD [20]. In addition, polymorphisms in genes involved in the IL-33/ST2 pathway have been associated with several immune and inflammatory diseases [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33].
Therefore, considering the role of inflammation in CHD, we hypothesized that polymorphisms in IL-33/ST2 might be associated with CHD risk. To test this hypothesis, we performed a genetic association analysis of IL-33/ST2 and CHD risk in a case-control study of the Han Chinese population.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characteristics of the Case and Control Subjects

The general characteristics of the case-control study population are presented in Table 1. Age and sex were similar for case and control subjects. Traditional CHD risk factors, such as body mass index (BMI) and fasting blood glucose (FBG), were significantly higher in CHD cases than in control subjects. CHD cases were more likely have a history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), and a family history of CHD. Total cholesterol (TC) levels were significantly lower in the cases than in the controls, possibly due to the use of cholesterol-lowering medications in this population.
Table 1. General characteristics of the study population.
Table 1. General characteristics of the study population.
VariablesCases (n = 1146)Controls (n = 1146)p Value
Sex, m/f (%)901/245 (78.6/21.4)891/255 (77.7/22.3)0.613
Age, years60.5 ± 11.360.0 ± 10.30.23
Blood pressure, mmHg
Systolic133.6 ± 29.0136.0 ± 25.30.034
Diastolic82.0 ± 11.382.9 ± 15.20.11
Body mass index, kg/m223.7 ± 3.124.4 ± 3.3<0.01
Fasting glucose, mmol/L5.6 ± 2.26.2 ± 3.0<0.01
Total cholesterol, mmol/L4.35 ± 1.104.68 ± 0.92<0.01
Triglyceride, mmol/L1.61 ± 1.301.67 ± 1.380.283
Smoking, no/yes (%)686/460 (59.9/40.1)774/369 (67.7/32.3)<0.01
Alcohol drinking, no/yes (%)776/365 (68.0/32.0)822/317 (72.2/27.8)<0.01
Past history
Hypertension, no/yes784/361 (68.5/31.5)351/790 (30.8/69.2)<0.01
Diabetics, no/yes1080/65 (94.3/5.7)824/314 (72.4/27.6)<0.01
Family history of CHD, no/yes (%)1133/10 (99.1/0.9)947/158 (85.7/14.3)<0.01
Variables are presented as the mean ± SD or percentage. p-Values were calculated; using independent-sample t-tests or Chi-square tests.

2.2. Associations between Interleukin 33 (IL-33)/Interleukin 1 Receptor-Like 1 (ST2)/IL-1R Accessory Protein (IL-1RAcP) Variants and Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) Risk

All the SNPs conformed to Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) (p > 0.001) except rs1157505, which significantly deviated from HWE in both control subjects and CHD cases (p < 0.001). The minor allele frequency (MAF) for -27307T/A and -27614C/A were 0, and these alleles have not previously been found in the Chinese Han population according to the HapMap database. Thus, 25 SNPs were selected for further analysis. To analyze the associations between these SNPs and CHD risk, we compared differences in the genotype distribution of each polymorphism between case and control subjects and analyzed the genotypes as dominant/recessive models. As shown in Table 2, homozygous rs4624606 variants (AA) had a significantly increased risk of CHD (OR = 1.85; 95% CI = 1.01–3.36; p = 0.045) compared to subjects with homozygous wild-type alleles (TT) after adjustment for conventional CHD risk factors, such as age, sex, smoking, drinking, BMI, triglyceride (TG), hypertension, DM, and family history of CHD. The SNP rs4624606 was also associated with a significantly increased risk of CHD in a recessive model (AA vs. (TT + TA): OR = 1.85; 95% CI = 1.02–3.35; p = 0.043, Table 2). This study had greater than 90% power to detect the associations between rs4624606 and CHD risk > 1.85 at a 0.05 significance level under both additive and recessive models. However, p-values for rs4624606 failed to reach significance after Bonferroni correction (p > 0.002). There was no significant association between the remaining 24 SNPs and CHD risk in the Chinese population (p > 0.05).
Table 2. Genotype frequencies of 25 SNPs and their association with coronary heart disease (CHD) risk in the Chinese population.
Table 2. Genotype frequencies of 25 SNPs and their association with coronary heart disease (CHD) risk in the Chinese population.
SNPsCase aControl aHeterozygote bVariant Homozygote bDominant Model cRecessive Model d
OR (95% CI) ep eOR (95% CI) ep eOR (95% CI) ep eOR (95% CI) ep e
IL33
rs1929992353/538/217369/527/2101.04 (0.82–1.32)0.7331.11 (0.83–1.49)0.4851.06 (0.85–1.32)0.5941.08 (0.84–1.41)0.542
rs10975520327/554/246335/539/2341.00 (0.79–1.27)0.9871.08 (0.81–1.44)0.6181.02 (0.82–1.28)0.831.07 (0.84–1.38)0.570
rs11792633361/552/222363/530/2111.01 (0.80–1.28)0.9121.09 (0.81–1.45)0.5811.03 (0.83–1.29)0.7621.08 (0.83–1.39)0.571
rs16241591010/94/31020/91/60.88 (0.61–1.28)0.5132.83 (0.58–13.9)0.1990.93 (0.65–1.35)0.7092.86 (0.58–14.04)0.195
ST2
rs3755278974/86/31045/89/41.02 (0.70–1.49)0.9283.44 (0.53–22.19)0.1931.06 (0.73–1.54)0.7433.44 (0.53–22.16)0.194
rs3821204457/512/157452/522/1340.94 (0.76–1.18)0.6121.26 (0.90–1.75)0.1781.00 (0.81–1.24)0.9721.30 (0.95–1.77)0.102
rs13431828925/194/15932/166/101.16 (0.88–1.54)0.2840.91 (0.35–2.38)0.8431.15 (0.87–1.50)0.3260.89 (0.34–2.32)0.805
rs10206753839/272/26832/252/241.07 (0.84–1.37)0.5620.97 (0.49–1.93)0.9391.06 (0.84–1.34)0.5980.96 (0.48–1.89)0.898
rs1041973845/248/41844/234/301.00 (0.78–1.29)0.9771.41 (0.79–2.49)0.2431.05 (0.83–1.33)0.6811.40 (0.80–2.48)0.242
rs12999364409/536/185407/527/1740.99 (0.79–1.24)0.9081.13 (0.83–1.55)0.4361.02 (0.82–1.26)0.8541.14 (0.86–1.51)0.363
rs6543116337/571/216326/537/2451.02 (0.81–1.30)0.8450.82 (0.61–1.10)0.1890.96 (0.77–1.21)0.7350.81 (0.62–1.04)0.101
rs951774660/413/58630/408/700.91 (0.73–1.13)0.3770.91 (0.57–1.45)0.6830.91 (0.74–1.12)0.3580.94 (0.60–1.49)0.8
rs10515922843/263/26833/247/281.00 (0.78–1.27)0.9761.13 (0.55–2.29)0.7451.01 (0.79–1.28)0.9551.13 (0.55–2.29)0.742
rs130065591063/77/21046/59/31.24 (0.80–1.94)0.341.37 (0.12–15.25)0.7981.25 (0.80–1.93)0.3261.36 (0.12–15.10)0.804
IL–1RAcP
rs1015704725/359/46686/381/410.89 (0.71–1.11)0.2951.02 (0.59–1.78)0.9350.90 (0.73–1.12)0.341.07 (0.62–1.84)0.819
rs9817203515/493/122506/489/1131.05 (0.84–1.30)0.6851.24 (0.87–1.77)0.2281.08 (0.88–1.33)0.4611.22 (0.87–1.70)0.255
rs1559018300/549/279276/569/2620.97 (0.76–1.25)0.8251.14 (0.85–1.53)0.3781.02 (0.81–1.30)0.8461.16 (0.91–1.48)0.223
rs3773986861/245/19844/250/141.01 (0.79–1.29)0.9361.23 (0.52–2.91)0.6441.02 (0.80–1.30)0.861.22 (0.52–2.90)0.647
rs6765375736/350/45699/375/340.89 (0.71–1.11)0.3011.18 (0.66–2.11)0.5760.91 (0.74–1.13)0.4081.23 (0.69–2.18)0.486
rs4624606734/338/46731/351/260.99 (0.79–1.25)0.9621.85 (1.01–3.36)0.0451.05 (0.85–1.31)0.6361.85 (1.02–3.35)0.043
rs16865597877/204/12854/223/171.02 (0.78–1.32)0.8921.19 (0.45–3.12)0.7281.03 (0.79–1.33)0.8371.18 (0.45–3.11)0.733
rs4687150559/434/105543/433/1100.92 (0.74–1.15)0.4590.90 (0.62–1.30)0.580.92 (0.74–1.13)0.4120.94 (0.66–1.33)0.712
rs3773958380/548/200368/534/2060.97 (0.77–1.22)0.7790.95 (0.70–1.28)0.7290.96 (0.77–1.20)0.7280.97 (0.74–1.26)0.806
rs3773981695/330/57726/336/420.94 (0.75–1.18)0.591.09 (0.65–1.80)0.7510.96 (0.77–1.19)0.6921.11 (0.67–1.83)0.689
rs6444435638/340/65691/363/510.97 (0.77–1.22)0.7971.39 (0.87–2.23)0.1681.02 (0.82–1.27)0.8431.41 (0.88–2.24)0.150
a Wild-type homozygote/heterozygote/variant homozygote; b The reference group comprised subjects homozygous for the wild-type allele; c Dominant model (wild-type homozygote vs. heterozygote + variant homozygote); d Recessive model (wild-type homozygote + heterozygote vs. variant homozygote); e Data were calculated by unconditional logistic regression, adjusted for age, sex, smoking, drinking, BMI, TG, hypertension, DM, and family history of CHD. Numbers in bold mean the SNP rs4624606 was also associated with a significantly increased risk of CHD in a recessive model (AA vs. (TT + TA): OR = 1.85; 95% CI = 1.02–3.35; p = 0.043, Table 2).

2.3. Association Analyses for Stratified Traditional Risk Factors

To evaluate whether traditional risk factors influenced the effects of genetic variants on CHD risk, we conducted stratification analysis for rs4624606 by sex, smoking, drinking, BMI, hypertension, and diabetes and examined the interactions between this SNP and traditional risk factors for CHD risk. As shown in Table 3, rs4624606 was associated with higher risk in hypertensive subjects (AA vs. TT: OR = 2.77, 95% CI = 1.01–7.57; AA vs. (TT + TA): OR = 2.91, 95% CI = 1.07–7.93). However, no significant interactions were observed between rs4624606 and sex, smoking, drinking, BMI, hypertension, or diabetes (all p > 0.05).
Table 3. Stratification analysis for the association between rs4624606 and the risk of CHD.
Table 3. Stratification analysis for the association between rs4624606 and the risk of CHD.
rs4624606 OR (95% CI) a
VariablesTTTAAAp bTT + TAAAp b
Sex
Male1.000.95 (0.74–1.22)1.70 (0.89–3.23)0.5151.001.72 (0.91–3.27)0.826
Female1.001.24 (0.72–2.12)1.37 (0.22–8.69)1.001.26 (0.20–7.93)
Smoke status
Smokers1.000.98 (0.67–1.45)1.68 (0.58–4.88)0.8201.001.69 (0.59–4.87)0.951
Nonsmokers1.000.95 (0.72–1.26)1.82 (0.87–3.80)1.001.85 (0.89–3.84)
Drink
Drinkers1.000.92 (0.60–1.39)1.99 (0.61–6.43)0.9741.001.74 (0.86–3.53)0.793
Nondrinkers1.001.00 (0.76–1.30)1.74 (0.85–3.55)1.002.04 (0.64–6.56)
BMI, kg/m2
< 251.001.08 (0.82–1.43)1.55 (0.70–3.47)0.2041.001.52 (0.68–3.38)0.365
≥ 251.000.85 (0.58–1.24)2.24 (0.88–5.75)1.002.33 (0.92–5.91)
Hypertension
No1.001.22 (0.89–1.68)1.32 (0.57–3.05)0.4911.001.24 (0.54–2.84)0.246
Yes1.000.85 (0.62–1.17)2.77 (1.01–7.57) c1.002.91 (1.07–7.93) c
Diabetes
No1.001.02 (0.80–1.29)1.85 (0.99–3.44)0.6261.001.84 (0.99–3.40)0.941
Yes1.000.87 (0.42–1.79)1.72 (0.17–17.27)1.001.78 (0.18–17.72)
a ORs were obtained from an unconditional logistic regression model with adjustment for age, sex, smoking, drinking, BMI, TG, hypertension, DM, and family history of CHD. For each stratified analysis, adjustments were made for all other variables excluding the stratified variable; b p-Values of interactions were calculated by unconditional logistic regression; c p < 0.05.

3. Discussion

In this case-control study, we investigated the associations of 28 polymorphisms in IL-33/ST2 signaling pathway genes with the risk of CHD. Our results showed that subjects with the rs4624606 AA genotype in the IL-1RAcP gene had an increased risk of CHD. Especially among hypertensive subjects, the genotype AA was strongly associated with a higher risk of CHD. It is possible that hypertension may exacerbate the influence of genetic factors. No variants in IL-33 or ST2 were associated with CHD risk. Moreover, no interactions were observed between these SNPs and CHD traditional risk factors.
Numerous in vitro and in vivo model studies have found that activation of the IL-33/ST2 signaling pathway can significantly attenuate the severity of CHD [4]. IL-33 appears to provide anti-atherosclerotic benefits in CHD. Furthermore, the sST2 isoform acts as a decoy receptor to reduce IL-33 signaling through the ST2L receptor and is a significant predictor of mortality in patients with several cardiovascular disorders [6]. To further explore the role of the IL-33 gene in the pathogenesis of CHD, we tested the association between IL-33 polymorphisms and CHD; however, no significant associations were found, nor were there significant interactions between these SNPs and traditional CHD risk factors.
The ST2 gene is located in chromosome 2q12 and contains 11 exons, a proximal promoter, and a distal promoter [24]. Many researchers have reported that rs6543116 (-26999G/A) in the distal promoter region of ST2 is associated with increased risk for atopic dermatitis and asthma [32,34]. Recently, Tsapaki et al. reported that -27307T/A and -27614C/A polymorphisms in the distal promoter region of ST2 influence susceptibility to severe CHD [20]. Based on these results, we hypothesized that SNPs in the distal promoter region of ST2 might be associated with CHD risk. In this study, we replicated these SNPs (rs6543116, -27307T/A, -27614C/A) and examined another three SNPs (rs951774, rs10515922, and 13006559) in the distal promoter region, which were selected by extending 30 kb into the 5' end of ST2. We also analyzed the tagSNPs in the ST2 gene to explore the genetic role of ST2 in the pathogenesis of CHD. However, we failed to show an association between these SNPs and CHD. One possibility for this discrepancy may be due to ethnic and phenotypic differences and disparate environmental effects between countries.
IL-1RAcP is a member of the IL-33/ST2 axis receptor complex and has been reported to play an important role in CHD [9]. Soluble IL-1RAcP interacts with the sST2-IL-33 complex to increase inhibition of IL-33 signaling. The IL-1RAcP gene is located on chromosome 3q28. Genetic variants in IL-1RAcP have been associated with prostate cancer, Kawasaki disease, and persistent hepatitis B virus [23,30,33]; however, the role of IL-1RAcP polymorphisms in CHD has never been investigated. In this study, we selected 11 tagSNPs and found that rs4624606 was associated with increased risk of CHD. Ramkumar et al. also reported that rs4624606 was associated with higher amniotic fluidIL-1β concentrations [26]. The SNP rs4624606 is located in the intron of IL-1RAcP. However, no functional studies have been performed to determine the characteristics of this SNP. Further research is required to understand the functions of variants associated with CHD.
Our study has several limitations. First, like other case-control studies, a possible selection bias (inclusion of surviving CHD patients) may exist. Second, not all controls had coronary angiography, introducing the possibility of false-negative cases. However, our controls had normal electrocardiography (ECG), no clinical symptoms, and no history of CHD before enrollment; additionally, false negatives are likely to be rare.

4. Experimental Section

4.1. Study Population

The sample population included 1146 patients and 1146 age- and sex-frequency-matched controls. CHD patients were recruited from three hospitals (Union Hospital, Tongji Hospital, and Wugang Hospital) in Wuhan, China [35,36]. CHD was diagnosed as angiographically demonstrated stenoses (≥50%) in a major or main branch of the coronary artery [37]. The control subjects, residing in the same communities as the patients, were determined to be free of CHD and peripheral atherosclerotic arterial disease by medical history, clinical examinations, and ECG. All subjects completed an Inter-Heart questionnaire and were interviewed about their demographic data, medical history, history of disease, family history of cardiovascular disease, and lifestyle habits (including smoking and alcohol consumption) by trained interviewers. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tongji Medical College (project identification code: S073, 21 February 2011), and all participants provided written informed consent.

4.2. Selection of Polymorphisms

TagSNPs were selected based on the HapMap phase I & II database (http://www.hapmap.org, CHB and JPT as the reference set). According to the criteria of r2 ≥ 0.8 and minor allele frequency (MAF) ≥ 0.05, we extended 2000 bp into the 5' and 3' ends of IL-33 and IL-1RAcP. To cover the distal promoter region of ST2, we extended 30 kb into the 5' and 2000 bp into the 3' end of ST2. Thus, we selected 18 tagSNPs in the three genes. We selected another 10 SNPs from previous reports in CHD (-27307T/A, -27614C/A) and other diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease, asthma, and atopic dermatitis [20,21,32,38]. In total, we selected and genotyped 28 SNPs (Table 4).
Table 4. SNP locations and allele frequencies.
Table 4. SNP locations and allele frequencies.
SNPGeneLocationGenotypeMAF *HWE p *
rs1929992IL33IntronA/G0.4890.655
rs10975520IL33IntronG/C0.4881
rs11792633IL33IntronT/C0.433
rs1157505IL33IntronG/C0.225
rs1624159IL33Between genesA/G0.060.02
rs3755278ST2intronA/G0.0671
rs3821204ST23'-Flanking regionC/G0.3580.403
rs13431828ST25'-Flanking regionT/C0.0891
rs10206753ST2ExonC/T0.1331
rs1041973ST2ExonA/C0.1560.527
rs12999364ST2Between genesT/C0.45
rs6543116ST2Distal promoterA/G0.367
rs951774ST2Distal promoterA/C0.2330.251
rs10515922ST2Distal promoterC/T0.1511
rs13006559ST2Distal promoterT/C0.071
-27307T/AST2Distal promoterT/A
-27614C/AST2Distal promoterC/A
rs1015704IL-1RAcPintronG/A0.2220.294
rs9817203IL-1RAcPintronT/C0.3950.439
rs1559018IL-1RAcPintronG/A 0.4880.479
rs3773986IL-1RAcPintronT/C0.0671
rs6765375IL-1RAcPintronC/A0.2331
rs4624606IL-1RAcPintronA/T0.2130.294
rs16865597IL-1RAcPintronC/T0.1590.273
rs4687150IL-1RAcPintronT/C0.3410.403
rs3773958IL-1RAcPintronG/T0.4190.752
rs3773981IL-1RAcPintronC/A0.1820.584
rs6444435IL-1RAcPintronA/G0.2510.233
* Data from the NCBI; – Data were not found in http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/.

4.3. DNA Isolation and Genotyping

Fasting venous blood was collected from the peripheral vein, and genomic DNA was extracted with a Puregene kit (Gentra Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). Twenty-five SNPs were genotyped using the Sequenom MassArray system (Sequenom Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The remaining rs3755278, rs6444435, and rs1157505 SNPs were genotyped by TaqMan SNP allelic discrimination (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). TaqMan data collection and analysis were performed with SDS 2.2.1. Thus, 28 SNPs were successfully genotyped with a successful call rate of greater than 95%, with the exception of rs6444435, for which the call rate was 93.7%.

4.4. Biological Variable Determination

FBG, TC, and TG were assayed by standard laboratory procedures in the clinical laboratory department at Union Hospital.

4.5. Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables are expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD). The normal distribution of data was verified by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov normality test. Continuous data with a normal distribution were compared by Student’s t-test, and those with unequal variance or without a normal distribution were analyzed by Mann–Whitney rank-sum tests. Chi-square tests were used to compare categorical variables and the HWE of the polymorphisms. Unconditional logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the associations between SNPs and CHD risk after adjustment for age, sex, smoking, drinking, body mass index (BMI), TG, hypertension, DM, and family history of CHD by odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The interactions of covariates with SNP genotypes were tested using the Wald test in unconditional logistic regression models. The significance of multiplicative interactions between SNPs and covariates was determined by the likelihood ratio test using the logistic regression model. Power calculations were performed using the QUANTO software program (Version 1.2.3) [39]. All other statistical analyses were carried out with the statistical analysis software package SPSS 12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Differences or associations with p-values of less than 0.05 were considered significant.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we found that the SNP rs4624606 within the IL-1RAcP locus was nominally associated with CHD susceptibility. Further studies in other independent populations with large sample sizes are required to validate these findings.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the National Natural Scientific Foundation of China (Grant No. 81172750).

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: Longxian Cheng, Fangqin Wu, Mei’an He; Performed the experiments: Fangqin Wu, Qiang Wen, Wencai Zhang, Jinhua Yang; Analyzed the data: Fangqin Wu, Mei’an He; Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: Xiaomin Zhang, Tangchun Wu, Longxian Cheng; Wrote the paper: Fangqin Wu, Mei’an He, Longxian Cheng.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Profumo, E.; Buttari, B.; Saso, L.; Capoano, R.; Salvati, B.; Rigano, R. T lymphocyte autoreactivity in inflammatory mechanisms regulating atherosclerosis. Sci. World J. 2012, 2012, 157534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Miller, A.M.; Xu, D.; Asquith, D.L.; Denby, L.; Li, Y.; Sattar, N.; Baker, A.H.; McInnes, I.B.; Liew, F.Y. IL-33 reduces the development of atherosclerosis. J. Exp. Med. 2008, 205, 339–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Weinberg, E.O.; Shimpo, M.; Hurwitz, S.; Tominaga, S.; Rouleau, J.L.; Lee, R.T. Identification of serum soluble ST2 receptor as a novel heart failure biomarker. Circulation 2003, 107, 721–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Liew, F.Y.; Pitman, N.I.; McInnes, I.B. Disease-associated functions of IL-33: The new kid in the IL-1 family. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2010, 10, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Dhillon, O.S.; Narayan, H.K.; Quinn, P.A.; Squire, I.B.; Davies, J.E.; Ng, L.L. Interleukin 33 and ST2 in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Comparison with global registry of acute coronary events risk scoring and NT-proBNP. Am. Heart J. 2011, 161, 1163–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Miller, A.M.; Liew, F.Y. The IL-33/ST2 pathway—A new therapeutic target in cardiovascular disease. Pharmacol. Ther. 2011, 131, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Milovanovic, M.; Volarevic, V.; Radosavljevic, G.; Jovanovic, I.; Pejnovic, N.; Arsenijevic, N.; Lukic, M.L. IL-33/ST2 axis in inflammation and immunopathology. Immunol. Res. 2012, 52, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Schmitz, J.; Owyang, A.; Oldham, E.; Song, Y.; Murphy, E.; McClanahan, T.K.; Zurawski, G.; Moshrefi, M.; Qin, J.; Li, X.; et al. IL-33, an interleukin-1-like cytokine that signals via the IL-1 receptor-related protein ST2 and induces T helper type 2-associated cytokines. Immunity 2005, 23, 479–490. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chackerian, A.A.; Oldham, E.R.; Murphy, E.E.; Schmitz, J.; Pflanz, S.; Kastelein, R.A. IL-1 receptor accessory protein and ST2 comprise the IL-33 receptor complex. J. Immunol. 2007, 179, 2551–2555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Liu, X.; Hammel, M.; He, Y.; Tainer, J.A.; Jeng, U.S.; Zhang, L.; Wang, S.; Wang, X. Structural insights into the interaction of IL-33 with its receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 14918–14923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Choi, Y.S.; Choi, H.J.; Min, J.K.; Pyun, B.J.; Maeng, Y.S.; Park, H.; Kim, J.; Kim, Y.M.; Kwon, Y.G. Interleukin-33 induces angiogenesis and vascular permeability through ST2/TRAF6-mediated endothelial nitric oxide production. Blood 2009, 114, 3117–3126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Demyanets, S.; Konya, V.; Kastl, S.P.; Kaun, C.; Rauscher, S.; Niessner, A.; Pentz, R.; Pfaffenberger, S.; Rychli, K.; Lemberger, C.E.; et al. Interleukin-33 induces expression of adhesion molecules and inflammatory activation in human endothelial cells and in human atherosclerotic plaques. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2011, 31, 2080–2089. [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhang, H.F.; Xie, S.L.; Chen, Y.X.; Mai, J.T.; Wang, J.F.; Zhu, W.L.; Zhu, L.G. Altered serum levels of IL-33 in patients with advanced systolic chronic heart failure: correlation with oxidative stress. J. Transl. Med. 2012, 10, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Demyanets, S.; Tentzeris, I.; Jarai, R.; Katsaros, K.M.; Farhan, S.; Wonnerth, A.; Weiss, T.W.; Wojta, J.; Speidl, W.S.; Huber, K. An increase of interleukin-33 serum levels after coronary stent implantation is associated with coronary in-stent restenosis. Cytokine 2014, 67, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Dhillon, O.S.; Narayan, H.K.; Khan, S.Q.; Kelly, D.; Quinn, P.A.; Squire, I.B.; Davies, J.E.; Ng, L.L. Pre-discharge risk stratification in unselected STEMI: Is there a role for ST2 or its natural ligand IL-33 when compared with contemporary risk markers? Int. J. Cardiol. 2013, 167, 2182–2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Demyanets, S.; Speidl, W.S.; Tentzeris, I.; Jarai, R.; Katsaros, K.M.; Farhan, S.; Krychtiuk, K.A.; Wonnerth, A.; Weiss, T.W.; Huber, K.; et al. Soluble ST2 and interleukin-33 levels in coronary artery disease: Relation to disease activity and adverse outcome. PLoS One 2014, 9, e95055. [Google Scholar]
  17. Seki, K.; Sanada, S.; Kudinova, A.Y.; Steinhauser, M.L.; Handa, V.; Gannon, J.; Lee, R.T. Interleukin-33 prevents apoptosis and improves survival after experimental myocardial infarction through ST2 signaling. Circ. Heart Fail. 2009, 2, 684–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dieplinger, B.; Egger, M.; Haltmayer, M.; Kleber, M.E.; Scharnagl, H.; Silbernagel, G.; de Boer, R.A.; Maerz, W.; Mueller, T. Increased soluble ST2 predicts long-term mortality in patients with stable coronary artery disease: Results from the Ludwigshafen risk and cardiovascular health study. Clin. Chem. 2014, 60, 530–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Wojtczak-Soska, K.; Pietrucha, T.; Sakowicz, A.; Lelonek, M. Soluble ST2 protein in chronic heart failure is independent of traditional factors. Arch. Med. Sci. 2013, 9, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Tsapaki, A.; Zaravinos, A.; Apostolakis, S.; Voudris, K.; Vogiatzi, K.; Kochiadakis, G.E.; Spandidos, D.A. Genetic variability of the distal promoter of the ST2 gene is associated with angiographic severity of coronary artery disease. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 2010, 30, 365–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Yu, J.; Song, J.; Wang, N.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, W.; Xuan, S.; Lan, T. Implication of IL-33 gene polymorphism in Chinese patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 2012, 33, 1011–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ryckman, K.K.; Williams, S.M.; Krohn, M.A.; Simhan, H.N. Interaction between interleukin-1 receptor 2 and Toll-like receptor 4, and cervical cytokines. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2011, 90, 220–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kim, J.J.; Hong, Y.M.; Sohn, S.; Jang, G.Y.; Ha, K.S.; Yun, S.W.; Han, M.K.; Lee, K.Y.; Song, M.S.; Lee, H.D.; et al. A genome-wide association analysis reveals 1p31 and 2p13.3 as susceptibility loci for Kawasaki disease. Hum. Genet. 2011, 129, 487–495. [Google Scholar]
  24. Akhabir, L.; Sandford, A. Genetics of interleukin 1 receptor-like 1 in immune and inflammatory diseases. Curr. Genomics 2010, 11, 591–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Buysschaert, I.D.; Grulois, V.; Eloy, P.; Jorissen, M.; Rombaux, P.; Bertrand, B.; Collet, S.; Bobic, S.; Vlaminck, S.; Hellings, P.W.; et al. Genetic evidence for a role of IL33 in nasal polyposis. Allergy 2010, 65, 616–622. [Google Scholar]
  26. Menon, R.; Fortunato, S.J.; Edwards, D.R.; Williams, S.M. Association of genetic variants, ethnicity and preterm birth with amniotic fluid cytokine concentrations. Ann. Hum. Genet. 2010, 74, 165–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chapuis, J.; Hot, D.; Hansmannel, F.; Kerdraon, O.; Ferreira, S.; Hubans, C.; Maurage, C.; Huot, L.; Bensemain, F.; Laumet, G.; et al. Transcriptomic and genetic studies identify IL-33 as a candidate gene for Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Psychiatry 2009, 14, 1004–1016. [Google Scholar]
  28. Gudbjartsson, D.F.; Bjornsdottir, U.S.; Halapi, E.; Helgadottir, A.; Sulem, P.; Jonsdottir, G.M.; Thorleifsson, G.; Helgadottir, H.; Steinthorsdottir, V.; Stefansson, H.; et al. Sequence variants affecting eosinophil numbers associate with asthma and myocardial infarction. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2008, 38, 1875–1881. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sakashita, M.; Yoshimoto, T.; Hirota, T.; Harada, M.; Okubo, K.; Osawa, Y.; Fujieda, S.; Nakamura, Y.; Yasuda, K.; Nakanishi, K.; et al. Association of serum interleukin-33 level and the interleukin-33 genetic variant with Japanese cedar pollinosis. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2008, 38, 1875–1881. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zheng, S.L.; Liu, W.; Wiklund, F.; Dimitrov, L.; Balter, K.; Sun, J.; Adami, H.O.; Johansson, J.E.; Sun, J.; Chang, B.; et al. A comprehensive association study for genes in inflammation pathway provides support for their roles in prostate cancer risk in the CAPS study. Prostate 2006, 66, 1556–1564. [Google Scholar]
  31. Castano, R.; Bosse, Y.; Endam, L.M.; Desrosiers, M. Evidence of association of interleukin-1 receptor-like 1 gene polymorphisms with chronic rhinosinusitis. Am. J. Rhinol. Allergy 2009, 23, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Shimizu, M.; Matsuda, A.; Yanagisawa, K.; Hirota, T.; Akahoshi, M.; Inomata, N.; Ebe, K.; Tanaka, K.; Sugiura, H.; Nakashima, K.; et al. Functional SNPs in the distal promoter of the ST2 gene are associated with atopic dermatitis. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2005, 14, 2919–2927. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kim, S.S.; Cheong, J.Y.; Lee, D.; Lee, S.K.; Kim, M.H.; Kwack, K.; Yang, S.J.; Lee, H.Y.; Cho, S.W. Interleukin-1β and interleukin-1 receptor accessory protein gene polymorphisms are associated with persistent hepatitis B virus infection. Hepato-Gastroenterology 2012, 59, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Ali, M.; Zhang, G.; Thomas, W.R.; McLean, C.J.; Bizzintino, J.A.; Laing, I.A.; Martin, A.C.; Goldblatt, J.; Le Souef, P.N.; Hayden, C.M. Investigations into the role of ST2 in acute asthma in children. Tissue Antigens 2009, 73, 206–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. He, M.; Guo, H.; Yang, X.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, X.; Cheng, L.; Zeng, H.; Hu, F.B.; Tanguay, R.M.; Wu, T. Genetic variations in HSPA8 gene associated with coronary heart disease risk in a Chinese population. PLoS One 2010, 5, e9684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Shi, Y.; Zhou, L.; Huang, L.H.; Lian, Y.T.; Zhang, X.M.; Guo, H.; Wu, T.C.; Cheng, L.X.; He, M.A. Plasma ferritin levels, genetic variations in HFE gene, and coronary heart disease in Chinese: A case-control study. Atherosclerosis 2011, 218, 386–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Rapaport, E. Nomenclature and criteria for diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. Report of the Joint International Society and Federation of Cardiology/World Health Organization task force on standardization of clinical nomenclature. Circulation 1979, 59, 607–609. [Google Scholar]
  38. Savenije, O.E.; Kerkhof, M.; Reijmerink, N.E.; Brunekreef, B.; de Jongste, J.C.; Smit, H.A.; Wijga, A.H.; Postma, D.S.; Koppelman, G.H. Interleukin-1 receptor-like 1 polymorphisms are associated with serum IL1RL1-a, eosinophils, and asthma in childhood. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011, 127, 750–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Gauderman, W.J.; Morrison, J.M. Quanto 1.1: A computer program for power and sample size calculations for genetic—Epidemiology studies. Available online: : http://hydra.Usc.Edu/gxe (accessed on 1 December 2008).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, F.; He, M.; Wen, Q.; Zhang, W.; Yang, J.; Zhang, X.; Wu, T.; Cheng, L. Associations between Variants in IL-33/ST2 Signaling Pathway Genes and Coronary Heart Disease Risk. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 23227-23239. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms151223227

AMA Style

Wu F, He M, Wen Q, Zhang W, Yang J, Zhang X, Wu T, Cheng L. Associations between Variants in IL-33/ST2 Signaling Pathway Genes and Coronary Heart Disease Risk. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2014; 15(12):23227-23239. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms151223227

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Fangqin, Mei'an He, Qiang Wen, Wencai Zhang, Jinhua Yang, Xiaomin Zhang, Tangchun Wu, and Longxian Cheng. 2014. "Associations between Variants in IL-33/ST2 Signaling Pathway Genes and Coronary Heart Disease Risk" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 15, no. 12: 23227-23239. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms151223227

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop