Next Article in Journal
Regulation of TNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand Signaling by Glycosylation
Next Article in Special Issue
A Review of the Interactions between Wheat and Wheat Pathogens: Zymoseptoria tritici, Fusarium spp. and Parastagonospora nodorum
Previous Article in Journal
The Regulatory Role of MeAIB in Protein Metabolism and the mTOR Signaling Pathway in Porcine Enterocytes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 19
Issue 3
10.3390/ijms19030717
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Transcriptome Profiling of Rice Near-Isogenic Line Carrying Xa23 under Infection of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae

by
Rezwan Tariq
,
Chunlian Wang
,
Tengfei Qin
,
Feifei Xu
,
Yongchao Tang
,
Ying Gao
,
Zhiyuan Ji
and
Kaijun Zhao
*
National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement (NFCRI), Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences (CAAS), Beijing 100081, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(3), 717; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19030717
Submission received: 8 February 2018 / Revised: 27 February 2018 / Accepted: 28 February 2018 / Published: 2 March 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Signal Transduction Pathways in Plants for Resistance Against Plant Pathogens)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Bacterial blight, caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo), is an overwhelming disease in rice-growing regions worldwide. Our previous studies revealed that the executor R gene Xa23 confers broad-spectrum disease resistance to all naturally occurring biotypes of Xoo. In this study, comparative transcriptomic profiling of two near-isogenic lines (NILs), CBB23 (harboring Xa23) and JG30 (without Xa23), before and after infection of the Xoo strain, PXO99A, was done by RNA sequencing, to identify genes associated with the resistance. After high throughput sequencing, 1645 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified between CBB23 and JG30 at different time points. Gene Ontlogy (GO) analysis categorized the DEGs into biological process, molecular function, and cellular component. KEGG analysis categorized the DEGs into different pathways, and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis was the most prominent pathway, followed by biosynthesis of plant hormones, flavonoid biosynthesis, and glycolysis/gluconeogenesis. Further analysis led to the identification of differentially expressed transcription factors (TFs) and different kinase responsive genes in CBB23, than that in JG30. Besides TFs and kinase responsive genes, DEGs related to ethylene, jasmonic acid, and secondary metabolites were also identified in both genotypes after PXO99A infection. The data of DEGs are a precious resource for further clarifying the network of Xa23-mediated resistance.

1. Introduction

Pathogens cause extensive damage to agriculture and food commodities. According to molecular clocks, land plants evolved 700 million years ago, and the establishment of land plants was facilitated by the symbiotic microbe association [1]. Interestingly, the epidemiological plant–microbe interaction provides the co-evolutionary arms race that varies in both time and space. For example, the increased virulence of a pathogen places strong selection on plants to modify their defense response. If successful resistance is developed, selection pressure is exerted on the pathogen for changing its tactics to overcome the developed resistance [2,3].
Rice is an important cereal crop which influences the economies of several billion people, especially in Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East. In rice, more than 70 diseases instigated by bacteria, fungi, nematodes, and viruses are prevalent [4]. Among bacterial diseases, bacterial blight, caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo), is an overwhelming disease in most of the rice growing regions worldwide [5]. Bacterial blight was first reported by the Japanese farmers in 1884, but not taken seriously due to it causing less damage [6]. However, this disease appeared again drastically in high yielding varieties during 1960–1970 [7]. Since then, the infection of the Xoo has been widely reported throughout Asia, and become one of the serious rice diseases, bringing about dreadful yield loss [8]. Typically, Xoo is a vascular pathogen, and enters the host through hydathodes of leaf margins and wounds, multiplies into the intercellular spaces beneath epithelial tissues, then moves to the xylem vessels for systemic infection [9]. During infection, Xoo injects transcription activator like-effector (TALE) protein into the host cell via the type III secretion system that activates the susceptible gene to promote the disease progression, or may activate the resistance gene that triggers the defense mechanism [10,11]. Interestingly, natural TALEs have central conserved repeat region of 34-amino acid-repeats (34-aa-repeats), an N terminus region for type III secretion system (TTSS), C-terminus containing acidic transcription activation domain (AD), and nuclear localization signal (NLS). Moreover, the central repeat region (CRR) of TAL effectors determines the targeted genes in the host plant cells [10].
Until now, 42 resistance genes have been identified to tackle the increasing threat of bacterial blight [12,13]. Xa23, a dominate bacterial blight resistance gene, confers broad-spectrum resistance against all naturally occurring biotypes of Xoo [14]. The expression of Xa23 causes hypersensitivity response (HR) or programmed cell death (PCD) in plants, which ultimately restricts the pathogen infection in disease resistant plants. Basically, Xa23 was derived from a wild race of rice (Oryza rufipogon) that confers broad-spectrum resistance against Xoo. A near-isogenic line (NIL), CBB23, was developed from a cross between O. rufipogon and susceptible indica variety JG30 [15].
Because Xa23 confers broad-spectrum resistance against Xoo, it is necessary to conduct an independent study to compare the gene expression profiles of the CBB23 and JG30 rice genotypes during different Xoo infection stages (12, 24, 36, and 48 h of post inoculation (hpi)). For comparative analysis, RNA-Seq allows transcriptomic analysis in an unbiased way, a tremendous detection range (>8000-fold) with single base pair resolution and low background signals [16]. Moreover, RNA-Seq has an ability to detect the differentially expressed genes with a broader dynamic range of expression levels [17]. Several transcriptomic profiling studies of plants, e.g., wheat, maize, rice, Arabidopsis, and watermelon, etc., under different biotic and abiotic stresses, have been investigated successfully [18,19,20,21]. Here we conducted a comparative transcriptomic study to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in both NILs (CBB23 and JG30) after PXO99A infection at the early and late time period. After transcriptomic analysis, we identified several DEGs, including different transcription factors (TFs), kinase responsive genes, and clusters of genes involved in different gene ontology terms (GO) and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) pathways. These DEGs would be a valuable resource for future molecular studies of rice resistance against Xoo infection.

2. Results

2.1. RNA Sequencing of Different Samples and Data Analysis

First, leaves of CBB23 and JG30 genotypes were infected by PXO99A via scissors-clipping method, for the confirmation of resistant and susceptible genotypes (Figure 1A). To investigate the comparative expression of genes in the NILs of rice, RNA was extracted from mock (C0 and J0) as well as leaves inoculated with PXO99A (12 hpi, 24 hpi, 36 hpi, and 48 hpi), and cDNA libraries were prepared for RNA-Seq (Figure 1B). Additionally, raw reads were ranged from 41893788 to 65574380 (Table 1 and Table S1). After a quality check, adapter and low-quality reads were eliminated from data. The clean data were ranged from 40,539,554 to 62,882,740 reads. The sequence reads were mapped to the rice reference genome using TopHat and implementing Bowtie. The number of reads, ranged from 79.99% to 83.96%, were mapped to the rice reference genome. Furthermore, GC contents were ranged from 52.85% to 55.23%. The mapping data depicted that >80% clean reads were successfully mapped to the rice reference genome (maximum of two mismatches). The high range of genome coverage of our RNA-Seq data revealed that DEGs data were reliable for further bioinformatics analysis.

2.2. Identification of DEGs in Response to PXO99A in CBB23 and JG30

To understand the expression pattern of genes induced by PXO99A in both resistant (CBB23) and susceptible (JG30) genotypes, pairwise comparisons were made between CBB23 vs. JG30 at a specific time interval. A p-value ≤ 0.05 threshold was set to retrieve the significantly DEGs in CBB23 and JG30 at different time intervals before and after PXO99A infection. Moreover, DEGs were screened on the basis of log2fold change (log2FC) ≥1 or ≤−1. Merely, DEGs identified by p-value ≤ 0.05 and log2FC ≥1 or ≤−1 were kept for further analysis (Table S2); a total of 1645 DEGs were identified between CBB23 and JG30 before and after PXO99A infection (Figure 2A). The comparison between two genotypes revealed that there were more downregulated genes than upregulated genes. Most of the genes were upregulated during 12 hpi and 36 hpi of PXO99A. Concisely, we identified 151 (60 upregulated and 91 downregulated), 476 (271 upregulated and 205 downregulated), 329 (85 upregulated and 244 downregulated), 384 (244 upregulated and 140 downregulated), and 305 (96 upregulated and 209 downregulated) in mock (C0 vs. J0), 12 hpi, 24 hpi, 36 hpi, and 48 hpi, respectively. Furthermore, the DEGs overlapped in CBB23 vs. JG30 were analyzed; though 26 DEGs were overlapped in all time points, 253, 144, 251, and 180 DEGs were distinctive at 12 hpi, 24 hpi, 36 hpi, and 48 hpi, respectively (Figure 2B).

2.3. Response of Differentially Expressed Transcription Factors to PXO99A Infection

Transcription factors appear to be involved in the regulation of different physiological programs in response to plant–pathogen interaction [22]. We identified 75 putative transcription factors that could be classified into 13 different TF families (Figure 3 and Table S3). These 75 differentially expressed TFs might perform an important role in the rice–PXO99A interaction. Among differentially expressed TFs, only 3 WRKY TFs (Os09G0417600, Os09G0417800, and Os05G0322900) were upregulated in C0 vs. J0; whereas, nine APETALA2/ethylene responsive factor (AP2-ERF), seven WRKY, two MYB, three bHLH, and seven Tify TFs were upregulated in CBB23 relative to JG30 at 12 hpi. At 24 hpi, eight AP2-ERF, six WRKY, five bHLH, and five Tify were the major downregulated TFs; however, only one C2H2 TF was upregulated in CBB23 compared to JG30 at 24 hpi. At 36 hpi, five AP2-ERF, seven bHLH, and three NAC TFs were the major genes that had high expression patterns in CBB23 relative to JG30. Moreover, one C3H and one NAC TFs were upregulated in CBB23 compared to JG30 at 48 hpi. Briefly, 47 TF responsive genes were upregulated and 28 were downregulated in CBB23 relative to JG30. Thus, upregulated genes may be involved in enhancing the immunity of CBB23 against PXO99A infection. Nevertheless, downregulated genes may be negatively regulating the rice immunity upon PXO99A infection.

2.4. Response of Different Kinase Responsive Genes to PXO99A Infection

Kinases play a crucial role in signaling during pathogen recognition and subsequent activation of the plant defense mechanism to counter the pathogen attack. In our experiments, we identified 39 differentially expressed kinase responsive genes at different time points before and after the PXO99A infection (Figure 4). Among the 39 kinase responsive genes, expressions of 13 genes were upregulated, and 26 were downregulated in CBB23 relative to JG30 after PXO99A infection (Table S4). In mock samples (C0 vs. J0), expression of three genes (Os11G0628000, Os02G0151800, and Os02G0791700) were downregulated, and only one gene (Os11G0672300) was upregulated. At 12 hpi, 23 DEGs (13 upregulated and 10 downregulated) were identified. Among the 13 upregulated DEGs, including three receptor like kinases (RLKs) (Os09G0442100, Os08G0374600, and Os11G0570000), 3 serine/threonine protein kinase (Os01G0699600, Os06G0202900, and Os07G0622000), 2 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) (Os03G0285800, Os05G0566400), one calcium-dependent protein kinase (Os02G0126400), one phytosulfokine receptor (PSK) (Os02G0154200), one ankyrin-kinase (Os01G0892800), one CBL-interacting protein kinase (Os07G0678300), and one kinase responsive protein (Os11G0672300), all exhibited positive regulation in CBB23 genotype compared to the JG30 genotype. At 24 hpi, 20 DEGs (3 upregulated and 17 downregulated) were identified. Among the 20 DEGs, three differentially expressed kinase responsive genes, including one CBL-interacting protein kinase (Os12G0113500), one phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (Os08G0307400), and one kinase responsive protein (Os11G0672300), were upregulated in CBB23 than in JG30. Differentially expressed kinase responsive genes with seven downregulated genes at 36 hpi; however, one DEG belong to the MAPK (Os02G0787300), one kinase responsive protein (Os11G0672300), respectively, were upregulated in CBB23 relative to JG30. At 48 hpi, eight DEGs were identified, and the expression of one kinase responsive protein (Os11G0672300) was upregulated, and the other seven genes were downregulated in CBB23 vs. JG30 after PXO99A infection.

2.5. GO Based Analysis of the DEGs

The gene ontology (GO) analysis was done by using AgriGO online tool. The DEGs were categorized into three different GO categories, i.e., (1) biological process, (2) molecular function, and (3) cellular component. The detailed GO analysis of 1645 DEGs between CBB23 vs. JG30 is shown in Table S5. To investigate the effect of PXO99A on the expression of the genes in rice, we analyzed the DEGs at different time intervals in terms of GO. Moreover, significantly enriched GO terms were retrieved by using the false discovery rate (FDR) ≤ 0.05 (Table S6). In C0 vs. J0, DEGs were grouped into 13 different GO terms (FDR ≤ 0.05), including 11 cellular components and two molecular function related terms. In CBB23-12 hpi vs. JG30-12 hpi, we identified 19 different GO terms (FDR ≤ 0.05), and the major terms were covered by molecular function (17) and cellular component (2). In CBB23-24 hpi vs. JG30-24 hpi, the DEGs were significantly enriched in biological process (17) followed by cellular component (18) and molecular function (5) related different GO terms (FDR ≤ 0.05). In CBB23-36 hpi vs. JG30-36 hpi, the significantly enriched 42 different GO terms (FDR ≤ 0.05) were classified into biological process (14), cellular component (16), and molecular function (12). In CBB23-48 hpi vs. JG30-48 hpi, the DEGs were remarkably enriched in 41 GO terms (FDR ≤ 0.05) consisting of biological process (15), cellular component (19), and molecular function (7).
To identify which biological process was differentially regulated after PXO99A inoculation, the GO analysis for the classification of 12 hpi, 24 hpi, 36 hpi, and 48 hpi DEGs was performed (Figure 5). The GO terms revealing the biological process were as follows: “organonitrogen compound metabolic process” (GO:1901564), “organic acid metabolic process” (GO:0006082), “generation of precursor metabolites and energy” (GO:0006091), “isoprenoid metabolic process” (GO:0006720), “terpenoid metabolic process” (GO:0006721), “diterpenoid metabolic process” (GO:0016101), “gibberellin metabolic process” (GO:0009685), and “diterpene phytoalexin metabolic process” (GO:0051501).

2.6. MapMan Overview of DEGs Related to Plant–Pathogen Interaction

To elucidate the role of PXO99A in the induction of DEGs in rice, the DEGs that had a role in defense during the plant-pathogen interaction were retrieved. For this, MapMan package was employed to investigate the pathway between rice-PXO99A interactions. Basically, MapMan package uses the input data of DEGs to form a particular biological process by the using available rice genome database. An overview of the regulation of DEGs, such as TFs, kinase responsive genes, PRs, and peroxidases, etc., is shown in Figure 6. Most of the DEGs belonging to ERFs were upregulated, while most of the DEGs encoding WRKY, MYB, and Dof-related DEGs were downregulated. Four of 12 DEGs encoding PRs were upregulated, and the other eight DEGs were downregulated. Twenty-one of 36 DEGs associated with secondary metabolites were upregulated, and other 15 DEGs were downregulated. Expression of 56 DEGs associated with signaling was influenced by PXO99A in CBB23 vs. JG30. Among the 56 DEGs, 38 genes were downregulated, and 18 signaling-associated genes were upregulated. Eight of the 12 DEGs associated with peroxidase and 3 DEGs from glutathione S-transferase were downregulated.
After PXO99A infection, two DEGs encoding abscisic acid (ABA) and two DEGs related to the salicylic acid (SA) were downregulated in CBB23 relative to JG30.
Fourteen of 25 DEGs encoding ethylene (ET) were upregulated, and five DEGs associated with cell wall were upregulated. In addition, five of seven DEGs were upregulated in beta-glucanase, and 13 DEGs encoding proteolysis were upregulated. The detailed list of all the DEGs involved in rice–PXO99A interaction in MapMan functional categories was pointed out in Table S7.

2.7. KEGG Pathway

To perform the pathway analysis of the 1645 DEGs between CBB23 and JG30 at different time intervals before and after the inoculation of PXO99A, we mapped the DEGs in the KEGG database. The KEGG pathways were scrutinized on the basis of p-value ≤ 0.05 (Table S8). The “biosynthesis of phenylpropanoids” and “biosynthesis of plant hormones” were prominent pathways between CBB23 and JG30 in response to PXO99A at 12, 24, 36, and 48 hpi.
“Biosynthesis of phenylpropanoids” and “flavonoid biosynthesis” were enriched at 24 and 36 hpi. Besides these above-mentioned pathways, “glycolysis/gluconeogenesis” was enriched at 36 and 48 hpi. In detail, as a result of PXO99A infection, the sketch of phenylpropanoid pathway revealed the most relevant biological function of the DEGs (Figure 7). The upregulated DEGs were in phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (EC:4.3.1.24), phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (EC:4.3.1.25), cinnamate 4-hydroxylase CYP73 (EC:1.14.13.11), 4-coumarate-CoA ligase 1 (EC 6.2.1.12), cinnamoyl CoA reductase (1.2.1.44), mannitol dehydrogenase (EC:1.1.1.195), and 1-cys peroxiredoxin (EC:1.11.1.7); while DEGs involved in aldehyde 5-hydroxylase (EC:1.14.-.-) were downregulated. The above results suggest that these pathways may perform to enhance the rice immunity against the PXO99A.

2.8. Validation of RNA-Seq Results by qRT-PCR

Eight DEGs genes influenced by PXO99A between CBB23 and JG30 were selected for qRT-PCR to validate the RNA-Seq data (Figure 8). Among the eight selected genes, Os08G0374600 (receptor kinase CRINKLY4) and Os01G0699600 (serine/threonine protein kinase) were highly expressed at 12 hpi in CBB23 than JG30. Os03G0850900 encoding another kinase exhibited continuous high expression patterns from 12 to 36 hpi in CBB23 compared with JG30. Os01G0862800, responsible for OsNAC59, showed a higher expression pattern at 24 hpi in JG30 than CBB23; hence, OsNAC59 was identified to be important for susceptibility. Os11G0667700 was identified as a kinase responsive gene, and exhibited high expression level in JG30 compared with CBB23 at 36 hpi. OsbHLH34 (Os02G0726700) was upregulated at 36 hpi and 48 hpi in JG30 compared to CBB23. Os04G0493400 encoding a pathogenesis-related protein (PR) expressed more highly in CBB23 than JG30 at 36 hpi. Os09G0443400 encoding a hypothetical protein exhibited significantly higher expression level at 24 hpi in JG30 than CBB23. In short, the expression pattern of DEGs by qRT-PCR validates the results revealed by RNA-Seq analysis.

3. Discussion

In our ecosystem, plants are surrounded by different microorganisms, e.g., bacteria, fungi, viruses, and nematodes. Bacteria become pathogens when they invade the host cell to proliferate [23]. Damaging is a crucial process for pathogens to get the nutrients from plant cell for their survival. The main nutritional component is sugar, located in the apoplast of the cell, but abundant amount is present in cellular matrix. Successful penetration to approach for the cellular matrix is not an easy job for the pathogen. To tackle the invading pathogen, plants have two layers of defense: the pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMP)-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI).
Usually, PTI is the first line of defense to counter the pathogen attack by recognizing the PAMPs through pattern recognition receptors (PPRs). ETI is a system that recognizes pathogen effectors and induces local cell death, often referred to as hypersensitivity reaction (HR) in plants [24]. NB-LRRs are proteins encoded by R genes and present a leucine-rich repeat (LRR), giving them specificity for binding interactions. Race-specific interactions between Xoo and rice are thought to follow the gene-for-gene model, which predicts that incompatible interactions are the result of positive function conferred by avirulence genes in the pathogen, and corresponding resistance R genes in the host [25]. Xa23, an executor R gene, confers a broad spectrum resistance against bacterial blight because AvrXa23 is widespread in all naturally occurring Xoo strains [14].
Through RNA-Seq, the NILs (CBB23 and JG30) were exploited to identify the defense response in the form of DEGs towards PXO99A. A clear morphological distinction between the leaves of CBB23 and JG30 was observed after 10 days of the PXO99A inoculation. Xa23-mediated resistance was observed in the form of HR reaction in CBB23; while clear PXO99A growth in form of chlorotic leaf was observed in JG30 leaves. Genome-wide profiles of the gene expression and related pathways differed significantly between these two NILs after PXO99A infection. DEGs upregulated in CBB23 were downregulated in susceptible JG30, at different time intervals of PXO99A post inoculation.
GO analysis identified the high proportion of the genes related to the intracellular organelle, organelle, intracellular membrane-bounded organelle, membrane-bounded organelle, intracellular part, cell part, and cell. Most of the DEGs belonging to the above-mentioned GO terms were also expressed before PXO99A infection in CBB23 vs. JG30. DEGs related to terpenoid metabolic process (GO:0006721), diterpenoid metabolic process (GO:0016101), and diterpene phytoalexin metabolic process (GO:0051501) were significantly expressed in CBB23 compared to JG30 after PXO99A infection. Previous studies approved that rice produces diterpenoids and phytoalexins that exhibit activity against Xoo [26]. Furthermore, it was found that terpenoids and phytoalexins induced by pathogens in rice showed antibiotic activities against Magnaporthe oryzae [27]. Calcium ion-binding protein (GO:0005509)-related genes were differentially expressed in CBB23 relative to the JG30 that may be involved in plant defense against pathogen attack; for example, OsCPK10 and OsCPK18 were observed to be positive and negative regulators of M. oryzae resistance, respectively [28,29].
Moreover, to boost the innate immune response, plants produce different reactive oxygen species (ROS) to restrict the pathogen entry into the plant cell through strengthening cell wall and callose deposition. Peroxidases (Prxs) create a physical barrier to confine the pathogen entry into the plant tissues by catalyzing the crosslinking of cell components [30]. DEGs belonging to the peroxidase GO term (GO:0004601) were upregulated in CBB23 after PXO99A infection, compared with JG30. The DEGs encoding peroxidase activity (GO:0004601) were as follows: Os04G0688100, Os07G0677100, Os07G0677500, Os01G0963000, Os12G0448900, Os04G0688300, Os03G0235000, Os06G0547400, Os10G0109600, Os07G0677200, and Os02G0236800. In a previous study, a thylakoid membrane-bound ascorbate peroxidase, OsAPX8, played role in enhancing plant resistance to Xoo [31]. Comparative transcriptomic analysis of rice stripe virus and small brown plant hoppers-infected rice leaves during early infection revealed that 12 genes encoding peroxidase class III were significantly upregulated in resistant cultivar to inhibit the infection [32]. In wheat, levels of ROS species were increased in root tissues after Rhizoctonia solani infection [33]. It was proposed that Prxs interaction with extensin (Tyr residues) makes the cell wall too hard for pathogens to penetrate [34]. Besides the Prxs interaction with Tyr extensin, pectin could act as an anchor for Prxs; the crosslinking between Prxs and pectin creates a dense and solid host plant cell wall, with the aim of limiting the pathogen entry into the plant cell [35,36].
Plant protein kinases are involved to regulate and mediate the different signal transduction processes during abiotic and biotic stresses. In our study, phytosulfokine receptor genes (PSKs), Os02G0154200 were more upregulated in CBB23 than JG30 at 12 hpi. PSKs are the intercellular signals that induce the cellular dedifferentiation at a low cellular level in Arabidopsis. Moreover, PSKs are the ligands of LRR-LRKs, crucial for regulating the plant–pathogen interaction, including plant innate immunity [37,38]. The serine/threonine encoding genes, i.e., Os01G0699600 and Os07G0622000, were upregulated at 12 hpi in CBB23 vs. JG30. PTO protein, a serine/threonine kinase, is predicted to be responsible for programmed cell death (PCD) against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato [39]. It is proposed that Pto encodes serine/threonine kinase gene has resistance to Pseudomonas syringae in tomato [40]. We identified three different genes (Os08G0374600, Os09G0442100, Os11G0570000) belonging to receptor-like kinase (RLKs). After infection of PXO99A, identified RLKs were upregulated at 12 hpi in CBB23 vs. JG30. Especially in rice, RLKs were predicted to be involved in response to various abiotic and biotic stresses [41]. An RLKs gene, Xa26, was induced by Xoo, and played a crucial role in resistance against bacterial blight [42]. In short, RLKs regulate the plant immune response to Xoo and M. oryzae in rice, and P. syringae pv. tomato (Pst) DC3000 in Arabidopsis, respectively [43]. RLK185 and RLK55 are positive regulators of plant immune response triggered by chitin and peptidoglycan [44]. In wheat, different RLKs seemed to be upregulated in WL711 + Lr57 (resistance) than WL711 (susceptible) after leaf rust disease [20].
Similarly, single immune receptor activation triggers various immune responses when plants face different biotic stresses in natural environments. Particularly, plants coordinate their stress responses with growth to maximize their fitness. Recent studies depicted that signal transduction is controlled by different TF regulatory networks. Different TFs, i.e., WRKY, NAC, bZIP, and AP2/ERF, etc., have been identified to be differentially expressed in CBB23 after PXO99A infection compared with JG30. WRKY TFs, i.e., OsWRKY28, OsWRKY76, OsWRKY7, and OsWRKY53 were induced after PXO99A in CBB23 vs. JG30. Previous reports suggested that OsWRKY28 was upregulated by the infection of M. oryzae in rice [45,46]. OsWRKY76 is responsible for activation of a pathogenesis-related gene, OsPR10, contributing to the resistance against Xoo [47]. In Arabidopsis, AtWRKY7 is induced by biotic stress and involved in plant defense [48]; moreover, OsWRKY53 was upregulated in resistant rice cultivar after infection by three different strains of M. oryzae (BR29, BR32, and FR13) [46,49].
AP2/ERF TFs, found only in plants, are involved in the regulation of various disease resistance pathways [50]. Though OPBP1 is a tobacco gene, it enhances the resistance to pathogen when expressed ectopically in transgenic rice [51]. AP2/ERF were suggested to be involved in the signaling of ethylene/jasmonic acid (ET/JA) and regulation of some PR genes; the transcription level of OsAP2 is significantly increased by SA, H2O2, and JA [52]. OsERF922 negatively regulates the resistance to M. oryzae by suppressing the expression of the genes encoding phytoalexin biosynthetic enzymes [53].
The expression of MYB-related TFs was observed after PXO99A infection in CBB23 vs. JG30; OsMYB4 (Os04G0517100) and R2R3-MYB (Os01G0874300 and Os12G0567300) were observed to be upregulated in CBB23 compared with JG30 after PXO99A infection. MYB4 was proposed to mediate the sheath blight resistance by binding to the promoter of peroxidase and oxidoreductase responsive genes [54]. R2R3-MYB TF controls a wide variety of processes, including phenylpropanoid metabolism and secondary cell wall formation [55]. Cell wall formation is a crucial event to prevent pathogen entry into the plant cell.
Moreover, positive increases in the expression of OsNAC103 (Os07G0683200), OsNAC58 (Os03G0327800), OsNAC4 (Os01G0816100), and OsNAC131 (Os12G0123700) were observed in CBB23 vs. JG30 at different time intervals of post inoculation of PXO99A. The previous literature suggests that OsNAC4 plays role in the hypersensitivity reaction (HR) cell death, accompanied by loss of plasma membrane integrity and typical morphological changes [56]. Whereas, OsNAC58 was reported to be important in rice resistance to bacterial blight by activating the defense-related genes and ET/JA signaling-related genes [57].
The KEGG analysis exhibited that a cluster of DEGs, after PXO99A infection, was enriched in the phenylpropanoid pathway. Previous literature reported that the phenylpropanoid pathway was involved in partial resistance to M. oryzae [58]. In Arabidopsis and populus, the phenylpropanoid pathway is regulated in stress conditions, and it is involved in the lignification process [59]. Furthermore, lignin formation is a key process for the protection of host plant under both abiotic and biotic stresses [60,61].
Plant hormones, JA, SA, and ET play important roles in regulating the plant development in response to various abiotic and biotic stresses [62]. In our experiment, SA-related genes (Os05G0102000 and Os11G0256900) were generally repressed after PXO99A infection in CBB23 compared with JG30, and 14 ET-encoding DEGs were upregulated in CBB23 vs. JG30. Previous reports mentioned that SA was downregulated in Xa7-mediated resistance against bacterial blight at high temperature [63]. It has been found that ET is induced during compatible reaction, but not the incompatible reaction with M. oryzae [64]; additionally, the elevated ET production coincided with the appearance of HR and induction of the defense-related genes [65].
In HR type immunity, effector protein is released by the pathogen, to promote the disease in the host plant. Meanwhile, plants secrete proteases in a rapid and robust manner to lower the pathogenicity level [66,67]. We identified 13 different upregulated proteolysis responsive genes in CBB23 compared with JG30. In Arabidopsis, AvrPphB and AvrRpt2 were reported to be secreted in response to the P. syringae pv. phaseolicola and P. syringae pv. tomato, respectively [68,69].
The RNA-Seq data analysis at different time points in CBB23 vs. JG30 led to the identification of differentially expressed genes. Further detailed analyses are needed to generate innovative information regarding the pattern of resistance conferred by Xa23. Besides, these DEGs could be used for further experiments to exploit the disease resistance mechanism in rice plants.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material and Growth Conditions

Two indica rice genotypes, CBB23 (resistant) and JG30 (susceptible), were used for the experiment. These two genotypes are near-isogenic lines (identical background except a single gene of Xa23). The resistance variety, CBB23, was developed after four generations of backcrossing between O. rufipogon and susceptible indica variety, JG30 [15]. Initially, rice seeds were surface-sterilized in 70% ethanol for 5 min, rinsed with deionized water. Afterwards, these sterilized rice seeds were water-soaked overnight. After pre-germination, rice seeds were sown in pots and kept in the greenhouse of Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing, P.R. China. The condition of greenhouse in which rice seeds were grown was 25/30 °C under a 14 h light/10 h dark cycle with 80% relative humidity.

4.2. Inoculation of Rice Plants with PXO99A and Collection of Leaf Samples

The Xoo strain PXO99A was used for inoculation into CBB23 and JG30 leaves. First, PXO99A was subcultured on TSA plate (tryptophan 10 g/L; sucrose 10 g/L; glutamic acid 1 g/L, and agar 5 g/200 mL) for 48 h at 28 °C. Inoculum was prepared by suspending the bacterial culture in sterile water to obtain an OD600 of 1.0. Sixty day old plants (vegetative phase) were used for inoculation with PXO99A through a needleless syringe. Inoculated leaves were harvested with three biological replicates at different time intervals (12 hpi, 24 hpi, 36 hpi, and 48 hpi, respectively) and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until RNA extraction. Here, mock leaves (without inoculation) of CBB23 and JG30 were denoted as C0 and J0, respectively.
Meanwhile, the leaves of CBB23 and JG30 were infected with PXO99A by using scissors dipped in bacterial suspensions to clip leaves 1–2 cm down from the tip of the leaf blade. After 2 weeks post inoculation, lesion length was measured from the cut surface to the distal-most position of the leaf blade that exhibited chlorotic or water-soaked lesions.

4.3. RNA Extraction and Library Preparation for Illumina Sequencing

All PXO99A infected and mock leaves were ground into a fine powder in liquid nitrogen by constant crushing using sterilized and chilled pestle and mortar, to isolate RNA by using TRIzol Reagent kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Thereafter, the samples were purified by using RNase-free DNase I (TaKaRa, Kyoto, Japan) to remove the genomic DNA. Total concentration of RNA was determined using NanoDrop microvolume spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific NanoDrop Products, Waltham, MA, USA). Afterwards, Illumina HiSeq2500 platform was used for RNA-Seq analysis. Library construction and RNA-Seq were carried out by Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.

4.4. Data Analysis

Initially, read quality of the raw data was evaluated by the fastQC application v0.11.2 [70]. Each paired-end library had insert size between 200–300 bp. The preprocessing of the data was performed by removing adapter sequences and low quality reads by cutadapt tool [71]. Thereafter, clean sequence reads were mapped to the available Japonica rice Nipponbare genome (http://rapdb.dna.affrc.go.jp/download/irgsp1.html) [72] using TopHat v2.0.12 (http://ccb.jhu.edu/software/tophat/index.shtml) [73], by applying Bowtie2 v2.0.0 [74]. Afterwards, Cufflinks was applied to measure the transcript abundance and gave the expression of each transcript, in FPKM (fragments per kilobase pair of exon model per million fragments mapped) [75]. The differential expression of the transcripts was calculated by using the ratio of two different samples FPKM values of a single gene by Cuffdiff. Actually, Cuffdiff is a tool for comparing expression level of transcripts and tells which genes are up- or downregulated between two or more conditions. Afterwards, the subsequent list of DEGs was filtered with Log2FC ≥1 (upregulated genes) or ≤−1 (downregulated genes).

4.5. Gene Enrichment Analysis

We conducted GO analysis to describe the characteristics and reaction features of the DEGs that were retrieved at different time periods before and after PXO99A infection from the NILs. The GO analysis was carried out by AgriGO software [76]. GO terms with FDR value ≤0.05 were considered significantly enriched by DEGs. For pathway analysis, we mapped all the DEGs in terms of KEGG and retrieved the significantly enriched pathway with p-value ≤ 0.05 [77]. For graphical overview of the biotic stress response, we used MapMan tool (http://MapMan.gabipd.org) [78].

4.6. Validation of RNA-Seq Data

Different genes from DEGs were selected to validate the RNA-Seq data. The corresponding sequences of the selected genes were retrieved from rice annotation project database. Primers of the DEGs were designed according to the transcript sequences by using AmplifX 1.5.4 software [79], and primers used in the experiment are listed in Table S9. Moreover, the total leaf RNA was isolated from mock and PXO99A infected leaves of CBB23 and JG30 by TRIzol reagent, and the purified RNA was reverse-transcribed through cDNA synthesis kit (TransGen, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed in 96-well plates on an ABI prism 7500 Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystem, Foster City, CA, USA) using SYBR Green Master ROX (TaKaRa). Ubiquitin was used as an internal control during qRT-PCR. The thermal cycler conditions were 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 34 s and 72 °C for 15 s. The relative expression level of the selected genes was calculated with the 2−ΔΔCT method [80].

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/19/3/717/s1.

Availability of Supporting Data

All the original RNA-Seq data has been submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the accession number of SRP132257.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the National Priority Program-Breeding New Rice Varieties for Southern China Area (2017YFD0100100), the Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences to Kaijun Zhao and Chunlian Wang. Rezwan Tariq received support from the China Scholarship Council (CSC) for Scholarship grant.

Author Contributions

Kaijun Zhao conceived and designed the research; Chunlian Wang designed some of the experiments; Rezwan Tariq, Chunlian Wang, Tengfei Qin, Feifei Xu, Yongchao Tang, Ying Gao and Zhiyuan Ji performed experiments; and Kaijun Zhao and Rezwan Tariq wrote the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Heckman, D.S.; Geiser, D.M.; Eidell, B.R.; Stauffer, R.L.; Kardos, N.L.; Hedges, S.B. Molecular evidence for the early colonization of land by fungi and plants. Science 2001, 293, 1129–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zuluaga, P.; Szurek, B.; Koebnik, R.; Kroj, T.; Morel, J.-B. Effector mimics and integrated decoys, the never-ending arms race between rice and Xanthomonas oryzae. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Anderson, J.P.; Gleason, C.A.; Foley, R.C.; Thrall, P.H.; Burdon, J.B.; Singh, K.B. Plants versus pathogens: An evolutionary arms race. Funct. Plant Biol. 2010, 37, 499–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Webster, R.K. Compendium of Rice Diseases; The American Phytopathological Society (APS): St. Paul, MN, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gnanamanickam, S.; Priyadarisini, V.B.; Narayanan, N.; Vasudevan, P.; Kavitha, S. An overview of bacterial blight disease of rice and strategies for its management. Curr. Sci. 1999, 1435–1444. [Google Scholar]
  6. Tagami, Y.; Mizukami, T. Historical review of the researches on bacterial blight of rice caused by Xanthomonas oryzae (Uyede and Ishiyama) dowson. Spec. Rep. Plant Dis. Insect Pests Forecast. Serv. 1962, 10, 1–112. [Google Scholar]
  7. Mizukami, T.; Wakimoto, S. Epidemiology and control of bacterial leaf blight of rice. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1969, 7, 51–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mew, T.W. Current status and future prospects of research on bacterial blight of rice. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1987, 25, 359–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Noda, T.; Kaku, H. Growth of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae in planta and in guttation fluid of rice. Jpn. J. Phytopathol. 1999, 65, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Boch, J.; Scholze, H.; Schornack, S.; Landgraf, A.; Hahn, S.; Kay, S.; Lahaye, T.; Nickstadt, A.; Bonas, U. Breaking the code of DNA binding specificity of TAL-type III effectors. Science 2009, 326, 1509–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Wang, L.; Rinaldi, F.C.; Singh, P.; Doyle, E.L.; Dubrow, Z.E.; Tran, T.T.; Pérez-Quintero, A.L.; Szurek, B.; Bogdanove, A.J. TAL effectors drive transcription bidirectionally in plants. Mol. Plant 2017, 10, 285–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Busungu, C.; Taura, S.; Sakagami, J.-I.; Ichitani, K. Identification and linkage analysis of a new rice bacterial blight resistance gene from Xm14, a mutant line from IR24. Breed. Sci. 2016, 66, 636–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Vikal, Y.; Bhatia, D. Genetics and genomics of bacterial blight resistance in rice. In Advances in International Rice Research; InTech: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang, C.; Zhang, X.; Fan, Y.; Gao, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Zheng, C.; Qin, T.; Li, Y.; Che, J.; Zhang, M. Xa23 is an executor R protein and confers broad-spectrum disease resistance in rice. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 290–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, Q.; Wang, C.; Zhao, K.; Zhao, Y.; Caslana, V.; Zhu, X.; Li, D.; Jiang, Q.X. The Effectiveness of Advanced Rice Lines with New Resistance Gene Xa23 to Rice Bacterial Blight. Rice Genet. Newsl. 2001, 18, 71–72. [Google Scholar]
  16. Han, Y.; Gao, S.; Muegge, K.; Zhang, W.; Zhou, B. Advanced applications of RNA sequencing and challenges. Bioinform. Biol. Insights 2015, 9, BBI-S28991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wang, Z.; Gerstein, M.; Snyder, M. RNA-Seq: A revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Vogel, C.; Bodenhausen, N.; Gruissem, W.; Vorholt, J.A. The arabidopsis leaf transcriptome reveals distinct but also overlapping responses to colonization by phyllosphere commensals and pathogen infection with impact on plant health. New Phytol. 2016, 212, 192–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ma, X.; Xia, H.; Liu, Y.; Wei, H.; Zheng, X.; Song, C.; Chen, L.; Liu, H.; Luo, L. Transcriptomic and metabolomic studies disclose key metabolism pathways contributing to well-maintained photosynthesis under the drought and the consequent drought-tolerance in rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Yadav, I.S.; Sharma, A.; Kaur, S.; Nahar, N.; Bhardwaj, S.C.; Sharma, T.R.; Chhuneja, P. Comparative temporal transcriptome profiling of wheat near isogenic line carrying Lr57 under compatible and incompatible interactions. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Wang, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Gao, J.; Wu, Y.; Xia, Z.; Zhang, H.; Wu, J. The mechanisms of maize resistance to Fusarium verticillioides by comprehensive analysis of RNA-Seq data. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Eulgem, T.; Rushton, P.J.; Robatzek, S.; Somssich, I.E. The wrky superfamily of plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2000, 5, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chisholm, S.T.; Coaker, G.; Day, B.; Staskawicz, B.J. Host-microbe interactions: Shaping the evolution of the plant immune response. Cell 2006, 124, 803–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Dodds, P.N.; Rathjen, J.P. Plant immunity: Towards an integrated view of plant–pathogen interactions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11, 539–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bonas, U.; Stall, R.E.; Staskawicz, B. Genetic and structural characterization of the avirulence gene avrBs3 from Xanthomonas campestris pv. Vesicatoria. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1989, 218, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kono, Y.; Kojima, A.; Nagai, R.; Watanabe, M.; Kawashima, T.; Onizawa, T.; Teraoka, T.; Watanab, M.; Koshino, H.; Uzawa, J. Antibacterial diterpenes and their fatty acid conjugates from rice leaves. Phytochemistry 2004, 65, 1291–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Schmelz, E.A.; Huffaker, A.; Sims, J.W.; Christensen, S.A.; Lu, X.; Okada, K.; Peters, R.J. Biosynthesis, elicitation and roles of monocot terpenoid phytoalexins. Plant J. 2014, 79, 659–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Xie, K.; Chen, J.; Wang, Q.; Yang, Y. Direct phosphorylation and activation of a mitogen-activated protein kinase by a calcium-dependent protein kinase in rice. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 3077–3089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Fu, L.; Yu, X.; An, C. Overexpression of constitutively active OsCPK10 increases Arabidopsis resistance against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato and rice resistance against Magnaporthe grisea. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 73, 202–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Almagro, L.; Gómez Ros, L.; Belchi-Navarro, S.; Bru, R.; Ros Barceló, A.; Pedreno, M. Class III peroxidases in plant defence reactions. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 60, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Jiang, G.; Yin, D.; Zhao, J.; Chen, H.; Guo, L.; Zhu, L.; Zhai, W. The rice thylakoid membrane-bound ascorbate peroxidase OsAPX8 functions in tolerance to bacterial blight. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 26104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zheng, W.; Ma, L.; Zhao, J.; Li, Z.; Sun, F.; Lu, X. Comparative transcriptome analysis of two rice varieties in response to rice stripe virus and small brown planthoppers during early interaction. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e82126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Foley, R.C.; Kidd, B.N.; Hane, J.K.; Anderson, J.P.; Singh, K.B. Reactive oxygen species play a role in the infection of the necrotrophic fungi, Rhizoctonia solani in wheat. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0152548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ralph, J.; Bunzel, M.; Marita, J.M.; Hatfield, R.D.; Lu, F.; Kim, H.; Schatz, P.F.; Grabber, J.H.; Steinhart, H. Peroxidase-dependent cross-linking reactions of p-hydroxycinnamates in plant cell walls. Phytochem. Rev. 2004, 3, 79–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Passardi, F.; Longet, D.; Penel, C.; Dunand, C. The class III peroxidase multigenic family in rice and its evolution in land plants. Phytochemistry 2004, 65, 1879–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Leng, Y.; Yang, Y.; Ren, D.; Huang, L.; Dai, L.; Wang, Y.; Chen, L.; Tu, Z.; Gao, Y.; Li, X. A rice pectate lyase-like gene is required for plant growth and leaf senescence. Plant Physiol. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Rodiuc, N.; Barlet, X.; Hok, S.; Perfusfusi, L.; Allasia, V.; Engler, G.; Seassau, A.; Marteu, N.; Almeida-Engler, J.; Panabierer, F.; et al. Evolution distant pathogens require the Arabidopsis phytosulfokine signaling pathway to establish disease. Plant Cell Environ. 2016, 39, 1396–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Matsubayashi, Y.; Ogawa, M.; Morita, A.; Sakagami, Y. An LRR receptor kinase involved in perception of a peptide plant hormone, phytosulfokine. Science 2002, 296, 1470–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Lin, N.-C.; Martin, G.B. Pto-and prf-mediated recognition of AvrPto and AvrPtoB restricts the ability of diverse Pseudomonas syringae pathovars to infect tomato. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2007, 20, 806–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Zhou, J.; Loh, Y.-T.; Bressan, R.A.; Martin, G.B. The tomato gene pti1 encodes a serine/threonine kinase that is phosphorylated by Pto and is involved in the hypersensitive response. Cell 1995, 83, 925–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Großkinsky, D.K.; van der Graaff, E.; Roitsch, T. Regulation of abiotic and biotic stress responses by plant hormones. In Plant Pathogen Resistance Biotechnology; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 131–154. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sun, X.; Cao, Y.; Yang, Z.; Xu, C.; Li, X.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Q. Xa26, a gene conferring resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae in rice, encodes an LRR receptor kinase-like protein. Plant J. 2004, 37, 517–527. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Balagué, C.; Gouget, A.; Bouchez, O.; Souriac, C.; Haget, N. Boutettet gene conferring resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae in rice, encodes an an d leafLecRK-I. 9 is required for full resistance to Pseudomonas syringae and affects jasmonate signalling. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2017, 18, 937–948. [Google Scholar]
  44. Tsuda, K.; Katagiri, F. Comparing signaling mechanisms engaged in pattern-triggered and effector-triggered immunity. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2010, 13, 459–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tripathi, P.; Rabara, R.C.; Rushton, P.J. A systems biology perspective on the role of WRKY transcription factors in drought responses in plants. Planta 2014, 239, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Berri, S.; Abbruscato, P.; Faivre-Rampant, O.; Brasileiro, A.C.; Fumasoni, I.; Satoh, K.; Kikuchi, S.; Mizzi, L.; Morandini, P.; Pè, M.E. Characterization of WRKY co-regulatory networks in rice and arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2009, 9, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Peng, Y.; Bartley, L.E.; Canlas, P.; Ronald, P.C. OsWRKY IIa transcription factors modulate rice innate immunity. Rice 2010, 3, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Park, C.Y.; Lee, J.H.; Yoo, J.H.; Moon, B.C.; Choi, M.S.; Kang, Y.H.; Lee, S.M.; Kim, H.S.; Kang, K.Y.; Chung, W.S. WRKY group IId transcription factors interact with calmodulin. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579, 1545–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Chujo, T.; Miyamoto, K.; Ogawa, S.; Masuda, Y.; Shimizu, T.; Kishi-Kaboshi, M.; Takahashi, A.; Nishizawa, Y.; Minami, E.; Nojiri, H. Overexpression of phosphomimic mutated OsWRKY53 leads to enhanced blast resistance in rice. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e98737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Licausi, F.; Ohmehmeblast Resistance in Rice; Shimizu, T.; Kishi-Kaboshi, M. AP2/ERF transcription factors: Mediators of stress responses and developmental programs. New Phytol. 2013, 199, 639–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Chen, X.; Guo, Z. Tobacco OPBP1 enhances salt tolerance and disease resistance of transgenic rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2008, 9, 2601–2613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Bernoux, M.; Moncuquet, P.; Kroj, T.; Dodds, P.N. A novel conserved mechanism for plant NLR protein pairs: The ‘integrated decoy’ hypothesis. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liu, D.; Chen, X.; Liu, J.; Ye, J.; Guo, Z. The rice ERF transcription factor OsERF922 negatively regulates resistance to Magnaporthe oryzae and salt tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 3899–3911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Pooja, S.; Sweta, K.; Mohanapriya, A.; Sudandiradoss, C.; Siva, R.; Gothandam, K.M.; Babu, S. Homotypic clustering of OsMYB4 binding site motifs in promoters of the rice genome and cellular-level implications on sheath blight disease resistance. Gene 2015, 561, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Soler, M.; Camargo, E.L.O.; Carocha, V.; Cassan-Wang, H.; San, C.H.; Savelli, B.; Hefer, C.A.; Paiva, J.A.; Myburg, A.A.; Grima-Pettenati, J. The Eucalyptus grandis R2R3-MYB transcription factor family: Evidence for woody growth-related evolution and function. New Phytol. 2015, 206, 1364–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Kaneda, T.; Taga, Y.; Takai, R.; Iwano, M.; Matsui, H.; Takayama, S.; Isogai, A.; Che, F.S. The transcription factor OsNAC4 is a key positive regulator of plant hypersensitive cell death. EMBO J. 2009, 28, 926–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Park, S.R.; Kim, H.S.; Lee, K.S.; Hwang, D.-J.; Bae, S.-C.; Ahn, I.-P.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, S.T. Overexpression of rice NAC transcription factor OsNAC58 on increased resistance to bacterial leaf blight. J. Plant Biotechnol. 2017, 44, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, Y.; Zhao, J.; Li, Y.; Yuan, Z.; He, H.; Yang, H.; Qu, H.; Ma, C.; Qu, S. Transcriptome analysis highlights defense and signaling pathways mediated by rice Pi21 gene with partial resistance to Magnaporthe oryzae. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Hamberger, B.; Ellis, M.; Friedmann, M.; de Azevedo Souza, C.; Barbazuk, B.; Douglas, C.J. Genome-wide analyses of phenylpropanoid-related genes in Populus trichocarpa, Arabidopsis thaliana, and Oryza sativa: The populus lignin toolbox and conservation and diversification of angiosperm gene families. Botany 2007, 85, 1182–1201. [Google Scholar]
  60. Vogt, T. Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. Mol. Plant 2010, 3, 2–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Miedes, E.; Vanholme, R.; Boerjan, W.; Molina, A. The role of the secondary cell wall in plant resistance to pathogens. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Bari, R.; Jones, J.D. Role of plant hormones in plant defence responses. Plant Mol. Biol. 2009, 69, 473–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Cohen, S.P.; Liu, H.; Argueso, C.T.; Pereira, A.; Cruz, C.V.; Verdier, V.; Leach, J.E. RNA-Seq analysis reveals insight into enhanced rice xa7-mediated bacterial blight resistance at high temperature. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0187625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Iwai, T.; Miyasaka, A.; Seo, S.; Ohashi, Y. Contribution of ethylene biosynthesis for resistance to blast fungus infection in young rice plants. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142, 1202–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Yang, D.-L.; Yang, Y.; He, Z. Roles of plant hormones and their interplay in rice immunity. Mol. Plant 2013, 6, 675–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Delaunois, B.; Jeandet, P.; Clément, C.; Baillieul, F.; Dorey, S.; Cordelier, S. Uncovering plant-pathogen crosstalk through apoplastic proteomic studies. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Figueiredo, A.; Monteiro, F.; Sebastiana, M. Subtilisin-like proteases in plant–pathogen recognition and immune priming: A perspective. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Cui, F.; Wu, S.; Sun, W.; Coaker, G.; Kunkel, B.; He, P.; Shan, L. The Pseudomonas syringae type III effector AvrPt2 promotes pathogen virulence via stimulating Arabidopsis auxin/indole acetic acid protein turnover. Plant Physiol. 2013, 162, 1018–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Zhang, J.; Li, W.; Xiang, T.; Liu, Z.; Laluk, K.; Ding, X.; Zou, Y.; Gao, M.; Zhang, X.; Chen, S. Receptor-like cytoplasmic kinases integrate signaling from multiple plant immune receptors and are targeted by a Pseudomonas syringae effector. Cell Host Microbe 2010, 7, 290–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Anders, S.; Huber, W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 2010, 11, R106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 2011, 17, 10–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Sakai, H.; Lee, S.S.; Tanaka, T.; Numa, H.; Kim, J.; Kawahara, Y.; Wakimoto, H.; Yang, C.C.; Iwamoto, M.; Abe, T.; et al. Rice annotation project database (rap-db): An integrative and interactive database for rice genomics. Plant Cell Physiol. 2013, 54, e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Kim, D.; Pertea, G.; Trapnell, C.; Pimentel, H.; Kelley, R.; Salzberg, S.L. Tophat2: Accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2013, 14, R36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Langmead, B.; Salzberg, S.L. Fast gapped-read alignment with bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 357–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Trapnell, C.; Williams, B.A.; Pertea, G.; Mortazavi, A.; Kwan, G.; Van Baren, M.J.; Salzberg, S.L.; Wold, B.J.; Pachter, L. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 511–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Zhou, D.; Xin, Z.; Yi, L.; Zhenhai, Z.; Zhen, S. agriGO: A GO Analysis Toolkit for the Agricultural Community. Available online: http://bioinfo.cau.edu.cn/agriGO/ (accessed on 15 September 2017).
  77. Minoru, K.; Susumu, G. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Available online: http://www.genome.jp/kegg/kegg2.html (accessed on 20 September 2017).
  78. Thimm, O.; Bläsing, O.; Gibon, Y.; Nagel, A.; Meyer, S.; Krüger, P.; Selbig, J.; Müller, L.A.; Rhee, S.Y.; Stitt, M. Mapman: A user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. Plant J. 2004, 37, 914–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Nicolas, J. Amplifx 1.5.4. Available online: http://www.brothersoft.com/amplifx-159421.html (accessed on 6 November 2017).
  80. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using Real-Time quantitative Pcr and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 19 00717 g001 550
Figure 1. Reaction patterns of CBB23 and JG30 leaves to Xoo strain PXO99A. (A) Comparison of CBB23 and JG30 leaves after inoculation of PXO99A strain by scissors-dipped method. Photographs were taken 14 days post inoculation; (B) Inoculation of PXO99A strain into CBB23 and JG30 leaves with a needleless syringe. Photographs were taken 4 days post inoculation.
Figure 1. Reaction patterns of CBB23 and JG30 leaves to Xoo strain PXO99A. (A) Comparison of CBB23 and JG30 leaves after inoculation of PXO99A strain by scissors-dipped method. Photographs were taken 14 days post inoculation; (B) Inoculation of PXO99A strain into CBB23 and JG30 leaves with a needleless syringe. Photographs were taken 4 days post inoculation.
Ijms 19 00717 g001
Ijms 19 00717 g002 550
Figure 2. Differentially expressed genes retrieved from CBB23 compared to JG30 at different time of intervals. (A) Overall, 1645 DEGs were perceived in CBB23 compared to JG30 at different time of intervals after PXO99A infection; (B) Venn diagram illustrating the differentially expressed genes at 4 different times of interval after PXO99A infection in CBB23 compared with JG30. A set of 476, 329, 384, and 305 DEGs were identified at 12 hpi, 24 hpi, 36 hpi, and 48 hpi, respectively.
Figure 2. Differentially expressed genes retrieved from CBB23 compared to JG30 at different time of intervals. (A) Overall, 1645 DEGs were perceived in CBB23 compared to JG30 at different time of intervals after PXO99A infection; (B) Venn diagram illustrating the differentially expressed genes at 4 different times of interval after PXO99A infection in CBB23 compared with JG30. A set of 476, 329, 384, and 305 DEGs were identified at 12 hpi, 24 hpi, 36 hpi, and 48 hpi, respectively.
Ijms 19 00717 g002
Ijms 19 00717 g003 550
Figure 3. Heat maps exhibiting the FPKM (fragments per kilobase pair of exon model per million fragments mapped) based expression pattern of differentially expressed transcription factors at different time points in CBB23 and JG30 before and after the PXO99A inoculation. The data of TFs were retrieved from Plant TFDB (Plant transcription factor database) and cross-checked with RAP-DB.
Figure 3. Heat maps exhibiting the FPKM (fragments per kilobase pair of exon model per million fragments mapped) based expression pattern of differentially expressed transcription factors at different time points in CBB23 and JG30 before and after the PXO99A inoculation. The data of TFs were retrieved from Plant TFDB (Plant transcription factor database) and cross-checked with RAP-DB.
Ijms 19 00717 g003
Ijms 19 00717 g004 550
Figure 4. Heat maps illustrating the FPKM based expression pattern of different kinase responsive genes in CBB23 and JG30 before and after PXO99A inoculation at different time points. The data of kinase responsive genes were retrieved from RAP-DB and rice kinase database (RKD).
Figure 4. Heat maps illustrating the FPKM based expression pattern of different kinase responsive genes in CBB23 and JG30 before and after PXO99A inoculation at different time points. The data of kinase responsive genes were retrieved from RAP-DB and rice kinase database (RKD).
Ijms 19 00717 g004
Ijms 19 00717 g005 550
Figure 5. Enriched biological process related GO terms after PXO99A infection. The boxes in the graphs are marked with their GO terms. The different colors schemes mention the significance level of GO terms.
Figure 5. Enriched biological process related GO terms after PXO99A infection. The boxes in the graphs are marked with their GO terms. The different colors schemes mention the significance level of GO terms.
Ijms 19 00717 g005
Ijms 19 00717 g006 550
Figure 6. MapMan visualization of defense response in CBB23 relative to JG30 after PXO99A infection. DEGs (p-value ≤ 0.05) were imported to MapMan for visualization. The range for the indication of up and downregulated genes is shown in red and blue colors, respectively. The log2FC are shown in scale bar.
Figure 6. MapMan visualization of defense response in CBB23 relative to JG30 after PXO99A infection. DEGs (p-value ≤ 0.05) were imported to MapMan for visualization. The range for the indication of up and downregulated genes is shown in red and blue colors, respectively. The log2FC are shown in scale bar.
Ijms 19 00717 g006
Ijms 19 00717 g007 550
Figure 7. Putative phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway was constructed based on the log2FC value of DEGs. The number in boxes represents the enzymes coding. The different color schemes were given to the boxes: blue and red colors depict the up- and downregulated genes, respectively.
Figure 7. Putative phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway was constructed based on the log2FC value of DEGs. The number in boxes represents the enzymes coding. The different color schemes were given to the boxes: blue and red colors depict the up- and downregulated genes, respectively.
Ijms 19 00717 g007
Ijms 19 00717 g008 550
Figure 8. qRT-PCR based validation of DEGs in response to PXO99A at different time intervals. The DEGs were randomly selected for qRT-PCR; the data were normalized by using ubiquitin as an internal reference. Data are represented as mean ± SD for three biological replicates.
Figure 8. qRT-PCR based validation of DEGs in response to PXO99A at different time intervals. The DEGs were randomly selected for qRT-PCR; the data were normalized by using ubiquitin as an internal reference. Data are represented as mean ± SD for three biological replicates.
Ijms 19 00717 g008
Table
Table 1. An overview of sequencing and assembly of CBB23 and JG30 samples.
Table 1. An overview of sequencing and assembly of CBB23 and JG30 samples.
SamplesRaw ReadsClean ReadsTotal MappedQ Value (30%)GC %
C046,594,24444,372,94436,489,861 (82.23%)9154
J051,085,43448,289,01039,611,914 (82.03%)9154
CBB23-12 hpi57,398,59854,774,15245,086,818 (82.31%)9254
CBB23-24 hpi52,122,83249,294,37441,275,771 (83.73%)9155
CBB23-36 hpi65,574,38062,882,74050,963,164 (81.04%)9253
CBB23-48 hpi41,893,78840,539,55433,922,512 (83.68%)9254
JG30-12 hpi49,890,01048,749,13240,250,051 (82.57%)9355
JG30-24 hpi54,891,57452,116,66043,303,751 (83.09%)9155
JG30-36 hpi45,507,16044,119,56635,292,193 (79.99%)9253
JG30-48 hpi57,418,69854,514,72245,769,331 (83.96%)9155

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tariq, R.; Wang, C.; Qin, T.; Xu, F.; Tang, Y.; Gao, Y.; Ji, Z.; Zhao, K. Comparative Transcriptome Profiling of Rice Near-Isogenic Line Carrying Xa23 under Infection of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 717. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19030717

AMA Style

Tariq R, Wang C, Qin T, Xu F, Tang Y, Gao Y, Ji Z, Zhao K. Comparative Transcriptome Profiling of Rice Near-Isogenic Line Carrying Xa23 under Infection of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018; 19(3):717. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19030717

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tariq, Rezwan, Chunlian Wang, Tengfei Qin, Feifei Xu, Yongchao Tang, Ying Gao, Zhiyuan Ji, and Kaijun Zhao. 2018. "Comparative Transcriptome Profiling of Rice Near-Isogenic Line Carrying Xa23 under Infection of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 3: 717. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19030717

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop