Next Article in Journal
Systemic Injection of Low-Dose Lipopolysaccharide Fails to Break down the Blood–Brain Barrier or Activate the TLR4-MyD88 Pathway in Neonatal Rat Brain
Next Article in Special Issue
Viral Metagenomics on Animals as a Tool for the Detection of Zoonoses Prior to Human Infection?
Previous Article in Journal
Direct Analysis of hCGβcf Glycosylation in Normal and Aberrant Pregnancy by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry
Previous Article in Special Issue
Marine Microbial Metagenomics: From Individual to the Environment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Comprehensive Insight into Tetracycline Resistant Bacteria and Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Activated Sludge Using Next-Generation Sequencing

State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, Environmental Health Research Center, School of the Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15(6), 10083-10100; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms150610083
Submission received: 30 March 2014 / Revised: 9 May 2014 / Accepted: 22 May 2014 / Published: 5 June 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metagenomics: a Powerful Lens Viewing the Microbial World)

Abstract

:
In order to comprehensively investigate tetracycline resistance in activated sludge of sewage treatment plants, 454 pyrosequencing and Illumina high-throughput sequencing were used to detect potential tetracycline resistant bacteria (TRB) and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in sludge cultured with different concentrations of tetracycline. Pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA gene revealed that tetracycline treatment greatly affected the bacterial community structure of the sludge. Nine genera consisting of Sulfuritalea, Armatimonas, Prosthecobacter, Hyphomicrobium, Azonexus, Longilinea, Paracoccus, Novosphingobium and Rhodobacter were identified as potential TRB in the sludge. Results of qPCR, molecular cloning and metagenomic analysis consistently indicated that tetracycline treatment could increase both the abundance and diversity of the tet genes, but decreased the occurrence and diversity of non-tetracycline ARG, especially sulfonamide resistance gene sul2. Cluster analysis showed that tetracycline treatment at subinhibitory concentrations (5 mg/L) was found to pose greater effects on the bacterial community composition, which may be responsible for the variations of the ARGs abundance. This study indicated that joint use of 454 pyrosequencing and Illumina high-throughput sequencing can be effectively used to explore ARB and ARGs in the environment, and future studies should include an in-depth investigation of the relationship between microbial community, ARGs and antibiotics in sewage treatment plant (STP) sludge.

1. Introduction

Extensive use and abuse of antibiotics in health protection and agricultural production have led to the emergence of widespread various antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) and resistant bacteria (ARB) in the environment [1,2], which is thought to pose an ever increasing threat to public health [3]. The broad spectrum tetracyclines are one of the most frequently used classes of antibiotics for protection of human and animal health [4]. Previous studies have shown that the concentrations of tetracycline in livestock wastewater [5,6] and municipal sewage [7,8] were 4.1~32.67 μg/L and 89.4~652.6 ng/L, respectively. Increasing evidence suggested that sewage treatment plants (STPs) serve as important reservoirs for environmental tetracycline resistant bacteria (TRB) and resistance genes (tet) [9,10,11].
Both culture-based [9,10,12] and culture-independent approaches [13] have been used to explore the TRB in STPs. Classical microbiological methodology relies on plate counting of coliforms, which makes the assessment results unrepresentative and biased. Currently, molecular methods used for exploring TRB in sludge include polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) [14], quantitative real time PCR (qPCR) [14], molecular cloning [11] and microarray [15], but the methods are time- and cost-consuming due to low throughput. Recently, growing evidence has shown that next-generation sequencing is a powerful metagenomic tool for comprehensive overview of microbial communities and/or functional genes in various environmental compartments, including soil [16], human gastrointestinal tract [17], sediments [18], and wastewater treatment plants [19].
In this study, we designed a batch experiment to culture STP sludge in filtered sewage fed with different concentrations of tetracycline to identify TRB community composition in the sludge and to evaluate the effect of tetracycline stress on the abundance and diversity of tet genes. 454 Pyrosequencing was used to explore the TRB in activated sludge based on PCR of bacterial 16S rRNA gene. Illumina high-throughput sequencing in combination with qPCR and molecular cloning were also employed to investigate the relative abundance and diversity of ARGs including tet genes. This study revealed the distribution patterns of TRB and ARGs in activated sludge and provided a useful tool for comprehensive investigation of tetracycline resistance in the environment.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Bacterial Community Shift under Tetracycline Stress

Pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA gene showed that 6-day tetracycline treatment separately at 1, 5 and 20 mg/L tended to increase the number of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in the sludge, which agrees with the patterns of Chao 1 and Shannon index (Table 1). The reason may be that the growth of the dominant species in the sludge was inhibited under tetracycline stress, while more species with low abundance had the opportunity to survive and reproduce to reach the detection limit. Li et al. [20] also indicated that the antibiotic stresses seemed not effective in reduction of the bacterial diversities of river water. Interestingly, the sludge fed with 5 mg/L had the richest diversity (1692 OTUs), and 1 mg/L tetracycline treatment also increased the OTUs number, revealing that subinhibitory concentrations of tetracycline stress may favor enhancement of species richness [21].
Table 1. Number of 16S rRNA gene sequences analyzed, observed OTUs, Chao 1 and Shannon index for each sample at similarity of 97%.
Table 1. Number of 16S rRNA gene sequences analyzed, observed OTUs, Chao 1 and Shannon index for each sample at similarity of 97%.
Tetracycline ConcentrationsNo. of Raw SequencesObserved OTUsChao 1Shannon Index
0 mg/L7097111215625.94
1 mg/L13,351130619886.19
5 mg/L9306169228996.60
20 mg/L12,802134719756.35
OTUs: Operational taxonomic units; Chao 1: Chao 1 estimator.
As shown in Figure 1, Acidobacteria (27.3%) was the most abundant phylum in the sludge without tetracycline treatment, followed by Proteobacteria (11.6%), Actinobacteria (11.2%), Planctomycetes (5.9%), Chloroflexi (5.3%), Bacteroidetes (1.8%), TM 7 (1.7%), WS3 (1.1%), Nitrospira (0.7%) and Firmicutes (0.5%). Lozada et al. [22] also indicated that Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria were dominant in surfactant-enrichment lab-scale activated sludge. Acidobacteria, a common and predominant phylum in sludge [22], seems susceptible to tetracycline since the phylum abundance decreased from 27.3% under no tetracycline stress to 6.2% with 20 mg/L tetracycline treatment. Actinobacteria and Planctomycetes were also susceptible to tetracycline since their abundance evidently decreased with the increase of tetracycline concentration. On the contrary, tetracycline treatment dramatically increased the abundance of Proteobacteria in the sludge. Bacteriodetes and Firmicutes seemed to have higher abundance after 5 mg/L tetracycline treatment, but had lower abundance after 20 mg/L tetracycline treatment.
Figure 1. Abundance of various bacterial phyla in sludge after 6 days treatment with different concentrations of tetracycline (0~20 mg/L). The filtered pyrosequencing reads were classified using RDP Classifier at a confidence threshold of 80%. The relative abundance is presented as the percentage of each phylum in total effective reads of the corresponding sample.
Figure 1. Abundance of various bacterial phyla in sludge after 6 days treatment with different concentrations of tetracycline (0~20 mg/L). The filtered pyrosequencing reads were classified using RDP Classifier at a confidence threshold of 80%. The relative abundance is presented as the percentage of each phylum in total effective reads of the corresponding sample.
Ijms 15 10083 g001
Figure 2 shows that at the level of genus, Gp16 (14.9%) dominated in the sludge without tetracycline treatment, followed by Gp17 (5.5%), Gp6 (5.4%), Caldilinea (2.5%), Singulisphaera (2.1%), TM7_genera_incertae_sedis (1.7%), Sphaerobacter (1.1%), WS3_genera_incertae_sedis (1.1%) and Conexibacter (1.0%). Culture with 5 mg/L tetracycline decreased the abundance of Gp16, Gp17, Gp6, Singulisphaera, Conexibacter and TM7_genera_incertae_sedis. It should be noted that tetracycline treatment at subinhibitory concentrations (5 mg/L) considerably reduced Acidobacteria abundance. Within the Acidobacteria phylum, the Gp16 genus was found very susceptible to tetracycline, since its abundance was 14.9%, 5.7% and 2.1% with tetracycline at 0, 1, and 5 mg/L, respectively (Figure 2). The subinhibitory-dose treatment tended to increase the abundance of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes phyla (Figure 1), as well as Azonexus, Methyloversatilis and Perlucidibaca genera (Figure 2). Various bacterial strains of Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria have previously been isolated from livestock feces, farmyard manure and soil [23].
Figure 2. Heat map of genera occurring at >1% abundance in at least one sludge sample. Scale bar on the right shows the variation of the normalized abundance of the genera. D6-0, D6-1, D6-5 and D6-20: sludge cultured with 0, 1, 5 and 20 mg/L tetracycline for 6 days, respectively.
Figure 2. Heat map of genera occurring at >1% abundance in at least one sludge sample. Scale bar on the right shows the variation of the normalized abundance of the genera. D6-0, D6-1, D6-5 and D6-20: sludge cultured with 0, 1, 5 and 20 mg/L tetracycline for 6 days, respectively.
Ijms 15 10083 g002

2.2. Identification of TRB in the Sludge

According to the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System, bacteria are identified as TRB if they can survive under 20 mg/L tetracycline stress [8,10,12]. In this study, the bacteria with successive increases of relative abundance in response of tetracycline stress enhancement were considered TRB.
In the sludge cultured with 20 mg/L tetracycline, TRB consisted of Proteobacteria, Armatimonadetes, Verrucomicrobia and Chloroflexi phyla, accounting for 60.61%, 16.97%, 15.76% and 6.67% of the total TRB community, respectively (Table 2). At the level of class, TRB consisted of Betaproteobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, Armatimonadia, Verrucomicrobiae and Anaerolineae, among which Betaproteobacteria and Alphaproteobacteria were the main classes. This is supported by a previous study indicating that Alphaproteobacteria and Betaproteobacteria dominated in an oxytetracycline production wastewater treatment plant [24] and an aerobic reactor treating high-concentration antibiotic wastewater [25]. A total of nine genera were identified for TRB in the sludge, among which Sulfuritalea (0.54%) had the highest abundance, followed by Armatimonas (0.39%), Prosthecobacter (0.37%), Hyphomicrobium (0.34%), Azonexus (0.20%), Longilinea (0.15%), Novosphingobium (0.13%), Paracoccus (0.11%) and Rhodobacter (0.10%) (Table 2).
Table 2. Taxon composition profile of tetracycline resistant bacteria (TRB) in activated sludge.
Table 2. Taxon composition profile of tetracycline resistant bacteria (TRB) in activated sludge.
PhylumClassGenusD6-0D6-1D6-5D6-20
ProteobacteriaBetaproteobacteriaSulfuritalea0.01%0.10%0.10%0.54%
ArmatimonadetesArmatimonadiaArmatimonasNDND0.01%0.39%
VerrucomicrobiaVerrucomicrobiaeProsthecobacterNDND0.01%0.37%
ProteobacteriaAlphaproteobacteriaHyphomicrobiumND0.11%0.13%0.34%
ProteobacteriaBetaproteobacteriaAzonexus0.01%0.15%0.18%0.20%
ChloroflexiAnaerolineaeLongilineaND0.01%0.01%0.15%
ProteobacteriaAlphaproteobacteriaNovosphingobium0.04%0.04%0.07%0.13%
ProteobacteriaAlphaproteobacteriaParacoccusND0.01%0.01%0.11%
ProteobacteriaAlphaproteobacteriaRhodobacterND0.01%0.03%0.10%
ND: Not detectable; D6-0, D6-1, D6-5 and D6-20: sludge cultured with 0, 1, 5 and 20 mg/L tetracycline for 6 days, respectively.
Paracoccus serving as an important denitrifier [26] has been reported to be TRB in STP sludge treated with tetracycline [13]. To our knowledge, the other 8 genera were firstly identified as TRB in this study, indicating that pyrosequencing is a new powerful tool to profile the ARB communities in the environment. An in-depth investigation showed that the function of the newly identified TRB mainly included denitrification and degradation. The TRB genus Sulfuritalea dominating in the sludge is a denitrifier frequently detected in freshwater lakes [27]. Both nitrate-reduction bacterium Azonexus caeni [28] and denitrifying photosynthetic bacteria Rhodobacter [29] were previously isolated from sludge of wastewater treatment plants. Hyphomicrobium sp. can grow on media with chloromethane, methanol, methylamine and ethanol as sole carbon and energy sources, and the microorganism has been used for bioremediation of gasoline-contaminated site [30]. Novosphingobium sp. is widely distributed in the environment, e.g., groundwater treatment bioreactor [31], deep-sea environment [32] and freshwater lakes [33], and can degrade various aromatic compounds including polychlorophenol and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. In addition, it has been reported that Novosphingobium sp. isolated from activated sludge of a Japanese STP is capable of estradiol degradation [34].

2.3. Effects of Tetracycline Stress on the Abundance and Diversity of ARGs

To investigate the impact of tetracycline stress on the abundance of ARGs, the sludge samples fed with 0 and 20 mg/L tetracycline were selected for Illumina high-throughput sequencing. Alignments of the Illumina reads against the Antibiotic Resistance Genes Database (ARDB) showed that a total of 2168 reads (0.0192%) from the sludge under no tetracycline stress and 515 reads (0.0043%) from the sludge fed with 20 mg/L tetracycline were annotated as 47 and 41 types of known ARGs, respectively (Figure 3). As a common hypothesis, ARGs may have higher abundance in the presence of antibiotics [35].
Figure 3. Relative abundance of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in sludge of D6-0 (Inner ring) and D6-20 (Outer ring). After searching in antibiotic resistance database (ARDB), the relative abundance was obtained with the matched sequencing reads normalized to the total reads of each sample. D6-0: sludge incubated with 0 mg/L tetracycline for 6 days; D6-20: sludge incubated with 20 mg/L tetracycline for 6 days.
Figure 3. Relative abundance of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in sludge of D6-0 (Inner ring) and D6-20 (Outer ring). After searching in antibiotic resistance database (ARDB), the relative abundance was obtained with the matched sequencing reads normalized to the total reads of each sample. D6-0: sludge incubated with 0 mg/L tetracycline for 6 days; D6-20: sludge incubated with 20 mg/L tetracycline for 6 days.
Ijms 15 10083 g003
However, this study showed that tetracycline treatment decreased both the occurrence and diversity of non-tetracycline ARGs, although the abundance of tet genes increased. The considerable decrease in the abundance of sulfonamide resistance gene sul2 (from 83.49% to 14.76%) mainly contributed to the diminishment of the non-tetracycline ARGs (Figure 3). Table S1 shows that sul2 (ARDB accession number: CAE53425) dominated in the sludge without tetracycline stress, but had much lower abundance in the sludge fed with 20 mg/L tetracycline (Table S2). Pasteurella multocida was often found to carry sul2 (http://ardb.cbcb.umd.edu/cgi/search.cgi?db=L&field=ni&term=CAE53425), and its growth can be inhibited by tetracycline via interference with protein synthesis by binding to the bacterial 30S ribosomal subunit [36]. Interestingly, this study showed that Salmonella enterica plasmid pCVM19633_110 and Pasteurella multocida plasmid pCCK381 predominant in the sludge under no tetracycline stress (Table S3) had much lower abundance in the sludge fed with 20 mg/L tetracycline (Table S4). This may be also responsible for the reduction of sul2 abundance induced by tetracycline treatment since sul2 are located on the genomes of the two plasmids [35]. In addition, we summarized the types of the ARGs detected in the sludge separately fed with 0 and 20 mg/L tetracycline (Figure 4A). Most of the assigned sequencing reads were found to be involved in sulfonamide resistance in the sludge containing no tetracycline (84.78%) and the sludge fed with 20 mg/L tetracycline (28.35%). Figure 4A illustrates that the tetracycline selection pressure (20 mg/L) promoted multidrug, aminoglycoside and tetracycline (from 0.78% to 6.99%) resistances in the sludge. A previous study also indicated that incubation in the presence of tetracycline favored the emergence of multidrug-resistance mutants in Pseudomonas aeruginosa [37].
Figure 4. Antibiotic resistance patterns (A) and tet genes (B) in sludge treated with 0 mg/L (D6-0) and 20 mg/L (D6-20) tetracycline. The resistance genes identified were grouped according to antibiotic types after alignment of the high-throughput sequencing reads against antibiotic resistance database (ARDB). D6-0: sludge incubated with 0 mg/L tetracycline for 6 days; D6-20: sludge incubated with 20 mg/L tetracycline for 6 days.
Figure 4. Antibiotic resistance patterns (A) and tet genes (B) in sludge treated with 0 mg/L (D6-0) and 20 mg/L (D6-20) tetracycline. The resistance genes identified were grouped according to antibiotic types after alignment of the high-throughput sequencing reads against antibiotic resistance database (ARDB). D6-0: sludge incubated with 0 mg/L tetracycline for 6 days; D6-20: sludge incubated with 20 mg/L tetracycline for 6 days.
Ijms 15 10083 g004
PCRs showed that 11 tet genes among the 15 tested genes were present in the sludge, including tetA, tetB, tetC, tetG, tetK and tetP(A) encoding tetracycline efflux proteins, tetM, tetO, tetS and tetW encoding ribosomal protection proteins, and tetX encoding enzymatic modification protein (Figure S1). Previous studies showed that tetA, tetC and tetG were more abundant than other tet genes [11,38], so tetA, tetC and tetG were selected for qPCR to investigate the impact of tetracycline stress on the abundance of tet genes. TetC had higher abundance than tetA and tetG by an order of magnitude, which indicated that tetC might play an important role in tetracycline resistance in the STP sludge. After 6 days treatment, the sludge fed with 5 or 20 mg/L tetracycline had comparatively higher levels of tetA, tetC and tetG, but 1 mg/L tetracycline treatment posed no evident effect (p > 0.05) (Figure 5). The result is confirmed by metagenomic analysis showing that tetA, tetC and tetG genes increased from 0.09% to 3.11%, 0.18% to 0.97% and 0.09% to 1.17% after 6 days treatment with 20 mg/L tetracycline, respectively (Figure 4B). Enhancement of tetracycline concentration led to significant increase in the relative abundance of tetA, tetC and tetG (Figure 4B and Figure 5), which may result from the microbial community shift (Figure 2). Li et al. [13] reported a similar result that tetA and tetG significantly increased after tetracycline treatment. In this study, metagenomic analysis also indicated that the relative abundance of tetO, tetP(A), tetW, tetX and tet33 increased after tetracycline incubation, but some minor tet genes, e.g., tetP(B), tetV and tet32, had lower abundance in response of tetracycline treatment (Figure 4B). Zhang et al. [14] indicated that proliferation of the ARGs can be accelerated in the activated sludge under tetracycline pressure. qPCR results showed that the tet genes tended to have the highest abundance under the condition of 5 mg/L tetracycline (Figure 5), which is confirmed by the pyrosequencing results demonstrating that the bacterial community structure of the sludge treated with 5 mg/L tetracycline were evidently divergent from those of the other three sludge samples (Figure 2). Further, it is known that antibiotic treatment at subinhibitory concentrations can increase the rate of mutation, horizontal gene transfer and spread of antibiotic resistance [39].
Most of the functional genes are considered conserved, but a previous study [11] showed that tetG had an extremely high diversity in STPs. In this study, a total of 52 clones, including 26 clones from the sludge containing no tetracycline and 26 clones from the sludge incubated with 20 mg/L tetracycline, were selected to investigate the effect of tetracycline on diversity of tetG. Results showed that 19 tetG genotypes occurred in the sludge under no tetracycline stress and 21 genotypes were present in the sludge treated with 20 mg/L tetracycline.
Among the clones of sludge fed with no tetracycline, types G0-1 and G0-26 had a 100% identity to Salmonella typhimurium tetG (Y19117.1), and G0-9 were identified as the corresponding sequence of Stenotrophomonas sp. tetG (EF055281.1). Each of the types G0-8 and G0-25 had a similarity of 95% to the most closely related known gene: Mannheimia haemolytica tetG (AJ276217.1), while G0-5 and G0-22 had a sequence identity of only 94% to Ochrobactrum sp. tetG (EF055280.1) (Figure 6A). Tetracycline may increase the diversity of tetG, since five genotypes of tetG cloned from the sludge treated with 20 mg/L tetracycline could not be matched to the known tetG genes deposited in GenBank (Figure 6B). The selective pressure resulted from absorption of tetracycline by activated sludge may contribute to alterations on tetG DNA sequences [40].
Figure 5. Relative abundance of tetA, tetC and tetG in sludge fed with different concentrations of tetracycline for 6 days. qPCR was used to determine the relative abundance normalized to the total copy number of 16S rRNA genes in corresponding samples. ** p < 0.01, comparing 5 mg/L with 0 mg/L; * p < 0.05, comparing 20 mg/L with 0 mg/L.
Figure 5. Relative abundance of tetA, tetC and tetG in sludge fed with different concentrations of tetracycline for 6 days. qPCR was used to determine the relative abundance normalized to the total copy number of 16S rRNA genes in corresponding samples. ** p < 0.01, comparing 5 mg/L with 0 mg/L; * p < 0.05, comparing 20 mg/L with 0 mg/L.
Ijms 15 10083 g005
Figure 6. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic analysis of tetG diversity in activated sludge of D6-0 (A) and D6-20 (B). The tree was constructed using MEGA version 5.05 and bootstrap analysis with 1000 replicates was used to evaluate the significance of the nodes. D6-0: sludge fed with 0 mg/L tetracycline for 6 days; D6-20: sludge fed with 20 mg/L tetracycline for 6 days.
Figure 6. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic analysis of tetG diversity in activated sludge of D6-0 (A) and D6-20 (B). The tree was constructed using MEGA version 5.05 and bootstrap analysis with 1000 replicates was used to evaluate the significance of the nodes. D6-0: sludge fed with 0 mg/L tetracycline for 6 days; D6-20: sludge fed with 20 mg/L tetracycline for 6 days.
Ijms 15 10083 g006

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Batch Experiments

Untreated sewage wastewater (25 L) and activated sludge (5 L) were sampled from Jiangxinzhou STP (Nanjing, China). Water and sludge samples were transported on ice to lab within 2 h. Sewage was filtered by 0.45 μm nitrate cellulose membrane. Activated sludge was centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min under 4 °C, and the pellets were dissolved in 1 L of the filtered sewage water. In the batch assay, four 500 mL glass flasks with activated sludge mixed liquor (300 mL) separately containing 0, 1, 5 and 20 mg/L tetracycline [8,10,12,13] were run continuously at (26 ± 1) °C for 6 days. The glass flasks were cultured in a shaking incubator at 140 rpm for the aeration and mixing, and the incubator was covered with aluminum foil to avoid possible tetracycline photolysis. Every 24 h for 6 days, one third (100 mL, v/v) of the sludge samples were taken out from the reactors for biomass determination and DNA extraction. The remaining mixed liquor (200 mL) was centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min under 4 °C. The pellets were transferred back to the reactors and then re-suspended with 300 mL filtered sewage containing corresponding concentrations of tetracycline (0, 1, 5 or 20 mg/L) for subsequent 24-h culture.

3.2. DNA Extraction and PCR

For DNA protection, activated sludge was sampled from the reactors every 24 h and mixed with 100% ethanol immediately at a ratio of 1:1 (v/v). The mixture was centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min under 4 °C to collect the pellets (approximately 200 mg) for DNA extraction. The total DNA extraction was conducted using the FastDNA SPIN Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA). The DNA concentrations and purity were determined through microspectrophotometry (NanoDrop®ND-2000, NanoDrop Technologies, Willmington, DE, USA). The DNA products were stored at −20 °C until further molecular analyses.
According to the previous studies, 15 tet genes were amplified using primers listed in Table S5 in a 30-μL reaction mixture containing 1× PCR buffer, 100 μM dNTP, 2 pmol of each primer, 150 ng of template DNA and 1 U of EX Taq polymerase (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan). TetO and tetS were amplified using the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 7 min, followed by 40 cycles of 94 °C for 15 s, 50.3 °C (tetO) or 56 °C (tetS) for 30 s and 72 °C for 30 s, with a final extension of 72 °C for 7 min. PCR of tetW was carried out through: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 25 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 64 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 30 s, with a final extension of 72 °C for 7 min. For the other 12 tet genes, PCR amplification was conducted according to the following protocols: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing for 1 min at different temperatures (Table S5) and extension at 72 °C for 1.5 min, with a final elongation step at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products obtained were analyzed by gel electrophoresis using 1% (w/v) agarose in 1× TAE buffer and further confirmed by DNA sequencing. To check reproducibility, duplicate PCR reactions were performed for each sample and sterile water was used as the negative control. The PCR products (longer than 200 bp) sequencing data were deposited in NCBI under accession number KJ603161~KJ603167.

3.3. Quantitative Real-Time PCR

TetA, tetC and tetG were selected for quantitative assay using SYBR Green I qPCR. The plasmids containing target genes were obtained by molecular cloning. In detail, the PCR products of each tet gene were purified using the DNA Fragment Purification Kit (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan) and cloned into the pMD19-T Vector (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan). Plasmids carrying each tet gene were extracted and purified using the MiniBest Plasmid Purification Kit (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan). Plasmid concentrations were determined by NanoDrop®ND-2000 (NanoDrop Technologies, Willmington, DE, USA). qPCRs were performed in 96-well plates with a final volume of 20 μL containing SYBR Premix EX Taq (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan) super mix (10 μL), 10 μM primer (0.2 μL each), DNA templates (8 μL) and ddH2O (1.6 μL). Thermal cycling and fluorescence detection were conducted in Corbett Real-Time PCR with the Rotor-Gene 6000 Series Software 1.7 (QIAGEN, Nijmegen Area, The Netherlands). qPCR were performed using the following protocol: 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at different temperatures (Table S5) for 45 s, and extension at 72 °C for 45 s. Each reaction was run in triplicate.
Five to seven-point calibration curves (Ct value versus log of initial tet gene copy) were generated for qPCR using 10-fold serial dilution of the tet-carrying plasmids. The PCR efficiency of each gene ranged from 92.1% to 102.6% with R2 values more than 0.995 for all calibration curves. Based on the calibration curves, the abundance of tet genes were calculated through the Ct values of the experimental samples. To minimize the potential variations in extraction efficiencies, eubacterial 16S rRNA genes were quantified using the method recommended by López-Gutiérrez et al. [41], and the relative abundance of tet genes was normalized to the total bacterial community.

3.4. Cloning and Phylogenetic Analysis of tetG

The PCR products of tetG were cloned to investigate the diversity of the genes in the sludge treated with 0 and 20 mg/L for 6 days. The purified PCR products were cloned to pMD19-T Vector (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan). A total of 52 clones were randomly selected for the library construction, sequencing and subsequent similarity analysis. Nucleotide sequences of tetG were aligned using CLUSTALW [42]. The clones sharing a consensus sequence were grouped into one genotype, and only one representative in each group was selected for construction of phylogenetic trees. The GenBank sequences having the highest identity to the sequences obtained in this study were retrieved for phylogenetic trees construction. The neighbor-joining trees were constructed using Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA version 5.05) [42] and bootstrap analysis with 1000 replicates was conducted to evaluate the significance of the nodes. The 52 sequences of tetG cloning obtained in this study have been deposited in NCBI (Accession number: KJ603168~KJ603219).

3.5. 454 Pyrosequencing

The DNA extracted from activated sludge dosed with different levels of tetracycline (0, 1, 5 and 20 mg/L) for 6 days were subjected to Beijing Genome Institute (Shenzhen, China) for 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing. The primers, V3F (5'-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3') and V4R (5'-TACNVGGGTATCTAATCC-3'), targeting the hypervariable V3–V4 region (about 460 bp) were used to amplify the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. PCRs were conducted in a reaction system (50 μL) containing 1× Pfx Amplification Buffer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 0.4 mM dNTP, 2 mM MgSO4, 0.4 μM each fusion primer, 1 μL of template DNA and 2 U of Platinum® Pfx DNA Polymerase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The 10 nucleotide “barcode” was permuted for each sample to separate the corresponding reads from the data pool generated in a single pyrosequencing run. PCR amplification was performed according to the following protocols: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 62 °C for 30 s and 70 °C for 45 s, with a final elongation step at 70 °C for 7 min. In order to minimize the impact of potential early-round PCR errors, amplicon libraries were prepared by a cocktail of three independent PCR products for each sample. The PCR products were purified using QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and quantified with an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilnet, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Equal DNA mass of each purified amplicon library from different samples were mixed for pyrosequencing on the Roche 454 FLX Titanium platform (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA) at Beijing Genome Institute (Shenzhen, China). The sequencing data were deposited in NCBI Sequence Read Archive under accession number SRP035342.

3.6. Illumina High-Throughput Sequencing

The metagenomic DNA extracted from the sludge cultured with 0 and 20 mg/L tetracycline was individually subjected to high-throughput sequencing using Illumina Hiseq 2000 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The “Index 101 PE” (Paired End sequencing, 101-bp reads and 8-bp index sequence) sequencing strategy was used for the high-throughput sequencing, which generates nearly equal amount of clean reads for each sample. A base-calling pipeline (Sequencing Control Software, Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) was applied to process the raw fluorescent images and the call sequences. The raw reads containing three or more “N” or contaminated by adapter (>15 bp overlap) were removed, and the filtered clean reads (about 1.6 Gb per each sample) were used for further metagenomic analyses. The sequencing data were deposited in the metagenomics RAST server (MG-RAST) [43] under accession number 4494851.3 (sludge treated with 20 mg/L tetracycline) and 4494856.3 (sludge without tetracycline treatment).

3.7. Bioinformatics Analysis

After 454 pyrosequencing, all the reads were subjected to the Pyrosequencing Pipeline Initial Process [44] of the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP): (1) To sort the reads to the designated sample based on their nucleotide barcode; (2) To trim off the adapters and barcodes using the default parameters; and (3) To remove sequences containing ambiguous “N” or shorter than 200 bp [45]. Sequences were de-noised using the “pre.cluster” command in the Mothur platform to remove the erroneous sequences due to pyrosequencing errors [46,47]. PCR chimeras were filtered out using Chimera Slayer [48]. The reads marked as chimeras were extracted and submitted to RDP. Those being assigned to any known genus with 90% confidence were integrated with the non-chimera reads [49], to form the “effective sequences”. The effective sequences of each sample were resubmitted to the RDP Classifier [50] to identify the archaeal and bacterial sequences, and the unexpected archaeal sequences were manually removed. In order to study the tetracycline effect on microbial communities, the samples of day 6 were individually selected for pyrosequencing, which generated a total of 42,556 reads for the four samples. As shown in Table 1, low quality reads were filtered using RDP and the effective reads were obtained after trimming the adapters, barcodes and primers. After denoising, filtering out chimeras and removing the archaeal sequences, the minimum number of bacterial sequences in the four samples was 7097. To fairly compare the four samples at the same sequencing depth, the number of the sequences from each sample was normalized to be 7097 for subsequent bioinformatics analyses. Taxonomic assignment of the sequences was separately performed using the RDP’s Classifier. A bootstrap cutoff of 80% was applied to assign the sequences to different taxonomy levels. Richness and diversity indices including OTUs, Chao 1 estimator and Shannon index, as well as rarefaction curves, were calculated using the relevant RDP modules, including Rarefaction and Shannon & Chao1 index.
Illumina sequencing reads were aligned against a self-established database via off-line BLAST to identify ARGs and plasmids in the sludge samples. A protein database of ARGs were created by downloading all sequences in ARDB (7828 sequences) [51]. A read was identified as an ARG according to its best BLAST hit (blastx) if the similarity was above 90% and the alignments was at least 25 amino acids [35]. The nucleotide sequences of plasmids were downloaded from NCBI RefSeq database (2408 plasmid genome sequences). A read was annotated as plasmids if the best BLAST hits (blastn) had a nucleotide sequence similarity >95% over at least 90 bp alignment [35].

4. Conclusions

Tetracycline treatment can affect bacterial community structure and increase total abundance and diversity of tet genes in the STP sludge, but tends to reduce the abundance of sul2 predominant in the sludge without tetracycline treatment. Several genera of TRB, including Sulfuritalea, Armatimonas, Prosthecobacter, Hyphomicrobium, Azonexus, Longilinea, Paracoccus, Novosphingobium and Rhodobacter are present in the sludge. Comparatively, antibiotic treatment at subinhibitory concentrations can pose greater effects on the bacterial community composition. The microbial community shift may be responsible for the ARGs distribution patterns variation induced by the tetracycline treatment. As a culture-independent method, pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA gene provides a comprehensive insight into microbial community structure of ARB. Illumina high-throughput sequencing offers enough sequencing depth for metagenomic analysis of ARGs. Combined use of 454 pyrosequencing and Illumina high-throughput sequencing is considered a promising tool for exploration of ARB and ARGs in the environment.

Supplementary Files

  • Supplementary File 1:

    Supplementary Information (PDF, 707 KB)

  • Acknowledgments

    This study was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51008153 and 51278240) and Environmental Protection Research Foundation of Jiangsu Province (China) (2012044 and 2012045).

    Author Contributions

    Conceived and designed the experiments: Kailong Huang, Xu-Xiang Zhang and Hongqiang Ren; Performed the experiments: Kailong Huang and Junying Tang; Analyzed the data: Kailong Huang, Xu-Xiang Zhang and Hongqiang Ren; Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: Xu-Xiang Zhang, Ke Xu and Hongqiang Ren; Wrote the paper: Kailong Huang, Xu-Xiang Zhang and Hongqiang Ren.

    Conflicts of Interest

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.

    References

    1. Kümmerer, K. Resistance in the environment. J. Antimicrob. Chemoth. 2004, 54, 311–320. [Google Scholar]
    2. Levy, S.B.; Marshall, B. Antibacterial resistance worldwide: Causes, challenges and responses. Nat. Med. 2004, 10, 122–129. [Google Scholar]
    3. Walsh, T.R.; Weeks, J.; Livermore, D.M.; Toleman, M.A. Dissemination of NDM-1 positive bacteria in the New Delhi environment and its implications for human health: An environmental point prevalence study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2011, 11, 355–362. [Google Scholar]
    4. Sarmah, A.K.; Meyer, M.T.; Boxall, A. A global perspective on the use, sales, exposure pathways, occurrence, fate and effects of veterinary antibiotics (VAs) in the environmt. Chemosphere 2006, 65, 725–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    5. Kim, H.; Hong, Y.; Park, J.-E.; Sharma, V.K.; Cho, S.-I. Sulfonamides and tetracyclines in livestock wastewater. Chemosphere 2013, 91, 888–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    6. Ben, W.; Qiang, Z.; Adams, C.; Zhang, H.; Chen, L. Simultaneous determination of sulfonamides, tetracyclines and tiamulin in swine wastewater by solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2008, 1202, 173–180. [Google Scholar]
    7. Li, B.; Zhang, T.; Xu, Z.; Fang, H.H.P. Rapid analysis of 21 antibiotics of multiple classes in municipal wastewater using ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 2009, 645, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    8. Gao, P.; Munir, M.; Xagoraraki, I. Correlation of tetracycline and sulfonamide antibiotics with corresponding resistance genes and resistant bacteria in a conventional municipal wastewater treatment plant. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 421, 173–183. [Google Scholar]
    9. Taviani, E.; Ceccarelli, D.; Lazaro, N.; Bani, S.; Cappuccinelli, P.; Colwell, R.R.; Colombo, M.M. Environmental Vibrio spp., isolated in Mozambique, contain a polymorphic group of integrative conjugative elements and class 1 integrons. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2008, 64, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    10. Zhang, T.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, X.-X.; Fang, H.H. Tetracycline resistance genes and tetracycline resistant lactose-fermenting Enterobacteriaceae in activated sludge of sewage treatment plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 3455–3460. [Google Scholar]
    11. Zhang, X.-X.; Zhang, T. Occurrence, abundance, and diversity of tetracycline resistance genes in 15 sewage treatment plants across China and other global locations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 2598–2604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    12. Kim, S.; Jensen, J.N.; Aga, D.S.; Weber, A.S. Tetracycline as a selector for resistant bacteria in activated sludge. Chemosphere 2007, 66, 1643–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    13. Li, B.; Zhang, X.-X.; Guo, F.; Wu, W.; Zhang, T. Characterization of tetracycline resistant bacterial community in saline activated sludge using batch stress incubation with high-throughput sequencing analysis. Water Res. 2013, 47, 4207–4216. [Google Scholar]
    14. Zhang, W.; Huang, M.-H.; Qi, F.-F.; Sun, P.-Z.; van Ginkel, S.W. Effect of trace tetracycline concentrations on the structure of a microbial community and the development of tetracycline resistance genes in sequencing batch reactors. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 150, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    15. Walsh, F.; Cooke, N.M.; Smith, S.G.; Moran, G.P.; Cooke, F.J.; Ivens, A.; Wain, J.; Rogers, T.R. Comparison of two DNA microarrays for detection of plasmid-mediated antimicrobial resistance and virulence factor genes in clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and non-Enterobacteriaceae. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agent 2010, 35, 593–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    16. Roesch, L.F.; Fulthorpe, R.R.; Riva, A.; Casella, G.; Hadwin, A.K.; Kent, A.D.; Daroub, S.H.; Camargo, F.A.; Farmerie, W.G.; Triplett, E.W. Pyrosequencing enumerates and contrasts soil microbial diversity. ISME J. 2007, 1, 283–290. [Google Scholar]
    17. Qin, J.; Li, R.; Raes, J.; Arumugam, M.; Burgdorf, K.S.; Manichanh, C.; Nielsen, T.; Pons, N.; Levenez, F.; Yamada, T. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 2010, 464, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [Green Version]
    18. Håvelsrud, O.; Haverkamp, T.; Kristensen, T.; Jakobsen, K.; Rike, A. Metagenomic and geochemical characterization of pockmarked sediments overlaying the Troll petroleum reservoir in the North Sea. BMC Microbiol. 2012, 12, 203. [Google Scholar] [Green Version]
    19. Ye, L.; Zhang, T.; Wang, T.; Fang, Z. Microbial structures, functions, and metabolic pathways in wastewater treatment bioreactors revealed using high-throughput sequencing. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 13244–13252. [Google Scholar]
    20. Li, D.; Qi, R.; Yang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, T. Bacterial community characteristics under long-term antibiotic selection pressures. Water Res. 2011, 45, 6063–6073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    21. Czárán, T.L.; Hoekstra, R.F.; Pagie, L. Chemical warfare between microbes promotes biodiversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 786–790. [Google Scholar]
    22. Lozada, M.; Figuerola, E.L.M.; Itria, R.F.; Erijman, L. Replicability of dominant bacterial populations after long-term surfactant-enrichment in lab-scale activated sludge. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 8, 625–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    23. Kobashi, Y.; Hasebe, A.; Nishio, M.; Uchiyama, H. Diversity of tetracycline resistance genes in bacteria isolated from various agricultural environments. Microbes Environ. 2007, 22, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    24. Li, D.; Yu, T.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, M.; Li, Z.; Liu, M.; Qi, R. Antibiotic resistance characteristics of environmental bacteria from an oxytetracycline production wastewater treatment plant and the receiving river. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2010, 76, 3444–3451. [Google Scholar]
    25. Deng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, Y.; Li, D.; Liu, R.; Liu, M.; Zhang, H.; Hu, B.; Yu, T.; Yang, M. Microbial community compositional analysis for series reactors treating high level antibiotic wastewater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 46, 795–801. [Google Scholar]
    26. Vacková, L.; Srb, M.; Stloukal, R.; Wanner, J. Comparison of denitrification at low temperature using encapsulated Paracoccus denitrificans, Pseudomonas fluorescens and mixed culture. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 4661–4666. [Google Scholar]
    27. Kojima, H.; Fukui, M. Sulfuritalea hydrogenivorans gen. nov., sp. nov., a facultative autotroph isolated from a freshwater lake. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2011, 61, 1651–1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    28. Quan, Z.-X.; Im, W.-T.; Lee, S.-T. Azonexus caeni sp. nov., a denitrifying bacterium isolated from sludge of a wastewater treatment plant. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2006, 56, 1043–1046. [Google Scholar]
    29. Kim, J.K.; Lee, B.-K.; Kim, S.-H.; Moon, J.-H. Characterization of denitrifying photosynthetic bacteria isolated from photosynthetic sludge. Aquacult. Eng. 1999, 19, 179–193. [Google Scholar]
    30. McDonald, I.R.; Doronina, N.V.; Trotsenko, Y.A.; McAnulla, C.; Murrell, J.C. Hyphomicrobium chloromethanicum sp. nov. and Methylobacterium chloromethanicum sp. nov., chloromethane-utilizing bacteria isolated from a polluted environment. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2001, 51, 119–122. [Google Scholar]
    31. Tiirola, M.A.; Männistö, M.K.; Puhakka, J.A.; Kulomaa, M.S. Isolation and characterization of Novosphingobium sp. strain MT1, a dominant polychlorophenol-degrading strain in a groundwater bioremediation system. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 173–180. [Google Scholar]
    32. Yuan, J.; Lai, Q.; Zheng, T.; Shao, Z. Novosphingobium indicum sp. nov., a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacterium isolated from a deep-sea environment. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2009, 59, 2084–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    33. Liu, Z.-P.; Wang, B.-J.; Liu, Y.-H.; Liu, S.-J. Novosphingobium taihuense sp. nov., a novel aromatic-compound-degrading bacterium isolated from Taihu Lake, China. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 1229–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    34. Fujii, K.; Satomi, M.; Morita, N.; Motomura, T.; Tanaka, T.; Kikuchi, S. Novosphingobium tardaugens sp. nov., an oestradiol-degrading bacterium isolated from activated sludge of a sewage treatment plant in Tokyo. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2003, 53, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    35. Kristiansson, E.; Fick, J.; Janzon, A.; Grabic, R.; Rutgersson, C.; Weijdegård, B.; Söderström, H.; Larsson, D.J. Pyrosequencing of antibiotic-contaminated river sediments reveals high levels of resistance and gene transfer elements. PLoS One 2011, 6, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
    36. Stevens, D.L.; Higbee, J.W.; Oberhofer, T.R.; Everett, E.D. Antibiotic susceptibilities of human isolates of Pasteurella. multocida. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1979, 16, 322–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    37. Alonso, A.; Campanario, E.; Martinez, J.L. Emergence of multidrug-resistant mutants is increased under antibiotic selective pressure in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiol-Sgm 1999, 145, 2857–2862. [Google Scholar]
    38. Auerbach, E.A.; Seyfried, E.E.; McMahon, K.D. Tetracycline resistance genes in activated sludge wastewater treatment plants. Water Res. 2007, 41, 1143–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    39. Laureti, L.; Matic, I.; Gutierrez, A. Bacterial responses and genome instability induced by subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics. Antibiotics 2013, 2, 100–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    40. Li, B.; Zhang, T. Biodegradation and adsorption of antibiotics in the activated sludge process. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 3468–3473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    41. López-Gutiérrez, J.C.; Henry, S.; Hallet, S.; Martin-Laurent, F.; Catroux, G.; Philippot, L. Quantification of a novel group of nitrate-reducing bacteria in the environment by real-time PCR. J. Microbiol. Meth. 2004, 57, 399–407. [Google Scholar]
    42. Tamura, K.; Peterson, D.; Peterson, N.; Stecher, G.; Nei, M.; Kumar, S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28, 2731–2739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    43. Meyer, F.; Paarmann, D.; D’Souza, M.; Olson, R.; Glass, E.M.; Kubal, M.; Paczian, T.; Rodriguez, A.; Stevens, R.; Wilke, A.; et al. The metagenomics RAST server–a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes. BMC Bioinform. 2008, 9, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
    44. Cole, J.R.; Wang, Q.; Cardenas, E.; Fish, J.; Chai, B.; Farris, R.J.; Kulam-Syed-Mohideen, A.S.; McGarrell, D.M.; Marsh, T.; Garrity, G.M. The ribosomal database project: Improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, 141–145. [Google Scholar]
    45. Claesson, M.J.; O’Sullivan, O.; Wang, Q.; Nikkila, J.; Marchesi, J.R.; Smidt, H.; de Vos, W.M.; Ross, R.P.; O’Toole, P.W. Comparative analysis of pyrosequencing and a phylogenetic microarray for exploring microbial community structures in the human distal intestine. PLoS One 2009, 4, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
    46. Huse, S.M.; Welch, D.M.; Morrison, H.G.; Sogin, M.L. Ironing out the wrinkles in the rare biosphere through improved OTU clustering. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 12, 1889–1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    47. Roeselers, G.; Mittge, E.K.; Stephens, W.Z.; Parichy, D.M.; Cavanaugh, C.M.; Guillemin, K.; Rawls, J.F. Evidence for a core gut microbiota in the zebrafish. ISME J. 2011, 5, 1595–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    48. Haas, B.J.; Gevers, D.; Earl, A.M.; Feldgarden, M.; Ward, D.V.; Giannoukos, G.; Ciulla, D.; Tabbaa, D.; Highlander, S.K.; Sodergren, E. Chimeric 16S rRNA sequence formation and detection in Sanger and 454-pyrosequenced PCR amplicons. Genome Res. 2011, 21, 494–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    49. Zhang, T.; Shao, M-F.; Ye, L. 454 Pyrosequencing reveals bacterial diversity of activated sludge from 14 sewage treatment plants. ISME J. 2012, 6, 1137–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    50. Wang, Q.; Garrity, G.M.; Tiedje, J.M.; Cole, J.R. Naive bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 5261–5267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
    51. Liu, B.; Pop, M. ARDB-Antibiotic Resistance Genes Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, 443–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

    Share and Cite

    MDPI and ACS Style

    Huang, K.; Tang, J.; Zhang, X.-X.; Xu, K.; Ren, H. A Comprehensive Insight into Tetracycline Resistant Bacteria and Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Activated Sludge Using Next-Generation Sequencing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 10083-10100. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms150610083

    AMA Style

    Huang K, Tang J, Zhang X-X, Xu K, Ren H. A Comprehensive Insight into Tetracycline Resistant Bacteria and Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Activated Sludge Using Next-Generation Sequencing. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2014; 15(6):10083-10100. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms150610083

    Chicago/Turabian Style

    Huang, Kailong, Junying Tang, Xu-Xiang Zhang, Ke Xu, and Hongqiang Ren. 2014. "A Comprehensive Insight into Tetracycline Resistant Bacteria and Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Activated Sludge Using Next-Generation Sequencing" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 15, no. 6: 10083-10100. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms150610083

    Article Metrics

    Back to TopTop