Next Article in Journal
Immunoproteome of Aspergillus fumigatus Using Sera of Patients with Invasive Aspergillosis
Next Article in Special Issue
RNA Recognition and Stress Granule Formation by TIA Proteins
Previous Article in Journal
MicroRNAs, Genomic Instability and Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Role of Sam68 in Post-Transcriptional Gene Regulation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 15
Issue 8
10.3390/ijms150814492
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

High-Resolution Imaging Reveals New Features of Nuclear Export of mRNA through the Nuclear Pore Complexes

by
Joseph M. Kelich
and
Weidong Yang
*
Department of Biology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15(8), 14492-14504; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms150814492
Submission received: 10 July 2014 / Revised: 8 August 2014 / Accepted: 15 August 2014 / Published: 20 August 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Post-Transcriptional Gene Regulation by Ribonucleoprotein Complexes)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The nuclear envelope (NE) of eukaryotic cells provides a physical barrier for messenger RNA (mRNA) and the associated proteins (mRNPs) traveling from sites of transcription in the nucleus to locations of translation processing in the cytoplasm. Nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) embedded in the NE serve as a dominant gateway for nuclear export of mRNA. However, the fundamental characterization of export dynamics of mRNPs through the NPC has been hindered by several technical limits. First, the size of NPC that is barely below the diffraction limit of conventional light microscopy requires a super-resolution microscopy imaging approach. Next, the fast transit of mRNPs through the NPC further demands a high temporal resolution by the imaging approach. Finally, the inherent three-dimensional (3D) movements of mRNPs through the NPC demand the method to provide a 3D mapping of both transport kinetics and transport pathways of mRNPs. This review will highlight the recently developed super-resolution imaging techniques advanced from 1D to 3D for nuclear export of mRNPs and summarize the new features in the dynamic nuclear export process of mRNPs revealed from these technical advances.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The presence of the double-membrane nuclear envelope (NE) in eukaryotic cells provides a physical barrier that transcribed mRNA generated in the nucleus must overcome to reach the cytoplasm, whereupon translation can occur on ribosomes generating the corresponding proteins encoded by these transcripts [1,2,3]. Prior to nuclear export, mRNA must first be processed by 5' capping, intron splicing, and polyadenylation [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. In addition, mRNA must become packaged into messenger ribonucleoprotein particles (mRNPs) comprising mRNA as well as adaptor proteins and export factors required for efficient nuclear export [13,14,15,16]. Although a recent study has suggested a membrane budding approach for mRNP nuclear export [17], the dominant pathway of mRNP exiting the nucleus is still gated by nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) embedded in the NE.
Two distinct categories of nucleocytoplasmic transport have been identified: passive diffusion and facilitated translocation. The former is reserved for signal-independent diffusing molecules that are smaller than 40 kDa, and the latter ensures efficient and timely translation of signal-dependent cargo molecules assisted by transport receptors through the NPC [18,19,20,21,22]. Moreover, passively diffusing molecules take a transport route consistent with a size-confinement mechanism through a central axial channel [20,23,24]. On the other hand, the facilitated translocation involves extensive interactions between transport receptors and intrinsically disordered nucleoporins (Nups) rich in phenylalanine-glycine (FG) repeats. These FG-Nups comprise one third of all Nups of the NPC and together create a selectively permeable entropic barrier in arguably a form of “polymer brush” or a form of “hydrogel meshwork” for transiting macromolecules [19,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. Human mRNPs are large particles with sizes up to 100 MDa [21] that generally require the transport receptor Tap forming a heterodimer with the cofactor p15 to chaperone them through the NPC via interactions between Tap-p15 and the FG Nups [32,33,34]. Furthermore, several other protein complexes have been shown to regulate the human mRNA export process through differing mechanisms including regulation by the transcription and export complex (TREX), and the more recently discovered TREX-2 complex (by its scaffold protein GAMP), both of which function to couple transcription of intron-less, and intron containing mRNAs to nuclear export [35,36,37,38]. The multi-subunit THO complex (THO) is a component of TREX and has been pinpointed as a requirement for nuclear export of polyadenylated RNA, spliced mRNA, mRNA coding for proteins involved in hematopoiesis, as well as for regulation of pluripotency gene mRNA export [39,40]. An additional mechanism has been discovered involving inositol polyphosphate multikinase (IPMK), which regulates transcript-selective nuclear mRNA export to retain genome integrity in humans [41].

2. A High-Resolution Microscopy Imaging Approach Is Needed to Look Inside the Nuclear Pore Complex (NPC)

Electron microscopy (EM) has revealed the physical structure of the NPC prepared from the chemical-fixed or frozen cell samples. In detail, the NPC is approximately (~180 nm) in length, consisting of the cytoplasmic fibrils (~50 nm), the central scaffold (~40 nm) and the nuclear basket (~90 nm) (Figure 1) [42,43,44,45,46]. Moreover, EM has enabled people to visualize details of mRNPs in the NPC due to its high spatial resolution of ≤1–5 nm [47,48]. Early imaging of salivary gland tissue of Chironomus tentans led to descriptions of “balbiani rings”, through which mRNPs were localized and visualized [49,50,51,52]. Additionally, EM data have shown that these mRNPs were elongated during their interaction with the NPC and exported as a linear molecule through the NPC contrasting with the “puff” or “ring” shape of mRNPs observed at other stages of the export process [21,50,53,54]. While helpful in obtaining information from static visualizations of mRNPs in fixed or frozen cells, EM still lacks the in vivo capabilities and temporal resolution necessary to capture accurate export kinetics and real-time pathways for mRNPs through NPCs [55,56,57].
Ijms 15 14492 g001 1024
Figure 1. Cartoon image of a nuclear pore complex depicting its length and central axial channel (orange lettering) [42,43,44,45]. Both the nuclear pore complexes (NPC) and the axial channel are below the size of point spread function (PSF) (~250 nm in x and y plane) of conventional light microscopy. The PSF is represented by the light-blue circled area [20,23,45,52,53,54,55].
Figure 1. Cartoon image of a nuclear pore complex depicting its length and central axial channel (orange lettering) [42,43,44,45]. Both the nuclear pore complexes (NPC) and the axial channel are below the size of point spread function (PSF) (~250 nm in x and y plane) of conventional light microscopy. The PSF is represented by the light-blue circled area [20,23,45,52,53,54,55].
Ijms 15 14492 g001
Fluorescence microscopy has the advantage of imaging substrates with site-specific fluorescent tags within living cells. Spatial distributions and dynamics of bulk mRNPs labeled by fluorophores in live cells have been well studied using fluorescence microscopy. But the real-time export details of mRNPs in the NPCs of live cells remain largely unknown because of the NPC’s sub-micrometer size. Although it is extremely large relative to the majority of cellular structures, the NPC is still barely below the diffraction-limit point spread function (PSF, ~250 nm in x and y plane and ~750 nm in z dimension) of conventional light microscopy (Figure 1) [58,59,60,61]. Furthermore, the central axial channel of the NPC that ranges from 10 to 17 nm in diameter falls even farther below this diffraction limit [23,42,43,44,45]. Fortunately, single-molecule tracking and super-resolution microscopic technology have recently been developed breaking the limitations of light diffraction of conventional fluorescence microscopy and allowing for super-resolution imaging. So far, several different single-molecule super-resolution fluorescence microscopy approaches have been successfully been applied to elucidate the transport kinetics and spatial routes of mRNPs in live cells (Table 1). These new methodologies have added for the first time the real-time export dynamic pictures of single mRNP molecules within the native NPCs into the static diagram of NPC structure obtained by EM, forming a comprehensive story for mRNP export through the NPC.
Table
Table 1. Overview of single-molecule techniques applied to mRNA nuclear export.
Table 1. Overview of single-molecule techniques applied to mRNA nuclear export.
Imaging MethodCell TypeRNA Type (Size in kb)Illumination AreaSpatiotemporal ResolutionMajor ConclusionsReference
Wide-field epi-fluorescence microscopyU2OSHuman (4.8, 8, 14)NEN/A nm, 1000 msmRNP nuclear export occurs faster than nucleoplasmic diffusion. Transcription, transport, and export occur between 5 and 40 min.[62]
Super-registration microscopyMouse embryo fibroblastsβ-Actin (3.3)NE25 nm, 20 msmRNA nuclear export includes a three-step process composed of docking, transport, and release with durations at ~80, 5–0, and ~80 ms respectively. mRNA movement is not limited to one direction within the NPC, and not all nuclear pores observed were equally active in mRNA export.[63]
Light sheet microscopyC. tentans salivary glandC. tentans (Up to 40)NE10 nm, 20 ms~25% of mRNPs successfully export through the NPC. Export time was determined to be between 65 ms to several seconds. With a dwell time of ~55 ms, Dbp5 interacts with the NPC most frequently from the cytoplasmic side.[64]
SPEED microscopyHeLaFirefly Luciferase (3.3)NPC8 nm, 2 ms~36% of mRNPs interacting with NPC successfully complete the export process. During their ~12 ms transport time, mRNPs adopt a fast-slow-fast diffusion pattern while interacting with the periphery of the NPC and rarely enter the central axial conduit reserved for passive diffusion revealed by a 3D reconstruction of the export route for mRNPs through the NPC in live cells.[65]
Abbreviations: NE, nuclear envelope; N/A, not available; NPC, nuclear pore complexes; mRNP, messenger ribonucleoprotein particles; SPEED, single-point edge-excitation sub-diffraction.

3. Various Single-Molecule Techniques Applied to Map Messenger Ribonucleoprotein Particles (mRNP) Export through the NPC

With yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) tagged mRNA transcripts and mCherry-labeled NPCs, Mor et al. [62] employed wide-field epi-fluorescence microscopy to track nuclear export of single mRNP molecules containing various larger mRNA constructs (14, 8, and 4.8 kb) in living cells (Table 1). Particularly, mRNPs were imaged via YFP fused MS2 coat proteins specific to different forms of human dystrophin mRNAs, transcribed in transfected U2OS cells. Taking advantage of the large field of illumination provided by wide-field imaging, many single mRNPs were simultaneously visualized in the nuclear as well as cytoplasmic portions of the cell. By quantifying single mRNPs in these cellular locales over time, a timeframe for cumulative transcription, transport and export of mRNA was estimated between 5 and 40 min with concentrations in the nucleoplasm remaining approximately constant due to continued transcription (Table 1). The temporal accuracy provided by the charge-coupled device (CCD) camera incorporated into the optical setup allowed for a frame rate of 1s per frame. Single mRNPs were recorded to cross the fluorescent NE as transported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm resulting in a transport rate fifteen times faster than simple diffusion in nucleoplasm, backing up the model for facilitated transport of mRNPs through the NPC [62,66].
With further modifications of wide-field epi-fluorescence setups, super-registration microscopy has been achieved by spatially registering two sources of emission fluorescence separated by a dichroic filter onto two pre-aligned CCD cameras. Thus, it was possible to image the mCherry-labeled NPCs and YFP-tagged endogenous β-actin mRNPs due to the super-registration set up. To achieve the labeling of native β-actin mRNA, the experimental design incorporated a transgenic mouse cell line in which YFP–MS2 proteins associated with endogenous β-actin mRNAs providing the advantage of imaging mRNA within its natural cellular environment. With a spatial and temporal resolution of 25 nm and 20 ms, super-registration microscopy revealed a three-step model for mRNA export through the NPC within a total transport time of ~180 ms, composed of docking (~80 ms), transport (5–20 ms) and release (~80 ms) processes (Table 1). Positional data of detected single mRNPs relative to the NPC center resulted in more interaction sites at the nucleoplasmic and cytoplasmic faces of the NPC compared to the central channel. One dimensional (1D) diffusion coefficient of mRNPs were determined from this data favoring a model in which nuclear export of mRNPs occurs faster during the central channel than the docking and the release steps on the nuclear and cytoplasmic regions of the NPC. Additionally, it was determined that not all NPCs are equally active in exporting mRNPs, and bidirectional movement of mRNPs is possible within the NPC [63].
Soon after, light sheet microscopy (LSM) was exploited to image single mRNP molecules exporting through the NPC in live cells. In contrast to wide-field epi-fluorescence microscopy and super-registration microscopy, the excitation laser beam in LSM penetrates the sample perpendicular to the direction of detection. The laser illumination profile is modified to produce a thin light sheet that can be used for optical sectioning. Since only a narrow strip of sample is illuminated at one time, photobleaching and phototoxic effects are minimal outside of the focused region and the lack of unwanted background fluorescence results in good signal to noise ratio [67,68,69,70]. mRNA nuclear export in a Chironomus tentans salivary gland cell system was mapped by LSM with a spatiotemporal resolution of ~10 nm and 20 ms (Table 1). In detail, endogenous individual mRNP was tracked via an Alexa-fluor-647-hrp36 fusion protein microinjected into the cells. Hrp36 is a ribonucleoprotein that associates with mRNA during the packing process resulting in mRNPs and remains associated with mRNPs until the start of translation. When fluorescently labeled, Hrp36 provided a tag thought to be less disturbing to the natural export machinery than MS2 coat proteins and also allowed different-sized endogenous mRNA to be imaged. To act as a reference point for tracking nucleocytoplasmic transport, the NE was illuminated by Alexa-fluor-546 labeled NTF2, a transport receptor known to facilitate RanGDP import into the nucleus [71,72,73]. By tracking these single fluorescent mRNPs in relation to labeled NE, it was determined that ~25% of mRNPs interacting with the NE successfully exported from the nucleus into the cytoplasm and the rest: ~75% returned to the nucleus. Nuclear export time was found to range from 65 ms to several seconds, suggesting different dwell times needed for tagged mRNPs of various sizes to transport through the NPC. In this work, Dbp5, a helicase necessary for mRNA export [54,74,75] was also fluorescently labeled and visualized in live cells, where it was seen to interact most frequently on the cytoplasmic sides of NPCs for a time of ~55 ms [64].
More recently, our lab has developed and applied an innovative super-resolution imaging technique, termed as single-point edge-excitation sub-diffraction (SPEED) Microscopy, to elucidate the export kinetics and map the three-dimensional (3D) spatial export route for firefly luciferase mRNPs in live NPCs with an unprecedented spatiotemporal resolution of 8 nm and 2 ms (Table 1) [23,65,76,77]. Our methodology includes two critical steps. First, we set out to obtain two-dimensional (2D) single-molecule trajectories of mcherry-MS2 associated mRNPs by specifically illuminating a single GFP-labeled NPC and tracking single mRNP molecules through this NPC in live cells. Second, we further recover the inherent 3D spatial distribution of mRNPs in the NPC by developing 2D to 3D deconvolution algorithms [23,77].
For the first aim, we shifted two overlapped excitation laser beams differing in wavelength off the center of the objective to create two superimposed inclined illumination PSFs (iPSFs) in the focal plane; one iPSF is to capture only a single GFP-labeled NPC at the equator of NE and the other is to track single mRNP molecules interacting with this illuminated NPC. The received fluorescent spot of a single NPC was then fit to a 2D elliptical Gaussian function to obtain the centroid of the NPC with a localization precision of 1–3 nm [77]. A frame rate of 500 frames per second enabled us to capture any transient interactions between the mRNPs and the NPC. We found the dwell time of mRNPs through the NPCs to be approximately 12 ms, ten-fold faster than previously reported data [63,65]. The difference is partially due to the different detection speeds and the distinct localizing approaches of single NPCs that our two groups used [65]. During the ~12 ms transport time, ~36% of mRNPs interacting with the NPC successfully travelled through the NPC to reach the cytoplasm. The remaining ~64% of transport events were abortive and the mRNPs were returned back to the nucleoplasm (Figure 2b) [65]. This transport efficiency is consistent with previous results [63,64] but deviates from the efficiency rate (~50%) recorded for Tap-p15 and other transport receptors indicating a stricter selective regulation for mRNPs at the NPC [23,65,76,77]. To further elucidate the activity of these successful and abortive mRNP transport events, single molecule trajectories were superimposed over an NPC schematic. Interestingly, ~80% of abortive mRNPs never reached the cytoplasmic face of the NPC with their deepest penetration reaching only the nuclear and central NPC sub-regions (−120 to 20 nm). In contrast, mRNPs that successfully translocated the NPC unavoidably arrived into the cytoplasmic sub-region (20–120 nm) whereupon dissociation was seen to occur mainly within the range of 50–80 nm on the cytoplasmic side of the NPC (Figure 2d). Apparently, these data support that major selection of mRNPs happens most likely on the nucleoplasmic side and within the central channel of the NPC [65].
Ijms 15 14492 g002 1024
Figure 2. The major new features in the dynamic nuclear export process of messenger ribonucleoprotein particles (mRNPs) revealed by single-point edge-excitation sub-diffraction (SPEED) microscopy. (a) Cartoon representation of the fast-slow-fast diffusion pattern that mRNA takes through the NPC; (b) Diagram shows the abortive and the successful transport events. Green depicts ~36% of recorded single mRNPs that successfully traveled through the NPC and reached the cytoplasm during their ~11 ms transport time. Depicted in red are the abortive events ~64% and the associated transport time of ~12 ms; (c) 3D probability density map reveals the nuclear export route through the NPCs in live cells. mRNP 3D positional data (red) is plotted over a cutaway schematic representation of NPC structure. (Deeper shading represents higher density). mRNPs translocate through the periphery of the NPC while rarely occupying a central axial channel before dissociation occurs on the cytoplasmic side; (d) Contour plot of mRNP export through the NPC highlighting the unoccupied axial channel (from −100 to 20 nm) with a diameter of 10 nm at the narrowest waist and the dissociating region, where mRNA invades the central axial channel at the end of its export pathway (from 50 to 80 nm). Color bar indicates spatial density from low to high.
Figure 2. The major new features in the dynamic nuclear export process of messenger ribonucleoprotein particles (mRNPs) revealed by single-point edge-excitation sub-diffraction (SPEED) microscopy. (a) Cartoon representation of the fast-slow-fast diffusion pattern that mRNA takes through the NPC; (b) Diagram shows the abortive and the successful transport events. Green depicts ~36% of recorded single mRNPs that successfully traveled through the NPC and reached the cytoplasm during their ~11 ms transport time. Depicted in red are the abortive events ~64% and the associated transport time of ~12 ms; (c) 3D probability density map reveals the nuclear export route through the NPCs in live cells. mRNP 3D positional data (red) is plotted over a cutaway schematic representation of NPC structure. (Deeper shading represents higher density). mRNPs translocate through the periphery of the NPC while rarely occupying a central axial channel before dissociation occurs on the cytoplasmic side; (d) Contour plot of mRNP export through the NPC highlighting the unoccupied axial channel (from −100 to 20 nm) with a diameter of 10 nm at the narrowest waist and the dissociating region, where mRNA invades the central axial channel at the end of its export pathway (from 50 to 80 nm). Color bar indicates spatial density from low to high.
Ijms 15 14492 g002
Relating positional data with the ~12 ms transport time for mRNPs, we estimated the dwell time of mRNPs in each NPC sub-region to be: ~5.5 ms on the nucleoplasmic side, ~1.6 ms for the central region, and ~4.9 ms for the cytoplasm side [65], which indicates an interaction time ~3 times longer at the nucleoplasmic and cytoplasmic faces compared with the central channel of the NPC. This ratio of dwell times for mRNPs agrees well with the results from Grünwald and Singer, though there is almost a ten-fold difference between our measurements of total nuclear export times for mRNPs [63,65]. Noteworthy, we further found that the longer residence times of mRNPs on both sides of the NPC do not suggest mRNPs move slower on either side than in the center. Instead, from hundreds of obtained single mRNP trajectories, the diffusion coefficient of mRNP was obtained in each sub-region of the NPC: ~0.16 µm2/s on the nucleoplasmic side, ~0.07 µm2/s in the central scaffold region, and ~0.19 µm2/s on the cytoplasmic side, revealing a fast-slow-fast diffusion pattern adopted by mRNPs to export through the NPC (Figure 2a). This diffusion pattern brings support for the models favoring an entropic barrier in the central channel of the NPC due to geometric constraints and higher spatial density of FG filaments [42,44,45,65].
In the second step, by virtue of the cylindrical topology of the NPC, 2D positional data recorded from single mRNPs interacting with the NPCs were converted to their cylindrical 3D coordinates using deconvolution algorithms, which eventually resulted in 3D probability density maps for mRNPs in the NPC (Figure 2c,d). A 3D view of the real-time mRNP export route revealed for the first time that (i) mRNPs seldom present in the central axial channel that is reserved for small molecules (<40 kDa) to passively diffuse through; and (ii) Instead, mRNPs translocate through the periphery of the NPC prior to dissociating within the region of (50–80 nm) on the cytoplasmic side, at which point mRNPs have a low probability of returning to the nucleoplasm and start extending into the previously unoccupied axial channel (Figure 2d) [65,76,77]. This agrees with the proposition of a narrow release site located on the cytoplasmic side of the NPC [63]. Moreover, this dissociating region may be where the DEAD box helicase Dbp5 and its cofactor Gle1 function to dissociate the Tap-p15/mRNP complex from Nup214 and/or remodel the mRNP complex to facilitate directionality to complete the nuclear export process [64,74,77,78,79]. Another potential player is RanBP2 localizing around the cytoplasmic side of the NPC, which is believed to be involved in the dissociation process as well [80].

4. Conclusions and Perspective

Single-molecule tracking and super-resolution microscopy imaging finally brought the detailed dynamics of mRNP nuclear export into focus. Many new features escaped from conventional fluorescence microscopy and EM like export time, export efficiency, diffusion coefficients and 3D export route for mRNPs have been revealed by the technical advances and summarized in this review paper. We expect at least two major developments regarding the NPC and RNA biology in the near future. One is to expand current high-resolution fluorescence microscopy imaging approaches to investigate nucleocytoplamic transport of other types of RNAs, such as rRNA, micro RNA and virus RNA, as well as perform comparative studies on mRNA regulated by different transport cofactors following possible distinct selective mechanisms. Comparisons between nuclear transport behaviors of these RNAs would provide more insight into other critical questions including the role the NPC plays in the quality control of RNAs. The other is to correlate super-resolution light microscopy with other high-resolution detection approaches, such as EM and atomic force microscopy, to further provide a more comprehensive understanding of RNA nuclear export in both function and structure.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jiong Ma for his assistance in Figure 2d. The research project was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH GM094041 and GM097037 to W.Y.).

Author Contributions

J.K. and W.Y. wrote the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Köhler, A. Exporting RNA from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8, 761–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lamond, A.I.; Earnshaw, W.C. Structure and function in the nucleus. Science 1998, 280, 547–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Moore, M.J. From birth to death: The complex lives of eukaryotic mRNAs. Science 2005, 309, 1514–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gallouzi, I.E.; Steitz, J.A. Delineation of mRNA export pathways by the use of cell-permeable peptides. Science 2001, 294, 1895–1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Huang, Y.; Steitz, J.A. Splicing factors SRp20 and 9G8 promote the nucleocytoplasmic export of mRNA. Mol. Cell. 2001, 7, 899–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Huang, Y.; Carmichael, G.G. Role of polyadenylation in nucleocytoplasmic transport of mRNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1996, 16, 1534–1542. [Google Scholar]
  7. Minvielle-Sebastia, L.; Keller, W. mRNA polyadenylation and its coupling to other RNA processing reactions and to transcription. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1999, 11, 352–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Eckner, R.; Ellmeier, W.; Birnstiel, M.L. Mature mRNA 3' end formation stimulates RNA export from the nucleus. EMBO J. 1991, 10, 3513–3522. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hammell, C.M.; Gross, S.; Zenklusen, D.; Heath, C.V.; Stutz, F.; Moore, C.; Cole, C.N. Coupling of termination, 3' processing, and mRNA export. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002, 22, 6441–6457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Visa, N.; Izaurralde, E.; Ferreira, J.; Daneholt, B.; Mattaj, I.W. A nuclear cap-binding complex binds Balbiani ring pre-mRNA cotranscriptionally and accompanies the ribonucleoprotein particle during nuclear export. J. Cell Biol. 1996, 133, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cheng, H.; Dufu, K.; Lee, C.S.; Hsu, J.L.; Dias, A.; Reed, R. Human mRNA export machinery recruited to the 5' end of mRNA. Cell 2006, 127, 1389–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zenklusen, D.; Vinciguerra, P.; Wyss, J.C.; Stutz, F. Stable mRNP formation and export require cotranscriptional recruitment of the mRNA export factors Yra1p and Sub2p by Hpr1p. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002, 22, 8241–8253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dreyfuss, G. Structure and function of nuclear and cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein particles. Annu. Rev. Cell. Biol. 1986, 2, 459–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Aguilera, A. Cotranscriptional mRNP assembly: From the DNA to the nuclear pore. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2005, 17, 242–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Terry, L.J.; Shows, E.B.; Wente, S.R. Crossing the nuclear envelope: Hierarchical regulation of nucleocytoplasmic transport. Science 2007, 318, 1412–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kelly, S.M.; Corbett, A.H. Messenger RNA export from the nucleus: A series of molecular wardrobe changes. Traffic 2009, 10, 1199–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Montpetit, B.; Weis, K. An alternative route for nuclear mRNP export by membrane budding. Science 2012, 336, 809–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Naim, B.; Brumfeld, V.; Kapon, R.; Kiss, V.; Nevo, R.; Reich, Z. Passive and facilitated transport in nuclear pore complexes is largely uncoupled. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 3881–3888. [Google Scholar]
  19. Weis, K. The nuclear pore complex: Oily spaghetti or gummy bear? Cell 2007, 130, 405–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Goryaynov, A.; Yang, W. Role of molecular charge in nucleocytoplasmic transport. PLoS One 2014, 9, e88792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Grünwald, D.; Singer, R.H.; Rout, M. Nuclear export dynamics of RNA–protein complexes. Nature 2011, 475, 333–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rout, M.P.; Aitchison, J.D.; Magnasco, M.O.; Chait, B.T. Virtual gating and nuclear transport: The hole picture. Trends Cell Biol. 2003, 13, 622–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ma, J.; Goryaynov, A.; Sarma, A.; Yang, W. Self-regulated viscous channel in the nuclear pore complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 7326–7331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kahms, M.; Hüve, J.; Wesselmann, R.; Farr, J.C.; Baumgärtel, V.; Peters, R. Lighting up the nuclear pore complex. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2011, 90, 751–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fried, H.; Kutay, U. Nucleocytoplasmic transport: Taking an inventory. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2003, 60, 1659–1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Labokha, A.A.; Gradmann, S.; Frey, S.; Hülsmann, B.B.; Urlaub, H.; Baldus, M.; Görlich, D. Systematic analysis of barrier forming FG hydrogels from Xenopus nuclear pore complexes. EMBO J. 2013, 32, 204–218. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hülsmann, B.B.; Labokha, A.A.; Görlich, D. The permeability of reconstituted nuclear pores provides direct evidence for the selective phase model. Cell 2012, 150, 738–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Petri, M.; Frey, S.; Menzel, A.; Görlich, D. Techert, S Structural characterization of nanoscale meshworks within a nucleoporin FG hydrogel. Biomacromolecules 2012, 13, 1882–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Milles, S.; Lemke, E.A. Single molecule study of the intrinsically disordered FG-repeat nucleoporin 153. Biophys. J. 2011, 101, 1710–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wälde, S.; Kehlenbach, R.H. The part and the whole: Functions of nucleoporins in nucleocytoplasmic transport. Trends Cell. Biol. 2010, 20, 461–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Stelter, P.; Kunze, R.; Fischer, J.; Hurt, E. Probing the nucleoporin FG repeat network defines structural and functional features of the nuclear pore complex. J. Cell Sci. 2011, 195, 183–192. [Google Scholar]
  32. Yang, W. “Natively unfolded” nucleoporins in nucleocytoplasmic transport: Clustered or evenly distributed. Nucleus 2010, 2, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Patel, S.; Belmont, B.; Sante, J.; Rexach, M. Natively unfolded nucleoporins gate protein diffusion across the nuclear pore complex. Cell 2007, 129, 83–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Reed, R.; Hurt, E. A conserved mRNA export machinery coupled to pre-mRNA splicing. Cell 2002, 108, 523–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wickramasinghe, V.O.; Andrews, R.; Ellis, P.; Langford, C.; Gurdon, J.B.; Stewart, M.; Venkitaraman, A.R.; Laskey, R.A. Selective nuclear export of specific classes of mRNA from mammalian nuclei is promoted by GANP. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, 5059–5071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sträßer, K.; Masuda, S.; Mason, P.; Pfannstiel, J.; Oppizzi, M.; Rodriguez-Navarro, S.; Rondón, A.G.; Aguilera, A.; Struhl, K.; Reed, R. TREX is a conserved complex coupling transcription with messenger RNA export. Nature 2002, 417, 304–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lei, H.; Dias, A.P.; Reed, R. Export and stability of naturally intronless mRNAs require specific coding region sequences and the TREX mRNA export complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 17985–17990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jani, D.; Lutz, S.; Hurt, E.; Laskey, R.A.; Stewart, M.; Wickramasinghe, V.O. Functional and structural characterization of the mammalian TREX-2 complex that links transcription with nuclear messenger RNA export. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 4562–4573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, L.; Miao, Y.L.; Zheng, X.; Lackford, B.; Zhou, B.; Han, L.; Chengguo, Y.; Ward, J.M.; Burkholder, A.; Lipchina, I.; et al. The THO complex regulates pluripotency gene mRNA export and controls embryonic stem cell self-renewal and somatic cell reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 2013, 13, 676–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Guria, A.; Tran, D.D.H.; Ramachandran, S.; Koch, A.; el Bounkari, O.; Dutta, P.; Hauser, H.; Tamura, T. Identification of mRNAs that are spliced but not exported to the cytoplasm in the absence of THOC5 in mouse embryo fibroblasts. RNA 2011, 17, 1048–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wickramasinghe, V.O.; Savill, J.M.; Chavali, S.; Jonsdottir, A.B.; Rajendra, E.; Grüner, T.; Laskey, R.A.; Babu, M.M.; Venkitaraman, A.R. Human inositol polyphosphate multikinase regulates transcript-selective nuclear mRNA export to preserve genome integrity. Mol. Cell. 2013, 51, 737–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Grossman, E.; Medalia, O.; Zwerger, M. Functional architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2012, 41, 557–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rout, M.P.; Blobel, G. Isolation of the yeast nuclear pore complex. J. Cell Biol. 1993, 123, 771–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hoelz, A.; Debler, E.W.; Blobel, G. The structure of the nuclear pore complex. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2011, 80, 613–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yang, W. Distinct, but not completely separate spatial transport routes in the nuclear pore complex. Nucleus 2013, 4, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tamura, K.; Hara-Nishimura, I. The molecular architecture of the plant nuclear pore complex. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 823–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Diebolder, C.; Koster, A.J.; Koning, R.I. Pushing the resolution limits in cryo electron tomography of biological structures. J. Microsc. 2012, 248, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Penczek, P. Chapter three—Resolution measures in electron microscopy. Methods Enzymol. 2010, 482, 73–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Beermann, W.; Bahr, G.F. The submicroscopic structure of the Balbiani-ring. Exp. Cell Res. 1954, 6, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mehlin, H.; Daneholt, B.; Skoglund, U. Translocation of a specific premessenger ribonucleoprotein particle through the nuclear pore studied with electron microscope tomography. Cell 1992, 69, 605–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lamb, M.M.; Daneholt, B. Characterization of active transcription units in Balbiani rings of Chironomus tentans. Cell 1979, 17, 835–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Stevens, B.J.; Swift, H. RNA transport from nucleus to cytoplasm in Chironomus salivary glands. J. Cell. Biol. 1966, 31, 55–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mehlin, H.; Skoglund, U.; Daneholt, B. Transport of Balbiani ring granules through nuclear pores in Chironomus tentans. Exp. Cell Res. 1991, 193, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cole, C.N.; Scarcelli, J.J. Unravelling mRNA export. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8, 645–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Patterson, G.H.; Lippincott-Schwartz, J. A photoactivatable GFP for selective photolabeling of proteins and cells. Science 2002, 297, 1873–1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Huang, B.; Bates, M.; Zhuang, X. Super resolution fluorescence microscopy. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2009, 78, 993–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Huang, B.; Wang, W.; Bates, M.; Zhuang, X. Three-dimensional super-resolution imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy. Science 2008, 319, 810–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Juette, M.F.; Gould, T.J.; Lessard, M.D.; Mlodzianoski, M.J.; Nagpure, B.S.; Bennett, B.T.; Hess, S.T.; Bewersdorf, J. Three-dimensional sub-100 nm resolution fluorescence microscopy of thick samples. Nat. Methods 2008, 5, 527–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bates, M.; Huang, B.; Zhuang, X. Super-resolution microscopy by nanoscale localization of photo-switchable fluorescent probes. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2008, 12, 505–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Pavani, S.R.P.; Thompson, M.A.; Biteen, J.S.; Lord, S.J.; Liu, N.; Twieg, R.J.; Piestun, R.; Moerner, W.E. Three-dimensional, single-molecule fluorescence imaging beyond the diffraction limit by using a double-helix point spread function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 2995–2999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Löschberger, A.; van de Linde, S.; Dabauvalle, M.C.; Rieger, B.; Heilemann, M.; Krohne, G.; Sauer, M. Super-resolution imaging visualizes the eightfold symmetry of gp210 proteins around the nuclear pore complex and resolves the central channel with nanometer resolution. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125, 570–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mor, A.; Suliman, S.; Ben-Yishay, R.; Yunger, S.; Brody, Y.; Shav-Tal, Y. Dynamics of single mRNP nucleocytoplasmic transport and export through the nuclear pore in living cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12, 543–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Grünwald, D.; Singer, R.H. In vivo imaging of labelled endogenous β-actin mRNA during nucleocytoplasmic transport. Nature 2010, 467, 604–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Siebrasse, J.P.; Kaminski, T.; Kubitscheck, U. Nuclear export of single native mRNA molecules observed by light sheet fluorescence microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 9426–9431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ma, J.; Liu, Z.; Michelotti, N.; Pitchiaya, S.; Veerapaneni, R.; Androsavich, J.R.; Walter, N.G.; Yang, W. High-resolution three-dimensional mapping of mRNA export through the nuclear pore. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2414. [Google Scholar]
  66. Stewart, M. Ratcheting mRNA out of the nucleus. Mol. Cell 2007, 25, 327–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Huisken, J.; Stainier, D.Y. Selective plane illumination microscopy techniques in developmental biology. Development 2009, 136, 1963–1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Keller, P.J.; Dodt, H.U. Light sheet microscopy of living or cleared specimens. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2012, 22, 138–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ritter, J.G.; Veith, R.; Veenendaal, A.; Siebrasse, J.P.; Kubitscheck, U. Light sheet microscopy for single molecule tracking in living tissue. PLoS One 2010, 5, e11639. [Google Scholar]
  70. Santi, P.A. Light sheet fluorescence microscopy: A review. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2011, 59, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ribbeck, K.; Lipowsky, G.; Kent, H.M.; Stewart, M.; Görlich, D. NTF2 mediates nuclear import of Ran. EMBO J. 1998, 17, 6587–6598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Paschal, B.M.; Gerace, L. Identification of NTF2, a cytosolic factor for nuclear import that interacts with nuclear pore complex protein p62. J. Cell. Biol. 1995, 129, 925–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Smith, A.; Brownawell, A.; Macara, I.G. Nuclear import of Ran is mediated by the transport factor NTF2. Curr. Biol. 1998, 8, 1403–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Tran, E.J.; Zhou, Y.; Corbett, A.H.; Wente, S.R. The DEAD-box protein Dbp5 controls mRNA export by triggering specific RNA: Protein remodeling events. Mol. Cell 2007, 28, 850–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zhao, J.; Jin, S.B.; Björkroth, B.; Wieslander, L.; Daneholt, B. The mRNA export factor Dbp5 is associated with Balbiani ring mRNP from gene to cytoplasm. EMBO J. 2002, 21, 1177–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Goryaynov, A.; Ma, J.; Yang, W. Single-molecule studies of nucleocytoplasmic transport: From one dimension to three dimensions. Integr. Biol. 2012, 4, 10–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ma, J.; Yang, W. Three-dimensional distribution of transient interactions in the nuclear pore obtained by single-molecule snapshots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 7305–7310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Paulillo, S.M.; Phillips, E.M.; Köser, J.; Sauder, U.; Ullman, K.S.; Powers, M.A.; Fahrenkrog, B. Nucleoporin domain topology is linked to the transport status of the nuclear pore complex. J. Mol. Biol. 2005, 351, 784–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Walther, T.C.; Pickersgill, H.S.; Cordes, V.C.; Goldberg, M.W.; Allen, T.D.; Mattaj, I.W.; Fornerod, M. The cytoplasmic filaments of the nuclear pore complex are dispensable for selective nuclear protein import. J. Cell Boil. 2002, 158, 63–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Mahadevan, K.; Zhang, H.; Akef, A.; Cui, X.A.; Gueroussov, S.; Cenik, C.; Roth, F.P.; Palazzo, A.F. RanBP2/Nup358 potentiates the translation of a subset of mRNAs encoding secretory proteins. PLoS Biol. 2013, 11, e1001545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kelich, J.M.; Yang, W. High-Resolution Imaging Reveals New Features of Nuclear Export of mRNA through the Nuclear Pore Complexes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 14492-14504. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms150814492

AMA Style

Kelich JM, Yang W. High-Resolution Imaging Reveals New Features of Nuclear Export of mRNA through the Nuclear Pore Complexes. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2014; 15(8):14492-14504. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms150814492

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kelich, Joseph M., and Weidong Yang. 2014. "High-Resolution Imaging Reveals New Features of Nuclear Export of mRNA through the Nuclear Pore Complexes" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 15, no. 8: 14492-14504. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms150814492

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop