Next Article in Journal
Imaging Collagen in Scar Tissue: Developments in Second Harmonic Generation Microscopy for Biomedical Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Role of Omentin, Vaspin, Cardiotrophin-1, TWEAK and NOV/CCN3 in Obesity and Diabetes Development
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Organization and Expression Profiling of the SBP-Box Gene Family in Chinese Jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.)

1
Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Tree Breeding by Molecular Design, National Engineering Laboratory for Tree Breeding, Key Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding in Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants, Ministry of Education, College of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
2
National Foundation for Improved Cultivar of Chinese Jujube, Cangzhou 061000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18(8), 1734; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18081734
Submission received: 10 July 2017 / Revised: 28 July 2017 / Accepted: 2 August 2017 / Published: 15 August 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)

Abstract

:
Transcription factors play vital roles in the developmental processes of plants. The SQUAMOSA promoter binding protein (SBP) genes encode a family of plant-specific transcription factors and plays many crucial roles in plant development. In this study, 16 SBP-box gene family members were identified in Ziziphus jujuba Mill. Dongzao (Dongzao), which were distributed over 8 chromosomes. They were classified into seven groups according to their phylogenetic relationships with other SBP-box gene families. Within each group, genes shared similar exon-intron structures and motif locations. The number of exons varied among the groups. We identified 12 homologous gene pairs between Dongzao and Arabidopsis. Expression profiling revealed that ZjSBP02 and ZjSBP14 expressed highly in mature fruits, ZjSBP01 expressed higher in mature leaves than other tissues and the expression level of ZjSBP12 was much higher in the flowers. The transcriptome analysis indicated that ZjSBPs had different expression patterns in various tissues. This study represents the first systematic analysis of the SBP-box gene family in Z. jujuba. The data presented here provides a foundation for understanding the crucial roles of ZjSBP genes in plant growth and development.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Transcription factors are proteins that bind DNA in a sequence-specific way and activate or repress the transcription of target genes to regulate the specific expression in different tissues and different environments. In plants, the transcription factors play important roles during the development process. The SBP-box genes encode a family of transcription factors that are specific in plants, which have a highly conserved domain with residues of about 76 amino acids. This conserved domain contains DNA-binding and nuclear localization with two zinc-binding sites [1,2,3]. SBP-box genes (AmSBP1 and AmSBP2) were first identified in Antirrhinum majus [4], based on their ability to interact with the promoter sequence region of the floral meristem identity gene, SQUAMOSA [1] (Klein et al., 1996). The SBP-box family has been identified in many plants, such as Arabidopsis [5], rice [6] and apple [7] etc.
Alternative splicing is a regulated process during gene expression that can code multiple proteins from one gene. There were 16 members in the Arabidopsis genome, of which nine were alternative splicing genes, such as At1g02065, At1g27360 and At1g27370 [2,5]. SPL3 (SQUAMOSA promoter binding protein-like 3) was demonstrated to play a significant role in floral transition [8] and most other members have also been explored [5,6] with functions involving sporogenesis [9], bud and leaf development [10,11], flowering [12], vegetative and reproductive phase transitions [13] and plant hormone signaling [14]. In rice, 19 members have been identified. More than half of the OsSPL genes were mainly expressed in young panicles [6]. OsSPL14 [15] and OsSPL16 [16] were demonstrated to play important roles in determining grain quality and yield in rice. There were 27 SBP-box gene family members in the apple genome and 15 of them were suggested to be putative targets of MdmiR156 [7]. In the tomato, there were 15 SBP-box gene family members. All the SlySBPs could be detected in these apical regions and be related to the response of specific stress. Most miR156-targeted SlySBPs expressed a high level in young inflorescences and during fruit development and ripening, suggesting that it plays an important role during tomato reproductive growth [17]. Manning et al. 2006 [18] used positional cloning and virus-induced gene silencing to confirm the SBP-box gene-CNR is strategic for normal ripening [18,19,20]. So far, there were 18 SBP-box gene family members in the grape and 12 of them were complementary to miRNA156/157. Some VvSBP genes could prospectively participate in the defense against biotic and abiotic stresses [21].
Chinese jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.) (2n = 2x = 24), which belongs to the Rhamnaceae family, is estimated to have been cultivated for more than 7000 years [22]. Its original cultivation center is in the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River [22]. Chinese jujube is cultivated in all the provinces of China except Heilongjiang and Tibet and the total planted area was about 2 million hectares [23,24]. So far, Chinese jujube has been introduced to more than 50 countries, such as Korea, Japan, Russia, India, Thailand, Europe, the United States and Australia [25]. Jujube fruit is abundant in biologically active components like vitamin C, phenolics, avonoids, triterpenic acids and polysaccharides, and is considered to have important medicinal uses [26]. Its fruit can be consumed as fresh fruit, dried fruit or processed into various jujube products [27].
Although the SBP-box gene family has been identified in many plants, nothing is known about the SBP-box gene family in the Chinese jujube. In this study, we identified 16 characterized putative SBP-box genes in the jujube genome and the expression pattern of ZjSBP genes in different tissues or organs were also surveyed. The outcomes of this study could facilitate further dissection of the SBP-box gene family in jujube.

2. Results

2.1. Identification of the SBP-Box Gene Family in Dongzao

We used the AtSBP genes to identify the gene family members on the NCBI. After blast in jujuba genome, we reorganized and merged the highly matched sequences and got 37 sequences that satisfied the requirement. InterProScan was used to scan for the SBP domain and to find the final members. Seventeen of them were excluded for having the same sequences and one of them was removed due to an incomplete SBP domain. There were 28 putative SBP genes in jujube as shown in Table 1, including seven alternative splicing genes (LOC107418038, LOC107423307, LOC107426205, LOC107428311, LOC107428287, LOC107432336 and LOC107408850). The sequences of each of the alternative splicing genes were similar, so we chose the longest transcript for the following analysis. The deduced length of the SBP proteins ranged from 154 (ZjSBP01) to 1059 (ZjSBP02) amino acids, while the pI values ranged from 5.20 (ZjSBP08) to 9.56 (ZjSBP15), which suggests that different SBP proteins might operate in different microenvironments. The putative SBP genes mapped to the chromosomes shown in Figure 1, provide a viewable insight into SBP-box gene distribution. According to the most recently assembled jujube genome resources [28], 16 ZjSBPs were unevenly distributed over 8 chromosomes with one on each of Chr01, Chr07, Chr08 and Chr09, two on each of Chr04 and Chr12, and three on each of Chr05 and Chr10. Only ZjSBP15 and ZjSBP16 were not assigned to any chromosomes.

2.2. Sequence Alignments and Phylogenetic Analyses

Multiple sequence alignment of full length protein sequences was completed by the DNAMAN (version 6.0, Lynnon Corp., Quebec, QC, Canada, http://www.lynnon.com/index.html) for defining the structure of each gene. There was one conserved SBP domain in all members (Figure 2a). These SBP domains were highly conserved at some positions, such as CQQC sequences, SCR sequences and RRR sequences (Figure 2b). Interestingly, all members have two zinc finger-like structure-Zn-1, Zn-2 and a highly conserved bipartite nuclear localization signal (NLS). The nuclear localization signal was partly overlapped with the second zinc finger-like structure [2]. All the ZjSBPs possessed the same zinc finger-like structure CysCysHisCys, while CysCysCysHis was another zinc finger-like structure for all members except ZjSBP07 with a zinc finger-like structure CysCysCysCys.
In order to further understand the evolutionary relationship of the ZjSBP genes and help to reveal roles of these ZjSBPs in jujube development, we employed 111 putative SBP sequences from six species, including monocotyledonous angiosperms (rice) and five dicotyledonous angiosperms (Arabidopsis, apple, grape, tomato and jujube) to construct a phylogenetic tree using MEGA 7.0 [29] (Figure 3). Only the conserved SBP domain (74 aa) were used for the phylogenetic tree construction (Table S1). These 111 sequences were classified into seven groups. Interestingly, all the OsSPL genes in each group were very dissimilar to other dicotyledons and most of the ZjSBP genes were closer to grape, apple, tomato and Arabidopsis than rice. The ZjSBP genes were distributed in all the groups.

2.3. Gene Structures of the ZjSBP Genes

To gain further insight into the structures of the ZjSBP genes, we generated the exon-intron structures based on their corresponding genome sequences and coding sequences (Figure 4). The groups corresponded to the phylogenetic groups discussed above. All members had an intron at the highly conserved position in the SBP-box [30]. All the ZjSBP genes had a similar structure of exon-intron within the same group, while the number of exons varied among groups. For example, the genes in Group 5 had two exons, whereas ZjSBP14 in Group 3 had eleven exons. Furthermore, except for ZjSBP14 and ZjSBP16, the SBP domains of all genes were distributed in the first and second exons.
We searched for the presence of any conserved motifs in the ZjSBP genes using the MEME software (Figure 5). Combined with the results of the InterProScan, Motif 1 consisted of the SBP domain and Motif 3 was the Ankyrin repeat-containing domain. Other motifs were unknown for their functions (Table 2). Furthermore, some motifs—for example Motif 3 and Motif 5—were only found in one unique group but were shared by all the members within the group. The best possible matches are shown in Table 3.

2.4. Homology Analysis

The members located on the scaffold were excluded because the length was too short to draw a picture of the results. According to OrthoMCL, there were 12 homologous gene pairs between jujube and Arabidopsis, five gene pairs in Arabidopsis and three gene pairs in jujube. The result was visualized using the Circos (Version 0.69) [31] (Table S1, Figure 6).

2.5. Expression Analysis of the ZjSBP Genes

To further confirm the function of ZjSBPs during jujube vegetative and reproductive growth, we explored the expression patterns of each gene by qRT-PCR. Generally, the expression profiles of ZjSBPs can be divided into two types (Figure 7). One type is similar to ZjSBP08, ZjSBP10, ZjSBP13, ZjSBP15 and ZjSBP16; they seemed to be expressed constitutively from leaves to fruits and their expression levels were similar between each tissue. Another type relates to genes whose expression levels in some tissues were clearly different, such as ZjSBP02 in mature fruits, ZjSBP12 in flowers and ZjSBP14 in mature fruits. The expression of ZjSBP01 was not detected in the stems. Among all ZjSBPs, ZjSBP02 and ZjSBP14 clearly expressed high levels in mature fruits. ZjSBP01 showed higher expression in mature leaves than other tissues. The expression levels of ZjSBP12 was much higher in flowers than other tissues.

2.6. Expression Patterns of the Transcriptome of Different Tissues

The expression levels of each of the genes in different tissues are shown in Figure 8. According to the FPKM value, most genes expressed clearly in all tissues except for ZjSBP03, ZjSBP06, ZjSBP13 and ZjSBP16. ZjSBP01 reached clearly higher levels in s-stem and leaves. ZjSBP06 only expressed in leaves and flowers and ZjSBP16 only expressed in the root. The expression value of ZjSBP13 was zero in fruit. The transcript of ZjSBP16 was zero in all tissues samples.

3. Discussion

SBP-box gene family encodes the transcription factors which are plant specific. At first, we identified 37 sequences from jujube. LOC107424208 was excluded for its uncompleted SBP domain. LOC107408877, LOC107408879, LOC107408885, LOC107409175 and LOC107409984 was similar to LOC107408850, so we chose LOC107408850 to represent these genes. LOC107404563 was similar to LOC107416051, LOC107432574 was similar to LOC10741647 and LOC107422456 was similar to LOC10741647 (only one amino acid was different, maybe due to a fault in the chromosome package of Junzao) [24]. We therefore chose LOC107416051 to represent LOC107404563 and LOC10741647 to represent LOC107432574 and LOC107422456, respectively. The different functions of these similar sequences can be explored in the future.
According to the phylogenetic analysis, all members from jujube are close to the apple, grape and tomato. Compared with rice, the ZjSBP genes were clustered more tightly with dicotyledon, which coincides with the fact that they diverged more recently from a common ancestor, rather than the lineage which produced the monocotyledon. These results indicate that although the SBP-box genes may come from the same ancestor and exist after the divergence of plants and animals, they have different differentiating patterns after each lineage was separated.
The differences of each group are reflected in the length of each gene. The amino acids length in Group 5, which contained ZjSBP01, ZjSBP03, ZjSBP08 and ZjSBP15 was approximately two hundred aa, but in Group 3 there were about one thousand aa for each member (Table 1). Intriguingly, the gene structures of different groups were also obvious. Genes in Group 2 had three exons (Figure 4) but genes in Group 7 had ten exons. For motifs, all members in Group 5 only had the SBP domain-motif 1, nevertheless, there were more than six motifs in Group 3 (Figure 5). Within the same phylogenetic group, members mostly had a similar exon-intron structure and motif structure, indicating that the evolution of the SBP-box gene family may be closely related to the diversification of gene structures, as explained before in rice [6].
The results of the quantitative RT-PCR indicated that ZjSBPs had different expressed patterns in various organs and at different stages of leaf and fruit development. The transcriptome data also showed that ZjSBPs had different expression patterns in different tissues (Figure 8). According to the transcriptome data, the expression of ZjSBP03 was zero and ZjSBP06 only expressed weakly in leaves and flowers. At the same time, the result of qRT-PCR indicated that ZjSBP03 and ZjSBP06 expressed very low in all tissues except for mature leaves. ZjSBP13 and ZjSBP15 exhibited low-level, constitutive expression in all tissues both from qRT-PCR and the transcriptome data. Interestingly, there were some discrepancies between the results of qRT-PCR and the transcriptome data. In terms of qRT-PCR, ZjSBP02 and ZjSBP14 exhibited high expression levels in mature fruit. However, the expression levels of ZjSBP02 and ZjSBP14 were weak in fruit according to the transcriptome data. Unfortunately, we did not have the information for the exact development stages of fruit employed in the RNA-seq data and the difference may be due to the fruits being from different development stages.
The functions of SBP-box genes have been identified to play vital roles in regulating flower and fruit development and other physiological processes, but in jujube, the functions are not clear. We predicted the functions of ZjSBPs based on their evolution relationships and the homology of other SBP-box genes. All members of ZjSBPs in Group 1 exhibited different expression profiles but have high expression levels in leaves and flowers. They were close to AtSPL13 in the phylogenetic tree, which was expressed mainly in the hypocotyl and affected leaf primordium development [32]. Interestingly, the homology analysis revealed that ZjSBP04 and ZjSBP12 were homologous with AtSPL13. This indicates that these genes may have a similar function in leaf or shoot development. There is an orthologous gene of AtSPL13 in maize named tga1 (teosinte glume architecture 1), which has been found to be involved in ear glume development in maize [33]. Furthermore, it has been confirmed that the OsSPL16 in this group influences grain size, shape and quality [16].
There were few reports about the genes from Group 2. The ZjSBPs in this group expressed a little high in flowers and young fruits. ZjSBP05 and ZjSBP10 may have functions during these tissues’ development. The genes in Group 3 are very highly expressed in mature fruits, almost ten times that of the young fruits, indicating that these genes may be related to the later stages of fruit development. Group 3 is close to AtSPL14, which has been found to relate to programmed cell death in response to the fungal toxin fumonisin B1 [34]. The homology analysis also showed that ZjSBP02 was homologous with AtSPL14. We can infer that these three ZjSBPs may have a similar function during plant development. In Group 4, ZjSBP13 expressed similarly in each tissue. We can find in the phylogenetic tree that AtSPL9, AtSPL15 and OsSPL14 were in this group. Meanwhile, AtSPL9 and AtSPL15 with ZjSBP13 were the homologous gene pair. The function of AtSPL9 and AtSPL15 was to control the shoot maturation and act redundantly in controlling the juvenile-to-adult phase transition [15]. Moreover, AtSPL9 plays an important role during the flowering and negatively regulates the accumulation of anthocyanin [35,36]. OsSPL14 has been proven to influence the panicle development and affect grain productivity [15]. ZjSBP07 is the only jujube member in Group 7. The homologous gene in Arabidopsis is AtSPL7, which has been shown to replay the copper deficiency [37].
In Group 5, CNR has been found to be critical for normal ripening in the tomato [18]. AtSPL8 was clustered in this group. Some reports found that AtSPL8 played a significant role in male fertility and anther development [9,38]. ZjSBP06 and ZjSBP11 are in Group 6, which contains AtSPL2, AtSPL10 and AtSPL11. Notably, AtSPL2 was the homologous gene with ZjSBP11. These three genes have been reported to control the development of lateral organs in association with shoot maturation in the reproductive phase [39].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material

Young leaves (the second to fifth fully expanded young leaves under shoot apices when new shoots were 40–60 cm in length), mature leaves (leaves at the bottom of new shoots with a length of 40–60 cm), shoots, flowers, young fruit on July 13 (green fruit about 1 cm in diameter) and mature fruit on September 3 (ripe fruit about 3 cm in diameter) of Z. jujuba Mill. Dongzao (Dongzao) were sampled from the National Key Base for Improved Chinese Jujube Cultivar (Cangzhou, China). All the plant tissues were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for later research.

4.2. Identification of SBP-Box Genes in Dongzao

The protein sequence of the SBP-box gene family in Arabidopsis were downloaded from the Arabidopsis Transcription Factors Database website (http://datf.cbi.pku.edu.cn/). Subsequently, these sequences were used to search the Dongzao genome (version 1.1) at the NCBI (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) using blast with a cut-off E-value of 1 × 10−5. We reorganized and merged the highly matched sequences and used InterProScan (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/pfa/iprscan5/) to scan the protein domain. The EST database in NCBI was used to further check the sequence of this gene family.

4.3. Sequence Alignments, Phylogenetic Analyses and Exon-Intron Structure Determination

We used ExPASy (http://www.expasy.org/) to compute the physical and chemical parameters of each protein sequence. Multiple sequence alignment was carried out on DNAMAN software (Version 6.0, Lynnon Biosoft, Quebec, QC, Canada). The sequence logo was obtained using the online Weblogo platform (http://weblogo.berkeley.edu). Phylogenetic trees were constructed using MEGA 7.0 software with the neighbor-joining (NJ) method and the bootstrap test replicated 1000 times. We aligned the coding sequences to their corresponding genomic sequences to get the exon-intron structures of the SBP-box genes. The graph of the exon-intron structures was obtained with the online Gene Structure Display Server (GSDS: http://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.ch). Furthermore, MEME (http://meme-suite.org/) was used to search for motifs in all SBP-box genes. The number of motifs was set to 10.

4.4. Homology Analysis

OrthoMCL [40] was used to search for orthologous and paralogous genes in jujube and Arabidopsis using the entire protein sequences. The results of the OrthoMCL were displayed by Circos [30].

4.5. Expression Analysis of the ZjSBP Genes

Beacon Designer 7.9 was used to design the gene-specific primers of each SBP-box gene (Table S2). All primers were designed avoiding the conserved domains. These sequences were subsequently verified using the BLAST tool at NCBI and a dissociation curve was also analyzed after the PCR reaction to confirm their specificity. The jujube actin gene (EU916201) was used as an internal control to normalize the expression level of the target genes among different samples. The total RNA of different tissues was extracted by the E.Z.N.A.TM Plant RNA Kit (OMEGA). Residual DNA was removed through treatment with DNase I (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The quantity of the total RNA was detected by NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). One microgramme of the total RNA was used for first-strand cDNA synthesis with a mixture of Poly dT and random hexamer primers (PrimeScriptTM RTase, TaKaRa Biotechnology, Dalian, China). The products were diluted ten times to be templates for later qRT-PCR, and stored at −20 °C. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed in the presence of SYBR Green (TaKaRa Biotechnology) and read on an IQ5 real-time PCR instrument (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Each reaction was performed in triplicate with a volume of 10 μL. The following program was used for qRT-PCR: 95 °C for 3 min followed by 39 cycles at 95 °C for 20 s, 55 °C for 20 s, 72 °C for 20 s.

4.6. Expression Quantity of the Transcriptome of Different Tissues

The data of transcriptomes from six tissues (the root, leaves, flower, t-stem, branch and fruit) of Dongzao were retrieved from NCBI with accession number PRJNA260241, which was reported previously by Liu et al. 2014 [28]. Raw sequences were filtered to remove adaptor-containing readings, readings with more than 10% unknown nucleotides, and low-quality readings with more than 50% of bases with a quality value ≤5. Evaluation of the quality of RNA-seq readings and trimming of low-quality readings (Phred quality (Q) score < 20) were carried out using FastQC v0.11.5. The readings were mapped to the jujube genome using TopHat2 version 2.1.1 [41] with default parameters. The Cufflinks Version 2.2.1 with default parameters was employed to perform the quantitative analysis of gene expression based on FPKM-values (Fragments Per Kilobase of gene model per Million fragments mapped) [42]. The different expression profiles were demonstrated by heat map with Heml 1.0 software (CUCKOO, China).

5. Conclusions

The SBP-box gene family is specific to plants and encodes transcription factors with a wide range of functions. To date, the SBP-box gene family of many species has been investigated but there is little information concerning jujube. In the present study, we identified 16 SBP-box gene family members in jujube. Subsequently, gene structures and exon-intron were examined. The phylogenetic analysis and homology analysis indicated the relationship between jujube and other species, from which we can conjecture the corresponding functions. Most ZjSBPs may play vital roles in flower, leaf and fruit development. Expression patterns in different tissues also revealed the potential functions. The results indicated fundamental information about ZjSBPs, which would provide valuable data to further investigate ZjSBP genes in jujube.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/18/8/1734/s1.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Projects in the National Science & Technology Pillar Program (2013BAD14B0302) and the funds from National Natural Science Foundation of China (31372019) and the Beijing Municipal Education Commission (CEFF-PXM2017_014207_000043).

Author Contributions

Xiaoming Pang conceived the project; Ming Cao prepared the plant materials; Shuang Song, Heying Zhou and Songbai Sheng performed the experiments; Shuang Song conducted the bioinformatic analysis. Shuang Song wrote the manuscript; Shuang Song, Xiaoming Pang and Yingyue Li revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Klein, J.; Saedler, H.; Huijser, P. A new family of DNA binding proteins includes putative transcriptional regulators of the Antirrhinum majus, floral meristem identity gene SQUAMOSA. Mol. Genet. Genom. 1996, 250, 7–16. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rainer, P.B.; Guido, J.; Heinz, S.; Peter, H. Functional dissection of the plant-specific SBP-domain: Overlap of the DNA-binding and nuclear localization domains. J. Mol. Biol. 2005, 352, 585–596. [Google Scholar]
  3. Guo, A.Y.; Zhu, Q.H.; Gu, X.; Ge, S.; Yang, J.; Luo, J. Genome-wide identification and evolutionary analysis of the plant specific SBP-box transcription factor family. Gene 2008, 418, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Iida, K.; Seki, M.; Sakurai, T.; Satou, M.; Akiyama, K.; Toyoda, T.; Konagaya, A.; Shinozakiet, K. RARTF: Database and tools for complete sets of Arabidopsis transcription factors. DNA Res. 2005, 12, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cardon, G.; Höhmann, S.; Klein, J.; Nettesheim, K.; Saedler, H.; Huijser, P. Molecular characterization of the Arabidopsis SBP-box genes. Gene. 1999, 237, 91–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xie, K. Genomic organization, differential expression, and interaction of SQUAMOSA promoter-binding-like transcription factors and microRNA156 in rice. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142, 280–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Li, J.; Hou, H.; Li, X.; Xiang, J.; Yin, X.; Gao, H.; Zheng, Y.; Bassett, C.L.; Wang, X.P. Genome-wide identification and analysis of the SBP-box family genes in apple (Malus×domestica Borkh.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 70, 100–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Cardon, G.H.; Höhmann, S.; Nettesheim, K.; Saedler, H.; Huijser, P. Functional analysis of the Arabidopsis thaliana SBP-box gene SPL3: A novel gene involved in the floral transition. Plant J. 1997, 12, 367–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Unte, U.S.; Sorensen, A.M.; Pesaresi, P.; Gandikota, M.; Leister, D.; Saedler, H.; Huijser, P. SPL8, an SBP-box gene that affects pollen sac development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 1009–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wu, G.; Poethig, R.S. Temporal regulation of shoot development in Arabidopsis thaliana by miR156 and its target SPL3. Development 2006, 133, 3539–3547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Schwarz, S.; Grande, A.V.; Bujdoso, N.; Saedler, H.; Huijser, P. The microRNA regulated SBP-box genes SPL9 and SPL15 control shoot maturation in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2008, 67, 183–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gandikota, M.; Birkenbihl, R.P.; Höhmann, S.; Cardon, G.H.; Saedler, H.; Huijser, P. The miRNA156/157 recognition element in the 3′ UTR of the Arabidopsis SBP box gene SPL3 prevents early flowering by translational inhibition in seedlings. Plant J. 2007, 49, 683–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jung, J.H.; Seo, P.J.; Kang, S.K.; Park, C.M. MiR172 signals are incorporated into the miR156 signaling pathway at the SPL3/4/5, genes in Arabidopsis, developmental transitions. Plant Mol. Biol. 2011, 76, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, Y.; Schwarz, S.; Saedler, H.; Huijser, P. SPL8, a local regulator in a subset of gibberellin-mediated developmental processes in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2007, 63, 429–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Miura, K.; Ikeda, M.; Matsubara, A.; Song, X.J.; Ito, M.; Asano, K.; Matsuoka, M.; Kitano, H.; Ashikari, M. OsSPL14 promotes panicle branching and higher grain productivity in rice. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42, 545–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wang, S.; Wu, K.; Yuan, Q.; Liu, X.; Liu, Z.; Lin, X.; Zeng, R.; Zhu, H.; Dong, G.; Qian, Q.; et al. Control of grain size, shape and quality by OsSPL16 in rice. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 950–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Salinas, M.; Xing, S.; Höhmann, S.; Berndtgen, R.; Huijser, P. Genomic organization, phylogenetic comparison and differential expression of the SBP-box family of transcription factors in tomato. Planta 2012, 235, 1171–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Manning, K.; Tör, M.; Poole, M.; Hong, Y.; Thompson, A.J.; King, G.J.; Giovannoni, J.J.; Seymour, G.B. A naturally occurring epigenetic mutation in a gene encoding an SBP-box transcription factor inhibits tomato fruit ripening. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38, 948–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Andrew, J.; Mahmut, T.; Cornelius, S.; Julia, V.; Caroline, O.; Michael, C.J.; James, J.G.; Donald, G.; Graham, B.S. Molecular and genetic characterization of a novel pleiotropic tomato-ripening mutant. Plant Physiol. 1999, 120, 383–389. [Google Scholar]
  20. Emma, E.M.; Bovy, A.; Manning, K.; Harrison, L.; Andrews, J.; de Silva, J.; Tucker, G.A.; Seymour, G.B. Effect of the colorless non-ripening mutation on cell wall biochemistry and gene expression during tomato fruit development and ripening. Plant Physiol. 2004, 136, 4184–4197. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hou, H.; Li, J.; Gao, M.; Singer, S.D.; Wang, H.; Mao, L.; Fei, Z.; Wang, X. Genomic organization, phylogenetic comparison and differential expression of the SBP-box family genes in grape. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e59358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, J.W.; Fan, L.P.; Ding, S.D.; Ding, X.L. Nutritional composition of five cultivars of Chinese jujube. Food Chem. 2007, 103, 454–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, M.J. The present status, problems and countermeasures of Chinese jujube production (in Chinese). Rev. China Agric. Sci. Technol. 2000, 2, 76–80. [Google Scholar]
  24. Huang, J.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, X.; Fei, Z.; Wan, K.; Zhang, Z.; Pang, X.; Yin, X.; Bai, Y.; Sun, X.; et al. The jujube genome provides insights into genome evolution and the domestication of sweetness/acidity taste in fruit trees. PLoS Genet. 2016, 12, e1006433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Xiao, J.; Zhao, J.; Liu, M.; Liu, P.; Dai, L.; Zhao, Z. Genome-wide characterization of Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) loci in Chinese jujube and jujube SSR primer transferability. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0127812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gao, Q.; Wu, C.; Wang, M. The jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.) fruit: A review of current knowledge of fruit composition and health benefits. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 3351–3363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Qu, Z.; Wang, Y. China fruit’s monograph—Chinese jujube volume. Beijing China For. Publ. House 1993, 56, 229. [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu, M.J.; Zhao, J.; Cai, Q.L.; Liu, G.C.; Wang, J.R.; Zhao, Z.H.; Liu, P.; Dai, L.; Yan, G.; Wang, W.J.; et al. The complex jujube genome provides insights into fruit tree biology. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5315–5326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Riese, M.; Höhmann, S.; Saedler, H.; Münster, T.; Huijser, P. Comparative analysis of the SBP-box gene families in P. patens and seed plants. Gene 2007, 401, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Martin, R.C.; Asahina, M.; Liu, P.P.; Kristof, J.R.; Coppersmith, J.L.; Pluskota, W.E.; Bassel, G.W.; Goloviznina, N.A.; Nguyen, T.T.; Martine-Andújar, C.; et al. The regulation of post-germinative transition from the cotyledon-to vegetative-leaf stages by microRNA-targeted SQUAMOSA PROMOTER-BINDING PROTEIN LIKE13 in Arabidopsis. Seed Sci. Res. 2010, 20, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Krzywinski, M.; Schein, J.I. Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 1639–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wang, H.; Nussbaumwagler, T.; Li, B.; Zhao, Q.; Vigouroux, Y.; Faller, M.; Kirsten, B.; Lewis, L.; John, D. The origin of the naked grains of maize. Nature 2005, 436, 714–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Stone, J.M.; Liang, X.; Nekl, E.R.; Stiers, J.J. Arabidopsis AtSPL14, a plant-specific SBP-domain transcription factor, participates in plant development and sensitivity to fumonisin B1. Plant J. 2005, 41, 744–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wang, J.W.; Czech, B.; Weigel, D. MiR156-regulated SPL transcription factors define an endogenous flowering pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell 2009, 138, 738–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Gou, J.Y.; Wang, J.W. Negative regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis by a miR156-targeted SPL transcription factor. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 1512–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Yamasaki, H.; Hayashi, M.; Fukazawa, M.; Kobayashi, Y.; Shikanai, T. SQUAMOSA promoter binding protein-like7 is a central regulator for copper homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 347–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Xing, S.; Salinas, M.; Höhmann, S.; Berndtgen, R.; Huijser, P. MiR156-targeted and nontargeted SBP-box transcription factors act in concert to secure male fertility in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 3935–3950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Shikata, M.; Koyama, T.; Mitsuda, N.; Ohme-Takagi, M. Arabidopsis SBP-box genes SPL10, SPL11 and SPL2 control morphological change in association with shoot maturation in the reproductive phase. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009, 50, 2133–2145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Li, L.; Stoeckert, C.J., Jr.; Roos, D.S. OrthoMCL: Identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 2003, 13, 2178–2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Trapnell, C.; Roberts, A.; Goff, L.; Pertea, G.; Kim, D.; Kelley, D.R.; Pimentel, H.; Salzberg, S.; Rinn, J.; Pachter, L.; et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-Seq experiments with Hophat and Cufflinks. Nat. Protoc. 2012, 7, 562–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Li, B.; Dewey, C.N. Rsem: Accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinform. 2011, 12, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Distribution of ZjSBP genes over the jujube chromosomes.
Figure 1. Distribution of ZjSBP genes over the jujube chromosomes.
Ijms 18 01734 g001
Figure 2. SBP domain alignment of the ZjSBPs. (a) Multiple alignments of the SBP domains of the ZjSBPs by DNAMAN; the two conserved zinc finger structures (Zn-1, Zn-2) and NLS are indicated; (b) Sequence logos of the SBP domain by the online Gene Structure Display Server; the overall height of each stack represents the degree of conservation at this position, while the height of the letters within each stack indicates the relative frequency of the corresponding amino acids.
Figure 2. SBP domain alignment of the ZjSBPs. (a) Multiple alignments of the SBP domains of the ZjSBPs by DNAMAN; the two conserved zinc finger structures (Zn-1, Zn-2) and NLS are indicated; (b) Sequence logos of the SBP domain by the online Gene Structure Display Server; the overall height of each stack represents the degree of conservation at this position, while the height of the letters within each stack indicates the relative frequency of the corresponding amino acids.
Ijms 18 01734 g002
Figure 3. Phylogenetic analysis of jujube and other SBP-box families by MEGA 7.0. The sequences of the SBP domain are from Arabidopsis (AtSPL), apple (MdSBP), rice (OsSPL), tomato (SlySBP or CNR), grape (VvSBP) and jujube (ZjSBP). The sequences and the sources of other plants are in Tables S2 and S3.
Figure 3. Phylogenetic analysis of jujube and other SBP-box families by MEGA 7.0. The sequences of the SBP domain are from Arabidopsis (AtSPL), apple (MdSBP), rice (OsSPL), tomato (SlySBP or CNR), grape (VvSBP) and jujube (ZjSBP). The sequences and the sources of other plants are in Tables S2 and S3.
Ijms 18 01734 g003
Figure 4. Phylogenetic analysis of jujube SBP domain proteins and exon-intron structures with the online Gene Structure Display Server. Exons and SBP domains are indicated by yellow and pink boxes. Black lines connecting two exons represent introns.
Figure 4. Phylogenetic analysis of jujube SBP domain proteins and exon-intron structures with the online Gene Structure Display Server. Exons and SBP domains are indicated by yellow and pink boxes. Black lines connecting two exons represent introns.
Ijms 18 01734 g004
Figure 5. The motifs of each ZjSBP gene by MEME. Numbers 1–10 are displayed in different colored boxes. The sequence information for each motif is provided in Table 2.
Figure 5. The motifs of each ZjSBP gene by MEME. Numbers 1–10 are displayed in different colored boxes. The sequence information for each motif is provided in Table 2.
Ijms 18 01734 g005
Figure 6. The homologous gene pairs between Z. jujuba Mill. Dongzao and Arabidopsis with Circus. Red, purple and blue lines indicate homologous gene pairs between Z. jujuba Mill. Dongzao and Arabidopsis, and Arabidopsis and Z. jujuba Mill. Dongzao.
Figure 6. The homologous gene pairs between Z. jujuba Mill. Dongzao and Arabidopsis with Circus. Red, purple and blue lines indicate homologous gene pairs between Z. jujuba Mill. Dongzao and Arabidopsis, and Arabidopsis and Z. jujuba Mill. Dongzao.
Ijms 18 01734 g006
Figure 7. Expression levels of ZjSBPs in different tissues. Differences in gene expression are shown in color according to the scale by Heml 1.0. Tissues or organs: YL—young leaves; ML—mature leaves; F—flowers; YF—young fruits; MF—mature fruits; S—shoots.
Figure 7. Expression levels of ZjSBPs in different tissues. Differences in gene expression are shown in color according to the scale by Heml 1.0. Tissues or organs: YL—young leaves; ML—mature leaves; F—flowers; YF—young fruits; MF—mature fruits; S—shoots.
Ijms 18 01734 g007
Figure 8. Expression quantities of ZjSBPs for different transcriptomes in different tissues by Heml 1.0.
Figure 8. Expression quantities of ZjSBPs for different transcriptomes in different tissues by Heml 1.0.
Ijms 18 01734 g008
Table 1. The SBP-box gene family in Z. jujuba Mill. Dongzao.
Table 1. The SBP-box gene family in Z. jujuba Mill. Dongzao.
Gene NameGene IDRefSeq IDLocationCDS (bp)Amino Acids Length (aa)MW (kDa)pIGRAVYInstability Index (II)EST
ZjSBP01LOC107425063XM_016034996.1chr01:21341210-2134354046515417,411.906.66−1.38288.82YES
ZjSBP02LOC107416051XM_016024498.1chr04:9923829-992951031801059117,174.398.73−0.47660.91YES
ZjSBP03LOC107416470XM_016024954.1chr04:14303210-1430541764221323,753.229.04−1.12760.78NO
ZjSBP04ALOC107418038XM_016026704.1chr05:6738154-6742177118539442,994.947.26−0.57653.17YES
ZjSBP04BLOC107418038XM_016026705.1chr05:6738154-6742177118539442,994.947.26−0.57653.17YES
ZjSBP05LOC107419077XM_016027806.1chr05:21507138-21511275166555460,692.968.07−0.48751.59YES
ZjSBP06LOC107417566XM_016026174.1chr05:2335756-2337973124541445,301.328.54−0.58058.86NO
ZjSBP07ALOC107423307XM_016032840.1chr07:23461384-23466777248782892,658.806.20−0.42756.10YES
ZjSBP07BLOC107423307XM_016032841.1chr07:23461384-23466777240079989,422.846.04−0.48155.73YES
ZjSBP08LOC107424290XM_016034051.1chr08:5519236-552044651917219,646.285.20−1.30978.87YES
ZjSBP09ALOC107426205XM_016036321.1chr09:3743974-375072630571018112,964.476.22−0.48249.87YES
ZjSBP09BLOC107426205XM_016036322.1chr09:3743974-375072630571018112,964.476.22−0.48249.87YES
ZjSBP09CLOC107426205XM_016036323.1chr09:3743974-375072630571018112,964.476.22−0.48249.87YES
ZjSBP10LOC107429070XM_016039720.1chr10:13935247-13941596154551457,356.097.56−0.61056.15YES
ZjSBP11ALOC107428311XM_016038829.1chr10:2775470-2780707144047952,124.507.24−0.76256.96YES
ZjSBP11BLOC107428311XM_016038830.1chr10:2775470-2780707144047952,124.507.24−0.76256.96YES
ZjSBP11CLOC107428311XM_016038831.1chr10:2775470-2780707144047952,124.507.24−0.76256.96YES
ZjSBP11DLOC107428311XM_016038833.1chr10:2775470-2780707144047952,124.507.24−0.76256.96YES
ZjSBP12ALOC107428287XM_016038800.1chr10:2934047-2937123106535439,239.788.54−0.72363.10YES
ZjSBP12BLOC107428287XM_016038801.1chr10:2934047-2937123103234337,911.278.55−0.71762.37YES
ZjSBP13ALOC107432336XM_016043455.1chr12:6956478-6961330116738841,547.479.11−0.53254.74YES
ZjSBP13BLOC107432336XM_016043456.1chr12:6956478-6961330114638140,762.539.11−0.54255.78YES
ZjSBP14LOC107433357XM_016044643.1chr12:19190329-1919580531351044116,394.537.84−0.41950.17YES
ZjSBP15LOC107406208XM_016013312.1add_scaffold 414:32884-3489757919221,583.479.56−0.99266.24YES
ZjSBP16ALOC107408850XM_016016273.1add_scaffold2409:1682-4023116738843,549.828.29−0.74353.37YES
ZjSBP16BLOC107408850XM_016016274.1add_scaffold2409:1682-4023114338047,233.328.98−0.75752.77YES
ZjSBP16CLOC107408850XM_016016275.1add_scaffold2409:1682-4023108336040,305.198.490−0.75157.42YES
ZjSBP16DLOC107408850XM_016016277.1add_scaffold2409:1682-4023108336040,305.198.490−0.75157.42YES
Table 2. Analysis and distribution of conserved motifs in ZjSBPs.
Table 2. Analysis and distribution of conserved motifs in ZjSBPs.
Motif No.E-ValueSitesWidthAnnotation of Motif
11.7 × 10−691680SBP domain
23.3 × 10−67468unknown
36.3 × 10−36378Ankyrin repeat
41.6 × 10−17333unknown
52.3 × 10−16278unknown
61.1 × 10−9270unknown
71.6 × 10−7811unknown
81.7 × 10−7419unknown
92.1 × 10−5519unknown
101.2 × 10−4253unknown
Table 3. Best possible match of conserved motifs.
Table 3. Best possible match of conserved motifs.
NameE-ValueBest Possible Match
Motif 11.7 × 10−69PSCQVEGCNADLSSAKDYHRRHKVCELHSKAPKVJVGGLEQRFCQQCSRFHELSEFDEGKRSCRRRLAGHNERRRKPQPE
Motif 23.37 × 10−67AQSRTGRIVFKLFGKDPNDFPLVLRAQILDWLSNSPSDIESYIRPGCIILTIYLAMPEAAWEELCENL
Motif 36.37 × 10−36AQSRTGRIVFKLFGKDPNDFPLVLRAQILDWLSNSPSDIESYIRPGCIILTIYLAMPEAAWEELCENL
Motif 41.67 × 10−17LLYRPAMLSMVAIAAVCVCVALLFKSSPEVVYV
Motif 52.37 × 10−16GNIEAKKQALDFIHEMGWLLHRSRAKLRLGHLDPNADPFPFKRFKWLMEFSLEHDWCAVVKKLLGILFEGSVDEGEHP
Motif 61.17 × 10−9DPFWRTGWVYIRLQNFIAFIYNGHVIJDTPLPLKSHKNCKILSIKPIAISASEKAQFIVKGFNLARPATR
Motif 71.67 × 10−7CALSLLSSQPT
Motif 81.77 × 10−7FFPFIVADEEVCSEIRVLE
Motif 92.17 × 10−5LEWDLKDWSWDGTLFLAEP
Motif 101.27 × 10−4TVVNGNSLNDERGSGYLLISLLRILSNMHSNRSDQNKDQDLLSHLLRSLANFT

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Song, S.; Zhou, H.; Sheng, S.; Cao, M.; Li, Y.; Pang, X. Genome-Wide Organization and Expression Profiling of the SBP-Box Gene Family in Chinese Jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1734. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18081734

AMA Style

Song S, Zhou H, Sheng S, Cao M, Li Y, Pang X. Genome-Wide Organization and Expression Profiling of the SBP-Box Gene Family in Chinese Jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.). International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2017; 18(8):1734. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18081734

Chicago/Turabian Style

Song, Shuang, Heying Zhou, Songbai Sheng, Ming Cao, Yingyue Li, and Xiaoming Pang. 2017. "Genome-Wide Organization and Expression Profiling of the SBP-Box Gene Family in Chinese Jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.)" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 18, no. 8: 1734. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18081734

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop