Next Article in Journal
Effect of Long-Term Dietary Arginyl-Fructose (AF) on Hyperglycemia and HbA1c in Diabetic db/db Mice
Next Article in Special Issue
Cytotoxic Autophagy in Cancer Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
Silencing of the CaCP Gene Delays Salt- and Osmotic-Induced Leaf Senescence in Capsicum annuum L.
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role of Survivin in Podocyte Injury Induced by Puromycin Aminonucleoside
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 15
Issue 5
10.3390/ijms15058335
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Apoptotic Death of Cancer Stem Cells for Cancer Therapy

by
Ying-Chun He
1,
Fang-Liang Zhou
1,
Yi Shen
2,
Duan-Fang Liao
1,* and
Deliang Cao
1,2,*
1
Division of Stem Cell Regulation and Application, College of Medicine, Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410208, China
2
Department of Medical Microbiology, Immunology & Cell Biology, Simmons Cancer Institute, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, 913 N, Rutledge Street, Springfield, IL 62702, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15(5), 8335-8351; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15058335
Submission received: 24 February 2014 / Revised: 18 April 2014 / Accepted: 18 April 2014 / Published: 12 May 2014
(This article belongs to the Collection Programmed Cell Death and Apoptosis)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cancer stem cells (CSCs) play crucial roles in tumor progression, chemo- and radiotherapy resistance, and recurrence. Recent studies on CSCs have advanced understanding of molecular oncology and development of novel therapeutic strategies. This review article updates the hypothesis and paradigm of CSCs with a focus on major signaling pathways and effectors that regulate CSC apoptosis. Selective CSC apoptotic inducers are introduced and their therapeutic potentials are discussed. These include synthetic and natural compounds, antibodies and recombinant proteins, and oligonucleotides.

1. Introduction

Management of patients with advanced malignancies is a worldwide problem. Tumors could be reduced or eliminated through surgical operation, radiotherapy or chemotherapy, but the disease-free survival of patients with advanced cancer is limited thus far. Chemo- and radioresistance widely exists, and recurrence occurs often within six months after primary treatment. Cancer cell dormancy, host immune insult due to tumors or high dose chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgical operation, etc. may lead to treatment failure and tumor recurrence. However, recent studies suggest that the few cells that exist in the tumor and have the characteristics of stem cells may be causative of cancer metastasis, recurrence, and drug resistance. These cells are named cancer stem cells (CSCs) or cancer initiating cells (CICs). Compared to regular tumor cells, unique aberrant gene expression and signaling transduction are recognized in CSCs. This current review discusses the new breakthroughs and discoveries in the CSCs, with a focus on apoptotic signaling pathways and selective inducers of CSC apoptosis.

2. Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs)

Early in 1875 Julius Cohnheim introduced a theory that tumors may arise from stem cells left over from embryonic development [1]; but the concept of CSCs was put forwarded for the first time in 1994 [2]. Thereafter; leukemia stem cells were first isolated in 1997 [3]; and CSCs were isolated and characterized from solid tumors in breast cancer in 2003 [4]. From the consensus of an American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) workshop in 2006, CSCs are defined as a kind of cell that possess stem cell-like properties, i.e., self-renewal and pluripotency [5]. CSCs usually account for 1–4 in 100 leukemia cells [6,7] or 1 in 1000–5000 cells in lung; ovarian; and breast cancers [8]; but have strong tumorigenicity; metastaticity and resistance to radio- and chemotherapy; playing critical roles in cancer progression and therapeutic response [9,10].
CSCs are heterogenetic. The CSCs isolated from different stages or grades of the same type of tumors are distinct, while CSCs from the primary and metastatic tumors are different [11,12]. Even in the same tumor, there co-exist different CSC pools, and the distinct CSC subpopulations within a tumor could interconvert. For instance, two molecularly distinct populations of leukemic stem cells (LSCs) co-exist and are hierarchically ordered in primary human CD34(+) acute myeloid leukemia; one LSC population gives rise to the other [13]. CSC heterogeneity also exists in solid tumors. Three cell populations differing in tumorigenicity and self-renewal are identified in estrogen receptor-negative breast tumors [14]. Two highly tumorigenic CSC populations that differ in CD34 expression but are enriched in integrins co-exist at the cancer-stroma interface and display different tumor growth properties [15]. The similar phenomenon is observed in ovarian carcinoma [16], colorectal cancer [17] and PTEN-deficient glioblastoma [18].
Understanding of CSCs has advanced in the past decade. Newer concepts of CSCs consider that CSCs are a “status”, but not a fixed, immutable and frozen cell population. CSCs and non-CSCs exist in a dynamic equilibrium and could interconvert [19,20]. Non-CSCs could acquire the properties and tumor formation ability of CSCs by reprogramming [20,21]. In fact, if CSCs are a fixed cell population, the ratio of CSCs should be progressively reduced with proliferation of cancer cells, but it is clearly not the case. The proportions of CSCs in cancer cell lines remain about 0.1% in the constant culture [10,22]. The microenvironment plays a critical role in CSC division and interconversion. Myofibroblast-secreted factors restore CSC phenotypes in more differentiated colon cancer cells in vitro and in vivo [23]. Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF2α) promotes the self-renewal of the stem cells and enhances a more stem-like phenotype in the non-stem population [24–26]. The CSCs may develop de novo from differentiated cancer cells (i.e., reprogramming) by the induction of microenvironment. Therefore, the hierarchical model of mammalian CSCs should be considered as bidirectional between stem and non-stem cells of the tumor [20,21].

3. Apoptotic Signaling in CSCs

Apoptosis is an active, strictly regulated, and energy-dependent cell death process [27]. In mammalian cells, apoptosis is regulated via two different pathways, i.e., the extrinsic and intrinsic pathways. Caspases play important roles in apoptosis. The activation of caspase family proteins triggered by these two signaling pathways results in a series of cellular substrate excision and changes, such as chromatin condensation, DNA fragmentation, membrane blebbing, and cell shrinkage [28]. The extrinsic pathway is triggered through the binding of extracellular proapoptotic ligands to cell surface receptors, known as death receptors, such as CD95, nerve growth factor receptor (NGFR), and TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) receptors (Figure 1) [29,30]. After binding to the receptor, a death-inducing signaling complex (DISC) composed of the Fas associated death domain (FADD) and procaspase-8 and -10 is formed [31–33], and this protein complex activates procaspase-8 and -10 inside itself, and then cleaves procaspase-3 and initiates the apoptosis process [34]. In the extrinsic pathway, the downregulation of cellular FLICE inhibitory protein long isoform (c-FLIPL) by ubiquitination at lysine residue (K) 195 occurs [35]. The intrinsic pathway, also known as the mitochondrial pathway, is induced by a variety of stress signals that trigger cellular and DNA damage, such as ionizing radiation, cytotoxic agents, and growth factor withdrawal. They lead to mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP) and transcription or post-translational activation of BH3-only proapoptotic B-cell leukemia/lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) family proteins [29]. The mitochondrial permeability is a key step in the apoptosis cascade and mediated by Bcl-2 family proteins. The mitochondrial permeability allows the release of apoptotic proteins, such as cytochrome c and second mitochondria-derived activator of caspase (Smac), from the intermembrane space into cytosol [36,37]. The assembly of cytochrome c and apoptotic protease-activating factor-1 (Apaf-1) activates caspase-9 which in turn activates the effectors caspase-3, -6, and -7, leading to apoptosis [29]. Inhibitors of apoptosis protein (IAP) prevent both intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis by inhibiting caspase activity, which represents the last protective measure against apoptosis [38]. Death signaling can also be activated by c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling which leads to phosphorylation of Bcl-xL at Ser62, decreasing its anti-apoptotic activity in the intrinsic pathway [35]. Intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis pathways are both disordered in cancer cells; and apoptosis evasion is one of the hallmarks in cancer cells [39,40].
Apoptotic signaling pathways, including extrinsic and intrinsic pathways, are also deregulated in CSCs. In glioblastoma and lung CSCs, the death receptors (DR) mediating the extrinsic pathway are expressed at a high level [41], and the upregulation of DR4 in colon CSCs leads to chemo-resistance [42]. The FLICE-like inhibitory proteins (cFLIP) are a negative modulator of death receptor-induced apoptosis, consisting of two subtypes: long cFLIP (cFLIPL) and short cFLIP (cFLIPS) [43,44]. In CD133+ glioblastoma, breast cancer, and T-cell acute leukemia cells, the cFLIPs are upregulated [45,46]. Silencing of cFLIPs by siRNA restores cell sensitivity to death stimuli, suppressing CSC self-renewal and tumor metastasis [47,48]. It was reported that insufficient expression of death receptors and upexpression of c-FLIPs leads to CSCs-enriched neurosphere resistance to TRAIL [49].
Survivin is an anti-apoptotic protein, belonging to the inhibitors of apoptosis protein (IAP) family that regulates cell division, apoptosis and pluripotency [38,50,51]. Survivin is enriched in hematopoietic stem cells, neuronal precursor cells, CD34(+)/38(−) AML stem cells and glioblastoma and astrocytoma CSCs [52–54]. Other IAP proteins upregulated in CSCs include XIAP, c-IAP1, and Livin [45,54].
Dysregulation of the intrinsic pathway in CSCs is mainly reflected in Bcl-2 family proteins and the DNA damage response. Bcl-2 family proteins are composed of anti-apoptotic proteins (Bcl-2, Bcl-XL and Mcl-1) and pro-apoptotic molecules (Bax, Bak, Bid, Bim, Bik, Noxa and Puma [55]. It is the imbalance of anti- to pro-apoptotic protein ratio rather than a specific molecule expression level that tips the balance to cell survival and regulates sensitivity to apoptotic stimuli [55]. In most tumors, anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins are overexpressed in CSCs [56]. For instance, CD133+ glioma CSCs express a high level of anti-apoptotic proteins Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL [45,57], and high expression of Mcl-1 correlates with resistance to the Bcl-2 inhibitor ABT-737 in glioma CSCs [57]. In colon CSCs, Bcl-2 is increased and inhibits apoptosis and autophagy [58]. Downregulation of Bcl-2 or upregulation of Bax induces apoptosis of CSCs [37,59]. Therefore, inhibition of the mitochondrial death cascade has been attractive for CSC-targeted therapeutic intervention of cancers.
DNA damage response (DDR) is tumor suppressor p53-mediated cell-cycle arrest, DNA repair, and apoptosis in response to DNA damage [60]. Glioma CSCs isolated from human glioma xenografts and primary glioblastoma produce radio-resistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response, and the radio-resistance of CSCs could be reversed by specific inhibition of Chk1 and Chk2 checkpoint kinases, upstream activators of p53 [61]. In addition, nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) signaling regulates apoptosis of CSCs through affecting the expression of pro and anti-apoptotic proteins. In leukemic stem cells, NF-κB is activated [62] and increases the quiescent LSC number [63]. Breast CSCs exhibit sensitivity and apoptosis to NF-κB pathway inhibitors, such as parthenolide, pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate, and diethyldithiocarbamate, and the expression of CD24 in CD44+ breast CSCs potentiates DNA damage-induced apoptosis by suppressing NF-κB signaling [64–66].
MiRNAs are small non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) that regulate protein translation by binding to target mRNAs [67]. MiRNAs are widely involved in cancer cell growth, migration, invasion, and drug sensitivity [68,69]. In tumor cells, miRNA expression is dysregulated, and function as tumor suppressors or oncogenes. For instance, miR-223, miR-122, and miR-26 function as tumor suppressors of liver carcinogenesis whereas miR-130b, miR-221, and miR-222 are oncogenic factors [70–74]. Emerging evidence indicates that miRNAs are key regulators of stemness. For instance, miRNAs let-7, miR-21, miR-22, miR-34, miR-101, miR-146a, and miR-200 affect CSC phenotypes and functions through targeting oncogenic signaling pathways [75]. Other miRNAs appear to affect the fate of CSCs by controlling their self-renewal. For example, MiR-34 inhibits human pancreatic CSCs by regulating Notch and bcl-2 gene expression [76], and miRNA-34a suppresses glioma CSC growth by targeting several oncogenes [77]. There is also a difference in miRNA expression levels between CSCs and non-CSC cancer cells [78]. For example, mir-21 and mir-302 expression is increased in CSCs whereas let-7a is downregulated. In addition, mir-372, mir-373, and mir-520c-5p are expressed at higher levels in non-CSC than in CSCs [78].

4. Apoptotic Inducers of CSCs

The death evasion of CSCs accounts for failure of existing therapies to eradicate tumors [79,80]. Increasing recognition of signal effectors of apoptosis pathways in CSCs paves the way for the development of more specific inducers targeting key signaling components [81,82]. To date, a variety of selectively CSC-targeting agents have been developed, and they are classified as natural compounds (e.g., traditional Chinese herb extracts and antibiotics), synthetic chemicals, antibodies or recombinant proteins, and oligonucleotides.

4.1. Natural Compounds

4.1.1. Natural Compounds from Traditional Chinese Medicines

Genistein (a prominent isoflavone) inhibits cell growth and induce apoptosis by suppressing the Notch signaling pathway [83]. Soy isoflavone genistein and blueberry polyphenolic acids repress mammosphere formation of breast cancer cells [84,85], and 20 (s)-ginsenoside Rg3 inhibits proliferation of colon CSCs and induces apoptosis through caspase-9 and caspase-3 pathways [86]. NV-128 is an isoflavone derivative that targets mitochondria of CD44+/MyD88+ ovarian CSCs and induce apoptosis by promoting a status of cellular starvation, which activates two independent pathways: the AMPKα1 pathway that causes mTOR inhibition and the mitochondrial MAP/ERK pathway that leads to loss of mitochondrial membrane potential [87]. Broussoflavonol B, a chemical purified from the bark of the Paper Mulberry tree (broussonetia papyrifera), downregulates estrogen receptor (ER)-α36 expression and inhibits growth of ER-negative breast cancer stem-like cells and induces apoptotic cell death [88]. Shikonin and topotecan, as topoisomerase I inhibitors, can induce apoptosis and inhibit growth of glioma cells and glioma stem cells [89]. Curcumin can induce CD133+ rectal CSC apoptosis and significantly increase radiosensitivity of CSCs [90]. Curcumin and piperine, alone or in combination, can suppress breast CSC growth [91]. In addition, resveratrol, a natural polyphenolic compound, inhibits the growth of breast CSCs and induces apoptosis through upregulation of DAPK2 and BNIP3 and downregulation of fatty acid synthetase (FAS) [92]. Furthermore, morusin induces apoptosis of cervical CSCs by downregulating NF-κB/p65 and Bcl-2 and upregulating Bax and caspase-3 in a dose-dependent manner [59]. Table 1 summarizes these natural compounds.

4.1.2. Antibiotics

Salinomycin (a polyether) selectively kills breast CSCs 100 times more effectively than anti-cancer agent paclitaxel [93]. Salinomycin triggers apoptosis of CSCs through multiple mechanisms, such as increasing the expression of death receptor-5 (DR5), caspase-8, and FADD, decreasing expression of FLIP, and activating caspase-3 and poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) cleavage [94].

4.2. Synthetic Compounds

As the prospective feature of CSC apoptosis in cancer therapy, a variety of small chemicals have been chemically synthesized and tested. Fenretinide is a synthetic retinoid developed by Ortho-McNeil Company and the United States National Cancer Institute. This chemical selectively inhibits colony formation of CD34+ AML cells, but has no effect on normal CD34+ cells; fenretinide also reduces the in vivo engraftment of AML CD34+ cells, but has no effect on normal hematopoietic stem cells in non-obese diabetic SCID mice [95]. In addition, a dopamine antagonist thioridazine can selectively destroy LSCs, but not normal hematopoietic stem cells [96].
Aspirin inhibits CSCs by decreasing the expression of Lgr 5 protein via both COX-2 dependent and independent pathways, and contributes to the prevention and treatment of colorectal cancer [97]. IMD-0354, an inhibitor of NF-κB, inhibits phosphorylation of IκBα and release of NF-κB proteins, and thus induces breast CSC apoptosis [98]. LDE225 (also named NVP-LDE-225 or Erismodegib), is a novel specific Smoothened antagonist and Hedgehog signaling pathway inhibitor. This chemical suppresses the growth and spheroid formation of prostate CSCs and induces apoptosis by affecting the expression of multiple pro-and anti-apoptotic proteins; LDE225 also stimulates Gli-DNA interaction and transcriptional activity [99].
Survivin has been an effective target for the inhibition of CSC proliferation. For instance, PF-03084014 could suppress the expression of survivin and MCL1 and diminish CSCs in triple-negative breast cancer tumor models [100], and FH535 (N-(2-Methyl-4-nitrophenyl)-2,5-dichlorobenzene-sulfonamide) and sorafenib inhibit liver CSC growth and proliferation by targeting survivin [101]. In addition, STX-0119, an inhibitor of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 3, inhibits the expression of STAT3 target genes, such as survivin and c-Myc and induces CSC apoptosis [102].

4.3. Antibodies and Recombinant Proteins

Several recombinant TRAIL receptor agonists and IAPs are being implemented thus far in phase I and II clinical trials, such as the 2/TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (Apo2L/TRAIL) that targets death receptors and induces selective apoptosis of CSCs [103]. Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that targets vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and suppresses angiogenesis in tumors, leading to collapse of the CSC niche. Microvessel density and tumor growth and CD133+/nestin CSCs are decreased in U87 glioma xenografts treated with bevacizumab in nude mice [104,105]. In addition, IL-4 protects the tumorigenic CD133+ CSCs in human colon carcinoma from apoptosis, and the anti-IL-4 antibody or IL-4R alpha antagonists induces apoptosis of CSCs and markedly sensitizes them to chemotherapeutic drugs [106]. Antibodies against CD47, which is expressed at a high level in ALL, can also effectively kill leukemia stem cells [107].

4.4. Oligonucleotides

Mature microRNAs (miRNAs) at 18–25 nucleotides in length are produced from longer primary miRNA (pri-miRNA) transcripts through sequential processing by RNase Drosha and Dicer1 [108,109]. MiRNAs negatively regulate the expression of targeted mRNAs involved in stem cell self-renewal, proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis [110]. MiRNAs may exert anti- or pro-apoptotic effect depending on the targeted mRNAs [111,112], thus being selectively targeted in order to trigger apoptosis of CSCs for cancer therapy.
Stranded antisense oligonucleotides (AS-ODN) are synthetic short chain DNA at 12–30 nt in length, complementary to a particular mRNA strand. An AS-ODN hybridizes with the targeted mRNA through Watson-Crick base pairing, and thus blocks translation of the targeted gene and inhibits its role. In human lung adenocarcinoma cells, an AS-ODN targeting survivin decreases its protein level in a dose-dependent manner and leads to apoptosis and chemotherapeutic sensitivity. The XIAP AS-ODN effectively induces apoptosis and increases the sensitivity of tumor cells to Taxol, etoposide, and doxorubicin [113,114]. Successful CSC-targeting of oligonucleotides was reported in an approach to telomerase. The telomere and telomerase play essential roles in the regulation of the lifespan of human cells. Imetelstat sodium (GRN163) is a 13-mer oligonucleotide N3′–P5′ thiophosphoramidate (NPS oligonucleotide) covalently attached to a C16 (palmitoyl) lipid moiety. GRN163 targets the active site of telomerase, competitively inhibiting its enzymatic activity. The Marian group [115] reported that Imetelstat reduces brain glioma CSCs telomere length, inhibits their proliferation, and ultimately induces apoptosis.

4.5. Combined Application of Apoptotic Inducers

Apoptotic inducers show potential pro-apoptotic effects in CSCs. However, CSCs have complex etiology and pathogenesis, characterized with considerable crosstalk and redundant signaling pathway networks. Targeting a single molecule or pathway may have limited efficacy in cancer therapy. Therefore, scientists use approaches combining applications of apoptotic inducers to improve therapeutic efficacy.
Lapatinib is a small synthetic, dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2). Lapatinib can significantly improve the sensitivity of CSCs to chemotheraputic drugs in adjuvant chemotherapy [116]. Combination of methylene blue (a P-gp inhibitor) with doxorubicin enhances tumor cell apoptosis and suppresses tumor growth, significantly improving survival of BALB/c mice bearing syngeneic JC adenocarcinoma [117]. Vinorelbine (a semi-synthetic derivative of vinblastine) stealth liposomes and parthenolide are developed to eradicate cancer cells [118]. The parthenolide significantly enhances the cytotoxicity of vinorelbine in MCF-7 CSCs [118].
Doxorubicin is a DNA-toxic antitumor agent. Metformin, an agent for diabetes, can inhibit cell transformation and selectively kill CSCs in breast cancer [119]. Metformin combined with doxorubicin can kill both CSCs, reduce tumor masses, and prevent metastasis and recurrence much more effectively than either agent alone [119]. In addition, it is also reported that Tamoxifen (a synthetic estradiol competitive antagonist) can enhance breast CSCs sensitivity to daunorubicin, demonstrating a synergistic effect [120]. Furthermore, a combination of salinomycin with gemcitabine eliminates the engraftments of human pancreatic cancer more effectively than the individual agent alone [121].
Ectopic expression of miR-128 sensitizes breast CSCs to DNA-damage and proapoptotic effects of doxorubicin [122] whereas miR-145 combined with cationic polyurethane-short branch PEI inhibits the glioblastoma CSC growth and increases their sensitivity to radiotherapy and temozolomide [123].
Combinatory approaches were also tested in synthetic chemicals with antibodies, recombinant proteins and oligonucleotides. For instance, perifosine and TRAIL synergistically activate caspase-8, induce apoptosis, and negatively affect the clonogenic activity of CD34(+) AML cells, but not CD34(+) cells from healthy donors [124]. CD133+ populations in T cell acute leukemia cell line Jurkat and breast cancer cell line MCF7 express high levels of apoptosis inhibitor, c-FLIP, and lead to TRAIL resistance. In these two cell lines suppression of c-FLIP with siRNA sensitizes CSCs to TRAIL and selectively removes CSCs [48].

5. Prospects

CSC differentiation is reversible, i.e., the mature tumor cells or precursor cells can obtain CSC properties by dedifferentiation. Understanding of CSCs has explained the heterogeneity, metastasis, recurrence and chemo-/radiotherapy resistance of tumors, and the evasion of apoptosis of CSCs is considered a main mechanism of recurrence and chemoresistance of cancers, representing novel therapeutic potentials. The apoptosis is mediated by complex networks composed of many death and survival signaling molecules and pathways. Manipulating the apoptotic machinery, including activation of pro-apoptotic pathways and inactivation of anti-apoptotic pathways to eradicate CSCs, displays great potentials. Selective induction of CSC differentiation, suppression of their self-renewal, or triggering of their apoptosis by targeting key signaling molecules and microenvironment factors, are certainly attractive explorations to cancer researchers. Combined applications of agents targeting CSC apoptosis are an important advantage improving their antitumor efficacy.

Acknowledgments

Authors appreciate Barbara Nowack for proofreading of this manuscript. This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81273988 for Y.-C.H., 31371161 for D.-F.L., and 81272918 for D.C.) and Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Department of China (2014FJ3021 for Y.-C.H.).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
  • Author ContributionsY.-C.H. wrote the draft, F.-L.Z. helped with literature search, Y.S. helped with revision, and D.-F.L. and D.C. revised and proofed of the manuscript.

References

  1. Julius Cohnheim (1839–1884) experimental pathologist. J. Am. Med. Assoc 1968, 206, 1561–1562.
  2. Lapidot, T.; Sirard, C.; Vormoor, J.; Murdoch, B.; Hoang, T.; Caceres-Cortes, J.; Minden, M.; Paterson, B.; Caligiuri, M.; Dick, J. A cell initiating human acute myeloid leukaemia after transplantation into SCID mice. Nature 1994, 367, 645–648. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bonnet, D.; Dick, J. Human acute myeloid leukemia is organized as a hierarchy that originates from a primitive hematopoietic cell. Nat. Med 1997, 3, 730–737. [Google Scholar]
  4. Al-Hajj, M.; Wicha, M.S.; Benito-Hernandez, A.; Morrison, S.J.; Clarke, M.F. Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 3983–3988. [Google Scholar]
  5. Clarke, M.F.; Dick, J.E.; Dirks, P.B.; Eaves, C.J.; Jamieson, C.H.M.; Jones, D.L.; Visvader, J.; Weissman, I.L.; Wahl, G.M. Cancer stem cells—Perspectives on current status and future directions: AACR workshop on cancer stem cells. Cancer Res 2006, 66, 9339–9344. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bruce, W.R.; van der Gaag, H. A quantitative assay for the number of murine lymphoma cells capable of proliferation in vivo. Nature 1963, 199, 79–80. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bergsagel, D.E.; Valeriote, F.A. Growth characteristics of a mouse plasma cell tumor. Cancer Res 1968, 28, 2187–2196. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hamburger, A.; Salmon, S. Primary bioassay of human tumor stem cells. Science 1977, 197, 461–463. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chaffer, C.L.; Weinberg, R.A. A perspective on cancer cell metastasis. Science 2011, 331, 1559–1564. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang, P.; Zhang, Y.; Mao, L.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, W. Side population in oral squamous cell carcinoma possesses tumor stem cell phenotypes. Cancer Lett 2009, 277, 227–234. [Google Scholar]
  11. Anderson, K.; Lutz, C.; van Delft, F.W.; Bateman, C.M.; Guo, Y.; Colman, S.M.; Kempski, H.; Moorman, A.V.; Titley, I.; Swansbury, J.; et al. Genetic variegation of clonal architecture and propagating cells in leukaemia. Nature 2011, 469, 356–361. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhang, Y.; Young, E.D.; Bill, K.; Belousov, R.; Peng, T.; Lazar, A.J.; Pollock, R.E.; Simmons, P.J.; Lev, D.; Kolonin, M.G. Heterogeneity and immunophenotypic plasticity of malignant cells in human liposarcomas. Stem Cell Res 2013, 11, 772–781. [Google Scholar]
  13. Goardon, N.; Marchi, E.; Atzberger, A.; Quek, L.; Schuh, A.; Soneji, S.; Woll, P.; Mead, A.; Alford, K.A.; Rout, R.; et al. Coexistence of LMPP-like and GMP-like leukemia stem cells in acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Cell 2011, 19, 138–152. [Google Scholar]
  14. Meyer, M.J.; Fleming, J.M.; Lin, A.F.; Hussnain, S.A.; Ginsburg, E.; Vonderhaar, B.K. CD44posCD49fhiCD133/2hi defines xenograft-initiating cells in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 2010, 70, 4624–4633. [Google Scholar]
  15. Schober, M.; Fuchs, E. Tumor-initiating stem cells of squamous cell carcinomas and their control by TGF-beta and integrin/focal adhesion kinase (FAK) signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 10544–10549. [Google Scholar]
  16. Stewart, J.M.; Shaw, P.A.; Gedye, C.; Bernardini, M.Q.; Neel, B.G.; Ailles, L.E. Phenotypic heterogeneity and instability of human ovarian tumor-initiating cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 6468–6473. [Google Scholar]
  17. Dieter, S.M.; Ball, C.R.; Hoffmann, C.M.; Nowrouzi, A.; Herbst, F.; Zavidij, O.; Abel, U.; Arens, A.; Weichert, W.; Brand, K.; et al. Distinct types of tumor-initiating cells form human colon cancer tumors and metastases. Cell Stem Cell 2011, 9, 357–365. [Google Scholar]
  18. Chen, R.; Nishimura, M.; Bumbaca, S.; Kharbanda, S.; Forrest, W.; Kasman, I.; Greve, J.; Soriano, R.; Gilmour, L.; Rivers, C.; et al. A hierarchy of self-renewing tumor-initiating cell types in glioblastoma. Cancer Cell 2010, 17, 362–375. [Google Scholar]
  19. Akunuru, S.; James Zhai, Q.; Zheng, Y. Non-small cell lung cancer stem/progenitor cells are enriched in multiple distinct phenotypic subpopulations and exhibit plasticity. Cell Death Dis 2012, 3, e352. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang, H.; Wu, H.; Zheng, J.; Yu, P.; Xu, L.; Jiang, P.; Gao, J.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Y. Transforming growth factor beta1 signal is crucial for dedifferentiation of cancer cells to cancer stem cells in osteosarcoma. Stem Cells 2013, 31, 433–446. [Google Scholar]
  21. Chaffer, C.L.; Brueckmann, I.; Scheel, C.; Kaestli, A.J.; Wiggins, P.A.; Rodrigues, L.O.; Brooks, M.; Reinhardt, F.; Su, Y.; Polyak, K.; et al. Normal and neoplastic nonstem cells can spontaneously convert to a stem-like state. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 7950–7955. [Google Scholar]
  22. Dey-Guha, I.; Wolfer, A.; Yeh, A.C.; Albeck, J.G.; Darp, R.; Leon, E.; Wulfkuhle, J.; Petricoin, E.F., III; Wittner, B.S.; Ramaswamy, S. Asymmetric cancer cell division regulated by AKT. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 12845–12850. [Google Scholar]
  23. Vermeulen, L.; de Sousa, E.; Melo, F.; van der Heijden, M.; Cameron, K.; de Jong, J.; Borovski, T.; Tuynman, J.; Todaro, M.; Merz, C.; et al. Wnt activity defines colon cancer stem cells and is regulated by the microenvironment. Nat. Cell Biol 2010, 12, 468–476. [Google Scholar]
  24. Heddleston, J.; Li, Z.; McLendon, R.; Hjelmeland, A.; Rich, J. The hypoxic microenvironment maintains glioblastoma stem cells and promotes reprogramming towards a cancer stem cell phenotype. Cell Cycle 2009, 8, 3274–3284. [Google Scholar]
  25. Li, Z.; Bao, S.; Wu, Q.; Wang, H.; Eyler, C.; Sathornsumetee, S.; Shi, Q.; Cao, Y.; Lathia, J.; McLendon, R.; et al. Hypoxia-inducible factors regulate tumorigenic capacity of glioma stem cells. Cancer Cell 2009, 15, 501–513. [Google Scholar]
  26. Mao, X.; Yan, M.; Xue, X.; Zhang, X.; Ren, H.; Guo, G.; Wang, P.; Zhang, W.; Huo, J. Overexpression of ZNF217 in glioblastoma contributes to the maintenance of glioma stem cells regulated by hypoxia-inducible factors. Lab. Investig 2011, 91, 1068–1078. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kerr, J.F.; Wyllie, A.H.; Currie, A.R. Apoptosis: A basic biological phenomenon with wide-ranging implications in tissue kinetics. Br. J. Cancer 1972, 26, 239–257. [Google Scholar]
  28. Taylor, R.C.; Cullen, S.P.; Martin, S.J. Apoptosis: Controlled demolition at the cellular level. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 2008, 9, 231–241. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ashkenazi, A. Targeting the extrinsic apoptosis pathway in cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2008, 19, 325–331. [Google Scholar]
  30. Scaffidi, C.; Fulda, S.; Srinivasan, A.; Friesen, C.; Li, F.; Tomaselli, K.J.; Debatin, K.M.; Krammer, P.H.; Peter, M.E. Two CD95 (APO-1/Fas) signaling pathways. EMBO J 1998, 17, 1675–1687. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kischkel, F.C.; Lawrence, D.A.; Chuntharapai, A.; Schow, P.; Kim, K.J.; Ashkenazi, A. Apo2L/TRAIL-dependent recruitment of endogenous FADD and caspase-8 to death receptors 4 and 5. Immunity 2000, 12, 611–620. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kischkel, F.C.; Lawrence, D.A.; Tinel, A.; LeBlanc, H.; Virmani, A.; Schow, P.; Gazdar, A.; Blenis, J.; Arnott, D.; Ashkenazi, A. Death receptor recruitment of endogenous caspase-10 and apoptosis initiation in the absence of caspase-8. J. Biol. Chem 2001, 276, 46639–46646. [Google Scholar]
  33. Falschlehner, C.; Emmerich, C.H.; Gerlach, B.; Walczak, H. TRAIL signalling: Decisions between life and death. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol 2007, 39, 1462–1475. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lavrik, I.; Golks, A.; Krammer, P.H. Death receptor signaling. J. Cell Sci 2005, 118, 265–267. [Google Scholar]
  35. Song, X.; Kim, S.Y.; Lee, Y.J. Evidence for two modes of synergistic induction of apoptosis by mapatumumab and oxaliplatin in combination with hyperthermia in human colon cancer cells. PLoS One 2013, 8, e73654. [Google Scholar]
  36. Fulda, S.; Galluzzi, L.; Kroemer, G. Targeting mitochondria for cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov 2010, 9, 447–464. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ma, X.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, C.X.; Li, X.Y.; Li, N.; Ju, R.J.; Shi, J.F.; Sun, M.G.; Zhao, W.Y.; Mu, L.M.; et al. Modulation of drug-resistant membrane and apoptosis proteins of breast cancer stem cells by targeting berberine liposomes. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 4452–4465. [Google Scholar]
  38. Eckelman, B.P.; Salvesen, G.S.; Scott, F.L. Human inhibitor of apoptosis proteins: Why XIAP is the black sheep of the family. EMBO Rep 2006, 7, 988–994. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 2000, 100, 57–70. [Google Scholar]
  40. Lowe, S.W.; Cepero, E.; Evan, G. Intrinsic tumour suppression. Nature 2004, 432, 307–315. [Google Scholar]
  41. Signore, M.; Ricci-Vitiani, L.; de Maria, R. Targeting apoptosis pathways in cancer stem cells. Cancer Lett 2013, 332, 374–382. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sussman, R.T.; Ricci, M.S.; Hart, L.S.; Sun, S.Y.; El-Deiry, W.S. Chemotherapy-resistant side-population of colon cancer cells has a higher sensitivity to TRAIL than the non-SP, a higher expression of c-Myc and TRAIL-receptor DR4. Cancer Biol. Ther 2007, 6, 1490–1495. [Google Scholar]
  43. Kataoka, T. The caspase-8 modulator c-FLIP. Crit. Rev. Immunol 2005, 25, 31–58. [Google Scholar]
  44. Micheau, O. Cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein: An update. In Apoptosis and Cancer Therapy; Debatin, K., Pulda, S., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; pp. 120–157. [Google Scholar]
  45. Liu, G.; Yuan, X.; Zeng, Z.; Tunici, P.; Ng, H.; Abdulkadir, I.R.; Lu, L.; Irvin, D.; Black, K.L.; Yu, J.S. Analysis of gene expression and chemoresistance of CD133+ cancer stem cells in glioblastoma. Mol. Cancer 2006, 5, 67. [Google Scholar]
  46. Zobalova, R.; McDermott, L.; Stantic, M.; Prokopova, K.; Dong, L.F.; Neuzil, J. CD133-positive cells are resistant to TRAIL due to up-regulation of FLIP. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 2008, 373, 567–571. [Google Scholar]
  47. Zobalova, R.; Stantic, M.; Prokopova, K.; Dong, L.F.; Neuzil, J. Cancer cells with high expression of CD133 exert FLIP upregulation and resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Biofactors 2008, 34, 231–235. [Google Scholar]
  48. Piggott, L.; Omidvar, N.; Marti Perez, S.; Eberl, M.; Clarkson, R.W. Suppression of apoptosis inhibitor c-FLIP selectively eliminates breast cancer stem cell activity in response to the anti-cancer agent, TRAIL. Breast Cancer Res 2011, 13, R88. [Google Scholar]
  49. Ding, L.; Yuan, C.; Wei, F.; Wang, G.; Zhang, J.; Bellail, A.C.; Zhang, Z.; Olson, J.J.; Hao, C. Cisplatin restores TRAIL apoptotic pathway in glioblastoma-derived stem cells through up-regulation of DR5 and down-regulation of c-FLIP. Cancer Investig 2011, 29, 511–520. [Google Scholar]
  50. Fukuda, S.; Foster, R.G.; Porter, S.B.; Pelus, L.M. The antiapoptosis protein survivin is associated with cell cycle entry of normal cord blood CD34(+) cells and modulates cell cycle and proliferation of mouse hematopoietic progenitor cells. Blood 2002, 100, 2463–2471. [Google Scholar]
  51. Leung, C.G.; Xu, Y.; Mularski, B.; Liu, H.; Gurbuxani, S.; Crispino, J.D. Requirements for survivin in terminal differentiation of erythroid cells and maintenance of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. J. Exp. Med 2007, 204, 1603–1611. [Google Scholar]
  52. Pennartz, S.; Belvindrah, R.; Tomiuk, S.; Zimmer, C.; Hofmann, K.; Conradt, M.; Bosio, A.; Cremer, H. Purification of neuronal precursors from the adult mouse brain: Comprehensive gene expression analysis provides new insights into the control of cell migration, differentiation, and homeostasis. Mol. Cell. Neurosci 2004, 25, 692–706. [Google Scholar]
  53. Carter, B.Z.; Qiu, Y.; Huang, X.; Diao, L.; Zhang, N.; Coombes, K.R.; Mak, D.H.; Konopleva, M.; Cortes, J.; Kantarjian, H.M.; et al. Survivin is highly expressed in CD34(+)38(−) leukemic stem/progenitor cells and predicts poor clinical outcomes in AML. Blood 2012, 120, 173–180. [Google Scholar]
  54. Jin, F.; Zhao, L.; Zhao, H.Y.; Guo, S.G.; Feng, J.; Jiang, X.B.; Zhang, S.L.; Wei, Y.J.; Fu, R.; Zhao, J.S. Comparison between cells and cancer stem-like cells isolated from glioblastoma and astrocytoma on expression of anti-apoptotic and multidrug resistance-associated protein genes. Neuroscience 2008, 154, 541–550. [Google Scholar]
  55. Kelly, P.N.; Puthalakath, H.; Adams, J.M.; Strasser, A. Endogenous bcl-2 is not required for the development of Emu-myc-induced B-cell lymphoma. Blood 2007, 109, 4907–4913. [Google Scholar]
  56. Madjd, Z.; Mehrjerdi, A.Z.; Sharifi, A.M.; Molanaei, S.; Shahzadi, S.Z.; Asadi-Lari, M. CD44+ cancer cells express higher levels of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 in breast tumours. Cancer Immun 2009, 9, 4. [Google Scholar]
  57. Tagscherer, K.E.; Fassl, A.; Campos, B.; Farhadi, M.; Kraemer, A.; Bock, B.C.; Macher-Goeppinger, S.; Radlwimmer, B.; Wiestler, O.D.; Herold-Mende, C.; et al. Apoptosis-based treatment of glioblastomas with ABT-737, a novel small molecule inhibitor of Bcl-2 family proteins. Oncogene 2008, 27, 6646–6656. [Google Scholar]
  58. Wu, S.; Wang, X.; Chen, J.; Chen, Y. Autophagy of cancer stem cells is involved with chemoresistance of colon cancer cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 2013, 434, 898–903. [Google Scholar]
  59. Wang, L.; Guo, H.; Yang, L.; Dong, L.; Lin, C.; Zhang, J.; Lin, P.; Wang, X. Morusin inhibits human cervical cancer stem cell growth and migration through attenuation of NF-kappaB activity and apoptosis induction. Mol. Cell. Biochem 2013, 379, 7–18. [Google Scholar]
  60. Vazquez, A.; Bond, E.E.; Levine, A.J.; Bond, G.L. The genetics of the p53 pathway, apoptosis and cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov 2008, 7, 979–987. [Google Scholar]
  61. Bao, S.; Wu, Q.; McLendon, R.E.; Hao, Y.; Shi, Q.; Hjelmeland, A.B.; Dewhirst, M.W.; Bigner, D.D.; Rich, J.N. Glioma stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response. Nature 2006, 444, 756–760. [Google Scholar]
  62. Guzman, M.L.; Neering, S.J.; Upchurch, D.; Grimes, B.; Howard, D.S.; Rizzieri, D.A.; Luger, S.M.; Jordan, C.T. Nuclear factor-kappaB is constitutively activated in primitive human acute myelogenous leukemia cells. Blood 2001, 98, 2301–2307. [Google Scholar]
  63. Warner, J.K.; Wang, J.C.; Hope, K.J.; Jin, L.; Dick, J.E. Concepts of human leukemic development. Oncogene 2004, 23, 7164–7177. [Google Scholar]
  64. Zhou, J.; Zhang, H.; Gu, P.; Bai, J.; Margolick, J.B.; Zhang, Y. NF-kappaB pathway inhibitors preferentially inhibit breast cancer stem-like cells. Breast Cancer Res. Treat 2008, 111, 419–427. [Google Scholar]
  65. Birnie, R.; Bryce, S.D.; Roome, C.; Dussupt, V.; Droop, A.; Lang, S.H.; Berry, P.A.; Hyde, C.F.; Lewis, J.L.; Stower, M.J.; et al. Gene expression profiling of human prostate cancer stem cells reveals a pro-inflammatory phenotype and the importance of extracellular matrix interactions. Genome Biol 2008, 9, R83. [Google Scholar]
  66. Ju, J.H.; Jang, K.; Lee, K.M.; Kim, M.; Kim, J.; Yi, J.Y.; Noh, D.Y.; Shin, I. CD24 enhances DNA damage-induced apoptosis by modulating NF-kappaB signaling in CD44-expressing breast cancer cells. Carcinogenesis 2011, 32, 1474–1483. [Google Scholar]
  67. Dalmay, T.; Edwards, D.R. MicroRNAs and the hallmarks of cancer. Oncogene 2006, 25, 6170–6175. [Google Scholar]
  68. Ruan, K.; Fang, X.; Ouyang, G. MicroRNAs: Novel regulators in the hallmarks of human cancer. Cancer Lett 2009, 285, 116–126. [Google Scholar]
  69. Tu, H.F.; Lin, S.C.; Chang, K.W. MicroRNA aberrances in head and neck cancer: Pathogenetic and clinical significance. Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg 2013, 21, 104–111. [Google Scholar]
  70. Wong, Q.W.; Lung, R.W.; Law, P.T.; Lai, P.B.; Chan, K.Y.; To, K.F.; Wong, N. MicroRNA-223 is commonly repressed in hepatocellular carcinoma and potentiates expression of Stathmin1. Gastroenterology 2008, 135, 257–269. [Google Scholar]
  71. Coulouarn, C.; Factor, V.M.; Andersen, J.B.; Durkin, M.E.; Thorgeirsson, S.S. Loss of miR-122 expression in liver cancer correlates with suppression of the hepatic phenotype and gain of metastatic properties. Oncogene 2009, 28, 3526–3536. [Google Scholar]
  72. Pineau, P.; Volinia, S.; McJunkin, K.; Marchio, A.; Battiston, C.; Terris, B.; Mazzaferro, V.; Lowe, S.W.; Croce, C.M.; Dejean, A. MiR-221 overexpression contributes to liver tumorigenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 264–269. [Google Scholar]
  73. Ma, S.; Tang, K.H.; Chan, Y.P.; Lee, T.K.; Kwan, P.S.; Castilho, A.; Ng, I.; Man, K.; Wong, N.; To, K.F.; et al. MiR-130b Promotes CD133(+) liver tumor-initiating cell growth and self-renewal via tumor protein 53-induced nuclear protein 1. Cell Stem Cell 2010, 7, 694–707. [Google Scholar]
  74. Wong, Q.W.; Ching, A.K.; Chan, A.W.; Choy, K.W.; To, K.F.; Lai, P.B.; Wong, N. MiR-222 overexpression confers cell migratory advantages in hepatocellular carcinoma through enhancing AKT signaling. Clin. Cancer Res 2010, 16, 867–875. [Google Scholar]
  75. Bao, B.; Li, Y.; Ahmad, A.; Azmi, A.S.; Bao, G.; Ali, S.; Banerjee, S.; Kong, D.; Sarkar, F.H. Targeting CSC-related miRNAs for cancer therapy by natural agents. Curr. Drug Targets 2012, 13, 1858–1868. [Google Scholar]
  76. Ji, Q.; Hao, X.; Zhang, M.; Tang, W.; Yang, M.; Li, L.; Xiang, D.; Desano, J.T.; Bommer, G.T.; Fan, D.; et al. MicroRNA miR-34 inhibits human pancreatic cancer tumor-initiating cells. PLoS One 2009, 4, e6816. [Google Scholar]
  77. Guessous, F.; Zhang, Y.; Kofman, A.; Catania, A.; Li, Y.; Schiff, D.; Purow, B.; Abounader, R. MicroRNA-34a is tumor suppressive in brain tumors and glioma stem cells. Cell Cycle 2010, 9, 1031–1036. [Google Scholar]
  78. Golestaneh, A.F.; Atashi, A.; Langroudi, L.; Shafiee, A.; Ghaemi, N.; Soleimani, M. MiRNAs expressed differently in cancer stem cells and cancer cells of human gastric cancer cell line MKN-45. Cell Biochem. Funct 2012, 30, 411–418. [Google Scholar]
  79. Pannuti, A.; Foreman, K.; Rizzo, P.; Osipo, C.; Golde, T.; Osborne, B.; Miele, L. Targeting Notch to target cancer stem cells. Clin. Cancer Res 2010, 16, 3141–3152. [Google Scholar]
  80. Frank, N.Y.; Schatton, T.; Frank, M.H. The therapeutic promise of the cancer stem cell concept. J. Clin. Investig 2010, 120, 41–50. [Google Scholar]
  81. Caba, O.; Diaz-Gavilan, M.; Rodriguez-Serrano, F.; Boulaiz, H.; Aranega, A.; Gallo, M.A.; Marchal, J.A.; Campos, J.M. Anticancer activity and cDNA microarray studies of a (RS)-1,2,3,5-tetrahydro-4,1-benzoxazepine-3-yl]-6-chloro-9H-purine, and an acyclic (RS)-O,N-acetalic 6-chloro-7H-purine. Eur. J. Med. Chem 2011, 46, 3802–3809. [Google Scholar]
  82. Caba, O.; Rodriguez-Serrano, F.; Diaz-Gavilan, M.; Conejo-Garcia, A.; Ortiz, R.; Martinez-Amat, A.; Alvarez, P.; Gallo, M.A.; Campos, J.M.; Marchal, J.A.; et al. The selective cytotoxic activity in breast cancer cells by an anthranilic alcohol-derived acyclic 5-fluorouracil O,N-acetal is mediated by endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis. Eur. J. Med. Chem 2012, 50, 376–382. [Google Scholar]
  83. Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Banerjee, S.; Liao, J.; Sarkar, F.H. Down-regulation of Notch-1 contributes to cell growth inhibition and apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells. Mol. Cancer Ther 2006, 5, 483–493. [Google Scholar]
  84. Montales, M.T.; Rahal, O.M.; Kang, J.; Rogers, T.J.; Prior, R.L.; Wu, X.; Simmen, R.C. Repression of mammosphere formation of human breast cancer cells by soy isoflavone genistein and blueberry polyphenolic acids suggests diet-mediated targeting of cancer stem-like/progenitor cells. Carcinogenesis 2012, 33, 652–660. [Google Scholar]
  85. Montales, M.T.; Rahal, O.M.; Nakatani, H.; Matsuda, T.; Simmen, R.C. Repression of mammary adipogenesis by genistein limits mammosphere formation of human MCF-7 cells. J. Endocrinol 2013, 218, 135–149. [Google Scholar]
  86. Han, B.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Bremer, E.; van Dam, G.; Kroesen, B.J.; de Leij, L.; Helfrich, W. Effect of 20(S)-ginsenoside Rg3 on cell proliferation and apoptosis of colon CSCs. Chin. J. Gerontol 2012, 32, 4431–4433. [Google Scholar]
  87. Alvero, A.B.; Montagna, M.K.; Holmberg, J.C.; Craveiro, V.; Brown, D.; Mor, G. Targeting the mitochondria activates two independent cell death pathways in ovarian cancer stem cells. Mol. Cancer Ther 2011, 10, 1385–1393. [Google Scholar]
  88. Guo, M.; Wang, M.; Zhang, X.; Deng, H.; Wang, Z.Y. Broussoflavonol B restricts growth of ER-negative breast cancer stem-like cells. Anticancer Res 2013, 33, 1873–1879. [Google Scholar]
  89. Zhang, F.L.; Wang, P.; Liu, Y.H.; Liu, L.B.; Liu, X.B.; Li, Z.; Xue, Y.X. Topoisomerase I inhibitors, shikonin and topotecan, inhibit growth and induce apoptosis of glioma cells and glioma stem cells. PLoS One 2013, 8, e81815. [Google Scholar]
  90. Wang, X.; QIU, J.; Yang, G.; Altman, A.R.; Reisman, D.S.; Higginson, J.S.; Davis, I.S. The radiosensitizing effect of curcumin on CD133+ rectal cancer cells. Chin. J. Gen. Surg 2013, 28, 134–137. [Google Scholar]
  91. Kakarala, M.; Brenner, D.E.; Korkaya, H.; Cheng, C.; Tazi, K.; Ginestier, C.; Liu, S.; Dontu, G.; Wicha, M.S. Targeting breast stem cells with the cancer preventive compounds curcumin and piperine. Breast Cancer Res. Treat 2010, 122, 777–785. [Google Scholar]
  92. Pandey, P.R.; Okuda, H.; Watabe, M.; Pai, S.K.; Liu, W.; Kobayashi, A.; Xing, F.; Fukuda, K.; Hirota, S.; Sugai, T.; et al. Resveratrol suppresses growth of cancer stem-like cells by inhibiting fatty acid synthase. Breast Cancer Res. Treat 2011, 130, 387–398. [Google Scholar]
  93. Gupta, P.B.; Onder, T.T.; Jiang, G.; Tao, K.; Kuperwasser, C.; Weinberg, R.A.; Lander, E.S. Identification of selective inhibitors of cancer stem cells by high-throughput screening. Cell 2009, 138, 645–659. [Google Scholar]
  94. Parajuli, B.; Shin, S.J.; Kwon, S.H.; Cha, S.D.; Chung, R.; Park, W.J.; Lee, H.G.; Cho, C.H. Salinomycin induces apoptosis via death receptor-5 up-regulation in cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cells. Anticancer Res 2013, 33, 1457–1462. [Google Scholar]
  95. Zhang, H.; Mi, J.Q.; Fang, H.; Wang, Z.; Wang, C.; Wu, L.; Zhang, B.; Minden, M.; Yang, W.T.; Wang, H.W.; et al. Preferential eradication of acute myelogenous leukemia stem cells by fenretinide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 5606–5611. [Google Scholar]
  96. Sachlos, E.; Risueno, R.M.; Laronde, S.; Shapovalova, Z.; Lee, J.H.; Russell, J.; Malig, M.; McNicol, J.D.; Fiebig-Comyn, A.; Graham, M.; et al. Identification of drugs including a dopamine receptor antagonist that selectively target cancer stem cells. Cell 2012, 149, 1284–1297. [Google Scholar]
  97. Chen, X.; Liao, Y.; Zhao, K.; Yang, J.C.; Zhao, S.J.; Ma, Z.J.; Yin, R.L.; Luo, G.B.; Zhao, Z.H. The effect of aspirin on the expression of tumor stem cell marker Lgr 5 in human colorectal cancer cells. Acta Acad. Med. Zunyi 2012, 35, 287–290. [Google Scholar]
  98. Gomez-Cabrero, A.; Wrasidlo, W.; Reisfeld, R.A. IMD-0354 targets breast cancer stem cells: A novel approach for an adjuvant to chemotherapy to prevent multidrug resistance in a murine model. PLoS One 2013, 8, e73607. [Google Scholar]
  99. Nanta, R.; Kumar, D.; Meeker, D.; Rodova, M.; van Veldhuizen, P.J.; Shankar, S.; Srivastava, R.K. NVP-LDE-225 (Erismodegib) inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition and human prostate cancer stem cell growth in NOD/SCID IL2Rgamma null mice by regulating Bmi-1 and microRNA-128. Oncogenesis 2013, 2, e42. [Google Scholar]
  100. Zhang, C.C.; Yan, Z.; Zong, Q.; Fang, D.D.; Painter, C.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, E.; Lira, M.E.; John-Baptiste, A.; Christensen, J.G. Synergistic effect of the γ-secretase inhibitor PF-03084014 and docetaxel in breast cancer models. Stem Cells Transl. Med 2013, 2, 233–242. [Google Scholar]
  101. Galuppo, R.; Maynard, E.; Shah, M.; Daily, M.F.; Chen, C.; Spear, B.T.; Gedaly, R. Synergistic inhibition of HCC and liver cancer stem cell proliferation by targeting RAS/RAF/MAPK and WNT/beta-catenin pathways. Anticancer Res 2014, 34, 1709–1713. [Google Scholar]
  102. Ashizawa, T.; Miyata, H.; Iizuka, A.; Komiyama, M.; Oshita, C.; Kume, A.; Nogami, M.; Yagoto, M.; Ito, I.; Oishi, T.; et al. Effect of the STAT3 inhibitor STX-0119 on the proliferation of cancer stem-like cells derived from recurrent glioblastoma. Int. J. Oncol 2013, 43, 219–227. [Google Scholar]
  103. Ashkenazi, A. Directing cancer cells to self-destruct with pro-apoptotic receptor agonists. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov 2008, 7, 1001–1012. [Google Scholar]
  104. Calabrese, C.; Poppleton, H.; Kocak, M.; Hogg, T.L.; Fuller, C.; Hamner, B.; Oh, E.Y.; Gaber, M.W.; Finklestein, D.; Allen, M.; et al. A perivascular niche for brain tumor stem cells. Cancer Cell 2007, 11, 69–82. [Google Scholar]
  105. Burkhardt, J.K.; Hofstetter, C.P.; Santillan, A.; Shin, B.J.; Foley, C.P.; Ballon, D.J.; Pierre Gobin, Y.; Boockvar, J.A. Orthotopic glioblastoma stem-like cell xenograft model in mice to evaluate intra-arterial delivery of bevacizumab: From bedside to bench. J. Clin. Neurosci. Off. J. Neurosurg. Soc. Australas 2012, 19, 1568–1572. [Google Scholar]
  106. Todaro, M.; Alea, M.P.; di Stefano, A.B.; Cammareri, P.; Vermeulen, L.; Iovino, F.; Tripodo, C.; Russo, A.; Gulotta, G.; Medema, J.P.; et al. Colon cancer stem cells dictate tumor growth and resist cell death by production of interleukin-4. Cell Stem Cell 2007, 1, 389–402. [Google Scholar]
  107. Chao, M.P.; Alizadeh, A.A.; Tang, C.; Jan, M.; Weissman-Tsukamoto, R.; Zhao, F.; Park, C.Y.; Weissman, I.L.; Majeti, R. Therapeutic antibody targeting of CD47 eliminates human acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Res 2011, 71, 1374–1384. [Google Scholar]
  108. Lee, Y.; Ahn, C.; Han, J.; Choi, H.; Kim, J.; Yim, J.; Lee, J.; Provost, P.; Radmark, O.; Kim, S.; et al. The nuclear RNase III Drosha initiates microRNA processing. Nature 2003, 425, 415–419. [Google Scholar]
  109. Bartel, D.P. MicroRNAs: Target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell 2009, 136, 215–233. [Google Scholar]
  110. Ambros, V. MicroRNA pathways in flies and worms: Growth, death, fat, stress, and timing. Cell 2003, 113, 673–676. [Google Scholar]
  111. Cimmino, A.; Calin, G.A.; Fabbri, M.; Iorio, M.V.; Ferracin, M.; Shimizu, M.; Wojcik, S.E.; Aqeilan, R.I.; Zupo, S.; Dono, M.; et al. MiR-15 and miR-16 induce apoptosis by targeting BCL2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 13944–13949. [Google Scholar]
  112. Selcuklu, S.D.; Donoghue, M.T.; Spillane, C. MiR-21 as a key regulator of oncogenic processes. Biochem. Soc. Trans 2009, 37, 918–925. [Google Scholar]
  113. Hu, Y.; Cherton-Horvat, G.; Dragowska, V.; Baird, S.; Korneluk, R.G.; Durkin, J.P.; Mayer, L.D.; LaCasse, E.C. Antisense oligonucleotides targeting XIAP induce apoptosis and enhance chemotherapeutic activity against human lung cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Clin. Cancer Res. 2003, 9, 2826–2836. [Google Scholar]
  114. LaCasse, E.C.; Mahoney, D.J.; Cheung, H.H.; Plenchette, S.; Baird, S.; Korneluk, R.G. IAP-targeted therapies for cancer. Oncogene 2008, 27, 6252–6275. [Google Scholar]
  115. Marian, C.O.; Cho, S.K.; McEllin, B.M.; Maher, E.A.; Hatanpaa, K.J.; Madden, C.J.; Mickey, B.E.; Wright, W.E.; Shay, J.W.; Bachoo, R.M. The telomerase antagonist, imetelstat, efficiently targets glioblastoma tumor-initiating cells leading to decreased proliferation and tumor growth. Clin. Cancer Res 2010, 16, 154–163. [Google Scholar]
  116. Li, X.; Lewis, M.T.; Huang, J.; Gutierrez, C.; Osborne, C.K.; Wu, M.F.; Hilsenbeck, S.G.; Pavlick, A.; Zhang, X.; Chamness, G.C.; et al. Intrinsic resistance of tumorigenic breast cancer cells to chemotherapy. J. Natl. Cancer Inst 2008, 100, 672–679. [Google Scholar]
  117. Khdair, A.; Chen, D.; Patil, Y.; Ma, L.; Dou, Q.P.; Shekhar, M.P.; Panyam, J. Nanoparticle-mediated combination chemotherapy and photodynamic therapy overcomes tumor drug resistance. J. Control. Release 2010, 141, 137–144. [Google Scholar]
  118. Liu, Y.; Lu, W.L.; Guo, J.; Du, J.; Li, T.; Wu, J.W.; Wang, G.L.; Wang, J.C.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Q. A potential target associated with both cancer and cancer stem cells: A combination therapy for eradication of breast cancer using vinorelbine stealthy liposomes plus parthenolide stealthy liposomes. J. Control. Release 2008, 129, 18–25. [Google Scholar]
  119. Hirsch, H.A.; Iliopoulos, D.; Tsichlis, P.N.; Struhl, K. Metformin selectively targets cancer stem cells, and acts together with chemotherapy to block tumor growth and prolong remission. Cancer Res 2009, 69, 7507–7511. [Google Scholar]
  120. Guo, J.; Zhou, J.; Ying, X.; Men, Y.; Li, R.J.; Zhang, Y.; Du, J.; Tian, W.; Yao, H.J.; Wang, X.X.; et al. Effects of stealth liposomal daunorubicin plus tamoxifen on the breast cancer and cancer stem cells. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci 2010, 13, 136–151. [Google Scholar]
  121. Zhang, G.N.; Liang, Y.; Zhou, L.J.; Chen, S.P.; Chen, G.; Zhang, T.P.; Kang, T.; Zhao, Y.P. Combination of salinomycin and gemcitabine eliminates pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Lett 2011, 313, 137–144. [Google Scholar]
  122. Zhu, Y.; Yu, F.; Jiao, Y.; Feng, J.; Tang, W.; Yao, H.; Gong, C.; Chen, J.; Su, F.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Reduced miR-128 in breast tumor-initiating cells induces chemotherapeutic resistance via Bmi-1 and ABCC5. Clin. Cancer Res 2011, 17, 7105–7115. [Google Scholar]
  123. Yang, Y.P.; Chien, Y.; Chiou, G.Y.; Cherng, J.Y.; Wang, M.L.; Lo, W.L.; Chang, Y.L.; Huang, P.I.; Chen, Y.W.; Shih, Y.H.; et al. Inhibition of cancer stem cell-like properties and reduced chemoradioresistance of glioblastoma using microRNA145 with cationic polyurethane-short branch PEI. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 1462–1476. [Google Scholar]
  124. Tazzari, P.L.; Tabellini, G.; Ricci, F.; Papa, V.; Bortul, R.; Chiarini, F.; Evangelisti, C.; Martinelli, G.; Bontadini, A.; Cocco, L.; et al. Synergistic proapoptotic activity of recombinant TRAIL plus the Akt inhibitor Perifosine in acute myelogenous leukemia cells. Cancer Res 2008, 68, 9394–9403. [Google Scholar]
Ijms 15 08335f1 1024
Figure 1. TRAIL-induced extrinsic apoptotic pathway. The apoptotic pathway is activated when the ligand (TRAIL) binds to the death receptor, followed by the recruitment of adaptor molecule FADD and activation of caspase-8 and -10. Activated caspase-8 and -10 activate the caspase-3 leading to apoptosis or cleave Bid to tBid that binds to Bcl-XL, triggering release of mitochondrial cytochrome c and Smac into the cytosol. Assembly of cytochrome c with apoptotic protease-activating factor-1 (Apaf-1) activates caspase-9, which in turn activate caspase-3 and -7, leading to apoptosis. C-FLIP inhibits the activation of caspase-8 by suppressing its combination with FADD. IAPs inhibit caspase-9 or form a complex with TRAF to inhibit caspase-8. Smac can bind to IAPs and attenuate their inhibitory effects on caspase-9.
Figure 1. TRAIL-induced extrinsic apoptotic pathway. The apoptotic pathway is activated when the ligand (TRAIL) binds to the death receptor, followed by the recruitment of adaptor molecule FADD and activation of caspase-8 and -10. Activated caspase-8 and -10 activate the caspase-3 leading to apoptosis or cleave Bid to tBid that binds to Bcl-XL, triggering release of mitochondrial cytochrome c and Smac into the cytosol. Assembly of cytochrome c with apoptotic protease-activating factor-1 (Apaf-1) activates caspase-9, which in turn activate caspase-3 and -7, leading to apoptosis. C-FLIP inhibits the activation of caspase-8 by suppressing its combination with FADD. IAPs inhibit caspase-9 or form a complex with TRAF to inhibit caspase-8. Smac can bind to IAPs and attenuate their inhibitory effects on caspase-9.
Ijms 15 08335f1
Table
Table 1. Natural inhibitors of cancer stem cells (CSCs).
Table 1. Natural inhibitors of cancer stem cells (CSCs).
Natural compoundSourcesTumor typesRef.
GenisteinSoyPancreatic CSCs[83]
GenisteinSoyBreast CSCs[84,85]
Blueberry Polyphenolic AcidsBlueberryBreast CSCs[84]
20(S)-Ginsenoside Rg3Panax GinsenColon CSCs[86]
Nv-128Soy (Isoflavone Derivative)Ovarian CSCs[87]
Broussoflavonol BBroussonetia PapyriferaBreast CSCs[88]
ShikoninArnebia EuchromaGlioma CSCs[89]
CurcuminCurcuma Longa L.Rectal CSCs, Breast CSCs[90,91]
PiperinePepperBreast CSCs[91]
ResveratrolGrape, Peanut, Polygonum CuspidatumBreast CSCs[92]
MorusinMorus Alba L.Cervical CSCs[59]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

He, Y.-C.; Zhou, F.-L.; Shen, Y.; Liao, D.-F.; Cao, D. Apoptotic Death of Cancer Stem Cells for Cancer Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 8335-8351. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15058335

AMA Style

He Y-C, Zhou F-L, Shen Y, Liao D-F, Cao D. Apoptotic Death of Cancer Stem Cells for Cancer Therapy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2014; 15(5):8335-8351. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15058335

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Ying-Chun, Fang-Liang Zhou, Yi Shen, Duan-Fang Liao, and Deliang Cao. 2014. "Apoptotic Death of Cancer Stem Cells for Cancer Therapy" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 15, no. 5: 8335-8351. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15058335

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop