Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of a 2-Furylpyrazoline Derivative Using Microwave Irradiation
Previous Article in Journal
2-(4-Pentyloxyphenyl)benzothiazole
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Short Note

Synthesis of Bis (1-Methyl-2-octynyl) Ether

by
David Díaz Díaz
* and
Víctor S. Martín
Instituto Universitario de Bio-Orgánica “Antonio González”, Universidad de La Laguna, Avda, Astrofísico Francisco Sánchez, 2, 38206 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molbank 2009, 2009(3), M612; https://doi.org/10.3390/M612
Submission received: 18 July 2009 / Accepted: 4 August 2009 / Published: 5 August 2009

Abstract

:
The synthesis of bis (1-methyl-2-octynyl) ether using two secondary alcohols under Nicholas reaction conditions is reported. The reaction is possible due to a catalytic participation of the Lewis acid when the nucleophilic alcohol is protected as a THPO-ether.

The reaction of a dicobalt octacarbonyl-stabilized propargylic cation with a nucleophile, followed by oxidative demetallation to yield propargylated products (Nicholas reaction) has been proved to be a versatile synthetic tool in organic synthesis [1,2,3,4]. This process has been used to prepare both symmetrical and unsymmetrical propargylic ethers [5], which are particularly important due to the wide range of functional group interconversions that the triple bond permits [6]. Nevertheless, when the propargylic cation is formed using a secondary alcohol, only primary alcohols are effective as nucleophiles to yield the corresponding ethers and avoid competitive elimination reactions [5].
Herein, we report the synthesis of bis (1-methyl-2-octynyl) ether (7) using only the secondary alcohol 1 as electrophile and its O-protected derivative 2 as nucleophile under Nicholas reaction conditions (Scheme 1). The overall reaction is possible due to a catalytic participation of the Lewis acid when the nucleophilic alcohol is protected as a THPO-ether 2, generating the desired ether 7 and tetrahydropyran-2-ol (5) as by-product, which is in agreement with previous observations [7].
Scheme 1.
Scheme 1.
Molbank 2009 m612 sch001

Experimental Section

General

1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded at 25 °C on Bruker Avance-300 spectrometer in CDCl3 as solvent, and chemical shifts are reported relative to Me4Si. Low- and high-resolution mass spectra were obtained by using a Micromass Autospec spectrometer. Elemental analysis was performed on a Fisons Instrument EA 1108 CHNS-O analyzer. Infrared spectra were recorded on a Bruker IFS 55 spectrophotometer on compounds dispersed on a CaF2 disc (20 × 2 mm). Column chromatographies were performed on Merck silica gel, 60 Å and 0.2−0.5 mm. Methylene chloride was dried by distillation over calcium hydride prior to use. Compound 3-nonyn-2-ol (1) was prepared as previously described in the literature and displayed spectroscopic data identical to those reported therein [8].

Synthesis of 1-methyl-2-octynyl tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-il ether (2)

To a stirred solution of 3-nonyn-2-ol (1) (200 mg, 1.43 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (8 mL) was added dihydropyran (0.20 mL, 2.15 mmol) and pyridinium p-toluenesulfonate (25 mg, 0.01 mmol) under an argon atmosphere at 0 °C. The reaction was allowed to continue at room temperature for 1 hour, after which time the mixture was poured into 20 mL of ice-water and extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 15 mL). The combined organic phases were washed with brine, dried (MgSO4), concentrated, and the crude purified by silica gel column chromatography yielding 2 (285 mg, 89% yield) as a yellowish oil: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ/ppm = 0.87 (m, 3H), 1.29−1.31 (m, 6H), 1.41 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H), 1.45−1.67 (m, 6H), 2.03 (m, 2H), 3.49−3.61 (m, 1H), 3.62−3.76 (m, 1H), 4.47−4.50 (m, 1H), 4.91 (br s, 1H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ/ppm = 13.9 (q), 18.5 (t), 19.5 (t), 22.0 (t), 22.2 (q), 25.4 (t), 28.3 (t), 30.6 (t), 33.9 (t), 61.1 (d), 62.2 (t), 81.3 (s), 85.2 (s), 98.8 (d); FT-IR (thin film) υmax (cm-1) 2875, 1458, 1310, 1115, 1091; FAB-MS m/z (relative intensity %) 224 [M]+ (11), 223 [M−1]+ (24), 153 [M−C5H11]+ (30), 85 (100). HMRS calculated for C14H24O2 [M]+ 224.177630, found 224.177120.

Synthesis of bis (1-methyl-2-octynyl) ether (7)

To a solution of alcohol 1 (100 mg, 0.71 mmol) was added dicobalt octadicarbonyl (297 mg, 0.86 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (7 mL) at room temperature. The reaction was stirred for 1 h, after which time the mixture was filtered through a pad of silica and the solvent evaporated to yield Co2(CO)6-propargylic ether 3 as a reddish oil. Complex 3 was dissolved in dry CH2Cl2 (7 mL) and THPO-protected propargylic alcohol 2 (302.4 mg, 1.35 mmol) was added. Then, BF3·OEt2 (29 μL, 0.23 mmol) was slowly added and the reaction mixture stirred for 1 h at −20 °C. The mixture was poured with vigorous stirring into a saturated solution of NaHCO3 (15 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (2 × 15 mL). The combined organic phases were washed with brine, dried (MgSO4), and concentrated to obtain the crude Co2(CO)6-propargylic ether 6 as a reddish oil, which was used in the next step without further purification. The crude 6 was dissolved in acetone (5 mL) and the mixture cooled to 0 °C. Then, Ce(NO3)6(NH4)2 (480 mg, 0.88 mmol) was added in one portion and the mixture stirred for 5 min. The reaction mixture was concentrated and the resulting residue extracted with Et2O (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic phases were dried (MgSO4), concentrated, and the residue purified by silica gel column chromatography to yield 7 (83 mg, 45% overall yield) as a yellowish oil: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ/ppm = 0.88 (t, J = 11.0 Hz, 6H), 1.27−1.37 (m, 6H), 1.40 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 6H), 1.46−1.60 (m, 6H), 2.20 (ddd, J = 7.1, 7.1, 1.9 Hz, 4H), 4.43 (m, 2H)); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ/ppm = 13.9 (q), 18.7 (t), 20.0 (q), 22.2 (t), 28.3 (t), 31.0 (t), 62.8 (d), 80.2 (s), 89.0 (s); FT-IR (thin film) υmax (cm-1) 2875, 1458, 1310, 1172, 1091; FAB-MS m/z (relative intensity %) 262 [M]+ (0.1), 247 [M−CH3]+ (34), 243 (14), 221 (17), 191 [M−C5H11]+ (5), 71 (100). Elemental analysis: Calculated for C18H30O: C, 82.38; H, 11.52. Found: C, 82.51; H, 11.80.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary File 1Supplementary File 2Supplementary File 3Supplementary File 4Supplementary File 5Supplementary File 6

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Spanish MICINN co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (CTQ2008-06806-C02-01/BQU), and the Canary Islands Government.

References and Notes

  1. Nicholas, K.M. Acc. Chem. Res. 1987, 20, 207–221.
  2. Green, J.R. Curr. Org. Chem. 2001, 5, 809–826.
  3. Teobald, B.J. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 4133–4170.
  4. Díaz, D.D.; Betancort, J.M.; Martín, V.S. Synlett 2007, 343–359.
  5. Díaz, D.D.; Martín, V.S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 9993–9996.
  6. March, J. Advanced Organic Chemistry; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  7. Díaz, D.D.; Martín, T.; Martín, V.S. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3289–3291.
  8. Vasil'ev, A.A. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 30, 38–41.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Díaz Díaz, D.; Martín, V.S. Synthesis of Bis (1-Methyl-2-octynyl) Ether. Molbank 2009, 2009, M612. https://doi.org/10.3390/M612

AMA Style

Díaz Díaz D, Martín VS. Synthesis of Bis (1-Methyl-2-octynyl) Ether. Molbank. 2009; 2009(3):M612. https://doi.org/10.3390/M612

Chicago/Turabian Style

Díaz Díaz, David, and Víctor S. Martín. 2009. "Synthesis of Bis (1-Methyl-2-octynyl) Ether" Molbank 2009, no. 3: M612. https://doi.org/10.3390/M612

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop